mupirocin and HIV-Infections

mupirocin has been researched along with HIV-Infections* in 4 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for mupirocin and HIV-Infections

ArticleYear
Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus colonization and prophylaxis for infection with topical intranasal mupirocin: an evidence-based review.
    Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2003, Oct-01, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Most Staphylococcus aureus infections are endogenously acquired, and treatment of nasal carriage is one potential strategy for prevention. We critically appraised the published evidence regarding the efficacy of intranasal mupirocin for eradication of S. aureus nasal carriage and for prophylaxis of infection. Sixteen randomized, controlled trials were appraised; 9 trials assessed eradication of colonization as a primary outcome measure, and 7 assessed the reduction in the rate of infection. Mupirocin was generally highly effective for eradication of nasal carriage in the short term. Prophylactic treatment of patients with intranasal mupirocin in large trials did not lead to a significant reduction in the overall rate of infections. However, subgroup analyses and several small studies revealed lower rates of S. aureus infection among selected populations of patients with nasal carriage treated with mupirocin. Although mupirocin is effective at reducing nasal carriage, routine use of topical intranasal mupirocin for infection prophylaxis is not supported by the currently available evidence.

    Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Clinical Trials as Topic; Health Occupations; HIV Infections; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Mupirocin; Renal Dialysis; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus

2003

Trials

2 trial(s) available for mupirocin and HIV-Infections

ArticleYear
Methodologic considerations of household-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus decolonization among persons living with HIV.
    American journal of infection control, 2017, Oct-01, Volume: 45, Issue:10

    People living with HIV (PLWH) have a higher prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization and likelihood of recurrent infection than the general population. Simultaneously treating MRSA-colonized household members may improve success with MRSA decolonization strategies. This article describes a pilot trial testing household-level MRSA decolonization and documents methodologic and pragmatic challenges of this approach.. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of individual versus individual-plus-household MRSA decolonization to reduce recurrent MRSA. PLWH with a history of MRSA who are patients of an urban HIV clinic received a standard MRSA decolonization regimen. MRSA colonization at 6 months was the primary outcome.. One hundred sixty-six patients were referred for MRSA screening; 77 (46%) enrolled. Of those, 28 (36%) were colonized with MRSA and identified risk factors consistent with the published literature. Eighteen were randomized and 13 households completed the study.. This is the first study to report on a household-level MRSA decolonization among PLWH. Challenges included provider referral, HIV stigma, confidentiality concerns over enrolling households, and dynamic living situations. Although simultaneous household MRSA decolonization may reduce recolonization, recruitment and retention challenges specific to PLWH limit the ability to conduct household-level research. Efforts to minimize these barriers are needed to inform evidence-based practice.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carrier State; Chlorhexidine; Family Characteristics; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Middle Aged; Mupirocin; Prospective Studies; Staphylococcal Infections; Treatment Outcome

2017
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study on Decolonization Procedures for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among HIV-Infected Adults.
    PloS one, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:5

    HIV-infected persons have increased risk of MRSA colonization and skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTI). However, no large clinical trial has examined the utility of decolonization procedures in reducing MRSA colonization or infection among community-dwelling HIV-infected persons.. 550 HIV-infected adults at four geographically diverse US military HIV clinics were prospectively screened for MRSA colonization at five body locations every 6 months during a 2-year period. Those colonized were randomized in a double-blind fashion to nasal mupirocin (Bactroban) twice daily and hexachlorophene (pHisoHex) soaps daily for 7 days compared to placeboes similar in appearance but without specific antibacterial activity. The primary endpoint was MRSA colonization at 6-months post-randomization; secondary endpoints were time to MRSA clearance, subsequent MRSA infections/SSTI, and predictors for MRSA clearance at the 6-month time point.. Forty-nine (9%) HIV-infected persons were MRSA colonized and randomized. Among those with 6-month colonization data (80% of those randomized), 67% were negative for MRSA colonization in both groups (p = 1.0). Analyses accounting for missing 6-month data showed no significant differences could have been achieved. In the multivariate adjusted models, randomization group was not associated with 6-month MRSA clearance. The median time to MRSA clearance was similar in the treatment vs. placebo groups (1.4 vs. 1.8 months, p = 0.35). There was no difference on subsequent development of MRSA infections/SSTI (p = 0.89). In a multivariable model, treatment group, demographics, and HIV-specific factors were not predictive of MRSA clearance at the 6-month time point.. A one-week decolonization procedure had no effect on MRSA colonization at the 6-month time point or subsequent infection rates among community-dwelling HIV-infected persons. More aggressive or novel interventions may be needed to reduce the burden of MRSA in this population.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00631566.

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hexachlorophene; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Middle Aged; Mupirocin; Prospective Studies; Staphylococcal Infections

2015

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for mupirocin and HIV-Infections

ArticleYear
Paronychia associated with antiretroviral therapy.
    The British journal of dermatology, 1999, Volume: 140, Issue:6

    We report six HIV patients who developed painful periungual inflammation of several nails during treatment with the antiretroviral drugs indinavir and lamivudine. The lesions appeared 2-12 months after starting treatment. The occurrence of paronychia in HIV patients has recently been reported in two groups of patients receiving either indinavir or lamivudine. Dermatologists should be aware of this recently reported and probably not uncommon side-effect of antiretroviral treatment in order to avoid an invasive approach to the nail lesions.

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Clobetasol; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Lamivudine; Male; Middle Aged; Mupirocin; Paronychia

1999