Page last updated: 2024-10-31

modafinil and Cognition Disorders

modafinil has been researched along with Cognition Disorders in 59 studies

Modafinil: A benzhydryl acetamide compound, central nervous system stimulant, and CYP3A4 inducing agent that is used in the treatment of NARCOLEPSY and SLEEP WAKE DISORDERS.
modafinil : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of armodafinil and (S)-modafinil. A central nervous system stimulant, it is used for the treatment of sleeping disorders such as narcolepsy, obstructive sleep apnoea, and shift-work sleep disorder. The optical enantiomers of modafinil have similar pharmacological actions in animals.
2-[(diphenylmethyl)sulfinyl]acetamide : A sulfoxide that is dimethylsulfoxide in which two hydrogens attached to one of the methyl groups are replaced by phenyl groups, while one hydrogen attached to the other methyl group is replaced by a carbamoyl (aminocarbonyl) group.

Cognition Disorders: Disorders characterized by disturbances in mental processes related to learning, thinking, reasoning, and judgment.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To assess the efficacy of modafinil for the treatment of new learning and memory deficits and fatigue in multiple sclerosis."9.22Cognitive effects of modafinil in patients with multiple sclerosis: A clinical trial. ( Chiaravalloti, ND; DeLuca, J; Elovic, E; Ford-Johnson, L; Lengenfelder, J; Zhang, J, 2016)
" Relative to baseline, patients reported lower fatigue severity (CIS) and better motivation (CIS) in both the modafinil (P = ."9.17The effect of modafinil on fatigue, cognitive functioning, and mood in primary brain tumor patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. ( Boele, FW; Cleijne, W; de Groot, M; Douw, L; Heimans, JJ; Klein, M; Reijneveld, JC; Taphoorn, MJ; van Thuijl, HF, 2013)
"To examine the efficacy and safety of modafinil on parkinsonism and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), as well as on negative symptoms and cognitive abilities in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV criteria) in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 8-week study."9.17Modafinil improves antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism but not excessive daytime sleepiness, psychiatric symptoms or cognition in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. ( Ancoli-Israel, S; Caligiuri, MP; Kash, TP; Liu, L; Lohr, JB; May, TA; Murphy, JD, 2013)
"Examine the efficacy of armodafinil in improving cognition in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS)."9.16Impact of armodafinil on cognition in multiple sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind crossover pilot study. ( Brown, A; Bruce, J; Hancock, L; Henkelman, E; Lynch, S; Roberg, B, 2012)
"The efficacy, safety and tolerability of adjunctive armodafinil for cognitive performance, and negative and affective symptoms, were examined in 60 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder."9.15The effect of adjunctive armodafinil on cognitive performance and psychopathology in antipsychotic-treated patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Bobo, WV; Jayathilake, K; Meltzer, HY; Sim, MY; Woodward, ND, 2011)
"Results of this pilot trial do not support routine use of modafinil to treat negative symptoms, cognitive deficits, or wakefulness/fatigue in patients on clozapine."9.14Modafinil for clozapine-treated schizophrenia patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. ( Cather, C; Evins, AE; Fan, X; Freudenreich, O; Goff, DC; Henderson, DC; Macklin, EA; Walsh, JP, 2009)
"In this 4-week study, adjunctive armodafinil was not associated with an improvement in cognitive measures, but armodafinil 200 mg/d appeared to mitigate the negative symptoms of schizophrenia."9.14Armodafinil as adjunctive therapy in adults with cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia: a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. ( D'Souza, DC; Kane, JM; Keefe, RS; Patkar, AA; Tiller, JM; Yang, R; Youakim, JM, 2010)
"The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effects of modafinil on prefrontal activation and cognitive control of motor activity in people with schizophrenia and prominent negative symptoms."9.12Impact of modafinil on prefrontal executive function in schizophrenia. ( Ganesan, V; Hunter, MD; Spence, SA; Wilkinson, ID, 2006)
"To assess the effects of modafinil on fatigue, symptoms, attention, working memory, and executive functioning in schizophrenia patients treated with psychotropic medications."9.11Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of modafinil for fatigue and cognition in schizophrenia patients treated with psychotropic medications. ( Alvir, J; Gunduz-Bruce, H; Meyer, S; Rosenthal, MH; Schooler, NR; Sevy, S; Visweswaraiah, H, 2005)
"One of 4 reviewed studies found a significant effect of modafinil as an alerting agent for antipsychotic-induced fatigue and sedation."8.85Modafinil as an adjunctive treatment of sedation, negative symptoms, and cognition in schizophrenia: a critical review. ( Anbarasan, D; Lindenmayer, JP; Saavedra-Velez, C; Yusim, A, 2009)
"Modafinil treatment in schizophrenia augments middle-frequency cortical oscillatory power associated with rule selection, and may subserve diverse subcomponent processes in proactive cognitive control."6.79Modafinil effects on middle-frequency oscillatory power during rule selection in schizophrenia. ( Carter, CS; Cheng, Y; Minzenberg, MJ; Yoon, JH, 2014)
"Modafinil is a central nervous system wake promoting agent used for the treatment of excessive daytime sleeping."6.49Modafinil effects on cognition and emotion in schizophrenia and its neurochemical modulation in the brain. ( Jones, PB; Sahakian, BJ; Scoriels, L, 2013)
" Currently, further research is required to address the potential benefits and risks of chronic administration of modafinil to patients with schizophrenia."6.44A review of the effects of modafinil on cognition in schizophrenia. ( Morein-Zamir, S; Sahakian, BJ; Turner, DC, 2007)
"Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder characterised by positive and negative symptoms."5.46Modafinil in schizophrenia: is the risk worth taking? ( Gago, J; Neto, D; Spínola, C, 2017)
"To assess the efficacy of modafinil for the treatment of new learning and memory deficits and fatigue in multiple sclerosis."5.22Cognitive effects of modafinil in patients with multiple sclerosis: A clinical trial. ( Chiaravalloti, ND; DeLuca, J; Elovic, E; Ford-Johnson, L; Lengenfelder, J; Zhang, J, 2016)
" Relative to baseline, patients reported lower fatigue severity (CIS) and better motivation (CIS) in both the modafinil (P = ."5.17The effect of modafinil on fatigue, cognitive functioning, and mood in primary brain tumor patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. ( Boele, FW; Cleijne, W; de Groot, M; Douw, L; Heimans, JJ; Klein, M; Reijneveld, JC; Taphoorn, MJ; van Thuijl, HF, 2013)
"To examine the efficacy and safety of modafinil on parkinsonism and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), as well as on negative symptoms and cognitive abilities in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV criteria) in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 8-week study."5.17Modafinil improves antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism but not excessive daytime sleepiness, psychiatric symptoms or cognition in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. ( Ancoli-Israel, S; Caligiuri, MP; Kash, TP; Liu, L; Lohr, JB; May, TA; Murphy, JD, 2013)
"Examine the efficacy of armodafinil in improving cognition in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS)."5.16Impact of armodafinil on cognition in multiple sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind crossover pilot study. ( Brown, A; Bruce, J; Hancock, L; Henkelman, E; Lynch, S; Roberg, B, 2012)
"The efficacy, safety and tolerability of adjunctive armodafinil for cognitive performance, and negative and affective symptoms, were examined in 60 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder."5.15The effect of adjunctive armodafinil on cognitive performance and psychopathology in antipsychotic-treated patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Bobo, WV; Jayathilake, K; Meltzer, HY; Sim, MY; Woodward, ND, 2011)
"In this 4-week study, adjunctive armodafinil was not associated with an improvement in cognitive measures, but armodafinil 200 mg/d appeared to mitigate the negative symptoms of schizophrenia."5.14Armodafinil as adjunctive therapy in adults with cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia: a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. ( D'Souza, DC; Kane, JM; Keefe, RS; Patkar, AA; Tiller, JM; Yang, R; Youakim, JM, 2010)
"Results of this pilot trial do not support routine use of modafinil to treat negative symptoms, cognitive deficits, or wakefulness/fatigue in patients on clozapine."5.14Modafinil for clozapine-treated schizophrenia patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. ( Cather, C; Evins, AE; Fan, X; Freudenreich, O; Goff, DC; Henderson, DC; Macklin, EA; Walsh, JP, 2009)
"The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effects of modafinil on prefrontal activation and cognitive control of motor activity in people with schizophrenia and prominent negative symptoms."5.12Impact of modafinil on prefrontal executive function in schizophrenia. ( Ganesan, V; Hunter, MD; Spence, SA; Wilkinson, ID, 2006)
"To assess the effects of modafinil on fatigue, symptoms, attention, working memory, and executive functioning in schizophrenia patients treated with psychotropic medications."5.11Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of modafinil for fatigue and cognition in schizophrenia patients treated with psychotropic medications. ( Alvir, J; Gunduz-Bruce, H; Meyer, S; Rosenthal, MH; Schooler, NR; Sevy, S; Visweswaraiah, H, 2005)
"One of 4 reviewed studies found a significant effect of modafinil as an alerting agent for antipsychotic-induced fatigue and sedation."4.85Modafinil as an adjunctive treatment of sedation, negative symptoms, and cognition in schizophrenia: a critical review. ( Anbarasan, D; Lindenmayer, JP; Saavedra-Velez, C; Yusim, A, 2009)
"There were 1948 treatment histories for modafinil and 1394 treatment reports for amitriptyline reported across five PatientsLikeMe communities (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, mood conditions, fibromyalgia/chronic fatigue syndrome, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis)."3.77Patient-reported outcomes as a source of evidence in off-label prescribing: analysis of data from PatientsLikeMe. ( Frost, J; Heywood, J; Okun, S; Vaughan, T; Wicks, P, 2011)
"Modafinil treatment in schizophrenia augments middle-frequency cortical oscillatory power associated with rule selection, and may subserve diverse subcomponent processes in proactive cognitive control."2.79Modafinil effects on middle-frequency oscillatory power during rule selection in schizophrenia. ( Carter, CS; Cheng, Y; Minzenberg, MJ; Yoon, JH, 2014)
"Modafinil is a promising compound in this respect."2.78Effect of modafinil on cognitive functions in alcohol dependent patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. ( Dom, G; Goudriaan, AE; Joos, L; Sabbe, BG; Schmaal, L; van den Brink, W, 2013)
"Modafinil is a wake-promoting drug that has been shown to improve attention, memory and executive function in the healthy population and in patients with schizophrenia."2.77Effects of modafinil on cognitive functions in first episode psychosis. ( Barnett, JH; Jones, PB; Sahakian, BJ; Scoriels, L; Soma, PK, 2012)
"Treatment with modafinil significantly attenuated the performance decrements seen for several parameters including cognitive-psychomotor speed, visual attention and reaction times both with progressive hours awake and when working at adverse circadian phases."2.75Effect of modafinil on impairments in neurobehavioral performance and learning associated with extended wakefulness and circadian misalignment. ( Aeschbach, D; Czeisler, CA; Grady, S; Wright, KP, 2010)
"Modafinil was associated with improvements in executive functioning after 4 weeks of open-label adjunctive treatment in currently depressed participants."2.61The Potential Procognitive Effects of Modafinil in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review. ( Bhat, V; Kennedy, SH; McInerney, SJ; Vaccarino, SR, 2019)
"Modafinil is a central nervous system wake promoting agent used for the treatment of excessive daytime sleeping."2.49Modafinil effects on cognition and emotion in schizophrenia and its neurochemical modulation in the brain. ( Jones, PB; Sahakian, BJ; Scoriels, L, 2013)
" The current chapter reviews the results of a range of studies examining adjunctive pharmacological treatments to enhance cognition in schizophrenia using a range of designs, including single-dose studies, open-label repeated dosing studies, and double-blind parallel group and crossover designs with repeated dosing."2.46Pharmacological strategies for enhancing cognition in schizophrenia. ( Barch, DM, 2010)
" Currently, further research is required to address the potential benefits and risks of chronic administration of modafinil to patients with schizophrenia."2.44A review of the effects of modafinil on cognition in schizophrenia. ( Morein-Zamir, S; Sahakian, BJ; Turner, DC, 2007)
"Modafinil has been proposed as a potentially effective clinical treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders characterized by cognitive control deficits."1.72Effects of modafinil on electroencephalographic microstates in healthy adults. ( Barnes, SA; Bergman, J; Breiger, M; Carlezon, WA; Der-Avakian, A; Iturra-Mena, AM; Kangas, BD; Linton, SR; Murphy, M; Pizzagalli, DA; Risbrough, VB; Schroder, HS, 2022)
"Modafinil is a wake-promoting drug that shows potential in improving attention and memory in humans and animals."1.72Modafinil rescues repeated morphine-induced synaptic and behavioural impairments via activation of D1R-ERK-CREB pathway in medial prefrontal cortex. ( Deji, C; Gao, K; Lai, J; Liu, J; Lu, Y; Qiao, X; Wang, Y; Xu, M; Yin, F; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y, 2022)
"Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder characterised by positive and negative symptoms."1.46Modafinil in schizophrenia: is the risk worth taking? ( Gago, J; Neto, D; Spínola, C, 2017)
"Sleep deprivation is known to be a stressor, affecting multiple body functions such as the cognition."1.39Modafinil ameliorates cognitive deficits induced by maternal separation and sleep deprivation. ( Alvarenga, T; Andersen, ML; Garcia, VA; Hirotsu, C; Kapczinski, F; Matos, G; Pires, GN; Schröder, N; Tufik, S, 2013)
" Physicians were presented with a hypothetical pharmaceutical cognitive enhancer that had been approved by the regulatory authorities for use in healthy adults, and was characterized as being safe, effective, and without significant adverse side effects."1.36Physician attitudes towards pharmacological cognitive enhancement: safety concerns are paramount. ( Banjo, OC; Nadler, R; Reiner, PB, 2010)

Research

Studies (59)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's22 (37.29)29.6817
2010's35 (59.32)24.3611
2020's2 (3.39)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Yin, F1
Zhang, J2
Lu, Y1
Zhang, Y1
Liu, J1
Deji, C1
Qiao, X1
Gao, K1
Xu, M1
Lai, J1
Wang, Y1
Linton, SR1
Murphy, M1
Schroder, HS1
Breiger, M1
Iturra-Mena, AM1
Kangas, BD1
Bergman, J1
Carlezon, WA1
Risbrough, VB1
Barnes, SA1
Der-Avakian, A1
Pizzagalli, DA1
Vaccarino, SR1
McInerney, SJ1
Kennedy, SH1
Bhat, V1
Rozenek, EB1
Górska, M1
Wilczyńska, K1
Waszkiewicz, N1
Neto, D1
Spínola, C1
Gago, J1
Geffen, S1
Shum, K1
Tan, HM1
Rubin, SM1
Garcia, VA1
Hirotsu, C1
Matos, G1
Alvarenga, T1
Pires, GN1
Kapczinski, F1
Schröder, N1
Tufik, S2
Andersen, ML1
Boele, FW1
Douw, L1
de Groot, M1
van Thuijl, HF1
Cleijne, W1
Heimans, JJ1
Taphoorn, MJ1
Reijneveld, JC1
Klein, M1
Lohr, JB1
Liu, L1
Caligiuri, MP1
Kash, TP1
May, TA1
Murphy, JD1
Ancoli-Israel, S1
McElhiney, M2
Rabkin, J2
Van Gorp, W2
Rabkin, R2
Joos, L1
Goudriaan, AE1
Schmaal, L1
van den Brink, W1
Sabbe, BG1
Dom, G1
Minzenberg, MJ1
Yoon, JH2
Cheng, Y1
Carter, CS1
Denlinger, CS1
Ligibel, JA1
Are, M1
Baker, KS1
Demark-Wahnefried, W1
Friedman, DL1
Goldman, M1
Jones, L1
King, A1
Ku, GH1
Kvale, E1
Langbaum, TS1
Leonardi-Warren, K1
McCabe, MS1
Melisko, M1
Montoya, JG1
Mooney, K1
Morgan, MA1
Moslehi, JJ1
O'Connor, T1
Overholser, L1
Paskett, ED1
Raza, M1
Syrjala, KL1
Urba, SG1
Wakabayashi, MT1
Zee, P1
McMillian, NR1
Freedman-Cass, DA1
Borghgraef, C1
Libert, Y1
Etienne, AM1
Delvaux, N1
Reynaert, C1
Razavi, D1
Day, J1
Zienius, K1
Gehring, K2
Grosshans, D1
Taphoorn, M1
Grant, R1
Li, J1
Brown, PD1
Lees, J1
Applegate, E1
Emsley, R1
Lewis, S1
Michalopoulou, P1
Collier, T1
Lopez-Lopez, C1
Kapur, S1
Pandina, GJ1
Drake, RJ1
Sahakian, BJ7
Morein-Zamir, S2
Dougall, D1
Poole, N1
Agrawal, N1
Ford-Johnson, L1
DeLuca, J1
Elovic, E1
Lengenfelder, J1
Chiaravalloti, ND1
Savulich, G1
Piercy, T1
Brühl, AB1
Fox, C1
Suckling, J1
Rowe, JB1
O'Brien, JT1
Blackwell, AD1
Paterson, NS1
Barker, RA1
Robbins, TW2
Killgore, WD2
Muckle, AE1
Grugle, NL2
Killgore, DB2
Balkin, TJ2
Saavedra-Velez, C1
Yusim, A1
Anbarasan, D1
Lindenmayer, JP1
Kahn-Greene, ET1
Pallier, PN1
Morton, AJ1
Lundorff, LE1
Jønsson, BH1
Sjøgren, P1
Freudenreich, O1
Henderson, DC1
Macklin, EA1
Evins, AE1
Fan, X1
Cather, C1
Walsh, JP1
Goff, DC1
Pedersen, CS1
Goetghebeur, P2
Dias, R2
Grady, S1
Aeschbach, D1
Wright, KP1
Czeisler, CA1
Kane, JM1
D'Souza, DC1
Patkar, AA1
Youakim, JM1
Tiller, JM1
Yang, R1
Keefe, RS1
Watanabe, Y1
Banjo, OC1
Nadler, R1
Reiner, PB1
Frost, J1
Okun, S1
Vaughan, T1
Heywood, J1
Wicks, P1
Barch, DM1
Bobo, WV1
Woodward, ND1
Sim, MY1
Jayathilake, K1
Meltzer, HY1
Scoriels, L2
Barnett, JH1
Soma, PK1
Jones, PB2
Patwardhan, SY1
Collins, R1
Groves, MD1
Etzel, CJ1
Meyers, CA1
Wefel, JS1
Dean, AC1
Sevak, RJ1
Monterosso, JR1
Hellemann, G1
Sugar, CA1
London, ED1
Ray, K1
Chatterjee, A1
Panjwani, U1
Kumar, S1
Sahu, S1
Ghosh, S1
Thakur, L1
Anand, JP1
Fernandes, HA1
Zanin, KA1
Patti, CL1
Wuo-Silva, R1
Carvalho, RC1
Fernandes-Santos, L1
Bittencourt, LR1
Frussa-Filho, R1
Kalechstein, AD1
Mahoney, JJ1
Bennett, R1
De la Garza, R1
Bruce, J1
Hancock, L1
Roberg, B1
Brown, A1
Henkelman, E1
Lynch, S1
Schillerstrom, JE1
Seaman, JS1
Smith, BW1
Hall, SS1
Turner, DC2
Clark, L1
Pomarol-Clotet, E1
McKenna, P1
DeBattista, C1
Sevy, S1
Rosenthal, MH1
Alvir, J1
Meyer, S1
Visweswaraiah, H1
Gunduz-Bruce, H1
Schooler, NR1
Oskooilar, N1
Hart, CL1
Haney, M1
Vosburg, SK1
Comer, SD1
Gunderson, E1
Foltin, RW1
Apud, JA1
Weinberger, DR1
Ling, W2
Rawson, R1
Shoptaw, S1
Hunter, MD1
Ganesan, V1
Wilkinson, ID1
Spence, SA1
Roth, T1
Rippon, GA1
Arora, S1

Clinical Trials (5)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Modafinil Augmentation in Chronic Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder: A Pilot Study[NCT00838227]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Withdrawn (stopped due to No source of funding to implement the study.)
A Head-to-Head Comparison of the 2B-Alert Caffeine Optimization Algorithm Versus Standard Caffeine Dosing on Performance During Sleep Deprivation (2B-2)[NCT05588934]180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-28Not yet recruiting
A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Modafinil (Provigil) Added to Clozapine in Patients With Schizophrenia[NCT00573417]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
A 4-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Fixed-Dosage Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Armodafinil as Adjunctive Therapy in Adults With Cognitive Deficits Associated With Schizophrenia[NCT00487942]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Effect of Addition of Modafinil on the Tolerability and Efficacy for Cognition of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder[NCT00373672]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day175906.8
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day45621.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day144855.3
Placebo38708.1

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch). (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-17.6
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.7
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day4.2
Placebo0.8

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in maximum activity to Endpoint. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-124.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-73.2
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day70.4
Placebo-5.9

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to endpoint in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch). (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-5.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.7
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day6.0
Placebo-1.9

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day7037.0
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-9164.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day23631.1
Placebo-24811.4

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Endpoint in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-41210.0
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-16150.5
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-5159.5
Placebo-34443.8

Change From Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline) in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores

The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4 or last observation after baseline

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-3.9
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.7
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-4.6
Placebo-3.1

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores

ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 1 in the ESS total score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-2.2
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-1.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0.0
Placebo-1.5

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores

SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 1. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-1.4
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-2.5
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-2.2
Placebo-2.2

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score

The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-0.4
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.2
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0.0
Placebo0.1

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 1 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day92077.4
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-28961.9
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day18639.8
Placebo-118038

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch)to Week 1. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-2.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day8.9
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day2.1
Placebo0.8

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in maximum activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-85.7
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day14.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day20.5
Placebo6.2

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch). (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-4.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day7.6
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day4.2
Placebo1.7

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 1 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day5913.6
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-3818.5
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day23665.1
Placebo-12675.4

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 1 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 1

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day2419.5
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day37665.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day15892.7
Placebo1116.3

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score

The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 1. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.0
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.2
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.1
Placebo-0.1

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 1. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.4
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-2.5
Placebo-0.4

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 1. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0.3
Placebo-0.6

Change From Baseline to Week 1 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 1. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 week following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.5
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-4.0
Placebo-2.3

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores

ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2 in the ESS total score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-1.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-1.6
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0.3
Placebo-2.1

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores

SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 2. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.4
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-4.5
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-4.4
Placebo-6.8

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score

The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.2
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day0.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.3
Placebo0.4

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-46326.7
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-44034.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-1954.7
Placebo-78154.5

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 2. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-15.4
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-7.9
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-7.2
Placebo13.1

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in maximum activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-152.7
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-146.3
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day11.8
Placebo-28.4

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch). (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-11.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-6.6
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-6.6
Placebo-0.3

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day2346.8
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-32082.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day3103.1
Placebo30660.0

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 2 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-3534.2
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day27543.3
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day7937.0
Placebo27759.5

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score

The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.3
Placebo0.0

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 2. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-0.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-1.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-2.3
Placebo-0.8

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 2. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-0.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-1.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0.4
Placebo-0.9

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 2. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-2.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-3.2
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-3.0
Placebo-2.8

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating

n The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.0
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.3
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0.6
Placebo-0.8

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores

The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-5.0
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-3.0
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-1.6
Placebo-3.3

Change From Baseline to Week 2 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score

The CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 2 in the total score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.7
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-1.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.8
Placebo0.4

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day40120.5
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day23748.0
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day61304.7
Placebo-41751.7

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 3. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day1.5
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day7.2
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day9.9
Placebo-1.6

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in maximum activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day1420.4
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day1522.5
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day1469.2
Placebo1505.1

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch). (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day5.2
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-6.6
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day15.2
Placebo1.1

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day39831.8
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day16850.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day56889.1
Placebo29067.5

Change From Baseline to Week 3 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 3 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 3

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day89886.7
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day91057.2
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day126496.5
Placebo60259.0

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores

ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 in the ESS total score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-2.0
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.5
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day1.0
Placebo-1.7

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery Composite Score

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score combines the individual scores of the 10 tests and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in composite T-score from baseline to 4 weeks. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day2.2
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day3.9
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day2.9
Placebo2.1

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores

SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Week 4. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-5.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-5.6
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-7.4
Placebo-6.3

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score

The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-0.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.2
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.2
Placebo-0.1

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Maximum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 4 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day7898.0
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-10300.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day123442.9
Placebo-240840

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Average Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline in average activity per epoch (counts/epoch) to Week 4. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-15.4
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day9.0
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.4
Placebo-18.7

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Maximum Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in maximum activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-173.5
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-61.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day57.5
Placebo-60.4

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Standard Deviation of Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in standard deviation of activity (counts/epoch). (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-7.9
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day6.3
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day7.4
Placebo-7.6

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Median Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to Week 4 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day1341.8
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day12620.9
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day55151.0
Placebo-24323.9

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Minimum Value for Actigraphy Data of Total Activity

An actigraphy device was worn by each patient starting with the initial screening. The device continuously measured movement, allowing for an evaluation of spontaneous motor activity. Data from the actigraphy device were downloaded at each visit. The data presented here is the change from baseline to week 4 in total activity. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionCounts (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-12493.6
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-6742.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day39458.0
Placebo1744.3

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score

The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-0.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.2
Placebo0.2

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 4. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-0.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-1.3
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-3.4
Placebo0.0

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Week 4. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-0.7
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.6
Placebo-1.0

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Week 4. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-2.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-3.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-6.3
Placebo-2.1

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating

The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-0.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.3
Placebo-0.5

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Total Scores

The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-3.8
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-1.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-4.6
Placebo-2.6

Change From Baseline to Week 4 on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score

The CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 in the total score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks following the start of study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.0
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.6
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0.3
Placebo0.2

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Total Scores

SANS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It contains 25 items in 5 domains: affective flattening/blunting, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, attentional impairment. Items in a domain assess symptoms and a global item assesses the overall severity of the domain. Each item is scored on a 6-point severity scale(0=Not at all, 1=questionable decrease, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=marked, 5=severe). The total scale ranges from 0-125. Data presented here represents change in total score from Baseline to Endpoint. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-5.6
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-3.0
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-7.4
Placebo-6.1

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Attention/Vigilance Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument containing 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Attention/Vigilance Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.4
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day3.7
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day1.8
Placebo3.0

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: Symbol Coding (BASC SC) Test of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The BASC SC Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in BASC SC Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.6
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day2.4
Placebo4.0

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Fluency Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Fluency Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in Fluency Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day2.2
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day0.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.5
Placebo-1.4

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Letter-Number Span (LNS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The LNS is a component of the Working Memory Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in LNS T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day3.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day2.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day3.1
Placebo4.5

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Modified Simpson-Angus Scale Total Score

The Modified Simpson Angus Scale is a clinician-rated scale to assess the presence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms associated study drug treatment. This is a 10-item scale that focuses on rigidity. The items are rated using a 5-point (0 - 4) scale. The total score ranges between 0 and 40. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 or the last observation following baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.3
Placebo0.3

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Negative Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Negative Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Negative Rating Scale from Baseline to Endpoint. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-0.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.3
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-3.4
Placebo0.1

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Positive Scale Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Positive Scale score ranges from 7 to 49. The data here represents the change in Positive Rating Scale from Baseline to Endpoint. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-0.7
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day0.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.4
Placebo-0.9

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument containing 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10) for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Reasoning and Problem Solving Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day1.6
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.3
Placebo-0.2

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) Interviewer Global Rating

The SCoRS is an 18-item interview based assessment covering all the cognitive domains in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery except social cognition. It is administered separately to the patient and an informant (family or friend) who are asked to rate the patient's level of difficulty in performing various cognitive functions on a 4-point scale (higher rating = greater impairment). They also complete a global assessment of cognitive function on a 1-10 scale. The interviewer factors in their own assessment on both the 18-items (Total Score) and the global assessment for the final score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.2
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.3
Placebo-0.4

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Social Cognition Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10) for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Social Cognition Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-3.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-1.3
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day3.6
Placebo3.8

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Speed of Processing Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Processing Speed Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline 4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day3.0
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day0.0
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day5.0
Placebo0.9

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trail Making Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Trail Making Test is a component of the Speed of Processing Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in Trail Making Test T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day4.2
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.2
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day9.2
Placebo-1.0

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Trails B Test

Trail B is an instrument designed to assess set shifting. The patient was given a paper with numbers and letters on it and asked to connect them in an alternating manner (eg. 1-A-2-B-3C). The time required for the patient to complete the test was recorded. The change from Baseline to last observation following Baseline in the time necessary to complete the test is presented here. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-8.7
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day17.5
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-20.8
Placebo-27.6

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Verbal Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Verbal Learning Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-1.2
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0.8
Placebo-2.2

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Visual Learning Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Visual Learning Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day4.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day3.9
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day1.3
Placebo0.2

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wechsler Memory Scale: Spatial Span (WMS-III SS) Test of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The WMS-III SS is a component of the Working Memory Domain scored on a normative scale to derive a T-score, (mean is 50 and standard deviation is 10). The data here represent the mean change in WMS-III SS T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.7
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day4.7
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day2.9
Placebo2.5

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Categories Completed

"WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only right or wrong to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules (sorting categories) during the test at which time the subject must alter their sorting category. The change from baseline in number of sorting categories achieved was assessed." (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionCategories Completed (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.0
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day0.5
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.3
Placebo0.2

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Consecutive Responses on the Final Category

"WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only right or wrong to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules (sorting categories) during the test at which time the subject must alter their sorting category. The change from baseline in number of consecutive responses on the final category was assessed." (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionResponses (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-1.6
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.5
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0.3
Placebo0.7

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST) - Number of Perseverative Errors

"WCST is an instrument administered electronically to assess abstract reasoning and ability to alter problem solving strategies. Patients are given 64 response cards and 4 stimulus cards and asked to match each stimulus card to 1 pile of response cards. The patient is not told how to match the cards, only right or wrong to each placement. Examiner may change matching rules during the test. Perseveration errors occur when subject repeats the same error no matter how many times they are told the placement is wrong. The change from baseline in number of perseveration errors was assessed." (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: 4 weeks (or last observation after baseline)

InterventionErrors (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day1.6
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-8.0
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-2.2
Placebo-1.9

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline in the Working Memory Domain of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The Domain score combines the individual test scores of the Domain and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represent the mean change in Working Memory Domain T-score from baseline to last observation after baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day2.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day4.3
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day3.5
Placebo4.4

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation After Baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score

The CDSS is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the level of depression in patients with schizophrenia. Each of the 9 items is scored on a 4-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The total score range is 0 - 27. The data presented here represents the change from Baseline to Week 4 or the last observation following baseline in the total score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0.2
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.4
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0.3
Placebo0.1

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Scores

ESS is a self-administered subjective measure of daytime sleepiness, based on responses to questions referring to 8 everyday situations (eg. sitting and reading, talking to someone) and reflects a patient's propensity to fall asleep in those situations. Score for the ESS range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness. Data here represents the change from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 4 or last observation following baseline) in the ESS total score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-2.1
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.6
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day1.0
Placebo-0.5

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Barnes Akathisia Scale (BARS) Total Score

The BARS is a 4-item clinician-rated scale to measure the presence and severity of drug-induced akathisia. Items related to the assessment of objective akathisia, subjective awareness of restlessness, and distress related to restlessness are rated using various 4-point (0 - 3) scales. A global assessment of akathisia is rated using a 6-point (0=Absent, 1=Questionable akathisia, 2=Mild akathisia, 3=Moderate akathisia, 4=Marked akathisia, 5=Severe akathisia) scale. The total score range is from 0 to 14 with a higher score indicating more severe akathisia. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-0.3
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.1
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-0.1
Placebo-0.1

Change From Baseline to Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline in the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) Total Score

PANSS is a clinician-rated instrument that rates the severity of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. 7 items measure positive symptoms (eg. delusions, hallucinations), 7 items measure negative symptoms (eg. blunted affect, social withdrawal), 16 items form a General Psychopathology scale (eg. anxiety, motor retardation). Each item is scored on a 7-point severity scale: 1=absent, 2=minimal, 3=mild, 4=moderate, 5=moderate severe, 6=severe, 7=extreme. The Total score ranges from 7 to 210. The data here represents the change in Total score from Baseline to Endpoint. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day-2.5
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day-0.9
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day-6.3
Placebo-1.7

Mean Change From Baseline to Last Observation After Baseline in Composite Score on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery is an instrument that contains 10 tests to measure cognitive performance in 7 cognitive domains: speed processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. The composite score combines the individual scores of the 10 tests and scores them on a normative scale to derive a T-score, where the mean is 50 and a standard deviation is 10 for the composite. The data here represents the change from baseline to last observation after baseline in Composite T-Score. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day1.9
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day2.8
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day2.9
Placebo2.2

Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Baseline

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at Baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
NormalBorderline illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day00113000
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0183000
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day00104000
Placebo00112000

Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 1

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 1. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 week

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
NormalBorderline illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day00112000
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day0182000
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day00103100
Placebo00111100

Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 2

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 2. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
NormalBorderline illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day0183000
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day01101000
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day0093000
Placebo00111000

Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at week 4. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
NormalBorderline illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day0183000
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day01101000
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day00102000
Placebo00111000

Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Ratings at Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline

The CGI-S is a standardized, clinician-rated assessment to rate the severity of illness of the patient. The clinician assessed the severity of illness using the following categories: 1 = normal, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill. The CGI-S was assessed at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 and Week 4. Data is presented representing the number of subjects who rated each CGI-S score at Endpoint which is Week 4 or the last observation following Baseline. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks (or last observation after Baseline)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
NormalBorderline illMildly illModerately illMarkedly illSeverely illAmong the most extremely ill
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day0185000
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day01101000
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day00113000
Placebo00112000

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 1

The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 1 is presented here. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Week 1

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Very much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improvedNo changeMinimally worseMuch worseVery much worse
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day21010000
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day2162000
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day1129010
Placebo1344100

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 2

The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 2 is presented here. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Week 2

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Very much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improvedNo changeMinimally worseMuch worseVery much worse
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day2136000
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day2352000
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day1325100
Placebo3423000

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4

The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 4 is presented here. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Week 4

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Very much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improvedNo changeMinimally worseMuch worseVery much worse
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day2244000
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day4160100
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day1370010
Placebo3251100

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4 or Last Observation Following Baseline

The PGIC is a patient-rated scale of the change in disease severity. The PGIC uses the following 7 categories and scoring assignments: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. The number of subjects who rated each category at Week 4 or at the last observation following Baseline is presented. (NCT00487942)
Timeframe: Week 4 or last observation following Baseline

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Very much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improvedNo changeMinimally worseMuch worseVery much worse
Armodafinil 100 mg/Day2245100
Armodafinil 200 mg/Day4160100
Armodafinil 50 mg/Day1390010
Placebo3252100

Reviews

14 reviews available for modafinil and Cognition Disorders

ArticleYear
The Potential Procognitive Effects of Modafinil in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2019, 10-08, Volume: 80, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic;

2019
In search of optimal psychoactivation: stimulants as cognitive performance enhancers.
    Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju, 2019, Sep-01, Volume: 70, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; F

2019
Management of cognition and fatigue.
    Disease-a-month : DM, 2013, Volume: 59, Issue:7

    Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition Disorders; Depression; D

2013
[Treatment of cognitive impairments in oncology: a review of longitudinal controlled studies].
    Bulletin du cancer, 2014, Volume: 101, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Case-Control Studies; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cog

2014
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014, Dec-18, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Donepezil; Humans; Indans; Me

2014
Pharmacotherapy for chronic cognitive impairment in traumatic brain injury.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015, Dec-01, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain Injuries; Chronic Di

2015
Modafinil as an adjunctive treatment of sedation, negative symptoms, and cognition in schizophrenia: a critical review.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2009, Volume: 70, Issue:1

    Topics: Affective Symptoms; Antipsychotic Agents; Arousal; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous

2009
[Preclinical approaches for drugs targeting cognitive deficits of schizophrenia].
    Nihon yakurigaku zasshi. Folia pharmacologica Japonica, 2010, Volume: 136, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Drug D

2010
Pharmacological strategies for enhancing cognition in schizophrenia.
    Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2010, Volume: 4

    Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cholinergic Agents; Cognition Disorders; Dopami

2010
Modafinil effects on cognition and emotion in schizophrenia and its neurochemical modulation in the brain.
    Neuropharmacology, 2013, Volume: 64

    Topics: Affective Symptoms; Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain; Brain Chemistry; Cog

2013
Executive dysfunction in major depressive disorder.
    Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 2005, Volume: 5, Issue:1

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depressive Disorder, M

2005
Pharmacogenetic tools for the development of target-oriented cognitive-enhancing drugs.
    NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2006, Volume: 3, Issue:1

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Catechol O-Methyltransferase Inhibitors; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Co

2006
Management of methamphetamine abuse and dependence.
    Current psychiatry reports, 2006, Volume: 8, Issue:5

    Topics: Baclofen; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain; Bupropion; Cognition Disorders; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy;

2006
A review of the effects of modafinil on cognition in schizophrenia.
    Schizophrenia bulletin, 2007, Volume: 33, Issue:6

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Modafinil; Neuropsychological Tests; S

2007

Trials

24 trials available for modafinil and Cognition Disorders

ArticleYear
The effect of modafinil on fatigue, cognitive functioning, and mood in primary brain tumor patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Neuro-oncology, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cross-Ov

2013
Modafinil improves antipsychotic-induced parkinsonism but not excessive daytime sleepiness, psychiatric symptoms or cognition in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    Schizophrenia research, 2013, Volume: 150, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition Disorders; Disord

2013
Effect of armodafinil on cognition in patients with HIV/AIDS and fatigue.
    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2013, Volume: 35, Issue:7

    Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Central

2013
Effect of modafinil on cognitive functions in alcohol dependent patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
    Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2013, Volume: 27, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alcoholism; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Doub

2013
Modafinil effects on middle-frequency oscillatory power during rule selection in schizophrenia.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2014, Volume: 39, Issue:13

    Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain Waves; Cerebral Cortex; Cognition Disorders

2014
Calibration and cross-validation of MCCB and CogState in schizophrenia.
    Psychopharmacology, 2015, Volume: 232, Issue:21-22

    Topics: Adult; alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Calibration; Centra

2015
Cognitive effects of modafinil in patients with multiple sclerosis: A clinical trial.
    Rehabilitation psychology, 2016, Volume: 61, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method

2016
The effects of modafinil on mood and cognition in Huntington's disease.
    Psychopharmacology, 2008, Volume: 199, Issue:1

    Topics: Affect; Arousal; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition

2008
Sustaining executive functions during sleep deprivation: A comparison of caffeine, dextroamphetamine, and modafinil.
    Sleep, 2009, Volume: 32, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Arousal; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Caffeine; Central Nervous System Stimul

2009
Modafinil for attentional and psychomotor dysfunction in advanced cancer: a double-blind, randomised, cross-over trial.
    Palliative medicine, 2009, Volume: 23, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders

2009
Modafinil for clozapine-treated schizophrenia patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2009, Volume: 70, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cl

2009
Modafinil effects on cognitive function in HIV+ patients treated for fatigue: a placebo controlled study.
    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2010, Volume: 32, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Benzhydryl Compounds; CD4 Antigens; Central Nervous System Stimul

2010
Effect of modafinil on impairments in neurobehavioral performance and learning associated with extended wakefulness and circadian misalignment.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2010, Volume: 35, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Benzhydryl Compounds; Body Temperature; Cognition Disorders; Double-Bli

2010
Armodafinil as adjunctive therapy in adults with cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia: a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2010, Volume: 71, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Benzodiazepines; Central Nervous System Stimulant

2010
The effect of adjunctive armodafinil on cognitive performance and psychopathology in antipsychotic-treated patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Schizophrenia research, 2011, Volume: 130, Issue:1-3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Met

2011
Effects of modafinil on cognitive functions in first episode psychosis.
    Psychopharmacology, 2012, Volume: 220, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Doub

2012
A randomized trial on the efficacy of methylphenidate and modafinil for improving cognitive functioning and symptoms in patients with a primary brain tumor.
    Journal of neuro-oncology, 2012, Volume: 107, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders

2012
Acute modafinil effects on attention and inhibitory control in methamphetamine-dependent humans.
    Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2011, Volume: 72, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamine-Related Disorders; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Case-Control Studies; Cogniti

2011
Modafinil, but not escitalopram, improves working memory and sustained attention in long-term, high-dose cocaine users.
    Neuropharmacology, 2013, Volume: 64

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Black or African American; Citalopram; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Cogni

2013
Impact of armodafinil on cognition in multiple sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind crossover pilot study.
    Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, 2012, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method

2012
Modafinil improves cognition and attentional set shifting in patients with chronic schizophrenia.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2004, Volume: 29, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzhydryl Co

2004
Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of modafinil for fatigue and cognition in schizophrenia patients treated with psychotropic medications.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2005, Volume: 66, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Diso

2005
Modafinil attenuates disruptions in cognitive performance during simulated night-shift work.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2006, Volume: 31, Issue:7

    Topics: Affect; Analysis of Variance; Area Under Curve; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Resp

2006
Impact of modafinil on prefrontal executive function in schizophrenia.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 2006, Volume: 163, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Cros

2006

Other Studies

21 other studies available for modafinil and Cognition Disorders

ArticleYear
Modafinil rescues repeated morphine-induced synaptic and behavioural impairments via activation of D1R-ERK-CREB pathway in medial prefrontal cortex.
    Addiction biology, 2022, Volume: 27, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Attention; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Impulsive Behavior; MAP K

2022
Effects of modafinil on electroencephalographic microstates in healthy adults.
    Psychopharmacology, 2022, Volume: 239, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Brain; Cognition Disorders; Cognitive Dysfunction; Electroencephalography; Humans; Modafinil

2022
Modafinil in schizophrenia: is the risk worth taking?
    BMJ case reports, 2017, Jun-05, Volume: 2017

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Male; Middle A

2017
Novel use of modafinal to treat severe physical and cognitive impairment post-stroke.
    Internal medicine journal, 2013, Volume: 43, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Male; Modafinil; Neuroprotecti

2013
Modafinil ameliorates cognitive deficits induced by maternal separation and sleep deprivation.
    Behavioural brain research, 2013, Sep-15, Volume: 253

    Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Anxiety, Separation; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Sti

2013
Survivorship: cognitive function, version 1.2014.
    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2014, Volume: 12, Issue:7

    Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants;

2014
Pharmacological cognitive enhancement: treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders and lifestyle use by healthy people.
    The lancet. Psychiatry, 2015, Volume: 2, Issue:4

    Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cholinestera

2015
Focusing the Neuroscience and Societal Implications of Cognitive Enhancers.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2017, Volume: 101, Issue:2

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition; Cognition Disorders;

2017
Sex differences in cognitive estimation during sleep deprivation: effects of stimulant countermeasures.
    The International journal of neuroscience, 2008, Volume: 118, Issue:11

    Topics: Adenosine; Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Caffeine; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cogn

2008
Management of sleep/wake cycles improves cognitive function in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington's disease.
    Brain research, 2009, Jul-07, Volume: 1279

    Topics: Affect; Alprazolam; Animals; Benzhydryl Compounds; Body Weight; Central Nervous System Stimulants; C

2009
Chronic infusion of PCP via osmotic mini-pumps: a new rodent model of cognitive deficit in schizophrenia characterized by impaired attentional set-shifting (ID/ED) performance.
    Journal of neuroscience methods, 2009, Dec-15, Volume: 185, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Behavior, Animal; Behavioral Sciences; Benzhydryl Compound

2009
Physician attitudes towards pharmacological cognitive enhancement: safety concerns are paramount.
    PloS one, 2010, Dec-14, Volume: 5, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders

2010
Patient-reported outcomes as a source of evidence in off-label prescribing: analysis of data from PatientsLikeMe.
    Journal of medical Internet research, 2011, Jan-21, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Amitriptyline; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition Disorders; Community N

2011
Modafinil improves event related potentials P300 and contingent negative variation after 24 h sleep deprivation.
    Life sciences, 2012, Aug-21, Volume: 91, Issue:3-4

    Topics: Actigraphy; Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Body Weight; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition;

2012
Inhibitory effects of modafinil on emotional memory in mice.
    Neuropharmacology, 2013, Volume: 64

    Topics: Amnesia; Animals; Avoidance Learning; Behavior, Animal; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System

2013
Modafinil augmentation of mirtazapine in a failure-to-thrive geriatric inpatient.
    International journal of psychiatry in medicine, 2002, Volume: 32, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cachexia; Central Nervous System Stimu

2002
Modafinil for treatment of cognitive side effects of antiepileptic drugs in a patient with seizures and stroke.
    Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2003, Volume: 4, Issue:3

    Topics: Anticonvulsants; Benzhydryl Compounds; Carbamazepine; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Infarction, Middl

2003
The quest for a smart pill.
    Scientific American, 2003, Volume: 289, Issue:3

    Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Benzhydryl Compounds; Caffeine; Central Nervous System

2003
A case of premature ventricular contractions with modafinil.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 2005, Volume: 162, Issue:10

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Drug Administration Sc

2005
Armodafinil improves wakefulness and long-term episodic memory in nCPAP-adherent patients with excessive sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea.
    Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2008, Volume: 12, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Comb

2008
Comparison of haloperidol, risperidone, sertindole, and modafinil to reverse an attentional set-shifting impairment following subchronic PCP administration in the rat--a back translational study.
    Psychopharmacology, 2009, Volume: 202, Issue:1-3

    Topics: Animals; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; C

2009