misoprostol and Vomiting

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Prophylactic uterotonic drugs can prevent PPH, and are routinely recommended. There are several uterotonic drugs for preventing PPH but it is still debatable which drug is best.. To identify the most effective uterotonic drug(s) to prevent PPH, and generate a ranking according to their effectiveness and side-effect profile.. We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (1 June 2015), ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for unpublished trial reports (30 June 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies.. All randomised controlled comparisons or cluster trials of effectiveness or side-effects of uterotonic drugs for preventing PPH.Quasi-randomised trials and cross-over trials are not eligible for inclusion in this review.. At least three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We estimated the relative effects and rankings for preventing PPH ≥ 500 mL and PPH ≥ 1000 mL as primary outcomes. We performed pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analysis to determine the relative effects and rankings of all available drugs. We stratified our primary outcomes according to mode of birth, prior risk of PPH, healthcare setting, dosage, regimen and route of drug administration, to detect subgroup effects.The absolute risks in the oxytocin are based on meta-analyses of proportions from the studies included in this review and the risks in the intervention groups were based on the assumed risk in the oxytocin group and the relative effects of the interventions.. This network meta-analysis included 140 randomised trials with data from 88,947 women. There are two large ongoing studies. The trials were mostly carried out in hospital settings and recruited women who were predominantly more than 37 weeks of gestation having a vaginal birth. The majority of trials were assessed to have uncertain risk of bias due to poor reporting of study design. This primarily impacted on our confidence in comparisons involving carbetocin trials more than other uterotonics.The three most effective drugs for prevention of PPH ≥ 500 mL were ergometrine plus oxytocin combination, carbetocin, and misoprostol plus oxytocin combination. These three options were more effective at preventing PPH ≥ 500 mL compared with oxytocin, the drug currently recommended by the WHO (ergometrine plus oxytocin risk ratio (RR) 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.83), moderate-quality evidence; carbetocin RR 0.72 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.00), very low-quality evidence; misoprostol plus oxytocin RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.90), moderate-quality evidence). Based on these results, about 10.5% women given oxytocin would experience a PPH of ≥ 500 mL compared with 7.2% given ergometrine plus oxytocin combination, 7.6% given carbetocin, and 7.7% given misoprostol plus oxytocin. Oxytocin was ranked fourth with close to 0% cumulative probability of being ranked in the top three for PPH ≥ 500 mL.The outcomes and rankings for the outcome of PPH ≥ 1000 mL were similar to those of PPH ≥ 500 mL. with the evidence for ergometrine plus oxytocin combination being more effective than oxytocin (RR 0.77 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.95), high-quality evidence) being more certain than that for carbetocin (RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.28), low-quality evidence), or misoprostol plus oxytocin combination (RR 0.90 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.14), moderate-quality evidence)There were no meaningful differences between all drugs for maternal deaths or severe morbidity as these outcomes were so rare in the included randomised trials.Two combination regimens had the poorest rankings for side-effects. Specifically, the ergometrine plus oxytocin combination had the higher risk for vomiting (RR 3.10 (95% CI 2.11 to 4.56), high-quality evidence; 1.9% versus 0.6%) and hypertension [RR 1.77 (95% CI 0.55 to 5.66), low-quality evidence; 1.2% versus 0.7%), while the misoprostol plus oxytocin combination had the higher risk for fever (RR 3.18 (95% CI 2.22 to 4.55), moderate-quality evidence; 11.4% versus 3.6%) when compare. Ergometrine plus oxytocin combination, carbetocin, and misoprostol plus oxytocin combination were more effective for preventing PPH ≥ 500 mL than the current standard oxytocin. Ergometrine plus oxytocin combination was more effective for preventing PPH ≥ 1000 mL than oxytocin. Misoprostol plus oxytocin combination evidence is less consistent and may relate to different routes and doses of misoprostol used in the studies. Carbetocin had the most favourable side-effect profile amongst the top three options; however, most carbetocin trials were small and at high risk of bias.Amongst the 11 ongoing studies listed in this review there are two key studies that will inform a future update of this review. The first is a WHO-led multi-centre study comparing the effectiveness of a room temperature stable carbetocin versus oxytocin (administered intramuscularly) for preventing PPH in women having a vaginal birth. The trial includes around 30,000 women from 10 countries. The other is a UK-based trial recruiting more than 6000 women to a three-arm trial comparing carbetocin, oxytocin and ergometrine plus oxytocin combination. Both trials are expected to report in 2018.Consultation with our consumer group demonstrated the need for more research into PPH outcomes identified as priorities for women and their families, such as women's views regarding the drugs used, clinical signs of excessive blood loss, neonatal unit admissions and breastfeeding at discharge. To date, trials have rarely investigated these outcomes. Consumers also considered the side-effects of uterotonic drugs to be important but these were often not reported. A forthcoming set of core outcomes relating to PPH will identify outcomes to prioritise in trial reporting and will inform futures updates of this review. We urge all trialists to consider measuring these outcomes for each drug in all future randomised trials. Lastly, future evidence synthesis research could compare the effects of different dosages and routes of administration for the most effective drugs.

Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Ergonovine; Female; Fever; Humans; Hypertension; Misoprostol; Network Meta-Analysis; Oxytocics; Oxytocin; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Vomiting

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Prophylactic uterotonic agents can prevent PPH, and are routinely recommended. The current World Health Organization (WHO) recommendation for preventing PPH is 10 IU (international units) of intramuscular or intravenous oxytocin. There are several uterotonic agents for preventing PPH but there is still uncertainty about which agent is most effective with the least side effects. This is an update of a Cochrane Review which was first published in April 2018 and was updated to incorporate results from a recent large WHO trial.. To identify the most effective uterotonic agent(s) to prevent PPH with the least side effects, and generate a ranking according to their effectiveness and side-effect profile.. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (24 May 2018), and reference lists of retrieved studies.. All randomised controlled trials or cluster-randomised trials comparing the effectiveness and side effects of uterotonic agents with other uterotonic agents, placebo or no treatment for preventing PPH were eligible for inclusion. Quasi-randomised trials were excluded. Randomised trials published only as abstracts were eligible if sufficient information could be retrieved.. At least three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We estimated the relative effects and rankings for preventing PPH ≥ 500 mL and PPH ≥ 1000 mL as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included blood loss and related outcomes, morbidity outcomes, maternal well-being and satisfaction and side effects. Primary outcomes were also reported for pre-specified subgroups, stratifying by mode of birth, prior risk of PPH, healthcare setting, dosage, regimen and route of administration. We performed pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analysis to determine the relative effects and rankings of all available agents.. The network meta-analysis included 196 trials (135,559 women) involving seven uterotonic agents and placebo or no treatment, conducted across 53 countries (including high-, middle- and low-income countries). Most trials were performed in a hospital setting (187/196, 95.4%) with women undergoing a vaginal birth (71.5%, 140/196).Relative effects from the network meta-analysis suggested that all agents were effective for preventing PPH ≥ 500 mL when compared with placebo or no treatment. The three highest ranked uterotonic agents for prevention of PPH ≥ 500 mL were ergometrine plus oxytocin combination, misoprostol plus oxytocin combination and carbetocin. There is evidence that ergometrine plus oxytocin (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.84, moderate certainty), carbetocin (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.93, moderate certainty) and misoprostol plus oxytocin (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.86, low certainty) may reduce PPH ≥ 500 mL compared with oxytocin. Low-certainty evidence suggests that misoprostol, injectable prostaglandins, and ergometrine may make little or no difference to this outcome compared with oxytocin.All agents except ergometrine and injectable prostaglandins were effective for preventing PPH ≥ 1000 mL when compared with placebo or no treatment. High-certainty evidence suggests that ergometrine plus oxytocin (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.03) and misoprostol plus oxytocin (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.11) make little or no difference in the outcome of PPH ≥ 1000 mL compared with oxytocin. Low-certainty evidence suggests that ergometrine may make little or no difference to this outcome compared with oxytocin meanwhile the evidence on carbetocin was of very low certainty. High-certainty evidence suggests that misoprostol is less effective in preventing PPH ≥ 1000 mL when compared with oxytocin (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42). Despite the comparable relative treatment effects between all uterotonics (except misoprostol) and oxytocin, ergometrine plus oxytocin, misoprostol plus oxytocin combinations and carbetocin were the highest ranked agents for PPH ≥ 1000 mL.Misoprostol plus oxytocin reduces the use of additional uterotonics (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.73, high certainty) and probably also reduces the risk of blood transfusion (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.70, moderate certainty) when compared with oxytocin. Carbetocin, injectable prostaglandins and ergometrine plus oxytocin may also reduce the use of additional uterotonics but the certainty of the evidence is low. No me. All agents were generally effective for preventing PPH when compared with placebo or no treatment. Ergometrine plus oxytocin combination, carbetocin, and misoprostol plus oxytocin combination may have some additional desirable effects compared with the current standard oxytocin. The two combination regimens, however, are associated with significant side effects. Carbetocin may be more effective than oxytocin for some outcomes without an increase in side effects.

Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Ergonovine; Female; Fever; Humans; Hypertension; Misoprostol; Network Meta-Analysis; Oxytocics; Oxytocin; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Prostaglandins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vomiting

Miscarriage occurs in 10% to 15% of pregnancies. The traditional treatment, after miscarriage, has been to perform surgery to remove any remaining placental tissues in the uterus ('evacuation of uterus'). However, medical treatments, or expectant care (no treatment), may also be effective, safe, and acceptable.. To assess the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of any medical treatment for incomplete miscarriage (before 24 weeks).. We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (13 May 2016) and reference lists of retrieved papers.. We included randomised controlled trials comparing medical treatment with expectant care or surgery, or alternative methods of medical treatment. We excluded quasi-randomised trials.. Two review authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias, and carried out data extraction. Data entry was checked. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.. We included 24 studies (5577 women). There were no trials specifically of miscarriage treatment after 13 weeks' gestation.Three trials involving 335 women compared misoprostol treatment (all vaginally administered) with expectant care. There was no difference in complete miscarriage (average risk ratio (RR) 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 2.10; 2 studies, 150 women, random-effects; very low-quality evidence), or in the need for surgical evacuation (average RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.26; 2 studies, 308 women, random-effects; low-quality evidence). There were few data on 'deaths or serious complications'. For unplanned surgical intervention, we did not identify any difference between misoprostol and expectant care (average RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.26; 2 studies, 308 women, random-effects; low-quality evidence).Sixteen trials involving 4044 women addressed the comparison of misoprostol (7 studies used oral administration, 6 studies used vaginal, 2 studies sublingual, 1 study combined vaginal + oral) with surgical evacuation. There was a slightly lower incidence of complete miscarriage with misoprostol (average RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.98; 15 studies, 3862 women, random-effects; very low-quality evidence) but with success rate high for both methods. Overall, there were fewer surgical evacuations with misoprostol (average RR 0.05, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.11; 13 studies, 3070 women, random-effects; very low-quality evidence) but more unplanned procedures (average RR 5.03, 95% CI 2.71 to 9.35; 11 studies, 2690 women, random-effects; low-quality evidence). There were few data on 'deaths or serious complications'. Nausea was more common with misoprostol (average RR 2.50, 95% CI 1.53 to 4.09; 11 studies, 3015 women, random-effects; low-quality evidence). We did not identify any difference in women's satisfaction between misoprostol and surgery (average RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.00; 9 studies, 3349 women, random-effects; moderate-quality evidence). More women had vomiting and diarrhoea with misoprostol compared with surgery (vomiting: average RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.36 to 2.85; 10 studies, 2977 women, random-effects; moderate-quality evidence; diarrhoea: average RR 4.82, 95% CI 1.09 to 21.32; 4 studies, 757 women, random-effects; moderate-quality evidence).Five trials compared different routes of administration, or doses, or both, of misoprostol. There was no clear evidence of one regimen being superior to another. Limited evidence suggests that women generally seem. The available evidence suggests that medical treatment, with misoprostol, and expectant care are both acceptable alternatives to routine surgical evacuation given the availability of health service resources to support all three approaches. Further studies, including long-term follow-up, are clearly needed to confirm these findings. There is an urgent need for studies on women who miscarry at more than 13 weeks' gestation.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Incomplete; Administration, Intravaginal; Administration, Oral; Diarrhea; Extraction, Obstetrical; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Misoprostol; Nausea; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Vomiting; Watchful Waiting

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Induced; Chills; Congenital Abnormalities; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fever; Gestational Age; Humans; Milk, Human; Misoprostol; Muscle Cramp; Nausea; Pregnancy; Uterine Hemorrhage; Vomiting

Data from four double-blind studies of the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis were combined. For 4 to 12 weeks, 747 patients received Arthrotec, a combination of 50 mg of diclofenac and 200 micrograms of misoprostol, and 754 patients received 50 mg of diclofenac; the drugs were given twice or three times daily. The five most commonly reported adverse events were abdominal pain by 23.2% of the diclofenac/misoprostol patients and 19.8% of the diclofenac patients; diarrhea by 19.9% and 11.3%; nausea by 11.8% and 6.5%; dyspepsia by 11.2% and 7.8%; and flatulence by 8.0% and 3.1%. Other adverse events, reported by similar proportions of both treatment groups, included headache, gastritis, dizziness, vomiting, and constipation. In the diclofenac/misoprostol-treated patients, the abdominal pain and diarrhea were rated mild in 30.6% and 24.3%, moderate in 49.1% and 51.4%, and severe in 20.2% and 24.3%. Serious adverse events occurred in eight of the diclofenac/misoprostol-treated patients and in 13 of the diclofenac-treated patients; 12.6% and 10.1%, respectively, were withdrawn from the study because of adverse events. Results of laboratory tests of hepatic and renal function were similar in the two treatment groups.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Constipation; Diarrhea; Diclofenac; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Misoprostol; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Vomiting

The study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of 200 and 400 µg of oral misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy.. A double-blinded randomized study included 70 patients scheduled for hysteroscopy in a Lebanese University Hospital. Two dosages of oral misoprostol (200 or 400 µg) were randomly distributed to these patients 1 h before surgery under general anesthesia. Subjective assessment of the ease of dilatation, size of the first used Hegar, cervical injuries, bleeding or uterine perforation, duration of the procedure and misoprostol adverse effect were all noted and compared.. The difficulty of dilation until a Hegar 10 was similar for both treatment groups. Operative time was not reduced with a higher misoprostol dosage. We found 2 uterine perforations within the 200 µg group (6.7%), and none within the 400 µg group. Cervical lacerations and bleeding were similar (20%) for both treatment groups. A 2-fold increase in side effects (nausea, vomiting and cramps) is reported among the 400 µg group.. Increasing the dose of misoprostol from 200 to 400 mg doubled the rate of side effects while no clinical benefit was noted. Larger trials are needed to assess rates of uterine perforation with the 200 µg dosage.

Topics: Adult; Cervix Uteri; Colic; Dilatation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hysteroscopy; Lacerations; Middle Aged; Misoprostol; Nausea; Oxytocics; Pregnancy; Preoperative Care; Uterine Perforation; Vomiting

To compare the efficacy of Laminaria tents with Misoprostol for cervical ripening before surgical process in missed abortion.. In a prospective study, 70 women with missed abortion were assigned to have either insertion of a 3 mm intracervical Laminaria tent (n = 35) or vaginal Misoprostol 400 μg (n = 35) on the day prior to suction dilation and curettage (D/C). The women were interviewed just prior to the D/C with regard to pain, vaginal bleeding, and cervical dilator preference.. Cervical dilation was greater in the Laminaria group but not significantly different from that in the Misoprostol group. However, additional cervical dilation before D/C was required in more patients in the Misoprostol group (45.7 vs 14.3%, P = 0.001). Women who received Laminaria reported significantly more pain at the time of insertion (62.8% in Laminaria group vs 22.8% in Misoprostol group) compared with women who received Misoprostol. Conversely, Misoprostol was associated with more nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and vaginal bleeding.. Laminaria tents are more effective cervical dilators than vaginal Misoprostol when inserted the day prior to suction D and C. Vaginal Misoprostol insertion is more comfortable, although it is associated with an increased risk of vaginal bleeding.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Missed; Administration, Intravaginal; Adult; Cervical Ripening; Diarrhea; Dilatation and Curettage; Female; Humans; Labor Stage, First; Laminaria; Misoprostol; Nausea; Pain; Pregnancy; Uterine Hemorrhage; Vomiting; Young Adult

To investigate the side effects of 600 microg oral misoprostol given for the mother and the newborn to prevent postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).. One thousand six hundred twenty women delivering at home or subcentres in rural India were randomised to receive misoprostol or placebo in the third stage of labour. Women were evaluated for shivering, fever, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea at 2 and 24 h postpartum. Newborns were evaluated within 24 h for diarrhea, vomiting and fever. Symptoms were graded as absent, mild-to-moderate or severe.. Women who received misoprostol had a significantly greater incidence of shivering (52%vs. 17%, p < 0.001) and fever (4.2%vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001) at 2 h postpartum compared with women who received placebo. At 24 h, women in the misoprostol group experienced significantly more shivering (4.6%vs. 1.4%, p < 0.001) and fever (1.4%vs. 0.4%, p < 0.03). There were no differences in nausea, vomiting or diarrhea between the two groups. There were no differences in the incidence of vomiting, diarrhea or fever for newborns.. Misoprostol is associated with a significant increase in postpartum maternal shivering and fever with no side effects for the newborn. Given its proven efficacy for the prevention of PPH, the benefits of misoprostol are greater than the associated risks.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Diarrhea, Infantile; Female; Fever; Humans; Incidence; India; Infant, Newborn; Maternal-Fetal Exchange; Misoprostol; Nausea; Oxytocics; Placebos; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Residence Characteristics; Rural Population; Shivering; Vomiting

To compare the experience of pain, need of analgesic interventions, preference and acceptability in medical abortion up to 49 days of amenorrhea with mifepristone and orally versus vaginally administered misoprostol.. Ninety-seven women were randomised to oral misoprostol, n=48, or vaginal misoprostol, n=49. On day 1 of the study, both the groups received 600 mg of mifepristone. On day 3 of the study, one group received 0.4 mg of misoprostol orally and the other group received 0.8 mg of misoprostol vaginally.. Even though oral administration of misoprostol seemed to be associated with a higher rate of gastrointestinal side effects, women in both the groups showed a clear preference towards the oral route of administration. The willingness to administer the misoprostol at home was also higher among the women in the oral group, which may in part depend on a more positive/less negative experience of the abortion.. A majority of women prefer oral administration of misoprostol in early medical abortion.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal; Abortion, Induced; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Analgesics; Female; Humans; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Nausea; Pain; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Patient Satisfaction; Pregnancy; Uterine Hemorrhage; Vagina; Vomiting

To compare the side effect profiles of regimens of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol after a single oral dose of 200 mg of mifepristone and to investigate patients' perceptions of medical abortion.. Double-blind, randomised controlled trial.. Fifteen gynaecological clinics in 11 countries.. A total of 2219 healthy pregnant women requesting medical abortion with < or =63 days of amenorrhoea. Two thousand women were asked about their perceptions of the method.. Mifepristone 200 mg orally on day one, followed by 0.8 mg misoprostol either orally or vaginally on day three. The oral group (O/O group) and one of the vaginal groups (V/O group) continued with 0.4 mg of oral misoprostol, and the vaginal-only group (V-only group) with oral placebo, twice daily for seven days. Side effects were recorded daily by women and reported at each visit. After misoprostol administration at the clinic, side effects were recorded at 1-hour interval up to 3 hours. Patients' perceptions were asked at the second follow up visit, six weeks after treatment.. The outcome measures were the following: pregnancy-related symptoms (nausea, vomiting, breast tenderness, fatigue, dizziness, headache), drug-related side effects (diarrhoea, fever, rash and blood pressure change), side effects related to the abortion process (lower abdominal pain) and women's perceptions of the method.. The pregnancy-related symptoms decreased in all groups after misoprostol, and breast tenderness decreased already after mifepristone. Oral administration of misoprostol was associated with a higher frequency of nausea and vomiting than vaginal administration at 1 hour after administration. With oral misoprostol, diarrhoea was more frequent at 1, 2 and at 3 hours after administration than with vaginal administration. Misoprostol induced fever during at least 3 hours after administration in up to 6% of the women, this peak being slightly higher and taking place later with the vaginal route. Lower abdominal pain peaked at 1 and 2 hours after oral misoprostol, while it did so at 2 and 3 hours after vaginal misoprostol. In the two groups that continued misoprostol, 27% of women had diarrhoea between the misoprostol visit and the two-week follow up visit, compared with 9% in the placebo group. Among the women studied, 84% would choose medical abortion again, 9% would choose surgical abortion and 7% did not know. Twenty-three percent of the women would choose to have a possible future abortion at home, 70% at a health facility and 7% did not know.. The pregnancy-related symptoms decrease significantly with time during medical abortion. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea were more frequent after oral administration of misoprostol. Pain related to the abortion process occurs earlier after oral misoprostol. Should a need arise, a majority of women would choose medical abortion again and would prefer to have it at a health facility rather than at home.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal; Abortion, Induced; Amenorrhea; Analgesics; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Headache; Humans; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Nausea; Parity; Patient Satisfaction; Perception; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

The objectives of the present clinical study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of misoprostol (Cytotec), self-administered into the vagina for medical abortion, in adolescents under 18 years ofage. A group of 150 adolescents with gestations between 63 and 84 days, with previous written consent from the patient and parents or guardians, received 800 microg of vaginal misoprostol every 24 h, up to a maximum of three main doses, for abortion. Outcomes assessed included successful abortion (complete abortion without surgery), side-effects, decrease in hemoglobin, mean time of vaginal bleeding, mean expulsion time and mean time for the return of menses. Complete abortion occurred in 126/150 (84.0%, 95% confidence interval 77-89) patients. The frequencies of nausea and vomiting were statistically significantly higher when compared to those obtained for adult females. Vaginal bleeding lasted for 13.2 +/- 3.8 days (median 13 days, range 1-22 days). The mean expulsion time was 8.0 +/- 3.4 h (median 8 h, range 1-14 h) for all subjects who aborted after the first misoprostol dose. The mean drop in hemoglobin was statistically significant (p = 0.001), but without clinical relevance. From the high abortion rate obtained, we concluded that misoprostol alone is a valid method for terminating unwanted pregnancies at 10-13 weeks' gestation in adolescents under 18 years of age in the absence of mifepristone.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Induced; Administration, Intravaginal; Adolescent; Adult; Female; Humans; Misoprostol; Nausea; Pregnancy; Pregnancy in Adolescence; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Vomiting

The objectives of this prospective non-concurrent cohort study were to confirm the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol for early pregnancy termination and to determine whether the incidence of side effects is lower with prophylactic loperamide and acetaminophen. Two-hundred women with an intrauterine pregnancy < or =56 days gestational age seeking medical pregnancy termination in an ambulatory research clinic were enrolled in the study. One-hundred participants (group 1) ingested 4 mg of loperamide and 500 mg of acetaminophen before the vaginal placement of 800 mirog of misoprostol moistened with 2 mL of saline. If abortion had not occurred, the same regimen was repeated every 24 h (maximum three doses). One-hundred participants (group 2) from the same clinic who previously underwent the same misoprostol regimen without prophylactic medication served as a control group for comparison with respect to abortion success and the incidence of side effects. The rate of successful abortion was not statistically significantly different between the two groups (group 1 93%, group 2 89%). The incidence of opiate analgesic use was significantly less in group 1 (4%) compared with group 2 (16%) (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.73, p = 0.01). There was a significantly lower incidence of diarrhea in group 1 (23%) compared with group 2 (44%) (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.73, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the incidence of fever/chills or the incidence of emesis between the two groups. Vaginal misoprostol is effective for termination of pregnancy < or = 56 days and the incidence of diarrhea and the use of opiate analgesia is significantly reduced with prophylactic loperamide and acetaminophen.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Induced; Acetaminophen; Administration, Intravaginal; Adolescent; Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Antidiarrheals; Cohort Studies; Diarrhea; Female; Fever; Gestational Age; Humans; Loperamide; Middle Aged; Misoprostol; Patient Satisfaction; Pregnancy; Surveys and Questionnaires; Vomiting

To compare the efficacy and complications of intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in patients with and without toxemia of pregnancy.. Forty-two patients with toxemia of pregnancy (group 1) and 59 women at term without toxemia (group 2) with Bishop scores of < or = 6 were treated with 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol given four times at 4-h intervals. Labor and neonatal outcomes, and any complications, were recorded. Mann-Whitney U-, Student's t- and chi(2)-tests were used for statistical analyses. P < or = 0.05 was considered significant.. The rates of vaginal delivery were 73.8% and 84.6%, oxytocin augmentation were 4.8% and 5.1% and the mean insertion to delivery times were 12.5 and 13.8 h in group 1 and 2, respectively, with no significant differences between the groups. Neonatal outcomes, rates of uterine contraction abnormalities and gastrointestinal symptoms were similar in both groups.. Intravaginal misoprostol is an equally effective and safe method of induction of labor in patients with toxemia of pregnancy and in normal pregnant women.

Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Adult; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Labor Stage, First; Labor, Induced; Misoprostol; Nausea; Obstetric Labor Complications; Oxytocics; Parity; Pre-Eclampsia; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Uterine Contraction; Vomiting

Misoprostol and mifepristone have been shown to be effective for medical abortion up to 9 weeks of gestation. When used alone, the successful complete abortion rate dropped to approximately 60%. It has been demonstrated that by adding water to misoprostol, the success rate rose to 92%. This is the first randomized study to investigate the efficacy of misoprostol and water versus misoprostol alone for first trimester medical abortion in women at

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Induced; Administration, Intravaginal; Adolescent; Adult; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Misoprostol; Nausea; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Prospective Studies; Tablets; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting; Water

A study was undertaken to determine whether the combination of oral tamoxifen and moistened misoprostol administered vaginally was superior to that of placebo and moistened misoprostol administered vaginally for elective termination of early pregnancies.A clinical trial was conducted with a study group of 150 healthy women with pregnancies of

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Induced; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Estrogen Antagonists; Female; Hemoglobins; Humans; Misoprostol; Patient Satisfaction; Pelvic Pain; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Tamoxifen; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Uterine Hemorrhage; Vomiting

To determine whether misoprostol (a prostaglandin E1 analogue) 400 micrograms orally (group 1) or 800 micrograms vaginally (group 2) will cause complete uterine evacuation in women with early pregnancy failure.. Twenty subjects were recruited for a prospective, non-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Early pregnancy failure was diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound examination; only women with a closed cervical os and minimal vaginal bleeding were enrolled. Subjects returned 24 hours after misoprostol administration for a transvaginal ultrasound examination. If the gestational sac was still present, the misoprostol dose was repeated and the subject returned again 24 hours later. Subjects who failed to expel the pregnancy were offered a suction curettage.. Twelve and eight women were randomized to groups 1 and 2, respectively. Complete uterine evacuation occurred in three of 12 [25%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1%, 50%] and seven of eight (88%, 95% CI 65%, 100%, P = .010) subjects in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Vomiting occurred in 30% and 13%, respectively, and diarrhea in 50% and 38%, respectively.. Vaginal misoprostol 800 micrograms is more effective than oral misoprostol 400 micrograms for uterine evacuation of early pregnancy failure and may be an effective alternative to dilation and curettage.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Missed; Administration, Intravaginal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Diarrhea; Female; Humans; Misoprostol; Pilot Projects; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Prospective Studies; Ultrasonography; Vomiting

Medical termination of pregnancy can be successfully performed with a combination of mifepristone (RU 486) and a prostaglandin analogue. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to compare oral with vaginal administration of the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol for first-trimester abortion in women treated initially with mifepristone.. The study population consisted of 270 women seeking abortion within 63 days after the onset of amenorrhea. The dose of mifepristone was 600 mg, and the dose of misoprostol was 800 micrograms. The study had two primary end points: expulsion of the conceptus without the need for a surgical procedure, and abortion within four hours after the administration of misoprostol.. Expulsion of the conceptus without the need for a surgical procedure occurred in 95 percent of the women who received misoprostol vaginally and in 87 percent of those who received it orally (P = 0.03). The rate of continued pregnancy was 7 percent with the oral regimen and 1 percent with the vaginal regimen (P = 0.01). Ninety-three percent of the women receiving misoprostol vaginally had abortions within four hours, as compared with only 78 percent of the women receiving the drug orally (P < 0.001). Vomiting and diarrhea were reported more frequently by the women who received oral misoprostol than by those who received vaginal misoprostol (P = 0.04 and P = 0.002, respectively).. After the administration of mifepristone, vaginal administration of misoprostol is more effective and better tolerated than oral administration for the induction of first-trimester abortion.. During June 1993-January 1994 in Scotland, clinicians recorded data on 270 women attending the fertility control clinic at Aberdeen Royal Hospitals for voluntary termination of early pregnancy (within 63 days from onset of amenorrhea). They received 600 mg of oral RU-486 on day 1 and either 800 mcg of oral misoprostol or 800 mcg misoprostol inserted deep into the vagina 36-48 hours later. Researchers wanted to compare the safety and efficacy of 800 mcg oral misoprostol with the safety and efficacy of 800 mcg vaginal misoprostol in women who had previously received RU-486. 2.6% aborted before receiving misoprostol. Complete abortion without surgical intervention was more frequent in the vaginal misoprostol group than the oral misoprostol group (95% vs. 87%; p = 0.03). The continued pregnancy rate was lower in the vaginal misoprostol group than the oral misoprostol group (1% vs. 7%; p = 0.01). Expulsion of the conceptus was more likely to occur within 4 hours of receiving misoprostol among the vaginal group than the oral group (93% vs. 78%; p 0.001). The oral misoprostol group had a higher incidence than the vaginal misoprostol group of vomiting (44% vs. 31%; p = 0.04) and diarrhea (36% vs. 18%; p = 0.002). The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to other side effects or severity of symptoms. The women in the oral misoprostol group were more likely to think that the antiemetic drug took minutes rather than 1 or more hours to act than those in the vaginal misoprostol group (61% vs. 34%; p 0.001). These findings show that, following administration of RU-486, vaginal misoprostol was better tolerated and more effective than oral misoprostol at inducing abortion in women in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Topics: Abortion, Induced; Administration, Intravaginal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Confidence Intervals; Diarrhea; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Vomiting

A randomized, double-blind, controlled study was performed with 18 arthritic dogs administered aspirin (25 mg/kg of body weight, PO, q 8 h) and excipient (control group) or aspirin and misoprostol (100 micrograms, PO, q 8 h). Dogs in the misoprostol (n = 10) and control (n = 8) groups were primarily compared by use of sequential gastroduodenoscopy, changes in PCV, and prevalence of clinical signs of gastrointestinal disturbance over a 14-day treatment period. The misoprostol/aspirin-treated group had significantly (P < 0.05) less gastroduodenal hemorrhage and ulceration and a significantly (P < 0.05) lower prevalence of vomiting than did the control group.

Topics: Animals; Aspirin; Diarrhea; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Double-Blind Method; Duodenoscopy; Female; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Gastroscopy; Male; Misoprostol; Osteoarthritis; Peptic Ulcer; Vomiting

Data from four double-blind studies of the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis were combined. For 4 to 12 weeks, 747 patients received Arthrotec, a combination of 50 mg of diclofenac and 200 micrograms of misoprostol, and 754 patients received 50 mg of diclofenac; the drugs were given twice or three times daily. The five most commonly reported adverse events were abdominal pain by 23.2% of the diclofenac/misoprostol patients and 19.8% of the diclofenac patients; diarrhea by 19.9% and 11.3%; nausea by 11.8% and 6.5%; dyspepsia by 11.2% and 7.8%; and flatulence by 8.0% and 3.1%. Other adverse events, reported by similar proportions of both treatment groups, included headache, gastritis, dizziness, vomiting, and constipation. In the diclofenac/misoprostol-treated patients, the abdominal pain and diarrhea were rated mild in 30.6% and 24.3%, moderate in 49.1% and 51.4%, and severe in 20.2% and 24.3%. Serious adverse events occurred in eight of the diclofenac/misoprostol-treated patients and in 13 of the diclofenac-treated patients; 12.6% and 10.1%, respectively, were withdrawn from the study because of adverse events. Results of laboratory tests of hepatic and renal function were similar in the two treatment groups.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Constipation; Diarrhea; Diclofenac; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Misoprostol; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Vomiting

Arthrotec(®) (AT) is a combination of diclofenac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and misoprostol (MP), a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1). MP is a lipophilic methyl ester prodrug. It is readily metabolized to the biologically active misoprostol acid (MPA). During the last few years, medical studies exhibited MP to be an excellent abortive. In this paper, we describe a rare criminal case of MP abortion, initiated by the expectant father. After the abortion, samples of vomit and urine were collected. Systemic exposure to MP is difficult to prove, because both MP and the active metabolite MPA are hardly excreted in urine. Therefore, in addition to routine toxicological analysis, we used slightly modified, well-established liquid and gas chromatographic/tandem mass spectrometric (LC/MS/MS and GC/MS/MS) methods, for the direct and the indirect detection of MPA and its metabolites. In this case, we were able to demonstrate the presence of the major MP metabolites 2,3-dinor-MPA and 2,3,4,5-tetranor-MPA in the urine of the victim. We also detected paracetamol, 3-methoxyparacetamol and diclofenac-glucuronide in the urine. In the vomit of the victim, we detected diclofenac and MPA. These results, combined with the criminal investigations, showed that the accused had mixed MP into the food of his pregnant girlfriend. Finally, these investigations contributed to a confession of the accused.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Induced; Chromatography, Liquid; Crime; Diclofenac; Fathers; Female; Food Contamination; Forensic Toxicology; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Germany; Humans; Male; Misoprostol; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Unwanted; Vomiting

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success rate and complications of medical termination of pregnancy up to 49 days of amenorrhea and present the outcome of our phone questionaire of satisfaction of patients.. Retrospective analysis.. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno.. The analysis of 111 patients, who underwent medical termination of pregnancy at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno from 1. 6. 2014 to 30. 6. 2015 using 600 mg of mifepristone (Mifegyne) and 400 µg of misoprostol (Mispregnol). In our set of patients we monitored subjective perception of medical termination of pregnancy (pain, nausea, vomiting, satisfaction with this method) and objective process (hospitalisation, surgical intervention). The view of patients was found out by the phone questionnaire. Complete abortion without a surgical intervention underwent 103 patients. Nausea, pelvic pain, and intensity of bleeding were evaluated as suitable. Only 1 patient (0.9%) was hospitalised for nausea and 1 patient (0.9%) was hospitalised in case of need for an emergency curretage and transfusions. Some kind of contraception after the medical termination of pregnancy started using 98.0% of women. The satisfaction rate of this method was high - 101 patients declared themselves satisfied - 66.7% very satisfied, 24.3% rather satisfied.. Medical termination of pregnancy has good efficiency, we consider it safe with minimum side-effects and is well evaluated by patients.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents; Abortion, Induced; Adult; Cohort Studies; Dilatation and Curettage; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Nausea; Personal Satisfaction; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Hemorrhage; Vomiting

We report the case of a 16 years old female patient, with a pregnancy history of 11.4 weeks by ultrasound and intrauterine fetal death. In a private clinic were prescribed methotrexate 500 mg intramuscular single dose, and vaginal misoprostol. She had a clinical feature of five days of evolution characterized by fever of 39 degrees C, nausea, general attack and vomiting. The initial diagnosis was severe sepsis secondary to septic abortion, oral candidiasis and acute poisoning by methotrexate. After that, she was referred to the Instituto Nacional de Perinatologia, where stayed with fever for four days, and was managed with hydration, antibiotics, folinic acid and alkalizing. Her recovery was gradual. She was discharged after 12 days with significant clinical improvement. The literature review describes that the use of methotrexate for abortion purpose with therapeutic-dose presents a similar adverse effects to those found in our patient, however there are no case reports that describe the use of this drug in macrodosis for the same purpose, and their cytotoxic effects. We present this case because the patient used a macrodosis of this antimetabolite and due to the premature and empirical management with folinic acid, joined with alkalinization of urine, is the ideal treatment and as it is illustrated in our case.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents; Abortion, Induced; Abortion, Missed; Abortion, Septic; Administration, Intravaginal; Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antidotes; Candidiasis, Oral; Female; Filgrastim; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Leucovorin; Methotrexate; Misoprostol; Neutropenia; Poisoning; Pregnancy; Recombinant Proteins; Vomiting

Therapeutic interruption of the pregnancies of the 2nd and 3-rd quarter is often badly accepted by the patients and it is original that his realization is easy, effective and the less traumatic possible. In this indication, the sulprostone (Nalador) is a big contribution.. The purpose of our study is to review this product, to describe our experience concerning its use in the therapeutic interruptions of pregnancies and to study alternatives in case of failure or of against indication in its use.. It is about a forward-looking study opened from the 01-07-02 led in the service "A" of the CMNT. We brought together 30 women where a therapeutic interruption of the pregnancy was put and who did'nt present of against indications to the sulprostone.. The average age was of 27 years with extremes from 18 to 39 years 50% of our patients were nullipares. The terms of pregnancy varied from 16 to 28 LIMITED COMPANIES with an average of 20 LIMITED COMPANIES. The indications of these terminations of pregnancy were maternal in 33.33% of cases and foetal in 66.66% of cases. The average number of light bulbs of Nalador used by the women was of 2.25 with extremes going from 1 to 4. The delay of eviction from the beginning of the induction was on average of 21 hours, with a rate of success of 90%. We did not regret any break uterine Delivery was incomplete requiring a uterine revision under general anesthetic in 5 cases. Tolerance was good in general In case of failure alternatives were: the misoprostol (cytotec *), the Probe extra amniotic dries and the wet Probe.. The sulprostone by intravenous way constitutes an effective method of medical interruption of the pregnancy in the 2-nd and 3-rd quarter with a satisfactory tolerance and a rate of success of 90 %.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Therapeutic; Adolescent; Adult; Congenital Abnormalities; Diarrhea; Dinoprostone; Female; Fetal Death; Gestational Age; Humans; Misoprostol; Parity; Pelvic Pain; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

Endometritis and toxic shock syndrome associated with Clostridium sordellii have previously been reported after childbirth and, in one case, after medical abortion. We describe four deaths due to endometritis and toxic shock syndrome associated with C. sordellii that occurred within one week after medically induced abortions. Clinical findings included tachycardia, hypotension, edema, hemoconcentration, profound leukocytosis, and absence of fever. These cases indicate the need for physician awareness of this syndrome and for further study of its association with medical abortion.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Abortifacient Agents; Abortion, Induced; Adolescent; Adult; Clostridium Infections; Clostridium sordellii; Diagnosis, Differential; Endometritis; Fatal Outcome; Female; Humans; Hypotension; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S; Shock, Septic; Tachycardia; Uterus; Vomiting

To assess the effectiveness of intravaginal misoprostol for second trimester uterine evacuation, we studied 70 women with singleton pregnancies complicated by fetal malformation or dead fetuses. Participants received 200 microg misoprostol administered at 4-hour intervals. Gestations with dead fetuses had a shorter induction-abortion interval [14.2 hours, standard deviation (SD) 4.3] than those with live, malformed fetuses (20.2 hours, SD 7.3) (P< 0.001). The abortion rate was significantly higher for gestations with dead fetuses (92.1%) than those with live, malformed fetuses (68.8%) (P< 0.05). There were no major complications and no significant difference in the incidence of side-effects. All women aborted within 38 hours. Administration of misoprostol is an effective clinical method to terminate second trimester, complicated pregnancy.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Induced; Administration, Intravaginal; Congenital Abnormalities; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fetal Death; Fever; Gestational Age; Hospitals, Military; Humans; Jordan; Misoprostol; Nausea; Parity; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Vomiting

Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 used during the first trimester of pregnancy as an adjacent to RU486 for medical termination of pregnancy. We present a case of a healthy 23-year-old woman who was admitted due to misoprostol overdose, used to induce an illegal abortion. Manifestations of toxicity included abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea and confusion. Treatment was supportive and included gastric lavage and administration of activated charcoal. Recovery was completed within a few hours, and the patient was scheduled for a dilatation and curettage the following day.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Criminal; Adult; Diarrhea; Drug Overdose; Female; Gastric Lavage; Gestational Age; Humans; Misoprostol; Poisoning; Pregnancy; Vomiting

This study evaluated the effectiveness and acute toxicity of DL111-IT combined with mifepristone (RU486) and misoprostol (MISO) on early pregnancy termination. In the pregnant rats experiments, the ED(50) values of RU486 in two-drug combinations were 0.16 (combined with DL111-IT) and 0.40 (combined with MISO) mg x kg(-1) x d(-1), while in three-drug combination treatment group (DL111-IT 9.0 mg x kg(-1) (

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal; Abortion, Induced; Animals; Columbidae; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Guinea Pigs; Male; Mice; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Triazoles; Uterus; Vomiting

We compared the published results of the 1994-1995 Population Council (PC) trial to those from the 1996-1997 Abortion Rights Mobilization (ARM) trial to determine whether 200 mg mifepristone with 800 micrograms vaginal misoprostol is more effective and has fewer side effects than 600 mg mifepristone with 400 micrograms oral misoprostol. The complete medical abortion rate was lower in the PC trial than the ARM trial: 92% compared with 97% up to 49 days LMP (p < 0.05) and 83% versus 96% from 50 to 56 days LMP (p < 0.05). Nausea and vomiting were reported more frequently in the PC trial. The overall acceptability of the procedure was lower in the PC trial (88%) than in the ARM trial (94%), (p < 0.05). Mifepristone can be reduced from 600 to 200 mg when followed by vaginal misoprostol without loss of efficacy. Vaginal misoprostol extends the efficacy to 56 days LMP and is associated with less nausea and vomiting. Home use of misoprostol is safe and acceptable to women and decreases the number of required visits from three to two in most cases.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal; Abortion, Induced; Administration, Intravaginal; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Nausea; Office Visits; Pregnancy; Vomiting

To evaluate the efficacy of a regimen of vaginal misoprostol in causing the complete expulsion of first-trimester missed abortions, or alternatively dilating the cervix for surgical evacuation.. Seventy-four women with a transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis of a first-trimester missed abortion and no more than slight vaginal bleeding were consecutively enrolled. Misoprostol (600 microg) was administered vaginally and repeated 4 h later if necessary. Surgical evacuation was performed when complete expulsion was not documented on the ultrasound 10-12 h after treatment.. Complete medical evacuation occurred in 42 women (56.8%), 11 (14.9%) of which required only one dose. Seventy women (94.6%) experienced abdominal pain, 73 (98.6%) vaginal bleeding, 10 (13.5%) nausea, 4 (5.4%) vomiting, 5 (6.8%) diarrhea, and 4 (5.4%) transient hyperthermia. There was one case of heavy vaginal bleeding requiring emergency surgical evacuation, and one re-admission for incomplete abortion at 30 days. All but 4 (5.4%) women had permeable cervices at the time of surgery.. The described regimen of vaginal misoprostol is safe and reasonably effective in inducing complete evacuation in missed abortions. When this does not occur, it almost always provides adequate cervical dilatation for surgery.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortion, Missed; Administration, Intravaginal; Adolescent; Adult; Diarrhea; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fever; Humans; Misoprostol; Nausea; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Prospective Studies; Time Factors; Ultrasonography; Uterine Hemorrhage; Vomiting

The effectiveness of a combined regimen of mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol for termination of pregnancies of 9-13 weeks of gestation was investigated in 120 UK abortion patients (median age, 22.1 years; median duration of amenorrhea, 10.3 weeks). Each woman received a single oral dose of 200 mg of mifepristone 36-48 hours before admission, at which time 800 mcg of misoprostol was administered vaginally. Where indicated, a further two doses of 400 mcg of misoprostol (vaginal or oral) were provided every 3 hours. All 120 women aborted on the day of prostaglandin administration; however, 6 women (5%) required exploratory curettage after the procedure for retained placenta. The median prostaglandin dose was 1200 mcg (range, 800-1600 mcg). The median time from misoprostol administration to abortion was 4.33 hours (range, 1.3-16.0 hours). 60 women (50%) required oral analgesics and 26 (22%) received parenteral analgesia. Diarrhea occurred in 38 women (32%). The median duration of bleeding after abortion was 12.5 days (range, 3-43 days). In questionnaires administered to 73 women, only 3 (4%) expressed dissatisfaction with medical abortion, because of pain or prolonged bleeding. The relatively high dose of misoprostol used in this study and the vaginal route of administration are presumed to account for the 95% success rate. Extension of medical abortion to later gestation times would decrease the need for surgery and expand women's choice of methods of pregnancy termination.

Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal; Abortion, Induced; Administration, Intravaginal; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Analgesics; Diarrhea; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gestational Age; Humans; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Pain; Patient Satisfaction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Uterine Hemorrhage; Vomiting

Medically induced abortion using a new regimen of oral mifepristone 600 mg and vaginal misoprostol 800 micrograms (PGE1 analogue) was carried out in 100 women. Abortion occurred in all patients without resort to surgery. In 99 women, the abortion occurred within 4 hours of the administration of the prostaglandin. Sixty-seven patients did not request any form of analgesia. This regimen is highly effective, has a low incidence of side effects (mainly gastrointestinal) and appears to be highly acceptable to women.. Obstetrician-gynecologists recruited 100 women (mean age = 24.1 years and mean duration of amenorrhea = 51 days) attending the Aberdeen Royal Infirmary in Scotland to undergo elected abortion into an open study of the use of a new regimen of oral mifepristone (600 mg) and vaginally-administered misoprostol (800 mcg). This was the first pregnancy for 77 of the women. No surgical intervention was required in any of the cases. The conceptus was expelled and confirmed within 4 hours after administration of misoprostol in 99 women. The other woman aborted within 2 hours after an ultrasound scan. One women bled heavily and did not completely abort. She was readmitted to the hospital, where she received a blood transfusion. An oxytocic injection resulted in a complete abortion. One woman had a complete abortion with just mifepristone. Vomiting (17%) and diarrhea (12%) were the leading side effects. None of the women with these gastrointestinal effects needed any treatment. Most women (66%) did not ask for any analgesia. Bleeding after the abortion lasted on average 9.5 days. Before and after mean hemoglobin levels were similar (13.1 and 12.9, respectively). No one developed an infection. These findings support those of another study that misoprostol administered vaginally is much more effective at terminating pregnancy than when it is administered orally. They also show that women find vaginally administered misoprostol very acceptable.

Topics: Abortion, Induced; Administration, Oral; Adult; Diarrhea; Female; Humans; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Pregnancy; Time Factors; Vagina; Vomiting