niacinamide has been researched along with Blood Diseases in 8 studies
nicotinamide : A pyridinecarboxamide that is pyridine in which the hydrogen at position 3 is replaced by a carboxamide group.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Sorafenib is the only drug that has shown a survival benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in randomized Phase 3 trials." | 7.76 | Sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Ahn, CS; Hwang, S; Kang, YK; Kim, KH; Kim, TW; Lee, HC; Lee, SG; Moon, DB; Ryoo, BY; Ryu, MH; Suh, DJ; Yoon, DH, 2010) |
"Sorafenib treatment was effective in two patients who achieved a partial response and a continuous stable disease with duration of 24." | 6.78 | Sorafenib in patients with refractory or recurrent multiple myeloma. ( Goldschmidt, H; Gütgemann, I; Hose, D; Moehler, T; Neben, K; Raab, MS; Schmidt-Wolf, IG; Witzens-Harig, M; Yordanova, A, 2013) |
"Sorafenib is the only drug that has shown a survival benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in randomized Phase 3 trials." | 3.76 | Sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. ( Ahn, CS; Hwang, S; Kang, YK; Kim, KH; Kim, TW; Lee, HC; Lee, SG; Moon, DB; Ryoo, BY; Ryu, MH; Suh, DJ; Yoon, DH, 2010) |
"Sorafenib treatment was effective in two patients who achieved a partial response and a continuous stable disease with duration of 24." | 2.78 | Sorafenib in patients with refractory or recurrent multiple myeloma. ( Goldschmidt, H; Gütgemann, I; Hose, D; Moehler, T; Neben, K; Raab, MS; Schmidt-Wolf, IG; Witzens-Harig, M; Yordanova, A, 2013) |
" This study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin." | 2.77 | Phase IB study of sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors. ( Brendel, E; Kornacker, M; Kummer, G; Schultheis, B; Strumberg, D; Xia, C; Zeth, M, 2012) |
"Sorafenib was well tolerated in both subgroups (grade 3/4: 20 and 22%, respectively)." | 2.75 | Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with and without prior cytokine therapy, a subanalysis of TARGET. ( Anderson, S; Bellmunt, J; Bukowski, R; Cihon, F; Escudier, B; Jäger, E; Lewis, J; McDermott, D; Moore, M; Negrier, S; Porta, C, 2010) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 1 (12.50) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 1 (12.50) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 6 (75.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Yordanova, A | 1 |
Hose, D | 1 |
Neben, K | 1 |
Witzens-Harig, M | 1 |
Gütgemann, I | 1 |
Raab, MS | 1 |
Moehler, T | 1 |
Goldschmidt, H | 1 |
Schmidt-Wolf, IG | 1 |
Bourlon, MT | 1 |
Gao, D | 1 |
Trigero, S | 1 |
Clemons, JE | 1 |
Breaker, K | 1 |
Lam, ET | 1 |
Flaig, TW | 1 |
Negrier, S | 1 |
Jäger, E | 1 |
Porta, C | 1 |
McDermott, D | 1 |
Moore, M | 1 |
Bellmunt, J | 1 |
Anderson, S | 1 |
Cihon, F | 1 |
Lewis, J | 1 |
Escudier, B | 1 |
Bukowski, R | 1 |
Kumar, R | 1 |
Crouthamel, MC | 1 |
Rominger, DH | 1 |
Gontarek, RR | 1 |
Tummino, PJ | 1 |
Levin, RA | 1 |
King, AG | 1 |
Yoon, DH | 1 |
Ryoo, BY | 1 |
Ryu, MH | 1 |
Lee, SG | 1 |
Hwang, S | 1 |
Suh, DJ | 1 |
Lee, HC | 1 |
Kim, TW | 1 |
Ahn, CS | 1 |
Kim, KH | 1 |
Moon, DB | 1 |
Kang, YK | 1 |
Spigel, DR | 1 |
Burris, HA | 1 |
Greco, FA | 1 |
Shipley, DL | 1 |
Friedman, EK | 1 |
Waterhouse, DM | 1 |
Whorf, RC | 1 |
Mitchell, RB | 1 |
Daniel, DB | 1 |
Zangmeister, J | 1 |
Bass, JD | 1 |
Hainsworth, JD | 1 |
Schultheis, B | 1 |
Kummer, G | 1 |
Zeth, M | 1 |
Brendel, E | 1 |
Xia, C | 1 |
Kornacker, M | 1 |
Strumberg, D | 1 |
INDOVINA, I | 1 |
CAUSI, N | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Phase III Randomized Study of BAY43-9006 in Patients With Unresectable and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.[NCT00073307] | Phase 3 | 903 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-11-30 | Completed | ||
Prospective Translational Study Investigating Possible Molecular prEdictors of Resistance to First-Line pazopanIb in Metastatic reNal Cell Carcinoma[NCT04462445] | Phase 2 | 25 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-06-25 | Completed | ||
Tarceva With or Without Apatinib in the First-line Therapy of Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma With Mutant EGFR:a Phase II Study.[NCT02704767] | Phase 2 | 60 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2016-06-30 | Not yet recruiting | ||
A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial of Sorafenib and Erlotinib or Erlotinib Alone in Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer[NCT00600015] | Phase 2 | 166 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-02-29 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Overall survival determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the date of death, due to any cause. Outcome measure was assessed regularly, i.e. every 3 weeks for the first 24 weeks during treatment and every 4 weeks thereafter and approximately every 3 months during post-treatment. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (8Sep2006) for the final OS analysis, approximately 33 months later
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 542 |
Placebo | 436 |
Overall survival determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the date of death, due to any cause. Outcome measure was assessed regularly, i.e. every 3 weeks for the first 24 weeks during treatment and every 4 weeks thereafter and approximately every 3 months during post-treatment. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (8Sep2006) for the final OS analysis, approximately 33 months later
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 542 |
Placebo | 461 |
PFS determined as the time (days) from the date of randomization at start of study to the actual date of disease progression (PD) (radiological or clinical) or death due to any cause, if death occurred before PD. Outcome measure was assessed approximately every 8 weeks using RECIST v1.0 criteria by independent radiologic review. Radiological PD defined as at least 20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of measured lesions taking as reference smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of new lesions. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (28Jan2005), approximately 14 months later, tumors assessed every 8 weeks.
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 167 |
Placebo | 84 |
Best overall response was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0 by independent radiologic review. Categories: complete response (CR, tumor disappears), partial response (PR, sum of lesion sizes decreased), stable disease (SD, steady state of disease), progressive disease (PD, sum of lesion sizes increased) and not evaluated. (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (28Jan2005), approximately 14 months later, tumors assessed every 8 weeks.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Complete Response | Partial Response | Stable Disease | Progressive Disease | Not Evaluated | |
Placebo | 0.0 | 0.0 | 55.2 | 30.3 | 14.5 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 0.0 | 2.1 | 77.9 | 8.7 | 11.3 |
"Primary Analysis for FKSI-10 patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure defined as longitudinal analysis of mean score over the first 5 treatment cycles. FKSI-10 patient responses for each question range from 0=not at all to 4=very much and after reverse coding the range of values for FKSI-10 total score is from 0 to 40; higher score represents better HRQOL." (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (31May2005), approximately 18 months later, PRO data collected at Day 1 of each cycle and end of treatment.
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2, Day 1 | Cycle 3, Day 1 | Cycle 4, Day 1 | Cycle 5, Day 1 | Cycles 1-5 (Overall) | |
Placebo | 27.78 | 27.28 | 26.78 | 26.28 | 27.20 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 27.77 | 27.27 | 26.77 | 26.27 | 27.19 |
"Primary Analysis for FACT-G (using PWB score) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure defined as longitudinal analysis of mean score over the first 5 treatment cycles. FACT-G (PWB score) patient responses for each question range from 0=not at all to 4=very much and after reverse coding the total FACT-G (PWB score) range of values is from 0 to 28; higher score represents better HRQOL." (NCT00073307)
Timeframe: From start of randomization of the first subject (1Dec2003) until the data cut-off (31May2005), approximately 18 months later, PRO data collected at Day 1 of each cycle and end of treatment.
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2, Day 1 | Cycle 3, Day 1 | Cycle 4, Day 1 | Cycle 5, Day 1 | Cycles 1-5 (Overall) | |
Placebo | 21.16 | 20.72 | 20.28 | 19.84 | 20.65 |
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) | 21.21 | 20.77 | 20.33 | 19.89 | 20.70 |
Progression free survival is defined as the time from the first day of treatment until the day tumor progression was documented. Response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Progressive Disease (PD): Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions (1). Percentage of participants who were progression free at 6 month from the start of treatment is reported here. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 29 |
Placebo | 22 |
"Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as the percentage of patients who have a partial/complete/stable response to therapy. Responses were assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.0).~Complete Response: Disappearance of all target lesions, and disappearance of all non-target lesions.~Partial Response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters) Stable Response: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response, nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters since the treatment started)." (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 54 |
Placebo | 38 |
Duration of response is defined as the time from when objective response is realized until time to first documented disease progression. Disease progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Objective Response = CR + PR. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | months (Mean) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 4.6430 |
Placebo | 5.2234 |
"Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of patients who have a partial or complete response to therapy. Responses were assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.0).~Complete Response: Disappearance of all target lesions, and disappearance of all non-target lesions.~Partial Response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters)" (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 8.1 |
Placebo | 10.9 |
OS is defined as the time from the first treatment until date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death or lack of data beyond follow-up period, the survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 7.62 |
Placebo | 7.23 |
"Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the first day of treatment until the day tumor progression was documented. Response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).~Progressive Disease (PD): Appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions" (NCT00600015)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Combination Therapy | 3.38 |
Placebo | 1.94 |
4 trials available for niacinamide and Blood Diseases
Article | Year |
---|---|
Sorafenib in patients with refractory or recurrent multiple myeloma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Combined Modality Thera | 2013 |
Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with and without prior cytokine therapy, a subanalysis of TARGET.
Topics: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzenesulfonates; | 2010 |
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo | 2011 |
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo | 2011 |
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo | 2011 |
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of sorafenib and erlotinib or erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclo | 2011 |
Phase IB study of sorafenib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Area Under Curve; Benzenesulfonates; Ci | 2012 |
4 other studies available for niacinamide and Blood Diseases
Article | Year |
---|---|
Clinical significance of sunitinib-associated macrocytosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Erythrocyte Indices; Erythroc | 2016 |
Myelosuppression and kinase selectivity of multikinase angiogenesis inhibitors.
Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Benzenesulfonates; Cell Line, Tumor; fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3; Hematologi | 2009 |
Sorafenib for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Disease Progression; Dru | 2010 |
[Metabolism of nicotinamide in man. III. Venous tolerance test in liver disease, blood disease, circulatory insufficiency and other morbid conditions].
Topics: Hematologic Diseases; Liver Diseases; Niacin; Niacinamide; Veins | 1952 |