mobic and Fever

To analyze selective COX 2 inhibitor nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in terms of their mechanism of action, principal indications, posology and most common adverse effects.. MEDLINE and LILACS databases and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and National Agency for Sanitary Vigilance (ANVISA - Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária) websites. The most important articles were selected and preference was given to articles published within the last 5 years.. The principal indications for NSAID are for control of pain and acute and chronic inflammation. There is no overwhelming evidence that demonstrates the superiority of one NSAID over another in terms of effectiveness. To date none of the COX 2 inhibitors has been liberated for use in the pediatric age group. Only meloxicam and etoricoxib can be prescribed for adolescents (13 and 16 years, respectively). Selective COX 2 inhibitors are indicated for patients with adverse effects that have proven to be associated with nonselective NSAID use. Selective COX 2 inhibitors can be prescribed in some cases of allergy to aspirin, but they must be used with care. Principal adverse effects include cardiovascular events and thrombotic phenomena.. Selective COX 2 inhibitors are medicines that have been used in certain well-defined clinical situations and which may offer certain advantages over nonselective NSAID. Nevertheless, taking into consideration the higher cost involved and the potential for adverse cardiovascular effects, they should be employed only in accordance with strict criteria.

Topics: Adolescent; Aspirin; Celecoxib; Child; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Drug Interactions; Etoricoxib; Fever; Humans; Hypersensitivity, Immediate; Inflammation; Leukotrienes; Meloxicam; Naproxen; Pain; Prostaglandins; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Sulfonamides; Sulfones; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome

The pharmacokinetics and the analgesic, anti-inflammatory and antipyretic effects of meloxicam were investigated in a placebo controlled study in 2-week-old piglets. Inflammation was induced by a subcutaneous injection of kaolin in the left metacarpus, and 16 h later, meloxicam (0.6 mg/kg) or saline was administered intramuscularly. The absorption half-life was relatively short (0.19 h) and the elimination half-life was 2.6 h. Mechanical nociceptive threshold testing was used to evaluate the analgesic effect, but no significant effect of the meloxicam treatment was found. The skin temperature of the inflamed area increased after the kaolin injection, but no significant decrease in temperature was found after administration of meloxicam. Only limited pyresis was observed after the kaolin injection, and no significant antipyretic effect of meloxicam was found. The results indicated that this dose of meloxicam had very limited anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects in piglets.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Body Temperature; Chromatography, Liquid; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fever; Inflammation; Injections, Intramuscular; Kaolin; Male; Meloxicam; Pain Measurement; Swine; Swine Diseases; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Thiazines; Thiazoles

Cats with non-erosive immune-mediated polyarthritis (IMPA) were identified from seven referral hospitals between 2009 and 2020 for a multicentre retrospective case series. Data were obtained from hospital records and referring veterinarians were contacted for follow-up. Twenty cases were identified: 12 castrated males (60%), one entire male (5%) and seven spayed females (35%). Common clinical signs included lameness (n = 20/20) and pyrexia (n = 10/18). Three cats presented with and two cats developed ligament laxity during treatment. Thirteen cats (65%) were diagnosed with non-associative IMPA and seven (35%) with associative IMPA. Comorbidities identified included chronic enteropathy (n = x/7), feline immunodeficiency virus (n = x/7) feline herpesvirus (n = x/7), bronchopneumonia (n = x/7) and discospondylitis (n = x/7). Sampling of the tarsal joints most frequently identified an increased proportion of neutrophils, consistent with IMPA. Eighteen cats (90%) received immunosuppressants. Eleven cats were started on prednisolone; eight had a poor response resulting in the addition of a second agent, euthanasia or acceptance of the persisting signs. One cat received ciclosporin and required an alternative second agent owing to adverse effects. Five cats were started on prednisolone and ciclosporin; three had a poor response and required an alternative second agent. One cat received prednisolone and chlorambucil and had a good response. Two cats (10%) received meloxicam and had a good response, although the clinical signs recurred when medication was tapered. A good outcome was achieved in 14/20 cats (70%) with IMPA. In the cats with a poor outcome 4/6 were euthanased and 2/6 had chronic lameness.. Prognosis for feline IMPA can be good. Multimodal immunosuppression was often required. IMPA should be considered in lame cats, with or without pyrexia, when there is no evidence of trauma or infection. The tarsal joints should be included in the multiple joints chosen for sampling. Ligament laxity can occur in non-erosive feline IMPA.

Topics: Animals; Arthritis; Cat Diseases; Cats; Chlorambucil; Cyclosporine; Female; Fever; Immunosuppressive Agents; Joint Diseases; Lameness, Animal; Male; Meloxicam; Organophosphorus Compounds; Prednisolone; Retrospective Studies

Peripheral inflammatory stimuli result in the modification of a number of vital brain-controlled functions including the thermoregulatory set-point (induction of fever) and the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. We addressed the question of whether both of these components of the acute-phase response are induced by a common signal pathway. For this purpose we recorded body temperature (by remote radio-telemetry), HPA axis activity (circulating concentrations of cortisol by radio-immunoassay) and levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-6 (TNF, IL-6, using specific bioassays) in six groups of guinea-pigs. The animals received intra-arterial injections of either 10 microg/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS) plus saline, 10 microg/kg LPS plus 5 mg/kg meloxicam (an inhibitor of the inducible form of cyclooxygenase), 10 microg/kg LPS plus 5 mg/kg diclofenac (a non-selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor), saline plus solvent, saline plus 5 mg/kg meloxicam or saline plus 5 mg/kg diclofenac. Injection of the cyclooxygenase inhibitors per se had no influence on the investigated parameters. Injection of LPS alone resulted in a biphasic fever, a more than fivefold increase in circulating cortisol and pronounced induction of TNF and IL-6. Treatment with the cyclooxygenase inhibitors either attenuated (meloxicam) or abolished (diclofenac) LPS-induced fever, but had no effect on the LPS-induced rise of plasma cortisol or IL-6. Circulating levels of TNF, in response to LPS, were enhanced by meloxicam and diclofenac, reflecting the negative feedback control exerted by prostaglandins on cytokine (specifically TNF) formation. These results provide the first evidence that the prostaglandin-dependent inflammatory pathway for fever induction is distinct from the pathway of HPA axis activation since fever, but not circulating cortisol, was attenuated by an inhibition of prostaglandin formation.

Topics: Animals; Body Temperature Regulation; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Diclofenac; Fever; Guinea Pigs; Hydrocortisone; Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System; Interleukin-6; Lipopolysaccharides; Male; Meloxicam; Pituitary-Adrenal System; Prostaglandins; Telemetry; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

The antipyretic efficacy of meloxicam was evaluated in a feline endotoxin model using a replicated change-over design. Twelve adult cats of both sexes were allocated at random to three experimental groups. At 30 min prior to the intravenous (i.v.) endotoxin challenge (0.5 microgram/kg body weight(b.w.)), 2 animals in each group received an i.v. injection of 0.1, 0.3 or 0.5 mg meloxicam/kg b.w. and the two remaining animals in each group received physiological saline. In a second phase, 21 days later, the meloxicam/placebo treatment was exchanged within each group. The rectal temperature and scores for general demeanour were determined at 30-min intervals from before dosing to 300 min after the endotoxin challenge. Haematological parameters were analysed before and 60 min after administration of endotoxin. The results indicated a significant dose-dependent antipyretic response to meloxicam after endotoxin challenge. The antipyretic response in the medium- and high-dose meloxicam groups did not differ significantly, but both were significantly different from the low-dosage group. The individual effects of endotoxin on general demeanour were rather variable but meloxicam tended to have a beneficial effect. Endotoxin induced a reduction in the white blood cell count but this was not influenced by meloxicam. It was concluded that the pyretic endotoxin model is very suitable for studying new NSAIDs in cats and that the optimum single dose of meloxicam in this model was 0.3 mg/kg b.w.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Behavior, Animal; Body Temperature; Cat Diseases; Cats; Cross-Over Studies; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endotoxins; Escherichia coli; Female; Fever; Injections, Intravenous; Male; Meloxicam; Thiazines; Thiazoles

The anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic properties of the new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent, meloxicam, were investigated in a variety of animal models and compared with the properties of piroxicam, diclofenac, indomethacin and several other NSAIDs. With respect to the total effect of a single oral dose, the anti-exudative effect of meloxicam on carrageenan-induced oedema in the rat exceeded that of all the NSAIDs included in the comparison. Additionally, meloxicam showed the greatest potency of all the compounds examined with respect to adjuvant-induced arthritis in the rat, the granuloma pouch model and the cotton pellet test in the rat. Unlike indomethacin, in the carrageenan pleurisy model in the rat, meloxicam caused both a dose-dependent reduction in exudate volume and also inhibition of leucocyte migration. Meloxicam showed a strong and lasting effect on inflammatory pain in the rat. Like other NSAIDs, but unlike dipyrone, meloxicam had no effect in the hot plate and tail clamp tests, which are used to identify weak central analgesic effects. Unlike dipyrone and like indomethacin, meloxicam had no effect in a model of visceral distention pain. In common with other NSAIDs, meloxicam had no influence on the body temperature of normothermic rats in the anti-inflammatory dose range, but did reduce yeast-induced fever in the rat in a dose-dependent manner. Like piroxicam, meloxicam had a uricosuric effect on rats treated with oxonic acid. Low-dose meloxicam inhibited both bradykinin-induced and PAF-induced bronchospasm in the guinea-pig, but had no effect on acetylcholine-induced bronchospasm. Piroxicam had greater ulcerogenic effects in the rat stomach than meloxicam. The therapeutic range of meloxicam in the rat, with regard to inhibition of adjuvant arthritis, was several times greater than that of piroxicam, indomethacin, diclofenac and naproxen.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Bronchial Spasm; Chemotaxis, Leukocyte; Fever; Guinea Pigs; In Vitro Techniques; Inflammation; Male; Meloxicam; Mice; Pain; Pain Measurement; Rats; Stomach Ulcer; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Uricosuric Agents