morphine has been researched along with Brain-Ischemia* in 3 studies
1 review(s) available for morphine and Brain-Ischemia
Article | Year |
---|---|
Routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction versus no suction at birth.
Oro/nasopharyngeal suction is a method used to clear secretions from the oropharynx and nasopharynx through the application of negative pressure via a suction catheter or bulb syringe. Traditionally, airway oro/nasopharyngeal suction at birth has been used routinely to remove fluid rapidly from the oropharynx and nasopharynx in vigorous and non-vigorous infants at birth. Concerns relating to the reported adverse effects of oro/nasopharyngeal suctioning led to a practice review and routine oro/nasopharyngeal suctioning is no longer recommended for vigorous infants. However, it is important to know whether there is any clear benefit or harm for infants whose oro/nasopharyngeal airway is suctioned compared to infants who are not suctioned.. To evaluate the effect of routine oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal suction compared to no suction on mortality and morbidity in newly born infants.. We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 3), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to April 18, 2016), Embase (1980 to April 18, 2016), and CINAHL (1982 to April 18, 2016). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.. Randomised, quasi-randomised controlled trials and cluster randomised trials that evaluated the effect of routine oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal suction compared to no suction on mortality and morbidity in newly born infants with and without meconium-stained amniotic fluid.. The review authors extracted from the reports of the clinical trials, data regarding clinical outcomes including mortality, need for resuscitation, admission to neonatal intensive care, five minute Apgar score, episodes of apnoea and length of hospital stay.. Eight randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and only included term infants (n = 4011). Five studies included infants with no fetal distress and clear amniotic fluid, one large study included vigorous infants with clear or meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and two large studies included infants with thin or thick meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Overall, there was no statistical difference between oro/nasopharyngeal suction and no oro/nasopharyngeal suction for all reported outcomes: mortality (typical RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.94 to 5.53; typical RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.00 to 0.01; I. The currently available evidence does not support or refute the benefits or harms of routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction over no suction. Further high-quality studies are required in preterm infants or term newborn infants with thick meconium amniotic fluid. Studies should investigate long-term effects such as neurodevelopmental outcomes. Topics: Amniotic Fluid; Brain Ischemia; Humans; Infant; Infant Mortality; Infant, Newborn; Infections; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; Intention to Treat Analysis; Meconium; Nasopharynx; Oropharynx; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Resuscitation; Suction | 2017 |
2 other study(ies) available for morphine and Brain-Ischemia
Article | Year |
---|---|
Can asphyxiated infants at risk for neonatal seizures be rapidly identified by current high-risk markers?
Markers currently used to identify infants at highest risk for perinatal hypoxic-ischemic cerebral injury are insensitive in predicting the subsequent occurrence of neonatal seizures and/or neurodevelopmental sequelae, ie, cerebral palsy. To facilitate therapeutic strategies, early identification of the infant at highest risk for developing seizures secondary to hypoxia ischemia or asphyxia is critical, particularly if novel but potentially toxic therapies currently under experimental investigation become available for clinical use.. Ninety-six inborn term infants considered at high risk for having neonatal seizures secondary to hypoxia ischemia or asphyxia and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit directly after labor and delivery were prospectively evaluated. Markers of high risk included the presence of moderate to thick meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF), fetal heart rate (FHRT) abnormalities abruptio placentae, intubation and positive pressure ventilation in the delivery room (DR), chest compressions and epinephrine administration as part of resuscitation, a 5-minute Apgar score of 5 or less, umbilical cord arterial pH of 7.00 or less, and/or a base deficit of -14 mEq/L or more negative.. Seizures developed in 5 (5.2%) of the 96 infants. High-risk markers included FHRT abnormalities only (n=36), FHRT abnormalities and MSAF (n=20), MSAF only (n=23), abruptio placentae (n=6), intubation in the DR (n=44), intubation in the neonatal intensive care unit (n=22), chest compressions (n=2), 5-minute Apgar scores of 5 or less (n=21), umbilical cord arterial pH of 7.00 or less (n=21), and base deficits of -14 mEq/L or more negative (n=19). By univariate analysis, significant relationships with seizures were found with Apgar scores, the need for intubation in the DR, umbilical cord arterial pH, and base deficit. Combinations of the identified risk markers showed a strong relationship with seizures with the following odds rations (ORs), 95% confidence limits, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs): (1) low cord pH and intubation, OR, 163 (confidence limits, 7.9 and 3343.7); sensitivity, 100%; specificity 94%; and PPV, 50%; (2) low cord pH and low 5-minute Apgar score, OR, 39 (confidence limits, 3.9 and 392.5); sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 91%; and PPV, 33.3%; and (3) low pH, intubation, and low 5-minute Apgar score, OR, 340 (confidence limits, 17.8 and 6480.6); sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 98.8%; and PPV, 80%.. A combination of high-risk postnatal markers, specifically, a low 5-minute Apgar score and intubation in the DR in association with severe fetal acidemia, facilitates the identification within the first hour of life of term infants at highest risk for developing seizures secondary to perinatal asphyxia. Topics: Abruptio Placentae; Acid-Base Imbalance; Adrenergic Agonists; Amniotic Fluid; Apgar Score; Asphyxia Neonatorum; Brain Ischemia; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Cerebral Palsy; Epinephrine; Female; Fetal Blood; Forecasting; Heart Rate, Fetal; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hypoxia, Brain; Infant, Newborn; Intensive Care, Neonatal; Intubation, Intratracheal; Meconium; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Seizures | 1996 |
Can meconium in the amniotic fluid injure the fetal brain?
To determine if meconium in the amniotic fluid (AF) can cause cerebral palsy by stimulating umbilical and placental blood vessels to constrict.. Brain injury patterns were analyzed in 43 children whose exposure to meconium in the AF was their only identified risk for quadriplegic cerebral palsy. The times their injuries occurred were established by following lymphocyte counts in their blood after birth.. All 43 had cerebral cortical and subcortical brain damage of the type produced by late gestational ischemia and hypoxemia. The time between the onset of injury and birth ranged from 2-38 hours. The neonates were severely acidotic at birth when birth occurred within 12-14 hours after ischemia and hypoxemia began. Thereafter, the acidosis receded as the time between its start and birth increased, presumably because vasoconstriction had ended. Severe acidosis did not recede in nine children whose cerebral palsy was due to disorders that kept them hypoxemic until birth.. Meconium in the AF may sometimes initiate vasoconstriction that leads to ischemic, hypoxemic cerebral palsy. Topics: Acidosis; Amniotic Fluid; Brain Ischemia; Cerebral Palsy; Erythroblasts; Erythrocyte Count; Fetal Blood; Fetal Diseases; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hypoxia; Infant, Newborn; Lymphocyte Count; Meconium; Time Factors; Umbilical Cord; Vasoconstriction | 1995 |