mobic and Carcinoma

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of low dose cyclophosphamide chemotherapy plus meloxicam as an adjuvant treatment, compared with high dose doxorubicin or surgery alone in cats with mammary carcinoma. Medical records of 228 female cats treated for mammary carcinoma between 2008 and 2018, were reviewed in eight veterinary institutions. Only cats with complete tumour staging and radical mastectomy were included in the study. One hundred and thirty-seven cats were divided into three treatment groups: group 1 (n = 80) cats treated with surgery, group 2 (n = 34) cats that had surgery and adjuvant treatment with doxorubicin, and group 3 (n = 23) cats with surgery and adjuvant treatment with low dose metronomic cyclophosphamide and meloxicam. The study endpoints were disease free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was evaluated according to the VCOG-CTCAE criteria. The median DFI was 270, 226 and 372 days in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The median OS was 338 (group 1), 421 (group 2) and 430 (group 3) days. The differences between groups were not significant (DFI P = .280 and OS P = .186). Toxicity was observed in 52.9% (n = 18) of cats in group 2 and 39.1% (n = 9) of cats in group 3, with mild to moderate intensity. Differences were not significant (P = .306). In conclusion, adjuvant chemotherapy treatment did not improve survival and the overall benefit remains unproven. Randomized prospective trials are necessary to clarify the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for feline mammary carcinomas.

Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma; Cat Diseases; Cats; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cyclophosphamide; Doxorubicin; Female; Mammary Neoplasms, Animal; Mastectomy; Meloxicam; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate

Many reports have demonstrated that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) suppress malignant transformation and tumor growth, and some NSAIDs are expected to be new anti-cancer agents. In this study, we examined the anti-tumor effects of the non-specific cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors aspirin and piroxicam, and the selective COX-2 inhibitor meloxicam on xenotransplanted ovarian cancer. Tumor growth and survival were compared in female nu/nu mice, xenografted with subcutaneous OVCAR-3 tumors or with intraperitoneal DISS tumors and treated with aspirin (200 ppm in diet, everyday), piroxicam (150 ppm in diet, everyday) or meloxicam (162 ppm in diet, everyday). Al, of the agents tested significantly suppressed the growth of OVCAR-3 tumors xenotransplanted subcutaneously as compared to the control. There was a significant difference in inhibition of OVCAR-3 tumor growth between meloxicam and aspirin treatment. Meloxicam and piroxicam treatment significantly prolonged survival of mice with malignant ascites derived from DISS cells as compared to control and aspirin treatment. Mice treated with meloxicam survived significantly longer than those treated with piroxicam. There was no significant difference in survival between control and aspirin treatment. Necropsy revealed that one of the 6 cancer-bearing mice treated with piroxicam suffered from stomach perforation. These results indicate that a selective COX-2 inhibitor produces greater anti-tumor effect against ovarian cancer than a nonselective COX inhibitor and that meloxicam may have a potential of leading to a novel therapeutic strategy against ovarian cancer.

Topics: Animals; Aspirin; Carcinoma; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Meloxicam; Mice; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Piroxicam; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays