Page last updated: 2024-11-01

nevirapine and Preterm Birth

nevirapine has been researched along with Preterm Birth in 6 studies

Nevirapine: A potent, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor used in combination with nucleoside analogues for treatment of HIV INFECTIONS and AIDS.
nevirapine : A dipyridodiazepine that is 5,11-dihydro-6H-dipyrido[3,2-b:2',3'-e][1,4]diazepine which is substituted by methyl, oxo, and cyclopropyl groups at positions 4, 6, and 11, respectively. A non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with activity against HIV-1, it is used in combination with other antiretrovirals for the treatment of HIV infection.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" We compared the pregnancy outcomes of women exposed to EFV and to nevirapine (NVP) during the first trimester."7.77Pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to efavirenz and nevirapine: an appraisal of the IeDEA West Africa and ANRS Databases, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. ( Amani-Bosse, C; Anglaret, X; Coffie, PA; Dabis, F; Danel, C; Eholié, SP; Ekouevi, DK; Messou, E; Moh, R; Ouattara, E; Sissoko, M, 2011)
" We compared the pregnancy outcomes of women exposed to EFV and to nevirapine (NVP) during the first trimester."3.77Pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to efavirenz and nevirapine: an appraisal of the IeDEA West Africa and ANRS Databases, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. ( Amani-Bosse, C; Anglaret, X; Coffie, PA; Dabis, F; Danel, C; Eholié, SP; Ekouevi, DK; Messou, E; Moh, R; Ouattara, E; Sissoko, M, 2011)
" Unbooked HIV positive pregnant women, who had not received antiretroviral drugs during the antenatal period but received nevirapine in labour, referred to as untreated-maternal HIV infection, were compared with women who received HAART early in pregnancy."3.77Pregnancy outcome among HIV positive women receiving antenatal HAART versus untreated maternal HIV infection. ( Biodun, O; Joseph, O; Michael, E, 2011)
" Based on current knowledge, the immense benefits of antiretroviral prophylaxis in reducing the risk of MTCT, far outweigh the potential for adverse effects."2.43The safety of antiretroviral drugs in pregnancy. ( Newell, ML; Thorne, C, 2005)

Research

Studies (6)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's1 (16.67)29.6817
2010's5 (83.33)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Venkatesh, KK1
Farhad, M1
Fenton, T1
Moodley, D1
Naik, S1
Nakabiito, C1
Fairlie, L1
Fowler, MG1
Stringer, JSA1
Chi, BH1
Darak, S1
Darak, T1
Kulkarni, S1
Kulkarni, V1
Parchure, R1
Hutter, I1
Janssen, F1
de Waal, R1
Kroon, SM1
Holgate, SL1
Horn, AR1
Tooke, LJ1
Norman, J1
Smith, P1
Blockman, M1
Cotton, MF1
McIlleron, HM1
Cohen, K1
Ekouevi, DK1
Coffie, PA1
Ouattara, E1
Moh, R1
Amani-Bosse, C1
Messou, E1
Sissoko, M1
Anglaret, X1
Eholié, SP1
Danel, C1
Dabis, F1
Joseph, O1
Biodun, O1
Michael, E1
Thorne, C1
Newell, ML1

Clinical Trials (2)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase I Study of the Safety, Tolerance, and Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) and the Combination of TDF Plus Emtricitabine in HIV-1 Infected Pregnant Women and Their Infants[NCT00076791]Phase 166 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of the Pharmacokinetics of Nevirapine and the Incidence of Nevirapine Resistance Mutations in HIV-Infected Women Receiving a Single Intrapartum Dose of Nevirapine With the Concomitant Administration of Zidovudine/Didanosine or Zidovudine/Di[NCT00109590]Phase 2175 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Area Under the Curve Pharmacokinetic Outcome for LPV/r. (AUC ug*hr/mL)

Data was analyzed with WinNonLin (Version 5.2, Pharsight, USA) using non-compartmental methods. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the linear-trapezoidal rule. Cpredose and C4hour at the two measurement times were compared within-subject using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. (NCT00109590)
Timeframe: Within 72 hours postpartum and during the first 30 days postpartum

Interventionug*hr/mL (Median)
Within 72 Hrs Ppm99.7
At Day 30 PpmNA

Four (4) Hour Concentration Pharmacokinetic Outcome for LPV/r (C4hour ug/mL).

Data was analyzed with WinNonLin (Version 5.2, Pharsight, USA) using non-compartmental methods. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the linear-trapezoidal rule. Cpredose and C4hour at the two measurement times were compared within-subject using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. (NCT00109590)
Timeframe: Within 72 hours postpartum and during the first 30 days postpartum

Interventionug/mL (Median)
Within 72 Hrs Ppm10.78
At Day 30 Ppm12.96

Maximum Concentration Pharmacokinetic Outcome for LPV/r (Cmax ug/mL) .

Data was analyzed with WinNonLin (Version 5.2, Pharsight, USA) using non-compartmental methods. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the linear-trapezoidal rule. Cpredose and C4hour at the two measurement times were compared within-subject using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. (NCT00109590)
Timeframe: Within 72 hours postpartum and during the first 30 days postpartum

Interventionug/mL (Median)
Within 72 Hrs Ppm11.2
At Day 30 PpmNA

Median HIV-1 Viral Load at 24 Weeks Postpartum in Women

(NCT00109590)
Timeframe: at 24 weeks postpartum

Interventionlog10 copies/mL (Median)
Arm A : LPV/r x 7d4.3
Arm B : no LPV/r3.9
Arm C: LPV/r x 30d4.0

Number of Women With Grade >=3 Events After Start of Study Treatment

Adverse events were graded using the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Table for Grading > the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (December 2004). All grade 3 and higher signs, symptoms, and laboratory toxicities (and events of any grade that led to a change in study treatment) were included. (NCT00109590)
Timeframe: After start of study Treatment (postpartum)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm A : LPV/r x 7d2
Arm B : no LPV/r0
Arm C: LPV/r x 30d2

Pre-dose Concentration Pharmacokinetic Outcome for LPV/r (Cpredose ug/mL).

Data was analyzed with WinNonLin (Version 5.2, Pharsight, USA) using non-compartmental methods. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the linear-trapezoidal rule. Cpredose and C4hour at the two measurement times were compared within-subject using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. (NCT00109590)
Timeframe: Within 72 hours postpartum and during the first 30 days postpartum

Interventionug/mL (Median)
Within 72 Hrs Ppm6.08
At Day 30 Ppm9.17

Resistance Mutations in HIV Infected Infants

Resistance mutations as identified by consensus sequencing or OLA (NCT00109590)
Timeframe: 24 weeks postpartum

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm B : no LPV/r0
Arm C: LPV/r x 30d0

The Proportion of Women in Each Randomized Arm Who Have One or More New NVP Resistance Mutations as Identified by Consensus Sequencing or Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay (OLA) in Plasma

The incidence of new NVP resistance mutations at day 10 or week 6 postpartum in each randomized arm. Samples with viral load <500 copies/mL were considered free of mutations. If a resistance result was missing for reasons other than VL <500 copies/ml it was conservatively imputed as resistant in the primary analysis. (NCT00109590)
Timeframe: at Day 10 or Week 6 postpartum.

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Arm A : LPV/r x 7d3.6
Arm B : no LPV/r7.1
Arm C : LPV/r x 30d5.3

The Proportion of Women in Each Randomized Arm Who Have One or More New NVP Resistance Mutations for the Subgroup of Women With Plasma HIV RNA >= 500 Copies/ml At Entry

The incidence of new NVP resistance mutations at day 10 or week 6 postpartum in each randomized arm. Samples with viral load <500 copies/mL were considered free of mutations. If a resistance result was missing for reasons other than VL <500 copies/ml it was conservatively imputed as resistant in the primary analysis. (NCT00109590)
Timeframe: at Day 10 or Week 6 postpartum.

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Arm A: LPV/r x 7d4.9
Arm B: no LPV/r9.5
Arm C : LPV/r x 30d7.0

The Proportion of Women Who Develop One or More New NVP Resistance Mutations as Identified by Consensus Sequencing or Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay in Plasma (Sampling Was Done at Days 10,21,30, and Weeks 5,6, and 8 Postpartum).

The incidence of new NVP resistance mutation in plasma HIV within 8 weeks postpartum in each randomized arm was estimated using an exact binomial confidence interval. If a resistance mutation was detected at any of the timepoints then an endpoint was met. Samples with VL <500 copies/mL were considered free of mutations. If a resistance result was missing for reasons other than VL <500 copies/ml (e.g.missed visit), it was conservatively imputed as resistant in the primary analysis. (NCT00109590)
Timeframe: within 8 weeks postpartum.

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Arm A : LPV/r x 7d7.1
Arm B : no LPV/r12.5
Arm C: LPV/r x 30d5.3

Proportion of Women With New NVP Resistance Mutation Within 8 Weeks Postpartum Who Had a NVP Resistance Mutation Detected at 72 Weeks Postpartum.

Resistance mutations as identified by OLA in plasma samples or PBMC at 72 weeks postpartum amongst women who had new NVP resistance mutations within 8 weeks postpatrum. These results were based on the 13 women who developed a new NVP resistance mutation in the first 8 weeks postpartum. For the primary outcome measure 1, one particpant in arm A was unavailable for follow-up after week 5 and was conservatively imputed to have developed resistance mutation. (NCT00109590)
Timeframe: within 72 weeks postpartum

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
OLA in plasma samplesOLA in PBMC
Arm A : LPV/r x 7d00
Arm B : no LPV/r00
Arm C: LPV/r x 30d01

The Proportion of Women With Any New ZDV, ddI, or LPV/r Resistance Mutations.

(NCT00109590)
Timeframe: At Week 5 postpartum (ZDV) and at the first timepoint with viral load >=500 copies/ml after treatment discontinuation (ddI and LPV/r).

,,
Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
The proportion of women with new ZDV resistanceThe proportion of women with new ddI resistanceThe proportion of women with new LPV/r resistance
Arm A : LPV/r x 7d000
Arm B : no LPV/r1.7800
Arm C: LPV/r x 30d000

Reviews

1 review available for nevirapine and Preterm Birth

ArticleYear
The safety of antiretroviral drugs in pregnancy.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2005, Volume: 4, Issue:2

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Acidosis, Lactic; Anemia; Animals; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Chemical and

2005
The safety of antiretroviral drugs in pregnancy.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2005, Volume: 4, Issue:2

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Acidosis, Lactic; Anemia; Animals; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Chemical and

2005
The safety of antiretroviral drugs in pregnancy.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2005, Volume: 4, Issue:2

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Acidosis, Lactic; Anemia; Animals; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Chemical and

2005
The safety of antiretroviral drugs in pregnancy.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2005, Volume: 4, Issue:2

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Acidosis, Lactic; Anemia; Animals; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Chemical and

2005

Trials

1 trial available for nevirapine and Preterm Birth

ArticleYear
Association between HIV antiretroviral therapy and preterm birth based on antenatal ultrasound gestational age determination: a comparative analysis.
    AIDS (London, England), 2019, 12-01, Volume: 33, Issue:15

    Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination;

2019

Other Studies

4 other studies available for nevirapine and Preterm Birth

ArticleYear
Effect of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) during pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes: experiences from a PMTCT program in western India.
    AIDS patient care and STDs, 2013, Volume: 27, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Fem

2013
Nevirapine concentrations in preterm and low birth weight HIV-exposed infants: implications for dosing recommendations.
    The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2014, Volume: 33, Issue:12

    Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infant; Infant, Low Birth Weight; Infant, Newborn;

2014
Pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to efavirenz and nevirapine: an appraisal of the IeDEA West Africa and ANRS Databases, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
    Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2011, Feb-01, Volume: 56, Issue:2

    Topics: Abortion, Induced; Abortion, Spontaneous; Adult; Africa, Western; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxaz

2011
Pregnancy outcome among HIV positive women receiving antenatal HAART versus untreated maternal HIV infection.
    Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP, 2011, Volume: 21, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Apgar Score; Cesarean Section; Chi-Sq

2011