Page last updated: 2024-10-31

muscimol and Huntington Disease

muscimol has been researched along with Huntington Disease in 8 studies

Muscimol: A neurotoxic isoxazole isolated from species of AMANITA. It is obtained by decarboxylation of IBOTENIC ACID. Muscimol is a potent agonist of GABA-A RECEPTORS and is used mainly as an experimental tool in animal and tissue studies.
muscimol : A member of the class of isoxazoles that is 1,2-oxazol-3(2H)-one substituted by an aminomethyl group at position 5. It has been isolated from mushrooms of the genus Amanita.

Huntington Disease: A familial disorder inherited as an autosomal dominant trait and characterized by the onset of progressive CHOREA and DEMENTIA in the fourth or fifth decade of life. Common initial manifestations include paranoia; poor impulse control; DEPRESSION; HALLUCINATIONS; and DELUSIONS. Eventually intellectual impairment; loss of fine motor control; ATHETOSIS; and diffuse chorea involving axial and limb musculature develops, leading to a vegetative state within 10-15 years of disease onset. The juvenile variant has a more fulminant course including SEIZURES; ATAXIA; dementia; and chorea. (From Adams et al., Principles of Neurology, 6th ed, pp1060-4)

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"The alteration in circulating levels of PRL, GH, TSH, and cortisol was studied after the oral administration of muscimol (3-hydroxy-5-aminomethylisoxazole) to human subjects with Huntington's disease (n = 4) and chronic schizophrenia (n = 5)."3.66Stimulation of prolactin and growth hormone secretion by muscimol, a gamma-aminobutyric acid agonist. ( Chase, TN; Frohman, LA; Neophytides, A; Tamminga, CA, 1978)

Research

Studies (8)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19908 (100.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's0 (0.00)29.6817
2010's0 (0.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Waddington, JL1
Cross, AJ1
Gale, K1
Casu, M1
Durso, R1
Tamminga, CA2
Denaro, A1
Ruggeri, S1
Chase, TN2
Hamel, E1
Goetz, IE1
Roberts, E1
Penney, JB1
Young, AB1
Marsden, CD1
Sheehy, MP1
Shoulson, I1
Goldblatt, D1
Charlton, M1
Joynt, RJ1
Neophytides, A1
Frohman, LA1

Clinical Trials (1)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study in Huntington's Disease (CIT-HD)[NCT00271596]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Executive Function Composite Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort.

Full Scale Name: The Executive Composite Score (ECS). Definition: Subscales were averaged to compute this composite total score. The ECS is the weighted average of performance on 6 subtests of executive function, including (1) the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, (2) Symbol Digit Modalities test; (3) Stroop Color Word Test (Interference Trial), (4) Trail Making test (Part B), (5) Letter-Number Sequencing, and (6) Animal Naming. Construct Measured: Thinking tasks involving planning, working memory, attention, problem solving, verbal reasoning, inhibition, mental flexibility, and task switching. ECS Scale Range: The ECS score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance on executive functioning tasks. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in executive functioning performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram0.005
Placebo0.172

Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression Comparing Screening (Intake Visit) to Visit 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Definition: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered multiple item questionnaire used to provide an indication of depression. Construct Measured: Depression. HAM-D Score Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 54, where higher scores indicate worsening mood. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in mood from screening (intake visit) to visit 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.67
Placebo1.23

Letter Number Sequencing Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: Letter Number Sequencing (LNS) subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) third edition. Definition: LNS is a task that requires the reordering of an initially unordered set of letters and numbers. Construct Measured: Working memory. LNS Score Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 21, where lower scores indicate poorer performance in working memory. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in working memory performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.113
Placebo0.225

Semantic Fluency Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Semantic Fluency Score. Definition: The Semantic Fluency Score is the number of words a person can produce given a category, including naming (1) Animal names, (2) Fruit names, (3) Boy names, (4) Girl names, and (5) Vegetable names. Construct Measured: Working memory and verbal initiation. Scale Range: The Semantic Fluency Score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance on working memory tasks. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in working memory performance from visit 2 (week 0) where patients named fruit names to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) where patients named girl names and vegetable names respectively for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram0.386
Placebo0.664

Stroop Interference Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

"Full Scale Name: Stroop Interference subtest from The Stroop Color and Word Test. Definition: Participants are asked to name the ink color in which a word is printed when the word itself (which is irrelevant to the task) is the name of a different color rather than the same color. For example, participants may be asked to say red to the word blue printed in red ink. Constructs Measured: Selective attention, response inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and processing speed. Scale Range: The Stroop Interference score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in attention and processing speed performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) and 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort." (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.256
Placebo-0.046

Subgroup Analysis of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Comparing Screening (Intake Visit) to Visit 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Definition: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression is a clinician-administered multiple item questionnaire used to provide an indication of depression. Construct Measured: Depression. HAM-D Score Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 54, where higher scores indicate worsening mood. Change Calculation Details: This analysis was restricted to a subgroup and, accordingly, does not reflect the total number of participants as reported in the Participant Flow. This analysis compares change in mood from screening (intake visit) to visit 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.10
Placebo1.50

Symbol-Digit Modalities Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Definition: The SDMT screens for organic cerebral dysfunction by having the examinee use a reference key to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures in 90 seconds. Construct Measured: Attention, processing speed, and working memory. SDMT Scale Range: Raw scores may range from 0 to 110, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) & 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.227
Placebo-0.170

Total Functional Capacity Score Comparing Baseline (Week -4) to Visits 4 (Week 6) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: The Total Functional Capacity (TFC) subscale from the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS). Definition: The TFC is a score that classifies five stages of Huntington's Disease and five levels of function in the domains of workplace, finances, domestic chores, activities of daily living and requirements for unskilled or skilled care. Construct Measured: Activities of Daily Living. Scale Range: The TFC score ranges from 0 to 13, where lower scores indicate poorer performance in activities of daily living. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in TFC performance from Baseline (week -4) to the weighted average of visits 4 (week 6) and 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram-0.54
Placebo-0.06

Trails B Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

"Full Scale Name: Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B). Definition: The TMT-B test requires participants to connect-the-dots of 25 consecutive targets on a sheet of paper where the subject alternates between numbers and letters, going in both numerical and alphabetical order. Constructs Measured: Attention, set shifting, and processing speed. Scale range: The TMT-B score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in attention and processing speed performance from visit 2 (week 0) to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) and 6 (week 15) for the citalopram versus placebo cohort." (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram0.087
Placebo0.405

Verbal Fluency Score Comparing Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visits 5 (Week 12) & 6 (Week 15) for the Citalopram Cohort Versus Placebo Cohort

Full Scale Name: The Verbal Fluency Score (VFC). Definition: The VFC is the number of words a person can produce given a letter, including (1) Naming words that start with F, A, and S; (2) naming words that start with K, W, and R; (3) naming words that start with V, I, and P; (4) naming words that start with O, G, and B; (5) naming words that start with E, N, and T; and (6) naming words that start with J, C, and S. Construct Measured: Verbal initiation and flexibility. Scale Range: The Verbal Fluency Composite Score ranges from -5 to +5 on a standardized (Z) score scale, where lower scores indicate poorer performance. Change Calculation Details: Compares change in verbal initiation and flexibility from visit 2 (week 0) where patients named words starting with O, G, and B to the weighted average of visits 5 (week 12) and 6 (week 15) where patients named words starting with E, N, and T, and J, C, and S respectively for the citalopram versus placebo cohort. (NCT00271596)
Timeframe: after 15 weeks of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Citalopram0.140
Placebo0.071

Reviews

1 review available for muscimol and Huntington Disease

ArticleYear
Dynamic utilization of GABA in substantia nigra: regulation by dopamine and GABA in the striatum, and its clinical and behavioral implications.
    Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 1981, Sep-25, Volume: 39

    Topics: 4-Aminobutyrate Transaminase; Afferent Pathways; Aminocaproates; Animals; Basal Ganglia; Behavior, A

1981

Trials

2 trials available for muscimol and Huntington Disease

ArticleYear
GABA and movement disorders.
    Advances in biochemical psychopharmacology, 1981, Volume: 30

    Topics: Anticonvulsants; Baclofen; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced;

1981
Huntington's disease: treatment with muscimol, a GABA-mimetic drug.
    Annals of neurology, 1978, Volume: 4, Issue:3

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adolescent; Adult; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition; Double-Blind Met

1978

Other Studies

5 other studies available for muscimol and Huntington Disease

ArticleYear
Pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies in Huntington's chorea.
    Lancet (London, England), 1980, Jul-26, Volume: 2, Issue:8187

    Topics: Dopamine; Humans; Huntington Disease; Muscimol

1980
Plasma growth hormone and prolactin response to dopaminergic GABAmimetic and cholinergic stimulation in Huntington's disease.
    Neurology, 1983, Volume: 33, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Apomorphine; Arecoline; Dopamine; Female; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Growth Hormone; Humans; Hu

1983
Glutamic acid decarboxylase and gamma-aminobutyric acid in Huntington's disease fibroblasts and other cultured cells, determined by a [3H]muscimol radioreceptor assay.
    Journal of neurochemistry, 1981, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    Topics: Carboxy-Lyases; Cells, Cultured; Fibroblasts; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Glutamate Decarboxylase; Huma

1981
Quantitative autoradiography of neurotransmitter receptors in Huntington disease.
    Neurology, 1982, Volume: 32, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Autoradiography; Brain; Female; Flunitrazepam; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Huntington Di

1982
Stimulation of prolactin and growth hormone secretion by muscimol, a gamma-aminobutyric acid agonist.
    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 1978, Volume: 47, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Chronic Disease; Female; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Growth Hormone; Humans; Huntington Di

1978