misoprostol has been researched along with Streptococcal-Infections* in 5 studies
2 review(s) available for misoprostol and Streptococcal-Infections
Article | Year |
---|---|
[Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Timing of Labor Induction].
To assess the effect of immediate induction versus expectant management on maternal and neonatal outcomes in case of term prelabor rupture of membranes.. We searched Medline Database, Cochrane Library and consulted international guidelines.. In case of term prelabor rupture of membranes, induction of labor is associated with shorter rupture of membranes to delivery intervals when compared to expectant management, if induction is conducted with oxytocin (LE2), prostaglandin E2 (LE2) or misoprostol (LE2), but not when induction is conducted with Foley® catheter (LE2), osmotic dilatator (LE2) or acupuncture (LE2). The strongest evidence to date comes from a large international randomized study, the TERMPROM study, which included over 5000 women between 1992 and 1995. This study compared immediate induction with oxytocin or prostaglandin E2 to expectant management up to 96hours, followed by induction by oxytocin or prostaglandin E2. Immediate induction was not associated with a decreased neonatal infection rate (LE1), even among women with a positive streptococcus B vaginal swab (LE2). Thus, expectant management can be offered without increasing the neonatal infection risk (Grade B). Induction with oxytocin was associated with a decreased risk of intra-uterine infection and postpartum fever in the TERMPROM study (LE2), however, this study had significant limitations concerning this outcome (unknown streptococcus B status and low rate of prophylactic antibiotics), and this association was not found in other smaller studies. This decrease was not observed with induction by prostaglandin E2. In the TERMPROM study, induction was not associated with an increase or decrease in the rate of cesarean section (LE2), whatever the parity (LE2) or Bishop score at admission (LE3). Induction can thus be proposed without increasing the cesarean section risk (Grade B). There is no study evaluating expectant management over 4 days.. In case of term prelabor rupture of membranes, induction can be offered without increasing the cesarean section risk (Grade B). Expectant management can be offered without increasing the neonatal infection risk (Grade B), even among women with a positive streptococcus B vaginal swab (Professional consensus). The optimal moment of induction will therefore be guided by the maternity wards organization and women's preference after having informed them of the risks and benefits associated with induction and expectant management (Professional consensus). In case of meconial fluid or term prelabor rupture of membranes>4 days, induction must be offered (Professional consensus). Topics: Delivery, Obstetric; Dinoprostone; Female; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; France; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Labor, Induced; MEDLINE; Misoprostol; Obstetrics; Oxytocics; Oxytocin; Pregnancy; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus agalactiae; Time Factors; Vagina | 2020 |
Prelabor rupture of membranes at term: induction techniques.
The clinical management of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term has been a matter of considerable controversy. Management options have included expectant management or induction of labor with oxytocin, dinoprostone (PGE2), or misoprostol. Early studies suggested that immediate oxytocin induction of labor might reduce maternal and neonatal infections while increasing risk for cesarean section. The definitive TermPROM study found no difference in neonatal infections between immediate and delayed induction with oxytocin and PGE2. However, neither PGE2 nor delayed induction resulted in fewer cesarean sections than immediate oxytocin. Misoprostol offers several theoretical advantages over oxytocin in the setting of PROM at term. However, randomized trials to date have found no significant advantage for misoprostol administration compared with other agents for women with PROM. Topics: Cesarean Section; Dinoprostone; Female; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; Humans; Labor, Induced; Misoprostol; Oxytocics; Oxytocin; Physical Examination; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Streptococcal Infections | 2006 |
3 other study(ies) available for misoprostol and Streptococcal-Infections
Article | Year |
---|---|
[Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Short Text].
To determine the management of patients with term prelabor rupture of membranes.. Synthesis of the literature from the PubMed and Cochrane databases and the recommendations of French and foreign societies and colleges.. Term prelabor rupture of membranes is considered a physiological process up to 12hours of rupture (Professional consensus). In case of expectant management and with a low rate of antibiotic prophylaxis, home care compared to hospitalization could be associated with an increase in neonatal infections (LE3), especially in case of group B streptococcus colonization (LE3). Home care is therefore not recommended (Grade C). In the absence of spontaneous labor within 12hours of rupture, antibiotic prophylaxis could reduce the risk of maternal intrauterine infection but not of neonatal infection (LE3). Its use after 12hours of rupture in term prelabor rupture of the membranes is therefore recommended (Grade C). When antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated, intravenous beta-lactams are recommended (Grade C). Induction of labor with oxytocin (LE1), prostaglandin E2 (LE1) or misoprostol (LE1), is associated with shorter rupture of membranes to delivery intervals when compared to expectant management. Compared with expectant management, immediate induction of labor is not associated with lower rates of neonatal infection (LE1), even among women with a positive streptococcus B vaginal swab (LE2). Thus, expectant management can be offered without increasing the risk of neonatal infection (Grade B). Induction of labor is not associated with an increase or decrease in the cesarean delivery rate (LE2), whatever parity (LE2) or Bishop score at admission (LE3). Induction can thus be proposed without increasing the risk of cesarean delivery (Grade B). No induction method (oxytocin, dinoprostone, misoprostol or Foley® catheter) has demonstrated superiority over another, whether to reduce rate of intrauterine or neonatal infection, rate of cesarean delivery or to shorten rupture of membranes to delivery intervals regardless of Bishop's score and parity.. Term prelabor rupture of membranes is a frequent event. A 12-hour delay without onset of spontaneous labor was chosen to differentiate a physiological condition from a potentially unsafe situation justifying an antibiotic prophylaxis. Expectant management or induction of labor can both be proposed, even in case of positive screening for streptococcus B, depending on the patient's wishes and maternity units' organization (Professional consensus). Topics: Antibiotic Prophylaxis; beta-Lactams; Dinoprostone; Female; Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; France; Humans; Labor, Induced; Misoprostol; Oxytocics; Oxytocin; Pregnancy; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus agalactiae | 2020 |
Group A Streptococcus endometritis following medical abortion.
Medical abortion is not recognized as a high-risk factor for invasive pelvic infection. Here, we report two cases of group A Streptococcus (GAS; Streptococcus pyogenes) endometritis following medical abortions with a protocol of oral mifepristone and misoprostol. Topics: Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal; Abortion, Induced; Adult; Endometritis; Female; Humans; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes | 2014 |
Group a Streptococcus causing necrotizing fasciitis and toxic shock syndrome after medical termination of pregnancy.
Group A Streptococcus is an aerobic gram-positive bacteria known to cause cutaneous infections. Invasive infections can lead to toxic shock syndrome with multiorgan failure and mortality rates of 25-48%.. A healthy, young woman developed necrotizing fasciitis, myonecrosis, and toxic shock syndrome after an elective medical termination of pregnancy. This patient had confirmed group A Streptococcus on blood cultures and underwent surgical debridement. After aggressive surgical treatment, below-the-knee amputation, and antibiotic therapy, the patient survived.. This case demonstrates the need for prompt recognition and treatment of necrotizing fasciitis/toxic shock syndrome. Topics: Abortifacient Agents; Abortion, Induced; Amputation, Surgical; Fasciitis, Necrotizing; Female; Humans; Mifepristone; Misoprostol; Shock, Septic; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Young Adult | 2009 |