misoprostol and Fetal-Distress

misoprostol has been researched along with Fetal-Distress* in 9 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for misoprostol and Fetal-Distress

ArticleYear
A retrospective review of pregnancy outcome after misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) induction of labour.
    The West Indian medical journal, 2001, Volume: 50, Issue:1

    This retrospective study looked at the outcome of using 50-100 micrograms misoprostol once daily to induce labour compared to the outcome of the overall patient population delivered during the same period (1994-1996). During that period 11,255 patients were delivered and 1037 (9.2%) were induced with misoprostol. Results showed a significantly lower mean Caesarean section rate: 9.3% for the misoprostol group versus 13.3% for the overall population (p = 0.002, Odds Ratio (OR) 0.67, 95% CI 0.53, 0.83). The abruption rates were not significantly different: 0.8% for misoprostol versus 0.4% (p = 0.09, OR 1.86, 95% CI 0.81, 4.09). There was more postpartum haemorrhage in the misoprostol group: 5.6% versus 3.5% (p = 0.0006, OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.22, 2.19); a higher incidence of Apgar scores less than 6 at one minute 10.2% versus 7.9% (p = 0.0093, OR 1.33, CI 1.06, 1.65) but not at five minutes 2.9% versus 2.4% (p = 0.674, OR 1.09, CI 0.73, 1.61) and a higher perinatal mortality rate 55/1000 versus 16.3/1000 (p = 0.00, OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.55, 4.80). The rate remained higher but not significantly so when a correction was made to eliminate the high number of intrauterine deaths induced with misoprostol 18/1000 versus 16.3/1000 (p = 0.69, OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66, 1.84). There were no cases of uterine rupture in either group. In conclusion, there was a significantly lower Caesarean section rate among patients who had once daily misoprostol induction of labour. Close monitoring of the foetus, in patients with misoprostol induction, is needed to detect foetal distress and prophylaxis against postpartum haemorrhage is still mandatory.

    Topics: Apgar Score; Cesarean Section; Female; Fetal Distress; Humans; Labor, Induced; Male; Misoprostol; Oxytocics; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Retrospective Studies

2001

Trials

3 trial(s) available for misoprostol and Fetal-Distress

ArticleYear
Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in pregnancies with oligohydramnios.
    Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 2004, Volume: 57, Issue:3

    The efficacy and safety of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with oligohydramnios was investigated. 57 pregnancies with oligohydramnios and 58 cases with a normal amniotic fluid volume (controls) were enrolled in this prospective trial. All patients received 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol every 5 h. Primary outcomes were: cesarean section rate; induction to delivery time; oxytocin augmentation; uterine hyperstimulation; meconium passage; fetal heart rate (FHR) changes; fetal distress requiring delivery, and Apgar scores. There were no differences in the mean time to delivery, cesarean section rate, oxytocin augmentation or Apgar scores. The mean induction to delivery time in oligohydramnios and control groups were, 11 h 43 min and 11 h 18 min, respectively (p > 0.05). FHR changes were observed in 26.3% of oligohydramnios group and 32.7% of control group (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the cesarean section rate and the uterine hyperstimulation between the 2 groups. These data suggest that misoprostol can be used as an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction in pregnancies with oligohydramnios without increasing the risk for perinatal outcome, compared to those with normal amniotic fluid volumes.

    Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Adult; Apgar Score; Cervical Ripening; Cesarean Section; Female; Fetal Distress; Gestational Age; Heart Rate, Fetal; Humans; Labor, Induced; Misoprostol; Oligohydramnios; Oxytocics; Oxytocin; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Time Factors

2004
A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2004, Volume: 191, Issue:1

    The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of misoprostol and dinoprostone in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress.. Medical indications for the induction of labor with postdate pregnancy or intrauterine growth restriction were randomized. A sequential design that was based on the triangular test was used.. At the fourth interim analysis, which included 140 patients, the trial was stopped because no significant difference was found in neonatal safety between misoprostol and dinoprostone, which was assessed on arterial cord pH <7.20 (14.3% vs 10.0%, respectively; P=.60). Neonatal tolerance was similar in the 2 groups, with no difference in the cesarean delivery rate for fetal distress or in the incidence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Time to vaginal delivery was shortened by misoprostol (P=.03).. Misoprostol and dinoprostone are equally safe for the induction of labor in pregnancies that are at high risk of fetal distress; however, misoprostol allowed the earlier induction of labor than did dinoprostone.

    Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Adult; Cesarean Section; Dinoprostone; Female; Fetal Distress; Fetal Growth Retardation; Humans; Labor, Induced; Misoprostol; Oxytocics; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, High-Risk; Pregnancy, Prolonged

2004
Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk?
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1999, Volume: 180, Issue:6 Pt 1

    Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of misoprostol with dinoprostone (Prepidil) for labor induction.. In a randomized, controlled trial of labor induction, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 50 microgram of intravaginal misoprostol every 4 hours or 0.5 mg of intracervical prostaglandin E2 every 6 hours. Eligibility criteria included gestation of >/=31 weeks, Bishop score <6, and fewer than 12 contractions per hour. Primary outcomes were cesarean section, induction to delivery time, oxytocin use, and fetal distress requiring delivery.. One hundred fifty-nine women were randomly assigned to receive misoprostol (n = 81) or Prepidil (n = 78). There were no differences in the indication for induction, preinduction Bishop score, epidural use, or cesarean section rate. Mean time to delivery was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group (19 hours 50 minutes) than in the Prepidil group (28 hours 52 minutes) (P =.005). Only 58% of women in the misoprostol group required oxytocin augmentation, in comparison with 88% of women receiving Prepidil (P =.00002). However, 41% of women receiving misoprostol and 17% receiving Prepidil had late decelerations or bradycardias (P =.001), and 20% of the misoprostol group and 5% of the Prepidil group had deliveries for fetal distress (P =.05).. Misoprostol is more efficacious than Prepidil for labor induction. However, the significantly increased incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings and the trend in increased deliveries for fetal distress with misoprostol dosing of 50 microgram every 4 hours are of concern. These data suggest that either a lower dose of misoprostol or less frequent dosing of misoprostol should be considered.

    Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Adult; Bradycardia; Cesarean Section; Dinoprostone; Female; Fetal Distress; Heart Rate, Fetal; Humans; Intensive Care, Neonatal; Labor, Induced; Misoprostol; Oxytocics; Pregnancy; Risk Factors; Time Factors

1999

Other Studies

5 other study(ies) available for misoprostol and Fetal-Distress

ArticleYear
Does Induction with Misoprostol Impact the Small for Gestational Age Neonate?
    American journal of perinatology, 2015, Volume: 32, Issue:14

    To compare outcomes in small for gestational age neonates induced with misoprostol to other cervical ripening agents. We hypothesized that misoprostol use will demonstrate no significant difference in outcomes compared with alternative agents.. Small for gestational age neonates (<10th percentile for gestational age) from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) sponsored Consortium on Safe Labor database were analyzed. Neonates induced with misoprostol ± oxytocin (n = 451) were compared with neonates induced with prostaglandin E2 ± oxytocin and/or mechanical dilation ± oxytocin (n = 663). Primary outcomes included intrapartum fetal distress, cesarean section for fetal distress, cesarean section for any reason, neonatal intensive care unit admission, low 5-minute Apgar, and composite neonatal morbidity. Multiple logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs). Data were analyzed using SAS.. Small for gestational age neonates induced with misoprostol ± oxytocin compared with alternative agents had decreased low 5-minute Apgar scores (aOR 0.27 [0.10-0.71]). No significant differences were demonstrated among very small for gestational age neonates (<5th percentile for gestational age).. Our results suggest that misoprostol does not increase risk of adverse outcomes in small for gestational age neonates; however, prospective studies are warranted to further assess optimal cervical ripening agents in this population.

    Topics: Adult; Apgar Score; Cesarean Section; Dilatation; Dinoprostone; Female; Fetal Distress; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Small for Gestational Age; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; Labor, Induced; Misoprostol; Oxytocics; Oxytocin; Patient Admission; Pregnancy; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult

2015
Unexpected tracheal tube blockage from a semi-dissolved misoprostol tablet.
    International journal of obstetric anesthesia, 2013, Volume: 22, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Airway Management; Airway Obstruction; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Cesarean Section; Female; Fetal Distress; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Misoprostol; Oxytocics; Pregnancy; Tablets

2013
Perinatal morbidity associated with misoprostol-induced labor.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2000, Volume: 182, Issue:3

    Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Fetal Distress; Heart Rate, Fetal; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; Labor, Induced; Misoprostol; Oxytocics; Pregnancy

2000
Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
    Southern medical journal, 2000, Volume: 93, Issue:9

    Misoprostol, the prostaglandin E1 analog, is increasingly used for cervical ripening and induction of labor. We evaluated our experience with misoprostol in an open-label setting.. Patients were selected for cervical ripening based on clinical profile. At 3 cm cervical dilation, misoprostol was discontinued and other means of labor augmentation were used. Over 13 months, 470 inductions of labor occurred, and 455 charts were available; 254 patients (56%) received misoprostol for cervical ripening, and 144 (32%) received dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2).. With misoprostol, mean time from beginning of contractions until delivery was 7 hours, 30 minutes; vaginal birth occurred in 85% of cases, and spontaneous labor occurred in 38%. Hyperstimulation occurred in 4 cases (1.6%) and precipitate labor in 7 (3%). All infants were discharged in excellent condition; one had a 5-minute Apgar score <7, and 33 (13%) had meconium, none with aspiration. Twenty-three patients who had had a previous cesarean section received misoprostol and delivered vaginally.. Misoprostol was found to be a safe and effective agent for cervical ripening as part of labor induction.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Apgar Score; Cervical Ripening; Cervix Uteri; Delivery, Obstetric; Dinoprostone; Female; Fetal Distress; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Labor, Induced; Labor, Obstetric; Meconium; Misoprostol; Oxytocics; Oxytocin; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Safety; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Uterine Contraction; Vaginal Birth after Cesarean

2000
Uterine rupture during induction of labor at term with intravaginal misoprostol.
    Obstetrics and gynecology, 1997, Volume: 89, Issue:5 Pt 2

    Misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) compares favorably with dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) and oxytocin for labor induction at term. Excessive uterine activity has been reported using high-dose regimens, but no negative effect on outcomes has been observed.. Labor was induced in a 34-year-old multipara at 39 weeks' gestation using intravaginal misoprostol tablets. Five hours after administration of the second 25-microgram dose, fetal bradycardia prompted emergency cesarean delivery. Hysterectomy and left salpingo-oophorectomy were necessary to control bleeding from a 15-cm posterior uterine wall rupture.. Misoprostol can cause excessive uterine activity and uterine rupture.

    Topics: Administration, Intravaginal; Adult; Cesarean Section; Emergencies; Female; Fetal Distress; Humans; Hysterectomy; Labor, Induced; Misoprostol; Ovariectomy; Oxytocics; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Uterine Rupture

1997