naloxone has been researched along with Postoperative-Nausea-and-Vomiting* in 25 studies
2 review(s) available for naloxone and Postoperative-Nausea-and-Vomiting
Article | Year |
---|---|
Monitoring, prevention and treatment of side effects of long-acting neuraxial opioids for post-cesarean analgesia.
Long-acting neuraxial opioids such as morphine and diamorphine, administered via spinal or epidural routes, are staple components of a multimodal approach to postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery. The widespread use of neuraxial opioids is due largely to their significant analgesic efficacy and favorable safety profile. The most common side effects of neuraxial opioids are pruritus, nausea and vomiting. These symptoms appear to be dose-related. The most serious complication of neuraxial opioids is respiratory depression, which occurs in 0-0.9% of cases. Hypothermia has also been reported in association with neuraxial morphine use at cesarean delivery. This article will review recent advances in prophylaxis, treatment and monitoring of the side effects of long-acting neuraxial opioids. Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Hypothermia; Morphine; Naloxone; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pregnancy; Pruritus; Respiratory Insufficiency; Serotonin Antagonists | 2019 |
Low-Dose Naloxone for Prophylaxis of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
To determine whether postoperative administration of low-dose intravenous naloxone decreases the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and its impact on postoperative opioid requirements and pain scores.. Meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials.. A total of 946 adult and pediatric patients who received low-dose intravenous naloxone for 24 hours after various surgeries.. Systemic literature searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, PubMed, and Ovid MEDLINE databases were conducted. Among the relevant studies, data extraction and bias assessment determined the trials for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Nine randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria. Naloxone demonstrated a reduced risk of postoperative nausea (risk ratio [RR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.95, p=0.01) in a pooled analysis of eight of the nine studies. However, naloxone did not decrease the risk of postoperative vomiting in a collective assessment of all nine trials (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.63-1.09, p=0.18). Subgroup analysis of continuous-infusion naloxone found further reductions in nausea and vomiting, but these findings were limited to 186 of the 946 patients. Three studies recorded antiemetic doses and found an overall dose reduction (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.96, p=0.03). Compared with controls, naloxone prophylaxis of PONV did not significantly change cumulative postoperative opioid needs (mean difference 0.29 mg, 95% CI -3.55 to 4.13 mg, p=0.88) among five trials, nor visual analog scale pain scores (mean difference -0.11, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.05, p=0.18) in six studies.. This pooled analysis of data suggests that low-dose naloxone plays no role in preventing PONV, while exhibiting no significant effects on postoperative opioid needs and pain scores. The reduction demonstrated in postoperative nausea did not translate into decreases in postoperative vomiting. Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic | 2017 |
19 trial(s) available for naloxone and Postoperative-Nausea-and-Vomiting
Article | Year |
---|---|
Preventing nausea and vomiting after gynecological laparoscopic surgery by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with a naloxone admixture: A randomized controlled trial.
Opioid-induced nausea and vomiting are common side effects of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). This study aimed to explore the inhibitory effect of a naloxone admixture on the incidence of sufentanil-induced postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).. A total of 132 Uyghur American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients scheduled to undergo elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery were recruited; among these, 120 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into 4 groups: patients receiving PCIA but no naloxone were included in the control group (group A); patients receiving PCIA with a low-dose naloxone admixture at 0.2 μg·kg-1·h-1 were included in group B; patients receiving PCIA with naloxone admixture at 0.4 μg·kg-1·h-1 were included in group C; patients receiving PCIA with naloxone admixture at 0.6 μg·kg-1·h-1 were included in group D. All patients were administered sufentanil at 0.04 kg-1·h-1, butorphanol at 2 kg-1·h-1, and dexmedetomidine at 0.08 kg-1·h-1 using a PCIA device within 2 days of surgery. The occurrence of nausea and vomiting, visual analogue scores for pain intensity, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, pruritus, lethargy, respiratory depression, etc, was recorded at 2, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively.. There was a significant difference in the PONV scores between the groups at 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery (P < 0.01). At 8 and 12 hours, the score of group C/D was significantly lower than that of group A/B (P < 0.01). At 24 hours after surgery, the PONV score of group B/C/D was significantly lower than that of group A (P < 0.01). No significant difference was observed in the general data and visual analogue scores for postoperative pain between the 4 groups.. Naloxone admixture administered at 0.4 to 0.6 μg·kg-1·h-1 can exert an effective inhibitory effect on the incidence and intensity of PONV in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Topics: Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Female; Humans; Laparoscopy; Naloxone; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Sufentanil | 2022 |
The Effect of Ultra-low-dose Intrathecal Naloxone on Pain Intensity After Lumbar Laminectomy With Spinal Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Despite advances in pain management, several patients continue to experience severe acute pain after lumbar spine surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of single ultra-low-dose intrathecal (IT) naloxone in combination with IT morphine for reducing pain intensity, pruritus, nausea, and vomiting in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy with spinal fusion.. In this double-blind trial, patients scheduled for lumbar laminectomy with spinal fusion were randomly assigned to receive single ultra-low-dose IT naloxone (20 μg) and IT morphine (0.2 mg) (group M+N) or IT morphine (0.2 mg) alone (group M). The severity of postoperative pain, pruritus and nausea, and frequency of vomiting were assessed at recovery from anesthesia and, subsequently, at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively using an 11-point (0-10) visual analogue scale.. A total of 77 patients completed the study, and there were significant differences in postoperative pain, pruritus, and nausea visual analogue scale between the groups (P<0.05). After adjusting for body mass index and surgery duration, IT naloxone administration reduced the pain score (coefficient=1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.63; P<0.001), and the scores of pruritus and nausea (coefficient=0.9; 95% CI, 0.44-1.37; P<0.001 and coefficient=0.71; 95% CI, 0.12-1.31; P=0.02, respectively) compared with IT morphine alone. No serious adverse effects were observed.. The addition of ultra-low-dose IT naloxone to IT morphine provides excellent postoperative pain management and effectively controls pruritus and nausea in patients undergoing laminectomy with spinal fusion. Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Injections, Spinal; Laminectomy; Lumbar Vertebrae; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pruritus; Spinal Fusion | 2020 |
Ultra-low-dose Naloxone as an Adjuvant to Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) With Morphine for Postoperative Pain Relief Following Lumber Discectomy: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial.
Lumbar discectomy is one of the most commonly performed neurosurgical procedures. Many patients experience postoperative pain after lumbar discectomy. This study evaluated the effect of ultra-low-dose naloxone infusion on pain intensity after lumbar discectomy in individuals receiving patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine.. In a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, a total of 80 patients scheduled for open discectomy was randomly assigned to receive naloxone (group N) or placebo (group P). After surgery, all patients were connected to a morphine PCA pump. Both groups received 500 mL of normal saline using a continuous infusion pump through a separate intravenous line for 24 hours. However, group N received a total dose of 0.25 μg/kg/h naloxone, which was added to the normal saline infusion. All patients were asked to grade the intensity of their pain, severity of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus on a 0 to 10 visual analog scale before being discharged from the postanesthesia care unit and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively.. It was observed that both groups had a statistically significant (P<0.01) time trend difference for pain, nausea, and pruritus scores. A significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of intensity of pain, nausea, and pruritus, with the naloxone group experiencing a lower level in comparison with the placebo group. Moreover, the median (interquartile range) of morphine consumption after surgery for patients who received naloxone was 26 (24.25 to 28) mg, which is significantly (P<0.001) lower than for the placebo group, which had a median (interquartile range) of 34 (32 to 36) mg.. It is concluded that infusion of ultra-low-dose naloxone (0.25 μg/kg/h) along with morphine PCA can significantly reduce pain intensity, morphine consumption, and opioid-induced nausea and pruritus after lumbar discectomy. Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Lumbar Vertebrae; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pruritus | 2018 |
Combatting pain after orthopedic/trauma surgery- perioperative oral extended-release tapentadol vs. extended-release oxycodone/naloxone.
High post-operative pain scores after "minor" orthopedic/trauma surgery are in part attributed to inadequate prescription of opioid analgesics. Novel concepts aiming to achieve sufficient analgesia while minimizing opioid-related side effects by avoiding fluctuating plasma levels are based on perioperative oral administration of extended-release opioids beginning with the first dose pre-operatively. This is the first study to evaluate analgesic efficacy and side effect rates of extended-release tapentadol compared to oxycodone/naloxone following orthopedic/trauma surgery.. This randomized, observer-blinded, active-controlled prospective clinical trial had 2 co-primary endpoints: (1) Analgesic efficacy: Mean pain level on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 during exercise over 5 days. (2) Safety: Side effect sum score of the following events: Nausea, vomiting, constipation, sedation, vertigo, somnolence. The study was powered to detect superiority of tapentadol for at least one endpoint pending statistical proof of non-inferiority for both endpoints in a first step.. Two hundred sixty-six trauma patients were randomized to receive either tapentadol (n = 133) or oxycodone/naloxone (n = 133). Analgesic efficacy: Mean (±SD) daily pain levels in the first five post-operative days were 2.8 ± 1.3 in both groups. Mean maximum pain intensity during exercise in the first 24 h after surgery was 3.8 ± 1.9 (tapentadol) and 3.8 ± 2.1 (oxycodone/naloxone). Statistically tapentadol was non-inferior but not superior to oxycodone/naloxone.. Vomiting on day 1 occurred in 11%, constipation in 35% of the tapentadol patients and in 16% and 30% of the oxycodone/naloxone patients (p = 0.60 and 0.33), respectively. The incidence of sedation/ vertigo was <10%, that of somnolence <2% in both groups (p > 0.3, respectively). The sum score of side effect events was 51% in the tapentadol vs. 49% in the oxycodone/naloxone group; risk difference 3% [95% CI, -8 to 14%]; p = 0.6). Non-inferiority of tapentadol could not be concluded as the pre-defined non-inferiority margin was exceeded.. With both concepts, mean maximum pain intensity during exercise within the first 24 h after orthopedic/trauma surgery was reduced to a score of <4. This analgesic efficacy came at the cost of mainly gastro-intestinal side effects. Thus, we now use a prophylaxis against nausea and vomiting and pre-emptive laxatives as part of these concepts.. https://eudract.ema.europa.eu (EudraCT- Nr. 2011-003238-15 ); October 24th, 2012. Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Orthopedic Procedures; Oxycodone; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Phenols; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Tapentadol | 2017 |
Effect of naloxone on intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
This study aims to evaluate the effect of naloxone on intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy under total intravenous anesthesia.A total of 90 patients, who underwent intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy under total intravenous anesthesia, were included into this study. All patients were randomly divided into 3 groups (each group, n=30): naloxone group (naloxone+fentanyl), tropisetron group (tropisetron+fentanyl), and fentanyl group (fentanyl). Patients in each group were given a corresponding dose of naloxone. Postoperative analgesia effect and the incidence of side effects such as nausea and vomiting were observed.Small doses of naloxone or tropisetron combined with fentanyl used for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia can significantly reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Six hours after surgery, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in patients that underwent intravenous patient-controlled analgesia using low-dose naloxone combined with fentanyl compared with patients who received fentanyl alone; however, the postoperative analgesic effect of tropisetron was not observed. Compared with the combination of tropisetron and fentanyl, low-dose naloxone combined with fentanyl can obviously reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients who underwent intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and enhance the analgesic effect of fentanyl 6 hours after surgery.Low-dose naloxone can reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy under total intravenous anesthesia, and exhibits a certain synergic analgesic effect. Topics: Aged; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Antiemetics; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fentanyl; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Tropisetron | 2016 |
A naloxone admixture to prevent opioid-induced pruritus in children: a randomized controlled trial.
Morphine administered by continuous opioid infusion (COI) or by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is associated with opioid-induced pruritus (OIP). Intravenous naloxone administered separately to the morphine infusion at a dose of 0.25-1.65 μg·kg(-1)·hr(-1) can provide effective prevention from OIP. Nevertheless, this strategy requires a dedicated intravenous line and an additional infusion pump. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an admixture of naloxone with morphine in normal saline administered via COI or PCA would also prevent OIP in children without attenuation of analgesia or increased opioid utilization.. In this randomized controlled trial, children meeting the inclusion criteria (aged 8-18 yr, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, normal developmental profile and prescribed COI/PCA morphine for postoperative analgesia) were randomized to receive an infusion containing a naloxone, opioid, and saline admixture (NOSA) of 12 μg naloxone per 1 mg morphine per 1 mL normal saline or morphine only (control). The severity of opioid-induced pruritus was assessed by self-report using a modified colour analogue scale (mCAS; score 0-10). The groups were also compared for opioid utilization, pain scores, and administration of antipruritic medications, which were recorded for up to 48 hr or until the COI/PCA was discontinued.. Ninety-two participants were enrolled in the study. The median [interquartile range] dose of naloxone administered to the NOSA participants was 0.37 [0.30-0.48] μg·kg(-1)·hr(-1). The incidence of OIP, determined by self-report and treatment, was not different between groups: 22% in the NOSA group vs 36% in the control group (mean difference, -15%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -33 to 4; P = 0.164). The severity of opioid-induced pruritus was similar in the two groups, with a median difference in the participants' mean mCAS score of -0.29 (95% CI, -0.75 to 0.26; P = 0.509). Opioid utilization did not differ between groups, with a median difference of -1.35 μg·kg(-1)·hr(-1) (95% CI, -5.85 to 7.55; P = 0.518), and pain scores did not differ, with a median difference of 0.0 (95% CI, -1.0 to 1.5; P = 0.659).. This admixture of naloxone and morphine in normal saline did not decrease the incidence or severity of OIP in this sample. Separate administration of naloxone may be the more effective strategy for prevention of OIP. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01071057). Topics: Adolescent; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pruritus; Survival Analysis | 2015 |
Antiemetic effect of naloxone in combination with dexamethasone and droperidol in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.
We examined the effects of dexamethasone, droperidol, naloxone, and a combination of these three agents on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in female patients.. In this randomized, controlled study, 120 female patients with ASA PS I or II undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery were randomly allocated into four groups. Patients received dexamethasone 8 mg (Dx group) or droperidol 1 mg (Dr group) before induction of general anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol and remifentanil. Postoperative analgesia was provided by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia using a disposable infusion pump filled with fentanyl 20 μg/kg alone (Dx group), fentanyl 20 μg/kg with droperidol 2 mg (Dr group), fentanyl 20 μg/kg with naloxone 0.1 mg (Nx group), or fentanyl 20 μg/kg with droperidol 2 mg and naloxone 0.1 mg (Cm group) in a total volume of 80 ml, with a constant infusion rate of 4 ml/h and a bolus dose 2 ml with a 30-min lockout time.. The number of patients who developed PONV and required a rescue antiemetic was significantly less in the Cm group than in the Nx group (p < 0.001 for all). The incidence of PONV was 43, 43, 70, and 17 % in the Dx, Dr, Nx, and Cm groups, respectively.. A combination of naloxone, droperidol, and dexamethasone was effective for preventing PONV in patients receiving fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic gynecological surgery, although further investigations are required to examine the effect of adding naloxone to other antiemetics. Topics: Adult; Antiemetics; Dexamethasone; Droperidol; Drug Combinations; Female; Fentanyl; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Laparoscopy; Naloxone; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting | 2013 |
Naloxone versus metoclopramide for the treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients following general anesthesia with fentanyl supplementation--pilot study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, General; Antiemetics; Female; Fentanyl; Humans; Male; Metoclopramide; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pilot Projects; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies | 2012 |
Naloxone infusion and post-hysterectomy morphine consumption: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
The evidence that an infusion of a low dose of naloxone reduces post-operative pain and opioid analgesic consumption is somewhat conflicting. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of an ultra-low dose of naloxone on patient-controlled morphine analgesia.. Ninety patients, 35-55 years old, scheduled for total abdominal hysterectomy, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study. Post-operatively, they received either saline (n = 45) or naloxone (n = 45) for 24 h. A standard general anesthesia was administered in both groups. In the recovery room, patients received morphine by a patient-controlled analgesia device. An ultra-low dose of naloxone was infused intravenously at 0.25 μg/kg/h for 24 h in the intervention group. Saline was infused in the control group. Following the surgery, morphine consumption, numeric rating score for pain intensity, nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and requests for antiemetic were recorded at baseline, 30 min, 1, 4, 8,16, 20, and 24 h following their discharge from recovery.. Naloxone reduced morphine consumption over the first 24 post-operative hours significantly compared with the controls (saline) {19.5 [standard deviation (SD) 3.4] mg vs. 27.5 [SD 5.9] mg; P < 0.001}. The incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting was significantly reduced in the naloxone group. The incidence of pruritus and the pain scores at rest and activity were not significantly different.. Following hysterectomy, an ultra-low dose of naloxone infusion proved to reduce morphine consumption as well as the incidence and severity of opioid-induced nausea and vomiting. Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Cough; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Infusions, Intravenous; Middle Aged; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pruritus; Treatment Outcome | 2012 |
Ondansetron is as effective as diphenhydramine for treatment of morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery.
Subarachnoid (SA) morphine, highly effective for the management of pain after a cesarean delivery, is associated with a significant incidence of pruritus in up to 80% of patients. No previous study has compared the effectiveness of ondansetron (5-HT(3) antagonist) vs. diphenhydramine (H(1) receptor blocker) for the treatment of this side effect.. In this randomized, double-blind study, 113 patients with a pruritus score 3 or 4 (1=absent; 2=mild, no treatment required; 3=moderate pruritus, treatment required; and 4=severe pruritus) after SA morphine 0.2 mg were assigned to group ondansetron, which received 4 mg intravenously (i.v.) ondansetron, and group diphenhydramine, which received 25 mg i.v. diphenhydramine. Patients who continued to have pruritus > or =3, 30 min after the study drug were considered treatment failures and were treated with naloxone 0.04 mg i.v. repeatedly, as well as patients who relapsed. Pain scores, nausea, vomiting, and sedation were determined before and 30 min after the study drugs were administered. Patients were followed up for 24 h.. The success rate was comparable between the two groups [40/57 (70%) and 38/56 (70%), P=0.79, in group ondansetron and group diphenhydramine, respectively]. Among the successfully treated patients, the recurrence rates of moderate to severe pruritus were 11/40 (28%) in group ondansetron and 13/38 (35%) in group diphenhydramine, P=0.52. The side effect profile was similar between the two groups.. Ondansetron is as effective as diphenhydramine in relieving pruritus caused by SA morphine in patients undergoing a cesarean delivery. However, up to 50% of patients required naloxone either for primary failure or for recurrence. Topics: Adult; Cesarean Section; Diphenhydramine; Double-Blind Method; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Ondansetron; Pain, Postoperative; Patient Satisfaction; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pregnancy; Pruritus; Recurrence; Serotonin Antagonists; Severity of Illness Index | 2010 |
An ultra-low dose of naloxone added to lidocaine or lidocaine-fentanyl mixture prolongs axillary brachial plexus blockade.
In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we evaluated the effect of an ultra-low dose of naloxone added to lidocaine and fentanyl mixture on the onset and duration of axillary brachial plexus block.. One hundred twelve patients scheduled for elective forearm surgery under axillary brachial plexus block were randomly allocated to receive 34 mL lidocaine 1.5% with 3 mL of isotonic saline chloride (control group, n = 28), 34 mL lidocaine 1.5% with 2 mL (100 microg) of fentanyl and 1 mL of isotonic saline chloride (fentanyl group, n = 28), 34 mL lidocaine 1.5% with 2 mL saline chloride and 100 ng (1 mL) naloxone (naloxone group, n = 28), or 34 mL lidocaine 1.5% with 2 mL (100 microg) of fentanyl and 100 ng (1 mL) naloxone (naloxone + fentanyl group, n = 28). A multiple stimulation technique was used in all patients. After performing the block, sensory and motor blockades of radial, median, musculocutaneous, and ulnar nerves were recorded at 5, 15, and 30 min. The onset time of the sensory and motor blockades was defined as the time between the last injection and the total abolition of the pinprick response and complete paralysis, respectively. The duration of sensory and motor blocks was considered as the time interval between the complete block and the first postoperative pain and complete recovery of motor functions.. Sensory and motor onset times were longer in the naloxone (sensory onset time: 15 +/- 3, and motor onset time: 21 +/- 4) and naloxone + fentanyl group than control or fentanyl groups (sensory onset time: 10 +/- 3 min in control group, 10 +/- 4 min in fentanyl group, and 17 +/- 3 min in naloxone + fentanyl group, motor onset time: 15 +/- 5 min in control group, 14 +/- 7 min in fentanyl group, and 17.3 +/- 3.4 min in naloxone + fentanyl group) (P < 0.001). The duration of time to first postoperative pain and motor blockade was significantly longer in the naloxone (92 +/- 10 and 115 +/- 10 min) and naloxone + fentanyl groups (98 +/- 12 and 122 +/- 16 min) than control (68 +/- 7 and 89 +/- 11 min) and fentanyl groups (68 +/- 11 and 90 +/- 12 min) (P < 0.001). The time to first postoperative pain was significantly longer in the naloxone and naloxone + fentanyl groups than in the control or fentanyl groups (P < 0.001).. The addition of an ultra-low dose of naloxone to lidocaine 1.5% solution with or without fentanyl solution in axillary brachial plexus block prolongs the time to first postoperative pain and motor blockade but also lengthens the onset time. Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthetics, Local; Axilla; Brachial Plexus; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; Fentanyl; Forearm; Humans; Lidocaine; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Nerve Block; Pain Measurement; Pain Threshold; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies; Pruritus; Recovery of Function; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult | 2009 |
Effect of combining ultralow-dose naloxone with morphine in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: the cut-off ratio of naloxone to morphine for antiemesis after gynecologic surgery.
Admixing an ultralow dose of naloxone with intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been shown to decrease postoperative nausea. However, the cut-off ratio of the naloxone-morphine admixture for antiemetic effects has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cut-off ratio of naloxone-morphine admixture in PCA for antiemesis after gynecologic surgery.. This double-blind study enrolled 120 female patients who were scheduled for gynecologic surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups (n = 40 for each group). The concentration of naloxone and morphine respectively was 0 microg/mL and 1 mg/mL in group 1, 0.1 microg/mL and 1 mg/mL in group 2 (1:10,000), and 1 microg/mL and 1 mg/mL in group 3 (1:1000). Morphine consumption, verbal rating score of wound pain at rest and with exertion, and morphine-related side effects were investigated at 1, 2, 4 and 24 hours postoperatively.. A total of 112 patients completed the study (37 in group 1, 36 in group 2, 39 in group 3). The incidence of nausea during the postoperative 4-24 hours was significantly lower in group 3 than in group 1 (23.1% vs. 56.8%, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the overall incidence of severe nausea was significantly lower in group 3 than in group 1 (2.6% vs. 24.3%, p < 0.05) as was the rescue antiemetic requirements (5.1% vs. 24.3%, p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between groups 2 and 1. The pain scores (at rest and with exertion) and 24-hour morphine consumption were not significantly different among the three groups.. The antiemetic efficacy of ultralow-dose naloxone combined with PCA morphine is limited by a cut-off ratio of naloxone to morphine of 1:10,000. Topics: Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting | 2008 |
Epidural naloxone reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients receiving epidural sufentanil for postoperative analgesia.
Epidural opioids have excellent analgesic properties, but their side-effects limit their use in patient-controlled epidural analgesia. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of epidural naloxone on the side-effects of sufentanil, focusing on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).. After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent, 50 patients undergoing unilateral TKR were randomly assigned to receive either sufentanil in ropivacaine alone (Group C, n = 25) or the same solution with naloxone (Group N, n = 25) for their postoperative epidural analgesia. Episodes of PONV and five-point-scaled nausea scores were evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 h after epidural analgesia was started. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain and the incidence of sedation, pruritus, hypotension, and respiratory depression were also evaluated at each of three time points.. The nausea score in Group N was significantly lower than that in Group C. The VAS pain score at rest and on movement were significantly lower in Group N than in Group C at 24 h. Other opioid-induced side-effects were not significantly different.. Epidural naloxone was effective in reducing PONV induced by epidural sufentanil and additionally enhanced the analgesic effect. Therefore, concomitant infusion of a small dose of epidural naloxone should be considered to reduce PONV, especially in patients at greater risk for PONV. Topics: Aged; Analgesia, Epidural; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pruritus; Sufentanil | 2007 |
Subcutaneous naloxone for the prevention of intrathecal morphine induced pruritus in elective Caesarean delivery.
The aim of this study was to assess the antipruritic efficacy of subcutaneous naloxone following intrathecal morphine administration. Fifty women undergoing elective Caesarean section using spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated, in a double-blind study design, to receive either naloxone 400 microg or placebo as a subcutaneous injection at the end of surgery. Spinal anaesthesia was performed using 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, 25 microg fentanyl and 150 microg of preservative-free morphine sulphate. The primary outcome measures were: incidence of pruritus, nausea and vomiting, and quality of analgesia. The incidence of pruritus and nausea and vomiting was not significantly different between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in postoperative analgesia between the two groups. We conclude that pruritus, following intrathecal fentanyl 25 microg and preservative-free morphine sulphate 150 microg, is not reduced by the addition of naloxone 400 microg administered subcutaneously on the completion of surgery. Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Obstetrical; Analgesics, Opioid; Antipruritics; Cesarean Section; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Morphine; Naloxone; Pain Measurement; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Pruritus; Severity of Illness Index | 2007 |
Effects of epidural naloxone on pruritus induced by epidural morphine: a randomized controlled trial.
Epidural morphine produces prolonged analgesia but has many side effects including pruritus. Naloxone is an antagonist that can reverse the side effects of morphine.. We studied the effects of continuously administered epidural naloxone mixed with morphine on side effects and analgesia in a randomized, double blind, two-armed study. Fifty-eight pregnant women undergoing cesarean section were enrolled. All patients received a 4-mg epidural bolus of morphine in the post-anesthetic care unit. After this, patients in group M (n=28) received continuous epidural morphine (6 mg over 48 h) in 0.1% bupivacaine; patients in group N (n=30) received an epidural infusion containing naloxone (1.2 mg over 48 h) and morphine (6 mg over 48 h) in 0.1% bupivacaine. The infusion rate was 2 mL/h.. The incidence (82% versus 47%) and severity of pruritus were lower in group N than group M (P=0.001). There were no significant differences in pain score or in the incidence of nausea, vomiting or urinary disturbance between groups.. Continuous epidural infusion of naloxone combined with morphine is effective in reducing the incidence and severity of pruritus induced by epidural morphine. Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Epidural; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Incidence; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pregnancy; Pruritus | 2005 |
The effects of a small-dose naloxone infusion on opioid-induced side effects and analgesia in children and adolescents treated with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Opioids are frequently associated with side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and pruritus. We hypothesized that a prophylactic, continuous small-dose naloxone infusion would reduce the incidence of opioid-induced side effects without affecting analgesia or opioid consumption. In this prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we studied 46 postoperative patients (M:F, 21:25), averaging 14 +/- 2.5 yr and 53 +/- 17 kg, at the start of morphine IV patient-controlled analgesia. Patients were randomized to either saline (control, n = 26) or naloxone 0.25 microg . kg(-1) . h(-1) (n = 20). We found that the incidence and severity of pruritus (77% versus 20%; P < 0.05) and nausea (70% versus 35%; P < 0.05) was significantly more frequent in the placebo group compared with the naloxone group. Morphine consumption (1.02 +/- 0.41 mg . kg(-1) . d(-1) versus 1.28 +/- 0.61 mg . kg(-1) . d(-1)), pain scores at rest (4 +/- 2 versus 3 +/- 2), and pain scores with coughing (6 +/- 2 versus 6 +/- 2) were not different. We conclude that, in children and adolescents, a small-dose naloxone infusion (0.25 microg . kg(-1) . h(-1)) can significantly reduce the incidence and severity of opioid-induced side effects without affecting opioid-induced analgesia. When initiating morphine IV patient-controlled analgesia for the treatment of moderate to severe pain, clinicians should strongly consider starting a concomitant small-dose naloxone infusion. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analgesia; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Child; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies; Pruritus | 2005 |
Intrathecal fentanyl-induced pruritus during labour: the effect of prophylactic ondansetron.
Fentanyl is commonly used for spinal analgesia during labour but it is associated with a high incidence of pruritus. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to evaluate the effect of prophylactic ondansetron on the incidence and severity of pruritus among parturients receiving intrathecal fentanyl as part of combined spinal-epidural analgesia. Seventy-three women were randomised to receive either saline placebo (group P, n = 25), ondansetron 4 mg (group O4, n = 23) or ondansetron 8 mg (group O8, n = 25) intravenously before intrathecal fentanyl 25 micrograms and bupivacaine 2 mg. The incidence and severity of pruritus were measured using a verbal rating and a visual analogue scale, and by the requirement for rescue anti-pruritic medication (naloxone). The overall incidence of pruritus was 95% (group P 100%, group O4 95%, group O8 90%). There were no significant differences between groups for severity of pruritus or requirement for treatment (naloxone given to 45%, 28% and 35% of groups P, O4 and O8 respectively). Secondary outcomes such as the incidence of headache, pain and nausea were not significantly different between groups. We conclude that prophylactic ondansetron 4 or 8 mg intravenously was ineffective in reducing the incidence or severity of intrathecal fentanyl-induced pruritus during labour. Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Obstetrical; Analgesics, Opioid; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fentanyl; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Injections, Spinal; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Ondansetron; Pain; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pregnancy; Pruritus; Serotonin Antagonists | 2004 |
Effect of combining naloxone and morphine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.
An early study showed that a naloxone infusion decreased the incidence of morphine-related side effects from intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. The authors tested the hypothesis that a more convenient combination of morphine and naloxone via patient-controlled analgesia would decrease the incidence of side effects compared to morphine alone.. Patients scheduled for hysterectomy under general anaesthesia were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Patients received a standardized general anesthetic and postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. They were randomized to receive 60 mg patient-controlled analgesia morphine in 30 ml saline or 60 mg morphine in 30 ml saline with naloxone 0.8 mg. Parameters for patient-controlled analgesia were a 1-mg bolus of morphine with a 5-min lockout and no background infusion. Patient recall of nausea, vomiting, itching, and pain (at rest and with movement) were assessed at 6 and 24 h postoperatively by verbal rating score. Pain was also assessed by a 0- to 100-mm visual analog score, and sedation was assessed by an observer. The amount of morphine used and the requirements for symptomatic treatment were also recorded.. Ninety-two patients completed the study, with no significant differences in outcomes between groups. At 24 h, the incidence of nausea was 84.8% in each group; the incidence of pruritus was 56.5% in the naloxone group and 58.7% in the placebo group. There were also no differences in symptomatic treatment requirements, pain scores, morphine use, or sedation between groups. The median dose of naloxone received equated to 0.38 microg x kg-1 x h-1 over 24 h.. There was no benefit from administering naloxone combined with morphine via patient-controlled analgesia. Topics: Adult; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, General; Antiemetics; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Mental Recall; Middle Aged; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain Measurement; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Promethazine; Pruritus | 2003 |
The safety and efficacy of parent-/nurse-controlled analgesia in patients less than six years of age.
Over the past 5 yr, we have treated nonsurgical and postoperative pain in children <6 yr of age by using a patient-controlled analgesia pump to deliver small-dose continuous IV opioid infusions supplemented by parent- and nurse-controlled opioid bolus dosing. We call this technique parent-/nurse-controlled analgesia (PNCA). Because the safety and efficacy of PNCA have not been previously evaluated, we have undertaken a prospective, 1-yr observational study to determine patient demographics, effectiveness of analgesia, and the incidence of complications (pruritus, vomiting, and respiratory depression) in patients receiving PNCA. Data were collected on 212 children (98 female) who were treated on 240 occasions with PNCA for episodes of pain. Patients averaged 2.3 +/- 1.7 yr of age and 11 +/- 5 kg, and received a median of 4 (range 2-54) days of PNCA therapy. Maximum daily pain scores were < or =3/10 (objective pain scale) or < or =2/5 (objective or self-report pain scale) in more than 80% of all occasions of PNCA use. PNCA usage was associated with an 8% incidence of pruritus and a 15% incidence of vomiting on the first day of treatment. Nine children studied received naloxone, four (1.7%) for treatment of PNCA-related apnea or desaturation. All had improvement in their symptoms after naloxone administration.. Parent-/nurse-controlled analgesia provided effective pain relief in most children <6 yr of age experiencing nonsurgical or postoperative pain. The observed incidence of vomiting and pruritus was similar to that seen in older patients treated with patient-controlled analgesia. However, significant respiratory depression, although uncommon, did occur, thus reinforcing the need for close patient monitoring. Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Nurses; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Parents; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies; Pruritus | 2000 |
4 other study(ies) available for naloxone and Postoperative-Nausea-and-Vomiting
Article | Year |
---|---|
Limiting the accessibility of cost-prohibitive drugs reduces overall anesthetic drug costs: a retrospective before and after analysis.
Cost effectiveness is becoming increasingly important in today's healthcare environment. Remifentanil, dexmedetomidine, and desflurane are costly agents that often have suitable alternatives to their use. We sought to identify changes in cost and outcomes following interventions that limited the availability of these drugs.. We calculated anesthetic drug costs for all operating room procedures performed before and after the accessibility interventions. We retrospectively compared drug costs per case and the frequency of agent use before and after the interventions. In addition, we analyzed the incidence of adverse outcomes, including delayed out-of-room times, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), unplanned intubations, use of naloxone, and reintubations. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Chi square analyses were used to quantify differences in cost, use, and outcomes between cohorts.. Of the 27,233 cases we identified, 24,201 cases were analyzed. The mean anesthetic drug costs per case were significantly lower after the interventions vs before at ($21.44 vs $32.39, respectively), a cost savings of $10.95 (95% confidence interval, $9.86 to $12.04; P < 0.001). Additionally, a comparison of data after vs before the interventions revealed the following results: remifentanil use was significantly lower (3.5% vs 9.2% of cases; P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine use did not differ significantly (0.4% vs 0.5% of cases; P = 0.07), and desflurane use was significantly lower (0.6% vs 20.2% of cases; P < 0.001). There was no significant relationship between the interventions and the frequency of delayed out-of-room times (15.5% vs 15.9%; P = 0.41), unplanned intubations (0.02% vs 0.03%; P = 0.60), and reintubations (0.01% vs 0.03%; P = 0.28). Postoperative nausea and vomiting decreased significantly after the interventions (22.8% vs 24.4%; P = 0.003), and naloxone use showed a significant increase (0.22% vs 0.11% of cases; P = 0.04).. Reducing the accessibility of these cost-prohibitive agents resulted in significant anesthetic drug cost savings and decreased utilization of remifentanil and desflurane. The interventions had no significant effect on patient recovery time, incidence of unplanned intubations, or incidence of reintubation, but they were associated with a decrease in PONV and an increase in naloxone use. Topics: Adult; Aged; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Desflurane; Dexmedetomidine; Drug Costs; Female; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Isoflurane; Male; Middle Aged; Naloxone; Piperidines; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Remifentanil; Retrospective Studies | 2015 |
Low-dose naloxone infusion for the treatment of intractable nausea and vomiting after intrathecal morphine in a parturient.
Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Anesthesia, Spinal; Antiemetics; Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Injections, Spinal; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Pregnancy; Treatment Failure | 2010 |
The impact of the joint commission for accreditation of healthcare organizations pain initiative on perioperative opiate consumption and recovery room length of stay.
The enhanced organizational emphasis on the management of pain in hospitalized patients mandated by the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO) pain initiative precipitated a number of changes by the perioperative services at our facility. In October 2002, a numeric pain scale became mandatory in our postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Response to analgesia in the PACU was recorded using this scale. In addition, an acceptable pain score was required for discharge from the PACU. We evaluated the effects of these changes in the pain management of 1082 patients undergoing general, orthopedic, neurosurgical, urologic, and gynecologic surgeries. We detected an overall increase in the average consumption of opiates (morphine equivalents) in 2002 compared with 2000 (46.6 +/- 20.4 mg versus 40.4 +/- 13.2 mg, P <0.001). This increase was most significant in the PACU (10.5 +/- 10.4 mg versus 6.5 +/- 7.3 mg, P <0.001 between the 2 periods, respectively). This increase in opiate use was not associated with an increased length of stay, an increase in the requirement for naloxone, or an increase in treatment for postoperative nausea and vomiting. We conclude that the increase in opiate use, which could be explained by compliance with the JCAHO pain initiative, was not associated with additional opiate-induced morbidity in the immediate postoperative period. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Antiemetics; Drug Utilization; Female; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Intraoperative Care; Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain; Pain Management; Pain Measurement; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Recovery Room; Respiratory Insufficiency; United States | 2005 |
Optimal dose range of epidural naloxone to reduce nausea in patients receiving epidural morphine.
Topics: Analgesia, Epidural; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, General; Anesthetics, Local; Bupivacaine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Hysterectomy; Morphine; Naloxone; Narcotic Antagonists; Pain Measurement; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome | 2004 |