mupirocin and Acinetobacter-Infections

mupirocin has been researched along with Acinetobacter-Infections* in 2 studies

Trials

1 trial(s) available for mupirocin and Acinetobacter-Infections

ArticleYear
Risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infection in patients with major burns and the efficacy of the topical application of mupirocin at the central venous catheter exit site.
    Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2015, Volume: 41, Issue:8

    The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the topical administration of mupirocin and other practices in central venous catheter (CVC) care to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in patients with major burns.. Patients with major burns admitted to a burn ICU were divided into four groups and disinfected at the CVC exit site with single povidone iodine (PVP-I) or PVP-I plus topical mupirocin ointment three times a day or once a day, respectively. The bacterial colonization of the skin at the CVC exit site and CVC tips and the incidence of CLABSI were recorded, and the risk factors were analyzed.. Administering mupirocin (RR=0.316, p=0.001), increasing the frequency of insertion-site care (RR=0.604, p=0.008), and avoiding cannulation at the burn site (RR=0.148, p<0.001) reduced skin colonization at the CVC insertion site. Topical administration of mupirocin significantly reduces both the bacterial colonization rate at CVC tips (RR=0.316, p=0.001) and the incidence of CLABSI (5.3 vs. 29.1 per 1000 catheter days, p<0.001).. Mupirocin is effective in the prophylaxis of CLABSI. Other CVC care practices were also found to affect the level of bacterial colonization, but their efficacy in preventing CLABSI needs to be evaluated further.

    Topics: Acinetobacter Infections; Administration, Cutaneous; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Burn Units; Burns; Carrier State; Catheter-Related Infections; Central Venous Catheters; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mupirocin; Prospective Studies; Protective Factors; Pseudomonas Infections; Risk Factors; Skin; Staphylococcal Infections; Trauma Severity Indices; Young Adult

2015

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for mupirocin and Acinetobacter-Infections

ArticleYear
Comparison of the antibacterial effect of silver sulfadiazine 1%, mupirocin 2%, Acticoat and octenidine dihydrochloride in a full-thickness rat burn model contaminated with multi drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.
    Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2012, Volume: 38, Issue:8

    In this study, our aim is to compare the efficacy of different topical antibacterial agents in a rat model contaminated with a multi drug resistant (MDR) standard Acinetobacter baumannii strain. The study was carried out on 40 Sprague-Dawley rats of 250-300 g each. For the purposes of this study, the rats were divided into 5 groups, with 8 rats in each group: Group 1 control; Group 2 silver sulfadiazine; Group 3 mupirocin; Group 4 Acticoat group; and Group 5 octenidine dihydrochloride group. Following to the formation of the full-thickness burn areas in rats, the MDR A. baumannii standard strain was inoculated into the burned area. The rats in all the groups were sacrificed at the end of the 10th day and subjected to histopathological and microbiological evaluation. In the histopathological evaluation, the lowest inflammatory cell response and bacterial density in the eschar and muscle tissues were observed in the Acticoat group. While these results were found to be statistically significant compared to the silver sulfadiazine group, only the bacterial density in the muscle tissue was found as significant in comparison to the mupirocin and octenidine groups. In the microbiological evaluation, the lowest growth in the muscle tissue culture among all the groups was observed in the Acticoat group. The growth in the eschar tissue culture was significantly lower in the Acticoat and octenidine groups in comparison to the silver sulfadiazine group. At the end of the study, it has been observed that Acticoat was effective both in eschar and muscle, while octenidine was effective in eschar tissues in a rat burn model contaminated with MDR A. baumannii.

    Topics: Acinetobacter baumannii; Acinetobacter Infections; Administration, Topical; Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Burns; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Imines; Mupirocin; Muscles; Polyesters; Polyethylenes; Pyridines; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Silver Sulfadiazine; Skin

2012