midazolam has been researched along with Psychomotor Agitation in 145 studies
Midazolam: A short-acting hypnotic-sedative drug with anxiolytic and amnestic properties. It is used in dentistry, cardiac surgery, endoscopic procedures, as preanesthetic medication, and as an adjunct to local anesthesia. The short duration and cardiorespiratory stability makes it useful in poor-risk, elderly, and cardiac patients. It is water-soluble at pH less than 4 and lipid-soluble at physiological pH.
midazolam : An imidazobenzodiazepine that is 4H-imidazo[1,5-a][1,4]benzodiazepine which is substituted by a methyl, 2-fluorophenyl and chloro groups at positions 1, 6 and 8, respectively.
Psychomotor Agitation: A feeling of restlessness associated with increased motor activity. This may occur as a manifestation of nervous system drug toxicity or other conditions.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
" The following data were observed: the anxiety scores of the children in the preoperative interview (T1), before intranasal premedication (T2), during the induction room play (T3) and in the beginning of sevoflurane-inhaled induction (T4) using Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (m-YPAS); the satisfaction scores of parents when children entering the operating room using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); and the cooperation scores of the children receiving the sevoflurane-inhaled induction using Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC)." | 9.22 | [Effects of intranasal midazolam premedication on inhaled induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane of pediatric patients]. ( Wang, R; Wang, WH, 2016) |
"To determine whether dexmedetomidine sedation in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) could decrease agitation and delirium after free flap surgery." | 9.20 | Effect of dexmedetomidine on preventing agitation and delirium after microvascular free flap surgery: a randomized, double-blind, control study. ( Gao, C; Li, Z; Liu, R; Yang, X, 2015) |
" In this study, 42 patients (American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I and II) who underwent scoliosis surgery were divided into two groups according to sedation protocols: group dexmedetomidine (DEX) (n = 22) and group midazolam (MDZ) (n = 20)." | 9.17 | Pain, fentanyl consumption, and delirium in adolescents after scoliosis surgery: dexmedetomidine vs midazolam. ( Aydogan, MS; Colak, C; Durmus, M; Erdogan, MA; Karaman, A; Korkmaz, MF; Ozgül, U; Togal, T; Yucel, A, 2013) |
" The frequency and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications of sevoflurane-fentanyl versus midazolam-fentanyl anesthesia were compared in 140 consecutive children (aged 3 months to 10 years) undergoing cleft lip and palate repair." | 9.14 | Complications of sevoflurane-fentanyl versus midazolam-fentanyl anesthesia in pediatric cleft lip and palate surgery: a randomized comparison study. ( Goranović, T; Knezević, P; Milić, M, 2010) |
"When haloperidol plus promethazine was compared with haloperidol alone for psychosis-induced aggression for the outcome not tranquil or asleep at 30 minutes, the combination treatment was clearly more effective (n=316, 1 RCT, RR 0." | 8.93 | Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis-induced aggression. ( Alexander, J; Allen, MH; Gandhi, P; Huf, G, 2016) |
"The objective of this article is to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation (EA) and recovery profiles in children after sevoflurane anesthesia and its pharmacological mechanisms." | 8.91 | Meta-analysis of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation and recovery profiles in children after sevoflurane anesthesia: different administration and different dosage. ( Niu, K; Wang, G; Wang, H; Zhu, A; Zhu, M, 2015) |
"To examine whether haloperidol plus promethazine is an effective treatment for psychosis induced agitation/aggression." | 8.85 | Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis-induced aggression. ( Alexander, J; Allen, MH; Huf, G; Raveendran, NS, 2009) |
"To examine whether haloperidol plus promethazine is an effective treatment for psychosis induced agitation/aggression." | 8.82 | Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis induced aggression. ( Alexander, J; Allen, MH; Huf, G, 2005) |
"Agitation is common in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and sedation with midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine is essential in agitation management." | 8.12 | Cerebrospinal fluid metabolic profiling reveals divergent modulation of pentose phosphate pathway by midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cohort study. ( A, JY; Ding, XS; Ge, WH; Li, YC; Liu, T; Na, SJ; Sun, RB; Wang, R, 2022) |
"We present 3 cases of severe serotonin syndrome in adolescents requiring intubation that were refractory to midazolam and/or propofol." | 7.80 | Dexmedetomidine in the treatment of serotonin syndrome. ( Charlton, NP; Rushton, WF, 2014) |
"Dexmedetomidine may help to eliminate the emergence of agitation and can be a good treatment choice for the delirium state after cardiac surgery." | 7.77 | Dexmedetomidine in cardiac surgery patients who fail extubation and present with a delirium state. ( Aykac, Z; Can, Y; Coruh, T; Kehlibar, T; Ozler, A; Tarhan, A; Yapici, F; Yapici, N, 2011) |
" Although delirium caused by midazolam or propofol in different patients has been reported, the present case represents a delirium that developed from both drugs in the same patient, possibly because of the patient's smaller tolerance to midazolam and propofol." | 7.73 | Delirium during intravenous sedation with midazolam alone and with propofol in dental treatment. ( Inada, H; Jinno, S; Kohase, H; Mohri-Ikuzawa, Y; Takahashi, N; Umino, M, 2006) |
"In both acute thermal- and inflammatory-induced pain, intrathecally administered midazolam and bupivacaine produced synergistic analgesia with decreased side effects in intrathecally catheterized rats." | 7.72 | Midazolam can potentiate the analgesic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine on thermal- or inflammatory-induced pain. ( Hanaoka, K; Nishiyama, T, 2003) |
"The symptoms of disorientation, restlessness, inconsolable crying and thrashing resemble an acute psychosis similar to an agitated central anticholinergic syndrome." | 6.73 | Physostigmine and anaesthesia emergence delirium in preschool children: a randomized blinded trial. ( Funk, W; Geroldinger, J; Hollnberger, H, 2008) |
"When midazolam was administered for the treatment of severe agitation it reduced the severity but did not abolish agitation." | 6.70 | [Prevention of "post-sevoflurane delirium" with midazolam]. ( Bressem, M; Kulka, PJ; Tryba, M; Wiebalck, A, 2001) |
"When droperidol was compared with placebo, for the outcome of tranquillisation or asleep by 30 minutes we found evidence of a clear difference (1 RCT, N = 227, RR 1." | 6.53 | Droperidol for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation. ( Khokhar, MA; Rathbone, J, 2016) |
"8-OH-DPAT-treated rats showed serotonin syndrome-like behaviors (low body posture, forepaw treading), hyperlocomotion, and decreased body temperature, which were completely inhibited by pretreatment with WAY 100635, a selective 5-HT1A antagonist (n = 8)." | 5.42 | A comparison of midazolam and dexmedetomidine for the recovery of serotonin syndrome in rats. ( Eguchi, S; Iwata, H; Kadono, T; Kaminaga, S; Kawano, T; Takahashi, T; Yamanaka, D; Yokoyama, M, 2015) |
"We conducted a randomized clinical trial comparing the rapidity of onset, level of sedation, and adverse effect profile of ketamine compared to a combination of midazolam and haloperidol for behavioral control of emergency department patients with severe psychomotor agitation." | 5.41 | Rapid Agitation Control With Ketamine in the Emergency Department: A Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. ( Andolfatto, G; Barbic, D; Barbic, SP; Grunau, B; Honer, WG; Macewan, B; Qian, H; Scheuermeyer, FX; Wong, H, 2021) |
"We present a novel study to determine whether ketamine is a rapid and safe option, compared to a combination of midazolam and haloperidol for the sedation of patients presenting to the ED with psychomotor agitation and violent behavior." | 5.27 | Rapid agitation control with ketamine in the emergency department (RACKED): a randomized controlled trial protocol. ( Andolfatto, G; Barbic, D; Barbic, SP; Grunau, B; Honer, WG; MacEwan, W; Scheuermeyer, FX; Wong, H, 2018) |
" The following data were observed: the anxiety scores of the children in the preoperative interview (T1), before intranasal premedication (T2), during the induction room play (T3) and in the beginning of sevoflurane-inhaled induction (T4) using Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (m-YPAS); the satisfaction scores of parents when children entering the operating room using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); and the cooperation scores of the children receiving the sevoflurane-inhaled induction using Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC)." | 5.22 | [Effects of intranasal midazolam premedication on inhaled induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane of pediatric patients]. ( Wang, R; Wang, WH, 2016) |
"To determine whether dexmedetomidine sedation in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) could decrease agitation and delirium after free flap surgery." | 5.20 | Effect of dexmedetomidine on preventing agitation and delirium after microvascular free flap surgery: a randomized, double-blind, control study. ( Gao, C; Li, Z; Liu, R; Yang, X, 2015) |
" In this study, 42 patients (American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I and II) who underwent scoliosis surgery were divided into two groups according to sedation protocols: group dexmedetomidine (DEX) (n = 22) and group midazolam (MDZ) (n = 20)." | 5.17 | Pain, fentanyl consumption, and delirium in adolescents after scoliosis surgery: dexmedetomidine vs midazolam. ( Aydogan, MS; Colak, C; Durmus, M; Erdogan, MA; Karaman, A; Korkmaz, MF; Ozgül, U; Togal, T; Yucel, A, 2013) |
"Intranasal dexmedetomidine and midazolam are equally effective in decreasing anxiety upon separation from parents; however, midazolam is superior in providing satisfactory conditions during mask induction." | 5.16 | Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia. ( Akin, A; Aksu, R; Altuntas, R; Bayram, A; Boyaci, A; Esmaoglu, A; Tosun, Z, 2012) |
"One hundred fifty patients with agitation caused by psychotic or bipolar disorder were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive olanzapine, ziprasidone, haloperidol plus midazolam, haloperidol plus promethazine or haloperidol alone." | 5.15 | Rapid tranquilization for agitated patients in emergency psychiatric rooms: a randomized trial of olanzapine, ziprasidone, haloperidol plus promethazine, haloperidol plus midazolam and haloperidol alone. ( Baldaçara, L; Cordeiro, DC; Jackoswski, AP; Sanches, M, 2011) |
" The frequency and type of intraoperative and postoperative complications of sevoflurane-fentanyl versus midazolam-fentanyl anesthesia were compared in 140 consecutive children (aged 3 months to 10 years) undergoing cleft lip and palate repair." | 5.14 | Complications of sevoflurane-fentanyl versus midazolam-fentanyl anesthesia in pediatric cleft lip and palate surgery: a randomized comparison study. ( Goranović, T; Knezević, P; Milić, M, 2010) |
"Melatonin was not only as effective as midazolam in alleviating preoperative anxiety in children, but it was also associated with a tendency towards faster recovery, lower incidence of excitement postoperatively and a lower incidence of sleep disturbance at week 2 postoperatively." | 5.11 | Melatonin vs. midazolam premedication in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. ( Albassam, A; Aldammas, F; Alotibi, W; Naguib, M; Riad, W; Samarkandi, A; Thalaj, A, 2005) |
" Midazolam was more rapidly sedating than haloperidol-promethazine, reducing the time people are exposed to aggression." | 5.10 | Rapid tranquillisation for agitated patients in emergency psychiatric rooms: a randomised trial of midazolam versus haloperidol plus promethazine. ( , 2003) |
"When haloperidol plus promethazine was compared with haloperidol alone for psychosis-induced aggression for the outcome not tranquil or asleep at 30 minutes, the combination treatment was clearly more effective (n=316, 1 RCT, RR 0." | 4.93 | Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis-induced aggression. ( Alexander, J; Allen, MH; Gandhi, P; Huf, G, 2016) |
"The objective of this article is to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation (EA) and recovery profiles in children after sevoflurane anesthesia and its pharmacological mechanisms." | 4.91 | Meta-analysis of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation and recovery profiles in children after sevoflurane anesthesia: different administration and different dosage. ( Niu, K; Wang, G; Wang, H; Zhu, A; Zhu, M, 2015) |
"Dexmedetomidine is effective in decreasing anxiety upon separation from parents, decreasing postoperative agitation, and providing more effective postoperative analgesia when compared with midazolam." | 4.91 | Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam as preanesthetic medication in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ( Borghi, G; Febres, D; Frati, E; Landoni, G; Pasin, L; Testa, V; Zangrillo, A, 2015) |
"To examine whether haloperidol plus promethazine is an effective treatment for psychosis induced agitation/aggression." | 4.85 | Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis-induced aggression. ( Alexander, J; Allen, MH; Huf, G; Raveendran, NS, 2009) |
"Oral midazolam premedication in children was found to reduce the anxiety associated with separation from parents/guardians, and with induction of anesthesia." | 4.83 | Evidence-based clinical update: does premedication with oral midazolam lead to improved behavioural outcomes in children? ( Cox, RG; Crowe, MJ; Ewen, A; Nemish, U, 2006) |
"To examine whether haloperidol plus promethazine is an effective treatment for psychosis induced agitation/aggression." | 4.82 | Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis induced aggression. ( Alexander, J; Allen, MH; Huf, G, 2005) |
"Agitation is common in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and sedation with midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine is essential in agitation management." | 4.12 | Cerebrospinal fluid metabolic profiling reveals divergent modulation of pentose phosphate pathway by midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cohort study. ( A, JY; Ding, XS; Ge, WH; Li, YC; Liu, T; Na, SJ; Sun, RB; Wang, R, 2022) |
"The World Health Organization recommends that anxiety, depression, agitation and delirium at end of life should be treated with drugs such as lorazepam, diazepam, midazolam and haloperidol." | 3.83 | Look again at psychedelic drugs. ( Cameron, R, 2016) |
" Significant difference was observed between EA and the control group in many aspects, such as sex, age, ASA classify, smoking history, history of cerebrovascular disease, preoperative anxiety, the use of midazolam, anesthesia means, postoperative pain, postoperative analgesia, presence of a tracheal tube, and presence of a urinary catheter." | 3.81 | [Analysis of risk factors for emergence agitation in adults undergoing general anesthesia for nasal surgery]. ( Liu, Z, 2015) |
"We present 3 cases of severe serotonin syndrome in adolescents requiring intubation that were refractory to midazolam and/or propofol." | 3.80 | Dexmedetomidine in the treatment of serotonin syndrome. ( Charlton, NP; Rushton, WF, 2014) |
"Dexmedetomidine may help to eliminate the emergence of agitation and can be a good treatment choice for the delirium state after cardiac surgery." | 3.77 | Dexmedetomidine in cardiac surgery patients who fail extubation and present with a delirium state. ( Aykac, Z; Can, Y; Coruh, T; Kehlibar, T; Ozler, A; Tarhan, A; Yapici, F; Yapici, N, 2011) |
" Although delirium caused by midazolam or propofol in different patients has been reported, the present case represents a delirium that developed from both drugs in the same patient, possibly because of the patient's smaller tolerance to midazolam and propofol." | 3.73 | Delirium during intravenous sedation with midazolam alone and with propofol in dental treatment. ( Inada, H; Jinno, S; Kohase, H; Mohri-Ikuzawa, Y; Takahashi, N; Umino, M, 2006) |
"In both acute thermal- and inflammatory-induced pain, intrathecally administered midazolam and bupivacaine produced synergistic analgesia with decreased side effects in intrathecally catheterized rats." | 3.72 | Midazolam can potentiate the analgesic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine on thermal- or inflammatory-induced pain. ( Hanaoka, K; Nishiyama, T, 2003) |
"The object of this study was to grade the response of patients undergoing a variety of dental procedures with the aid of intravenous midazolam sedation in general dental practice and to explore any relationships between the patients preoperative anxiety assessment and the clinician's assessment of co-operation whilst under sedation." | 3.69 | Response to intravenous midazolam sedation in general dental practice. ( Ellis, S, 1996) |
" The successful use of midazolam to treat psychomotor agitation in this patient is also reported." | 3.68 | [Aseptic meningitis following spinal anesthesia. Report of a case]. ( Bugedo, G; Muñoz, H; Valenzuela, J, 1991) |
"Recovery conditions, postoperative pain, and postoperative agitation were also recorded." | 2.79 | Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. ( Abdelhalim, AA; Al-Sarheed, MA; Sheta, SA, 2014) |
"In selected cases intranasal sedation provides a safe and effective alternative for dental GA in short invasive procedures limited to one or two quadrants in children." | 2.76 | The safety and efficacy of using a concentrated intranasal midazolam formulation for paediatric dental sedation. ( Wood, M, 2011) |
"Dizziness was greater in the modafinil/remifentanil/propofol group 1." | 2.75 | Modafinil reduces patient-reported tiredness after sedation/analgesia but does not improve patient psychomotor skills. ( Boesjes, H; Galvin, E; Hol, J; Klein, J; Ubben, JF; Verbrugge, SJ, 2010) |
"Propofol was administered until the patients did not respond to a verbal command." | 2.74 | Premedication with dexmedetomidine and midazolam attenuates agitation after electroconvulsive therapy. ( Bulut, M; Ganidagli, S; Koruk, S; Mizrak, A; Oner, U, 2009) |
"Midazolam doses were lower in P than in C group (0." | 2.73 | [Protocol based sedation versus conventional treatment in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation]. ( Asenjo B, R; Aspée L, P; Castro O, J; Lanas M, A; Pino P, S; Prat R, D; Rivas V, S; Tobar A, E, 2008) |
"Sevoflurane anaesthesia was administered via a facemask (O2/N2O: 40/60)." | 2.73 | Oral clonidine vs midazolam in the prevention of sevoflurane-induced agitation in children. a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. ( De Groote, F; De Hert, S; De Villé, A; Dierick, A; Tazeroualti, N; Van der Linden, P, 2007) |
"The symptoms of disorientation, restlessness, inconsolable crying and thrashing resemble an acute psychosis similar to an agitated central anticholinergic syndrome." | 2.73 | Physostigmine and anaesthesia emergence delirium in preschool children: a randomized blinded trial. ( Funk, W; Geroldinger, J; Hollnberger, H, 2008) |
"Midazolam and Propofol were used following a bolus-infusion sequence, both separately and in combination among themselves (MID\\PROP group), or with an opioid, Remifentanil (MID\\PROP\\REMI group)." | 2.72 | Neurosedation in dentistry of the disabled patient: the use of midazolam, propofol, and remifentanil. ( Barraco, G; Collini, S; Di Carlo, S; Gatto, R; Lejeune, L; Meloncelli, S; Pinto, G, 2006) |
"Midazolam has a significantly shorter time to onset of sedation and a more rapid time to arousal than lorazepam or haloperidol." | 2.71 | A prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of midazolam versus haloperidol versus lorazepam in the chemical restraint of violent and severely agitated patients. ( Dresden, GM; Levitt, MA; Nobay, F; Simon, BC, 2004) |
"When midazolam was administered for the treatment of severe agitation it reduced the severity but did not abolish agitation." | 2.70 | [Prevention of "post-sevoflurane delirium" with midazolam]. ( Bressem, M; Kulka, PJ; Tryba, M; Wiebalck, A, 2001) |
"Sevoflurane is a volatile anesthetic agent with low pungency, non-irritating odor, and low blood/gas partition coefficient that makes it an attractive alternative to halothane." | 2.70 | Premedication with low-dose oral midazolam reduces the incidence and severity of emergence agitation in pediatric patients following sevoflurane anesthesia. ( Chen, CC; Cheng, CR; Huang, CJ; Hung, YC; Ko, YP; Su, NY; Tsai, PS, 2001) |
"A literature review was conducted, and studies were included if involving adults, receiving Midazolam, alone or in combination, whatever the route, dosage or indication and if they reported adverse events related to the use of Midazolam." | 2.61 | Tolerability of Midazolam to treat acute agitation in elderly demented patients: A systematic review. ( Bloch, F; Boutalha, S; Defouilloy, C; Dubaele, JM; Karoui, I, 2019) |
"When droperidol was compared with placebo, for the outcome of tranquillisation or asleep by 30 minutes we found evidence of a clear difference (1 RCT, N = 227, RR 1." | 2.53 | Droperidol for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation. ( Khokhar, MA; Rathbone, J, 2016) |
"Sedation and restlessness in all patients were controlled by midazolam administered intravenously by the attending anaesthesiologist; these parameters were later objectively confirmed by recorded actigrams." | 2.41 | The midazolam-induced paradox phenomenon is reversible by flumazenil. Epidemiology, patient characteristics and review of the literature. ( Flaishon, R; Ogorek, D; Szold, O; Weinbroum, AA, 2001) |
"Terminal restlessness is a variant of delirium observed in some patients in their last days of life." | 2.40 | Palliative care: an update on "terminal restlessness". ( Burke, AL, 1997) |
"Delirium is a prevalent clinical presentation in advanced illness." | 1.72 | Refractory hyperactive delirium in the dying: pharmacological management. ( Rashed, S; Shiu, A; Tham, K; Walpole, G; William, L, 2022) |
"Background Psychomotor agitation can be problematic in an overcrowded emergency department (ED) during uncontrolled procedural sedation." | 1.51 | Post-traumatic stress disorder or emergence phenomena? A case of psychomotor agitation after procedural sedation and analgesia. ( Akbari, H; Bahreini, M; Jalali, A, 2019) |
"8-OH-DPAT-treated rats showed serotonin syndrome-like behaviors (low body posture, forepaw treading), hyperlocomotion, and decreased body temperature, which were completely inhibited by pretreatment with WAY 100635, a selective 5-HT1A antagonist (n = 8)." | 1.42 | A comparison of midazolam and dexmedetomidine for the recovery of serotonin syndrome in rats. ( Eguchi, S; Iwata, H; Kadono, T; Kaminaga, S; Kawano, T; Takahashi, T; Yamanaka, D; Yokoyama, M, 2015) |
"Droperidol was effective for sedation in most elderly patients with ABD, and adverse effects were uncommon." | 1.39 | Parenteral sedation of elderly patients with acute behavioral disturbance in the ED. ( Calver, L; Isbister, GK, 2013) |
"Delirium was detected at least once in 65% of the patients (n = 640)." | 1.39 | Fluctuations in sedation levels may contribute to delirium in ICU patients. ( Christensen, D; Egerod, I; Frydenberg, M; Svenningsen, H; Tønnesen, EK; Videbech, P, 2013) |
"The objectives of this study were to describe the type and frequency of postdischarge adverse events related to sedation for elective diagnostic imaging in children and to determine if any patient or drug characteristics were associated with such adverse events." | 1.38 | Postdischarge adverse events related to sedation for diagnostic imaging in children. ( Chen, X; Kaila, R; Kannikeswaran, N, 2012) |
"57% of patients having complications (52 patients having 60 adverse events)." | 1.37 | Safety of intravenous sedation administered by the operating oral surgeon: the second 7 years of office practice. ( Rodgers, MS; Rodgers, SF, 2011) |
" Extrapyramidal side effects like tardive dyskinesia are known to develop with chronic use of metoclopramide, while acute akathisia is a lesser known side effect following IV administration." | 1.37 | Case of acute akathisia from intravenous metoclopramide. ( Lim, BL; Qiu, LM, 2011) |
"The main adverse effects were diplopia and post-sedation dysphoria." | 1.36 | Oral sedation for dental treatment in young children in a hospital setting. ( Lourenço-Matharu, L; Roberts, GJ, 2010) |
" There were a total of 70 patients who had 77 adverse events." | 1.33 | Safety of intravenous sedation administered by the operating oral surgeon: the first 7 years of office practice. ( Rodgers, SF, 2005) |
"Management of airway foreign bodies must be undertaken in specialized units with experienced staff and known protocols." | 1.32 | How we do it: management of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children. ( Babin, E; Bigeon, JY; Doppia, MA; Edy, E; Sigston, E, 2004) |
"IV caffeine appears to be an effective treatment for PH in children with sedation-induced PH." | 1.32 | Oral and intravenous caffeine for treatment of children with post-sedation paradoxical hyperactivity. ( Bartko, M; Baskin, KM; Cahill, AM; Kaye, RD; Rubin, JT; Towbin, RB, 2004) |
"A propofol infusion was chosen for anaesthesia to achieve early discharge and to reduce the incidence of postoperative emesis." | 1.29 | Propofol for pulsed dye laser treatments in paediatric outpatients. ( Charest, J; Vischoff, D, 1994) |
"Midazolam was initiated in an effort to resolve his agitation and the patient continued to receive frequent bolus injections, averaging 22 mg/d over 21 days." | 1.28 | Precipitation of benzodiazepine withdrawal following sudden discontinuation of midazolam. ( Finley, PR; Nolan, PE, 1989) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 7 (4.83) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 16 (11.03) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 46 (31.72) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 69 (47.59) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 7 (4.83) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Conrardy, MJ | 1 |
Tyler, DJ | 1 |
Cruz, DS | 1 |
Fant, AL | 1 |
Malik, S | 1 |
Lank, PM | 1 |
Kim, HS | 1 |
Tham, K | 1 |
Shiu, A | 1 |
William, L | 1 |
Walpole, G | 1 |
Rashed, S | 1 |
Li, YC | 1 |
Wang, R | 2 |
A, JY | 1 |
Sun, RB | 1 |
Na, SJ | 1 |
Liu, T | 1 |
Ding, XS | 1 |
Ge, WH | 1 |
Yan, VKC | 1 |
Haendler, M | 1 |
Lau, H | 1 |
Li, X | 1 |
Lao, KSJ | 1 |
Tsui, SH | 1 |
Yap, CYL | 2 |
Knapp, MRJ | 1 |
Chan, EW | 4 |
Thiemann, P | 1 |
Roy, D | 1 |
Huecker, M | 1 |
Senn, J | 1 |
Javed, J | 1 |
Thomas, A | 1 |
Shreffler, J | 1 |
Shaw, I | 1 |
Allen, PJ | 1 |
Johanson, KE | 1 |
Reveles, KR | 1 |
Neff, LA | 1 |
Lock, AE | 1 |
Patel, C | 1 |
Kleinig, P | 1 |
Bakker, M | 1 |
Tait, P | 1 |
Jalali, A | 1 |
Akbari, H | 1 |
Bahreini, M | 1 |
Barbic, D | 2 |
Andolfatto, G | 2 |
Grunau, B | 2 |
Scheuermeyer, FX | 2 |
Macewan, B | 1 |
Qian, H | 1 |
Wong, H | 2 |
Barbic, SP | 2 |
Honer, WG | 2 |
Li, QD | 1 |
Wan, XY | 1 |
Zhang, YL | 1 |
Li, SW | 1 |
Han, LL | 1 |
Li, WW | 1 |
Shi, HY | 1 |
Klein, LR | 2 |
Driver, BE | 2 |
Miner, JR | 1 |
Martel, ML | 2 |
Hessel, M | 1 |
Collins, JD | 1 |
Horton, GB | 1 |
Fagerstrom, E | 1 |
Satpathy, R | 1 |
Cole, JB | 2 |
Abdel-Ghaffar, HS | 1 |
Kamal, SM | 1 |
El Sherif, FA | 1 |
Mohamed, SA | 1 |
Giordano, V | 1 |
Deindl, P | 1 |
Goeral, K | 1 |
Czaba, C | 1 |
Weninger, M | 1 |
Berger, A | 1 |
Olischar, M | 1 |
Werther, T | 1 |
MacEwan, W | 1 |
Bloch, F | 1 |
Karoui, I | 1 |
Boutalha, S | 1 |
Defouilloy, C | 1 |
Dubaele, JM | 1 |
Bak, M | 1 |
Weltens, I | 1 |
Bervoets, C | 1 |
De Fruyt, J | 1 |
Samochowiec, J | 1 |
Fiorillo, A | 1 |
Sampogna, G | 1 |
Bienkowski, P | 1 |
Preuss, WU | 1 |
Misiak, B | 1 |
Frydecka, D | 1 |
Samochowiec, A | 1 |
Bak, E | 1 |
Drukker, M | 1 |
Dom, G | 1 |
Horton, G | 1 |
Scharber, S | 1 |
Ingravallo, F | 1 |
de Nooijer, K | 1 |
Pucci, V | 1 |
Casini, C | 1 |
Miccinesi, G | 1 |
Rietjens, JAC | 1 |
Morino, P | 1 |
Tan, D | 1 |
Xia, H | 1 |
Sun, S | 1 |
Wang, F | 1 |
Postaci, A | 1 |
Tiryaki, C | 1 |
Sacan, O | 1 |
Ornek, D | 2 |
Kalyoncu, M | 1 |
Dikmen, B | 1 |
Aydogan, MS | 1 |
Korkmaz, MF | 1 |
Ozgül, U | 1 |
Erdogan, MA | 1 |
Yucel, A | 1 |
Karaman, A | 1 |
Togal, T | 2 |
Durmus, M | 1 |
Colak, C | 1 |
Cohen, MB | 1 |
Stewart, JT | 1 |
Sud, P | 1 |
Nelson, L | 1 |
Diller, D | 1 |
Taylor, DM | 4 |
Knott, JC | 4 |
Phillips, GA | 3 |
Castle, DJ | 4 |
Kong, DC | 2 |
Jarman, A | 1 |
Duke, G | 1 |
Reade, M | 1 |
Casamento, A | 1 |
Eucker, SA | 1 |
Barrett, TW | 1 |
Schriger, DL | 1 |
Calver, L | 1 |
Isbister, GK | 1 |
Periñan Blanco, R | 1 |
Holgado Pascual, CM | 1 |
Añez Simón, C | 1 |
de Molina Fernández, MI | 1 |
Sheta, SA | 1 |
Al-Sarheed, MA | 1 |
Abdelhalim, AA | 1 |
Gambles, M | 1 |
McGlinchey, T | 1 |
Latten, R | 1 |
Dickman, A | 2 |
Lowe, D | 1 |
Ellershaw, JE | 1 |
Sun, Y | 1 |
Lu, Y | 1 |
Huang, Y | 1 |
Jiang, H | 1 |
Benedict, N | 1 |
Felbinger, M | 1 |
Ridenour, T | 1 |
Anthes, A | 1 |
Altawalbeh, S | 1 |
Kane-Gill, S | 1 |
Almenrader, N | 1 |
Galante, D | 1 |
Engelhardt, T | 1 |
Rushton, WF | 1 |
Charlton, NP | 1 |
Bilgen, S | 1 |
Köner, Ö | 1 |
Karacay, S | 1 |
Sancar, NK | 1 |
Kaspar, EC | 1 |
Sözübir, S | 1 |
Afacan, MA | 1 |
Colak, S | 1 |
Erdogan, MO | 1 |
Kosargelir, M | 1 |
Ibrahim, A | 1 |
Tekesin, K | 1 |
Kandis, H | 1 |
Pasin, L | 1 |
Febres, D | 1 |
Testa, V | 1 |
Frati, E | 1 |
Borghi, G | 1 |
Landoni, G | 1 |
Zangrillo, A | 1 |
Kawano, T | 1 |
Takahashi, T | 1 |
Kaminaga, S | 1 |
Kadono, T | 1 |
Yamanaka, D | 1 |
Iwata, H | 1 |
Eguchi, S | 1 |
Yokoyama, M | 1 |
Zhu, M | 1 |
Wang, H | 1 |
Zhu, A | 1 |
Niu, K | 1 |
Wang, G | 1 |
Yang, X | 1 |
Li, Z | 1 |
Gao, C | 1 |
Liu, R | 1 |
Gonçalves, F | 2 |
Almeida, A | 3 |
Pereira, S | 2 |
Isenberg, DL | 1 |
Jacobs, D | 1 |
Liu, Z | 1 |
Banik, S | 1 |
Rath, GP | 1 |
Huygen, FJ | 1 |
Cameron, R | 1 |
Wang, WH | 1 |
Abouchedid, R | 1 |
Ho, JH | 1 |
Hudson, S | 1 |
Dines, A | 1 |
Archer, JR | 1 |
Wood, DM | 1 |
Dargan, PI | 1 |
Taylor, SE | 1 |
Karro, J | 1 |
Kong, DCM | 1 |
Ferraz Gonçalves, JA | 1 |
Costa, I | 1 |
Silva, P | 1 |
Carneiro, R | 1 |
Huf, G | 5 |
Alexander, J | 3 |
Gandhi, P | 1 |
Allen, MH | 3 |
Khokhar, MA | 1 |
Rathbone, J | 1 |
Kousgaard, SJ | 1 |
Licht, RW | 1 |
Nielsen, RE | 1 |
Tobar A, E | 1 |
Lanas M, A | 1 |
Pino P, S | 1 |
Aspée L, P | 1 |
Rivas V, S | 1 |
Prat R, D | 1 |
Asenjo B, R | 1 |
Castro O, J | 1 |
Mizrak, A | 1 |
Koruk, S | 1 |
Ganidagli, S | 1 |
Bulut, M | 1 |
Oner, U | 1 |
Passmore, MJ | 1 |
Sheldon, L | 1 |
Lax, S | 1 |
Wilkins-Ho, M | 1 |
Illing, M | 1 |
Heller, M | 1 |
Hayes, CM | 1 |
Krejci, NC | 1 |
Nishiyama, T | 2 |
Raveendran, NS | 1 |
Galvin, E | 1 |
Boesjes, H | 1 |
Hol, J | 1 |
Ubben, JF | 1 |
Klein, J | 1 |
Verbrugge, SJ | 1 |
Coutinho, ES | 2 |
Adams, CE | 2 |
Milić, M | 1 |
Goranović, T | 1 |
Knezević, P | 1 |
Almgren, M | 1 |
Lundmark, M | 1 |
Samuelson, K | 1 |
Khattab, AM | 1 |
El-Seify, ZA | 1 |
Shaaban, A | 1 |
Radojevic, D | 1 |
Jankovic, I | 1 |
Dahmani, S | 1 |
Brasher, C | 1 |
Stany, I | 1 |
Golmard, J | 1 |
Skhiri, A | 1 |
Bruneau, B | 1 |
Nivoche, Y | 1 |
Constant, I | 2 |
Murat, I | 2 |
Ghai, B | 1 |
Ram, J | 1 |
Chauhan, S | 1 |
Wig, J | 1 |
Chen, J | 1 |
Li, W | 1 |
Hu, X | 1 |
Wang, D | 1 |
Lourenço-Matharu, L | 1 |
Roberts, GJ | 1 |
McKenzie, WS | 1 |
Rosenberg, M | 1 |
Sener, S | 1 |
Eken, C | 1 |
Schultz, CH | 1 |
Serinken, M | 1 |
Ozsarac, M | 1 |
Qiu, LM | 1 |
Lim, BL | 1 |
Wood, M | 1 |
Özcengiz, D | 1 |
Gunes, Y | 1 |
Ozmete, O | 1 |
Yapici, N | 1 |
Coruh, T | 1 |
Kehlibar, T | 1 |
Yapici, F | 1 |
Tarhan, A | 1 |
Can, Y | 1 |
Ozler, A | 1 |
Aykac, Z | 1 |
Baldaçara, L | 1 |
Sanches, M | 1 |
Cordeiro, DC | 1 |
Jackoswski, AP | 1 |
Rodgers, SF | 2 |
Rodgers, MS | 1 |
Zand, F | 1 |
Allahyary, E | 1 |
Hamidi, AR | 1 |
Weiss, S | 1 |
Peterson, K | 1 |
Cheney, P | 1 |
Froman, P | 1 |
Ernst, A | 1 |
Campbell, M | 1 |
Akin, A | 1 |
Bayram, A | 1 |
Esmaoglu, A | 1 |
Tosun, Z | 1 |
Aksu, R | 1 |
Altuntas, R | 1 |
Boyaci, A | 1 |
Teixeira, S | 1 |
Edra, N | 1 |
Kaila, R | 1 |
Chen, X | 1 |
Kannikeswaran, N | 1 |
Lindqvist, O | 1 |
Lundquist, G | 1 |
Bükki, J | 1 |
Lunder, U | 1 |
Hagelin, CL | 1 |
Rasmussen, BH | 1 |
Sauter, S | 1 |
Tishelman, C | 1 |
Fürst, CJ | 1 |
Svenningsen, H | 1 |
Egerod, I | 1 |
Videbech, P | 1 |
Christensen, D | 1 |
Frydenberg, M | 1 |
Tønnesen, EK | 1 |
Cohen, IT | 1 |
Drewsen, S | 1 |
Hannallah, RS | 1 |
Augoustides, JG | 1 |
Greenblatt, E | 1 |
Abbas, MA | 1 |
O'Reardon, JP | 1 |
Datto, CJ | 1 |
Saito, M | 1 |
Terao, Y | 1 |
Fukusaki, M | 1 |
Makita, T | 1 |
Shibata, O | 1 |
Sumikawa, K | 1 |
Hanaoka, K | 1 |
Vivien, B | 1 |
Di Maria, S | 1 |
Ouattara, A | 1 |
Langeron, O | 1 |
Coriat, P | 1 |
Riou, B | 1 |
Stewart, PC | 1 |
Cunnington, P | 1 |
Martin, R | 1 |
Kanegaye, JT | 1 |
Favela, JL | 1 |
Acosta, M | 1 |
Bank, DE | 1 |
Leport, Y | 1 |
Richard, P | 1 |
Moutard, ML | 1 |
Nobay, F | 1 |
Simon, BC | 1 |
Levitt, MA | 1 |
Dresden, GM | 1 |
Demirbilek, S | 1 |
Cicek, M | 1 |
Aslan, U | 1 |
Sizanli, E | 1 |
Ersoy, MO | 1 |
Rubin, JT | 1 |
Towbin, RB | 1 |
Bartko, M | 1 |
Baskin, KM | 1 |
Cahill, AM | 1 |
Kaye, RD | 1 |
Babin, E | 1 |
Sigston, E | 1 |
Bigeon, JY | 1 |
Doppia, MA | 1 |
Edy, E | 1 |
Samarkandi, A | 1 |
Naguib, M | 1 |
Riad, W | 1 |
Thalaj, A | 1 |
Alotibi, W | 1 |
Aldammas, F | 1 |
Albassam, A | 1 |
Horiuchi, T | 1 |
Kawaguchi, M | 1 |
Kurehara, K | 1 |
Kawaraguchi, Y | 1 |
Sasaoka, N | 1 |
Furuya, H | 1 |
Araki, H | 1 |
Fujiwara, Y | 1 |
Shimada, Y | 1 |
Martel, M | 1 |
Sterzinger, A | 1 |
Miner, J | 1 |
Clinton, J | 1 |
Biros, M | 1 |
Rudge, AD | 2 |
Chase, JG | 2 |
Shaw, GM | 2 |
Lee, D | 2 |
Collini, S | 1 |
Pinto, G | 1 |
Lejeune, L | 1 |
Di Carlo, S | 1 |
Meloncelli, S | 1 |
Barraco, G | 1 |
Gatto, R | 1 |
Bujok, GJ | 1 |
Misio ek, H | 1 |
Hann, CE | 1 |
Cox, RG | 1 |
Nemish, U | 1 |
Ewen, A | 1 |
Crowe, MJ | 1 |
Mohri-Ikuzawa, Y | 1 |
Inada, H | 1 |
Takahashi, N | 1 |
Kohase, H | 1 |
Jinno, S | 1 |
Umino, M | 1 |
Tazeroualti, N | 1 |
De Groote, F | 1 |
De Hert, S | 1 |
De Villé, A | 1 |
Dierick, A | 1 |
Van der Linden, P | 1 |
Erk, G | 1 |
Dönmez, NF | 1 |
Taşpinar, V | 1 |
Funk, W | 1 |
Hollnberger, H | 1 |
Geroldinger, J | 1 |
Weitz, G | 1 |
Homann, N | 1 |
von Jagow, DC | 1 |
Wellhöner, P | 1 |
Sauer, A | 1 |
Ludwig, D | 1 |
Bamgbade, OA | 1 |
Spain, D | 1 |
Crilly, J | 1 |
Whyte, I | 1 |
Jenner, L | 1 |
Carr, V | 1 |
Baker, A | 1 |
Warner, DL | 1 |
Cabaret, J | 1 |
Velling, D | 1 |
Fowler, SB | 1 |
Hertzog, J | 1 |
Wagner, BK | 1 |
Pruitt, JW | 1 |
Goldwasser, MS | 1 |
Sabol, SR | 1 |
Prstojevich, SJ | 1 |
Labbate, LA | 1 |
Miller, JP | 1 |
Vischoff, D | 1 |
Charest, J | 1 |
Bleasel, MD | 1 |
Peterson, GM | 1 |
Dunne, PF | 1 |
Pohlman, AS | 1 |
Simpson, KP | 1 |
Hall, JB | 1 |
Ellis, S | 1 |
Manninen, PH | 1 |
Chan, AS | 1 |
Papworth, D | 1 |
Burke, AL | 1 |
Massanari, M | 1 |
Novitsky, J | 1 |
Reinstein, LJ | 1 |
Jakobsson, M | 1 |
Strang, P | 1 |
Verhagen, EH | 1 |
Eliel, MR | 1 |
de Graeff, A | 1 |
Teunissen, SC | 1 |
Gozal, D | 1 |
Gozal, Y | 1 |
Kulka, PJ | 2 |
Bressem, M | 2 |
Wiebalck, A | 1 |
Tryba, M | 2 |
Weinbroum, AA | 1 |
Szold, O | 1 |
Ogorek, D | 1 |
Flaishon, R | 1 |
Ko, YP | 1 |
Huang, CJ | 1 |
Hung, YC | 1 |
Su, NY | 1 |
Tsai, PS | 1 |
Chen, CC | 1 |
Cheng, CR | 1 |
Cole, JW | 1 |
Murray, DJ | 1 |
McAllister, JD | 1 |
Hirshberg, GE | 1 |
Collins, PD | 1 |
Poole, K | 1 |
Bugedo, G | 1 |
Valenzuela, J | 1 |
Muñoz, H | 1 |
Bottomley, DM | 1 |
Hanks, GW | 1 |
Finley, PR | 1 |
Nolan, PE | 1 |
Shapiro, JM | 1 |
Westphal, LM | 1 |
White, PF | 1 |
Sladen, RN | 1 |
Rosenthal, MH | 1 |
Graham, MA | 1 |
Silvasi, DL | 1 |
Rosen, DA | 1 |
Rosen, KR | 1 |
Dochy, M | 1 |
Adams, J | 2 |
Mendoza, R | 1 |
Djenderedjian, AH | 1 |
Ananth, J | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prospective Observational Investigation of Olanzapine Versus Haloperidol Versus Ziprasidone Versus Midazolam for the Treatment of Acute Undifferentiated Agitation in the Emergency Department[NCT03211897] | 737 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2017-06-15 | Completed | |||
Premedication With Different Nebulized Ketamine,Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam in Oncologic Preschool Children[NCT02935959] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 90 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-10-31 | Completed | ||
Comparison of Oral Chloral Hydrate and Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine for Rescue After Failed Pediatric Procedural Sedation: a Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT04822064] | 70 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-09-22 | Recruiting | |||
Comparison of Oral Chloral Hydrate and Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT04820205] | 136 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-09-03 | Recruiting | |||
Rapid Agitation Control With Ketamine in the Emergency Department (RACKED): a Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT03375671] | Phase 2 | 81 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-05-29 | Completed | ||
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine as Premedication for Suspension Laryngoscopy[NCT02108171] | 81 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-03-31 | Completed | |||
Comparing Intranasal Dexmedetomidine With Oral Midazolam as Premedication for Older Children Undergoing General Anesthesia for Dental Rehabilitation[NCT02250703] | Phase 3 | 75 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Comparison of Virtual Reality Headset and Touch Screen Tablet for Minimizing Anxiety During Separation From Caregiver and Induction of Anesthesia in Children[NCT04414501] | 94 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-04-30 | Completed | |||
IN Dexmedetomidine for Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Closed Reductions for Distal Forearm Fractures. Timmons Z MD, Feudale B MD Children Presenting to the ED With Distal Forearm Extremity Fractures Often Require Re-alignment Under Conscious Sedation. T[NCT03466242] | Early Phase 1 | 40 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2018-05-01 | Not yet recruiting | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo Controlled Trial Using Single Dose Dexmedetomidine In The Treatment Of Pain In Patients Undergoing Cleft Palate Repair[NCT02915042] | Phase 4 | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-12-31 | Withdrawn (stopped due to Recruitment concerns) | ||
Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Active-controlled, Phase 3 Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine to Oral Midazolam as Premedication for Propofol Sedation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Magnet[NCT05192629] | Phase 3 | 250 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-03-09 | Recruiting | ||
Ketamine Versus Midazolam for Prehospital Agitation[NCT03554915] | 314 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2017-08-01 | Completed | |||
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Evaluation of Modafinil vs Placebo for the Treatment of General Anesthesia Related Delayed Emergence in Patients With the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea[NCT02494102] | Phase 4 | 105 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-02-29 | Terminated | ||
Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter (ONSD): A New Modality to Assess Postoperative Agitation After a Single Bolus of Dexmedetomidine Versus Nalbuphine in Children With Cleft Palate Repair[NCT04928391] | Phase 3 | 90 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-06-20 | Recruiting | ||
Delirium Screening 3 Methods Study (DELIS-3). Agreement Between CAM-ICU, CAM-ICU-7 and ICDSC in a Danish Population of ICU Patients and Nurses' Perception of the Clinical Relevance of Delirium Screening[NCT04551508] | 1,126 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2020-09-09 | Completed | |||
[NCT01506622] | 222 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-01-31 | Completed | |||
Use of Sevoflurane, Midazolam and Ketamine in Children for Dental Sedation Treatment: Occurrence of Adverse Events[NCT02284204] | Phase 2 | 27 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-01-31 | Completed | ||
PARADOX - the Incidence of Paradoxical Reactions in Pediatric Patients Premedicated With Midazolam[NCT04190537] | 500 participants (Anticipated) | Observational | 2019-09-01 | Recruiting | |||
A Comparison of Midazolam or Haloperidol Premedication Versus Placebo for Reducing Ketamine Induced Agitation After Adult Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department[NCT02909465] | Phase 4 | 185 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-07-31 | Completed | ||
Positive Imagery Therapy and the Incidence of Emergence Reactions With the Use of Ketamine[NCT04746079] | 180 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-02-05 | Recruiting | |||
Effect of Clonidine vs. Dexmedetomidine in Addition to Standard Treatment in Agitated Delirium in Intensive Care Patients: Pilot Study.[NCT04758936] | Phase 4 | 50 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-02-01 | Recruiting | ||
Evaluating Stress Response and Anxiety Score in Paediatric Patients Sedated With Intranasal Dexmedetomidine[NCT04526652] | Phase 2 | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-12-01 | Completed | ||
Oro-dispersible Olanzapine (Wafer) Versus Conventional Oral Haloperidol or Diazepam Tablets for the Management of Acute Agitation in the Accident and Emergency Department - a Multicentre Randomised Clinical Trial[NCT03246620] | Phase 4 | 12 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-09-01 | Terminated (stopped due to The study was terminated prematurely due to difficulties in patient recruitment and associated potential for selection bias.) | ||
Intramuscular Olanzapine Versus Haloperidol or Midazolam for the Management of Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department - a Multicentre Randomised Clinical Trial[NCT02380118] | Phase 4 | 167 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-12-31 | Terminated (stopped due to Primary endpoint reached based on data projection from interim analysis.) | ||
Bispectral Index: A Comparison of Bifrontal Montage Agreement[NCT04062240] | 15 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2019-11-27 | Completed | |||
The Effects of Single-dose Rectal Midazolam Application on Post-operative Recovery, Sedation, and Analgesia in Children Given Caudal Anesthesia Plus Bupivacaine[NCT02127489] | Phase 4 | 40 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-06-30 | Completed | ||
Comparing the Efficacy Between Desflurane and Sevoflurane in Miantainance of Spontaneous General Anaesthesia Using Ambu Aura Gain in Paediatrics Patients[NCT04771962] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 80 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2020-01-01 | Completed | ||
Premedication With Melatonin vs. Placebo in Patients Undergoing Interventional Pain Procedure[NCT02415309] | Phase 3 | 25 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-07-31 | Completed | ||
The Effect of Melatonin Administration on Sedation Level as Adjuvant to Propofol in Mechanically Ventilated Traumatic Brain Injury Patient: RCT[NCT04034771] | Phase 3 | 38 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-01-01 | Completed | ||
Use of Intraoperative Clonidine for Prevention of Postoperative Agitation in Pedriatic Anesthesia With Sevoflurane.[NCT02181543] | Phase 3 | 30 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-08-31 | Completed | ||
ROPIVACAINE WITH CLONIDINE FOR PEDIATRIC RECTUS SHEATH BLOCKS- THE MAGIC COMBINATION? - A Double Blinded Prospective Study[NCT02439281] | 50 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-05-31 | Terminated (stopped due to The patients were discharged on the day of the surgery.) | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
"Patient satisfaction scores using a 3-point satisfaction score (1 = highly satisfactory, 2 = acceptable, and 3 = unacceptable) were collected when patients were discharged from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).~Satisfaction score <2 was considered to be better for the patient" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participant (Number) |
---|---|
Dexmedetomidine | 34 |
Placebo | 25 |
Patients with postoperative analgesia in two groups. analgesic requests within 2 h after extubation were recorded. An investigator who was blinded from the grouping asked the patients to mark their pain level on a 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS). A VAS higher than 50 was considered a worse outcome and need to be treated with intravenous 40 mg of parecoxib. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | Number of Participants with VAS >50 (Number) |
---|---|
Dexmedetomidine | 5 |
Placebo | 15 |
Patients With intra-operative awareness in Two Groups. patients receiving intranasal placebo or dexmedetomidine (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Dexmedetomidine | 0 |
Placebo | 0 |
Patients With postoperative nausea in Two Groups. Nausea or vomiting was treated with 4 mg of intravenous ondansetron. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Dexmedetomidine | 1 |
Placebo | 3 |
Patients With postoperative shivering in Two Groups. the occurrence of postoperative shivering (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Dexmedetomidine | 1 |
Placebo | 4 |
Patients With postoperative vomiting in Two Groups. Nausea or vomiting was treated with 4 mg of intravenous ondansetron. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Dexmedetomidine | 0 |
Placebo | 1 |
"Anxiety score of Patients Receiving Intranasal dexmedetomidine at Pre-induction.~The patients were taught to rate their anxiety levels using a 4-point anxiety score (1 = combative, 2 =anxious, 3 = calm, and 4 = amiable)" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
"Anxiety score of Patients Receiving Intranasal dexmedetomidine Before Intranasal Drugs.~The patients were taught to rate their anxiety levels using a 4-point anxiety score (1 = combative, 2 =anxious, 3 = calm, and 4 = amiable)" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Anxiety score of Patients Receiving Intranasal Placebo at Pre-induction. The patients were taught to rate their anxiety levels using a 4-point anxiety score (1 = combative, 2 =anxious, 3 = calm, and 4 = amiable) (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Anxiety score of Patients Receiving Intranasal Placebo Before Intranasal Drugs. The patients were taught to rate their anxiety levels using a 4-point anxiety score (1 = combative, 2 =anxious, 3 = calm, and 4 = amiable) (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
"4-point anxiety score:~= combative~= anxious~= calm~= amiable. Anxiety score >2 was considered to be better for the preoperative patients." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Before intranasal drugs | Pre-induction | |
Dexmedetomidine | 3 | 3 |
Placebo | 3 | 3 |
Baseline characteristic data of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine The heights of 40 adult patients receiving intranasal placebo (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | cm (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 163 | 155 | 182 | 169 | 160 | 150 | 170 | 158 | 160 | 165 | 167 | 170 | 160 | 167 | 150 | 162 | 170 | 160 | 157 | 160 | 150 | 151 | 160 | 176 | 165 | 172 | 152 | 174 | 156 | 167 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 157 | 167 | 167 | 161 | 174 | 173 |
Baseline characteristic data of patients receiving intranasal placebo The heights of 41 adult patients receiving intranasal placebo (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | cm (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 163 | 171 | 177 | 170 | 168 | 155 | 160 | 165 | 165 | 163 | 162 | 157 | 160 | 159 | 157 | 168 | 168 | 160 | 162 | 165 | 170 | 161 | 160 | 154 | 157 | 150 | 156 | 155 | 160 | 173 | 169 | 165 | 162 | 155 | 155 | 164 | 163 | 162 | 160 | 154 | 172 |
Baseline characteristic data of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine The weights of 40 adult patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | kg (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 61 | 50 | 58 | 52 | 64 | 62 | 56 | 53 | 59 | 54 | 65 | 68 | 58 | 78 | 53 | 75 | 75 | 59 | 73 | 56 | 46 | 54 | 47.5 | 75 | 80 | 69 | 57 | 65 | 58 | 60 | 45 | 52 | 45 | 52 | 52 | 58 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 72 |
Baseline characteristic data of patients receiving intranasal placebo The weights of 41 adult patients receiving intranasal placebo (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | kg (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 54 | 67 | 80 | 80 | 65 | 49 | 60 | 55 | 73 | 59 | 71.5 | 59 | 57 | 55 | 59 | 53 | 45 | 53 | 58 | 78 | 65 | 69 | 47 | 61 | 50 | 40 | 55 | 51 | 50 | 71 | 69 | 79 | 60 | 54 | 47 | 51 | 60 | 60 | 57 | 61 | 78 |
"American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status of patients receiving intranasal placebo or dexmedetomidine.~ASA I: No organic, physiologic, biochemical or psychiatric disturbance ASA II: A patient with mild systemic disease that results in no functional limitation.~ASA III: A patient with severe systemic disease that results in functional impairment.~ASA IV: Severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life. ASA V: Moribund condition in a patient who is not expected to survive with or without the operation.~ASA VI: Declared brain death patient whose organs are being harvested for transplantation." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participant (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASA I | ASA II | ASA III | ASA IV | ASA V | ASA VI | |
Dexmedetomidine | 36 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Placebo | 38 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics (sex)of patients receiving intranasal placebo or dexmedetomidine The sex of 81 adult patients receiving intranasal placebo or dexmedetomidine (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Male | Female | |
Dexmedetomidine | 16 | 24 |
Placebo | 13 | 28 |
Duration of minutes From Intranasal Drug Administration to Anesthesia Intubation of Patients Receiving Intranasal dexmedetomidine surgical data of Patients Receiving Intranasal dexmedetomidine. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 112 | 40 | 52 | 56 | 50 | 49 | 45 | 45 | 105 | 53 | 47 | 105 | 45 | 32 | 55 | 52 | 46 | 81 | 46 | 41 | 52 | 55 | 101 | 54 | 45 | 43 | 33 | 78 | 60 | 88 | 63 | 62 | 69 | 141 | 74 | 73 | 61 | 62 | 55 | 58 |
Duration from intranasal drug administration to anesthesia intubation of Patients Receiving Intranasal Placebo surgical data of patients receiving intranasal placebo (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 60 | 77 | 96 | 48 | 54 | 55 | 77 | 83 | 84 | 54 | 70 | 73 | 45 | 48 | 45 | 45 | 50 | 48 | 51 | 47 | 47 | 69 | 54 | 49 | 46 | 23 | 40 | 79 | 57 | 49 | 53 | 54 | 69 | 115 | 62 | 113 | 68 | 71 | 54 | 51 | 54 |
Duration From Intranasal Drug Administration to Arrival at Operating Room of Patients Receiving Intranasal dexmedetomidine surgical data of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 100 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 40 | 41 | 35 | 35 | 95 | 40 | 40 | 30 | 40 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 75 | 40 | 32 | 5 | 45 | 65 | 38 | 38 | 30 | 25 | 60 | 50 | 62 | 44 | 47 | 55 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 45 | 43 | 32 | 30 |
Duration from intranasal drug administration to arrival at operating room of patients receiving intranasal placebo surgical data of patients receiving intranasal placebo (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 50 | 45 | 60 | 30 | 45 | 45 | 65 | 75 | 78 | 35 | 60 | 60 | 40 | 0 | 33 | 35 | 0 | 40 | 35 | 45 | 40 | 55 | 40 | 40 | 18 | 15 | 30 | 35 | 0 | 40 | 5 | 40 | 45 | 27 | 50 | 40 | 52 | 45 | 40 | 40 | 40 |
Duration of anesthesia of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine Duration from anesthesia intubation to anesthesia ending (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 42 | 28 | 87 | 53 | 16 | 73 | 36 | 30 | 27 | 24 | 49 | 35 | 29 | 37 | 27 | 31 | 34 | 36 | 48 | 31 | 53 | 37 | 29 | 31 | 35 | 80 | 49 | 52 | 45 | 30 | 28 | 17 | 36 | 50 | 24 | 31 | 26 | 25 | 44 | 72 |
Duration of anesthesia of patients receiving intranasal placebo Duration from anesthesia intubation to anesthesia ending (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 45 | 33 | 26 | 37 | 45 | 34 | 18 | 37 | 54 | 48 | 40 | 29 | 31 | 32 | 158 | 38 | 41 | 30 | 28 | 28 | 43 | 35 | 40 | 28 | 34 | 69 | 40 | 56 | 43 | 78 | 54 | 38 | 88 | 38 | 31 | 106 | 29 | 31 | 21 | 49 | 60 |
Duration of surgery of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine. Duration from surgery beginning to anesthesia ending (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number58 | Patient number57 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 19 | 14 | 61 | 34 | 4 | 50 | 22 | 15 | 13 | 10 | 27 | 13 | 9 | 19 | 9 | 7 | 18 | 20 | 34 | 10 | 30 | 24 | 16 | 16 | 61 | 18 | 29 | 27 | 25 | 11 | 12 | 7 | 21 | 33 | 9 | 15 | 9 | 7 | 29 | 45 |
Duration of surgery of patients receiving intranasal placebo Duration from surgery beginning to anesthesia ending (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 30 | 19 | 10 | 13 | 29 | 14 | 5 | 18 | 20 | 56 | 19 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 132 | 18 | 16 | 11 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 12 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 48 | 21 | 30 | 25 | 60 | 29 | 18 | 58 | 19 | 17 | 90 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 31 | 28 |
The times from stopping anesthetic infusions to adequate ventilation, consciousness and extubation after intranasal dexmedetomidine or placebo administration (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 days
Intervention | min (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Extubation time | consciousness time | adequate ventilation time | |
Dexmedetomidine | 18.58 | 16.21 | 8.24 |
Placebo | 17.16 | 14.74 | 7.87 |
Heart rate (HR) of patients receiving intranasal placebo or dexmedetomidine. HR was monitored in the study. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | bpm (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before intranasal drops | On arrival at operating room | At pre-induction | After tracheal intubation | After inserting operative laryngoscope | After removal of laryngoscope | On arrival at PACU | At emergency | After tracheal extubation | Before leaving PACU | |
Dexmedetomidine | 71.75 | 66.93 | 65.63 | 70.62 | 75.48 | 71.76 | 67.14 | 67.81 | 64.24 | 65.52 |
Placebo | 72.2 | 71.53 | 72 | 85.26 | 83.61 | 77.06 | 68.9 | 72.48 | 73.65 | 69.32 |
HR in the dexmedetomidine group at pre-induction. HR was monitored by fiber-optic pulse oximetry during patient transfer from the ward to the operating room (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | bpm (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 62 | 62 | 93 | 70 | 53 | 75 | 62 | 55 | 59 | 68 | 60 | 88 | 66 | 64 | 69 | 61 | 48 | 55 | 76 | 80 | 70 | 72 | 64 | 68 | 63 | 54 | 54 | 63 | 83 | 73 | 68 | 66 | 61 | 53 | 64 | 55 | 67 | 71 | 62 | 65 |
HR in the dexmedetomidine group Before Intranasal Drugs . HR was monitored by fiber-optic pulse oximetry during patient transfer from the ward to the operating room (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | bpm (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | ||
Dexmedetomidine | 73 | 68 | 80 | 80 | 67 | 70 | 69 | 70 | 75 | 80 | 75 | 87 | 73 | 60 | 90 | 73 | 58 | 66 | 80 | 85 | 71 | 79 | 69 | 75 | 76 | 61 | 70 | 55 | 97 | 68 | 65 | 65 | 67 | 80 | 55 | 62 | 69 | 80 | 55 | 69 |
HR in the placebo group at pre-induction. HR was monitored by fiber-optic pulse oximetry during patient transfer from the ward to the operating room (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | bpm (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 76 | 85 | 63 | 80 | 53 | 79 | 62 | 72 | 70 | 59 | 74 | 73 | 90 | 82 | 78 | 61 | 92 | 85 | 54 | 66 | 75 | 60 | 94 | 72 | 85 | 87 | 81 | 61 | 72 | 53 | 70 | 72 | 78 | 75 | 70 | 69 | 62 | 69 | 66 | 55 | 72 |
HR in the placebo group Before Intranasal Drugs HR was monitored by fiber-optic pulse oximetry during patient transfer from the ward to the operating room (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | bpm (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 65 | 77 | 61 | 80 | 67 | 75 | 55 | 65 | 78 | 57 | 76 | 85 | 69 | 71 | 75 | 65 | 100 | 83 | 55 | 72 | 75 | 75 | 120 | 59 | 89 | 90 | 74 | 63 | 88 | 56 | 75 | 63 | 82 | 80 | 65 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 63 | 55 | 72 |
"Modified OAA/S score of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine after extubation.~Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (Modified OAA/S score):~6 Appears alert and awake, responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 5 Appears asleep but responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 4 Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone 3 Responds only after name is called loudly or repeatedly 2 Responds only after mild prodding or shaking~1 Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking 0 Does not respond to noxious stimulus" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
"Modified OAA/S score of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine at Pre-induction.~Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (Modified OAA/S score):~6 Appears alert and awake, responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 5 Appears asleep but responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 4 Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone 3 Responds only after name is called loudly or repeatedly 2 Responds only after mild prodding or shaking~1 Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking 0 Does not respond to noxious stimulus" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
"Modified OAA/S score of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine Before intranasal drugs Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (Modified OAA/S score) 6 Appears alert and awake, responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 5 Appears asleep but responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 4 Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone 3 Responds only after name is called loudly or repeatedly 2 Responds only after mild prodding or shaking~1 Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking 0 Does not respond to noxious stimulus" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
"Modified OAA/S score of patients receiving intranasal placebo After extubation. Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (Modified OAA/S score) 6 Appears alert and awake, responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 5 Appears asleep but responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 4 Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone 3 Responds only after name is called loudly or repeatedly 2 Responds only after mild prodding or shaking~1 Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking 0 Does not respond to noxious stimulus" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
"Modified OAA/S score of patients receiving intranasal placebo at Pre-induction.~Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (Modified OAA/S score):~6 Appears alert and awake, responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 5 Appears asleep but responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 4 Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone 3 Responds only after name is called loudly or repeatedly 2 Responds only after mild prodding or shaking~1 Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking 0 Does not respond to noxious stimulus" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
"Modified OAA/S score of patients receiving intranasal placebo Before intranasal drugs Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (Modified OAA/S score) 6 Appears alert and awake, responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 5 Appears asleep but responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 4 Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone 3 Responds only after name is called loudly or repeatedly 2 Responds only after mild prodding or shaking~1 Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking 0 Does not respond to noxious stimulus" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number81 | Patient number78 | |
Placebo | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
"Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale (OAA/S) scores and 4 point anxiety score of patients receiving intranasal placebo or dexmedetomidine.~Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale:~6 Appears alert and awake, responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 5 Appears asleep but responds readily to name spoken in normal tone 4 Lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone 3 Responds only after name is called loudly or repeatedly 2 Responds only after mild prodding or shaking~1 Does not respond to mild prodding or shaking 0 Does not respond to noxious stimulus." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 days
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Before intranasal drugs | Pre-induction | After extubation | |
Dexmedetomidine | 6 | 4 | 4 |
Placebo | 6 | 6 | 4 |
"satisfaction using a 3-point satisfaction score (1 = highly satisfactory, 2 = acceptable, and 3 = unacceptable) anxiety levels using a 4-point anxiety score (1 = combative, 2 = anxious, 3 = calm, and 4 = amiable) were collected before intranasal drugs and at pre-induction.~Anxiety score >2 was considered to be better for the patient." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participant (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Before intranasal drugs | Pre-induction | |
Dexmedetomidine | 25 | 39 |
Placebo | 23 | 29 |
Bradycardia was defined as heart rate (HR) <45 bpm for more than 10 s. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participant (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Bradycardiac episode:Pre-induction | Bradycardiac episode:After intubation | Bradycardiac episode:Intra-operative | Bradycardiac episode:After extubation | |
Dexmedetomidine | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Placebo | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) increased 130% of the pre-operative value for more than 1 min. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participant (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Hypertensive episode:Pre-induction | Hypertensive episode:After intubation | Hypertensive episode:Intra-operative | Hypertensive episode:After extubation | |
Dexmedetomidine | 1 | 6 | 6 | 14 |
Placebo | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased more than 30% of the pre-operative value for more than 1 min. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participant (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Hypotensive episode:Pre-induction | Hypotensive episode:After intubation | Hypotensive episode:Post-induction | Hypotensive episode:After extubation | |
Dexmedetomidine | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
Placebo | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Tachycardia was defined as heart rate (HR) >100 bpm for more than 10 s. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | participant (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tachycardiac episode:Pre-induction | Tachycardiac episode:After intubation | Tachycardiac episode:Intra-operative | Tachycardiac episode:After extubation | |
Dexmedetomidine | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
Placebo | 0 | 8 | 11 | 9 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal dexmedetomidine at emergence.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a TCI plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | µg/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.5 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal dexmedetomidine at extubation.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a TCI plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | µg/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal dexmedetomidine at return of spontaneous breathing.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a TCI plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | µg/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.6 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal dexmedetomidine at tracheal intubation.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a TCI plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | µg/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 1.4 | 1.7 | 4 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2 | 0.9 | 2 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 3 | 2 | 2.3 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal dexmedetomidine before inserting operative laryngoscope.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a TCI plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | µg/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 3 | 2.8 | 4.9 | 4 | 2.4 | 4 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 3 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 3 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 3 | 4.2 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 3 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal dexmedetomidine on removal of operative laryngoscope.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a TCI plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | µg/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2.5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3 | 4.5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3.5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 3 | 3.5 | 4 | 3 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal placebo at emergence.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a TCI plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | µg/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1 | 1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.1 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal placebo at extubation.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a TCI plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | µg/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.9 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal placebo at return of spontaneous breathing.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a TCI plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ug/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 2.1 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal placebo at tracheal intubation.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a target-controlled infusion (TCI) plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | µg/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 2.1 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 3 | 1.9 | 1 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 2.2 | 1 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.3 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal placebo before inserting operative laryngoscope.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a TCI plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | µg/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 3 | 3.5 | 3 | 3 | 2.5 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 4 | 5 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 3.4 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 3.9 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 4 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4 | 3.5 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 3.7 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of propofol after intranasal placebo on removal of operative laryngoscope.~Propofol was infused intraoperatively to a TCI plasma concentration of 2.5μg∙ml-1 using DiprifusorTM software. The infusion rate was adjusted via plasma concentration increments of 0.5 μg∙ml-1 at 2-min intervals to maintain the Narcotrend index between 'D0' and 'E1' until the end of surgery." (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | µg/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 3 | 3.5 | 3 | 3 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 2.5 | 4 | 3 | 4.5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3.5 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3 | 3.5 | 3 | 3.5 | 3.6 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal dexmedetomidine at emergence.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.32 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.1 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.1 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.14 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.47 | 0.28 | 0.2 | 0.18 | 0.05 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal dexmedetomidine at extubation.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number14 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.2 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.2 | 0.28 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 0.4 | 0.41 | 0.26 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.04 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal dexmedetomidine at return of spontaneous breathing.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | ||
Dexmedetomidine | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.56 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.83 | 0.4 | 0.75 | 0.18 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.47 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.56 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.28 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.41 | 0.6 | 0.78 | 0.6 | 1 | 0.27 | 0.5 | 0.09 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal dexmedetomidine at tracheal intubation.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal dexmedetomidine before inserting operative laryngoscope.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal dexmedetomidine on removal of operative laryngoscope.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2 | 3 | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3.5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal placebo at emergence.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.04 | 0.3 | 0.13 | 0.1 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.16 | 0.4 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.28 | 0.16 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.28 | 0.2 | 0.98 | 0.04 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.34 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal placebo at extubation.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.37 | 0.3 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.35 | 0.23 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.2 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 0.1 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.26 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal placebo at return of spontaneous breathing.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 0.98 | 1.03 | 1 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.27 | 0.7 | 0.35 | 0.3 | 0.98 | 0.35 | 0.54 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 1.28 | 0.78 | 1.4 | 0.16 | 1 | 0.41 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal placebo at tracheal intubation.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number81 | Patient number78 | |
Placebo | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal placebo before inserting operative laryngoscope.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 |
"Predicted effect-site concentrations of remifentanil after intranasal placebo on removal of operative laryngoscope.~Remifentanil was infused to achieve a TCI plasma concentration of 3.0 ng∙ml-1 using the Minto pharmacokinetic model 24 and then adjusted to maintain the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 25% of the pre-operative value and the HR at less than 90 bpm. To maintain a neuromuscular blockade, 0.15 mg∙kg-1 increments of rocuronium were infused upon observation of the first twitch in a train-of-four response with the nerve stimulator" (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | ng/ml (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 2.5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3.5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 2 | 3 | 2.5 | 2 | 2 | 2.5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Satisfaction scores of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine. Satisfaction used a 3-point satisfaction score(1 = highly satisfactory, 2 = acceptable, and 3 = unacceptable). (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Satisfaction scores of patients receiving intranasal placebo. satisfaction was assessed using a 3-point satisfaction score(1 = highly satisfactory, 2 = acceptable, and 3 = unacceptable). (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Systolic blood pressure(SBP)of Patients Receiving Intranasal Placebo or Dexmedetomidine. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before intranasal drops | On arrival at operating room | At pre-induction | After tracheal intubation | After inserting operative laryngoscope | After removal of laryngoscope | On arrival at PACU | At emergency | After tracheal extubation | Before leaving PACU | |
Dexmedetomidine | 120.8684 | 120.5641 | 117.725 | 121.57 | 130.00 | 126.33 | 128.52 | 132.76 | 136.76 | 130.00 |
Placebo | 116.8462 | 126.875 | 122.6 | 119.52 | 123.65 | 123.39 | 123.90 | 130.71 | 132.13 | 127.97 |
Time to consciousness of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine. The time elapsed between stopping anesthetic infusions and consciousness. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 11 | 14 | 16 | 11 | 18 | 13 | 15 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 14 | 12 | 31 | 16 | 19 | 12 | 18 | 16 | 41 | 14 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 17 | 17 | 16 | 20 | 19 | 24 | 19 | 12 | 18 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 14 | 13 | 14 | 25 |
Time to consciousness of patients receiving intranasal placebo. The time elapsed between stopping anesthetic infusions and consciousness. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 9 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 14 | 12 | 29 | 15 | 17 | 19 | 20 | 15 | 12 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 15 | 14 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 10 | 8 | 14 | 16 | 5 | 26 | 13 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 14 | 21 | 11 | 14 | 41 |
Time to extubation of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine. The time elapsed between stopping anesthetic infusions and extubation (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 12 | 15 | 18 | 13 | 20 | 15 | 16 | 13 | 14 | 25 | 16 | 14 | 36 | 18 | 22 | 17 | 21 | 18 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 11 | 11 | 21 | 17 | 19 | 19 | 23 | 22 | 26 | 23 | 14 | 22 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 30 |
Time to extubation of patients receiving intranasal placebo. The time elapsed between stopping anesthetic infusions and extubation (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 11 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 14 | 35 | 17 | 19 | 21 | 22 | 17 | 14 | 12 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 16 | 19 | 18 | 14 | 17 | 18 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 12 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 29 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 26 | 13 | 17 | 46 |
Time to spontaneous breathing of patients receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine. The time elapsed between stopping anesthetic infusions and adequate ventilation (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 18 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 11 | 7 | 20 |
Time to spontaneous breathing of patients receiving intranasal placebo. The time elapsed between stopping anesthetic infusions and adequate ventilation (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | minutes (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 15 | 8 | 13 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 11 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
An investigator who was blinded from the grouping asked the patients to mark their pain level on a 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS). A VAS higher than 50 was considered a worse outcome and need to be treated with intravenous 40 mg of parecoxib. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number2 | Patient number3 | Patient number5 | Patient number6 | Patient number7 | Patient number9 | Patient number10 | Patient number11 | Patient number18 | Patient number24 | Patient number25 | Patient number28 | Patient number29 | Patient number31 | Patient number33 | Patient number36 | Patient number38 | Patient number40 | Patient number44 | Patient number46 | Patient number50 | Patient number52 | Patient number53 | Patient number56 | Patient number57 | Patient number58 | Patient number59 | Patient number61 | Patient number62 | Patient number63 | Patient number65 | Patient number66 | Patient number67 | Patient number71 | Patient number72 | Patient number74 | Patient number75 | Patient number76 | Patient number79 | Patient number80 | |
Dexmedetomidine | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 80 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
An investigator who was blinded from the grouping asked the patients to mark their pain level on a 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS). A VAS higher than 50 was considered a worse outcome and need to be treated with intravenous 40 mg of parecoxib. (NCT02108171)
Timeframe: 1 day
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient number1 | Patient number4 | Patient number8 | Patient number12 | Patient number13 | Patient number14 | Patient number15 | Patient number16 | Patient number17 | Patient number19 | Patient number20 | Patient number21 | Patient number22 | Patient number23 | Patient number26 | Patient number27 | Patient number30 | Patient number32 | Patient number34 | Patient number35 | Patient number37 | Patient number39 | Patient number41 | Patient number42 | Patient number43 | Patient number45 | Patient number47 | Patient number48 | Patient number49 | Patient number51 | Patient number54 | Patient number55 | Patient number60 | Patient number64 | Patient number68 | Patient number69 | Patient number70 | Patient number73 | Patient number77 | Patient number78 | Patient number81 | |
Placebo | 80 | 20 | 20 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 20 | 0 | 80 | 20 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 20 | 80 | 20 | 80 | 0 | 20 | 20 |
"Level of sedation at separation from parents and at the time of mask induction will be measured on a scale of 0 to 4 (University of Michigan Sedation Scale)~University of Michigan Sedation Scale:~0 -Awake/Alert~1 -Minimally Sedated: Tired/sleepy, appropriate response to verbal conversation and/or sounds.~2- Moderately Sedated: Somnolent/sleeping, easily aroused with light tactile stimulation.~3 - Deeply Sedated: Deep sleep, arousable only with significant physical stimulation.~4 - Unarousable~Moderately and Deeply sedated: Satisfactory Awake, minimally sedate, unarousable: Unsatisfactory" (NCT02250703)
Timeframe: Day 0:Just before the patient will be brought to the operating room
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfactory sedation on separation from parents | Unsatisfactory sedation on separation from parents | Satisfactory sedation on transfer to OR table | Unsatisfactory sedation on transfer to OR table | |
Dexmedetomidine | 25 | 11 | 22 | 14 |
Midazolam | 15 | 22 | 12 | 25 |
Length of time of above compared between groups (NCT02494102)
Timeframe: 24 hours
Intervention | minutes (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 53.5 |
Modafinil | 61.0 |
Postanesthesia quality recovery scale (PQRS). Component and aggregate scoring on the scale. Measures physiology, nociceptive, emotional activities of daily living cognitive and overall patient perspective. The scale is dimensionless and the aggregate of all individually tested dimensions is scaled from 17-65. A higher value implies improved postanesthesia recovery. Mean difference was assessed in each patient and aggregated thus patients with no difference between pre- and post-operative scores were zeroed (received a zero score if the difference was zero). A negative value was associated with worse outcome. (NCT02494102)
Timeframe: baseline and 6 hours after surgery
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -5.67 |
Modafinil | -8.91 |
"Degree of variability between the values produced by the BIS sensors in a bifrontal montage when monitored simultaneously by use of a Bland-Altmann plot. The average value of each timed pair was plotted against the difference between the pairs.~The BIS monitor outputs data on a scale of 0-100 in arbitrary units; 0 = an isoelectric state on EEG, 100 = fully awake patient. BIS values of 40-60 are thought to reduce the chance of patient recall during general anesthesia.~For the purpose of this study, a smaller confidence interval is better as it indicates a higher level of agreement between the two BIS sensors." (NCT04062240)
Timeframe: 10 minutes where both sensors are recording concurrently
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Additional BIS Sensor | 0.01 |
Numeric Rating Pain Scores ( 0-10), will be obtained every 2 hours after PACU discharge up to 18 hours or until hospital discharge, whichever occurs first. The pain score of 0, means no pain, is a good outcome , and a pain score of 10 is excruciating pain, a very bad outcome. The average of these scores will be evaluated.The pain scores will not longer be documented after the numbness went away. (NCT02439281)
Timeframe: Logistic regression of the 4 th pain score assessment
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Ropivacaine Group | 2 |
Ropivacaine/ Clonidine Group | 1.5 |
The investigators hypothesize that patient postoperative anxiety scores are lower in the Ropivacaine/Clonidine group and postoperative anxiety scores decrease more in Ropivacaine /Clonidine Group, than in Ropivacaine Group. (NCT02439281)
Timeframe: 6 hours after block placement
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Ropivacaine Group | 30 |
Ropivacaine/ Clonidine Group | 29 |
The investigators expect no difference in incidence of complications (e.g. oversedation, hypotension, bradycardia episodes, etc.). (NCT02439281)
Timeframe: until study completion
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Ropivacaine/ Clonidine Group | 1 |
Ropivacaine Group | 1 |
The investigators hypothesize that rectus sheath injections with ropivacaine/ clonidine would result in longer duration of analgesia and decreased pain scores compared to ropivacaine alone. (NCT02439281)
Timeframe: indicated by the first request for pain medication at umbilicus site
Intervention | minutes (Median) |
---|---|
Ropivacaine/ Clonidine Group | 230 |
Ropivacaine Group | 240 |
The investigators hypothesize that rectus sheath injections with ropivacaine and clonidine result in longer duration of sensory block (paresthesia) compared to ropivacaine alone. (NCT02439281)
Timeframe: Indicated by return of normal sensation (expected average of 12 hours after block placement).
Intervention | minutes (Median) |
---|---|
Ropivacaine/ Clonidine Group | 823.5 |
Ropivacaine Group | 540 |
Total intravenous morphine equivalents mg/kg (NCT02439281)
Timeframe: 18 hours after surgery
Intervention | mg/kg (Median) |
---|---|
Ropivacaine/ Clonidine Group | 0.20 |
Ropivacaine Group | 0.22 |
The investigators hypothesize that rectus sheath injections with ropivacaine/ clonidine would result in better satisfaction with pain control. (NCT02439281)
Timeframe: Prior to hospital discharge (up to 24 hours after surgery)
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Ropivacaine/ Clonidine Group | 9 |
Ropivacaine Group | 9 |
21 reviews available for midazolam and Psychomotor Agitation
Article | Year |
---|---|
Palliative sedation: A safety net for the relief of refractory and intolerable symptoms at the end of life.
Topics: Aged; Analgesics; Conscious Sedation; Dehydration; Dyspnea; Humans; Hydromorphone; Hypnotics and Sed | 2019 |
Tolerability of Midazolam to treat acute agitation in elderly demented patients: A systematic review.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Dementia; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Mi | 2019 |
The pharmacological management of agitated and aggressive behaviour: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Aggression; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; H | 2019 |
Effect of ancillary drugs on sevoflurane related emergence agitation in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Topics: Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Analgesics; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Bayes Theo | 2019 |
Is dexmedetomidine superior to midazolam as a premedication in children? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Delirium; Dexmedetomidine; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Mid | 2014 |
Is dexmedetomidine superior to midazolam as a premedication in children? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Delirium; Dexmedetomidine; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Mid | 2014 |
Is dexmedetomidine superior to midazolam as a premedication in children? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Delirium; Dexmedetomidine; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Mid | 2014 |
Is dexmedetomidine superior to midazolam as a premedication in children? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Delirium; Dexmedetomidine; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Mid | 2014 |
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam as preanesthetic medication in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Anxiety; Child; Dexmedetomidine; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Midazolam; Postoperative Complicat | 2015 |
Meta-analysis of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation and recovery profiles in children after sevoflurane anesthesia: different administration and different dosage.
Topics: Anesthesia; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Child; Dexmedetomidine; Fentanyl; H | 2015 |
Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis-induced aggression.
Topics: Aggression; Benzodiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Haloperidol; Humans; Lorazepam; Midazolam; P | 2016 |
Droperidol for psychosis-induced aggression or agitation.
Topics: Acute Disease; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Droperidol; Haloperidol; Humans; M | 2016 |
Effects of Intramuscular Midazolam and Lorazepam on Acute Agitation in Non-Elderly Subjects - A Systematic Review.
Topics: Anti-Anxiety Agents; Humans; Injections, Intramuscular; Lorazepam; Midazolam; Psychomotor Agitation | 2017 |
Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis-induced aggression.
Topics: Aggression; Benzodiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Haloperidol; Humans; Lorazepam; Midazolam; O | 2009 |
[Haloperidol plus promethazine for agitated patients--a systematic review].
Topics: Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Haloperidol; | 2009 |
Premedication with clonidine is superior to benzodiazepines. A meta analysis of published studies.
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Benzodiazepines; Child; Child, Preschool; Clo | 2010 |
Haloperidol plus promethazine for psychosis induced aggression.
Topics: Aggression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Haloperidol; Humans; Lorazepam; Midazolam; Promethazine; Psyc | 2005 |
Evidence-based clinical update: does premedication with oral midazolam lead to improved behavioural outcomes in children?
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anxiety; Child; Child Behavior; Evidence-Based Med | 2006 |
Severe needle phobia in the perianesthesia setting.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Desensitization, Psychologic; Epilepsies, Part | 2007 |
Pharmacological interventions for agitation in head-injured patients in the acute care setting.
Topics: Adult; Brain Injuries; Critical Care; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule | 1995 |
Palliative care: an update on "terminal restlessness".
Topics: Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anticonvulsants; Antipsychotic Agents; Clonazepam; Delirium; Diazepam; Humans; | 1997 |
[Midazolam (Dormicum) in terminal anxiety and agitation. The last choice alternative in palliative care].
Topics: Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anxiety Disorders; Humans; Midazolam; Palliative Care; Psychomotor Agitation; T | 1999 |
[Sedation in the terminal phase of life].
Topics: Adult; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Conscious Sedation; Delirium; Euthanasia, Passive; Female; Humans; Hypno | 1999 |
The midazolam-induced paradox phenomenon is reversible by flumazenil. Epidemiology, patient characteristics and review of the literature.
Topics: Aged; Aggression; Anesthesia, Epidural; Anesthesia, Spinal; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Female; Flumazenil; | 2001 |
52 trials available for midazolam and Psychomotor Agitation
Article | Year |
---|---|
Cost-Effectiveness of Midazolam Versus Haloperidol Versus Olanzapine for the Management of Acute Agitation in the Accident and Emergency Department.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Emergency Service, Hospital; Haloperid | 2022 |
Rapid Agitation Control With Ketamine in the Emergency Department: A Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Canada; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Inje | 2021 |
Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anxiety, Separation; Bone Marrow Examination | 2018 |
Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anxiety, Separation; Bone Marrow Examination | 2018 |
Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anxiety, Separation; Bone Marrow Examination | 2018 |
Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anxiety, Separation; Bone Marrow Examination | 2018 |
Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anxiety, Separation; Bone Marrow Examination | 2018 |
Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anxiety, Separation; Bone Marrow Examination | 2018 |
Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anxiety, Separation; Bone Marrow Examination | 2018 |
Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anxiety, Separation; Bone Marrow Examination | 2018 |
Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anxiety, Separation; Bone Marrow Examination | 2018 |
Rapid agitation control with ketamine in the emergency department (RACKED): a randomized controlled trial protocol.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Dissociative; British Columbia; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Haloperidol | 2018 |
Pain, fentanyl consumption, and delirium in adolescents after scoliosis surgery: dexmedetomidine vs midazolam.
Topics: Adolescent; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, General; Arterial Pressure; Child; Conscious Sedation; C | 2013 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Local; Blood Pressure; Child, Preschool | 2014 |
Effect of ketamine versus alfentanil following midazolam in preventing emergence agitation in children after sevoflurane anaesthesia: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Topics: Alfentanil; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Thera | 2014 |
Effect of dexmedetomidine on preventing agitation and delirium after microvascular free flap surgery: a randomized, double-blind, control study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Blood Pressure; Delirium; Dexmedetomidi | 2015 |
Prehospital Agitation and Sedation Trial (PhAST): A Randomized Control Trial of Intramuscular Haloperidol versus Intramuscular Midazolam for the Sedation of the Agitated or Violent Patient in the Prehospital Environment.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Conscious Sedation; Female; Haloperidol; Human | 2015 |
[Effects of intranasal midazolam premedication on inhaled induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane of pediatric patients].
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anxiety; Child | 2016 |
Midazolam-Droperidol, Droperidol, or Olanzapine for Acute Agitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Benzodiazepines; Conscious Sedation; Double-Blind Method; Droperidol; Drug The | 2017 |
Comparison of Haloperidol Alone and in Combination with Midazolam for the Treatment of Acute Agitation in an Inpatient Palliative Care Service.
Topics: Aged; Antipsychotic Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Hypnotics and Se | 2016 |
[Protocol based sedation versus conventional treatment in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation].
Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Analgesia; Analgesics, Opioid; APACHE; Conscious Sedation; Critical Illness; Deep | 2008 |
Premedication with dexmedetomidine and midazolam attenuates agitation after electroconvulsive therapy.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia; Bipolar Disorder; Blood Pressure; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dexmedetomidine; El | 2009 |
Modafinil reduces patient-reported tiredness after sedation/analgesia but does not improve patient psychomotor skills.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesia; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Inha | 2010 |
Complications of sevoflurane-fentanyl versus midazolam-fentanyl anesthesia in pediatric cleft lip and palate surgery: a randomized comparison study.
Topics: Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous | 2010 |
Effects of clonidine on recovery after sevoflurane anaesthesia in children undergoing cataract surgery.
Topics: Anesthesia, Inhalation; Blood Pressure; Cataract Extraction; Child; Child, Preschool; Clonidine; Fem | 2010 |
Emergence agitation after cataract surgery in children: a comparison of midazolam, propofol and ketamine.
Topics: Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, General; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anesthetics, Inhalation; | 2010 |
Ketamine with and without midazolam for emergency department sedation in adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Analgesics; Conscious Sedation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emergency Ser | 2011 |
Ketamine with and without midazolam for emergency department sedation in adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Analgesics; Conscious Sedation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emergency Ser | 2011 |
Ketamine with and without midazolam for emergency department sedation in adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Analgesics; Conscious Sedation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emergency Ser | 2011 |
Ketamine with and without midazolam for emergency department sedation in adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Analgesics; Conscious Sedation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emergency Ser | 2011 |
The safety and efficacy of using a concentrated intranasal midazolam formulation for paediatric dental sedation.
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Local; Child; Child Behavio | 2011 |
Oral melatonin, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam for prevention of postoperative agitation in children.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Child; Child, Preschool; Dexmedetomidine; Female; Humans; Male; Melatonin; Met | 2011 |
Rapid tranquilization for agitated patients in emergency psychiatric rooms: a randomized trial of olanzapine, ziprasidone, haloperidol plus promethazine, haloperidol plus midazolam and haloperidol alone.
Topics: Adult; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Bipolar Disorder; Double-Blind Method; Dru | 2011 |
Postoperative agitation in preschool children following emergence from sevoflurane or halothane anesthesia: a randomized study on the forestalling effect of midazolam premedication versus parental presence at induction of anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Halothane; Humans; Inc | 2011 |
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anxiety; Child; Child, Preschool; Dexmedetomidine; | 2012 |
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anxiety; Child; Child, Preschool; Dexmedetomidine; | 2012 |
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anxiety; Child; Child, Preschool; Dexmedetomidine; | 2012 |
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anxiety; Child; Child, Preschool; Dexmedetomidine; | 2012 |
Intravenous droperidol or olanzapine as an adjunct to midazolam for the acutely agitated patient: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Droperidol; Drug Thera | 2013 |
Intravenous droperidol or olanzapine as an adjunct to midazolam for the acutely agitated patient: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Droperidol; Drug Thera | 2013 |
Intravenous droperidol or olanzapine as an adjunct to midazolam for the acutely agitated patient: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Droperidol; Drug Thera | 2013 |
Intravenous droperidol or olanzapine as an adjunct to midazolam for the acutely agitated patient: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzodiazepines; Double-Blind Method; Droperidol; Drug Thera | 2013 |
Propofol or midazolam do not reduce the incidence of emergence agitation associated with desflurane anaesthesia in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Child; Child, Preschool; Desflur | 2002 |
Sequential use of midazolam and propofol for long-term sedation in postoperative mechanically ventilated patients.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Conscious Sedation; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Male | 2003 |
Overestimation of Bispectral Index in sedated intensive care unit patients revealed by administration of muscle relaxant.
Topics: Anesthetics, Intravenous; Conscious Sedation; Critical Care; Echocardiography; Electroencephalograph | 2003 |
Rapid tranquillisation for agitated patients in emergency psychiatric rooms: a randomised trial of midazolam versus haloperidol plus promethazine.
Topics: Adult; Aggression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emergency Service, Hospital; Emergency Services, Psych | 2003 |
High-dose rectal midazolam for pediatric procedures: a randomized trial of sedative efficacy and agitation.
Topics: Administration, Rectal; Anxiety; Child, Preschool; Conscious Sedation; Dose-Response Relationship, D | 2003 |
High-dose rectal midazolam for pediatric procedures: a randomized trial of sedative efficacy and agitation.
Topics: Administration, Rectal; Anxiety; Child, Preschool; Conscious Sedation; Dose-Response Relationship, D | 2003 |
High-dose rectal midazolam for pediatric procedures: a randomized trial of sedative efficacy and agitation.
Topics: Administration, Rectal; Anxiety; Child, Preschool; Conscious Sedation; Dose-Response Relationship, D | 2003 |
High-dose rectal midazolam for pediatric procedures: a randomized trial of sedative efficacy and agitation.
Topics: Administration, Rectal; Anxiety; Child, Preschool; Conscious Sedation; Dose-Response Relationship, D | 2003 |
Agitation and changes of Bispectral Index and electroencephalographic-derived variables during sevoflurane induction in children: clonidine premedication reduces agitation compared with midazolam.
Topics: Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Analgesics; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Central Nervous System; Child; Child, Pr | 2004 |
A prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of midazolam versus haloperidol versus lorazepam in the chemical restraint of violent and severely agitated patients.
Topics: Adult; Arousal; Blood Pressure; Double-Blind Method; Haloperidol; Heart Rate; Humans; Lorazepam; Mid | 2004 |
Effects of fentanyl on the incidence of emergence agitation in children receiving desflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, General; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics | 2004 |
Melatonin vs. midazolam premedication in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anxiety; Anxiety, Separatio | 2005 |
Melatonin vs. midazolam premedication in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anxiety; Anxiety, Separatio | 2005 |
Melatonin vs. midazolam premedication in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anxiety; Anxiety, Separatio | 2005 |
Melatonin vs. midazolam premedication in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anxiety; Anxiety, Separatio | 2005 |
Evaluation of relatively low dose of oral transmucosal ketamine premedication in children: a comparison with oral midazolam.
Topics: Administration, Buccal; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anxiety, Separation; Chil | 2005 |
Effect of flumazenil on recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in children premedicated with oral midazolam before undergoing herniorrhaphy with or without caudal analgesia.
Topics: Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Caudal; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Chi | 2005 |
Management of acute undifferentiated agitation in the emergency department: a randomized double-blind trial of droperidol, ziprasidone, and midazolam.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug | 2005 |
Randomized clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam and droperidol for sedation of the acutely agitated patient in the emergency department.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Apnea; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena; Dose-R | 2006 |
Randomized clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam and droperidol for sedation of the acutely agitated patient in the emergency department.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Apnea; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena; Dose-R | 2006 |
Randomized clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam and droperidol for sedation of the acutely agitated patient in the emergency department.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Apnea; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena; Dose-R | 2006 |
Randomized clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam and droperidol for sedation of the acutely agitated patient in the emergency department.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Apnea; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena; Dose-R | 2006 |
Neurosedation in dentistry of the disabled patient: the use of midazolam, propofol, and remifentanil.
Topics: Adult; Conscious Sedation; Dental Anxiety; Dental Implantation; Disabled Persons; Drug Synergism; Dr | 2006 |
Oral clonidine vs midazolam in the prevention of sevoflurane-induced agitation in children. a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Child; Child, | 2007 |
The use of ketamine or ketamine-midazolam for adenotonsillectomy.
Topics: Adenoidectomy; Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Atropin | 2007 |
Physostigmine and anaesthesia emergence delirium in preschool children: a randomized blinded trial.
Topics: Analgesics; Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Child, Preschool; Delirium; Female; Humans; Intraop | 2008 |
Premedication with orally administered lorazepam in adults undergoing ERCP: a randomized double-blind study.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograd | 2007 |
Ketamine plus midazolam, a most effective paediatric oral premedicant.
Topics: Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Administration, Oral; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Anxi | 1995 |
Plasma concentrations of midazolam during continuous subcutaneous administration in palliative care.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chromatography, Gas; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Infusion | 1994 |
Continuous intravenous infusions of lorazepam versus midazolam for sedation during mechanical ventilatory support: a prospective, randomized study.
Topics: Adult; Clinical Protocols; Conscious Sedation; Critical Care; Female; Fluid Therapy; Humans; Infusio | 1994 |
Conscious sedation for interventional neuroradiology: a comparison of midazolam and propofol infusion.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Anxiety; Attitude of Health Personnel; Cerebrovascular Disorders; C | 1997 |
[Prevention of "post-sevoflurane delirium" with midazolam].
Topics: Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Child; Child, Preschool; Delirium; Double-Blind Meth | 2001 |
Clonidine prevents sevoflurane-induced agitation in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Inhalation; Blood Pressure; Child; Child, Preschool; Clonidine; Double-Blind Method; He | 2001 |
Clonidine prevents sevoflurane-induced agitation in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Inhalation; Blood Pressure; Child; Child, Preschool; Clonidine; Double-Blind Method; He | 2001 |
Clonidine prevents sevoflurane-induced agitation in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Inhalation; Blood Pressure; Child; Child, Preschool; Clonidine; Double-Blind Method; He | 2001 |
Clonidine prevents sevoflurane-induced agitation in children.
Topics: Anesthetics, Inhalation; Blood Pressure; Child; Child, Preschool; Clonidine; Double-Blind Method; He | 2001 |
Premedication with low-dose oral midazolam reduces the incidence and severity of emergence agitation in pediatric patients following sevoflurane anesthesia.
Topics: Anesthesia, Inhalation; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Methyl Ethers; | 2001 |
Misuse of midazolam.
Topics: Acute Disease; Aggression; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Midazolam; Psychomotor Agitation; Psych | 1988 |
Double blind comparative study with intrarectal administration of midazolam, intramuscular administration of diazepam and intrarectal administration of diazepam: preliminary results.
Topics: Administration, Rectal; Anxiety; Child; Child, Preschool; Diazepam; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Inf | 1987 |
72 other studies available for midazolam and Psychomotor Agitation
Article | Year |
---|---|
Midazolam with haloperidol versus lorazepam with haloperidol for agitation: Effect on emergency department lengths of stay.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Emergency Service, Hospital; Haloperidol; Humans; L | 2022 |
Refractory hyperactive delirium in the dying: pharmacological management.
Topics: Australia; Death; Delirium; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Midazolam; Palliative Care; Psychomotor | 2022 |
Cerebrospinal fluid metabolic profiling reveals divergent modulation of pentose phosphate pathway by midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cohort study.
Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Dexmedetomidine; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Male; Midazolam; Mid | 2022 |
Prospective study of haloperidol plus lorazepam versus droperidol plus midazolam for the treatment of acute agitation in the emergency department.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Droperidol; Emergency Service, Hospital; Haloperidol; Humans; Lorazepam; Midaz | 2022 |
Comparison of Droperidol and Midazolam Versus Haloperidol and Lorazepam for Acute Agitation Management in the Emergency Department.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Droperidol; Emergency Service, Hospital; Haloperidol; Humans; Injections, Intr | 2023 |
Post-traumatic stress disorder or emergence phenomena? A case of psychomotor agitation after procedural sedation and analgesia.
Topics: Analgesia; Analgesics; Conscious Sedation; Emergency Service, Hospital; Humans; Injections, Intramus | 2019 |
[The impact of goal directed analgesia on mechanical ventilated patients's outcomes in intensive care unit: a clinical observational study].
Topics: Analgesia; China; Critical Care; Delirium; Dexmedetomidine; Drug Administration Schedule; Goals; Hum | 2017 |
Intramuscular Midazolam, Olanzapine, Ziprasidone, or Haloperidol for Treating Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Cohort Studies; Emergency Medical | 2018 |
The power of N-PASS, aEEG, and BIS in detecting different levels of sedation in neonates: A preliminary study.
Topics: Analgesics; Conscious Sedation; Consciousness Monitors; Deep Sedation; Drug Monitoring; Electroencep | 2018 |
Rescue Sedation When Treating Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department With Intramuscular Antipsychotics.
Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Droperidol; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Halop | 2019 |
Discussions about palliative sedation in hospice: Frequency, timing and factors associated with patient involvement.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Antipsychotic Agents; Decision Making, Shared; Delirium | 2019 |
Rocuronium-sugammadex decreases the severity of post-electroconvulsive therapy agitation.
Topics: Androstanols; Depressive Disorder, Major; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Electroencephalography; gamma-C | 2013 |
Treatment of post-electroconvulsive therapy agitation with dexmedetomidine.
Topics: Aged; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dexmedetomidine; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Humans; Hypnotics and | 2013 |
Intravenous droperidol or olanzapine as an adjunct to midazolam for the acutely agitated patient: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Topics: Benzodiazepines; Droperidol; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; M | 2013 |
In reply.
Topics: Benzodiazepines; Droperidol; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; M | 2013 |
The association between sedation practices and duration of mechanical ventilation in intensive care.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Conscious Sedation; Critical Care; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Se | 2013 |
Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club. Are 2 drugs better than 1 for acute agitation? A discussion on black box warnings, waiver of informed consent, and the ethics of enrolling impaired subjects in clinical trials: Answers to the January 2013 Journal
Topics: Benzodiazepines; Droperidol; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; M | 2013 |
Parenteral sedation of elderly patients with acute behavioral disturbance in the ED.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Conscious Sedation; Droperidol; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans | 2013 |
[Premedication with intranasal fentanyl and midazolam in uncooperative patients].
Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Drug | 2014 |
How is agitation and restlessness managed in the last 24 h of life in patients whose care is supported by the Liverpool care pathway for the dying patient?
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antipsychotic Agents; Cohort Studies; Critical Pathways; Female; Haloperido | 2011 |
Correlation of patient-reported outcomes of sedation and sedation assessment scores in critically ill patients.
Topics: Adult; Conscious Sedation; Critical Illness; Dexmedetomidine; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedative | 2014 |
Emergence agitation: is there a European consensus?
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Child; Consensus; Delirium; Europe; Humans; Hypnotic | 2014 |
Dexmedetomidine in the treatment of serotonin syndrome.
Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Benzodiazepines; Dexmedetomidine; Female; Humans; Hypnotics a | 2014 |
Lidocaine-induced delirium: a case report.
Topics: Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Delirium; Diagnostic Imaging; Emergency Service, Hos | 2015 |
A comparison of midazolam and dexmedetomidine for the recovery of serotonin syndrome in rats.
Topics: 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin; Animals; Benzodiazepines; Dexmedetomidine; Hypnotics and Sed | 2015 |
A Protocol for the Control of Agitation in Palliative Care.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Protocols; Drug Administration Routes; Drug Administration Schedul | 2016 |
[Analysis of risk factors for emergence agitation in adults undergoing general anesthesia for nasal surgery].
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Analgesia; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, General; Anesthesia, Inhalati | 2015 |
Dexmedetomidine Infusion may Cause Agitation During Procedural Sedation.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Catheter Ablation; Conscious Sedation; Dexmedetomidine; Fentanyl; Humans; Hypnot | 2016 |
Look again at psychedelic drugs.
Topics: Anxiety; Delirium; Depression; Diazepam; Hallucinogens; Haloperidol; Humans; Lorazepam; Midazolam; P | 2016 |
Acute Toxicity Associated with Use of 5F-Derivations of Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists with Analytical Confirmation.
Topics: Adamantane; Administration, Intravenous; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists; Citalop | 2016 |
Oral midazolam for dementia-related response agitation.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged, 80 and over; Aggression; Alzheimer Disease; Female; Humans; Hypnotics an | 2009 |
Paradoxical reaction to midazolam reversed with flumazenil in a patient undergoing tumescent liposuction.
Topics: Antidotes; Axilla; Female; Flumazenil; GABA-A Receptor Antagonists; Humans; Hyperhidrosis; Hypnotics | 2009 |
Interaction between midazolam and serotonin in spinally mediated antinociception in rats.
Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Formaldehyde; GABA Agonists | 2009 |
The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: translation and reliability testing in a Swedish intensive care unit.
Topics: Aged; APACHE; Awareness; Conscious Sedation; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Intensive Care | 2010 |
Sevoflurane-emergence agitation: effect of supplementary low-dose oral ketamine premedication in preschool children undergoing dental surgery.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous; | 2010 |
Oral sedation for dental treatment in young children in a hospital setting.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anesthesia, Dental; Chi-Square Distribution; Child; Child, Preschool; Consciou | 2010 |
Paradoxical reaction following administration of a benzodiazepine.
Topics: Adolescent; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Antidotes; Female; Flumazenil; GABA-A Rece | 2010 |
Case of acute akathisia from intravenous metoclopramide.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Diphenhydramine; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female | 2011 |
Dexmedetomidine in cardiac surgery patients who fail extubation and present with a delirium state.
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Continuous P | 2011 |
Safety of intravenous sedation administered by the operating oral surgeon: the second 7 years of office practice.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Conscious | 2011 |
The use of chemical restraints reduces agitation in patients transported by emergency medical services.
Topics: Adult; Ambulances; Analysis of Variance; Emergency Medical Services; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and S | 2012 |
A protocol for the acute control of agitation in palliative care: a preliminary report.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Clinical Protocols; Drug Therapy, Combination; Haloperidol; Humans; Hypnotics | 2012 |
Postdischarge adverse events related to sedation for diagnostic imaging in children.
Topics: Child; Child, Preschool; Dizziness; Female; Fentanyl; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedat | 2012 |
Four essential drugs needed for quality care of the dying: a Delphi-study based international expert consensus opinion.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Delphi Technique; Drugs, | 2013 |
Fluctuations in sedation levels may contribute to delirium in ICU patients.
Topics: Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Cohort Studies; Confusion; Conscious Sedation; Critical Care; Data Collect | 2013 |
TREC-Rio trial: a randomised controlled trial for rapid tranquillisation for agitated patients in emergency psychiatric rooms [ISRCTN44153243].
Topics: Brazil; Clinical Protocols; Drug Combinations; Emergency Services, Psychiatric; Ethics, Research; Ha | 2002 |
Clinical approach to agitation after electroconvulsive therapy: a case report and literature review.
Topics: Anesthesia Recovery Period; Bipolar Disorder; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electroconvulsive Therapy; | 2002 |
Midazolam can potentiate the analgesic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine on thermal- or inflammatory-induced pain.
Topics: Anesthetics, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Bupivacaine; Dose-Response | 2003 |
Comment on Cohen et al.
Topics: Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthetics, Inhalation; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Child; Child, Prescho | 2003 |
Oral and intravenous caffeine for treatment of children with post-sedation paradoxical hyperactivity.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Caffeine; Case-Control Studies; Central | 2004 |
How we do it: management of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children.
Topics: Algorithms; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Anxiety; Bronchi; Bronchoscopy; Child; Foreign Bodies; Humans; | 2004 |
Safety of intravenous sedation administered by the operating oral surgeon: the first 7 years of office practice.
Topics: Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Intravenou | 2005 |
Physiological modelling of agitation-sedation dynamics including endogenous agitation reduction.
Topics: Biomedical Engineering; Critical Care; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Midazolam; Models, Biologica | 2006 |
Choice of optimal anesthesia for transdermal kidney biopsy.
Topics: Analgesics; Anesthesia; Anesthesia, Local; Biopsy; Child; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Intraoper | 2006 |
Parameter identification and sedative sensitivity analysis of an agitation-sedation model.
Topics: Computer Simulation; Critical Care; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Midazolam; Models, Biological; | 2006 |
Delirium during intravenous sedation with midazolam alone and with propofol in dental treatment.
Topics: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Combined; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Co | 2006 |
Safety and effectiveness of high-dose midazolam for severe behavioural disturbance in an emergency department with suspected psychostimulant-affected patients.
Topics: Adult; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Glasgow Coma Scale; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Mal | 2008 |
Intramuscular ketamine, midazolam, and glycopyrrolate for pediatric sedation in the emergency department.
Topics: Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Dental; Anesthetics, Dissociative; Child; Child Behavior; Ch | 1995 |
Midazolam for treatment of agitation after ECT.
Topics: Adult; Confusion; Depressive Disorder; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Humans; Male; Midazolam; Psychomot | 1995 |
Propofol for pulsed dye laser treatments in paediatric outpatients.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Anesthesia Recovery Period; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Child; Child, Preschool; Facial | 1994 |
Response to intravenous midazolam sedation in general dental practice.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anesthesia, Dental; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Anxiety; Conscious Sedation; Cooperative | 1996 |
Paradoxical reactions in children associated with midazolam use during endoscopy.
Topics: Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Adolescent; Adolescent Behavior; Aggression; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Anti-An | 1997 |
An unusual cause of failed sedation.
Topics: Adolescent; Adolescent Behavior; Anesthesia, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Animals; Cardiac | 2000 |
Emergence behaviour in children: defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anaesthesia.
Topics: Abdomen; Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Age Factors; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Anesthesia; Anesthesia | 2002 |
Terminal restlessness--its management and the role of midazolam.
Topics: Humans; Midazolam; Propofol; Psychomotor Agitation | 1992 |
[Aseptic meningitis following spinal anesthesia. Report of a case].
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Obstetrical; Anesthesia, Spinal; Cesarean Section; Female; Humans; Meningitis, As | 1991 |
Subcutaneous midazolam infusion in palliative care.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Infusions, Parenteral; Male; Midazolam; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Psychom | 1990 |
Precipitation of benzodiazepine withdrawal following sudden discontinuation of midazolam.
Topics: Anxiety; Humans; Jejunostomy; Male; Midazolam; Middle Aged; Morphine; Pneumonia; Postoperative Compl | 1989 |
Midazolam infusion for sedation in the intensive care unit: effect on adrenal function.
Topics: Adrenal Glands; Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Adult; Aged; Benzodiazepines; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hyd | 1986 |
Continuous intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation in the pediatric intensive care unit.
Topics: Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Infusions, Intravenous; Intensive Care Units; Male; Midazolam; Psy | 1988 |
Use of midazolam hydrochloride in the acutely agitated patient manifesting violent behavior.
Topics: Acute Disease; Emergencies; Humans; Midazolam; Psychomotor Agitation; Violence | 1987 |
Midazolam in acute psychotic patients with hyperarousal.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Emergency Services, Psychiatric; Female; Humans; Male; Midazolam; | 1987 |