Page last updated: 2024-10-19

niacinamide and Cancer of Lung

niacinamide has been researched along with Cancer of Lung in 272 studies

nicotinamide : A pyridinecarboxamide that is pyridine in which the hydrogen at position 3 is replaced by a carboxamide group.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Aim of the study was to investigate efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) therapy."9.19A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib monotherapy in clinically selected patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of EGFR-TKI therapy (Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group, CTONG 0805). ( Chen, GY; Cheng, Y; Huang, C; Li, AW; Su, J; Wu, YL; Xu, CR; Yan, HH; Yang, JJ; Zhang, L; Zhang, XC; Zhou, CC; Zhou, Q, 2014)
"Sorafenib has shown promise in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic thyroid carcinoma."9.15Response to sorafenib at a low dose in patients with radioiodine-refractory pulmonary metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma. ( Chen, L; Lu, H; Luo, Q; Shen, Y; Yu, Y; Zhu, R, 2011)
"Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received sorafenib at a dose of 400 mg twice daily in 4-week cycles."9.14Phase 2 open-label study of single-agent sorafenib in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B-endemic Asian population: presence of lung metastasis predicts poor response. ( Chan, P; Cheung, TT; Chok, SH; Fan, ST; Ng, KK; Poon, RT; Yau, T, 2009)
"Sorafenib is a clinically useful multiple kinase inhibitor for the treatment of kidney cancer, liver cancer and acute myelocytic leukemia, while it has shown weak efficacy in suppressing breast cancer."8.12Potential synthetic lethality for breast cancer: A selective sirtuin 2 inhibitor combined with a multiple kinase inhibitor sorafenib. ( Guan, XY; Li, GB; Ma, X; Song, C; Wang, HL; Yang, LL; Yu, YM, 2022)
" The authors have therefore assessed if the concurrent use of gastric acid suppressants and sorafenib impairs outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."8.02Association of Gastric Acid Suppression and Sorafenib Efficacy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Fletcher, P; Kunene, V; Ma, YT; Razak, RA, 2021)
"We report an advanced HCC patient with many lung metastases who failed sorafenib treatment."7.88The excellent antitumor effect of apatinib alone as second-line therapy in a patient with sorafenib-refractory hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report. ( Duo, J; Ma, X; Zhao, Y; Zhu, H, 2018)
"We analyzed the molecular mechanisms of the antiproliferative effects of sorafenib in mesothelioma TIC cultures."7.85The inhibition of FGF receptor 1 activity mediates sorafenib antiproliferative effects in human malignant pleural mesothelioma tumor-initiating cells. ( Barbieri, F; Carra, E; Daga, A; Favoni, RE; Filiberti, RA; Florio, T; Marubbi, D; Mutti, L; Pattarozzi, A; Würth, R, 2017)
"We previously found that a low dose of sorafenib had a prometastatic effect on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which was caused by downregulation of TIP30 expression."7.83Metformin inhibits the prometastatic effect of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating the expression of TIP30. ( Cao, M; Cui, Y; Fang, F; Gao, J; Guo, Z; Li, H; Li, Q; Song, T; Sun, H; You, A; Zhang, T; Zhang, W; Zhou, H; Zhu, X, 2016)
"We evaluated radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy (HT) combined with sorafenib for treatment of pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."7.83Simultaneous multitarget radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy and its combination with sorafenib for pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. ( He, J; Sun, J; Sun, T; Zeng, M; Zeng, Z; Zhang, S, 2016)
"Sorafenib is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor with a demonstrated activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and it is currently used for the treatment of these pathologies."7.83Efficacy of sorafenib in BRAF-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no response in synchronous BRAF wild type-hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report. ( Casadei Gardini, A; Chiadini, E; Delmonte, A; Dubini, A; Faloppi, L; Frassineti, GL; Loretelli, C; Lucchesi, A; Marisi, G; Oboldi, D; Scartozzi, M; Ulivi, P, 2016)
"The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between fever within 2 weeks after the start of sorafenib therapy and treatment efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."7.83Fever within 2 Weeks of Sorafenib Therapy Predicts Favorable Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Goto, H; Hayashi, K; Hirooka, Y; Honda, T; Ishigami, M; Ishikawa, T; Ishizu, Y; Kuzuya, T; Nakano, I, 2016)
"We report the first case of initially unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein and hepatic venous tumor thrombosis and multiple lung metastases that allowed for curative hepatectomy after multidisciplinary treatment including sorafenib."7.81Complete pathological response induced by sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases and venous tumor thrombosis allowing for curative resection. ( Fujimoto, Y; Hatano, E; Kaido, T; Kitajima, T; Minamiguchi, S; Mitsunori, Y; Mizumoto, M; Okajima, H; Taura, K; Uemoto, S, 2015)
" Sorafenib is a small-molecule multikinase inhibitor used in radioactive iodine ((131)I)-refractive papillary thyroid carcinoma."7.80Response to sorafenib in a pediatric patient with papillary thyroid carcinoma with diffuse nodular pulmonary disease requiring mechanical ventilation. ( Ewig, JM; Iyer, P; Mayer, JL, 2014)
" One patient with advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma, who was treated with oral sorafenib, demonstrated a near-complete clinical and radiographic remission for 5 years."7.80Oncogenic and sorafenib-sensitive ARAF mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. ( Amann, J; Araujo, L; Carbone, DP; Greulich, H; Horn, L; Imielinski, M; Kaplan, B; Meyerson, M; Schiller, J; Villalona-Calero, MA, 2014)
"The aim of the present study was to observe the effects of sorafenib on the proliferation, apoptosis and invasion of A549/DDP cisplatin-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cells cultured in vitro."7.80Therapeutic effects of sorafenib on the A549/DDP human lung adenocarcinoma cell line in vitro. ( Chen, XQ; Li, ZY; Lin, TY; Wang, YL, 2014)
"Sorafenib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."7.79Suppression of natural killer cells by sorafenib contributes to prometastatic effects in hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Bu, Y; Chai, ZT; Jia, QA; Kong, LQ; Lu, L; Sun, HC; Tang, ZY; Wang, L; Wang, M; Wang, WQ; Wu, WZ; Zhang, KZ; Zhang, QB; Zhu, XD, 2013)
"The response rate to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is relatively low (0."7.79FGF3/FGF4 amplification and multiple lung metastases in responders to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Arao, T; Arii, S; Hagiwara, S; Haji, S; Hakamada, K; Hiasa, Y; Hidaka, H; Hirooka, M; Hisai, H; Iso, Y; Izumi, N; Kanazawa, A; Kimura, H; Kubota, K; Kudo, M; Kumada, T; Kuzuya, T; Matsumoto, K; Nagai, T; Nishio, K; Sakurai, T; Sato, S; Shimada, M; Toyoda, H; Toyoki, Y; Tsuchiya, K; Ueshima, K; Utsunomiya, T; Yasui, K, 2013)
"Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."7.77Complete response of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases treated with sorafenib: a case report. ( Henmi, S; Inuzuka, T; Kimura, T; Kita, R; Kudo, M; Nishikawa, H; Osaki, Y; Saito, S; Sakamoto, A; Sekikawa, A; Takeda, H, 2011)
"To evaluate (125)I seed brachytherapy combined with sorafenib in the treatment of patients with multiple lung metastases after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."7.76Feasibility of (125)I brachytherapy combined with sorafenib treatment in patients with multiple lung metastases after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Huang, Z; Li, C; Wu, P; Zhang, F; Zhang, L; Zhang, W, 2010)
"A 66-year-old man with malignant melanoma was treated with sorafenib, 2 yen 400 mg per day."7.75Multiple colon ulcerations, perforation and death during treatment of malignant melanoma with sorafenib. ( Frieling, T; Heise, J; Wassilew, SW, 2009)
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with lung metastasis."7.75[Clinical observation of the treatment with combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with lung metastasis]. ( Duan, F; Liu, FY; Song, P; Wang, MQ; Wang, ZJ, 2009)
" The nanocomplex enhanced bioavailability of hydrophobic drugs, efficient tumor cell targeting and exhibited pH-responsive function and sustained release profile."5.46Simultaneous inhibition of growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by co-delivery of ursolic acid and sorafenib using lactobionic acid modified and pH-sensitive chitosan-conjugated mesoporous silica nanocomplex. ( Fan, L; Jiang, K; Li, T; Shao, J; Zhao, R; Zheng, G, 2017)
"Melanoma is the most aggressive and deadly form of cutaneous neoplasm due to its propensity to metastasize."5.43Fisetin, a dietary flavonoid, augments the anti-invasive and anti-metastatic potential of sorafenib in melanoma. ( Afaq, F; Athar, M; Diamond, AC; Elmets, CA; Kappes, JC; Katiyar, SK; Pal, HC; Strickland, LR, 2016)
"Regorafenib has a closely related chemical structure as sorafenib and is approved for the pharmacotherapy of mCRC."5.43Regorafenib (Stivarga) pharmacologically targets epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. ( Chen, KF; Fan, LC; Hung, MH; Jiang, JK; Shiau, CW; Tai, WT; Teng, HW; Yang, SH, 2016)
"A 74-year-old man was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC; S4/8)and underwent anterior segment resection of the liver in 2015."5.43[Treatment Experience with Sorafenib for Lung Metastases of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated with Interstitial Pneumonia]. ( Hasegawa, J; Hirota, M; Kameda, C; Kawabata, R; Koga, C; Matsumura, T; Murakami, M; Noura, S; Shimizu, J; Shuto, T; Yasuyama, A; Yoshikawa, M, 2016)
"Many patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develop lung metastasis and available treatments are limited."5.42Effects of sorafenib on lung metastasis in rats with hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of microRNAs. ( Huang, A; Shi, Y, 2015)
"Sorafenib is a small molecule that blocks the activation of C-RAF, B-RAF, c-KIT, FLT-3, RET, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and PDGFR approved for advanced renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma (b, c)."5.42A significant response to sorafenib in a woman with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and a BRAF non-V600 mutation. ( Casado Sáenz, E; Falagan, S; García Sánchez, S; Gómez-Raposo, C; Hernández Jusdado, R; Moreno Rubio, J; Moreno, V; Sereno, M; Zambrana Tébar, F, 2015)
"Sorafenib has shown promise in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic thyroid carcinoma."5.38Brain metastasis from follicular thyroid carcinoma: treatment with sorafenib. ( Chen, L; Lu, H; Luo, Q; Ruan, M; Shen, Y; Yu, Y; Zhu, R, 2012)
" Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 92% of all patients necessitating sorafenib discontinuation in 77%."5.38High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Fischer, L; Nashan, B; Seegers, B; Staufer, K; Sterneck, M; Vettorazzi, E, 2012)
"Aim of the study was to investigate efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) therapy."5.19A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib monotherapy in clinically selected patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of EGFR-TKI therapy (Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group, CTONG 0805). ( Chen, GY; Cheng, Y; Huang, C; Li, AW; Su, J; Wu, YL; Xu, CR; Yan, HH; Yang, JJ; Zhang, L; Zhang, XC; Zhou, CC; Zhou, Q, 2014)
"We evaluated whether motesanib (a selective oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3; platelet-derived growth factor receptor; and Kit) combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy alone in patients with nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in the subset of patients with adenocarcinoma."5.16International, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: MONET1. ( Banaclocha, NM; Blackhall, F; Ciuleanu, TE; Dediu, M; Galimi, F; Galiulin, R; Hei, YJ; Ichinose, Y; Kubota, K; McCoy, S; Papai-Szekely, Z; Park, K; Pirker, R; Scagliotti, GV; Spigel, DR; Sydorenko, O; Vynnychenko, I; Yao, B, 2012)
"Sorafenib has shown promise in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic thyroid carcinoma."5.15Response to sorafenib at a low dose in patients with radioiodine-refractory pulmonary metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma. ( Chen, L; Lu, H; Luo, Q; Shen, Y; Yu, Y; Zhu, R, 2011)
"Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received sorafenib at a dose of 400 mg twice daily in 4-week cycles."5.14Phase 2 open-label study of single-agent sorafenib in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B-endemic Asian population: presence of lung metastasis predicts poor response. ( Chan, P; Cheung, TT; Chok, SH; Fan, ST; Ng, KK; Poon, RT; Yau, T, 2009)
"Sorafenib is a clinically useful multiple kinase inhibitor for the treatment of kidney cancer, liver cancer and acute myelocytic leukemia, while it has shown weak efficacy in suppressing breast cancer."4.12Potential synthetic lethality for breast cancer: A selective sirtuin 2 inhibitor combined with a multiple kinase inhibitor sorafenib. ( Guan, XY; Li, GB; Ma, X; Song, C; Wang, HL; Yang, LL; Yu, YM, 2022)
" The authors have therefore assessed if the concurrent use of gastric acid suppressants and sorafenib impairs outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."4.02Association of Gastric Acid Suppression and Sorafenib Efficacy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Fletcher, P; Kunene, V; Ma, YT; Razak, RA, 2021)
"We report an advanced HCC patient with many lung metastases who failed sorafenib treatment."3.88The excellent antitumor effect of apatinib alone as second-line therapy in a patient with sorafenib-refractory hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report. ( Duo, J; Ma, X; Zhao, Y; Zhu, H, 2018)
" Independent actions of the model drugs DNA-intercalating doxorubicin, RNA-interfering miR-34a and protein-inhibiting sorafenib on DNA replication, RNA translation and protein kinase signaling in highly metastatic, human osteosarcoma 143B cells were demonstrated by the increase of γH2A."3.85Co-targeting of DNA, RNA, and protein molecules provides optimal outcomes for treating osteosarcoma and pulmonary metastasis in spontaneous and experimental metastasis mouse models. ( DeVere White, RW; Duan, Z; Ho, PY; Jian, C; Lam, KS; Lara, PN; Qiu, JX; Tu, MJ; Wun, T; Yu, AM; Yu, AX; Zhang, Q, 2017)
"We analyzed the molecular mechanisms of the antiproliferative effects of sorafenib in mesothelioma TIC cultures."3.85The inhibition of FGF receptor 1 activity mediates sorafenib antiproliferative effects in human malignant pleural mesothelioma tumor-initiating cells. ( Barbieri, F; Carra, E; Daga, A; Favoni, RE; Filiberti, RA; Florio, T; Marubbi, D; Mutti, L; Pattarozzi, A; Würth, R, 2017)
"We previously found that a low dose of sorafenib had a prometastatic effect on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which was caused by downregulation of TIP30 expression."3.83Metformin inhibits the prometastatic effect of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating the expression of TIP30. ( Cao, M; Cui, Y; Fang, F; Gao, J; Guo, Z; Li, H; Li, Q; Song, T; Sun, H; You, A; Zhang, T; Zhang, W; Zhou, H; Zhu, X, 2016)
"We evaluated radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy (HT) combined with sorafenib for treatment of pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."3.83Simultaneous multitarget radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy and its combination with sorafenib for pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. ( He, J; Sun, J; Sun, T; Zeng, M; Zeng, Z; Zhang, S, 2016)
"Sorafenib is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor with a demonstrated activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and it is currently used for the treatment of these pathologies."3.83Efficacy of sorafenib in BRAF-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no response in synchronous BRAF wild type-hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report. ( Casadei Gardini, A; Chiadini, E; Delmonte, A; Dubini, A; Faloppi, L; Frassineti, GL; Loretelli, C; Lucchesi, A; Marisi, G; Oboldi, D; Scartozzi, M; Ulivi, P, 2016)
"The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between fever within 2 weeks after the start of sorafenib therapy and treatment efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."3.83Fever within 2 Weeks of Sorafenib Therapy Predicts Favorable Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Goto, H; Hayashi, K; Hirooka, Y; Honda, T; Ishigami, M; Ishikawa, T; Ishizu, Y; Kuzuya, T; Nakano, I, 2016)
"We report the first case of initially unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein and hepatic venous tumor thrombosis and multiple lung metastases that allowed for curative hepatectomy after multidisciplinary treatment including sorafenib."3.81Complete pathological response induced by sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases and venous tumor thrombosis allowing for curative resection. ( Fujimoto, Y; Hatano, E; Kaido, T; Kitajima, T; Minamiguchi, S; Mitsunori, Y; Mizumoto, M; Okajima, H; Taura, K; Uemoto, S, 2015)
" Sorafenib is a small-molecule multikinase inhibitor used in radioactive iodine ((131)I)-refractive papillary thyroid carcinoma."3.80Response to sorafenib in a pediatric patient with papillary thyroid carcinoma with diffuse nodular pulmonary disease requiring mechanical ventilation. ( Ewig, JM; Iyer, P; Mayer, JL, 2014)
"THERE WERE 62 PATIENTS (37 MEN, MEAN AGE: 61 years) treated with sorafenib (62%), sunitinib (22%), and vandetanib (16%) outside of clinical trials; 22 had papillary, five had follicular, five had Hürthle cell, 13 had poorly differentiated, and 17 had medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC)."3.80Tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with metastatic thyroid carcinomas: a retrospective study of the TUTHYREF network. ( Baudin, E; Bonichon, F; Borget, I; Brassard, M; Chougnet, CN; Claude-Desroches, M; de la Fouchardière, C; Do Cao, C; Giraudet, AL; Leboulleux, S; Massicotte, MH; Schlumberger, M, 2014)
" One patient with advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma, who was treated with oral sorafenib, demonstrated a near-complete clinical and radiographic remission for 5 years."3.80Oncogenic and sorafenib-sensitive ARAF mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. ( Amann, J; Araujo, L; Carbone, DP; Greulich, H; Horn, L; Imielinski, M; Kaplan, B; Meyerson, M; Schiller, J; Villalona-Calero, MA, 2014)
"The aim of the present study was to observe the effects of sorafenib on the proliferation, apoptosis and invasion of A549/DDP cisplatin-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cells cultured in vitro."3.80Therapeutic effects of sorafenib on the A549/DDP human lung adenocarcinoma cell line in vitro. ( Chen, XQ; Li, ZY; Lin, TY; Wang, YL, 2014)
" This case report discusses an atypical presentation of the hand-foot syndrome in one patient treated with sorafenib."3.80Hand, foot and scrotal blisters in a patient with cancer receiving oral chemotherapy. ( Bella, A; Guerra, JR; Lolo, D; Suelves, AM, 2014)
"We exposed human sarcoma cell lines to sorafenib, regorafenib, and pazopanib and assessed cell viability and expression of CSC markers (ALDH, CD24, CD44, and CD133)."3.80Anti-proliferative but not anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors enrich for cancer stem cells in soft tissue sarcoma. ( Ames, E; Borys, D; Canter, RJ; Chen, M; Grossenbacher, SK; Li, CS; Mac, S; Monjazeb, AM; Murphy, WJ; Sayers, TJ; Smith, RC; Tellez, J, 2014)
"Sorafenib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."3.79Suppression of natural killer cells by sorafenib contributes to prometastatic effects in hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Bu, Y; Chai, ZT; Jia, QA; Kong, LQ; Lu, L; Sun, HC; Tang, ZY; Wang, L; Wang, M; Wang, WQ; Wu, WZ; Zhang, KZ; Zhang, QB; Zhu, XD, 2013)
"Antiangiogenic therapy, specially sorafenib, has become the standard of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however, the improvement in survival time is not satisfactory."3.79Antiangiogenic therapy promoted metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by suppressing host-derived interleukin-12b in mouse models. ( Chai, ZT; Gao, DM; Kong, LQ; Lu, L; Sun, HC; Tang, ZY; Wang, L; Wang, WQ; Wu, WZ; Xu, HX; Zhang, JB; Zhang, W; Zhu, XD; Zhuang, PY, 2013)
"The response rate to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is relatively low (0."3.79FGF3/FGF4 amplification and multiple lung metastases in responders to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Arao, T; Arii, S; Hagiwara, S; Haji, S; Hakamada, K; Hiasa, Y; Hidaka, H; Hirooka, M; Hisai, H; Iso, Y; Izumi, N; Kanazawa, A; Kimura, H; Kubota, K; Kudo, M; Kumada, T; Kuzuya, T; Matsumoto, K; Nagai, T; Nishio, K; Sakurai, T; Sato, S; Shimada, M; Toyoda, H; Toyoki, Y; Tsuchiya, K; Ueshima, K; Utsunomiya, T; Yasui, K, 2013)
"Sorafenib is a new drug, multikinase inhibitor, which has been recently approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma."3.77Severe sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction. ( Betlloch, I; Cuesta, L; Latorre, N; Monteagudo, A; Toledo, F, 2011)
"Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."3.77Complete response of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases treated with sorafenib: a case report. ( Henmi, S; Inuzuka, T; Kimura, T; Kita, R; Kudo, M; Nishikawa, H; Osaki, Y; Saito, S; Sakamoto, A; Sekikawa, A; Takeda, H, 2011)
"Tumor growth, lung metastasis, and tumor angiogenesis were observed in HCCLM3-R and SMMC7721, two human hepatocellular carcinoma xenograft nude mouse models, when treated with sorafenib (30 mg/kg daily, n = 6 per group) or a vehicle as control."3.76Depletion of tumor-associated macrophages enhances the effect of sorafenib in metastatic liver cancer models by antimetastatic and antiangiogenic effects. ( Kong, LQ; Sun, HC; Tang, ZY; Wang, L; Wu, WZ; Xiong, YQ; Xu, HX; Zhang, W; Zhu, XD; Zhuang, PY, 2010)
"Sorafenib, erlotinib, and cetuximab, alone or in combination, were tested in vitro in a panel of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer cell lines and in vivo in H1299 tumor xenografts."3.76Synergistic antitumor activity of sorafenib in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in colorectal and lung cancer cells. ( Berrino, L; Capasso, A; Ciardiello, F; De Vita, F; Eckhardt, SG; Martinelli, E; Morelli, MP; Morgillo, F; Orditura, M; Rodolico, G; Santoro, M; Troiani, T; Tuccillo, C; Vecchione, L; Vitagliano, D, 2010)
"To evaluate (125)I seed brachytherapy combined with sorafenib in the treatment of patients with multiple lung metastases after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)."3.76Feasibility of (125)I brachytherapy combined with sorafenib treatment in patients with multiple lung metastases after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Huang, Z; Li, C; Wu, P; Zhang, F; Zhang, L; Zhang, W, 2010)
"A 66-year-old man with malignant melanoma was treated with sorafenib, 2 yen 400 mg per day."3.75Multiple colon ulcerations, perforation and death during treatment of malignant melanoma with sorafenib. ( Frieling, T; Heise, J; Wassilew, SW, 2009)
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with lung metastasis."3.75[Clinical observation of the treatment with combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with lung metastasis]. ( Duan, F; Liu, FY; Song, P; Wang, MQ; Wang, ZJ, 2009)
"Subcutaneous tumours and artificially induced pulmonary metastases of the rhabdomyosarcoma R1H of the rat were treated either with fractionated irradiation alone or in combination with nicotinamide and carbogen."3.69Combination of fractionated irradiation with nicotinamide and carbogen in R1H-tumours of the rat and its pulmonary metastases. ( Beck-Bornholdt, HP; Krüll, A; Raabe, A; Rett, M, 1997)
" Given their synergistic activity in combination, we conducted a phase II study to determine the clinical activity of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)."2.82A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (KCSG-0806). ( Cho, BC; Choi, JH; Choi, JR; Heo, DS; Jung, M; Kang, SY; Kim, DW; Kim, HT; Kim, JH; Kim, SW; Lee, DH; Lim, SM; Shim, HS, 2016)
" Overall, adverse event rates were generally similar between the treatment arms."2.80SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer. ( Bos, MM; De Santis, M; Eichelberg, C; Fischer von Weikersthal, L; Flörcken, A; Freier, W; Goebell, PJ; Gottstein, D; Hauswald, K; Indorf, M; Lerchenmüller, C; Los, M; Michel, MS; Pahernik, S; Schenck, M; Schirrmacher-Memmel, S; Staehler, M; van Arkel, C; Vervenne, WL; Zimmermann, U, 2015)
"Sorafenib monotherapy has shown benefits in phase II trials as third-/fourth-line treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)."2.80Monotherapy Administration of Sorafenib in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MISSION) Trial: A Phase III, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sorafenib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Predominantly Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Canc ( Arén, O; de Marinis, F; Hirsh, V; Juhász, E; Mok, TS; Novello, S; Ong, TJ; Paz-Ares, L; Peña, C; Schmelter, T; Seto, T; Smit, EF; Sun, Y; Wakelee, HA; Wu, YL; Yang, JC; Zhang, L, 2015)
"Sorafenib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor of Raf kinase, VEGFR, and PDGFR."2.79Phase II trial of sorafenib in conjunction with chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. ( Dowlati, A; Fu, P; Halmos, B; Ma, P; Mekhail, T; Nickolich, M; Pennell, N; Sharma, N, 2014)
"Sorafenib has proven efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)."2.78Could interferon still play a role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma? A randomized study of two schedules of sorafenib plus interferon-alpha 2a (RAPSODY). ( Boni, C; Bracarda, S; Caserta, C; Cinquini, M; Cortesi, E; De Angelis, V; Di Costanzo, F; Falcone, A; Gasparro, D; Labianca, R; Mucciarini, C; Paglino, C; Pazzola, A; Porta, C; Santoro, A, 2013)
"Treatment with sorafenib has relevant clinical activity in patients with NSCLC harboring KRAS mutations."2.78A phase II study of sorafenib in patients with platinum-pretreated, advanced (Stage IIIb or IV) non-small cell lung cancer with a KRAS mutation. ( Burgers, SA; Dingemans, AM; Groen, HJ; Heideman, DA; Kunst, PW; Mellema, WW; Smit, EF; Thunnissen, E; van Wijk, A, 2013)
"Sorafenib is a raf kinase and angiogenesis inhibitor with activity in multiple cancers."2.77A double-blind randomized discontinuation phase-II study of sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients: eastern cooperative oncology group study E2501. ( Carbone, DP; Hanna, NH; Lee, JW; Schiller, JH; Traynor, AM; Wakelee, HA, 2012)
"Sorafenib has demonstrated single agent activity in non-small cell (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC)."2.76A phase I trial of sorafenib combined with cisplatin/etoposide or carboplatin/pemetrexed in refractory solid tumor patients. ( Bernard, S; Chiu, M; Davies, JM; Dees, EC; Dhruva, NS; Hayes, DN; Hilbun, LR; Ivanova, A; Keller, K; Kim, WY; Socinski, MA; Stinchcombe, TE; Walko, CM, 2011)
"The combination of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine is tolerable, but requires attenuation of sorafenib and capecitabine dosing because of the overlapping toxicity of hand-foot syndrome."2.76A phase I trial of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: New York Cancer Consortium Trial NCI 6981. ( Jeske, S; Kung, S; Lehrer, D; Matulich, D; Mazumdar, M; Milowsky, MI; Nanus, DM; Selzer, J; Sung, M; Tagawa, ST; Wright, JJ, 2011)
"Sorafenib is a small-molecule multitargeted kinase inhibitor that blocks the activation of C-RAF, B-RAF, c-KIT, FLT-3, RET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), VEGFR-3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor β."2.76Sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or with gemcitabine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study. ( Cerea, G; Chella, A; Ciardiello, F; de Marinis, F; Di Maio, M; Fasano, M; Favaretto, A; Gridelli, C; Maione, P; Mattioli, R; Morgillo, F; Pasello, G; Ricciardi, S; Rossi, A; Tortora, G, 2011)
" The majority of adverse events (AEs) were Grade 1-2 in severity."2.76Long-term safety and tolerability of sorafenib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a case-based review. ( Adjei, AA; Blumenschein, GR; Gatzemeier, U; Heigener, D; Hillman, S; Mandrekar, S, 2011)
" The results of this study also showed that this combination therapy had encouraging antitumor activity and was not associated with relevant pharmacokinetic interaction in Japanese NSCLC patients."2.75Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. ( Fukino, K; Fukuoka, M; Hasegawa, Y; Kaneda, H; Kawada, A; Miyazaki, M; Morinaga, R; Nakagawa, K; Okamoto, I; Satoh, T; Tanigawa, T; Ueda, S, 2010)
"The overall incidence of brain metastases in patients receiving sorafenib was 3% (2 of 70 patients) compared with 12% (8 of 69 patients) in patients receiving placebo (P < 0."2.75Incidence of brain metastases in renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib. ( Escudier, B; Fizazi, K; Gross-Goupil, M; Massard, C; Szczylik, C; Zonierek, J, 2010)
"Treatment with motesanib was tolerable when combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel and/or panitumumab, with little effect on motesanib pharmacokinetics at the 125-mg once daily dose level."2.75Phase 1b study of motesanib, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel and/or panitumumab for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. ( Blumenschein, GR; Gladish, G; McGreivy, J; O'Rourke, T; Parson, M; Reckamp, K; Sandler, A; Stephenson, GJ; Sun, YN; Ye, Y, 2010)
"Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor affecting pathways involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis."2.75Sorafenib in platinum-treated patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 0435) phase II trial. ( Bury, MJ; Floyd, JD; Gandara, DR; Gitlitz, BJ; Glisson, BS; Ho, C; Moon, J; Reimers, HJ; Schulz, TK; Sundaram, PK, 2010)
"Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK mitogenic signaling pathway and the angiogenic receptor tyrosine kinases, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta."2.74Phase II, multicenter, uncontrolled trial of single-agent sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. ( Blumenschein, GR; Cihon, F; Cupit, L; Fossella, F; Gatzemeier, U; O'Leary, J; Reck, M; Stewart, DJ, 2009)
" Potential drug-drug interactions and the relationship between pharmacokinetics and toxicity were also assessed."2.73Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with gefitinib in patients with refractory or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. ( Adjei, AA; Croghan, G; Hanson, LJ; Jett, JR; Lathia, C; Mandrekar, SJ; Marks, R; Molina, JR; Reid, JR; Simantov, R; Xia, C, 2007)
"Full pharmacokinetic profiles of nicotinamide concentrations in plasma were analyzed repeatedly in 15 patients to determine the inter- and intra-patient variability in peak plasma concentrations and the optimum times for administering nicotinamide as a radiosensitizer."2.69Pharmacokinetics of nicotinamide in cancer patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy: the experience of the Co-operative Group of Radiotherapy of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. ( Bernier, J; Bieri, S; Bolla, M; Denekamp, J; Dennis, MF; Hagen, F; Kocagöncü, O; Rojas, A; Stratford, MR, 1998)
" Common adverse events (AEs) were also studied."2.52Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Chen, Y; Hong, S; Luo, S; Tan, M; Wang, S; Zhang, L, 2015)
" Grade 3 or greater sorafenib-related adverse events included fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea, oral mucositis, rash and HFSR."2.50Efficacy and safety of sorafenib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ( Guo, DH; Pei, F; Si, HY; Tang, ZH; Wang, DX; Wang, WL; Xiao, BK; Xie, TT; Zhang, XY; Zhu, M, 2014)
"Sorafenib has shown anti-tumor activity in NSCLC."2.48Sorafenib in non-small cell lung cancer. ( Gold, KA; Kim, E; Zhang, J, 2012)
"The prognosis of pulmonary blastoma is very poor; overall five-year survival is 16%."2.47Classic biphasic pulmonary blastoma: a case report and review of the literature. ( Boeykens, E; Rutsaert, R; Stappaerts, I; Van Loo, S, 2011)
" Oral bioavailability and preliminary evidence of activity make this compound an appealing choice for additional investigations."2.47Motesanib and advanced NSCLC: experiences and expectations. ( Blumenschein, GR; Raghav, KP, 2011)
"Sorafenib was approved by the FDA in fast track for advanced renal cell cancer and hepatocellular cancer and shows good clinical activity in thyroid cancer."2.46Sorafenib. ( Hasskarl, J, 2010)
"Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States."2.45Emerging data with antiangiogenic therapies in early and advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. ( Horn, L; Sandler, AB, 2009)
"Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide, with most patients dying with metastatic disease."2.43Angiogenesis and lung cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications. ( Herbst, RS; Onn, A; Sandler, A, 2005)
"Inflammation has been demonstrated to promote cancer metastasis."1.56Nicaraven Attenuates Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Responses-Induced Tumor Metastasis. ( Goto, S; Guo, CY; Kawabata, T; Li, TS; Liu, KX; Moriwaki, T; Zhang, X, 2020)
" This technique could help in improving bioavailability of drug, hence reducing the need for high dosages and signifying a novel paradigm for future clinical applications."1.56Autophagy-Inducing Inhalable Co-crystal Formulation of Niclosamide-Nicotinamide for Lung Cancer Therapy. ( Khan, R; Kumar, A; Ray, E; Sharma, A; Shukla, R; Vaghasiya, K; Verma, RK, 2020)
"Brain metastases are a common consequence of advanced lung cancer, resulting in cranial neuropathies and increased mortality."1.51A TAZ-AXL-ABL2 Feed-Forward Signaling Axis Promotes Lung Adenocarcinoma Brain Metastasis. ( Hoj, JP; Mayro, B; Pendergast, AM, 2019)
" Considering the critical role of VEGF signaling in the homeostasis of the cardiovascular system, we speculated that the long-term use of axitinib and sorafenib directly influenced the initiation of aortic dissection and cardiac dysfunction."1.48Aortic Dissection and Cardiac Dysfunction Emerged Coincidentally During the Long-Term Treatment with Angiogenesis Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. ( Fujita, M; Kuroda, T; Mukai, M; Nakai, Y; Nishimura, K; Oka, T; Shioyama, W; Takada, M; Yasui, T, 2018)
"Lung cancer is currently the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide."1.46Carboxyamidotriazole Synergizes with Sorafenib to Combat Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer through Inhibition of NANOG and Aggravation of Apoptosis. ( Chen, C; Chen, W; Guo, L; Ju, R; Li, J; Shi, J; Sun, F; Ye, C; Zhang, D; Zhu, L, 2017)
" The nanocomplex enhanced bioavailability of hydrophobic drugs, efficient tumor cell targeting and exhibited pH-responsive function and sustained release profile."1.46Simultaneous inhibition of growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by co-delivery of ursolic acid and sorafenib using lactobionic acid modified and pH-sensitive chitosan-conjugated mesoporous silica nanocomplex. ( Fan, L; Jiang, K; Li, T; Shao, J; Zhao, R; Zheng, G, 2017)
"Several adverse events (AEs) are known to be commonly observed during treatment with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients."1.43Absence of Significant Correlation of Adverse Events Between First- and Second-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. ( Fujisawa, M; Harada, K; Imai, S; Miyake, H, 2016)
"Melanoma is the most aggressive and deadly form of cutaneous neoplasm due to its propensity to metastasize."1.43Fisetin, a dietary flavonoid, augments the anti-invasive and anti-metastatic potential of sorafenib in melanoma. ( Afaq, F; Athar, M; Diamond, AC; Elmets, CA; Kappes, JC; Katiyar, SK; Pal, HC; Strickland, LR, 2016)
"Effective therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are limited."1.43Comprehensive multiplatform biomarker analysis of 350 hepatocellular carcinomas identifies potential novel therapeutic options. ( Abou-Alfa, GK; Ang, C; Gamblin, TC; Gatalica, Z; He, R; Millis, SZ; Miura, JT; Reddy, SK; Xiu, J; Yee, NS, 2016)
"Identical data to that in breast cancer were obtained in NSCLC tumors using the ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor afatinib."1.43[Pemetrexed + Sorafenib] lethality is increased by inhibition of ERBB1/2/3-PI3K-NFκB compensatory survival signaling. ( Boone, DL; Booth, L; Chuckalovcak, J; Dent, P; Koromilas, AE; McGuire, WP; Poklepovic, A; Roberts, JL; Stringer, DK; Tavallai, M, 2016)
"Sorafenib is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor and has been the subject of extensive clinical research in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)."1.43HDAC6-mediated EGFR stabilization and activation restrict cell response to sorafenib in non-small cell lung cancer cells. ( Hu, P; Tang, F; Wang, Z; Xie, C, 2016)
"Sorafenib was started for the lung metastases 1 year after the operation."1.43Long-term response of over ten years with sorafenib monotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a case report. ( Chikui, K; Igawa, T; Matsuo, M; Nakiri, M; Nishihara, K; Ogasawara, N; Suekane, S; Suyama, S; Ueda, K, 2016)
"To evaluated patterns and outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT)."1.43Clinical analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living-donor liver transplantation. ( Hong, TH; Kim, DG; Na, GH; You, YK, 2016)
"Regorafenib has a closely related chemical structure as sorafenib and is approved for the pharmacotherapy of mCRC."1.43Regorafenib (Stivarga) pharmacologically targets epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. ( Chen, KF; Fan, LC; Hung, MH; Jiang, JK; Shiau, CW; Tai, WT; Teng, HW; Yang, SH, 2016)
"A 74-year-old man was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC; S4/8)and underwent anterior segment resection of the liver in 2015."1.43[Treatment Experience with Sorafenib for Lung Metastases of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated with Interstitial Pneumonia]. ( Hasegawa, J; Hirota, M; Kameda, C; Kawabata, R; Koga, C; Matsumura, T; Murakami, M; Noura, S; Shimizu, J; Shuto, T; Yasuyama, A; Yoshikawa, M, 2016)
"Many patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develop lung metastasis and available treatments are limited."1.42Effects of sorafenib on lung metastasis in rats with hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of microRNAs. ( Huang, A; Shi, Y, 2015)
"Sorafenib is a small molecule that blocks the activation of C-RAF, B-RAF, c-KIT, FLT-3, RET, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and PDGFR approved for advanced renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma (b, c)."1.42A significant response to sorafenib in a woman with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and a BRAF non-V600 mutation. ( Casado Sáenz, E; Falagan, S; García Sánchez, S; Gómez-Raposo, C; Hernández Jusdado, R; Moreno Rubio, J; Moreno, V; Sereno, M; Zambrana Tébar, F, 2015)
"Lung cancer is a heterogeneous disease encompassing a wide array of genetic abnormalities."1.40Dramatic antitumor effects of the dual MET/RON small-molecule inhibitor LY2801653 in non-small cell lung cancer. ( Arif, Q; Hasina, R; Husain, AN; Kawada, I; Mueller, J; Salgia, R; Smithberger, E; Vokes, EE, 2014)
"Sorafenib doses were increased up to 1600 mg bid, in order to maintain clinical activity, and to restore active plasma concentration, since sorafenib exposure had decreased over the time."1.40Critical role of sorafenib exposure over time for its antitumor activity in thyroid cancer. ( Bellesoeur, A; Billemont, B; Blanchet, B; Carton, E; Clerc, J; Goldwasser, F; Groussin, L; Mir, O, 2014)
" Finally, this study demonstrated that MPT0B271 in combination with erlotinib significantly inhibits the growth of the human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells as compared with erlotinib treatment alone, both in vitro and in vivo."1.40Orally active microtubule-targeting agent, MPT0B271, for the treatment of human non-small cell lung cancer, alone and in combination with erlotinib. ( Chang, JY; Hsiao, CJ; Liou, JP; Pai, HC; Pan, SL; Teng, CM; Tsai, AC; Wang, CY; Wang, JC, 2014)
"The findings showed that, pre-treating lung cancer cells with HDACIs, nicotinamide (NM) or Trichostatin A (TsA) or both significantly enhanced hyperthermia-induced Bax-dependent apoptosis in PC-10 cells."1.40Histone deacetylase inhibitors sensitize lung cancer cells to hyperthermia: involvement of Ku70/SirT-1 in thermo-protection. ( Fujioka, Y; Hassan, MK; Mohamed, Z; Ohba, Y; Sakuragi, N; Salah-Eldin, AE; Sultan, AS; Watari, H, 2014)
" A partial radiological response was achieved; dosage was reduced to 1."1.40Response to trabectedin in a patient with advanced synovial sarcoma with lung metastases. ( Basso, U; Maruzzo, M; Montesco, MC; Rastrelli, M; Roma, A; Zanardi, E, 2014)
"Lung cancer is the most frequent and lethal human cancer in the world."1.40Synergistic anti-tumor effects of the combination of a benzofuroxan derivate and sorafenib on NCI-H460 human large cell lung carcinoma cells. ( Alexandre de Azevedo, R; Barbuto, JA; Bydlowski, SP; Ferreira, AK; Jorge, SD; Levy, D; Pizzo, CR; Rodrigues, CP; Salomon, MA; Teixeira, SF, 2014)
"Thyroid cancer is the most prevalent endocrine malignancy."1.40To treat or not to treat: developments in the field of advanced differentiated thyroid cancer. ( Corssmit, EP; Kapiteijn, E; Links, TP; Oosting, SF; Schneider, TC; van der Horst-Schrivers, AN, 2014)
"Sorafenib can inhibit not only the tumor growth and lung metastsis in the nude mouse models, but also reduce the expression of multidrug resistance proteins P-gp and Topo IIa as well."1.39[Suppression of the growth of subcutaneous transplanted human liver cancer and lung metastasis in nude mice treated by sorafenib combined with fluorouracil]. ( Shen, HJ; Wang, YH; Xu, J, 2013)
" Previously, we reported on the development of LY2801653: a novel, orally bioavailable oncokinase inhibitor with MET as one of its targets."1.39Inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer by LY2801653, an inhibitor of several oncokinases, including MET. ( Bi, C; Credille, KM; Donoho, GP; Manro, JR; Peek, VL; Walgren, RA; Wijsman, JA; Wu, W; Yan, L; Yan, SB, 2013)
"Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor FDA-approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma."1.39Sorafenib induced eruptive melanocytic lesions. ( Aronson, P; Uhlenhake, EE; Watson, AC, 2013)
"Here we present a man with pancreatic metastases from PTC, report our experience with sorafenib therapy, and discuss the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsy in its diagnosis."1.38Pancreatic metastasis arising from a BRAF(V600E)-positive papillary thyroid cancer: the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy and response to sorafenib therapy. ( Abalkhail, H; Al Sohaibani, F; Almanea, H; AlQaraawi, A; Alzahrani, AS, 2012)
"Sorafenib has shown promise in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic thyroid carcinoma."1.38Brain metastasis from follicular thyroid carcinoma: treatment with sorafenib. ( Chen, L; Lu, H; Luo, Q; Ruan, M; Shen, Y; Yu, Y; Zhu, R, 2012)
" Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 92% of all patients necessitating sorafenib discontinuation in 77%."1.38High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Fischer, L; Nashan, B; Seegers, B; Staufer, K; Sterneck, M; Vettorazzi, E, 2012)
" We investigated the antitumor activity of motesanib, a selective antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Kit, alone and combined with chemotherapy in five human NSCLC xenograft models (A549, Calu-6, NCI-H358, NCI-H1299, and NCI-H1650) containing diverse genetic mutations."1.38Antitumor activity of motesanib alone and in combination with cisplatin or docetaxel in multiple human non-small-cell lung cancer xenograft models. ( Coxon, A; Kaufman, S; Polverino, A; Saffran, D; Schmidt, J; Starnes, C; Sweet, H; Wang, H; Weishuhn, D; Xu, M; Ziegler, B, 2012)
"Long-term stabilization of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by the sequence of sorafenib monotherapy followed by sunitinib and everolimus treatments in a man with multiple metastases is reported."1.37Long-term stable disease in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: sorafenib sequenced to sunitinib and everolimus: a case study. ( Beck, J; Bellmunt, J; Escudier, B, 2011)
"Lung cancer is one of the most lethal tumors and, although standard chemotherapy produces clinical response, there has been little improvement in prognosis."1.37Synergistic cytotoxicity, inhibition of signal transduction pathways and pharmacogenetics of sorafenib and gemcitabine in human NSCLC cell lines. ( Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Mey, V; Pasqualetti, G; Ricciardi, S, 2011)
"Spontaneous pyopneumothorax is a very rare occurrence, even in cancer treated patients."1.36Spontaneous pyopneumothorax in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors for subpleural pulmonary metastases. ( Beynat, C; Coudert, B; Diaz, P; Favier, L; Ghiringhelli, F; Ladoire, S, 2010)
"Lung-metastasized renal cell carcinoma mice were treated with various combinations of recombinant human interleukin-2 and sorafenib."1.36Combination therapy of interleukin-2 and sorafenib improves survival benefits and prevents spontaneous pulmonary metastasis in murine renal cell carcinoma models. ( Abe, K; Amagai, Y; Hojo, K; Ide, N; Iguchi, M; Kato, A; Matsumoto, M; Shichijo, M; Tanaka, H; Wada, T, 2010)
"The pathological diagnosis was renal cell carcinoma, clear cell type, grade 1, pT3bNxMx stage III."1.36[Tegafur-uracil markedly reduced pulmonary metastasis from renal cell carcinoma refractory to sorafenib, interferon and interleukin 2]. ( Homma, Y; Kaneko, T; Matsushima, H; Morimoto, H; Tsuzaka, Y, 2010)
"A case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with pulmonary recurrence after liver transplantation for HCC is presented in this report."1.36Sirolimus plus sorafenib in treating HCC recurrence after liver transplantation: a case report. ( Halff, G; Speeg, KV; Wang, Y; Washburn, WK, 2010)
"sorafenib)."1.35Sorafenib: tolerance in patients on chronic hemodialysis: a single-center experience. ( Rey, PM; Villavicencio, H, 2008)
"Sorafenib did not inhibit rhIL-2-induced natural killer cell expansion and rhIL-2 had no effect on the anti-angiogenic activity of sorafenib."1.35Antitumor efficacy of recombinant human interleukin-2 combined with sorafenib against mouse renal cell carcinoma. ( Abe, K; Arimura, A; Hojo, K; Iguchi, M; Matsumoto, M; Matsuo, Y; Wada, T, 2009)
"Sorafenib is an orally administered multi-kinase inhibitor that has shown promise in the treatment of adults with advanced thyroid cancer, but it has not yet been studied in children with this disease."1.35The successful use of sorafenib to treat pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma. ( Clayman, GL; Herzog, CE; Sherman, SI; Waguespack, SG; Williams, MD, 2009)
"Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor whose targets include B-RAF and C-RAF, both of which function in the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway but which also have distinct downstream targets."1.35Sorafenib inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell growth by targeting B-RAF in KRAS wild-type cells and C-RAF in KRAS mutant cells. ( Fukuoka, M; Hatashita, E; Nakagawa, K; Okamoto, I; Takezawa, K; Yamada, Y; Yonesaka, K, 2009)
"Malignant schwannomas or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) represent approximately 10% of all soft tissue sarcomas."1.35Metastatic chest wall malignant schwannoma responding to sorafenib: case report and literature review. ( Fenning, R; Gudena, V; Kizziah, M; Montero, AJ; Post, G; Verma, N, 2008)
"Intravenous (iv) vinorelbine and interperitoneal (ip) cisplatin were administered intermittently (q4d x 3) in combination with sorafenib administered orally (po) once daily for 9 days starting on the same day as the standard agent."1.34Sorafenib is efficacious and tolerated in combination with cytotoxic or cytostatic agents in preclinical models of human non-small cell lung carcinoma. ( Brink, C; Carter, CA; Chen, C; Gilbert, KS; Maxuitenko, YY; Vincent, P; Waud, WR; Zhang, X, 2007)
"Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits the kinase activity of both C-RAF and B-RAF and targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor family (VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor family (PDGFR-beta and stem cell factor receptor [KIT])."1.34Sorafenib and sunitinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. ( Colantuoni, G; Comunale, D; De Vita, A; Del Gaizo, F; Ferrara, C; Gridelli, C; Guerriero, C; Maione, P; Nicolella, D; Rossi, A, 2007)
"Biphasic pulmonary blastoma is a rare malignancy of the lung composed of proliferating epithelial and mesenchymal cells with a high vessel density at the tumor periphery."1.34Pulmonary blastoma with renal metastasis responds to sorafenib. ( Dudek, AZ; Mulamalla, K; Truskinovsky, AM, 2007)
"Due to the long-lasting course of CLL second cancers can occur in these patients."1.34[Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and loss of strength in the right arm--not a typical combination]. ( Bargetzi, M; Puric, E; Schönenberger, A; Sendi, P, 2007)
"The study design includes two different dosage arms and a placebo group with a total sample size of 150 patients and is powered to detect a modest reduction in the mean tumor size burden in the high-dose sorafenib arm compared with a slight increase in the placebo group."1.34Design of phase II cancer trials using a continuous endpoint of change in tumor size: application to a study of sorafenib and erlotinib in non small-cell lung cancer. ( Karrison, TG; Maitland, ML; Ratain, MJ; Stadler, WM, 2007)
" Safety was acceptable, with the most common adverse events consisting of hand-foot skin reaction, cutaneous rash, diarrhoea, fatigue and hypertension."1.34Safety and activity of sorafenib in different histotypes of advanced renal cell carcinoma. ( Bajetta, E; Catena, L; Gevorgyan, A; Guadalupi, V; Mancin, M; Martinetti, A; Platania, M; Procopio, G; Pusceddu, S; Verzoni, E, 2007)
"Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors are rare spindle-cell sarcomas derived from Schwann cells or pluripotent cells of the neural crest."1.33Spinal cord metastasis of a non-neurofibromatosis type-1 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: an unusual manifestation of a rare tumor. ( Baek, WS; Pytel, P; Rubeiz, H; Undevia, SD, 2005)

Research

Studies (272)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19906 (2.21)18.7374
1990's4 (1.47)18.2507
2000's55 (20.22)29.6817
2010's201 (73.90)24.3611
2020's6 (2.21)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Wang, HL1
Ma, X2
Guan, XY1
Song, C1
Li, GB1
Yu, YM1
Yang, LL1
Zhu, S2
Han, X2
Yang, R2
Tian, Y2
Zhang, Q3
Wu, Y4
Dong, S2
Zhang, B2
Ishigaki, H1
Minami, T1
Morimura, O1
Kitai, H1
Horio, D1
Koda, Y1
Fujimoto, E1
Negi, Y1
Nakajima, Y1
Niki, M1
Kanemura, S1
Shibata, E1
Mikami, K1
Takahashi, R1
Yokoi, T1
Kuribayashi, K1
Kijima, T1
Hoj, JP1
Mayro, B1
Pendergast, AM1
Zhang, X3
Moriwaki, T1
Kawabata, T1
Goto, S2
Liu, KX1
Guo, CY1
Li, TS2
Razak, RA1
Fletcher, P1
Kunene, V1
Ma, YT1
Ray, E1
Vaghasiya, K1
Sharma, A1
Shukla, R1
Khan, R1
Kumar, A1
Verma, RK1
Liu, BL1
Hong, JJ1
Tang, K1
Lin, J1
Zheng, XW1
Chen, SC1
Chao, Y1
Yang, MH1
Jian, C1
Tu, MJ1
Ho, PY1
Duan, Z1
Qiu, JX1
DeVere White, RW1
Wun, T1
Lara, PN2
Lam, KS1
Yu, AX1
Yu, AM1
Chen, C3
Ju, R1
Shi, J1
Chen, W1
Sun, F1
Zhu, L1
Li, J1
Zhang, D1
Ye, C1
Guo, L1
Pattarozzi, A1
Carra, E1
Favoni, RE1
Würth, R1
Marubbi, D1
Filiberti, RA1
Mutti, L1
Florio, T1
Barbieri, F1
Daga, A1
Zhao, R1
Li, T1
Zheng, G1
Jiang, K1
Fan, L1
Shao, J1
Hata, AN1
Rowley, S1
Archibald, HL1
Gomez-Caraballo, M1
Siddiqui, FM1
Ji, F1
Jung, J1
Light, M1
Lee, JS3
Debussche, L1
Sidhu, S1
Sadreyev, RI1
Watters, J1
Engelman, JA1
Li, M1
Yang, J1
Zhou, W1
Ren, Y1
Wang, X1
Chen, H1
Zhang, J3
Chen, J3
Sun, Y4
Cui, L1
Liu, X2
Wang, L5
Wu, C1
Kubota, K4
Yoshioka, H1
Oshita, F1
Hida, T1
Yoh, K1
Hayashi, H1
Kato, T1
Kaneda, H2
Yamada, K1
Tanaka, H4
Ichinose, Y3
Park, K3
Cho, EK1
Lee, KH3
Lin, CB1
Yang, JC2
Hara, K1
Asato, T1
Nakagawa, K3
Manzo, A1
Montanino, A1
Carillio, G1
Costanzo, R2
Sandomenico, C1
Normanno, N2
Piccirillo, MC2
Daniele, G2
Perrone, F2
Rocco, G2
Morabito, A2
Spigel, DR5
Rubin, MS1
Gian, VG1
Shipley, DL3
Burris, HA2
Kosloff, RA1
Shih, KC1
Quinn, R1
Greco, FA2
Hainsworth, JD3
Yan, C1
Luo, L1
Urata, Y1
Caiola, E1
Frapolli, R1
Tomanelli, M1
Valerio, R1
Iezzi, A1
Garassino, MC1
Broggini, M1
Marabese, M1
Zhu, H1
Zhao, Y2
Duo, J1
Takada, M1
Yasui, T1
Oka, T1
Shioyama, W1
Kuroda, T1
Nakai, Y1
Nishimura, K1
Mukai, M1
Fujita, M1
Kim, DH1
Cho, E1
Cho, SB1
Choi, SK1
Kim, S1
Yu, J1
Koh, YI1
Sim, DW1
Jun, CH1
Galbraith, AR1
Seabloom, DE1
Wuertz, BR1
Antonides, JD1
Steele, VE1
Wattenberg, LW1
Ondrey, FG1
Jablonska, P1
Mierzejewska, P1
Kutryb-Zajac, B1
Rzyman, W1
Dziadziuszko, R1
Polanska, J1
Sitkiewicz, M1
Smolenski, RT1
Slominska, EM1
Wang, M2
Naganna, N1
Sintim, HO1
Zhang, QB2
Sun, HC3
Zhang, KZ1
Jia, QA1
Bu, Y1
Chai, ZT2
Wang, WQ2
Kong, LQ3
Zhu, XD3
Lu, L2
Wu, WZ3
Tang, ZY3
Santidrian, AF1
Matsuno-Yagi, A1
Ritland, M1
Seo, BB1
LeBoeuf, SE1
Gay, LJ1
Yagi, T1
Felding-Habermann, B1
Jiang, W1
Zeng, ZC1
Iyer, P1
Mayer, JL1
Ewig, JM1
Mender, I1
Senturk, S1
Ozgunes, N1
Akcali, KC1
Kletsas, D1
Gryaznov, S1
Can, A1
Shay, JW2
Dikmen, ZG1
Haraldsdottir, S1
Li, Q2
Villalona-Calero, MA2
Olencki, TE1
Kendra, K1
Ing, SW1
Waterhouse, DM2
Penley, WC1
Thompson, DS1
Webb, CD1
Anthony Greco, F1
Zhao, RN1
Nie, LH1
Gong, R1
Wang, JZ1
Wazir, R1
Liu, LR1
Song, TR1
Wei, Q1
Shen, HJ1
Wang, YH1
Xu, J2
Bahadoran, P1
Allegra, M1
Le Duff, F1
Long-Mira, E1
Hofman, P1
Giacchero, D1
Passeron, T1
Lacour, JP1
Ballotti, R1
Xu, HX2
Zhang, JB1
Gao, DM1
Zhang, W4
Zhuang, PY2
Eisner, F1
Schaberl-Moser, R1
Gerger, A1
Samonigg, H1
Pichler, M1
Nagaria, TS1
Williams, JL1
Leduc, C1
Squire, JA1
Greer, PA1
Sangrar, W1
Wu, W1
Bi, C1
Credille, KM1
Manro, JR1
Peek, VL1
Donoho, GP1
Yan, L1
Wijsman, JA1
Yan, SB1
Walgren, RA1
He, X1
Zhang, T2
Uhlenhake, EE1
Watson, AC1
Aronson, P1
Guerin, M1
Salem, N1
Walz, J1
Dermeche, S1
Gravis, G1
Ishii, T1
Hatano, E2
Yasuchika, K1
Taura, K2
Seo, S1
Uemoto, S2
Kawada, I1
Hasina, R1
Arif, Q1
Mueller, J1
Smithberger, E1
Husain, AN1
Vokes, EE1
Salgia, R1
Bellesoeur, A1
Carton, E1
Mir, O2
Groussin, L1
Blanchet, B1
Billemont, B1
Clerc, J2
Goldwasser, F2
Huang, LY1
Lee, YS1
Huang, JJ1
Chang, CC1
Chang, JM1
Chuang, SH1
Kao, KJ1
Tsai, YJ1
Tsai, PY1
Liu, CW1
Lin, HS1
Lau, JY1
Scagliotti, G2
Spigel, D1
Kim, JH2
Shinkai, T1
Takeda, K1
Kim, SW2
Hsia, TC1
Li, RK1
Tiangco, BJ1
Yau, S1
Lim, WT2
Yao, B3
Hei, YJ6
Sharma, N1
Pennell, N1
Nickolich, M1
Halmos, B1
Ma, P1
Mekhail, T1
Fu, P1
Dowlati, A1
Massicotte, MH1
Brassard, M1
Claude-Desroches, M1
Borget, I1
Bonichon, F1
Giraudet, AL1
Do Cao, C1
Chougnet, CN1
Leboulleux, S1
Baudin, E1
Schlumberger, M1
de la Fouchardière, C1
Zhou, Q1
Zhou, CC1
Chen, GY1
Cheng, Y1
Huang, C1
Zhang, L5
Xu, CR1
Li, AW1
Yan, HH1
Su, J1
Zhang, XC1
Yang, JJ1
Wu, YL2
Claret, L2
Bruno, R2
Lu, JF2
Sun, YN4
Hsu, CP2
Lee, DW1
Chang, H2
Kim, YJ1
Kim, KM1
Lee, HJ1
Zhang, H1
Li, Z1
Wang, K1
Imielinski, M1
Greulich, H1
Kaplan, B1
Araujo, L1
Amann, J1
Horn, L2
Schiller, J1
Meyerson, M1
Carbone, DP2
Tsai, AC1
Wang, CY2
Liou, JP1
Pai, HC1
Hsiao, CJ1
Chang, JY1
Wang, JC1
Teng, CM1
Pan, SL1
Hassan, MK1
Watari, H1
Salah-Eldin, AE1
Sultan, AS1
Mohamed, Z1
Fujioka, Y1
Ohba, Y1
Sakuragi, N1
Pitoia, F1
Chao, TT1
Tai, WT2
Chang, FY1
Su, WP1
Chen, YL1
Chen, PT1
Weng, CY1
Yuan, A1
Shiau, CW2
Yu, CJ1
Chen, KF2
Masri, SC1
Misselt, AJ1
Dudek, A1
Konety, SH1
Chen, XQ1
Wang, YL1
Li, ZY1
Lin, TY2
Guerra, JR1
Suelves, AM1
Bella, A1
Lolo, D1
Rijavec, E1
Genova, C1
Barletta, G1
Biello, F1
Dal Bello, MG1
Coco, S1
Truini, A1
Vanni, I1
Alama, A1
Boccardo, F1
Grossi, F2
Zanardi, E1
Maruzzo, M1
Montesco, MC1
Roma, A1
Rastrelli, M1
Basso, U2
Groenendijk, FH1
Mellema, WW2
van der Burg, E1
Schut, E1
Hauptmann, M1
Horlings, HM1
Willems, SM1
van den Heuvel, MM1
Jonkers, J1
Smit, EF10
Bernards, R1
Wang, WL1
Tang, ZH1
Xie, TT1
Xiao, BK1
Zhang, XY1
Guo, DH1
Wang, DX1
Pei, F1
Si, HY1
Zhu, M1
İlknur, T1
Akarsu, S1
Çarsanbali, S1
Lebe, B1
Fetil, E1
Novello, S4
Scagliotti, GV3
Sydorenko, O2
Vynnychenko, I2
Volovat, C1
Schneider, CP1
Blackhall, F2
McCoy, S2
Canter, RJ1
Ames, E1
Mac, S1
Grossenbacher, SK1
Chen, M1
Li, CS1
Borys, D1
Smith, RC1
Tellez, J1
Sayers, TJ1
Monjazeb, AM1
Murphy, WJ1
Teixeira, SF1
Alexandre de Azevedo, R1
Salomon, MA1
Jorge, SD1
Levy, D1
Bydlowski, SP1
Rodrigues, CP1
Pizzo, CR1
Barbuto, JA1
Ferreira, AK1
Bass, MB1
Ye, Y2
Davis, GJ1
Davis, MT1
Kaesdorf, BA1
Chan, SS1
Patterson, SD1
Hong, S1
Tan, M1
Wang, S2
Luo, S1
Chen, Y1
Schneider, TC1
Kapiteijn, E1
Corssmit, EP1
Oosting, SF1
van der Horst-Schrivers, AN1
Links, TP1
Kondo, T1
Nakazawa, H1
Oya, M1
Kimura, G1
Fujii, Y1
Hatano, T1
Kawata, N1
Kume, H1
Morita, M1
Nakajima, K1
Ohno, Y1
Okegawa, T1
Takahashi, S1
Wakumoto, Y1
Horie, S1
Yamaguchi, R1
Saito, K1
Murakami, M2
Chiappori, AA1
Kolevska, T1
Hager, S1
Rarick, M1
Gadgeel, S1
Blais, N1
Von Pawel, J3
Hart, L1
Reck, M3
Bassett, E1
Burington, B1
Schiller, JH4
Moon, J2
Redman, MW1
Semrad, TJ1
Kelly, K1
Allen, JW1
Gitlitz, BJ2
Mack, PC1
Gandara, DR2
Dicken, V1
Bornemann, L1
Moltz, JH1
Peitgen, HO1
Zaim, S1
Scheuring, U1
Gavrancic, T1
Park, YH1
Tan, EH1
Tan, DS1
Li, WY1
Haaland, B1
Ang, MK1
Chau, NM1
Toh, CK1
Tan, IB1
Koh, TS1
Thng, CH1
Chowbay, B1
Hui, KM1
Ng, QS1
Eichelberg, C1
Vervenne, WL1
De Santis, M1
Fischer von Weikersthal, L1
Goebell, PJ1
Lerchenmüller, C1
Zimmermann, U1
Bos, MM1
Freier, W1
Schirrmacher-Memmel, S1
Staehler, M1
Pahernik, S1
Los, M1
Schenck, M1
Flörcken, A1
van Arkel, C1
Hauswald, K1
Indorf, M1
Gottstein, D1
Michel, MS1
Thoma, C1
Shi, Y2
Huang, A1
An, H1
Stoops, SL1
Deane, NG1
Zhu, J1
Zi, J1
Weaver, C1
Waterson, AG1
Zijlstra, A1
Lindsley, CW1
Beauchamp, RD1
Albiges, L1
Escudier, B3
Sereno, M1
Moreno, V1
Moreno Rubio, J1
Gómez-Raposo, C1
García Sánchez, S1
Hernández Jusdado, R1
Falagan, S1
Zambrana Tébar, F1
Casado Sáenz, E1
Kitajima, T1
Mitsunori, Y1
Fujimoto, Y1
Mizumoto, M1
Okajima, H1
Kaido, T1
Minamiguchi, S1
Seo, MS1
Kim, JK1
Shim, JY1
Miyake, H1
Imai, S1
Harada, K1
Fujisawa, M1
Gon, H1
Kido, M1
Fukumoto, T1
Takebe, A1
Tanaka, M1
Kuramitsu, K1
Kinoshita, H1
Fukushima, K1
Urade, T1
So, S1
Shinzeki, M1
Matsumoto, I1
Ajiki, T1
Ku, Y1
Pal, HC1
Diamond, AC1
Strickland, LR1
Kappes, JC1
Katiyar, SK1
Elmets, CA1
Athar, M1
Afaq, F1
Ang, C1
Miura, JT1
Gamblin, TC1
He, R1
Xiu, J1
Millis, SZ1
Gatalica, Z1
Reddy, SK1
Yee, NS1
Abou-Alfa, GK1
Della Corte, CM1
Ciaramella, V1
Di Mauro, C1
Castellone, MD1
Papaccio, F1
Fasano, M2
Sasso, FC1
Martinelli, E3
Troiani, T3
De Vita, F2
Orditura, M2
Bianco, R1
Ciardiello, F5
Morgillo, F4
Paz-Ares, L1
Hirsh, V1
de Marinis, F3
Wakelee, HA3
Seto, T1
Juhász, E1
Arén, O2
Schmelter, T1
Ong, TJ2
Peña, C1
Mok, TS1
Amato, KR1
Tan, L1
Hastings, AK1
Song, W1
Lovly, CM1
Meador, CB1
Ye, F1
Lu, P1
Balko, JM1
Colvin, DC1
Cates, JM1
Pao, W1
Gray, NS1
Buchler, T1
Bortlicek, Z1
Poprach, A1
Pavlik, T1
Veskrnova, V1
Honzirkova, M1
Zemanova, M1
Fiala, O1
Kubackova, K1
Slaby, O1
Svoboda, M1
Vyzula, R1
Dusek, L1
Melichar, B1
Guo, Z1
Cao, M1
You, A1
Gao, J1
Zhou, H1
Li, H2
Cui, Y1
Fang, F1
Song, T1
Zhu, X1
Sun, H1
Hu, H1
Lim, SM1
Cho, BC1
Kang, SY1
Heo, DS1
Kim, HT1
Lee, DH1
Kim, DW1
Jung, M1
Choi, JH1
Shim, HS1
Choi, JR1
Horiike, A1
Takeuchi, K1
Uenami, T1
Kawano, Y1
Tanimoto, A1
Kaburaki, K1
Tambo, Y1
Kudo, K1
Yanagitani, N1
Ohyanagi, F1
Motoi, N1
Ishikawa, Y1
Horai, T1
Nishio, M1
Heqing, Y1
Bin, L1
Xuemei, Y1
Linfa, L1
Booth, L2
Roberts, JL2
Tavallai, M1
Chuckalovcak, J1
Stringer, DK1
Koromilas, AE1
Boone, DL1
McGuire, WP1
Poklepovic, A2
Dent, P2
Rovithi, M1
Lind, JS6
Pham, TV1
Voortman, J1
Knol, JC1
Verheul, HM3
Jimenez, CR1
Wang, Z2
Hu, P1
Tang, F1
Xie, C1
Sun, T1
He, J1
Zhang, S1
Sun, J1
Zeng, M1
Zeng, Z1
Frink, RE1
Peyton, M1
Gazdar, AF1
Minna, JD1
Grünwald, V1
Lin, X2
Kalanovic, D1
Simantov, R2
Ueda, K1
Suekane, S1
Ogasawara, N1
Chikui, K1
Suyama, S1
Nakiri, M1
Nishihara, K1
Matsuo, M1
Igawa, T1
Casadei Gardini, A1
Chiadini, E1
Faloppi, L1
Marisi, G1
Delmonte, A1
Scartozzi, M1
Loretelli, C1
Lucchesi, A1
Oboldi, D1
Dubini, A1
Frassineti, GL1
Ulivi, P1
Blazejczyk, A1
Switalska, M1
Chlopicki, S1
Marcinek, A1
Gebicki, J1
Nowak, M1
Nasulewicz-Goldeman, A1
Wietrzyk, J1
Na, GH1
Hong, TH1
You, YK1
Kim, DG1
Fan, LC1
Teng, HW1
Hung, MH1
Yang, SH1
Jiang, JK1
Kuzuya, T2
Ishigami, M1
Ishizu, Y1
Honda, T1
Hayashi, K1
Ishikawa, T1
Nakano, I1
Goto, H1
Hirooka, Y1
Song, J1
Kim, SB1
Kim, KH1
Kim, TN1
Sung, JH1
Moon, SU1
Kim, HS1
Kim, JW1
Wu, G1
Liu, G1
Kong, W1
Qu, J1
Suo, S1
Shuto, T1
Shimizu, J1
Koga, C1
Yasuyama, A1
Matsumura, T1
Kameda, C1
Kawabata, R1
Hirota, M1
Yoshikawa, M1
Noura, S1
Hasegawa, J1
Gettinger, S1
Blumenschein, G2
Adjei, AA4
Rey, PM1
Villavicencio, H1
Lopez, V1
Pinazo, I1
Marti, N1
Monteagudo, C1
Jorda, E1
Döme, B2
Magyar, M1
Li, XF1
Chen, Q1
Huang, WX1
Ye, YB1
Yau, T1
Chan, P1
Ng, KK1
Chok, SH1
Cheung, TT1
Fan, ST1
Poon, RT1
Brunello, A1
Bertuzzi, A1
Santoro, A3
Zimmermann, K1
Schmittel, A1
Steiner, U1
Asemissen, AM1
Knoedler, M1
Thiel, E1
Miller, K1
Keilholz, U1
Iguchi, M2
Matsumoto, M2
Hojo, K2
Wada, T2
Matsuo, Y1
Arimura, A1
Abe, K2
Waguespack, SG1
Sherman, SI1
Williams, MD1
Clayman, GL1
Herzog, CE1
Sandler, AB1
Beauparlant, P1
Bédard, D1
Bernier, C1
Chan, H1
Gilbert, K1
Goulet, D1
Gratton, MO1
Lavoie, M1
Roulston, A1
Turcotte, E1
Watson, M1
Desar, IM1
Mulder, SF2
Stillebroer, AB1
van Spronsen, DJ2
van der Graaf, WT1
Mulders, PF1
van Herpen, CM1
Frieling, T1
Heise, J1
Wassilew, SW1
Pallis, AG1
Serfass, L1
Dziadziusko, R1
van Meerbeeck, JP1
Fennell, D1
Lacombe, D1
Welch, J1
Gridelli, C4
Takezawa, K1
Okamoto, I2
Yonesaka, K1
Hatashita, E1
Yamada, Y1
Fukuoka, M2
Ye, SL1
Blumenschein, GR5
Gatzemeier, U2
Fossella, F1
Stewart, DJ2
Cupit, L2
Cihon, F2
O'Leary, J1
Spector, E1
Franklin, MJ1
Truskinovsky, AM2
Dudek, AZ2
Miyazaki, M1
Morinaga, R1
Ueda, S1
Hasegawa, Y1
Satoh, T1
Kawada, A1
Fukino, K1
Tanigawa, T1
Ladoire, S1
Beynat, C1
Diaz, P1
Coudert, B1
Favier, L1
Ghiringhelli, F1
Massard, C1
Zonierek, J1
Gross-Goupil, M1
Fizazi, K1
Szczylik, C1
Ide, S1
Soda, H1
Hakariya, T1
Takemoto, S1
Ishimoto, H1
Tomari, S1
Sawai, T1
Nagashima, S1
Furukawa, M1
Nakamura, Y1
Kohno, S1
Vroling, L1
de Haas, RR1
van Hinsbergh, VW1
Broxterman, HJ1
Yeganeh, M1
Finn, RS1
Saab, S1
Xie, XD1
Piao, Y1
Liu, ZZ1
Duan, F2
Wang, MQ2
Liu, FY2
Wang, ZJ2
Song, P2
Reckamp, K2
Stephenson, GJ1
O'Rourke, T1
Gladish, G1
McGreivy, J1
Parson, M1
Sandler, A2
Le Moulec, S1
Loriot, Y1
Soria, JC1
Katz, SI2
Zhou, L2
Chao, G1
Smith, CD2
Ferrara, T1
Wang, W2
Dicker, DT1
El-Deiry, WS2
Hasskarl, J1
Boonstra, JJ1
van Marion, R1
Beer, DG1
Lin, L1
Chaves, P1
Ribeiro, C1
Pereira, AD1
Roque, L1
Darnton, SJ1
Altorki, NK1
Schrump, DS1
Klimstra, DS1
Tang, LH1
Eshleman, JR1
Alvarez, H1
Shimada, Y1
van Dekken, H1
Tilanus, HW1
Dinjens, WN1
Amagai, Y1
Ide, N1
Kato, A1
Shichijo, M1
Kurashige, Y1
Otani, A1
Yoshimura, N1
Puca, R1
Nardinocchi, L1
Starace, G1
Rechavi, G1
Sacchi, A1
Givol, D1
D'Orazi, G1
Hammer, S1
Sommer, A1
Fichtner, I1
Becker, M1
Rolff, J1
Merk, J1
Klar, U1
Hoffmann, J1
Pereira, JR1
Thomas, M1
Abrão Miziara, JE1
Balint, B1
Keller, A1
Csollak, M1
Albert, I1
Barrios, CH1
Krzakowski, M1
Dimatteo, S1
Hanna, N2
Dingemans, AM5
Groen, HJ3
Thunnissen, FB2
Bekers, O1
Heideman, DA2
Honeywell, RJ1
Giovannetti, E2
Peters, GJ2
Postmus, PE3
van Suylen, RJ2
Hochstenbach, MM1
Xiong, YQ1
Davies, JM1
Dhruva, NS1
Walko, CM1
Socinski, MA1
Bernard, S1
Hayes, DN1
Kim, WY1
Ivanova, A1
Keller, K1
Hilbun, LR1
Chiu, M1
Dees, EC1
Stinchcombe, TE1
Beck, J1
Bellmunt, J2
Maroto-Rey, P1
Trigo, JM1
Carles, J1
Guillem, V1
López-Martín, JA1
Antón-Torres, A1
Urruticoechea, L1
Meijerink, MR1
van Kuijk, C1
Ollers, MC1
de Ruysscher, D1
Hou, MM1
Hsieh, JJ1
Chang, NJ1
Huang, HY1
Wang, HM1
Chuang, CK1
Hsu, T1
Chang, JW1
Jones, SJ1
Laskin, J1
Li, YY1
Griffith, OL1
An, J1
Bilenky, M1
Butterfield, YS1
Cezard, T1
Chuah, E1
Corbett, R1
Fejes, AP1
Griffith, M1
Yee, J1
Martin, M1
Mayo, M1
Melnyk, N1
Morin, RD1
Pugh, TJ1
Severson, T1
Shah, SP1
Sutcliffe, M1
Tam, A1
Terry, J1
Thiessen, N1
Thomson, T1
Varhol, R1
Zeng, T1
Moore, RA1
Huntsman, DG1
Birol, I1
Hirst, M1
Holt, RA1
Marra, MA1
Masunaga, S2
Matsumoto, Y1
Kashino, G1
Hirayama, R1
Liu, Y3
Sakurai, Y2
Suzuki, M2
Kinashi, Y2
Maruhashi, A2
Ono, K2
Rodolico, G1
Vitagliano, D1
Morelli, MP1
Tuccillo, C2
Vecchione, L1
Capasso, A1
Eckhardt, SG1
Santoro, M1
Berrino, L2
Li, C2
Zhang, F1
Huang, Z1
Wu, P1
Tagawa, ST1
Milowsky, MI1
Jeske, S1
Mazumdar, M1
Kung, S1
Sung, M1
Lehrer, D1
Matulich, D1
Selzer, J1
Wright, JJ2
Nanus, DM1
Glisson, BS1
Reimers, HJ1
Bury, MJ1
Floyd, JD1
Schulz, TK1
Sundaram, PK1
Ho, C1
Morimoto, H1
Tsuzaka, Y1
Kaneko, T1
Matsushima, H1
Homma, Y1
Di Maio, M2
Giordano, P1
Riccardi, MG1
Wang, Y3
Speeg, KV1
Washburn, WK1
Halff, G1
Ruangkanchanasetr, P1
Kanjanapayak, B1
Jungmeechoke, K1
Chen, L3
Shen, Y3
Luo, Q2
Yu, Y3
Lu, H2
Zhu, R2
Favaretto, A1
Chella, A1
Cerea, G1
Mattioli, R1
Tortora, G2
Rossi, A3
Pasello, G1
Ricciardi, S2
Maione, P3
Dy, GK1
Hillman, SL1
Rowland, KM1
Molina, JR2
Steen, PD1
Wender, DB1
Nair, S1
Mandrekar, S2
Schild, SE1
Kelly, RJ1
Rajan, A2
Force, J2
Lopez-Chavez, A1
Keen, C1
Cao, L1
Choyke, P1
Turkbey, B1
Raffeld, M1
Xi, L1
Steinberg, SM2
Kummar, S1
Gutierrez, M3
Giaccone, G2
Kabbinavar, F1
Menon, H1
Mok, TSK1
Stephenson, J1
Beck, JT1
Lakshmaiah, K1
Kracht, K1
Sikorski, R1
Schwartzberg, L1
Friedrich, MJ1
Yu, S1
Coriat, R1
Ropert, S1
Van Loo, S1
Boeykens, E1
Stappaerts, I1
Rutsaert, R1
Pasqualetti, G1
Mey, V1
Del Tacca, M1
Danesi, R1
Raghav, KP1
Ferrara, TA1
Mayes, PA1
Block, MS1
Kohli, M1
Friedman, EK1
Whorf, RC1
Mitchell, RB1
Daniel, DB1
Zangmeister, J1
Bass, JD1
Kim, YS1
Jin, HO1
Seo, SK1
Woo, SH1
Choe, TB1
An, S1
Hong, SI1
Lee, SJ1
Park, IC1
Dombi, E1
Cuesta, L1
Betlloch, I1
Toledo, F1
Latorre, N1
Monteagudo, A1
Hu, J1
Qiu, SJ1
Huang, XW1
Dai, Z1
Tan, CJ1
Zhou, J1
Fan, J1
Mansi, L1
Viel, E1
Curtit, E1
Medioni, J1
Le Tourneau, C1
Hillman, S1
Heigener, D2
Iakovlev, AIu1
Gordeeva, OS1
Denisenko, AN1
Vorontsov, AIu1
Ulitin, DN1
Wu, S1
Keresztes, RS1
Cascone, T1
D'Aiuto, E1
Saintigny, P1
De Palma, R1
Heymach, JV1
Cabrejas Gómez, Mdel C1
Aguillo Gutiérrez, E1
Altemir Trallero, J1
Ocón Bretón, J1
Lázaro Sierra, J1
Mets, RB1
Golchet, P1
Adamus, G1
Anitori, R1
Wilson, D1
Shaw, J1
Jampol, LM1
Inuzuka, T1
Nishikawa, H1
Sekikawa, A1
Takeda, H1
Henmi, S1
Sakamoto, A1
Saito, S1
Kita, R1
Kimura, T1
Osaki, Y1
Kudo, M2
Ma, WL1
Hsu, CL1
Yeh, CC1
Wu, MH1
Huang, CK1
Jeng, LB1
Hung, YC1
Yeh, S1
Chang, C1
Kondo, N1
Dasari, A1
Gore, L1
Messersmith, WA1
Diab, S1
Jimeno, A1
Weekes, CD1
Lewis, KD1
Drabkin, HA1
Flaig, TW1
Camidge, DR1
Zhang, XH1
Shin, JY1
Kim, JO1
Oh, JE1
Yoon, SA1
Jung, CK1
Kang, JH1
Alzahrani, AS1
AlQaraawi, A1
Al Sohaibani, F1
Almanea, H1
Abalkhail, H1
Chan, SL1
Johnson, P1
Lucas, LM1
Crouzeix, G1
Michels, JJ1
Sevin, E1
Aide, N1
Vaur, D1
Bardet, S1
Gold, KA1
Kim, E2
Morgensztern, D1
Herbst, RS3
Pirker, R1
Galiulin, R1
Ciuleanu, TE1
Dediu, M1
Papai-Szekely, Z1
Banaclocha, NM1
Galimi, F1
Jiang, Y1
Ma, Y1
Li, Y1
Ruan, M1
Bria, E1
Pilotto, S1
Paz-Ares, LG1
Biesma, B1
Eisen, T1
Bennouna, J1
Liao, M1
Gans, S1
Syrigos, K1
Le Marie, E1
Gottfried, M1
Vansteenkiste, J1
Alberola, V1
Strauss, UP1
Montegriffo, E1
Staufer, K1
Fischer, L1
Seegers, B1
Vettorazzi, E1
Nashan, B1
Sterneck, M1
Arao, T1
Ueshima, K1
Matsumoto, K1
Nagai, T1
Kimura, H1
Hagiwara, S1
Sakurai, T1
Haji, S1
Kanazawa, A1
Hidaka, H1
Iso, Y1
Shimada, M1
Utsunomiya, T1
Hirooka, M1
Hiasa, Y1
Toyoki, Y1
Hakamada, K1
Yasui, K1
Kumada, T1
Toyoda, H1
Sato, S1
Hisai, H1
Tsuchiya, K1
Izumi, N1
Arii, S1
Nishio, K1
Wege, H1
Brümmendorf, TH1
Gambacorti-Passerini, C1
Bracarda, S1
Porta, C1
Boni, C1
Mucciarini, C1
Pazzola, A1
Cortesi, E1
Gasparro, D1
Labianca, R1
Di Costanzo, F1
Falcone, A1
Cinquini, M1
Caserta, C1
Paglino, C1
De Angelis, V1
Labots, M1
Dekker, H1
Galvani, E1
Sciarrillo, R1
Honeywell, R1
Lee, JW1
Hanna, NH1
Traynor, AM1
Coxon, A1
Ziegler, B1
Kaufman, S1
Xu, M1
Wang, H1
Weishuhn, D1
Schmidt, J1
Sweet, H1
Starnes, C1
Saffran, D1
Polverino, A1
Török, S1
Cserepes T, M1
Rényi-Vámos, F1
Tsao, AS1
Liu, S1
Lee, JJ1
Alden, C1
Herbst, R1
Davis, SE1
Lippman, S1
Stewart, D1
Tang, XM1
Wistuba, I1
Hong, WK1
Kuiper, JL1
Roder, J1
Grigorieva, J1
Roder, H1
Hegde, U1
Patel, V1
Kaloudis, E1
van Wijk, A1
Burgers, SA1
Kunst, PW1
Thunnissen, E1
Mosher, CE1
Bakas, T1
Champion, VL1
Vavalà, T1
Levra, MG1
Solitro, F1
Pelosi, E1
Veltri, A1
Hammond, E1
Brandt, R1
Dredge, K1
KALASHNIKOV, AP1
Kramer, BW1
Götz, R1
Rapp, UR1
Onn, A1
Baek, WS1
Pytel, P1
Undevia, SD1
Rubeiz, H1
Tiseo, M2
Franciosi, V1
Ardizzoni, A2
Carter, CA1
Brink, C1
Vincent, P1
Maxuitenko, YY1
Gilbert, KS1
Waud, WR1
Kang, HT1
Lee, HI1
Hwang, ES1
Chung, NM1
Turner, ML2
Morgan-Lappe, S1
Huang, X1
Li, L1
Zakula, DM1
Vernetti, LA1
Fesik, SW1
Kong, HH1
Cowen, EW1
Azad, NS1
Dahut, W1
MacGregor, JL1
Silvers, DN1
Grossman, ME1
Sherman, WH1
Del Gaizo, F1
Colantuoni, G1
Guerriero, C1
Ferrara, C1
Nicolella, D1
Comunale, D1
De Vita, A1
Dasanu, CA1
Alexandrescu, DT1
Dutcher, J1
Mulamalla, K1
Yan, Z1
De Mulder, PH1
Mandrekar, SJ1
Marks, R1
Reid, JR1
Croghan, G1
Hanson, LJ1
Jett, JR1
Xia, C1
Lathia, C1
Sendi, P1
Puric, E1
Schönenberger, A1
Bargetzi, M1
Mongillo, F1
Bareschino, M1
Cabebe, E1
Wakelee, H1
Karrison, TG1
Maitland, ML1
Stadler, WM1
Ratain, MJ1
Quesada, AR1
Medina, MA1
Alba, E1
Gudena, V1
Verma, N1
Post, G1
Kizziah, M1
Fenning, R1
Montero, AJ1
Procopio, G1
Verzoni, E1
Gevorgyan, A1
Mancin, M1
Pusceddu, S1
Catena, L1
Platania, M1
Guadalupi, V1
Martinetti, A1
Bajetta, E1
Fischer, B1
Buhl, R1
Raabe, A1
Rett, M1
Krüll, A1
Beck-Bornholdt, HP1
Bernier, J2
Stratford, MR1
Denekamp, J2
Dennis, MF1
Bieri, S1
Hagen, F1
Kocagöncü, O1
Bolla, M1
Rojas, A2
Honess, DJ1
Hill, SA1
Collingridge, DR1
Edwards, B1
Brauers, G1
Powell, NA1
Chaplin, DJ1
Trovò, M1
Horiot, JC1
Hamers, H1
Antognoni, P1
Dahl, O1
Richaud, P1
Kaanders, J1
van Glabbeke, M1
Piérart, M1
French, FA1
Draudin-Krylenko, VA1
Bukin, IuV1
Nikonova, TV1
Grassetti, DR1
Gotoh, H1
Nomura, T1
Nakajima, H1
Hasegawa, C1
Sakamoto, Y1
von Ardenne, M1
Chaplain, RA1

Clinical Trials (39)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Randomized Phase II Trial of Sorafenib and Erlotinib or Sorafenib Alone in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Progressing on Erlotinib[NCT00609804]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Detection of Plasmatic Cell-free BRAF and NRAS Mutations: a New Tool for Monitoring Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma Treated With Targeted Therapies or Immunotherapy ( MALT )[NCT03493230]35 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of AMG 706 in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.[NCT00460317]Phase 31,450 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Terminated (stopped due to Amgen discontinued the development of AMG706 because 20050201 did not meet its primary objective.)
A Phase II Study of Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006®) in Patients With Relapsed Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer(NSCLC) After Failure of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (EGFR-TKI)Treatment[NCT00922584]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized Trial of AMG 706 or Bevacizumab in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Advanced Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00369070]Phase 2186 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Terminated
A Phase II Trial of PS-341 (NSC-681239) in Patients With Platinum-Treated Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00068289]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-09-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of BAY 43-9006 (NSC-724772) in Patients With Platinum-Treated Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00182689]Phase 289 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Weekly Topotecan With and Without AVE0005 (Aflibercept; NSC-724770) in Patients With Platinum Treated Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (E-SCLC)[NCT00828139]Phase 2189 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized Sequential Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib Followed by Sunitinib Versus Sunitinib Followed by Sorafenib in the Treatment of First-Line Advanced / Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00732914]Phase 3272 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Multicenter, Open-label, Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Combination With Erlotinib in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Refractory to One or Two Prior Chemotherapy Regimens[NCT00801385]Phase 247 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-09-30Recruiting
Randomized, Double-blind Phase 2 Study Of Axitinib (Ag-013736) With Or Without Dose Titration In Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00835978]Phase 2213 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Phase II Study Of Single-Agent SU011248 In The Second-Line Treatment Of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00054886]Phase 263 participants Interventional2003-01-31Completed
AG-013736 (AXITINIB) FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC RENAL CELL CANCER[NCT00920816]Phase 3492 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-25Completed
A Phase 2 Efficacy And Safety Study Of SU011248 Administered In A Continuous Daily Regimen In Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00137423]Phase 2107 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Phase 3b, Randomized, Open-Label Study Of Bevacizumab + Temsirolimus Vs. Bevacizumab + Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Treatment In Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00631371]Phase 3791 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
AXITINIB (AG-013736) AS SECOND LINE THERAPY FOR METASTATIC RENAL CELL CANCER: AXIS TRIAL[NCT00678392]Phase 3723 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-03Completed
A Phase II Efficacy And Safety Study Of Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) Administered In A Continuous Daily Regimen In Patients With Advanced (First-Line) Renal Cell Cancer[NCT00338884]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Randomized Trial Of Temsirolimus Versus Sorafenib As Second-Line Therapy In Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Failed First-Line Sunitinib Therapy[NCT00474786]Phase 3512 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Sunitinib Malate Schedule 4/2 vs. Sunitinib Malate Continuous Dosing As First-Line Therapy For Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer (Renal EFFECT Trial)[NCT00267748]Phase 2317 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Pivotal Study Of SU011248 In The Treatment Of Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00077974]Phase 2106 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized Study Of SU011248 Versus Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Systemic Therapy For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00083889]Phase 3750 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
A Phase 3, Three-Arm, Randomized, Open-Label Study Of Interferon Alfa Alone, CCI-779 Alone, And The Combination Of Interferon Alfa And CCI-779 In First-Line Poor-Prognosis Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.[NCT00065468]Phase 3626 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
An Open-label, Prospective Study of Tumor Response Time of Palbociclib in Combination With AI in Real-world First-line Treatment of Postmenopausal Chinese Patients With ER (+) HER2 (-) Metastatic Breast Cancer[NCT04858997]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-22Recruiting
Molecular Epidemiology of Lung Adenocarcinoma in Multi-ethnic Asian Phenotype[NCT01774526]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-12-31Recruiting
Phase I Study of Continuous Dosing of Sunitinib in Non GIST Sarcomas With Concomitant Radiotherapy[NCT01308034]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of Salvage Therapy With Sunitinib,Docetaxel and Platinum on Metastatic or Unresectable Non Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT01019798]Phase 216 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Recruiting
A Phase II Multicenter Uncontrolled Trial of BAY43-9006 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma[NCT00101413]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Phase III Randomized Study of BAY43-9006 in Patients With Unresectable and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.[NCT00073307]Phase 3903 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
An Open-label, Dose-finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMG 706 With Carboplatin/Paclitaxel, AMG 706 With Panitumumab and AMG 706 With Panitumumab and Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced Non-Smal[NCT00094835]Phase 1/Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Sequential Stereotactic Radiotherapy With S1 Combined With Endostar in the Treatment of Stage IV Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Prospective, Multicenter, Exploratory Study[NCT04274270]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Plus or Minus Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) in Chemonaive Patients With Stage IIIB-IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)[NCT00300885]Phase 3926 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated (stopped due to Based on the results of the interim analysis, it was determined that the study would not meet its primary efficacy endpoint and the study was terminated early.)
Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) Program of British Columbia: Connecting Cancer Genomics to Cancer Care[NCT02155621]5,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-07-31Recruiting
Canadian Atezolizumab Precision Targeting for Immunotherapy Intervention[NCT04273061]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-17Recruiting
Phase II Study of Bay 43-9006 (Sorafenib) With Evaluation of RAS Signal Pathway in Patients With Relapsed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00098254]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Tarceva With or Without Apatinib in the First-line Therapy of Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma With Mutant EGFR:a Phase II Study.[NCT02704767]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial of Sorafenib and Erlotinib or Erlotinib Alone in Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00600015]Phase 2166 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Sorafenib to Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Placebo in First-Line Treatment of Patients With Stage IIIb With Effusion and Stage IV Non-Small Ce[NCT00449033]Phase 3904 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
A Dyad-based Multiple Behavior Intervention for Reducing Lung Cancer Symptoms - a Pilot Randomized Control Trial (Breathe Easier II)[NCT05956782]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-15Recruiting
A Phase II Study of BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) in Metastatic, Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer[NCT00090545]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-01Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Overall Response Rate

The Number of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00609804)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sorafenib+Erlotinib2
Sorafenib1

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Worsening of Their Disease. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00609804)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sorafenib+Erlotinib3.1
Sorafenib1.9

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

Defined as the number of participants with treatment-emergent grade 3/4 adverse events utilizing the National Cancer Institute Common Technology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0 (NCT00609804)
Timeframe: 18 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AnemiaFatigueDiarrheaDehydrationRash/DesquamationHand-foot skin reactionDyspneaHyponatremiaHyperglycemiaLipase increasedAnorexiaAtrial FibrillationCognitive DisturbanceConfusionCongestive Heart FailureConstipationDysphagiaExtremity - upper (function)HypertensionCardiac Ischemia/InfarctionHypokalemiaHypoxiaIleusInfection - PneumoniaInfection - WoundMalaiseNauseaObstruction, GIPain - abdomenPain - chestPain - musculoskeletalPerforation, GIVomitingDizzinessInfection - urinary tract NOSNeuropathy - cranialPain - backPain - head/headacheCOPD exacerbationOcular surgeryPersonality changeRespiratory failurePulmonary embolism
Sorafenib0202221310200101001020000020128011212111000
Sorafenib and Erlotinib1443323222111111111111131111121110000000111

Objective Response (Confirmed and Unconfirmed, Complete and Partial Responses Per RECIST)

Complete Response (CR) is a complete disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease. No new lesions, no disease related symptoms. Normalization of markers and other abnormal lab values. Partial Response (PR) is greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease. No new lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR means a repeat scan at least 4 weeks apart documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration. (NCT00182689)
Timeframe: 8 weeks to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Platinum-Sensitive11
Platinum-Refractory2

Overall Survival

Measured from time of registration to death, or last contact date (NCT00182689)
Timeframe: 0 - 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Platinum-Sensitive6.7
Platinum-Refractory5.3

Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug

Adverse Events (AEs) are reported by the CTCAE (NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) Version 3.0. For each patient, worst grade of each event type is reported. Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, Grade 5 = Fatal. (NCT00182689)
Timeframe: Patients were assessed for adverse events after completion of every 28-day cycle.

,
InterventionParticipants with a given type of AE (Number)
AST, SGOTAllergic reaction/hypersensitivityAnorexiaAtaxia (incoordination)Bilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia)ConfusionDehydrationDiarrheaDizzinessDyspnea (shortness of breath)Fatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise)Fever in absence of neutropenia, ANC lt1.0x10e9/LHemoglobinHypertensionINR (of prothrombin time)Inf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - SkinInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - UTILipaseMuscle weakness, not d/t neuropathy - body/generalNauseaNeuropathy: sensoryPTT (Partial thromboplastin time)Pain - Abdomen NOSPain - Extremity-limbPain - JointPain-Other (Specify)PancreatitisPhosphate, serum-low (hypophosphatemia)Pleural effusion (non-malignant)Pneumonitis/pulmonary infiltratesPotassium, serum-low (hypokalemia)Rash/desquamationRash: acne/acneiformRash: erythema multiformeRash: hand-foot skin reactionSodium, serum-low (hyponatremia)Speech impairment (e.g., dysphasia or aphasia)Syncope (fainting)VomitingWeight loss
Platinum Refractory0111122200311000111101211111100201821011
Platinum Sensitive1020010013500311000110101101011120910100

Overall Survival

Estimated to within at least 15% (95% confidence interval). (NCT00828139)
Timeframe: Weekly, up to 2 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Platinum-Sensitive Treated With Topotecan and Ziv-aflibercept6.0
Platinum Sensitivity Treated With Topotecan Alone4.6
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan + Ziv-aflibercept4.6
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan Aloine4.2

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"From the date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause.~Progression is defined as 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease during therapy) using the same techniques as baseline. Unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease in the opinion of the treating physician (an explanation must be provided). Appearance of any new lesion/site. Death due to disease without prior documentation of progression and without symptomatic deterioration." (NCT00828139)
Timeframe: Disease assessments were performed every 6 weeks, up to 2 years.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Platinum-Sensitive Treated With Topotecan and Ziv-aflibercept1.8
Platinum Sensitivity Treated With Topotecan Alone1.3
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan + Ziv-aflibercept1.4
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan Aloine1.4

Response Rate (Confirmed and Unconfirmed, Complete and Partial Responses)

"The number of confirmed and unconfirmed complete and partial responses in the subset of patients with measurable disease per RECIST 1.0. Estimated to within at least 17% (95% confidence interval).~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT00828139)
Timeframe: Disease assessment for response were performed every 6 weeks, up to 2 years.

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Platinum-Sensitive Treated With Topotecan and Ziv-aflibercept0.02
Platinum Sensitivity Treated With Topotecan Alone0
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan + Ziv-aflibercept0.02
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan Aloine0

Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drugs

Adverse Events (AEs) are reported by CTCAE Version 3.0. Only adverse events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported. The events listed here are not necessary to be included in Serious Adverse Event. A serious event could be death, life-threatening, hospitalization, disability or permanent damage, congenital anomaly...Grade 3 through 5 adverse event may not meet the criterion of serious adverse event. (NCT00828139)
Timeframe: Toxicity assessment was evaluated after each cycle (21 days), up to 2 years.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
AST, SGOTAnorexiaBilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia)Bronchospasm, wheezingCalcium, serum-high (hypercalcemia)Cardiac-ischemia/infarctionColitis, infectious (e.g., Clostridium difficile)ConfusionConstipationCreatinineDehydrationDiarrheaDizzinessDyspnea (shortness of breath)Fatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise)Febrile neutropeniaGGT (gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase)HemoglobinHemolysisHemorrhage, GI - Upper GI NOSHemorrhage, pulmo/upper resp- Bronchopulmonary NOSHemorrhage, pulmonary/upper respiratory - LungHemorrhage, pulmonary/upper respiratory - NoseHypertensionINR (of prothrombin time)Inf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - ColonInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - LungInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - BronchusInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - LungInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - UTIInfection with unknown ANC - BloodInfection with unknown ANC - Lung (pneumonia)Left ventricular systolic dysfunctionLeukocytes (total WBC)Leukoencephalopathy (radiolographic findings)LipaseLymphopeniaMucositis/stomatitis (clinical exam) - Oral cavityMuscle weakness, not d/t neuropathy - body/generalNauseaNeutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)Pain - Abdomen NOSPain - Chest wallPain - Head/headachePain - Pain NOSPlateletsPneumonitis/pulmonary infiltratesPotassium, serum-high (hyperkalemia)Potassium, serum-low (hypokalemia)ProteinuriaPsychosis (hallucinations/delusions)Renal failureSeizureSodium, serum-high (hypernatremia)Sodium, serum-low (hyponatremia)Syndromes-Other (Specify)Thrombosis/thrombus/embolismVoice changes/dysarthriaVomitingWeight loss
Topotecan2201000011101130071000000010012002200130112300001711101201100000
Ziv-aflibercept + Topotecan1310111300612715119121123110110011171151343031212900310010612121

Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Axitinib

Clearance (CL) of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed (F). Clearance is defined as the volume of blood from which drug can be completely removed per unit of time. CL/F for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

InterventionL/hr (Geometric Mean)
Active Titration Arm54.15
Placebo Titration Arm61.93

Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Elimination Phase (Vz/F) for Axitinib

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Vz/F is influenced by the fraction absorbed. Vz/F for steady-state axitinb was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Active Titration Arm158.18
Placebo Titration Arm216.62

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours[AUC(0-24)] for Axitinib

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero 24 hours[AUC(0-24). AUC(0-24) for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

Interventionng.hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Active Titration Arm258.68
Placebo Titration Arm161.38

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Axitinib

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measurable concentration (AUClast). AUClast for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

Interventionng.hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Active Titration Arm105.33
Placebo Titration Arm78.44

Duration of Response (DR)

DR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (complete response - CR or Partial response - PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median values were estimated based on Kaplan-Meier method. 95% confidence interval was based on the Brookmeyer and Crowley method. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Active Titration ArmNA
Placebo Titration Arm21.2
Non-randomized Arm23.3

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Axitinib

Cmax for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 15 (C2D15): pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Active Titration Arm31.74
Placebo Titration Arm23.05

Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

ORR was defined as the proportion of participants with objective response based assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. No new lesions. PR was defined as >=30% decrease on study under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Active Titration Arm53.6
Placebo Titration Arm33.9
Non-randomized Arm59.3
All Participants48.4

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from date of the first dose of the study medication to date of death due to any cause. For participants who did not die, their survival times were to be censored at the last date they were known to be alive. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Active Titration Arm (FA Population)42.7
Placebo Titration Arm (FA Population)30.4
Non-randomized Arm (SA Population)41.6

Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) for Axitinib

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Plasma decay half life for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

Interventionhr (Mean)
Active Titration Arm2.48
Placebo Titration Arm2.81

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The time from first dose administration to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. PFS in each arm was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimates of the PFS curves from the Kaplan-Meier method were presented. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Active Titration Arm14.5
Placebo Titration Arm15.7
Non-randomized Arm16.6
All Participants14.6

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Axitinib,

Tmax for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

Interventionhrs (Median)
Active Titration Arm2.04
Placebo Titration Arm2.00

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Value at respective visit minus value at baseline. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At screening (D-14 to D-1); lead-in period: Cycle 1 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 2 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 3 & subsequent cycles Day 1; end of study and follow-up 28 days after last dose.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=52,51,73)Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=56,56,91)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=56,56,91)Cycle 2 Day 15 (n=55,55,86)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=48,49,84)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=45,48,79)End of treatment (n=35,44,51)Follow-up (n=16,25,36)
Active Titration Arm-1.64.84.25.56.67.40.6-4.5
Non-randomized Arm0.511.510.59.79.18.73.01.8
Placebo Titration Arm-2.63.03.54.45.94.63.5-1.3

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure

Value at respective visit minus value at baseline (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At screening (D-14 to D-1); lead-in period: Cycle 1 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 2 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 3 & subsequent cycles Day 1; end of study and follow-up 28 days after last dose.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=52,51,73)Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=56,56,91)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=56,56,91)Cycle 2 Day 15 (n=55,55,86)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=48,49,84)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=45,48,79)End of treatment (n=35,44,51)Follow-up (n=16,25,36)
Active Titration Arm-4.33.81.93.63.54.32.4-3.6
Non-randomized Arm-1.811.59.95.95.25.5-2.8-0.6
Placebo Titration Arm-2.94.10.92.78.43.51.7-0.4

Circulating Endothelial Cells (CECs) in Blood: CD31+/CD146+

CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD31+/CD146+ CECs, CD31+/CD146+ MFI PDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ MFI pPDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ pVEGFR, CD31+/CD146+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)

,,
InterventionFluorescent Intensity Unit (FIU) (Mean)
Baseline CECs Count (n=17,22,20)Baseline MFI PDGFR-BETA (n=17,21,20)Baseline MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=17,21,20)Baseline MFI pVEGFR (n=17,22,20)Baseline MFI VEGFR (n=17,22,20)
Active Titration Arm74668333760380139385617330333
Non-randomized Arm77437442642383202380184359097
Placebo Titration Arm76258380886355441352644401909

Comparison of Circulating Endothelial Cells (CECs) in Blood: Cluster of Differentiation (CD)146+/CD105+ at Baseline

CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD146+/CD105+ CECs, CD146+/CD105+ mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ MFI phospho-PDGFR (pPDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ phospho-Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (pVEGFR), CD146+/CD105+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)

,,
InterventionFluorescent Intensity Unit (FIU) (Mean)
Baseline CECs Count (n=17,22,20)Baseline MFI PDGFR-BETA (n=17,22,20)Baseline MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=17,22,20)Baseline MFI pVEGFR (n=16,22,20)Baseline MFI VEGFR (n=16,22,20)
Active Titration Arm23584346815401226456086367799
Non-randomized Arm29663327567397672398754359092
Placebo Titration Arm28544455238395509436197473290

Comparison of Ratio of CECs in Blood: CD31+/CD146+ at Each Time Point to Baseline

CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD31+/CD146+ CECs, CD31+/CD146+ MFI PDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ MFI pPDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ pVEGFR, CD31+/CD146+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At end of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 15), Cycle 2 Day 15 and End of therapy (EOT)

,,
InterventionRatio (Mean)
C1D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=11,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=13,16,11)EOT:C1D1 CECs COUNT (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=11,15,13)C2D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=13,14,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=6,8,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=11,15,13)C2D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=13,14,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI pPDGFRBETA (n=6,8,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=11,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=13,16,10)EOT:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=11,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR n=13,16,10)EOT:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=7,9,4)
Active Titration Arm2.71.41.51.21.41.21.21.20.71.11.20.71.31.51.2
Non-randomized Arm1.52.50.60.82.21.71.01.13.01.21.33.11.02.11.5
Placebo Titration Arm1.62.21.41.31.10.61.40.80.81.40.91.11.31.21.1

Comparison of the Ratio of CECs in Blood: CD146+/CD105+ at Each Time Point to Baseline

CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD146+/CD105+ CECs, CD146+/CD105+ MFI platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ MFI phospho-PDGFR (pPDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ phospho-VEGFR (pVEGFR), CD146+/CD105+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At end of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 15), Cycle 2 Day 15 and End of therapy (EOT)

,,
InterventionRatio (Mean)
C1D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=11,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=13,16,11)EOT:C1D1 CECs Count (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=11,17,13)C2D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=13,16,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=11,17,13)C2D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=13,16,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI pPDGFRBETA (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=10,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=12,16,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=10,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=12,16,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=7,9,4)
Active Titration Arm2.31.32.81.31.41.51.11.00.81.01.00.81.41.51.1
Non-randomized Arm2.21.31.21.12.21.21.01.21.91.21.23.01.02.11.9
Placebo Titration Arm3.74.48.91.51.10.61.20.80.81.20.91.31.31.30.7

ORR in Subgroups That Were Defined by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGFA) or Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 3 (VEGFR3) Polymorphisms

ORR, defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR according to RECIST, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFA or VEGFR3 polymorphisms. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/A (n = 7, 9, 14)VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/C (n = 22, 20, 41)VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: C/C (n = 14, 14, 24)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/G (n = 22, 23, 43)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/A (n = 19, 16, 29)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: A/A (n = 2, 4, 7)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/G (n = 16, 15, 28)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/C (n = 22, 22, 35)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: C/C (n = 5, 6, 16)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/A (n = 36, 39, 79)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/G (n = 6, 4, 9)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: G/G (n = 1, 0, 0)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/G (n = 36, 38, 79)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/T (n = 6, 5, 10)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: T/T (n = 1, 0, 0)
Active Titration Arm85.754.550.059.157.950.081.345.540.058.350.0100.055.666.7100.0
Non-randomized Arm42.965.966.767.458.642.960.757.175.064.344.4065.240.00
Placebo Titration Arm22.235.035.739.118.850.053.318.233.330.850.0028.960.00

PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGFA) or Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 3 (VEGFR3) Polymorphisms

PFS, defined as the time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFA or VEGFR3 polymorphisms. Estimates of the PFS curves from the Kaplan-Meier method were presented. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)

,,
InterventionMonths (Median)
VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/A (n = 7, 9, 14)VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/C (n = 22, 20, 41)VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: C/C (n = 14, 14, 41)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/G (n = 22, 23, 43)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/A (n = 19, 16, 29)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: A/A (n = 2, 4, 29)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/G (n = 16, 15, 28)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/C (n = 22, 22, 35)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: C/C (n = 5, 6, 16)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/A (n = 36, 39, 70)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/G (n = 6, 4, 9)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: G/G (n = 0, 0, 0)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/G (n = 36, 38, 69)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/T (n = 36, 38, 10)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: T/T (n = 1, 0, 0)
Active Titration ArmNA11.0718.7414.6212.78NA17.449.1811.0713.7316.52NA12.7824.80NA
Non-randomized Arm7.3316.5925.1325.1313.908.5722.5413.83NA16.5616.26NA16.5913.86NA
Placebo Titration Arm11.509.6724.6419.428.3410.0419.428.3115.6715.677.93NA15.678.34NA

Duration of Response (DR): First-Line Participants

Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response that is subsequently confirmed to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (First-line Participants)14.7
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)14.3

Duration of Response (DR): Second-Line Participants

Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response that is subsequently confirmed to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)NA
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)8.7

Overall Survival (OS): First-Line Participants

Time in months from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (First-line Participants)NA
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)NA

Overall Survival (OS): Second-Line Participants

Time in months from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)17.2
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)18.1

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR): First-Line Participants

Percentage of participants with OR based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Axitinib (First-line Participants)32.3
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)14.6

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR): Second-Line Participants

Percentage of participants with OR based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)23.7
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)10.1

Progression Free Survival (PFS): First-Line Participants

"Time in months from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS calculated as (first event date minus date of randomization plus 1)/30.4. Tumor progression determined from oncologic assessment data (where it meets criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where outcome was Death). Progression using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is >= 20 percent (%) increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (First-line Participants)10.1
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)6.5

Progression Free Survival (PFS): Second-Line Participants

"Time in months from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS calculated as (first event date minus date of randomization plus 1)/30.4. Tumor progression determined from oncologic assessment data (where it meets criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where outcome was Death). Progression using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is >= 20 percent (%) increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)6.5
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)4.8

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Index Score: First-Line Participants

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1C22 D1C23 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (First-line Participants)0.7100.7090.6940.6960.7080.6830.6850.6780.7040.6820.6980.7080.7080.7030.6890.7020.7060.6990.7130.6990.7120.7370.7360.6350.545
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)0.7120.6930.6870.6680.6730.6410.6760.7170.7290.7230.7480.7420.7610.7310.7550.7750.7380.7770.7620.7100.7020.7740.7890.5880.618

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Index Score: Second-Line Participants

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)0.8120.7690.7720.7370.7800.7670.7620.7580.7960.7680.7920.7970.7860.8330.8190.8110.8340.8300.8300.8320.8590.5820.429
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)0.8310.7540.7550.7590.7680.7530.7680.7330.7940.8200.8480.8370.8140.8710.8290.8280.8650.8290.8610.9230.8520.6230.418

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS): First-Line Participants

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0: worst imaginable health state to 100: best imaginable health state; higher scores indicate a better health state. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1C22 D1C23 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (First-line Participants)71.18171.71472.00672.17972.45171.57471.05071.03172.69072.91072.76373.61073.03073.14774.49473.87873.09073.81772.08974.24475.69478.00077.14367.25469.195
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)72.36272.42271.24172.08673.61569.94473.92373.18373.78072.40072.27175.29575.43275.10874.40575.81874.33375.57175.12574.19070.50073.91772.57167.04864.885

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Second-Line Participants

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0: worst imaginable health state to 100: best imaginable health state; higher scores indicate a better health state. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)82.79981.10280.89581.13883.01882.22282.90083.38284.17183.04184.13684.30582.92786.52085.84187.57988.42486.58689.50090.33390.31375.56858.154
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)82.05878.23180.53481.24580.25080.82980.86881.00083.78882.77883.00083.50083.30086.66786.46286.08384.30083.12582.14386.00084.16774.74164.333

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index -Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS): First-Line Participants

FKSI-DRS: subset of FKSI which is FACT-Kidney Symptom Index questionnaire used to assess QoL for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. FKSI contains 15 questions and FKSI-DRS 9 questions (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, hematuria) each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FKSI-DRS total score 0 to 36; higher scores associated with better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1 (C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1C22 D1C23 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (First-line Participants)28.69128.72829.17128.57729.02028.57428.56828.55728.81729.05729.14629.64829.54529.57929.85929.68329.56429.38029.73729.84430.88931.69631.35726.55626.805
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)29.65329.96329.75029.64230.25529.15329.52330.29630.18630.36430.68830.72731.48331.02730.73031.51531.56731.10731.41730.76230.05631.00031.14326.78626.769

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index -Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS): Second-Line Participants

FKSI-DRS: subset of FKSI which is FACT-Kidney Symptom Index questionnaire used to assess QoL for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. FKSI contains 15 questions and FKSI-DRS 9 questions (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, hematuria) each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FKSI-DRS total score 0 to 36; higher scores associated with better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)31.02030.60030.64530.10330.67630.73130.92030.96631.01230.98631.21231.35631.41832.10032.00031.92132.06131.93132.36431.90533.12528.21624.692
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)31.48930.68230.96530.67931.06331.43930.63230.70330.66730.92632.04532.00032.10032.80032.76933.16732.80032.62532.42933.50033.50029.51927.500

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-15 (FKSI-15): First-Line Participants

FKSI-15 questionnaires (lack of energy, side effects, pain, weight loss, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria, sleep) was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer. Questions answered on 5-point Likert scale: 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score 0 to 60; higher scores=better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1C22 D1C23 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (First-line Participants)43.86943.32843.36642.93243.21142.78742.47442.53442.77843.12043.26443.96244.14143.78944.17644.23243.89743.76143.73743.73345.41747.00047.57139.05239.683
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)43.86543.96943.34542.92644.02242.34443.44644.07744.05144.01845.00045.31845.78745.45945.51446.00046.40045.35745.58344.33343.50045.83345.71439.52440.038

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-15 (FKSI-15): Second-Line Participants

FKSI-15 questionnaires (lack of energy, side effects, pain, weight loss, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria, sleep) was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer. Questions answered on 5-point Likert scale: 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score 0 to 60; higher scores=better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)46.75346.21745.96845.06045.77545.40745.70945.16945.82945.60845.83345.79746.72747.74048.02348.18447.90948.13848.63648.81050.18841.43235.385
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)47.47045.04545.68445.79246.12546.34145.05345.67645.97046.14847.22748.09147.60049.13349.30850.50049.00049.12548.57150.50050.00042.88938.583

Duration of Tumor Response

Using RECIST criteria: date of 1st objective tumor response (CR or PR) subsequently confirmed to date of 1st objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause within 28 days after last dose of study medication, whichever was first. Censored on day after the date of the last oncologic assessment documenting no tumor progression. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up

Interventionweeks (Median)
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)24.0
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)32.0

Objective Response (Complete Response[CR] + Partial Response[PR]) in Subjects

Confirmed objective responses using RECIST criteria defined as responses persisting on repeat imaging study for 2 assessments with at least 4 weeks between, and evaluating all target and non-target sites followed since baseline. Two PRs separated by an SD or NE visit in between was considered a confirmed response if the 2 PRs were > 4 weeks apart. CR=disappearance of all target lesions. PR is a >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)15
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)6

Overall Survival

Overall survival is time from the date of first dose of medication to the date of death due to any cause (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up

Interventionweeks (Median)
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)91.4
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)76.4

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Using RECIST criteria: Time from date 1st dose study medication to date 1st documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause occurring on treatment including within 28 days after last dose, whichever occurred 1st. Censored on day following the date of last oncologic assessment documenting absence of tumor progression. PFS based on the number of subjects with measurable disease at baseline, the correct histological cancer type, and had disease that was refractory to prior cytokine-based therapy(105 in total group). (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up

Interventionweeks (Median)
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)35.7
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)35.3

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

Time from date of first dose of study medication to date of first documentation of objective tumor progression using RECIST criteria that occurred on treatment including within 28 days after the last dose of study medication. TTP censored on the day following the date of last oncologic assessment documenting absence of tumor progression. TTP based on the number of subjects with measurable disease at baseline, the correct histological cancer type, and had disease that was refractory to prior cytokine-based therapy(105 in total group). (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up

Interventionweeks (Median)
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)35.7
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)35.9

Change From Baseline in Euro-QoL Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Weighted Health Index

EQ-5D health status in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, pain / discomfort, anxiety / depression, usual activities) with a weighted health index based on general population values where 0.0=death and 1.0 = perfect health. Change: median index score at observation minus median index score at baseline. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.

,
Interventionscore on scale (Median)
Maximum IncreaseMaximum Decrease
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)0.00.0
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)0.0-0.1

Change From Baseline in EuroQoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) Overall Health Thermometer Score

"EQ-VAS score on the self-rated thermometer indicated the patient's own assessment of their health status from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) imaginable health state. Change: median score at observation minus median score at baseline. Maximum changes (increase or decrease from baseline)." (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.

,
Interventionscore on scale (Median)
Maximum IncreaseMaximum Decrease
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)0.0-10.0
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)0.0-9.0

Summary of FACIT Fatigue Scale Overall Score

FACIT Fatigue Scale: Overall score from 13-questionnaire, which measures fatigue / asthenia for patients with chronic, life-threatening illnesses. For each question, a patient rates his / her condition for the past week on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores always represent less fatigue / asthenia. Outcome based on completed questionnaires. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.

,
Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Baseline Score n=52,52Maximum Post-Baseline Score n=53,52Minimum Post-Baseline Score n=53,52
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate39.543.428.0
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate39.642.729.4

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censored at the last date known alive. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until death due to any cause, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus25.8
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa25.5

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Complete Response/Partial Response): Independent-Assessment

Percentage of participants with OR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30% decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus27.0
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa27.4

Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Independent-Assessment

PFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization until the earlier date of progression or death. Progression was assessed by independent imaging reviewers using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria which is 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions from nadir (the lowest blood counts); measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus9.1
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa9.3

Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Investigator-Assessment

PFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization until the earlier date of progression or death. Progression was assessed by investigator imaging reviewers using RECIST criteria which is 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions from nadir (the lowest blood counts); measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus9.1
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa10.8

Duration of Response (DR)

DR: time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR), that was subsequently confirmed, to the first documentation of PD or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first as per RECIST version 1.0, a) CR: disappearance of all target, non target lesions and no appearance of new lesions, documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks, b) PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum of LD, without progression of non target lesions, no appearance of new lesions, c) PD: >=20% increase in sum of LD of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of pleural effusion or ascites if demonstrated by cytological investigation, not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib 5 mg11.0
Sorafenib 400 mg10.6

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR = percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.0 recorded from first dose of study treatment until PD or death due to any cause. CR: disappearance of all target, non target lesions and no appearance of new lesions, documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks. PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum of LD, without progression of non target lesions, no appearance of new lesions. PD: >=20% increase in sum of LD of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of pleural effusion or ascites if demonstrated by cytological investigation, not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Axitinib 5 mg19.4
Sorafenib 400 mg9.4

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the duration from start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (months) = (date of death minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.4. For participants who were alive, overall survival was censored on last date the participants were known to be alive. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib 5 mg20.1
Sorafenib 400 mg19.2

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time in months from start of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor progression of disease (PD) or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. PD: >=20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest dimensions (LD) of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of a pleural effusion or ascites was also considered PD if demonstrated by cytological investigation and it was not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented were considered PD if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib 5 mg6.7
Sorafenib 400 mg4.7

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D): Health State Profile Utility Score

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility or index score. Health state profile component assesses level of health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain was rated on a 3-point response scale (1= no problems, 2= some/moderate problems and 3= extreme problems). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigned a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score were transformed and resulted in a total score range of 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n =347, 341)Cycle 2/Day1 (n =326, 307)Cycle 3/Day1 (n =287, 248)Cycle 4/Day1 (n =262, 226)Cycle 5/Day1 (n =244, 207)Cycle 6/Day1 (n =221, 178)Cycle 7/Day1 (n =213, 163)Cycle 8/Day1 (n =181, 136)Cycle 9/Day1 (n =169, 120)Cycle 10/Day1 (n =151, 98)Cycle 11/Day1 (n =126, 87)Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 73)Cycle 13/Day1 (n =96, 61)Cycle 14/Day1 (n =80, 57)Cycle 15/Day1 (n =63, 41)Cycle 16/Day1 (n =54, 37)Cycle 17/Day1 (n =48, 29)Cycle 18/Day1 (n =37, 20)Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14)Cycle 20/Day1 (n =21, 12)Cycle 21/Day1 (n =16, 7)End of Treatment (n =169, 196)Follow up (n =76, 106)
Axitinib 5 mg0.7320.7160.7220.7300.7300.7340.7180.7560.7600.7340.7640.7440.7600.7230.7300.7490.7790.7550.7340.7940.7000.6080.682
Sorafenib 400 mg0.7310.6960.7090.7160.7110.7040.7280.7020.7300.7300.7240.7340.7530.7520.7580.7850.7640.7550.8040.7710.7710.6120.666

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D): Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. VAS component: participants rated their current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n =341, 339)Cycle 2/Day1 (n =317, 302)Cycle 3/Day1 (n =280, 250)Cycle 4/Day1 (n =261, 224)Cycle 5/Day1 (n =244, 205)Cycle 6/Day1 (n =220, 178)Cycle 7/Day1 (n =209, 163)Cycle 8/Day1 (n =180, 139)Cycle 9/Day1 (n =168, 121)Cycle 10/Day1 (n =151, 98)Cycle 11/Day1 (n =126, 87)Cycle 12/Day1 (n =111, 73)Cycle 13/Day1 (n =94, 61)Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 58)Cycle 15/Day1 (n =62, 42)Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 37)Cycle 17/Day1 (n =48, 30)Cycle 18/Day1 (n =37, 23)Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14)Cycle 20/Day1 (n =21, 12)Cycle 21/Day1 (n =16, 7)End of Treatment (n =166, 197)Follow up (n =76, 109)
Axitinib 5 mg70.56069.00369.84369.18069.70569.90069.91970.75670.66770.62972.10371.73070.72369.42073.01670.26971.37570.45971.03473.14374.56361.75964.382
Sorafenib 400 mg70.35167.60669.71270.75971.88871.36572.28271.47573.38075.10274.58673.95975.69375.36275.35773.67673.76773.87070.57166.91764.71461.69066.037

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-15 (FKSI-15) Score

FKSI was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer and consisted of 15 items (lack of energy, side effects, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria and sleep). Each of the 15 items was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score = sum of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (very much); higher scores indicate greater presence of symptoms. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n =346, 342)Cycle 2/Day1 (n =319, 296)Cycle 3/Day1 (n =279, 246)Cycle 4/Day1 (n =257, 221)Cycle 5/Day1 (n =238, 203)Cycle 6/Day1 (n =213, 179)Cycle 7/Day1 (n =206, 158)Cycle 8/Day1 (n =177, 136)Cycle 9/Day1 (n =163, 118)Cycle 10/Day1 (n =146, 96)Cycle 11/Day1 (n =122, 85)Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 70)Cycle 13/Day1 (n =92, 58)Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 54)Cycle 15/Day1 (n =61, 38)Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 34)Cycle 17/Day1 (n =47, 28)Cycle 18/Day1 (n =36, 22)Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14)Cycle 20/Day1 (n =20, 12)Cycle 21/Day1 (n =15, 7)End of treatment (n=163, 191)Follow up (n =80, 110)
Axitinib 5 mg43.19942.35142.59042.79142.96842.94942.74743.58043.19143.31244.11944.51744.49244.48545.29145.21745.24244.86145.37947.05045.85038.32841.919
Sorafenib 400 mg43.33941.66842.42443.42442.90743.05743.57844.07444.51844.77144.43844.35745.26144.89845.05344.44544.43844.18245.02644.78044.49438.45740.028

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Score

FKSI-DRS was used to assess quality of life for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer and consisted of 9 items (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, and hematuria). Each of the 9 items was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI-DRS score = sum of the 9 item scores; total range: 0 - 36; 0 (no symptoms) to 36 (very much); higher scores indicate greater presence of symptoms. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n =346, 341)Cycle 2/Day1 (n =319, 295)Cycle 3/Day1 (n =279, 244)Cycle 4/Day1 (n =257, 220)Cycle 5/Day1 (n =238, 202)Cycle 6/Day1 (n =213, 178)Cycle 7/Day1 (n =206, 157)Cycle 8/Day1 (n =177, 135)Cycle 9/Day1 (n =163, 117)Cycle 10/Day1 (n =146, 96)Cycle 11/Day1 (n =122, 85)Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 70)Cycle 13/Day1 (n =92, 58)Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 54)Cycle 15/Day1 (n =61, 38)Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 34)Cycle 17/Day1 (n =47, 28)Cycle 18/Day1 (n =36, 22)Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14)Cycle 20/Day1 (n =20, 12)Cycle 21/Day1 (n =15, 7)End of Treatment (n =163, 191)Follow up (n =80, 110)
Axitinib 5 mg28.87428.21128.64028.82228.86929.15929.04229.52029.19429.34329.76229.76429.59429.71130.32430.43030.55130.19430.13031.30031.06726.28828.263
Sorafenib 400 mg28.97528.39928.64029.13029.00729.09829.36129.61929.88429.60429.36629.25729.66629.82029.50029.47428.73729.04529.28629.25030.14326.51727.516

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Biochemistry

Biochemistry laboratory test included parameters: alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase, bicarbonate, bilirubin, creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia and lipase. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 1 (n =331, 313)Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 2 (n =331, 313)Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 3 (n =331, 313)Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 4 (n =331, 313)Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 1 (n =336, 319)Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 2 (n =336, 319)Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 3 (n =336, 319)Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 4 (n =336, 319)Amylase: Grade 1 (n =338, 319)Amylase: Grade 2 (n =338, 319)Amylase: Grade 3 (n =338, 319)Amylase: Grade 4 (n =338, 319)Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 1 (n =331, 311)Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 2 (n =331, 311)Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 3 (n =331, 311)Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 4 (n =331, 311)Bicarbonate: Grade 1 (n =314, 291)Bicarbonate: Grade 2 (n =314, 291)Bicarbonate: Grade 3 (n =314, 291)Bicarbonate: Grade 4 (n =314, 291)Bilirubin: Grade 1 (n =336, 318)Bilirubin: Grade 2 (n =336, 318)Bilirubin: Grade 3 (n =336, 318)Bilirubin: Grade 4 (n =336, 318)Creatinine: Grade 1 (n =336, 318)Creatinine: Grade 2 (n =336, 318)Creatinine: Grade 3 (n =336, 318)Creatinine: Grade 4 (n =336, 318)Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319)Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319)Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319)Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319)Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319)Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319)Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319)Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319)Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 (n =333, 314)Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 (n =333, 314)Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 (n =333, 314)Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 (n =333, 314)Hypernatremia: Grade 1 (n =338, 319)Hypernatremia: Grade 2 (n =338, 319)Hypernatremia: Grade 3 (n =338, 319)Hypernatremia: Grade 4 (n =338, 319)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 (n =337, 319)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 (n =337, 319)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 (n =337, 319)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 (n =337, 319)Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319)Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319)Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319)Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319)Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319)Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319)Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319)Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319)Hypokalemia: Grade 1 (n =333, 314)Hypokalemia: Grade 2 (n =333, 314)Hypokalemia: Grade 3 (n =333, 314)Hypokalemia: Grade 4 (n =333, 314)Hyponatremia: Grade 1 (n =338, 319)Hyponatremia: Grade 2 (n =338, 319)Hyponatremia: Grade 3 (n =338, 319)Hyponatremia: Grade 4 (n =338, 319)Hypophosphatemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 318)Hypophosphatemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 318)Hypophosphatemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 318)Hypophosphatemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 318)Lipase: Grade 1 (n =338, 319)Lipase: Grade 2 (n =338, 319)Lipase: Grade 3 (n =338, 319)Lipase: Grade 4 (n =338, 319)
Axitinib 5 mg658108884064127059510127110116810155300092810414570042903419303711102542123121022000330111433605322142
Sorafenib 400 mg576239215307621616774011510001221012191022100283770022802314122531206718229161021050270618995107625407

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematology

Hematology laboratory test included hemoglobin, platelet count, white blood cells count, neutrophils and lymphocytes. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin: Grade 1 (n =320, 316)Hemoglobin: Grade 2 (n =320, 316)Hemoglobin: Grade 3 (n =320, 316)Hemoglobin: Grade 4 (n =320, 316)Lymphocytes: Grade 1 (n =317, 309)Lymphocytes: Grade 2 (n =317, 309)Lymphocytes: Grade 3 (n =317, 309)Lymphocytes: Grade 4 (n =317, 309)Neutrophils: Grade 1 (n =316, 308)Neutrophils: Grade 2 (n =316, 308)Neutrophils: Grade 3 (n =316, 308)Neutrophils: Grade 4 (n =316, 308)Platelets: Grade 1 (n =312, 310)Platelets: Grade 2 (n =312, 310)Platelets: Grade 3 (n =312, 310)Platelets: Grade 4 (n =312, 310)White Blood Cells: Grade 1 (n =320, 315)White Blood Cells: Grade 2 (n =320, 315)White Blood Cells: Grade 3 (n =320, 315)White Blood Cells: Grade 4 (n =320, 315)
Axitinib 5 mg931910789100134204701032400
Sorafenib 400 mg112411117931102042041300361210

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Urinalysis

Urinalysis included urine blood/ hemoglobin, glucose and protein. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 1 (n =304, 272)Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 2 (n =304, 272)Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 3 (n =304, 272)Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 4 (n =304, 272)Urine glucose: Grade 1 (n =322, 286)Urine glucose: Grade 2 (n =322, 286)Urine glucose: Grade 3 (n =322, 286)Urine glucose: Grade 4 (n =322, 286)Urine protein: Grade 1 (n =326, 289)Urine protein: Grade 2 (n =326, 289)Urine protein: Grade 3 (n =326, 289)Urine protein: Grade 4 (n =326, 289)
Axitinib 5 mg451001200110531279
Sorafenib 400 mg35000133019127217

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severity of the AEs was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe; Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5= death related to AE. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Axitinib 5 mg3.920.147.610.613.9
Sorafenib 400 mg3.121.752.411.59.3

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Axitinib 5 mg96.140.7
Sorafenib 400 mg98.035.8

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life -threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious and non -serious AEs. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Axitinib 5 mg92.215.3
Sorafenib 400 mg95.213.8

1-Year Survival

One year survival rate defined as the probability that a subject was alive 1 year after the date of first study treatment. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter up until 1 year

Interventionpercent chance of survival (Median)
Sunitinib67.8

Duration of Response (DR)

Time from start of the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. DR was calculated as [the end date for DR minus first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed +1]/7. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter or death due to any cause

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Sunitinib7.14

Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Objective Response (OR)

OR = subjects with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) persisting > = 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sunitinib41

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Time from start of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in months) was calculated as (first event date minus first dose date +1)/7. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter or death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sunitinib9.0

Soluble VEGF Receptor 2 (sVEGFR2) Concentration at Baseline

(NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Sunitinib9163.4

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

Time from date of first dose of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression. The 50% quartile point estimate is provided. The criteria for tumor progression was according to RECIST. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sunitinib10.0

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Concentration at Baseline

(NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionpicograms (pg)/mL (Mean)
Sunitinib154.8

Cancer Related Symptoms, Well-Being, and Concerns

FACT-Advanced Kidney Cancer Symptom Index (FKSI) Questionnaire: subscale designed to be a stand-alone instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced kidney cancer. Contains 15 questions. Each question was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Total FKSI score = sum score of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (most severe symptoms and concerns) to 60 (no symptoms or concerns). End of treatment assessment was for subjects who completed the study only. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Week 1), Day 1 of Weeks 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, Week 53 (End of Treatment)

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=109)Week 3 (n=104)Week 5 (n=101)Week 7 (n=97)Week 9 (n=88)Week 11 (n=84)Week 13 (n=81)Week 17 (n=72)Week 21 (n=63)Week 25 (n=55)Week 29 (n=55)Week 33 (n=50)Week 37 (n=47)Week 41 (n=45)Week 45 (n=37)Week 49 (n=36)Week 53 (End of Treatment) (n=35)
Sunitinib44.6843.6942.7143.6944.1143.2643.4944.2145.5145.4244.6444.0645.2344.7146.7345.9245.94

Ctrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)

Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111)Day 1, Week 3 (n=108)Day 1, Week 5 (n=106)Day 1, Week 7 (n=104)Day 1, Week 9 (n=97)Day 1, Week 13 (n=93)Day 1, Week 17 (n=82)Day 1, Week 21 (n=73)Day 1, Week 25 (n=70)Day 1, Week 29 (n=58)Day 1, Week 33 (n=58)Day 1, Week 37 (n=50)Day 1, Week 41 (n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (n=33)
Sunitinib2.6220.2720.2520.4121.1820.0119.7617.1317.3017.3816.5515.7116.5015.6116.5713.81

Ctrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)

Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111)Day 1, Week 3 (n=108)Day 1, Week 5 (n=106)Day 1, Week 7 (n=104)Day 1, Week 9 (n=97)Day 1, Week 13 (n=93)Day 1, Week 17 (n=82)Day 1, Week 21 (n=73)Day 1, Week 25 (n=70)Day 1, Week 29 (n=58)Day 1, Week 33 (n=58)Day 1, Week 37 (n=50)Day 1, Week 41 (n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (n=33)
Sunitinib9.7775.0465.8966.7668.7261.3161.4153.0953.6955.3950.2751.7449.8351.8253.0746.91

Ctrough Stratified by CR or PR Versus PD for SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00018.25016.65017.30015.10015.90014.30012.60014.50012.85012.80014.35014.00013.40014.70011.6000.00020.00018.80014.30016.5509.71012.60023.40029.40013.7004.360

Ctrough Stratified by CR or PR Versus PD for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU012662)

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00076.95065.90066.10065.15057.60055.66047.37050.70050.65046.00049.75043.36545.20049.97541.0000.00069.00064.70050.20055.85034.81040.80071.10052.10037.40013.880

Ctrough Stratified by CR or PR Versus Progressive Disease (PD) for Sunitinib

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00057.90045.00045.40046.25040.00041.35034.40034.20034.45033.00035.35030.90034.00036.25028.6000.00050.20045.60035.60039.05025.10028.20047.70022.70023.7009.520

Ctrough Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD) for SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00018.80017.30017.90018.70016.35014.60014.10014.95014.90014.05015.50015.40013.70014.70011.4500.00020.00018.80014.30016.5509.71012.60023.40029.40013.7004.360

Ctrough Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD) for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU012662)

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00075.00063.30066.40070.60057.60058.10049.86051.15053.50050.05050.80048.00050.50054.88542.1600.00069.00064.70050.20055.85034.81040.80071.10052.10037.40013.880

Ctrough Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [Stable Disease (SD) > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD) for Sunitinib

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00055.30044.60046.75049.50039.55042.30036.50035.50037.25034.40035.30033.20035.95037.25031.1000.00050.20045.60035.60039.05025.10028.20047.70022.70023.7009.520

Patient-Assessed Fatigue

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale: Overall score from 13-question questionnaire (measures fatigue/asthenia for patients with chronic, life-threatening illnesses). For each question, patient rates condition for the past week on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Total FACIT-Fatigue score = sum score of the 13 question scores; total range: 0 - 52; higher total score represents less fatigue. End of treatment assessment was for subjects who completed the study only. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Week 1), Day 1 of Weeks 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, Week 53 (End of Treatment)

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=118)Week 3 (n=113)Week 5 (n=110)Week 7 (n=106)Week 9 (n=97)Week 11 (n=93)Week 13 (n=90)Week 17 (n=80)Week 21 (n=71)Week 25 (n=62)Week 29 (n=60)Week 33 (n=55)Week 37 (n=52)Week 41 (n=50)Week 45 (n=42)Week 49 (n=41)Week 53 (End of Treatment) (n=40)
Sunitinib39.2936.9835.4436.5436.8235.9436.5837.4438.4238.0536.7736.0037.8836.9638.7139.3239.05

sVEGFR2 at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD)

Summary statistics of sVEGFR2 at baseline by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16)
Sunitinib9772.5008342.750

sVEGFR2 at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR Versus PD)

Summary statistics of sVEGFR2 at baseline by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR, n=40)Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16)
Sunitinib9968.0008342.750

sVEGFR2 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point

sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Mean)
Day 1, Week 3 (n=106)Day 1, Week 5 (n=104)Day 1, Week 7 (n=101)Day 1, Week 9 (n=95)Day 1, Week 13 (n=91)Day 1, Week 17 (n=79)Day 1, Week 21 (n=69)Day 1, Week 25 (n=68)Day 1, Week 29 (n=55)Day 1, Week 33 (n=55)Day 1, Week 37 (n=50)Day 1, Week 41 (n=48)Day 1, Week 45 (n=42)Day 1, Week 49 (n=38)Day 1, Week 53 (n=31)
Sunitinib0.70.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.7

sVEGFR2 Ratio to Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD)

Median sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 weeks] versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Median)
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=81)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=81)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=84)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=77)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=67)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=66)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=53)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=54)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=48)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=42)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=38)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=30)
Sunitinib0.6910.6530.6250.5310.5990.5740.5630.6030.5340.5290.5240.6870.5480.5400.5700.5090.5560.6710.5690.6100.5590.5720.5380.5690.638

sVEGFR2 Ratio to Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR Versus PD)

Median sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Median)
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=36)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=36)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=30)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=32)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=29)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=29)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=25)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=20)
Sunitinib0.7040.6530.6380.5310.5960.5740.5620.6030.5550.5290.5450.6870.5660.5400.5640.5090.5640.6710.5470.6100.5540.5610.5350.5550.630

Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Sunitinib

Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionnanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL) (Mean)
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111)Day 1, Week 3 (n=108)Day 1, Week 5 (n=106)Day 1, Week 7 (n=104)Day 1, Week 9 (n=97)Day 1, Week 13 (n=93)Day 1, Week 17 (n=82)Day 1, Week 21 (n=73)Day 1, Week 25 (n=70)Day 1, Week 29 (n=58)Day 1, Week 33 (n=58)Day 1, Week 37 (n=50)Day 1, Week 41 (n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (n=33)
Sunitinib7.1554.7845.6446.3547.5441.2941.6535.9536.3938.0133.7236.0433.3336.2036.4933.10

VEGF at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD)

Summary statistics of VEGF at baseline by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16)
Sunitinib86.400109.300

VEGF at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR Versus PD)

Summary statistics of VEGF at baseline by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR, n=39)Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16)
Sunitinib73.600109.300

VEGF Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point

VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Mean)
Day 1, Week 3 (n=108)Day 1, Week 5 (n=104)Day 1, Week 7 (n=101)Day 1, Week 9 (n=95)Day 1, Week 13 (n=91)Day 1, Week 17 (n=78)Day 1, Week 21 (n=70)Day 1, Week 25 (n=67)Day 1, Week 29 (n=55)Day 1, Week 33 (n=54)Day 1, Week 37 (n=49)Day 1, Week 41 (n=48)Day 1, Week 45 (n=41)Day 1, Week 49 (n=37)Day 1, Week 53 (n=30)
Sunitinib2.92.62.63.43.22.82.632.52.32.75.52.92.83.2

VEGF Ratio to Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD)

Median VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 weeks] versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Median)
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=81)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=84)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=76)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=68)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=65)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=53)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=53)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=48)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=48)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=41)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=37)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=29)
Sunitinib2.1271.9481.5742.4711.7981.4052.4811.1761.8903.9212.0700.9881.9721.5101.9061.4331.8311.9292.2001.0632.2011.8592.4842.3292.431

VEGF Ratio to Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR Versus PD)

Median VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Median)
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=36)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=36)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=35)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=30)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=31)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=27)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=24)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=19)
Sunitinib1.9991.9481.3832.4711.7611.4052.2151.1761.7533.9212.0120.9881.5231.5101.8091.4331.8051.9292.2481.0632.1791.8642.2402.7072.863

Duration of Response (DR)

Duration of response as defined by the time from CR or PR (whichever status recorded first) until the date of death or PD was objectively documented. Median and its 95 percent confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temsirolimus8.26
Sorafenib6.96

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was the duration from randomization to death. For participants who are alive, overall survival was censored at the last contact. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline to date of death from any cause (up to 24 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temsirolimus12.27
Sorafenib16.64

Percentage of Participants With Tumor Response

Percentage of participants with tumor response based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST and evaluated by independent central review. CR/PR persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. PR had at least 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Temsirolimus7.7
Sorafenib7.9

Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment

Interval from date of randomization until documentation of PD by an investigator tumor assessment, symptomatic deterioration, or death for any reason whichever occurred first. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temsirolimus5.43
Sorafenib4.14

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Interval from date of randomization until documentation of progressive disease (PD) by an independent tumor assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) or death for any reason whichever occurred first. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temsirolimus4.28
Sorafenib3.91

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Counts of participants who had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), defined as newly occurring or worsening after first dose. Relatedness to [study drug] was assessed by the investigator (Yes/No). Participants with multiple occurrences of an AE within a category were counted once within the category. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious AEAny AE
Sorafenib86251
Temsirolimus103248

Percentage of Participants With PFS Events at 12, 24 and 36 Weeks by Independent Assessment

PFS: Interval from date of randomization until documentation of PD by an independent tumor assessment according to RECIST or death for any reason whichever occurred first. PFS calculated as (Weeks)=(randomization date minus first dose date plus 1) divided by 7. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Weeks 12, 24, and 36

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline to Week 12Week 13 to Week 24Week 25 to Week 36
Sorafenib36.720.111.2
Temsirolimus31.220.912.3

Duration of Response (DR)

Time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.44. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)12.5
Sunitinib 37.5 mg8.7

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index for Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS)

"FKSI-DRS is a subset of FKSI which is a questionnaire for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy -Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer.~The FKSI contained 15 questions and the FKSI-DRS consisted of 9 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI-DRS ranged between 0-36. Since the questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FKSI-DRS, 0 and 36 could be considered the worst and best health states based on the 9 questions comprising FKSI-DRS." (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

InterventionUnits on scale (Mean)
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)28.3
Sunitinib 37.5 mg27.2

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)

FACT-G is core questionnaire of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in cancer population.FACT-G consisted of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general Health-Related QoL(HRQoL):Physical Well-being(PWB),Social/Family Well-Being (SWB),Emotional Well-Being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB);each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FACT-G ranged between 0-108.Since questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FACT-G,0 and 108 could be considered worst and best health states. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)78.0
Sunitinib 37.5 mg77.0

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR are defined as the disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR are those with atleast 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)32.2
Sunitinib 37.5 mg28.1

Overall Survival (OS) Assessed Using MSKCC Prognostic Factors Model

MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low (0), intermediate (1-2) or high (=>3) based upon number of criteria present. Criteria as follows: Karnofsky performance status < 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5 * Upper limit of Normal, Hemoglobin < lower limit of normal for local lab, Corrected serum calcium > 10 mg/dL; Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of < 1 year. OS was defined as time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS, in months, was calculated as (event date -start of treatment date + 1)/30.44. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
High Risk (equal or more than 3)Intermediate Risk (1-2)Low Risk (0)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg6.121.828.9
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)3.519.3NA

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) Assessed Using Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Prognostic Factors Model

MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low(0),intermediate(1-2) or high(=>3) based on number of criteria present such as Karnofsky performance status < 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5 * Upper limit of Normal,Hemoglobin < lower limit of normal, serum calcium > 10 mg/dL;Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of < 1 year.TTP was time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer.TTP was calculated as (first event date minus date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
Stratified analysis : High Risk (=>3)Stratified analysis : Intermediate Risk (1-2)Stratified analysis : Low Risk (0)Overall unstratified analysis
Sunitinib 37.5 mg4.47.18.47.1
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)3.18.020.79.9

Duration of Response (DR)

"Time in weeks from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cancer. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 7.~DR was calculated for the subgroup of patients with a confirmed objective tumor response." (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter or death due to cancer

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib Malate60.4

Number of Subjects With Confirmed Objective Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST)

Overall confirmed objective response = confirmed Complete Response (CR) or confirmed Partial Response (PR) according to RECIST. CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR defined as >= 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sunitinib Malate35

Overall Survival (OS)

Time in weeks from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the subject current status was death). (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until death

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib Malate104.1

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"Time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where the outcome was Death)." (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter or death

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib Malate38.0

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

Time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer, whichever comes first. TTP was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]). (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib Malate46.3

Dose Corrected Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib

Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib. Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3)
Sunitinib Malate53.6455.9469.4464.331.942.152.042.322.072.683.421.942.232.411.582.422.233.051.925.093.413.914.533.823.144.092.122.974.021.36

Dose Corrected Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib Metabolite

Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib metabolite (SU012662). Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3)
Sunitinib Malate31.8528.1540.5338.042.993.353.113.373.453.614.373.243.683.542.803.402.552.592.934.533.975.314.263.623.004.492.362.943.321.18

Dose Corrected Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib Plus Metabolite

Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib plus its metabolite (SU012662). Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3)
Sunitinib Malate85.4984.09109.97102.374.935.505.155.695.526.297.785.195.915.954.395.824.785.644.859.637.389.238.797.446.138.584.485.907.342.54

Observed Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib

Observed plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4)
Sunitinib Malate46.8250.1349.3653.181.551.441.511.601.601.692.051.721.741.601.561.461.422.201.342.962.532.183.142.751.992.461.201.752.931.02

Observed Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib Metabolite

Observed plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib metabolite (SU012662) (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4)
Sunitinib Malate26.4428.2128.3228.542.502.642.642.662.812.542.782.672.772.492.512.301.832.162.062.923.133.243.102.641.992.601.361.812.431.10

Observed Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib Plus Metabolite

Observed plasma trough (predose) concentrations of sunitinib plus its metabolite (SU012662) (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4)
Sunitinib Malate73.2678.3477.6881.714.044.084.154.264.414.234.834.394.524.094.073.753.254.353.405.885.665.436.245.393.975.062.553.565.362.13

Percent Chance of Patient Survival

Probability of survival 1 year and 2 years after the first dose of study treatment (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until death

Interventionpercent chance of survival (Number)
1 year2 years
Sunitinib Malate67.250.2

Duration of Response (DR), Core Radiology Assessement

Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each cycle: duraton of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124852.9
IFN-α64.9

Duration of Response (DR), Investigator's Assessment

Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentaion of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124856.3
IFN-α48.1

Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)

Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of sunitinib compared to IFN-a as first-line treatment for MRCC, defined as the ratio of the incremental cost of treatment over the incremental effectiveness; effectiveness measured as quality adjusted life year (QALY) gain. This objective was not addressed in the clinical study report, but an interim analysis of cost-effectiveness was presented separately. These results were not available for inclusion at the time of this posting. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: post study measurement

Interventionratio (Number)
SU0112480
IFN-α0

Objective Response, Core Radiology Assessment

Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses (CR or PR) = those that persisted on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionparticipants (Number)
SU011248145
IFN-α29

Objective Response, Investigator's Assessment

Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses = those that persist on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionparticipants (Number)
SU011248171
IFN-α45

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) = time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For patients not expiring, survival time was censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Patients lacking data beyond randomization had their survival times censored at the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Clinic visit or telephone contact every 2 months until death

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU011248114.6
IFN-α94.9

Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Core Radiology Assessment

Progression-free survival (PFS) = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1. On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124848.3
IFN-α22.1

Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Investigator's Assessment

Progression-free survival = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1). On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124847.7
IFN-α22.1

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Core Radiology Assessment

TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124849.1
IFN-α22.4

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Investigator's Assessment

TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than the study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124849.0
IFN-α22.3

Ctrough Concentrations of Metabolite SU012662

Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of active metabolite SU012662 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=26)
SU01266227.1027.3526.1122.1128.2128.3229.0425.99

Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248

Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of SU011248 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=26)
SU01124857.2657.5950.2645.0564.2259.9058.4554.31

Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248 and Active Metabolite SU012662

Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of total drug (SU011248 and its active metabolite SU012662) per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=27)
Total Drug: SU011248 and SU01266284.3684.9476.3767.1592.4388.2287.4980.30

Euro-QoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)

EQ-VAS: overall self-rating rating of the patient's current health state using a 20 cm Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), also called the health state thermometer) is a metric measurement (in 2 mm interval) from the visual analog scale which ranges between 0 (worse imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=365, 352)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 315)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=323, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=314, 237)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=293, 198)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 193)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=270, 152)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 139)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 118)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=240, 104)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=237, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 98)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=209, 77)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=201, 74)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=191, 60)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 50)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=168, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=160, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 45)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 34)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=130, 31)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=115, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=92, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=82, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=78, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=62, 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=54, 9)
IFN-α71.4367.6670.4570.7072.6871.4572.7472.2073.4472.5773.6872.2673.8073.4674.2774.3377.6676.5776.6476.6975.0672.2175.1973.8477.5273.5676.6976.4476.6276.5074.8473.1176.9472.8674.4273.8279.2768.5576.0075.44
SU01124873.8069.3575.0572.0676.2372.3377.4675.1579.8375.1378.8376.8179.3976.0981.3477.5380.0876.2479.1876.4479.7276.8180.8476.7180.5977.2280.3976.5380.5076.5179.8575.5180.7477.1080.4077.7681.4777.0581.1076.85

EuroQoL Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index

EQ-5D Health State Index: a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. Respondents were asked to describe their current health state on each of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety or depression) on a three-level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). A maximum score of 1 can be derived from these 5 dimensions by score conversion; range: -0.39 (worst health state)to 1.00 (best health state). This descriptive system classifies respondents into one of 243 possible distinct health states (EQ-5D descriptive system). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=363, 352)Cycle 1 Day 28 (346, 315)Cycle 2 Day 1 (326, 244)Cycle 2 Day 28 (311, 233)Cycle 3 Day 1 (287, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (283, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (269, 150)Cycle 4 Day 28 (261, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (247, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (240, 106)Cycle 6 Day 1 (240, 98)Cycle 6 Day 28 (224, 100)Cycle 7 Day 1 (205, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (204, 74)Cycle 8 Day 1 (192, 68)Cycle 8 Day 28 (190, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (170, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (168, 45)Cycle 10 Day 1 (161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (153, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (138, 34)Cycle 11 Day 28 (138, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (132, 31)Cycle 12 Day 28 (127, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (114, 26)Cycle 13 Day 28 (115, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (114, 25)Cycle 14 Day 28 (107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (100, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (95, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (93, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (84, 15)Cycle 17 Day 28 (82, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (71, 10)Cycle 19 Day 1 (69, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (62, 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (63, 8)Cycle 20 Day 28 (54, 9)
IFN-α0.760.700.750.740.760.750.800.790.790.780.800.800.800.810.820.810.840.840.850.820.850.840.820.850.830.820.860.870.880.880.840.830.880.830.860.840.880.720.850.86
SU0112480.760.720.780.730.780.750.800.760.800.760.800.770.810.770.820.770.800.780.810.780.800.750.810.770.810.770.810.750.800.750.790.760.790.770.810.760.810.780.810.77

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) Subscale

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) subscale designed to be a stand-alone instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced kidney cancer. Contains 15 questions; some questions overlap with the FACT-G questions. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Total FKSI score = sum score of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (most severe symptoms and concerns) to 60 (no symptoms or concerns). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=369, 351)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 317)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=327, 246)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 198)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 151)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 119)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=242, 109)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 99)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=203, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 68)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=155, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 31)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=113, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=105, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=100, 22)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=94, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9)
IFN-α46.0940.9342.3342.0143.6443.1344.7844.0344.8244.4145.3844.0745.0944.6545.3845.1046.8846.1646.2245.1646.2645.4646.0846.0046.2545.8446.0846.1045.6245.3043.6443.4645.5943.6444.9245.2746.6444.4745.0046.00
SU01124846.4542.7145.9843.7546.6044.0146.9945.0847.9944.9947.6145.4047.8445.3948.2445.8348.3145.7947.9045.7047.9045.2847.9045.6748.0245.6547.9045.1048.2645.3747.7545.9548.0746.2747.4745.3647.7046.0748.8846.26

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Subscale

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) subscale of the FKSI to measure advanced kidney cancer disease related symptoms. Includes 9 items: lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, and hematuria. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 36. A score greater than 0 indicates the difference favored sunitinib. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=368, 351)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 317)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=327, 246)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n= 315, 237)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 198)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 151)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 119 )Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=242, 109)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 99)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=203, 75 )Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 68)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=155, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 31)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (113, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=105, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=100, 22)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=94, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9)
IFN-α29.5526.6827.5927.2228.2027.8128.8528.3028.5728.3729.1228.4428.9928.5028.7628.6729.8629.3629.4329.0329.8929.2429.5429.4829.8129.6329.3529.2329.1828.8927.7928.2829.2627.9428.8328.7329.6428.6528.4429.22
SU01124829.7427.7329.6628.4929.9328.7230.2529.4330.8729.4330.8029.6230.9329.7331.0329.7631.2429.7230.7329.7830.7229.3430.7629.6330.5829.3030.5828.9430.8729.2630.6329.5130.6929.7330.2429.1530.1129.4831.0729.44

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): core questionnaire of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system that has been validated in a variety of cancer populations. 27 questions grouped into 4 domains that measure a patient's physical, functional, social and family, and emotional well-being. Five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = sum score of item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 108 with higher score indicating better quality of life. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=368, 346)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=345, 316)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=314, 237)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=293, 199)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 193)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=269, 149)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=263, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=247, 119)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=240, 106)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=238, 98)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 97)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=206, 78)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=200, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 66)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=170, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=158, 49)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=150, 45)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=134, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=139, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=130, 29)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=126, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=113, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 20)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=89, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 16)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 8)
IFN-α81.2274.9177.0277.0579.3578.4280.8680.4681.9680.6081.9779.7080.3981.0681.2581.3184.5083.1484.0381.7981.6080.2080.9981.7381.1880.6781.2281.5781.6680.8878.2078.3881.8078.9682.2482.2782.4879.6381.7079.54
SU01124882.3078.7582.8880.5184.2480.5985.3282.0886.4082.2384.9082.5485.0182.1686.8383.0585.8182.7185.3282.1484.7581.9185.3182.4385.5083.6185.2482.3486.2482.6484.7783.3886.7884.4285.7483.5187.1684.5487.9684.62

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Emotional Well Being (EWB) Subscale

Emotional well-being (EWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 24; lower score indicates better emotional well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (370, 352)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 318)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 249)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=316, 237)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 196)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 152)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=265, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=249, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 109)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 99)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 77)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=204, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 62)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=171, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=167, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 45)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=91, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9)
IFN-α17.0617.4017.5217.7318.1318.1718.8018.3919.0018.7018.6018.1418.0818.5518.5418.5518.9818.7618.9218.3618.9718.5218.8719.4518.6318.9718.0518.7618.2418.7517.2616.8318.2818.0019.6219.5519.0918.2018.6718.67
SU01124817.1517.7618.4618.4618.8218.5319.0418.7619.1818.6318.9918.7319.0818.6919.3318.9819.2518.9319.3218.7118.9219.1019.1419.0619.3819.3919.5519.2319.5719.4119.5419.3319.9519.6619.6419.3419.9419.6120.0019.75

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Functional Well Being (FWB) Subscale

Functional well-being (FWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; higher score indicates greater functional well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=371, 353)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 318)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 249)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 152)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=265, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=249, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 109)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=239, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 99)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=204, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=170, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=167, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=137, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=91, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9)
IFN-α18.5116.3717.0817.1817.9217.5618.4018.3718.8118.4719.0218.2418.4518.7619.2219.1020.2020.0419.8819.4018.8918.8118.8019.1319.6318.5919.6219.7219.8619.8318.8918.6119.3518.7119.0819.0019.6419.1020.0020.22
SU01124818.9317.9218.7818.3719.5118.5819.9318.8620.2719.0219.7419.2119.6919.1220.2919.3319.8719.2719.9519.2219.8119.1219.9819.4220.0219.6520.0419.0720.1319.2419.8019.5320.2019.6719.7619.4720.1819.5920.5020.15

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Physical Well Being (PWB) Subscale

Physical well-being (PWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates better physical well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=369, 348)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 318)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=329, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=316, 239)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=286, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=270, 150)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 106)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=239, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=224, 97)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=207, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=201, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=193, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=159, 49)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=151, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=135, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=131, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=127, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 16)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 9)
IFN-α22.7018.8520.0519.8420.8720.6321.5621.3121.8421.2321.7020.9621.6721.6621.9421.4022.5822.3822.6021.8322.2321.8822.6021.9021.9921.8022.0522.7522.3322.0720.6321.4221.8120.5021.8322.4522.4521.6021.7822.33
SU01124823.1419.4322.2220.3422.4520.1822.7221.0023.2420.9122.9921.2223.0521.2223.5821.5123.4121.2922.9421.2123.1620.9823.0320.8723.0521.2623.0220.8023.2620.9522.6021.3122.9921.6822.8520.8923.2021.8223.6821.81

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Social/Family Well Being (SWB) Subscale

Social/family well-being (SWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates less social/family well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=370, 349)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 319)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=292, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=284, 194)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=269, 150)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=263, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=247, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 107)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=238, 98)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=224, 97)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=207, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=200, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=193, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=158, 49)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=151, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=135, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=131, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=127, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=89, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 16)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 8)
IFN-α22.9422.2022.3122.2222.4222.1222.2622.3822.3522.3622.5622.3322.4622.1021.9522.1722.7421.9622.4522.0621.5121.0920.7921.2520.9321.3021.5120.3220.3520.2321.4121.5222.2521.7521.7121.2721.3020.7321.2620.67
SU01124823.1423.6023.5023.4023.5123.4423.7323.3623.5323.6823.3523.4023.2923.1323.6723.2623.2623.2623.0823.0323.0522.7123.2323.0723.1523.3122.8223.2423.2823.0423.1123.4123.4223.5023.5323.7023.8523.5323.6022.93

Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis

Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionpg/ml and ratio to Baseline (Mean)
PLASMA bFGF: C2D28:C1D1 (n=14, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C3D1:C1D1 (n=12, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C3D28:C1D1 (n=12, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C4D1:C1D1 (n=14, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=10, 0)
SU0112480.7601.5821.6712.8950.803

Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma VEGF-A, Plasma VEGF-C, Plasma sVEGFR-3, PLASMA IL-8, and PLASMA bFGF That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis

Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

,
Interventionpg/ml and ratio to Baseline (Mean)
Plasma VEGF-A: Baseline (n=33, 31)Plasma VEGF-A: C1D28: C1D1 (n=31, 26)Plasma VEGF-A: C2D1: C1D1 (n=32, 21)Plasma VEGF-A: C2D28: C1D1 (n=31, 20)Plasma VEGF-A: C3D1: C1D1 (n=27, 15)Plasma VEGF-A: C3D28: C1D1 (n=28, 15)Plasma VEGF-A: C4D1: C1D1 (n=27, 12)Plasma VEGF-A: C4D28: C1D1 (n=25, 11)Plasma VEGF-C: Baseline (n=35, 31)Plasma VEGF-C: C1D28: C1D1 (n=31, 26)Plasma VEGF-C: C2D1:C1D1 (n=30, 21)Plasma VEGF-C: C2D28:C1D1 (n=31, 19)Plasma VEGF-C: C3D1:C1D1 (n=28, 15)Plasma VEGF-C: C3D28:C1D1 (n=28, 15)Plasma VEGF-C: C4D1:C1D1 (n=28, 12)Plasma VEGF-C: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=26, 11)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: Baseline (n=29, 30)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C1D28:C1D1 (n=27, 25)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C2D1:C1D1 (n=28, 20)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C2D28:C1D1 (n=28, 19)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C3D1:C1D1 (n=25, 14)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C3D28:C1D1 (n=25, 14)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C4D1:C1D1 (n=24, 11)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=23, 10)PLASMA IL-8: Baseline (n=31, 29)PLASMA IL-8: C1D28:C1D1 (n=29, 25)PLASMA IL-8: C2D1:C1D1 (n=29, 20)PLASMA IL-8: C2D28:C1D1 (n=29, 19)PLASMA IL-8: C3D1:C1D1 (n=26, 15)PLASMA IL-8: C3D28:C1D1 (n=26, 14)PLASMA IL-8: C4D1:C1D1 (n=26, 12)PLASMA IL-8: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=25, 11)PLASMA bFGF: Baseline (n=21, 2)PLASMA bFGF: C1D28:C1D1 (n=15, 1)PLASMA bFGF: C2D1:C1D1 (n=13, 1)
IFN-α109.01.1341.1711.1531.2531.1491.2091.008651.21.1651.1771.0811.1741.0541.3821.13940317.71.0681.0751.1501.0151.0421.1831.04418.62.2971.5791.8581.5311.9991.6622.49213.60.4290.157
SU011248101.94.2801.1615.8511.6305.2361.4864.924556.40.9451.0450.8711.1591.0431.2431.20744049.30.4730.7870.4070.8000.4270.8460.48610.12.8151.7162.4232.7882.5741.9342.54913.12.7621.370

Duration of Response (DR)

DR: Time from first documentation of objective tumor response to first date that recurrence or progressive disease (PD) was objectively documented, taking as a reference for PD, the smallest sum LD recorded since randomization. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every month until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa7.4
Temsirolimus11.1
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus9.3

European Quality of Life Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) - Index Score

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. EQ-5D index measured 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Range of EQ-5D index score = -0.594 to 1 where higher scores indicated a better health state. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Interferon Alfa0.656
Temsirolimus0.689
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus0.689

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is the duration from randomization to death. For participants who are alive, overall survival is censored at the last contact. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 80

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa7.3
Temsirolimus10.9
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus8.4

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

Clinical benefit: confirmed CR or PR or had stable disease (SD) lasting at least 24 weeks. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions and non target lesions. PR was at least a 30% decrease in sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD was having neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 2 months until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Alfa16.4
Temsirolimus34.0
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus30.0

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was the disappearance of all target lesions and non target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 2 months until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Alfa5.3
Temsirolimus9.1
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus9.5

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS based on Independent Central Review Assessment. The period from randomization until disease progression, death or date of last contact. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, monthly until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa3.2
Temsirolimus5.6
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus4.9

Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST)

"The Q-Twist is not a score calculated for each participant but is defined only on a by treatment group basis. For each treatment group, it is the weighted sum of the mean durations of the health states Tox, Twist, and Relapse. Tox is defined as time with severe toxicity related to treatment; Twist: time without symptoms or toxic side effects; and Relapse: time after relapse/progression. The mean duration of each health state is calculated based on the area under the Kaplan Meier curve pertaining to that health state. There is no direct method for calculating the dispersion of Q-Twist, and it is typically done using bootstrap method for purposes of inference (see, e.g., Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Gelber RD. Quality adjusted survival analysis. Stat Med 1990; 9: 1259-76). In practice, as apparently in the case with this study, the intermediate values resulting from the bootstrap exercise were not displayed." (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 80

Interventionmonths (Number)
Interferon Alfa6.9083
Temsirolimus8.3707
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus7.4821

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of PD or death, withdrawal from treatment due to an adverse event (AE), withdrawal of voluntary consent, or lost to follow-up, whichever occurred first, censored at the date of the conclusion of treatment phase. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every month until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa1.9
Temsirolimus3.7
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus2.5

Duration of Stable Disease

Duration of stable disease was calculated as date of first treatment until date of documented progressive disease (PD) or last observation if subject did not progress. Stable disease (SD) defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Kaplan-Meier methodology, descriptive analysis. (NCT00101413)
Timeframe: First patient first treatment until date for last data collection for efficacy for a study period up to 62 weeks. Tumor assessed per RECIST at baseline (BL), every 8 weeks during treatment and at end of treatment.

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib103

Overall Survival

"Overall survival was calculated from the date of the first treatment until death of the subject.~Evaluation by Kaplan-Meier methodology, descriptive analysis." (NCT00101413)
Timeframe: First patient first treatment until date for last data collection for efficacy for a study period up to 62 weeks.

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib205

Percentage of Subjects With Stable Disease (SD)

Percentage of subjects with stable disease was calculated from date of first treatment until date of documented progressive disease (PD) or last observation if subject did not progress. Stable disease (SD) defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Descriptive summary of subjects with SD. (NCT00101413)
Timeframe: First patient first treatment until date for last data collection for efficacy for a study period up to 62 weeks. Tumor assessed per RECIST at baseline (BL), every 8 weeks during treatment and at end of treatment.

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sorafenib58.8

Anti-cancer Activity (eg, Percentage of Patients With Confirmed Complete Responses (CR) and Partial Responses (PR) Per RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) Criteria in Patients With Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC)

CR-disappearance of clinical/radiological tumor evidence (target/nontarget). PR- >=30% decrease in sum longest diameter (LD) of target lesions from BL sum LD. Stable disease (SD)-no shrinkage for PR nor increase for PD. Progressive disease (PD) measurement proven- >=20% increase in sum LD of lesions from smallest sum LD since start or new lesions. Progression by clinical judgement- >clinically meaningful cancer-related deterioration as judged by the investigator. (NCT00101413)
Timeframe: First patient first treatment until date for last data collection for efficacy for a study period up to 62 weeks. Tumor assessed per RECIST at baseline (BL), every 8 weeks during treatment and at end of treatment.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete response + Partial responseComplete responsePartial responseStable diseaseProgressive disease measurement provenProgression by clinical judgementNot evaluated
Sorafenib0.00.00.058.823.511.85.9

Change From Baseline of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Score Assessed at Cycle 2, Cycle 4, and End of Treatment (EOT)

HRQoL was assessed with the FACT-L questionnaire, a validated instrument for determining lung cancer HRQoL. The 36-item questionnaire includes 4 domains: Physical, functional, emotional, and social/family well-being, and a lung cancer-specific subscale. The FACT-L total score ranges from 1 to 136. Lower scores (negative change from baseline) demonstrate impaired HRQoL. (NCT00101413)
Timeframe: From first patient first treatment until date of last efficacy data collection (study period up to 62 weeks). HRQoL assessed at baseline (BL), end of treatment Cycles 2 and 4, and at end of treatment

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2Cycle 4End of treatment
Sorafenib-4.80.0-14.9

Final Overall Survival - Secondary Analysis (Placebo Data Censored at 30June2005) in the ITT Population

Overall survival determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the date of death, due to any cause. Outcome measure was assessed regularly, i.e. every 3 weeks for the first 24 weeks during treatment and every 4 weeks thereafter and approximately every 3 months during post-treatment. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (8Sep2006) for the final OS analysis, approximately 33 months later

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)542
Placebo436

Final Overall Survival (OS) - Primary Analysis in the ITT (Intent To Treat) Population

Overall survival determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the date of death, due to any cause. Outcome measure was assessed regularly, i.e. every 3 weeks for the first 24 weeks during treatment and every 4 weeks thereafter and approximately every 3 months during post-treatment. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (8Sep2006) for the final OS analysis, approximately 33 months later

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)542
Placebo461

Final Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Independent Radiological Review

PFS determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the actual date of disease progression (PD) (radiological or clinical) or death due to any cause, if death occurred before PD. Outcome measure was assessed approximately every 8 weeks using RECIST v1.0 criteria by independent radiologic review. Radiological PD defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of measured lesions taking as reference smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of new lesions. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (28Jan2005), approximately 14 months later, tumors assessed every 8 weeks.

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)167
Placebo84

Best Overall Response - Independent Radiological Review

Best overall response was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0 by independent radiologic review. Categories: complete response (CR, tumor disappears), partial response (PR, sum of lesion sizes decreased), stable disease (SD, steady state of disease), progressive disease (PD, sum of lesion sizes increased) and not evaluated. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (28Jan2005), approximately 14 months later, tumors assessed every 8 weeks.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot Evaluated
Placebo0.00.055.230.314.5
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)0.02.177.98.711.3

Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) by FKSI-10 (Functional Assessment of General Therapy Kidney Symptom Index 10) Assessment

"Primary Analysis for FKSI-10 patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure defined as longitudinal analysis of mean score over the first 5 treatment cycles. FKSI-10 patient responses for each question range from 0=not at all to 4=very much and after reverse coding the range of values for FKSI-10 total score is from 0 to 40; higher score represents better HRQOL." (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (31May2005), approximately 18 months later, PRO data collected at Day 1 of each cycle and end of treatment.

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycles 1-5 (Overall)
Placebo27.7827.2826.7826.2827.20
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)27.7727.2726.7726.2727.19

Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) by Physical Well-Being (PWB) Score of the FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Version) Assessment

"Primary Analysis for FACT-G (using PWB score) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure defined as longitudinal analysis of mean score over the first 5 treatment cycles. FACT-G (PWB score) patient responses for each question range from 0=not at all to 4=very much and after reverse coding the total FACT-G (PWB score) range of values is from 0 to 28; higher score represents better HRQOL." (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (31May2005), approximately 18 months later, PRO data collected at Day 1 of each cycle and end of treatment.

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycles 1-5 (Overall)
Placebo21.1620.7220.2819.8420.65
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)21.2120.7720.3319.8920.70

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve for Motesanib in Cycle 1

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for motesanib in Cycle 1 calculated using the using the linear/log trapezoidal method. AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) is reported for the 50 and 125 mg QD cohorts and AUC from time 0 to 24 hours post-dose (AUC0-24) is reported for the 75 mg BID cohort, where AUC0-24 is the sum of AUC0-12 for the first and second daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 3 at predose, 15 and 30 minutes, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionμg*hr/mL (Mean)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD0.971
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD3.21
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID2.91
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD1.74
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD3.23
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID2.04

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Motesanib in Cycle 2

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours post-dose (AUC0-24) for motesanib in Cycle 2 calculated using the using the linear/log trapezoidal method. For the 75 mg BID cohort AUC0-24 is the sum of AUC0-12 for the first and second daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 15 and 30 minutes, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionμg*hr/mL (Mean)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD4.50
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID3.11
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD1.26
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD3.92
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD3.16

Estimated Terminal-phase Half-life (t1/2,z) of Motesanib in Cycle 1

The terminal-phase elimination half-life (t1/2,z) of motesanib was calculated as ln(2)/λz. The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) was determined by linear regression of the natural logarithms of at least the last 3 measurable concentrations during the terminal phase. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, t1/2,z is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 3 at predose, 15 and 30 min, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours postdose.

Interventionhours (Mean)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD7.34
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD5.33
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID5.77
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD6.47
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD7.57
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID8.28

Estimated Terminal-phase Half-life (t1/2,z) of Motesanib in Cycle 2

The terminal-phase elimination half-life (t1/2,z) of motesanib was calculated as ln(2)/λz. The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) was determined by linear regression of the natural logarithms of at least the last 3 measurable concentrations during the terminal phase. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, t1/2,z is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 15 and 30 min, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionhours (Mean)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD6.41
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID6.36
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD7.08
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD4.90

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Motesanib (Cmax) in Cycle 1

The maximal observed plasma concentration of motesanib after a single dose dose in Cycle 1. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, Cmax is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 3 at predose, 15 and 30 min, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD158
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD525
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID448
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD328
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD444
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID198
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD360

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Motesanib (Cmax) in Cycle 2

The maximal observed plasma concentration of motesanib in Cycle 2, after multiple doses. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, Cmax is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 15 and 30 min, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD148
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD748
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID390
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD265
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD672
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID242
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD651

Percentage of Participants With an Overall Objective Response

Confirmed objective tumor response defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. Tumor response was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Responding disease (CR or PR) was confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. A complete response defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and all non-target lesions, no new lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Partial response defined as either the disappearance of all target lesions and the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or/and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diamer (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD and no new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: After 9 weeks of treatment (at the end of Cycle 3)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD33
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD18
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID0
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD0
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD0
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID0
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD17

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Motesanib (Tmax) for Cycle 1

The time after dosing that the maximal plasma concentration of motesanib was observed in Cycle 1. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, Tmax is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 3 at predose, 15 and 30 minutes, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionhours (Median)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD0.75
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD1.0
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID0.75
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD1.5
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD1.0
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID0.58
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD1.0

Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration of Motesanib (Tmax) in Cycle 2

The time after dosing that the maximal plasma concentration of motesanib was observed in Cycle 2. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, Tmax is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 15 and 30 min, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.

Interventionhours (Median)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD1.5
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD1.0
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID0.63
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD1.0
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD0.75
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID1.0
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD2.0

Trough Plasma Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24) for Motesanib in Cycle 1

The trough plasma concentration for motesanib at 24 hours postdose in Cycle 1. For the 75 BID cohort, C24 is the observed concentration at 24 hours (ie, after the second daily dose). (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 3, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD9.12
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD26.5
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID56.7
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD14.0
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD32.5
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID56.8

Trough Plasma Concentration at 24 Hours Post-dose (C24) for Motesanib in Cycle 2

The trough plasma concentration for motesanib at 24 hours postdose in Cycle 2. For the 75 BID cohort, C24 is the observed concentration at 24 hours (ie, after the second daily dose). (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD43.4
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID45.4
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD10.4
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD61.1
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD45.1

Duration of Response

Duration of response (PR or better) is defined as the time from the first documented objective response of PR or CR, whichever is noted earlier, to disease progression or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Tumor measurements and assessments based on RECIST criteria were performed every 6 weeks for the first 18 weeks of therapy ( week 6, 12, and 18) and every 12 weeks thereafter up to data cutoff (1Oct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib + C/P168
Placebo + C/P134

Overall Survival (OS) in Patients Treated With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel and Sorafenib to OS in Patients Treated With Carboplatin, Paclitaxel and Placebo

Overall survival determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the date of death, due to any cause. Outcome measure was assessed regularly, i.e. every 3 weeks during study treatment and every 3 months during post-treatment. (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Outcome measure was assessed every 3 weeks starting from randomization, during treatment period and every 3 months during follow-up period until death was recorded or up to data cutoff (1Oct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib + C/P324
Placebo + C/P322

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS determined as time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to disease progression (radiological or clinical) or death due to any cause, if death occurs before progression. (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Tumor measurements and assessments based on RECIST criteria were performed every 6 weeks for the first 18 weeks of therapy ( week 6, 12, and 18) and every 12 weeks thereafter up to data cutoff (1Oct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib + C/P139
Placebo + C/P163

Overall Best Response

Best overall tumor response for the ITT population was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Categories: complete response (CR, tumor disappears), partial response (PR, sum of lesion sizes decreased), stable disease (SD, steady state of disease), progressive disease (PD, sum of lesion sizes increased). (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Tumor measurements and assessments based on RECIST criteria were performed every 6 weeks for the first 18 weeks of therapy ( week 6, 12, and 18) and every 12 weeks thereafter up to data cutoff (1Oct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Not evaluatedDisease control
Placebo + C/P1.122.947.817.510.656.3
Sorafenib + C/P0.027.445.99.916.849.8

Patient Reported Outcome as Assessed by FACT-L Score. Change From Baseline in Total FACT-L at Cycles 3,5,7,9 and End of Treatment (EOT)

"Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung cancer subscore (FACT-L). Patient reported outcome as assessed by FACT-L score. FACT-L questionnaire comprises statements about physical, social / family, emotional and functional well-being as well as additional concerns which have to be rated by the patients (0=not at all to 4=very much). Cycle duration defined as 21 days. Change from baseline in Total FACT-L on day 1 of cycles 3,5,7,9 (weeks 7,13,19 and 25) and end of treatment (EOT); cycle 1, day 1 used as baseline. EOT is determined by patient's last visit after treatment discontinuation." (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Outcome measure was assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of every other cycle (i.e. Cycle 3, 5, 7 etc.) during treatment and at end of treatment visit or up to data cutoff (10ct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1End of treatment (EOT)
Placebo + C/P0.1-1.3-0.5-0.6-2.7
Sorafenib + C/P0.0-1.4-0.8-1.2-3.1

Patient Reported Outcome as Assessed by LCS Subscale Score. Change From Baseline in LCS Subscale at Cycles 2 Through 9 and at End of Treatment (EOT)

Lung Cancer Symptoms (LCS) subscale ranges from 0 (severe debilitation) to 28 (asymptomatic). Cycle duration defined as 21 days. Change from baseline in LCS Subscale on day 1 of cycles 2 through 9 (weeks 4,7,10,13,16,19,22 and 25) and end of treatment (EOT); cycle 1, day 1 used as baseline. EOT is determined by patient's last visit after treatment discontinuation. (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Outcome measure was assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of every cycle (i.e. Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5 etc.) during treatment and at end of treatment visit or up to data cutoff (10ct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 6, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 8, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1End of treatment (EOT)
Placebo + C/P-0.1-0.2-0.3-0.5-0.4-0.4-0.2-0.3-0.4
Sorafenib + C/P0.0-0.4-0.6-0.6-0.8-0.8-1.2-0.9-0.9

Overall Survival

Time between the first day of treatment to the days of death. (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 17 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)11.6

Progression Free Survival

"Time between the first day of treatment to the day of disease progression. Progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.~Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progressions of existing non-target lesions." (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 17 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)3.4

Response Rate

Percentage of participants with response rate = CR + PR. Response will be evaluated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR (complete response) is the disappearance of all target lesions; PR (partial response) is a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD (progressive disease) is a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; and SD (stable disease) are small changes that do not meet the above criteria. Please see the Protocol Link module for additional information about RECIST if desired. (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 17 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)6

The Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here are the total number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 5 1/2 years

InterventionParticipants (Number)
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)37

Correlation of Response to Treatment With KRAS Mutational Status

Mutational analysis of these genes was performed on paraffin-imbedded tissue blocks from prior pathologic specimens. Disease control rate was correlated with KRAS mutational status. Disease control rate was defined as complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR)+ stable disease (SD). (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 42 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DCR observed in KRAS mutant participantsDCR observed in KRAS wild-type participantsDCR observed in EGFR mutant participantsDCR observed in EGFR wild-type participants
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)60714069

Cytokine Levels

Serial plasma samples were collected from all patients and cytokine levels were measured. The concentrations of the cytokines were determined with recombinant standards and expressed as picograms per milliliter (pg/ml). (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 54 days

Interventionpg/ml (Median)
VEGFsVEGFRIPLGFbFGF
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)101115196

Overall Survival Associated With Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF)

Serum plasma is collected at the beginning of each cycle during the course of the study and analyzed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Overall survival for bFGF day 0<6 pg/mlOverall survival for bFGF day 0>6 pg/ml
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)15.45.5

Overall Survival Reported Separately for Participants With a Change in PLGF Below 11 pg/ml and Above 12 pg/ml

Difference in placental derived growth factor (PLGF) between day 28 and day 0 of < 11 pg/ml vs. > 12 pg/ml. (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 17 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
PLGF ,< 11 pg/mlPLGF > 12 pg/ml
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)6.615.6

Percentage of Participants With an Increase or Decrease in the Reverse Contrast Transfer Rate (Kep), Forward Contrast Transfer Rate (Ktrans), and Extravascular Fraction (Ve) With the Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI)

DCE-MRI was used to evaluate changes (e.g. decrease/increase in Ve, Ktrans, Kep value) in vascularity and quality of index lesions to provide early indication of treatment effect before changes in size can be perceived on CT. Changes were reflected in a decrease/increase of Ve, Ktrans, or Kep (Kep, Ve, Ktrans measurements at day 0, day 14 and the difference between the day 14 and the day 0 measurements (day 14-day 0). (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 59 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
percentage of pts with an increase in Ktrans orKeppercentage of pts with an decrease in Ktrans orKepPercentage of pts with an increase or decrease-Ve
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)19810

Progression Free Survival Associated With Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF)

Serum plasma is collected at the beginning of each cycle during the course of the study and analyzed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 17 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Progression free survival for bFGF day 28<6 pg/mlProgression free survival for bFGF day 28>6 pg/ml
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)4.41.8

6-month PFS

Progression free survival is defined as the time from the first day of treatment until the day tumor progression was documented. Response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Progressive Disease (PD): Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions (1). Percentage of participants who were progression free at 6 month from the start of treatment is reported here. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Therapy29
Placebo22

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

"Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as the percentage of patients who have a partial/complete/stable response to therapy. Responses were assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.0).~Complete Response: Disappearance of all target lesions, and disappearance of all non-target lesions.~Partial Response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters) Stable Response: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response, nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since the treatment started)." (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Therapy54
Placebo38

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the time from when objective response is realized until time to first documented disease progression. Disease progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Objective Response = CR + PR. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Combination Therapy4.6430
Placebo5.2234

Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR)

"Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of patients who have a partial or complete response to therapy. Responses were assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.0).~Complete Response: Disappearance of all target lesions, and disappearance of all non-target lesions.~Partial Response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters)" (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Therapy8.1
Placebo10.9

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the first treatment until date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death or lack of data beyond follow-up period, the survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combination Therapy7.62
Placebo7.23

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the first day of treatment until the day tumor progression was documented. Response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).~Progressive Disease (PD): Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions" (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combination Therapy3.38
Placebo1.94

Disease Control (DC) in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

DC was defined as the total number of patients whose best response was not PD according to RECIST (version 1.0) by Investigator-assessment (= total number of CR + total number of PR + total number of SD; CR or PR had to be maintained for at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating, SD had to be documented at least once more than 6 weeks from baseline). PD: an increase in the sum of tumor lesions sizes or new lesions. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC62.1
Placebo + GC63.1

Duration of Response in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

Duration of response was defined as the time from date of first documented objective response of PR or CR, whichever was noted earlier, to date of disease progression or death (if death occurred before progression was documented). Patients without disease progression at the time of analysis or death before progression were censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. Disease progression: increase in the sum of tumor lesion sizes or new lesions. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC171
Placebo + GC133

Duration of Stable Disease (SD) in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

Duration of SD was defined as the time from date of randomization to date that disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever was earlier) was first documented. Patients without disease progression at the time of analysis or death before progression were censored at the date of their last tumor assessment.(Disease progression: increase in the sum of tumor lesion sizes or new lesions.) Duration of stable disease was only evaluated in patients failing to achieve a best response of CR or PR. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC144
Placebo + GC131

OS in the ITT (Both Squamous and Non-squamous) Population

OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Patients still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death of any cause whichever came first

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC371
Placebo + GC378

OS in the ITT (Squamous) Population

OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Patients still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death of any cause whichever came first

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC254
Placebo + GC374

Overall Survival (OS) in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Patients still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death of any cause whichever came first

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC376
Placebo + GC379

Progression-free Survival (PFS) in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever was earlier, based on Investigator-assessment using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.0) or death due to any cause, whichever occured first. Patients without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Disease progression: increase in the sum of tumor lesion sizes or new lesions. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC183
Placebo + GC168

Time to Progression (TTP) in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever was earlier, based on Investigator-assessment using RECIST version 1.0). Patients without progression at the time of analysis or death before progression were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Disease progression: increase in the sum of tumor lesion sizes or new lesions. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC185
Placebo + GC167

Time to Response (TTR) in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

TTR for patients who achieved a best response (CR or PR) was defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date that response was first documented. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death of any cause whichever came first

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC42
Placebo + GC43

Time to Symptomatic Deterioration (TSD) in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

TSD is defined as the time from randomization to the date of symptomatic deterioration (≥3 point decline in the LCS score that is maintained for at least 2 consecutive cycles) or death if death occurs before these 2 consecutive cycles are completed. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient to 38 months later or death whatever occurs first

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC6.9
Placebo + GC4.5

EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

The EQ-5D also contains a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), which records the respondent's self-rated health status on a vertical graduated visual analog scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months later or death whatever occurs first

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
cycle 1 (day 1)cycle 2 (day 22)cycle 3 (day 43)cycle 4 (day 64)cycle 5 (day 85)cycle 6 (day 106)
Placebo + GC68.9668.9668.9568.9568.9568.95
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC66.4366.4366.4366.4366.4266.42

Euro Quality of Life - 5D (EQ-5D) Index Scores in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

The EQ-5D contains a descriptive system which measures 5 health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. These five health dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ-5D index score which ranges from -0.594 to 1 when the United Kingdom (UK) weights are applied (0=death, 1=perfect health). Higher index scores represent better health states. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months later or death whatever occurs first

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
cycle 1 (day 1)cycle 2 (day 22)cycle 3 (day 43)cycle 4 (day 64)cycle 5 (day 85)cycle 6 (day 106)
Placebo + GC0.760.750.750.740.730.73
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC0.700.690.690.680.680.67

Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lung (FACT-L) Scores in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

The FACT-L measures health related quality of life (HRQOL) and composes of five domains: the four domains (physical well being, emotional well being, social well being, functional well being) from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General scale (FACT-G) and the lung cancer subscale (LCS). The FACT-L total score ranges from 0 to 136, higher scores represent better HRQOL. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
cycle 2 (day 22)cycle 4 (day 64)cycle 6 (day 106)
Placebo + GC94.093.693.1
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC90.690.189.7

Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) Scores in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

LCS is a subscale of FACT-L measuring lung cancer specific symptoms. The LCS scores range from 0 to 28, higher scores represent fewer lung cancer symptoms. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient to 38 months later or death whatever occurs first.

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
cycle 1 (day 1)cycle 2 (day 22)cycle 3 (day 43)cycle 4 (day 64)cycle 5 (day 85)cycle 6 (day 106)
Placebo + GC20.520.520.420.320.320.2
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC20.019.919.919.819.719.7

Percentage of Participants With Different Tumor Response in the ITT (Non-squamous) Population

Tumor response (= Best Overall Response) of a patient was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response (CR: disappearance of tumor lesions), confirmed Partial Response (PR: a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes), Stable Disease (SD: steady state of disease), or Progressive Disease (PD: an increase in the sum of tumor lesions sizes or new lesions)) observed during trial period assessed according to the RECIST criteria (version 1.0) based on Investigator-assessment. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRconfirmed PRSDPDNot assessable
Placebo + GC0.025.837.217.119.9
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC0.027.834.310.927.0

Geometric Mean for Exposure Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-12

Geometric mean exposure for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionmg/L.h (Geometric Mean)
First Stage - Disease Progression9.76
Second Stage - Increased Accrual18.63

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)

Plasma concentration-time profile for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, AND 24 hours post dose

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
First Stage - Disease Progression1.28
Second Stage - Increased Accrual2.57

Median Overall Survival

Time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive, approximately 18.3 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
First Stage - Disease Progression18
Second Stage - Increased Accrual18.3

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events, see the adverse event module. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 49 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
First Stage - Disease Progression22
Second Stage - Increased Accrual23

Progression Free Survival

Determine whether BAY 43-9006 when used to treat metastatic prostate cancer is associated with having 50% of Patients Progression Free at 4 Months by clinical, radiographic, and prostatic specific antigen (PSA)criteria. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Stage - Disease Progression1.83
Second Stage - Increased Accrual3.7

Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)

Time to maximum concentration for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
First Stage - Disease Progression0.68
Second Stage - Increased Accrual8

Overall Response Evaluated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Overall response was evaluated by the RECIST. Complete Response (CR) is the disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. Stable Disease (SD) is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseProgressive DiseaseStable Disease
First Stage - Disease Progression0080
Second Stage - Increased Accrual011310

Reviews

29 reviews available for niacinamide and Cancer of Lung

ArticleYear
Angiogenesis Inhibitors in NSCLC.
    International journal of molecular sciences, 2017, Sep-21, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized;

2017
Complete response of hepatocellular carcinoma with right atrium and pulmonary metastases treated by combined treatments (a possible treatment effect of natural killer cell): A case report and literature review.
    Medicine, 2018, Volume: 97, Issue:42

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Thera

2018
Active targeted therapy for metastatic collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: a case report and review of the literature.
    International urology and nephrology, 2013, Volume: 45, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biopsy, Needle; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progr

2013
Efficacy of motesanib diphosphate in non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2014, Volume: 15, Issue:12

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protoc

2014
Efficacy and safety of sorafenib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2014, Volume: 15, Issue:14

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Lung N

2014
Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015, Volume: 141, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic A

2015
The role and mechanism of autophagy in sorafenib targeted cancer therapy.
    Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 2016, Volume: 100

    Topics: Animals; Autophagy; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; N

2016
Targeted therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine, 2008, Volume: 29, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic A

2008
Sorafenib in lung cancer: clinical developments and future directions.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2008, Volume: 3, Issue:6 Suppl 2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; F

2008
K-ras as a target for lung cancer therapy.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2008, Volume: 3, Issue:6 Suppl 2

    Topics: Benzamides; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cl

2008
[Tumor vasculature as a therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer].
    Magyar onkologia, 2008, Volume: 52, Issue:3

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Axitinib; Benzen

2008
Emerging data with antiangiogenic therapies in early and advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Clinical lung cancer, 2009, Volume: 10 Suppl 1

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Benzenesulfonate

2009
Targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2009, Volume: 45, Issue:14

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates;

2009
Sorafenib.
    Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer, 2010, Volume: 184

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic;

2010
New drugs in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: searching for the correct clinical development.
    Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2010, Volume: 19, Issue:12

    Topics: Afatinib; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Drug Delivery Systems; Dru

2010
Classic biphasic pulmonary blastoma: a case report and review of the literature.
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2011, Volume: 73, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Fatal Outcome; Humans; Intestinal Pe

2011
Motesanib and advanced NSCLC: experiences and expectations.
    Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2011, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Biological Availabili

2011
[Targeting the RAS signalling pathway in cancer].
    Bulletin du cancer, 2011, Volume: 98, Issue:9

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Colorectal Neoplasms; ErbB Receptors; Extracellular Signal

2011
Sorafenib in non-small cell lung cancer.
    Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2012, Volume: 21, Issue:9

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; H

2012
[Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) in the treatment of solid cancers: an overview of biological and clinical aspects].
    Magyar onkologia, 2012, Volume: 56, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clinical Tri

2012
Angiogenesis and lung cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2005, May-10, Volume: 23, Issue:14

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Benzenesulfonates; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Human

2005
Targeting angiogenesis with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor small-molecule inhibitors: novel agents with potential in lung cancer.
    Clinical lung cancer, 2005, Volume: 7 Suppl 1

    Topics: Benzenesulfonates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Indoles; Lung Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pa

2005
Multi-target inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2006, Volume: 17 Suppl 2

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinom

2006
Toxicities of antiangiogenic therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Clinical lung cancer, 2006, Volume: 8 Suppl 1

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic A

2006
[Relation between cytochrome P450 2D6 and lung cancer susceptibility caused by smoking].
    Wei sheng yan jiu = Journal of hygiene research, 2007, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Nit

2007
Combination of target agents: challenges and opportunities.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2007, Volume: 2, Issue:5 Suppl

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans

2007
Role of anti-angiogenesis agents in treating NSCLC: focus on bevacizumab and VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
    Current treatment options in oncology, 2007, Volume: 8, Issue:1

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic A

2007
Playing only one instrument may be not enough: limitations and future of the antiangiogenic treatment of cancer.
    BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:11

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma

2007
[Lung cancer].
    Medizinische Klinik (Munich, Germany : 1983), 2008, May-15, Volume: 103, Issue:5

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates;

2008

Trials

54 trials available for niacinamide and Cancer of Lung

ArticleYear
Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of Motesanib (AMG-706) in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in East Asian Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2017, Nov-10, Volume: 35, Issue:32

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; D

2017
Sorafenib and continued erlotinib or sorafenib alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer progressing on erlotinib: A randomized phase II study of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI).
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2017, Volume: 113

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small

2017
Sorafenib and everolimus in advanced clear cell renal carcinoma: a phase I/II trial of the SCRI Oncology Research Consortium.
    Cancer investigation, 2013, Volume: 31, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cel

2013
Phase III study (MONET1) of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonsquamous nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Asian subgroup analysis.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2014, Volume: 25, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asian People; Carbop

2014
Phase II trial of sorafenib in conjunction with chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
    Investigational new drugs, 2014, Volume: 32, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Disease-Free Sur

2014
A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib monotherapy in clinically selected patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of EGFR-TKI therapy (Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group, CTONG 0805).
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2014, Volume: 83, Issue:3

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins

2014
Sorafenib synergizes with metformin in NSCLC through AMPK pathway activation.
    International journal of cancer, 2015, Mar-15, Volume: 136, Issue:6

    Topics: AMP-Activated Protein Kinases; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein

2015
Motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the randomized controlled MONET1 study.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Carcino

2014
Challenges in developing a validated biomarker for angiogenesis inhibitors: the motesanib experience.
    PloS one, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Bio

2014
Challenges in developing a validated biomarker for angiogenesis inhibitors: the motesanib experience.
    PloS one, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Bio

2014
Challenges in developing a validated biomarker for angiogenesis inhibitors: the motesanib experience.
    PloS one, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Bio

2014
Challenges in developing a validated biomarker for angiogenesis inhibitors: the motesanib experience.
    PloS one, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Bio

2014
Clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of tumor progression in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2015, Volume: 45, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell;

2015
A randomized phase II study of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat as maintenance therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2015, Volume: 26, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free

2015
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte

2015
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte

2015
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte

2015
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte

2015
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte

2015
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte

2015
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte

2015
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte

2015
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte

2015
Comparison of volumetric and linear serial CT assessments of lung metastases in renal cell carcinoma patients in a clinical phase IIB study.
    Academic radiology, 2015, Volume: 22, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Kidney Neoplasms; Lu

2015
SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.
    European urology, 2015, Volume: 68, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brai

2015
Monotherapy Administration of Sorafenib in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MISSION) Trial: A Phase III, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sorafenib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Predominantly Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Canc
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:12

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Double-Blind Method; ErbB Receptors; Female;

2015
A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (KCSG-0806).
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2016, Volume: 93

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease

2016
Response and toxicity prediction by MALDI-TOF-MS serum peptide profiling in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
    Proteomics. Clinical applications, 2016, Volume: 10, Issue:7

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; D

2016
Phase 2 open-label study of single-agent sorafenib in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B-endemic Asian population: presence of lung metastasis predicts poor response.
    Cancer, 2009, Jan-15, Volume: 115, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Fema

2009
Phase II, multicenter, uncontrolled trial of single-agent sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2009, Sep-10, Volume: 27, Issue:26

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Diarrhea; Drug Resis

2009
Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Investigational new drugs, 2010, Volume: 28, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonate

2010
Incidence of brain metastases in renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2010, Volume: 21, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Re

2010
Phase 1b study of motesanib, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel and/or panitumumab for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2010, Jan-01, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy P

2010
Phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or with sorafenib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010, Apr-10, Volume: 28, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benz

2010
Phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or with sorafenib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010, Apr-10, Volume: 28, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benz

2010
Phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or with sorafenib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010, Apr-10, Volume: 28, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benz

2010
Phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or with sorafenib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010, Apr-10, Volume: 28, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benz

2010
A multicenter phase II study of erlotinib and sorafenib in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2010, Jun-01, Volume: 16, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small

2010
A phase I trial of sorafenib combined with cisplatin/etoposide or carboplatin/pemetrexed in refractory solid tumor patients.
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2011, Volume: 71, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonate

2011
A phase II trial of first-line sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma unwilling to receive or with early intolerance to immunotherapy: SOGUG Study 06-01.
    Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal

2010
Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in patients treated with sorafenib and erlotinib for non-small cell lung cancer: a new method of monitoring treatment?
    European radiology, 2010, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; C

2010
A phase I trial of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: New York Cancer Consortium Trial NCI 6981.
    American journal of clinical oncology, 2011, Volume: 34, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Capecitabin

2011
Sorafenib in platinum-treated patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 0435) phase II trial.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2010, Volume: 5, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm;

2010
Response to sorafenib at a low dose in patients with radioiodine-refractory pulmonary metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma.
    Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association, 2011, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Papillary; China; Disea

2011
Sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or with gemcitabine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2011, Volume: 22, Issue:7

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combine

2011
A front-line window of opportunity phase 2 study of sorafenib in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N0326.
    Cancer, 2010, Dec-15, Volume: 116, Issue:24

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; D

2010
Evaluation of KRAS mutations, angiogenic biomarkers, and DCE-MRI in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving sorafenib.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2011, Mar-01, Volume: 17, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; B

2011
A phase II, multicenter, open-label randomized study of motesanib or bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2011, Volume: 22, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemother

2011
[Randomize trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either sorafenib or placebo as first-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer].
    Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2011, Volume: 14, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small

2011
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011, Jun-20, Volume: 29, Issue:18

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo

2011
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011, Jun-20, Volume: 29, Issue:18

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo

2011
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011, Jun-20, Volume: 29, Issue:18

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo

2011
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011, Jun-20, Volume: 29, Issue:18

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo

2011
Assessment of objective responses using volumetric evaluation in advanced thymic malignancies and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2011, Volume: 6, Issue:7

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Large

2011
Long-term safety and tolerability of sorafenib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a case-based review.
    Clinical lung cancer, 2011, Volume: 12, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulf

2011
[Postoperative correction of the methabolism of the single lung after pulmonectomy].
    Khirurgiia, 2011, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Drug Combinations; Enteral Nutrition; Flavin Mononucleotide; Follow-Up Studies; Humans;

2011
A phase I study of sorafenib and vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors with expanded cohorts in renal cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer.
    Investigational new drugs, 2013, Volume: 31, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Ce

2013
International, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: MONET1.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2012, Aug-10, Volume: 30, Issue:23

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carb

2012
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin alone or with sorafenib for the first-line treatment of advanced, nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2012, Sep-01, Volume: 30, Issue:25

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell L

2012
Simulations using a drug-disease modeling framework and phase II data predict phase III survival outcome in first-line non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 92, Issue:5

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carb

2012
Could interferon still play a role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma? A randomized study of two schedules of sorafenib plus interferon-alpha 2a (RAPSODY).
    European urology, 2013, Volume: 63, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combi

2013
A double-blind randomized discontinuation phase-II study of sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients: eastern cooperative oncology group study E2501.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2012, Volume: 7, Issue:10

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic

2012
Clinical outcomes and biomarker profiles of elderly pretreated NSCLC patients from the BATTLE trial.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2012, Volume: 7, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bexa

2012
VeriStrat(®) has prognostic value in advanced stage NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib and sorafenib.
    British journal of cancer, 2012, Nov-20, Volume: 107, Issue:11

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Surviva

2012
A phase II study of sorafenib in patients with platinum-pretreated, advanced (Stage IIIb or IV) non-small cell lung cancer with a KRAS mutation.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013, Feb-01, Volume: 19, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; M

2013
Early response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer assessed by [18F]-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography.
    Clinical lung cancer, 2013, Volume: 14, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; D

2013
Second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: big targets, small progress; small targets, big progress?
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2006, Volume: 1, Issue:9

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot

2006
Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with gefitinib in patients with refractory or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2007, May-01, Volume: 13, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell L

2007
A randomized phase II study of sorafenib/gemcitabine or sorafenib/erlotinib for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients or patients with a performance status of 2: treatment rationale and protocol dynamics.
    Clinical lung cancer, 2007, Volume: 8, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell L

2007
Pharmacokinetics of nicotinamide in cancer patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy: the experience of the Co-operative Group of Radiotherapy of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
    Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 1998, Volume: 48, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Area Under Curve; Carbon Dioxide; Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; C

1998
ARCON: accelerated radiotherapy with carbogen and nicotinamide in non small cell lung cancer: a phase I/II study by the EORTC.
    Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 1999, Volume: 52, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Carbon Dioxide; Carcinoma, Non-Small-

1999

Other Studies

189 other studies available for niacinamide and Cancer of Lung

ArticleYear
Potential synthetic lethality for breast cancer: A selective sirtuin 2 inhibitor combined with a multiple kinase inhibitor sorafenib.
    Pharmacological research, 2022, Volume: 177

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor

2022
Metabolomics study of ribavirin in the treatment of orthotopic lung cancer based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS.
    Chemico-biological interactions, 2023, Jan-25, Volume: 370

    Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acid; Biomarkers; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Linoleic Acid; Lung Neo

2023
Metabolomics study of ribavirin in the treatment of orthotopic lung cancer based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS.
    Chemico-biological interactions, 2023, Jan-25, Volume: 370

    Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acid; Biomarkers; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Linoleic Acid; Lung Neo

2023
Metabolomics study of ribavirin in the treatment of orthotopic lung cancer based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS.
    Chemico-biological interactions, 2023, Jan-25, Volume: 370

    Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acid; Biomarkers; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Linoleic Acid; Lung Neo

2023
Metabolomics study of ribavirin in the treatment of orthotopic lung cancer based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS.
    Chemico-biological interactions, 2023, Jan-25, Volume: 370

    Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acid; Biomarkers; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Linoleic Acid; Lung Neo

2023
EphA2 inhibition suppresses proliferation of small-cell lung cancer cells through inducing cell cycle arrest.
    Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2019, 11-19, Volume: 519, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Proliferation; Dasatinib; Drug Scree

2019
A TAZ-AXL-ABL2 Feed-Forward Signaling Axis Promotes Lung Adenocarcinoma Brain Metastasis.
    Cell reports, 2019, 12-10, Volume: 29, Issue:11

    Topics: Acyltransferases; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Axl Receptor Tyrosine Kina

2019
Nicaraven Attenuates Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Responses-Induced Tumor Metastasis.
    Annals of surgical oncology, 2020, Volume: 27, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Cytokines; Inflammation; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Neoplasm Met

2020
Association of Gastric Acid Suppression and Sorafenib Efficacy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Journal of clinical gastroenterology, 2021, 02-01, Volume: 55, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Survi

2021
Autophagy-Inducing Inhalable Co-crystal Formulation of Niclosamide-Nicotinamide for Lung Cancer Therapy.
    AAPS PharmSciTech, 2020, Sep-17, Volume: 21, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Autophagy; Calorimetry, Differential Scanning; Crystallization; Desiccat

2020
18F-PSMA-1007 Uptake in Pulmonary Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis Metastasis From Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical nuclear medicine, 2021, Jul-01, Volume: 46, Issue:7

    Topics: Biological Transport; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Niacinamide; Oligopeptides; Positro

2021
Complete Response to the Combination of Pembrolizumab and Sorafenib for Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Report.
    The American journal of gastroenterology, 2017, Volume: 112, Issue:4

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Proto

2017
Co-targeting of DNA, RNA, and protein molecules provides optimal outcomes for treating osteosarcoma and pulmonary metastasis in spontaneous and experimental metastasis mouse models.
    Oncotarget, 2017, May-09, Volume: 8, Issue:19

    Topics: Animals; Bone Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Combined Modality Ther

2017
Carboxyamidotriazole Synergizes with Sorafenib to Combat Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer through Inhibition of NANOG and Aggravation of Apoptosis.
    The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2017, Volume: 362, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Carcinoma

2017
The inhibition of FGF receptor 1 activity mediates sorafenib antiproliferative effects in human malignant pleural mesothelioma tumor-initiating cells.
    Stem cell research & therapy, 2017, 05-25, Volume: 8, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Separation; C

2017
Simultaneous inhibition of growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by co-delivery of ursolic acid and sorafenib using lactobionic acid modified and pH-sensitive chitosan-conjugated mesoporous silica nanocomplex.
    Biomaterials, 2017, Volume: 143

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocel

2017
Synergistic activity and heterogeneous acquired resistance of combined MDM2 and MEK inhibition in KRAS mutant cancers.
    Oncogene, 2017, 11-23, Volume: 36, Issue:47

    Topics: A549 Cells; Animals; Apoptosis; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; Bcl-2-Like Protein 11; Carcinoma, Non

2017
Activation of an AKT/FOXM1/STMN1 pathway drives resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer.
    British journal of cancer, 2017, Sep-26, Volume: 117, Issue:7

    Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Epithelial-Mes

2017
Nicaraven reduces cancer metastasis to irradiated lungs by decreasing CCL8 and macrophage recruitment.
    Cancer letters, 2018, 04-01, Volume: 418

    Topics: Amifostine; Animals; Antioxidants; Cell Line, Tumor; Chemokine CCL8; Gamma Rays; Humans; Lung; Lung

2018
Wee1 inhibitor MK1775 sensitizes KRAS mutated NSCLC cells to sorafenib.
    Scientific reports, 2018, 01-17, Volume: 8, Issue:1

    Topics: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutat

2018
The excellent antitumor effect of apatinib alone as second-line therapy in a patient with sorafenib-refractory hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report.
    Medicine, 2018, Volume: 97, Issue:25

    Topics: Adult; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Disease Progression; Fatal Outcome

2018
Aortic Dissection and Cardiac Dysfunction Emerged Coincidentally During the Long-Term Treatment with Angiogenesis Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    International heart journal, 2018, Sep-26, Volume: 59, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Aortic Dissection; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Heart Diseases; H

2018
Chemoprevention of Lung Carcinogenesis by Dietary Nicotinamide and Inhaled Budesonide.
    Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2019, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Apoptosis; Benzo(a)pyrene; Budesonide

2019
Increased plasma concentration of 4-pyridone-3-carboxamide-1-ß-D-ribonucleoside (4PYR) in lung cancer. Preliminary studies.
    Nucleosides, nucleotides & nucleic acids, 2019, Volume: 38, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Arginine; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Endothelial Cells; Female; Humans; Lung

2019
Identification of nicotinamide aminonaphthyridine compounds as potent RET kinase inhibitors and antitumor activities against RET rearranged lung adenocarcinoma.
    Bioorganic chemistry, 2019, Volume: 90

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Dos

2019
Suppression of natural killer cells by sorafenib contributes to prometastatic effects in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    PloS one, 2013, Volume: 8, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Antigens, CD; Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, He

2013
Mitochondrial complex I activity and NAD+/NADH balance regulate breast cancer progression.
    The Journal of clinical investigation, 2013, Volume: 123, Issue:3

    Topics: Acrylamides; Animals; Autophagy; Autophagy-Related Protein 5; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cel

2013
Is it time to adopt external beam radiotherapy in the NCCN guidelines as a therapeutic strategy for intermediate/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma?.
    Oncology, 2013, Volume: 84 Suppl 1

    Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembo

2013
Response to sorafenib in a pediatric patient with papillary thyroid carcinoma with diffuse nodular pulmonary disease requiring mechanical ventilation.
    Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association, 2014, Volume: 24, Issue:1

    Topics: Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Papillary; Child; Humans; Hypoxia; Iodine Radioisotopes; Lung Neoplasms; Male;

2014
Imetelstat (a telomerase antagonist) exerts off‑target effects on the cytoskeleton.
    International journal of oncology, 2013, Volume: 42, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cytoskeleton; Gene Expression Reg

2013
Case of sorafenib-induced thyroid storm.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Jun-01, Volume: 31, Issue:16

    Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Aged; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Atrial Fib

2013
[Suppression of the growth of subcutaneous transplanted human liver cancer and lung metastasis in nude mice treated by sorafenib combined with fluorouracil].
    Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology], 2013, Volume: 35, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, S

2013
Major clinical response to a BRAF inhibitor in a patient with a BRAF L597R-mutated melanoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Jul-01, Volume: 31, Issue:19

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Arginine; Back; Cell Survival; Enzyme Activation; Extracellular Signal-

2013
Antiangiogenic therapy promoted metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by suppressing host-derived interleukin-12b in mouse models.
    Angiogenesis, 2013, Volume: 16, Issue:4

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Dendritic Cells; Diph

2013
Successful use of sorafenib after bortezomib failure in metastatic follicular thyroid cancer - a case report.
    Onkologie, 2013, Volume: 36, Issue:6

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Adult; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung

2013
Flavopiridol synergizes with sorafenib to induce cytotoxicity and potentiate antitumorigenic activity in EGFR/HER-2 and mutant RAS/RAF breast cancer model systems.
    Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:8

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Ce

2013
Inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer by LY2801653, an inhibitor of several oncokinases, including MET.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013, Oct-15, Volume: 19, Issue:20

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small

2013
Alteration in the balance of prosurvival and proapoptotic signalling pathways leads to sequence-dependent synergism between docetaxel and sorafenib in human non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.
    Cell biochemistry and biophysics, 2014, Volume: 68, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Carcinoma

2014
Sorafenib induced eruptive melanocytic lesions.
    Dermatology online journal, 2013, May-15, Volume: 19, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Brachytherapy; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Eruptions; Fatal Outcome; Humans;

2013
Major response with sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma after 14 years of follow-up.
    World journal of surgical oncology, 2013, Sep-27, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Human

2013
High risk of lung metastasis after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma more than 7 cm in diameter.
    Surgery today, 2014, Volume: 44, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Female; Hepatectomy; Hum

2014
Dramatic antitumor effects of the dual MET/RON small-molecule inhibitor LY2801653 in non-small cell lung cancer.
    Cancer research, 2014, Feb-01, Volume: 74, Issue:3

    Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation;

2014
Critical role of sorafenib exposure over time for its antitumor activity in thyroid cancer.
    Investigational new drugs, 2014, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Prot

2014
Characterization of the biological activity of a potent small molecule Hec1 inhibitor TAI-1.
    Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2014, Jan-09, Volume: 33

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; A

2014
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with metastatic thyroid carcinomas: a retrospective study of the TUTHYREF network.
    European journal of endocrinology, 2014, Volume: 170, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Adenoma, Oxyphilic; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents;

2014
Exploratory modeling and simulation to support development of motesanib in Asian patients with non-small cell lung cancer based on MONET1 study results.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2014, Volume: 95, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asian People; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinic

2014
Sorafenib-induced tumor response in a patient with metastatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2014, Apr-10, Volume: 32, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Angiomyolipoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Biopsy, Needle; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplas

2014
Combining sorafenib with celecoxib synergistically inhibits tumor growth of non-small cell lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.
    Oncology reports, 2014, Volume: 31, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Carcinoma, No

2014
Oncogenic and sorafenib-sensitive ARAF mutations in lung adenocarcinoma.
    The Journal of clinical investigation, 2014, Volume: 124, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Aged; Amino Acid Substitution; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell T

2014
Orally active microtubule-targeting agent, MPT0B271, for the treatment of human non-small cell lung cancer, alone and in combination with erlotinib.
    Cell death & disease, 2014, Apr-10, Volume: 5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biological Availabili

2014
Histone deacetylase inhibitors sensitize lung cancer cells to hyperthermia: involvement of Ku70/SirT-1 in thermo-protection.
    PloS one, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:4

    Topics: Antigens, Nuclear; Apoptosis; bcl-2-Associated X Protein; Cell Death; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA-Binding

2014
Response to sorafenib treatment in advanced metastatic thyroid cancer.
    Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia, 2014, Volume: 58, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Papillary; Compassionate Use Trials; Female;

2014
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 as molecular therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Carcinoma, Large Cel

2014
Radiation recall reaction causing cardiotoxicity.
    Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2014, Apr-22, Volume: 16

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Antineoplastic Agents; Chemoradiotherapy; Coronary Angiograp

2014
Therapeutic effects of sorafenib on the A549/DDP human lung adenocarcinoma cell line in vitro.
    Molecular medicine reports, 2014, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Mov

2014
Hand, foot and scrotal blisters in a patient with cancer receiving oral chemotherapy.
    BMJ case reports, 2014, May-19, Volume: 2014

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Blister; Carcinoma, He

2014
Response to trabectedin in a patient with advanced synovial sarcoma with lung metastases.
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2014, Volume: 25, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Axilla; Combined Modality Therapy; Dioxoles; Epirubicin; Fatal Outcome

2014
Sorafenib-associated psoriasiform eruption in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2014, Volume: 13, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Eruptions; Humans

2014
Anti-proliferative but not anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors enrich for cancer stem cells in soft tissue sarcoma.
    BMC cancer, 2014, Oct-10, Volume: 14

    Topics: Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antigens, CD; Cell Line, Tumor; C

2014
Synergistic anti-tumor effects of the combination of a benzofuroxan derivate and sorafenib on NCI-H460 human large cell lung carcinoma cells.
    Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, 2014, Volume: 68, Issue:8

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzoxazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Survival; Dose-Response Re

2014
To treat or not to treat: developments in the field of advanced differentiated thyroid cancer.
    The Netherlands journal of medicine, 2014, Volume: 72, Issue:8

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Aged; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Drug Delivery Systems; Female;

2014
A novel approach using sorafenib in alpha fetoprotein-producing hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung.
    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2015, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; alpha-Fetoproteins; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Fat

2015
Metronomic vinorelbine (oral) in combination with sorafenib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2015, Volume: 88, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Metronomic; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2015
Kidney cancer: SWITCHing inconsequential.
    Nature reviews. Urology, 2015, Volume: 12, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Ce

2015
Effects of sorafenib on lung metastasis in rats with hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of microRNAs.
    Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2015, Volume: 36, Issue:11

    Topics: Animals; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Gene Expression Re

2015
Small molecule/ML327 mediated transcriptional de-repression of E-cadherin and inhibition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.
    Oncotarget, 2015, Sep-08, Volume: 6, Issue:26

    Topics: Animals; Cadherins; Cell Line, Tumor; Chick Embryo; Colorectal Neoplasms; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Tra

2015
Sorafenib-Sunitinib Sequence: The Jury Is Out.
    European urology, 2015, Volume: 68, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Ce

2015
A significant response to sorafenib in a woman with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and a BRAF non-V600 mutation.
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2015, Volume: 26, Issue:9

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Mutation; Niacin

2015
Complete pathological response induced by sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases and venous tumor thrombosis allowing for curative resection.
    Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2015, Volume: 8, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Combined Modality Therapy; Hepatectomy; Hepatic Ve

2015
High-Dose Vitamin C Promotes Regression of Multiple Pulmonary Metastases Originating from Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Yonsei medical journal, 2015, Volume: 56, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Ascorbic Acid; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeuti

2015
Absence of Significant Correlation of Adverse Events Between First- and Second-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2016, Volume: 14, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Huma

2016
[Successful Multimodal Treatment for Aggressive Extrahepatic Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma - A Case Report].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2015, Volume: 42, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Combined Modality Therapy; Hepatectomy; Hum

2015
Fisetin, a dietary flavonoid, augments the anti-invasive and anti-metastatic potential of sorafenib in melanoma.
    Oncotarget, 2016, Jan-12, Volume: 7, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Blotting, Western; Cadherins; Cell Line, Tu

2016
Comprehensive multiplatform biomarker analysis of 350 hepatocellular carcinomas identifies potential novel therapeutic options.
    Journal of surgical oncology, 2016, Volume: 113, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; beta Catenin; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, H

2016
Metformin increases antitumor activity of MEK inhibitors through GLI1 downregulation in LKB1 positive human NSCLC cancer cells.
    Oncotarget, 2016, Jan-26, Volume: 7, Issue:4

    Topics: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apopt

2016
EPHA2 Blockade Overcomes Acquired Resistance to EGFR Kinase Inhibitors in Lung Cancer.
    Cancer research, 2016, Jan-15, Volume: 76, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Benzamides; Cell Line, Tumor; Ce

2016
Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Achieving a Complete Response on Targeted Therapy: A Registry-based Analysis.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Huma

2016
Metformin inhibits the prometastatic effect of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating the expression of TIP30.
    Cancer science, 2016, Volume: 107, Issue:4

    Topics: Acetyltransferases; Animals; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Gene E

2016
[Treatment of refractory pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using arsenic trioxide in combination with sorafinib].
    Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology], 2015, Volume: 37, Issue:12

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Arsenic Trioxide; Arsenicals; Carcinoma, Hepatocellu

2015
Sorafenib treatment for patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer.
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2016, Volume: 93

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms;

2016
[Pemetrexed + Sorafenib] lethality is increased by inhibition of ERBB1/2/3-PI3K-NFκB compensatory survival signaling.
    Oncotarget, 2016, Apr-26, Volume: 7, Issue:17

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Breast Neopla

2016
HDAC6-mediated EGFR stabilization and activation restrict cell response to sorafenib in non-small cell lung cancer cells.
    Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2016, Volume: 33, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Drug Re

2016
Simultaneous multitarget radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy and its combination with sorafenib for pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Oncotarget, 2016, Jul-26, Volume: 7, Issue:30

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cohort Studies; Combined Modali

2016
Telomerase inhibitor imetelstat has preclinical activity across the spectrum of non-small cell lung cancer oncogenotypes in a telomere length dependent manner.
    Oncotarget, 2016, May-31, Volume: 7, Issue:22

    Topics: A549 Cells; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Proliferation; Dose

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Long-term response of over ten years with sorafenib monotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a case report.
    Journal of medical case reports, 2016, Jun-16, Volume: 10

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Male;

2016
Efficacy of sorafenib in BRAF-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no response in synchronous BRAF wild type-hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report.
    BMC cancer, 2016, 07-07, Volume: 16

    Topics: Aged; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neopl

2016
1-methylnicotinamide and its structural analog 1,4-dimethylpyridine for the prevention of cancer metastasis.
    Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2016, 07-13, Volume: 35, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Cadherins; Cdh1 Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Epoprostenol; Female; Gene Expression Regulatio

2016
Clinical analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living-donor liver transplantation.
    World journal of gastroenterology, 2016, Jul-07, Volume: 22, Issue:25

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Female; Humans; Liver Neopl

2016
Regorafenib (Stivarga) pharmacologically targets epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer.
    Oncotarget, 2016, Sep-27, Volume: 7, Issue:39

    Topics: Animals; Antigens, CD; Antineoplastic Agents; Cadherins; Cell Movement; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dose-R

2016
Fever within 2 Weeks of Sorafenib Therapy Predicts Favorable Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Oncology, 2016, Volume: 91, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Contrast Media; Fe

2016
A case report of motesanib-induced biliary sludge formation causing obstructive cholangitis with acute pancreatitis treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy.
    Medicine, 2016, Volume: 95, Issue:37

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Bile; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cholangitis; Fatal Outcome; Huma

2016
EGF Induced RET Inhibitor Resistance in CCDC6-RET Lung Cancer Cells.
    Yonsei medical journal, 2017, Volume: 58, Issue:1

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Cell Line, Tumor; Cetuximab; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Epidermal Growth Factor; Erb

2017
PDE5 inhibitors enhance the lethality of [pemetrexed + sorafenib].
    Oncotarget, 2017, Feb-21, Volume: 8, Issue:8

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Autophagy; Cell Line, Tumor; Dru

2017
Assessment of response to anti-angiogenic targeted therapy in pulmonary metastatic renal cell carcinoma: R2* value as a predictive biomarker.
    European radiology, 2017, Volume: 27, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Indoles

2017
[Treatment Experience with Sorafenib for Lung Metastases of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated with Interstitial Pneumonia].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2016, Volume: 43, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Diseases, Inte

2016
Sorafenib: tolerance in patients on chronic hemodialysis: a single-center experience.
    Oncology, 2008, Volume: 74, Issue:3-4

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lu

2008
Follicular hyperplasia on the face subsequent to therapy with sorafenib. A new skin side effect.
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2009, Volume: 23, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Humans; Hyperplasia; Lung Neoplasms; Ma

2009
Response to sorafenib in cisplatin-resistant thymic carcinoma: a case report.
    Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2009, Volume: 26, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma;

2009
Sorafenib is active on lung metastases from synovial sarcoma.
    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2009, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Niacinamide; Ph

2009
Sunitinib treatment for patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma after progression on sorafenib.
    Oncology, 2009, Volume: 76, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, R

2009
Antitumor efficacy of recombinant human interleukin-2 combined with sorafenib against mouse renal cell carcinoma.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2009, Volume: 39, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; C

2009
The successful use of sorafenib to treat pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma.
    Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association, 2009, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Papillary; Child; Female; Humans; Iodine Radioisotopes; Lu

2009
Preclinical development of the nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase inhibitor prodrug GMX1777.
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2009, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Small Cell; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neo

2009
The reverse side of the victory: flare up of symptoms after discontinuation of sunitinib or sorafenib in renal cell cancer patients. A report of three cases.
    Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2009, Volume: 48, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Indoles; Kidn

2009
Multiple colon ulcerations, perforation and death during treatment of malignant melanoma with sorafenib.
    Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2009, Volume: 134, Issue:28-29

    Topics: Abdomen, Acute; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Colectomy; Colonic Diseases; Diarrhe

2009
Sorafenib inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell growth by targeting B-RAF in KRAS wild-type cells and C-RAF in KRAS mutant cells.
    Cancer research, 2009, Aug-15, Volume: 69, Issue:16

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Proliferation; Cyclin

2009
[Expert consensus on standardization of the management of primary liver cancer].
    Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology, 2009, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: alpha-Fetoproteins; Benzenesulfonates; Biomarkers; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Catheter Ablation; Che

2009
Sorafenib induces partial response in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma.
    Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2010, Volume: 49, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Humans;

2010
Spontaneous pyopneumothorax in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors for subpleural pulmonary metastases.
    Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2010, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Calcitonin; Carcinoma, Rena

2010
Interstitial pneumonia probably associated with sorafenib treatment: An alert of an adverse event.
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2010, Volume: 67, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Human

2010
CD133+ circulating haematopoietic progenitor cells predict for response to sorafenib plus erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
    British journal of cancer, 2010, Jan-19, Volume: 102, Issue:2

    Topics: AC133 Antigen; Adult; Aged; Antigens, CD; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesul

2010
Apparent remission of a solitary metastatic pulmonary lesion in a liver transplant recipient treated with sorafenib.
    American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2009, Volume: 9, Issue:12

    Topics: Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Combined Modality Therapy; Hep

2009
[Clinical observation of 21 cases of metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib].
    Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology], 2009, Volume: 31, Issue:9

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma,

2009
[Clinical observation of the treatment with combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with lung metastasis].
    Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology], 2009, Volume: 31, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization,

2009
[Targeting KRAS pathway in NSCLC therapy].
    Bulletin du cancer, 2009, Volume: 96 Suppl

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Farnesyltranstran

2009
Sorafenib inhibits ERK1/2 and MCL-1(L) phosphorylation levels resulting in caspase-independent cell death in malignant pleural mesothelioma.
    Cancer biology & therapy, 2009, Volume: 8, Issue:24

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Caspase 3; Cell Line, Tumor; Extracell

2009
Verification and unmasking of widely used human esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010, Feb-24, Volume: 102, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Biomedical Research; Carcinoma; Carcinoma,

2010
Combination therapy of interleukin-2 and sorafenib improves survival benefits and prevents spontaneous pulmonary metastasis in murine renal cell carcinoma models.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2010, Volume: 40, Issue:6

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; C

2010
Choroidal metastasis of renal cell carcinoma: a case report.
    Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2010, Volume: 54, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Choroid Neoplasms; Eye Enucleation;

2010
Nox1 is involved in p53 deacetylation and suppression of its transcriptional activity and apoptosis.
    Free radical biology & medicine, 2010, May-15, Volume: 48, Issue:10

    Topics: Acetylation; Apoptosis; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma; Carrier Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Cloning, Mo

2010
Comparative profiling of the novel epothilone, sagopilone, in xenografts derived from primary non-small cell lung cancer.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2010, Mar-01, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesu

2010
Sorafenib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer that harbor K-ras mutations: a brief report.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2010, Volume: 5, Issue:5

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulf

2010
Depletion of tumor-associated macrophages enhances the effect of sorafenib in metastatic liver cancer models by antimetastatic and antiangiogenic effects.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2010, Jul-01, Volume: 16, Issue:13

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cl

2010
Long-term stable disease in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: sorafenib sequenced to sunitinib and everolimus: a case study.
    Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2011, Volume: 28, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carc

2011
Response to sorafenib in a patient with metastatic xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2010, Volume: 30, Issue:11

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Chromosomes, Human, X; Disease-Free

2010
Evolution of an adenocarcinoma in response to selection by targeted kinase inhibitors.
    Genome biology, 2010, Volume: 11, Issue:8

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Benzenesulfonates; Gene Dosage; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genes, Neopl

2010
Evolution of an adenocarcinoma in response to selection by targeted kinase inhibitors.
    Genome biology, 2010, Volume: 11, Issue:8

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Benzenesulfonates; Gene Dosage; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genes, Neopl

2010
Evolution of an adenocarcinoma in response to selection by targeted kinase inhibitors.
    Genome biology, 2010, Volume: 11, Issue:8

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Benzenesulfonates; Gene Dosage; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genes, Neopl

2010
Evolution of an adenocarcinoma in response to selection by targeted kinase inhibitors.
    Genome biology, 2010, Volume: 11, Issue:8

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Benzenesulfonates; Gene Dosage; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genes, Neopl

2010
Significance of manipulating tumour hypoxia and radiation dose rate in terms of local tumour response and lung metastatic potential, referring to the response of quiescent cell populations.
    The British journal of radiology, 2010, Volume: 83, Issue:993

    Topics: Animals; Bromodeoxyuridine; Cell Hypoxia; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Gamma Rays; Lung Neopla

2010
Synergistic antitumor activity of sorafenib in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in colorectal and lung cancer cells.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2010, Oct-15, Volume: 16, Issue:20

    Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemothe

2010
Feasibility of (125)I brachytherapy combined with sorafenib treatment in patients with multiple lung metastases after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2010, Volume: 136, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Brachytherapy; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cause of

2010
[Tegafur-uracil markedly reduced pulmonary metastasis from renal cell carcinoma refractory to sorafenib, interferon and interleukin 2].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2010, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug

2010
Sirolimus plus sorafenib in treating HCC recurrence after liver transplantation: a case report.
    World journal of gastroenterology, 2010, Nov-21, Volume: 16, Issue:43

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Therapy, Combination; Huma

2010
Prolonged survival in renal transplant recipient with advanced renal cell carcinoma by everolimus and sorafenib.
    Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.), 2011, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Fr

2011
NSCLC drug targets acquire new visibility.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011, Mar-02, Volume: 103, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Benzimidazoles; Bexarotene; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma,

2011
A painful cranial bulge.
    Lancet (London, England), 2011, May-21, Volume: 377, Issue:9779

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Brain Neoplasms; Drug Administ

2011
Synergistic cytotoxicity, inhibition of signal transduction pathways and pharmacogenetics of sorafenib and gemcitabine in human NSCLC cell lines.
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2011, Volume: 74, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-C

2011
FLT-PET may not be a reliable indicator of therapeutic response in p53-null malignancy.
    International journal of oncology, 2011, Volume: 39, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell L

2011
Clinical hypothyroidism in a renal cell carcinoma patient treated with sorafenib.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2011, Volume: 9, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Hypothyroidism; Lung Neopla

2011
Sorafenib induces apoptotic cell death in human non-small cell lung cancer cells by down-regulating mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent survivin expression.
    Biochemical pharmacology, 2011, Aug-01, Volume: 82, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumo

2011
Severe sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction.
    Dermatology online journal, 2011, May-15, Volume: 17, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clobetasol; Dis

2011
An investigation of the effect of sorafenib on tumour growth and recurrence after liver cancer resection in nude mice independent of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase levels.
    Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2011, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Growth Processes; Cell Li

2011
Antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer: characterizing the molecular basis for serious adverse events.
    Cancer investigation, 2011, Volume: 29, Issue:7

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Benzenesulfonate

2011
Antitumour efficacy of MEK inhibitors in human lung cancer cells and their derivatives with acquired resistance to different tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
    British journal of cancer, 2011, Jul-26, Volume: 105, Issue:3

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Animals; Benzenesulfonates; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Prolifera

2011
[Long-standing differentiated thyroid carcinoma].
    Endocrinologia y nutricion : organo de la Sociedad Espanola de Endocrinologia y Nutricion, 2012, Volume: 59, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Biopsy, Needle; Carcinoma, Large Cell; Carcinoma, Papillar

2012
Bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation with a positive ophthalmoscopic and visual response to plasmapheresis.
    Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960), 2011, Volume: 129, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Autoantibodies; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Bronchogenic; Cell Proliferation; Eye Proteins;

2011
Complete response of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases treated with sorafenib: a case report.
    Oncology, 2011, Volume: 81 Suppl 1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Female; Humans; Liver Neo

2011
Hepatic androgen receptor suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through modulation of cell migration and anoikis.
    Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2012, Volume: 56, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Anoikis; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; D

2012
Effects of employing a ¹⁰B-carrier and manipulating intratumour hypoxia on local tumour response and lung metastatic potential in boron neutron capture therapy.
    The British journal of radiology, 2012, Volume: 85, Issue:1011

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Borohydrides; Boron Neutron Capture Therapy; Bromodeoxyuridine; Cell

2012
Synergistic antitumor efficacy of sequentially combined paclitaxel with sorafenib in vitro and in vivo NSCLC models harboring KRAS or BRAF mutations.
    Cancer letters, 2012, Sep-28, Volume: 322, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, No

2012
Pancreatic metastasis arising from a BRAF(V600E)-positive papillary thyroid cancer: the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy and response to sorafenib therapy.
    Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association, 2012, Volume: 22, Issue:5

    Topics: Benzenesulfonates; Biopsy; Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Papillary; Disease Progression; Endoscopy; Fatal Ou

2012
Intra-arterial infusion of chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an Asian perspective.
    Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2012, Volume: 8, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic;

2012
Sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolization and bronchial arterial chemoinfusion in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis.
    Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2012, Volume: 8, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bronchial Arteries; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoemboli

2012
Painful leg mass.
    The Journal of family practice, 2012, Volume: 61, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Hospice Care; Humans; Kidney Neopla

2012
Unusual short-term complete response to two regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy in a patient with poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2012, Volume: 97, Issue:9

    Topics: Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy

2012
Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors in unselected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): impressions from MONET (the motesanib NSCLC efficacy and tolerability study).
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2012, Aug-10, Volume: 30, Issue:23

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Fema

2012
The inhibition of the pemetrexed-activated MAPK pathway via sorafenib is involved in the synergistic mechanism of sorafenib subsequent potentiation of pemetrexed cytotoxicity in EGFR TKI-resistant cell lines.
    Clinical laboratory, 2012, Volume: 58, Issue:5-6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Sur

2012
Brain metastasis from follicular thyroid carcinoma: treatment with sorafenib.
    Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association, 2012, Volume: 22, Issue:8

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Brain Neoplasms; Female; Human

2012
Sorafenib for lung cancer: is the "Battle" still open?
    Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2012, Volume: 21, Issue:10

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lung Neoplasms;

2012
High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.
    Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2012, Volume: 25, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Carci

2012
FGF3/FGF4 amplification and multiple lung metastases in responders to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2013, Volume: 57, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line

2013
A needle in a haystack: Identifying biomarkers to personalize systemic therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2013, Volume: 57, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Female; Fibroblast Growth Factor 3; Fibro

2013
Molecular mechanisms and modulation of key pathways underlying the synergistic interaction of sorafenib with erlotinib in non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC) cells.
    Current pharmaceutical design, 2013, Volume: 19, Issue:5

    Topics: Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; Chromato

2013
Antitumor activity of motesanib alone and in combination with cisplatin or docetaxel in multiple human non-small-cell lung cancer xenograft models.
    Molecular cancer, 2012, Sep-19, Volume: 11

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation

2012
Durable spontaneous regression of lung metastases from renal cell carcinoma after incomplete use of multiple kinase inhibitor sorafenib.
    International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2013, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung; Lung Neo

2013
Physical health, mental health, and life changes among family caregivers of patients with lung cancer.
    Oncology nursing forum, 2013, Volume: 40, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Caregivers; Cross-Sectional Studies; Family Health; Female; Health S

2013
PG545, a heparan sulfate mimetic, reduces heparanase expression in vivo, blocks spontaneous metastases and enhances overall survival in the 4T1 breast carcinoma model.
    PloS one, 2012, Volume: 7, Issue:12

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protoc

2012
[THE LEVEL OF NICOTINIC ACID DERIVATIVES AND THEIR EXCRETION IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC AND PULMONARY CANCER].
    Voprosy onkologii, 1964, Volume: 10

    Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Niacin; Niacinamide; Nicotinic Acids; Stomach Neoplasms

1964
Use of mitogenic cascade blockers for treatment of C-Raf induced lung adenoma in vivo: CI-1040 strongly reduces growth and improves lung structure.
    BMC cancer, 2004, Jun-01, Volume: 4

    Topics: Adenoma; Animals; Apoptosis; Benzamides; Benzenesulfonates; Cell Differentiation; Cell Division; Lun

2004
Spinal cord metastasis of a non-neurofibromatosis type-1 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: an unusual manifestation of a rare tumor.
    Journal of neuro-oncology, 2005, Volume: 74, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Benzenesulfonates; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Fatal Outcome; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mag

2005
Sorafenib is efficacious and tolerated in combination with cytotoxic or cytostatic agents in preclinical models of human non-small cell lung carcinoma.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2007, Volume: 59, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2007
Nicotinamide extends replicative lifespan of human cells.
    Aging cell, 2006, Volume: 5, Issue:5

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Carcinoma; Cell Division; Cell Line, Tumor; Cells, Cultured; Cellular Senesc

2006
Leukocytoclastic vasculitis masquerading as hand-foot syndrome in a patient treated with sorafenib.
    Archives of dermatology, 2006, Volume: 142, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Diagnosis, Different

2006
'Seed' analysis of off-target siRNAs reveals an essential role of Mcl-1 in resistance to the small-molecule Bcl-2/Bcl-XL inhibitor ABT-737.
    Oncogene, 2007, Jun-07, Volume: 26, Issue:27

    Topics: 3' Untranslated Regions; Antineoplastic Agents; Base Sequence; bcl-X Protein; Benzenesulfonates; Bip

2007
Keratoacanthomas associated with sorafenib therapy.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2007, Volume: 56, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Arm; Benzenesulfonates; Facial Dermatoses; Female; Humans; Keratoacanth

2007
Sorafenib-induced erythema multiforme.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2007, Volume: 56, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzenesulfonates; Erythema Multiforme; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Melano

2007
Sorafenib and sunitinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    The oncologist, 2007, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials as Topic;

2007
Yellow skin discoloration associated with sorafenib use for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Southern medical journal, 2007, Volume: 100, Issue:3

    Topics: Acrodermatitis; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Erythema; Humans; K

2007
Pulmonary blastoma with renal metastasis responds to sorafenib.
    Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2007, Volume: 2, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Benzenesulfonates; Biopsy, Needle; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Combined Mod

2007
Do the results of the new trials change the standard treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer?
    Onkologie, 2007, Volume: 30, Issue:5

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical T

2007
[Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and loss of strength in the right arm--not a typical combination].
    Praxis, 2007, May-02, Volume: 96, Issue:18

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Arm; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma

2007
ASCO 2007: plenary top 5.
    Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.), 2007, Volume: 21, Issue:7

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Carcinom

2007
Design of phase II cancer trials using a continuous endpoint of change in tumor size: application to a study of sorafenib and erlotinib in non small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007, Oct-03, Volume: 99, Issue:19

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; C

2007
Re: Design of phase II cancer trials using a continuous endpoint of change in tumor size: application to a study of sorafenib and erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008, Mar-19, Volume: 100, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase II

2008
Metastatic chest wall malignant schwannoma responding to sorafenib: case report and literature review.
    Cancer biology & therapy, 2008, Volume: 7, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Brain Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Ma

2008
Safety and activity of sorafenib in different histotypes of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
    Oncology, 2007, Volume: 73, Issue:3-4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Proto

2007
Combination of fractionated irradiation with nicotinamide and carbogen in R1H-tumours of the rat and its pulmonary metastases.
    Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 1997, Volume: 45, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Carbon Dioxide; Combined Modality Therapy; Disease Models, Animal; Dose Fractionation, Radi

1997
Preclinical evaluation of the novel hypoxic marker 99mTc-HL91 (Prognox) in murine and xenograft systems in vivo.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 1998, Nov-01, Volume: 42, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Carbon Dioxide; Carcinoma; Cell Hypoxia; Colonic Neoplasms; Contrast Media;

1998
The influence of nutritional factors on pulmonary adenomas in mice.
    Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 1977, Volume: 91

    Topics: Adenoma; Animals; Body Weight; Choline; Inositol; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Inbred Strains; Niacin

1977
[Anticarcinogenic action of vitamins PP and B6 in the natulan initiation of malignant growth in mice].
    Voprosy onkologii, 1989, Volume: 35, Issue:1

    Topics: Adenoma; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Interactions; Female; Lu

1989
The antimetastatic and tumor growth retarding effects of sulfur containing analogs of nicotinamide.
    Cancer letters, 1986, Volume: 31, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Female; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Neoplasm Transplantation; Niacinamide; St

1986
Inhibiting effects of nicotinamide on urethane-induced malformations and tumors in mice.
    Mutation research, 1988, Volume: 199, Issue:1

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Animals; Cleft Lip; Cleft Palate; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

1988
The inhibitory effect of B-group vitamins on the incidence of tumour metastases.
    Die Naturwissenschaften, 1971, Volume: 58, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Lung Neoplasms; Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental; Mice; Neoplasm Metastasis; Niacinamide; Ox

1971