Page last updated: 2024-10-19

niacinamide and Bone Neoplasms

niacinamide has been researched along with Bone Neoplasms in 61 studies

nicotinamide : A pyridinecarboxamide that is pyridine in which the hydrogen at position 3 is replaced by a carboxamide group.

Bone Neoplasms: Tumors or cancer located in bone tissue or specific BONES.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Results of previous study showed promising but short-lived activity of sorafenib in the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced and metastatic osteosarcoma."9.20Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial. ( Aglietta, M; Asaftei, SD; Bertulli, R; Biagini, R; Capozzi, F; Casali, PG; D'Ambrosio, L; Fagioli, F; Ferraresi, V; Ferrari, S; Gambarotti, M; Grignani, G; Marchesi, E; Palmerini, E; Picci, P; Pignochino, Y; Sangiolo, D; Tamburini, A, 2015)
"A pilot Phase II study adding sorafenib to endocrine therapy in 11 patients with metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer was conducted."9.19Impact of adding the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib to endocrine therapy in metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. ( Black, EP; Karabakhtsian, RG; Massarweh, S; Moss, J; Napier, D; Romond, E; Slone, S; Wang, C; Weiss, H, 2014)
"This is the first report of activity achieved by the combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab in a patient with osteosarcoma."7.81RANK ligand blockade with denosumab in combination with sorafenib in chemorefractory osteosarcoma: a possible step forward? ( Bode, B; Cathomas, R; Fuchs, B; Rothermundt, C; Schwitter, M; von Moos, R, 2015)
"The application of sorafenib tosylate monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel is effective against experimental breast cancer bone metastases resulting in anti-angiogenic, anti-tumour and anti-resorptive effects."7.77Sorafenib tosylate and paclitaxel induce anti-angiogenic, anti-tumour and anti-resorptive effects in experimental breast cancer bone metastases. ( Bäuerle, T; Komljenovic, D; Merz, M; Semmler, W; Zwick, S, 2011)
"Our findings demonstrate that sorafenib inhibited the Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway in a time- and dose-dependent fashion in chondrosarcoma cell lines SW1353 and CRL7891 and suggest that sorafenib may be a new therapeutic option for patients with chondrosarcoma."7.76Sorafenib induces growth inhibition and apoptosis of human chondrosarcoma cells by blocking the RAF/ERK/MEK pathway. ( Guo, W; Lu, X; Ren, T; Tang, X; Zhao, H, 2010)
"Osteosarcoma is a rare but aggressive bone neoplasm in humans, which is commonly treated with surgery, classical chemotherapy and radiation."5.40Human osteosarcoma cells respond to sorafenib chemotherapy by downregulation of the tumor progression factors S100A4, CXCR4 and the oncogene FOS. ( Burger, S; Gallè, B; Mair, G; Miller, I; Steinborn, R; Walter, I; Wolfesberger, B, 2014)
"Sorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that targets tumor growth and angiogenesis signal transduction pathways."5.39[Complete response after sorafenib therapy plus zoledronic acid for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with bone metastasis - a case report]. ( Natori, T; Yamaguchi, M, 2013)
" Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 92% of all patients necessitating sorafenib discontinuation in 77%."5.38High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Fischer, L; Nashan, B; Seegers, B; Staufer, K; Sterneck, M; Vettorazzi, E, 2012)
"Results of previous study showed promising but short-lived activity of sorafenib in the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced and metastatic osteosarcoma."5.20Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial. ( Aglietta, M; Asaftei, SD; Bertulli, R; Biagini, R; Capozzi, F; Casali, PG; D'Ambrosio, L; Fagioli, F; Ferraresi, V; Ferrari, S; Gambarotti, M; Grignani, G; Marchesi, E; Palmerini, E; Picci, P; Pignochino, Y; Sangiolo, D; Tamburini, A, 2015)
"A pilot Phase II study adding sorafenib to endocrine therapy in 11 patients with metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer was conducted."5.19Impact of adding the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib to endocrine therapy in metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. ( Black, EP; Karabakhtsian, RG; Massarweh, S; Moss, J; Napier, D; Romond, E; Slone, S; Wang, C; Weiss, H, 2014)
" Independent actions of the model drugs DNA-intercalating doxorubicin, RNA-interfering miR-34a and protein-inhibiting sorafenib on DNA replication, RNA translation and protein kinase signaling in highly metastatic, human osteosarcoma 143B cells were demonstrated by the increase of γH2A."3.85Co-targeting of DNA, RNA, and protein molecules provides optimal outcomes for treating osteosarcoma and pulmonary metastasis in spontaneous and experimental metastasis mouse models. ( DeVere White, RW; Duan, Z; Ho, PY; Jian, C; Lam, KS; Lara, PN; Qiu, JX; Tu, MJ; Wun, T; Yu, AM; Yu, AX; Zhang, Q, 2017)
"This is the first report of activity achieved by the combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab in a patient with osteosarcoma."3.81RANK ligand blockade with denosumab in combination with sorafenib in chemorefractory osteosarcoma: a possible step forward? ( Bode, B; Cathomas, R; Fuchs, B; Rothermundt, C; Schwitter, M; von Moos, R, 2015)
" In a study evaluating the combination of sorafenib, bevacizumab, and low-dose cyclophosphamide in children with solid tumors, an unexpectedly high incidence of pneumothorax was observed."3.81Pneumothorax as a complication of combination antiangiogenic therapy in children and young adults with refractory/recurrent solid tumors. ( Davidoff, AM; Interiano, RB; McCarville, MB; Navid, F; Sandoval, J; Wu, J, 2015)
"THERE WERE 62 PATIENTS (37 MEN, MEAN AGE: 61 years) treated with sorafenib (62%), sunitinib (22%), and vandetanib (16%) outside of clinical trials; 22 had papillary, five had follicular, five had Hürthle cell, 13 had poorly differentiated, and 17 had medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC)."3.80Tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with metastatic thyroid carcinomas: a retrospective study of the TUTHYREF network. ( Baudin, E; Bonichon, F; Borget, I; Brassard, M; Chougnet, CN; Claude-Desroches, M; de la Fouchardière, C; Do Cao, C; Giraudet, AL; Leboulleux, S; Massicotte, MH; Schlumberger, M, 2014)
"Retrospective study on all the renal cell carcinoma patients with bone metastases treated with sunitinib or sorafenib between November 2005 and June 2012 at the University Hospitals Leuven and AZ Groeninge in Kortrijk."3.78Concomitant oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors and bisphosphonates in advanced renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases. ( Berkers, J; Beuselinck, B; Body, JJ; Debruyne, P; Dumez, H; Elaidi, R; Karadimou, A; Lerut, E; Paridaens, R; Rogiers, A; Schöffski, P; Van Cann, T; Van Poppel, H; Willems, L; Wolter, P, 2012)
"The application of sorafenib tosylate monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel is effective against experimental breast cancer bone metastases resulting in anti-angiogenic, anti-tumour and anti-resorptive effects."3.77Sorafenib tosylate and paclitaxel induce anti-angiogenic, anti-tumour and anti-resorptive effects in experimental breast cancer bone metastases. ( Bäuerle, T; Komljenovic, D; Merz, M; Semmler, W; Zwick, S, 2011)
"Sorafenib is a new drug, multikinase inhibitor, which has been recently approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma."3.77Severe sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction. ( Betlloch, I; Cuesta, L; Latorre, N; Monteagudo, A; Toledo, F, 2011)
"Our findings demonstrate that sorafenib inhibited the Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway in a time- and dose-dependent fashion in chondrosarcoma cell lines SW1353 and CRL7891 and suggest that sorafenib may be a new therapeutic option for patients with chondrosarcoma."3.76Sorafenib induces growth inhibition and apoptosis of human chondrosarcoma cells by blocking the RAF/ERK/MEK pathway. ( Guo, W; Lu, X; Ren, T; Tang, X; Zhao, H, 2010)
" Overall, adverse event rates were generally similar between the treatment arms."2.80SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer. ( Bos, MM; De Santis, M; Eichelberg, C; Fischer von Weikersthal, L; Flörcken, A; Freier, W; Goebell, PJ; Gottstein, D; Hauswald, K; Indorf, M; Lerchenmüller, C; Los, M; Michel, MS; Pahernik, S; Schenck, M; Schirrmacher-Memmel, S; Staehler, M; van Arkel, C; Vervenne, WL; Zimmermann, U, 2015)
"Sorafenib has proven efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)."2.78Could interferon still play a role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma? A randomized study of two schedules of sorafenib plus interferon-alpha 2a (RAPSODY). ( Boni, C; Bracarda, S; Caserta, C; Cinquini, M; Cortesi, E; De Angelis, V; Di Costanzo, F; Falcone, A; Gasparro, D; Labianca, R; Mucciarini, C; Paglino, C; Pazzola, A; Porta, C; Santoro, A, 2013)
"The combination of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine is tolerable, but requires attenuation of sorafenib and capecitabine dosing because of the overlapping toxicity of hand-foot syndrome."2.76A phase I trial of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: New York Cancer Consortium Trial NCI 6981. ( Jeske, S; Kung, S; Lehrer, D; Matulich, D; Mazumdar, M; Milowsky, MI; Nanus, DM; Selzer, J; Sung, M; Tagawa, ST; Wright, JJ, 2011)
"Sorafenib has a beneficial effect on tumor progression in patients with metastatic DTC, but was less effective in patients with bone metastases."2.74Beneficial effects of sorafenib on tumor progression, but not on radioiodine uptake, in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. ( Corssmit, EP; Gelderblom, H; Heemstra, KA; Hoftijzer, H; Huijberts, M; Kapiteijn, E; Morreau, H; Pereira, AM; Romijn, JA; Smit, JW; Stokkel, MP; Weijers, K, 2009)
"Sorafenib was given at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles."2.74Final analysis of a phase II trial using sorafenib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ( Aragon-Ching, JB; Arlen, PM; Chen, CC; Dahut, WL; Draper, D; Figg, WD; Gulley, JL; Jain, L; Jones, E; Steinberg, SM; Venitz, J; Wright, JJ, 2009)
"Sorafenib 400 mg was administered twice daily from mid-March."2.53Radiation recall dermatitis induced by sorafenib : A case study and review of the literature. ( Brüssow, C; Guckenberger, M; Pestalozzi, B; Riesterer, O; Stieb, S; Weiler, S, 2016)
"The prognosis of pulmonary blastoma is very poor; overall five-year survival is 16%."2.47Classic biphasic pulmonary blastoma: a case report and review of the literature. ( Boeykens, E; Rutsaert, R; Stappaerts, I; Van Loo, S, 2011)
"Bone biopsy confirmed metastases of prostate cancer."1.62False-Positive 18F-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-1007 PET/CT Caused by Hepatic Multifocal Inflammatory Foci. ( Canelo, A; Ladrón-de-Guevara, D; Piottante, A; Regonesi, C, 2021)
"The osteosarcoma was only partially sensitive to the molecular-targeting drug sorafenib, which did not arrest its growth."1.46Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R regresses an osteosarcoma in a patient-derived xenograft model resistant to a molecular-targeting drug. ( Chishima, T; Dry, SM; Eilber, FC; Elliott, I; Endo, I; Federman, N; Hiroshima, Y; Hoffman, RM; Igarashi, K; Kawaguchi, K; Kiyuna, T; Li, Y; Matsuyama, R; Murakami, T; Nelson, SD; Russell, T; Singh, A; Tanaka, K; Yanagawa, J; Zhang, Y; Zhao, M, 2017)
"To evaluated patterns and outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT)."1.43Clinical analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living-donor liver transplantation. ( Hong, TH; Kim, DG; Na, GH; You, YK, 2016)
"Oral squamous cell carcinoma often causes bone invasion resulting in poor prognosis and affects the quality of life for patients."1.42Synergistic Effect of Sorafenib and Radiation on Human Oral Carcinoma in vivo. ( Chang, B; Chen, JC; Chiang, IT; Hsu, FT; Hwang, JJ; Kwang, WK; Liu, YC, 2015)
"The occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is closely associated with viral hepatitis or alcoholic hepatitis."1.42Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Cervical Spine and Pelvic Bone Metastases Presenting as Unknown Primary Neoplasm. ( Chun, HG; Chun, HJ; Hong, SH; Hwang, SW; Jung, ES; Lee, JE; Lee, JM; Lee, MA; Lee, SH, 2015)
"Osteosarcoma is a rare but aggressive bone neoplasm in humans, which is commonly treated with surgery, classical chemotherapy and radiation."1.40Human osteosarcoma cells respond to sorafenib chemotherapy by downregulation of the tumor progression factors S100A4, CXCR4 and the oncogene FOS. ( Burger, S; Gallè, B; Mair, G; Miller, I; Steinborn, R; Walter, I; Wolfesberger, B, 2014)
"Sorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that targets tumor growth and angiogenesis signal transduction pathways."1.39[Complete response after sorafenib therapy plus zoledronic acid for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with bone metastasis - a case report]. ( Natori, T; Yamaguchi, M, 2013)
"Hyponatremia is reported to be associated with poor survival in localized renal cell carcinoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immunotherapy."1.38Impact of hyponatremia on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with molecular targeted therapy. ( Arai, Y; Kawashima, A; Nakai, Y; Nin, M; Nishimura, K; Nonomura, N; Takayama, H; Tanigawa, G; Tsujimura, A; Uemura, M, 2012)
" Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 92% of all patients necessitating sorafenib discontinuation in 77%."1.38High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Fischer, L; Nashan, B; Seegers, B; Staufer, K; Sterneck, M; Vettorazzi, E, 2012)
"We report a case of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the native kidney of a renal transplant recipient."1.35Multidisciplinary treatment including sorafenib stabilized the bone metastases of renal cell carcinoma in an immunosuppressed renal transplant recipient. ( Hasegawa, Y; Matsubara, A; Mita, K; Ohdan, H, 2009)
"Due to the long-lasting course of CLL second cancers can occur in these patients."1.34[Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and loss of strength in the right arm--not a typical combination]. ( Bargetzi, M; Puric, E; Schönenberger, A; Sendi, P, 2007)
" Safety was acceptable, with the most common adverse events consisting of hand-foot skin reaction, cutaneous rash, diarrhoea, fatigue and hypertension."1.34Safety and activity of sorafenib in different histotypes of advanced renal cell carcinoma. ( Bajetta, E; Catena, L; Gevorgyan, A; Guadalupi, V; Mancin, M; Martinetti, A; Platania, M; Procopio, G; Pusceddu, S; Verzoni, E, 2007)

Research

Studies (61)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's7 (11.48)29.6817
2010's51 (83.61)24.3611
2020's3 (4.92)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Giordano, G1
Merlini, A1
Ferrero, G1
Mesiano, G1
Fiorino, E1
Brusco, S1
Centomo, ML1
Leuci, V1
D'Ambrosio, L2
Aglietta, M2
Sangiolo, D2
Grignani, G2
Pignochino, Y2
Ladrón-de-Guevara, D1
Canelo, A1
Piottante, A1
Regonesi, C1
Watabe, T1
Uemura, M2
Soeda, F1
Naka, S1
Ujike, T1
Hatano, K1
Sasaki, H1
Kamiya, T1
Shimosegawa, E1
Kato, H1
Cardinale, J1
Tateishi, U1
Nonomura, N2
Giesel, FL1
Jian, C1
Tu, MJ1
Ho, PY1
Duan, Z1
Zhang, Q1
Qiu, JX1
DeVere White, RW1
Wun, T1
Lara, PN1
Lam, KS1
Yu, AX1
Yu, AM1
García Carretero, R1
Vazquez-Gomez, O1
Romero Brugera, M1
Rebollo-Aparicio, N1
Panagiotidis, E1
Paschali, A1
Giannoula, E1
Chatzipavlidou, V1
Jiang, W1
Zeng, ZC1
Vrdoljak, E1
Rini, B1
Schmidinger, M1
Omrčen, T1
Torday, L1
Szczylik, C2
Sella, A1
Haraldsdottir, S1
Li, Q1
Villalona-Calero, MA1
Olencki, TE1
Kendra, K1
Ing, SW1
Smidt-Hansen, T1
Folkmar, TB1
Fode, K1
Agerbaek, M1
Donskov, F1
Natori, T1
Yamaguchi, M1
Clyne, M1
Thompson, PA1
Drissi, R1
Muscal, JA1
Panditharatna, E1
Fouladi, M1
Ingle, AM1
Ahern, CH1
Reid, JM1
Lin, T1
Weigel, BJ1
Blaney, SM1
Walter, I2
Wolfesberger, B2
Miller, I1
Mair, G1
Burger, S1
Gallè, B1
Steinborn, R1
Massicotte, MH1
Brassard, M1
Claude-Desroches, M1
Borget, I1
Bonichon, F1
Giraudet, AL1
Do Cao, C1
Chougnet, CN1
Leboulleux, S1
Baudin, E1
Schlumberger, M1
de la Fouchardière, C1
McKay, RR1
Lin, X2
Perkins, JJ1
Heng, DY1
Simantov, R2
Choueiri, TK1
Pitoia, F1
Massarweh, S1
Moss, J1
Wang, C1
Romond, E1
Slone, S1
Weiss, H1
Karabakhtsian, RG1
Napier, D1
Black, EP1
Palmerini, E1
Ferraresi, V1
Bertulli, R1
Asaftei, SD1
Tamburini, A1
Marchesi, E1
Capozzi, F1
Biagini, R1
Gambarotti, M1
Fagioli, F1
Casali, PG1
Picci, P1
Ferrari, S1
Cathomas, R1
Rothermundt, C1
Bode, B1
Fuchs, B1
von Moos, R1
Schwitter, M1
Interiano, RB1
McCarville, MB1
Wu, J1
Davidoff, AM1
Sandoval, J1
Navid, F1
Eichelberg, C1
Vervenne, WL1
De Santis, M1
Fischer von Weikersthal, L1
Goebell, PJ1
Lerchenmüller, C1
Zimmermann, U1
Bos, MM1
Freier, W1
Schirrmacher-Memmel, S1
Staehler, M1
Pahernik, S1
Los, M1
Schenck, M1
Flörcken, A1
van Arkel, C1
Hauswald, K1
Indorf, M1
Gottstein, D1
Michel, MS1
Thoma, C1
Albiges, L1
Escudier, B1
Hwang, SW1
Lee, JE1
Lee, JM1
Hong, SH2
Lee, MA1
Chun, HG1
Chun, HJ1
Lee, SH1
Jung, ES1
Hsu, FT1
Chang, B1
Chen, JC1
Chiang, IT1
Liu, YC1
Kwang, WK1
Hwang, JJ1
Zhang, Y2
Li, Y2
Cai, Y1
Wang, K1
Li, H1
Stieb, S1
Riesterer, O1
Brüssow, C1
Pestalozzi, B1
Guckenberger, M1
Weiler, S1
Yılmaz, S1
Özçakar, ZB1
Taktak, A1
Kiremitçi, S1
Ensari, A1
Dinçaslan, H1
Yalçınkaya, F1
Grünwald, V1
Kalanovic, D1
Na, GH1
Hong, TH1
You, YK1
Kim, DG1
Murakami, T1
Igarashi, K1
Kawaguchi, K1
Kiyuna, T1
Zhao, M1
Hiroshima, Y1
Nelson, SD1
Dry, SM1
Yanagawa, J1
Russell, T1
Federman, N1
Singh, A1
Elliott, I1
Matsuyama, R1
Chishima, T1
Tanaka, K1
Endo, I1
Eilber, FC1
Hoffman, RM1
Kim, SH1
Kim, S1
Nam, BH1
Lee, SE1
Kim, CS1
Seo, IY1
Kim, TN1
Kwon, TG1
Seo, SI1
Joo, KJ1
Song, K1
Kwak, C1
Chung, J1
Aragon-Ching, JB1
Jain, L1
Gulley, JL1
Arlen, PM1
Wright, JJ2
Steinberg, SM1
Draper, D1
Venitz, J1
Jones, E1
Chen, CC1
Figg, WD1
Dahut, WL1
Zimmermann, K1
Schmittel, A1
Steiner, U1
Asemissen, AM1
Knoedler, M1
Thiel, E1
Miller, K1
Keilholz, U1
Tonar, Z1
Gerner, W1
Skalicky, M1
Heiduschka, G1
Egerbacher, M1
Thalhammer, JG1
Zołnierek, J1
Nurzyński, P1
Langiewicz, P1
Oborska, S1
Waśko-Grabowska, A1
Kuszatal, E1
Obrocka, B1
Spector, E1
Franklin, MJ1
Truskinovsky, AM1
Dudek, AZ1
Hoftijzer, H1
Heemstra, KA1
Morreau, H1
Stokkel, MP1
Corssmit, EP1
Gelderblom, H1
Weijers, K1
Pereira, AM1
Huijberts, M1
Kapiteijn, E1
Romijn, JA1
Smit, JW1
Hasegawa, Y1
Mita, K1
Matsubara, A1
Ohdan, H1
Ide, S1
Soda, H1
Hakariya, T1
Takemoto, S1
Ishimoto, H1
Tomari, S1
Sawai, T1
Nagashima, S1
Furukawa, M1
Nakamura, Y1
Kohno, S1
Bellmunt, J1
Maroto-Rey, P1
Trigo, JM1
Carles, J1
Guillem, V1
López-Martín, JA1
Antón-Torres, A1
Urruticoechea, L1
Lu, X1
Tang, X1
Guo, W1
Ren, T1
Zhao, H1
Merz, M1
Komljenovic, D1
Zwick, S1
Semmler, W1
Bäuerle, T1
Tagawa, ST1
Milowsky, MI1
Jeske, S1
Mazumdar, M1
Kung, S1
Sung, M1
Lehrer, D1
Matulich, D1
Selzer, J1
Nanus, DM1
Kusuda, Y1
Miyake, H1
Behnsawy, HM1
Fukuhara, T1
Inoue, TA1
Fujisawa, M1
Van Loo, S1
Boeykens, E1
Stappaerts, I1
Rutsaert, R1
Cuesta, L1
Betlloch, I1
Toledo, F1
Latorre, N1
Monteagudo, A1
Rastogi, A1
Bihari, C1
Jain, D1
Gupta, NL1
Sarin, SK1
Svoboda, RM1
Mackay, D1
Welsch, MJ1
Anderson, BE1
Kawashima, A1
Tsujimura, A1
Takayama, H1
Arai, Y1
Nin, M1
Tanigawa, G1
Nakai, Y1
Nishimura, K1
Staufer, K1
Fischer, L1
Seegers, B1
Vettorazzi, E1
Nashan, B1
Sterneck, M1
Saito, K1
Bracarda, S1
Porta, C1
Boni, C1
Santoro, A1
Mucciarini, C1
Pazzola, A1
Cortesi, E1
Gasparro, D1
Labianca, R1
Di Costanzo, F1
Falcone, A1
Cinquini, M1
Caserta, C1
Paglino, C1
De Angelis, V1
Vázquez-Alonso, F1
Puche-Sanz, I1
Beuselinck, B1
Wolter, P1
Karadimou, A1
Elaidi, R1
Dumez, H1
Rogiers, A1
Van Cann, T1
Willems, L1
Body, JJ1
Berkers, J1
Van Poppel, H1
Lerut, E1
Debruyne, P1
Paridaens, R1
Schöffski, P1
Takagi, Y1
Kametaka, H1
Makino, H1
Koyama, T1
Seike, K1
Hara, J1
Hasegawa, A1
Sciarra, A1
Autran Gomez, AM1
Gentilucci, A1
Parente, U1
Salciccia, S1
Gentile, V1
Di Silverio, F1
Sendi, P1
Puric, E1
Schönenberger, A1
Bargetzi, M1
Procopio, G1
Verzoni, E1
Gevorgyan, A1
Mancin, M1
Pusceddu, S1
Catena, L1
Platania, M1
Guadalupi, V1
Martinetti, A1
Bajetta, E1

Clinical Trials (19)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase II Study of Adding the Multikinase Inhibitor Sorafenib (Nexavar) to Existing Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer[NCT00525161]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated (stopped due to Slow accrual and loss of funding)
A Phase II, Open Label, Non-randomized Study of Second or Third Line Treatment With the Combination of Sorafenib and Everolimus in Patients Affected by Relapsed and Non-resectable High-grade Osteosarcoma[NCT01804374]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Apatinib in Relapsed and Unresectable High-grade Osteosarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy[NCT02711007]Phase 2/Phase 337 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized Sequential Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib Followed by Sunitinib Versus Sunitinib Followed by Sorafenib in the Treatment of First-Line Advanced / Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00732914]Phase 3272 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Randomized, Double-blind Phase 2 Study Of Axitinib (Ag-013736) With Or Without Dose Titration In Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00835978]Phase 2213 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Phase II Study Of Single-Agent SU011248 In The Second-Line Treatment Of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00054886]Phase 263 participants Interventional2003-01-31Completed
AG-013736 (AXITINIB) FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC RENAL CELL CANCER[NCT00920816]Phase 3492 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-25Completed
A Phase 2 Efficacy And Safety Study Of SU011248 Administered In A Continuous Daily Regimen In Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00137423]Phase 2107 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Phase 3b, Randomized, Open-Label Study Of Bevacizumab + Temsirolimus Vs. Bevacizumab + Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Treatment In Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00631371]Phase 3791 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
AXITINIB (AG-013736) AS SECOND LINE THERAPY FOR METASTATIC RENAL CELL CANCER: AXIS TRIAL[NCT00678392]Phase 3723 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-03Completed
A Phase II Efficacy And Safety Study Of Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) Administered In A Continuous Daily Regimen In Patients With Advanced (First-Line) Renal Cell Cancer[NCT00338884]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Randomized Trial Of Temsirolimus Versus Sorafenib As Second-Line Therapy In Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Failed First-Line Sunitinib Therapy[NCT00474786]Phase 3512 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Sunitinib Malate Schedule 4/2 vs. Sunitinib Malate Continuous Dosing As First-Line Therapy For Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer (Renal EFFECT Trial)[NCT00267748]Phase 2317 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Pivotal Study Of SU011248 In The Treatment Of Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00077974]Phase 2106 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized Study Of SU011248 Versus Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Systemic Therapy For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00083889]Phase 3750 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
A Phase 3, Three-Arm, Randomized, Open-Label Study Of Interferon Alfa Alone, CCI-779 Alone, And The Combination Of Interferon Alfa And CCI-779 In First-Line Poor-Prognosis Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.[NCT00065468]Phase 3626 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
An Open-label, Prospective Study of Tumor Response Time of Palbociclib in Combination With AI in Real-world First-line Treatment of Postmenopausal Chinese Patients With ER (+) HER2 (-) Metastatic Breast Cancer[NCT04858997]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-22Recruiting
A Phase II Study of BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) in Metastatic, Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer[NCT00090545]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-01Completed
Sorafenib as Adjuvant to Radioiodine Therapy in Non-Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma[NCT00887107]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Clinical Benefit Rate

Clinical benefit rate is defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease (CR/PR/SD) as measured by Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for a minimum of at least 24 weeks. (NCT00525161)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sorafenib & Endocrine Therapy50

Time to Progression

(NCT00525161)
Timeframe: continuously

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sorafenib & Endocrine Therapy6.1

Response Rate

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. Patients were followed monthly for clinical and toxicity evaluation. Disease response by RECIST criteria v1.0 was assessed after 3 months by appropriate scans and these were obtained every 2 months thereafter until progression. (NCT00525161)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after treatment & 8 weeks after initial documentation of response

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stable DiseaseProgression
Sorafenib & Endocrine Therapy73

Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Axitinib

Clearance (CL) of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed (F). Clearance is defined as the volume of blood from which drug can be completely removed per unit of time. CL/F for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

InterventionL/hr (Geometric Mean)
Active Titration Arm54.15
Placebo Titration Arm61.93

Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Elimination Phase (Vz/F) for Axitinib

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Vz/F is influenced by the fraction absorbed. Vz/F for steady-state axitinb was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Active Titration Arm158.18
Placebo Titration Arm216.62

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours[AUC(0-24)] for Axitinib

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero 24 hours[AUC(0-24). AUC(0-24) for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

Interventionng.hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Active Titration Arm258.68
Placebo Titration Arm161.38

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Axitinib

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measurable concentration (AUClast). AUClast for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

Interventionng.hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Active Titration Arm105.33
Placebo Titration Arm78.44

Duration of Response (DR)

DR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (complete response - CR or Partial response - PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median values were estimated based on Kaplan-Meier method. 95% confidence interval was based on the Brookmeyer and Crowley method. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Active Titration ArmNA
Placebo Titration Arm21.2
Non-randomized Arm23.3

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Axitinib

Cmax for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 15 (C2D15): pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Active Titration Arm31.74
Placebo Titration Arm23.05

Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

ORR was defined as the proportion of participants with objective response based assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. No new lesions. PR was defined as >=30% decrease on study under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Active Titration Arm53.6
Placebo Titration Arm33.9
Non-randomized Arm59.3
All Participants48.4

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from date of the first dose of the study medication to date of death due to any cause. For participants who did not die, their survival times were to be censored at the last date they were known to be alive. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Active Titration Arm (FA Population)42.7
Placebo Titration Arm (FA Population)30.4
Non-randomized Arm (SA Population)41.6

Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) for Axitinib

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Plasma decay half life for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

Interventionhr (Mean)
Active Titration Arm2.48
Placebo Titration Arm2.81

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The time from first dose administration to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. PFS in each arm was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimates of the PFS curves from the Kaplan-Meier method were presented. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Active Titration Arm14.5
Placebo Titration Arm15.7
Non-randomized Arm16.6
All Participants14.6

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Axitinib,

Tmax for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose

Interventionhrs (Median)
Active Titration Arm2.04
Placebo Titration Arm2.00

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Value at respective visit minus value at baseline. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At screening (D-14 to D-1); lead-in period: Cycle 1 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 2 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 3 & subsequent cycles Day 1; end of study and follow-up 28 days after last dose.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=52,51,73)Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=56,56,91)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=56,56,91)Cycle 2 Day 15 (n=55,55,86)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=48,49,84)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=45,48,79)End of treatment (n=35,44,51)Follow-up (n=16,25,36)
Active Titration Arm-1.64.84.25.56.67.40.6-4.5
Non-randomized Arm0.511.510.59.79.18.73.01.8
Placebo Titration Arm-2.63.03.54.45.94.63.5-1.3

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure

Value at respective visit minus value at baseline (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At screening (D-14 to D-1); lead-in period: Cycle 1 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 2 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 3 & subsequent cycles Day 1; end of study and follow-up 28 days after last dose.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=52,51,73)Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=56,56,91)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=56,56,91)Cycle 2 Day 15 (n=55,55,86)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=48,49,84)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=45,48,79)End of treatment (n=35,44,51)Follow-up (n=16,25,36)
Active Titration Arm-4.33.81.93.63.54.32.4-3.6
Non-randomized Arm-1.811.59.95.95.25.5-2.8-0.6
Placebo Titration Arm-2.94.10.92.78.43.51.7-0.4

Circulating Endothelial Cells (CECs) in Blood: CD31+/CD146+

CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD31+/CD146+ CECs, CD31+/CD146+ MFI PDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ MFI pPDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ pVEGFR, CD31+/CD146+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)

,,
InterventionFluorescent Intensity Unit (FIU) (Mean)
Baseline CECs Count (n=17,22,20)Baseline MFI PDGFR-BETA (n=17,21,20)Baseline MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=17,21,20)Baseline MFI pVEGFR (n=17,22,20)Baseline MFI VEGFR (n=17,22,20)
Active Titration Arm74668333760380139385617330333
Non-randomized Arm77437442642383202380184359097
Placebo Titration Arm76258380886355441352644401909

Comparison of Circulating Endothelial Cells (CECs) in Blood: Cluster of Differentiation (CD)146+/CD105+ at Baseline

CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD146+/CD105+ CECs, CD146+/CD105+ mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ MFI phospho-PDGFR (pPDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ phospho-Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (pVEGFR), CD146+/CD105+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)

,,
InterventionFluorescent Intensity Unit (FIU) (Mean)
Baseline CECs Count (n=17,22,20)Baseline MFI PDGFR-BETA (n=17,22,20)Baseline MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=17,22,20)Baseline MFI pVEGFR (n=16,22,20)Baseline MFI VEGFR (n=16,22,20)
Active Titration Arm23584346815401226456086367799
Non-randomized Arm29663327567397672398754359092
Placebo Titration Arm28544455238395509436197473290

Comparison of Ratio of CECs in Blood: CD31+/CD146+ at Each Time Point to Baseline

CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD31+/CD146+ CECs, CD31+/CD146+ MFI PDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ MFI pPDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ pVEGFR, CD31+/CD146+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At end of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 15), Cycle 2 Day 15 and End of therapy (EOT)

,,
InterventionRatio (Mean)
C1D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=11,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=13,16,11)EOT:C1D1 CECs COUNT (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=11,15,13)C2D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=13,14,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=6,8,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=11,15,13)C2D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=13,14,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI pPDGFRBETA (n=6,8,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=11,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=13,16,10)EOT:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=11,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR n=13,16,10)EOT:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=7,9,4)
Active Titration Arm2.71.41.51.21.41.21.21.20.71.11.20.71.31.51.2
Non-randomized Arm1.52.50.60.82.21.71.01.13.01.21.33.11.02.11.5
Placebo Titration Arm1.62.21.41.31.10.61.40.80.81.40.91.11.31.21.1

Comparison of the Ratio of CECs in Blood: CD146+/CD105+ at Each Time Point to Baseline

CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD146+/CD105+ CECs, CD146+/CD105+ MFI platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ MFI phospho-PDGFR (pPDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ phospho-VEGFR (pVEGFR), CD146+/CD105+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At end of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 15), Cycle 2 Day 15 and End of therapy (EOT)

,,
InterventionRatio (Mean)
C1D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=11,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=13,16,11)EOT:C1D1 CECs Count (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=11,17,13)C2D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=13,16,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=11,17,13)C2D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=13,16,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI pPDGFRBETA (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=10,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=12,16,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=7,9,4)C1D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=10,18,14)C2D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=12,16,11)EOT:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=7,9,4)
Active Titration Arm2.31.32.81.31.41.51.11.00.81.01.00.81.41.51.1
Non-randomized Arm2.21.31.21.12.21.21.01.21.91.21.23.01.02.11.9
Placebo Titration Arm3.74.48.91.51.10.61.20.80.81.20.91.31.31.30.7

ORR in Subgroups That Were Defined by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGFA) or Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 3 (VEGFR3) Polymorphisms

ORR, defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR according to RECIST, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFA or VEGFR3 polymorphisms. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/A (n = 7, 9, 14)VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/C (n = 22, 20, 41)VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: C/C (n = 14, 14, 24)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/G (n = 22, 23, 43)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/A (n = 19, 16, 29)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: A/A (n = 2, 4, 7)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/G (n = 16, 15, 28)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/C (n = 22, 22, 35)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: C/C (n = 5, 6, 16)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/A (n = 36, 39, 79)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/G (n = 6, 4, 9)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: G/G (n = 1, 0, 0)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/G (n = 36, 38, 79)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/T (n = 6, 5, 10)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: T/T (n = 1, 0, 0)
Active Titration Arm85.754.550.059.157.950.081.345.540.058.350.0100.055.666.7100.0
Non-randomized Arm42.965.966.767.458.642.960.757.175.064.344.4065.240.00
Placebo Titration Arm22.235.035.739.118.850.053.318.233.330.850.0028.960.00

PFS in Subgroups That Were Defined by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGFA) or Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 3 (VEGFR3) Polymorphisms

PFS, defined as the time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFA or VEGFR3 polymorphisms. Estimates of the PFS curves from the Kaplan-Meier method were presented. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)

,,
InterventionMonths (Median)
VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/A (n = 7, 9, 14)VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/C (n = 22, 20, 41)VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: C/C (n = 14, 14, 41)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/G (n = 22, 23, 43)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/A (n = 19, 16, 29)VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: A/A (n = 2, 4, 29)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/G (n = 16, 15, 28)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/C (n = 22, 22, 35)VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: C/C (n = 5, 6, 16)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/A (n = 36, 39, 70)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/G (n = 6, 4, 9)VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: G/G (n = 0, 0, 0)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/G (n = 36, 38, 69)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/T (n = 36, 38, 10)VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: T/T (n = 1, 0, 0)
Active Titration ArmNA11.0718.7414.6212.78NA17.449.1811.0713.7316.52NA12.7824.80NA
Non-randomized Arm7.3316.5925.1325.1313.908.5722.5413.83NA16.5616.26NA16.5913.86NA
Placebo Titration Arm11.509.6724.6419.428.3410.0419.428.3115.6715.677.93NA15.678.34NA

Duration of Response (DR): First-Line Participants

Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response that is subsequently confirmed to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (First-line Participants)14.7
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)14.3

Duration of Response (DR): Second-Line Participants

Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response that is subsequently confirmed to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)NA
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)8.7

Overall Survival (OS): First-Line Participants

Time in months from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (First-line Participants)NA
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)NA

Overall Survival (OS): Second-Line Participants

Time in months from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)17.2
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)18.1

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR): First-Line Participants

Percentage of participants with OR based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Axitinib (First-line Participants)32.3
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)14.6

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR): Second-Line Participants

Percentage of participants with OR based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)23.7
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)10.1

Progression Free Survival (PFS): First-Line Participants

"Time in months from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS calculated as (first event date minus date of randomization plus 1)/30.4. Tumor progression determined from oncologic assessment data (where it meets criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where outcome was Death). Progression using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is >= 20 percent (%) increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (First-line Participants)10.1
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)6.5

Progression Free Survival (PFS): Second-Line Participants

"Time in months from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS calculated as (first event date minus date of randomization plus 1)/30.4. Tumor progression determined from oncologic assessment data (where it meets criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where outcome was Death). Progression using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is >= 20 percent (%) increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)6.5
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)4.8

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Index Score: First-Line Participants

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1C22 D1C23 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (First-line Participants)0.7100.7090.6940.6960.7080.6830.6850.6780.7040.6820.6980.7080.7080.7030.6890.7020.7060.6990.7130.6990.7120.7370.7360.6350.545
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)0.7120.6930.6870.6680.6730.6410.6760.7170.7290.7230.7480.7420.7610.7310.7550.7750.7380.7770.7620.7100.7020.7740.7890.5880.618

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Index Score: Second-Line Participants

"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)0.8120.7690.7720.7370.7800.7670.7620.7580.7960.7680.7920.7970.7860.8330.8190.8110.8340.8300.8300.8320.8590.5820.429
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)0.8310.7540.7550.7590.7680.7530.7680.7330.7940.8200.8480.8370.8140.8710.8290.8280.8650.8290.8610.9230.8520.6230.418

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS): First-Line Participants

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0: worst imaginable health state to 100: best imaginable health state; higher scores indicate a better health state. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1C22 D1C23 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (First-line Participants)71.18171.71472.00672.17972.45171.57471.05071.03172.69072.91072.76373.61073.03073.14774.49473.87873.09073.81772.08974.24475.69478.00077.14367.25469.195
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)72.36272.42271.24172.08673.61569.94473.92373.18373.78072.40072.27175.29575.43275.10874.40575.81874.33375.57175.12574.19070.50073.91772.57167.04864.885

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Second-Line Participants

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0: worst imaginable health state to 100: best imaginable health state; higher scores indicate a better health state. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)82.79981.10280.89581.13883.01882.22282.90083.38284.17183.04184.13684.30582.92786.52085.84187.57988.42486.58689.50090.33390.31375.56858.154
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)82.05878.23180.53481.24580.25080.82980.86881.00083.78882.77883.00083.50083.30086.66786.46286.08384.30083.12582.14386.00084.16774.74164.333

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index -Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS): First-Line Participants

FKSI-DRS: subset of FKSI which is FACT-Kidney Symptom Index questionnaire used to assess QoL for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. FKSI contains 15 questions and FKSI-DRS 9 questions (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, hematuria) each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FKSI-DRS total score 0 to 36; higher scores associated with better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1 (C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1C22 D1C23 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (First-line Participants)28.69128.72829.17128.57729.02028.57428.56828.55728.81729.05729.14629.64829.54529.57929.85929.68329.56429.38029.73729.84430.88931.69631.35726.55626.805
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)29.65329.96329.75029.64230.25529.15329.52330.29630.18630.36430.68830.72731.48331.02730.73031.51531.56731.10731.41730.76230.05631.00031.14326.78626.769

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index -Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS): Second-Line Participants

FKSI-DRS: subset of FKSI which is FACT-Kidney Symptom Index questionnaire used to assess QoL for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. FKSI contains 15 questions and FKSI-DRS 9 questions (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, hematuria) each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FKSI-DRS total score 0 to 36; higher scores associated with better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)31.02030.60030.64530.10330.67630.73130.92030.96631.01230.98631.21231.35631.41832.10032.00031.92132.06131.93132.36431.90533.12528.21624.692
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)31.48930.68230.96530.67931.06331.43930.63230.70330.66730.92632.04532.00032.10032.80032.76933.16732.80032.62532.42933.50033.50029.51927.500

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-15 (FKSI-15): First-Line Participants

FKSI-15 questionnaires (lack of energy, side effects, pain, weight loss, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria, sleep) was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer. Questions answered on 5-point Likert scale: 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score 0 to 60; higher scores=better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1C22 D1C23 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (First-line Participants)43.86943.32843.36642.93243.21142.78742.47442.53442.77843.12043.26443.96244.14143.78944.17644.23243.89743.76143.73743.73345.41747.00047.57139.05239.683
Sorafenib (First-line Participants)43.86543.96943.34542.92644.02242.34443.44644.07744.05144.01845.00045.31845.78745.45945.51446.00046.40045.35745.58344.33343.50045.83345.71439.52440.038

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-15 (FKSI-15): Second-Line Participants

FKSI-15 questionnaires (lack of energy, side effects, pain, weight loss, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria, sleep) was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer. Questions answered on 5-point Likert scale: 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score 0 to 60; higher scores=better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1 D1C2 D1C3 D1C4 D1C5 D1C6 D1C7 D1C8 D1C9 D1C10 D1C11 D1C12 D1C13 D1C14 D1C15 D1C16 D1C17 D1C18 D1C19 D1C20 D1C21 D1End of treatmentFollow-up
Axitinib (Second-line Participants)46.75346.21745.96845.06045.77545.40745.70945.16945.82945.60845.83345.79746.72747.74048.02348.18447.90948.13848.63648.81050.18841.43235.385
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants)47.47045.04545.68445.79246.12546.34145.05345.67645.97046.14847.22748.09147.60049.13349.30850.50049.00049.12548.57150.50050.00042.88938.583

Duration of Tumor Response

Using RECIST criteria: date of 1st objective tumor response (CR or PR) subsequently confirmed to date of 1st objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause within 28 days after last dose of study medication, whichever was first. Censored on day after the date of the last oncologic assessment documenting no tumor progression. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up

Interventionweeks (Median)
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)24.0
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)32.0

Objective Response (Complete Response[CR] + Partial Response[PR]) in Subjects

Confirmed objective responses using RECIST criteria defined as responses persisting on repeat imaging study for 2 assessments with at least 4 weeks between, and evaluating all target and non-target sites followed since baseline. Two PRs separated by an SD or NE visit in between was considered a confirmed response if the 2 PRs were > 4 weeks apart. CR=disappearance of all target lesions. PR is a >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)15
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)6

Overall Survival

Overall survival is time from the date of first dose of medication to the date of death due to any cause (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up

Interventionweeks (Median)
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)91.4
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)76.4

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Using RECIST criteria: Time from date 1st dose study medication to date 1st documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause occurring on treatment including within 28 days after last dose, whichever occurred 1st. Censored on day following the date of last oncologic assessment documenting absence of tumor progression. PFS based on the number of subjects with measurable disease at baseline, the correct histological cancer type, and had disease that was refractory to prior cytokine-based therapy(105 in total group). (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up

Interventionweeks (Median)
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)35.7
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)35.3

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

Time from date of first dose of study medication to date of first documentation of objective tumor progression using RECIST criteria that occurred on treatment including within 28 days after the last dose of study medication. TTP censored on the day following the date of last oncologic assessment documenting absence of tumor progression. TTP based on the number of subjects with measurable disease at baseline, the correct histological cancer type, and had disease that was refractory to prior cytokine-based therapy(105 in total group). (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up

Interventionweeks (Median)
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)35.7
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)35.9

Change From Baseline in Euro-QoL Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Weighted Health Index

EQ-5D health status in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, pain / discomfort, anxiety / depression, usual activities) with a weighted health index based on general population values where 0.0=death and 1.0 = perfect health. Change: median index score at observation minus median index score at baseline. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.

,
Interventionscore on scale (Median)
Maximum IncreaseMaximum Decrease
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)0.00.0
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)0.0-0.1

Change From Baseline in EuroQoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) Overall Health Thermometer Score

"EQ-VAS score on the self-rated thermometer indicated the patient's own assessment of their health status from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) imaginable health state. Change: median score at observation minus median score at baseline. Maximum changes (increase or decrease from baseline)." (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.

,
Interventionscore on scale (Median)
Maximum IncreaseMaximum Decrease
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)0.0-10.0
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248)0.0-9.0

Summary of FACIT Fatigue Scale Overall Score

FACIT Fatigue Scale: Overall score from 13-questionnaire, which measures fatigue / asthenia for patients with chronic, life-threatening illnesses. For each question, a patient rates his / her condition for the past week on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores always represent less fatigue / asthenia. Outcome based on completed questionnaires. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.

,
Interventionscore on scale (Mean)
Baseline Score n=52,52Maximum Post-Baseline Score n=53,52Minimum Post-Baseline Score n=53,52
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate39.543.428.0
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate39.642.729.4

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censored at the last date known alive. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until death due to any cause, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus25.8
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa25.5

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Complete Response/Partial Response): Independent-Assessment

Percentage of participants with OR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30% decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus27.0
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa27.4

Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Independent-Assessment

PFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization until the earlier date of progression or death. Progression was assessed by independent imaging reviewers using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria which is 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions from nadir (the lowest blood counts); measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus9.1
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa9.3

Progression-Free Survival (PFS): Investigator-Assessment

PFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization until the earlier date of progression or death. Progression was assessed by investigator imaging reviewers using RECIST criteria which is 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions from nadir (the lowest blood counts); measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus9.1
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa10.8

Duration of Response (DR)

DR: time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR), that was subsequently confirmed, to the first documentation of PD or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first as per RECIST version 1.0, a) CR: disappearance of all target, non target lesions and no appearance of new lesions, documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks, b) PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum of LD, without progression of non target lesions, no appearance of new lesions, c) PD: >=20% increase in sum of LD of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of pleural effusion or ascites if demonstrated by cytological investigation, not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib 5 mg11.0
Sorafenib 400 mg10.6

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR = percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.0 recorded from first dose of study treatment until PD or death due to any cause. CR: disappearance of all target, non target lesions and no appearance of new lesions, documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks. PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum of LD, without progression of non target lesions, no appearance of new lesions. PD: >=20% increase in sum of LD of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of pleural effusion or ascites if demonstrated by cytological investigation, not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Axitinib 5 mg19.4
Sorafenib 400 mg9.4

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the duration from start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (months) = (date of death minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.4. For participants who were alive, overall survival was censored on last date the participants were known to be alive. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib 5 mg20.1
Sorafenib 400 mg19.2

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time in months from start of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor progression of disease (PD) or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. PD: >=20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest dimensions (LD) of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of a pleural effusion or ascites was also considered PD if demonstrated by cytological investigation and it was not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented were considered PD if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib 5 mg6.7
Sorafenib 400 mg4.7

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D): Health State Profile Utility Score

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility or index score. Health state profile component assesses level of health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain was rated on a 3-point response scale (1= no problems, 2= some/moderate problems and 3= extreme problems). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigned a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score were transformed and resulted in a total score range of 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n =347, 341)Cycle 2/Day1 (n =326, 307)Cycle 3/Day1 (n =287, 248)Cycle 4/Day1 (n =262, 226)Cycle 5/Day1 (n =244, 207)Cycle 6/Day1 (n =221, 178)Cycle 7/Day1 (n =213, 163)Cycle 8/Day1 (n =181, 136)Cycle 9/Day1 (n =169, 120)Cycle 10/Day1 (n =151, 98)Cycle 11/Day1 (n =126, 87)Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 73)Cycle 13/Day1 (n =96, 61)Cycle 14/Day1 (n =80, 57)Cycle 15/Day1 (n =63, 41)Cycle 16/Day1 (n =54, 37)Cycle 17/Day1 (n =48, 29)Cycle 18/Day1 (n =37, 20)Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14)Cycle 20/Day1 (n =21, 12)Cycle 21/Day1 (n =16, 7)End of Treatment (n =169, 196)Follow up (n =76, 106)
Axitinib 5 mg0.7320.7160.7220.7300.7300.7340.7180.7560.7600.7340.7640.7440.7600.7230.7300.7490.7790.7550.7340.7940.7000.6080.682
Sorafenib 400 mg0.7310.6960.7090.7160.7110.7040.7280.7020.7300.7300.7240.7340.7530.7520.7580.7850.7640.7550.8040.7710.7710.6120.666

Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D): Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. VAS component: participants rated their current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n =341, 339)Cycle 2/Day1 (n =317, 302)Cycle 3/Day1 (n =280, 250)Cycle 4/Day1 (n =261, 224)Cycle 5/Day1 (n =244, 205)Cycle 6/Day1 (n =220, 178)Cycle 7/Day1 (n =209, 163)Cycle 8/Day1 (n =180, 139)Cycle 9/Day1 (n =168, 121)Cycle 10/Day1 (n =151, 98)Cycle 11/Day1 (n =126, 87)Cycle 12/Day1 (n =111, 73)Cycle 13/Day1 (n =94, 61)Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 58)Cycle 15/Day1 (n =62, 42)Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 37)Cycle 17/Day1 (n =48, 30)Cycle 18/Day1 (n =37, 23)Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14)Cycle 20/Day1 (n =21, 12)Cycle 21/Day1 (n =16, 7)End of Treatment (n =166, 197)Follow up (n =76, 109)
Axitinib 5 mg70.56069.00369.84369.18069.70569.90069.91970.75670.66770.62972.10371.73070.72369.42073.01670.26971.37570.45971.03473.14374.56361.75964.382
Sorafenib 400 mg70.35167.60669.71270.75971.88871.36572.28271.47573.38075.10274.58673.95975.69375.36275.35773.67673.76773.87070.57166.91764.71461.69066.037

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-15 (FKSI-15) Score

FKSI was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer and consisted of 15 items (lack of energy, side effects, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria and sleep). Each of the 15 items was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score = sum of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (very much); higher scores indicate greater presence of symptoms. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n =346, 342)Cycle 2/Day1 (n =319, 296)Cycle 3/Day1 (n =279, 246)Cycle 4/Day1 (n =257, 221)Cycle 5/Day1 (n =238, 203)Cycle 6/Day1 (n =213, 179)Cycle 7/Day1 (n =206, 158)Cycle 8/Day1 (n =177, 136)Cycle 9/Day1 (n =163, 118)Cycle 10/Day1 (n =146, 96)Cycle 11/Day1 (n =122, 85)Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 70)Cycle 13/Day1 (n =92, 58)Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 54)Cycle 15/Day1 (n =61, 38)Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 34)Cycle 17/Day1 (n =47, 28)Cycle 18/Day1 (n =36, 22)Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14)Cycle 20/Day1 (n =20, 12)Cycle 21/Day1 (n =15, 7)End of treatment (n=163, 191)Follow up (n =80, 110)
Axitinib 5 mg43.19942.35142.59042.79142.96842.94942.74743.58043.19143.31244.11944.51744.49244.48545.29145.21745.24244.86145.37947.05045.85038.32841.919
Sorafenib 400 mg43.33941.66842.42443.42442.90743.05743.57844.07444.51844.77144.43844.35745.26144.89845.05344.44544.43844.18245.02644.78044.49438.45740.028

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Score

FKSI-DRS was used to assess quality of life for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer and consisted of 9 items (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, and hematuria). Each of the 9 items was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI-DRS score = sum of the 9 item scores; total range: 0 - 36; 0 (no symptoms) to 36 (very much); higher scores indicate greater presence of symptoms. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n =346, 341)Cycle 2/Day1 (n =319, 295)Cycle 3/Day1 (n =279, 244)Cycle 4/Day1 (n =257, 220)Cycle 5/Day1 (n =238, 202)Cycle 6/Day1 (n =213, 178)Cycle 7/Day1 (n =206, 157)Cycle 8/Day1 (n =177, 135)Cycle 9/Day1 (n =163, 117)Cycle 10/Day1 (n =146, 96)Cycle 11/Day1 (n =122, 85)Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 70)Cycle 13/Day1 (n =92, 58)Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 54)Cycle 15/Day1 (n =61, 38)Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 34)Cycle 17/Day1 (n =47, 28)Cycle 18/Day1 (n =36, 22)Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14)Cycle 20/Day1 (n =20, 12)Cycle 21/Day1 (n =15, 7)End of Treatment (n =163, 191)Follow up (n =80, 110)
Axitinib 5 mg28.87428.21128.64028.82228.86929.15929.04229.52029.19429.34329.76229.76429.59429.71130.32430.43030.55130.19430.13031.30031.06726.28828.263
Sorafenib 400 mg28.97528.39928.64029.13029.00729.09829.36129.61929.88429.60429.36629.25729.66629.82029.50029.47428.73729.04529.28629.25030.14326.51727.516

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Biochemistry

Biochemistry laboratory test included parameters: alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase, bicarbonate, bilirubin, creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia and lipase. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 1 (n =331, 313)Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 2 (n =331, 313)Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 3 (n =331, 313)Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 4 (n =331, 313)Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 1 (n =336, 319)Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 2 (n =336, 319)Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 3 (n =336, 319)Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 4 (n =336, 319)Amylase: Grade 1 (n =338, 319)Amylase: Grade 2 (n =338, 319)Amylase: Grade 3 (n =338, 319)Amylase: Grade 4 (n =338, 319)Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 1 (n =331, 311)Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 2 (n =331, 311)Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 3 (n =331, 311)Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 4 (n =331, 311)Bicarbonate: Grade 1 (n =314, 291)Bicarbonate: Grade 2 (n =314, 291)Bicarbonate: Grade 3 (n =314, 291)Bicarbonate: Grade 4 (n =314, 291)Bilirubin: Grade 1 (n =336, 318)Bilirubin: Grade 2 (n =336, 318)Bilirubin: Grade 3 (n =336, 318)Bilirubin: Grade 4 (n =336, 318)Creatinine: Grade 1 (n =336, 318)Creatinine: Grade 2 (n =336, 318)Creatinine: Grade 3 (n =336, 318)Creatinine: Grade 4 (n =336, 318)Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319)Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319)Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319)Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319)Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319)Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319)Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319)Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319)Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 (n =333, 314)Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 (n =333, 314)Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 (n =333, 314)Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 (n =333, 314)Hypernatremia: Grade 1 (n =338, 319)Hypernatremia: Grade 2 (n =338, 319)Hypernatremia: Grade 3 (n =338, 319)Hypernatremia: Grade 4 (n =338, 319)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 (n =337, 319)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 (n =337, 319)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 (n =337, 319)Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 (n =337, 319)Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319)Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319)Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319)Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319)Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319)Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319)Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319)Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319)Hypokalemia: Grade 1 (n =333, 314)Hypokalemia: Grade 2 (n =333, 314)Hypokalemia: Grade 3 (n =333, 314)Hypokalemia: Grade 4 (n =333, 314)Hyponatremia: Grade 1 (n =338, 319)Hyponatremia: Grade 2 (n =338, 319)Hyponatremia: Grade 3 (n =338, 319)Hyponatremia: Grade 4 (n =338, 319)Hypophosphatemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 318)Hypophosphatemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 318)Hypophosphatemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 318)Hypophosphatemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 318)Lipase: Grade 1 (n =338, 319)Lipase: Grade 2 (n =338, 319)Lipase: Grade 3 (n =338, 319)Lipase: Grade 4 (n =338, 319)
Axitinib 5 mg658108884064127059510127110116810155300092810414570042903419303711102542123121022000330111433605322142
Sorafenib 400 mg576239215307621616774011510001221012191022100283770022802314122531206718229161021050270618995107625407

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematology

Hematology laboratory test included hemoglobin, platelet count, white blood cells count, neutrophils and lymphocytes. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin: Grade 1 (n =320, 316)Hemoglobin: Grade 2 (n =320, 316)Hemoglobin: Grade 3 (n =320, 316)Hemoglobin: Grade 4 (n =320, 316)Lymphocytes: Grade 1 (n =317, 309)Lymphocytes: Grade 2 (n =317, 309)Lymphocytes: Grade 3 (n =317, 309)Lymphocytes: Grade 4 (n =317, 309)Neutrophils: Grade 1 (n =316, 308)Neutrophils: Grade 2 (n =316, 308)Neutrophils: Grade 3 (n =316, 308)Neutrophils: Grade 4 (n =316, 308)Platelets: Grade 1 (n =312, 310)Platelets: Grade 2 (n =312, 310)Platelets: Grade 3 (n =312, 310)Platelets: Grade 4 (n =312, 310)White Blood Cells: Grade 1 (n =320, 315)White Blood Cells: Grade 2 (n =320, 315)White Blood Cells: Grade 3 (n =320, 315)White Blood Cells: Grade 4 (n =320, 315)
Axitinib 5 mg931910789100134204701032400
Sorafenib 400 mg112411117931102042041300361210

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Urinalysis

Urinalysis included urine blood/ hemoglobin, glucose and protein. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 1 (n =304, 272)Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 2 (n =304, 272)Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 3 (n =304, 272)Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 4 (n =304, 272)Urine glucose: Grade 1 (n =322, 286)Urine glucose: Grade 2 (n =322, 286)Urine glucose: Grade 3 (n =322, 286)Urine glucose: Grade 4 (n =322, 286)Urine protein: Grade 1 (n =326, 289)Urine protein: Grade 2 (n =326, 289)Urine protein: Grade 3 (n =326, 289)Urine protein: Grade 4 (n =326, 289)
Axitinib 5 mg451001200110531279
Sorafenib 400 mg35000133019127217

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severity of the AEs was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe; Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5= death related to AE. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Axitinib 5 mg3.920.147.610.613.9
Sorafenib 400 mg3.121.752.411.59.3

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Axitinib 5 mg96.140.7
Sorafenib 400 mg98.035.8

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life -threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious and non -serious AEs. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Axitinib 5 mg92.215.3
Sorafenib 400 mg95.213.8

1-Year Survival

One year survival rate defined as the probability that a subject was alive 1 year after the date of first study treatment. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter up until 1 year

Interventionpercent chance of survival (Median)
Sunitinib67.8

Duration of Response (DR)

Time from start of the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. DR was calculated as [the end date for DR minus first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed +1]/7. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter or death due to any cause

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Sunitinib7.14

Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Objective Response (OR)

OR = subjects with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) persisting > = 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sunitinib41

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Time from start of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in months) was calculated as (first event date minus first dose date +1)/7. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter or death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sunitinib9.0

Soluble VEGF Receptor 2 (sVEGFR2) Concentration at Baseline

(NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Sunitinib9163.4

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

Time from date of first dose of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression. The 50% quartile point estimate is provided. The criteria for tumor progression was according to RECIST. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sunitinib10.0

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Concentration at Baseline

(NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionpicograms (pg)/mL (Mean)
Sunitinib154.8

Cancer Related Symptoms, Well-Being, and Concerns

FACT-Advanced Kidney Cancer Symptom Index (FKSI) Questionnaire: subscale designed to be a stand-alone instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced kidney cancer. Contains 15 questions. Each question was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Total FKSI score = sum score of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (most severe symptoms and concerns) to 60 (no symptoms or concerns). End of treatment assessment was for subjects who completed the study only. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Week 1), Day 1 of Weeks 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, Week 53 (End of Treatment)

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=109)Week 3 (n=104)Week 5 (n=101)Week 7 (n=97)Week 9 (n=88)Week 11 (n=84)Week 13 (n=81)Week 17 (n=72)Week 21 (n=63)Week 25 (n=55)Week 29 (n=55)Week 33 (n=50)Week 37 (n=47)Week 41 (n=45)Week 45 (n=37)Week 49 (n=36)Week 53 (End of Treatment) (n=35)
Sunitinib44.6843.6942.7143.6944.1143.2643.4944.2145.5145.4244.6444.0645.2344.7146.7345.9245.94

Ctrough of SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)

Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111)Day 1, Week 3 (n=108)Day 1, Week 5 (n=106)Day 1, Week 7 (n=104)Day 1, Week 9 (n=97)Day 1, Week 13 (n=93)Day 1, Week 17 (n=82)Day 1, Week 21 (n=73)Day 1, Week 25 (n=70)Day 1, Week 29 (n=58)Day 1, Week 33 (n=58)Day 1, Week 37 (n=50)Day 1, Week 41 (n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (n=33)
Sunitinib2.6220.2720.2520.4121.1820.0119.7617.1317.3017.3816.5515.7116.5015.6116.5713.81

Ctrough of Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU-012662)

Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111)Day 1, Week 3 (n=108)Day 1, Week 5 (n=106)Day 1, Week 7 (n=104)Day 1, Week 9 (n=97)Day 1, Week 13 (n=93)Day 1, Week 17 (n=82)Day 1, Week 21 (n=73)Day 1, Week 25 (n=70)Day 1, Week 29 (n=58)Day 1, Week 33 (n=58)Day 1, Week 37 (n=50)Day 1, Week 41 (n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (n=33)
Sunitinib9.7775.0465.8966.7668.7261.3161.4153.0953.6955.3950.2751.7449.8351.8253.0746.91

Ctrough Stratified by CR or PR Versus PD for SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00018.25016.65017.30015.10015.90014.30012.60014.50012.85012.80014.35014.00013.40014.70011.6000.00020.00018.80014.30016.5509.71012.60023.40029.40013.7004.360

Ctrough Stratified by CR or PR Versus PD for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU012662)

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00076.95065.90066.10065.15057.60055.66047.37050.70050.65046.00049.75043.36545.20049.97541.0000.00069.00064.70050.20055.85034.81040.80071.10052.10037.40013.880

Ctrough Stratified by CR or PR Versus Progressive Disease (PD) for Sunitinib

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00057.90045.00045.40046.25040.00041.35034.40034.20034.45033.00035.35030.90034.00036.25028.6000.00050.20045.60035.60039.05025.10028.20047.70022.70023.7009.520

Ctrough Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD) for SU-012662 (Sunitinib's Metabolite)

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00018.80017.30017.90018.70016.35014.60014.10014.95014.90014.05015.50015.40013.70014.70011.4500.00020.00018.80014.30016.5509.71012.60023.40029.40013.7004.360

Ctrough Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD) for Total Drug (Sunitinib + SU012662)

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00075.00063.30066.40070.60057.60058.10049.86051.15053.50050.05050.80048.00050.50054.88542.1600.00069.00064.70050.20055.85034.81040.80071.10052.10037.40013.880

Ctrough Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [Stable Disease (SD) > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD) for Sunitinib

Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32)Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)
Sunitinib0.00055.30044.60046.75049.50039.55042.30036.50035.50037.25034.40035.30033.20035.95037.25031.1000.00050.20045.60035.60039.05025.10028.20047.70022.70023.7009.520

Patient-Assessed Fatigue

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale: Overall score from 13-question questionnaire (measures fatigue/asthenia for patients with chronic, life-threatening illnesses). For each question, patient rates condition for the past week on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Total FACIT-Fatigue score = sum score of the 13 question scores; total range: 0 - 52; higher total score represents less fatigue. End of treatment assessment was for subjects who completed the study only. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Week 1), Day 1 of Weeks 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, Week 53 (End of Treatment)

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=118)Week 3 (n=113)Week 5 (n=110)Week 7 (n=106)Week 9 (n=97)Week 11 (n=93)Week 13 (n=90)Week 17 (n=80)Week 21 (n=71)Week 25 (n=62)Week 29 (n=60)Week 33 (n=55)Week 37 (n=52)Week 41 (n=50)Week 45 (n=42)Week 49 (n=41)Week 53 (End of Treatment) (n=40)
Sunitinib39.2936.9835.4436.5436.8235.9436.5837.4438.4238.0536.7736.0037.8836.9638.7139.3239.05

sVEGFR2 at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD)

Summary statistics of sVEGFR2 at baseline by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16)
Sunitinib9772.5008342.750

sVEGFR2 at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR Versus PD)

Summary statistics of sVEGFR2 at baseline by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR, n=40)Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16)
Sunitinib9968.0008342.750

sVEGFR2 Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point

sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Mean)
Day 1, Week 3 (n=106)Day 1, Week 5 (n=104)Day 1, Week 7 (n=101)Day 1, Week 9 (n=95)Day 1, Week 13 (n=91)Day 1, Week 17 (n=79)Day 1, Week 21 (n=69)Day 1, Week 25 (n=68)Day 1, Week 29 (n=55)Day 1, Week 33 (n=55)Day 1, Week 37 (n=50)Day 1, Week 41 (n=48)Day 1, Week 45 (n=42)Day 1, Week 49 (n=38)Day 1, Week 53 (n=31)
Sunitinib0.70.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.60.7

sVEGFR2 Ratio to Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD)

Median sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 weeks] versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Median)
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=81)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=81)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=84)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=77)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=67)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=66)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=53)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=54)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=48)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=42)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=38)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=30)
Sunitinib0.6910.6530.6250.5310.5990.5740.5630.6030.5340.5290.5240.6870.5480.5400.5700.5090.5560.6710.5690.6100.5590.5720.5380.5690.638

sVEGFR2 Ratio to Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR Versus PD)

Median sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Median)
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=40)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=36)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=36)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=30)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=32)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=29)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=29)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=25)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=20)
Sunitinib0.7040.6530.6380.5310.5960.5740.5620.6030.5550.5290.5450.6870.5660.5400.5640.5090.5640.6710.5470.6100.5540.5610.5350.5550.630

Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Sunitinib

Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

Interventionnanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL) (Mean)
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111)Day 1, Week 3 (n=108)Day 1, Week 5 (n=106)Day 1, Week 7 (n=104)Day 1, Week 9 (n=97)Day 1, Week 13 (n=93)Day 1, Week 17 (n=82)Day 1, Week 21 (n=73)Day 1, Week 25 (n=70)Day 1, Week 29 (n=58)Day 1, Week 33 (n=58)Day 1, Week 37 (n=50)Day 1, Week 41 (n=49)Day 1, Week 45 (n=44)Day 1, Week 49 (n=40)Day 1, Week 53 (n=33)
Sunitinib7.1554.7845.6446.3547.5441.2941.6535.9536.3938.0133.7236.0433.3336.2036.4933.10

VEGF at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD)

Summary statistics of VEGF at baseline by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16)
Sunitinib86.400109.300

VEGF at Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR Versus PD)

Summary statistics of VEGF at baseline by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR, n=39)Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16)
Sunitinib73.600109.300

VEGF Ratio to Baseline at Each Time Point

VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Mean)
Day 1, Week 3 (n=108)Day 1, Week 5 (n=104)Day 1, Week 7 (n=101)Day 1, Week 9 (n=95)Day 1, Week 13 (n=91)Day 1, Week 17 (n=78)Day 1, Week 21 (n=70)Day 1, Week 25 (n=67)Day 1, Week 29 (n=55)Day 1, Week 33 (n=54)Day 1, Week 37 (n=49)Day 1, Week 41 (n=48)Day 1, Week 45 (n=41)Day 1, Week 49 (n=37)Day 1, Week 53 (n=30)
Sunitinib2.92.62.63.43.22.82.632.52.32.75.52.92.83.2

VEGF Ratio to Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 Weeks] Versus PD)

Median VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 weeks] versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Median)
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=81)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=84)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=83)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=85)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=76)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=68)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=65)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=53)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=53)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=48)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=48)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=41)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=37)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=29)
Sunitinib2.1271.9481.5742.4711.7981.4052.4811.1761.8903.9212.0700.9881.9721.5101.9061.4331.8311.9292.2001.0632.2011.8592.4842.3292.431

VEGF Ratio to Baseline Stratified by Tumor Response (CR or PR Versus PD)

Median VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53

Interventionratio (Median)
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=38)Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15)Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13)Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=37)Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8)Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=39)Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2)Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=36)Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=36)Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=35)Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=30)Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=31)Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1)Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28)Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=27)Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=24)Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=19)
Sunitinib1.9991.9481.3832.4711.7611.4052.2151.1761.7533.9212.0120.9881.5231.5101.8091.4331.8051.9292.2481.0632.1791.8642.2402.7072.863

Duration of Response (DR)

Duration of response as defined by the time from CR or PR (whichever status recorded first) until the date of death or PD was objectively documented. Median and its 95 percent confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temsirolimus8.26
Sorafenib6.96

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was the duration from randomization to death. For participants who are alive, overall survival was censored at the last contact. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline to date of death from any cause (up to 24 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temsirolimus12.27
Sorafenib16.64

Percentage of Participants With Tumor Response

Percentage of participants with tumor response based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST and evaluated by independent central review. CR/PR persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. PR had at least 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Temsirolimus7.7
Sorafenib7.9

Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment

Interval from date of randomization until documentation of PD by an investigator tumor assessment, symptomatic deterioration, or death for any reason whichever occurred first. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temsirolimus5.43
Sorafenib4.14

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Interval from date of randomization until documentation of progressive disease (PD) by an independent tumor assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) or death for any reason whichever occurred first. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temsirolimus4.28
Sorafenib3.91

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Counts of participants who had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), defined as newly occurring or worsening after first dose. Relatedness to [study drug] was assessed by the investigator (Yes/No). Participants with multiple occurrences of an AE within a category were counted once within the category. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Serious AEAny AE
Sorafenib86251
Temsirolimus103248

Percentage of Participants With PFS Events at 12, 24 and 36 Weeks by Independent Assessment

PFS: Interval from date of randomization until documentation of PD by an independent tumor assessment according to RECIST or death for any reason whichever occurred first. PFS calculated as (Weeks)=(randomization date minus first dose date plus 1) divided by 7. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Weeks 12, 24, and 36

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Baseline to Week 12Week 13 to Week 24Week 25 to Week 36
Sorafenib36.720.111.2
Temsirolimus31.220.912.3

Duration of Response (DR)

Time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.44. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)12.5
Sunitinib 37.5 mg8.7

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index for Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS)

"FKSI-DRS is a subset of FKSI which is a questionnaire for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy -Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer.~The FKSI contained 15 questions and the FKSI-DRS consisted of 9 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI-DRS ranged between 0-36. Since the questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FKSI-DRS, 0 and 36 could be considered the worst and best health states based on the 9 questions comprising FKSI-DRS." (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

InterventionUnits on scale (Mean)
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)28.3
Sunitinib 37.5 mg27.2

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)

FACT-G is core questionnaire of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in cancer population.FACT-G consisted of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general Health-Related QoL(HRQoL):Physical Well-being(PWB),Social/Family Well-Being (SWB),Emotional Well-Being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB);each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FACT-G ranged between 0-108.Since questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FACT-G,0 and 108 could be considered worst and best health states. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)78.0
Sunitinib 37.5 mg77.0

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR are defined as the disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR are those with atleast 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)32.2
Sunitinib 37.5 mg28.1

Overall Survival (OS) Assessed Using MSKCC Prognostic Factors Model

MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low (0), intermediate (1-2) or high (=>3) based upon number of criteria present. Criteria as follows: Karnofsky performance status < 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5 * Upper limit of Normal, Hemoglobin < lower limit of normal for local lab, Corrected serum calcium > 10 mg/dL; Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of < 1 year. OS was defined as time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS, in months, was calculated as (event date -start of treatment date + 1)/30.44. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
High Risk (equal or more than 3)Intermediate Risk (1-2)Low Risk (0)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg6.121.828.9
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)3.519.3NA

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) Assessed Using Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Prognostic Factors Model

MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low(0),intermediate(1-2) or high(=>3) based on number of criteria present such as Karnofsky performance status < 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5 * Upper limit of Normal,Hemoglobin < lower limit of normal, serum calcium > 10 mg/dL;Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of < 1 year.TTP was time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer.TTP was calculated as (first event date minus date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years

,
InterventionMonths (Median)
Stratified analysis : High Risk (=>3)Stratified analysis : Intermediate Risk (1-2)Stratified analysis : Low Risk (0)Overall unstratified analysis
Sunitinib 37.5 mg4.47.18.47.1
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2)3.18.020.79.9

Duration of Response (DR)

"Time in weeks from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cancer. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 7.~DR was calculated for the subgroup of patients with a confirmed objective tumor response." (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter or death due to cancer

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib Malate60.4

Number of Subjects With Confirmed Objective Response According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST)

Overall confirmed objective response = confirmed Complete Response (CR) or confirmed Partial Response (PR) according to RECIST. CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR defined as >= 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sunitinib Malate35

Overall Survival (OS)

Time in weeks from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the subject current status was death). (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until death

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib Malate104.1

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"Time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where the outcome was Death)." (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter or death

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib Malate38.0

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

Time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer, whichever comes first. TTP was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]). (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib Malate46.3

Dose Corrected Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib

Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib. Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3)
Sunitinib Malate53.6455.9469.4464.331.942.152.042.322.072.683.421.942.232.411.582.422.233.051.925.093.413.914.533.823.144.092.122.974.021.36

Dose Corrected Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib Metabolite

Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib metabolite (SU012662). Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3)
Sunitinib Malate31.8528.1540.5338.042.993.353.113.373.453.614.373.243.683.542.803.402.552.592.934.533.975.314.263.623.004.492.362.943.321.18

Dose Corrected Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib Plus Metabolite

Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib plus its metabolite (SU012662). Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3)
Sunitinib Malate85.4984.09109.97102.374.935.505.155.695.526.297.785.195.915.954.395.824.785.644.859.637.389.238.797.446.138.584.485.907.342.54

Observed Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib

Observed plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4)
Sunitinib Malate46.8250.1349.3653.181.551.441.511.601.601.692.051.721.741.601.561.461.422.201.342.962.532.183.142.751.992.461.201.752.931.02

Observed Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib Metabolite

Observed plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib metabolite (SU012662) (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4)
Sunitinib Malate26.4428.2128.3228.542.502.642.642.662.812.542.782.672.772.492.512.301.832.162.062.923.133.243.102.641.992.601.361.812.431.10

Observed Plasma Trough Concentrations of Sunitinib Plus Metabolite

Observed plasma trough (predose) concentrations of sunitinib plus its metabolite (SU012662) (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12)Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11)Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7)Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6)Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4)Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5)Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4)
Sunitinib Malate73.2678.3477.6881.714.044.084.154.264.414.234.834.394.524.094.073.753.254.353.405.885.665.436.245.393.975.062.553.565.362.13

Percent Chance of Patient Survival

Probability of survival 1 year and 2 years after the first dose of study treatment (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until death

Interventionpercent chance of survival (Number)
1 year2 years
Sunitinib Malate67.250.2

Duration of Response (DR), Core Radiology Assessement

Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each cycle: duraton of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124852.9
IFN-α64.9

Duration of Response (DR), Investigator's Assessment

Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentaion of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124856.3
IFN-α48.1

Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER)

Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of sunitinib compared to IFN-a as first-line treatment for MRCC, defined as the ratio of the incremental cost of treatment over the incremental effectiveness; effectiveness measured as quality adjusted life year (QALY) gain. This objective was not addressed in the clinical study report, but an interim analysis of cost-effectiveness was presented separately. These results were not available for inclusion at the time of this posting. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: post study measurement

Interventionratio (Number)
SU0112480
IFN-α0

Objective Response, Core Radiology Assessment

Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses (CR or PR) = those that persisted on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionparticipants (Number)
SU011248145
IFN-α29

Objective Response, Investigator's Assessment

Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses = those that persist on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionparticipants (Number)
SU011248171
IFN-α45

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) = time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For patients not expiring, survival time was censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Patients lacking data beyond randomization had their survival times censored at the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Clinic visit or telephone contact every 2 months until death

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU011248114.6
IFN-α94.9

Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Core Radiology Assessment

Progression-free survival (PFS) = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1. On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124848.3
IFN-α22.1

Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Investigator's Assessment

Progression-free survival = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1). On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124847.7
IFN-α22.1

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Core Radiology Assessment

TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124849.1
IFN-α22.4

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP), Investigator's Assessment

TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than the study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase

Interventionweeks (Median)
SU01124849.0
IFN-α22.3

Ctrough Concentrations of Metabolite SU012662

Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of active metabolite SU012662 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=26)
SU01266227.1027.3526.1122.1128.2128.3229.0425.99

Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248

Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of SU011248 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=26)
SU01124857.2657.5950.2645.0564.2259.9058.4554.31

Ctrough Concentrations of SU011248 and Active Metabolite SU012662

Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of total drug (SU011248 and its active metabolite SU012662) per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31)Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36)Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27)Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=27)
Total Drug: SU011248 and SU01266284.3684.9476.3767.1592.4388.2287.4980.30

Euro-QoL Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS)

EQ-VAS: overall self-rating rating of the patient's current health state using a 20 cm Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), also called the health state thermometer) is a metric measurement (in 2 mm interval) from the visual analog scale which ranges between 0 (worse imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=365, 352)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 315)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=323, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=314, 237)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=293, 198)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 193)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=270, 152)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 139)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 118)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=240, 104)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=237, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 98)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=209, 77)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=201, 74)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=191, 60)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 50)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=168, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=160, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 45)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 34)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=130, 31)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=115, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=92, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=82, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=78, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=62, 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=54, 9)
IFN-α71.4367.6670.4570.7072.6871.4572.7472.2073.4472.5773.6872.2673.8073.4674.2774.3377.6676.5776.6476.6975.0672.2175.1973.8477.5273.5676.6976.4476.6276.5074.8473.1176.9472.8674.4273.8279.2768.5576.0075.44
SU01124873.8069.3575.0572.0676.2372.3377.4675.1579.8375.1378.8376.8179.3976.0981.3477.5380.0876.2479.1876.4479.7276.8180.8476.7180.5977.2280.3976.5380.5076.5179.8575.5180.7477.1080.4077.7681.4777.0581.1076.85

EuroQoL Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Index

EQ-5D Health State Index: a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. Respondents were asked to describe their current health state on each of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety or depression) on a three-level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). A maximum score of 1 can be derived from these 5 dimensions by score conversion; range: -0.39 (worst health state)to 1.00 (best health state). This descriptive system classifies respondents into one of 243 possible distinct health states (EQ-5D descriptive system). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=363, 352)Cycle 1 Day 28 (346, 315)Cycle 2 Day 1 (326, 244)Cycle 2 Day 28 (311, 233)Cycle 3 Day 1 (287, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (283, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (269, 150)Cycle 4 Day 28 (261, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (247, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (240, 106)Cycle 6 Day 1 (240, 98)Cycle 6 Day 28 (224, 100)Cycle 7 Day 1 (205, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (204, 74)Cycle 8 Day 1 (192, 68)Cycle 8 Day 28 (190, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (170, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (168, 45)Cycle 10 Day 1 (161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (153, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (138, 34)Cycle 11 Day 28 (138, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (132, 31)Cycle 12 Day 28 (127, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (114, 26)Cycle 13 Day 28 (115, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (114, 25)Cycle 14 Day 28 (107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (100, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (95, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (93, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (84, 15)Cycle 17 Day 28 (82, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (71, 10)Cycle 19 Day 1 (69, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (62, 11)Cycle 20 Day 1 (63, 8)Cycle 20 Day 28 (54, 9)
IFN-α0.760.700.750.740.760.750.800.790.790.780.800.800.800.810.820.810.840.840.850.820.850.840.820.850.830.820.860.870.880.880.840.830.880.830.860.840.880.720.850.86
SU0112480.760.720.780.730.780.750.800.760.800.760.800.770.810.770.820.770.800.780.810.780.800.750.810.770.810.770.810.750.800.750.790.760.790.770.810.760.810.780.810.77

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) Subscale

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) subscale designed to be a stand-alone instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced kidney cancer. Contains 15 questions; some questions overlap with the FACT-G questions. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Total FKSI score = sum score of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (most severe symptoms and concerns) to 60 (no symptoms or concerns). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=369, 351)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 317)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=327, 246)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 198)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 151)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 119)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=242, 109)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 99)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=203, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 68)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=155, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 31)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=113, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=105, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=100, 22)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=94, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9)
IFN-α46.0940.9342.3342.0143.6443.1344.7844.0344.8244.4145.3844.0745.0944.6545.3845.1046.8846.1646.2245.1646.2645.4646.0846.0046.2545.8446.0846.1045.6245.3043.6443.4645.5943.6444.9245.2746.6444.4745.0046.00
SU01124846.4542.7145.9843.7546.6044.0146.9945.0847.9944.9947.6145.4047.8445.3948.2445.8348.3145.7947.9045.7047.9045.2847.9045.6748.0245.6547.9045.1048.2645.3747.7545.9548.0746.2747.4745.3647.7046.0748.8846.26

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Subscale

FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) subscale of the FKSI to measure advanced kidney cancer disease related symptoms. Includes 9 items: lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, and hematuria. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 36. A score greater than 0 indicates the difference favored sunitinib. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=368, 351)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 317)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=327, 246)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n= 315, 237)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 198)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 151)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 119 )Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=242, 109)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 99)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=203, 75 )Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 68)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=155, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 31)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (113, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=105, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=100, 22)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=94, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9)
IFN-α29.5526.6827.5927.2228.2027.8128.8528.3028.5728.3729.1228.4428.9928.5028.7628.6729.8629.3629.4329.0329.8929.2429.5429.4829.8129.6329.3529.2329.1828.8927.7928.2829.2627.9428.8328.7329.6428.6528.4429.22
SU01124829.7427.7329.6628.4929.9328.7230.2529.4330.8729.4330.8029.6230.9329.7331.0329.7631.2429.7230.7329.7830.7229.3430.7629.6330.5829.3030.5828.9430.8729.2630.6329.5130.6929.7330.2429.1530.1129.4831.0729.44

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): core questionnaire of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system that has been validated in a variety of cancer populations. 27 questions grouped into 4 domains that measure a patient's physical, functional, social and family, and emotional well-being. Five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = sum score of item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 108 with higher score indicating better quality of life. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=368, 346)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=345, 316)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=314, 237)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=293, 199)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 193)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=269, 149)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=263, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=247, 119)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=240, 106)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=238, 98)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 97)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=206, 78)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=200, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 66)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=170, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=158, 49)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=150, 45)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=134, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=139, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=130, 29)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=126, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=113, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 20)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=89, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 16)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 8)
IFN-α81.2274.9177.0277.0579.3578.4280.8680.4681.9680.6081.9779.7080.3981.0681.2581.3184.5083.1484.0381.7981.6080.2080.9981.7381.1880.6781.2281.5781.6680.8878.2078.3881.8078.9682.2482.2782.4879.6381.7079.54
SU01124882.3078.7582.8880.5184.2480.5985.3282.0886.4082.2384.9082.5485.0182.1686.8383.0585.8182.7185.3282.1484.7581.9185.3182.4385.5083.6185.2482.3486.2482.6484.7783.3886.7884.4285.7483.5187.1684.5487.9684.62

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Emotional Well Being (EWB) Subscale

Emotional well-being (EWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 24; lower score indicates better emotional well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (370, 352)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 318)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 249)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=316, 237)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 196)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 152)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=265, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=249, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 109)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 99)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 77)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=204, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 62)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=171, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=167, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 45)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=91, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9)
IFN-α17.0617.4017.5217.7318.1318.1718.8018.3919.0018.7018.6018.1418.0818.5518.5418.5518.9818.7618.9218.3618.9718.5218.8719.4518.6318.9718.0518.7618.2418.7517.2616.8318.2818.0019.6219.5519.0918.2018.6718.67
SU01124817.1517.7618.4618.4618.8218.5319.0418.7619.1818.6318.9918.7319.0818.6919.3318.9819.2518.9319.3218.7118.9219.1019.1419.0619.3819.3919.5519.2319.5719.4119.5419.3319.9519.6619.6419.3419.9419.6120.0019.75

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Functional Well Being (FWB) Subscale

Functional well-being (FWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; higher score indicates greater functional well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=371, 353)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 318)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 249)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 152)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=265, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=249, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 109)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=239, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 99)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=204, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=170, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=167, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=137, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 33)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=91, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9)
IFN-α18.5116.3717.0817.1817.9217.5618.4018.3718.8118.4719.0218.2418.4518.7619.2219.1020.2020.0419.8819.4018.8918.8118.8019.1319.6318.5919.6219.7219.8619.8318.8918.6119.3518.7119.0819.0019.6419.1020.0020.22
SU01124818.9317.9218.7818.3719.5118.5819.9318.8620.2719.0219.7419.2119.6919.1220.2919.3319.8719.2719.9519.2219.8119.1219.9819.4220.0219.6520.0419.0720.1319.2419.8019.5320.2019.6719.7619.4720.1819.5920.5020.15

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Physical Well Being (PWB) Subscale

Physical well-being (PWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates better physical well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=369, 348)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 318)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=329, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=316, 239)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=286, 195)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=270, 150)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 106)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=239, 99)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=224, 97)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=207, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=201, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=193, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=159, 49)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=151, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=135, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=131, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=127, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 16)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 9)
IFN-α22.7018.8520.0519.8420.8720.6321.5621.3121.8421.2321.7020.9621.6721.6621.9421.4022.5822.3822.6021.8322.2321.8822.6021.9021.9921.8022.0522.7522.3322.0720.6321.4221.8120.5021.8322.4522.4521.6021.7822.33
SU01124823.1419.4322.2220.3422.4520.1822.7221.0023.2420.9122.9921.2223.0521.2223.5821.5123.4121.2922.9421.2123.1620.9823.0320.8723.0521.2623.0220.8023.2620.9522.6021.3122.9921.6822.8520.8923.2021.8223.6821.81

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): Social/Family Well Being (SWB) Subscale

Social/family well-being (SWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates less social/family well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase

,
Interventionscores on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=370, 349)Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 319)Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 247)Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238)Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=292, 200)Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=284, 194)Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=269, 150)Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=263, 142)Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=247, 120)Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 107)Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=238, 98)Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=224, 97)Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=207, 79)Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=200, 75)Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=193, 67)Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61)Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51)Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46)Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=158, 49)Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=151, 46)Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=135, 35)Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 32)Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=131, 30)Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=127, 31)Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27)Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27)Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26)Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24)Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21)Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20)Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19)Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=89, 18)Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 16)Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14)Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12)Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11)Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11)Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10)Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9)Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 8)
IFN-α22.9422.2022.3122.2222.4222.1222.2622.3822.3522.3622.5622.3322.4622.1021.9522.1722.7421.9622.4522.0621.5121.0920.7921.2520.9321.3021.5120.3220.3520.2321.4121.5222.2521.7521.7121.2721.3020.7321.2620.67
SU01124823.1423.6023.5023.4023.5123.4423.7323.3623.5323.6823.3523.4023.2923.1323.6723.2623.2623.2623.0823.0323.0522.7123.2323.0723.1523.3122.8223.2423.2823.0423.1123.4123.4223.5023.5323.7023.8523.5323.6022.93

Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis

Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

Interventionpg/ml and ratio to Baseline (Mean)
PLASMA bFGF: C2D28:C1D1 (n=14, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C3D1:C1D1 (n=12, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C3D28:C1D1 (n=12, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C4D1:C1D1 (n=14, 0)PLASMA bFGF: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=10, 0)
SU0112480.7601.5821.6712.8950.803

Plasma Concentrations of Soluble Proteins: Plasma VEGF-A, Plasma VEGF-C, Plasma sVEGFR-3, PLASMA IL-8, and PLASMA bFGF That May be Associated With Tumor Proliferation or Angiogenesis

Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4

,
Interventionpg/ml and ratio to Baseline (Mean)
Plasma VEGF-A: Baseline (n=33, 31)Plasma VEGF-A: C1D28: C1D1 (n=31, 26)Plasma VEGF-A: C2D1: C1D1 (n=32, 21)Plasma VEGF-A: C2D28: C1D1 (n=31, 20)Plasma VEGF-A: C3D1: C1D1 (n=27, 15)Plasma VEGF-A: C3D28: C1D1 (n=28, 15)Plasma VEGF-A: C4D1: C1D1 (n=27, 12)Plasma VEGF-A: C4D28: C1D1 (n=25, 11)Plasma VEGF-C: Baseline (n=35, 31)Plasma VEGF-C: C1D28: C1D1 (n=31, 26)Plasma VEGF-C: C2D1:C1D1 (n=30, 21)Plasma VEGF-C: C2D28:C1D1 (n=31, 19)Plasma VEGF-C: C3D1:C1D1 (n=28, 15)Plasma VEGF-C: C3D28:C1D1 (n=28, 15)Plasma VEGF-C: C4D1:C1D1 (n=28, 12)Plasma VEGF-C: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=26, 11)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: Baseline (n=29, 30)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C1D28:C1D1 (n=27, 25)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C2D1:C1D1 (n=28, 20)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C2D28:C1D1 (n=28, 19)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C3D1:C1D1 (n=25, 14)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C3D28:C1D1 (n=25, 14)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C4D1:C1D1 (n=24, 11)PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=23, 10)PLASMA IL-8: Baseline (n=31, 29)PLASMA IL-8: C1D28:C1D1 (n=29, 25)PLASMA IL-8: C2D1:C1D1 (n=29, 20)PLASMA IL-8: C2D28:C1D1 (n=29, 19)PLASMA IL-8: C3D1:C1D1 (n=26, 15)PLASMA IL-8: C3D28:C1D1 (n=26, 14)PLASMA IL-8: C4D1:C1D1 (n=26, 12)PLASMA IL-8: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=25, 11)PLASMA bFGF: Baseline (n=21, 2)PLASMA bFGF: C1D28:C1D1 (n=15, 1)PLASMA bFGF: C2D1:C1D1 (n=13, 1)
IFN-α109.01.1341.1711.1531.2531.1491.2091.008651.21.1651.1771.0811.1741.0541.3821.13940317.71.0681.0751.1501.0151.0421.1831.04418.62.2971.5791.8581.5311.9991.6622.49213.60.4290.157
SU011248101.94.2801.1615.8511.6305.2361.4864.924556.40.9451.0450.8711.1591.0431.2431.20744049.30.4730.7870.4070.8000.4270.8460.48610.12.8151.7162.4232.7882.5741.9342.54913.12.7621.370

Duration of Response (DR)

DR: Time from first documentation of objective tumor response to first date that recurrence or progressive disease (PD) was objectively documented, taking as a reference for PD, the smallest sum LD recorded since randomization. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every month until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa7.4
Temsirolimus11.1
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus9.3

European Quality of Life Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) - Index Score

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. EQ-5D index measured 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Range of EQ-5D index score = -0.594 to 1 where higher scores indicated a better health state. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Interferon Alfa0.656
Temsirolimus0.689
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus0.689

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is the duration from randomization to death. For participants who are alive, overall survival is censored at the last contact. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 80

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa7.3
Temsirolimus10.9
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus8.4

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

Clinical benefit: confirmed CR or PR or had stable disease (SD) lasting at least 24 weeks. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions and non target lesions. PR was at least a 30% decrease in sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD was having neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 2 months until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Alfa16.4
Temsirolimus34.0
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus30.0

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was the disappearance of all target lesions and non target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 2 months until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Interferon Alfa5.3
Temsirolimus9.1
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus9.5

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS based on Independent Central Review Assessment. The period from randomization until disease progression, death or date of last contact. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, monthly until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa3.2
Temsirolimus5.6
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus4.9

Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST)

"The Q-Twist is not a score calculated for each participant but is defined only on a by treatment group basis. For each treatment group, it is the weighted sum of the mean durations of the health states Tox, Twist, and Relapse. Tox is defined as time with severe toxicity related to treatment; Twist: time without symptoms or toxic side effects; and Relapse: time after relapse/progression. The mean duration of each health state is calculated based on the area under the Kaplan Meier curve pertaining to that health state. There is no direct method for calculating the dispersion of Q-Twist, and it is typically done using bootstrap method for purposes of inference (see, e.g., Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Gelber RD. Quality adjusted survival analysis. Stat Med 1990; 9: 1259-76). In practice, as apparently in the case with this study, the intermediate values resulting from the bootstrap exercise were not displayed." (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 80

Interventionmonths (Number)
Interferon Alfa6.9083
Temsirolimus8.3707
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus7.4821

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of PD or death, withdrawal from treatment due to an adverse event (AE), withdrawal of voluntary consent, or lost to follow-up, whichever occurred first, censored at the date of the conclusion of treatment phase. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every month until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Interferon Alfa1.9
Temsirolimus3.7
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus2.5

Geometric Mean for Exposure Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0-12

Geometric mean exposure for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionmg/L.h (Geometric Mean)
First Stage - Disease Progression9.76
Second Stage - Increased Accrual18.63

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)

Plasma concentration-time profile for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, AND 24 hours post dose

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
First Stage - Disease Progression1.28
Second Stage - Increased Accrual2.57

Median Overall Survival

Time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive, approximately 18.3 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
First Stage - Disease Progression18
Second Stage - Increased Accrual18.3

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events, see the adverse event module. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 49 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
First Stage - Disease Progression22
Second Stage - Increased Accrual23

Progression Free Survival

Determine whether BAY 43-9006 when used to treat metastatic prostate cancer is associated with having 50% of Patients Progression Free at 4 Months by clinical, radiographic, and prostatic specific antigen (PSA)criteria. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
First Stage - Disease Progression1.83
Second Stage - Increased Accrual3.7

Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib)

Time to maximum concentration for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
First Stage - Disease Progression0.68
Second Stage - Increased Accrual8

Overall Response Evaluated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Overall response was evaluated by the RECIST. Complete Response (CR) is the disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. Stable Disease (SD) is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseProgressive DiseaseStable Disease
First Stage - Disease Progression0080
Second Stage - Increased Accrual011310

Reviews

3 reviews available for niacinamide and Bone Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Bisphosphonates and vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted drugs in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma metastatic to bone.
    Anti-cancer drugs, 2013, Volume: 24, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Re

2013
Radiation recall dermatitis induced by sorafenib : A case study and review of the literature.
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2016, Volume: 192, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Protei

2016
Classic biphasic pulmonary blastoma: a case report and review of the literature.
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2011, Volume: 73, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Fatal Outcome; Humans; Intestinal Pe

2011

Trials

9 trials available for niacinamide and Bone Neoplasms

ArticleYear
A phase I trial of imetelstat in children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Study (ADVL1112).
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013, Dec-01, Volume: 19, Issue:23

    Topics: Adolescent; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Bone Neoplasms; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug A

2013
Impact of adding the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib to endocrine therapy in metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2014, Volume: 10, Issue:15

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Biomarkers, Tumor; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Br

2014
Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Disease Progressi

2015
Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Disease Progressi

2015
Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Disease Progressi

2015
Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2015, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Disease Progressi

2015
SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.
    European urology, 2015, Volume: 68, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brai

2015
Final analysis of a phase II trial using sorafenib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    BJU international, 2009, Volume: 103, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Disease-Free Surv

2009
Beneficial effects of sorafenib on tumor progression, but not on radioiodine uptake, in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
    European journal of endocrinology, 2009, Volume: 161, Issue:6

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Disease-Free

2009
A phase II trial of first-line sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma unwilling to receive or with early intolerance to immunotherapy: SOGUG Study 06-01.
    Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal

2010
A phase I trial of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: New York Cancer Consortium Trial NCI 6981.
    American journal of clinical oncology, 2011, Volume: 34, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Capecitabin

2011
Could interferon still play a role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma? A randomized study of two schedules of sorafenib plus interferon-alpha 2a (RAPSODY).
    European urology, 2013, Volume: 63, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combi

2013

Other Studies

49 other studies available for niacinamide and Bone Neoplasms

ArticleYear
EphA2 Expression in Bone Sarcomas: Bioinformatic Analyses and Preclinical Characterization in Patient-Derived Models of Osteosarcoma, Ewing's Sarcoma and Chondrosarcoma.
    Cells, 2021, 10-26, Volume: 10, Issue:11

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Bone Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Chondrosarcoma; Comput

2021
False-Positive 18F-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-1007 PET/CT Caused by Hepatic Multifocal Inflammatory Foci.
    Clinical nuclear medicine, 2021, Feb-01, Volume: 46, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Biopsy; Bone Neoplasms; False Positive Reactions; Fluorine Radioisotopes; Humans; Inflammation

2021
High detection rate in [
    Annals of nuclear medicine, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Bone Neoplasms; Diagnostic Imaging; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm R

2021
Co-targeting of DNA, RNA, and protein molecules provides optimal outcomes for treating osteosarcoma and pulmonary metastasis in spontaneous and experimental metastasis mouse models.
    Oncotarget, 2017, May-09, Volume: 8, Issue:19

    Topics: Animals; Bone Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Combined Modality Ther

2017
A typical presentation of a hepatocellular carcinoma in a middle-aged patient.
    BMJ case reports, 2017, Aug-21, Volume: 2017

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biopsy, Fine-Needle; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clavicle; Fat

2017
Rib Fractures Mimicking Bone Metastases in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for Prostate Cancer.
    Clinical nuclear medicine, 2019, Volume: 44, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Bone Neoplasms; Diagnosis, Differential; Fluorine Radioisotopes; Humans; Male; Niacinamide; Ol

2019
Is it time to adopt external beam radiotherapy in the NCCN guidelines as a therapeutic strategy for intermediate/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma?.
    Oncology, 2013, Volume: 84 Suppl 1

    Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembo

2013
Case of sorafenib-induced thyroid storm.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Jun-01, Volume: 31, Issue:16

    Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Aged; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Atrial Fib

2013
Combination of zoledronic Acid and targeted therapy is active but may induce osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2013, Volume: 71, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Beva

2013
[Complete response after sorafenib therapy plus zoledronic acid for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with bone metastasis - a case report].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2013, Volume: 40, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Diphospho

2013
Kidney cancer: predicting survival after targeted therapy for mRCC.
    Nature reviews. Urology, 2013, Volume: 10, Issue:10

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Live

2013
Human osteosarcoma cells respond to sorafenib chemotherapy by downregulation of the tumor progression factors S100A4, CXCR4 and the oncogene FOS.
    Oncology reports, 2014, Volume: 31, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Down-Regulation; Drug Screening Assays, Ant

2014
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with metastatic thyroid carcinomas: a retrospective study of the TUTHYREF network.
    European journal of endocrinology, 2014, Volume: 170, Issue:4

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Adenoma, Oxyphilic; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents;

2014
Prognostic significance of bone metastases and bisphosphonate therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
    European urology, 2014, Volume: 66, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw; Bone Dens

2014
Response to sorafenib treatment in advanced metastatic thyroid cancer.
    Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia, 2014, Volume: 58, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Papillary; Compassionate Use Trials; Female;

2014
RANK ligand blockade with denosumab in combination with sorafenib in chemorefractory osteosarcoma: a possible step forward?
    Oncology, 2015, Volume: 88, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neopl

2015
Pneumothorax as a complication of combination antiangiogenic therapy in children and young adults with refractory/recurrent solid tumors.
    Journal of pediatric surgery, 2015, Volume: 50, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Bone Neoplasms; Child; Child, Preschool; Fe

2015
Kidney cancer: SWITCHing inconsequential.
    Nature reviews. Urology, 2015, Volume: 12, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Ce

2015
Sorafenib-Sunitinib Sequence: The Jury Is Out.
    European urology, 2015, Volume: 68, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Ce

2015
Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Cervical Spine and Pelvic Bone Metastases Presenting as Unknown Primary Neoplasm.
    The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2015, Volume: 66, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cervical Cord; Chemoembolization,

2015
Synergistic Effect of Sorafenib and Radiation on Human Oral Carcinoma in vivo.
    Scientific reports, 2015, Oct-21, Volume: 5

    Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cell Proliferation; Combined Modality

2015
Efficacy of sorafenib correlates with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk classification and bone metastasis in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Cellular oncology (Dordrecht), 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian People; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans;

2016
Anti-VEGF-related thrombotic microangiopathy in a child presenting with nephrotic syndrome.
    Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2016, Volume: 31, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    European urology, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab;

2016
Clinical analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living-donor liver transplantation.
    World journal of gastroenterology, 2016, Jul-07, Volume: 22, Issue:25

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Female; Humans; Liver Neopl

2016
Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R regresses an osteosarcoma in a patient-derived xenograft model resistant to a molecular-targeting drug.
    Oncotarget, 2017, Jan-31, Volume: 8, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Biological Therapy; Bone Neoplasms; Drug Resistance, Neo

2017
Primary Tumor Characteristics Are Important Prognostic Factors for Sorafenib-Treated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
    BioMed research international, 2017, Volume: 2017

    Topics: Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Demography; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Mei

2017
Sunitinib treatment for patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma after progression on sorafenib.
    Oncology, 2009, Volume: 76, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, R

2009
The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib decreases cell number and induces apoptosis in a canine osteosarcoma cell line.
    Research in veterinary science, 2010, Volume: 88, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Caspase 3; Cell Count;

2010
Efficacy of targeted therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma with pre-existing or new bone metastases.
    Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2010, Volume: 136, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carc

2010
Sorafenib induces partial response in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma.
    Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2010, Volume: 49, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Humans;

2010
Multidisciplinary treatment including sorafenib stabilized the bone metastases of renal cell carcinoma in an immunosuppressed renal transplant recipient.
    International journal of clinical oncology, 2009, Volume: 14, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Density Conservation Agents;

2009
Interstitial pneumonia probably associated with sorafenib treatment: An alert of an adverse event.
    Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2010, Volume: 67, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Human

2010
[Diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis of renal cancer: an expert consensus statement (2008 version)].
    Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology], 2010, Volume: 32, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neopl

2010
Sorafenib induces growth inhibition and apoptosis of human chondrosarcoma cells by blocking the RAF/ERK/MEK pathway.
    Journal of surgical oncology, 2010, Dec-01, Volume: 102, Issue:7

    Topics: Apoptosis; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; Benzenesulfonates; Blotting, Western; Bone Neoplasms; Cell

2010
Sorafenib tosylate and paclitaxel induce anti-angiogenic, anti-tumour and anti-resorptive effects in experimental breast cancer bone metastases.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2011, Volume: 47, Issue:2

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates;

2011
Prognostic prediction in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib based on expression levels of potential molecular markers in radical nephrectomy specimens.
    Urologic oncology, 2013, Volume: 31, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma,

2013
Severe sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction.
    Dermatology online journal, 2011, May-15, Volume: 17, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clobetasol; Dis

2011
Hepatocellular carcinoma presenting with multiple bone and soft tissue metastases and atypical cytomorphological features--a rare case report.
    Diagnostic cytopathology, 2013, Volume: 41, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Mal

2013
Multiple cutaneous metastatic chordomas from the sacrum.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2012, Volume: 66, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Chordoma; Female; Humans; Niacinamid

2012
Impact of hyponatremia on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with molecular targeted therapy.
    International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2012, Volume: 19, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; C-Reactive Protein; Carcinoma

2012
High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.
    Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2012, Volume: 25, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Carci

2012
Editorial comment from Dr Saito to impact of hyponatremia on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with molecular targeted therapy.
    International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2012, Volume: 19, Issue:12

    Topics: Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Hyponatremia; Indoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male

2012
Editorial comment from Dr Vázquez-Alonso and Dr Puche-Sanz to impact of hyponatremia on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with molecular targeted therapy.
    International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2012, Volume: 19, Issue:12

    Topics: Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Hyponatremia; Indoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male

2012
Concomitant oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors and bisphosphonates in advanced renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases.
    British journal of cancer, 2012, Nov-06, Volume: 107, Issue:10

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Ca

2012
[A case of hepatocellular carcinoma treated by resection of metachronous rib metastasis after primary hepatectomy].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2012, Volume: 39, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Combined Modality Therapy; H

2012
Adjuvant therapy with sorafenib in bone metastases bilateral renal carcinoma: a case report.
    European urology, 2007, Volume: 52, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Combined Moda

2007
[Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and loss of strength in the right arm--not a typical combination].
    Praxis, 2007, May-02, Volume: 96, Issue:18

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Arm; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma

2007
Safety and activity of sorafenib in different histotypes of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
    Oncology, 2007, Volume: 73, Issue:3-4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Proto

2007