nafarelin has been researched along with Prostatic-Neoplasms* in 4 studies
1 review(s) available for nafarelin and Prostatic-Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone analogues: a new therapeutic approach for prostatic carcinoma.
The introduction of potent analogues of gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) into clinical practice and their use in patients with metastatic prostatic carcinoma provides an effective alternative to the exogenous administration of pharmacologic doses of estrogens or surgical castration. Their advantages over estrogens are primarily related to a lower incidence of cardiovascular toxicity and gynecomastia. Their choice over orchiectomy is based on cosmetic and psychologic factors since their endocrine effects and clinical benefits are virtually the same. In this review, we describe the current experience with GnRH analogues in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma and discuss their use in the context of other endocrine manipulations. GnRH analogues act on the pituitary and indirectly affect gonadal function, and represent an opportunity for combination with other compounds capable of suppressing or interfering with the effects of circulating and androgens. The availability of several new compounds affecting different aspects of androgen metabolism provides promise for rational drug selection and testing. Topics: Buserelin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diethylstilbestrol; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Gonadotropins, Pituitary; Goserelin; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Nafarelin; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Orchiectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Testosterone | 1986 |
1 trial(s) available for nafarelin and Prostatic-Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone analogues: a new therapeutic approach for prostatic carcinoma.
The introduction of potent analogues of gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) into clinical practice and their use in patients with metastatic prostatic carcinoma provides an effective alternative to the exogenous administration of pharmacologic doses of estrogens or surgical castration. Their advantages over estrogens are primarily related to a lower incidence of cardiovascular toxicity and gynecomastia. Their choice over orchiectomy is based on cosmetic and psychologic factors since their endocrine effects and clinical benefits are virtually the same. In this review, we describe the current experience with GnRH analogues in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma and discuss their use in the context of other endocrine manipulations. GnRH analogues act on the pituitary and indirectly affect gonadal function, and represent an opportunity for combination with other compounds capable of suppressing or interfering with the effects of circulating and androgens. The availability of several new compounds affecting different aspects of androgen metabolism provides promise for rational drug selection and testing. Topics: Buserelin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diethylstilbestrol; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Gonadotropins, Pituitary; Goserelin; Humans; Leuprolide; Male; Nafarelin; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Orchiectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Testosterone | 1986 |
3 other study(ies) available for nafarelin and Prostatic-Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
GnRH agonists: gonadorelin, leuprolide and nafarelin.
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), a decapeptide synthesized and released by the hypothalamus, regulates production and release of the gonadotropins luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) by the adenohypophysis. Parenterally administered GnRH was initially used diagnostically as a test of adenohypophyseal reserve of LH and FSH. Subsequently, native GnRH was used therapeutically to treat hypothalamic hypogonadal and infertility states in both men and women. Because of the low potency and short half-life of native GnRH, long-acting, potent analogs have been developed that suppress secretion of native pituitary gonadotropins, resulting in medical gonadectomy. When administered parenterally and, more recently, intranasally, these compounds are useful in the management of prostate and breast carcinoma, endometriosis and uterine leiomyomata, precocious puberty and nontumorous ovarian hyperandrogenic syndromes. Topics: Endometriosis; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Infertility, Female; Leuprolide; Male; Nafarelin; Prostatic Neoplasms | 1991 |
The ratios of serum bioactive/immunoreactive luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in various clinical conditions with increased and decreased gonadotropin secretion: reevaluation by a highly sensitive immunometric assay.
Serum bioactive and immunoreactive LH and FSH were measured in clinical conditions with increased or decreased gonadotropin secretion. Gonadotropin immunoreactivity was measured using a conventional RIA (I) and an ultrasensitive immunofluorometric method (F). Bioactive (B) LH was assessed by the mouse interstitial cells in vitro bioassay, and B-FSH using the immature rat granulosa cell assay. Acute GnRH stimulation of adult men (n = 6) increased LH levels measured by the different methods 4.3- to 5.3-fold. The B/I ratio of LH increased from 2.34 +/- 0.21 to 3.71 +/- 0.36 (mean +/- SEM) at 120 min (P less than 0.05), but no change was found in the B/F ratio. After ovariectomy of premenopausal women (n = 6), the LH levels increased in 1 week 4- to 6-fold, the B/I ratio from 1.85 +/- 0.22 to 2.59 +/- 0.24, and the B/F ratio from 1.78 +/- 0.22 to 2.90 +/- 0.30 (P less than 0.05 for both). In addition, the LH levels were measured during GnRH agonist treatment of ovarian carcinoma (n = 8), endometriosis (n = 8), and prostatic carcinoma after orchiectomy (n = 8). In the two former groups, serum B-LH decreased in 1 month to undetectable levels (less than 0.5 IU/L), and in the prostate cancer patients to 1.2 (0.8-1.9) IU/L (log mean and range of +/- SEM). The concomitant decline of I-LH was to 1.5-1.9 IU/L in the agonist-treated female patients, and that of F-LH to 0.10-0.15 IU/L; in the prostate cancer patients, respectively, these values were 7-8 and 0.3-0.7 IU/L. The B/I and B/F ratios during the agonist treatments could only be calculated in the prostate cancer patients (in the others, B-LH became undetectable). The B/I ratio decreased from 2.34 +/- 0.5 to 0.14 +/- 0.03 (P less than 0.01), but no suppression was found in the B/F ratio from a pretreatment value of 3.6 +/- 0.8. B-, I-, and F-FSH levels were measured in the GnRH agonist-treated orchiectomized prostate cancer patients. The pretreatment level of B-FSH was 154 (137-175), that of I-FSH was 38.0 (34.4-42.0), and that of F-FSH was 39.8 (35.3-44.9) IU/L. The B/I ratio of FSH was 3.76 +/- 0.49, and the B/F ratio was 3.53 +/- 0.59. The mean B-FSH level decreased during treatment by 87-93.5%, that of I-FSH by 98%, and that of F-FSH by 91.5% (P less than 0.01 for all).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS) Topics: Adult; Aged; Biological Assay; Buserelin; Endometriosis; Female; Fluorescent Antibody Technique; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Goserelin; Humans; Luteinizing Hormone; Male; Menopause; Middle Aged; Nafarelin; Orchiectomy; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovariectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Radioimmunoassay; Uterine Neoplasms | 1990 |
Treatment of stage D2 prostatic carcinoma with combined gonadal and adrenal suppression in a 60-year-old man.
A 60-year-old man with stage D2 prostatic carcinoma received treatment with a new luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone superagonist. After a seven-month remission; relapse of the disease occurred and an adrenal-suppressing dose of dexamethasone was added. The resulting combined gonadal and adrenal suppression led to another remission that lasted five months. This case supports other observations of the importance of adrenal androgen production in the pathobiology of prostatic carcinoma. Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biopsy; Dexamethasone; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Nafarelin; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Remission Induction; Time Factors | 1987 |