niacinamide has been researched along with Bone Neoplasms in 61 studies
nicotinamide : A pyridinecarboxamide that is pyridine in which the hydrogen at position 3 is replaced by a carboxamide group.
Bone Neoplasms: Tumors or cancer located in bone tissue or specific BONES.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Results of previous study showed promising but short-lived activity of sorafenib in the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced and metastatic osteosarcoma." | 9.20 | Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial. ( Aglietta, M; Asaftei, SD; Bertulli, R; Biagini, R; Capozzi, F; Casali, PG; D'Ambrosio, L; Fagioli, F; Ferraresi, V; Ferrari, S; Gambarotti, M; Grignani, G; Marchesi, E; Palmerini, E; Picci, P; Pignochino, Y; Sangiolo, D; Tamburini, A, 2015) |
"A pilot Phase II study adding sorafenib to endocrine therapy in 11 patients with metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer was conducted." | 9.19 | Impact of adding the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib to endocrine therapy in metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. ( Black, EP; Karabakhtsian, RG; Massarweh, S; Moss, J; Napier, D; Romond, E; Slone, S; Wang, C; Weiss, H, 2014) |
"This is the first report of activity achieved by the combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab in a patient with osteosarcoma." | 7.81 | RANK ligand blockade with denosumab in combination with sorafenib in chemorefractory osteosarcoma: a possible step forward? ( Bode, B; Cathomas, R; Fuchs, B; Rothermundt, C; Schwitter, M; von Moos, R, 2015) |
"The application of sorafenib tosylate monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel is effective against experimental breast cancer bone metastases resulting in anti-angiogenic, anti-tumour and anti-resorptive effects." | 7.77 | Sorafenib tosylate and paclitaxel induce anti-angiogenic, anti-tumour and anti-resorptive effects in experimental breast cancer bone metastases. ( Bäuerle, T; Komljenovic, D; Merz, M; Semmler, W; Zwick, S, 2011) |
"Our findings demonstrate that sorafenib inhibited the Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway in a time- and dose-dependent fashion in chondrosarcoma cell lines SW1353 and CRL7891 and suggest that sorafenib may be a new therapeutic option for patients with chondrosarcoma." | 7.76 | Sorafenib induces growth inhibition and apoptosis of human chondrosarcoma cells by blocking the RAF/ERK/MEK pathway. ( Guo, W; Lu, X; Ren, T; Tang, X; Zhao, H, 2010) |
"Osteosarcoma is a rare but aggressive bone neoplasm in humans, which is commonly treated with surgery, classical chemotherapy and radiation." | 5.40 | Human osteosarcoma cells respond to sorafenib chemotherapy by downregulation of the tumor progression factors S100A4, CXCR4 and the oncogene FOS. ( Burger, S; Gallè, B; Mair, G; Miller, I; Steinborn, R; Walter, I; Wolfesberger, B, 2014) |
"Sorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that targets tumor growth and angiogenesis signal transduction pathways." | 5.39 | [Complete response after sorafenib therapy plus zoledronic acid for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with bone metastasis - a case report]. ( Natori, T; Yamaguchi, M, 2013) |
" Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 92% of all patients necessitating sorafenib discontinuation in 77%." | 5.38 | High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Fischer, L; Nashan, B; Seegers, B; Staufer, K; Sterneck, M; Vettorazzi, E, 2012) |
"Results of previous study showed promising but short-lived activity of sorafenib in the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced and metastatic osteosarcoma." | 5.20 | Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial. ( Aglietta, M; Asaftei, SD; Bertulli, R; Biagini, R; Capozzi, F; Casali, PG; D'Ambrosio, L; Fagioli, F; Ferraresi, V; Ferrari, S; Gambarotti, M; Grignani, G; Marchesi, E; Palmerini, E; Picci, P; Pignochino, Y; Sangiolo, D; Tamburini, A, 2015) |
"A pilot Phase II study adding sorafenib to endocrine therapy in 11 patients with metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer was conducted." | 5.19 | Impact of adding the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib to endocrine therapy in metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. ( Black, EP; Karabakhtsian, RG; Massarweh, S; Moss, J; Napier, D; Romond, E; Slone, S; Wang, C; Weiss, H, 2014) |
" Independent actions of the model drugs DNA-intercalating doxorubicin, RNA-interfering miR-34a and protein-inhibiting sorafenib on DNA replication, RNA translation and protein kinase signaling in highly metastatic, human osteosarcoma 143B cells were demonstrated by the increase of γH2A." | 3.85 | Co-targeting of DNA, RNA, and protein molecules provides optimal outcomes for treating osteosarcoma and pulmonary metastasis in spontaneous and experimental metastasis mouse models. ( DeVere White, RW; Duan, Z; Ho, PY; Jian, C; Lam, KS; Lara, PN; Qiu, JX; Tu, MJ; Wun, T; Yu, AM; Yu, AX; Zhang, Q, 2017) |
"This is the first report of activity achieved by the combination of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab in a patient with osteosarcoma." | 3.81 | RANK ligand blockade with denosumab in combination with sorafenib in chemorefractory osteosarcoma: a possible step forward? ( Bode, B; Cathomas, R; Fuchs, B; Rothermundt, C; Schwitter, M; von Moos, R, 2015) |
" In a study evaluating the combination of sorafenib, bevacizumab, and low-dose cyclophosphamide in children with solid tumors, an unexpectedly high incidence of pneumothorax was observed." | 3.81 | Pneumothorax as a complication of combination antiangiogenic therapy in children and young adults with refractory/recurrent solid tumors. ( Davidoff, AM; Interiano, RB; McCarville, MB; Navid, F; Sandoval, J; Wu, J, 2015) |
"THERE WERE 62 PATIENTS (37 MEN, MEAN AGE: 61 years) treated with sorafenib (62%), sunitinib (22%), and vandetanib (16%) outside of clinical trials; 22 had papillary, five had follicular, five had Hürthle cell, 13 had poorly differentiated, and 17 had medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC)." | 3.80 | Tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with metastatic thyroid carcinomas: a retrospective study of the TUTHYREF network. ( Baudin, E; Bonichon, F; Borget, I; Brassard, M; Chougnet, CN; Claude-Desroches, M; de la Fouchardière, C; Do Cao, C; Giraudet, AL; Leboulleux, S; Massicotte, MH; Schlumberger, M, 2014) |
"Retrospective study on all the renal cell carcinoma patients with bone metastases treated with sunitinib or sorafenib between November 2005 and June 2012 at the University Hospitals Leuven and AZ Groeninge in Kortrijk." | 3.78 | Concomitant oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors and bisphosphonates in advanced renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases. ( Berkers, J; Beuselinck, B; Body, JJ; Debruyne, P; Dumez, H; Elaidi, R; Karadimou, A; Lerut, E; Paridaens, R; Rogiers, A; Schöffski, P; Van Cann, T; Van Poppel, H; Willems, L; Wolter, P, 2012) |
"The application of sorafenib tosylate monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel is effective against experimental breast cancer bone metastases resulting in anti-angiogenic, anti-tumour and anti-resorptive effects." | 3.77 | Sorafenib tosylate and paclitaxel induce anti-angiogenic, anti-tumour and anti-resorptive effects in experimental breast cancer bone metastases. ( Bäuerle, T; Komljenovic, D; Merz, M; Semmler, W; Zwick, S, 2011) |
"Sorafenib is a new drug, multikinase inhibitor, which has been recently approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma." | 3.77 | Severe sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction. ( Betlloch, I; Cuesta, L; Latorre, N; Monteagudo, A; Toledo, F, 2011) |
"Our findings demonstrate that sorafenib inhibited the Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway in a time- and dose-dependent fashion in chondrosarcoma cell lines SW1353 and CRL7891 and suggest that sorafenib may be a new therapeutic option for patients with chondrosarcoma." | 3.76 | Sorafenib induces growth inhibition and apoptosis of human chondrosarcoma cells by blocking the RAF/ERK/MEK pathway. ( Guo, W; Lu, X; Ren, T; Tang, X; Zhao, H, 2010) |
" Overall, adverse event rates were generally similar between the treatment arms." | 2.80 | SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer. ( Bos, MM; De Santis, M; Eichelberg, C; Fischer von Weikersthal, L; Flörcken, A; Freier, W; Goebell, PJ; Gottstein, D; Hauswald, K; Indorf, M; Lerchenmüller, C; Los, M; Michel, MS; Pahernik, S; Schenck, M; Schirrmacher-Memmel, S; Staehler, M; van Arkel, C; Vervenne, WL; Zimmermann, U, 2015) |
"Sorafenib has proven efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)." | 2.78 | Could interferon still play a role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma? A randomized study of two schedules of sorafenib plus interferon-alpha 2a (RAPSODY). ( Boni, C; Bracarda, S; Caserta, C; Cinquini, M; Cortesi, E; De Angelis, V; Di Costanzo, F; Falcone, A; Gasparro, D; Labianca, R; Mucciarini, C; Paglino, C; Pazzola, A; Porta, C; Santoro, A, 2013) |
"The combination of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine is tolerable, but requires attenuation of sorafenib and capecitabine dosing because of the overlapping toxicity of hand-foot syndrome." | 2.76 | A phase I trial of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: New York Cancer Consortium Trial NCI 6981. ( Jeske, S; Kung, S; Lehrer, D; Matulich, D; Mazumdar, M; Milowsky, MI; Nanus, DM; Selzer, J; Sung, M; Tagawa, ST; Wright, JJ, 2011) |
"Sorafenib has a beneficial effect on tumor progression in patients with metastatic DTC, but was less effective in patients with bone metastases." | 2.74 | Beneficial effects of sorafenib on tumor progression, but not on radioiodine uptake, in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. ( Corssmit, EP; Gelderblom, H; Heemstra, KA; Hoftijzer, H; Huijberts, M; Kapiteijn, E; Morreau, H; Pereira, AM; Romijn, JA; Smit, JW; Stokkel, MP; Weijers, K, 2009) |
"Sorafenib was given at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles." | 2.74 | Final analysis of a phase II trial using sorafenib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. ( Aragon-Ching, JB; Arlen, PM; Chen, CC; Dahut, WL; Draper, D; Figg, WD; Gulley, JL; Jain, L; Jones, E; Steinberg, SM; Venitz, J; Wright, JJ, 2009) |
"Sorafenib 400 mg was administered twice daily from mid-March." | 2.53 | Radiation recall dermatitis induced by sorafenib : A case study and review of the literature. ( Brüssow, C; Guckenberger, M; Pestalozzi, B; Riesterer, O; Stieb, S; Weiler, S, 2016) |
"The prognosis of pulmonary blastoma is very poor; overall five-year survival is 16%." | 2.47 | Classic biphasic pulmonary blastoma: a case report and review of the literature. ( Boeykens, E; Rutsaert, R; Stappaerts, I; Van Loo, S, 2011) |
"Bone biopsy confirmed metastases of prostate cancer." | 1.62 | False-Positive 18F-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-1007 PET/CT Caused by Hepatic Multifocal Inflammatory Foci. ( Canelo, A; Ladrón-de-Guevara, D; Piottante, A; Regonesi, C, 2021) |
"The osteosarcoma was only partially sensitive to the molecular-targeting drug sorafenib, which did not arrest its growth." | 1.46 | Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R regresses an osteosarcoma in a patient-derived xenograft model resistant to a molecular-targeting drug. ( Chishima, T; Dry, SM; Eilber, FC; Elliott, I; Endo, I; Federman, N; Hiroshima, Y; Hoffman, RM; Igarashi, K; Kawaguchi, K; Kiyuna, T; Li, Y; Matsuyama, R; Murakami, T; Nelson, SD; Russell, T; Singh, A; Tanaka, K; Yanagawa, J; Zhang, Y; Zhao, M, 2017) |
"To evaluated patterns and outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT)." | 1.43 | Clinical analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living-donor liver transplantation. ( Hong, TH; Kim, DG; Na, GH; You, YK, 2016) |
"Oral squamous cell carcinoma often causes bone invasion resulting in poor prognosis and affects the quality of life for patients." | 1.42 | Synergistic Effect of Sorafenib and Radiation on Human Oral Carcinoma in vivo. ( Chang, B; Chen, JC; Chiang, IT; Hsu, FT; Hwang, JJ; Kwang, WK; Liu, YC, 2015) |
"The occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is closely associated with viral hepatitis or alcoholic hepatitis." | 1.42 | Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Cervical Spine and Pelvic Bone Metastases Presenting as Unknown Primary Neoplasm. ( Chun, HG; Chun, HJ; Hong, SH; Hwang, SW; Jung, ES; Lee, JE; Lee, JM; Lee, MA; Lee, SH, 2015) |
"Osteosarcoma is a rare but aggressive bone neoplasm in humans, which is commonly treated with surgery, classical chemotherapy and radiation." | 1.40 | Human osteosarcoma cells respond to sorafenib chemotherapy by downregulation of the tumor progression factors S100A4, CXCR4 and the oncogene FOS. ( Burger, S; Gallè, B; Mair, G; Miller, I; Steinborn, R; Walter, I; Wolfesberger, B, 2014) |
"Sorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that targets tumor growth and angiogenesis signal transduction pathways." | 1.39 | [Complete response after sorafenib therapy plus zoledronic acid for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with bone metastasis - a case report]. ( Natori, T; Yamaguchi, M, 2013) |
"Hyponatremia is reported to be associated with poor survival in localized renal cell carcinoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immunotherapy." | 1.38 | Impact of hyponatremia on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with molecular targeted therapy. ( Arai, Y; Kawashima, A; Nakai, Y; Nin, M; Nishimura, K; Nonomura, N; Takayama, H; Tanigawa, G; Tsujimura, A; Uemura, M, 2012) |
" Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 92% of all patients necessitating sorafenib discontinuation in 77%." | 1.38 | High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Fischer, L; Nashan, B; Seegers, B; Staufer, K; Sterneck, M; Vettorazzi, E, 2012) |
"We report a case of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the native kidney of a renal transplant recipient." | 1.35 | Multidisciplinary treatment including sorafenib stabilized the bone metastases of renal cell carcinoma in an immunosuppressed renal transplant recipient. ( Hasegawa, Y; Matsubara, A; Mita, K; Ohdan, H, 2009) |
"Due to the long-lasting course of CLL second cancers can occur in these patients." | 1.34 | [Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and loss of strength in the right arm--not a typical combination]. ( Bargetzi, M; Puric, E; Schönenberger, A; Sendi, P, 2007) |
" Safety was acceptable, with the most common adverse events consisting of hand-foot skin reaction, cutaneous rash, diarrhoea, fatigue and hypertension." | 1.34 | Safety and activity of sorafenib in different histotypes of advanced renal cell carcinoma. ( Bajetta, E; Catena, L; Gevorgyan, A; Guadalupi, V; Mancin, M; Martinetti, A; Platania, M; Procopio, G; Pusceddu, S; Verzoni, E, 2007) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 7 (11.48) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 51 (83.61) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 3 (4.92) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Giordano, G | 1 |
Merlini, A | 1 |
Ferrero, G | 1 |
Mesiano, G | 1 |
Fiorino, E | 1 |
Brusco, S | 1 |
Centomo, ML | 1 |
Leuci, V | 1 |
D'Ambrosio, L | 2 |
Aglietta, M | 2 |
Sangiolo, D | 2 |
Grignani, G | 2 |
Pignochino, Y | 2 |
Ladrón-de-Guevara, D | 1 |
Canelo, A | 1 |
Piottante, A | 1 |
Regonesi, C | 1 |
Watabe, T | 1 |
Uemura, M | 2 |
Soeda, F | 1 |
Naka, S | 1 |
Ujike, T | 1 |
Hatano, K | 1 |
Sasaki, H | 1 |
Kamiya, T | 1 |
Shimosegawa, E | 1 |
Kato, H | 1 |
Cardinale, J | 1 |
Tateishi, U | 1 |
Nonomura, N | 2 |
Giesel, FL | 1 |
Jian, C | 1 |
Tu, MJ | 1 |
Ho, PY | 1 |
Duan, Z | 1 |
Zhang, Q | 1 |
Qiu, JX | 1 |
DeVere White, RW | 1 |
Wun, T | 1 |
Lara, PN | 1 |
Lam, KS | 1 |
Yu, AX | 1 |
Yu, AM | 1 |
García Carretero, R | 1 |
Vazquez-Gomez, O | 1 |
Romero Brugera, M | 1 |
Rebollo-Aparicio, N | 1 |
Panagiotidis, E | 1 |
Paschali, A | 1 |
Giannoula, E | 1 |
Chatzipavlidou, V | 1 |
Jiang, W | 1 |
Zeng, ZC | 1 |
Vrdoljak, E | 1 |
Rini, B | 1 |
Schmidinger, M | 1 |
Omrčen, T | 1 |
Torday, L | 1 |
Szczylik, C | 2 |
Sella, A | 1 |
Haraldsdottir, S | 1 |
Li, Q | 1 |
Villalona-Calero, MA | 1 |
Olencki, TE | 1 |
Kendra, K | 1 |
Ing, SW | 1 |
Smidt-Hansen, T | 1 |
Folkmar, TB | 1 |
Fode, K | 1 |
Agerbaek, M | 1 |
Donskov, F | 1 |
Natori, T | 1 |
Yamaguchi, M | 1 |
Clyne, M | 1 |
Thompson, PA | 1 |
Drissi, R | 1 |
Muscal, JA | 1 |
Panditharatna, E | 1 |
Fouladi, M | 1 |
Ingle, AM | 1 |
Ahern, CH | 1 |
Reid, JM | 1 |
Lin, T | 1 |
Weigel, BJ | 1 |
Blaney, SM | 1 |
Walter, I | 2 |
Wolfesberger, B | 2 |
Miller, I | 1 |
Mair, G | 1 |
Burger, S | 1 |
Gallè, B | 1 |
Steinborn, R | 1 |
Massicotte, MH | 1 |
Brassard, M | 1 |
Claude-Desroches, M | 1 |
Borget, I | 1 |
Bonichon, F | 1 |
Giraudet, AL | 1 |
Do Cao, C | 1 |
Chougnet, CN | 1 |
Leboulleux, S | 1 |
Baudin, E | 1 |
Schlumberger, M | 1 |
de la Fouchardière, C | 1 |
McKay, RR | 1 |
Lin, X | 2 |
Perkins, JJ | 1 |
Heng, DY | 1 |
Simantov, R | 2 |
Choueiri, TK | 1 |
Pitoia, F | 1 |
Massarweh, S | 1 |
Moss, J | 1 |
Wang, C | 1 |
Romond, E | 1 |
Slone, S | 1 |
Weiss, H | 1 |
Karabakhtsian, RG | 1 |
Napier, D | 1 |
Black, EP | 1 |
Palmerini, E | 1 |
Ferraresi, V | 1 |
Bertulli, R | 1 |
Asaftei, SD | 1 |
Tamburini, A | 1 |
Marchesi, E | 1 |
Capozzi, F | 1 |
Biagini, R | 1 |
Gambarotti, M | 1 |
Fagioli, F | 1 |
Casali, PG | 1 |
Picci, P | 1 |
Ferrari, S | 1 |
Cathomas, R | 1 |
Rothermundt, C | 1 |
Bode, B | 1 |
Fuchs, B | 1 |
von Moos, R | 1 |
Schwitter, M | 1 |
Interiano, RB | 1 |
McCarville, MB | 1 |
Wu, J | 1 |
Davidoff, AM | 1 |
Sandoval, J | 1 |
Navid, F | 1 |
Eichelberg, C | 1 |
Vervenne, WL | 1 |
De Santis, M | 1 |
Fischer von Weikersthal, L | 1 |
Goebell, PJ | 1 |
Lerchenmüller, C | 1 |
Zimmermann, U | 1 |
Bos, MM | 1 |
Freier, W | 1 |
Schirrmacher-Memmel, S | 1 |
Staehler, M | 1 |
Pahernik, S | 1 |
Los, M | 1 |
Schenck, M | 1 |
Flörcken, A | 1 |
van Arkel, C | 1 |
Hauswald, K | 1 |
Indorf, M | 1 |
Gottstein, D | 1 |
Michel, MS | 1 |
Thoma, C | 1 |
Albiges, L | 1 |
Escudier, B | 1 |
Hwang, SW | 1 |
Lee, JE | 1 |
Lee, JM | 1 |
Hong, SH | 2 |
Lee, MA | 1 |
Chun, HG | 1 |
Chun, HJ | 1 |
Lee, SH | 1 |
Jung, ES | 1 |
Hsu, FT | 1 |
Chang, B | 1 |
Chen, JC | 1 |
Chiang, IT | 1 |
Liu, YC | 1 |
Kwang, WK | 1 |
Hwang, JJ | 1 |
Zhang, Y | 2 |
Li, Y | 2 |
Cai, Y | 1 |
Wang, K | 1 |
Li, H | 1 |
Stieb, S | 1 |
Riesterer, O | 1 |
Brüssow, C | 1 |
Pestalozzi, B | 1 |
Guckenberger, M | 1 |
Weiler, S | 1 |
Yılmaz, S | 1 |
Özçakar, ZB | 1 |
Taktak, A | 1 |
Kiremitçi, S | 1 |
Ensari, A | 1 |
Dinçaslan, H | 1 |
Yalçınkaya, F | 1 |
Grünwald, V | 1 |
Kalanovic, D | 1 |
Na, GH | 1 |
Hong, TH | 1 |
You, YK | 1 |
Kim, DG | 1 |
Murakami, T | 1 |
Igarashi, K | 1 |
Kawaguchi, K | 1 |
Kiyuna, T | 1 |
Zhao, M | 1 |
Hiroshima, Y | 1 |
Nelson, SD | 1 |
Dry, SM | 1 |
Yanagawa, J | 1 |
Russell, T | 1 |
Federman, N | 1 |
Singh, A | 1 |
Elliott, I | 1 |
Matsuyama, R | 1 |
Chishima, T | 1 |
Tanaka, K | 1 |
Endo, I | 1 |
Eilber, FC | 1 |
Hoffman, RM | 1 |
Kim, SH | 1 |
Kim, S | 1 |
Nam, BH | 1 |
Lee, SE | 1 |
Kim, CS | 1 |
Seo, IY | 1 |
Kim, TN | 1 |
Kwon, TG | 1 |
Seo, SI | 1 |
Joo, KJ | 1 |
Song, K | 1 |
Kwak, C | 1 |
Chung, J | 1 |
Aragon-Ching, JB | 1 |
Jain, L | 1 |
Gulley, JL | 1 |
Arlen, PM | 1 |
Wright, JJ | 2 |
Steinberg, SM | 1 |
Draper, D | 1 |
Venitz, J | 1 |
Jones, E | 1 |
Chen, CC | 1 |
Figg, WD | 1 |
Dahut, WL | 1 |
Zimmermann, K | 1 |
Schmittel, A | 1 |
Steiner, U | 1 |
Asemissen, AM | 1 |
Knoedler, M | 1 |
Thiel, E | 1 |
Miller, K | 1 |
Keilholz, U | 1 |
Tonar, Z | 1 |
Gerner, W | 1 |
Skalicky, M | 1 |
Heiduschka, G | 1 |
Egerbacher, M | 1 |
Thalhammer, JG | 1 |
Zołnierek, J | 1 |
Nurzyński, P | 1 |
Langiewicz, P | 1 |
Oborska, S | 1 |
Waśko-Grabowska, A | 1 |
Kuszatal, E | 1 |
Obrocka, B | 1 |
Spector, E | 1 |
Franklin, MJ | 1 |
Truskinovsky, AM | 1 |
Dudek, AZ | 1 |
Hoftijzer, H | 1 |
Heemstra, KA | 1 |
Morreau, H | 1 |
Stokkel, MP | 1 |
Corssmit, EP | 1 |
Gelderblom, H | 1 |
Weijers, K | 1 |
Pereira, AM | 1 |
Huijberts, M | 1 |
Kapiteijn, E | 1 |
Romijn, JA | 1 |
Smit, JW | 1 |
Hasegawa, Y | 1 |
Mita, K | 1 |
Matsubara, A | 1 |
Ohdan, H | 1 |
Ide, S | 1 |
Soda, H | 1 |
Hakariya, T | 1 |
Takemoto, S | 1 |
Ishimoto, H | 1 |
Tomari, S | 1 |
Sawai, T | 1 |
Nagashima, S | 1 |
Furukawa, M | 1 |
Nakamura, Y | 1 |
Kohno, S | 1 |
Bellmunt, J | 1 |
Maroto-Rey, P | 1 |
Trigo, JM | 1 |
Carles, J | 1 |
Guillem, V | 1 |
López-Martín, JA | 1 |
Antón-Torres, A | 1 |
Urruticoechea, L | 1 |
Lu, X | 1 |
Tang, X | 1 |
Guo, W | 1 |
Ren, T | 1 |
Zhao, H | 1 |
Merz, M | 1 |
Komljenovic, D | 1 |
Zwick, S | 1 |
Semmler, W | 1 |
Bäuerle, T | 1 |
Tagawa, ST | 1 |
Milowsky, MI | 1 |
Jeske, S | 1 |
Mazumdar, M | 1 |
Kung, S | 1 |
Sung, M | 1 |
Lehrer, D | 1 |
Matulich, D | 1 |
Selzer, J | 1 |
Nanus, DM | 1 |
Kusuda, Y | 1 |
Miyake, H | 1 |
Behnsawy, HM | 1 |
Fukuhara, T | 1 |
Inoue, TA | 1 |
Fujisawa, M | 1 |
Van Loo, S | 1 |
Boeykens, E | 1 |
Stappaerts, I | 1 |
Rutsaert, R | 1 |
Cuesta, L | 1 |
Betlloch, I | 1 |
Toledo, F | 1 |
Latorre, N | 1 |
Monteagudo, A | 1 |
Rastogi, A | 1 |
Bihari, C | 1 |
Jain, D | 1 |
Gupta, NL | 1 |
Sarin, SK | 1 |
Svoboda, RM | 1 |
Mackay, D | 1 |
Welsch, MJ | 1 |
Anderson, BE | 1 |
Kawashima, A | 1 |
Tsujimura, A | 1 |
Takayama, H | 1 |
Arai, Y | 1 |
Nin, M | 1 |
Tanigawa, G | 1 |
Nakai, Y | 1 |
Nishimura, K | 1 |
Staufer, K | 1 |
Fischer, L | 1 |
Seegers, B | 1 |
Vettorazzi, E | 1 |
Nashan, B | 1 |
Sterneck, M | 1 |
Saito, K | 1 |
Bracarda, S | 1 |
Porta, C | 1 |
Boni, C | 1 |
Santoro, A | 1 |
Mucciarini, C | 1 |
Pazzola, A | 1 |
Cortesi, E | 1 |
Gasparro, D | 1 |
Labianca, R | 1 |
Di Costanzo, F | 1 |
Falcone, A | 1 |
Cinquini, M | 1 |
Caserta, C | 1 |
Paglino, C | 1 |
De Angelis, V | 1 |
Vázquez-Alonso, F | 1 |
Puche-Sanz, I | 1 |
Beuselinck, B | 1 |
Wolter, P | 1 |
Karadimou, A | 1 |
Elaidi, R | 1 |
Dumez, H | 1 |
Rogiers, A | 1 |
Van Cann, T | 1 |
Willems, L | 1 |
Body, JJ | 1 |
Berkers, J | 1 |
Van Poppel, H | 1 |
Lerut, E | 1 |
Debruyne, P | 1 |
Paridaens, R | 1 |
Schöffski, P | 1 |
Takagi, Y | 1 |
Kametaka, H | 1 |
Makino, H | 1 |
Koyama, T | 1 |
Seike, K | 1 |
Hara, J | 1 |
Hasegawa, A | 1 |
Sciarra, A | 1 |
Autran Gomez, AM | 1 |
Gentilucci, A | 1 |
Parente, U | 1 |
Salciccia, S | 1 |
Gentile, V | 1 |
Di Silverio, F | 1 |
Sendi, P | 1 |
Puric, E | 1 |
Schönenberger, A | 1 |
Bargetzi, M | 1 |
Procopio, G | 1 |
Verzoni, E | 1 |
Gevorgyan, A | 1 |
Mancin, M | 1 |
Pusceddu, S | 1 |
Catena, L | 1 |
Platania, M | 1 |
Guadalupi, V | 1 |
Martinetti, A | 1 |
Bajetta, E | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Phase II Study of Adding the Multikinase Inhibitor Sorafenib (Nexavar) to Existing Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer[NCT00525161] | Phase 2 | 11 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-10-31 | Terminated (stopped due to Slow accrual and loss of funding) | ||
A Phase II, Open Label, Non-randomized Study of Second or Third Line Treatment With the Combination of Sorafenib and Everolimus in Patients Affected by Relapsed and Non-resectable High-grade Osteosarcoma[NCT01804374] | Phase 2 | 38 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-06-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase II Trial of Apatinib in Relapsed and Unresectable High-grade Osteosarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy[NCT02711007] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 37 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-03-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase III Randomized Sequential Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib Followed by Sunitinib Versus Sunitinib Followed by Sorafenib in the Treatment of First-Line Advanced / Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00732914] | Phase 3 | 272 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-01-31 | Completed | ||
Randomized, Double-blind Phase 2 Study Of Axitinib (Ag-013736) With Or Without Dose Titration In Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00835978] | Phase 2 | 213 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-08-31 | Completed | ||
Phase II Study Of Single-Agent SU011248 In The Second-Line Treatment Of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00054886] | Phase 2 | 63 participants | Interventional | 2003-01-31 | Completed | ||
AG-013736 (AXITINIB) FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC RENAL CELL CANCER[NCT00920816] | Phase 3 | 492 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-08-25 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2 Efficacy And Safety Study Of SU011248 Administered In A Continuous Daily Regimen In Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00137423] | Phase 2 | 107 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-05-31 | Completed | ||
Phase 3b, Randomized, Open-Label Study Of Bevacizumab + Temsirolimus Vs. Bevacizumab + Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Treatment In Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00631371] | Phase 3 | 791 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-04-30 | Completed | ||
AXITINIB (AG-013736) AS SECOND LINE THERAPY FOR METASTATIC RENAL CELL CANCER: AXIS TRIAL[NCT00678392] | Phase 3 | 723 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-09-03 | Completed | ||
A Phase II Efficacy And Safety Study Of Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) Administered In A Continuous Daily Regimen In Patients With Advanced (First-Line) Renal Cell Cancer[NCT00338884] | Phase 2 | 120 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomized Trial Of Temsirolimus Versus Sorafenib As Second-Line Therapy In Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Failed First-Line Sunitinib Therapy[NCT00474786] | Phase 3 | 512 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomized Phase II Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Sunitinib Malate Schedule 4/2 vs. Sunitinib Malate Continuous Dosing As First-Line Therapy For Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer (Renal EFFECT Trial)[NCT00267748] | Phase 2 | 317 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-12-31 | Completed | ||
A Pivotal Study Of SU011248 In The Treatment Of Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00077974] | Phase 2 | 106 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-02-29 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Randomized Study Of SU011248 Versus Interferon-Alfa As First-Line Systemic Therapy For Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma[NCT00083889] | Phase 3 | 750 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-08-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Three-Arm, Randomized, Open-Label Study Of Interferon Alfa Alone, CCI-779 Alone, And The Combination Of Interferon Alfa And CCI-779 In First-Line Poor-Prognosis Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.[NCT00065468] | Phase 3 | 626 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-07-31 | Completed | ||
An Open-label, Prospective Study of Tumor Response Time of Palbociclib in Combination With AI in Real-world First-line Treatment of Postmenopausal Chinese Patients With ER (+) HER2 (-) Metastatic Breast Cancer[NCT04858997] | Phase 2 | 150 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-04-22 | Recruiting | ||
A Phase II Study of BAY 43-9006 (Sorafenib) in Metastatic, Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer[NCT00090545] | Phase 2 | 46 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-09-01 | Completed | ||
Sorafenib as Adjuvant to Radioiodine Therapy in Non-Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma[NCT00887107] | Phase 2 | 32 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-10-31 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Clinical benefit rate is defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease (CR/PR/SD) as measured by Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for a minimum of at least 24 weeks. (NCT00525161)
Timeframe: 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sorafenib & Endocrine Therapy | 50 |
(NCT00525161)
Timeframe: continuously
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib & Endocrine Therapy | 6.1 |
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. Patients were followed monthly for clinical and toxicity evaluation. Disease response by RECIST criteria v1.0 was assessed after 3 months by appropriate scans and these were obtained every 2 months thereafter until progression. (NCT00525161)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after treatment & 8 weeks after initial documentation of response
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Stable Disease | Progression | |
Sorafenib & Endocrine Therapy | 7 | 3 |
Clearance (CL) of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed (F). Clearance is defined as the volume of blood from which drug can be completely removed per unit of time. CL/F for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | L/hr (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 54.15 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 61.93 |
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Vz/F is influenced by the fraction absorbed. Vz/F for steady-state axitinb was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | L (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 158.18 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 216.62 |
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero 24 hours[AUC(0-24). AUC(0-24) for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng.hr/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 258.68 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 161.38 |
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measurable concentration (AUClast). AUClast for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng.hr/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 105.33 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 78.44 |
DR was defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (complete response - CR or Partial response - PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The median values were estimated based on Kaplan-Meier method. 95% confidence interval was based on the Brookmeyer and Crowley method. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | NA |
Placebo Titration Arm | 21.2 |
Non-randomized Arm | 23.3 |
Cmax for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. Results were normalized to axitinib 7 mg dose for active titration arm and axitinib 5 mg dose for placebo titration arm. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 15 (C2D15): pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 31.74 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 23.05 |
ORR was defined as the proportion of participants with objective response based assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease. No new lesions. PR was defined as >=30% decrease on study under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 53.6 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 33.9 |
Non-randomized Arm | 59.3 |
All Participants | 48.4 |
OS was defined as the time from date of the first dose of the study medication to date of death due to any cause. For participants who did not die, their survival times were to be censored at the last date they were known to be alive. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm (FA Population) | 42.7 |
Placebo Titration Arm (FA Population) | 30.4 |
Non-randomized Arm (SA Population) | 41.6 |
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Plasma decay half life for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | hr (Mean) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 2.48 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 2.81 |
The time from first dose administration to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. PFS in each arm was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimates of the PFS curves from the Kaplan-Meier method were presented. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death, or withdrawal; performed at baseline and repeated every 8 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks.
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 14.5 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 15.7 |
Non-randomized Arm | 16.6 |
All Participants | 14.6 |
Tmax for steady-state axitinib was evaluated on Cycle 2 Day 15. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: C2D15: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose
Intervention | hrs (Median) |
---|---|
Active Titration Arm | 2.04 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 2.00 |
Value at respective visit minus value at baseline. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At screening (D-14 to D-1); lead-in period: Cycle 1 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 2 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 3 & subsequent cycles Day 1; end of study and follow-up 28 days after last dose.
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=52,51,73) | Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=56,56,91) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=56,56,91) | Cycle 2 Day 15 (n=55,55,86) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=48,49,84) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=45,48,79) | End of treatment (n=35,44,51) | Follow-up (n=16,25,36) | |
Active Titration Arm | -1.6 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 5.5 | 6.6 | 7.4 | 0.6 | -4.5 |
Non-randomized Arm | 0.5 | 11.5 | 10.5 | 9.7 | 9.1 | 8.7 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
Placebo Titration Arm | -2.6 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 5.9 | 4.6 | 3.5 | -1.3 |
Value at respective visit minus value at baseline (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At screening (D-14 to D-1); lead-in period: Cycle 1 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 2 - Day 1 and Day 15; Cycle 3 & subsequent cycles Day 1; end of study and follow-up 28 days after last dose.
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=52,51,73) | Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=56,56,91) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=56,56,91) | Cycle 2 Day 15 (n=55,55,86) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=48,49,84) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=45,48,79) | End of treatment (n=35,44,51) | Follow-up (n=16,25,36) | |
Active Titration Arm | -4.3 | 3.8 | 1.9 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 2.4 | -3.6 |
Non-randomized Arm | -1.8 | 11.5 | 9.9 | 5.9 | 5.2 | 5.5 | -2.8 | -0.6 |
Placebo Titration Arm | -2.9 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 8.4 | 3.5 | 1.7 | -0.4 |
CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD31+/CD146+ CECs, CD31+/CD146+ MFI PDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ MFI pPDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ pVEGFR, CD31+/CD146+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)
Intervention | Fluorescent Intensity Unit (FIU) (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline CECs Count (n=17,22,20) | Baseline MFI PDGFR-BETA (n=17,21,20) | Baseline MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=17,21,20) | Baseline MFI pVEGFR (n=17,22,20) | Baseline MFI VEGFR (n=17,22,20) | |
Active Titration Arm | 74668 | 333760 | 380139 | 385617 | 330333 |
Non-randomized Arm | 77437 | 442642 | 383202 | 380184 | 359097 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 76258 | 380886 | 355441 | 352644 | 401909 |
CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD146+/CD105+ CECs, CD146+/CD105+ mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ MFI phospho-PDGFR (pPDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ phospho-Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (pVEGFR), CD146+/CD105+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)
Intervention | Fluorescent Intensity Unit (FIU) (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline CECs Count (n=17,22,20) | Baseline MFI PDGFR-BETA (n=17,22,20) | Baseline MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=17,22,20) | Baseline MFI pVEGFR (n=16,22,20) | Baseline MFI VEGFR (n=16,22,20) | |
Active Titration Arm | 23584 | 346815 | 401226 | 456086 | 367799 |
Non-randomized Arm | 29663 | 327567 | 397672 | 398754 | 359092 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 28544 | 455238 | 395509 | 436197 | 473290 |
CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD31+/CD146+ CECs, CD31+/CD146+ MFI PDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ MFI pPDGFR-beta, CD31+/CD146+ pVEGFR, CD31+/CD146+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At end of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 15), Cycle 2 Day 15 and End of therapy (EOT)
Intervention | Ratio (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=11,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=13,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 CECs COUNT (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=11,15,13) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=13,14,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=6,8,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=11,15,13) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=13,14,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI pPDGFRBETA (n=6,8,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=11,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=13,16,10) | EOT:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=11,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR n=13,16,10) | EOT:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=7,9,4) | |
Active Titration Arm | 2.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
Non-randomized Arm | 1.5 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
CECs are noninvasive marker of vascular damage, remodeling, and dysfunction. Samples were collected and following proteins were analyzed: CD146+/CD105+ CECs, CD146+/CD105+ MFI platelet derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ MFI phospho-PDGFR (pPDGFR)-beta, CD146+/CD105+ phospho-VEGFR (pVEGFR), CD146+/CD105+ MFI VEGFR. The ratio of plasma levels of the biomarkers at the selected time point vs baseline is reported. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At end of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 15), Cycle 2 Day 15 and End of therapy (EOT)
Intervention | Ratio (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=11,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 CECs Count (n=13,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 CECs Count (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=11,17,13) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=13,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI PDGFRBETA (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=11,17,13) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI pPDGFR-BETA (n=13,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI pPDGFRBETA (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=10,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=12,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI pVEGFR (n=7,9,4) | C1D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=10,18,14) | C2D15:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=12,16,11) | EOT:C1D1 MFI VEGFR (n=7,9,4) | |
Active Titration Arm | 2.3 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.1 |
Non-randomized Arm | 2.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 3.7 | 4.4 | 8.9 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 |
ORR, defined as proportion of participants with CR or PR according to RECIST, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFA or VEGFR3 polymorphisms. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/A (n = 7, 9, 14) | VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/C (n = 22, 20, 41) | VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: C/C (n = 14, 14, 24) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/G (n = 22, 23, 43) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/A (n = 19, 16, 29) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: A/A (n = 2, 4, 7) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/G (n = 16, 15, 28) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/C (n = 22, 22, 35) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: C/C (n = 5, 6, 16) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/A (n = 36, 39, 79) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/G (n = 6, 4, 9) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: G/G (n = 1, 0, 0) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/G (n = 36, 38, 79) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/T (n = 6, 5, 10) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: T/T (n = 1, 0, 0) | |
Active Titration Arm | 85.7 | 54.5 | 50.0 | 59.1 | 57.9 | 50.0 | 81.3 | 45.5 | 40.0 | 58.3 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 55.6 | 66.7 | 100.0 |
Non-randomized Arm | 42.9 | 65.9 | 66.7 | 67.4 | 58.6 | 42.9 | 60.7 | 57.1 | 75.0 | 64.3 | 44.4 | 0 | 65.2 | 40.0 | 0 |
Placebo Titration Arm | 22.2 | 35.0 | 35.7 | 39.1 | 18.8 | 50.0 | 53.3 | 18.2 | 33.3 | 30.8 | 50.0 | 0 | 28.9 | 60.0 | 0 |
PFS, defined as the time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, in subgroups that were defined by VEGFA or VEGFR3 polymorphisms. Estimates of the PFS curves from the Kaplan-Meier method were presented. (NCT00835978)
Timeframe: At baseline - Beginning of the lead-in period (Cycle 1 Day 1)
Intervention | Months (Median) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/A (n = 7, 9, 14) | VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: A/C (n = 22, 20, 41) | VEGFA/rs699947 Genotype: C/C (n = 14, 14, 41) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/G (n = 22, 23, 43) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: G/A (n = 19, 16, 29) | VEGFA/rs1570360 Genotype: A/A (n = 2, 4, 29) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/G (n = 16, 15, 28) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: G/C (n = 22, 22, 35) | VEGFR3/rs448012 Genotype: C/C (n = 5, 6, 16) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/A (n = 36, 39, 70) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: A/G (n = 6, 4, 9) | VEGFR3/rs307826 Genotype: G/G (n = 0, 0, 0) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/G (n = 36, 38, 69) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: G/T (n = 36, 38, 10) | VEGFR3/rs307821 Genotype: T/T (n = 1, 0, 0) | |
Active Titration Arm | NA | 11.07 | 18.74 | 14.62 | 12.78 | NA | 17.44 | 9.18 | 11.07 | 13.73 | 16.52 | NA | 12.78 | 24.80 | NA |
Non-randomized Arm | 7.33 | 16.59 | 25.13 | 25.13 | 13.90 | 8.57 | 22.54 | 13.83 | NA | 16.56 | 16.26 | NA | 16.59 | 13.86 | NA |
Placebo Titration Arm | 11.50 | 9.67 | 24.64 | 19.42 | 8.34 | 10.04 | 19.42 | 8.31 | 15.67 | 15.67 | 7.93 | NA | 15.67 | 8.34 | NA |
Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response that is subsequently confirmed to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 14.7 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 14.3 |
Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response that is subsequently confirmed to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | NA |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 8.7 |
Time in months from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | NA |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | NA |
Time in months from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of randomization plus 1) divided by 30.4. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 17.2 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 18.1 |
Percentage of participants with OR based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 32.3 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 14.6 |
Percentage of participants with OR based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 23.7 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 10.1 |
"Time in months from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS calculated as (first event date minus date of randomization plus 1)/30.4. Tumor progression determined from oncologic assessment data (where it meets criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where outcome was Death). Progression using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is >= 20 percent (%) increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 107)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 10.1 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 6.5 |
"Time in months from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS calculated as (first event date minus date of randomization plus 1)/30.4. Tumor progression determined from oncologic assessment data (where it meets criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where outcome was Death). Progression using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is >= 20 percent (%) increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or death (assessed on Week 6, Week 12 and thereafter every 8 weeks up to Week 103)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 6.5 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 4.8 |
"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | C22 D1 | C23 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 0.710 | 0.709 | 0.694 | 0.696 | 0.708 | 0.683 | 0.685 | 0.678 | 0.704 | 0.682 | 0.698 | 0.708 | 0.708 | 0.703 | 0.689 | 0.702 | 0.706 | 0.699 | 0.713 | 0.699 | 0.712 | 0.737 | 0.736 | 0.635 | 0.545 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 0.712 | 0.693 | 0.687 | 0.668 | 0.673 | 0.641 | 0.676 | 0.717 | 0.729 | 0.723 | 0.748 | 0.742 | 0.761 | 0.731 | 0.755 | 0.775 | 0.738 | 0.777 | 0.762 | 0.710 | 0.702 | 0.774 | 0.789 | 0.588 | 0.618 |
"EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state (confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state." (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 0.812 | 0.769 | 0.772 | 0.737 | 0.780 | 0.767 | 0.762 | 0.758 | 0.796 | 0.768 | 0.792 | 0.797 | 0.786 | 0.833 | 0.819 | 0.811 | 0.834 | 0.830 | 0.830 | 0.832 | 0.859 | 0.582 | 0.429 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 0.831 | 0.754 | 0.755 | 0.759 | 0.768 | 0.753 | 0.768 | 0.733 | 0.794 | 0.820 | 0.848 | 0.837 | 0.814 | 0.871 | 0.829 | 0.828 | 0.865 | 0.829 | 0.861 | 0.923 | 0.852 | 0.623 | 0.418 |
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0: worst imaginable health state to 100: best imaginable health state; higher scores indicate a better health state. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | C22 D1 | C23 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 71.181 | 71.714 | 72.006 | 72.179 | 72.451 | 71.574 | 71.050 | 71.031 | 72.690 | 72.910 | 72.763 | 73.610 | 73.030 | 73.147 | 74.494 | 73.878 | 73.090 | 73.817 | 72.089 | 74.244 | 75.694 | 78.000 | 77.143 | 67.254 | 69.195 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 72.362 | 72.422 | 71.241 | 72.086 | 73.615 | 69.944 | 73.923 | 73.183 | 73.780 | 72.400 | 72.271 | 75.295 | 75.432 | 75.108 | 74.405 | 75.818 | 74.333 | 75.571 | 75.125 | 74.190 | 70.500 | 73.917 | 72.571 | 67.048 | 64.885 |
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0: worst imaginable health state to 100: best imaginable health state; higher scores indicate a better health state. (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 82.799 | 81.102 | 80.895 | 81.138 | 83.018 | 82.222 | 82.900 | 83.382 | 84.171 | 83.041 | 84.136 | 84.305 | 82.927 | 86.520 | 85.841 | 87.579 | 88.424 | 86.586 | 89.500 | 90.333 | 90.313 | 75.568 | 58.154 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 82.058 | 78.231 | 80.534 | 81.245 | 80.250 | 80.829 | 80.868 | 81.000 | 83.788 | 82.778 | 83.000 | 83.500 | 83.300 | 86.667 | 86.462 | 86.083 | 84.300 | 83.125 | 82.143 | 86.000 | 84.167 | 74.741 | 64.333 |
FKSI-DRS: subset of FKSI which is FACT-Kidney Symptom Index questionnaire used to assess QoL for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. FKSI contains 15 questions and FKSI-DRS 9 questions (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, hematuria) each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FKSI-DRS total score 0 to 36; higher scores associated with better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 ( | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | C22 D1 | C23 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 28.691 | 28.728 | 29.171 | 28.577 | 29.020 | 28.574 | 28.568 | 28.557 | 28.817 | 29.057 | 29.146 | 29.648 | 29.545 | 29.579 | 29.859 | 29.683 | 29.564 | 29.380 | 29.737 | 29.844 | 30.889 | 31.696 | 31.357 | 26.556 | 26.805 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 29.653 | 29.963 | 29.750 | 29.642 | 30.255 | 29.153 | 29.523 | 30.296 | 30.186 | 30.364 | 30.688 | 30.727 | 31.483 | 31.027 | 30.730 | 31.515 | 31.567 | 31.107 | 31.417 | 30.762 | 30.056 | 31.000 | 31.143 | 26.786 | 26.769 |
FKSI-DRS: subset of FKSI which is FACT-Kidney Symptom Index questionnaire used to assess QoL for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer. FKSI contains 15 questions and FKSI-DRS 9 questions (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, hematuria) each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). FKSI-DRS total score 0 to 36; higher scores associated with better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 31.020 | 30.600 | 30.645 | 30.103 | 30.676 | 30.731 | 30.920 | 30.966 | 31.012 | 30.986 | 31.212 | 31.356 | 31.418 | 32.100 | 32.000 | 31.921 | 32.061 | 31.931 | 32.364 | 31.905 | 33.125 | 28.216 | 24.692 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 31.489 | 30.682 | 30.965 | 30.679 | 31.063 | 31.439 | 30.632 | 30.703 | 30.667 | 30.926 | 32.045 | 32.000 | 32.100 | 32.800 | 32.769 | 33.167 | 32.800 | 32.625 | 32.429 | 33.500 | 33.500 | 29.519 | 27.500 |
FKSI-15 questionnaires (lack of energy, side effects, pain, weight loss, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria, sleep) was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer. Questions answered on 5-point Likert scale: 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score 0 to 60; higher scores=better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C23, end of treatment (up to Week 107), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | C22 D1 | C23 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (First-line Participants) | 43.869 | 43.328 | 43.366 | 42.932 | 43.211 | 42.787 | 42.474 | 42.534 | 42.778 | 43.120 | 43.264 | 43.962 | 44.141 | 43.789 | 44.176 | 44.232 | 43.897 | 43.761 | 43.737 | 43.733 | 45.417 | 47.000 | 47.571 | 39.052 | 39.683 |
Sorafenib (First-line Participants) | 43.865 | 43.969 | 43.345 | 42.926 | 44.022 | 42.344 | 43.446 | 44.077 | 44.051 | 44.018 | 45.000 | 45.318 | 45.787 | 45.459 | 45.514 | 46.000 | 46.400 | 45.357 | 45.583 | 44.333 | 43.500 | 45.833 | 45.714 | 39.524 | 40.038 |
FKSI-15 questionnaires (lack of energy, side effects, pain, weight loss, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria, sleep) was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer. Questions answered on 5-point Likert scale: 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score 0 to 60; higher scores=better health states (Individual questions may be reversed coded, as appropriate). (NCT00920816)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle [C]1 Day [D]1), D1 of each cycle until C21, end of treatment (up to Week 103), follow-up (28 days after last dose)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 D1 | C2 D1 | C3 D1 | C4 D1 | C5 D1 | C6 D1 | C7 D1 | C8 D1 | C9 D1 | C10 D1 | C11 D1 | C12 D1 | C13 D1 | C14 D1 | C15 D1 | C16 D1 | C17 D1 | C18 D1 | C19 D1 | C20 D1 | C21 D1 | End of treatment | Follow-up | |
Axitinib (Second-line Participants) | 46.753 | 46.217 | 45.968 | 45.060 | 45.775 | 45.407 | 45.709 | 45.169 | 45.829 | 45.608 | 45.833 | 45.797 | 46.727 | 47.740 | 48.023 | 48.184 | 47.909 | 48.138 | 48.636 | 48.810 | 50.188 | 41.432 | 35.385 |
Sorafenib (Second-line Participants) | 47.470 | 45.045 | 45.684 | 45.792 | 46.125 | 46.341 | 45.053 | 45.676 | 45.970 | 46.148 | 47.227 | 48.091 | 47.600 | 49.133 | 49.308 | 50.500 | 49.000 | 49.125 | 48.571 | 50.500 | 50.000 | 42.889 | 38.583 |
Using RECIST criteria: date of 1st objective tumor response (CR or PR) subsequently confirmed to date of 1st objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause within 28 days after last dose of study medication, whichever was first. Censored on day after the date of the last oncologic assessment documenting no tumor progression. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 24.0 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 32.0 |
Confirmed objective responses using RECIST criteria defined as responses persisting on repeat imaging study for 2 assessments with at least 4 weeks between, and evaluating all target and non-target sites followed since baseline. Two PRs separated by an SD or NE visit in between was considered a confirmed response if the 2 PRs were > 4 weeks apart. CR=disappearance of all target lesions. PR is a >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 15 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 6 |
Overall survival is time from the date of first dose of medication to the date of death due to any cause (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 91.4 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 76.4 |
Using RECIST criteria: Time from date 1st dose study medication to date 1st documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause occurring on treatment including within 28 days after last dose, whichever occurred 1st. Censored on day following the date of last oncologic assessment documenting absence of tumor progression. PFS based on the number of subjects with measurable disease at baseline, the correct histological cancer type, and had disease that was refractory to prior cytokine-based therapy(105 in total group). (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 35.7 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 35.3 |
Time from date of first dose of study medication to date of first documentation of objective tumor progression using RECIST criteria that occurred on treatment including within 28 days after the last dose of study medication. TTP censored on the day following the date of last oncologic assessment documenting absence of tumor progression. TTP based on the number of subjects with measurable disease at baseline, the correct histological cancer type, and had disease that was refractory to prior cytokine-based therapy(105 in total group). (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: 4 week treatment cycles up to 1 year in absence of withdrawal criteria requiring discontinuation includes 28 day post study follow up
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 35.7 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 35.9 |
EQ-5D health status in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, pain / discomfort, anxiety / depression, usual activities) with a weighted health index based on general population values where 0.0=death and 1.0 = perfect health. Change: median index score at observation minus median index score at baseline. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.
Intervention | score on scale (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Maximum Increase | Maximum Decrease | |
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 0.0 | -0.1 |
"EQ-VAS score on the self-rated thermometer indicated the patient's own assessment of their health status from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) imaginable health state. Change: median score at observation minus median score at baseline. Maximum changes (increase or decrease from baseline)." (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.
Intervention | score on scale (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Maximum Increase | Maximum Decrease | |
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 0.0 | -10.0 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate (SU011248) | 0.0 | -9.0 |
FACIT Fatigue Scale: Overall score from 13-questionnaire, which measures fatigue / asthenia for patients with chronic, life-threatening illnesses. For each question, a patient rates his / her condition for the past week on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores always represent less fatigue / asthenia. Outcome based on completed questionnaires. (NCT00137423)
Timeframe: Day 1 and day 15 of each treatment cycle from cycle 1 to cycle 4; day 1 of each treatment cycle after cycle 4 up to one year.
Intervention | score on scale (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline Score n=52,52 | Maximum Post-Baseline Score n=53,52 | Minimum Post-Baseline Score n=53,52 | |
AM Dose Sunitinib Malate | 39.5 | 43.4 | 28.0 |
PM Dose Sunitinib Malate | 39.6 | 42.7 | 29.4 |
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censored at the last date known alive. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until death due to any cause, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus | 25.8 |
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa | 25.5 |
Percentage of participants with OR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST. Confirmed response were those that persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR were those with at least 30% decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus | 27.0 |
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa | 27.4 |
PFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization until the earlier date of progression or death. Progression was assessed by independent imaging reviewers using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria which is 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions from nadir (the lowest blood counts); measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus | 9.1 |
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa | 9.3 |
PFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization until the earlier date of progression or death. Progression was assessed by investigator imaging reviewers using RECIST criteria which is 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions from nadir (the lowest blood counts); measurable increase in non-target lesion; appearance of new lesions. (NCT00631371)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression, initiation of new anticancer treatment, or death, assessed every 8 weeks (up to cut-off date: 19 April 2012)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Bevacizumab+Temsirolimus | 9.1 |
Bevacizumab+ Interferon-Alfa | 10.8 |
DR: time from first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR), that was subsequently confirmed, to the first documentation of PD or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first as per RECIST version 1.0, a) CR: disappearance of all target, non target lesions and no appearance of new lesions, documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks, b) PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum of LD, without progression of non target lesions, no appearance of new lesions, c) PD: >=20% increase in sum of LD of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of pleural effusion or ascites if demonstrated by cytological investigation, not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib 5 mg | 11.0 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 10.6 |
ORR = percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.0 recorded from first dose of study treatment until PD or death due to any cause. CR: disappearance of all target, non target lesions and no appearance of new lesions, documented on 2 occasions separated by at least 4 weeks. PR: at least 30 % decrease in sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum of LD, without progression of non target lesions, no appearance of new lesions. PD: >=20% increase in sum of LD of the target lesions taking as a reference smallest sum of LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of pleural effusion or ascites if demonstrated by cytological investigation, not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Axitinib 5 mg | 19.4 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 9.4 |
OS was defined as the duration from start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (months) = (date of death minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.4. For participants who were alive, overall survival was censored on last date the participants were known to be alive. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib 5 mg | 20.1 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 19.2 |
PFS was defined as the time in months from start of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor progression of disease (PD) or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.0. PD: >=20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest dimensions (LD) of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the LD recorded since the start of treatment or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Occurrence of a pleural effusion or ascites was also considered PD if demonstrated by cytological investigation and it was not previously documented. New bone lesions not previously documented were considered PD if confirmed by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging or X-ray. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Axitinib 5 mg | 6.7 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 4.7 |
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility or index score. Health state profile component assesses level of health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each domain was rated on a 3-point response scale (1= no problems, 2= some/moderate problems and 3= extreme problems). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigned a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score were transformed and resulted in a total score range of 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n =347, 341) | Cycle 2/Day1 (n =326, 307) | Cycle 3/Day1 (n =287, 248) | Cycle 4/Day1 (n =262, 226) | Cycle 5/Day1 (n =244, 207) | Cycle 6/Day1 (n =221, 178) | Cycle 7/Day1 (n =213, 163) | Cycle 8/Day1 (n =181, 136) | Cycle 9/Day1 (n =169, 120) | Cycle 10/Day1 (n =151, 98) | Cycle 11/Day1 (n =126, 87) | Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 73) | Cycle 13/Day1 (n =96, 61) | Cycle 14/Day1 (n =80, 57) | Cycle 15/Day1 (n =63, 41) | Cycle 16/Day1 (n =54, 37) | Cycle 17/Day1 (n =48, 29) | Cycle 18/Day1 (n =37, 20) | Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14) | Cycle 20/Day1 (n =21, 12) | Cycle 21/Day1 (n =16, 7) | End of Treatment (n =169, 196) | Follow up (n =76, 106) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 0.732 | 0.716 | 0.722 | 0.730 | 0.730 | 0.734 | 0.718 | 0.756 | 0.760 | 0.734 | 0.764 | 0.744 | 0.760 | 0.723 | 0.730 | 0.749 | 0.779 | 0.755 | 0.734 | 0.794 | 0.700 | 0.608 | 0.682 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 0.731 | 0.696 | 0.709 | 0.716 | 0.711 | 0.704 | 0.728 | 0.702 | 0.730 | 0.730 | 0.724 | 0.734 | 0.753 | 0.752 | 0.758 | 0.785 | 0.764 | 0.755 | 0.804 | 0.771 | 0.771 | 0.612 | 0.666 |
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. VAS component: participants rated their current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n =341, 339) | Cycle 2/Day1 (n =317, 302) | Cycle 3/Day1 (n =280, 250) | Cycle 4/Day1 (n =261, 224) | Cycle 5/Day1 (n =244, 205) | Cycle 6/Day1 (n =220, 178) | Cycle 7/Day1 (n =209, 163) | Cycle 8/Day1 (n =180, 139) | Cycle 9/Day1 (n =168, 121) | Cycle 10/Day1 (n =151, 98) | Cycle 11/Day1 (n =126, 87) | Cycle 12/Day1 (n =111, 73) | Cycle 13/Day1 (n =94, 61) | Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 58) | Cycle 15/Day1 (n =62, 42) | Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 37) | Cycle 17/Day1 (n =48, 30) | Cycle 18/Day1 (n =37, 23) | Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14) | Cycle 20/Day1 (n =21, 12) | Cycle 21/Day1 (n =16, 7) | End of Treatment (n =166, 197) | Follow up (n =76, 109) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 70.560 | 69.003 | 69.843 | 69.180 | 69.705 | 69.900 | 69.919 | 70.756 | 70.667 | 70.629 | 72.103 | 71.730 | 70.723 | 69.420 | 73.016 | 70.269 | 71.375 | 70.459 | 71.034 | 73.143 | 74.563 | 61.759 | 64.382 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 70.351 | 67.606 | 69.712 | 70.759 | 71.888 | 71.365 | 72.282 | 71.475 | 73.380 | 75.102 | 74.586 | 73.959 | 75.693 | 75.362 | 75.357 | 73.676 | 73.767 | 73.870 | 70.571 | 66.917 | 64.714 | 61.690 | 66.037 |
FKSI was used to assess quality of life (QoL) for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer and consisted of 15 items (lack of energy, side effects, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, enjoying life, short of breath, worsened condition, appetite, coughing, bothered by fevers, ability to work, hematuria and sleep). Each of the 15 items was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI score = sum of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (very much); higher scores indicate greater presence of symptoms. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n =346, 342) | Cycle 2/Day1 (n =319, 296) | Cycle 3/Day1 (n =279, 246) | Cycle 4/Day1 (n =257, 221) | Cycle 5/Day1 (n =238, 203) | Cycle 6/Day1 (n =213, 179) | Cycle 7/Day1 (n =206, 158) | Cycle 8/Day1 (n =177, 136) | Cycle 9/Day1 (n =163, 118) | Cycle 10/Day1 (n =146, 96) | Cycle 11/Day1 (n =122, 85) | Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 70) | Cycle 13/Day1 (n =92, 58) | Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 54) | Cycle 15/Day1 (n =61, 38) | Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 34) | Cycle 17/Day1 (n =47, 28) | Cycle 18/Day1 (n =36, 22) | Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14) | Cycle 20/Day1 (n =20, 12) | Cycle 21/Day1 (n =15, 7) | End of treatment (n=163, 191) | Follow up (n =80, 110) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 43.199 | 42.351 | 42.590 | 42.791 | 42.968 | 42.949 | 42.747 | 43.580 | 43.191 | 43.312 | 44.119 | 44.517 | 44.492 | 44.485 | 45.291 | 45.217 | 45.242 | 44.861 | 45.379 | 47.050 | 45.850 | 38.328 | 41.919 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 43.339 | 41.668 | 42.424 | 43.424 | 42.907 | 43.057 | 43.578 | 44.074 | 44.518 | 44.771 | 44.438 | 44.357 | 45.261 | 44.898 | 45.053 | 44.445 | 44.438 | 44.182 | 45.026 | 44.780 | 44.494 | 38.457 | 40.028 |
FKSI-DRS was used to assess quality of life for those diagnosed with renal cell cancer and consisted of 9 items (lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, and hematuria). Each of the 9 items was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0= not at all, 1= a little bit, 2= somewhat, 3= quite a bit, 4= very much). Total FKSI-DRS score = sum of the 9 item scores; total range: 0 - 36; 0 (no symptoms) to 36 (very much); higher scores indicate greater presence of symptoms. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: Baseline (Predose on Cycle 1 Day 1) , Day 1 of each cycle until Cycle 21, End of treatment (Day 670) and Follow-up visit (Day 698)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n =346, 341) | Cycle 2/Day1 (n =319, 295) | Cycle 3/Day1 (n =279, 244) | Cycle 4/Day1 (n =257, 220) | Cycle 5/Day1 (n =238, 202) | Cycle 6/Day1 (n =213, 178) | Cycle 7/Day1 (n =206, 157) | Cycle 8/Day1 (n =177, 135) | Cycle 9/Day1 (n =163, 117) | Cycle 10/Day1 (n =146, 96) | Cycle 11/Day1 (n =122, 85) | Cycle 12/Day1 (n =110, 70) | Cycle 13/Day1 (n =92, 58) | Cycle 14/Day1 (n =81, 54) | Cycle 15/Day1 (n =61, 38) | Cycle 16/Day1 (n =52, 34) | Cycle 17/Day1 (n =47, 28) | Cycle 18/Day1 (n =36, 22) | Cycle 19/Day1 (n =29, 14) | Cycle 20/Day1 (n =20, 12) | Cycle 21/Day1 (n =15, 7) | End of Treatment (n =163, 191) | Follow up (n =80, 110) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 28.874 | 28.211 | 28.640 | 28.822 | 28.869 | 29.159 | 29.042 | 29.520 | 29.194 | 29.343 | 29.762 | 29.764 | 29.594 | 29.711 | 30.324 | 30.430 | 30.551 | 30.194 | 30.130 | 31.300 | 31.067 | 26.288 | 28.263 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 28.975 | 28.399 | 28.640 | 29.130 | 29.007 | 29.098 | 29.361 | 29.619 | 29.884 | 29.604 | 29.366 | 29.257 | 29.666 | 29.820 | 29.500 | 29.474 | 28.737 | 29.045 | 29.286 | 29.250 | 30.143 | 26.517 | 27.516 |
Biochemistry laboratory test included parameters: alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase, bicarbonate, bilirubin, creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia and lipase. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 1 (n =331, 313) | Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 2 (n =331, 313) | Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 3 (n =331, 313) | Alanine aminotransferase: Grade 4 (n =331, 313) | Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 1 (n =336, 319) | Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 2 (n =336, 319) | Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 3 (n =336, 319) | Alkaline phosphatase: Grade 4 (n =336, 319) | Amylase: Grade 1 (n =338, 319) | Amylase: Grade 2 (n =338, 319) | Amylase: Grade 3 (n =338, 319) | Amylase: Grade 4 (n =338, 319) | Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 1 (n =331, 311) | Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 2 (n =331, 311) | Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 3 (n =331, 311) | Aspartate aminotransferase: Grade 4 (n =331, 311) | Bicarbonate: Grade 1 (n =314, 291) | Bicarbonate: Grade 2 (n =314, 291) | Bicarbonate: Grade 3 (n =314, 291) | Bicarbonate: Grade 4 (n =314, 291) | Bilirubin: Grade 1 (n =336, 318) | Bilirubin: Grade 2 (n =336, 318) | Bilirubin: Grade 3 (n =336, 318) | Bilirubin: Grade 4 (n =336, 318) | Creatinine: Grade 1 (n =336, 318) | Creatinine: Grade 2 (n =336, 318) | Creatinine: Grade 3 (n =336, 318) | Creatinine: Grade 4 (n =336, 318) | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319) | Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319) | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319) | Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319) | Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319) | Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319) | Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319) | Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319) | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 (n =333, 314) | Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 (n =333, 314) | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 (n =333, 314) | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 (n =333, 314) | Hypernatremia: Grade 1 (n =338, 319) | Hypernatremia: Grade 2 (n =338, 319) | Hypernatremia: Grade 3 (n =338, 319) | Hypernatremia: Grade 4 (n =338, 319) | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 (n =337, 319) | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 (n =337, 319) | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 (n =337, 319) | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 (n =337, 319) | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319) | Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319) | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319) | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319) | Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 319) | Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 319) | Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 319) | Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 319) | Hypokalemia: Grade 1 (n =333, 314) | Hypokalemia: Grade 2 (n =333, 314) | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 (n =333, 314) | Hypokalemia: Grade 4 (n =333, 314) | Hyponatremia: Grade 1 (n =338, 319) | Hyponatremia: Grade 2 (n =338, 319) | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 (n =338, 319) | Hyponatremia: Grade 4 (n =338, 319) | Hypophosphatemia: Grade 1 (n =336, 318) | Hypophosphatemia: Grade 2 (n =336, 318) | Hypophosphatemia: Grade 3 (n =336, 318) | Hypophosphatemia: Grade 4 (n =336, 318) | Lipase: Grade 1 (n =338, 319) | Lipase: Grade 2 (n =338, 319) | Lipase: Grade 3 (n =338, 319) | Lipase: Grade 4 (n =338, 319) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 65 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 64 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 59 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 127 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 155 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 92 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 41 | 45 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 9 | 0 | 34 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 37 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 33 | 6 | 0 | 53 | 22 | 14 | 2 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 57 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 92 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 76 | 21 | 6 | 1 | 67 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 115 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 121 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 37 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 8 | 0 | 23 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 31 | 2 | 0 | 67 | 18 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 99 | 51 | 0 | 76 | 25 | 40 | 7 |
Hematology laboratory test included hemoglobin, platelet count, white blood cells count, neutrophils and lymphocytes. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hemoglobin: Grade 1 (n =320, 316) | Hemoglobin: Grade 2 (n =320, 316) | Hemoglobin: Grade 3 (n =320, 316) | Hemoglobin: Grade 4 (n =320, 316) | Lymphocytes: Grade 1 (n =317, 309) | Lymphocytes: Grade 2 (n =317, 309) | Lymphocytes: Grade 3 (n =317, 309) | Lymphocytes: Grade 4 (n =317, 309) | Neutrophils: Grade 1 (n =316, 308) | Neutrophils: Grade 2 (n =316, 308) | Neutrophils: Grade 3 (n =316, 308) | Neutrophils: Grade 4 (n =316, 308) | Platelets: Grade 1 (n =312, 310) | Platelets: Grade 2 (n =312, 310) | Platelets: Grade 3 (n =312, 310) | Platelets: Grade 4 (n =312, 310) | White Blood Cells: Grade 1 (n =320, 315) | White Blood Cells: Grade 2 (n =320, 315) | White Blood Cells: Grade 3 (n =320, 315) | White Blood Cells: Grade 4 (n =320, 315) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 93 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 89 | 10 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 47 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 112 | 41 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 93 | 11 | 0 | 20 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 41 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
Urinalysis included urine blood/ hemoglobin, glucose and protein. Abnormalities were assessed by CTCAE Grade Version 2 for severity: Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Participants (Number) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 1 (n =304, 272) | Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 2 (n =304, 272) | Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 3 (n =304, 272) | Urine blood/ hemoglobin: Grade 4 (n =304, 272) | Urine glucose: Grade 1 (n =322, 286) | Urine glucose: Grade 2 (n =322, 286) | Urine glucose: Grade 3 (n =322, 286) | Urine glucose: Grade 4 (n =322, 286) | Urine protein: Grade 1 (n =326, 289) | Urine protein: Grade 2 (n =326, 289) | Urine protein: Grade 3 (n =326, 289) | Urine protein: Grade 4 (n =326, 289) | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 45 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 105 | 31 | 27 | 9 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 91 | 27 | 21 | 7 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Severity of the AEs was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe; Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5= death related to AE. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 3.9 | 20.1 | 47.6 | 10.6 | 13.9 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 3.1 | 21.7 | 52.4 | 11.5 | 9.3 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life- threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 96.1 | 40.7 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 98.0 | 35.8 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life -threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious and non -serious AEs. (NCT00678392)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to follow-up period (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
Axitinib 5 mg | 92.2 | 15.3 |
Sorafenib 400 mg | 95.2 | 13.8 |
One year survival rate defined as the probability that a subject was alive 1 year after the date of first study treatment. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter up until 1 year
Intervention | percent chance of survival (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 67.8 |
Time from start of the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. DR was calculated as [the end date for DR minus first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed +1]/7. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter or death due to any cause
Intervention | months (Mean) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 7.14 |
OR = subjects with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) persisting > = 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 41 |
Time from start of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS (in months) was calculated as (first event date minus first dose date +1)/7. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter or death
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 9.0 |
(NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline
Intervention | pg/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 9163.4 |
Time from date of first dose of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression. The 50% quartile point estimate is provided. The criteria for tumor progression was according to RECIST. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: From start of treatment through Day 1 of Weeks 5, 9, and every 8 weeks thereafter
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 10.0 |
(NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline
Intervention | picograms (pg)/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Sunitinib | 154.8 |
FACT-Advanced Kidney Cancer Symptom Index (FKSI) Questionnaire: subscale designed to be a stand-alone instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced kidney cancer. Contains 15 questions. Each question was answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Total FKSI score = sum score of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (most severe symptoms and concerns) to 60 (no symptoms or concerns). End of treatment assessment was for subjects who completed the study only. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Week 1), Day 1 of Weeks 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, Week 53 (End of Treatment)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=109) | Week 3 (n=104) | Week 5 (n=101) | Week 7 (n=97) | Week 9 (n=88) | Week 11 (n=84) | Week 13 (n=81) | Week 17 (n=72) | Week 21 (n=63) | Week 25 (n=55) | Week 29 (n=55) | Week 33 (n=50) | Week 37 (n=47) | Week 41 (n=45) | Week 45 (n=37) | Week 49 (n=36) | Week 53 (End of Treatment) (n=35) | |
Sunitinib | 44.68 | 43.69 | 42.71 | 43.69 | 44.11 | 43.26 | 43.49 | 44.21 | 45.51 | 45.42 | 44.64 | 44.06 | 45.23 | 44.71 | 46.73 | 45.92 | 45.94 |
Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111) | Day 1, Week 3 (n=108) | Day 1, Week 5 (n=106) | Day 1, Week 7 (n=104) | Day 1, Week 9 (n=97) | Day 1, Week 13 (n=93) | Day 1, Week 17 (n=82) | Day 1, Week 21 (n=73) | Day 1, Week 25 (n=70) | Day 1, Week 29 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 33 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 37 (n=50) | Day 1, Week 41 (n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (n=33) | |
Sunitinib | 2.62 | 20.27 | 20.25 | 20.41 | 21.18 | 20.01 | 19.76 | 17.13 | 17.30 | 17.38 | 16.55 | 15.71 | 16.50 | 15.61 | 16.57 | 13.81 |
Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111) | Day 1, Week 3 (n=108) | Day 1, Week 5 (n=106) | Day 1, Week 7 (n=104) | Day 1, Week 9 (n=97) | Day 1, Week 13 (n=93) | Day 1, Week 17 (n=82) | Day 1, Week 21 (n=73) | Day 1, Week 25 (n=70) | Day 1, Week 29 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 33 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 37 (n=50) | Day 1, Week 41 (n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (n=33) | |
Sunitinib | 9.77 | 75.04 | 65.89 | 66.76 | 68.72 | 61.31 | 61.41 | 53.09 | 53.69 | 55.39 | 50.27 | 51.74 | 49.83 | 51.82 | 53.07 | 46.91 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 18.250 | 16.650 | 17.300 | 15.100 | 15.900 | 14.300 | 12.600 | 14.500 | 12.850 | 12.800 | 14.350 | 14.000 | 13.400 | 14.700 | 11.600 | 0.000 | 20.000 | 18.800 | 14.300 | 16.550 | 9.710 | 12.600 | 23.400 | 29.400 | 13.700 | 4.360 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 76.950 | 65.900 | 66.100 | 65.150 | 57.600 | 55.660 | 47.370 | 50.700 | 50.650 | 46.000 | 49.750 | 43.365 | 45.200 | 49.975 | 41.000 | 0.000 | 69.000 | 64.700 | 50.200 | 55.850 | 34.810 | 40.800 | 71.100 | 52.100 | 37.400 | 13.880 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=41) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=32) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=33) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=29) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=26) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=21) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 57.900 | 45.000 | 45.400 | 46.250 | 40.000 | 41.350 | 34.400 | 34.200 | 34.450 | 33.000 | 35.350 | 30.900 | 34.000 | 36.250 | 28.600 | 0.000 | 50.200 | 45.600 | 35.600 | 39.050 | 25.100 | 28.200 | 47.700 | 22.700 | 23.700 | 9.520 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 18.800 | 17.300 | 17.900 | 18.700 | 16.350 | 14.600 | 14.100 | 14.950 | 14.900 | 14.050 | 15.500 | 15.400 | 13.700 | 14.700 | 11.450 | 0.000 | 20.000 | 18.800 | 14.300 | 16.550 | 9.710 | 12.600 | 23.400 | 29.400 | 13.700 | 4.360 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 75.000 | 63.300 | 66.400 | 70.600 | 57.600 | 58.100 | 49.860 | 51.150 | 53.500 | 50.050 | 50.800 | 48.000 | 50.500 | 54.885 | 42.160 | 0.000 | 69.000 | 64.700 | 50.200 | 55.850 | 34.810 | 40.800 | 71.100 | 52.100 | 37.400 | 13.880 |
Summary statistics of ctrough at each time point by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | ng/mL (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=86) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=88) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=79) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=71) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=68) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=56) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=32) | Day 1, Week 1 (PD, n=16) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | |
Sunitinib | 0.000 | 55.300 | 44.600 | 46.750 | 49.500 | 39.550 | 42.300 | 36.500 | 35.500 | 37.250 | 34.400 | 35.300 | 33.200 | 35.950 | 37.250 | 31.100 | 0.000 | 50.200 | 45.600 | 35.600 | 39.050 | 25.100 | 28.200 | 47.700 | 22.700 | 23.700 | 9.520 |
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale: Overall score from 13-question questionnaire (measures fatigue/asthenia for patients with chronic, life-threatening illnesses). For each question, patient rates condition for the past week on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Total FACIT-Fatigue score = sum score of the 13 question scores; total range: 0 - 52; higher total score represents less fatigue. End of treatment assessment was for subjects who completed the study only. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1, Week 1), Day 1 of Weeks 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, Week 53 (End of Treatment)
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=118) | Week 3 (n=113) | Week 5 (n=110) | Week 7 (n=106) | Week 9 (n=97) | Week 11 (n=93) | Week 13 (n=90) | Week 17 (n=80) | Week 21 (n=71) | Week 25 (n=62) | Week 29 (n=60) | Week 33 (n=55) | Week 37 (n=52) | Week 41 (n=50) | Week 45 (n=42) | Week 49 (n=41) | Week 53 (End of Treatment) (n=40) | |
Sunitinib | 39.29 | 36.98 | 35.44 | 36.54 | 36.82 | 35.94 | 36.58 | 37.44 | 38.42 | 38.05 | 36.77 | 36.00 | 37.88 | 36.96 | 38.71 | 39.32 | 39.05 |
Summary statistics of sVEGFR2 at baseline by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Intervention | pg/mL (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16) | |
Sunitinib | 9772.500 | 8342.750 |
Summary statistics of sVEGFR2 at baseline by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Intervention | pg/mL (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR, n=40) | Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16) | |
Sunitinib | 9968.000 | 8342.750 |
sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (n=106) | Day 1, Week 5 (n=104) | Day 1, Week 7 (n=101) | Day 1, Week 9 (n=95) | Day 1, Week 13 (n=91) | Day 1, Week 17 (n=79) | Day 1, Week 21 (n=69) | Day 1, Week 25 (n=68) | Day 1, Week 29 (n=55) | Day 1, Week 33 (n=55) | Day 1, Week 37 (n=50) | Day 1, Week 41 (n=48) | Day 1, Week 45 (n=42) | Day 1, Week 49 (n=38) | Day 1, Week 53 (n=31) | |
Sunitinib | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
Median sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 weeks] versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=81) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=81) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=84) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=77) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=67) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=66) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=53) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=54) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=49) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=48) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=42) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=38) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=30) | |
Sunitinib | 0.691 | 0.653 | 0.625 | 0.531 | 0.599 | 0.574 | 0.563 | 0.603 | 0.534 | 0.529 | 0.524 | 0.687 | 0.548 | 0.540 | 0.570 | 0.509 | 0.556 | 0.671 | 0.569 | 0.610 | 0.559 | 0.572 | 0.538 | 0.569 | 0.638 |
Median sVEGFR2 concentration at each time point divided by sVEGFR2 concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=40) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=36) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=36) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=30) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=32) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=29) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=29) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=25) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=20) | |
Sunitinib | 0.704 | 0.653 | 0.638 | 0.531 | 0.596 | 0.574 | 0.562 | 0.603 | 0.555 | 0.529 | 0.545 | 0.687 | 0.566 | 0.540 | 0.564 | 0.509 | 0.564 | 0.671 | 0.547 | 0.610 | 0.554 | 0.561 | 0.535 | 0.555 | 0.630 |
Ctrough = the concentration prior to study drug administration. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Predose on Day 1 of Weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Intervention | nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL) (Mean) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 1 (n=111) | Day 1, Week 3 (n=108) | Day 1, Week 5 (n=106) | Day 1, Week 7 (n=104) | Day 1, Week 9 (n=97) | Day 1, Week 13 (n=93) | Day 1, Week 17 (n=82) | Day 1, Week 21 (n=73) | Day 1, Week 25 (n=70) | Day 1, Week 29 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 33 (n=58) | Day 1, Week 37 (n=50) | Day 1, Week 41 (n=49) | Day 1, Week 45 (n=44) | Day 1, Week 49 (n=40) | Day 1, Week 53 (n=33) | |
Sunitinib | 7.15 | 54.78 | 45.64 | 46.35 | 47.54 | 41.29 | 41.65 | 35.95 | 36.39 | 38.01 | 33.72 | 36.04 | 33.33 | 36.20 | 36.49 | 33.10 |
Summary statistics of VEGF at baseline by group (CR or PR or SD versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Intervention | pg/mL (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16) | |
Sunitinib | 86.400 | 109.300 |
Summary statistics of VEGF at baseline by group (CR or PR versus PD) are presented. (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1, Day 1)
Intervention | pg/mL (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 1 (CR or PR, n=39) | Cycle 1, Day 1 (PD, n=16) | |
Sunitinib | 73.600 | 109.300 |
VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (n=108) | Day 1, Week 5 (n=104) | Day 1, Week 7 (n=101) | Day 1, Week 9 (n=95) | Day 1, Week 13 (n=91) | Day 1, Week 17 (n=78) | Day 1, Week 21 (n=70) | Day 1, Week 25 (n=67) | Day 1, Week 29 (n=55) | Day 1, Week 33 (n=54) | Day 1, Week 37 (n=49) | Day 1, Week 41 (n=48) | Day 1, Week 45 (n=41) | Day 1, Week 49 (n=37) | Day 1, Week 53 (n=30) | |
Sunitinib | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 3 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 5.5 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 3.2 |
Median VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR or [SD > = 12 weeks] versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR or SD, n=81) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR or SD, n=84) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR or SD, n=83) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR or SD, n=85) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR or SD, n=76) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR or SD, n=68) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR or SD, n=65) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR or SD, n=53) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR or SD, n=53) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR or SD, n=48) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR or SD, n=48) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR or SD, n=41) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR or SD, n=37) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR or SD, n=29) | |
Sunitinib | 2.127 | 1.948 | 1.574 | 2.471 | 1.798 | 1.405 | 2.481 | 1.176 | 1.890 | 3.921 | 2.070 | 0.988 | 1.972 | 1.510 | 1.906 | 1.433 | 1.831 | 1.929 | 2.200 | 1.063 | 2.201 | 1.859 | 2.484 | 2.329 | 2.431 |
Median VEGF concentration at each time point divided by VEGF concentration at baseline (ratio to baseline) for subjects with tumor response (CR or PR versus PD). (NCT00338884)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 1 of Weeks 3 through 53
Intervention | ratio (Median) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, Week 3 (CR or PR, n=38) | Day 1, Week 3 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 5 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 5 (PD, n=15) | Day 1, Week 7 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 7 (PD, n=13) | Day 1, Week 9 (CR or PR, n=37) | Day 1, Week 9 (PD, n=8) | Day 1, Week 13 (CR or PR, n=39) | Day 1, Week 13 (PD, n=2) | Day 1, Week 17 (CR or PR, n=36) | Day 1, Week 17 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 21 (CR or PR, n=36) | Day 1, Week 21 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 25 (CR or PR, n=35) | Day 1, Week 25 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 29 (CR or PR, n=30) | Day 1, Week 29 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 33 (CR or PR, n=31) | Day 1, Week 33 (PD, n=1) | Day 1, Week 37 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 41 (CR or PR, n=28) | Day 1, Week 45 (CR or PR, n=27) | Day 1, Week 49 (CR or PR, n=24) | Day 1, Week 53 (CR or PR, n=19) | |
Sunitinib | 1.999 | 1.948 | 1.383 | 2.471 | 1.761 | 1.405 | 2.215 | 1.176 | 1.753 | 3.921 | 2.012 | 0.988 | 1.523 | 1.510 | 1.809 | 1.433 | 1.805 | 1.929 | 2.248 | 1.063 | 2.179 | 1.864 | 2.240 | 2.707 | 2.863 |
Duration of response as defined by the time from CR or PR (whichever status recorded first) until the date of death or PD was objectively documented. Median and its 95 percent confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Temsirolimus | 8.26 |
Sorafenib | 6.96 |
Overall survival was the duration from randomization to death. For participants who are alive, overall survival was censored at the last contact. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline to date of death from any cause (up to 24 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Temsirolimus | 12.27 |
Sorafenib | 16.64 |
Percentage of participants with tumor response based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST and evaluated by independent central review. CR/PR persisted on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. PR had at least 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Temsirolimus | 7.7 |
Sorafenib | 7.9 |
Interval from date of randomization until documentation of PD by an investigator tumor assessment, symptomatic deterioration, or death for any reason whichever occurred first. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Temsirolimus | 5.43 |
Sorafenib | 4.14 |
Interval from date of randomization until documentation of progressive disease (PD) by an independent tumor assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) or death for any reason whichever occurred first. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 Months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Temsirolimus | 4.28 |
Sorafenib | 3.91 |
Counts of participants who had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), defined as newly occurring or worsening after first dose. Relatedness to [study drug] was assessed by the investigator (Yes/No). Participants with multiple occurrences of an AE within a category were counted once within the category. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 24 months
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Serious AE | Any AE | |
Sorafenib | 86 | 251 |
Temsirolimus | 103 | 248 |
PFS: Interval from date of randomization until documentation of PD by an independent tumor assessment according to RECIST or death for any reason whichever occurred first. PFS calculated as (Weeks)=(randomization date minus first dose date plus 1) divided by 7. (NCT00474786)
Timeframe: Weeks 12, 24, and 36
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline to Week 12 | Week 13 to Week 24 | Week 25 to Week 36 | |
Sorafenib | 36.7 | 20.1 | 11.2 |
Temsirolimus | 31.2 | 20.9 | 12.3 |
Time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.44. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 12.5 |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 8.7 |
"FKSI-DRS is a subset of FKSI which is a questionnaire for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy -Kidney Symptom Index used to assess QoL/participant-reported outcomes for participants diagnosed with renal cell cancer.~The FKSI contained 15 questions and the FKSI-DRS consisted of 9 questions each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FKSI-DRS ranged between 0-36. Since the questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FKSI-DRS, 0 and 36 could be considered the worst and best health states based on the 9 questions comprising FKSI-DRS." (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Units on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 28.3 |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 27.2 |
FACT-G is core questionnaire of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in cancer population.FACT-G consisted of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general Health-Related QoL(HRQoL):Physical Well-being(PWB),Social/Family Well-Being (SWB),Emotional Well-Being (EWB) and Functional Well-Being (FWB);each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) so that FACT-G ranged between 0-108.Since questions could be reversed coded, as appropriate, before calculating FACT-G,0 and 108 could be considered worst and best health states. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 78.0 |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 77.0 |
Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR are defined as the disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). PR are those with atleast 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 32.2 |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 28.1 |
MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low (0), intermediate (1-2) or high (=>3) based upon number of criteria present. Criteria as follows: Karnofsky performance status < 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5 * Upper limit of Normal, Hemoglobin < lower limit of normal for local lab, Corrected serum calcium > 10 mg/dL; Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of < 1 year. OS was defined as time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS, in months, was calculated as (event date -start of treatment date + 1)/30.44. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Months (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
High Risk (equal or more than 3) | Intermediate Risk (1-2) | Low Risk (0) | |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 6.1 | 21.8 | 28.9 |
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 3.5 | 19.3 | NA |
MSKCC Prognostic Factor Model assessed as low(0),intermediate(1-2) or high(=>3) based on number of criteria present such as Karnofsky performance status < 80 %, Lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5 * Upper limit of Normal,Hemoglobin < lower limit of normal, serum calcium > 10 mg/dL;Time from first diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma to start of systemic therapy of < 1 year.TTP was time from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer.TTP was calculated as (first event date minus date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. (NCT00267748)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 2 years
Intervention | Months (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Stratified analysis : High Risk (=>3) | Stratified analysis : Intermediate Risk (1-2) | Stratified analysis : Low Risk (0) | Overall unstratified analysis | |
Sunitinib 37.5 mg | 4.4 | 7.1 | 8.4 | 7.1 |
Sunitinib 50 mg (Schedule 4/2) | 3.1 | 8.0 | 20.7 | 9.9 |
"Time in weeks from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cancer. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 7.~DR was calculated for the subgroup of patients with a confirmed objective tumor response." (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter or death due to cancer
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib Malate | 60.4 |
Overall confirmed objective response = confirmed Complete Response (CR) or confirmed Partial Response (PR) according to RECIST. CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions. PR defined as >= 30 percent decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sunitinib Malate | 35 |
Time in weeks from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the subject current status was death). (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until death
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib Malate | 104.1 |
"Time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where the outcome was Death)." (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter or death
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib Malate | 38.0 |
Time in weeks from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer, whichever comes first. TTP was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]). (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until Day 28 of Cycles 1-5, Day 28 of even Cycles thereafter
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Sunitinib Malate | 46.3 |
Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib. Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 53.64 | 55.94 | 69.44 | 64.33 | 1.94 | 2.15 | 2.04 | 2.32 | 2.07 | 2.68 | 3.42 | 1.94 | 2.23 | 2.41 | 1.58 | 2.42 | 2.23 | 3.05 | 1.92 | 5.09 | 3.41 | 3.91 | 4.53 | 3.82 | 3.14 | 4.09 | 2.12 | 2.97 | 4.02 | 1.36 |
Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib metabolite (SU012662). Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 31.85 | 28.15 | 40.53 | 38.04 | 2.99 | 3.35 | 3.11 | 3.37 | 3.45 | 3.61 | 4.37 | 3.24 | 3.68 | 3.54 | 2.80 | 3.40 | 2.55 | 2.59 | 2.93 | 4.53 | 3.97 | 5.31 | 4.26 | 3.62 | 3.00 | 4.49 | 2.36 | 2.94 | 3.32 | 1.18 |
Dose corrected plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib plus its metabolite (SU012662). Dose-corrected trough concentrations were set to missing for trough samples collected outside acceptable times from dose administration, samples not collected within scheduled day range, samples with missing collection or administration dates or times, samples collected with dose interruption, and samples collected with inconsistent dose level within 10 days of last dose date. (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 33) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 26) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 20) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 25) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 35) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 32) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 25) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 28) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 23) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 17) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 8) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 9) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 3) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 85.49 | 84.09 | 109.97 | 102.37 | 4.93 | 5.50 | 5.15 | 5.69 | 5.52 | 6.29 | 7.78 | 5.19 | 5.91 | 5.95 | 4.39 | 5.82 | 4.78 | 5.64 | 4.85 | 9.63 | 7.38 | 9.23 | 8.79 | 7.44 | 6.13 | 8.58 | 4.48 | 5.90 | 7.34 | 2.54 |
Observed plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 46.82 | 50.13 | 49.36 | 53.18 | 1.55 | 1.44 | 1.51 | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.69 | 2.05 | 1.72 | 1.74 | 1.60 | 1.56 | 1.46 | 1.42 | 2.20 | 1.34 | 2.96 | 2.53 | 2.18 | 3.14 | 2.75 | 1.99 | 2.46 | 1.20 | 1.75 | 2.93 | 1.02 |
Observed plasma trough (predose) (Cmin) concentrations of sunitinib metabolite (SU012662) (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 26.44 | 28.21 | 28.32 | 28.54 | 2.50 | 2.64 | 2.64 | 2.66 | 2.81 | 2.54 | 2.78 | 2.67 | 2.77 | 2.49 | 2.51 | 2.30 | 1.83 | 2.16 | 2.06 | 2.92 | 3.13 | 3.24 | 3.10 | 2.64 | 1.99 | 2.60 | 1.36 | 1.81 | 2.43 | 1.10 |
Observed plasma trough (predose) concentrations of sunitinib plus its metabolite (SU012662) (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 through 4, Day 1 of Cycles 5 and greater
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 28 (n = 103) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n = 81) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n = 73) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n = 66) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n = 63) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n = 59) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n = 52) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n = 48) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n = 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n = 41) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n = 38) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n = 34) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n = 30) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n = 24) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n = 19) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n = 16) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n = 14) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n = 12) | Cycle 21 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 22 Day 1 (n = 11) | Cycle 23 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 24 Day 1 (n = 7) | Cycle 25 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 26 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 27 Day 1 (n = 6) | Cycle 28 Day 1 (n = 4) | Cycle 29 Day 1 (n = 5) | Cycle 30 Day 1 (n = 4) | |
Sunitinib Malate | 73.26 | 78.34 | 77.68 | 81.71 | 4.04 | 4.08 | 4.15 | 4.26 | 4.41 | 4.23 | 4.83 | 4.39 | 4.52 | 4.09 | 4.07 | 3.75 | 3.25 | 4.35 | 3.40 | 5.88 | 5.66 | 5.43 | 6.24 | 5.39 | 3.97 | 5.06 | 2.55 | 3.56 | 5.36 | 2.13 |
Probability of survival 1 year and 2 years after the first dose of study treatment (NCT00077974)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until death
Intervention | percent chance of survival (Number) | |
---|---|---|
1 year | 2 years | |
Sunitinib Malate | 67.2 | 50.2 |
Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each cycle: duraton of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 52.9 |
IFN-α | 64.9 |
Duration of response (DR) = time from the first documentation of objective tumor response to the first documentaion of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause. DR data were censored on the day following the date of the last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects without objective tumor progression who did not die due to any cause while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to observing tumor progression. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 56.3 |
IFN-α | 48.1 |
Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of sunitinib compared to IFN-a as first-line treatment for MRCC, defined as the ratio of the incremental cost of treatment over the incremental effectiveness; effectiveness measured as quality adjusted life year (QALY) gain. This objective was not addressed in the clinical study report, but an interim analysis of cost-effectiveness was presented separately. These results were not available for inclusion at the time of this posting. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: post study measurement
Intervention | ratio (Number) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 0 |
IFN-α | 0 |
Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses (CR or PR) = those that persisted on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 145 |
IFN-α | 29 |
Objective response (OR) = the number of patients with confirmed complete response (CR) and confirmed partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, relative to all randomized patients. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. Confirmed responses = those that persist on repeat imaging study >= 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 171 |
IFN-α | 45 |
Overall survival (OS) = time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For patients not expiring, survival time was censored at the last date they were known to be alive. Patients lacking data beyond randomization had their survival times censored at the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Clinic visit or telephone contact every 2 months until death
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 114.6 |
IFN-α | 94.9 |
Progression-free survival (PFS) = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1. On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 48.3 |
IFN-α | 22.1 |
Progression-free survival = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occured first. PFS = first event date minus the date of randomization + 1). On study included treatment plus 28-day follow-up periods. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of each 6-week cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 47.7 |
IFN-α | 22.1 |
TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 49.1 |
IFN-α | 22.4 |
TTP = time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP data were censored on the day following the date of last on treatment (including 28 day follow-up period) tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for subjects who did not have objective tumor progression while on treatment or who were given anti-tumor treatment other than the study treatment prior to documentation of objective tumor progression. Subjects with no tumor assessments after randomization had TTP censored on the date of randomization with a duration of 1 day. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Randomization to first documentation of tumor progression: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
SU011248 | 49.0 |
IFN-α | 22.3 |
Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of active metabolite SU012662 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31) | Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=26) | |
SU012662 | 27.10 | 27.35 | 26.11 | 22.11 | 28.21 | 28.32 | 29.04 | 25.99 |
Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of SU011248 per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31) | Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=26) | |
SU011248 | 57.26 | 57.59 | 50.26 | 45.05 | 64.22 | 59.90 | 58.45 | 54.31 |
Subject observed Ctrough (trough drug) concentrations of total drug (SU011248 and its active metabolite SU012662) per cycle and study day determined by plasma trough samples collected from a subset of patients. Steady-state observed trough concentrations were dose corrected to the starting dose (reference dose) where appropriate. Concentrations below the limits of quantitation (BLQ) were set to 0. Ctrough = minimum (trough) plasma concentration (nanograms per milliliter [ng/mL]). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=31) | Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=36) | Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=32) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 1, Day 28 (n=24) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 2, Day 28 (n=28) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 3, Day 28 (n=27) | Dose-Corrected: Cycle 4, Day 28 (n=27) | |
Total Drug: SU011248 and SU012662 | 84.36 | 84.94 | 76.37 | 67.15 | 92.43 | 88.22 | 87.49 | 80.30 |
EQ-VAS: overall self-rating rating of the patient's current health state using a 20 cm Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), also called the health state thermometer) is a metric measurement (in 2 mm interval) from the visual analog scale which ranges between 0 (worse imaginable health state) and 100 (best imaginable health state). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=365, 352) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 315) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=323, 247) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=314, 237) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=293, 198) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 193) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=270, 152) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 139) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 118) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=240, 104) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=237, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 98) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=209, 77) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=201, 74) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=191, 60) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 50) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=168, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=160, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 45) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 34) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=130, 31) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=115, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=92, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 17) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=82, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=78, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=62, 11) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=54, 9) | |
IFN-α | 71.43 | 67.66 | 70.45 | 70.70 | 72.68 | 71.45 | 72.74 | 72.20 | 73.44 | 72.57 | 73.68 | 72.26 | 73.80 | 73.46 | 74.27 | 74.33 | 77.66 | 76.57 | 76.64 | 76.69 | 75.06 | 72.21 | 75.19 | 73.84 | 77.52 | 73.56 | 76.69 | 76.44 | 76.62 | 76.50 | 74.84 | 73.11 | 76.94 | 72.86 | 74.42 | 73.82 | 79.27 | 68.55 | 76.00 | 75.44 |
SU011248 | 73.80 | 69.35 | 75.05 | 72.06 | 76.23 | 72.33 | 77.46 | 75.15 | 79.83 | 75.13 | 78.83 | 76.81 | 79.39 | 76.09 | 81.34 | 77.53 | 80.08 | 76.24 | 79.18 | 76.44 | 79.72 | 76.81 | 80.84 | 76.71 | 80.59 | 77.22 | 80.39 | 76.53 | 80.50 | 76.51 | 79.85 | 75.51 | 80.74 | 77.10 | 80.40 | 77.76 | 81.47 | 77.05 | 81.10 | 76.85 |
EQ-5D Health State Index: a brief, self-administered generic health status instrument. Respondents were asked to describe their current health state on each of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety or depression) on a three-level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). A maximum score of 1 can be derived from these 5 dimensions by score conversion; range: -0.39 (worst health state)to 1.00 (best health state). This descriptive system classifies respondents into one of 243 possible distinct health states (EQ-5D descriptive system). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=363, 352) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (346, 315) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (326, 244) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (311, 233) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (287, 200) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (283, 195) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (269, 150) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (261, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (247, 120) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (240, 106) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (240, 98) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (224, 100) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (205, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (204, 74) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (192, 68) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (190, 61) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (170, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (168, 45) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (161, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (153, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (138, 34) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (138, 32) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (132, 31) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (127, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (114, 26) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (115, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (114, 25) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (107, 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (100, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (95, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (93, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (84, 15) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (82, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (80, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (71, 10) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (69, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (62, 11) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (63, 8) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (54, 9) | |
IFN-α | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.86 |
SU011248 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.77 |
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI) subscale designed to be a stand-alone instrument to measure symptoms and quality of life in patients with advanced kidney cancer. Contains 15 questions; some questions overlap with the FACT-G questions. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Total FKSI score = sum score of the 15 item scores; total range: 0 - 60; 0 (most severe symptoms and concerns) to 60 (no symptoms or concerns). (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=369, 351) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 317) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=327, 246) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 198) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 195) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 151) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 119) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=242, 109) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 99) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=203, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 68) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=155, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 31) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=113, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=105, 25) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=100, 22) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=94, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9) | |
IFN-α | 46.09 | 40.93 | 42.33 | 42.01 | 43.64 | 43.13 | 44.78 | 44.03 | 44.82 | 44.41 | 45.38 | 44.07 | 45.09 | 44.65 | 45.38 | 45.10 | 46.88 | 46.16 | 46.22 | 45.16 | 46.26 | 45.46 | 46.08 | 46.00 | 46.25 | 45.84 | 46.08 | 46.10 | 45.62 | 45.30 | 43.64 | 43.46 | 45.59 | 43.64 | 44.92 | 45.27 | 46.64 | 44.47 | 45.00 | 46.00 |
SU011248 | 46.45 | 42.71 | 45.98 | 43.75 | 46.60 | 44.01 | 46.99 | 45.08 | 47.99 | 44.99 | 47.61 | 45.40 | 47.84 | 45.39 | 48.24 | 45.83 | 48.31 | 45.79 | 47.90 | 45.70 | 47.90 | 45.28 | 47.90 | 45.67 | 48.02 | 45.65 | 47.90 | 45.10 | 48.26 | 45.37 | 47.75 | 45.95 | 48.07 | 46.27 | 47.47 | 45.36 | 47.70 | 46.07 | 48.88 | 46.26 |
FACT-Kidney Symptom Index-Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) subscale of the FKSI to measure advanced kidney cancer disease related symptoms. Includes 9 items: lack of energy, pain, losing weight, bone pain, fatigue, short of breath, coughing, bothered by fevers, and hematuria. Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 36. A score greater than 0 indicates the difference favored sunitinib. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=368, 351) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 317) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=327, 246) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n= 315, 237) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 198) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 195) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 151) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 119 ) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=242, 109) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=223, 99) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=203, 75 ) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 68) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=155, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 31) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (113, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=105, 25) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=100, 22) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=94, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9) | |
IFN-α | 29.55 | 26.68 | 27.59 | 27.22 | 28.20 | 27.81 | 28.85 | 28.30 | 28.57 | 28.37 | 29.12 | 28.44 | 28.99 | 28.50 | 28.76 | 28.67 | 29.86 | 29.36 | 29.43 | 29.03 | 29.89 | 29.24 | 29.54 | 29.48 | 29.81 | 29.63 | 29.35 | 29.23 | 29.18 | 28.89 | 27.79 | 28.28 | 29.26 | 27.94 | 28.83 | 28.73 | 29.64 | 28.65 | 28.44 | 29.22 |
SU011248 | 29.74 | 27.73 | 29.66 | 28.49 | 29.93 | 28.72 | 30.25 | 29.43 | 30.87 | 29.43 | 30.80 | 29.62 | 30.93 | 29.73 | 31.03 | 29.76 | 31.24 | 29.72 | 30.73 | 29.78 | 30.72 | 29.34 | 30.76 | 29.63 | 30.58 | 29.30 | 30.58 | 28.94 | 30.87 | 29.26 | 30.63 | 29.51 | 30.69 | 29.73 | 30.24 | 29.15 | 30.11 | 29.48 | 31.07 | 29.44 |
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G): core questionnaire of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system that has been validated in a variety of cancer populations. 27 questions grouped into 4 domains that measure a patient's physical, functional, social and family, and emotional well-being. Five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = sum score of item scores in the subscale; total range: 0 to 108 with higher score indicating better quality of life. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=368, 346) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=345, 316) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 247) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=314, 237) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=293, 199) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=285, 193) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=269, 149) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=263, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=247, 119) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=240, 106) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=238, 98) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 97) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=206, 78) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=200, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 66) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=170, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=158, 49) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=150, 45) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=134, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=139, 32) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=130, 29) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=126, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=113, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 20) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=89, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 16) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 8) | |
IFN-α | 81.22 | 74.91 | 77.02 | 77.05 | 79.35 | 78.42 | 80.86 | 80.46 | 81.96 | 80.60 | 81.97 | 79.70 | 80.39 | 81.06 | 81.25 | 81.31 | 84.50 | 83.14 | 84.03 | 81.79 | 81.60 | 80.20 | 80.99 | 81.73 | 81.18 | 80.67 | 81.22 | 81.57 | 81.66 | 80.88 | 78.20 | 78.38 | 81.80 | 78.96 | 82.24 | 82.27 | 82.48 | 79.63 | 81.70 | 79.54 |
SU011248 | 82.30 | 78.75 | 82.88 | 80.51 | 84.24 | 80.59 | 85.32 | 82.08 | 86.40 | 82.23 | 84.90 | 82.54 | 85.01 | 82.16 | 86.83 | 83.05 | 85.81 | 82.71 | 85.32 | 82.14 | 84.75 | 81.91 | 85.31 | 82.43 | 85.50 | 83.61 | 85.24 | 82.34 | 86.24 | 82.64 | 84.77 | 83.38 | 86.78 | 84.42 | 85.74 | 83.51 | 87.16 | 84.54 | 87.96 | 84.62 |
Emotional well-being (EWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 24; lower score indicates better emotional well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (370, 352) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 318) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 249) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=316, 237) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 196) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 152) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=265, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=249, 120) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 109) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=240, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 99) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 77) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=204, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 62) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=171, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=167, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 45) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=138, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=141, 33) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 30) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=91, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=84, 17) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9) | |
IFN-α | 17.06 | 17.40 | 17.52 | 17.73 | 18.13 | 18.17 | 18.80 | 18.39 | 19.00 | 18.70 | 18.60 | 18.14 | 18.08 | 18.55 | 18.54 | 18.55 | 18.98 | 18.76 | 18.92 | 18.36 | 18.97 | 18.52 | 18.87 | 19.45 | 18.63 | 18.97 | 18.05 | 18.76 | 18.24 | 18.75 | 17.26 | 16.83 | 18.28 | 18.00 | 19.62 | 19.55 | 19.09 | 18.20 | 18.67 | 18.67 |
SU011248 | 17.15 | 17.76 | 18.46 | 18.46 | 18.82 | 18.53 | 19.04 | 18.76 | 19.18 | 18.63 | 18.99 | 18.73 | 19.08 | 18.69 | 19.33 | 18.98 | 19.25 | 18.93 | 19.32 | 18.71 | 18.92 | 19.10 | 19.14 | 19.06 | 19.38 | 19.39 | 19.55 | 19.23 | 19.57 | 19.41 | 19.54 | 19.33 | 19.95 | 19.66 | 19.64 | 19.34 | 19.94 | 19.61 | 20.00 | 19.75 |
Functional well-being (FWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; higher score indicates greater functional well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=371, 353) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=347, 318) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 249) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=287, 195) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=272, 152) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=265, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=249, 120) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 109) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=239, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=222, 99) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=208, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=204, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=192, 67) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=190, 62) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=170, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=167, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=161, 50) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=154, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=137, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 33) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=132, 30) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=128, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=114, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 25) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=96, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=91, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 17) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=81, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=80, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=65, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=53, 9) | |
IFN-α | 18.51 | 16.37 | 17.08 | 17.18 | 17.92 | 17.56 | 18.40 | 18.37 | 18.81 | 18.47 | 19.02 | 18.24 | 18.45 | 18.76 | 19.22 | 19.10 | 20.20 | 20.04 | 19.88 | 19.40 | 18.89 | 18.81 | 18.80 | 19.13 | 19.63 | 18.59 | 19.62 | 19.72 | 19.86 | 19.83 | 18.89 | 18.61 | 19.35 | 18.71 | 19.08 | 19.00 | 19.64 | 19.10 | 20.00 | 20.22 |
SU011248 | 18.93 | 17.92 | 18.78 | 18.37 | 19.51 | 18.58 | 19.93 | 18.86 | 20.27 | 19.02 | 19.74 | 19.21 | 19.69 | 19.12 | 20.29 | 19.33 | 19.87 | 19.27 | 19.95 | 19.22 | 19.81 | 19.12 | 19.98 | 19.42 | 20.02 | 19.65 | 20.04 | 19.07 | 20.13 | 19.24 | 19.80 | 19.53 | 20.20 | 19.67 | 19.76 | 19.47 | 20.18 | 19.59 | 20.50 | 20.15 |
Physical well-being (PWB) subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates better physical well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=369, 348) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 318) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=329, 247) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=316, 239) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=294, 200) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=286, 195) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=270, 150) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=264, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=248, 120) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 106) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=239, 99) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=224, 97) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=207, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=201, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=193, 67) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=159, 49) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=151, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=135, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 32) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=131, 30) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=127, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=90, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 16) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 9) | |
IFN-α | 22.70 | 18.85 | 20.05 | 19.84 | 20.87 | 20.63 | 21.56 | 21.31 | 21.84 | 21.23 | 21.70 | 20.96 | 21.67 | 21.66 | 21.94 | 21.40 | 22.58 | 22.38 | 22.60 | 21.83 | 22.23 | 21.88 | 22.60 | 21.90 | 21.99 | 21.80 | 22.05 | 22.75 | 22.33 | 22.07 | 20.63 | 21.42 | 21.81 | 20.50 | 21.83 | 22.45 | 22.45 | 21.60 | 21.78 | 22.33 |
SU011248 | 23.14 | 19.43 | 22.22 | 20.34 | 22.45 | 20.18 | 22.72 | 21.00 | 23.24 | 20.91 | 22.99 | 21.22 | 23.05 | 21.22 | 23.58 | 21.51 | 23.41 | 21.29 | 22.94 | 21.21 | 23.16 | 20.98 | 23.03 | 20.87 | 23.05 | 21.26 | 23.02 | 20.80 | 23.26 | 20.95 | 22.60 | 21.31 | 22.99 | 21.68 | 22.85 | 20.89 | 23.20 | 21.82 | 23.68 | 21.81 |
Social/family well-being (SWB)subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Each question was answered on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Score = the sum score of the item scores in the subscale; range: 0 to 28; lower score indicates less social/family well-being. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & 28 of each cycle: duration of treatment phase
Intervention | scores on scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=370, 349) | Cycle 1 Day 28 (n=348, 319) | Cycle 2 Day 1 (n=328, 247) | Cycle 2 Day 28 (n=315, 238) | Cycle 3 Day 1 (n=292, 200) | Cycle 3 Day 28 (n=284, 194) | Cycle 4 Day 1 (n=269, 150) | Cycle 4 Day 28 (n=263, 142) | Cycle 5 Day 1 (n=247, 120) | Cycle 5 Day 28 (n=241, 107) | Cycle 6 Day 1 (n=238, 98) | Cycle 6 Day 28 (n=224, 97) | Cycle 7 Day 1 (n=207, 79) | Cycle 7 Day 28 (n=200, 75) | Cycle 8 Day 1 (n=193, 67) | Cycle 8 Day 28 (n=189, 61) | Cycle 9 Day 1 (n=172, 51) | Cycle 9 Day 28 (n=166, 46) | Cycle 10 Day 1 (n=158, 49) | Cycle 10 Day 28 (n=151, 46) | Cycle 11 Day 1 (n=135, 35) | Cycle 11 Day 28 (n=140, 32) | Cycle 12 Day 1 (n=131, 30) | Cycle 12 Day 28 (n=127, 31) | Cycle 13 Day 1 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 13 Day 28 (n=114, 27) | Cycle 14 Day 1 (n=112, 26) | Cycle 14 Day 28 (n=107, 24) | Cycle 15 Day 1 (n=101, 21) | Cycle 15 Day 28 (n=96, 20) | Cycle 16 Day 1 (n=94, 19) | Cycle 16 Day 28 (n=89, 18) | Cycle 17 Day 1 (n=85, 16) | Cycle 17 Day 28 (n=80, 14) | Cycle 18 Day 1 (n=79, 12) | Cycle 18 Day 28 (n=70, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 1 (n=71, 11) | Cycle 19 Day 28 (n=61, 10) | Cycle 20 Day 1 (n=63, 9) | Cycle 20 Day 28 (n=52, 8) | |
IFN-α | 22.94 | 22.20 | 22.31 | 22.22 | 22.42 | 22.12 | 22.26 | 22.38 | 22.35 | 22.36 | 22.56 | 22.33 | 22.46 | 22.10 | 21.95 | 22.17 | 22.74 | 21.96 | 22.45 | 22.06 | 21.51 | 21.09 | 20.79 | 21.25 | 20.93 | 21.30 | 21.51 | 20.32 | 20.35 | 20.23 | 21.41 | 21.52 | 22.25 | 21.75 | 21.71 | 21.27 | 21.30 | 20.73 | 21.26 | 20.67 |
SU011248 | 23.14 | 23.60 | 23.50 | 23.40 | 23.51 | 23.44 | 23.73 | 23.36 | 23.53 | 23.68 | 23.35 | 23.40 | 23.29 | 23.13 | 23.67 | 23.26 | 23.26 | 23.26 | 23.08 | 23.03 | 23.05 | 22.71 | 23.23 | 23.07 | 23.15 | 23.31 | 22.82 | 23.24 | 23.28 | 23.04 | 23.11 | 23.41 | 23.42 | 23.50 | 23.53 | 23.70 | 23.85 | 23.53 | 23.60 | 22.93 |
Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Intervention | pg/ml and ratio to Baseline (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLASMA bFGF: C2D28:C1D1 (n=14, 0) | PLASMA bFGF: C3D1:C1D1 (n=12, 0) | PLASMA bFGF: C3D28:C1D1 (n=12, 0) | PLASMA bFGF: C4D1:C1D1 (n=14, 0) | PLASMA bFGF: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=10, 0) | |
SU011248 | 0.760 | 1.582 | 1.671 | 2.895 | 0.803 |
Plasma concentrations of soluble proteins that may be associated with tumor proliferation or angiogenesis collected from a subset of patients were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis. Soluble protein values: Baseline concentration (pM) and ratio to Baseline at each timepoint; ratio = plasma concentration of soluble protein (picograms per milliliter [pg/ml]) at timepoint / concentration of soluble protein (pg/ml) at baseline. Samples below the limit of quantitation and samples with insufficient volume available were excluded. (NCT00083889)
Timeframe: Day 1 & Day 28, Cycle 1 to Cycle 4
Intervention | pg/ml and ratio to Baseline (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plasma VEGF-A: Baseline (n=33, 31) | Plasma VEGF-A: C1D28: C1D1 (n=31, 26) | Plasma VEGF-A: C2D1: C1D1 (n=32, 21) | Plasma VEGF-A: C2D28: C1D1 (n=31, 20) | Plasma VEGF-A: C3D1: C1D1 (n=27, 15) | Plasma VEGF-A: C3D28: C1D1 (n=28, 15) | Plasma VEGF-A: C4D1: C1D1 (n=27, 12) | Plasma VEGF-A: C4D28: C1D1 (n=25, 11) | Plasma VEGF-C: Baseline (n=35, 31) | Plasma VEGF-C: C1D28: C1D1 (n=31, 26) | Plasma VEGF-C: C2D1:C1D1 (n=30, 21) | Plasma VEGF-C: C2D28:C1D1 (n=31, 19) | Plasma VEGF-C: C3D1:C1D1 (n=28, 15) | Plasma VEGF-C: C3D28:C1D1 (n=28, 15) | Plasma VEGF-C: C4D1:C1D1 (n=28, 12) | Plasma VEGF-C: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=26, 11) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: Baseline (n=29, 30) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C1D28:C1D1 (n=27, 25) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C2D1:C1D1 (n=28, 20) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C2D28:C1D1 (n=28, 19) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C3D1:C1D1 (n=25, 14) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C3D28:C1D1 (n=25, 14) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C4D1:C1D1 (n=24, 11) | PLASMA sVEGFR-3: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=23, 10) | PLASMA IL-8: Baseline (n=31, 29) | PLASMA IL-8: C1D28:C1D1 (n=29, 25) | PLASMA IL-8: C2D1:C1D1 (n=29, 20) | PLASMA IL-8: C2D28:C1D1 (n=29, 19) | PLASMA IL-8: C3D1:C1D1 (n=26, 15) | PLASMA IL-8: C3D28:C1D1 (n=26, 14) | PLASMA IL-8: C4D1:C1D1 (n=26, 12) | PLASMA IL-8: C4:D28:C1D1 (n=25, 11) | PLASMA bFGF: Baseline (n=21, 2) | PLASMA bFGF: C1D28:C1D1 (n=15, 1) | PLASMA bFGF: C2D1:C1D1 (n=13, 1) | |
IFN-α | 109.0 | 1.134 | 1.171 | 1.153 | 1.253 | 1.149 | 1.209 | 1.008 | 651.2 | 1.165 | 1.177 | 1.081 | 1.174 | 1.054 | 1.382 | 1.139 | 40317.7 | 1.068 | 1.075 | 1.150 | 1.015 | 1.042 | 1.183 | 1.044 | 18.6 | 2.297 | 1.579 | 1.858 | 1.531 | 1.999 | 1.662 | 2.492 | 13.6 | 0.429 | 0.157 |
SU011248 | 101.9 | 4.280 | 1.161 | 5.851 | 1.630 | 5.236 | 1.486 | 4.924 | 556.4 | 0.945 | 1.045 | 0.871 | 1.159 | 1.043 | 1.243 | 1.207 | 44049.3 | 0.473 | 0.787 | 0.407 | 0.800 | 0.427 | 0.846 | 0.486 | 10.1 | 2.815 | 1.716 | 2.423 | 2.788 | 2.574 | 1.934 | 2.549 | 13.1 | 2.762 | 1.370 |
DR: Time from first documentation of objective tumor response to first date that recurrence or progressive disease (PD) was objectively documented, taking as a reference for PD, the smallest sum LD recorded since randomization. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every month until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 7.4 |
Temsirolimus | 11.1 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 9.3 |
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. EQ-5D index measured 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Range of EQ-5D index score = -0.594 to 1 where higher scores indicated a better health state. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 0.656 |
Temsirolimus | 0.689 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 0.689 |
Overall survival is the duration from randomization to death. For participants who are alive, overall survival is censored at the last contact. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Month 80
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 7.3 |
Temsirolimus | 10.9 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 8.4 |
Clinical benefit: confirmed CR or PR or had stable disease (SD) lasting at least 24 weeks. CR was the disappearance of all target lesions and non target lesions. PR was at least a 30% decrease in sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD was having neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 2 months until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 16.4 |
Temsirolimus | 34.0 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 30.0 |
Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was the disappearance of all target lesions and non target lesions. PR was at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 2 months until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 5.3 |
Temsirolimus | 9.1 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 9.5 |
PFS based on Independent Central Review Assessment. The period from randomization until disease progression, death or date of last contact. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, monthly until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 3.2 |
Temsirolimus | 5.6 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 4.9 |
"The Q-Twist is not a score calculated for each participant but is defined only on a by treatment group basis. For each treatment group, it is the weighted sum of the mean durations of the health states Tox, Twist, and Relapse. Tox is defined as time with severe toxicity related to treatment; Twist: time without symptoms or toxic side effects; and Relapse: time after relapse/progression. The mean duration of each health state is calculated based on the area under the Kaplan Meier curve pertaining to that health state. There is no direct method for calculating the dispersion of Q-Twist, and it is typically done using bootstrap method for purposes of inference (see, e.g., Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Gelber RD. Quality adjusted survival analysis. Stat Med 1990; 9: 1259-76). In practice, as apparently in the case with this study, the intermediate values resulting from the bootstrap exercise were not displayed." (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 80
Intervention | months (Number) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 6.9083 |
Temsirolimus | 8.3707 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 7.4821 |
TTF is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of PD or death, withdrawal from treatment due to an adverse event (AE), withdrawal of voluntary consent, or lost to follow-up, whichever occurred first, censored at the date of the conclusion of treatment phase. (NCT00065468)
Timeframe: Baseline, every month until tumor progression or death (up to Month 80)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Interferon Alfa | 1.9 |
Temsirolimus | 3.7 |
Interferon Alfa and Temsirolimus | 2.5 |
Geometric mean exposure for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | mg/L.h (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 9.76 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 18.63 |
Plasma concentration-time profile for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, AND 24 hours post dose
Intervention | mg/L (Mean) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 1.28 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 2.57 |
Time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive, approximately 18.3 months.
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 18 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 18.3 |
Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events, see the adverse event module. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 49 months.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 22 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 23 |
Determine whether BAY 43-9006 when used to treat metastatic prostate cancer is associated with having 50% of Patients Progression Free at 4 Months by clinical, radiographic, and prostatic specific antigen (PSA)criteria. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 4 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 1.83 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 3.7 |
Time to maximum concentration for sorafenib. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-dose
Intervention | hours (Median) |
---|---|
First Stage - Disease Progression | 0.68 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 8 |
Overall response was evaluated by the RECIST. Complete Response (CR) is the disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. Stable Disease (SD) is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. (NCT00090545)
Timeframe: Every 2 cycles (1 cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Complete Response | Partial Response | Progressive Disease | Stable Disease | |
First Stage - Disease Progression | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
Second Stage - Increased Accrual | 0 | 1 | 13 | 10 |
3 reviews available for niacinamide and Bone Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Bisphosphonates and vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted drugs in the treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma metastatic to bone.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Re | 2013 |
Radiation recall dermatitis induced by sorafenib : A case study and review of the literature.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Niacinamide; Phenylurea Compounds; Protei | 2016 |
Classic biphasic pulmonary blastoma: a case report and review of the literature.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Fatal Outcome; Humans; Intestinal Pe | 2011 |
9 trials available for niacinamide and Bone Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
A phase I trial of imetelstat in children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Study (ADVL1112).
Topics: Adolescent; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Bone Neoplasms; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug A | 2013 |
Impact of adding the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib to endocrine therapy in metastatic estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Biomarkers, Tumor; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Br | 2014 |
Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Disease Progressi | 2015 |
Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Disease Progressi | 2015 |
Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Disease Progressi | 2015 |
Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Disease Progressi | 2015 |
SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brai | 2015 |
Final analysis of a phase II trial using sorafenib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Disease-Free Surv | 2009 |
Beneficial effects of sorafenib on tumor progression, but not on radioiodine uptake, in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Disease-Free | 2009 |
A phase II trial of first-line sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma unwilling to receive or with early intolerance to immunotherapy: SOGUG Study 06-01.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal | 2010 |
A phase I trial of sorafenib plus gemcitabine and capecitabine for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: New York Cancer Consortium Trial NCI 6981.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Capecitabin | 2011 |
Could interferon still play a role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma? A randomized study of two schedules of sorafenib plus interferon-alpha 2a (RAPSODY).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combi | 2013 |
49 other studies available for niacinamide and Bone Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
EphA2 Expression in Bone Sarcomas: Bioinformatic Analyses and Preclinical Characterization in Patient-Derived Models of Osteosarcoma, Ewing's Sarcoma and Chondrosarcoma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzamides; Bone Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Chondrosarcoma; Comput | 2021 |
False-Positive 18F-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-1007 PET/CT Caused by Hepatic Multifocal Inflammatory Foci.
Topics: Aged; Biopsy; Bone Neoplasms; False Positive Reactions; Fluorine Radioisotopes; Humans; Inflammation | 2021 |
High detection rate in [
Topics: Aged; Bone Neoplasms; Diagnostic Imaging; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm R | 2021 |
Co-targeting of DNA, RNA, and protein molecules provides optimal outcomes for treating osteosarcoma and pulmonary metastasis in spontaneous and experimental metastasis mouse models.
Topics: Animals; Bone Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Combined Modality Ther | 2017 |
A typical presentation of a hepatocellular carcinoma in a middle-aged patient.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biopsy, Fine-Needle; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clavicle; Fat | 2017 |
Rib Fractures Mimicking Bone Metastases in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for Prostate Cancer.
Topics: Aged; Bone Neoplasms; Diagnosis, Differential; Fluorine Radioisotopes; Humans; Male; Niacinamide; Ol | 2019 |
Is it time to adopt external beam radiotherapy in the NCCN guidelines as a therapeutic strategy for intermediate/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma?.
Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Chemoembo | 2013 |
Case of sorafenib-induced thyroid storm.
Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Aged; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Atrial Fib | 2013 |
Combination of zoledronic Acid and targeted therapy is active but may induce osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Beva | 2013 |
[Complete response after sorafenib therapy plus zoledronic acid for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with bone metastasis - a case report].
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Diphospho | 2013 |
Kidney cancer: predicting survival after targeted therapy for mRCC.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Live | 2013 |
Human osteosarcoma cells respond to sorafenib chemotherapy by downregulation of the tumor progression factors S100A4, CXCR4 and the oncogene FOS.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Down-Regulation; Drug Screening Assays, Ant | 2014 |
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in patients with metastatic thyroid carcinomas: a retrospective study of the TUTHYREF network.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma, Follicular; Adenoma, Oxyphilic; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; | 2014 |
Prognostic significance of bone metastases and bisphosphonate therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Axitinib; Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw; Bone Dens | 2014 |
Response to sorafenib treatment in advanced metastatic thyroid cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Papillary; Compassionate Use Trials; Female; | 2014 |
RANK ligand blockade with denosumab in combination with sorafenib in chemorefractory osteosarcoma: a possible step forward?
Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neopl | 2015 |
Pneumothorax as a complication of combination antiangiogenic therapy in children and young adults with refractory/recurrent solid tumors.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Bevacizumab; Bone Neoplasms; Child; Child, Preschool; Fe | 2015 |
Kidney cancer: SWITCHing inconsequential.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Ce | 2015 |
Sorafenib-Sunitinib Sequence: The Jury Is Out.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Ce | 2015 |
Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Cervical Spine and Pelvic Bone Metastases Presenting as Unknown Primary Neoplasm.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cervical Cord; Chemoembolization, | 2015 |
Synergistic Effect of Sorafenib and Radiation on Human Oral Carcinoma in vivo.
Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cell Proliferation; Combined Modality | 2015 |
Efficacy of sorafenib correlates with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk classification and bone metastasis in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian People; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; | 2016 |
Anti-VEGF-related thrombotic microangiopathy in a child presenting with nephrotic syndrome.
Topics: Adolescent; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pro | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Early Tumour Shrinkage: A Tool for the Detection of Early Clinical Activity in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Axitinib; Bevacizumab; | 2016 |
Clinical analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living-donor liver transplantation.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Female; Humans; Liver Neopl | 2016 |
Tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R regresses an osteosarcoma in a patient-derived xenograft model resistant to a molecular-targeting drug.
Topics: Adolescent; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Biological Therapy; Bone Neoplasms; Drug Resistance, Neo | 2017 |
Primary Tumor Characteristics Are Important Prognostic Factors for Sorafenib-Treated Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
Topics: Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Demography; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Mei | 2017 |
Sunitinib treatment for patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma after progression on sorafenib.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, R | 2009 |
The tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib decreases cell number and induces apoptosis in a canine osteosarcoma cell line.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Caspase 3; Cell Count; | 2010 |
Efficacy of targeted therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma with pre-existing or new bone metastases.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carc | 2010 |
Sorafenib induces partial response in metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Humans; | 2010 |
Multidisciplinary treatment including sorafenib stabilized the bone metastases of renal cell carcinoma in an immunosuppressed renal transplant recipient.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Density Conservation Agents; | 2009 |
Interstitial pneumonia probably associated with sorafenib treatment: An alert of an adverse event.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Asian People; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Human | 2010 |
[Diagnosis and treatment of bone metastasis of renal cancer: an expert consensus statement (2008 version)].
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neopl | 2010 |
Sorafenib induces growth inhibition and apoptosis of human chondrosarcoma cells by blocking the RAF/ERK/MEK pathway.
Topics: Apoptosis; Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins; Benzenesulfonates; Blotting, Western; Bone Neoplasms; Cell | 2010 |
Sorafenib tosylate and paclitaxel induce anti-angiogenic, anti-tumour and anti-resorptive effects in experimental breast cancer bone metastases.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; | 2011 |
Prognostic prediction in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sorafenib based on expression levels of potential molecular markers in radical nephrectomy specimens.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, | 2013 |
Severe sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clobetasol; Dis | 2011 |
Hepatocellular carcinoma presenting with multiple bone and soft tissue metastases and atypical cytomorphological features--a rare case report.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Mal | 2013 |
Multiple cutaneous metastatic chordomas from the sacrum.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Chordoma; Female; Humans; Niacinamid | 2012 |
Impact of hyponatremia on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with molecular targeted therapy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; C-Reactive Protein; Carcinoma | 2012 |
High toxicity of sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Carci | 2012 |
Editorial comment from Dr Saito to impact of hyponatremia on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with molecular targeted therapy.
Topics: Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Hyponatremia; Indoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male | 2012 |
Editorial comment from Dr Vázquez-Alonso and Dr Puche-Sanz to impact of hyponatremia on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with molecular targeted therapy.
Topics: Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Female; Humans; Hyponatremia; Indoles; Kidney Neoplasms; Male | 2012 |
Concomitant oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors and bisphosphonates in advanced renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Ca | 2012 |
[A case of hepatocellular carcinoma treated by resection of metachronous rib metastasis after primary hepatectomy].
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Combined Modality Therapy; H | 2012 |
Adjuvant therapy with sorafenib in bone metastases bilateral renal carcinoma: a case report.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Combined Moda | 2007 |
[Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and loss of strength in the right arm--not a typical combination].
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Arm; Benzenesulfonates; Bone Neoplasms; Carcinoma | 2007 |
Safety and activity of sorafenib in different histotypes of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Proto | 2007 |