mirabegron and Ureteral-Calculi

Topics: Acetanilides; Female; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ureteral Calculi

To observe the efficacy and safety of Mirabegron in patients with distal, ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm.. A total of 90 patients with distal ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm were prospectively randomized into two groups. Forty-five cases in the study group and 45 cases as control. The stone-free rates (SFRs) and renal colic episodes between two groups were compared at the 1st, 2nd and 4th week end by imaging examinations.. All of 90 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In patients with ≤ 5 mm stones, the SFRs in the 1st week (63.6% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.040), the 2nd week (86.4% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.018), and the 4th week (90.9% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.046) after treatment were all significantly higher than that in the control group by the stratification analysis of stone size. Even though SFRs were all higher for patients with > 5 mm stones in study group, there was no statistically significant difference (All P > 0.05). In terms of renal colic episodes, the frequency of occurrence of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group and need less antalgic.. The MET with Mirabegron has a significant role in improve SFR for the patients with distal ureteral stones ≤ 5 mm and no effect in > 5 mm stones. Furthermore, Mirabegron reduces the need for antalgic in ≤ 10 mm stones with low incidence of adverse effects.

Topics: Acetanilides; Adrenergic beta-3 Receptor Agonists; Adult; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ureteral Calculi

To evaluate the efficacy of silodosin or mirabegron as a medical expulsive therapy for ureteric stones in adults.. This is a prospective, randomized multicentric study. Patients who had ureter stones in size between 4 and 10 mm were assessed prospectively. Patients were divided into three groups with equal randomization. Group 1 was the control group; group 2 took silodosin 8 mg, and group 3 took mirabegron 50 mg once daily.. All 169 patients were included in the final analysis. The spontaneous expulsion rate was similar between groups. In patients with distal localization, the stone expulsion interval was shorter in the silodosin group (7.1 ± 4.5 days) than the control (12 ± 8.7) (p = 0.034). In patients with stone size smaller than 6 mm, the stone expulsion interval was shorter in the silodosin group (5.8 ± 4) than the control (12.2 ± 2.8) (p = 0.004); the analgesic requirement was less in the silodosin group (1.4 ± 1.3) than in the control (3.6 ± 2.8) (p = 0.028). Mirabegron had no effect on stone expulsion interval in any analysis. In patients with distal localization or stone size bigger or equal to 6 mm, the need for an analgesic was less in the mirabegron group (1.8 ± 1.9) (1.9 ± 1.8) than in the control (3.6 ± 2.3) (3.2 ± 1.8), respectively (p = 0.004) (p = 0.017).. Silodosin or mirabegron does not improve the stone expulsion rate. Silodosin improves the stone expulsion interval and decreases the need for an analgesic or < 6 mm stones. Mirabegron has no effect on the stone expulsion interval, but decreases the need for an analgesic in patients with distal or sized ≥ 6 mm stones.

Topics: Acetanilides; Adult; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ureteral Calculi

To evaluate efficiency and safety of adjunct tamsulosin and mirabegron therapy before semi-rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones.. In this prospective, randomized, single-blind and multicentric study, participants were randomized into three groups. Group 1 was the control, participants in Group 2 used tamsulosin, and those in Group 3 used mirabegron. Operations were performed 7 days after drug administration. In all clinics, a 6/7.5-Fr ureteroscope with a laser power source for lithotripsy was used.. After excluding participants whose stones spontaneously passed, who discontinued medication due to adverse events and who were lost to follow-up, 186 participants were included in the final analysis. Mean age, gender, laterality, stone distribution and mean stone surface area were similar between groups. The number of participants requiring balloon dilatation was higher in the control group (23.8%) than in the tamsulosin (8.2%) and mirabegron (6.5%) groups (p = 0.006). Successful access rate was lower in the control group (81%) than in the tamsulosin (96.7%) and mirabegron (95.2%) groups (p = 0.003). Stone-free rate was lower in the control group (77.8%) than in the tamsulosin (90.2%) and mirabegron (95.2%) groups (p = 0.01). Complication rates were similar among groups.. Tamsulosin or mirabegron use for 1 week before semi-rigid ureteroscope increases stone access and the stone-free rate. Tamsulosin or mirabegron can be used with safety and efficacy before ureteroscopy for ureteral stones.

Topics: Acetanilides; Adult; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Humans; Lithotripsy; Male; Prospective Studies; Single-Blind Method; Tamsulosin; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ureteral Calculi; Ureteroscopy; Urological Agents

To evaluate the effects of 50 mg mirabegron once daily for ureteric stent-related discomfort after ureteroscopic procedures by conducting a multicentre randomized study.. A total of 100 patients with indwelling ureteric stents after ureteroscopic stone removal or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) were randomized 1:1 to receive either no treatment or mirabegron during the stenting period. At the time of stent removal, the validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), total amount of analgesics administered, and post-voiding residual urine volume were reported for each patient.. Overall, 96 patients were enrolled for analysis. The postoperative USSQ body pain score (21.96 vs 13.96; P = 0.007) and overall pain score (5.58 vs 2.83; P = 0.002) were lower in the mirabegron group than in the control group. The USSQ urinary symptom scores (32.58 vs 27.92; P = 0.582) and USSQ general health score (17.71 vs 14.00; P = 0.281) were also lower in the mirabegron group, but the difference was not significant. Postoperative IPSS total scores and quality-of-life scores were lower in the mirabegron group, but the difference was not significant. The change in IPSS storage symptom score, however, was lower in the mirabegron group than in the control group (3.58 ± 3.58 vs 1.83 ± 4.39; P = 0.035). Post-void residual urine volume did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05).. The use of 50 mg mirabegron once daily has the potential to reduce ureteric stent-related discomfort. Prospective larger-scale, placebo-controlled studies are warranted to further evaluate the beneficial effects of mirabegron on stent-related symptoms.

Topics: Acetanilides; Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pain, Postoperative; Prospective Studies; Stents; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ureter; Ureteral Calculi; Urological Agents

To show the efficacy of mirabegron for medical expulsive treatment, in patients had intramural located distal ureteral stone. A 80 patients had intramural ureteral stone were assessed retrospectively between April 2017 and January 2018. Mirabegron 50 mg/day + diclofenac 100 mg/day (group 1, n = 40), and only diclofenac 100 mg/day (group 2, n = 40) were administered to patients, consecutively. Age, gender, stone size, laterality, and severity of hydronephrosis were recorded. Spontaneous stone expulsion rates (SER), stone expulsion time, and the number of daily colic episodes were evaluated. In the group 1, one (2.5%) patient was excluded due to nasopharyngitis, and one (2.5%) patient was excluded due to 5 mmHg systolic blood pressure increase. In addition, four (10%) patients in group 1, and six (15%) patients in group 2, who did not attend follow-up examinations, were excluded from the study. There was not any statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, stone location, severity of hydronephrosis, stone size (p = 0.736, p = 0.310, p = 0.467, p = 0.801, p = 0.761, consecutively). Spontaneous expulsion ratios were calculated as 73.52% in group 1, and 47.05% in group 2 (p = 0.026). However, there was not any statistically significant difference in terms of stone expulsion time (p = 0.979). SER for patients had ≤ 6 mm stones was higher in group 1 (87.5 vs 52.49%, p = 0.031). In addition, group 2 patients had more pain episodes (1.02 ± 0.52 vs. 1.29 ± 0.57, p = 0.049). In the current study, mirabegron has been shown to be an efficient, safe and a new treatment modality, with lower side effect profile for the intramural located distal ureteral stones.

Topics: Acetanilides; Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Thiazoles; Treatment Outcome; Ureteral Calculi; Urological Agents

Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is used especially in distal ureteral stones to reduce colics and decrease the number of endourological surgical interventions. A broad spectrum of agents can be used for the relaxation and the dilatation of the ureter, reducing the intraureteric pressure. Alfa-blockers, calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors, and spasmolytics have been shown as effective in clinical trials on urolithiasis. It is a fact that the urothelium itself, the interstitial cells and the ureteric smooth muscle, have B-beta-2 and beta-3 adrenoreceptors. Stimulation of these receptors results in relaxation of the ureter. A recent beta-3 agonist, mirabegron, is commonly used for overactive bladder nowadays. The mechanism of action is adrenergic agonism that affects with the storage phase of the bladder, without interfering the voiding phase, which is regulated by parasympathetic pathways, commonly muscarinic. Agonism of the beta-3 receptors in the ureter has been shown to decrease the intraluminal pressure. By this mechanism, mirabegron can be thought as an alternative MET agent. Acting through different pathways, and having low adverse effect profile, can be thought as the most striking advantages of mirabegron as a MET. In vitro and in vivo trials should be conducted to support this hypothesis.

Topics: Acetanilides; Adrenergic beta-3 Receptor Agonists; Humans; Muscle Relaxation; Thiazoles; Ureter; Ureteral Calculi