naloxone and Skin-Neoplasms

Intense, generalized pruritus associated with mycosis fungoides was relieved using subcutaneous naloxone but intensified when changed to the new oral opioid antagonist, naltrexone. Rechallenge again led to worsening in pruritus. This unexpected adverse effect is surprising as naltrexone and naloxone are currently thought to work via similar opioid receptor binding. The worsening of the itch may have been due to adaptation in opioid receptor expression induced by prolonged naloxone therapy, possibly highlighting differential opioid receptor affinity between naltrexone and naloxone, or may have represented an idiosyncratic adverse reaction. Naltrexone and naloxone have been reported to reduce pruritus due to cholestasis, uraemia, morphine epidurals, and possibly atopic dermatitis and urticaria. Naltrexone has the convenience of oral administration and a longer half-life. The role of the opioid system and naltrexone in pruritus is reviewed.

Topics: Female; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Middle Aged; Mycosis Fungoides; Naloxone; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pruritus; Skin Neoplasms

Fentanyl is an opioid commonly prescribed for cancer pain. Using melanoma-bearing mice, we investigated whether peripheral action would contribute to fentanyl analgesia in cancer pain. Intravenous injection of fentanyl inhibited mechanical nociception in healthy mice, which was markedly inhibited by the opioid antagonist naloxone, but not naloxone methiodide, a peripherally acting opioid antagonist. Melanoma-bearing mice showed mechanical allodynia and spontaneous licking, a pain-related behavior, which were suppressed by intravenous and local injections of fentanyl. Both naloxone and naloxone methiodide inhibited the analgesic effect of intravenous fentanyl to the same degree. Electrophysiological analysis showed that melanoma growth increased the spontaneous and mechanical stimuli-evoked activity of the tibial nerve, which were inhibited by intravenous fentanyl. There was a greater expression of µ- opioid receptors in skin with a melanoma mass than in the contralateral normal skin. In addition, we found µ-opioid receptors in cultured melanoma cells. There was no difference between the number of µ-opioid receptors in the dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord of the melanoma-bearing and contralateral skin side. These results suggest that the analgesic effect of systemic fentanyl is produced via central and peripheral µ- opioid receptors in cancer pain, and cancer cells are a key site of peripheral action.

Topics: Action Potentials; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Cancer Pain; Cell Line, Tumor; Disease Models, Animal; Fentanyl; Humans; Hyperalgesia; Injections, Intramuscular; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Melanoma; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Receptors, Opioid; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Skin; Skin Neoplasms; Spinal Cord; Tibial Nerve; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

The search for new drugs for cancer pain management has been a long-standing goal in basic and clinical research. Classical opioid drugs exert their primary antinociceptive effect upon activating opioid receptors located in the central nervous system. A substantial body of evidence points to the relevance of peripheral opioid receptors as potential targets for cancer pain treatment. Peptides showing limited blood-brain-barrier permeability promote peripheral analgesia in many pain models. In the present study we examined the peripheral and central analgesic effect of intravenously administered biphalin - a dimeric opioid peptide in a mouse skin cancer pain model, developed by an intraplantar inoculation of B16F0 melanoma cells. The effect of biphalin was compared with morphine - a golden standard in cancer pain management. Biphalin produced profound, dose-dependent and naloxone sensitive spinal analgesia. Additionally, the effect in the tumor-bearing paw was largely mediated by peripheral opioid receptors, as it was readily attenuated by the blood-brain-barrier-restricted opioid receptor antagonist - naloxone methiodide. On the contrary, morphine facilitated its analgesic effect primarily by activating spinal opioid receptors. Both drugs induced tolerance in B16F0 - implanted paws after chronic treatment, however biphalin as opposed to morphine, showed little decrease in its activity at the spinal level. Our results indicate that biphalin may be considered a future alternative drug in cancer pain treatment due to an enhanced local analgesic activity as well as lower tolerance liability compared with morphine.

Topics: Analgesia; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Blood-Brain Barrier; Cancer Pain; Cell Line, Tumor; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Tolerance; Enkephalins; Male; Melanoma, Experimental; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Morphine; Naloxone; Opioid Peptides; Permeability; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Receptors, Opioid; Skin Neoplasms