mobic and Bone-Neoplasms

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is common in cats and humans and invades oral bone. We hypothesized that the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, meloxicam, with the bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid (ZOL), would inhibit tumour growth, osteolysis and invasion in feline OSCC xenografts in mice. Human and feline OSCC cell lines expressed COX-1 and COX-2 and the SCCF2 cells had increased COX-2 mRNA expression with bone conditioned medium. Luciferase-expressing feline SCCF2Luc cells were injected beneath the perimaxillary gingiva and mice were treated with 0.1 mg kg(-1) ZOL twice weekly, 0.3 mg kg(-1) meloxicam daily, combined ZOL and meloxicam, or vehicle. ZOL inhibited osteoclastic bone resorption at the tumour-bone interface. Meloxicam was more effective than ZOL at reducing xenograft growth but did not affect osteoclastic bone resorption. Although a synergistic effect of combined ZOL and meloxicam was not observed, combination therapy was well-tolerated and may be useful in the clinical management of bone-invasive feline OSCC.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Neoplasms; Bone Resorption; Cat Diseases; Cats; Cell Line, Tumor; Cyclooxygenase 1; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Diphosphonates; Disease Models, Animal; Heterografts; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Meloxicam; Mice; Mice, Nude; Mouth Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Squamous Cell; Random Allocation; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA, Messenger; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Zoledronic Acid

Little is known about the treatment of bone pain in animal models of bone cancer. In the present study, the orthotopic 143-B human osteosarcoma xenotransplantation model was used to address the following questions: (1) Can repetitive analgesic treatment extend the experimental period by prolonging the time to reach humane endpoints and (2) Does repetitive analgesic treatment affect bone tumour development and metastasis? The analgesics, buprenorphine and meloxicam, were either applied individually or in combination at 12 h intervals as soon as the animals began to avoid using the tumour cell injected leg. While control mice treated with NaCl showed continuous body weight loss, the major criterion previously for terminating the experiments, animals treated with analgesic substances did not. The control mice had to be sacrificed 26 days after tumour cell injection, whereas the groups of animals with the different pain treatments were euthanized after an additional eight days. Importantly, primary intratibial tumour growth was not affected in any of the experimental groups by any of the pain treatment procedures. Between days 26 and 34 after tumour cell injection an increase of about 100% of the number of lung metastases was found for the groups treated with buprenorphine alone or together with meloxicam, but not for the group treated with meloxicam alone. In summary, the results indicated that both buprenorphine and meloxicam are suitable analgesics for prolonging the experimental periods in an experimental intratibial osteosarcoma mouse model.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animal Welfare; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Bone Neoplasms; Buprenorphine; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Injections; Longevity; Lung Neoplasms; Meloxicam; Mice; Mice, SCID; Osteosarcoma; Pain Management; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Tibia

A protein corona forms spontaneously around silica nanoparticles (SNPs) in serum-containing media. To test whether this protein corona can be utilized for the loading and release of anticancer drugs we incorporated the hydrophilic doxorubicin, the hydrophobic meloxicam as well as their combination in the corona around SNPs. The application of corona-covered SNPs to osteosarcoma cells revealed that drug-free particles did not affect the cell viability. In contrast, SNPs carrying a protein corona with doxorubicin or meloxicam lowered the cell proliferation in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, these particles had an even greater antiproliferative potential than the respective concentrations of free drugs. The best antiproliferative effects were observed for SNPs containing both doxorubicin and meloxicam in their corona. Co-localization studies revealed the presence of doxorubicin fluorescence in the nucleus and lysosomes of cells exposed to doxorubicin-containing coated SNPs, suggesting that endocytotic uptake of the SNPs facilitates the cellular accumulation of the drug. Our data demonstrate that the protein corona, which spontaneously forms around nanoparticles, can be efficiently exploited for loading the particles with multiple drugs for therapeutic purposes. As drugs are efficiently released from such particles they may have a great potential for nanomedical applications.

Topics: Blood Proteins; Bone Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Doxorubicin; Drug Carriers; Humans; Meloxicam; Nanoparticles; Osteosarcoma; Silicon Dioxide; Thiazines; Thiazoles

A decisive role in cancer development has been attributed to cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) activity, but the significance of COX-2 inhibitors in cancer treatment still needs to be thoroughly investigated. We studied the influence of meloxicam, a non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug with preferential inhibitory effects on COX-2 compared to COX-1, on canine osteosarcoma (D-17) cells. We demonstrated that D-17 cells expressed mRNA and COX-2 protein. Treatment with meloxicam induced a time- and dose-dependent inhibition of cellular growth. To determine if apoptosis plays a role in meloxicam-induced cell death, we performed agarose gel electrophoresis and found a DNA-ladder pattern, typically seen in apoptosis, as well as early apoptotic changes by Annexin V tests. Furthermore, electron microscopy revealed ultrastructural alterations typical of apoptosis. Quantification of apoptotic cells by immunohistochemical staining of caspase 3 confirmed the results. However, further studies with meloxicam are necessary to assess its potential use for treatment of osteosarcomas in dogs.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Bone Neoplasms; Caspase 3; Caspases; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Immunohistochemistry; Meloxicam; Microscopy, Electron, Transmission; Microscopy, Fluorescence; Osteosarcoma; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; RNA, Neoplasm; Thiazines; Thiazoles

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors exert antitumor activity via COX-2-dependent and independent pathways. We wished to evaluate the antitumor activity of meloxicam, a preferential COX-2 inhibitor, in osteosarcoma, the most common primary malignant bone tumor, and determine whether its antitumor effect is COX-2-dependent. COX-2 expression in the osteosarcoma cell lines MG-63, HOS and U2-OS was determined by real-time RT-PCR and western blotting. Subsequently, the inhibitory effects of meloxicam on osteosarcoma cell growth and invasiveness were assayed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and matrigel invasion assays, respectively. Apoptotic activity was evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling staining and semi-quantification of Bax and Bcl-2 expression by real time RT-PCR and western blotting. Prostaglandin-E(2) (PGE(2)) production in the presence and absence of meloxicam was analyzed by enzyme immunoassay, and to determine whether the effects of meloxicam are COX-2-dependent or independent, PGE(2) was added to see if it reversed the effects of meloxicam. In addition, the effects of meloxicam on tumor growth and metastasis were evaluated in an in vivo mouse model using grafted LM-8 mouse osteosarcoma cells, together with immunohistochemical analysis for vascular endothelial growth factor in lung metastatic lesion. Meloxicam inhibited PGE(2) production, proliferation and invasiveness especially in MG-63 cells, which express relatively high levels of COX-2. Only high concentrations of meloxicam caused apoptosis and upregulated Bax mRNA and protein in MG-63 cell culture. In contrast, meloxicam did not induce apoptosis in HOS and U2-OS cells, expressing relatively low levels of COX-2. Exogenous PGE(2) reduced the effects of meloxicam on cell viability and invasiveness, but not its effect on Bax mRNA. In vivo, high doses of meloxicam suppressed LM-8 tumor growth and lung metastasis. Meloxicam, may have both COX-2-dependent and independent inhibitory actions on osteosarcoma. Its effects are more prominent in osteosarcoma cells that have relatively high levels of COX-2.

Topics: Apoptosis; Blotting, Western; Bone Neoplasms; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Cyclooxygenase 2; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Dinoprostone; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Meloxicam; Osteosarcoma; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors, already widely used to reduce fever, inflammation and pain, are under increasing consideration as potential agents for the prevention and treatment of neoplasia. As COX-2 was detected in human and canine osteosarcomas, we have evaluated the effect of the preferential COX-2 inhibitor meloxicam on an established D-17 canine osteosarcoma cell line, which expressed, as well as COX-1 and COX-2 also COX-3 (as demonstrated by Western blot). An XTT proliferation kit was used to assess surviving cells after drug treatment. At low concentrations (1, 2, 4 and 10 microm) meloxicam caused an increase in cell numbers while a marked anti-proliferative effect was observed at higher concentrations (100, 200 microm) after 3 days and also 3 weeks of incubation. The chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin showed a cytotoxic effect at all concentrations (60-1920 nm). Exposure of tumour cells to combinations of meloxicam and doxorubicin revealed synergistic effects (with 240 nm doxorubicin), as well as sub-additive and antagonistic results, especially if combined with concentrations of meloxicam typically found in serum. Care should be taken in concluding, on the basis of one in vitro study, that meloxicam does not have a role in the treatment of canine osteosarcomas given that the results from in vivo studies may differ.

Topics: Animals; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Bone Neoplasms; Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors; Dogs; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doxorubicin; Drug Synergism; Meloxicam; Osteosarcoma; Thiazines; Thiazoles; Tumor Cells, Cultured