montelukast and Conjunctivitis--Allergic

montelukast has been researched along with Conjunctivitis--Allergic* in 4 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for montelukast and Conjunctivitis--Allergic

ArticleYear
A meta-analysis of sublingual allergen immunotherapy and pharmacotherapy in pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
    BMC medicine, 2014, May-01, Volume: 12

    The capacity of sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) to provide effective symptom relief in pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis is often questioned, despite evidence of clinical efficacy from meta-analyses and well-powered, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials. In the absence of direct, head-to-head, comparative trials of SLIT and symptomatic medication, only indirect comparisons are possible.. We performed a meta-analysis of classes of products (second-generation H1-antihistamines, nasal corticosteroids and grass pollen SLIT tablet formulations) and single products (the azelastine-fluticasone combination MP29-02, and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast) for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults, adolescents and/or children. We searched the literature for large (n >100 in the smallest treatment arm) double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials. For each drug or drug class, we performed a meta-analysis of the effect on symptom scores. For each selected trial, we calculated the relative clinical impact (according to a previously published method) on the basis of the reported post-treatment or season-long nasal or total symptom scores: 100 × (scorePlacebo - scoreActive)/scorePlacebo.. Twenty-eight publications on symptomatic medication trials and ten on SLIT trials met our selection criteria (total number of patients: n = 21,223). The Hedges' g values from the meta-analyses confirmed the presence of a treatment effect for all drug classes. In an indirect comparison, the weighted mean (range) relative clinical impacts were -29.6% (-23% to -37%) for five-grass pollen SLIT tablets, -19.2% (-6% to -29%) for timothy pollen SLIT tablets, -23.5% (-7% to -54%) for nasal corticosteroids, -17.1% (-15% to -20%) for MP29-02, -15.0% (-3% to -26%) for H1-antihistamines and -6.5% (-3% to -10%) for montelukast.. In an indirect comparison, grass pollen SLIT tablets had a greater mean relative clinical impact than second-generation antihistamines and montelukast and much the same mean relative clinical impact as nasal corticosteroids. This result was obtained despite the presence of methodological factors that mask the clinical efficacy of SLIT for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

    Topics: Acetates; Administration, Sublingual; Adolescent; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Allergens; Androstadienes; Child; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Cyclopropanes; Desensitization, Immunologic; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Leukotriene Antagonists; Phthalazines; Pollen; Quinolines; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Seasons; Sublingual Immunotherapy; Sulfides

2014

Trials

2 trial(s) available for montelukast and Conjunctivitis--Allergic

ArticleYear
Efficacy of montelukast in preventing seasonal recurrence of vernal keratoconjunctivitis in children.
    Eye (London, England), 2022, Volume: 36, Issue:5

    Vernal keratoconjunctivitis is a chronic, seasonally exacerbated, allergic inflammation of the eye. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral montelukast in treating vernal keratoconjunctivitis in pediatric patients.. This is a 26-week, prospective, randomized, open-label study. Fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned to two groups-the treatment (montelukast) and control groups. At the beginning of the study, both the groups received topical loteprednol etabonate (0.1%) in tapering doses for a month, and topical olopatadine (0.1%) for the first 3 months. Symptoms and signs observed before and after treatment and assigned scores were studied. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in the mean score on the visual analog scale (VAS) for each subjective symptom. The secondary efficacy endpoint was change in the total score of objective signs.. The montelukast group showed clinically relevant improvements in the signs and symptoms of vernal keratoconjunctivitis, compared to the control group. There was considerable improvement in clinical signs. Individual symptoms such as redness, itching, foreign body sensation, and tearing showed significant improvement at 6 months follow-up. The gradual improvement in symptoms until the last visit was statistically more significant within montelukast group. Mean VAS score showed statistically significant improvement in itching (p < 0.001) and redness (p < 0.008) in montelukast group even at 3 months. No adverse events were reported in either group.. Montelukast was found to be safe and effective as a long-term therapy to prevent relapse in moderate to severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

    Topics: Acetates; Child; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Cyclopropanes; Humans; Ophthalmic Solutions; Prospective Studies; Pruritus; Quinolines; Seasons; Sulfides; Treatment Outcome

2022
Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in vernal keratoconjunctivitis associated with asthma.
    Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960), 2003, Volume: 121, Issue:5

    To evaluate the effects on signs and symptoms of a coexisting vernal keratoconjunctivitis in patients treated with oral montelukast sodium for asthma.. Twelve patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis and asthma were enrolled in this pilot study. Topical eyedrops or any systemic treatment was discontinued for at least 7 days before montelukast treatment. Patients were asked to grade their ocular discomfort daily. The following signs and symptoms were also recorded and graded through medical examination at baseline,after 15 days of treatment, and 15 days after treatment discontinuation: physician-evaluated tarsal and bulbar papillae, hyperemia, secretion, and chemosis; and patient-evaluated itching, burning, tearing, photophobia, foreign body sensation, secretion, and redness. Peak expiratory flow rate at 8 AM was also recorded. Samples were collected at the same time points for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay measurement of leukotriene B4 in tears and leukotriene E4 in urine.. Eight of the 10 patients evaluated reported a reduction in symptoms at the end of treatment. Montelukast treatment significantly decreased physician-rated hyperemia, secretion, and chemosis as well as patient-rated burning, tearing, photophobia, secretion, and redness. Effects persisted 15 days after discontinuation of treatment. Clinical changes were associated with a significant increase in leukotriene B4 in tears and a significant decrease in leukotriene E4 in urine after 15 days of treatment.. The significant and persistent reduction of ocular signs and symptoms in asthmatic patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis treated for 15 days with montelukast strongly suggests the need for double-masked placebo-controlled trials to confirm the potential of this new treatment in vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

    Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Child; Child, Preschool; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Cyclopropanes; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Female; Humans; Leukotriene Antagonists; Leukotriene B4; Leukotriene E4; Male; Ophthalmic Solutions; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate; Pilot Projects; Quinolines; Sulfides; Tears

2003

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for montelukast and Conjunctivitis--Allergic

ArticleYear
Singulair-induced anaphylaxis?
    The Journal of family practice, 2009, Volume: 58, Issue:3

    Topics: Acetates; Anaphylaxis; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Child, Preschool; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Cyclopropanes; Dermatitis, Atopic; Humans; Infant; Leukotriene Antagonists; Male; Prognosis; Quinolines; Respiratory Hypersensitivity; Sulfides

2009