niacinamide has been researched along with Fibrosis in 13 studies
nicotinamide : A pyridinecarboxamide that is pyridine in which the hydrogen at position 3 is replaced by a carboxamide group.
Fibrosis: Any pathological condition where fibrous connective tissue invades any organ, usually as a consequence of inflammation or other injury.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"We sought to obtain preliminary information on the therapeutic activity and safety of imetelstat in patients with high-risk or intermediate-2-risk myelofibrosis." | 9.20 | A Pilot Study of the Telomerase Inhibitor Imetelstat for Myelofibrosis. ( Begna, KH; Finke, CM; Gangat, N; Hanson, CA; Laborde, RR; Lasho, TL; Pardanani, A; Patnaik, MM; Schimek, L; Tefferi, A; Wang, X; Wassie, E; Zblewski, DL, 2015) |
"This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent and sequential sorafenib therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 9.19 | Phase 2 study of combined sorafenib and radiation therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Chen, SW; Chiou, JF; Kuo, CC; Kuo, YC; Liang, JA; Lin, LC, 2014) |
" Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a model for AKI, which results in tubular damage, dysfunction of the mitochondria and autophagy, and in decreased cellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) with progressing fibrosis resulting in CKD." | 8.02 | Effect of NAD+ boosting on kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. ( Andersen, CB; Egstrand, S; Lewin, E; Mace, ML; Morevati, M; Nordholm, A; Olgaard, K; Salmani, R, 2021) |
"Sorafenib, which has been used extensively for the treatment of renal cell cancer and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), has also been shown to have antifibrotic effects in liver fibrosis." | 7.83 | Sorafenib Inhibits Renal Fibrosis Induced by Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction via Inhibition of Macrophage Infiltration. ( He, C; Li, Q; Liu, C; Liu, Q; Ma, W; Tao, L; Wang, X; Xue, D; Zhang, J; Zhang, W, 2016) |
"Eight-week-old rats were subjected to unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) and were intragastrically administered sorafenib, while control and sham groups were administered vehicle for 14 or 21 days." | 7.81 | Sorafenib ameliorates renal fibrosis through inhibition of TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. ( Chen, Z; Duan, Z; Fu, R; Ge, H; Gui, B; Han, J; Jia, L; Ma, X; Ou, Y; Tian, L; Wang, L, 2015) |
"Sorafenib (SO) was the first systemic agent to demonstrate a significant improvement in overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); international guidelines now recommend SO as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable HCC who are not eligible for locoregional therapies and maintain preserved liver function." | 7.79 | Selection and management of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with sorafenib: recommendations and opinions from an Italian liver unit. ( D'Angelo, S; De Cristofano, R; Secondulfo, M; Sorrentino, P, 2013) |
"We sought to obtain preliminary information on the therapeutic activity and safety of imetelstat in patients with high-risk or intermediate-2-risk myelofibrosis." | 5.20 | A Pilot Study of the Telomerase Inhibitor Imetelstat for Myelofibrosis. ( Begna, KH; Finke, CM; Gangat, N; Hanson, CA; Laborde, RR; Lasho, TL; Pardanani, A; Patnaik, MM; Schimek, L; Tefferi, A; Wang, X; Wassie, E; Zblewski, DL, 2015) |
"This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent and sequential sorafenib therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 5.19 | Phase 2 study of combined sorafenib and radiation therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Chen, SW; Chiou, JF; Kuo, CC; Kuo, YC; Liang, JA; Lin, LC, 2014) |
" Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a model for AKI, which results in tubular damage, dysfunction of the mitochondria and autophagy, and in decreased cellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) with progressing fibrosis resulting in CKD." | 4.02 | Effect of NAD+ boosting on kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. ( Andersen, CB; Egstrand, S; Lewin, E; Mace, ML; Morevati, M; Nordholm, A; Olgaard, K; Salmani, R, 2021) |
"Sorafenib, which has been used extensively for the treatment of renal cell cancer and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), has also been shown to have antifibrotic effects in liver fibrosis." | 3.83 | Sorafenib Inhibits Renal Fibrosis Induced by Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction via Inhibition of Macrophage Infiltration. ( He, C; Li, Q; Liu, C; Liu, Q; Ma, W; Tao, L; Wang, X; Xue, D; Zhang, J; Zhang, W, 2016) |
"Eight-week-old rats were subjected to unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) and were intragastrically administered sorafenib, while control and sham groups were administered vehicle for 14 or 21 days." | 3.81 | Sorafenib ameliorates renal fibrosis through inhibition of TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. ( Chen, Z; Duan, Z; Fu, R; Ge, H; Gui, B; Han, J; Jia, L; Ma, X; Ou, Y; Tian, L; Wang, L, 2015) |
"Sorafenib (SO) was the first systemic agent to demonstrate a significant improvement in overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); international guidelines now recommend SO as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable HCC who are not eligible for locoregional therapies and maintain preserved liver function." | 3.79 | Selection and management of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with sorafenib: recommendations and opinions from an Italian liver unit. ( D'Angelo, S; De Cristofano, R; Secondulfo, M; Sorrentino, P, 2013) |
"Renal interstitial fibrosis is a common pathological feature in progressive kidney diseases currently lacking effective treatment." | 1.51 | Nicotinamide reduces renal interstitial fibrosis by suppressing tubular injury and inflammation. ( Cai, J; Dong, Z; Liu, Z; Shu, S; Tang, C; Wang, Y; Zheng, M, 2019) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 1 (7.69) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 9 (69.23) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 3 (23.08) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Zhang, W | 2 |
Rong, G | 1 |
Gu, J | 1 |
Fan, C | 1 |
Guo, T | 1 |
Jiang, T | 1 |
Deng, W | 1 |
Xie, J | 1 |
Su, Z | 1 |
Yu, Q | 1 |
Mai, J | 1 |
Zheng, R | 1 |
Chen, X | 1 |
Tang, X | 1 |
Zhang, J | 2 |
Takahashi, R | 1 |
Kanda, T | 1 |
Komatsu, M | 1 |
Itoh, T | 1 |
Minakuchi, H | 1 |
Urai, H | 1 |
Kuroita, T | 1 |
Shigaki, S | 1 |
Tsukamoto, T | 1 |
Higuchi, N | 1 |
Ikeda, M | 1 |
Yamanaka, R | 1 |
Yoshimura, N | 1 |
Ono, T | 1 |
Yukioka, H | 1 |
Hasegawa, K | 1 |
Tokuyama, H | 1 |
Wakino, S | 1 |
Itoh, H | 1 |
Song, SB | 1 |
Park, JS | 1 |
Chung, GJ | 1 |
Lee, IH | 1 |
Hwang, ES | 1 |
Morevati, M | 1 |
Egstrand, S | 1 |
Nordholm, A | 1 |
Mace, ML | 1 |
Andersen, CB | 1 |
Salmani, R | 1 |
Olgaard, K | 1 |
Lewin, E | 1 |
Othman, AI | 1 |
El-Sawi, MR | 1 |
El-Missiry, MA | 1 |
Abukhalil, MH | 1 |
Zheng, M | 1 |
Cai, J | 1 |
Liu, Z | 1 |
Shu, S | 1 |
Wang, Y | 1 |
Tang, C | 1 |
Dong, Z | 1 |
D'Angelo, S | 1 |
Secondulfo, M | 1 |
De Cristofano, R | 1 |
Sorrentino, P | 1 |
Noguchi, S | 1 |
Yamauchi, Y | 1 |
Takizawa, H | 1 |
Chen, SW | 1 |
Lin, LC | 1 |
Kuo, YC | 1 |
Liang, JA | 1 |
Kuo, CC | 1 |
Chiou, JF | 1 |
Jia, L | 1 |
Ma, X | 1 |
Gui, B | 1 |
Ge, H | 1 |
Wang, L | 1 |
Ou, Y | 1 |
Tian, L | 1 |
Chen, Z | 1 |
Duan, Z | 1 |
Han, J | 1 |
Fu, R | 1 |
Tefferi, A | 1 |
Lasho, TL | 1 |
Begna, KH | 1 |
Patnaik, MM | 1 |
Zblewski, DL | 1 |
Finke, CM | 1 |
Laborde, RR | 1 |
Wassie, E | 1 |
Schimek, L | 1 |
Hanson, CA | 1 |
Gangat, N | 1 |
Wang, X | 2 |
Pardanani, A | 1 |
Ma, W | 1 |
Tao, L | 1 |
Liu, Q | 1 |
Li, Q | 1 |
He, C | 1 |
Xue, D | 1 |
Liu, C | 1 |
Di Maio, M | 1 |
Daniele, B | 1 |
Perrone, F | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Pilot Open-Label Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Imetelstat (GRN163L) in Myelofibrosis and Other Myeloid Malignancies[NCT01731951] | Phase 2 | 80 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-10-29 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
For this pilot study, overall response was defined as achievement of a leukemic response (i.e. a clinically meaningful reduction in Blast cells). This was quantified as <5% peripheral blood and bone marrow blasts % that lasts for at least two months. Data is reported separately for this arm where response was assessed by this specific criterion. (NCT01731951)
Timeframe: Up to first 9 cycles of treatment (each cycle was of 28 days for Arm D)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm D: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (Blast-phase MF/Acute Myeloid Leukemia) | 0 |
DOR: time of initial response (CR/PR/HI) until documented PD/death whichever occurs first. If no PD/death occurs DOR is censored at last disease evaluation date for responders. Data reported separately for arm assessed per IWG. Kaplan-Meier method was used. (NCT01731951)
Timeframe: From the time of initial response (CR/PR/HI) until documented disease progression or death whichever occurs first (Up to approximately 5.7 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Arm G: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MDS/MPN or MDS With Spliceosome Mutations or Ring Sideroblasts) | NA |
Transfusion dependency was defined by a history of at least 2 units of red blood cell transfusions in the last month for a hemoglobin level of less than 85 g/L that was not associated with clinically overt bleeding. A participant who was transfusion dependent at baseline was considered transfusion independent if the participant met either of the following conditions: Received no more than 1 unit of red blood cell transfusions in a rolling time interval of 30 days or more, and had a hemoglobin level increase over baseline more than 2 g/dL if participant baseline hemoglobin level was less than 85 g/L and received no transfusion. HI responses included: 1) Erythroid: Hgb increase ≥1.5 g/dL, Relevant reduction of RBC units transfusions by absolute number of >=4 RBC transfusions/8 week compared with pretreatment transfusion number in previous 8 week. Only RBC transfusions given for Hgb of ≤9.0 g/dL. Data is reported separately for arm assessed as per IWG criteria. (NCT01731951)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 5.7 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Arm G: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MDS/MPN or MDS With Spliceosome Mutations or Ring Sideroblasts) | 3 |
OR: HI/PR/CR per IWG. CR: BM:≤5% myeloblasts (all cell lines normal maturation), Peripheral blood:Hgb ≥11g/dL, PLTs ≥100x10^9/L, Neutrophils ≥1.0x10^9/L, Blasts 0%. PR: All CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except- BM blasts decreased ≥50% over pretreatment but still >5%, Cellularity, morphology not relevant. HI responses:1) Erythroid: Hgb increase ≥1.5 g/dL, Relevant reduction of red blood cell(RBC) units transfusions by absolute ≥4 RBC transfusions/8 week (wk) compared with pretreatment transfusion number in previous 8 wk. Only RBC transfusions given for Hgb of ≤9.0 g/dL.2)PLTs:Absolute increase ≥30x10^9/L starting >20x10^9/L PLTs; Increase from <20x10^9/L to >20x10^9/L and by ≥100%; 3)Neutrophil: ≥100% increase, absolute increase >0.5x10^9/L; 4)Progression/relapse after HI:≥1 of following:≥50% decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes/PLTs, Reduction in Hgb ≥1.5 g/dL,Transfusion dependence. Data is reported separately for arm whose response was assessed per IWG. (NCT01731951)
Timeframe: Up to first 9 cycles of treatment (each cycle was of 28 days for Arm G)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm G: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MDS/MPN or MDS With Spliceosome Mutations or Ring Sideroblasts) | 33.3 |
Time to response was defined as the duration from study Day 1 to the earliest date that a response is first documented. Response was defined as HI, PR or CR per IWG criteria. Data for time to response is reported as per criteria of response assessment. (NCT01731951)
Timeframe: From study Day 1 to the earliest date that a response was first documented (Up to approximately 5.7 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Arm G: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MDS/MPN or MDS With Spliceosome Mutations or Ring Sideroblasts) | 3.7 |
Transfusion dependency was defined by a history of at least 2 units of red blood cell transfusions in the last month for a hemoglobin level of less than 85 g/L that was not associated with clinically overt bleeding. A participant who was transfusion dependent at baseline was considered transfusion independent if the participant met either of the following conditions: Received no more than 1 unit of red blood cell transfusions in a rolling time interval of 30 days or more, and had a hemoglobin level increase over baseline more than 2 g/dL if participant baseline hemoglobin level was less than 85 g/L and received no transfusion. Anemia response per IWG-MRT Criteria- Transfusion-independent participants: a ≥20 g/L increase in hemoglobin level. Transfusion-dependent participants: becoming transfusion-independent. Data is reported separately for arms assessed as per the IWG-MRT criteria. (NCT01731951)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 5.7 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Arm A: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (MF) | 1 |
Arm B: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg as Induction + Maintenance (MF) | 0 |
Arm D: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (Blast-phase MF/Acute Myeloid Leukemia) | 0 |
Arm E: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [With Spliceosome Mutation or Ring Sideroblasts]) | 0 |
Arm F: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [Without Spliceosome Mutation and Ring Sideroblasts]) | 3 |
DOR measured from time of initial response (CR/PR/CI) until documented PD or death whichever occurs first. If no PD/death occurs DOR is censored at last disease evaluation date for responders. CR:BM: <5%blasts; ≤Grade 1 MF, AND Peripheral blood:Hb≥100 g/L and
Timeframe: From time of initial response until documented disease progression or death whichever occurs first (Up to approximately 5.7 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Arm A: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (MF) | 24.36 |
Arm B: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg as Induction + Maintenance (MF) | NA |
Arm F: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [Without Spliceosome Mutation and Ring Sideroblasts]) | 35.52 |
OR:CI/PR/CR per IWG-MRT. CR:Bone marrow (BM):<5% blasts;≤Grade 1 MF, AND Peripheral blood:Hemoglobin (Hb) ≥100 g/liter (g/L) and
Timeframe: Up to first 9 cycles of treatment (each cycle was of 21 days for Arms A and B and 28 days for Arms E and F)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm A: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (MF) | 36.84 |
Arm B: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg as Induction + Maintenance (MF) | 35.7 |
Arm E: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [With Spliceosome Mutation or Ring Sideroblasts]) | 0 |
Arm F: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [Without Spliceosome Mutation and Ring Sideroblasts]) | 33.3 |
Time to response was defined as the duration from study Day 1 to the earliest date that a response is first documented. The response CI/CR/PR was assessed by IWG-MRT criteria. (NCT01731951)
Timeframe: From study Day 1 to the earliest date that a response was first documented (Up to approximately 5.7 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Arm A: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (MF) | 2.1 |
Arm B: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg as Induction + Maintenance (MF) | 1.4 |
Arm F: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [Without Spliceosome Mutation and Ring Sideroblasts]) | 2.9 |
Spleen response per IWG-MRT criteria defined as baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at 5-10 cm, below the LCM, becomes not palpable, OR A baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at >10 cm, below the LCM, decreases by ≥50%. Baseline splenomegaly that is palpable at <5 cm, below the LCM, is not eligible for spleen response. Confirmation by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) showing ≥35% spleen volume reduction is recommended (but not required). Spleen response was assessed only in participants with MF. (NCT01731951)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 5.7 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Arm A: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (MF) | 3 |
Arm B: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg as Induction + Maintenance (MF) | 1 |
Arm D: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (Blast-phase MF/Acute Myeloid Leukemia) | 1 |
Arm E: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [With Spliceosome Mutation or Ring Sideroblasts]) | 0 |
Arm F: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [Without Spliceosome Mutation and Ring Sideroblasts]) | 2 |
OS was defined as the as the interval from Study Day 1 to the date of death from any cause. Survival time of living participants was censored on the last date a participant is known to be alive or lost to follow-up. Overall Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01731951)
Timeframe: From Study Day 1 to the date of death from any cause (Up to approximately 5.7 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Arm A: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (MF) | 42.61 |
Arm B: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg as Induction + Maintenance (MF) | 26.73 |
Arm D: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (Blast-phase MF/Acute Myeloid Leukemia) | 4.93 |
Arm E: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [With Spliceosome Mutation or Ring Sideroblasts]) | 12.09 |
Arm F: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [Without Spliceosome Mutation and Ring Sideroblasts]) | NA |
Arm G: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MDS/MPN or MDS With Spliceosome Mutations or Ring Sideroblasts) | 28.42 |
TEAEs defined as those events that 1) occur on or after the first dose of study drug, through the treatment phase, and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug or until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if earlier; 2) any event that is considered study drug-related regardless of the start date of the event; or 3) any event that is present at baseline but worsens in severity or is subsequently considered drug-related by the investigator. Grade >=3 TEAE defined as events that are severe, life-threatening or disabling, or fatal and considered related to imetelstat as per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. An AE was considered related to the study drug if the event was assessed by the investigator as probably or possibly related. (NCT01731951)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days from the last dose of study drug or until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if earlier (Up to approximately 5.7 years)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
TEAEs | Grade >=3 TEAEs | Treatment Related AEs | |
Arm A: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (MF) | 100 | 100 | 89.5 |
Arm B: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg as Induction + Maintenance (MF) | 100 | 93.5 | 75 |
Arm D: Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg (Blast-phase MF/Acute Myeloid Leukemia) | 100 | 100 | 88.9 |
Arm E: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [With Spliceosome Mutation or Ring Sideroblasts]) | 100 | 77.8 | 77.8 |
Arm F: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MF [Without Spliceosome Mutation and Ring Sideroblasts]) | 100 | 83.3 | 83.3 |
Arm G: Imetelstat 7.5 - 9.4 mg/kg (MDS/MPN or MDS With Spliceosome Mutations or Ring Sideroblasts) | 100 | 100 | 100 |
2 reviews available for niacinamide and Fibrosis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Diverse therapeutic efficacies and more diverse mechanisms of nicotinamide.
Topics: Animals; Cell Survival; Fibrosis; Humans; Inflammation; Mitochondria; Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Skin D | 2019 |
Novel therapeutic strategies for fibrotic lung disease: a review with a focus on epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
Topics: Airway Remodeling; Animals; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Fibrosis; Humans; Inflammation Mediat | 2014 |
2 trials available for niacinamide and Fibrosis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Phase 2 study of combined sorafenib and radiation therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoradiotherapy; Diarrhea; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Adm | 2014 |
A Pilot Study of the Telomerase Inhibitor Imetelstat for Myelofibrosis.
Topics: Aged; Bone Marrow Cells; DNA Mutational Analysis; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fibrosis; Hu | 2015 |
9 other studies available for niacinamide and Fibrosis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Nicotinamide N-methyltransferase ameliorates renal fibrosis by its metabolite 1-methylnicotinamide inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway.
Topics: Animals; Cells, Cultured; Fibrosis; Kidney; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Niacinamide; Nicotinamid | 2022 |
The significance of NAD + metabolites and nicotinamide N-methyltransferase in chronic kidney disease.
Topics: Animals; Female; Fibrosis; Humans; Male; Methionine; Mice; NAD; Niacinamide; Nicotinamide N-Methyltr | 2022 |
Effect of NAD+ boosting on kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Animals; Autophagy; Disease Progression; Fibrosis; Glucuronidase; Kidney; Kloth | 2021 |
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate protects against diabetic cardiomyopathy through modulating the cardiometabolic risk factors, oxidative stress, inflammation, cell death and fibrosis in streptozotocin-nicotinamide-induced diabetic rats.
Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Biomarkers; Cardiotonic Agents; Catechin; Cytokines; Diabetes Mellitus, Experime | 2017 |
Nicotinamide reduces renal interstitial fibrosis by suppressing tubular injury and inflammation.
Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Cell Line; Chemokine CCL2; Disease Models, Animal; Fibrosis; Inflammation; Inter | 2019 |
Selection and management of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with sorafenib: recommendations and opinions from an Italian liver unit.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; | 2013 |
Sorafenib ameliorates renal fibrosis through inhibition of TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
Topics: Actins; Animals; Apoptosis; Cadherins; Cell Line; Disease Models, Animal; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Tra | 2015 |
Sorafenib Inhibits Renal Fibrosis Induced by Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction via Inhibition of Macrophage Infiltration.
Topics: Animals; Antigens, CD; Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Adhesi | 2016 |
Targeted therapies: Role of sorafenib in HCC patients with compromised liver function.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clinical Trials, Phase III as T | 2009 |