mycophenolic-acid and Coronary-Artery-Disease

With an increasing number of heart transplants being performed around the world and the improvement in survival rates, more transplant recipients may present to the emergency department with comorbidities unique to the transplanted heart and related immunosuppression, including heart failure. This article is aimed at enabling the emergency department physician identify and better manage this unique group of patients for whom time is life.

Topics: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Contraindications; Coronary Artery Disease; Diagnosis, Differential; Dyspnea; Electrocardiography; Emergency Service, Hospital; Heart Failure; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Mycophenolic Acid; Myocardium; Natriuretic Peptides; Postoperative Complications; Transplantation, Homologous; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Standard immunosuppression after cardiac transplantation includes a calcineurin inhibitor in combination with mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine and corticosteroids. These agents have led to excellent outcomes but have shortcomings in terms of efficacy and toxicity. A new class of immunosuppressants, proliferation signal inhibitors, may meet some of these shortcomings.. The efficacy of the available proliferation signal inhibitors - sirolimus and its derivative everolimus - has been compared with azathioprine in three randomized clinical trials. Sirolimus or everolimus use was associated with lower rates of acute rejection and reduced development of chronic allograft vasculopathy. Sirolimus was not found to be superior to mycophenolate mofetil in a randomized trial. Proliferation signal inhibitors have been reported to be effective in refractory recurrent acute rejection. Nonrandomized studies have demonstrated that proliferation signal inhibitor-based immunosuppression enables recovery from renal dysfunction secondary to calcineurin inhibitor treatment. Proliferation signal inhibitor-based treatment is associated with a lower risk of malignancy than calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. Proliferation signal inhibitors have significant adverse effects that may limit widespread use.. Proliferation signal inhibitors are important new immunosuppressive agents that have added considerably to the armamentarium allowing further tailored immunosuppression to individualize patient care after heart transplantation.

Topics: Azathioprine; Calcineurin; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Cell Proliferation; Coronary Artery Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Everolimus; Graft Rejection; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Mycophenolic Acid; Signal Transduction; Sirolimus

A calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppressive regimen has been demonstrated to improve renal function early after heart transplantation, but long-term outcome of such a strategy has not been well described.. In the randomized SCHEDULE trial, de novo heart transplant recipients received (1) everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (cyclosporine) followed by CNI withdrawal at week 7-11 posttransplant or (2) standard-exposure cyclosporine, both with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids; 95/115 randomized patients were followed up at 5-7 years posttransplant.. Mean measured glomerular filtration rate was 74.7 mL/min and 62.4 mL/min with everolimus and CNI, respectively. The mean difference was in favor of everolimus by 11.8 mL/min in the intent-to-treat population (P = 0.004) and 17.2 mL/min in the per protocol population (n = 75; P < 0.001). From transplantation to last follow-up, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was 77% (37/48) and 66% (31/47) (P = 0.23) with treated BPAR in 50% and 23% (P < 0.01) in the everolimus and CNI groups, respectively; no episode led to hemodynamic compromise. Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) assessed by coronary intravascular ultrasound was present in 53% (19/36) and 74% (26/35) of everolimus- and CNI-treated patients, respectively (P = 0.037). Graft dimensions and function were similar between the groups. Late adverse events were comparable.. These results suggest that de novo heart transplant patients randomized to everolimus and low-dose CNI followed by CNI-free therapy maintain significantly better long-term renal function as well as significantly reduced CAV than patients randomized to standard CNI treatment. Increased BPAR in the everolimus group during year 1 did not impair long-term graft function.

Topics: Adult; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Cyclosporine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Everolimus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glucocorticoids; Graft Rejection; Graft Survival; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Long-term results of prospective randomized trials comparing triple immunosuppressive strategies combining tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporine A (CsA) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids after heart transplantation (HTX) are rarely published. Therefore, we collected long-term follow-up data of an intervention cohort 10 years after randomization.. Ten-year follow-up data of 60 patients included in a prospective, randomized trial between 1998 and 2000 were analyzed as intention-to-treat (TAC-MMF n=30; CsA-MMF n=30). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) was graduated in accordance with the new ISHLT classification.. Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 96.7%, 80.0%, and 66.7% for TAC-MMF and 90.0%, 83.3%, and 80.0% for CsA-MMF (P=ns). Freedom from acute rejection (AR) was significantly higher in TAC-MMF versus CsA-MMF (65.5% vs. 21.7%, log-rank 8.3, P=0.004). Freedom from ISHLT≥CAV1 after 5 and 10 years was in TAC-MMF 64.0% and 45.8%, and in CsA-MMF 36.0% (log-rank 3.0, P=0.085) and 8.0% (log-rank 9.0, P=0.003). No difference in long-term results for freedom from coronary angioplasty or stenting, renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, CMV infection, or malignancy was detected.. Cross-over effects because of treatment switch may result in impairment of significance between the groups. The long-term analysis resulted in a significant difference in manifestation of CAV between the groups after 10 years. Less rejection in the TAC-group might have contributed to the lower incidence of CAV. Superior freedom from AR and CAV in the TAC-MMF group did not result in better long-term survival.

Topics: Adult; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Artery Disease; Cyclosporine; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Germany; Graft Rejection; Graft Survival; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Tacrolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

A pre-planned substudy of a larger multicenter randomized trial was undertaken to compare the efficacy of everolimus with reduced-dose cyclosporine in the prevention of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after heart transplantation to that of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with standard-dose cyclosporine.. CAV is a major cause of long-term mortality following heart transplantation. Everolimus has been shown to reduce the severity and incidence of CAV as measured by first year intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). MMF, in combination with cyclosporine, has also been shown to have a beneficial effect in slowing the progression of CAV.. Study patients were a pre-specified subgroup of the 553-patient Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplantation: a randomized, multicenter trial who underwent heart transplantation and were randomized to everolimus 1.5 mg or MMF 3 g/day. IVUS was performed at baseline and at 12 months. Evaluable IVUS data were available in 189 patients (34.6%).. Increase in average maximal intimal thickness (MIT) from baseline to month 12 was significantly smaller in the everolimus 1.5 mg group compared with the MMF group (0.03 mm vs. 0.07 mm, p < 0.001). The incidence of CAV, defined as an increase in MIT from baseline to month 12 of greater than 0.5 mm, was 12.5% with everolimus versus 26.7% with MMF (p = 0.018). These findings remained irrespective of sex, age, diabetic status, donor disease, and across lipid categories.. Everolimus was significantly more efficacious than MMF in preventing CAV as measured by IVUS among heart-transplant recipients after 1 year, a finding, which was maintained in a range of patient subpopulations. CV surgery: transplantation, ventricular assistance, cardiomyopathy.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Everolimus; Female; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Postoperative Complications; Sirolimus; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Cardiac transplantation, a procedure nearly abandoned in the 1970s, has evolved into the standard of care for appropriate patients with end-stage heart failure. Much of this success has been due to improvements in immunosuppression, including the introduction of a triple-drug regimen. Retrospective reports suggested that single-drug immunosuppression with tacrolimus was feasible. As such, a prospective, randomized trial was conducted to test this approach.. One hundred fifty adult de novo heart transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial comparing tacrolimus monotherapy (MONO) with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil therapy (COMBO). Corticosteroids were used in the early postoperative period but discontinued in all patients over 8 to 9 weeks. The primary end point was the composite biopsy score at 6 months after transplant. Patients were followed for 1 to 5 years. The composite biopsy score was similar between groups at 6 and 12 months: 6-month MONO, 0.70 ± 0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.80) versus COMBO, 0.65 ± 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.74; P=0.44). Allograft vasculopathy was assessed by angiography and intravascular ultrasound, with no significant differences noted. Three-year survival was also similar (92.4% MONO versus 97% COMBO; P=0.58, log-rank).. Addition of mycophenolate to single-agent immunosuppression did not provide an advantage over single-agent immunosuppression in terms of rejection, allograft vasculopathy, or 3-year survival. Corticosteroids, which have traditionally been a mainstay of therapy, were successfully discontinued in all patients. These conclusions are tempered by the limited statistical power associated with a sample size of only 150 patients. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00299221.

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Aged; Biopsy; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Graft Rejection; Graft Survival; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Prospective Studies; Tacrolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional; United States

Rapamycin has been shown to reduce anatomical evidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, but its effect on coronary artery physiology is unknown.. Twenty-seven patients without angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease underwent measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) within 8 weeks and then 1 year after transplantation using a pressure sensor/thermistor-tipped guidewire. Measurements were compared between consecutive patients who were on rapamycin for at least 3 months during the first year after transplantation (rapamycin group, n = 9) and a comparable group on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) instead (MMF group, n = 18).. At baseline, there was no significant difference in FFR, CFR, or IMR between the 2 groups. At 1 year, FFR declined significantly in the MMF group (0.87 +/- 0.06 to 0.82 +/- 0.06, P = .009) but did not change in the rapamycin group (0.91 +/- 0.05 to 0.89 +/- 0.04, P = .33). Coronary flow reserve and IMR did not change significantly in the MMF group (3.1 +/- 1.7 to 3.2 +/- 1.0, P = .76; and 27.5 +/- 18.1 to 19.1 +/- 7.6, P = .10, respectively) but improved significantly in the rapamycin group (2.3 +/- 0.8 to 3.8 +/- 1.4, P < .03; and 27.0 +/- 11.5 to 17.6 +/- 7.5, P < .03, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that rapamycin therapy was an independent predictor of CFR and FFR at 1 year after transplantation.. Early after cardiac transplantation, rapamycin therapy is associated with improved coronary artery physiology involving both the epicardial vessel and the microvasculature.

Topics: Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Female; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Sirolimus; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome

New immunosuppressive drugs are extensively being investigated for their effect on T-cell immunity, with far less being known about their effect on the humoral immune response. In view of the experimental and clinical evidence that humoral immunity contributes to acute and chronic rejection, we investigated post-transplant production of anti-vimentin and anti-HLA antibodies in 86 patients who were part of a worldwide clinical trial for mycophenolate mofetil in cardiac transplantation. The results demonstrate that patients taking MMF instead of azathioprine generated significantly fewer de novo anti-vimentin antibodies.

Topics: Antibody Formation; Azathioprine; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Graft Rejection; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Mycophenolic Acid; Postoperative Complications; Time; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vimentin

Intravenous thymoglobuline (125 mg a day for 3 days, Institut Mérieux, France) has been used to induce immunosuppression following heart transplantation. Cyclosporine and prednisone, with and without azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil were used as maintenance immunosuppression.. The objective of the study was to determine the clinical effect of antibody induction of immunosuppression following heart transplantation.. A retrospective analysis of the clinical experience at the Montreal Heart Institute. From 1988 to 1998, 163 patients were administered a 3-day course of intravenous thymoglobuline immediately following heart transplantation (Group 1). From 1983 to 1987 and during an isolated period in 1994, intravenous and oral cyclosporine was used immediately following heart transplantation in 48 patients (Group 2). Routine endomyocardial biopsies were performed in all patients and only moderate and severe rejection was treated.. One, 5- and 10-year actuarial survival rate averaged 85%+/-3, 77%+/-4 and 67%+/-5 in Group 1 compared with 88%+/-5, 81%+/-6 and 76%+/-6 in Group 2 (p = 0.5). At 1 year, the freedom rate from an episode of acute rejection averaged 43%+/-4 in Group 1 and 30%+/-7 in Group 2 (p = 0.03) and the freedom rate from an episode of infection averaged 44%+/-4 in Group 1 and 31%+/-7 in Group 2 (p = 0.2). At 1, 5 and 10 years, the freedom rate from graft coronary artery disease averaged 93%+/-2, 68%+/-5 and 50%+/-7 in Group 1 compared with 93%+/-4, 58%+/-8 and 30%+/-8 in Group 2 (p = 0.1) and the freedom rate from cancer averaged 98%+/-1, 91%+/-3 and 67%+/-8 in Group 1 compared with 100%, 95%+/-3 and 77%+/-8 in Group 2 (p = 0.2). There was no side-effect related to the systemic injection of thymoglobuline.. In a cyclosporine based protocol of immunosuppression, induction with an initial 3-day course of intravenous thymoglobuline is associated with a lower rate of acute rejection. Moreover, the risk of infection and of developing cancer is not increased whereas there was a trend towards a lower incidence of coronary atherosclerosis 5 and 10 years after transplantation.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antilymphocyte Serum; Azathioprine; Coronary Artery Disease; Cyclosporine; Female; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppression Therapy; Immunosuppressive Agents; Injections, Intravenous; Lymphocyte Subsets; Male; Mycophenolic Acid; Prednisone; Retrospective Studies; T-Lymphocytes

CXC motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) blockade is pursued as an alternative to mesenchymal stem cell treatment in transplantation based on our previous report that burixafor, through CXCR4 antagonism, mobilizes immunomodulatory mesenchymal stem cells. Here, we explored the efficacy of combining mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based immunosuppressants with repetitive burixafor administration.. Swine heterotopic cardiac allograft recipients received MMF and corticosteroids (control, n = 10) combined with burixafor as a 2-dose (burixafor2D, n = 7) or 2-dose plus booster injections (burixafor2D + B, n = 5) regimen. The efficacy endpoints were graft survival, freedom from first acute rejection, and the severity of intimal hyperplasia. Each specimen was sacrificed either at its first graft arrest or after 150 days.. After 150 days, all specimens in the control group had died, but 28.5% of the burixafor2D group survived, and 60% of the burixafor2D + B group survived (P = 0.0088). Although the control group demonstrated acute rejection at a median of 33.5 days, the burixafor2D + B group survived without acute rejection for a median of 136 days (P = 0.0209). Burixafor administration significantly attenuated the incidence rate of acute rejection (P = 0.002) and the severity of intimal hyperplasia (P = 0.0097) at end point relative to the controls. These findings were associated with reduced cell infiltrates in the allografts, and modulation of C-reactive protein profiles in the circulation.. The augmentation of conventional MMF plus corticosteroids with a CXCR4 antagonist is potentially effective in improving outcomes after heart transplantation in minipigs. Future studies are warranted into optimizing the therapeutic regimens for humans.

Topics: Acute Disease; Allografts; Animals; Coronary Artery Disease; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Graft Rejection; Graft Survival; Heart Transplantation; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Mycophenolic Acid; Receptors, CXCR4; Swine; Swine, Miniature; Time Factors

The transplant vasculopathy as a sign of chronic graft rejection affects both the epicardial and the intramyocardial arteries of the graft. This is at least partially mediated by NO synthases. The aim of this study was to assess possible protective effects of cyclosporine A (CsA), tacrolimus (FK506), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on the expression of NO synthases in an experimental transplant rat model.. Heart transplantation was performed in 322 rats. These were randomly assigned to four equal groups (control, CsA, FK506, MMF). Recipients were monitored up to 60 days after transplantation, while transplanted hearts were recovered at certain time points for analysis. Expression and staining intensity for endothelial nitric oxide synthases (e-nos) and inducible nitric oxide synthases (i-nos) were analyzed in epicardial and intramyocardial vessels in each group.. All employed drugs led to a significant reduction of expression or staining intensity of i-nos and e-nos. MMF was most effective in reduction in expression of both NO synthases.. These results imply that all described drugs prevent endothelial impairment induced by toxicity of NO and thereby prevent transplant vasculopathy. MMF seems to be the most effective drug.

Topics: Allografts; Animals; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Cyclosporine; Disease Models, Animal; Down-Regulation; Graft Rejection; Graft Survival; Heart Transplantation; Immunosuppressive Agents; Mycophenolic Acid; Nitric Oxide; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II; Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III; Rats, Inbred Lew; Tacrolimus; Time Factors

Accelerated atherosclerosis is a major cause of mortality in SLE. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been shown to suppress growth factor-induced proliferation of vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells in animal models. We hypothesized that MMF might modify the inflammatory component of atherosclerosis in SLE. We examined the effect of MMF on atherosclerosis as measured by changes in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) or coronary artery calcium (CAC) over 2 years. CAC and carotid IMT were measured at baseline and 2 years later in a cohort of 187 patients with SLE. The cohort was 91% women, 59% Caucasian, and 35% African-American, with a mean age of 45 ± 11 years. Of these, 12.5% (n = 25) received MMF during follow-up. The daily dose ranged from 500 to 3,000 mg/day, and duration ranged from 84 days to the entire 2 years. We divided MMF users into three groups: low exposure (<1,500 mg average daily dose), high exposure (≥1,500 average daily dose), and any exposure of MMF (<1,500 or ≥1,500 average daily dose) for 2 years. The mean CAC increased in all four groups: no MMF: 1.17-1.28, low MMF: 1.02-1.13, high MMF: 1.44-1.61, and any MMF: 1.21-1.34 log-Agatston units. Compared to no MMF, there was no statistically different change between the three groups (p = 0.99, 0.87, and 0.91). Similarly, mean carotid IMT increased in all four groups: no MMF: 0.58-0.66, low MMF: 0.55-0.60, high MMF: 0.56-0.71, and any MMF: 0.56-0.66. We then adjusted for statin use, lupus nephritis, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, cholesterol, and age during the 2-year follow-up. The association between MMF exposure and change in CAC or carotid IMT was not statistically significant (p = 0.63 for CAC, and p = 0.085 for carotid IMT). There was no evidence that MMF slowed or decreased the progression of atherosclerosis as measured by carotid IMT or CAC. Because the number of patients taking MMF was only twenty-five, larger studies for longer time periods are needed to explore any effect of MMF on subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE.

Topics: Adult; Calcium; Carotid Artery Diseases; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Vessels; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Longitudinal Studies; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains one of the leading causes of late graft failure and death. Cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral (CsA) had been used in heart transplantation (HTx) recipients. Meanwhile, Everolimus (EVL; Certican, Norvatis Pharmaceuticals; Basel, Switzerland) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been combined with CsA for maintenance treatment. We compared atherosclerosis in HTx patients showing CAV by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in two groups: the CE who received CsA, EVL, and steroid versus the CM group, who received CsA, MMF, and steroid.. We explored IVUS parameters such as plaque thickness (PT), lumen circumference (LC), media adventitial circumference, lumen diameter (LD), and media adventitial diameter to characterize the atherosclerosis among CE versus CM groups.. In this study, both the CE and CM groups showed increased plaque thickening in the first year posttransplantation (P < .05). However, MMF significantly reduced LC and LD (P < .05) Upon multivariate linear regression analysis, the CE group seemed to show less effect on the maximal difference in PT between 2 and 12 months after adjusting for age at transplantation and gender (P < .05). There was no acute clinical adverse event of CAV reported in either both group during the follow-up. The atherosclerosis of CAV revealed by LC, LDmax, and LDmin was significantly less among patients treated with CE than CM.. These results suggested that everolimus-treated patients showed benefits compared with MMF-treated subjects as extrapolated from these IVUS data.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Coronary Artery Disease; Cyclosporine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Everolimus; Female; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Mycophenolic Acid; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sirolimus; Steroids; Taiwan; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional

Topics: Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Bundle-Branch Block; C-Reactive Protein; Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Electric Countershock; Glomerulonephritis; Heart Arrest; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid; Prednisone; Ventricular Fibrillation

Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Biopsy; Coronary Artery Disease; Drug Therapy, Combination; Graft Rejection; Graft Survival; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Mycophenolic Acid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Research Design; Tacrolimus; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome