niacinamide has been researched along with Cancer of Lung in 272 studies
nicotinamide : A pyridinecarboxamide that is pyridine in which the hydrogen at position 3 is replaced by a carboxamide group.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Aim of the study was to investigate efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) therapy." | 9.19 | A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib monotherapy in clinically selected patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of EGFR-TKI therapy (Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group, CTONG 0805). ( Chen, GY; Cheng, Y; Huang, C; Li, AW; Su, J; Wu, YL; Xu, CR; Yan, HH; Yang, JJ; Zhang, L; Zhang, XC; Zhou, CC; Zhou, Q, 2014) |
"Sorafenib has shown promise in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic thyroid carcinoma." | 9.15 | Response to sorafenib at a low dose in patients with radioiodine-refractory pulmonary metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma. ( Chen, L; Lu, H; Luo, Q; Shen, Y; Yu, Y; Zhu, R, 2011) |
"Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received sorafenib at a dose of 400 mg twice daily in 4-week cycles." | 9.14 | Phase 2 open-label study of single-agent sorafenib in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B-endemic Asian population: presence of lung metastasis predicts poor response. ( Chan, P; Cheung, TT; Chok, SH; Fan, ST; Ng, KK; Poon, RT; Yau, T, 2009) |
"Sorafenib is a clinically useful multiple kinase inhibitor for the treatment of kidney cancer, liver cancer and acute myelocytic leukemia, while it has shown weak efficacy in suppressing breast cancer." | 8.12 | Potential synthetic lethality for breast cancer: A selective sirtuin 2 inhibitor combined with a multiple kinase inhibitor sorafenib. ( Guan, XY; Li, GB; Ma, X; Song, C; Wang, HL; Yang, LL; Yu, YM, 2022) |
" The authors have therefore assessed if the concurrent use of gastric acid suppressants and sorafenib impairs outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 8.02 | Association of Gastric Acid Suppression and Sorafenib Efficacy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Fletcher, P; Kunene, V; Ma, YT; Razak, RA, 2021) |
"We report an advanced HCC patient with many lung metastases who failed sorafenib treatment." | 7.88 | The excellent antitumor effect of apatinib alone as second-line therapy in a patient with sorafenib-refractory hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report. ( Duo, J; Ma, X; Zhao, Y; Zhu, H, 2018) |
"We analyzed the molecular mechanisms of the antiproliferative effects of sorafenib in mesothelioma TIC cultures." | 7.85 | The inhibition of FGF receptor 1 activity mediates sorafenib antiproliferative effects in human malignant pleural mesothelioma tumor-initiating cells. ( Barbieri, F; Carra, E; Daga, A; Favoni, RE; Filiberti, RA; Florio, T; Marubbi, D; Mutti, L; Pattarozzi, A; Würth, R, 2017) |
"We previously found that a low dose of sorafenib had a prometastatic effect on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which was caused by downregulation of TIP30 expression." | 7.83 | Metformin inhibits the prometastatic effect of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating the expression of TIP30. ( Cao, M; Cui, Y; Fang, F; Gao, J; Guo, Z; Li, H; Li, Q; Song, T; Sun, H; You, A; Zhang, T; Zhang, W; Zhou, H; Zhu, X, 2016) |
"We evaluated radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy (HT) combined with sorafenib for treatment of pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 7.83 | Simultaneous multitarget radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy and its combination with sorafenib for pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. ( He, J; Sun, J; Sun, T; Zeng, M; Zeng, Z; Zhang, S, 2016) |
"Sorafenib is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor with a demonstrated activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and it is currently used for the treatment of these pathologies." | 7.83 | Efficacy of sorafenib in BRAF-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no response in synchronous BRAF wild type-hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report. ( Casadei Gardini, A; Chiadini, E; Delmonte, A; Dubini, A; Faloppi, L; Frassineti, GL; Loretelli, C; Lucchesi, A; Marisi, G; Oboldi, D; Scartozzi, M; Ulivi, P, 2016) |
"The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between fever within 2 weeks after the start of sorafenib therapy and treatment efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 7.83 | Fever within 2 Weeks of Sorafenib Therapy Predicts Favorable Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Goto, H; Hayashi, K; Hirooka, Y; Honda, T; Ishigami, M; Ishikawa, T; Ishizu, Y; Kuzuya, T; Nakano, I, 2016) |
"We report the first case of initially unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein and hepatic venous tumor thrombosis and multiple lung metastases that allowed for curative hepatectomy after multidisciplinary treatment including sorafenib." | 7.81 | Complete pathological response induced by sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases and venous tumor thrombosis allowing for curative resection. ( Fujimoto, Y; Hatano, E; Kaido, T; Kitajima, T; Minamiguchi, S; Mitsunori, Y; Mizumoto, M; Okajima, H; Taura, K; Uemoto, S, 2015) |
" Sorafenib is a small-molecule multikinase inhibitor used in radioactive iodine ((131)I)-refractive papillary thyroid carcinoma." | 7.80 | Response to sorafenib in a pediatric patient with papillary thyroid carcinoma with diffuse nodular pulmonary disease requiring mechanical ventilation. ( Ewig, JM; Iyer, P; Mayer, JL, 2014) |
" One patient with advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma, who was treated with oral sorafenib, demonstrated a near-complete clinical and radiographic remission for 5 years." | 7.80 | Oncogenic and sorafenib-sensitive ARAF mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. ( Amann, J; Araujo, L; Carbone, DP; Greulich, H; Horn, L; Imielinski, M; Kaplan, B; Meyerson, M; Schiller, J; Villalona-Calero, MA, 2014) |
"The aim of the present study was to observe the effects of sorafenib on the proliferation, apoptosis and invasion of A549/DDP cisplatin-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cells cultured in vitro." | 7.80 | Therapeutic effects of sorafenib on the A549/DDP human lung adenocarcinoma cell line in vitro. ( Chen, XQ; Li, ZY; Lin, TY; Wang, YL, 2014) |
"Sorafenib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 7.79 | Suppression of natural killer cells by sorafenib contributes to prometastatic effects in hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Bu, Y; Chai, ZT; Jia, QA; Kong, LQ; Lu, L; Sun, HC; Tang, ZY; Wang, L; Wang, M; Wang, WQ; Wu, WZ; Zhang, KZ; Zhang, QB; Zhu, XD, 2013) |
"The response rate to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is relatively low (0." | 7.79 | FGF3/FGF4 amplification and multiple lung metastases in responders to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Arao, T; Arii, S; Hagiwara, S; Haji, S; Hakamada, K; Hiasa, Y; Hidaka, H; Hirooka, M; Hisai, H; Iso, Y; Izumi, N; Kanazawa, A; Kimura, H; Kubota, K; Kudo, M; Kumada, T; Kuzuya, T; Matsumoto, K; Nagai, T; Nishio, K; Sakurai, T; Sato, S; Shimada, M; Toyoda, H; Toyoki, Y; Tsuchiya, K; Ueshima, K; Utsunomiya, T; Yasui, K, 2013) |
"Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 7.77 | Complete response of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases treated with sorafenib: a case report. ( Henmi, S; Inuzuka, T; Kimura, T; Kita, R; Kudo, M; Nishikawa, H; Osaki, Y; Saito, S; Sakamoto, A; Sekikawa, A; Takeda, H, 2011) |
"To evaluate (125)I seed brachytherapy combined with sorafenib in the treatment of patients with multiple lung metastases after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 7.76 | Feasibility of (125)I brachytherapy combined with sorafenib treatment in patients with multiple lung metastases after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Huang, Z; Li, C; Wu, P; Zhang, F; Zhang, L; Zhang, W, 2010) |
"A 66-year-old man with malignant melanoma was treated with sorafenib, 2 yen 400 mg per day." | 7.75 | Multiple colon ulcerations, perforation and death during treatment of malignant melanoma with sorafenib. ( Frieling, T; Heise, J; Wassilew, SW, 2009) |
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with lung metastasis." | 7.75 | [Clinical observation of the treatment with combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with lung metastasis]. ( Duan, F; Liu, FY; Song, P; Wang, MQ; Wang, ZJ, 2009) |
" The nanocomplex enhanced bioavailability of hydrophobic drugs, efficient tumor cell targeting and exhibited pH-responsive function and sustained release profile." | 5.46 | Simultaneous inhibition of growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by co-delivery of ursolic acid and sorafenib using lactobionic acid modified and pH-sensitive chitosan-conjugated mesoporous silica nanocomplex. ( Fan, L; Jiang, K; Li, T; Shao, J; Zhao, R; Zheng, G, 2017) |
"Melanoma is the most aggressive and deadly form of cutaneous neoplasm due to its propensity to metastasize." | 5.43 | Fisetin, a dietary flavonoid, augments the anti-invasive and anti-metastatic potential of sorafenib in melanoma. ( Afaq, F; Athar, M; Diamond, AC; Elmets, CA; Kappes, JC; Katiyar, SK; Pal, HC; Strickland, LR, 2016) |
"Regorafenib has a closely related chemical structure as sorafenib and is approved for the pharmacotherapy of mCRC." | 5.43 | Regorafenib (Stivarga) pharmacologically targets epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. ( Chen, KF; Fan, LC; Hung, MH; Jiang, JK; Shiau, CW; Tai, WT; Teng, HW; Yang, SH, 2016) |
"A 74-year-old man was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC; S4/8)and underwent anterior segment resection of the liver in 2015." | 5.43 | [Treatment Experience with Sorafenib for Lung Metastases of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated with Interstitial Pneumonia]. ( Hasegawa, J; Hirota, M; Kameda, C; Kawabata, R; Koga, C; Matsumura, T; Murakami, M; Noura, S; Shimizu, J; Shuto, T; Yasuyama, A; Yoshikawa, M, 2016) |
"Many patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develop lung metastasis and available treatments are limited." | 5.42 | Effects of sorafenib on lung metastasis in rats with hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of microRNAs. ( Huang, A; Shi, Y, 2015) |
"Sorafenib is a small molecule that blocks the activation of C-RAF, B-RAF, c-KIT, FLT-3, RET, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and PDGFR approved for advanced renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma (b, c)." | 5.42 | A significant response to sorafenib in a woman with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and a BRAF non-V600 mutation. ( Casado Sáenz, E; Falagan, S; García Sánchez, S; Gómez-Raposo, C; Hernández Jusdado, R; Moreno Rubio, J; Moreno, V; Sereno, M; Zambrana Tébar, F, 2015) |
"Sorafenib has shown promise in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic thyroid carcinoma." | 5.38 | Brain metastasis from follicular thyroid carcinoma: treatment with sorafenib. ( Chen, L; Lu, H; Luo, Q; Ruan, M; Shen, Y; Yu, Y; Zhu, R, 2012) |
" Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 92% of all patients necessitating sorafenib discontinuation in 77%." | 5.38 | High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Fischer, L; Nashan, B; Seegers, B; Staufer, K; Sterneck, M; Vettorazzi, E, 2012) |
"Aim of the study was to investigate efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) therapy." | 5.19 | A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib monotherapy in clinically selected patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of EGFR-TKI therapy (Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group, CTONG 0805). ( Chen, GY; Cheng, Y; Huang, C; Li, AW; Su, J; Wu, YL; Xu, CR; Yan, HH; Yang, JJ; Zhang, L; Zhang, XC; Zhou, CC; Zhou, Q, 2014) |
"We evaluated whether motesanib (a selective oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3; platelet-derived growth factor receptor; and Kit) combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy alone in patients with nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in the subset of patients with adenocarcinoma." | 5.16 | International, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: MONET1. ( Banaclocha, NM; Blackhall, F; Ciuleanu, TE; Dediu, M; Galimi, F; Galiulin, R; Hei, YJ; Ichinose, Y; Kubota, K; McCoy, S; Papai-Szekely, Z; Park, K; Pirker, R; Scagliotti, GV; Spigel, DR; Sydorenko, O; Vynnychenko, I; Yao, B, 2012) |
"Sorafenib has shown promise in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic thyroid carcinoma." | 5.15 | Response to sorafenib at a low dose in patients with radioiodine-refractory pulmonary metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma. ( Chen, L; Lu, H; Luo, Q; Shen, Y; Yu, Y; Zhu, R, 2011) |
"Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received sorafenib at a dose of 400 mg twice daily in 4-week cycles." | 5.14 | Phase 2 open-label study of single-agent sorafenib in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B-endemic Asian population: presence of lung metastasis predicts poor response. ( Chan, P; Cheung, TT; Chok, SH; Fan, ST; Ng, KK; Poon, RT; Yau, T, 2009) |
"Sorafenib is a clinically useful multiple kinase inhibitor for the treatment of kidney cancer, liver cancer and acute myelocytic leukemia, while it has shown weak efficacy in suppressing breast cancer." | 4.12 | Potential synthetic lethality for breast cancer: A selective sirtuin 2 inhibitor combined with a multiple kinase inhibitor sorafenib. ( Guan, XY; Li, GB; Ma, X; Song, C; Wang, HL; Yang, LL; Yu, YM, 2022) |
" The authors have therefore assessed if the concurrent use of gastric acid suppressants and sorafenib impairs outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 4.02 | Association of Gastric Acid Suppression and Sorafenib Efficacy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Fletcher, P; Kunene, V; Ma, YT; Razak, RA, 2021) |
"We report an advanced HCC patient with many lung metastases who failed sorafenib treatment." | 3.88 | The excellent antitumor effect of apatinib alone as second-line therapy in a patient with sorafenib-refractory hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report. ( Duo, J; Ma, X; Zhao, Y; Zhu, H, 2018) |
" Independent actions of the model drugs DNA-intercalating doxorubicin, RNA-interfering miR-34a and protein-inhibiting sorafenib on DNA replication, RNA translation and protein kinase signaling in highly metastatic, human osteosarcoma 143B cells were demonstrated by the increase of γH2A." | 3.85 | Co-targeting of DNA, RNA, and protein molecules provides optimal outcomes for treating osteosarcoma and pulmonary metastasis in spontaneous and experimental metastasis mouse models. ( DeVere White, RW; Duan, Z; Ho, PY; Jian, C; Lam, KS; Lara, PN; Qiu, JX; Tu, MJ; Wun, T; Yu, AM; Yu, AX; Zhang, Q, 2017) |
"We analyzed the molecular mechanisms of the antiproliferative effects of sorafenib in mesothelioma TIC cultures." | 3.85 | The inhibition of FGF receptor 1 activity mediates sorafenib antiproliferative effects in human malignant pleural mesothelioma tumor-initiating cells. ( Barbieri, F; Carra, E; Daga, A; Favoni, RE; Filiberti, RA; Florio, T; Marubbi, D; Mutti, L; Pattarozzi, A; Würth, R, 2017) |
"We previously found that a low dose of sorafenib had a prometastatic effect on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which was caused by downregulation of TIP30 expression." | 3.83 | Metformin inhibits the prometastatic effect of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating the expression of TIP30. ( Cao, M; Cui, Y; Fang, F; Gao, J; Guo, Z; Li, H; Li, Q; Song, T; Sun, H; You, A; Zhang, T; Zhang, W; Zhou, H; Zhu, X, 2016) |
"We evaluated radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy (HT) combined with sorafenib for treatment of pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 3.83 | Simultaneous multitarget radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy and its combination with sorafenib for pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. ( He, J; Sun, J; Sun, T; Zeng, M; Zeng, Z; Zhang, S, 2016) |
"Sorafenib is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor with a demonstrated activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and it is currently used for the treatment of these pathologies." | 3.83 | Efficacy of sorafenib in BRAF-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no response in synchronous BRAF wild type-hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report. ( Casadei Gardini, A; Chiadini, E; Delmonte, A; Dubini, A; Faloppi, L; Frassineti, GL; Loretelli, C; Lucchesi, A; Marisi, G; Oboldi, D; Scartozzi, M; Ulivi, P, 2016) |
"The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between fever within 2 weeks after the start of sorafenib therapy and treatment efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 3.83 | Fever within 2 Weeks of Sorafenib Therapy Predicts Favorable Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ( Goto, H; Hayashi, K; Hirooka, Y; Honda, T; Ishigami, M; Ishikawa, T; Ishizu, Y; Kuzuya, T; Nakano, I, 2016) |
"We report the first case of initially unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein and hepatic venous tumor thrombosis and multiple lung metastases that allowed for curative hepatectomy after multidisciplinary treatment including sorafenib." | 3.81 | Complete pathological response induced by sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases and venous tumor thrombosis allowing for curative resection. ( Fujimoto, Y; Hatano, E; Kaido, T; Kitajima, T; Minamiguchi, S; Mitsunori, Y; Mizumoto, M; Okajima, H; Taura, K; Uemoto, S, 2015) |
" Sorafenib is a small-molecule multikinase inhibitor used in radioactive iodine ((131)I)-refractive papillary thyroid carcinoma." | 3.80 | Response to sorafenib in a pediatric patient with papillary thyroid carcinoma with diffuse nodular pulmonary disease requiring mechanical ventilation. ( Ewig, JM; Iyer, P; Mayer, JL, 2014) |
"THERE WERE 62 PATIENTS (37 MEN, MEAN AGE: 61 years) treated with sorafenib (62%), sunitinib (22%), and vandetanib (16%) outside of clinical trials; 22 had papillary, five had follicular, five had Hürthle cell, 13 had poorly differentiated, and 17 had medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC)." | 3.80 | Tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with metastatic thyroid carcinomas: a retrospective study of the TUTHYREF network. ( Baudin, E; Bonichon, F; Borget, I; Brassard, M; Chougnet, CN; Claude-Desroches, M; de la Fouchardière, C; Do Cao, C; Giraudet, AL; Leboulleux, S; Massicotte, MH; Schlumberger, M, 2014) |
" One patient with advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma, who was treated with oral sorafenib, demonstrated a near-complete clinical and radiographic remission for 5 years." | 3.80 | Oncogenic and sorafenib-sensitive ARAF mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. ( Amann, J; Araujo, L; Carbone, DP; Greulich, H; Horn, L; Imielinski, M; Kaplan, B; Meyerson, M; Schiller, J; Villalona-Calero, MA, 2014) |
"The aim of the present study was to observe the effects of sorafenib on the proliferation, apoptosis and invasion of A549/DDP cisplatin-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cells cultured in vitro." | 3.80 | Therapeutic effects of sorafenib on the A549/DDP human lung adenocarcinoma cell line in vitro. ( Chen, XQ; Li, ZY; Lin, TY; Wang, YL, 2014) |
" This case report discusses an atypical presentation of the hand-foot syndrome in one patient treated with sorafenib." | 3.80 | Hand, foot and scrotal blisters in a patient with cancer receiving oral chemotherapy. ( Bella, A; Guerra, JR; Lolo, D; Suelves, AM, 2014) |
"We exposed human sarcoma cell lines to sorafenib, regorafenib, and pazopanib and assessed cell viability and expression of CSC markers (ALDH, CD24, CD44, and CD133)." | 3.80 | Anti-proliferative but not anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors enrich for cancer stem cells in soft tissue sarcoma. ( Ames, E; Borys, D; Canter, RJ; Chen, M; Grossenbacher, SK; Li, CS; Mac, S; Monjazeb, AM; Murphy, WJ; Sayers, TJ; Smith, RC; Tellez, J, 2014) |
"Sorafenib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 3.79 | Suppression of natural killer cells by sorafenib contributes to prometastatic effects in hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Bu, Y; Chai, ZT; Jia, QA; Kong, LQ; Lu, L; Sun, HC; Tang, ZY; Wang, L; Wang, M; Wang, WQ; Wu, WZ; Zhang, KZ; Zhang, QB; Zhu, XD, 2013) |
"Antiangiogenic therapy, specially sorafenib, has become the standard of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however, the improvement in survival time is not satisfactory." | 3.79 | Antiangiogenic therapy promoted metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by suppressing host-derived interleukin-12b in mouse models. ( Chai, ZT; Gao, DM; Kong, LQ; Lu, L; Sun, HC; Tang, ZY; Wang, L; Wang, WQ; Wu, WZ; Xu, HX; Zhang, JB; Zhang, W; Zhu, XD; Zhuang, PY, 2013) |
"The response rate to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is relatively low (0." | 3.79 | FGF3/FGF4 amplification and multiple lung metastases in responders to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Arao, T; Arii, S; Hagiwara, S; Haji, S; Hakamada, K; Hiasa, Y; Hidaka, H; Hirooka, M; Hisai, H; Iso, Y; Izumi, N; Kanazawa, A; Kimura, H; Kubota, K; Kudo, M; Kumada, T; Kuzuya, T; Matsumoto, K; Nagai, T; Nishio, K; Sakurai, T; Sato, S; Shimada, M; Toyoda, H; Toyoki, Y; Tsuchiya, K; Ueshima, K; Utsunomiya, T; Yasui, K, 2013) |
"Sorafenib is a new drug, multikinase inhibitor, which has been recently approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma." | 3.77 | Severe sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction. ( Betlloch, I; Cuesta, L; Latorre, N; Monteagudo, A; Toledo, F, 2011) |
"Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 3.77 | Complete response of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases treated with sorafenib: a case report. ( Henmi, S; Inuzuka, T; Kimura, T; Kita, R; Kudo, M; Nishikawa, H; Osaki, Y; Saito, S; Sakamoto, A; Sekikawa, A; Takeda, H, 2011) |
"Tumor growth, lung metastasis, and tumor angiogenesis were observed in HCCLM3-R and SMMC7721, two human hepatocellular carcinoma xenograft nude mouse models, when treated with sorafenib (30 mg/kg daily, n = 6 per group) or a vehicle as control." | 3.76 | Depletion of tumor-associated macrophages enhances the effect of sorafenib in metastatic liver cancer models by antimetastatic and antiangiogenic effects. ( Kong, LQ; Sun, HC; Tang, ZY; Wang, L; Wu, WZ; Xiong, YQ; Xu, HX; Zhang, W; Zhu, XD; Zhuang, PY, 2010) |
"Sorafenib, erlotinib, and cetuximab, alone or in combination, were tested in vitro in a panel of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer cell lines and in vivo in H1299 tumor xenografts." | 3.76 | Synergistic antitumor activity of sorafenib in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in colorectal and lung cancer cells. ( Berrino, L; Capasso, A; Ciardiello, F; De Vita, F; Eckhardt, SG; Martinelli, E; Morelli, MP; Morgillo, F; Orditura, M; Rodolico, G; Santoro, M; Troiani, T; Tuccillo, C; Vecchione, L; Vitagliano, D, 2010) |
"To evaluate (125)I seed brachytherapy combined with sorafenib in the treatment of patients with multiple lung metastases after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)." | 3.76 | Feasibility of (125)I brachytherapy combined with sorafenib treatment in patients with multiple lung metastases after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. ( Huang, Z; Li, C; Wu, P; Zhang, F; Zhang, L; Zhang, W, 2010) |
"A 66-year-old man with malignant melanoma was treated with sorafenib, 2 yen 400 mg per day." | 3.75 | Multiple colon ulcerations, perforation and death during treatment of malignant melanoma with sorafenib. ( Frieling, T; Heise, J; Wassilew, SW, 2009) |
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with lung metastasis." | 3.75 | [Clinical observation of the treatment with combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with lung metastasis]. ( Duan, F; Liu, FY; Song, P; Wang, MQ; Wang, ZJ, 2009) |
"Subcutaneous tumours and artificially induced pulmonary metastases of the rhabdomyosarcoma R1H of the rat were treated either with fractionated irradiation alone or in combination with nicotinamide and carbogen." | 3.69 | Combination of fractionated irradiation with nicotinamide and carbogen in R1H-tumours of the rat and its pulmonary metastases. ( Beck-Bornholdt, HP; Krüll, A; Raabe, A; Rett, M, 1997) |
" Given their synergistic activity in combination, we conducted a phase II study to determine the clinical activity of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)." | 2.82 | A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (KCSG-0806). ( Cho, BC; Choi, JH; Choi, JR; Heo, DS; Jung, M; Kang, SY; Kim, DW; Kim, HT; Kim, JH; Kim, SW; Lee, DH; Lim, SM; Shim, HS, 2016) |
" Overall, adverse event rates were generally similar between the treatment arms." | 2.80 | SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer. ( Bos, MM; De Santis, M; Eichelberg, C; Fischer von Weikersthal, L; Flörcken, A; Freier, W; Goebell, PJ; Gottstein, D; Hauswald, K; Indorf, M; Lerchenmüller, C; Los, M; Michel, MS; Pahernik, S; Schenck, M; Schirrmacher-Memmel, S; Staehler, M; van Arkel, C; Vervenne, WL; Zimmermann, U, 2015) |
"Sorafenib monotherapy has shown benefits in phase II trials as third-/fourth-line treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)." | 2.80 | Monotherapy Administration of Sorafenib in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MISSION) Trial: A Phase III, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sorafenib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Predominantly Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Canc ( Arén, O; de Marinis, F; Hirsh, V; Juhász, E; Mok, TS; Novello, S; Ong, TJ; Paz-Ares, L; Peña, C; Schmelter, T; Seto, T; Smit, EF; Sun, Y; Wakelee, HA; Wu, YL; Yang, JC; Zhang, L, 2015) |
"Sorafenib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor of Raf kinase, VEGFR, and PDGFR." | 2.79 | Phase II trial of sorafenib in conjunction with chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. ( Dowlati, A; Fu, P; Halmos, B; Ma, P; Mekhail, T; Nickolich, M; Pennell, N; Sharma, N, 2014) |
"Sorafenib has proven efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)." | 2.78 | Could interferon still play a role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma? A randomized study of two schedules of sorafenib plus interferon-alpha 2a (RAPSODY). ( Boni, C; Bracarda, S; Caserta, C; Cinquini, M; Cortesi, E; De Angelis, V; Di Costanzo, F; Falcone, A; Gasparro, D; Labianca, R; Mucciarini, C; Paglino, C; Pazzola, A; Porta, C; Santoro, A, 2013) |
"Treatment with sorafenib has relevant clinical activity in patients with NSCLC harboring KRAS mutations." | 2.78 | A phase II study of sorafenib in patients with platinum-pretreated, advanced (Stage IIIb or IV) non-small cell lung cancer with a KRAS mutation. ( Burgers, SA; Dingemans, AM; Groen, HJ; Heideman, DA; Kunst, PW; Mellema, WW; Smit, EF; Thunnissen, E; van Wijk, A, 2013) |
"Sorafenib is a raf kinase and angiogenesis inhibitor with activity in multiple cancers." | 2.77 | A double-blind randomized discontinuation phase-II study of sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients: eastern cooperative oncology group study E2501. ( Carbone, DP; Hanna, NH; Lee, JW; Schiller, JH; Traynor, AM; Wakelee, HA, 2012) |
"Sorafenib has demonstrated single agent activity in non-small cell (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC)." | 2.76 | A phase I trial of sorafenib combined with cisplatin/etoposide or carboplatin/pemetrexed in refractory solid tumor patients. ( Bernard, S; Chiu, M; Davies, JM; Dees, EC; Dhruva, NS; Hayes, DN; Hilbun, LR; Ivanova, A; Keller, K; Kim, WY; Socinski, MA; Stinchcombe, TE; Walko, CM, 2011) |
"The combination of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine is tolerable, but requires attenuation of sorafenib and capecitabine dosing because of the overlapping toxicity of hand-foot syndrome." | 2.76 | A phase I trial of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: New York Cancer Consortium Trial NCI 6981. ( Jeske, S; Kung, S; Lehrer, D; Matulich, D; Mazumdar, M; Milowsky, MI; Nanus, DM; Selzer, J; Sung, M; Tagawa, ST; Wright, JJ, 2011) |
"Sorafenib is a small-molecule multitargeted kinase inhibitor that blocks the activation of C-RAF, B-RAF, c-KIT, FLT-3, RET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), VEGFR-3 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor β." | 2.76 | Sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or with gemcitabine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study. ( Cerea, G; Chella, A; Ciardiello, F; de Marinis, F; Di Maio, M; Fasano, M; Favaretto, A; Gridelli, C; Maione, P; Mattioli, R; Morgillo, F; Pasello, G; Ricciardi, S; Rossi, A; Tortora, G, 2011) |
" The majority of adverse events (AEs) were Grade 1-2 in severity." | 2.76 | Long-term safety and tolerability of sorafenib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a case-based review. ( Adjei, AA; Blumenschein, GR; Gatzemeier, U; Heigener, D; Hillman, S; Mandrekar, S, 2011) |
" The results of this study also showed that this combination therapy had encouraging antitumor activity and was not associated with relevant pharmacokinetic interaction in Japanese NSCLC patients." | 2.75 | Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. ( Fukino, K; Fukuoka, M; Hasegawa, Y; Kaneda, H; Kawada, A; Miyazaki, M; Morinaga, R; Nakagawa, K; Okamoto, I; Satoh, T; Tanigawa, T; Ueda, S, 2010) |
"The overall incidence of brain metastases in patients receiving sorafenib was 3% (2 of 70 patients) compared with 12% (8 of 69 patients) in patients receiving placebo (P < 0." | 2.75 | Incidence of brain metastases in renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib. ( Escudier, B; Fizazi, K; Gross-Goupil, M; Massard, C; Szczylik, C; Zonierek, J, 2010) |
"Treatment with motesanib was tolerable when combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel and/or panitumumab, with little effect on motesanib pharmacokinetics at the 125-mg once daily dose level." | 2.75 | Phase 1b study of motesanib, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel and/or panitumumab for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. ( Blumenschein, GR; Gladish, G; McGreivy, J; O'Rourke, T; Parson, M; Reckamp, K; Sandler, A; Stephenson, GJ; Sun, YN; Ye, Y, 2010) |
"Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor affecting pathways involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis." | 2.75 | Sorafenib in platinum-treated patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 0435) phase II trial. ( Bury, MJ; Floyd, JD; Gandara, DR; Gitlitz, BJ; Glisson, BS; Ho, C; Moon, J; Reimers, HJ; Schulz, TK; Sundaram, PK, 2010) |
"Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK mitogenic signaling pathway and the angiogenic receptor tyrosine kinases, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta." | 2.74 | Phase II, multicenter, uncontrolled trial of single-agent sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. ( Blumenschein, GR; Cihon, F; Cupit, L; Fossella, F; Gatzemeier, U; O'Leary, J; Reck, M; Stewart, DJ, 2009) |
" Potential drug-drug interactions and the relationship between pharmacokinetics and toxicity were also assessed." | 2.73 | Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with gefitinib in patients with refractory or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. ( Adjei, AA; Croghan, G; Hanson, LJ; Jett, JR; Lathia, C; Mandrekar, SJ; Marks, R; Molina, JR; Reid, JR; Simantov, R; Xia, C, 2007) |
"Full pharmacokinetic profiles of nicotinamide concentrations in plasma were analyzed repeatedly in 15 patients to determine the inter- and intra-patient variability in peak plasma concentrations and the optimum times for administering nicotinamide as a radiosensitizer." | 2.69 | Pharmacokinetics of nicotinamide in cancer patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy: the experience of the Co-operative Group of Radiotherapy of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. ( Bernier, J; Bieri, S; Bolla, M; Denekamp, J; Dennis, MF; Hagen, F; Kocagöncü, O; Rojas, A; Stratford, MR, 1998) |
" Common adverse events (AEs) were also studied." | 2.52 | Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Chen, Y; Hong, S; Luo, S; Tan, M; Wang, S; Zhang, L, 2015) |
" Grade 3 or greater sorafenib-related adverse events included fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea, oral mucositis, rash and HFSR." | 2.50 | Efficacy and safety of sorafenib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ( Guo, DH; Pei, F; Si, HY; Tang, ZH; Wang, DX; Wang, WL; Xiao, BK; Xie, TT; Zhang, XY; Zhu, M, 2014) |
"Sorafenib has shown anti-tumor activity in NSCLC." | 2.48 | Sorafenib in non-small cell lung cancer. ( Gold, KA; Kim, E; Zhang, J, 2012) |
"The prognosis of pulmonary blastoma is very poor; overall five-year survival is 16%." | 2.47 | Classic biphasic pulmonary blastoma: a case report and review of the literature. ( Boeykens, E; Rutsaert, R; Stappaerts, I; Van Loo, S, 2011) |
" Oral bioavailability and preliminary evidence of activity make this compound an appealing choice for additional investigations." | 2.47 | Motesanib and advanced NSCLC: experiences and expectations. ( Blumenschein, GR; Raghav, KP, 2011) |
"Sorafenib was approved by the FDA in fast track for advanced renal cell cancer and hepatocellular cancer and shows good clinical activity in thyroid cancer." | 2.46 | Sorafenib. ( Hasskarl, J, 2010) |
"Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States." | 2.45 | Emerging data with antiangiogenic therapies in early and advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. ( Horn, L; Sandler, AB, 2009) |
"Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide, with most patients dying with metastatic disease." | 2.43 | Angiogenesis and lung cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications. ( Herbst, RS; Onn, A; Sandler, A, 2005) |
"Inflammation has been demonstrated to promote cancer metastasis." | 1.56 | Nicaraven Attenuates Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Responses-Induced Tumor Metastasis. ( Goto, S; Guo, CY; Kawabata, T; Li, TS; Liu, KX; Moriwaki, T; Zhang, X, 2020) |
" This technique could help in improving bioavailability of drug, hence reducing the need for high dosages and signifying a novel paradigm for future clinical applications." | 1.56 | Autophagy-Inducing Inhalable Co-crystal Formulation of Niclosamide-Nicotinamide for Lung Cancer Therapy. ( Khan, R; Kumar, A; Ray, E; Sharma, A; Shukla, R; Vaghasiya, K; Verma, RK, 2020) |
"Brain metastases are a common consequence of advanced lung cancer, resulting in cranial neuropathies and increased mortality." | 1.51 | A TAZ-AXL-ABL2 Feed-Forward Signaling Axis Promotes Lung Adenocarcinoma Brain Metastasis. ( Hoj, JP; Mayro, B; Pendergast, AM, 2019) |
" Considering the critical role of VEGF signaling in the homeostasis of the cardiovascular system, we speculated that the long-term use of axitinib and sorafenib directly influenced the initiation of aortic dissection and cardiac dysfunction." | 1.48 | Aortic Dissection and Cardiac Dysfunction Emerged Coincidentally During the Long-Term Treatment with Angiogenesis Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. ( Fujita, M; Kuroda, T; Mukai, M; Nakai, Y; Nishimura, K; Oka, T; Shioyama, W; Takada, M; Yasui, T, 2018) |
"Lung cancer is currently the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide." | 1.46 | Carboxyamidotriazole Synergizes with Sorafenib to Combat Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer through Inhibition of NANOG and Aggravation of Apoptosis. ( Chen, C; Chen, W; Guo, L; Ju, R; Li, J; Shi, J; Sun, F; Ye, C; Zhang, D; Zhu, L, 2017) |
" The nanocomplex enhanced bioavailability of hydrophobic drugs, efficient tumor cell targeting and exhibited pH-responsive function and sustained release profile." | 1.46 | Simultaneous inhibition of growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by co-delivery of ursolic acid and sorafenib using lactobionic acid modified and pH-sensitive chitosan-conjugated mesoporous silica nanocomplex. ( Fan, L; Jiang, K; Li, T; Shao, J; Zhao, R; Zheng, G, 2017) |
"Several adverse events (AEs) are known to be commonly observed during treatment with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients." | 1.43 | Absence of Significant Correlation of Adverse Events Between First- and Second-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. ( Fujisawa, M; Harada, K; Imai, S; Miyake, H, 2016) |
"Melanoma is the most aggressive and deadly form of cutaneous neoplasm due to its propensity to metastasize." | 1.43 | Fisetin, a dietary flavonoid, augments the anti-invasive and anti-metastatic potential of sorafenib in melanoma. ( Afaq, F; Athar, M; Diamond, AC; Elmets, CA; Kappes, JC; Katiyar, SK; Pal, HC; Strickland, LR, 2016) |
"Effective therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are limited." | 1.43 | Comprehensive multiplatform biomarker analysis of 350 hepatocellular carcinomas identifies potential novel therapeutic options. ( Abou-Alfa, GK; Ang, C; Gamblin, TC; Gatalica, Z; He, R; Millis, SZ; Miura, JT; Reddy, SK; Xiu, J; Yee, NS, 2016) |
"Identical data to that in breast cancer were obtained in NSCLC tumors using the ERBB1/2/4 inhibitor afatinib." | 1.43 | [Pemetrexed + Sorafenib] lethality is increased by inhibition of ERBB1/2/3-PI3K-NFκB compensatory survival signaling. ( Boone, DL; Booth, L; Chuckalovcak, J; Dent, P; Koromilas, AE; McGuire, WP; Poklepovic, A; Roberts, JL; Stringer, DK; Tavallai, M, 2016) |
"Sorafenib is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor and has been the subject of extensive clinical research in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)." | 1.43 | HDAC6-mediated EGFR stabilization and activation restrict cell response to sorafenib in non-small cell lung cancer cells. ( Hu, P; Tang, F; Wang, Z; Xie, C, 2016) |
"Sorafenib was started for the lung metastases 1 year after the operation." | 1.43 | Long-term response of over ten years with sorafenib monotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a case report. ( Chikui, K; Igawa, T; Matsuo, M; Nakiri, M; Nishihara, K; Ogasawara, N; Suekane, S; Suyama, S; Ueda, K, 2016) |
"To evaluated patterns and outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT)." | 1.43 | Clinical analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living-donor liver transplantation. ( Hong, TH; Kim, DG; Na, GH; You, YK, 2016) |
"Regorafenib has a closely related chemical structure as sorafenib and is approved for the pharmacotherapy of mCRC." | 1.43 | Regorafenib (Stivarga) pharmacologically targets epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. ( Chen, KF; Fan, LC; Hung, MH; Jiang, JK; Shiau, CW; Tai, WT; Teng, HW; Yang, SH, 2016) |
"A 74-year-old man was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC; S4/8)and underwent anterior segment resection of the liver in 2015." | 1.43 | [Treatment Experience with Sorafenib for Lung Metastases of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated with Interstitial Pneumonia]. ( Hasegawa, J; Hirota, M; Kameda, C; Kawabata, R; Koga, C; Matsumura, T; Murakami, M; Noura, S; Shimizu, J; Shuto, T; Yasuyama, A; Yoshikawa, M, 2016) |
"Many patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) develop lung metastasis and available treatments are limited." | 1.42 | Effects of sorafenib on lung metastasis in rats with hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of microRNAs. ( Huang, A; Shi, Y, 2015) |
"Sorafenib is a small molecule that blocks the activation of C-RAF, B-RAF, c-KIT, FLT-3, RET, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and PDGFR approved for advanced renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma (b, c)." | 1.42 | A significant response to sorafenib in a woman with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and a BRAF non-V600 mutation. ( Casado Sáenz, E; Falagan, S; García Sánchez, S; Gómez-Raposo, C; Hernández Jusdado, R; Moreno Rubio, J; Moreno, V; Sereno, M; Zambrana Tébar, F, 2015) |
"Lung cancer is a heterogeneous disease encompassing a wide array of genetic abnormalities." | 1.40 | Dramatic antitumor effects of the dual MET/RON small-molecule inhibitor LY2801653 in non-small cell lung cancer. ( Arif, Q; Hasina, R; Husain, AN; Kawada, I; Mueller, J; Salgia, R; Smithberger, E; Vokes, EE, 2014) |
"Sorafenib doses were increased up to 1600 mg bid, in order to maintain clinical activity, and to restore active plasma concentration, since sorafenib exposure had decreased over the time." | 1.40 | Critical role of sorafenib exposure over time for its antitumor activity in thyroid cancer. ( Bellesoeur, A; Billemont, B; Blanchet, B; Carton, E; Clerc, J; Goldwasser, F; Groussin, L; Mir, O, 2014) |
" Finally, this study demonstrated that MPT0B271 in combination with erlotinib significantly inhibits the growth of the human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells as compared with erlotinib treatment alone, both in vitro and in vivo." | 1.40 | Orally active microtubule-targeting agent, MPT0B271, for the treatment of human non-small cell lung cancer, alone and in combination with erlotinib. ( Chang, JY; Hsiao, CJ; Liou, JP; Pai, HC; Pan, SL; Teng, CM; Tsai, AC; Wang, CY; Wang, JC, 2014) |
"The findings showed that, pre-treating lung cancer cells with HDACIs, nicotinamide (NM) or Trichostatin A (TsA) or both significantly enhanced hyperthermia-induced Bax-dependent apoptosis in PC-10 cells." | 1.40 | Histone deacetylase inhibitors sensitize lung cancer cells to hyperthermia: involvement of Ku70/SirT-1 in thermo-protection. ( Fujioka, Y; Hassan, MK; Mohamed, Z; Ohba, Y; Sakuragi, N; Salah-Eldin, AE; Sultan, AS; Watari, H, 2014) |
" A partial radiological response was achieved; dosage was reduced to 1." | 1.40 | Response to trabectedin in a patient with advanced synovial sarcoma with lung metastases. ( Basso, U; Maruzzo, M; Montesco, MC; Rastrelli, M; Roma, A; Zanardi, E, 2014) |
"Lung cancer is the most frequent and lethal human cancer in the world." | 1.40 | Synergistic anti-tumor effects of the combination of a benzofuroxan derivate and sorafenib on NCI-H460 human large cell lung carcinoma cells. ( Alexandre de Azevedo, R; Barbuto, JA; Bydlowski, SP; Ferreira, AK; Jorge, SD; Levy, D; Pizzo, CR; Rodrigues, CP; Salomon, MA; Teixeira, SF, 2014) |
"Thyroid cancer is the most prevalent endocrine malignancy." | 1.40 | To treat or not to treat: developments in the field of advanced differentiated thyroid cancer. ( Corssmit, EP; Kapiteijn, E; Links, TP; Oosting, SF; Schneider, TC; van der Horst-Schrivers, AN, 2014) |
"Sorafenib can inhibit not only the tumor growth and lung metastsis in the nude mouse models, but also reduce the expression of multidrug resistance proteins P-gp and Topo IIa as well." | 1.39 | [Suppression of the growth of subcutaneous transplanted human liver cancer and lung metastasis in nude mice treated by sorafenib combined with fluorouracil]. ( Shen, HJ; Wang, YH; Xu, J, 2013) |
" Previously, we reported on the development of LY2801653: a novel, orally bioavailable oncokinase inhibitor with MET as one of its targets." | 1.39 | Inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer by LY2801653, an inhibitor of several oncokinases, including MET. ( Bi, C; Credille, KM; Donoho, GP; Manro, JR; Peek, VL; Walgren, RA; Wijsman, JA; Wu, W; Yan, L; Yan, SB, 2013) |
"Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor FDA-approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell and hepatocellular carcinoma." | 1.39 | Sorafenib induced eruptive melanocytic lesions. ( Aronson, P; Uhlenhake, EE; Watson, AC, 2013) |
"Here we present a man with pancreatic metastases from PTC, report our experience with sorafenib therapy, and discuss the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsy in its diagnosis." | 1.38 | Pancreatic metastasis arising from a BRAF(V600E)-positive papillary thyroid cancer: the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy and response to sorafenib therapy. ( Abalkhail, H; Al Sohaibani, F; Almanea, H; AlQaraawi, A; Alzahrani, AS, 2012) |
"Sorafenib has shown promise in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic thyroid carcinoma." | 1.38 | Brain metastasis from follicular thyroid carcinoma: treatment with sorafenib. ( Chen, L; Lu, H; Luo, Q; Ruan, M; Shen, Y; Yu, Y; Zhu, R, 2012) |
" Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 92% of all patients necessitating sorafenib discontinuation in 77%." | 1.38 | High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Fischer, L; Nashan, B; Seegers, B; Staufer, K; Sterneck, M; Vettorazzi, E, 2012) |
" We investigated the antitumor activity of motesanib, a selective antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Kit, alone and combined with chemotherapy in five human NSCLC xenograft models (A549, Calu-6, NCI-H358, NCI-H1299, and NCI-H1650) containing diverse genetic mutations." | 1.38 | Antitumor activity of motesanib alone and in combination with cisplatin or docetaxel in multiple human non-small-cell lung cancer xenograft models. ( Coxon, A; Kaufman, S; Polverino, A; Saffran, D; Schmidt, J; Starnes, C; Sweet, H; Wang, H; Weishuhn, D; Xu, M; Ziegler, B, 2012) |
"Long-term stabilization of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by the sequence of sorafenib monotherapy followed by sunitinib and everolimus treatments in a man with multiple metastases is reported." | 1.37 | Long-term stable disease in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: sorafenib sequenced to sunitinib and everolimus: a case study. ( Beck, J; Bellmunt, J; Escudier, B, 2011) |
"Lung cancer is one of the most lethal tumors and, although standard chemotherapy produces clinical response, there has been little improvement in prognosis." | 1.37 | Synergistic cytotoxicity, inhibition of signal transduction pathways and pharmacogenetics of sorafenib and gemcitabine in human NSCLC cell lines. ( Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Mey, V; Pasqualetti, G; Ricciardi, S, 2011) |
"Spontaneous pyopneumothorax is a very rare occurrence, even in cancer treated patients." | 1.36 | Spontaneous pyopneumothorax in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors for subpleural pulmonary metastases. ( Beynat, C; Coudert, B; Diaz, P; Favier, L; Ghiringhelli, F; Ladoire, S, 2010) |
"Lung-metastasized renal cell carcinoma mice were treated with various combinations of recombinant human interleukin-2 and sorafenib." | 1.36 | Combination therapy of interleukin-2 and sorafenib improves survival benefits and prevents spontaneous pulmonary metastasis in murine renal cell carcinoma models. ( Abe, K; Amagai, Y; Hojo, K; Ide, N; Iguchi, M; Kato, A; Matsumoto, M; Shichijo, M; Tanaka, H; Wada, T, 2010) |
"The pathological diagnosis was renal cell carcinoma, clear cell type, grade 1, pT3bNxMx stage III." | 1.36 | [Tegafur-uracil markedly reduced pulmonary metastasis from renal cell carcinoma refractory to sorafenib, interferon and interleukin 2]. ( Homma, Y; Kaneko, T; Matsushima, H; Morimoto, H; Tsuzaka, Y, 2010) |
"A case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with pulmonary recurrence after liver transplantation for HCC is presented in this report." | 1.36 | Sirolimus plus sorafenib in treating HCC recurrence after liver transplantation: a case report. ( Halff, G; Speeg, KV; Wang, Y; Washburn, WK, 2010) |
"sorafenib)." | 1.35 | Sorafenib: tolerance in patients on chronic hemodialysis: a single-center experience. ( Rey, PM; Villavicencio, H, 2008) |
"Sorafenib did not inhibit rhIL-2-induced natural killer cell expansion and rhIL-2 had no effect on the anti-angiogenic activity of sorafenib." | 1.35 | Antitumor efficacy of recombinant human interleukin-2 combined with sorafenib against mouse renal cell carcinoma. ( Abe, K; Arimura, A; Hojo, K; Iguchi, M; Matsumoto, M; Matsuo, Y; Wada, T, 2009) |
"Sorafenib is an orally administered multi-kinase inhibitor that has shown promise in the treatment of adults with advanced thyroid cancer, but it has not yet been studied in children with this disease." | 1.35 | The successful use of sorafenib to treat pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma. ( Clayman, GL; Herzog, CE; Sherman, SI; Waguespack, SG; Williams, MD, 2009) |
"Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor whose targets include B-RAF and C-RAF, both of which function in the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway but which also have distinct downstream targets." | 1.35 | Sorafenib inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell growth by targeting B-RAF in KRAS wild-type cells and C-RAF in KRAS mutant cells. ( Fukuoka, M; Hatashita, E; Nakagawa, K; Okamoto, I; Takezawa, K; Yamada, Y; Yonesaka, K, 2009) |
"Malignant schwannomas or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) represent approximately 10% of all soft tissue sarcomas." | 1.35 | Metastatic chest wall malignant schwannoma responding to sorafenib: case report and literature review. ( Fenning, R; Gudena, V; Kizziah, M; Montero, AJ; Post, G; Verma, N, 2008) |
"Intravenous (iv) vinorelbine and interperitoneal (ip) cisplatin were administered intermittently (q4d x 3) in combination with sorafenib administered orally (po) once daily for 9 days starting on the same day as the standard agent." | 1.34 | Sorafenib is efficacious and tolerated in combination with cytotoxic or cytostatic agents in preclinical models of human non-small cell lung carcinoma. ( Brink, C; Carter, CA; Chen, C; Gilbert, KS; Maxuitenko, YY; Vincent, P; Waud, WR; Zhang, X, 2007) |
"Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits the kinase activity of both C-RAF and B-RAF and targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor family (VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor family (PDGFR-beta and stem cell factor receptor [KIT])." | 1.34 | Sorafenib and sunitinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. ( Colantuoni, G; Comunale, D; De Vita, A; Del Gaizo, F; Ferrara, C; Gridelli, C; Guerriero, C; Maione, P; Nicolella, D; Rossi, A, 2007) |
"Biphasic pulmonary blastoma is a rare malignancy of the lung composed of proliferating epithelial and mesenchymal cells with a high vessel density at the tumor periphery." | 1.34 | Pulmonary blastoma with renal metastasis responds to sorafenib. ( Dudek, AZ; Mulamalla, K; Truskinovsky, AM, 2007) |
"Due to the long-lasting course of CLL second cancers can occur in these patients." | 1.34 | [Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and loss of strength in the right arm--not a typical combination]. ( Bargetzi, M; Puric, E; Schönenberger, A; Sendi, P, 2007) |
"The study design includes two different dosage arms and a placebo group with a total sample size of 150 patients and is powered to detect a modest reduction in the mean tumor size burden in the high-dose sorafenib arm compared with a slight increase in the placebo group." | 1.34 | Design of phase II cancer trials using a continuous endpoint of change in tumor size: application to a study of sorafenib and erlotinib in non small-cell lung cancer. ( Karrison, TG; Maitland, ML; Ratain, MJ; Stadler, WM, 2007) |
" Safety was acceptable, with the most common adverse events consisting of hand-foot skin reaction, cutaneous rash, diarrhoea, fatigue and hypertension." | 1.34 | Safety and activity of sorafenib in different histotypes of advanced renal cell carcinoma. ( Bajetta, E; Catena, L; Gevorgyan, A; Guadalupi, V; Mancin, M; Martinetti, A; Platania, M; Procopio, G; Pusceddu, S; Verzoni, E, 2007) |
"Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors are rare spindle-cell sarcomas derived from Schwann cells or pluripotent cells of the neural crest." | 1.33 | Spinal cord metastasis of a non-neurofibromatosis type-1 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: an unusual manifestation of a rare tumor. ( Baek, WS; Pytel, P; Rubeiz, H; Undevia, SD, 2005) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 6 (2.21) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 4 (1.47) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 55 (20.22) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 201 (73.90) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 6 (2.21) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Wang, HL | 1 |
Ma, X | 2 |
Guan, XY | 1 |
Song, C | 1 |
Li, GB | 1 |
Yu, YM | 1 |
Yang, LL | 1 |
Zhu, S | 2 |
Han, X | 2 |
Yang, R | 2 |
Tian, Y | 2 |
Zhang, Q | 3 |
Wu, Y | 4 |
Dong, S | 2 |
Zhang, B | 2 |
Ishigaki, H | 1 |
Minami, T | 1 |
Morimura, O | 1 |
Kitai, H | 1 |
Horio, D | 1 |
Koda, Y | 1 |
Fujimoto, E | 1 |
Negi, Y | 1 |
Nakajima, Y | 1 |
Niki, M | 1 |
Kanemura, S | 1 |
Shibata, E | 1 |
Mikami, K | 1 |
Takahashi, R | 1 |
Yokoi, T | 1 |
Kuribayashi, K | 1 |
Kijima, T | 1 |
Hoj, JP | 1 |
Mayro, B | 1 |
Pendergast, AM | 1 |
Zhang, X | 3 |
Moriwaki, T | 1 |
Kawabata, T | 1 |
Goto, S | 2 |
Liu, KX | 1 |
Guo, CY | 1 |
Li, TS | 2 |
Razak, RA | 1 |
Fletcher, P | 1 |
Kunene, V | 1 |
Ma, YT | 1 |
Ray, E | 1 |
Vaghasiya, K | 1 |
Sharma, A | 1 |
Shukla, R | 1 |
Khan, R | 1 |
Kumar, A | 1 |
Verma, RK | 1 |
Liu, BL | 1 |
Hong, JJ | 1 |
Tang, K | 1 |
Lin, J | 1 |
Zheng, XW | 1 |
Chen, SC | 1 |
Chao, Y | 1 |
Yang, MH | 1 |
Jian, C | 1 |
Tu, MJ | 1 |
Ho, PY | 1 |
Duan, Z | 1 |
Qiu, JX | 1 |
DeVere White, RW | 1 |
Wun, T | 1 |
Lara, PN | 2 |
Lam, KS | 1 |
Yu, AX | 1 |
Yu, AM | 1 |
Chen, C | 3 |
Ju, R | 1 |
Shi, J | 1 |
Chen, W | 1 |
Sun, F | 1 |
Zhu, L | 1 |
Li, J | 1 |
Zhang, D | 1 |
Ye, C | 1 |
Guo, L | 1 |
Pattarozzi, A | 1 |
Carra, E | 1 |
Favoni, RE | 1 |
Würth, R | 1 |
Marubbi, D | 1 |
Filiberti, RA | 1 |
Mutti, L | 1 |
Florio, T | 1 |
Barbieri, F | 1 |
Daga, A | 1 |
Zhao, R | 1 |
Li, T | 1 |
Zheng, G | 1 |
Jiang, K | 1 |
Fan, L | 1 |
Shao, J | 1 |
Hata, AN | 1 |
Rowley, S | 1 |
Archibald, HL | 1 |
Gomez-Caraballo, M | 1 |
Siddiqui, FM | 1 |
Ji, F | 1 |
Jung, J | 1 |
Light, M | 1 |
Lee, JS | 3 |
Debussche, L | 1 |
Sidhu, S | 1 |
Sadreyev, RI | 1 |
Watters, J | 1 |
Engelman, JA | 1 |
Li, M | 1 |
Yang, J | 1 |
Zhou, W | 1 |
Ren, Y | 1 |
Wang, X | 1 |
Chen, H | 1 |
Zhang, J | 3 |
Chen, J | 3 |
Sun, Y | 4 |
Cui, L | 1 |
Liu, X | 2 |
Wang, L | 5 |
Wu, C | 1 |
Kubota, K | 4 |
Yoshioka, H | 1 |
Oshita, F | 1 |
Hida, T | 1 |
Yoh, K | 1 |
Hayashi, H | 1 |
Kato, T | 1 |
Kaneda, H | 2 |
Yamada, K | 1 |
Tanaka, H | 4 |
Ichinose, Y | 3 |
Park, K | 3 |
Cho, EK | 1 |
Lee, KH | 3 |
Lin, CB | 1 |
Yang, JC | 2 |
Hara, K | 1 |
Asato, T | 1 |
Nakagawa, K | 3 |
Manzo, A | 1 |
Montanino, A | 1 |
Carillio, G | 1 |
Costanzo, R | 2 |
Sandomenico, C | 1 |
Normanno, N | 2 |
Piccirillo, MC | 2 |
Daniele, G | 2 |
Perrone, F | 2 |
Rocco, G | 2 |
Morabito, A | 2 |
Spigel, DR | 5 |
Rubin, MS | 1 |
Gian, VG | 1 |
Shipley, DL | 3 |
Burris, HA | 2 |
Kosloff, RA | 1 |
Shih, KC | 1 |
Quinn, R | 1 |
Greco, FA | 2 |
Hainsworth, JD | 3 |
Yan, C | 1 |
Luo, L | 1 |
Urata, Y | 1 |
Caiola, E | 1 |
Frapolli, R | 1 |
Tomanelli, M | 1 |
Valerio, R | 1 |
Iezzi, A | 1 |
Garassino, MC | 1 |
Broggini, M | 1 |
Marabese, M | 1 |
Zhu, H | 1 |
Zhao, Y | 2 |
Duo, J | 1 |
Takada, M | 1 |
Yasui, T | 1 |
Oka, T | 1 |
Shioyama, W | 1 |
Kuroda, T | 1 |
Nakai, Y | 1 |
Nishimura, K | 1 |
Mukai, M | 1 |
Fujita, M | 1 |
Kim, DH | 1 |
Cho, E | 1 |
Cho, SB | 1 |
Choi, SK | 1 |
Kim, S | 1 |
Yu, J | 1 |
Koh, YI | 1 |
Sim, DW | 1 |
Jun, CH | 1 |
Galbraith, AR | 1 |
Seabloom, DE | 1 |
Wuertz, BR | 1 |
Antonides, JD | 1 |
Steele, VE | 1 |
Wattenberg, LW | 1 |
Ondrey, FG | 1 |
Jablonska, P | 1 |
Mierzejewska, P | 1 |
Kutryb-Zajac, B | 1 |
Rzyman, W | 1 |
Dziadziuszko, R | 1 |
Polanska, J | 1 |
Sitkiewicz, M | 1 |
Smolenski, RT | 1 |
Slominska, EM | 1 |
Wang, M | 2 |
Naganna, N | 1 |
Sintim, HO | 1 |
Zhang, QB | 2 |
Sun, HC | 3 |
Zhang, KZ | 1 |
Jia, QA | 1 |
Bu, Y | 1 |
Chai, ZT | 2 |
Wang, WQ | 2 |
Kong, LQ | 3 |
Zhu, XD | 3 |
Lu, L | 2 |
Wu, WZ | 3 |
Tang, ZY | 3 |
Santidrian, AF | 1 |
Matsuno-Yagi, A | 1 |
Ritland, M | 1 |
Seo, BB | 1 |
LeBoeuf, SE | 1 |
Gay, LJ | 1 |
Yagi, T | 1 |
Felding-Habermann, B | 1 |
Jiang, W | 1 |
Zeng, ZC | 1 |
Iyer, P | 1 |
Mayer, JL | 1 |
Ewig, JM | 1 |
Mender, I | 1 |
Senturk, S | 1 |
Ozgunes, N | 1 |
Akcali, KC | 1 |
Kletsas, D | 1 |
Gryaznov, S | 1 |
Can, A | 1 |
Shay, JW | 2 |
Dikmen, ZG | 1 |
Haraldsdottir, S | 1 |
Li, Q | 2 |
Villalona-Calero, MA | 2 |
Olencki, TE | 1 |
Kendra, K | 1 |
Ing, SW | 1 |
Waterhouse, DM | 2 |
Penley, WC | 1 |
Thompson, DS | 1 |
Webb, CD | 1 |
Anthony Greco, F | 1 |
Zhao, RN | 1 |
Nie, LH | 1 |
Gong, R | 1 |
Wang, JZ | 1 |
Wazir, R | 1 |
Liu, LR | 1 |
Song, TR | 1 |
Wei, Q | 1 |
Shen, HJ | 1 |
Wang, YH | 1 |
Xu, J | 2 |
Bahadoran, P | 1 |
Allegra, M | 1 |
Le Duff, F | 1 |
Long-Mira, E | 1 |
Hofman, P | 1 |
Giacchero, D | 1 |
Passeron, T | 1 |
Lacour, JP | 1 |
Ballotti, R | 1 |
Xu, HX | 2 |
Zhang, JB | 1 |
Gao, DM | 1 |
Zhang, W | 4 |
Zhuang, PY | 2 |
Eisner, F | 1 |
Schaberl-Moser, R | 1 |
Gerger, A | 1 |
Samonigg, H | 1 |
Pichler, M | 1 |
Nagaria, TS | 1 |
Williams, JL | 1 |
Leduc, C | 1 |
Squire, JA | 1 |
Greer, PA | 1 |
Sangrar, W | 1 |
Wu, W | 1 |
Bi, C | 1 |
Credille, KM | 1 |
Manro, JR | 1 |
Peek, VL | 1 |
Donoho, GP | 1 |
Yan, L | 1 |
Wijsman, JA | 1 |
Yan, SB | 1 |
Walgren, RA | 1 |
He, X | 1 |
Zhang, T | 2 |
Uhlenhake, EE | 1 |
Watson, AC | 1 |
Aronson, P | 1 |
Guerin, M | 1 |
Salem, N | 1 |
Walz, J | 1 |
Dermeche, S | 1 |
Gravis, G | 1 |
Ishii, T | 1 |
Hatano, E | 2 |
Yasuchika, K | 1 |
Taura, K | 2 |
Seo, S | 1 |
Uemoto, S | 2 |
Kawada, I | 1 |
Hasina, R | 1 |
Arif, Q | 1 |
Mueller, J | 1 |
Smithberger, E | 1 |
Husain, AN | 1 |
Vokes, EE | 1 |
Salgia, R | 1 |
Bellesoeur, A | 1 |
Carton, E | 1 |
Mir, O | 2 |
Groussin, L | 1 |
Blanchet, B | 1 |
Billemont, B | 1 |
Clerc, J | 2 |
Goldwasser, F | 2 |
Huang, LY | 1 |
Lee, YS | 1 |
Huang, JJ | 1 |
Chang, CC | 1 |
Chang, JM | 1 |
Chuang, SH | 1 |
Kao, KJ | 1 |
Tsai, YJ | 1 |
Tsai, PY | 1 |
Liu, CW | 1 |
Lin, HS | 1 |
Lau, JY | 1 |
Scagliotti, G | 2 |
Spigel, D | 1 |
Kim, JH | 2 |
Shinkai, T | 1 |
Takeda, K | 1 |
Kim, SW | 2 |
Hsia, TC | 1 |
Li, RK | 1 |
Tiangco, BJ | 1 |
Yau, S | 1 |
Lim, WT | 2 |
Yao, B | 3 |
Hei, YJ | 6 |
Sharma, N | 1 |
Pennell, N | 1 |
Nickolich, M | 1 |
Halmos, B | 1 |
Ma, P | 1 |
Mekhail, T | 1 |
Fu, P | 1 |
Dowlati, A | 1 |
Massicotte, MH | 1 |
Brassard, M | 1 |
Claude-Desroches, M | 1 |
Borget, I | 1 |
Bonichon, F | 1 |
Giraudet, AL | 1 |
Do Cao, C | 1 |
Chougnet, CN | 1 |
Leboulleux, S | 1 |
Baudin, E | 1 |
Schlumberger, M | 1 |
de la Fouchardière, C | 1 |
Zhou, Q | 1 |
Zhou, CC | 1 |
Chen, GY | 1 |
Cheng, Y | 1 |
Huang, C | 1 |
Zhang, L | 5 |
Xu, CR | 1 |
Li, AW | 1 |
Yan, HH | 1 |
Su, J | 1 |
Zhang, XC | 1 |
Yang, JJ | 1 |
Wu, YL | 2 |
Claret, L | 2 |
Bruno, R | 2 |
Lu, JF | 2 |
Sun, YN | 4 |
Hsu, CP | 2 |
Lee, DW | 1 |
Chang, H | 2 |
Kim, YJ | 1 |
Kim, KM | 1 |
Lee, HJ | 1 |
Zhang, H | 1 |
Li, Z | 1 |
Wang, K | 1 |
Imielinski, M | 1 |
Greulich, H | 1 |
Kaplan, B | 1 |
Araujo, L | 1 |
Amann, J | 1 |
Horn, L | 2 |
Schiller, J | 1 |
Meyerson, M | 1 |
Carbone, DP | 2 |
Tsai, AC | 1 |
Wang, CY | 2 |
Liou, JP | 1 |
Pai, HC | 1 |
Hsiao, CJ | 1 |
Chang, JY | 1 |
Wang, JC | 1 |
Teng, CM | 1 |
Pan, SL | 1 |
Hassan, MK | 1 |
Watari, H | 1 |
Salah-Eldin, AE | 1 |
Sultan, AS | 1 |
Mohamed, Z | 1 |
Fujioka, Y | 1 |
Ohba, Y | 1 |
Sakuragi, N | 1 |
Pitoia, F | 1 |
Chao, TT | 1 |
Tai, WT | 2 |
Chang, FY | 1 |
Su, WP | 1 |
Chen, YL | 1 |
Chen, PT | 1 |
Weng, CY | 1 |
Yuan, A | 1 |
Shiau, CW | 2 |
Yu, CJ | 1 |
Chen, KF | 2 |
Masri, SC | 1 |
Misselt, AJ | 1 |
Dudek, A | 1 |
Konety, SH | 1 |
Chen, XQ | 1 |
Wang, YL | 1 |
Li, ZY | 1 |
Lin, TY | 2 |
Guerra, JR | 1 |
Suelves, AM | 1 |
Bella, A | 1 |
Lolo, D | 1 |
Rijavec, E | 1 |
Genova, C | 1 |
Barletta, G | 1 |
Biello, F | 1 |
Dal Bello, MG | 1 |
Coco, S | 1 |
Truini, A | 1 |
Vanni, I | 1 |
Alama, A | 1 |
Boccardo, F | 1 |
Grossi, F | 2 |
Zanardi, E | 1 |
Maruzzo, M | 1 |
Montesco, MC | 1 |
Roma, A | 1 |
Rastrelli, M | 1 |
Basso, U | 2 |
Groenendijk, FH | 1 |
Mellema, WW | 2 |
van der Burg, E | 1 |
Schut, E | 1 |
Hauptmann, M | 1 |
Horlings, HM | 1 |
Willems, SM | 1 |
van den Heuvel, MM | 1 |
Jonkers, J | 1 |
Smit, EF | 10 |
Bernards, R | 1 |
Wang, WL | 1 |
Tang, ZH | 1 |
Xie, TT | 1 |
Xiao, BK | 1 |
Zhang, XY | 1 |
Guo, DH | 1 |
Wang, DX | 1 |
Pei, F | 1 |
Si, HY | 1 |
Zhu, M | 1 |
İlknur, T | 1 |
Akarsu, S | 1 |
Çarsanbali, S | 1 |
Lebe, B | 1 |
Fetil, E | 1 |
Novello, S | 4 |
Scagliotti, GV | 3 |
Sydorenko, O | 2 |
Vynnychenko, I | 2 |
Volovat, C | 1 |
Schneider, CP | 1 |
Blackhall, F | 2 |
McCoy, S | 2 |
Canter, RJ | 1 |
Ames, E | 1 |
Mac, S | 1 |
Grossenbacher, SK | 1 |
Chen, M | 1 |
Li, CS | 1 |
Borys, D | 1 |
Smith, RC | 1 |
Tellez, J | 1 |
Sayers, TJ | 1 |
Monjazeb, AM | 1 |
Murphy, WJ | 1 |
Teixeira, SF | 1 |
Alexandre de Azevedo, R | 1 |
Salomon, MA | 1 |
Jorge, SD | 1 |
Levy, D | 1 |
Bydlowski, SP | 1 |
Rodrigues, CP | 1 |
Pizzo, CR | 1 |
Barbuto, JA | 1 |
Ferreira, AK | 1 |
Bass, MB | 1 |
Ye, Y | 2 |
Davis, GJ | 1 |
Davis, MT | 1 |
Kaesdorf, BA | 1 |
Chan, SS | 1 |
Patterson, SD | 1 |
Hong, S | 1 |
Tan, M | 1 |
Wang, S | 2 |
Luo, S | 1 |
Chen, Y | 1 |
Schneider, TC | 1 |
Kapiteijn, E | 1 |
Corssmit, EP | 1 |
Oosting, SF | 1 |
van der Horst-Schrivers, AN | 1 |
Links, TP | 1 |
Kondo, T | 1 |
Nakazawa, H | 1 |
Oya, M | 1 |
Kimura, G | 1 |
Fujii, Y | 1 |
Hatano, T | 1 |
Kawata, N | 1 |
Kume, H | 1 |
Morita, M | 1 |
Nakajima, K | 1 |
Ohno, Y | 1 |
Okegawa, T | 1 |
Takahashi, S | 1 |
Wakumoto, Y | 1 |
Horie, S | 1 |
Yamaguchi, R | 1 |
Saito, K | 1 |
Murakami, M | 2 |
Chiappori, AA | 1 |
Kolevska, T | 1 |
Hager, S | 1 |
Rarick, M | 1 |
Gadgeel, S | 1 |
Blais, N | 1 |
Von Pawel, J | 3 |
Hart, L | 1 |
Reck, M | 3 |
Bassett, E | 1 |
Burington, B | 1 |
Schiller, JH | 4 |
Moon, J | 2 |
Redman, MW | 1 |
Semrad, TJ | 1 |
Kelly, K | 1 |
Allen, JW | 1 |
Gitlitz, BJ | 2 |
Mack, PC | 1 |
Gandara, DR | 2 |
Dicken, V | 1 |
Bornemann, L | 1 |
Moltz, JH | 1 |
Peitgen, HO | 1 |
Zaim, S | 1 |
Scheuring, U | 1 |
Gavrancic, T | 1 |
Park, YH | 1 |
Tan, EH | 1 |
Tan, DS | 1 |
Li, WY | 1 |
Haaland, B | 1 |
Ang, MK | 1 |
Chau, NM | 1 |
Toh, CK | 1 |
Tan, IB | 1 |
Koh, TS | 1 |
Thng, CH | 1 |
Chowbay, B | 1 |
Hui, KM | 1 |
Ng, QS | 1 |
Eichelberg, C | 1 |
Vervenne, WL | 1 |
De Santis, M | 1 |
Fischer von Weikersthal, L | 1 |
Goebell, PJ | 1 |
Lerchenmüller, C | 1 |
Zimmermann, U | 1 |
Bos, MM | 1 |
Freier, W | 1 |
Schirrmacher-Memmel, S | 1 |
Staehler, M | 1 |
Pahernik, S | 1 |
Los, M | 1 |
Schenck, M | 1 |
Flörcken, A | 1 |
van Arkel, C | 1 |
Hauswald, K | 1 |
Indorf, M | 1 |
Gottstein, D | 1 |
Michel, MS | 1 |
Thoma, C | 1 |
Shi, Y | 2 |
Huang, A | 1 |
An, H | 1 |
Stoops, SL | 1 |
Deane, NG | 1 |
Zhu, J | 1 |
Zi, J | 1 |
Weaver, C | 1 |
Waterson, AG | 1 |
Zijlstra, A | 1 |
Lindsley, CW | 1 |
Beauchamp, RD | 1 |
Albiges, L | 1 |
Escudier, B | 3 |
Sereno, M | 1 |
Moreno, V | 1 |
Moreno Rubio, J | 1 |
Gómez-Raposo, C | 1 |
García Sánchez, S | 1 |
Hernández Jusdado, R | 1 |
Falagan, S | 1 |
Zambrana Tébar, F | 1 |
Casado Sáenz, E | 1 |
Kitajima, T | 1 |
Mitsunori, Y | 1 |
Fujimoto, Y | 1 |
Mizumoto, M | 1 |
Okajima, H | 1 |
Kaido, T | 1 |
Minamiguchi, S | 1 |
Seo, MS | 1 |
Kim, JK | 1 |
Shim, JY | 1 |
Miyake, H | 1 |
Imai, S | 1 |
Harada, K | 1 |
Fujisawa, M | 1 |
Gon, H | 1 |
Kido, M | 1 |
Fukumoto, T | 1 |
Takebe, A | 1 |
Tanaka, M | 1 |
Kuramitsu, K | 1 |
Kinoshita, H | 1 |
Fukushima, K | 1 |
Urade, T | 1 |
So, S | 1 |
Shinzeki, M | 1 |
Matsumoto, I | 1 |
Ajiki, T | 1 |
Ku, Y | 1 |
Pal, HC | 1 |
Diamond, AC | 1 |
Strickland, LR | 1 |
Kappes, JC | 1 |
Katiyar, SK | 1 |
Elmets, CA | 1 |
Athar, M | 1 |
Afaq, F | 1 |
Ang, C | 1 |
Miura, JT | 1 |
Gamblin, TC | 1 |
He, R | 1 |
Xiu, J | 1 |
Millis, SZ | 1 |
Gatalica, Z | 1 |
Reddy, SK | 1 |
Yee, NS | 1 |
Abou-Alfa, GK | 1 |
Della Corte, CM | 1 |
Ciaramella, V | 1 |
Di Mauro, C | 1 |
Castellone, MD | 1 |
Papaccio, F | 1 |
Fasano, M | 2 |
Sasso, FC | 1 |
Martinelli, E | 3 |
Troiani, T | 3 |
De Vita, F | 2 |
Orditura, M | 2 |
Bianco, R | 1 |
Ciardiello, F | 5 |
Morgillo, F | 4 |
Paz-Ares, L | 1 |
Hirsh, V | 1 |
de Marinis, F | 3 |
Wakelee, HA | 3 |
Seto, T | 1 |
Juhász, E | 1 |
Arén, O | 2 |
Schmelter, T | 1 |
Ong, TJ | 2 |
Peña, C | 1 |
Mok, TS | 1 |
Amato, KR | 1 |
Tan, L | 1 |
Hastings, AK | 1 |
Song, W | 1 |
Lovly, CM | 1 |
Meador, CB | 1 |
Ye, F | 1 |
Lu, P | 1 |
Balko, JM | 1 |
Colvin, DC | 1 |
Cates, JM | 1 |
Pao, W | 1 |
Gray, NS | 1 |
Buchler, T | 1 |
Bortlicek, Z | 1 |
Poprach, A | 1 |
Pavlik, T | 1 |
Veskrnova, V | 1 |
Honzirkova, M | 1 |
Zemanova, M | 1 |
Fiala, O | 1 |
Kubackova, K | 1 |
Slaby, O | 1 |
Svoboda, M | 1 |
Vyzula, R | 1 |
Dusek, L | 1 |
Melichar, B | 1 |
Guo, Z | 1 |
Cao, M | 1 |
You, A | 1 |
Gao, J | 1 |
Zhou, H | 1 |
Li, H | 2 |
Cui, Y | 1 |
Fang, F | 1 |
Song, T | 1 |
Zhu, X | 1 |
Sun, H | 1 |
Hu, H | 1 |
Lim, SM | 1 |
Cho, BC | 1 |
Kang, SY | 1 |
Heo, DS | 1 |
Kim, HT | 1 |
Lee, DH | 1 |
Kim, DW | 1 |
Jung, M | 1 |
Choi, JH | 1 |
Shim, HS | 1 |
Choi, JR | 1 |
Horiike, A | 1 |
Takeuchi, K | 1 |
Uenami, T | 1 |
Kawano, Y | 1 |
Tanimoto, A | 1 |
Kaburaki, K | 1 |
Tambo, Y | 1 |
Kudo, K | 1 |
Yanagitani, N | 1 |
Ohyanagi, F | 1 |
Motoi, N | 1 |
Ishikawa, Y | 1 |
Horai, T | 1 |
Nishio, M | 1 |
Heqing, Y | 1 |
Bin, L | 1 |
Xuemei, Y | 1 |
Linfa, L | 1 |
Booth, L | 2 |
Roberts, JL | 2 |
Tavallai, M | 1 |
Chuckalovcak, J | 1 |
Stringer, DK | 1 |
Koromilas, AE | 1 |
Boone, DL | 1 |
McGuire, WP | 1 |
Poklepovic, A | 2 |
Dent, P | 2 |
Rovithi, M | 1 |
Lind, JS | 6 |
Pham, TV | 1 |
Voortman, J | 1 |
Knol, JC | 1 |
Verheul, HM | 3 |
Jimenez, CR | 1 |
Wang, Z | 2 |
Hu, P | 1 |
Tang, F | 1 |
Xie, C | 1 |
Sun, T | 1 |
He, J | 1 |
Zhang, S | 1 |
Sun, J | 1 |
Zeng, M | 1 |
Zeng, Z | 1 |
Frink, RE | 1 |
Peyton, M | 1 |
Gazdar, AF | 1 |
Minna, JD | 1 |
Grünwald, V | 1 |
Lin, X | 2 |
Kalanovic, D | 1 |
Simantov, R | 2 |
Ueda, K | 1 |
Suekane, S | 1 |
Ogasawara, N | 1 |
Chikui, K | 1 |
Suyama, S | 1 |
Nakiri, M | 1 |
Nishihara, K | 1 |
Matsuo, M | 1 |
Igawa, T | 1 |
Casadei Gardini, A | 1 |
Chiadini, E | 1 |
Faloppi, L | 1 |
Marisi, G | 1 |
Delmonte, A | 1 |
Scartozzi, M | 1 |
Loretelli, C | 1 |
Lucchesi, A | 1 |
Oboldi, D | 1 |
Dubini, A | 1 |
Frassineti, GL | 1 |
Ulivi, P | 1 |
Blazejczyk, A | 1 |
Switalska, M | 1 |
Chlopicki, S | 1 |
Marcinek, A | 1 |
Gebicki, J | 1 |
Nowak, M | 1 |
Nasulewicz-Goldeman, A | 1 |
Wietrzyk, J | 1 |
Na, GH | 1 |
Hong, TH | 1 |
You, YK | 1 |
Kim, DG | 1 |
Fan, LC | 1 |
Teng, HW | 1 |
Hung, MH | 1 |
Yang, SH | 1 |
Jiang, JK | 1 |
Kuzuya, T | 2 |
Ishigami, M | 1 |
Ishizu, Y | 1 |
Honda, T | 1 |
Hayashi, K | 1 |
Ishikawa, T | 1 |
Nakano, I | 1 |
Goto, H | 1 |
Hirooka, Y | 1 |
Song, J | 1 |
Kim, SB | 1 |
Kim, KH | 1 |
Kim, TN | 1 |
Sung, JH | 1 |
Moon, SU | 1 |
Kim, HS | 1 |
Kim, JW | 1 |
Wu, G | 1 |
Liu, G | 1 |
Kong, W | 1 |
Qu, J | 1 |
Suo, S | 1 |
Shuto, T | 1 |
Shimizu, J | 1 |
Koga, C | 1 |
Yasuyama, A | 1 |
Matsumura, T | 1 |
Kameda, C | 1 |
Kawabata, R | 1 |
Hirota, M | 1 |
Yoshikawa, M | 1 |
Noura, S | 1 |
Hasegawa, J | 1 |
Gettinger, S | 1 |
Blumenschein, G | 2 |
Adjei, AA | 4 |
Rey, PM | 1 |
Villavicencio, H | 1 |
Lopez, V | 1 |
Pinazo, I | 1 |
Marti, N | 1 |
Monteagudo, C | 1 |
Jorda, E | 1 |
Döme, B | 2 |
Magyar, M | 1 |
Li, XF | 1 |
Chen, Q | 1 |
Huang, WX | 1 |
Ye, YB | 1 |
Yau, T | 1 |
Chan, P | 1 |
Ng, KK | 1 |
Chok, SH | 1 |
Cheung, TT | 1 |
Fan, ST | 1 |
Poon, RT | 1 |
Brunello, A | 1 |
Bertuzzi, A | 1 |
Santoro, A | 3 |
Zimmermann, K | 1 |
Schmittel, A | 1 |
Steiner, U | 1 |
Asemissen, AM | 1 |
Knoedler, M | 1 |
Thiel, E | 1 |
Miller, K | 1 |
Keilholz, U | 1 |
Iguchi, M | 2 |
Matsumoto, M | 2 |
Hojo, K | 2 |
Wada, T | 2 |
Matsuo, Y | 1 |
Arimura, A | 1 |
Abe, K | 2 |
Waguespack, SG | 1 |
Sherman, SI | 1 |
Williams, MD | 1 |
Clayman, GL | 1 |
Herzog, CE | 1 |
Sandler, AB | 1 |
Beauparlant, P | 1 |
Bédard, D | 1 |
Bernier, C | 1 |
Chan, H | 1 |
Gilbert, K | 1 |
Goulet, D | 1 |
Gratton, MO | 1 |
Lavoie, M | 1 |
Roulston, A | 1 |
Turcotte, E | 1 |
Watson, M | 1 |
Desar, IM | 1 |
Mulder, SF | 2 |
Stillebroer, AB | 1 |
van Spronsen, DJ | 2 |
van der Graaf, WT | 1 |
Mulders, PF | 1 |
van Herpen, CM | 1 |
Frieling, T | 1 |
Heise, J | 1 |
Wassilew, SW | 1 |
Pallis, AG | 1 |
Serfass, L | 1 |
Dziadziusko, R | 1 |
van Meerbeeck, JP | 1 |
Fennell, D | 1 |
Lacombe, D | 1 |
Welch, J | 1 |
Gridelli, C | 4 |
Takezawa, K | 1 |
Okamoto, I | 2 |
Yonesaka, K | 1 |
Hatashita, E | 1 |
Yamada, Y | 1 |
Fukuoka, M | 2 |
Ye, SL | 1 |
Blumenschein, GR | 5 |
Gatzemeier, U | 2 |
Fossella, F | 1 |
Stewart, DJ | 2 |
Cupit, L | 2 |
Cihon, F | 2 |
O'Leary, J | 1 |
Spector, E | 1 |
Franklin, MJ | 1 |
Truskinovsky, AM | 2 |
Dudek, AZ | 2 |
Miyazaki, M | 1 |
Morinaga, R | 1 |
Ueda, S | 1 |
Hasegawa, Y | 1 |
Satoh, T | 1 |
Kawada, A | 1 |
Fukino, K | 1 |
Tanigawa, T | 1 |
Ladoire, S | 1 |
Beynat, C | 1 |
Diaz, P | 1 |
Coudert, B | 1 |
Favier, L | 1 |
Ghiringhelli, F | 1 |
Massard, C | 1 |
Zonierek, J | 1 |
Gross-Goupil, M | 1 |
Fizazi, K | 1 |
Szczylik, C | 1 |
Ide, S | 1 |
Soda, H | 1 |
Hakariya, T | 1 |
Takemoto, S | 1 |
Ishimoto, H | 1 |
Tomari, S | 1 |
Sawai, T | 1 |
Nagashima, S | 1 |
Furukawa, M | 1 |
Nakamura, Y | 1 |
Kohno, S | 1 |
Vroling, L | 1 |
de Haas, RR | 1 |
van Hinsbergh, VW | 1 |
Broxterman, HJ | 1 |
Yeganeh, M | 1 |
Finn, RS | 1 |
Saab, S | 1 |
Xie, XD | 1 |
Piao, Y | 1 |
Liu, ZZ | 1 |
Duan, F | 2 |
Wang, MQ | 2 |
Liu, FY | 2 |
Wang, ZJ | 2 |
Song, P | 2 |
Reckamp, K | 2 |
Stephenson, GJ | 1 |
O'Rourke, T | 1 |
Gladish, G | 1 |
McGreivy, J | 1 |
Parson, M | 1 |
Sandler, A | 2 |
Le Moulec, S | 1 |
Loriot, Y | 1 |
Soria, JC | 1 |
Katz, SI | 2 |
Zhou, L | 2 |
Chao, G | 1 |
Smith, CD | 2 |
Ferrara, T | 1 |
Wang, W | 2 |
Dicker, DT | 1 |
El-Deiry, WS | 2 |
Hasskarl, J | 1 |
Boonstra, JJ | 1 |
van Marion, R | 1 |
Beer, DG | 1 |
Lin, L | 1 |
Chaves, P | 1 |
Ribeiro, C | 1 |
Pereira, AD | 1 |
Roque, L | 1 |
Darnton, SJ | 1 |
Altorki, NK | 1 |
Schrump, DS | 1 |
Klimstra, DS | 1 |
Tang, LH | 1 |
Eshleman, JR | 1 |
Alvarez, H | 1 |
Shimada, Y | 1 |
van Dekken, H | 1 |
Tilanus, HW | 1 |
Dinjens, WN | 1 |
Amagai, Y | 1 |
Ide, N | 1 |
Kato, A | 1 |
Shichijo, M | 1 |
Kurashige, Y | 1 |
Otani, A | 1 |
Yoshimura, N | 1 |
Puca, R | 1 |
Nardinocchi, L | 1 |
Starace, G | 1 |
Rechavi, G | 1 |
Sacchi, A | 1 |
Givol, D | 1 |
D'Orazi, G | 1 |
Hammer, S | 1 |
Sommer, A | 1 |
Fichtner, I | 1 |
Becker, M | 1 |
Rolff, J | 1 |
Merk, J | 1 |
Klar, U | 1 |
Hoffmann, J | 1 |
Pereira, JR | 1 |
Thomas, M | 1 |
Abrão Miziara, JE | 1 |
Balint, B | 1 |
Keller, A | 1 |
Csollak, M | 1 |
Albert, I | 1 |
Barrios, CH | 1 |
Krzakowski, M | 1 |
Dimatteo, S | 1 |
Hanna, N | 2 |
Dingemans, AM | 5 |
Groen, HJ | 3 |
Thunnissen, FB | 2 |
Bekers, O | 1 |
Heideman, DA | 2 |
Honeywell, RJ | 1 |
Giovannetti, E | 2 |
Peters, GJ | 2 |
Postmus, PE | 3 |
van Suylen, RJ | 2 |
Hochstenbach, MM | 1 |
Xiong, YQ | 1 |
Davies, JM | 1 |
Dhruva, NS | 1 |
Walko, CM | 1 |
Socinski, MA | 1 |
Bernard, S | 1 |
Hayes, DN | 1 |
Kim, WY | 1 |
Ivanova, A | 1 |
Keller, K | 1 |
Hilbun, LR | 1 |
Chiu, M | 1 |
Dees, EC | 1 |
Stinchcombe, TE | 1 |
Beck, J | 1 |
Bellmunt, J | 2 |
Maroto-Rey, P | 1 |
Trigo, JM | 1 |
Carles, J | 1 |
Guillem, V | 1 |
López-Martín, JA | 1 |
Antón-Torres, A | 1 |
Urruticoechea, L | 1 |
Meijerink, MR | 1 |
van Kuijk, C | 1 |
Ollers, MC | 1 |
de Ruysscher, D | 1 |
Hou, MM | 1 |
Hsieh, JJ | 1 |
Chang, NJ | 1 |
Huang, HY | 1 |
Wang, HM | 1 |
Chuang, CK | 1 |
Hsu, T | 1 |
Chang, JW | 1 |
Jones, SJ | 1 |
Laskin, J | 1 |
Li, YY | 1 |
Griffith, OL | 1 |
An, J | 1 |
Bilenky, M | 1 |
Butterfield, YS | 1 |
Cezard, T | 1 |
Chuah, E | 1 |
Corbett, R | 1 |
Fejes, AP | 1 |
Griffith, M | 1 |
Yee, J | 1 |
Martin, M | 1 |
Mayo, M | 1 |
Melnyk, N | 1 |
Morin, RD | 1 |
Pugh, TJ | 1 |
Severson, T | 1 |
Shah, SP | 1 |
Sutcliffe, M | 1 |
Tam, A | 1 |
Terry, J | 1 |
Thiessen, N | 1 |
Thomson, T | 1 |
Varhol, R | 1 |
Zeng, T | 1 |
Moore, RA | 1 |
Huntsman, DG | 1 |
Birol, I | 1 |
Hirst, M | 1 |
Holt, RA | 1 |
Marra, MA | 1 |
Masunaga, S | 2 |
Matsumoto, Y | 1 |
Kashino, G | 1 |
Hirayama, R | 1 |
Liu, Y | 3 |
Sakurai, Y | 2 |
Suzuki, M | 2 |
Kinashi, Y | 2 |
Maruhashi, A | 2 |
Ono, K | 2 |
Rodolico, G | 1 |
Vitagliano, D | 1 |
Morelli, MP | 1 |
Tuccillo, C | 2 |
Vecchione, L | 1 |
Capasso, A | 1 |
Eckhardt, SG | 1 |
Santoro, M | 1 |
Berrino, L | 2 |
Li, C | 2 |
Zhang, F | 1 |
Huang, Z | 1 |
Wu, P | 1 |
Tagawa, ST | 1 |
Milowsky, MI | 1 |
Jeske, S | 1 |
Mazumdar, M | 1 |
Kung, S | 1 |
Sung, M | 1 |
Lehrer, D | 1 |
Matulich, D | 1 |
Selzer, J | 1 |
Wright, JJ | 2 |
Nanus, DM | 1 |
Glisson, BS | 1 |
Reimers, HJ | 1 |
Bury, MJ | 1 |
Floyd, JD | 1 |
Schulz, TK | 1 |
Sundaram, PK | 1 |
Ho, C | 1 |
Morimoto, H | 1 |
Tsuzaka, Y | 1 |
Kaneko, T | 1 |
Matsushima, H | 1 |
Homma, Y | 1 |
Di Maio, M | 2 |
Giordano, P | 1 |
Riccardi, MG | 1 |
Wang, Y | 3 |
Speeg, KV | 1 |
Washburn, WK | 1 |
Halff, G | 1 |
Ruangkanchanasetr, P | 1 |
Kanjanapayak, B | 1 |
Jungmeechoke, K | 1 |
Chen, L | 3 |
Shen, Y | 3 |
Luo, Q | 2 |
Yu, Y | 3 |
Lu, H | 2 |
Zhu, R | 2 |
Favaretto, A | 1 |
Chella, A | 1 |
Cerea, G | 1 |
Mattioli, R | 1 |
Tortora, G | 2 |
Rossi, A | 3 |
Pasello, G | 1 |
Ricciardi, S | 2 |
Maione, P | 3 |
Dy, GK | 1 |
Hillman, SL | 1 |
Rowland, KM | 1 |
Molina, JR | 2 |
Steen, PD | 1 |
Wender, DB | 1 |
Nair, S | 1 |
Mandrekar, S | 2 |
Schild, SE | 1 |
Kelly, RJ | 1 |
Rajan, A | 2 |
Force, J | 2 |
Lopez-Chavez, A | 1 |
Keen, C | 1 |
Cao, L | 1 |
Choyke, P | 1 |
Turkbey, B | 1 |
Raffeld, M | 1 |
Xi, L | 1 |
Steinberg, SM | 2 |
Kummar, S | 1 |
Gutierrez, M | 3 |
Giaccone, G | 2 |
Kabbinavar, F | 1 |
Menon, H | 1 |
Mok, TSK | 1 |
Stephenson, J | 1 |
Beck, JT | 1 |
Lakshmaiah, K | 1 |
Kracht, K | 1 |
Sikorski, R | 1 |
Schwartzberg, L | 1 |
Friedrich, MJ | 1 |
Yu, S | 1 |
Coriat, R | 1 |
Ropert, S | 1 |
Van Loo, S | 1 |
Boeykens, E | 1 |
Stappaerts, I | 1 |
Rutsaert, R | 1 |
Pasqualetti, G | 1 |
Mey, V | 1 |
Del Tacca, M | 1 |
Danesi, R | 1 |
Raghav, KP | 1 |
Ferrara, TA | 1 |
Mayes, PA | 1 |
Block, MS | 1 |
Kohli, M | 1 |
Friedman, EK | 1 |
Whorf, RC | 1 |
Mitchell, RB | 1 |
Daniel, DB | 1 |
Zangmeister, J | 1 |
Bass, JD | 1 |
Kim, YS | 1 |
Jin, HO | 1 |
Seo, SK | 1 |
Woo, SH | 1 |
Choe, TB | 1 |
An, S | 1 |
Hong, SI | 1 |
Lee, SJ | 1 |
Park, IC | 1 |
Dombi, E | 1 |
Cuesta, L | 1 |
Betlloch, I | 1 |
Toledo, F | 1 |
Latorre, N | 1 |
Monteagudo, A | 1 |
Hu, J | 1 |
Qiu, SJ | 1 |
Huang, XW | 1 |
Dai, Z | 1 |
Tan, CJ | 1 |
Zhou, J | 1 |
Fan, J | 1 |
Mansi, L | 1 |
Viel, E | 1 |
Curtit, E | 1 |
Medioni, J | 1 |
Le Tourneau, C | 1 |
Hillman, S | 1 |
Heigener, D | 2 |
Iakovlev, AIu | 1 |
Gordeeva, OS | 1 |
Denisenko, AN | 1 |
Vorontsov, AIu | 1 |
Ulitin, DN | 1 |
Wu, S | 1 |
Keresztes, RS | 1 |
Cascone, T | 1 |
D'Aiuto, E | 1 |
Saintigny, P | 1 |
De Palma, R | 1 |
Heymach, JV | 1 |
Cabrejas Gómez, Mdel C | 1 |
Aguillo Gutiérrez, E | 1 |
Altemir Trallero, J | 1 |
Ocón Bretón, J | 1 |
Lázaro Sierra, J | 1 |
Mets, RB | 1 |
Golchet, P | 1 |
Adamus, G | 1 |
Anitori, R | 1 |
Wilson, D | 1 |
Shaw, J | 1 |
Jampol, LM | 1 |
Inuzuka, T | 1 |
Nishikawa, H | 1 |
Sekikawa, A | 1 |
Takeda, H | 1 |
Henmi, S | 1 |
Sakamoto, A | 1 |
Saito, S | 1 |
Kita, R | 1 |
Kimura, T | 1 |
Osaki, Y | 1 |
Kudo, M | 2 |
Ma, WL | 1 |
Hsu, CL | 1 |
Yeh, CC | 1 |
Wu, MH | 1 |
Huang, CK | 1 |
Jeng, LB | 1 |
Hung, YC | 1 |
Yeh, S | 1 |
Chang, C | 1 |
Kondo, N | 1 |
Dasari, A | 1 |
Gore, L | 1 |
Messersmith, WA | 1 |
Diab, S | 1 |
Jimeno, A | 1 |
Weekes, CD | 1 |
Lewis, KD | 1 |
Drabkin, HA | 1 |
Flaig, TW | 1 |
Camidge, DR | 1 |
Zhang, XH | 1 |
Shin, JY | 1 |
Kim, JO | 1 |
Oh, JE | 1 |
Yoon, SA | 1 |
Jung, CK | 1 |
Kang, JH | 1 |
Alzahrani, AS | 1 |
AlQaraawi, A | 1 |
Al Sohaibani, F | 1 |
Almanea, H | 1 |
Abalkhail, H | 1 |
Chan, SL | 1 |
Johnson, P | 1 |
Lucas, LM | 1 |
Crouzeix, G | 1 |
Michels, JJ | 1 |
Sevin, E | 1 |
Aide, N | 1 |
Vaur, D | 1 |
Bardet, S | 1 |
Gold, KA | 1 |
Kim, E | 2 |
Morgensztern, D | 1 |
Herbst, RS | 3 |
Pirker, R | 1 |
Galiulin, R | 1 |
Ciuleanu, TE | 1 |
Dediu, M | 1 |
Papai-Szekely, Z | 1 |
Banaclocha, NM | 1 |
Galimi, F | 1 |
Jiang, Y | 1 |
Ma, Y | 1 |
Li, Y | 1 |
Ruan, M | 1 |
Bria, E | 1 |
Pilotto, S | 1 |
Paz-Ares, LG | 1 |
Biesma, B | 1 |
Eisen, T | 1 |
Bennouna, J | 1 |
Liao, M | 1 |
Gans, S | 1 |
Syrigos, K | 1 |
Le Marie, E | 1 |
Gottfried, M | 1 |
Vansteenkiste, J | 1 |
Alberola, V | 1 |
Strauss, UP | 1 |
Montegriffo, E | 1 |
Staufer, K | 1 |
Fischer, L | 1 |
Seegers, B | 1 |
Vettorazzi, E | 1 |
Nashan, B | 1 |
Sterneck, M | 1 |
Arao, T | 1 |
Ueshima, K | 1 |
Matsumoto, K | 1 |
Nagai, T | 1 |
Kimura, H | 1 |
Hagiwara, S | 1 |
Sakurai, T | 1 |
Haji, S | 1 |
Kanazawa, A | 1 |
Hidaka, H | 1 |
Iso, Y | 1 |
Shimada, M | 1 |
Utsunomiya, T | 1 |
Hirooka, M | 1 |
Hiasa, Y | 1 |
Toyoki, Y | 1 |
Hakamada, K | 1 |
Yasui, K | 1 |
Kumada, T | 1 |
Toyoda, H | 1 |
Sato, S | 1 |
Hisai, H | 1 |
Tsuchiya, K | 1 |
Izumi, N | 1 |
Arii, S | 1 |
Nishio, K | 1 |
Wege, H | 1 |
Brümmendorf, TH | 1 |
Gambacorti-Passerini, C | 1 |
Bracarda, S | 1 |
Porta, C | 1 |
Boni, C | 1 |
Mucciarini, C | 1 |
Pazzola, A | 1 |
Cortesi, E | 1 |
Gasparro, D | 1 |
Labianca, R | 1 |
Di Costanzo, F | 1 |
Falcone, A | 1 |
Cinquini, M | 1 |
Caserta, C | 1 |
Paglino, C | 1 |
De Angelis, V | 1 |
Labots, M | 1 |
Dekker, H | 1 |
Galvani, E | 1 |
Sciarrillo, R | 1 |
Honeywell, R | 1 |
Lee, JW | 1 |
Hanna, NH | 1 |
Traynor, AM | 1 |
Coxon, A | 1 |
Ziegler, B | 1 |
Kaufman, S | 1 |
Xu, M | 1 |
Wang, H | 1 |
Weishuhn, D | 1 |
Schmidt, J | 1 |
Sweet, H | 1 |
Starnes, C | 1 |
Saffran, D | 1 |
Polverino, A | 1 |
Török, S | 1 |
Cserepes T, M | 1 |
Rényi-Vámos, F | 1 |
Tsao, AS | 1 |
Liu, S | 1 |
Lee, JJ | 1 |
Alden, C | 1 |
Herbst, R | 1 |
Davis, SE | 1 |
Lippman, S | 1 |
Stewart, D | 1 |
Tang, XM | 1 |
Wistuba, I | 1 |
Hong, WK | 1 |
Kuiper, JL | 1 |
Roder, J | 1 |
Grigorieva, J | 1 |
Roder, H | 1 |
Hegde, U | 1 |
Patel, V | 1 |
Kaloudis, E | 1 |
van Wijk, A | 1 |
Burgers, SA | 1 |
Kunst, PW | 1 |
Thunnissen, E | 1 |
Mosher, CE | 1 |
Bakas, T | 1 |
Champion, VL | 1 |
Vavalà, T | 1 |
Levra, MG | 1 |
Solitro, F | 1 |
Pelosi, E | 1 |
Veltri, A | 1 |
Hammond, E | 1 |
Brandt, R | 1 |
Dredge, K | 1 |
KALASHNIKOV, AP | 1 |
Kramer, BW | 1 |
Götz, R | 1 |
Rapp, UR | 1 |
Onn, A | 1 |
Baek, WS | 1 |
Pytel, P | 1 |
Undevia, SD | 1 |
Rubeiz, H | 1 |
Tiseo, M | 2 |
Franciosi, V | 1 |
Ardizzoni, A | 2 |
Carter, CA | 1 |
Brink, C | 1 |
Vincent, P | 1 |
Maxuitenko, YY | 1 |
Gilbert, KS | 1 |
Waud, WR | 1 |
Kang, HT | 1 |
Lee, HI | 1 |
Hwang, ES | 1 |
Chung, NM | 1 |
Turner, ML | 2 |
Morgan-Lappe, S | 1 |
Huang, X | 1 |
Li, L | 1 |
Zakula, DM | 1 |
Vernetti, LA | 1 |
Fesik, SW | 1 |
Kong, HH | 1 |
Cowen, EW | 1 |
Azad, NS | 1 |
Dahut, W | 1 |
MacGregor, JL | 1 |
Silvers, DN | 1 |
Grossman, ME | 1 |
Sherman, WH | 1 |
Del Gaizo, F | 1 |
Colantuoni, G | 1 |
Guerriero, C | 1 |
Ferrara, C | 1 |
Nicolella, D | 1 |
Comunale, D | 1 |
De Vita, A | 1 |
Dasanu, CA | 1 |
Alexandrescu, DT | 1 |
Dutcher, J | 1 |
Mulamalla, K | 1 |
Yan, Z | 1 |
De Mulder, PH | 1 |
Mandrekar, SJ | 1 |
Marks, R | 1 |
Reid, JR | 1 |
Croghan, G | 1 |
Hanson, LJ | 1 |
Jett, JR | 1 |
Xia, C | 1 |
Lathia, C | 1 |
Sendi, P | 1 |
Puric, E | 1 |
Schönenberger, A | 1 |
Bargetzi, M | 1 |
Mongillo, F | 1 |
Bareschino, M | 1 |
Cabebe, E | 1 |
Wakelee, H | 1 |
Karrison, TG | 1 |
Maitland, ML | 1 |
Stadler, WM | 1 |
Ratain, MJ | 1 |
Quesada, AR | 1 |
Medina, MA | 1 |
Alba, E | 1 |
Gudena, V | 1 |
Verma, N | 1 |
Post, G | 1 |
Kizziah, M | 1 |
Fenning, R | 1 |
Montero, AJ | 1 |
Procopio, G | 1 |
Verzoni, E | 1 |
Gevorgyan, A | 1 |
Mancin, M | 1 |
Pusceddu, S | 1 |
Catena, L | 1 |
Platania, M | 1 |
Guadalupi, V | 1 |
Martinetti, A | 1 |
Bajetta, E | 1 |
Fischer, B | 1 |
Buhl, R | 1 |
Raabe, A | 1 |
Rett, M | 1 |
Krüll, A | 1 |
Beck-Bornholdt, HP | 1 |
Bernier, J | 2 |
Stratford, MR | 1 |
Denekamp, J | 2 |
Dennis, MF | 1 |
Bieri, S | 1 |
Hagen, F | 1 |
Kocagöncü, O | 1 |
Bolla, M | 1 |
Rojas, A | 2 |
Honess, DJ | 1 |
Hill, SA | 1 |
Collingridge, DR | 1 |
Edwards, B | 1 |
Brauers, G | 1 |
Powell, NA | 1 |
Chaplin, DJ | 1 |
Trovò, M | 1 |
Horiot, JC | 1 |
Hamers, H | 1 |
Antognoni, P | 1 |
Dahl, O | 1 |
Richaud, P | 1 |
Kaanders, J | 1 |
van Glabbeke, M | 1 |
Piérart, M | 1 |
French, FA | 1 |
Draudin-Krylenko, VA | 1 |
Bukin, IuV | 1 |
Nikonova, TV | 1 |
Grassetti, DR | 1 |
Gotoh, H | 1 |
Nomura, T | 1 |
Nakajima, H | 1 |
Hasegawa, C | 1 |
Sakamoto, Y | 1 |
von Ardenne, M | 1 |
Chaplain, RA | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Randomized Phase II Trial of Sorafenib and Erlotinib or Sorafenib Alone in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Progressing on Erlotinib[NCT00609804] | Phase 2 | 53 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-03-31 | Completed | ||
Detection of Plasmatic Cell-free BRAF and NRAS Mutations: a New Tool for Monitoring Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma Treated With Targeted Therapies or Immunotherapy ( MALT )[NCT03493230] | 35 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2018-04-30 | Not yet recruiting | |||
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of AMG 706 in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.[NCT00460317] | Phase 3 | 1,450 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-07-31 | Terminated (stopped due to Amgen discontinued the development of AMG706 because 20050201 did not meet its primary objective.) | ||
A Phase II Study of Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006®) in Patients With Relapsed Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer(NSCLC) After Failure of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (EGFR-TKI)Treatment[NCT00922584] | Phase 2 | 65 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-12-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized Trial of AMG 706 or Bevacizumab in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Advanced Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00369070] | Phase 2 | 186 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-01-31 | Terminated | ||
A Phase II Trial of PS-341 (NSC-681239) in Patients With Platinum-Treated Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00068289] | Phase 2 | 0 participants | Interventional | 2003-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase II Trial of BAY 43-9006 (NSC-724772) in Patients With Platinum-Treated Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00182689] | Phase 2 | 89 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Weekly Topotecan With and Without AVE0005 (Aflibercept; NSC-724770) in Patients With Platinum Treated Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (E-SCLC)[NCT00828139] | Phase 2 | 189 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-05-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase III Randomized Sequential Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib Followed by Sunitinib Versus Sunitinib Followed by Sorafenib in the Treatment of First-Line Advanced / Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00732914] | Phase 3 | 272 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-01-31 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Open-label, Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Combination With Erlotinib in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Refractory to One or Two Prior Chemotherapy Regimens[NCT00801385] | Phase 2 | 47 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2008-09-30 | Recruiting | ||
Randomized, Double-blind Phase 2 Study Of Axitinib (Ag-013736) With Or Without Dose Titration In Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00835978] | Phase 2 | 213 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-08-31 | Completed | ||
Phase II Study Of Single-Agent SU011248 In The Second-Line Treatment Of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00054886] | Phase 2 | 63 participants | Interventional | 2003-01-31 | Completed | ||
AG-013736 (AXITINIB) FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC RENAL CELL CANCER[NCT00920816] | Phase 3 | 492 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-08-25 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2 Efficacy And Safety Study Of SU011248 Administered In A Continuous Daily Regimen In Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00137423] | Phase 2 | 107 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-05-31 | Completed | ||
Phase 3b, Randomized, Open-Label Study Of Bevacizumab + Temsirolimus Vs. Bevacizumab + Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Treatment In Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00631371] | Phase 3 | 791 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-04-30 | Completed | ||
AXITINIB (AG-013736) AS SECOND LINE THERAPY FOR METASTATIC RENAL CELL CANCER: AXIS TRIAL[NCT00678392] | Phase 3 | 723 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-09-03 | Completed | ||
A Phase II Efficacy And Safety Study Of Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) Administered In A Continuous Daily Regimen In Patients With Advanced (First-Line) Renal Cell Cancer[NCT00338884] | Phase 2 | 120 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomized Trial Of Temsirolimus Versus Sorafenib As Second-Line Therapy In Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Failed First-Line Sunitinib Therapy[NCT00474786] | Phase 3 | 512 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomized Phase II Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Sunitinib Malate Schedule 4/2 vs. Sunitinib Malate Continuous Dosing As First-Line Therapy For Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer (Renal EFFECT Trial)[NCT00267748] | Phase 2 | 317 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-12-31 | Completed | ||
A Pivotal Study Of SU011248 In The Treatment Of Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00077974] | Phase 2 | 106 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-02-29 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Randomized Study Of SU011248 Versus Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Systemic Therapy For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00083889] | Phase 3 | 750 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-08-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Three-Arm, Randomized, Open-Label Study Of Interferon Alfa Alone, CCI-779 Alone, And The Combination Of Interferon Alfa And CCI-779 In First-Line Poor-Prognosis Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.[NCT00065468] | Phase 3 | 626 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-07-31 | Completed | ||
An Open-label, Prospective Study of Tumor Response Time of Palbociclib in Combination With AI in Real-world First-line Treatment of Postmenopausal Chinese Patients With ER (+) HER2 (-) Metastatic Breast Cancer[NCT04858997] | Phase 2 | 150 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-04-22 | Recruiting | ||
Molecular Epidemiology of Lung Adenocarcinoma in Multi-ethnic Asian Phenotype[NCT01774526] | 40 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2010-12-31 | Recruiting | |||
Phase I Study of Continuous Dosing of Sunitinib in Non GIST Sarcomas With Concomitant Radiotherapy[NCT01308034] | Phase 1 | 25 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-03-31 | Completed | ||
Phase II Study of Salvage Therapy With Sunitinib,Docetaxel and Platinum on Metastatic or Unresectable Non Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT01019798] | Phase 2 | 16 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2009-01-31 | Recruiting | ||
A Phase II Multicenter Uncontrolled Trial of BAY43-9006 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma[NCT00101413] | Phase 2 | 52 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-04-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase III Randomized Study of BAY43-9006 in Patients With Unresectable and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.[NCT00073307] | Phase 3 | 903 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-11-30 | Completed | ||
An Open-label, Dose-finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of AMG 706 With Carboplatin/Paclitaxel, AMG 706 With Panitumumab and AMG 706 With Panitumumab and Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced Non-Smal[NCT00094835] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 51 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-01-31 | Completed | ||
Safety and Efficacy of Sequential Stereotactic Radiotherapy With S1 Combined With Endostar in the Treatment of Stage IV Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Prospective, Multicenter, Exploratory Study[NCT04274270] | 60 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-04-01 | Not yet recruiting | |||
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Plus or Minus Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) in Chemonaive Patients With Stage IIIB-IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)[NCT00300885] | Phase 3 | 926 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-02-28 | Terminated (stopped due to Based on the results of the interim analysis, it was determined that the study would not meet its primary efficacy endpoint and the study was terminated early.) | ||
Personalized OncoGenomics (POG) Program of British Columbia: Connecting Cancer Genomics to Cancer Care[NCT02155621] | 5,000 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2014-07-31 | Recruiting | |||
Canadian Atezolizumab Precision Targeting for Immunotherapy Intervention[NCT04273061] | Phase 2 | 200 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-06-17 | Recruiting | ||
Phase II Study of Bay 43-9006 (Sorafenib) With Evaluation of RAS Signal Pathway in Patients With Relapsed Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00098254] | Phase 2 | 37 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-12-31 | Completed | ||
Tarceva With or Without Apatinib in the First-line Therapy of Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma With Mutant EGFR:a Phase II Study.[NCT02704767] | Phase 2 | 60 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2016-06-30 | Not yet recruiting | ||
A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial of Sorafenib and Erlotinib or Erlotinib Alone in Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00600015] | Phase 2 | 166 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-02-29 | Completed | ||
A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Sorafenib to Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Placebo in First-Line Treatment of Patients With Stage IIIb With Effusion and Stage IV Non-Small Ce[NCT00449033] | Phase 3 | 904 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-02-28 | Completed | ||
A Dyad-based Multiple Behavior Intervention for Reducing Lung Cancer Symptoms - a Pilot Randomized Control Trial (Breathe Easier II)[NCT05956782] | 60 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-06-15 | Recruiting | |||
A Phase II Study of BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) in Metastatic, Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer[NCT00090545] | Phase 2 | 46 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-09-01 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
The Number of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00609804)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sorafenib+Erlotinib | 2 |
Sorafenib | 1 |
The Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Worsening of Their Disease. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00609804)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib+Erlotinib | 3.1 |
Sorafenib | 1.9 |
Defined as the number of participants with treatment-emergent grade 3/4 adverse events utilizing the National Cancer Institute Common Technology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0 (NCT00609804)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anemia | Fatigue | Diarrhea | Dehydration | Rash/Desquamation | Hand-foot skin reaction | Dyspnea | Hyponatremia | Hyperglycemia | Lipase increased | Anorexia | Atrial Fibrillation | Cognitive Disturbance | Confusion | Congestive Heart Failure | Constipation | Dysphagia | Extremity - upper (function) | Hypertension | Cardiac Ischemia/Infarction | Hypokalemia | Hypoxia | Ileus | Infection - Pneumonia | Infection - Wound | Malaise | Nausea | Obstruction, GI | Pain - abdomen | Pain - chest | Pain - musculoskeletal | Perforation, GI | Vomiting | Dizziness | Infection - urinary tract NOS | Neuropathy - cranial | Pain - back | Pain - head/headache | COPD exacerbation | Ocular surgery | Personality change | Respiratory failure | Pulmonary embolism | |
Sorafenib | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sorafenib and Erlotinib | 1 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Complete Response (CR) is a complete disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease. No new lesions, no disease related symptoms. Normalization of markers and other abnormal lab values. Partial Response (PR) is greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease. No new lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR means a repeat scan at least 4 weeks apart documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration. (NCT00182689)
Timeframe: 8 weeks to 2 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Platinum-Sensitive | 11 |
Platinum-Refractory | 2 |
Measured from time of registration to death, or last contact date (NCT00182689)
Timeframe: 0 - 2 years
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Platinum-Sensitive | 6.7 |
Platinum-Refractory | 5.3 |
Adverse Events (AEs) are reported by the CTCAE (NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) Version 3.0. For each patient, worst grade of each event type is reported. Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, Grade 5 = Fatal. (NCT00182689)
Timeframe: Patients were assessed for adverse events after completion of every 28-day cycle.
Intervention | Participants with a given type of AE (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AST, SGOT | Allergic reaction/hypersensitivity | Anorexia | Ataxia (incoordination) | Bilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia) | Confusion | Dehydration | Diarrhea | Dizziness | Dyspnea (shortness of breath) | Fatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise) | Fever in absence of neutropenia, ANC lt1.0x10e9/L | Hemoglobin | Hypertension | INR (of prothrombin time) | Inf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - Skin | Inf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - UTI | Lipase | Muscle weakness, not d/t neuropathy - body/general | Nausea | Neuropathy: sensory | PTT (Partial thromboplastin time) | Pain - Abdomen NOS | Pain - Extremity-limb | Pain - Joint | Pain-Other (Specify) | Pancreatitis | Phosphate, serum-low (hypophosphatemia) | Pleural effusion (non-malignant) | Pneumonitis/pulmonary infiltrates | Potassium, serum-low (hypokalemia) | Rash/desquamation | Rash: acne/acneiform | Rash: erythema multiforme | Rash: hand-foot skin reaction | Sodium, serum-low (hyponatremia) | Speech impairment (e.g., dysphasia or aphasia) | Syncope (fainting) | Vomiting | Weight loss | |
Platinum Refractory | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Platinum Sensitive | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Estimated to within at least 15% (95% confidence interval). (NCT00828139)
Timeframe: Weekly, up to 2 years.
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Platinum-Sensitive Treated With Topotecan and Ziv-aflibercept | 6.0 |
Platinum Sensitivity Treated With Topotecan Alone | 4.6 |
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan + Ziv-aflibercept | 4.6 |
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan Aloine | 4.2 |
"From the date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause.~Progression is defined as 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of target measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease during therapy) using the same techniques as baseline. Unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease in the opinion of the treating physician (an explanation must be provided). Appearance of any new lesion/site. Death due to disease without prior documentation of progression and without symptomatic deterioration." (NCT00828139)
Timeframe: Disease assessments were performed every 6 weeks, up to 2 years.
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Platinum-Sensitive Treated With Topotecan and Ziv-aflibercept | 1.8 |
Platinum Sensitivity Treated With Topotecan Alone | 1.3 |
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan + Ziv-aflibercept | 1.4 |
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan Aloine | 1.4 |
"The number of confirmed and unconfirmed complete and partial responses in the subset of patients with measurable disease per RECIST 1.0. Estimated to within at least 17% (95% confidence interval).~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT00828139)
Timeframe: Disease assessment for response were performed every 6 weeks, up to 2 years.
Intervention | proportion of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Platinum-Sensitive Treated With Topotecan and Ziv-aflibercept | 0.02 |
Platinum Sensitivity Treated With Topotecan Alone | 0 |
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan + Ziv-aflibercept | 0.02 |
Platinum Refractory Treated With Topotecan Aloine | 0 |
Adverse Events (AEs) are reported by CTCAE Version 3.0. Only adverse events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported. The events listed here are not necessary to be included in Serious Adverse Event. A serious event could be death, life-threatening, hospitalization, disability or permanent damage, congenital anomaly...Grade 3 through 5 adverse event may not meet the criterion of serious adverse event. (NCT00828139)
Timeframe: Toxicity assessment was evaluated after each cycle (21 days), up to 2 years.
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AST, SGOT | Anorexia | Bilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia) | Bronchospasm, wheezing | Calcium, serum-high (hypercalcemia) | Cardiac-ischemia/infarction | Colitis, infectious (e.g., Clostridium difficile) | Confusion | Constipation | Creatinine | Dehydration | Diarrhea | Dizziness | Dyspnea (shortness of breath) | Fatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise) | Febrile neutropenia | GGT (gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase) | Hemoglobin | Hemolysis | Hemorrhage, GI - Upper GI NOS | Hemorrhage, pulmo/upper resp- Bronchopulmonary NOS | Hemorrhage, pulmonary/upper respiratory - Lung | Hemorrhage, pulmonary/upper respiratory - Nose | Hypertension | INR (of prothrombin time) | Inf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - Colon | Inf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - Lung | Inf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - Bronchus | Inf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - Lung | Inf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - UTI | Infection with unknown ANC - Blood | Infection with unknown ANC - Lung (pneumonia) | Left ventricular systolic dysfunction | Leukocytes (total WBC) | Leukoencephalopathy (radiolographic findings) | Lipase | Lymphopenia | Mucositis/stomatitis (clinical exam) - Oral cavity | Muscle weakness, not d/t neuropathy - body/general | Nausea | Neutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC) | Pain - Abdomen NOS | Pain - Chest wall | Pain - Head/headache | Pain - Pain NOS | Platelets | Pneumonitis/pulmonary infiltrates | Potassium, serum-high (hyperkalemia) | Potassium, serum-low (hypokalemia) | Proteinuria | Psychosis (hallucinations/delusions) | Renal failure | Seizure | Sodium, serum-high (hypernatremia) | Sodium, serum-low (hyponatremia) | Syndromes-Other (Specify) | Thrombosis/thrombus/embolism | Voice changes/dysarthria | Vomiting | Weight loss | |
Topotecan | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ziv-aflibercept + Topotecan | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 30 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Clearance (CL) of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed (F). Clearance is defined as the volume of blood from which drug can be completely removed per unit of time. CL/F for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | L/hr (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 54.15 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 61.93 |
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Vz/F is influenced by the fraction absorbed. Vz/F for steady-state axitinb was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | L (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 158.18 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 216.62 |
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero 24 hours[AUC(0-24). AUC(0-24) for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng.hr/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 258.68 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 161.38 |
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measurable concentration (AUClast). AUClast for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng.hr/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 105.33 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 78.44 |
DR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (complete response - CR or Partial response - PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median values were estimated based on Kaplan-Meier method. 95% confidence interval was based on the Brookmeyer and Crowley method. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | NA |
Placebo Titration Arm | 21.2 |
Non-randomized Arm | 23.3 |
Cmax for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 15 (C2D15): pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 31.74 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 23.05 |
ORR was defined as the proportion of participants with objective response based assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. No new lesions. PR was defined as >=30% decrease on study under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 53.6 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 33.9 |
Non-randomized Arm | 59.3 |
All Participants | 48.4 |
OS was defined as the time from date of the first dose of the study medication to date of death due to any cause. For participants who did not die, their survival times were to be censored at the last date they were known to be alive. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm (FA Population) | 42.7 |
Placebo Titration Arm (FA Population) | 30.4 |
Non-randomized Arm (SA Population) | 41.6 |
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Plasma decay half life for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | hr (Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 2.48 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 2.81 |
The time from first dose administration to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. PFS in each arm was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimates of the PFS curves from the Kaplan-Meier method were presented. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 14.5 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 15.7 |
Non-randomized Arm | 16.6 |
All Participants | 14.6 |
Tmax for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | hrs (Median) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 2.04 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 2.00 |
Value at respective visit minus value at baseline. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At screening (D-14 to D-1); lead-in period: Cycle 1 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 2 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 3 & subsequent cycles Day 1; end of study and follow-up 28 days after last dose.
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=52,51,73) | Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=56,56,91) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=56,56,91) | Cycle 2 Day 15 (n=55,55,86) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=48,49,84) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=45,48,79) | End of treatment (n=35,44,51) | Follow-up (n=16,25,36) | |
Active Titration Arm | -1.6 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 5.5 | 6.6 | 7.4 | 0.6 | -4.5 |
Non-randomized Arm | 0.5 | 11.5 | 10.5 | 9.7 | 9.1 | 8.7 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
Placebo Titration Arm | -2.6 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 5.9 | 4.6 | 3.5 | -1.3 |
Value at respective visit minus value at baseline (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At screening (D-14 to D-1); lead-in period: Cycle 1 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 2 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 3 & subsequent cycles Day 1; end of study and follow-up 28 days after last dose.
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=52,51,73) | Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=56,56,91) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=56,56,91) | Cycle 2 Day 15 (n=55,55,86) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=48,49,84) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=45,48,79) | End of treatment (n=35,44,51) | Follow-up (n=16,25,36) | |
Active Titration Arm | -4.3 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 2.4 | -3.6 |
Non-randomized Arm | -1.8 | 11.5 | 9.9 | 5.9 | 5.2 | 5.5 | -2.8 | -0.6 |
Placebo Titration Arm | -2.9 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 8.4 | 3.5 | 1.7 | -0.4 |
CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD31+/CD146+ CECs, CD31+/CD146+ MFI PDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ MFI pPDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ pVEGFR, CD31+/CD146+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)
Intervention | Fluorescent Intensity Unit (FIU) (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline CECs Count (n=17,22,20) | Baseline MFI PDGFR-BETA (n=17,21,20) | Baseline MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=17,21,20) | Baseline MFI pVEGFR (n=17,22,20) | Baseline MFI VEGFR (n=17,22,20) | |
Active Titration Arm | 74668 | 333760 | 380139 | 385617 | 330333 |
Non-randomized Arm | 77437 | 442642 | 383202 | 380184 | 359097 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 76258 | 380886 | 355441 | 352644 | 401909 |
CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD146+/CD105+ CECs, CD146+/CD105+ mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ MFI phospho-PDGFR (pPDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ phospho-Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (pVEGFR), CD146+/CD105+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)
Intervention | Fluorescent Intensity Unit (FIU) (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline CECs Count (n=17,22,20) | Baseline MFI PDGFR-BETA (n=17,22,20) | Baseline MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=17,22,20) | Baseline MFI pVEGFR (n=16,22,20) | Baseline MFI VEGFR (n=16,22,20) | |
Active Titration Arm | 23584 | 346815 | 401226 | 456086 | 367799 |
Non-randomized Arm | 29663 | 327567 | 397672 | 398754 | 359092 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 28544 | 455238 | 395509 | 436197 | 473290 |
CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD31+/CD146+ CECs, CD31+/CD146+ MFI PDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ MFI pPDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ pVEGFR, CD31+/CD146+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At end of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 15), Cycle 2 Day 15 and End of therapy (EOT)
Intervention | Ratio (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=11,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=13,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 CECs COUNT (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=11,15,13) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=13,14,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=6,8,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=11,15,13) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=13,14,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI pPDGFRBETA (n=6,8,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=11,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=13,16,10) | EOT:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=11,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR n=13,16,10) | EOT:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=7,9,4) | |
Active Titration Arm | 2.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
Non-randomized Arm | 1.5 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD146+/CD105+ CECs, CD146+/CD105+ MFI platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ MFI phospho-PDGFR (pPDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ phospho-VEGFR (pVEGFR), CD146+/CD105+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At end of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 15), Cycle 2 Day 15 and End of therapy (EOT)
Intervention | Ratio (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=11,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=13,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 CECs Count (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=11,17,13) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=13,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=11,17,13) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=13,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI pPDGFRBETA (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=10,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=12,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=10,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=12,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=7,9,4) | |
Active Titration Arm | 2.3 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.1 |
Non-randomized Arm | 2.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 3.7 | 4.4 | 8.9 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 |
ORR, defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR according to RECIST, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFA or VEGFR3 polymorphisms. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/A (n = 7, 9, 14) | VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/C (n = 22, 20, 41) | VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: C/C (n = 14, 14, 24) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/G (n = 22, 23, 43) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/A (n = 19, 16, 29) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: A/A (n = 2, 4, 7) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/G (n = 16, 15, 28) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/C (n = 22, 22, 35) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: C/C (n = 5, 6, 16) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/A (n = 36, 39, 79) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/G (n = 6, 4, 9) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: G/G (n = 1, 0, 0) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/G (n = 36, 38, 79) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/T (n = 6, 5, 10) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: T/T (n = 1, 0, 0) | |
Active Titration Arm | 85.7 | 54.5 | 50.0 | 59.1 | 57.9 | 50.0 | 81.3 | 45.5 | 40.0 | 58.3 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 55.6 | 66.7 | 100.0 |
Non-randomized Arm | 42.9 | 65.9 | 66.7 | 67.4 | 58.6 | 42.9 | 60.7 | 57.1 | 75.0 | 64.3 | 44.4 | 0 | 65.2 | 40.0 | 0 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 22.2 | 35.0 | 35.7 | 39.1 | 18.8 | 50.0 | 53.3 | 18.2 | 33.3 | 30.8 | 50.0 | 0 | 28.9 | 60.0 | 0 |
PFS, defined as the time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFA or VEGFR3 polymorphisms. Estimates of the PFS curves from the Kaplan-Meier method were presented. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)
Intervention | Months (Median) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/A (n = 7, 9, 14) | VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/C (n = 22, 20, 41) | VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: C/C (n = 14, 14, 41) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/G (n = 22, 23, 43) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/A (n = 19, 16, 29) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: A/A (n = 2, 4, 29) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/G (n = 16, 15, 28) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/C (n = 22, 22, 35) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: C/C (n = 5, 6, 16) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/A (n = 36, 39, 70) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/G (n = 6, 4, 9) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: G/G (n = 0, 0, 0) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/G (n = 36, 38, 69) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/T (n = 36, 38, 10) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: T/T (n = 1, 0, 0) | |
Active Titration Arm | NA | 11.07 | 18.74 | 14.62 | 12.78 | NA | 17.44 | 9.18 | 11.07 | 13.73 | 16.52 | NA | 12.78 | 24.80 | NA |
Non-randomized Arm | 7.33 | 16.59 | 25.13 | 25.13 | 13.90 | 8.57 | 22.54 | 13.83 | NA | 16.56 | 16.26 | NA | 16.59 | 13.86 | NA |
Placebo Titration Arm | 11.50 | 9.67 | 24.64 | 19.42 | 8.34 | 10.04 | 19.42 | 8.31 | 15.67 | 15.67 | 7.93 | NA | 15.67 | 8.34 | NA |
Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response that is subsequently confirmed to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 14.7 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 14.3 |
Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response that is subsequently confirmed to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | NA |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 8.7 |
Time in months from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | NA |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | NA |
Time in months from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 17.2 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 18.1 |
Percentage of participants with OR based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 32.3 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 14.6 |
Percentage of participants with OR based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 23.7 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 10.1 |
"Time in months from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS calculated as (first event date minus date of randomization plus 1)/30.4. Tumor progression determined from oncologic assessment data (where it meets criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where outcome was Death). Progression using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is >= 20 percent (%) increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 10.1 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 6.5 |
"Time in months from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS calculated as (first event date minus date of randomization plus 1)/30.4. Tumor progression determined from oncologic assessment data (where it meets criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where outcome was Death). Progression using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is >= 20 percent (%) increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 6.5 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 4.8 |
"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | C22 D1 | C23 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 0.710 | 0.709 | 0.694 | 0.696 | 0.708 | 0.683 | 0.685 | 0.678 | 0.704 | 0.682 | 0.698 | 0.708 | 0.708 | 0.703 | 0.689 | 0.702 | 0.706 | 0.699 | 0.713 | 0.699 | 0.712 | 0.737 | 0.736 | 0.635 | 0.545 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 0.712 | 0.693 | 0.687 | 0.668 | 0.673 | 0.641 | 0.676 | 0.717 | 0.729 | 0.723 | 0.748 | 0.742 | 0.761 | 0.731 | 0.755 | 0.775 | 0.738 | 0.777 | 0.762 | 0.710 | 0.702 | 0.774 | 0.789 | 0.588 | 0.618 |
"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 0.812 | 0.769 | 0.772 | 0.737 | 0.780 | 0.767 | 0.762 | 0.758 | 0.796 | 0.768 | 0.792 | 0.797 | 0.786 | 0.833 | 0.819 | 0.811 | 0.834 | 0.830 | 0.830 | 0.832 | 0.859 | 0.582 | 0.429 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 0.831 | 0.754 | 0.755 | 0.759 | 0.768 | 0.753 | 0.768 | 0.733 | 0.794 | 0.820 | 0.848 | 0.837 | 0.814 | 0.871 | 0.829 | 0.828 | 0.865 | 0.829 | 0.861 | 0.923 | 0.852 | 0.623 | 0.418 |
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0: worst imaginable health state to 100: best imaginable health state; higher scores indicate a better health state. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | C22 D1 | C23 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 71.181 | 71.714 | 72.006 | 72.179 | 72.451 | 71.574 | 71.050 | 71.031 | 72.690 | 72.910 | 72.763 | 73.610 | 73.030 | 73.147 | 74.494 | 73.878 | 73.090 | 73.817 | 72.089 | 74.244 | 75.694 | 78.000 | 77.143 | 67.254 | 69.195 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 72.362 | 72.422 | 71.241 | 72.086 | 73.615 | 69.944 | 73.923 | 73.183 | 73.780 | 72.400 | 72.271 | 75.295 | 75.432 | 75.108 | 74.405 | 75.818 | 74.333 | 75.571 | 75.125 | 74.190 | 70.500 | 73.917 | 72.571 | 67.048 | 64.885 |
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0: worst imaginable health state to 100: best imaginable health state; higher scores indicate a better health state. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 82.799 | 81.102 | 80.895 | 81.138 | 83.018 | 82.222 | 82.900 | 83.382 | 84.171 | 83.041 | 84.136 | 84.305 | 82.927 | 86.520 | 85.841 | 87.579 | 88.424 | 86.586 | 89.500 | 90.333 | 90.313 | 75.568 | 58.154 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 82.058 | 78.231 | 80.534 | 81.245 | 80.250 | 80.829 | 80.868 | 81.000 | 83.788 | 82.778 | 83.000 | 83.500 | 83.300 | 86.667 | 86.462 | 86.083 | 84.300 | 83.125 | 82.143 | 86.000 | 84.167 | 74.741 | 64.333 |
FKSI-DRS: subset of FKSI which is FACT-Kidney Symptom Index questionnaire used to assess QoL for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. FKSI contains 15 questions and FKSI-DRS 9 questions (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, hematuria) each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FKSI-DRS total score 0 to 36; higher scores associated with better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 ( | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | C22 D1 | C23 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 28.691 | 28.728 | 29.171 | 28.577 | 29.020 | 28.574 | 28.568 | 28.557 | 28.817 | 29.057 | 29.146 | 29.648 | 29.545 | 29.579 | 29.859 | 29.683 | 29.564 | 29.380 | 29.737 | 29.844 | 30.889 | 31.696 | 31.357 | 26.556 | 26.805 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 29.653 | 29.963 | 29.750 | 29.642 | 30.255 | 29.153 | 29.523 | 30.296 | 30.186 | 30.364 | 30.688 | 30.727 | 31.483 | 31.027 | 30.730 | 31.515 | 31.567 | 31.107 | 31.417 | 30.762 | 30.056 | 31.000 | 31.143 | 26.786 | 26.769 |
FKSI-DRS: subset of FKSI which is FACT-Kidney Symptom Index questionnaire used to assess QoL for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. FKSI contains 15 questions and FKSI-DRS 9 questions (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, hematuria) each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FKSI-DRS total score 0 to 36; higher scores associated with better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 31.020 | 30.600 | 30.645 | 30.103 | 30.676 | 30.731 | 30.920 | 30.966 | 31.012 | 30.986 | 31.212 | 31.356 | 31.418 | 32.100 | 32.000 | 31.921 | 32.061 | 31.931 | 32.364 | 31.905 | 33.125 | 28.216 | 24.692 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 31.489 | 30.682 | 30.965 | 30.679 | 31.063 | 31.439 | 30.632 | 30.703 | 30.667 | 30.926 | 32.045 | 32.000 | 32.100 | 32.800 | 32.769 | 33.167 | 32.800 | 32.625 | 32.429 | 33.500 | 33.500 | 29.519 | 27.500 |
FKSI-15 questionnaires (lack of energy, side effects, pain, weight loss, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria, sleep) was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer. Questions answered on 5-point Likert scale: 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score 0 to 60; higher scores=better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | C22 D1 | C23 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 43.869 | 43.328 | 43.366 | 42.932 | 43.211 | 42.787 | 42.474 | 42.534 | 42.778 | 43.120 | 43.264 | 43.962 | 44.141 | 43.789 | 44.176 | 44.232 | 43.897 | 43.761 | 43.737 | 43.733 | 45.417 | 47.000 | 47.571 | 39.052 | 39.683 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 43.865 | 43.969 | 43.345 | 42.926 | 44.022 | 42.344 | 43.446 | 44.077 | 44.051 | 44.018 | 45.000 | 45.318 | 45.787 | 45.459 | 45.514 | 46.000 | 46.400 | 45.357 | 45.583 | 44.333 | 43.500 | 45.833 | 45.714 | 39.524 | 40.038 |
FKSI-15 questionnaires (lack of energy, side effects, pain, weight loss, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria, sleep) was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer. Questions answered on 5-point Likert scale: 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score 0 to 60; higher scores=better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 46.753 | 46.217 | 45.968 | 45.060 | 45.775 | 45.407 | 45.709 | 45.169 | 45.829 | 45.608 | 45.833 | 45.797 | 46.727 | 47.740 | 48.023 | 48.184 | 47.909 | 48.138 | 48.636 | 48.810 | 50.188 | 41.432 | 35.385 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 47.470 | 45.045 | 45.684 | 45.792 | 46.125 | 46.341 | 45.053 | 45.676 | 45.970 | 46.148 | 47.227 | 48.091 | 47.600 | 49.133 | 49.308 | 50.500 | 49.000 | 49.125 | 48.571 | 50.500 | 50.000 | 42.889 | 38.583 |
Using RECIST criteria: date of 1st objective tumor response (CR or PR) subsequently confirmed to date of 1st objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause within 28 days after last dose of study medication, whichever was first. Censored on day after the date of the last oncologic assessment documenting no tumor progression. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 24.0 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 32.0 |
Confirmed objective responses using RECIST criteria defined as responses persisting on repeat imaging study for 2 assessments with at least 4 weeks between, and evaluating all target and non-target sites followed since baseline. Two PRs separated by an SD or NE visit in between was considered a confirmed response if the 2 PRs were > 4 weeks apart. CR=disappearance of all target lesions. PR is a >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 15 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 6 |
Overall survival is time from the date of first dose of medication to the date of death due to any cause (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 91.4 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 76.4 |
Using RECIST criteria: Time from date 1st dose study medication to date 1st documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause occurring on treatment including within 28 days after last dose, whichever occurred 1st. Censored on day following the date of last oncologic assessment documenting absence of tumor progression. PFS based on the number of subjects with measurable disease at baseline, the correct histological cancer type, and had disease that was refractory to prior cytokine-based therapy(105 in total group). (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 35.7 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 35.3 |
Time from date of first dose of study medication to date of first documentation of objective tumor progression using RECIST criteria that occurred on treatment including within 28 days after the last dose of study medication. TTP censored on the day following the date of last oncologic assessment documenting absence of tumor progression. TTP based on the number of subjects with measurable disease at baseline, the correct histological cancer type, and had disease that was refractory to prior cytokine-based therapy(105 in total group). (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 35.7 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 35.9 |
EQ-5D health status in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, pain / discomfort, anxiety / depression, usual activities) with a weighted health index based on general population values where 0.0=death and 1.0 = perfect health. Change: median index score at observation minus median index score at baseline. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.
Intervention | score on scale (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Maximum Increase | Maximum Decrease | |
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 0.0 | -0.1 |
"EQ-VAS score on the self-rated thermometer indicated the patient's own assessment of their health status from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) imaginable health state. Change: median score at observation minus median score at baseline. Maximum changes (increase or decrease from baseline)." (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.
Intervention | score on scale (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Maximum Increase | Maximum Decrease | |
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 0.0 | -10.0 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 0.0 | -9.0 |
FACIT Fatigue Scale: Overall score from 13-questionnaire, which measures fatigue / asthenia for patients with chronic, life-threatening illnesses. For each question, a patient rates his / her condition for the past week on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores always represent less fatigue / asthenia. Outcome based on completed questionnaires. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Score n=52,52 | Maximum Post-Baseline Score n=53,52 | Minimum Post-Baseline Score n=53,52 | |
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate | 39.5 | 43.4 | 28.0 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate | 39.6 | 42.7 | 29.4 |
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censored at the last date known alive. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until death due to any cause, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus | 25.8 |
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa | 25.5 |
Percentage of participants with OR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30% decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus | 27.0 |
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa | 27.4 |
PFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization until the earlier date of progression or death. Progression was assessed by independent imaging reviewers using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria which is 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions from nadir (the lowest blood counts); measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus | 9.1 |
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa | 9.3 |
PFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization until the earlier date of progression or death. Progression was assessed by investigator imaging reviewers using RECIST criteria which is 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions from nadir (the lowest blood counts); measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus | 9.1 |
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa | 10.8 |
DR: time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR), that was subsequently confirmed, to the first documentation of PD or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first as per RECIST version 1.0, a) CR: disappearance of all target, non target lesions and no appearance of new lesions, documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks, b) PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum of LD, without progression of non target lesions, no appearance of new lesions, c) PD: >=20% increase in sum of LD of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of pleural effusion or ascites if demonstrated by cytological investigation, not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib 5 mg | 11.0 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 10.6 |
ORR = percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.0 recorded from first dose of study treatment until PD or death due to any cause. CR: disappearance of all target, non target lesions and no appearance of new lesions, documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks. PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum of LD, without progression of non target lesions, no appearance of new lesions. PD: >=20% increase in sum of LD of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of pleural effusion or ascites if demonstrated by cytological investigation, not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Axitinib 5 mg | 19.4 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 9.4 |
OS was defined as the duration from start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (months) = (date of death minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.4. For participants who were alive, overall survival was censored on last date the participants were known to be alive. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib 5 mg | 20.1 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 19.2 |
PFS was defined as the time in months from start of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor progression of disease (PD) or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. PD: >=20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest dimensions (LD) of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of a pleural effusion or ascites was also considered PD if demonstrated by cytological investigation and it was not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented were considered PD if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib 5 mg | 6.7 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 4.7 |
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility or index score. Health state profile component assesses level of health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain was rated on a 3-point response scale (1= no problems, 2= some/moderate problems and 3= extreme problems). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigned a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score were transformed and resulted in a total score range of 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n =347, 341) | Cycle 2/Day1 (n =326, 307) | Cycle 3/Day1 (n =287, 248) | Cycle 4/Day1 (n =262, 226) | Cycle 5/Day1 (n =244, 207) | Cycle 6/Day1 (n =221, 178) | Cycle 7/Day1 (n =213, 163) | Cycle 8/Day1 (n =181, 136) | Cycle 9/Day1 (n =169, 120) | Cycle 10/Day1 (n =151, 98) | Cycle 11/Day1 (n =126, 87) | Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 73) | Cycle 13/Day1 (n =96, 61) | Cycle 14/Day1 (n =80, 57) | Cycle 15/Day1 (n =63, 41) | Cycle 16/Day1 (n =54, 37) | Cycle 17/Day1 (n =48, 29) | Cycle 18/Day1 (n =37, 20) | Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14) | Cycle 20/Day1 (n =21, 12) | Cycle 21/Day1 (n =16, 7) | End of Treatment (n =169, 196) | Follow up (n =76, 106) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 0.732 | 0.716 | 0.722 | 0.730 | 0.730 | 0.734 | 0.718 | 0.756 | 0.760 | 0.734 | 0.764 | 0.744 | 0.760 | 0.723 | 0.730 | 0.749 | 0.779 | 0.755 | 0.734 | 0.794 | 0.700 | 0.608 | 0.682 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 0.731 | 0.696 | 0.709 | 0.716 | 0.711 | 0.704 | 0.728 | 0.702 | 0.730 | 0.730 | 0.724 | 0.734 | 0.753 | 0.752 | 0.758 | 0.785 | 0.764 | 0.755 | 0.804 | 0.771 | 0.771 | 0.612 | 0.666 |
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. VAS component: participants rated their current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n =341, 339) | Cycle 2/Day1 (n =317, 302) | Cycle 3/Day1 (n =280, 250) | Cycle 4/Day1 (n =261, 224) | Cycle 5/Day1 (n =244, 205) | Cycle 6/Day1 (n =220, 178) | Cycle 7/Day1 (n =209, 163) | Cycle 8/Day1 (n =180, 139) | Cycle 9/Day1 (n =168, 121) | Cycle 10/Day1 (n =151, 98) | Cycle 11/Day1 (n =126, 87) | Cycle 12/Day1 (n =111, 73) | Cycle 13/Day1 (n =94, 61) | Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 58) | Cycle 15/Day1 (n =62, 42) | Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 37) | Cycle 17/Day1 (n =48, 30) | Cycle 18/Day1 (n =37, 23) | Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14) | Cycle 20/Day1 (n =21, 12) | Cycle 21/Day1 (n =16, 7) | End of Treatment (n =166, 197) | Follow up (n =76, 109) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 70.560 | 69.003 | 69.843 | 69.180 | 69.705 | 69.900 | 69.919 | 70.756 | 70.667 | 70.629 | 72.103 | 71.730 | 70.723 | 69.420 | 73.016 | 70.269 | 71.375 | 70.459 | 71.034 | 73.143 | 74.563 | 61.759 | 64.382 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 70.351 | 67.606 | 69.712 | 70.759 | 71.888 | 71.365 | 72.282 | 71.475 | 73.380 | 75.102 | 74.586 | 73.959 | 75.693 | 75.362 | 75.357 | 73.676 | 73.767 | 73.870 | 70.571 | 66.917 | 64.714 | 61.690 | 66.037 |
FKSI was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer and consisted of 15 items (lack of energy, side effects, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria and sleep). Each of the 15 items was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score = sum of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (very much); higher scores indicate greater presence of symptoms. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n =346, 342) | Cycle 2/Day1 (n =319, 296) | Cycle 3/Day1 (n =279, 246) | Cycle 4/Day1 (n =257, 221) | Cycle 5/Day1 (n =238, 203) | Cycle 6/Day1 (n =213, 179) | Cycle 7/Day1 (n =206, 158) | Cycle 8/Day1 (n =177, 136) | Cycle 9/Day1 (n =163, 118) | Cycle 10/Day1 (n =146, 96) | Cycle 11/Day1 (n =122, 85) | Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 70) | Cycle 13/Day1 (n =92, 58) | Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 54) | Cycle 15/Day1 (n =61, 38) | Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 34) | Cycle 17/Day1 (n =47, 28) | Cycle 18/Day1 (n =36, 22) | Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14) | Cycle 20/Day1 (n =20, 12) | Cycle 21/Day1 (n =15, 7) | End of treatment (n=163, 191) | Follow up (n =80, 110) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 43.199 | 42.351 | 42.590 | 42.791 | 42.968 | 42.949 | 42.747 | 43.580 | 43.191 | 43.312 | 44.119 | 44.517 | 44.492 | 44.485 | 45.291 | 45.217 | 45.242 | 44.861 | 45.379 | 47.050 | 45.850 | 38.328 | 41.919 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 43.339 | 41.668 | 42.424 | 43.424 | 42.907 | 43.057 | 43.578 | 44.074 | 44.518 | 44.771 | 44.438 | 44.357 | 45.261 | 44.898 | 45.053 | 44.445 | 44.438 | 44.182 | 45.026 | 44.780 | 44.494 | 38.457 | 40.028 |
FKSI-DRS was used to assess quality of life for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer and consisted of 9 items (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, and hematuria). Each of the 9 items was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI-DRS score = sum of the 9 item scores; total range: 0 - 36; 0 (no symptoms) to 36 (very much); higher scores indicate greater presence of symptoms. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n =346, 341) | Cycle 2/Day1 (n =319, 295) | Cycle 3/Day1 (n =279, 244) | Cycle 4/Day1 (n =257, 220) | Cycle 5/Day1 (n =238, 202) | Cycle 6/Day1 (n =213, 178) | Cycle 7/Day1 (n =206, 157) | Cycle 8/Day1 (n =177, 135) | Cycle 9/Day1 (n =163, 117) | Cycle 10/Day1 (n =146, 96) | Cycle 11/Day1 (n =122, 85) | Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 70) | Cycle 13/Day1 (n =92, 58) | Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 54) | Cycle 15/Day1 (n =61, 38) | Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 34) | Cycle 17/Day1 (n =47, 28) | Cycle 18/Day1 (n =36, 22) | Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14) | Cycle 20/Day1 (n =20, 12) | Cycle 21/Day1 (n =15, 7) | End of Treatment (n =163, 191) | Follow up (n =80, 110) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 28.874 | 28.211 | 28.640 | 28.822 | 28.869 | 29.159 | 29.042 | 29.520 | 29.194 | 29.343 | 29.762 | 29.764 | 29.594 | 29.711 | 30.324 | 30.430 | 30.551 | 30.194 | 30.130 | 31.300 | 31.067 | 26.288 | 28.263 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 28.975 | 28.399 | 28.640 | 29.130 | 29.007 | 29.098 | 29.361 | 29.619 | 29.884 | 29.604 | 29.366 | 29.257 | 29.666 | 29.820 | 29.500 | 29.474 | 28.737 | 29.045 | 29.286 | 29.250 | 30.143 | 26.517 | 27.516 |
Biochemistry laboratory test included parameters: alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase, bicarbonate, bilirubin, creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia and lipase. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 1 (n =331, 313) | Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 2 (n =331, 313) | Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 3 (n =331, 313) | Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 4 (n =331, 313) | Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 1 (n =336, 319) | Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 2 (n =336, 319) | Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 3 (n =336, 319) | Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 4 (n =336, 319) | Amylase: Grade 1 (n =338, 319) | Amylase: Grade 2 (n =338, 319) | Amylase: Grade 3 (n =338, 319) | Amylase: Grade 4 (n =338, 319) | Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 1 (n =331, 311) | Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 2 (n =331, 311) | Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 3 (n =331, 311) | Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 4 (n =331, 311) | Bicarbonate: Grade 1 (n =314, 291) | Bicarbonate: Grade 2 (n =314, 291) | Bicarbonate: Grade 3 (n =314, 291) | Bicarbonate: Grade 4 (n =314, 291) | Bilirubin: Grade 1 (n =336, 318) | Bilirubin: Grade 2 (n =336, 318) | Bilirubin: Grade 3 (n =336, 318) | Bilirubin: Grade 4 (n =336, 318) | Creatinine: Grade 1 (n =336, 318) | Creatinine: Grade 2 (n =336, 318) | Creatinine: Grade 3 (n =336, 318) | Creatinine: Grade 4 (n =336, 318) | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319) | Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319) | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319) | Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319) | Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319) | Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319) | Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319) | Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319) | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 (n =333, 314) | Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 (n =333, 314) | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 (n =333, 314) | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 (n =333, 314) | Hypernatremia: Grade 1 (n =338, 319) | Hypernatremia: Grade 2 (n =338, 319) | Hypernatremia: Grade 3 (n =338, 319) | Hypernatremia: Grade 4 (n =338, 319) | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 (n =337, 319) | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 (n =337, 319) | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 (n =337, 319) | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 (n =337, 319) | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319) | Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319) | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319) | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319) | Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319) | Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319) | Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319) | Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319) | Hypokalemia: Grade 1 (n =333, 314) | Hypokalemia: Grade 2 (n =333, 314) | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 (n =333, 314) | Hypokalemia: Grade 4 (n =333, 314) | Hyponatremia: Grade 1 (n =338, 319) | Hyponatremia: Grade 2 (n =338, 319) | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 (n =338, 319) | Hyponatremia: Grade 4 (n =338, 319) | Hypophosphatemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 318) | Hypophosphatemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 318) | Hypophosphatemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 318) | Hypophosphatemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 318) | Lipase: Grade 1 (n =338, 319) | Lipase: Grade 2 (n =338, 319) | Lipase: Grade 3 (n =338, 319) | Lipase: Grade 4 (n =338, 319) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 65 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 64 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 59 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 127 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 155 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 92 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 41 | 45 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 9 | 0 | 34 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 37 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 0 | 53 | 22 | 14 | 2 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 57 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 92 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 76 | 21 | 6 | 1 | 67 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 115 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 121 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 37 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 8 | 0 | 23 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 31 | 2 | 0 | 67 | 18 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 99 | 51 | 0 | 76 | 25 | 40 | 7 |
Hematology laboratory test included hemoglobin, platelet count, white blood cells count, neutrophils and lymphocytes. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hemoglobin: Grade 1 (n =320, 316) | Hemoglobin: Grade 2 (n =320, 316) | Hemoglobin: Grade 3 (n =320, 316) | Hemoglobin: Grade 4 (n =320, 316) | Lymphocytes: Grade 1 (n =317, 309) | Lymphocytes: Grade 2 (n =317, 309) | Lymphocytes: Grade 3 (n =317, 309) | Lymphocytes: Grade 4 (n =317, 309) | Neutrophils: Grade 1 (n =316, 308) | Neutrophils: Grade 2 (n =316, 308) | Neutrophils: Grade 3 (n =316, 308) | Neutrophils: Grade 4 (n =316, 308) | Platelets: Grade 1 (n =312, 310) | Platelets: Grade 2 (n =312, 310) | Platelets: Grade 3 (n =312, 310) | Platelets: Grade 4 (n =312, 310) | White Blood Cells: Grade 1 (n =320, 315) | White Blood Cells: Grade 2 (n =320, 315) | White Blood Cells: Grade 3 (n =320, 315) | White Blood Cells: Grade 4 (n =320, 315) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 93 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 89 | 10 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 47 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 112 | 41 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 93 | 11 | 0 | 20 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 41 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
Urinalysis included urine blood/ hemoglobin, glucose and protein. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 1 (n =304, 272) | Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 2 (n =304, 272) | Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 3 (n =304, 272) | Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 4 (n =304, 272) | Urine glucose: Grade 1 (n =322, 286) | Urine glucose: Grade 2 (n =322, 286) | Urine glucose: Grade 3 (n =322, 286) | Urine glucose: Grade 4 (n =322, 286) | Urine protein: Grade 1 (n =326, 289) | Urine protein: Grade 2 (n =326, 289) | Urine protein: Grade 3 (n =326, 289) | Urine protein: Grade 4 (n =326, 289) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 45 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 105 | 31 | 27 | 9 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 91 | 27 | 21 | 7 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severity of the AEs was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe; Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5= death related to AE. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 3.9 | 20.1 | 47.6 | 10.6 | 13.9 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 3.1 | 21.7 | 52.4 | 11.5 | 9.3 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 96.1 | 40.7 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 98.0 | 35.8 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life -threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious and non -serious AEs. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 92.2 | 15.3 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 95.2 | 13.8 |
One year survival rate defined as the probability that a subject was alive 1 year after the date of first study treatment. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter up until 1 year
Intervention | percent chance of survival (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 67.8 |
Time from start of the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. DR was calculated as [the end date for DR minus first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed +1]/7. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter or death due to any cause
Intervention | months (Mean) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 7.14 |
OR = subjects with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) persisting > = 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 41 |
Time from start of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in months) was calculated as (first event date minus first dose date +1)/7. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter or death
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 9.0 |
(NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline
Intervention | pg/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 9163.4 |
Time from date of first dose of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression. The 50% quartile point estimate is provided. The criteria for tumor progression was according to RECIST. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 10.0 |
(NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline
Intervention | picograms (pg)/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 154.8 |
FACT-Advanced Kidney Cancer Symptom Index (FKSI) Questionnaire: subscale designed to be a stand-alone instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced kidney cancer. Contains 15 questions. Each question was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Total FKSI score = sum score of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (most severe symptoms and concerns) to 60 (no symptoms or concerns). End of treatment assessment was for subjects who completed the study only. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Week 1), Day 1 of Weeks 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, Week 53 (End of Treatment)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=109) | Week 3 (n=104) | Week 5 (n=101) | Week 7 (n=97) | Week 9 (n=88) | Week 11 (n=84) | Week 13 (n=81) | Week 17 (n=72) | Week 21 (n=63) | Week 25 (n=55) | Week 29 (n=55) | Week 33 (n=50) | Week 37 (n=47) | Week 41 (n=45) | Week 45 (n=37) | Week 49 (n=36) | Week 53 (End of Treatment) (n=35) | |
Sunitinib | 44.68 | 43.69 | 42.71 | 43.69 | 44.11 | 43.26 | 43.49 | 44.21 | 45.51 | 45.42 | 44.64 | 44.06 | 45.23 | 44.71 | 46.73 | 45.92 | 45.94 |
Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111) | Day 1, Week 3 (n=108) | Day 1, Week 5 (n=106) | Day 1, Week 7 (n=104) | Day 1, Week 9 (n=97) | Day 1, Week 13 (n=93) | Day 1, Week 17 (n=82) | Day 1, Week 21 (n=73) | Day 1, Week 25 (n=70) | Day 1, Week 29 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 33 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 37 (n=50) | Day 1, Week 41 (n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (n=33) | |
Sunitinib | 2.62 | 20.27 | 20.25 | 20.41 | 21.18 | 20.01 | 19.76 | 17.13 | 17.30 | 17.38 | 16.55 | 15.71 | 16.50 | 15.61 | 16.57 | 13.81 |
Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111) | Day 1, Week 3 (n=108) | Day 1, Week 5 (n=106) | Day 1, Week 7 (n=104) | Day 1, Week 9 (n=97) | Day 1, Week 13 (n=93) | Day 1, Week 17 (n=82) | Day 1, Week 21 (n=73) | Day 1, Week 25 (n=70) | Day 1, Week 29 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 33 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 37 (n=50) | Day 1, Week 41 (n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (n=33) | |
Sunitinib | 9.77 | 75.04 | 65.89 | 66.76 | 68.72 | 61.31 | 61.41 | 53.09 | 53.69 | 55.39 | 50.27 | 51.74 | 49.83 | 51.82 | 53.07 | 46.91 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 18.250 | 16.650 | 17.300 | 15.100 | 15.900 | 14.300 | 12.600 | 14.500 | 12.850 | 12.800 | 14.350 | 14.000 | 13.400 | 14.700 | 11.600 | 0.000 | 20.000 | 18.800 | 14.300 | 16.550 | 9.710 | 12.600 | 23.400 | 29.400 | 13.700 | 4.360 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 76.950 | 65.900 | 66.100 | 65.150 | 57.600 | 55.660 | 47.370 | 50.700 | 50.650 | 46.000 | 49.750 | 43.365 | 45.200 | 49.975 | 41.000 | 0.000 | 69.000 | 64.700 | 50.200 | 55.850 | 34.810 | 40.800 | 71.100 | 52.100 | 37.400 | 13.880 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 57.900 | 45.000 | 45.400 | 46.250 | 40.000 | 41.350 | 34.400 | 34.200 | 34.450 | 33.000 | 35.350 | 30.900 | 34.000 | 36.250 | 28.600 | 0.000 | 50.200 | 45.600 | 35.600 | 39.050 | 25.100 | 28.200 | 47.700 | 22.700 | 23.700 | 9.520 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 18.800 | 17.300 | 17.900 | 18.700 | 16.350 | 14.600 | 14.100 | 14.950 | 14.900 | 14.050 | 15.500 | 15.400 | 13.700 | 14.700 | 11.450 | 0.000 | 20.000 | 18.800 | 14.300 | 16.550 | 9.710 | 12.600 | 23.400 | 29.400 | 13.700 | 4.360 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 75.000 | 63.300 | 66.400 | 70.600 | 57.600 | 58.100 | 49.860 | 51.150 | 53.500 | 50.050 | 50.800 | 48.000 | 50.500 | 54.885 | 42.160 | 0.000 | 69.000 | 64.700 | 50.200 | 55.850 | 34.810 | 40.800 | 71.100 | 52.100 | 37.400 | 13.880 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 55.300 | 44.600 | 46.750 | 49.500 | 39.550 | 42.300 | 36.500 | 35.500 | 37.250 | 34.400 | 35.300 | 33.200 | 35.950 | 37.250 | 31.100 | 0.000 | 50.200 | 45.600 | 35.600 | 39.050 | 25.100 | 28.200 | 47.700 | 22.700 | 23.700 | 9.520 |
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale: Overall score from 13-question questionnaire (measures fatigue/asthenia for patients with chronic, life-threatening illnesses). For each question, patient rates condition for the past week on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Total FACIT-Fatigue score = sum score of the 13 question scores; total range: 0 - 52; higher total score represents less fatigue. End of treatment assessment was for subjects who completed the study only. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Week 1), Day 1 of Weeks 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, Week 53 (End of Treatment)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=118) | Week 3 (n=113) | Week 5 (n=110) | Week 7 (n=106) | Week 9 (n=97) | Week 11 (n=93) | Week 13 (n=90) | Week 17 (n=80) | Week 21 (n=71) | Week 25 (n=62) | Week 29 (n=60) | Week 33 (n=55) | Week 37 (n=52) | Week 41 (n=50) | Week 45 (n=42) | Week 49 (n=41) | Week 53 (End of Treatment) (n=40) | |
Sunitinib | 39.29 | 36.98 | 35.44 | 36.54 | 36.82 | 35.94 | 36.58 | 37.44 | 38.42 | 38.05 | 36.77 | 36.00 | 37.88 | 36.96 | 38.71 | 39.32 | 39.05 |
Summary statistics of sVEGFR2 at baseline by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Intervention | pg/mL (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16) | |
Sunitinib | 9772.500 | 8342.750 |
Summary statistics of sVEGFR2 at baseline by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Intervention | pg/mL (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR, n=40) | Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16) | |
Sunitinib | 9968.000 | 8342.750 |
sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (n=106) | Day 1, Week 5 (n=104) | Day 1, Week 7 (n=101) | Day 1, Week 9 (n=95) | Day 1, Week 13 (n=91) | Day 1, Week 17 (n=79) | Day 1, Week 21 (n=69) | Day 1, Week 25 (n=68) | Day 1, Week 29 (n=55) | Day 1, Week 33 (n=55) | Day 1, Week 37 (n=50) | Day 1, Week 41 (n=48) | Day 1, Week 45 (n=42) | Day 1, Week 49 (n=38) | Day 1, Week 53 (n=31) | |
Sunitinib | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
Median sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 weeks] versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=81) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=81) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=84) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=77) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=67) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=66) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=53) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=54) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=48) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=42) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=38) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=30) | |
Sunitinib | 0.691 | 0.653 | 0.625 | 0.531 | 0.599 | 0.574 | 0.563 | 0.603 | 0.534 | 0.529 | 0.524 | 0.687 | 0.548 | 0.540 | 0.570 | 0.509 | 0.556 | 0.671 | 0.569 | 0.610 | 0.559 | 0.572 | 0.538 | 0.569 | 0.638 |
Median sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=36) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=36) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=30) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=32) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=29) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=29) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=25) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=20) | |
Sunitinib | 0.704 | 0.653 | 0.638 | 0.531 | 0.596 | 0.574 | 0.562 | 0.603 | 0.555 | 0.529 | 0.545 | 0.687 | 0.566 | 0.540 | 0.564 | 0.509 | 0.564 | 0.671 | 0.547 | 0.610 | 0.554 | 0.561 | 0.535 | 0.555 | 0.630 |
Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL) (Mean) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111) | Day 1, Week 3 (n=108) | Day 1, Week 5 (n=106) | Day 1, Week 7 (n=104) | Day 1, Week 9 (n=97) | Day 1, Week 13 (n=93) | Day 1, Week 17 (n=82) | Day 1, Week 21 (n=73) | Day 1, Week 25 (n=70) | Day 1, Week 29 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 33 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 37 (n=50) | Day 1, Week 41 (n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (n=33) | |
Sunitinib | 7.15 | 54.78 | 45.64 | 46.35 | 47.54 | 41.29 | 41.65 | 35.95 | 36.39 | 38.01 | 33.72 | 36.04 | 33.33 | 36.20 | 36.49 | 33.10 |
Summary statistics of VEGF at baseline by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Intervention | pg/mL (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16) | |
Sunitinib | 86.400 | 109.300 |
Summary statistics of VEGF at baseline by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Intervention | pg/mL (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR, n=39) | Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16) | |
Sunitinib | 73.600 | 109.300 |
VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (n=108) | Day 1, Week 5 (n=104) | Day 1, Week 7 (n=101) | Day 1, Week 9 (n=95) | Day 1, Week 13 (n=91) | Day 1, Week 17 (n=78) | Day 1, Week 21 (n=70) | Day 1, Week 25 (n=67) | Day 1, Week 29 (n=55) | Day 1, Week 33 (n=54) | Day 1, Week 37 (n=49) | Day 1, Week 41 (n=48) | Day 1, Week 45 (n=41) | Day 1, Week 49 (n=37) | Day 1, Week 53 (n=30) | |
Sunitinib | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 3 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 5.5 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 3.2 |
Median VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 weeks] versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=81) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=84) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=76) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=68) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=65) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=53) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=53) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=48) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=48) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=41) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=37) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=29) | |
Sunitinib | 2.127 | 1.948 | 1.574 | 2.471 | 1.798 | 1.405 | 2.481 | 1.176 | 1.890 | 3.921 | 2.070 | 0.988 | 1.972 | 1.510 | 1.906 | 1.433 | 1.831 | 1.929 | 2.200 | 1.063 | 2.201 | 1.859 | 2.484 | 2.329 | 2.431 |
Median VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=36) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=36) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=35) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=30) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=31) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=27) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=24) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=19) | |
Sunitinib | 1.999 | 1.948 | 1.383 | 2.471 | 1.761 | 1.405 | 2.215 | 1.176 | 1.753 | 3.921 | 2.012 | 0.988 | 1.523 | 1.510 | 1.809 | 1.433 | 1.805 | 1.929 | 2.248 | 1.063 | 2.179 | 1.864 | 2.240 | 2.707 | 2.863 |
Duration of response as defined by the time from CR or PR (whichever status recorded first) until the date of death or PD was objectively documented. Median and its 95 percent confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Temsirolimus | 8.26 |
Sorafenib | 6.96 |
Overall survival was the duration from randomization to death. For participants who are alive, overall survival was censored at the last contact. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline to date of death from any cause (up to 24 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Temsirolimus | 12.27 |
Sorafenib | 16.64 |
Percentage of participants with tumor response based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST and evaluated by independent central review. CR/PR persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. PR had at least 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Temsirolimus | 7.7 |
Sorafenib | 7.9 |
Interval from date of randomization until documentation of PD by an investigator tumor assessment, symptomatic deterioration, or death for any reason whichever occurred first. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Temsirolimus | 5.43 |
Sorafenib | 4.14 |
Interval from date of randomization until documentation of progressive disease (PD) by an independent tumor assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) or death for any reason whichever occurred first. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Temsirolimus | 4.28 |
Sorafenib | 3.91 |
Counts of participants who had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), defined as newly occurring or worsening after first dose. Relatedness to [study drug] was assessed by the investigator (Yes/No). Participants with multiple occurrences of an AE within a category were counted once within the category. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 months
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Serious AE | Any AE | |
Sorafenib | 86 | 251 |
Temsirolimus | 103 | 248 |
PFS: Interval from date of randomization until documentation of PD by an independent tumor assessment according to RECIST or death for any reason whichever occurred first. PFS calculated as (Weeks)=(randomization date minus first dose date plus 1) divided by 7. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Weeks 12, 24, and 36
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline to Week 12 | Week 13 to Week 24 | Week 25 to Week 36 | |
Sorafenib | 36.7 | 20.1 | 11.2 |
Temsirolimus | 31.2 | 20.9 | 12.3 |
Time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.44. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 12.5 |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 8.7 |
"FKSI-DRS is a subset of FKSI which is a questionnaire for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy -Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer.~The FKSI contained 15 questions and the FKSI-DRS consisted of 9 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI-DRS ranged between 0-36. Since the questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FKSI-DRS, 0 and 36 could be considered the worst and best health states based on the 9 questions comprising FKSI-DRS." (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Units on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 28.3 |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 27.2 |
FACT-G is core questionnaire of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in cancer population.FACT-G consisted of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general Health-Related QoL(HRQoL):Physical Well-being(PWB),Social/Family Well-Being (SWB),Emotional Well-Being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB);each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FACT-G ranged between 0-108.Since questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FACT-G,0 and 108 could be considered worst and best health states. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 78.0 |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 77.0 |
Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR are defined as the disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR are those with atleast 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 32.2 |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 28.1 |
MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low (0), intermediate (1-2) or high (=>3) based upon number of criteria present. Criteria as follows: Karnofsky performance status < 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5 * Upper limit of Normal, Hemoglobin < lower limit of normal for local lab, Corrected serum calcium > 10 mg/dL; Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of < 1 year. OS was defined as time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS, in months, was calculated as (event date -start of treatment date + 1)/30.44. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Months (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
High Risk (equal or more than 3) | Intermediate Risk (1-2) | Low Risk (0) | |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 6.1 | 21.8 | 28.9 |
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 3.5 | 19.3 | NA |
MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low(0),intermediate(1-2) or high(=>3) based on number of criteria present such as Karnofsky performance status < 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5 * Upper limit of Normal,Hemoglobin < lower limit of normal, serum calcium > 10 mg/dL;Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of < 1 year.TTP was time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer.TTP was calculated as (first event date minus date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Months (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Stratified analysis : High Risk (=>3) | Stratified analysis : Intermediate Risk (1-2) | Stratified analysis : Low Risk (0) | Overall unstratified analysis | |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 4.4 | 7.1 | 8.4 | 7.1 |
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 3.1 | 8.0 | 20.7 | 9.9 |
"Time in weeks from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cancer. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 7.~DR was calculated for the subgroup of patients with a confirmed objective tumor response." (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter or death due to cancer
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib Malate | 60.4 |
Overall confirmed objective response = confirmed Complete Response (CR) or confirmed Partial Response (PR) according to RECIST. CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR defined as >= 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sunitinib Malate | 35 |
Time in weeks from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the subject current status was death). (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until death
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib Malate | 104.1 |
"Time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where the outcome was Death)." (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter or death
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib Malate | 38.0 |
Time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer, whichever comes first. TTP was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]). (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib Malate | 46.3 |
Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib. Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 53.64 | 55.94 | 69.44 | 64.33 | 1.94 | 2.15 | 2.04 | 2.32 | 2.07 | 2.68 | 3.42 | 1.94 | 2.23 | 2.41 | 1.58 | 2.42 | 2.23 | 3.05 | 1.92 | 5.09 | 3.41 | 3.91 | 4.53 | 3.82 | 3.14 | 4.09 | 2.12 | 2.97 | 4.02 | 1.36 |
Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib metabolite (SU012662). Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 31.85 | 28.15 | 40.53 | 38.04 | 2.99 | 3.35 | 3.11 | 3.37 | 3.45 | 3.61 | 4.37 | 3.24 | 3.68 | 3.54 | 2.80 | 3.40 | 2.55 | 2.59 | 2.93 | 4.53 | 3.97 | 5.31 | 4.26 | 3.62 | 3.00 | 4.49 | 2.36 | 2.94 | 3.32 | 1.18 |
Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib plus its metabolite (SU012662). Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 85.49 | 84.09 | 109.97 | 102.37 | 4.93 | 5.50 | 5.15 | 5.69 | 5.52 | 6.29 | 7.78 | 5.19 | 5.91 | 5.95 | 4.39 | 5.82 | 4.78 | 5.64 | 4.85 | 9.63 | 7.38 | 9.23 | 8.79 | 7.44 | 6.13 | 8.58 | 4.48 | 5.90 | 7.34 | 2.54 |
Observed plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 46.82 | 50.13 | 49.36 | 53.18 | 1.55 | 1.44 | 1.51 | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.69 | 2.05 | 1.72 | 1.74 | 1.60 | 1.56 | 1.46 | 1.42 | 2.20 | 1.34 | 2.96 | 2.53 | 2.18 | 3.14 | 2.75 | 1.99 | 2.46 | 1.20 | 1.75 | 2.93 | 1.02 |
Observed plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib metabolite (SU012662) (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 26.44 | 28.21 | 28.32 | 28.54 | 2.50 | 2.64 | 2.64 | 2.66 | 2.81 | 2.54 | 2.78 | 2.67 | 2.77 | 2.49 | 2.51 | 2.30 | 1.83 | 2.16 | 2.06 | 2.92 | 3.13 | 3.24 | 3.10 | 2.64 | 1.99 | 2.60 | 1.36 | 1.81 | 2.43 | 1.10 |
Observed plasma trough (predose) concentrations of sunitinib plus its metabolite (SU012662) (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 73.26 | 78.34 | 77.68 | 81.71 | 4.04 | 4.08 | 4.15 | 4.26 | 4.41 | 4.23 | 4.83 | 4.39 | 4.52 | 4.09 | 4.07 | 3.75 | 3.25 | 4.35 | 3.40 | 5.88 | 5.66 | 5.43 | 6.24 | 5.39 | 3.97 | 5.06 | 2.55 | 3.56 | 5.36 | 2.13 |
Probability of survival 1 year and 2 years after the first dose of study treatment (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until death
Intervention | percent chance of survival (Number) | |
---|---|---|
1 year | 2 years | |
Sunitinib Malate | 67.2 | 50.2 |
Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each cycle: duraton of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 52.9 |
IFN-α | 64.9 |
Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentaion of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 56.3 |
IFN-α | 48.1 |
Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of sunitinib compared to IFN-a as first-line treatment for MRCC, defined as the ratio of the incremental cost of treatment over the incremental effectiveness; effectiveness measured as quality adjusted life year (QALY) gain. This objective was not addressed in the clinical study report, but an interim analysis of cost-effectiveness was presented separately. These results were not available for inclusion at the time of this posting. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: post study measurement
Intervention | ratio (Number) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 0 |
IFN-α | 0 |
Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses (CR or PR) = those that persisted on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 145 |
IFN-α | 29 |
Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses = those that persist on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 171 |
IFN-α | 45 |
Overall survival (OS) = time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For patients not expiring, survival time was censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Patients lacking data beyond randomization had their survival times censored at the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Clinic visit or telephone contact every 2 months until death
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 114.6 |
IFN-α | 94.9 |
Progression-free survival (PFS) = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1. On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 48.3 |
IFN-α | 22.1 |
Progression-free survival = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1). On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 47.7 |
IFN-α | 22.1 |
TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 49.1 |
IFN-α | 22.4 |
TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than the study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 49.0 |
IFN-α | 22.3 |
Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of active metabolite SU012662 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31) | Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=26) | |
SU012662 | 27.10 | 27.35 | 26.11 | 22.11 | 28.21 | 28.32 | 29.04 | 25.99 |
Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of SU011248 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31) | Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=26) | |
SU011248 | 57.26 | 57.59 | 50.26 | 45.05 | 64.22 | 59.90 | 58.45 | 54.31 |
Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of total drug (SU011248 and its active metabolite SU012662) per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31) | Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=27) | |
Total Drug: SU011248 and SU012662 | 84.36 | 84.94 | 76.37 | 67.15 | 92.43 | 88.22 | 87.49 | 80.30 |
EQ-VAS: overall self-rating rating of the patient's current health state using a 20 cm Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), also called the health state thermometer) is a metric measurement (in 2 mm interval) from the visual analog scale which ranges between 0 (worse imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=365, 352) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 315) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=323, 247) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=314, 237) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=293, 198) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 193) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=270, 152) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 139) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 118) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=240, 104) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=237, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 98) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=209, 77) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=201, 74) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=191, 60) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 50) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=168, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=160, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 45) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 34) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=130, 31) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=115, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=92, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 17) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=82, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=78, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=62, 11) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=54, 9) | |
IFN-α | 71.43 | 67.66 | 70.45 | 70.70 | 72.68 | 71.45 | 72.74 | 72.20 | 73.44 | 72.57 | 73.68 | 72.26 | 73.80 | 73.46 | 74.27 | 74.33 | 77.66 | 76.57 | 76.64 | 76.69 | 75.06 | 72.21 | 75.19 | 73.84 | 77.52 | 73.56 | 76.69 | 76.44 | 76.62 | 76.50 | 74.84 | 73.11 | 76.94 | 72.86 | 74.42 | 73.82 | 79.27 | 68.55 | 76.00 | 75.44 |
SU011248 | 73.80 | 69.35 | 75.05 | 72.06 | 76.23 | 72.33 | 77.46 | 75.15 | 79.83 | 75.13 | 78.83 | 76.81 | 79.39 | 76.09 | 81.34 | 77.53 | 80.08 | 76.24 | 79.18 | 76.44 | 79.72 | 76.81 | 80.84 | 76.71 | 80.59 | 77.22 | 80.39 | 76.53 | 80.50 | 76.51 | 79.85 | 75.51 | 80.74 | 77.10 | 80.40 | 77.76 | 81.47 | 77.05 | 81.10 | 76.85 |
EQ-5D Health State Index: a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. Respondents were asked to describe their current health state on each of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety or depression) on a three-level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). A maximum score of 1 can be derived from these 5 dimensions by score conversion; range: -0.39 (worst health state)to 1.00 (best health state). This descriptive system classifies respondents into one of 243 possible distinct health states (EQ-5D descriptive system). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=363, 352) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (346, 315) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (326, 244) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (311, 233) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (287, 200) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (283, 195) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (269, 150) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (261, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (247, 120) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (240, 106) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (240, 98) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (224, 100) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (205, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (204, 74) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (192, 68) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (190, 61) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (170, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (168, 45) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (161, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (153, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (138, 34) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (138, 32) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (132, 31) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (127, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (114, 26) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (115, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (114, 25) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (107, 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (100, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (95, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (93, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (84, 15) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (82, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (80, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (71, 10) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (69, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (62, 11) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (63, 8) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (54, 9) | |
IFN-α | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.86 |
SU011248 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.77 |
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) subscale designed to be a stand-alone instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced kidney cancer. Contains 15 questions; some questions overlap with the FACT-G questions. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Total FKSI score = sum score of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (most severe symptoms and concerns) to 60 (no symptoms or concerns). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=369, 351) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 317) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=327, 246) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 198) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 195) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 151) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 119) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=242, 109) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 99) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=203, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 68) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=155, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 31) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=113, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=105, 25) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=100, 22) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=94, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9) | |
IFN-α | 46.09 | 40.93 | 42.33 | 42.01 | 43.64 | 43.13 | 44.78 | 44.03 | 44.82 | 44.41 | 45.38 | 44.07 | 45.09 | 44.65 | 45.38 | 45.10 | 46.88 | 46.16 | 46.22 | 45.16 | 46.26 | 45.46 | 46.08 | 46.00 | 46.25 | 45.84 | 46.08 | 46.10 | 45.62 | 45.30 | 43.64 | 43.46 | 45.59 | 43.64 | 44.92 | 45.27 | 46.64 | 44.47 | 45.00 | 46.00 |
SU011248 | 46.45 | 42.71 | 45.98 | 43.75 | 46.60 | 44.01 | 46.99 | 45.08 | 47.99 | 44.99 | 47.61 | 45.40 | 47.84 | 45.39 | 48.24 | 45.83 | 48.31 | 45.79 | 47.90 | 45.70 | 47.90 | 45.28 | 47.90 | 45.67 | 48.02 | 45.65 | 47.90 | 45.10 | 48.26 | 45.37 | 47.75 | 45.95 | 48.07 | 46.27 | 47.47 | 45.36 | 47.70 | 46.07 | 48.88 | 46.26 |
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) subscale of the FKSI to measure advanced kidney cancer disease related symptoms. Includes 9 items: lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, and hematuria. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 36. A score greater than 0 indicates the difference favored sunitinib. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=368, 351) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 317) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=327, 246) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n= 315, 237) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 198) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 195) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 151) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 119 ) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=242, 109) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 99) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=203, 75 ) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 68) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=155, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 31) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (113, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=105, 25) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=100, 22) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=94, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9) | |
IFN-α | 29.55 | 26.68 | 27.59 | 27.22 | 28.20 | 27.81 | 28.85 | 28.30 | 28.57 | 28.37 | 29.12 | 28.44 | 28.99 | 28.50 | 28.76 | 28.67 | 29.86 | 29.36 | 29.43 | 29.03 | 29.89 | 29.24 | 29.54 | 29.48 | 29.81 | 29.63 | 29.35 | 29.23 | 29.18 | 28.89 | 27.79 | 28.28 | 29.26 | 27.94 | 28.83 | 28.73 | 29.64 | 28.65 | 28.44 | 29.22 |
SU011248 | 29.74 | 27.73 | 29.66 | 28.49 | 29.93 | 28.72 | 30.25 | 29.43 | 30.87 | 29.43 | 30.80 | 29.62 | 30.93 | 29.73 | 31.03 | 29.76 | 31.24 | 29.72 | 30.73 | 29.78 | 30.72 | 29.34 | 30.76 | 29.63 | 30.58 | 29.30 | 30.58 | 28.94 | 30.87 | 29.26 | 30.63 | 29.51 | 30.69 | 29.73 | 30.24 | 29.15 | 30.11 | 29.48 | 31.07 | 29.44 |
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): core questionnaire of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system that has been validated in a variety of cancer populations. 27 questions grouped into 4 domains that measure a patient's physical, functional, social and family, and emotional well-being. Five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = sum score of item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 108 with higher score indicating better quality of life. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=368, 346) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=345, 316) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 247) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=314, 237) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=293, 199) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 193) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=269, 149) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=263, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=247, 119) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=240, 106) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=238, 98) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 97) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=206, 78) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=200, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 66) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=170, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=158, 49) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=150, 45) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=134, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=139, 32) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=130, 29) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=126, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=113, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 20) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=89, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 16) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 8) | |
IFN-α | 81.22 | 74.91 | 77.02 | 77.05 | 79.35 | 78.42 | 80.86 | 80.46 | 81.96 | 80.60 | 81.97 | 79.70 | 80.39 | 81.06 | 81.25 | 81.31 | 84.50 | 83.14 | 84.03 | 81.79 | 81.60 | 80.20 | 80.99 | 81.73 | 81.18 | 80.67 | 81.22 | 81.57 | 81.66 | 80.88 | 78.20 | 78.38 | 81.80 | 78.96 | 82.24 | 82.27 | 82.48 | 79.63 | 81.70 | 79.54 |
SU011248 | 82.30 | 78.75 | 82.88 | 80.51 | 84.24 | 80.59 | 85.32 | 82.08 | 86.40 | 82.23 | 84.90 | 82.54 | 85.01 | 82.16 | 86.83 | 83.05 | 85.81 | 82.71 | 85.32 | 82.14 | 84.75 | 81.91 | 85.31 | 82.43 | 85.50 | 83.61 | 85.24 | 82.34 | 86.24 | 82.64 | 84.77 | 83.38 | 86.78 | 84.42 | 85.74 | 83.51 | 87.16 | 84.54 | 87.96 | 84.62 |
Emotional well-being (EWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 24; lower score indicates better emotional well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (370, 352) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 318) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 249) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=316, 237) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 196) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 152) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=265, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=249, 120) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 109) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 99) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 77) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=204, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 62) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=171, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=167, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 45) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 30) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=91, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 17) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9) | |
IFN-α | 17.06 | 17.40 | 17.52 | 17.73 | 18.13 | 18.17 | 18.80 | 18.39 | 19.00 | 18.70 | 18.60 | 18.14 | 18.08 | 18.55 | 18.54 | 18.55 | 18.98 | 18.76 | 18.92 | 18.36 | 18.97 | 18.52 | 18.87 | 19.45 | 18.63 | 18.97 | 18.05 | 18.76 | 18.24 | 18.75 | 17.26 | 16.83 | 18.28 | 18.00 | 19.62 | 19.55 | 19.09 | 18.20 | 18.67 | 18.67 |
SU011248 | 17.15 | 17.76 | 18.46 | 18.46 | 18.82 | 18.53 | 19.04 | 18.76 | 19.18 | 18.63 | 18.99 | 18.73 | 19.08 | 18.69 | 19.33 | 18.98 | 19.25 | 18.93 | 19.32 | 18.71 | 18.92 | 19.10 | 19.14 | 19.06 | 19.38 | 19.39 | 19.55 | 19.23 | 19.57 | 19.41 | 19.54 | 19.33 | 19.95 | 19.66 | 19.64 | 19.34 | 19.94 | 19.61 | 20.00 | 19.75 |
Functional well-being (FWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; higher score indicates greater functional well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=371, 353) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 318) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 249) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 195) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 152) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=265, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=249, 120) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 109) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=239, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 99) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=204, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=170, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=167, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=137, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 33) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 30) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=91, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9) | |
IFN-α | 18.51 | 16.37 | 17.08 | 17.18 | 17.92 | 17.56 | 18.40 | 18.37 | 18.81 | 18.47 | 19.02 | 18.24 | 18.45 | 18.76 | 19.22 | 19.10 | 20.20 | 20.04 | 19.88 | 19.40 | 18.89 | 18.81 | 18.80 | 19.13 | 19.63 | 18.59 | 19.62 | 19.72 | 19.86 | 19.83 | 18.89 | 18.61 | 19.35 | 18.71 | 19.08 | 19.00 | 19.64 | 19.10 | 20.00 | 20.22 |
SU011248 | 18.93 | 17.92 | 18.78 | 18.37 | 19.51 | 18.58 | 19.93 | 18.86 | 20.27 | 19.02 | 19.74 | 19.21 | 19.69 | 19.12 | 20.29 | 19.33 | 19.87 | 19.27 | 19.95 | 19.22 | 19.81 | 19.12 | 19.98 | 19.42 | 20.02 | 19.65 | 20.04 | 19.07 | 20.13 | 19.24 | 19.80 | 19.53 | 20.20 | 19.67 | 19.76 | 19.47 | 20.18 | 19.59 | 20.50 | 20.15 |
Physical well-being (PWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates better physical well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=369, 348) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 318) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=329, 247) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=316, 239) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=286, 195) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=270, 150) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 120) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 106) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=239, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=224, 97) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=207, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=201, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=193, 67) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=159, 49) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=151, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=135, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 32) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=131, 30) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=127, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 16) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 9) | |
IFN-α | 22.70 | 18.85 | 20.05 | 19.84 | 20.87 | 20.63 | 21.56 | 21.31 | 21.84 | 21.23 | 21.70 | 20.96 | 21.67 | 21.66 | 21.94 | 21.40 | 22.58 | 22.38 | 22.60 | 21.83 | 22.23 | 21.88 | 22.60 | 21.90 | 21.99 | 21.80 | 22.05 | 22.75 | 22.33 | 22.07 | 20.63 | 21.42 | 21.81 | 20.50 | 21.83 | 22.45 | 22.45 | 21.60 | 21.78 | 22.33 |
SU011248 | 23.14 | 19.43 | 22.22 | 20.34 | 22.45 | 20.18 | 22.72 | 21.00 | 23.24 | 20.91 | 22.99 | 21.22 | 23.05 | 21.22 | 23.58 | 21.51 | 23.41 | 21.29 | 22.94 | 21.21 | 23.16 | 20.98 | 23.03 | 20.87 | 23.05 | 21.26 | 23.02 | 20.80 | 23.26 | 20.95 | 22.60 | 21.31 | 22.99 | 21.68 | 22.85 | 20.89 | 23.20 | 21.82 | 23.68 | 21.81 |
Social/family well-being (SWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates less social/family well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=370, 349) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 319) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 247) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=292, 200) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=284, 194) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=269, 150) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=263, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=247, 120) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 107) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=238, 98) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=224, 97) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=207, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=200, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=193, 67) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=158, 49) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=151, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=135, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 32) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=131, 30) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=127, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=89, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 16) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 8) | |
IFN-α | 22.94 | 22.20 | 22.31 | 22.22 | 22.42 | 22.12 | 22.26 | 22.38 | 22.35 | 22.36 | 22.56 | 22.33 | 22.46 | 22.10 | 21.95 | 22.17 | 22.74 | 21.96 | 22.45 | 22.06 | 21.51 | 21.09 | 20.79 | 21.25 | 20.93 | 21.30 | 21.51 | 20.32 | 20.35 | 20.23 | 21.41 | 21.52 | 22.25 | 21.75 | 21.71 | 21.27 | 21.30 | 20.73 | 21.26 | 20.67 |
SU011248 | 23.14 | 23.60 | 23.50 | 23.40 | 23.51 | 23.44 | 23.73 | 23.36 | 23.53 | 23.68 | 23.35 | 23.40 | 23.29 | 23.13 | 23.67 | 23.26 | 23.26 | 23.26 | 23.08 | 23.03 | 23.05 | 22.71 | 23.23 | 23.07 | 23.15 | 23.31 | 22.82 | 23.24 | 23.28 | 23.04 | 23.11 | 23.41 | 23.42 | 23.50 | 23.53 | 23.70 | 23.85 | 23.53 | 23.60 | 22.93 |
Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Intervention | pg/ml and ratio to Baseline (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLASMA bFGF: C2D28:C1D1 (n=14, 0) | PLASMA bFGF: C3D1:C1D1 (n=12, 0) | PLASMA bFGF: C3D28:C1D1 (n=12, 0) | PLASMA bFGF: C4D1:C1D1 (n=14, 0) | PLASMA bFGF: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=10, 0) | |
SU011248 | 0.760 | 1.582 | 1.671 | 2.895 | 0.803 |
Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Intervention | pg/ml and ratio to Baseline (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plasma VEGF-A: Baseline (n=33, 31) | Plasma VEGF-A: C1D28: C1D1 (n=31, 26) | Plasma VEGF-A: C2D1: C1D1 (n=32, 21) | Plasma VEGF-A: C2D28: C1D1 (n=31, 20) | Plasma VEGF-A: C3D1: C1D1 (n=27, 15) | Plasma VEGF-A: C3D28: C1D1 (n=28, 15) | Plasma VEGF-A: C4D1: C1D1 (n=27, 12) | Plasma VEGF-A: C4D28: C1D1 (n=25, 11) | Plasma VEGF-C: Baseline (n=35, 31) | Plasma VEGF-C: C1D28: C1D1 (n=31, 26) | Plasma VEGF-C: C2D1:C1D1 (n=30, 21) | Plasma VEGF-C: C2D28:C1D1 (n=31, 19) | Plasma VEGF-C: C3D1:C1D1 (n=28, 15) | Plasma VEGF-C: C3D28:C1D1 (n=28, 15) | Plasma VEGF-C: C4D1:C1D1 (n=28, 12) | Plasma VEGF-C: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=26, 11) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: Baseline (n=29, 30) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C1D28:C1D1 (n=27, 25) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C2D1:C1D1 (n=28, 20) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C2D28:C1D1 (n=28, 19) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C3D1:C1D1 (n=25, 14) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C3D28:C1D1 (n=25, 14) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C4D1:C1D1 (n=24, 11) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=23, 10) | PLASMA IL-8: Baseline (n=31, 29) | PLASMA IL-8: C1D28:C1D1 (n=29, 25) | PLASMA IL-8: C2D1:C1D1 (n=29, 20) | PLASMA IL-8: C2D28:C1D1 (n=29, 19) | PLASMA IL-8: C3D1:C1D1 (n=26, 15) | PLASMA IL-8: C3D28:C1D1 (n=26, 14) | PLASMA IL-8: C4D1:C1D1 (n=26, 12) | PLASMA IL-8: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=25, 11) | PLASMA bFGF: Baseline (n=21, 2) | PLASMA bFGF: C1D28:C1D1 (n=15, 1) | PLASMA bFGF: C2D1:C1D1 (n=13, 1) | |
IFN-α | 109.0 | 1.134 | 1.171 | 1.153 | 1.253 | 1.149 | 1.209 | 1.008 | 651.2 | 1.165 | 1.177 | 1.081 | 1.174 | 1.054 | 1.382 | 1.139 | 40317.7 | 1.068 | 1.075 | 1.150 | 1.015 | 1.042 | 1.183 | 1.044 | 18.6 | 2.297 | 1.579 | 1.858 | 1.531 | 1.999 | 1.662 | 2.492 | 13.6 | 0.429 | 0.157 |
SU011248 | 101.9 | 4.280 | 1.161 | 5.851 | 1.630 | 5.236 | 1.486 | 4.924 | 556.4 | 0.945 | 1.045 | 0.871 | 1.159 | 1.043 | 1.243 | 1.207 | 44049.3 | 0.473 | 0.787 | 0.407 | 0.800 | 0.427 | 0.846 | 0.486 | 10.1 | 2.815 | 1.716 | 2.423 | 2.788 | 2.574 | 1.934 | 2.549 | 13.1 | 2.762 | 1.370 |
DR: Time from first documentation of objective tumor response to first date that recurrence or progressive disease (PD) was objectively documented, taking as a reference for PD, the smallest sum LD recorded since randomization. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every month until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 7.4 |
Temsirolimus | 11.1 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 9.3 |
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. EQ-5D index measured 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Range of EQ-5D index score = -0.594 to 1 where higher scores indicated a better health state. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 0.656 |
Temsirolimus | 0.689 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 0.689 |
Overall survival is the duration from randomization to death. For participants who are alive, overall survival is censored at the last contact. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 80
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 7.3 |
Temsirolimus | 10.9 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 8.4 |
Clinical benefit: confirmed CR or PR or had stable disease (SD) lasting at least 24 weeks. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions and non target lesions. PR was at least a 30% decrease in sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD was having neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 2 months until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 16.4 |
Temsirolimus | 34.0 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 30.0 |
Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was the disappearance of all target lesions and non target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 2 months until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 5.3 |
Temsirolimus | 9.1 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 9.5 |
PFS based on Independent Central Review Assessment. The period from randomization until disease progression, death or date of last contact. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, monthly until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 3.2 |
Temsirolimus | 5.6 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 4.9 |
"The Q-Twist is not a score calculated for each participant but is defined only on a by treatment group basis. For each treatment group, it is the weighted sum of the mean durations of the health states Tox, Twist, and Relapse. Tox is defined as time with severe toxicity related to treatment; Twist: time without symptoms or toxic side effects; and Relapse: time after relapse/progression. The mean duration of each health state is calculated based on the area under the Kaplan Meier curve pertaining to that health state. There is no direct method for calculating the dispersion of Q-Twist, and it is typically done using bootstrap method for purposes of inference (see, e.g., Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Gelber RD. Quality adjusted survival analysis. Stat Med 1990; 9: 1259-76). In practice, as apparently in the case with this study, the intermediate values resulting from the bootstrap exercise were not displayed." (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 80
Intervention | months (Number) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 6.9083 |
Temsirolimus | 8.3707 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 7.4821 |
TTF is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of PD or death, withdrawal from treatment due to an adverse event (AE), withdrawal of voluntary consent, or lost to follow-up, whichever occurred first, censored at the date of the conclusion of treatment phase. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every month until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 1.9 |
Temsirolimus | 3.7 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 2.5 |
Duration of stable disease was calculated as date of first treatment until date of documented progressive disease (PD) or last observation if subject did not progress. Stable disease (SD) defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Kaplan-Meier methodology, descriptive analysis. (NCT00101413)
Timeframe: First patient first treatment until date for last data collection for efficacy for a study period up to 62 weeks. Tumor assessed per RECIST at baseline (BL), every 8 weeks during treatment and at end of treatment.
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib | 103 |
"Overall survival was calculated from the date of the first treatment until death of the subject.~Evaluation by Kaplan-Meier methodology, descriptive analysis." (NCT00101413)
Timeframe: First patient first treatment until date for last data collection for efficacy for a study period up to 62 weeks.
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib | 205 |
Percentage of subjects with stable disease was calculated from date of first treatment until date of documented progressive disease (PD) or last observation if subject did not progress. Stable disease (SD) defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Descriptive summary of subjects with SD. (NCT00101413)
Timeframe: First patient first treatment until date for last data collection for efficacy for a study period up to 62 weeks. Tumor assessed per RECIST at baseline (BL), every 8 weeks during treatment and at end of treatment.
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sorafenib | 58.8 |
CR-disappearance of clinical/radiological tumor evidence (target/nontarget). PR- >=30% decrease in sum longest diameter (LD) of target lesions from BL sum LD. Stable disease (SD)-no shrinkage for PR nor increase for PD. Progressive disease (PD) measurement proven- >=20% increase in sum LD of lesions from smallest sum LD since start or new lesions. Progression by clinical judgement- >clinically meaningful cancer-related deterioration as judged by the investigator. (NCT00101413)
Timeframe: First patient first treatment until date for last data collection for efficacy for a study period up to 62 weeks. Tumor assessed per RECIST at baseline (BL), every 8 weeks during treatment and at end of treatment.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Complete response + Partial response | Complete response | Partial response | Stable disease | Progressive disease measurement proven | Progression by clinical judgement | Not evaluated | |
Sorafenib | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 58.8 | 23.5 | 11.8 | 5.9 |
HRQoL was assessed with the FACT-L questionnaire, a validated instrument for determining lung cancer HRQoL. The 36-item questionnaire includes 4 domains: Physical, functional, emotional, and social/family well-being, and a lung cancer-specific subscale. The FACT-L total score ranges from 1 to 136. Lower scores (negative change from baseline) demonstrate impaired HRQoL. (NCT00101413)
Timeframe: From first patient first treatment until date of last efficacy data collection (study period up to 62 weeks). HRQoL assessed at baseline (BL), end of treatment Cycles 2 and 4, and at end of treatment
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2 | Cycle 4 | End of treatment | |
Sorafenib | -4.8 | 0.0 | -14.9 |
Overall survival determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the date of death, due to any cause. Outcome measure was assessed regularly, i.e. every 3 weeks for the first 24 weeks during treatment and every 4 weeks thereafter and approximately every 3 months during post-treatment. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (8Sep2006) for the final OS analysis, approximately 33 months later
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 542 |
Placebo | 436 |
Overall survival determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the date of death, due to any cause. Outcome measure was assessed regularly, i.e. every 3 weeks for the first 24 weeks during treatment and every 4 weeks thereafter and approximately every 3 months during post-treatment. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (8Sep2006) for the final OS analysis, approximately 33 months later
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 542 |
Placebo | 461 |
PFS determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the actual date of disease progression (PD) (radiological or clinical) or death due to any cause, if death occurred before PD. Outcome measure was assessed approximately every 8 weeks using RECIST v1.0 criteria by independent radiologic review. Radiological PD defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of measured lesions taking as reference smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of new lesions. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (28Jan2005), approximately 14 months later, tumors assessed every 8 weeks.
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 167 |
Placebo | 84 |
Best overall response was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0 by independent radiologic review. Categories: complete response (CR, tumor disappears), partial response (PR, sum of lesion sizes decreased), stable disease (SD, steady state of disease), progressive disease (PD, sum of lesion sizes increased) and not evaluated. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (28Jan2005), approximately 14 months later, tumors assessed every 8 weeks.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Complete Response | Partial Response | Stable Disease | Progressive Disease | Not Evaluated | |
Placebo | 0.0 | 0.0 | 55.2 | 30.3 | 14.5 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 0.0 | 2.1 | 77.9 | 8.7 | 11.3 |
"Primary Analysis for FKSI-10 patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure defined as longitudinal analysis of mean score over the first 5 treatment cycles. FKSI-10 patient responses for each question range from 0=not at all to 4=very much and after reverse coding the range of values for FKSI-10 total score is from 0 to 40; higher score represents better HRQOL." (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (31May2005), approximately 18 months later, PRO data collected at Day 1 of each cycle and end of treatment.
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2, Day 1 | Cycle 3, Day 1 | Cycle 4, Day 1 | Cycle 5, Day 1 | Cycles 1-5 (Overall) | |
Placebo | 27.78 | 27.28 | 26.78 | 26.28 | 27.20 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 27.77 | 27.27 | 26.77 | 26.27 | 27.19 |
"Primary Analysis for FACT-G (using PWB score) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure defined as longitudinal analysis of mean score over the first 5 treatment cycles. FACT-G (PWB score) patient responses for each question range from 0=not at all to 4=very much and after reverse coding the total FACT-G (PWB score) range of values is from 0 to 28; higher score represents better HRQOL." (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (31May2005), approximately 18 months later, PRO data collected at Day 1 of each cycle and end of treatment.
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2, Day 1 | Cycle 3, Day 1 | Cycle 4, Day 1 | Cycle 5, Day 1 | Cycles 1-5 (Overall) | |
Placebo | 21.16 | 20.72 | 20.28 | 19.84 | 20.65 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 21.21 | 20.77 | 20.33 | 19.89 | 20.70 |
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for motesanib in Cycle 1 calculated using the using the linear/log trapezoidal method. AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) is reported for the 50 and 125 mg QD cohorts and AUC from time 0 to 24 hours post-dose (AUC0-24) is reported for the 75 mg BID cohort, where AUC0-24 is the sum of AUC0-12 for the first and second daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 3 at predose, 15 and 30 minutes, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.
Intervention | μg*hr/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 0.971 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 3.21 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 2.91 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 1.74 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 3.23 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 2.04 |
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours post-dose (AUC0-24) for motesanib in Cycle 2 calculated using the using the linear/log trapezoidal method. For the 75 mg BID cohort AUC0-24 is the sum of AUC0-12 for the first and second daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 15 and 30 minutes, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.
Intervention | μg*hr/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 4.50 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 3.11 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 1.26 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 3.92 |
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 3.16 |
The terminal-phase elimination half-life (t1/2,z) of motesanib was calculated as ln(2)/λz. The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) was determined by linear regression of the natural logarithms of at least the last 3 measurable concentrations during the terminal phase. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, t1/2,z is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 3 at predose, 15 and 30 min, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours postdose.
Intervention | hours (Mean) |
---|---|
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 7.34 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 5.33 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 5.77 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 6.47 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 7.57 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 8.28 |
The terminal-phase elimination half-life (t1/2,z) of motesanib was calculated as ln(2)/λz. The terminal elimination rate constant (λz) was determined by linear regression of the natural logarithms of at least the last 3 measurable concentrations during the terminal phase. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, t1/2,z is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 15 and 30 min, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.
Intervention | hours (Mean) |
---|---|
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 6.41 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 6.36 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 7.08 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 4.90 |
The maximal observed plasma concentration of motesanib after a single dose dose in Cycle 1. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, Cmax is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 3 at predose, 15 and 30 min, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 158 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 525 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 448 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 328 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 444 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 198 |
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 360 |
The maximal observed plasma concentration of motesanib in Cycle 2, after multiple doses. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, Cmax is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 15 and 30 min, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 148 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 748 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 390 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 265 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 672 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 242 |
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 651 |
Confirmed objective tumor response defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. Tumor response was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Responding disease (CR or PR) was confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the criteria for response were first met. A complete response defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and all non-target lesions, no new lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. Partial response defined as either the disappearance of all target lesions and the persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or/and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diamer (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD and no new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: After 9 weeks of treatment (at the end of Cycle 3)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 33 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 18 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 0 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 0 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 0 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 0 |
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 17 |
The time after dosing that the maximal plasma concentration of motesanib was observed in Cycle 1. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, Tmax is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 3 at predose, 15 and 30 minutes, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.
Intervention | hours (Median) |
---|---|
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 0.75 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 1.0 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 0.75 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 1.5 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 1.0 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 0.58 |
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 1.0 |
The time after dosing that the maximal plasma concentration of motesanib was observed in Cycle 2. For the 75 mg BID cohorts, Tmax is reported for the first daily dose. (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1 at predose, 15 and 30 min, and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 (QD cohorts only), and 24 hours post-dose.
Intervention | hours (Median) |
---|---|
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 1.5 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 1.0 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 0.63 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 1.0 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 0.75 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 1.0 |
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 2.0 |
The trough plasma concentration for motesanib at 24 hours postdose in Cycle 1. For the 75 BID cohort, C24 is the observed concentration at 24 hours (ie, after the second daily dose). (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 3, 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 9.12 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 26.5 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 56.7 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 14.0 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 32.5 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 56.8 |
The trough plasma concentration for motesanib at 24 hours postdose in Cycle 2. For the 75 BID cohort, C24 is the observed concentration at 24 hours (ie, after the second daily dose). (NCT00094835)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1, 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 43.4 |
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 75 mg BID | 45.4 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 50 mg QD | 10.4 |
Panitumumab + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 61.1 |
Panitumumab + Paclitaxel/Carboplatin + Motesanib 125 mg QD | 45.1 |
Duration of response (PR or better) is defined as the time from the first documented objective response of PR or CR, whichever is noted earlier, to disease progression or death (if death occurs before progression is documented). (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Tumor measurements and assessments based on RECIST criteria were performed every 6 weeks for the first 18 weeks of therapy ( week 6, 12, and 18) and every 12 weeks thereafter up to data cutoff (1Oct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib + C/P | 168 |
Placebo + C/P | 134 |
Overall survival determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the date of death, due to any cause. Outcome measure was assessed regularly, i.e. every 3 weeks during study treatment and every 3 months during post-treatment. (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Outcome measure was assessed every 3 weeks starting from randomization, during treatment period and every 3 months during follow-up period until death was recorded or up to data cutoff (1Oct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib + C/P | 324 |
Placebo + C/P | 322 |
PFS determined as time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to disease progression (radiological or clinical) or death due to any cause, if death occurs before progression. (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Tumor measurements and assessments based on RECIST criteria were performed every 6 weeks for the first 18 weeks of therapy ( week 6, 12, and 18) and every 12 weeks thereafter up to data cutoff (1Oct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib + C/P | 139 |
Placebo + C/P | 163 |
Best overall tumor response for the ITT population was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Categories: complete response (CR, tumor disappears), partial response (PR, sum of lesion sizes decreased), stable disease (SD, steady state of disease), progressive disease (PD, sum of lesion sizes increased). (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Tumor measurements and assessments based on RECIST criteria were performed every 6 weeks for the first 18 weeks of therapy ( week 6, 12, and 18) and every 12 weeks thereafter up to data cutoff (1Oct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Complete Response (CR) | Partial Response (PR) | Stable Disease (SD) | Progressive Disease (PD) | Not evaluated | Disease control | |
Placebo + C/P | 1.1 | 22.9 | 47.8 | 17.5 | 10.6 | 56.3 |
Sorafenib + C/P | 0.0 | 27.4 | 45.9 | 9.9 | 16.8 | 49.8 |
"Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung cancer subscore (FACT-L). Patient reported outcome as assessed by FACT-L score. FACT-L questionnaire comprises statements about physical, social / family, emotional and functional well-being as well as additional concerns which have to be rated by the patients (0=not at all to 4=very much). Cycle duration defined as 21 days. Change from baseline in Total FACT-L on day 1 of cycles 3,5,7,9 (weeks 7,13,19 and 25) and end of treatment (EOT); cycle 1, day 1 used as baseline. EOT is determined by patient's last visit after treatment discontinuation." (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Outcome measure was assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of every other cycle (i.e. Cycle 3, 5, 7 etc.) during treatment and at end of treatment visit or up to data cutoff (10ct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 3, Day 1 | Cycle 5, Day 1 | Cycle 7, Day 1 | Cycle 9, Day 1 | End of treatment (EOT) | |
Placebo + C/P | 0.1 | -1.3 | -0.5 | -0.6 | -2.7 |
Sorafenib + C/P | 0.0 | -1.4 | -0.8 | -1.2 | -3.1 |
Lung Cancer Symptoms (LCS) subscale ranges from 0 (severe debilitation) to 28 (asymptomatic). Cycle duration defined as 21 days. Change from baseline in LCS Subscale on day 1 of cycles 2 through 9 (weeks 4,7,10,13,16,19,22 and 25) and end of treatment (EOT); cycle 1, day 1 used as baseline. EOT is determined by patient's last visit after treatment discontinuation. (NCT00300885)
Timeframe: Outcome measure was assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of every cycle (i.e. Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5 etc.) during treatment and at end of treatment visit or up to data cutoff (10ct2007) used for planned formal interim analysis
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2, Day 1 | Cycle 3, Day 1 | Cycle 4, Day 1 | Cycle 5, Day 1 | Cycle 6, Day 1 | Cycle 7, Day 1 | Cycle 8, Day 1 | Cycle 9, Day 1 | End of treatment (EOT) | |
Placebo + C/P | -0.1 | -0.2 | -0.3 | -0.5 | -0.4 | -0.4 | -0.2 | -0.3 | -0.4 |
Sorafenib + C/P | 0.0 | -0.4 | -0.6 | -0.6 | -0.8 | -0.8 | -1.2 | -0.9 | -0.9 |
Time between the first day of treatment to the days of death. (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 17 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) | 11.6 |
"Time between the first day of treatment to the day of disease progression. Progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.~Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progressions of existing non-target lesions." (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 17 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) | 3.4 |
Percentage of participants with response rate = CR + PR. Response will be evaluated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. CR (complete response) is the disappearance of all target lesions; PR (partial response) is a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD (progressive disease) is a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; and SD (stable disease) are small changes that do not meet the above criteria. Please see the Protocol Link module for additional information about RECIST if desired. (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 17 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) | 6 |
Here are the total number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 5 1/2 years
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) | 37 |
Mutational analysis of these genes was performed on paraffin-imbedded tissue blocks from prior pathologic specimens. Disease control rate was correlated with KRAS mutational status. Disease control rate was defined as complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR)+ stable disease (SD). (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 42 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
DCR observed in KRAS mutant participants | DCR observed in KRAS wild-type participants | DCR observed in EGFR mutant participants | DCR observed in EGFR wild-type participants | |
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) | 60 | 71 | 40 | 69 |
Serial plasma samples were collected from all patients and cytokine levels were measured. The concentrations of the cytokines were determined with recombinant standards and expressed as picograms per milliliter (pg/ml). (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 54 days
Intervention | pg/ml (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
VEGF | sVEGFRI | PLGF | bFGF | |
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) | 101 | 115 | 19 | 6 |
Serum plasma is collected at the beginning of each cycle during the course of the study and analyzed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 42 months
Intervention | months (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Overall survival for bFGF day 0<6 pg/ml | Overall survival for bFGF day 0>6 pg/ml | |
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) | 15.4 | 5.5 |
Difference in placental derived growth factor (PLGF) between day 28 and day 0 of < 11 pg/ml vs. > 12 pg/ml. (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 17 months
Intervention | months (Median) | |
---|---|---|
PLGF ,< 11 pg/ml | PLGF > 12 pg/ml | |
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) | 6.6 | 15.6 |
DCE-MRI was used to evaluate changes (e.g. decrease/increase in Ve, Ktrans, Kep value) in vascularity and quality of index lesions to provide early indication of treatment effect before changes in size can be perceived on CT. Changes were reflected in a decrease/increase of Ve, Ktrans, or Kep (Kep, Ve, Ktrans measurements at day 0, day 14 and the difference between the day 14 and the day 0 measurements (day 14-day 0). (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 59 months
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
percentage of pts with an increase in Ktrans orKep | percentage of pts with an decrease in Ktrans orKep | Percentage of pts with an increase or decrease-Ve | |
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) | 19 | 81 | 0 |
Serum plasma is collected at the beginning of each cycle during the course of the study and analyzed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (NCT00098254)
Timeframe: 17 months
Intervention | months (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Progression free survival for bFGF day 28<6 pg/ml | Progression free survival for bFGF day 28>6 pg/ml | |
BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) | 4.4 | 1.8 |
Progression free survival is defined as the time from the first day of treatment until the day tumor progression was documented. Response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Progressive Disease (PD): Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions (1). Percentage of participants who were progression free at 6 month from the start of treatment is reported here. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 29 |
Placebo | 22 |
"Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as the percentage of patients who have a partial/complete/stable response to therapy. Responses were assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.0).~Complete Response: Disappearance of all target lesions, and disappearance of all non-target lesions.~Partial Response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters) Stable Response: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response, nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since the treatment started)." (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 54 |
Placebo | 38 |
Duration of response is defined as the time from when objective response is realized until time to first documented disease progression. Disease progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Objective Response = CR + PR. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | months (Mean) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 4.6430 |
Placebo | 5.2234 |
"Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of patients who have a partial or complete response to therapy. Responses were assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.0).~Complete Response: Disappearance of all target lesions, and disappearance of all non-target lesions.~Partial Response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters)" (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 8.1 |
Placebo | 10.9 |
OS is defined as the time from the first treatment until date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death or lack of data beyond follow-up period, the survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 7.62 |
Placebo | 7.23 |
"Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the first day of treatment until the day tumor progression was documented. Response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).~Progressive Disease (PD): Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions" (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 3.38 |
Placebo | 1.94 |
DC was defined as the total number of patients whose best response was not PD according to RECIST (version 1.0) by Investigator-assessment (= total number of CR + total number of PR + total number of SD; CR or PR had to be maintained for at least 28 days from the first demonstration of that rating, SD had to be documented at least once more than 6 weeks from baseline). PD: an increase in the sum of tumor lesions sizes or new lesions. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 62.1 |
Placebo + GC | 63.1 |
Duration of response was defined as the time from date of first documented objective response of PR or CR, whichever was noted earlier, to date of disease progression or death (if death occurred before progression was documented). Patients without disease progression at the time of analysis or death before progression were censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. Disease progression: increase in the sum of tumor lesion sizes or new lesions. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 171 |
Placebo + GC | 133 |
Duration of SD was defined as the time from date of randomization to date that disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever was earlier) was first documented. Patients without disease progression at the time of analysis or death before progression were censored at the date of their last tumor assessment.(Disease progression: increase in the sum of tumor lesion sizes or new lesions.) Duration of stable disease was only evaluated in patients failing to achieve a best response of CR or PR. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 144 |
Placebo + GC | 131 |
OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Patients still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death of any cause whichever came first
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 371 |
Placebo + GC | 378 |
OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Patients still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death of any cause whichever came first
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 254 |
Placebo + GC | 374 |
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. Patients still alive at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of last contact. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death of any cause whichever came first
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 376 |
Placebo + GC | 379 |
PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever was earlier, based on Investigator-assessment using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.0) or death due to any cause, whichever occured first. Patients without progression or death at the time of analysis were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Disease progression: increase in the sum of tumor lesion sizes or new lesions. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 183 |
Placebo + GC | 168 |
TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to disease progression (radiological or clinical, whichever was earlier, based on Investigator-assessment using RECIST version 1.0). Patients without progression at the time of analysis or death before progression were censored at their last date of tumor evaluation. Disease progression: increase in the sum of tumor lesion sizes or new lesions. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 185 |
Placebo + GC | 167 |
TTR for patients who achieved a best response (CR or PR) was defined as the time from date of randomization to the earliest date that response was first documented. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death of any cause whichever came first
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 42 |
Placebo + GC | 43 |
TSD is defined as the time from randomization to the date of symptomatic deterioration (≥3 point decline in the LCS score that is maintained for at least 2 consecutive cycles) or death if death occurs before these 2 consecutive cycles are completed. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient to 38 months later or death whatever occurs first
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 6.9 |
Placebo + GC | 4.5 |
The EQ-5D also contains a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), which records the respondent's self-rated health status on a vertical graduated visual analog scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months later or death whatever occurs first
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cycle 1 (day 1) | cycle 2 (day 22) | cycle 3 (day 43) | cycle 4 (day 64) | cycle 5 (day 85) | cycle 6 (day 106) | |
Placebo + GC | 68.96 | 68.96 | 68.95 | 68.95 | 68.95 | 68.95 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 66.43 | 66.43 | 66.43 | 66.43 | 66.42 | 66.42 |
The EQ-5D contains a descriptive system which measures 5 health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. These five health dimensions are summarized into a single score, the EQ-5D index score which ranges from -0.594 to 1 when the United Kingdom (UK) weights are applied (0=death, 1=perfect health). Higher index scores represent better health states. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months later or death whatever occurs first
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cycle 1 (day 1) | cycle 2 (day 22) | cycle 3 (day 43) | cycle 4 (day 64) | cycle 5 (day 85) | cycle 6 (day 106) | |
Placebo + GC | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.67 |
The FACT-L measures health related quality of life (HRQOL) and composes of five domains: the four domains (physical well being, emotional well being, social well being, functional well being) from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General scale (FACT-G) and the lung cancer subscale (LCS). The FACT-L total score ranges from 0 to 136, higher scores represent better HRQOL. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
cycle 2 (day 22) | cycle 4 (day 64) | cycle 6 (day 106) | |
Placebo + GC | 94.0 | 93.6 | 93.1 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 90.6 | 90.1 | 89.7 |
LCS is a subscale of FACT-L measuring lung cancer specific symptoms. The LCS scores range from 0 to 28, higher scores represent fewer lung cancer symptoms. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient to 38 months later or death whatever occurs first.
Intervention | scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cycle 1 (day 1) | cycle 2 (day 22) | cycle 3 (day 43) | cycle 4 (day 64) | cycle 5 (day 85) | cycle 6 (day 106) | |
Placebo + GC | 20.5 | 20.5 | 20.4 | 20.3 | 20.3 | 20.2 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 20.0 | 19.9 | 19.9 | 19.8 | 19.7 | 19.7 |
Tumor response (= Best Overall Response) of a patient was defined as the best tumor response (confirmed Complete Response (CR: disappearance of tumor lesions), confirmed Partial Response (PR: a decrease of at least 30% in the sum of tumor lesion sizes), Stable Disease (SD: steady state of disease), or Progressive Disease (PD: an increase in the sum of tumor lesions sizes or new lesions)) observed during trial period assessed according to the RECIST criteria (version 1.0) based on Investigator-assessment. (NCT00449033)
Timeframe: from randomization of the first patient until 38 months or date of death or progression whichever came first, assessed until discontinuation every 6 weeks up to 9 months and then every 12 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR | confirmed PR | SD | PD | Not assessable | |
Placebo + GC | 0.0 | 25.8 | 37.2 | 17.1 | 19.9 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) + GC | 0.0 | 27.8 | 34.3 | 10.9 | 27.0 |
Geometric mean exposure for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | mg/L.h (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 9.76 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 18.63 |
Plasma concentration-time profile for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, AND 24 hours post dose
Intervention | mg/L (Mean) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 1.28 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 2.57 |
Time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive, approximately 18.3 months.
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 18 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 18.3 |
Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events, see the adverse event module. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 49 months.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 22 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 23 |
Determine whether BAY 43-9006 when used to treat metastatic prostate cancer is associated with having 50% of Patients Progression Free at 4 Months by clinical, radiographic, and prostatic specific antigen (PSA)criteria. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 4 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 1.83 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 3.7 |
Time to maximum concentration for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | hours (Median) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 0.68 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 8 |
Overall response was evaluated by the RECIST. Complete Response (CR) is the disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. Stable Disease (SD) is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Complete Response | Partial Response | Progressive Disease | Stable Disease | |
First Stage - Disease Progression | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 0 | 1 | 13 | 10 |
29 reviews available for niacinamide and Cancer of Lung
Article | Year |
---|---|
Angiogenesis Inhibitors in NSCLC.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; | 2017 |
Complete response of hepatocellular carcinoma with right atrium and pulmonary metastases treated by combined treatments (a possible treatment effect of natural killer cell): A case report and literature review.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Thera | 2018 |
Active targeted therapy for metastatic collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: a case report and review of the literature.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biopsy, Needle; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progr | 2013 |
Efficacy of motesanib diphosphate in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protoc | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of sorafenib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Lung N | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic A | 2015 |
The role and mechanism of autophagy in sorafenib targeted cancer therapy.
Topics: Animals; Autophagy; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; N | 2016 |
Targeted therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic A | 2008 |
Sorafenib in lung cancer: clinical developments and future directions.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; F | 2008 |
K-ras as a target for lung cancer therapy.
Topics: Benzamides; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Cl | 2008 |
[Tumor vasculature as a therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer].
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Axitinib; Benzen | 2008 |
Emerging data with antiangiogenic therapies in early and advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Benzenesulfonate | 2009 |
Targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; | 2009 |
Sorafenib.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; | 2010 |
New drugs in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: searching for the correct clinical development.
Topics: Afatinib; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Drug Delivery Systems; Dru | 2010 |
Classic biphasic pulmonary blastoma: a case report and review of the literature.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Fatal Outcome; Humans; Intestinal Pe | 2011 |
Motesanib and advanced NSCLC: experiences and expectations.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Biological Availabili | 2011 |
[Targeting the RAS signalling pathway in cancer].
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Colorectal Neoplasms; ErbB Receptors; Extracellular Signal | 2011 |
Sorafenib in non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; H | 2012 |
[Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) in the treatment of solid cancers: an overview of biological and clinical aspects].
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clinical Tri | 2012 |
Angiogenesis and lung cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Benzenesulfonates; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Human | 2005 |
Targeting angiogenesis with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor small-molecule inhibitors: novel agents with potential in lung cancer.
Topics: Benzenesulfonates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Indoles; Lung Neoplasms; Neovascularization, Pa | 2005 |
Multi-target inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinom | 2006 |
Toxicities of antiangiogenic therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic A | 2006 |
[Relation between cytochrome P450 2D6 and lung cancer susceptibility caused by smoking].
Topics: Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Nit | 2007 |
Combination of target agents: challenges and opportunities.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans | 2007 |
Role of anti-angiogenesis agents in treating NSCLC: focus on bevacizumab and VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic A | 2007 |
Playing only one instrument may be not enough: limitations and future of the antiangiogenic treatment of cancer.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma | 2007 |
[Lung cancer].
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; | 2008 |
54 trials available for niacinamide and Cancer of Lung
Article | Year |
---|---|
Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of Motesanib (AMG-706) in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in East Asian Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; D | 2017 |
Sorafenib and continued erlotinib or sorafenib alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer progressing on erlotinib: A randomized phase II study of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small | 2017 |
Sorafenib and everolimus in advanced clear cell renal carcinoma: a phase I/II trial of the SCRI Oncology Research Consortium.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Renal Cel | 2013 |
Phase III study (MONET1) of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonsquamous nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Asian subgroup analysis.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asian People; Carbop | 2014 |
Phase II trial of sorafenib in conjunction with chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Cisplatin; Disease-Free Sur | 2014 |
A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib monotherapy in clinically selected patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma after failure of EGFR-TKI therapy (Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group, CTONG 0805).
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins | 2014 |
Sorafenib synergizes with metformin in NSCLC through AMPK pathway activation.
Topics: AMP-Activated Protein Kinases; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Calcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein | 2015 |
Motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the randomized controlled MONET1 study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Carcino | 2014 |
Challenges in developing a validated biomarker for angiogenesis inhibitors: the motesanib experience.
Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Bio | 2014 |
Challenges in developing a validated biomarker for angiogenesis inhibitors: the motesanib experience.
Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Bio | 2014 |
Challenges in developing a validated biomarker for angiogenesis inhibitors: the motesanib experience.
Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Bio | 2014 |
Challenges in developing a validated biomarker for angiogenesis inhibitors: the motesanib experience.
Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Bio | 2014 |
Clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of tumor progression in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; | 2015 |
A randomized phase II study of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat as maintenance therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free | 2015 |
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2015 |
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2015 |
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2015 |
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2015 |
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2015 |
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2015 |
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2015 |
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2015 |
Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boronic Acids; Borte | 2015 |
Comparison of volumetric and linear serial CT assessments of lung metastases in renal cell carcinoma patients in a clinical phase IIB study.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Kidney Neoplasms; Lu | 2015 |
SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brai | 2015 |
Monotherapy Administration of Sorafenib in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MISSION) Trial: A Phase III, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sorafenib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Predominantly Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Canc
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Double-Blind Method; ErbB Receptors; Female; | 2015 |
A multicenter phase II study of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (KCSG-0806).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease | 2016 |
Response and toxicity prediction by MALDI-TOF-MS serum peptide profiling in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; D | 2016 |
Phase 2 open-label study of single-agent sorafenib in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B-endemic Asian population: presence of lung metastasis predicts poor response.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Fema | 2009 |
Phase II, multicenter, uncontrolled trial of single-agent sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Diarrhea; Drug Resis | 2009 |
Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonate | 2010 |
Incidence of brain metastases in renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Re | 2010 |
Phase 1b study of motesanib, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel and/or panitumumab for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy P | 2010 |
Phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or with sorafenib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benz | 2010 |
Phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or with sorafenib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benz | 2010 |
Phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or with sorafenib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benz | 2010 |
Phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or with sorafenib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benz | 2010 |
A multicenter phase II study of erlotinib and sorafenib in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small | 2010 |
A phase I trial of sorafenib combined with cisplatin/etoposide or carboplatin/pemetrexed in refractory solid tumor patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonate | 2011 |
A phase II trial of first-line sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma unwilling to receive or with early intolerance to immunotherapy: SOGUG Study 06-01.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal | 2010 |
Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in patients treated with sorafenib and erlotinib for non-small cell lung cancer: a new method of monitoring treatment?
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; C | 2010 |
A phase I trial of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: New York Cancer Consortium Trial NCI 6981.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Capecitabin | 2011 |
Sorafenib in platinum-treated patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 0435) phase II trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; | 2010 |
Response to sorafenib at a low dose in patients with radioiodine-refractory pulmonary metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Papillary; China; Disea | 2011 |
Sorafenib in combination with erlotinib or with gemcitabine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combine | 2011 |
A front-line window of opportunity phase 2 study of sorafenib in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N0326.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; D | 2010 |
Evaluation of KRAS mutations, angiogenic biomarkers, and DCE-MRI in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving sorafenib.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; B | 2011 |
A phase II, multicenter, open-label randomized study of motesanib or bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemother | 2011 |
[Randomize trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either sorafenib or placebo as first-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small | 2011 |
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo | 2011 |
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo | 2011 |
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo | 2011 |
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo | 2011 |
Assessment of objective responses using volumetric evaluation in advanced thymic malignancies and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Large | 2011 |
Long-term safety and tolerability of sorafenib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a case-based review.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulf | 2011 |
[Postoperative correction of the methabolism of the single lung after pulmonectomy].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Drug Combinations; Enteral Nutrition; Flavin Mononucleotide; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; | 2011 |
A phase I study of sorafenib and vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors with expanded cohorts in renal cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Ce | 2013 |
International, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: MONET1.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carb | 2012 |
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin alone or with sorafenib for the first-line treatment of advanced, nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell L | 2012 |
Simulations using a drug-disease modeling framework and phase II data predict phase III survival outcome in first-line non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bevacizumab; Carb | 2012 |
Could interferon still play a role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma? A randomized study of two schedules of sorafenib plus interferon-alpha 2a (RAPSODY).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combi | 2013 |
A double-blind randomized discontinuation phase-II study of sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients: eastern cooperative oncology group study E2501.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic | 2012 |
Clinical outcomes and biomarker profiles of elderly pretreated NSCLC patients from the BATTLE trial.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bexa | 2012 |
VeriStrat(®) has prognostic value in advanced stage NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib and sorafenib.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Surviva | 2012 |
A phase II study of sorafenib in patients with platinum-pretreated, advanced (Stage IIIb or IV) non-small cell lung cancer with a KRAS mutation.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; M | 2013 |
Early response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer assessed by [18F]-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; D | 2013 |
Second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: big targets, small progress; small targets, big progress?
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot | 2006 |
Phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with gefitinib in patients with refractory or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell L | 2007 |
A randomized phase II study of sorafenib/gemcitabine or sorafenib/erlotinib for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients or patients with a performance status of 2: treatment rationale and protocol dynamics.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell L | 2007 |
Pharmacokinetics of nicotinamide in cancer patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy: the experience of the Co-operative Group of Radiotherapy of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Area Under Curve; Carbon Dioxide; Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; C | 1998 |
ARCON: accelerated radiotherapy with carbogen and nicotinamide in non small cell lung cancer: a phase I/II study by the EORTC.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Carbon Dioxide; Carcinoma, Non-Small- | 1999 |
189 other studies available for niacinamide and Cancer of Lung
Article | Year |
---|---|
Potential synthetic lethality for breast cancer: A selective sirtuin 2 inhibitor combined with a multiple kinase inhibitor sorafenib.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor | 2022 |
Metabolomics study of ribavirin in the treatment of orthotopic lung cancer based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS.
Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acid; Biomarkers; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Linoleic Acid; Lung Neo | 2023 |
Metabolomics study of ribavirin in the treatment of orthotopic lung cancer based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS.
Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acid; Biomarkers; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Linoleic Acid; Lung Neo | 2023 |
Metabolomics study of ribavirin in the treatment of orthotopic lung cancer based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS.
Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acid; Biomarkers; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Linoleic Acid; Lung Neo | 2023 |
Metabolomics study of ribavirin in the treatment of orthotopic lung cancer based on UPLC-Q-TOF/MS.
Topics: Animals; Arachidonic Acid; Biomarkers; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Linoleic Acid; Lung Neo | 2023 |
EphA2 inhibition suppresses proliferation of small-cell lung cancer cells through inducing cell cycle arrest.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Proliferation; Dasatinib; Drug Scree | 2019 |
A TAZ-AXL-ABL2 Feed-Forward Signaling Axis Promotes Lung Adenocarcinoma Brain Metastasis.
Topics: Acyltransferases; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Axl Receptor Tyrosine Kina | 2019 |
Nicaraven Attenuates Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Responses-Induced Tumor Metastasis.
Topics: Animals; Cytokines; Inflammation; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Neoplasm Met | 2020 |
Association of Gastric Acid Suppression and Sorafenib Efficacy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Disease-Free Survi | 2021 |
Autophagy-Inducing Inhalable Co-crystal Formulation of Niclosamide-Nicotinamide for Lung Cancer Therapy.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Autophagy; Calorimetry, Differential Scanning; Crystallization; Desiccat | 2020 |
18F-PSMA-1007 Uptake in Pulmonary Lymphangitic Carcinomatosis Metastasis From Prostate Cancer.
Topics: Biological Transport; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Niacinamide; Oligopeptides; Positro | 2021 |
Complete Response to the Combination of Pembrolizumab and Sorafenib for Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Report.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Proto | 2017 |
Co-targeting of DNA, RNA, and protein molecules provides optimal outcomes for treating osteosarcoma and pulmonary metastasis in spontaneous and experimental metastasis mouse models.
Topics: Animals; Bone Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Combined Modality Ther | 2017 |
Carboxyamidotriazole Synergizes with Sorafenib to Combat Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer through Inhibition of NANOG and Aggravation of Apoptosis.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Carcinoma | 2017 |
The inhibition of FGF receptor 1 activity mediates sorafenib antiproliferative effects in human malignant pleural mesothelioma tumor-initiating cells.
Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Separation; C | 2017 |
Simultaneous inhibition of growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by co-delivery of ursolic acid and sorafenib using lactobionic acid modified and pH-sensitive chitosan-conjugated mesoporous silica nanocomplex.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Hepatocel | 2017 |
Synergistic activity and heterogeneous acquired resistance of combined MDM2 and MEK inhibition in KRAS mutant cancers.
Topics: A549 Cells; Animals; Apoptosis; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; Bcl-2-Like Protein 11; Carcinoma, Non | 2017 |
Activation of an AKT/FOXM1/STMN1 pathway drives resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer.
Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Epithelial-Mes | 2017 |
Nicaraven reduces cancer metastasis to irradiated lungs by decreasing CCL8 and macrophage recruitment.
Topics: Amifostine; Animals; Antioxidants; Cell Line, Tumor; Chemokine CCL8; Gamma Rays; Humans; Lung; Lung | 2018 |
Wee1 inhibitor MK1775 sensitizes KRAS mutated NSCLC cells to sorafenib.
Topics: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mutat | 2018 |
The excellent antitumor effect of apatinib alone as second-line therapy in a patient with sorafenib-refractory hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report.
Topics: Adult; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Disease Progression; Fatal Outcome | 2018 |
Aortic Dissection and Cardiac Dysfunction Emerged Coincidentally During the Long-Term Treatment with Angiogenesis Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Aortic Dissection; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Heart Diseases; H | 2018 |
Chemoprevention of Lung Carcinogenesis by Dietary Nicotinamide and Inhaled Budesonide.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Apoptosis; Benzo(a)pyrene; Budesonide | 2019 |
Increased plasma concentration of 4-pyridone-3-carboxamide-1-ß-D-ribonucleoside (4PYR) in lung cancer. Preliminary studies.
Topics: Aged; Arginine; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Endothelial Cells; Female; Humans; Lung | 2019 |
Identification of nicotinamide aminonaphthyridine compounds as potent RET kinase inhibitors and antitumor activities against RET rearranged lung adenocarcinoma.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Dos | 2019 |
Suppression of natural killer cells by sorafenib contributes to prometastatic effects in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Topics: Animals; Antigens, CD; Antigens, Differentiation, T-Lymphocyte; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, He | 2013 |
Mitochondrial complex I activity and NAD+/NADH balance regulate breast cancer progression.
Topics: Acrylamides; Animals; Autophagy; Autophagy-Related Protein 5; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cel | 2013 |
Is it time to adopt external beam radiotherapy in the NCCN guidelines as a therapeutic strategy for intermediate/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma?.
Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembo | 2013 |
Response to sorafenib in a pediatric patient with papillary thyroid carcinoma with diffuse nodular pulmonary disease requiring mechanical ventilation.
Topics: Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Papillary; Child; Humans; Hypoxia; Iodine Radioisotopes; Lung Neoplasms; Male; | 2014 |
Imetelstat (a telomerase antagonist) exerts off‑target effects on the cytoskeleton.
Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cytoskeleton; Gene Expression Reg | 2013 |
Case of sorafenib-induced thyroid storm.
Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Aged; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Atrial Fib | 2013 |
[Suppression of the growth of subcutaneous transplanted human liver cancer and lung metastasis in nude mice treated by sorafenib combined with fluorouracil].
Topics: Animals; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, S | 2013 |
Major clinical response to a BRAF inhibitor in a patient with a BRAF L597R-mutated melanoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Arginine; Back; Cell Survival; Enzyme Activation; Extracellular Signal- | 2013 |
Antiangiogenic therapy promoted metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by suppressing host-derived interleukin-12b in mouse models.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Dendritic Cells; Diph | 2013 |
Successful use of sorafenib after bortezomib failure in metastatic follicular thyroid cancer - a case report.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Adult; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung | 2013 |
Flavopiridol synergizes with sorafenib to induce cytotoxicity and potentiate antitumorigenic activity in EGFR/HER-2 and mutant RAS/RAF breast cancer model systems.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Ce | 2013 |
Inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer by LY2801653, an inhibitor of several oncokinases, including MET.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small | 2013 |
Alteration in the balance of prosurvival and proapoptotic signalling pathways leads to sequence-dependent synergism between docetaxel and sorafenib in human non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Carcinoma | 2014 |
Sorafenib induced eruptive melanocytic lesions.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Brachytherapy; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug Eruptions; Fatal Outcome; Humans; | 2013 |
Major response with sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma after 14 years of follow-up.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease Progression; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Human | 2013 |
High risk of lung metastasis after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma more than 7 cm in diameter.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Female; Hepatectomy; Hum | 2014 |
Dramatic antitumor effects of the dual MET/RON small-molecule inhibitor LY2801653 in non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; | 2014 |
Critical role of sorafenib exposure over time for its antitumor activity in thyroid cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Prot | 2014 |
Characterization of the biological activity of a potent small molecule Hec1 inhibitor TAI-1.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; A | 2014 |
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with metastatic thyroid carcinomas: a retrospective study of the TUTHYREF network.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Adenoma, Oxyphilic; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; | 2014 |
Exploratory modeling and simulation to support development of motesanib in Asian patients with non-small cell lung cancer based on MONET1 study results.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asian People; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinic | 2014 |
Sorafenib-induced tumor response in a patient with metastatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma.
Topics: Adult; Angiomyolipoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Biopsy, Needle; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplas | 2014 |
Combining sorafenib with celecoxib synergistically inhibits tumor growth of non-small cell lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Carcinoma, No | 2014 |
Oncogenic and sorafenib-sensitive ARAF mutations in lung adenocarcinoma.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Aged; Amino Acid Substitution; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell T | 2014 |
Orally active microtubule-targeting agent, MPT0B271, for the treatment of human non-small cell lung cancer, alone and in combination with erlotinib.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biological Availabili | 2014 |
Histone deacetylase inhibitors sensitize lung cancer cells to hyperthermia: involvement of Ku70/SirT-1 in thermo-protection.
Topics: Antigens, Nuclear; Apoptosis; bcl-2-Associated X Protein; Cell Death; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA-Binding | 2014 |
Response to sorafenib treatment in advanced metastatic thyroid cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Papillary; Compassionate Use Trials; Female; | 2014 |
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 as molecular therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Carcinoma, Large Cel | 2014 |
Radiation recall reaction causing cardiotoxicity.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Antineoplastic Agents; Chemoradiotherapy; Coronary Angiograp | 2014 |
Therapeutic effects of sorafenib on the A549/DDP human lung adenocarcinoma cell line in vitro.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Mov | 2014 |
Hand, foot and scrotal blisters in a patient with cancer receiving oral chemotherapy.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Aged; Blister; Carcinoma, He | 2014 |
Response to trabectedin in a patient with advanced synovial sarcoma with lung metastases.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Axilla; Combined Modality Therapy; Dioxoles; Epirubicin; Fatal Outcome | 2014 |
Sorafenib-associated psoriasiform eruption in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Eruptions; Humans | 2014 |
Anti-proliferative but not anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors enrich for cancer stem cells in soft tissue sarcoma.
Topics: Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antigens, CD; Cell Line, Tumor; C | 2014 |
Synergistic anti-tumor effects of the combination of a benzofuroxan derivate and sorafenib on NCI-H460 human large cell lung carcinoma cells.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzoxazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Survival; Dose-Response Re | 2014 |
To treat or not to treat: developments in the field of advanced differentiated thyroid cancer.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Aged; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Drug Delivery Systems; Female; | 2014 |
A novel approach using sorafenib in alpha fetoprotein-producing hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; alpha-Fetoproteins; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Fat | 2015 |
Metronomic vinorelbine (oral) in combination with sorafenib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Administration, Metronomic; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro | 2015 |
Kidney cancer: SWITCHing inconsequential.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Ce | 2015 |
Effects of sorafenib on lung metastasis in rats with hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of microRNAs.
Topics: Animals; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Gene Expression Re | 2015 |
Small molecule/ML327 mediated transcriptional de-repression of E-cadherin and inhibition of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.
Topics: Animals; Cadherins; Cell Line, Tumor; Chick Embryo; Colorectal Neoplasms; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Tra | 2015 |
Sorafenib-Sunitinib Sequence: The Jury Is Out.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Ce | 2015 |
A significant response to sorafenib in a woman with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and a BRAF non-V600 mutation.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Mutation; Niacin | 2015 |
Complete pathological response induced by sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases and venous tumor thrombosis allowing for curative resection.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Combined Modality Therapy; Hepatectomy; Hepatic Ve | 2015 |
High-Dose Vitamin C Promotes Regression of Multiple Pulmonary Metastases Originating from Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Ascorbic Acid; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeuti | 2015 |
Absence of Significant Correlation of Adverse Events Between First- and Second-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Huma | 2016 |
[Successful Multimodal Treatment for Aggressive Extrahepatic Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma - A Case Report].
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Combined Modality Therapy; Hepatectomy; Hum | 2015 |
Fisetin, a dietary flavonoid, augments the anti-invasive and anti-metastatic potential of sorafenib in melanoma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Blotting, Western; Cadherins; Cell Line, Tu | 2016 |
Comprehensive multiplatform biomarker analysis of 350 hepatocellular carcinomas identifies potential novel therapeutic options.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; beta Catenin; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, H | 2016 |
Metformin increases antitumor activity of MEK inhibitors through GLI1 downregulation in LKB1 positive human NSCLC cancer cells.
Topics: AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apopt | 2016 |
EPHA2 Blockade Overcomes Acquired Resistance to EGFR Kinase Inhibitors in Lung Cancer.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Benzamides; Cell Line, Tumor; Ce | 2016 |
Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Achieving a Complete Response on Targeted Therapy: A Registry-based Analysis.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Huma | 2016 |
Metformin inhibits the prometastatic effect of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating the expression of TIP30.
Topics: Acetyltransferases; Animals; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Gene E | 2016 |
[Treatment of refractory pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using arsenic trioxide in combination with sorafinib].
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Arsenic Trioxide; Arsenicals; Carcinoma, Hepatocellu | 2015 |
Sorafenib treatment for patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; | 2016 |
[Pemetrexed + Sorafenib] lethality is increased by inhibition of ERBB1/2/3-PI3K-NFκB compensatory survival signaling.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Breast Neopla | 2016 |
HDAC6-mediated EGFR stabilization and activation restrict cell response to sorafenib in non-small cell lung cancer cells.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Drug Re | 2016 |
Simultaneous multitarget radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy and its combination with sorafenib for pulmonary metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cohort Studies; Combined Modali | 2016 |
Telomerase inhibitor imetelstat has preclinical activity across the spectrum of non-small cell lung cancer oncogenotypes in a telomere length dependent manner.
Topics: A549 Cells; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Proliferation; Dose | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Long-term response of over ten years with sorafenib monotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a case report.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Male; | 2016 |
Efficacy of sorafenib in BRAF-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and no response in synchronous BRAF wild type-hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report.
Topics: Aged; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neopl | 2016 |
1-methylnicotinamide and its structural analog 1,4-dimethylpyridine for the prevention of cancer metastasis.
Topics: Animals; Cadherins; Cdh1 Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Epoprostenol; Female; Gene Expression Regulatio | 2016 |
Clinical analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living-donor liver transplantation.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Female; Humans; Liver Neopl | 2016 |
Regorafenib (Stivarga) pharmacologically targets epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer.
Topics: Animals; Antigens, CD; Antineoplastic Agents; Cadherins; Cell Movement; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dose-R | 2016 |
Fever within 2 Weeks of Sorafenib Therapy Predicts Favorable Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Contrast Media; Fe | 2016 |
A case report of motesanib-induced biliary sludge formation causing obstructive cholangitis with acute pancreatitis treated by endoscopic sphincterotomy.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Bile; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cholangitis; Fatal Outcome; Huma | 2016 |
EGF Induced RET Inhibitor Resistance in CCDC6-RET Lung Cancer Cells.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Cell Line, Tumor; Cetuximab; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Epidermal Growth Factor; Erb | 2017 |
PDE5 inhibitors enhance the lethality of [pemetrexed + sorafenib].
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Autophagy; Cell Line, Tumor; Dru | 2017 |
Assessment of response to anti-angiogenic targeted therapy in pulmonary metastatic renal cell carcinoma: R2* value as a predictive biomarker.
Topics: Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Indoles | 2017 |
[Treatment Experience with Sorafenib for Lung Metastases of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Complicated with Interstitial Pneumonia].
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Diseases, Inte | 2016 |
Sorafenib: tolerance in patients on chronic hemodialysis: a single-center experience.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lu | 2008 |
Follicular hyperplasia on the face subsequent to therapy with sorafenib. A new skin side effect.
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Humans; Hyperplasia; Lung Neoplasms; Ma | 2009 |
Response to sorafenib in cisplatin-resistant thymic carcinoma: a case report.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma; | 2009 |
Sorafenib is active on lung metastases from synovial sarcoma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Niacinamide; Ph | 2009 |
Sunitinib treatment for patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma after progression on sorafenib.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, R | 2009 |
Antitumor efficacy of recombinant human interleukin-2 combined with sorafenib against mouse renal cell carcinoma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; C | 2009 |
The successful use of sorafenib to treat pediatric papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Topics: Adolescent; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Papillary; Child; Female; Humans; Iodine Radioisotopes; Lu | 2009 |
Preclinical development of the nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase inhibitor prodrug GMX1777.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Small Cell; Cell Line, Tumor; Colonic Neo | 2009 |
The reverse side of the victory: flare up of symptoms after discontinuation of sunitinib or sorafenib in renal cell cancer patients. A report of three cases.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Indoles; Kidn | 2009 |
Multiple colon ulcerations, perforation and death during treatment of malignant melanoma with sorafenib.
Topics: Abdomen, Acute; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Colectomy; Colonic Diseases; Diarrhe | 2009 |
Sorafenib inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell growth by targeting B-RAF in KRAS wild-type cells and C-RAF in KRAS mutant cells.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Proliferation; Cyclin | 2009 |
[Expert consensus on standardization of the management of primary liver cancer].
Topics: alpha-Fetoproteins; Benzenesulfonates; Biomarkers; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Catheter Ablation; Che | 2009 |
Sorafenib induces partial response in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Humans; | 2010 |
Spontaneous pyopneumothorax in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors for subpleural pulmonary metastases.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Calcitonin; Carcinoma, Rena | 2010 |
Interstitial pneumonia probably associated with sorafenib treatment: An alert of an adverse event.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Human | 2010 |
CD133+ circulating haematopoietic progenitor cells predict for response to sorafenib plus erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Topics: AC133 Antigen; Adult; Aged; Antigens, CD; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesul | 2010 |
Apparent remission of a solitary metastatic pulmonary lesion in a liver transplant recipient treated with sorafenib.
Topics: Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Combined Modality Therapy; Hep | 2009 |
[Clinical observation of 21 cases of metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib].
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, | 2009 |
[Clinical observation of the treatment with combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma with lung metastasis].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, | 2009 |
[Targeting KRAS pathway in NSCLC therapy].
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Farnesyltranstran | 2009 |
Sorafenib inhibits ERK1/2 and MCL-1(L) phosphorylation levels resulting in caspase-independent cell death in malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Caspase 3; Cell Line, Tumor; Extracell | 2009 |
Verification and unmasking of widely used human esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Biomedical Research; Carcinoma; Carcinoma, | 2010 |
Combination therapy of interleukin-2 and sorafenib improves survival benefits and prevents spontaneous pulmonary metastasis in murine renal cell carcinoma models.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; C | 2010 |
Choroidal metastasis of renal cell carcinoma: a case report.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Choroid Neoplasms; Eye Enucleation; | 2010 |
Nox1 is involved in p53 deacetylation and suppression of its transcriptional activity and apoptosis.
Topics: Acetylation; Apoptosis; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma; Carrier Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Cloning, Mo | 2010 |
Comparative profiling of the novel epothilone, sagopilone, in xenografts derived from primary non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesu | 2010 |
Sorafenib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer that harbor K-ras mutations: a brief report.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulf | 2010 |
Depletion of tumor-associated macrophages enhances the effect of sorafenib in metastatic liver cancer models by antimetastatic and antiangiogenic effects.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cl | 2010 |
Long-term stable disease in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: sorafenib sequenced to sunitinib and everolimus: a case study.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carc | 2011 |
Response to sorafenib in a patient with metastatic xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Chromosomes, Human, X; Disease-Free | 2010 |
Evolution of an adenocarcinoma in response to selection by targeted kinase inhibitors.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Benzenesulfonates; Gene Dosage; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genes, Neopl | 2010 |
Evolution of an adenocarcinoma in response to selection by targeted kinase inhibitors.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Benzenesulfonates; Gene Dosage; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genes, Neopl | 2010 |
Evolution of an adenocarcinoma in response to selection by targeted kinase inhibitors.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Benzenesulfonates; Gene Dosage; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genes, Neopl | 2010 |
Evolution of an adenocarcinoma in response to selection by targeted kinase inhibitors.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Benzenesulfonates; Gene Dosage; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genes, Neopl | 2010 |
Significance of manipulating tumour hypoxia and radiation dose rate in terms of local tumour response and lung metastatic potential, referring to the response of quiescent cell populations.
Topics: Animals; Bromodeoxyuridine; Cell Hypoxia; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Gamma Rays; Lung Neopla | 2010 |
Synergistic antitumor activity of sorafenib in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in colorectal and lung cancer cells.
Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemothe | 2010 |
Feasibility of (125)I brachytherapy combined with sorafenib treatment in patients with multiple lung metastases after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Brachytherapy; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cause of | 2010 |
[Tegafur-uracil markedly reduced pulmonary metastasis from renal cell carcinoma refractory to sorafenib, interferon and interleukin 2].
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Drug | 2010 |
Sirolimus plus sorafenib in treating HCC recurrence after liver transplantation: a case report.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Therapy, Combination; Huma | 2010 |
Prolonged survival in renal transplant recipient with advanced renal cell carcinoma by everolimus and sorafenib.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Disease-Fr | 2011 |
NSCLC drug targets acquire new visibility.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Benzimidazoles; Bexarotene; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, | 2011 |
A painful cranial bulge.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Brain Neoplasms; Drug Administ | 2011 |
Synergistic cytotoxicity, inhibition of signal transduction pathways and pharmacogenetics of sorafenib and gemcitabine in human NSCLC cell lines.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-C | 2011 |
FLT-PET may not be a reliable indicator of therapeutic response in p53-null malignancy.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell L | 2011 |
Clinical hypothyroidism in a renal cell carcinoma patient treated with sorafenib.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Humans; Hypothyroidism; Lung Neopla | 2011 |
Sorafenib induces apoptotic cell death in human non-small cell lung cancer cells by down-regulating mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent survivin expression.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumo | 2011 |
Severe sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clobetasol; Dis | 2011 |
An investigation of the effect of sorafenib on tumour growth and recurrence after liver cancer resection in nude mice independent of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase levels.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Growth Processes; Cell Li | 2011 |
Antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer: characterizing the molecular basis for serious adverse events.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Benzenesulfonate | 2011 |
Antitumour efficacy of MEK inhibitors in human lung cancer cells and their derivatives with acquired resistance to different tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Animals; Benzenesulfonates; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Prolifera | 2011 |
[Long-standing differentiated thyroid carcinoma].
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Biopsy, Needle; Carcinoma, Large Cell; Carcinoma, Papillar | 2012 |
Bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation with a positive ophthalmoscopic and visual response to plasmapheresis.
Topics: Aged; Autoantibodies; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Bronchogenic; Cell Proliferation; Eye Proteins; | 2011 |
Complete response of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases treated with sorafenib: a case report.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Female; Humans; Liver Neo | 2011 |
Hepatic androgen receptor suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through modulation of cell migration and anoikis.
Topics: Animals; Anoikis; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; D | 2012 |
Effects of employing a ¹⁰B-carrier and manipulating intratumour hypoxia on local tumour response and lung metastatic potential in boron neutron capture therapy.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Borohydrides; Boron Neutron Capture Therapy; Bromodeoxyuridine; Cell | 2012 |
Synergistic antitumor efficacy of sequentially combined paclitaxel with sorafenib in vitro and in vivo NSCLC models harboring KRAS or BRAF mutations.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, No | 2012 |
Pancreatic metastasis arising from a BRAF(V600E)-positive papillary thyroid cancer: the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy and response to sorafenib therapy.
Topics: Benzenesulfonates; Biopsy; Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Papillary; Disease Progression; Endoscopy; Fatal Ou | 2012 |
Intra-arterial infusion of chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an Asian perspective.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; | 2012 |
Sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolization and bronchial arterial chemoinfusion in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bronchial Arteries; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoemboli | 2012 |
Painful leg mass.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Hospice Care; Humans; Kidney Neopla | 2012 |
Unusual short-term complete response to two regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy in a patient with poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
Topics: Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy | 2012 |
Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors in unselected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): impressions from MONET (the motesanib NSCLC efficacy and tolerability study).
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Fema | 2012 |
The inhibition of the pemetrexed-activated MAPK pathway via sorafenib is involved in the synergistic mechanism of sorafenib subsequent potentiation of pemetrexed cytotoxicity in EGFR TKI-resistant cell lines.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Sur | 2012 |
Brain metastasis from follicular thyroid carcinoma: treatment with sorafenib.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Brain Neoplasms; Female; Human | 2012 |
Sorafenib for lung cancer: is the "Battle" still open?
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; | 2012 |
High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Carci | 2012 |
FGF3/FGF4 amplification and multiple lung metastases in responders to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line | 2013 |
A needle in a haystack: Identifying biomarkers to personalize systemic therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Female; Fibroblast Growth Factor 3; Fibro | 2013 |
Molecular mechanisms and modulation of key pathways underlying the synergistic interaction of sorafenib with erlotinib in non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC) cells.
Topics: Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; Chromato | 2013 |
Antitumor activity of motesanib alone and in combination with cisplatin or docetaxel in multiple human non-small-cell lung cancer xenograft models.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation | 2012 |
Durable spontaneous regression of lung metastases from renal cell carcinoma after incomplete use of multiple kinase inhibitor sorafenib.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung; Lung Neo | 2013 |
Physical health, mental health, and life changes among family caregivers of patients with lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Caregivers; Cross-Sectional Studies; Family Health; Female; Health S | 2013 |
PG545, a heparan sulfate mimetic, reduces heparanase expression in vivo, blocks spontaneous metastases and enhances overall survival in the 4T1 breast carcinoma model.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protoc | 2012 |
[THE LEVEL OF NICOTINIC ACID DERIVATIVES AND THEIR EXCRETION IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC AND PULMONARY CANCER].
Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Niacin; Niacinamide; Nicotinic Acids; Stomach Neoplasms | 1964 |
Use of mitogenic cascade blockers for treatment of C-Raf induced lung adenoma in vivo: CI-1040 strongly reduces growth and improves lung structure.
Topics: Adenoma; Animals; Apoptosis; Benzamides; Benzenesulfonates; Cell Differentiation; Cell Division; Lun | 2004 |
Spinal cord metastasis of a non-neurofibromatosis type-1 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: an unusual manifestation of a rare tumor.
Topics: Adult; Benzenesulfonates; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Fatal Outcome; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Mag | 2005 |
Sorafenib is efficacious and tolerated in combination with cytotoxic or cytostatic agents in preclinical models of human non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2007 |
Nicotinamide extends replicative lifespan of human cells.
Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Carcinoma; Cell Division; Cell Line, Tumor; Cells, Cultured; Cellular Senesc | 2006 |
Leukocytoclastic vasculitis masquerading as hand-foot syndrome in a patient treated with sorafenib.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Diagnosis, Different | 2006 |
'Seed' analysis of off-target siRNAs reveals an essential role of Mcl-1 in resistance to the small-molecule Bcl-2/Bcl-XL inhibitor ABT-737.
Topics: 3' Untranslated Regions; Antineoplastic Agents; Base Sequence; bcl-X Protein; Benzenesulfonates; Bip | 2007 |
Keratoacanthomas associated with sorafenib therapy.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Arm; Benzenesulfonates; Facial Dermatoses; Female; Humans; Keratoacanth | 2007 |
Sorafenib-induced erythema multiforme.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzenesulfonates; Erythema Multiforme; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Melano | 2007 |
Sorafenib and sunitinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials as Topic; | 2007 |
Yellow skin discoloration associated with sorafenib use for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Topics: Acrodermatitis; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Erythema; Humans; K | 2007 |
Pulmonary blastoma with renal metastasis responds to sorafenib.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Benzenesulfonates; Biopsy, Needle; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Combined Mod | 2007 |
Do the results of the new trials change the standard treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer?
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Clinical T | 2007 |
[Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and loss of strength in the right arm--not a typical combination].
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Arm; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma | 2007 |
ASCO 2007: plenary top 5.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Carcinom | 2007 |
Design of phase II cancer trials using a continuous endpoint of change in tumor size: application to a study of sorafenib and erlotinib in non small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; C | 2007 |
Re: Design of phase II cancer trials using a continuous endpoint of change in tumor size: application to a study of sorafenib and erlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase II | 2008 |
Metastatic chest wall malignant schwannoma responding to sorafenib: case report and literature review.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Brain Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Ma | 2008 |
Safety and activity of sorafenib in different histotypes of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Proto | 2007 |
Combination of fractionated irradiation with nicotinamide and carbogen in R1H-tumours of the rat and its pulmonary metastases.
Topics: Animals; Carbon Dioxide; Combined Modality Therapy; Disease Models, Animal; Dose Fractionation, Radi | 1997 |
Preclinical evaluation of the novel hypoxic marker 99mTc-HL91 (Prognox) in murine and xenograft systems in vivo.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Animals; Carbon Dioxide; Carcinoma; Cell Hypoxia; Colonic Neoplasms; Contrast Media; | 1998 |
The influence of nutritional factors on pulmonary adenomas in mice.
Topics: Adenoma; Animals; Body Weight; Choline; Inositol; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Inbred Strains; Niacin | 1977 |
[Anticarcinogenic action of vitamins PP and B6 in the natulan initiation of malignant growth in mice].
Topics: Adenoma; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Interactions; Female; Lu | 1989 |
The antimetastatic and tumor growth retarding effects of sulfur containing analogs of nicotinamide.
Topics: Animals; Female; Lung Neoplasms; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Neoplasm Transplantation; Niacinamide; St | 1986 |
Inhibiting effects of nicotinamide on urethane-induced malformations and tumors in mice.
Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Animals; Cleft Lip; Cleft Palate; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 1988 |
The inhibitory effect of B-group vitamins on the incidence of tumour metastases.
Topics: Animals; Lung Neoplasms; Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental; Mice; Neoplasm Metastasis; Niacinamide; Ox | 1971 |