netilmicin and Cross-Infection

We compared the effectiveness of a single dose and a three-day course of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing bacterial infections in high-risk neonates. The study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted in a 20-bed tertiary referral neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). A series of 130 neonates admitted consecutively to the NICU, fulfilling risk factors for infection, were assigned at random to receive intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis with ampicillin and netilmicin either in two daily doses for 72 h (three-day-administration group, 67 infants) or in a single bolus injection on admission (bolus group, 63 infants). Hospital-acquired infection, the main outcome measure, was defined as infection that developed at least 48 h after admission, and vertical infection (maternally transmitted) was considered to be present when clinical symptoms and abnormal laboratory findings became evident within 48 h of birth. Infections were considered as suspected when clinical and laboratory findings of infection were present, without positive cultures, and as confirmed when positive cultures were also present. No significant differences were found between the two groups of neonates studied in mean birth weight, gestational age or postnatal age on admission. The incidence of vertical infection was similar in the two groups (16/67, 23.9% vs. 14/63, 22.2%). Of the 130 newborns studied, 29 (22.3%) acquired at least one nosocomial infection during their NICU stay; total hospital-acquired infections, calculated as the incidence density of infection (the number of infective episodes divided by the number of days in the NICU), were less frequent among newborns who received the three-day course than the bolus (relative risk 0.69). This difference, although not statistically significant, depended on the different incidence density of confirmed nosocomial infections rather than on suspected infections (relative risk 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.32-1.09; P=0.1). There were no significant differences between the two groups in overall mortality. A single bolus administration on admission is therefore likely to be as effective as a three-day course of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing bacterial infection in high-risk infants admitted to an NICU.

Topics: Ampicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Bacterial Infections; Cross Infection; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Infection Control; Infusions, Intravenous; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; Intensive Care, Neonatal; Italy; Male; Netilmicin; Treatment Outcome

An open, randomized, multicenter study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of piperacillin/tazobactam and co-amoxiclav plus aminoglycoside in the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe community-acquired or nosocomial pneumonia. Of the 89 patients who entered the study, 84 (94%) were clinically evaluable. A favorable clinical response was observed in 90% of the piperacillin/ tazobactam group and in 84% of the co-amoxiclav/aminoglycoside group (not significant). The bacteriological efficacy was comparable in both groups (96% vs. 92%; not significant). There was only one fatal outcome in the piperacillin/tazobactam group compared to six in the co-amoxiclav/aminoglycoside group regimen (P=0.058). The adverse event rate was non-significantly lower in the piperacillin/ tazobactam group compared to the co-amoxiclav/aminoglycoside group (2% vs. 7%; P=0.32). Piperacillin/tazobactam is safe and highly efficacious in the treatment of serious pneumonia in hospitalized patients. It compares favorably with the combination of co-amoxiclav/aminoglycoside.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Community-Acquired Infections; Cross Infection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gentamicins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Netilmicin; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Treatment Outcome

A prospective, randomized trial was conducted in a medical intensive care unit to assess safety and tolerability of four different dose regimens of intravenous netilmicin given once daily in the treatment of febrile episodes in critically ill patients. Eighty patients with febrile episodes during their stay in the intensive care unit were included in the study. The patients were randomized into four groups: Group 1 received a single daily dose of netilmicin based upon weight, age and renal function according to a dosage nomogram [13] (mean dose 298 +/- 29 mg, median 300 mg, range 250-350 mg), group 2 received 150% of this standard dose (mean 418 +/- 45 mg, median 400 mg, range 350-500 mg), group 3 200% (mean 525 +/- 41 mg, median 500 mg, range 400-550 mg) and group 4 250% (mean 710 +/- 39 mg, median 650 mg, range 600-750 mg). Duration of treatment was six days. Positive cultures were obtained in 29 patients. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance, as well as netilmicin trough levels and levels of alpha 1-microglobulin showed no significant difference between the groups before, during, and after therapy. Our results indicate that with once daily dosing even high doses of netilmicin are well tolerated in patients with a creatinine clearance of > 70 ml/min before therapy. Necessary precautions include monitoring of drug trough levels (< 1 mg/L) and maintenance of adequate volume status.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross Infection; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Netilmicin; Prospective Studies

A prospective, randomized multicentre study was conducted in order to evaluate the potentially superior tolerability profile of teicoplanin plus netilmicin compared with vancomycin plus netilmicin in patients in ICUs. We considered that these glycopeptides have been shown to have comparable efficacy and that comparative tolerability is of paramount importance, particularly in severely ill patients. A total of 56 patients were enrolled into the study (36 males and 20 females). Twenty-four patients were included in the teicoplanin plus netilmicin group (15 males, 9 females: mean age 56.8 years). The mean simplified acute physiological score (SAPS) was 9.4 (range 4-20). Thirty-two patients were randomized to receive vancomycin plus netilmicin (21 males, 11 females; mean age 56.4 years). The mean SAPS was 9.3 (range 2-16). Septicaemia was the most common infection (14 cases in each group). Most infections were caused by Staphylococcus aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococci. The mean daily doses were: for teicoplanin, 457 mg (6.7 mg/kg); for vancomycin, 1678 mg (24.4 mg/kg); and for netilmicin 263.3 mg (3.9 mg/kg) in the teicoplanin group and 248 mg (3.8 mg/kg) in the vancomycin group. The trough levels of teicoplanin in the serum remained mostly between 7 and 10 mg/l, while more fluctuation was seen in patients receiving vancomycin. The mean trough levels of netilmicin in the serum were 1.2 (SD 0.9) mg/l in the teicoplanin group, compared with 1.7 (SD 1.4) mg/l in the vancomycin group (NS: p > 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Critical Care; Cross Infection; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Netilmicin; Prospective Studies; Teicoplanin; Vancomycin

Nosocomial pneumonia and sepsis, as well as severe diffuse peritonitis, must be treated early in order to prevent complications such as septic shock and organ dysfunctions. With the availability of new broad-spectrum and highly bactericidal antibiotics, the need of combining beta-lactams with aminoglycosides for the treatment of severe infections should be reassessed. A prospective randomized controlled study was performed to compare imipenem monotherapy with a combination of imipenem plus netilmicin in the empiric treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, nosocomial sepsis, and severe diffuse peritonitis. A total of 313 patients were enrolled, and 280 were assessable. The antibiotic treatment was successful in 113 of 142 patients (80%) given the monotherapy and in 119 of 138 patients (86%) given the combination (P = 0.19). The failure rates for the most important type of infection, i.e., pneumonia, were similar in the two groups, as well as the number of superinfections. While creatinine increase was associated with factors not related to antibiotic therapy for all eight patients of the monotherapy group, no factor other than the antibiotics could be found for 6 of the 14 cases of nephrotoxicity observed in the combination group (P = 0.014). Finally, the emergence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to imipenem occurred in 8 monotherapy patients and in 13 combination therapy patients. In conclusion, imipenem monotherapy appeared as effective as the combination of imipenem plus netilmicin for the treatment of severe infection. The addition of netilmicin increased nephrotoxicity, and it did not prevent the emergence of P. aeruginosa resistant to imipenem.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Bacteremia; Bacterial Infections; Cross Infection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Imipenem; Male; Middle Aged; Netilmicin; Peritonitis; Pneumonia; Prospective Studies

Two randomized studies have been initiated to establish the role of teicoplanin as systemic therapy for infections in burns patients and as short-term prophylaxis for orthopaedic implant surgery. Opportunistic micro-organisms causing infections in burn patients are often acquired in hospital. These infections commonly involve Gram-positive organisms which may be resistant to several antibiotics. Teicoplanin, alone and in combination with additional antibacterial drugs, is effective in the treatment of Gram-positive infections of various types. In addition, teicoplanin has proved useful as prophylaxis against infection in orthopaedic surgery. Deep prosthetic infections are very difficult to cure without removing the infected device; the outcome can be devastating, such as total loss of joint function, amputation, and, occasionally, death. Preliminary results from the two studies are encouraging and show that teicoplanin has a role to play both in treatment of infection and as prophylaxis against hospital-acquired infection.

Topics: Adult; Burns; Cefazolin; Cross Infection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycopeptides; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Male; Middle Aged; Netilmicin; Postoperative Complications; Teicoplanin; Thymus Extracts; Wound Infection

Four previous studies comparing netilmicin and amikacin have yielded inconclusive results concerning efficacy and rates of nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. For this reason, we conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the two drugs in the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe infection.. A total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study; 100 received netilmicin and 102 received amikacin. Concomitant antimicrobials were restricted to metronidazole and benzylpenicillin. Peak and trough aminoglycoside levels were assayed within the first 36 hours and at least every 72 hours thereafter. A full blood cell count, serum electrolytes, creatinine, bilirubin, and liver enzymes were measured before therapy, weekly thereafter, and within 48 hours after the discontinuation of therapy. Nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity were assessed in patients. A standard agar dilution procedure was used to determine minimal inhibitory concentrations.. No significant pretreatment differences were found between the two groups. Patients in the amikacin group responded significantly better to treatment than did patients in the netilmicin group (90% versus 79%; p less than 0.05). A notable finding was the markedly inferior response rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections to netilmicin as compared with amikacin (13 of 24 with a favorable response compared with 25 of 26). No significant difference in ototoxicity was found, whereas nephrotoxicity appeared to be significantly less with amikacin (4% versus 12%, p less than 0.05). Although amikacin seemed less nephrotoxic than netilmicin, this may have been related to the significantly greater number of patients with initial renal dysfunction who received netilmicin.. Amikacin appears to be significantly more efficacious than netilmicin for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections, especially those in non-urinary tract sites. There is no apparent difference between the two drugs in terms of ototoxicity.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amikacin; Bacteria; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cross Infection; Ear; Female; Humans; Kidney; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Netilmicin; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation; Superinfection

93 patients were enrolled into a prospective randomised study to determine the efficacy and safety of netilmicin, cefotaxime or their combination in the treatment of sepsis caused by susceptible strains of Enterobacteriaceae or staphylococci. 83 patients were evaluable for safety, 74 for clinical efficacy and 63 for microbiological response including 36 patients (57%) with positive blood cultures. There were significantly more clinical failures with cefotaxime than with netilmicin even when urinary tract sepsis was excluded. Microbiological failures occurred more frequently in the cefotaxime arm and were associated with Klebsiella and Enterobacter spp. Four cefotaxime failures were subsequently successfully treated with netilmicin. More mixed infections were however enrolled by chance into the cefotaxime arm. The statistical difference between netilmicin and cefotaxime is not significant if mixed infections are excluded. There was no difference in efficacy between the netilmicin and combination groups although superinfection was seen in the latter group. The incidence of nephrotoxicity was greater in the netilmicin group but not significantly so. Only one minor case of ototoxicity was detected in the 41 patients receiving netilmicin who had serial audiograms. The results suggest that netilmicin is a more effective agent than cefotaxime for treating life-threatening infections with susceptible Enterobacteriaceae or staphylococci particularly with infections in non-urinary tract sites. If dosage of netilmicin is closely monitored by measuring serum concentrations, toxicity is minimal.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Bacterial Infections; Cefotaxime; Cross Infection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Humans; Netilmicin; Random Allocation; Sepsis; Staphylococcal Infections

During a randomized clinical trial comparing tobramycin plus ticarcillin to netilmicin plus ticarcillin as empiric therapy of febrile neutropenic patients, Staphylococcus epidermidis emerged as the predominate superinfecting pathogen in tobramycin recipients. Overall clinical response was 68% (44/65 responding) in tobramycin/ticarcillin recipients and 73% (45/62) in netilmicin/ticarcillin recipients. However, 5/65 tobramycin/ticarcillin treated episodes were complicated by bacteremic superinfection with Staphylococcus epidermidis, as compared to 0/62 netilmicin/ticarcillin treated episodes (p less than 0.05). Four of the five bacteremic strains produced aminoglycoside adenylating enzyme ANT 4', 4''. Prior colonization of patients with identical strains was demonstrated by plasmid profile analysis, antibiograms and biotyping with the API Staph-Ident system. During the trial, 36 consecutive patients were studied for colonization patterns with coagulase-negative staphylococci. S. epidermidis accounted for 566/831 (68%) isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci recovered from surveillance cultures. Tobramycin-resistant strains were acquired in 2/17, 4/12 and 9/14 patients during trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, netilmicin/ticarcillin and tobramycin/ticarcillin therapy, respectively. Prior to aminoglycoside therapy, 77% of strains were susceptible to less than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml of tobramycin, but only 35% and 28% were susceptible to tobramycin after initiation of tobramycin/ticarcillin and netilmicin/ticarcillin therapy, respectively. In contrast, greater than or equal to 93% of isolates were susceptible to netilmicin before and after aminoglycoside therapy. Absence of several sites susceptible to modification by aminoglycoside inactivating enzymes produced by staphylococci may give netilmicin a therapeutic advantage in the therapy of febrile neutropenic patients.

Topics: Adult; Agranulocytosis; Aminoglycosides; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cross Infection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ear; Humans; Kidney; Netilmicin; Neutropenia; Penicillin Resistance; Random Allocation; Sepsis; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus epidermidis; Ticarcillin; Tobramycin

Staphylococcus aureus can cause severe infections, including bacteremia and sepsis. The spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) highlights the need for novel treatment options. Sodium new houttuyfonate (SNH) is an analogue of houttuynin, the main antibacterial ingredient of Houttuynia cordata Thunb. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro activity of SNH and its potential for synergy with antibiotics against hospital-associated MRSA.. A total of 103 MRSA clinical isolates recovered in two hospitals in Beijing were evaluated for susceptibility to SNH, oxacillin, cephalothin, meropenem, vancomycin, levofloxacin, minocycline, netilmicin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole by broth microdilution. Ten isolates were evaluated for potential for synergy between SNH and the antibiotics above by checkerboard assay. Time-kill analysis was performed in three isolates to characterize the kill kinetics of SNH alone and in combination with the antibiotics that engendered synergy in checkerboard assays. Besides, two reference strains were included in all assays.. SNH inhibited all test strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 16 to 64 µg/mL in susceptibility tests, and displayed inhibition to bacterial growth in concentration-dependent manner in time-kill analysis. In synergy studies, the combinations of SNH-oxacillin, SNH-cephalothin, SNH-meropenem and SNH-netilmicin showed synergistic effects against 12 MRSA strains with median fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices of 0.38, 0.38, 0.25 and 0.38 in checkerboard assays. In time-kill analysis, SNH at 1/2 MIC in combination with oxacillin at 1/128 to 1/64 MIC or netilmicin at 1/8 to 1/2 MIC decreased the viable colonies by ≥ 2log(10) CFU/mL.. SNH demonstrated in vitro antibacterial activity against 103 hospital-associated MRSA isolates. Combinations of sub-MIC levels of SNH and oxacillin or netilmicin significantly improved the in vitro antibacterial activity against MRSA compared with either drug alone. The SNH-based combinations showed promise in combating MRSA.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cross Infection; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Synergism; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Netilmicin; Oxacillin; Species Specificity; Sulfonic Acids; Time Factors

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is acquiring increasing importance as a nosocomial pathogen.. We retrospectively studied the characteristics and outcome of patients with any type of S. maltophilia infection at the University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece, between 1/2005-12/2010. S. maltophilia antimicrobial susceptibility was tested with the agar dilution method. Prognostic factors for all-cause in-hospital mortality were assessed with multivariate logistic regression.. Sixty-eight patients (median age: 70.5 years; 64.7% males) with S. maltophilia infection, not related to cystic fibrosis, were included. The 68 patients were hospitalized in medical (29.4%), surgical (26.5%), hematology/oncology departments (23.5%), or the intensive care units (ICU; 20.6%). The most frequent infection types were respiratory tract (54.4%), bloodstream (16.2%), skin/soft tissue (10.3%), and intra-abdominal (8.8%) infection. The S. maltophilia-associated infection was polymicrobial in 33.8% of the cases. In vitro susceptibility was higher to colistin (91.2%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and netilmicin (85.3% each), and ciprofloxacin (82.4%). The empirical and the targeted treatment regimens were microbiologically appropriate for 47.3% and 63.6% of the 55 patients with data available, respectively. Most patients received targeted therapy with a combination of agents other than trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The crude mortality and the mortality and the S. maltophilia infection-related mortality were 14.7% and 4.4%, respectively. ICU hospitalization was the only independent prognostic factor for mortality.. S. maltophilia infection in a general hospital can be associated with a good prognosis, except for the patients hospitalized in the ICU. Combination reigmens with fluoroquinolones, colistin, or tigecycline could be alternative treatment options to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

Topics: Aged; Ciprofloxacin; Colistin; Colony Count, Microbial; Cross Infection; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Female; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Greece; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Netilmicin; Retrospective Studies; Statistics, Nonparametric; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Treatment Outcome; Trimethoprim

The first outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates producing the plasmid-encoded carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinase OXA-48 is reported. The 39 isolates belonged to two different clones and were collected at the University Hospital of Istanbul, Turkey, from May 2006 to February 2007, and they coproduced various beta-lactamases (SHV-12, OXA-9, and TEM-1 for clone A and CTX-M-15, TEM-1, and OXA-1 for clone B).

Topics: Bacterial Proteins; beta-Lactamases; Carbapenems; Cross Infection; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field; Humans; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Models, Genetic; Turkey

Seven bla(IMP-1)-harboring Acinetobacter sp. isolates and one Pseudomonas putida clinical isolate were recovered from hospitalized patients. All isolates possessed a class 1 integron, named In86, carrying the same cassette array [bla(IMP1), aac(6')-31, and aadA1], which was plasmid located in five of the isolates. This report describes the ability of nonfermentative nosocomial pathogens to acquire and disseminate antimicrobial resistance determinants.

Topics: Acinetobacter; Amino Acid Sequence; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Base Sequence; Brazil; Codon, Terminator; Cross Infection; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Gene Transfer, Horizontal; Genes, Bacterial; Hospitals; Humans; Integrons; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Molecular Sequence Data; Open Reading Frames; Plasmids; Pseudomonas putida; Transcription, Genetic

Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Acinetobacter Infections; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Cerebrospinal Fluid; Craniotomy; Cross Infection; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Fatal Outcome; Female; Humans; Hydrocephalus; Injections, Spinal; Meningitis, Bacterial; Netilmicin; Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt

In the present study MRSA prevalence increased from 12% in 1992 to 80.83% in 1999. Indian literature shows that MRSA incidence was as low as 6.9% in 1988 and reached to 24% and 32.6% in Vellore and Lucknow in 1994 and was of the same order in Mumbai, Delhi and Bangalore in 1996 and in Rohtak and Mangalore in 1999. However, in some of the centres it was as high as 87%. All the MRSA isolates in India including in the present study were sensitive to vancomycin and resistance to netilmycin appears to be low among MRSA isolates in India. All the MRSA isolates were also found to be sensitive to teicoplanin in the present study. Like in other Indian studies, resistance to cotrimoxazole, erythromycin, gentamicin, other penicillins and cephalosporins appeared to be a common feature for MRSA isolates in the present study.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cross Infection; Humans; India; Methicillin Resistance; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Netilmicin; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Vancomycin

The postantibiotic effect (PAE) (postantibiotic phase induced by 2x or 4x MIC) as well as the postantibiotic effect of subinhibitory concentrations (0.1x, 0.2x and 0.3x MIC) (PA SME) of netilmicin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin affected the production of the virulence factor alginate by a P. aeruginosa strain. Aminoglycosides and ciprofloxacin at a concentration of 4x MIC inhibited the alginate production more significantly than 2x MIC. Suprainhibitory concentrations of aminoglycosides were more effective than pefloxacin (2x or 4x MIC) and ciprofloxacin (2x MIC). PA SME demonstrated by the above antibiotics (with the exception of ciprofloxacin 2x MIC + 0.1x MIC) suppressed alginate production more efficiently.

Topics: Alginates; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Ciprofloxacin; Cross Infection; Depression, Chemical; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Gentamicins; Glucuronic Acid; Hexuronic Acids; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Netilmicin; Pefloxacin; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Tobramycin; Virulence

To investigate at what time the peak level should be determined under conventional thrice daily (t.i.d.) administration of the aminoglycoside netilmicin and to study its serum concentrations under once daily (od) treatment to define the required daily dose and to gain information about convenient drug monitoring.. The design of the study was a consecutive sample trial.. The study took place in a university hospital.. 41 intubated patients of a surgical ICU who received netilmicin as a short-term infusion over 30 min for life-threatening infections were included in the study.. In 21 patients netilmicin was administered t.i.d. The virtual peak levels which had been determined by pharmacokinetic dosage calculation were compared with the serum concentrations obtained directly after the administration as well as after 15, 30, 60 and 180 min. In 20 patients the netilmicin serum concentrations during od treatment were determined directly before and immediately after the application as well as 0.5, 1, 3, 7 and 12 h later. To achieve a virtual peak level of 25 mg/l and a trough level of 0.5 mg/l individual adjustment of the dosage based on pharmacokinetic calculations was performed.. In t.i.d. treatment the serum concentration measured after 30 min was closest to the virtual peak level; therefore, this is the best time to determine the peak level. In od treatment the required daily dose was 7.86 mg/kg body weight (median) in patients with normal renal function. During od dosing the trough level was extremely important in drug monitoring, whereas determination of the high peak level was of doubtful value.. The peak level should be determined during t.i.d. administration at 30 min. In od treatment the initial daily dose should be 7 mg/kg body weight; in drug monitoring the trough level is very important.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cefotaxime; Cross Infection; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fosfomycin; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Intensive Care Units; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Metronidazole; Middle Aged; Netilmicin; Piperacillin; Respiration, Artificial; Staphylococcal Infections; Teicoplanin

In a retrospective study once-daily dosage of netilmicin was compared with the thrice-daily regimen in critically ill patients. Netilmicin given once daily for 5 days appeared to be as effective as the multiple dose regimen, with no increase in the incidence of nephrotoxicity.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Critical Care; Cross Infection; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Netilmicin; Retrospective Studies

A total of 142 Acinetobacter baumanii strains isolated from hospital patients were biotyped according to the scheme of Bouvet and Grimont. Most of the strains belonged to biotype 9 and were highly resistant to antibiotics including cephalosporins and amikacin. Imipenem and ticarcillin were the only drugs having a bactericidal activity against A. baumanii. The combination imipenem-netilmicin and ticarcillin-netilmicin were more rapidly bactericidal than imipenem or ticarcillin alone. No resistant strain to imipenem was isolated.

Topics: Acinetobacter; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cross Infection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Imipenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Netilmicin; Ticarcillin

The minimal inhibiting concentrations (MIC) of 5 aminosids have been determined by the microdilution method in liquid medium of 4,582 bacterial strains isolated from various pathological samples: 1,039 Staphylococcus, 2,629 Enterobacteria, 759 Pseudomonas and 155 Acinetobacter. The phenotype of resistance has been defined for each strain by listing the antibiotics for which a resistance was observed. The frequencies of the bacterial resistances varied according to the aminosid (gentamicin, sisomicin, tobramycin, netilmicin and amikacin) and to the species studied. For the bacterial species studied, these frequencies of resistance to the aminosid family of antibiotic were weaker in the military hospitals in the district of Paris, than in different civil hospitals where similar studies were conducted.

Topics: Acinetobacter; Amikacin; Aminoglycosides; Cross Infection; Enterobacteriaceae; Gentamicins; Hospitals, Military; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Netilmicin; Paris; Pseudomonas; Sisomicin; Tobramycin

Topics: Cross Infection; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Gentamicins; Humans; Netilmicin; Serratia marcescens

An outbreak of colonisation and infection with a netilmicin resistant strain of Serratia marcescens occurred in a special care baby unit. S marcescens was isolated from a total of 13 babies; significant infection occurred in five, of whom two died. Epidemiological investigation failed to detect a common source but gastrointestinal colonisation of babies formed a prolonged and possibly important reservoir for infection. Containment proved difficult until the unit was closed to new admissions, and even then spread to a temporary unit ensued. O Serotyping and bacteriophage typing disclosed a single epidemic strain. This produced an aminoglycoside acetylating enzyme (AAC(6')) conferring resistance to netilmicin and tobramycin and moderate resistance to amikacin. Use of gentamicin resulted in the isolation of serratia with increased resistance to all aminoglycosides, and, similarly, increased resistance to third generation cephalosporins emerged with their use.

Topics: Acetyltransferases; Amikacin; Cefotaxime; Cross Infection; Disease Outbreaks; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Gentamicins; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Netilmicin; Nurseries, Hospital; Serratia marcescens; Tobramycin

Isolates of gentamicin-resistant gram-negative bacilli from clinical specimens peaked at nine to 10 per month in 1973-1974. Instituting barrier-type precautions during 1974-1977 was associated with a sustained 87% reduction in resistant Enterobacteriaceae. The number of resistant Pseudomonadaceae fell temporarily by 28%, paralleling gentamicin usage. During an endemic 15-month period in 1976-1977 nonenzymatically mediated resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa often emerged after aminoglycoside therapy in patients who had prior carriage of sensitive strains of the same serotype (P = 0.002); this resistance was associated with wound or sputum isolates (P = 0.003). Resistant Enterobacteriaceae more often demonstrated the converse, that is, spread of urinary tract isolates with enzymatically mediated resistance from patients not on aminoglycoside therapy. These findings suggest that control measures to minimize occurrence of resistant bacilli include barrier-type precautions for patients with resistant Enterobacteriaceae, evaluation of transfers and readmissions as a source of resistant organisms, and reduction of aminoglycoside use to decrease the selection of nonenzymatic resistance.

Topics: Amikacin; Aminoglycosides; Chicago; Cross Infection; Disease Outbreaks; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Enterobacter; Enterobacteriaceae; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Escherichia coli; Gentamicins; Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria; Humans; Klebsiella; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Netilmicin; Pseudomonadaceae; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Tobramycin; Urine

An outbreak of amikacin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (KES) occurred in the Intensive Care Nursery (ICN) of the Louisville General Hospital from January 1978 through March 1978. Epidemic disease and an increased colonization rate in newborn infants due to amikacin-resistant microorganisms has not been documented previously. Three of the 11 neonates died. The organisms isolated were resistant to amikacin and two experimental aminoglycosides, sissomicin and netilmicin. The outbreak was contained following institution of several control measures, including pharyngeal inoculation of an experimental strain of alpha streptococcus in four infants.

Topics: Amikacin; Cross Infection; Disease Outbreaks; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Enterobacter; Enterobacteriaceae Infections; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Intensive Care Units; Kanamycin; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Male; Netilmicin; Nurseries, Hospital; Serratia marcescens; Sisomicin