morphine-6-glucuronide and Pain

The main aim of synthesizing permanently charged opioids is to ensure that they do not enter the central nervous system. Such drugs can provide analgesic activity with reduced sedation and other side effects on the central nervous system.. We undertook a search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed research literature and also summarized our published results in this field.. The present review focuses on the characterization of permanently charged opioids by various physicochemical methods, and in vitro as well as in vivo tests. The basicity and lipophilicity of opioid alkaloids are discussed at the microscopic, speciesspecific level. Glucuronide conjugates of opioids are also reviewed. Whereas the primary metabolite morphine-3-glucuronide does not bind to opioid receptors with high affinity, morphine-6-glucuronide is a potent analgesic, at least, partly due to its unexpectedly high lipophilicity. We discuss the quaternary ammonium opioid derivatives of a permanent positive charge, detailing their antinociceptive activity and effects on gastrointestinal motility in various in vivo animal tests and in vitro studies. Compounds with antagonistic activity are also reviewed. The last part of our study concentrates on sulfate conjugates of morphine derivatives that display unique pharmacological properties because they carry a negative charge at any pH value in the human body.. In conclusion, the findings of this review confirm the importance of permanently charged opioids in the investigated fields of pharmacology.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Drug Discovery; Gastrointestinal Motility; Humans; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds; Receptors, Opioid; Sulfates

The chemical structures of morphine and its metabolites are closely related to the clinical effects of drugs (analgesia and side-effects) and to their capability to cross the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB). Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and Morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) are both highly hydrophilic, but only M6G can penetrate the BBB; accordingly, M6G is considered a more attractive analgesic than the parent drug and the M3G. Several hypotheses have been made to explain these differences. In this review we will discuss recent advances in the field, considering brain disposition of M6G, UDP-glucoronosyltransferases (UGT) involved in morphine metabolism, UGT interindividual variability and transport proteins.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Biological Transport; Blood-Brain Barrier; Brain; Glucuronosyltransferase; Humans; Liver; Mice; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Rats; Receptors, Opioid, mu

Impairment of renal function is common among elderly patients due to an age-related decline in renal excretory function. In addition, many diseases such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus are associated with an accelerated decline in renal function. Renal dysfunction affects the metabolism of compounds and thus has important therapeutic consequences for drug safety. For pain patients who have reduced renal function such as those in palliative care, most opioids used for chronic pain treatment should be administered at reduced dosages, with increased dosage intervals, or not at all because of the risk of accumulation of the parent compound or its metabolites. For instance, for morphine or codeine, active metabolites are formed in the liver and cleared by the kidney and may therefore accumulate in cases of renal dysfunction. In contrast, buprenorphine can be administered at normal doses in patients with renal dysfunction because it is mainly excreted through the liver. In patients undergoing regular haemodialysis treatment, removal of an opioid during dialysis varies between individuals based upon a number of factors including the dialysis technique used. Morphine appears to be difficult to process in haemodialysis patients due to possible 'rebound' of metabolites between dialysis sessions. By contrast, the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine are unchanged in haemodialysis patients, which means that there is no need for dose-reduction with this drug. Thus, in patients with reduced renal function, chronic renal insufficiency and haemodialysis, buprenorphine appears to be a safe choice when opioid treatment is initiated.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Contraindications; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) appears to show equivalent analgesia to morphine but to have a superior side-effect profile in terms of reduced liability to induce nausea and vomiting and respiratory depression. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence behind this statement and to identify the possible reasons that may contribute to the profile of M6G. The vast majority of available data supports the notion that both M6G and morphine mediate their effects by activating the micro-opioid receptor. The differences for which there is a reasonable consensus in the literature can be summarized as: (1) Morphine has a slightly higher affinity for the micro-opioid receptor than M6G, (2) M6G shows a slightly higher efficacy at the micro-opioid receptor, (3) M6G has a lower affinity for the kappa-opioid receptor than morphine, and (4) M6G has a very different absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) profile from morphine. However, none of these are adequate alone to explain the clinical differences between M6G and morphine. The ADME differences are perhaps most likely to explain some of the differences but seem unlikely to be the whole story. Further work is required to examine further the profile of M6G, notably whether M6G penetrates differentially to areas of the brain involved in pain and those involved in nausea, vomiting, and respiratory control or whether micro-opioid receptors in these brain areas differ in either their regulation or pharmacology.

Topics: Animals; Humans; Morphine Derivatives; Nausea; Pain; Receptors, Opioid; Respiratory Insufficiency; Vomiting

This review discusses the role of dynamic medicinal chemistry in the design and development of more effective opioids for the treatment of pain. Human Phase II clinical studies have shown that morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) has equivalent analgesic effects to morphine and an improved side effect profile particularly at reducing the tendency to cause nausea, vomiting, sedation and respiratory depression. Based on these clinical observations, a new class of pain medication could be developed. Despite the promise, M6G is not an ideal drug because bioavailability is low and hydrolysis occurs in the gut. The literature covered includes a comprehensive list of work that illustrates: (i) the role of drug metabolism and drug disposition concepts in M6G analog drug development, (ii) the use of dynamic medicinal chemistry in improving M6G pharmaceutical properties, and (iii) the role of drug metabolism in enhancing bioavailability of M6G. Using optimized dynamic medicinal chemistry procedures for drug design and development, understanding the use of drug development concepts in early drug development and applying new methods from other fields may help advance this field of drug development. This review summarizes studies that support the feasibility of elaborating longer-acting, less expensive pain medications with possibly a safer profile of side effects. Development of new pain medications for cancer and other diseases based on M6G could provide novel agents that could balance optimal analgesia with a decreased occurrence of adverse side effects.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Biological Availability; Drug Design; Glycosides; Monosaccharides; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pharmacokinetics

Morphine metabolites are involved in various ways in determining the complex effects of morphine, both favourable and adverse, and may complicate the clinical use of morphine in the treatment of cancer pain. The production and effects of the principal morphine metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, in both normal and pathological states have been reviewed in the current literature. Therapeutic implications are also reviewed on the basis of experimental and clinical reports. The presence of these metabolites should be recognized in the chronic treatment of cancer pain with morphine, especially in the presence of renal impairment, and should be considered to have an important influence on opioid responsiveness, defined as a balance between the achievement of an optimal analgesia and the occurrence of adverse effects.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Humans; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

Though many of the treatment strategies used in palliative care have never been subjected to clinical trial, it has been argued that advances in palliative care have outstripped those in many other specialties. This article is not a comprehensive review of therapeutic options, nor even of recent advances in this topic, but concentrates on the latest developments and controversies in the pharmacological treatment of four frequent and important symptoms: neuropathic pain, anorexia and cachexia, intestinal obstruction, and breathlessness. It is difficult to perform blinded, randomised trials in patients with advanced disease and poor performance status, yet it is these patients who may gain most from the adoption of new well evaluated treatment strategies.

Topics: Anorexia; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Cachexia; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Palliative Care; Respiration Disorders

Topics: Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

The well established use of oral morphine in the treatment of chronic cancer pain has developed empirically and a knowledge of its pharmacokinetics is not necessary in order to use the drug effectively. However recent information about the pharmacokinetics of morphine may help resolve the controversy about oral to parenteral relative potency ratios, and may also in the future shed some light on the problem of patients whose pain does not respond to morphine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

Our aim was to compare pharmacological aspects of two switching strategies from morphine/oxycodone to methadone; the stop and go (SAG) strategy in which methadone is started directly after the initial opioid has been stopped, and the 3-days switch (3DS), in which morphine/oxycodone is gradually changed to methadone by cross-tapering over 3 days.. Forty-two cancer patients with pain and/or opioid side effects were assessed in this randomised trial. Trough serum concentrations of methadone, morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), and oxycodone were measured on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 14. Primary outcome was number of patients with methadone concentrations in apparent C(SS) on day 4. Secondary outcomes were exposure to opioids during the first 3 days, interindividual variation of opioid concentrations, and correlation between methadone concentrations and pain intensity (PI) day 3.. Thirty-five patients received methadone (16 in the SAG group, 19 in the 3DS group). The median preswitch morphine equivalent doses were 620 (range 350-2000) mg/day in the SAG group and 800 (range 90-3600) mg/day in the 3DS group (p = 0.43);42% reached C(SS) for methadone in the SAG group on day 4 compared with 22% in the 3DS group (p = 0.42). The SAG group was significantly less exposed to morphine/M6G/oxycodone and significantly more exposed to methadone in the first 3 days. Methadone showed a low correlation with PI. More patients dropped out after intervention in the SAG group than in the 3DS group (38% vs. 5%; p = 0.032). One SAG patient suffered from respiratory depression on day 5.. The SAG group was initially more exposed to methadone and less to the replaced opioids but without observed clinical benefit and with a higher dropout rate. Patients switched to methadone should be followed closely for the first 5 days, regardless of switching strategy.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Oxycodone; Pain; Palliative Care; Patient Dropouts

The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine and morphine 6-glucuronide (M6G) in children with cancer. Serum concentrations of morphine and M6G in children who received single oral or short term continuous intravenous morphine were determined by HPLC and ELISA assays, respectively. The serum C(max) of morphine and M6G after i.v. morphine administration was 560.5 and 309.0 nM and the T(max) was 61 and 65 min, respectively. The elimination half-life was 140.0 and 328.7 min, respectively. After oral administration of morphine, the serum C(max) of morphine and M6G was 408.34 and 256.3 nM and the T(max) was 40.0 and 60 min, respectively. The half-life was 131.0 and 325.8 min, respectively. The side effects were: drowsiness (100%), nausea and/or vomiting (57%), pruritus (28%) and urinary retention (14%). There were no reports of respiratory complications. This study showed that pharmacokinetics factors of morphine and M6G in children were significantly different from adults. Therefore the required dose for children should be different from that of adults and should be based on studies performed on children rather than on studies on adults. Some adverse effects, particularly nausea and pruritus, may be commoner than is usually thought, while others, particularly respiratory problems did not occur.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Biotransformation; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Half-Life; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Models, Biological; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Narcotics; Nausea; Neoplasms; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pruritus; Sleep Stages; Urinary Retention; Vomiting

We prospectively investigated the efficacy of opioid rotation from oral morphine to oral oxycodone in cancer patients who had difficulty in continuing oral morphine treatment because of inadequate analgesia and/or intolerable side effects.. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled and 25 were evaluated. The rate of patients who achieved adequate pain control, which provided an indication of treatment success, was evaluated as primary endpoint. The acceptability and pharmacokinetics of oxycodone were evaluated in addition to the assessment of analgesic efficacy and safety during the study period.. In spite of intense pain, the morphine daily dose could not be increased in most patients before the study because of intolerable side effects. However, switching to oral oxycodone allowed approximately 1.7-fold increase as morphine equivalent dose. Consequently, 84.0% (21/25) of patients achieved adequate pain control. By the end of the study, all patients except one had tolerated the morphine-induced intolerable side effects (i.e. nausea, vomiting, constipation, drowsiness). Common side effects (>10%) that occurred during the study were typically known for strong opioid analgesics, and most were mild to moderate in severity. A significant negative correlation between creatinine clearance (CCr) value and the trough concentrations of the morphine metabolites was observed. On the other hand, no significant correlation was found between CCr value and the pharmacokinetic parameters of oxycodone or its metabolites.. For patients who had difficulty in continuing oral morphine treatment, regardless of renal function, opioid rotation to oral oxycodone may be an effective approach to alleviate intolerable side effects and pain.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Constipation; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Nausea; Neoplasms; Oxycodone; Pain; Prospective Studies; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Sleep Stages; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is a metabolite of morphine and a micro-opioid agonist. To quantify the potency and speed of onset-offset of M6G and explore putative sex dependency, the authors studied the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of M6G in volunteers using a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study design.. Ten men and 10 women received 0.3 mg/kg intravenous M6G and placebo (two thirds of the dose as bolus, one third as a continuous infusion over 1 h) on separate occasions. For 7 h, pain tolerance was measured using gradually increasing transcutaneous electrical stimulation, and blood samples were obtained. A population pharmacokinetic (inhibitory sigmoid Emax)-pharmacodynamic analysis was used to analyze M6G-induced changes in tolerated stimulus intensity. The improvement in model fits by inclusion of covariate sex was tested for significance. P values less than 0.01 were considered significant. Taking into account previous morphine data, a predictive pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was constructed to determine the contribution of M6G to morphine analgesia.. M6G concentrations did not differ between men and women. M6G caused analgesia significantly greater than that observed with placebo (P < 0.01). The M6G analgesia data were well described by the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. The M6G effect site concentration causing a 25% increase in current (C25) was 275 +/- 135 nm (population estimate +/- SE), the blood effect site equilibration half-life was 6.2 +/- 3.3 h, and the steepness parameter was 0.71 +/- 0.18. Intersubject variability was 167% for C25 and 218% for the effect half-life. None of the model parameters showed sex dependency.. A cumulative dose of 0.3 mg/kg M6G, given over 1 h, produces long-term analgesia greater than that observed with placebo, with equal dynamics (potency and speed of onset-offset) in men and women. Possible causes for the great intersubject response variability, such as genetic polymorphism of the micro-opioid receptor and placebo-related phenomena, are discussed. The predictive pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was applied successfully and was used to estimate M6G analgesia after morphine in patients with normal and impaired renal function.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Analgesia; Analgesics, Opioid; Area Under Curve; Bayes Theorem; Electric Stimulation; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Models, Biological; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pain Measurement; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Sex Characteristics

A number of studies have reported the analgesic effect of morphine when applied topically to painful skin ulcers. It has been suggested that morphine may exert a local action, as opioid receptors have been demonstrated on peripheral nerve terminals. In this study, we investigated the bioavailability of topically applied morphine to cutaneous ulcers. Six hospice inpatients with skin ulcers were given morphine sulfate 10 mg in Intrasite gel topically and morphine sulfate 10 mg subcutaneously over 4 hours, at least 48 hours apart, in randomized order. Morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) were determined in plasma using a specific HPLC method. In five patients morphine and its metabolites were undetectable when applied topically. In one patient (with the largest ulcer), morphine and M6G were detected. The calculated morphine and M6G bioavailability in this patient were 20% and 21%, respectively. M3G was also detected but was below the lower limit of quantitation. When applied topically to ulcers, morphine was not absorbed in the majority of patients, suggesting any analgesic effect would be mediated locally rather than systemically. However, in ulcers with a large surface area, systemic absorption may occur.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Biological Availability; Female; Humans; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Skin Ulcer

Our objective was to quantify the extent and time course of the effects of morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine on pain threshold, pain tolerance, pupil diameter, and side effects.. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 3-way crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers (6 men and 6 women) received 63 to 112 mg of morphine-6-glucuronide or 26 to 66 mg of morphine as an intravenous bolus, followed by an infusion of the same medication for 1.8 to 6.4 hours. Analgesia was assessed every 30 minutes for up to 16 hours by means of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (sine wave, 5 Hz; intensity, 0-9.99 mA). Pupil diameter and side effects were recorded concomitantly.. At the administered doses, morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine had comparable effects on pain tolerance, pupil diameter, and side effects. The delay between the time course of the plasma concentrations and the time course of the effects was longer for morphine-6-glucuronide than for morphine (transfer half-life, 8.2 hours versus 2.6 hours for pain tolerance and 7.7 hours versus 2.8 hours for pupil diameter). The slope of the linear concentration versus effect relationship for pain tolerance was flatter for morphine-6-glucuronide than for morphine (0.05% versus 0.6% increase in pain tolerance per nanomole per liter of morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine at effect site, respectively). Morphine-6-glucuronide was less potent than morphine in producing pupil constriction (mean concentration at half-maximum effect, 745 nmol/L versus 26.4 nmol/L for morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine, respectively). In carriers of the mutated G118 allele of the mu-opioid receptor, the potency of the pupil-constricting effects of morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine was significantly smaller, and carriers of the G118 allele reported less nausea and vomited less often after administration of morphine-6-glucuronide.. Morphine-6-glucuronide clearly produced analgesic effects in healthy volunteers. However, the high amounts of systemic morphine-6-glucuronide needed to produce the same effects as morphine suggest that morphine-6-glucuronide barely contributes to the central nervous opioid effects after administration of analgesic doses of morphine.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Analysis of Variance; Area Under Curve; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Electric Stimulation; Female; Humans; Male; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pain Threshold; Polymorphism, Genetic; Pupil; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Reference Values; Time Factors

In order to make treatment decisions physicians should have knowledge about the relations between patient characteristics and drug disposition. Dose, route of administration, gender, age and renal function are reported to influence the serum concentrations of morphine, morphine-6-glucurnide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) during chronic treatment of cancer pain. These factors, however, are not evaluated in studies with a sample size sufficient to explore predictive factors.. Three hundred consecutive morphine users admitted because of a malignant disease were recruited. The relations of serum concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G to patient characteristics (gender, age, weight, renal function, liver function, dose, route of administration) were explored, and regression analysis performed to investigate whether these characteristics predicted serum concentrations obtained during routine clinical drug monitoring.. Morphine dose was associated with serum concentrations of morphine (r = 0.69), M6G (r = 0.76) and M3G (r = 0.76). Oral morphine resulted in higher dose-adjusted M6G and M3G serum concentrations compared with s.c. morphine. Creatinine serum concentrations correlated with serum concentrations of M6G and M3G. Dose and route of administration predicted morphine serum concentrations, while dose and renal function predicted M6G and M3G serum concentrations. Age was an additional factor predicting M3G concentrations. Dose was the only factor that explained a clinically significant part of the observed variability.. Patient characteristics predict only minor parts of the variability of morphine, M3G and M6G serum concentrations observed during routine clinical drug-monitoring in cancer patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Biotransformation; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Liver Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Prospective Studies

In 25 cancer patients treated with slow-release oral morphine and in 10 cancer patients treated with continuous infusion of morphine, plasma steady-state concentrations of morphine (M), morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Blood samples were withdrawn at 0, 2 and 6 h after oral administration in patients treated with slow-release oral morphine and once or twice a day in patients treated with continuous infusion of morphine. In four cancer patients treated with continuous infusion of morphine, in order to analyze chronopharmacokinetic variability, the M-3-G/M ratio was observed at 12:00 h and 24:00 h. No significant changes were observed in M-3-G/M ratios and M-6-G ratios at 0, 2, and 6 h after oral administration of morphine. The M-3-G/M ratio (38.6 +/- 25.7) in the oral morphine group was significantly higher than that (15.3 +/- 12.9) in the continuous infusion group (p < 0.01). There was an approximately 10-fold interindividual variation in the M-3-G/M ratio both in the continuous infusion group and in the oral morphine group. These results suggest that the activity of UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 in the intestinal metabolism of morphine may play an active part in a large interindividual variation in the ratio of metabolites to morphine. Further studies are needed to clarify this hypothesis.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alanine Transaminase; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Delayed-Action Preparations; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Liver; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Tablets

UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7 is the major UGT isoform responsible for the 3- and 6-glucuronidation of morphine in humans. Studies in rats have indicated that UGT1A1 may also contribute to the formation of morphine 3-glucuronide (M3G). Our objective was to investigate whether the UGT2B7 H268Y and UGT1A1*28 polymorphisms contribute to the variability in morphine glucuronide-to-morphine plasma ratios among cancer patients undergoing analgesic therapy with morphine.. Seventy patients with normal hepatic and renal function using slow-release morphine to relieve cancer pain were included. UGT2B7 genotyping was performed using restriction enzyme analysis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified DNA fragments. Wild-type and variant alleles of the UGT1A1 gene were identified using sizing of PCR-amplified fragments. Morphine 6-glucuronide (M6G)/morphine, M3G/morphine, and M3G/M6G plasma ratios were compared between genotypes.. The M3G/morphine, M6G/morphine, and M3G/M6G plasma ratios varied 16-, 42-, and sevenfold, respectively, among individuals. No statistically significant differences in plasma ratios were found between individuals possessing UGT2B7 H/H ( n=20), H/Y ( n=30), or Y/Y ( n=20) genotypes. Five patients were homozygous for the UGT1A1 TA(7) allele, which is associated with reduced UGT1A1 gene expression. However, the mean M3G/M6G and M3G/morphine plasma ratios in TA(7) homozygous subjects did not differ significantly from those of heterozygous or homozygous wild-type (TA(6)) individuals.. The UGT2B7 H268Y polymorphism cannot account for the considerable variation in glucuronide-to-morphine ratios in cancer patients. Moreover, the contribution of UGT1A1 to the formation of M3G appears to be of minor biological significance, at least in a UGT2B7 background.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Genotype; Glucuronosyltransferase; Humans; Isoenzymes; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

This study was performed to develop an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for estimating the contribution of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) to morphine-associated antinociception in humans. Healthy volunteers (n = 8) received 10 mg of morphine sulfate as a 5-minute i.v. infusion. A Contact Thermode heat probe was placed on the volar forearm to elicitpain. Thermal threshold, defined as the temperature at which pain was first perceived, was measured at fixed time intervals over 8 hours. Serum concentrations of morphine and M6G were determined by LC/MS. Concentration- and effect-time data were analyzed by stepwise nonlinear least-squares regression. The pharmacodynamic parameter estimates were recovered with a linear effect-compartment model and were used to assess the contribution of M6G to morphine-associated analgesia. The estimates (mean +/- SEM) for morphine total clearance and steady-state volume of distribution were 1.0 +/- 0.07 L/h/kg and 1.6 +/- 0.1 L/kg, respectively. The AUC ratio of M6G to morphine was 0.73 +/- 0.06. The contribution of M6G to analgesia ranged from < 0.1% to 66% and was inversely related to the overall effect elicited by the morphine dose (r2 = 0.776). Differences in gender were observed where the contribution (mean +/- SEM) of M6G to analgesia was 32% +/- 19% in males (n = 3) and 13% +/- 8% in females (n = 5). These results suggest that as the overall effect of morphine increases, the fractional contribution of M6G declines and the contribution of M6G to analgesia may differ between males and females. Alterations in the M6G/morphine system may have clinically significant pharmacodynamic consequences.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Sex Characteristics; Temperature

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is an active metabolite of morphine with potent analgesic activity. Morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), the most prevalent metabolite, has minimal affinity for opioid receptors. It has been suggested from animal model data and by examination of metabolite ratios in humans that M3G may functionally antagonize the respiratory depressant and analgesic actions of morphine and M6G.. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled trial with 10 healthy volunteers. The trial had 6 arms: (1) placebo, (2) 10 mg/70 kg of morphine, (3) 3.3 mg/70 kg of M6G, (4) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G, (5) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G with 10 mg/70 kg of morphine, and (6) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G with 3.3 mg/70 kg of M6G; all were give by slow intravenous bolus. Analgesia was assessed with the use of the submaximal ischemic pain model. The effects were quantified on numerical and visual analogue scales. Respiratory parameters and response to steady state 5% carbon dioxide challenge were assessed with spirometry, mass spectroscopy, and earlobe blood gas analysis.. Morphine and M6G produced significant pain relief compared with placebo (morphine, P < .0001; M6G, P = .033). Pain relief after M6G was less than after morphine (P = .009) and M3G was no better than placebo (P = .26). Pain relief with morphine and M6G were not significantly altered by M3G (P = .59 and P = .28, respectively). Significant and similar dysphoria and sedation occurred with both morphine (P < .002) and M6G (P < .016) but were absent with both M3G and placebo. Respiratory parameters suggested that M6G produced less respiratory depression than morphine. Both morphine and M6G caused a significant reduction in respiratory drive compared with placebo (morphine, P = .002; M6G, P = .013); this effect was not reversed by M3G (P = .35 and P = .83, respectively).. M3G appears to be devoid of significant activity; in these circumstances and at these doses, it does not antagonize either the analgesic or respiratory depressant effects of M6G or morphine.

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Conscious Sedation; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Male; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pain Measurement; Placebos; Pulmonary Ventilation

Oxycodone is an opioid analgesic that closely resembles morphine. Oxymorphone, the active metabolite of oxycodone, is formed in a reaction catalyzed by CYP2D6, which is under polymorphic genetic control. The role of oxymorphone in the analgesic effect of oxycodone is not yet clear. In this study, controlled-release (CR) oxycodone and morphine were examined in cancer pain. CR oxycodone and morphine were administered to 45 adult patients with stable pain for 3-6 days after open-label titration in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial. Twenty patients were evaluable. Both opioids provided adequate analgesia. The variation in plasma morphine concentrations was higher than that of oxycodone, consistent with the lower bioavailability of morphine. Liver dysfunction affected selectively either oxycodone or morphine metabolism. Three patients with markedly aberrant plasma opioid concentrations are presented. Significant individual variation in morphine and oxycodone metabolism may account for abnormal responses during treatment of chronic cancer pain.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Cross-Over Studies; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Debrisoquin; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphinans; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Oxycodone; Pain; Pain Measurement; Phenotype

Eleven morphine naïve patients with cancer-related pain were given a single dose of either intravenous morphine (n = 5) or oral morphine (n = 6). Blood sampling was performed over a 24-hr period and serial pain assessments were made using a categorical scale. Plasma samples were analyzed for morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G), morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G), and normorphine using high-performance liquid chromatography. In neither the intravenous nor oral group was there a correlation between analgesia duration and the half-lives of morphine and M-6-G. There was no correlation between the time to peak analgesia and time to peak concentration for morphine or M-6-G. There was no significant difference in absolute concentrations of M-6-G or M-3-6 nor in the ratio of M-3-G to M-6-G at peak analgesia versus relapse.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Area Under Curve; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Half-Life; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Pain Measurement

The analgesic activity of morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) is well recognized for its contribution to the effects of morphine and its possible use as an opioid analgesic with a wider therapeutic range than morphine. The present study attempted to quantify the relative contribution of M-6-G to analgesia observed after systemic administration of morphine.. In a placebo-controlled, sixfold crossover study in 20 healthy men, the effects of M-6-G were assessed at steady-state plasma concentrations of M-6-G identical to and two and three times higher than those measured after administration of morphine. Morphine and M-6-G were administered as an intravenous bolus followed by infusion over 4 h. Dosage A was M-6-G-bolus of 0.015 mg/kg plus infusion of 0.0072 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Dosage B was M-6-G-bolus of 0.029 mg/kg plus infusion of 0.014 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Dosage C was M-6-G-bolus of 0.044 mg/kg plus infusion of 0.022 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Dosage D was a morphine bolus of 0.14 mg/kg plus infusion of 0.05 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 4 h. Dosage E was M-6-G combined with morphine (doses A + D). Dosage F was a placebo. The analgesic effects of M-6-G and morphine were measured before administration of the bolus and after 3.5 h using an experimental pain model based on pain-related cortical potentials and pain ratings after specific stimulation of the nasal nociceptor with short pulses of gaseous carbon dioxide.. Morphine significantly reduced subjective and objective pain correlates compared with placebo. In contrast, M-6-G produced no statistically significant effects. The addition of M-6-G to morphine did not increase the effects of morphine. Morphine produced significantly more side effects than M-6-G.. After short-term intravenous administration at doses that produce plasma concentrations of M-6-G similar to those seen after administration of morphine, M-6-G had no analgesic effects in the present placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers.

Topics: Adult; Analgesia; Analgesics, Opioid; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pain Measurement; Time Factors

The relationships between plasma morphine and metabolite (M3G and M6G) concentrations and analgesic efficacy were investigated in an open study of 39 cancer pain patients receiving chronic oral morphine therapy with either morphine sulfate solution or controlled-release morphine tablets. There were no differences in morphine, metabolite kinetics, or analgesic efficacy between equivalent doses of conventional or controlled-release formulations. The increase in morphine plasma concentration after a dose (1 hr for normal release, 2 hr for controlled release) was correlated significantly with the dose of morphine (r = 0.914, P < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in pain intensity (P < 0.05) and increase in pain relief (P < 0.001) after the dose of morphine administration, when compared with the predose score. One-half of the patients had mild and tolerable adverse effects. Patients were classified by mean pain relief between doses as having optimal, moderate, or poor pain control. No simple relationship was found between morphine plasma concentration and pain control. Morphine plus M6G concentrations in the "optimal control" group (751.2 +/- 194 nmol/L), however, were more than twice those found in the "moderate control" group (276.9 +/- 41.9 nmol/L) (P < 0.05), and no patient in the moderate control group had a morphine plus M6G concentration greater than 405 nmol/L. These results support the importance of M6G in morphine analgesia. For these hospitalized patients, there appeared to be a therapeutic range of morphine plus M6G plasma concentrations for optimal pain control with a lower limit of 400 nmol/L predose.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) steady-state concentrations (Css) of morphine (M) and the main metabolites morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in 21 cancer patients treated with chronic subcutaneous morphine infusion. There was a moderate, but statistically significant correlation between the daily dose of morphine and the concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G in CSF. A poorer correlation to concentrations were seen in plasma. The mean +/- SEM CSF/plasma morphine concentration ratio was 0.36 +/- 0.07. In plasma and CSF, the mean steady state concentration of M3G but not M6G substantially exceeded that of morphine where the mean CSF M/M3G/M6G ratio was 1:15:0.5 (molar basis), and the mean plasma ratio was M/M3G/M6G 1:31:3 (molar basis). The mean M3G and M6G concentrations in CSF were approximately 8 and 10% of those found in plasma, but there was a wide interindividual variation. Plasma concentrations of both morphine glucuronides were positively correlated to serum creatinine. Neither pain intensity, evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), nor side effects showed any relationship to the CSF M3G concentrations, M3G/M or the M3G/M6G ratios. We conclude that during steady state subcutaneous administration of morphine, there is a large interindividual variation in plasma morphine with poor relationship to the daily administered dose. In CSF this correlation was more evident. Plasma and CSF concentrations of M3G and CSF concentrations of M6G correlated with administered morphine dose. There was an accumulation of both morphine glucuronides in patients with elevated serum creatinine. Measurements of morphine, M3G and M6G in CSF did not show any overt relationship to analgesia or side effects.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Creatinine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Infusions, Parenteral; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

1. Morphine 6-glucuronide (M6G) is a metabolite of morphine with analgesic activity. A double-blind, randomised comparison of the effects of morphine and M6G on respiratory function was carried out in 10 normal subjects after i.v. morphine (10 mg 70 kg-1) or M6G (1, 3.3 and 5 mg 70 kg-1). Analgesic potency was also assessed using an ischaemic pain test and other toxic effects were monitored. 2. Following morphine there was a significant increase in arterial PCO2, as measured by blood gases 45 min post dose (0.54 +/- 0.24 (s.d.) kPa, P < 0.001), and in transcutaneous PCO2 from 15 min post dose until the end of the study period (4 h), whereas blood gas and transcutaneous PCO2 were unchanged after M6G at 1.0, 3.3 and 5.0 mg 70 kg-1. This increased PCO2 following morphine was associated with an increase in expired CO2 concentration (FECO2) (0.20 +/- 0.14% expired air at 15 min post dose, P = 0.002), compared with small but significant reductions in FECO2 following morphine 6-glucuronide (-0.15 +/- 0.17% at 1 mg 70 kg-1 P = 0.030, -0.14 +/- 0.15% at 3.3 mg 70 kg-1 P = 0.017, -0.18 +/- 0.11% at 5 mg 70 kg-1 P = 0.024). Maximum transcutaneous PCO2 was significantly increased after morphine (0.63 +/- 0.28 kPa P = 0.009), but was not changed after M6G at 1 mg (0.10 +/- 0.34 kPa P = 0.11) 3.3 mg (0.06 +/- 0.37 kPa P = 0.34) or 5 mg (0.26 +/- 0.07 kPa P = 0.10).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Blood Pressure; Carbon Dioxide; Depression, Chemical; Double-Blind Method; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Ischemia; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Nausea; Pain; Partial Pressure; Respiration; Respiratory Function Tests; Vomiting

Concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were measured by h.p.l.c. in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 16 patients with cancer receiving oral (controlled-release) morphine. There was a close correlation between plasma and CSF morphine concentrations (r = 0.94, P = 0.0001) and both correlated with drug dosage (r = 0.61, P = 0.013 and r = 0.74, P = 0.0001, respectively). M3G and M6G in plasma and CSF were correlated (r = 0.81 and r = 0.82, both P = 0.0001). No relationship was apparent between M plus M6G concentrations in the CSF and pain scores.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Pain Measurement

Sustained-release morphine (MST) given by the rectal route was compared with oral MST in an open randomised cross-over trial in ten patients with cancer who received stable doses of MST. No significant difference was found in the areas under the curve of the concentration-time profiles (AUC) following oral or rectal administration for parent morphine. The AUCs determined for morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) after oral administration were approximately twice those obtained following rectal administration. The maximal concentration achieved was lower and the time to maximal concentration was longer following rectal administration for morphine, M6G and M3G. The relative mean arrival times following rectal administration were significantly longer for morphine and M3G but not for M6G. These findings suggest slower absorption but less first-pass metabolism of MST after rectal administration. No significant difference was noted between the oral and the rectal route in measurements on visual-analogue scales for pain or side effects. We recommend the rectal route as being suitable for MST administration when the oral route is no longer available. In changing from oral to rectal administration, the same dose and dose interval may be used, but dose adjustment may be needed.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Rectal; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Pain Measurement; Time Factors

Clinical studies on the effectiveness of morphine administered through different routes are contradictory. In order to further elucidate this point, the plasma concentrations of morphine and its 3- and 6-glucuronated metabolites were measured after short-term oral, sublabial, rectal and subcutaneous administration of the opiate. The bioavailability of free morphine and the 6-glucuronated active metabolite was comparable through the different routes. It was concluded that the choice of the route of morphine administration should be mainly guided by the needs of each individual patient.

Topics: Aged; Drug Administration Routes; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

The analgesic efficacy and CSF pharmacokinetics of intrathecal morphine sulphate and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were compared in a single-blind crossover study. Lumbar intrathecal catheters were sited in three patients with chronic cancer pain, and morphine sulphate 500 micrograms or M6G 500 micrograms given via the catheter on separate days. CSF was sampled for 24 h following drug administration and analysed for morphine and M6G by high pressure liquid chromatography. The mean (SD) requirement for patient controlled analgesia with pethidine was 393.3 (227.4) mg/24 h during the morphine limb of the trial and 226.7 (113.6) mg/24 h during the M6G limb. M6G was not detected in CSF following administration of morphine. Fitting of CSF concentrations to triexponential curves revealed mean (SD) alpha, beta and gamma half-lives of 13.2 (7.4), 54.9 (31.5) and 222.5 (100) min for morphine and 11.2 (2.4), 67.3 (49.9) and 619.3 (629.7) min for M6G.

Topics: Aged; Chronic Disease; Humans; Injections, Spinal; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Single-Blind Method

Epidural administration of morphine has been shown to be an effective analgesic strategy in horses; however, the possible occurrence of side effects limits its usage. In order to decrease their frequency, it is important to target the minimal effective plasma concentration and avoid overdosing. As to date species-specific pharmacokinetics data are not available for epidural morphine, the dosing regimen is usually established on the basis of clinical reports and personal experience. In certain physiological conditions, like gestation, the outcome of an empirical dosing scheme can be unpredictable. The aim of this case report is to describe the pharmacological profile of morphine and its metabolites after prolonged epidural administration in a pregnant mare and her foal.. A 20 years old pregnant mare was presented to our hospital because of severe lameness, 2 months before delivery. Following an ineffective systemic pain treatment, an epidural catheter was inserted and morphine administered (initial dose 0.1 mg/kg every 8 h). Due to its efficacy in controlling pain, it was continued until end of gestation. Plasmatic concentration of morphine and its metabolites were assessed in the mare 6 weeks after starting the treatment, and in both the mare and foal during the first days after delivery. Plasmatic values similar to those previously reported in the literature following morphine short term administration through various routes and not accompanied by side effects were found in the mare, except during an excitatory period. Moreover, no evidence of dangerous drug accumulation or significant milk passage was noticed in the foal. Mild reduction of feces production with no signs of colic and two self-limiting episodes of excitement occurred during treatment in the mare. No side effects occurred during gestation and first phases of life in the foal.. Prolonged epidural administration of morphine in a pregnant mare allowed good pain control in absence of clinically relevant side effects, in both the mare and her foal. Sudden increase in morphine plasmatic concentration can occur and side effects appear; careful treatment to the lowest effective dose and continuous monitoring of the clinical condition of the treated horse should be performed.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Female; Horses; Injections, Epidural; Lameness, Animal; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pregnancy; Tendinopathy

Morphine is administered intravenously for pain management in the perioperative period. The effect of the inflammatory response to surgery on morphine distribution across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in humans was investigated. We hypothesized that a graded surgically induced, systemic inflammatory response alters cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) through a temporary reduction in BBB drug efflux transporter function.. We conducted a prospective pharmacokinetic study of the plasma and CSF distribution of the P-glycoprotein (PGP) substrate morphine in 33 patients undergoing open thoracic (n = 18) or endovascular (n = 15) aortic aneurysm repair. Morphine was administered with induction of anesthesia and in the intensive care unit. Plasma and CSF concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6, morphine, M3G, M6G, and albumin were measured prior to surgery (baseline), during surgery, and postoperatively every six hours until removal of the CSF drain. The area under the curve (AUC) was determined for plasma and CSF IL-6, morphine, M3G, and M6G concentrations vs time. The primary endpoint measures were the correlations between the morphine, M6G, and M3G AUC CSF/plasma ratios and systemic inflammation as quantified by the time-normalized IL-6 exposure, which was calculated for each individual by dividing the total exposure (AUC) by time (t). A Bonferroni corrected P < 0.017 indicated a significant correlation.. Morphine distribution into the CSF was not significantly altered in patients undergoing thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. This suggests that BBB PGP function may not be affected by the perioperative inflammatory response.. www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT 00878371. Registered 7 April 2009.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Area Under Curve; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Biological Transport; Blood-Brain Barrier; Female; Humans; Inflammation; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Prospective Studies; Time Factors

For patients experiencing inadequate analgesia and intolerable opioid-related side effects on one strong opioid analgesic, pain relief with acceptable tolerability is often achieved by rotation to a second strong opioid. These observations suggest subtle pharmacodynamic differences between opioids in vivo. This study in rats was designed to assess differences between opioids in their in vivo profiles.. Male Sprague Dawley rats were given single i.c.v. bolus doses of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), fentanyl, oxycodone, buprenorphine, DPDPE ([D-penicillamine(2,5) ]-enkephalin) or U69,593. Antinociception, constipation and respiratory depression were assessed using the warm water tail-flick test, the castor oil-induced diarrhoea test and whole body plethysmography respectively.. These opioid agonists produced dose-dependent antinociception, constipation and respiratory depression. For antinociception, morphine, fentanyl and oxycodone were full agonists, buprenorphine and M6G were partial agonists, whereas DPDPE and U69,593 had low potency. For constipation, M6G, fentanyl and buprenorphine were full agonists, oxycodone was a partial agonist, morphine produced a bell-shaped dose-response curve, whereas DPDPE and U69,593 were inactive. For respiratory depression, morphine, M6G, fentanyl and buprenorphine were full agonists, oxycodone was a partial agonist, whereas DPDPE and U69,593 were inactive. The respiratory depressant effects of fentanyl and oxycodone were of short duration, whereas morphine, M6G and buprenorphine evoked prolonged respiratory depression.. For the seven opioids we assessed, no two had the same profile for evoking antinociception, constipation and respiratory depression, suggesting that these effects are differentially regulated. Our findings may explain the clinical success of 'opioid rotation'.. This article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Benzeneacetamides; Buprenorphine; Castor Oil; Constipation; Diarrhea; Enkephalin, D-Penicillamine (2,5)-; Fentanyl; Hot Temperature; Male; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Oxycodone; Pain; Pyrrolidines; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Respiratory Insufficiency

Morphine is extensively metabolized to neurotoxic morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and opioid agonist morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). Due to these different roles, interindividual variability and co-administration of drugs that interfere with metabolism may affect analgesia. The aim of the study was to investigate the repercussions of administration of an inducer (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, TCDD) and an inhibitor (ranitidine) of glucuronidation in morphine metabolism and consequent analgesia, using the Guinea pig as a suitable model.. Thirty male Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs were divided in six groups: control, morphine, ranitidine, ranitidine+morphine, TCDD and TCDD+morphine. After previous exposure to TCDD and ranitidine, morphine effect was assessed by an increasing temperature hotplate (35-52.5°C), during 60min after morphine administration. Then, blood was collected and plasma morphine and metabolites were quantified.. Animals treated with TCDD presented faster analgesic effect and 75% reached the cut-off temperature of 52.5°C, comparing with only 25% in morphine group. Animals treated with ranitidine presented a significantly lower analgesic effect, compared with morphine group (p<0.05). Moreover, significant differences between groups were found in M3G levels and M3G/morphine ratio (p<0.001 and p<0.0001), with TCDD animals presenting the highest values for M3G, M6G, M3G/morphine and M6G/morphine, and the lowest value for morphine. The opposite was observed in the animals treated with ranitidine.. Our results indicate that modulation of morphine metabolism may result in variations in metabolite concentrations, leading to different analgesic responses to morphine, in an animal model that may be used to improve morphine effect in clinical practice.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Guinea Pigs; Male; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pain Measurement; Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins; Ranitidine

In spite of numerous investigations and decades of research, there is still a void in the complete understanding of the therapeutic action of morphine due to the complex nature of its pharmacokinetic/metabolic disposition coupled with elusive pharmacodynamics. This commentary attempts to collate current information on this very important topic and provide perspective to further tease out the relationship between morphine and its metabolites to its purported clinical effect. Similar to numerous acute therapies that need a close vigil for therapy optimization, postoperative pain management with morphine is a challenge due to its extreme intrasubject variability, a fragile therapeutic index, and complex pharmacology interlinked with formation and transport of active metabolite(s). Although numerous investigations of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of morphine and its active glucuronide metabolites have been carried out and excellent data published, still there remains a void in complete understanding of desired therapeutic levels for a meaningful therapeutic outcome without the avoidance of morphine-related side effect profile. The 2009 report of Hammoud et al. (Pain. 2009;144:139-146) confirms the challenges of which one need to be aware during postoperative pain management with morphine in spite of well-controlled intravenous titration using an institutional protocol. These authors have attempted to correlate the plasma concentrations of morphine and its key metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide (3MG) and morphine-6-glucuronide (6MG), with clinical outcomes such as sedation and adverse effects. This report assumes high significance, since such an investigation to titrate postoperative patients to a fixed desired clinical efficacy outcome has hitherto been not performed in patients who underwent postoperative pain managemnt. Moreover, the intravenous titration option used in the study provided a clean collection of pharmacokinetic surrogate data of morphine along with its metabolites without the issue of absorption and/or oral bioavailability setback if morphine was given by oral route. However, the various pharmacokinetic surrogates used in this study was found insufficient to distinguish the clinical effects. Given the complicated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of morphine and its metabolites (6MG and 3MG), this commentary provides some thoughts to seek answers for this interesting dilemma.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Humans; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pain, Postoperative

This study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between the plasma concentration of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide and pain in cancer patients receiving oral morphine.. The trough value of plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites were measured by high performance liquid chromatography using an ultraviolet detector. Using this assay system, the plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide in 26 cancer pain patients were measured and compared with pain intensity. The pain intensity was assessed at the time of blood sampling using the visual analog scale.. The trough value of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide did not show a significant correlation with pain intensity by visual analog scale assessment, but morphine-3-glucuronide and the ratio of morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine showed a significantly positive correlation (r = 0.528, P = 0.006 and r = 0.671, P < 0.001, respectively). By dividing the group according to low (≤ median value) or high (> median value) VAS scores a significant difference was found between the two groups in morphine-3-glucuronide and the ratio of morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine (P = 0.045 and P = 0.007, respectively).. These results indicated that the level of morphine-3-glucuronide is related to the patient's perception of morphine effect, and the plasma concentration of morphine-3-glucuronide and the ratio of morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine indicated potency to assess clinical effect.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Pain Measurement

Morphine-6beta-glucuronide (M6G) is well known as a potent active metabolite in humans. To clarify concentration-antinociceptive effect relationships for morphine and M6G, we evaluated comparatively the pharmacokinetics and antinociceptive effects of morphine and M6G. The spinal CSF concentration and antinociception were simultaneously measured by using the combination of a microdialysis method and the formalin test in conscious rats after the s.c. administration of morphine (0.3-3 mg/kg) and M6G (0.1-3 mg/kg). The plasma concentration of M6G after s.c. administration was higher than that of morphine, as shown by the 2.1 times greater value of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(plasma)). The spinal CSF concentrations of morphine and M6G increased dose-dependently. The AUC(CSF) of M6G was 1.6-1.8 times higher than that of morphine at each dose. Administration of morphine and M6G dose-dependently suppressed the flinching behavior induced by formalin injection. The ED(50) values for M6G were 3 times lower than those of morphine, although the spinal CSF concentration versus antinociceptive effect curves of morphine and M6G were very similar, with similar EC(50) values. These results suggest that the antinociceptive potencies of morphine and M6G, evaluated by simultaneous measurements of spinal CSF drug concentration and antinociception, are equivalent. Simultaneous measurement of spinal CSF concentration and antinociception by using microdialysis should be useful for elucidating the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of various opioids.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Area Under Curve; Behavior, Animal; Cerebrospinal Fluid; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Microdialysis; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pain Threshold; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Spinal Cord

A recent genetic study in mice and humans revealed the modulatory effect of MC1R (melanocortin-1 receptor) gene variants on kappa-opioid receptor mediated analgesia. It is unclear whether this gene affects basal pain sensitivity or the efficacy of analgesics acting at the more clinically relevant mu-opioid receptor.. To characterise sensitivity to pain and mu-opioid analgesia in mice and humans with non-functional melanocortin-1 receptors.. Comparisons of spontaneous mutant C57BL/6-Mc1r(e/e) mice to C57BL/6 wildtype mice, followed by a gene dosage study of pain and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) analgesia in humans with MC1R variants.. C57BL/6-Mc1r(e/e) mutant mice and human redheads--both with non-functional MC1Rs--display reduced sensitivity to noxious stimuli and increased analgesic responsiveness to the mu-opioid selective morphine metabolite, M6G. In both species the differential analgesia is likely due to pharmacodynamic factors, as plasma levels of M6G are similar across genotype.. Genotype at MC1R similarly affects pain sensitivity and M6G analgesia in mice and humans. These findings confirm the utility of cross species translational strategies in pharmacogenetics.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Analgesia; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Genetic Variation; Genotype; Hair Color; Humans; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Mutant Strains; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pain Threshold; Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 1; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Reference Values

In patients with pain of malignant origin morphine may be administered in high and often increasing doses during extended periods of time. In patients with chronic pain of non-malignant origin morphine may be an important remedy, and in these cases the goal is to keep the morphine dose stable. The pharmacokinetic as well as the pharmacodynamic consequences of long-term morphine treatment with special reference to the two most important metabolites of morphine morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) remain to be settled.. Assessments for pain, sedation and other morphine induced side effects were made several times for 19 cancer patients treated with changing doses of oral sustained release (SR) morphine and twice for 17 non-cancer patients treated with stable doses of SR morphine. Blood samples were obtained simultaneously and analysed for contents of morphine, M-3-G and M-6-G by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).. Significant correlations were found between the daily dose of SR morphine and plasma morphine (r = 0.469, p < 0.01), plasma M-6-G (r = 0.677, p < 0.01), and plasma M-3-G ((r = 0.827, p < 0.01), in the cancer patient group, but only between the daily dose of SR morphine and plasma M-3-G (0.662, p < 0.01) and plasma M-6-G (0.571, p < 0.01) in the non-cancer patient group. Normalised M-3-G/M and M-6-G/M ratios for the cancer patient group were independent of duration of treatment and daily dose of SR morphine. Likewise in the non-cancer patient group duration of treatment did not influence the metabolite ratios. Correlations between pain score and plasma morphine, M-6-G and M-6-G/M were weak in the cancer patient as well as in the non-cancer patient group making it impossible to draw any conclusion regarding the potential contributory analgesic effect of M-6-G. Dryness of the mouth was the most frequent adverse effect reported in the non-cancer as well as the cancer patient group. In the latter group patients complaining of dryness of the mouth had significantly higher plasma morphine and M-6-G concentrations than patients who did not suffer from this side effect. This difference persisted (or was close to significance) when excluding patients receiving antidepressants.. In the cancer patient group neither dose nor treatment period seems to influence morphine glucuronidation. Likewise in the non-cancer patient group receiving stable doses of morphine duration of treatment does not seem to influence morphine glucuronidation. Dryness of the mouth was positively correlated to high plasma concentrations of morphine and M-6-G.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Routes; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Pain Measurement; Salivary Glands; Xerostomia

Morphine, the recommended drug for the management of moderate to severe cancer pain, is metabolized predominantly to the glucuronides morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G). The quantitative clinical importance of these metabolites following the administration of oral morphine is unclear. This study investigates the relationship between plasma concentrations of morphine (M), M6G, M3G and clinical effects in patients receiving sustained release oral morphine for cancer-related pain. Peak and trough plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). At corresponding time points, pain [Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), Verbal Rating Scales (VRS), Pain Relief Scores (PRS)] and toxicity (VAS and VRS) were assessed. Renal and liver function tests were performed. Forty-six patients were included in the study. There was a significant correlation between dose and both peak and trough plasma M, M6G and M3G (r > 0.60, P < 0.001 for each). Differences between peak and trough M, M6G, M3G, M+M6G, M6G:M, M3G:M and M3G:M6G were all significant (P < 0.001 for each). Pain was generally well controlled in the group, with a median VAS of 15 mm at the peak blood sampling time point. The differences between peak and trough values for VAS pain, VAS nausea and VAS drowsiness were not statistically significant (P = 0.078, 0.45 and 0.099, respectively). There were no differences in peak or trough morphine and metabolite concentrations or ratios between patients with low (< median) or high pain scores. Similarly, there was no significant relationship between high and low plasma concentrations and clinical effect. This study did not identify a simple relationship between plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine metabolites or metabolite ratios and clinical effects in patients with cancer and pain who were receiving chronic oral morphine therapy. Although overall pain control was good, there was marked interpatient variability in the dose of morphine and the plasma concentrations necessary to achieve this degree of analgesia.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Pain Measurement

To provide additional pharmacokinetic evidence for the oral-to-parenteral relative potency ratio of 1:2 to 1:3 for chronic morphine use in a palliative care setting, we determined the plasma concentrations of morphine and its major metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), in hospitalized advanced cancer patients maintained on long-term oral or intravenous morphine. There were significant linear correlations between daily doses of morphine and plasma concentrations (molar base) of morphine, M3G and M6G for both routes of administration. The oral-to-intravenous relative ratios of the regression coefficients were 2.9 for morphine and 1.8 for morphine + M6G. The morphine kinetic variables were not significantly influenced by any hepato-renal biochemical markers. These results support the commonly used oral-to-intravenous relative potency ratio of 1:2 to 1:3 in patients with cancer pain receiving chronic morphine treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Disease; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Infusions, Parenteral; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Palliative Care

The clinical importance of routine drug monitoring of serum concentrations of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) during chronic morphine therapy is not established. We measured morphine, M6G and M3G serum concentrations in cancer pain patients receiving oral (n = 263, median dose 80 mg/24 hours) or subcutaneous (sc) (n = 35, median dose 110 mg/24 hours) morphine. Regression analyses were performed to investigate if serum concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G predicted pain intensity (Brief Pain Inventory), health-related quality-of-life variables (EORTC QLQ-C30) and cognitive function (Mini-Mental Score). Serum concentrations were also compared in patients categorized as morphine 'treatment successes' and 'treatment failures'. We observed that serum concentrations of morphine, M6G or M3G did not predict pain intensity, cognitive function, nausea or tiredness. 'Treatment failures' caused by nausea, tiredness, cognitive failure or constipation did not have statistically significant different morphine, M6G and M3G serum concentrations than patients classified as 'treatment successes'. In conclusion, this study did not observe any concentration-effect relationships of morphine, M3G or M6G with pain intensity, nausea, constipation, tiredness or cognitive failure in blood samples obtained during routine clinical drug monitoring in cancer patients. This result suggests that therapeutic drug monitoring as a routine tool during chronic morphine treatment has limited value for clinical decision making.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Infusions, Parenteral; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Nausea; Neoplasms; Pain; Pain Measurement; Palliative Care

Some, but not all, patients with renal dysfunction suffer from side effects after morphine administration because of accumulation of the active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). The current study aims to identify genetic causes that put patients at risk for, or protect them from, opioid side effects related to high plasma M6G. Candidate genetic causes are the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A118G of the mu-opioid-receptor gene (OPRM1), which has recently been identified to result in decreased potency of M6G, and mutations in the MDR1-gene coding P-glycoprotein, of which morphine and M6G might be a substrate.. Two men, aged 87 and 65 yr, with renal failure (creatinine clearance of 6 and 9 ml/min) received 30 mg/day oral morphine for pain treatment. Both patients had sufficient analgesia from morphine. However, while one patient tolerated morphine well despite high plasma M6G of 1735 nM, in the patient with M6G plasma concentrations of 941 nM it caused severe sleepiness and drowsiness. Patients were genotyped for known SNPs of the OPRM1 and MDR1 genes.. The patient who tolerated morphine well despite high plasma M6G was a homozygous carrier of the mutated G118 allele of the mu-opioid-receptor gene, which has been previously related to decreased M6G potency. In contrast, the patient who suffered from side effects was "wild-type" for this mutation. No other differences were found between the OPRM1 and MDR1 genes.. The authors hypothesize that the A118G single nucleotide polymorphism of the mu-opioid-receptor is among the protective factors against M6G-related opioid toxicity. The observation encourages the search for pharmacogenetic reasons that cause interindividual variability of the clinical effects of morphine.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6; Genotype; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Polymorphism, Genetic; Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Risk Factors

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which forms an outward transporter at the blood-brain barrier. Inhibition of P-gp may therefore be expected to cause increased CNS uptake of M6G. We directly assessed the spinal concentrations of M6G and its antinociceptive effects in rats following pharmacological inhibition of P-gp. Spinal cord tissue concentrations of M6G were assessed by microdialysis with probes transversally implanted through the dorsal horns of the spinal cord at level L4. Ten rats received M6G intravenously (0.018 mg/kg loading dose plus 0.00115 mg/kg/min for an 8-h infusion), five of them together with PSC833 to inhibit P-gp (32-h infusion, starting 24 h before the addition of M6G). Antinociceptive effects were explored by means of formalin tests. After having obtained evidence for enhanced CNS uptake and antinociception of M6G in the presence of PSC833, additional behavioural experiments were performed in another 32 rats to assess the dose dependency of the antinociceptive effects of M6G either with or without PSC833 in comparison with both PSC833 alone and placebo. Inhibition of P-gp increased the M6G concentrations in the spinal cord approximately three-fold whereas the plasma concentrations were increased only by a factor of 1.4, which resulted in a more than doubled spinal cord/plasma concentration ratio (from 0.08 +/- 0.03 for M6G alone to 0.17 +/- 0.08 for M6G plus PSC833). Antinociceptive effects of M6G were significantly enhanced by inhibition of P-gp. Inhibition of P-gp alters the transport of M6G across the blood-brain barrier, resulting in enhanced spinal cord uptake and enhanced antinociception.

Topics: Animals; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Behavior, Animal; Blotting, Western; Central Nervous System; Cyclosporins; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Formaldehyde; Infusions, Intravenous; Kidney; Lumbosacral Region; Male; Microdialysis; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pain Measurement; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Spinal Cord

A cancer patient receiving long-term oral sustained-release morphine treatment and periodically presenting with unusually high plasma M3G/M6G ratios is described. We found the patient's formation of M6G more unstable and perhaps delayed compared to the formation of M3G. There is no apparent explanation for this phenomenon and the high M3G/M6G ratios had no implications for the patient's pain experience or side effects from the morphine treatment.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Prostatic Neoplasms; Time Factors

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) are the two most important metabolites of morphine. Both are pharmacologically active, however, with different effects. M-6-G has been demonstrated capable of inducing anti-nociception and sedation, and M-3-G may induce behavioural excitation and possibly antagonise anti-nociception. Their impact on pharmacodynamics in patients in long-term treatment with oral morphine remains to be settled.. Forty-two cancer patients treated with oral sustained-release (SR) morphine were assessed for pain, sedation and other side effects related to morphine treatment. Blood samples were analysed for morphine, M-3-G and M-6-G by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).. Significant correlations were found between the daily dose of SR morphine and plasma morphine (M) (r = 0.535, P < 0.001), plasma M-6-G (r = 0.868, P < 0.001) and plasma M-3-G (r = 0.865, P < 0.001). There was no relationship between plasma morphine, M-6-G, M-6-G/M and pain and sedation scores. Seventy-nine percent of the patients suffered from dryness of the mouth, which was the most frequent side effect observed. Patients in this group had higher plasma morphine and M-6-G concentrations than patients who did not suffer from this side effect.. The plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites, M-3-G and M-6-G, are significantly correlated to the daily dose of SR morphine. Although M-6-G has analgesic properties, no associations were found between pain and plasma morphine and morphine metabolites. This may be due to the multitudinous factors affecting the dose-effect relationship. Patients with dryness of the mouth had higher concentrations of morphine and M-6-G than patients without this side effect.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Delayed-Action Preparations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

To investigate the serum concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and the relationships between serum concentrations and clinical effects associated with start of morphine treatment in cancer patients.. Forty patients with malignant disease and intolerable pain on weak opioids (codeine/dextropropoxyphen) were included. After a wash-out period, titration with immediate-release (IR) morphine was started. When a stable dose was achieved, the morphine treatment was changed to slow-release (SR) morphine in equivalent daily dosages. Clinical data and serum concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G were obtained at the end of the IR and SR morphine treatment periods.. The mean trough serum morphine concentration associated with pain relief was 66 nmol/l. The corresponding mean concentrations of M6G and M3G were 257 nmol/l and 1943 nmol/l, respectively. Morphine serum trough concentrations showed a 33-fold variation. Seventy percent of the variation was predicted in a model including age, daily morphine dose and M6G/morphine ratio as independent variables. No associations were observed between side effects and serum concentrations of morphine and its metabolites.. In this study, a mean serum trough morphine concentration of 66 nmol/l was associated with satisfactory pain relief when disease progression required an increase in intensity of pain therapy from step II to step III in the World Health Organization pain ladder. An increased ratio of M6G to morphine serum concentrations predicted lower effective serum morphine concentrations at the time of satisfactory pain relief. This observation supports that M6G contributes to the pain control produced by oral morphine in patients with pain caused by malignant disease.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Palliative Care; Time Factors

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), a major metabolite of morphine with agonist opioid-receptor activity, was reported to be a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Inhibition of P-gp may thus result in higher brain uptake of M6G. The goal of this observer-blinded, placebo controlled study, was to compare the antinociceptive effects of M6G in homozygous P-gp knockout (mdr1a(-/-)) and wildtype (mdr1a(+/+)) mice. M6G was injected intraperitoneally as a single dose of 0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg. Eight P-gp knockout and eight wildtype mice were studied per dose. A hot plate test was performed before and 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min after M6G administration. Plasma-concentrations of M6G, morphine, and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) were measured after intraperitoneal injection of 5 mg/kg M6G in another 14 P-gp knockout and 14 wildtype mice. No difference neither in the dose response relationship, nor in the time course of response latency times were observed between P-gp knockout and wildtype mice. However, latency times increased with higher doses of M6G, with antinociception significantly different from placebo at a M6G dose of 5 and 10 mg/kg. P-gp knockout mice tended to have higher plasma concentrations than the wildtype. However, plasma concentrations widely overlapped between groups and therefore no statistical significant group difference could be detected. We conclude that despite reported doubling of M6G brain uptake, absence of mdr1a coded P-gp does not enhance antinociceptive effects of M6G in the hotplate test after acute single-dose administration in mdr1a(-/-) knockout mice.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Homozygote; Male; Mice; Mice, Knockout; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pain Measurement; Random Allocation; Reaction Time

Twenty-three patients treated with intracerebroventricular (ICV) morphine in this study not only obtained excellent pain relief without rapid increases in dose, but also experienced a reduction in morphine-related side effects. By 24 h after initiation of ICV morphine, the mean trough cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) morphine concentration (approximately 20 microM) was 50-fold higher than the baseline concentration (approximately 0.4 microM), and the CSF concentration of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) was undetectable (<0.01 microM). The mean CSF concentration of morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) decreased 90%, from a baseline concentration of 1 microM to 0.1 microM by Day 7 postventriculostomy. Thereafter, the mean trough CSF M3G concentration remained relatively constant while ICV morphine was continued, although the concomitant M3G plasma concentrations were undetectable (<0.01 microM). The large increase in the CSF morphine concentration in patients receiving ICV morphine strongly suggests that increased CSF morphine levels are unlikely to be the primary cause of analgesic tolerance or undesirable excitatory side effects (hyperalgesia, myoclonus, seizures) experienced by some patients receiving chronic large-dose systemic morphine.. After initiation of intracerebroventricular morphine, cancer patients experienced excellent pain relief. Although the mean morphine concentration in cerebrospinal fluid increased 50-fold relative to preventriculostomy levels, rapid dose increases did not occur, which suggests that increased cerebrospinal fluid morphine levels are unlikely to be the main cause of analgesic tolerance.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Female; Humans; Individuality; Injections, Intravenous; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

This study was conducted with the aim of characterising the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), a morphine metabolite possessing agonist properties. M6G was administered to three groups of rats as either a bolus dose, a 2 h computer-controlled stepwise infusion or as two consecutive 30-min infusions given 3 h apart. Clearance and initial volume of distribution were estimated to be 27 ml/min/kg for clearance and 339 ml/kg for initial volume. Morphine could not be detected until 4 h after dosing. The antinociceptive response profile, measured using the electrical stimulation vocalisation method, showed a pronounced delay in relation to the plasma concentration profile. The peak concentrations of 12,000 ng/ml, 6270 ng/ml and 12,800 ng/ml in the bolus, the stepwise infusion and the two consecutive infusion groups gave corresponding maximal antinociceptive effects of 49%, 181% and 168%. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was applied to the data and the effect delay was estimated to be 1.4 h, which is considerably longer compared to morphine (0.5 h). Acute tolerance to the antinociceptive response was observed but could not be quantified due to the slowly ascending effect. Based on these results, the importance of study design for potency determination of drugs exhibiting different effect equilibration times was elucidated. Significant increases in the pCO2 levels were observed following the stepwise infusion and the two consecutive infusions. When compared to morphine, there was a tendency of a less pronounced effect on respiration by M6G.

Topics: Animals; Blood Gas Analysis; Drug Tolerance; Male; Morphine Derivatives; Nociceptors; Pain; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Respiration; Time Factors

The active morphine metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G), may contribute to both the analgesia and the adverse effects observed during morphine (MOR) therapy. To evaluate the relationship between M-6-G and adverse effects, we measured steady-state plasma concentrations of MOR and M-6-G and concurrently noted the presence or absence of moderate to severe cognitive impairment or myoclonus in 109 cancer patients who were receiving either oral (n = 71) or parenteral (n = 38) morphine. MOR and M-6-G plasma concentrations were determined by HPLC with electrochemical detection. The presence of cognitive impairment or myoclonus was analyzed in relation to molar M-6-G/MOR ratio, age, morphine dose, the use of other centrally acting drugs, renal function (blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine), hepatic function (serum bilirubin, serum glutamic oxalacetic transaminase (SGOT), and alkaline phosphotase) and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The patient population consisted of 60 women and 49 men. The mean age was 51.5 years (range: 10-85 years). The mean morphine dose (total dose-prior 48 h) was 486 mg (range: 40-4800 mg) for the oral group and 931 mg (range: (10-9062 mg) for the parenteral group. The mean molar M-6-G/MOR ratios were 6.1 (SD: 18.2; range: 0.01-153.3) for the oral treatment group and 2.7 (SD: 4.16; range: 0.05-23.8) for the parenteral treatment group. Overall, the M-6-G/MOR ratio demonstrated a moderate but significant correlation with BUN (r = 0.4; P < 0.001) and creatinine (r = 0.45; P < 0.001) levels, but not with the other clinical variables examined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Child; Cognition Disorders; Drug Administration Routes; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Female; Health Surveys; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Myoclonus; Neoplasms; Pain; Regression Analysis

In 34 cancer patients treated with chronic slow-release oral morphine, plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) minimum steady-state concentrations of morphine (M), morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Both plasma and CSF morphine, M3G and M6G, concentrations were linearly related to dose of morphine. At steady state, the mean +/- SEM CSF/plasma morphine concentration ratio was 0.8 +/- 0.1. In plasma and CSF, the mean steady-state concentrations of M3G and M6G substantially exceeded those of morphine where the mean CSF M/M3G/M6G ratio was 1:47:5 (weight basis), 1:34:4 (molar basis) and the mean plasma ratio was M/M3G/M6G 1:150:23 (weight basis), 1:109:17 (molar basis). The mean M3G and M6G concentrations in CSF at steady state were 15-18% of those found in plasma. Pain relief, evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS), did not correlate with the CSF M3G concentrations or with the M3G/M ratio. Since CSF M6G concentrations were high, M6G could, however, contribute to pain relief. We conclude that after oral administration of slow-release morphine, there is a significant passage of the morphine glucuronide metabolites to the CSF and that the M3G and M6G metabolites in CSF are in the concentration range where they may have an influence on analgesia.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics, Opioid; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Lumbosacral Region; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

Recent studies have suggested that morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) may antagonize the analgesic effects of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). To investigate this hypothesis, steady-state concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were measured in 11 patients receiving chronic morphine therapy (9 orally and 2 subcutaneously) for treatment of cancer-related pain. All patients appeared to have morphine-resistant pain and had elected to proceed to intrathecal bupivacaine or percutaneous cordotomy. Morphine, M6G and M3G concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The concentrations (median and range) for morphine, M6G and M3G in serum were 193 (14-1086) nmol/l, 847 (210-4113) nmol/l and 4553 (1324-24035) nmol/l, respectively, while in CSF concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G were 200 (21-1461) nmol/l, 115 (30-427) nmol/l and 719 (249-3252) nmol/l, respectively. Median molar ratios of M6G/morphine and M3G/morphine in serum were 3.79 and 22.1, respectively, while in CSF the same ratios were 0.42 and 2.39, respectively. Median molar ratios of M3G/M6G in serum and CSF were 5.84 and 6.61, respectively. The median molar ratios for CSF/serum distribution of morphine, M6G and M3G were 1.23, 0.12 and 0.14, respectively. Thus, despite their relatively poor ability to penetrate into the CSF, the high serum concentrations of M6G and M3G resulted in substantial concentrations of these metabolites in the CSF. Nevertheless, M3G/M6G ratios in our morphine-resistant patients were similar to published values in patients with well-controlled pain, suggesting that the hypothesis that M3G plays a major role in morphine-resistance is not correct.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Drug Resistance; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

The antinociceptive potency of morphine and the morphine metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) was examined after injection into the substantia nigra and periaqueductal gray (PAG) of rats. Both drugs produced antinociception in both sites. The antinociceptive potency of M6G was significantly greater than morphine in the nigra. There was no difference in the antinociceptive potency of M6G in the nigra and PAG. M6G and other opioids were also examined for motivational effects after intranigral injection. A high dose of intranigral morphine (10.0 nmol) produced a conditioned place preference. No significant motivational effects were produced by 1.0 nmol of M6G, D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol-enkephalin (DAGO), D-Pen2,D-Pen5-enkephalin (DPDPE), or U-50,488H. It is concluded that the substantia nigra plays an important role in opioid antinociception. The role of the nigra in opioid reward is questionable.

Topics: 3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-Isomer; Analgesics; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-; Enkephalin, D-Penicillamine (2,5)-; Enkephalins; Male; Microinjections; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Motivation; Pain; Periaqueductal Gray; Pyrrolidines; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Reward; Stereotaxic Techniques; Substantia Nigra; Time Factors

Morphine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (analgesia and sedation) were evaluated after continuous intravenous infusion of morphine in 19 neonates, both preterm and term, whose lungs were ventilated to relieve respiratory distress. Elimination half-life, total plasma clearance, and volume of distribution (mean +/- SD) were 9.6 +/- 3.0 hours, 2.55 +/- 1.65 ml/min/kg (area analysis) or 2.09 +/- 1.19 ml/min/kg (steady-state data), and 2.05 +/- 1.05 L/kg, respectively, and were not significantly different in preterm and term neonates. In neonates with adverse effects of morphine, the plasma clearance was decreased twofold. Mean morphine concentration required to produce adequate sedation in 50% of patients was found to be 125 ng/ml, but concentrations above 300 ng/ml may be associated with adverse effects of morphine. Morphine-6-glucuronide was not detected in the plasma of any neonate, which may explain why neonates require high plasma concentrations of unchanged morphine for sedation.

Topics: Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Male; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain

Morphine-6-glucuronide is a metabolite of morphine that binds to the opioid receptor and is analgesic in animals and humans. Although accumulation of morphine-6-glucuronide in patients with renal insufficiency has been implicated in morphine toxicity, the contribution of the metabolite to morphine analgesia in patients with normal renal function has not been established. To evaluate this contribution, we repeatedly sampled blood and assessed effects during and after a loading infusion with morphine (mean duration, 168 minutes) in 14 patients with chronic pain, all of whom had normal serum creatinine levels. Plasma concentrations of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide were assayed by use of high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Patients were divided into three groups on the basis of the molar concentration ratio of morphine-6-glucuronide:morphine from the start of the infusion until 240 minutes later: Group 1 (n = 5) had a mean ratio greater than or equal to 0.7:1; group 2 (n = 4) had a mean ratio less than 0.7:1 but greater than or equal to 0.4:1; and group 3 (n = 5) had a mean ratio less than 0.4:1. Time-effect plots revealed that average and peak relief were greater in group 1 than group 2 and greater in group 2 than group 3. For all patients, mean morphine-6-glucuronide:morphine ratio throughout the study was significantly correlated with mean pain relief (r = 0.611, p less than 0.02). These data suggest that morphine-6-glucuronide contributes to morphine analgesia in patients with normal renal function. The role of the metabolite should be considered when morphine is used clinically.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Creatinine; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Pain; Pain Measurement

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) is an active metabolite of morphine that may contribute to drug effects. To understand better the relationship between morphine and M-6-G in cancer patients receiving chronic therapy, we employed high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection to measure: (1) morphine and M-6-G plasma concentrations following discontinuation of dosing in 2 patients, one receiving oral therapy and the other an intravenous infusion; (2) morphine and M-6-G concentrations in random blood samples taken at apparent steady state from 8 patients, 7 with normal renal function and 1 with mild renal insufficiency, who were receiving continuous morphine infusions; and (3) morphine and M-6-G concentrations in random blood samples taken over a period of weeks from 4 patients, 2 with stable and 2 with declining renal function. Results demonstrated a slightly slower decline in plasma M-6-G than morphine concentrations following drug discontinuation, as would be expected for metabolite and parent relationship; roughly similar M-6-G: morphine ratios (mean molar ratio = 1.22) across a broad range of morphine doses in patients with normal renal function; and an increase in this ratio over time in patients with progressive renal dysfunction. These data illustrate the kinetics of M-6-G in cancer patients receiving chronic morphine therapy and confirm the importance of renal function in determining the concentration of the metabolite.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

Topics: Humans; Injections, Spinal; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) is an active metabolite that may contribute to the clinical effects produced by systemic administration of morphine. To help clarify the extent to which M-6-G may cross the blood-brain barrier and exert effects, we employed high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection to measure the concentrations of M-6-G and morphine in the plasma and either ventricular (three patients) or lumbar (eight patients) CSF of cancer patients receiving chronic morphine therapy. The mean ratio of morphine in ventricular CSF:morphine in plasma was 0.71; the same ratio for M-6-G was only 0.077. The average molar ratio of M-6-G: morphine in ventricular CSF was 0.207, and the average molar ratio in plasma was 1.89. Although sampling problems render the lumbar CSF results less reliable, they were very similar. Thus, plasma contained approximately twice as much M-6-G as morphine, whereas CSF contained only one-fifth to one-third as much. These data confirm that M-6-G in plasma is distributed into CSF, but to a far lesser extent than morphine. They help explain animal data demonstrating much higher potency of M-6-G on administration into CSF than systemic administration and indicate that the degree to which M-6-G contributes to morphine effects in humans remains an unresolved question.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain

Morphine-6-glucuronide is an active metabolite of morphine that has analgesic properties and is measurable in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of patients treated with this opioid. Decreased clearance of the compound has been observed in patients with renal insufficiency, and this has been associated with an increase in the ratio of morphine-6-glucuronide to morphine. Clinical effects from accumulation of morphine-6-glucuronide have not been described with the exception of case reports in which patients with renal failure were noted to develop opioid toxicity with high plasma levels of the metabolite and low levels of the parent drug. We describe a patient who experienced chronic nausea and an episode of confusion while treated with a small, stable dose of oral morphine in the setting of mild renal insufficiency. Relatively high levels of morphine-6-glucuronide were measured and all symptoms resolved promptly as the concentration of this metabolite declined. This case provides suggestive evidence that morphine-6-glucuronide can produce clinically significant effects in patients with mild renal insufficiency.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Confusion; Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Nausea; Pain; Pancreatic Neoplasms

One hundred fifty-one patients with chronic cancer pain were studied during chronic treatment with oral morphine. Plasma concentrations of morphine and metabolites (M3G and M6G) were measured. The ratio of plasma morphine to metabolites was not affected by dose. Generalized linear interactive modeling analysis using morphine dose, age, sex, renal and hepatic dysfunction, and concomitant medication as explanatory variables accounted for 70% of the variance in plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). Increasing morphine dose was a significant factor for increased plasma concentrations of morphine, M3G, and M6G. Other significant factors were: age greater than 70 years (increased M3G and M6G plasma concentrations), plasma creatinine greater than 150 mumol/L (increased M3G and M6G plasma concentrations), male sex (decreased morphine and M6G plasma concentrations), raised creatinine plus coadministration of tricyclic antidepressants (increased M3G plasma concentrations), ranitidine (increased morphine plasma concentrations), and raised creatinine plus coadministration of ranitidine (increased M6G plasma concentrations).

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain; Sex Factors

Topics: Chronic Disease; Humans; Morphine Derivatives; Pain

The profound and prolonged effects of morphine in patients with renal dysfunction have been associated with high plasma levels of the opiate metabolites morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) rather than an increased concentration of morphine. We present here electrophysiological evidence to suggest that potent spinal antinociception can be produced by both M6G and normorphine, another metabolite of morphine. Extracellular recordings of A beta- and C-fibre-evoked responses of convergent dorsal horn neurones were made in the halothane anaesthetised rat. M6G elicited dose-dependent, naloxone-reversible inhibitions of C-fibre-evoked responses which were completely suppressed (8% of control) by 2 micrograms M6G whereas A beta-fibre-evoked responses were only reduced to 57% of controls. The ED50 for the effects of M6G on C-fibre-evoked activity was calculated to be 0.53 micrograms. Systemic administration of M6G (2 mg/kg) also profoundly reduced noxious evoked neuronal activity. Intrathecal normorphine was less potent than M6G but complete selective inhibitions of C-fibre-evoked response could be elicited by 25 micrograms and the ED50 was calculated to be 2.68 micrograms. No such inhibitions were observed following administration of M3G. A comparison with intrathecal morphine in the same preparation reveals that normorphine is equipotent with morphine whereas M6G is 13-fold more potent. These results therefore confirm that M6G and normorphine might be significant contributers to opiate analgesia after administration of morphine.

Topics: Action Potentials; Animals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Male; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Nociceptors; Pain; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Spinal Cord

The antinociceptive effects of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were examined in two animal models of pain, the tail immersion test (reflex withdrawal to noxious heat) and the formalin test (behavioral response to minor tissue injury). In the tail immersion test, M6G produced an increase in withdrawal latency that rose rapidly between 0.01 and 0.025 ug ICV or 1 and 2 mg/kg SC. A further increase occurred at doses greater than 0.2 ug ICV or 4 mg/kg SC and was associated with marked catalepsy and cyanosis. Naloxone, 0.1 mg/kg SC, shifted the lower component of the dose-effect relation by a factor of 24. In the formalin test, 0.01 ug M6G ICV produced hyperalgesia, while between 0.05 and 0.2 ug ICV, antinociception increased rapidly without toxicity. The dose effect relations for hyperalgesia and antinociception were shifted to the right by factors of 20- and 3-fold, respectively. By comparison, ICV morphine was 60 (formalin test) to 145-200 (tail immersion test) times less potent than M6G. At sub-nanomolar concentrations, M6G enhanced the binding of [3H]-etorphine, [3H]-dihydromorphine and [3H]-naloxone to rat brain membrane receptors by 20-40%. At higher concentrations, M6G displaced each ligand from binding sites, with Ki values of about 30 nM, as compared to morphine Ki values of about 3 nM. The data indicate that the in vivo and in vitro effects of M6G are complex and that M6G may play an important role in analgesia in experimental animals, and by implication, in man.

Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Binding, Competitive; Cerebral Ventricles; Injections, Intraventricular; Kinetics; Male; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Naloxone; Pain; Rats; Receptors, Opioid; Reference Values

The kinetics of morphine and formation of the main metabolite, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) after single and intravenous doses of morphine were studied in six cancer patients and compared with the formation rate of M3G in vitro in microsomes isolated from liver biopsies obtained from the same patients at palliative laparotomy. The results showed that high formation rates of M3G in vitro in microsomes isolated from liver biopsies were associated both with high apparent oral clearance values and high M3G/morphine AUC (area under the concentration vs time curve) ratios as measured in vivo in the same patients. In accordance with previous results marked interindividual differences were seen in the kinetics of morphine; the oral bioavailability varied between 30 and 69% and the systemic plasma clearance between 18.6 and 34.0 ml min-1 kg-1. This variation correlated with the variation in morphine metabolism as assessed in vitro. In vivo, a high M3G/morphine AUC ratio predicted a high oral clearance. Hepatic UDP-glucuronyl transferase activity is thus an important determinant of the in vivo kinetics of orally administered morphine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Glucuronates; Half-Life; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Injections, Intravenous; Kinetics; Liver; Male; Microsomes, Liver; Middle Aged; Morphine; Morphine Derivatives; Neoplasms; Pain