Page last updated: 2024-10-19

niacinamide and Blood Diseases

niacinamide has been researched along with Blood Diseases in 8 studies

nicotinamide : A pyridinecarboxamide that is pyridine in which the hydrogen at position 3 is replaced by a carboxamide group.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Sorafenib is the only drug that has shown a survival benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in randomized Phase 3 trials."7.76Sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Ahn, CS; Hwang, S; Kang, YK; Kim, KH; Kim, TW; Lee, HC; Lee, SG; Moon, DB; Ryoo, BY; Ryu, MH; Suh, DJ; Yoon, DH, 2010)
"Sorafenib treatment was effective in two patients who achieved a partial response and a continuous stable disease with duration of 24."6.78Sorafenib in patients with refractory or recurrent multiple myeloma. ( Goldschmidt, H; Gütgemann, I; Hose, D; Moehler, T; Neben, K; Raab, MS; Schmidt-Wolf, IG; Witzens-Harig, M; Yordanova, A, 2013)
"Sorafenib is the only drug that has shown a survival benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in randomized Phase 3 trials."3.76Sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Ahn, CS; Hwang, S; Kang, YK; Kim, KH; Kim, TW; Lee, HC; Lee, SG; Moon, DB; Ryoo, BY; Ryu, MH; Suh, DJ; Yoon, DH, 2010)
"Sorafenib treatment was effective in two patients who achieved a partial response and a continuous stable disease with duration of 24."2.78Sorafenib in patients with refractory or recurrent multiple myeloma. ( Goldschmidt, H; Gütgemann, I; Hose, D; Moehler, T; Neben, K; Raab, MS; Schmidt-Wolf, IG; Witzens-Harig, M; Yordanova, A, 2013)
" This study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin."2.77Phase IB study of sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors. ( Brendel, E; Kornacker, M; Kummer, G; Schultheis, B; Strumberg, D; Xia, C; Zeth, M, 2012)
"Sorafenib was well tolerated in both subgroups (grade 3/4: 20 and 22%, respectively)."2.75Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with and without prior cytokine therapy, a subanalysis of TARGET. ( Anderson, S; Bellmunt, J; Bukowski, R; Cihon, F; Escudier, B; Jäger, E; Lewis, J; McDermott, D; Moore, M; Negrier, S; Porta, C, 2010)

Research

Studies (8)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19901 (12.50)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's1 (12.50)29.6817
2010's6 (75.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Yordanova, A1
Hose, D1
Neben, K1
Witzens-Harig, M1
Gütgemann, I1
Raab, MS1
Moehler, T1
Goldschmidt, H1
Schmidt-Wolf, IG1
Bourlon, MT1
Gao, D1
Trigero, S1
Clemons, JE1
Breaker, K1
Lam, ET1
Flaig, TW1
Negrier, S1
Jäger, E1
Porta, C1
McDermott, D1
Moore, M1
Bellmunt, J1
Anderson, S1
Cihon, F1
Lewis, J1
Escudier, B1
Bukowski, R1
Kumar, R1
Crouthamel, MC1
Rominger, DH1
Gontarek, RR1
Tummino, PJ1
Levin, RA1
King, AG1
Yoon, DH1
Ryoo, BY1
Ryu, MH1
Lee, SG1
Hwang, S1
Suh, DJ1
Lee, HC1
Kim, TW1
Ahn, CS1
Kim, KH1
Moon, DB1
Kang, YK1
Spigel, DR1
Burris, HA1
Greco, FA1
Shipley, DL1
Friedman, EK1
Waterhouse, DM1
Whorf, RC1
Mitchell, RB1
Daniel, DB1
Zangmeister, J1
Bass, JD1
Hainsworth, JD1
Schultheis, B1
Kummer, G1
Zeth, M1
Brendel, E1
Xia, C1
Kornacker, M1
Strumberg, D1
INDOVINA, I1
CAUSI, N1

Clinical Trials (4)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase III Randomized Study of BAY43-9006 in Patients With Unresectable and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.[NCT00073307]Phase 3903 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
Prospective Translational Study Investigating Possible Molecular prEdictors of Resistance to First-Line pazopanIb in Metastatic reNal Cell Carcinoma[NCT04462445]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-25Completed
Tarceva With or Without Apatinib in the First-line Therapy of Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma With Mutant EGFR:a Phase II Study.[NCT02704767]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-06-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial of Sorafenib and Erlotinib or Erlotinib Alone in Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00600015]Phase 2166 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Final Overall Survival - Secondary Analysis (Placebo Data Censored at 30June2005) in the ITT Population

Overall survival determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the date of death, due to any cause. Outcome measure was assessed regularly, i.e. every 3 weeks for the first 24 weeks during treatment and every 4 weeks thereafter and approximately every 3 months during post-treatment. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (8Sep2006) for the final OS analysis, approximately 33 months later

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)542
Placebo436

Final Overall Survival (OS) - Primary Analysis in the ITT (Intent To Treat) Population

Overall survival determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the date of death, due to any cause. Outcome measure was assessed regularly, i.e. every 3 weeks for the first 24 weeks during treatment and every 4 weeks thereafter and approximately every 3 months during post-treatment. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (8Sep2006) for the final OS analysis, approximately 33 months later

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)542
Placebo461

Final Progression-Free Survival (PFS) - Independent Radiological Review

PFS determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the actual date of disease progression (PD) (radiological or clinical) or death due to any cause, if death occurred before PD. Outcome measure was assessed approximately every 8 weeks using RECIST v1.0 criteria by independent radiologic review. Radiological PD defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of measured lesions taking as reference smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of new lesions. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (28Jan2005), approximately 14 months later, tumors assessed every 8 weeks.

Interventiondays (Median)
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)167
Placebo84

Best Overall Response - Independent Radiological Review

Best overall response was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0 by independent radiologic review. Categories: complete response (CR, tumor disappears), partial response (PR, sum of lesion sizes decreased), stable disease (SD, steady state of disease), progressive disease (PD, sum of lesion sizes increased) and not evaluated. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (28Jan2005), approximately 14 months later, tumors assessed every 8 weeks.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot Evaluated
Placebo0.00.055.230.314.5
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)0.02.177.98.711.3

Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) by FKSI-10 (Functional Assessment of General Therapy Kidney Symptom Index 10) Assessment

"Primary Analysis for FKSI-10 patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure defined as longitudinal analysis of mean score over the first 5 treatment cycles. FKSI-10 patient responses for each question range from 0=not at all to 4=very much and after reverse coding the range of values for FKSI-10 total score is from 0 to 40; higher score represents better HRQOL." (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (31May2005), approximately 18 months later, PRO data collected at Day 1 of each cycle and end of treatment.

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycles 1-5 (Overall)
Placebo27.7827.2826.7826.2827.20
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)27.7727.2726.7726.2727.19

Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) by Physical Well-Being (PWB) Score of the FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Version) Assessment

"Primary Analysis for FACT-G (using PWB score) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure defined as longitudinal analysis of mean score over the first 5 treatment cycles. FACT-G (PWB score) patient responses for each question range from 0=not at all to 4=very much and after reverse coding the total FACT-G (PWB score) range of values is from 0 to 28; higher score represents better HRQOL." (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (31May2005), approximately 18 months later, PRO data collected at Day 1 of each cycle and end of treatment.

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 4, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycles 1-5 (Overall)
Placebo21.1620.7220.2819.8420.65
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)21.2120.7720.3319.8920.70

6-month PFS

Progression free survival is defined as the time from the first day of treatment until the day tumor progression was documented. Response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Progressive Disease (PD): Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions (1). Percentage of participants who were progression free at 6 month from the start of treatment is reported here. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Therapy29
Placebo22

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

"Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as the percentage of patients who have a partial/complete/stable response to therapy. Responses were assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.0).~Complete Response: Disappearance of all target lesions, and disappearance of all non-target lesions.~Partial Response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters) Stable Response: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response, nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since the treatment started)." (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Therapy54
Placebo38

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the time from when objective response is realized until time to first documented disease progression. Disease progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Objective Response = CR + PR. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Combination Therapy4.6430
Placebo5.2234

Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR)

"Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of patients who have a partial or complete response to therapy. Responses were assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.0).~Complete Response: Disappearance of all target lesions, and disappearance of all non-target lesions.~Partial Response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters)" (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Therapy8.1
Placebo10.9

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the first treatment until date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death or lack of data beyond follow-up period, the survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combination Therapy7.62
Placebo7.23

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the first day of treatment until the day tumor progression was documented. Response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).~Progressive Disease (PD): Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions" (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combination Therapy3.38
Placebo1.94

Trials

4 trials available for niacinamide and Blood Diseases

ArticleYear
Sorafenib in patients with refractory or recurrent multiple myeloma.
    Hematological oncology, 2013, Volume: 31, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Thera

2013
Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with and without prior cytokine therapy, a subanalysis of TARGET.
    Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2010, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates;

2010
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011, Jun-20, Volume: 29, Issue:18

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo

2011
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011, Jun-20, Volume: 29, Issue:18

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo

2011
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011, Jun-20, Volume: 29, Issue:18

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo

2011
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011, Jun-20, Volume: 29, Issue:18

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo

2011
Phase IB study of sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2012, Volume: 69, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Benzenesulfonates; Ci

2012

Other Studies

4 other studies available for niacinamide and Blood Diseases

ArticleYear
Clinical significance of sunitinib-associated macrocytosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
    Cancer medicine, 2016, Volume: 5, Issue:12

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Erythrocyte Indices; Erythroc

2016
Myelosuppression and kinase selectivity of multikinase angiogenesis inhibitors.
    British journal of cancer, 2009, Nov-17, Volume: 101, Issue:10

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Benzenesulfonates; Cell Line, Tumor; fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3; Hematologi

2009
Sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2010, Volume: 40, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Disease Progression; Dru

2010
[Metabolism of nicotinamide in man. III. Venous tolerance test in liver disease, blood disease, circulatory insufficiency and other morbid conditions].
    Bollettino della Societa italiana di biologia sperimentale, 1952, Volume: 28, Issue:7

    Topics: Hematologic Diseases; Liver Diseases; Niacin; Niacinamide; Veins

1952