midazolam has been researched along with Lung Neoplasms in 21 studies
Midazolam: A short-acting hypnotic-sedative drug with anxiolytic and amnestic properties. It is used in dentistry, cardiac surgery, endoscopic procedures, as preanesthetic medication, and as an adjunct to local anesthesia. The short duration and cardiorespiratory stability makes it useful in poor-risk, elderly, and cardiac patients. It is water-soluble at pH less than 4 and lipid-soluble at physiological pH.
midazolam : An imidazobenzodiazepine that is 4H-imidazo[1,5-a][1,4]benzodiazepine which is substituted by a methyl, 2-fluorophenyl and chloro groups at positions 1, 6 and 8, respectively.
Lung Neoplasms: Tumors or cancer of the LUNG.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Our findings indicate the advantages of sedation with fentanyl and midazolam without oropharyngeal anesthesia for ultrathin bronchoscopy through nasal intubation." | 8.02 | Sedation with fentanyl and midazolam without oropharyngeal anesthesia compared with sedation with pethidine and midazolam with oropharyngeal anesthesia in ultrathin bronchoscopy for peripheral lung lesions. ( Chiba, H; Kamada, K; Mori, Y; Nakata, H; Sawai, T; Shijubou, N; Sumi, T; Yamada, Y, 2021) |
"Midazolam possesses antitumorigenic properties partly mediated by the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor, whereas dexmedetomidine promotes cancer cell survival through signaling via the α2-adrenoceptor in lung carcinoma and neuroglioma cells." | 7.88 | Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine Affect Neuroglioma and Lung Carcinoma Cell Biology In Vitro and In Vivo. ( Bevan, C; Date, A; Datoo, T; Jiang, C; Ma, D; Sanders, RD; Wang, C; Wang, G; Wu, L; Zhao, H, 2018) |
"Our findings indicate the advantages of sedation with fentanyl and midazolam without oropharyngeal anesthesia for ultrathin bronchoscopy through nasal intubation." | 4.02 | Sedation with fentanyl and midazolam without oropharyngeal anesthesia compared with sedation with pethidine and midazolam with oropharyngeal anesthesia in ultrathin bronchoscopy for peripheral lung lesions. ( Chiba, H; Kamada, K; Mori, Y; Nakata, H; Sawai, T; Shijubou, N; Sumi, T; Yamada, Y, 2021) |
"Midazolam possesses antitumorigenic properties partly mediated by the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor, whereas dexmedetomidine promotes cancer cell survival through signaling via the α2-adrenoceptor in lung carcinoma and neuroglioma cells." | 3.88 | Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine Affect Neuroglioma and Lung Carcinoma Cell Biology In Vitro and In Vivo. ( Bevan, C; Date, A; Datoo, T; Jiang, C; Ma, D; Sanders, RD; Wang, C; Wang, G; Wu, L; Zhao, H, 2018) |
"A combination of opioid, midazolam, and scopolamine (that we call "distress protocol" [DP]) is used to induce transient sedation when emergencies occur in palliative care." | 3.83 | A Distress Protocol for Respiratory Emergencies in Terminally Ill Patients With Lung Cancer or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. ( Godbout, K; Lacasse, Y; Tremblay, L, 2016) |
" A phase 1 drug-drug interaction study was conducted to evaluate the effect of multiple-dose administration of brigatinib on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a sensitive cytochrome P450 3A substrate." | 3.30 | A Phase 1 Drug-Drug Interaction Study Between Brigatinib and the CYP3A Substrate Midazolam in Patients With ALK-Positive or ROS1-Positive Solid Tumors. ( D'Arcangelo, M; Felip, E; Garrido, P; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Vranceanu, F; Ye, M; Zhu, J, 2023) |
" Here, we investigate the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction potential of trilaciclib." | 3.11 | Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Studies Between Trilaciclib and Midazolam, Metformin, Rifampin, Itraconazole, and Topotecan in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer. ( Beelen, A; Curd, L; Goti, V; Horton, JK; Li, C; Sale, M; Tao, W, 2022) |
"Ceritinib is an ALK receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved as first- and second-line treatment in adult patients with ALK + metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)." | 3.01 | Effect of ceritinib on the pharmacokinetics of coadministered CYP3A and 2C9 substrates: a phase I, multicenter, drug-drug interaction study in patients with ALK + advanced tumors. ( de Braud, F; De Castro Carpeño, J; de Miguel Luken, MJ; Hurtado, FK; Lau, YY; Mau-Sorensen, M; McCulloch, T; Scott, J; Wang, D, 2021) |
" We present results from 3 fixed-sequence studies evaluating drug-drug interactions for alectinib through CYP3A." | 2.84 | Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions Through Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) for the Selective ALK Inhibitor Alectinib. ( Bogman, K; Bordogna, W; Cleary, Y; Dall, G; De Petris, L; Guerini, E; Martin-Facklam, M; Morcos, PN; Phipps, A; Viteri, S; Yu, L, 2017) |
"4 minutes and the mean dosage of drugs was 4." | 1.72 | Efficacy and safety of EBUS-TBNA under conscious sedation with meperidine and midazolam. ( Casalini, E; Facciolongo, N; Fontana, M; Galeone, C; Ghidoni, G; Patricelli, G; Piro, R; Ruggiero, P; Taddei, S, 2022) |
"Midazolam is an anesthetic agent commonly used for anesthesia and sedation in surgery." | 1.56 | Anti-metastatic effect of midazolam on melanoma B16F10 cells in the lungs of diabetic mice. ( Ha, KS; Han, ET; Hong, SH; Jeon, HY; Kim, M; Kim, YM; Lee, YJ; Park, WS; Seo, JA, 2020) |
"Midazolam was administered to all patients." | 1.46 | Bronchoscopic diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lung cancer employing sedation with fentanyl and midazolam. ( Ando, C; Fujiwara, K; Iwamoto Md, Y; Minami, D; Nakasuka, T; Sato, K; Sato, T; Shibayama, T; Yonei Md PhD, T, 2017) |
"Etiology of stenosis included lung cancer (46 patients) esophageal cancer (14 patients) and other malignancies (8 patients)." | 1.38 | The insertion of self expanding metal stents with flexible bronchoscopy under sedation for malignant tracheobronchial stenosis: a single-center retrospective analysis. ( Anderson, P; McGrath, EE; Warriner, D, 2012) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 2 (9.52) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 1 (4.76) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 9 (42.86) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 9 (42.86) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Piro, R | 1 |
Casalini, E | 1 |
Fontana, M | 1 |
Galeone, C | 1 |
Ruggiero, P | 1 |
Taddei, S | 1 |
Ghidoni, G | 1 |
Patricelli, G | 1 |
Facciolongo, N | 1 |
Li, C | 1 |
Horton, JK | 1 |
Sale, M | 1 |
Curd, L | 1 |
Goti, V | 1 |
Tao, W | 1 |
Beelen, A | 1 |
Chung, HS | 1 |
Pak, K | 1 |
Lee, G | 1 |
Eom, JS | 1 |
Hanley, MJ | 1 |
D'Arcangelo, M | 1 |
Felip, E | 1 |
Garrido, P | 1 |
Zhu, J | 1 |
Ye, M | 1 |
Vranceanu, F | 1 |
Gupta, N | 1 |
Yalkinoglu, Ö | 1 |
Becker, A | 1 |
Krebs-Brown, A | 1 |
Vetter, C | 1 |
Lüpfert, C | 1 |
Perrin, D | 1 |
Heuer, J | 1 |
Biedert, H | 1 |
Hirt, S | 1 |
Bytyqi, A | 1 |
Bachmann, A | 1 |
Strotmann, R | 1 |
Seo, JA | 1 |
Jeon, HY | 1 |
Kim, M | 1 |
Lee, YJ | 1 |
Han, ET | 1 |
Park, WS | 1 |
Hong, SH | 1 |
Kim, YM | 1 |
Ha, KS | 1 |
Sumi, T | 1 |
Kamada, K | 1 |
Sawai, T | 1 |
Shijubou, N | 1 |
Yamada, Y | 1 |
Nakata, H | 1 |
Mori, Y | 1 |
Chiba, H | 1 |
Hurtado, FK | 1 |
de Braud, F | 1 |
De Castro Carpeño, J | 1 |
de Miguel Luken, MJ | 1 |
Wang, D | 1 |
Scott, J | 1 |
Lau, YY | 1 |
McCulloch, T | 1 |
Mau-Sorensen, M | 1 |
Okabayashi, H | 1 |
Kitamura, H | 1 |
Ikeda, S | 1 |
Sekine, A | 1 |
Oda, T | 1 |
Baba, T | 1 |
Hagiwara, E | 1 |
Sakagami, T | 1 |
Ogura, T | 1 |
Parra-Guillen, ZP | 1 |
Berger, PB | 1 |
Haschke, M | 1 |
Donzelli, M | 1 |
Winogradova, D | 1 |
Pfister, B | 1 |
Früh, M | 1 |
Gillessen, S | 1 |
Krähenbühl, S | 1 |
Kloft, C | 1 |
Joerger, M | 1 |
Minami, D | 1 |
Nakasuka, T | 1 |
Ando, C | 1 |
Iwamoto Md, Y | 1 |
Sato, K | 1 |
Fujiwara, K | 1 |
Shibayama, T | 1 |
Yonei Md PhD, T | 1 |
Sato, T | 1 |
Wang, C | 1 |
Datoo, T | 1 |
Zhao, H | 1 |
Wu, L | 1 |
Date, A | 1 |
Jiang, C | 1 |
Sanders, RD | 1 |
Wang, G | 1 |
Bevan, C | 1 |
Ma, D | 1 |
Conte, SC | 1 |
Spagnol, G | 1 |
Confalonieri, M | 1 |
Brizi, B | 1 |
Jeyabalan, A | 1 |
Medford, AR | 1 |
Godbout, K | 1 |
Tremblay, L | 1 |
Lacasse, Y | 1 |
Morcos, PN | 1 |
Cleary, Y | 1 |
Guerini, E | 1 |
Dall, G | 1 |
Bogman, K | 1 |
De Petris, L | 1 |
Viteri, S | 1 |
Bordogna, W | 1 |
Yu, L | 1 |
Martin-Facklam, M | 1 |
Phipps, A | 1 |
McGrath, EE | 1 |
Warriner, D | 1 |
Anderson, P | 1 |
Arroyo-Cózar, M | 1 |
Grau Delgado, J | 1 |
Gabaldón Conejos, T | 1 |
Postovsky, S | 1 |
Moaed, B | 1 |
Krivoy, E | 1 |
Ofir, R | 1 |
Ben Arush, MW | 1 |
Wilcock, A | 1 |
Twycross, R | 1 |
Hughes, SA | 1 |
Benumof, JL | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase 1b/2a Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of G1T28 in Patients With Previously Treated Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Receiving Topotecan Chemotherapy[NCT02514447] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 123 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-10-05 | Terminated (stopped due to Primary Analysis and survival follow up completed per protocol. Not stopped due to safety concerns.) | ||
Impact of Remimazolam Tosilate for General Anesthesia on Prognosis After Bladder Cancer Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT04532606] | Phase 4 | 1,128 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-02-05 | Recruiting | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
"The percentage of patients experiencing DLTs in Part 1 of the study in each cohort, including:~Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 0.5 × 10^9/L lasting for ≥ 7 days~≥ Grade 3 neutropenic infection/febrile neutropenia~Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or ≥ Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding~Unable to start next cycle of chemotherapy due to lack of recovery to an ANC ≥ 1.5 × 10^9/L and platelet count ≥ 100 × 10^9/L; a delay of up to 1 week from the scheduled start of Cycle 2 is allowed for recovery of ANC and platelet count, and is not considered a DLT~≥ Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea failing maximal medical management; fatigue lasting for > 72 hours)" (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: Evaluated for Cycle 1 (i.e., from date of first dose of study drug (Part 1) to the end of Cycle 1, each cycle = 21 days)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m²- Part 1 Cohort 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m²- Part 1 Cohort 2 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m²- Part 1 Cohort 3 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m²- Part 1 Cohorts 4 and 6 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m²- Part 1 Cohort 5 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m²- Part 1 Cohort 7 | 2 |
The weekly event rate of Major Adverse Hematologic Events (MAHE) events (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | events per participant/week (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 0.258 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 0.091 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 0.102 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 0.403 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 0.156 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 0.102 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 0.037 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 0.085 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 0.073 |
Average duration of exposure to chemotherapy (topotecan) in days. (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to a maximum of 1335 days).
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 94 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 110 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 109 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 147 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 147 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 102 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 124 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 78 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 83 |
Overall event rate of dose reductions in chemotherapy (topotecan) (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | events per participant per cycle (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 0.116 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 0.053 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 0.051 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 0.500 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 0.250 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 0.118 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 0.089 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 0.040 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 0.036 |
The median months and 95% CIs of duration of response. (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: From date of first dose of study drug (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2) until the occurrence of progressive disease, withdrawal of consent, or initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, (assessed up to a maximum of 1335 days).
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 4.9 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 7.8 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 6.8 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | NA |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 5.4 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 6.7 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | NA |
Duration of severe neutropenia (DSN; days) was defined as the number of days from the date of the first ANC value of <0.5 × 10^9/L observed between start of cycle and end of cycle to the date of the first ANC value ≥0.5 × 10^9/L that met the following criteria: (1) occurred after the ANC value of <0.5 × 10^9/L and (2) no other ANC values <0.5 × 10^9/L occurred between this day and end of cycle. DSN is set to 0 for patients who did not experience SN in a cycle, including those who were randomized but never treated. Data from unscheduled visits and the actual assessment date (rather than visit date) were included in the derivation. (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: Evaluated for Cycle 1 (i.e., from date of first dose of study drug (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2) to the end of Cycle 1, each cycle = 21 days)
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 8 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 14 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 8 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 3 |
Percentage of patients requiring G-CSF administration. (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 19 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 8 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 16 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 4 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 3 |
The count of patients who received any ESA administration. (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 6 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 5 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 1 |
Percentage of patients who experience febrile neutropenia adverse events (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 5 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 0 |
The count of patients with any hematologic lab value that meets the CTCAE toxicity grade criteria for ≥ Grade 3 and the value is treatment emergent (occurs after first dose of study drug). Labs include: Hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit, white blood cell (WBC), platelet counts, ANC, ALC, Monocyte Absolute, Basophil Absolute, and Eosinophil Absolute. (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 27 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 25 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 29 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 3 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 4 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 7 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 7 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 7 |
Percentage of patients experiencing an SAE that codes to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class (SOC) of Infections and Infestations (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 3 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 1 |
Percentage of patients requiring systemic/IV antibiotics (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 8 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 8 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 7 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 1 |
Percentage of patients requiring a platelet transfusion (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 9 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 4 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 8 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 0 |
Percentage of patients experiencing an SAE that codes to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class (SOC) of Infections and Infestations and falls into a preferred term (PT) categorized as a pulmonary infection custom MedDRA query (CMQ) (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 1 |
Percentage of patients requiring a RBC transfusion on/after week 5 (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1056 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 12 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 5 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 10 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 2 |
Number of Participants with severe (Grade 4) neutropenia (SN) was a binary variable. If a patient had at least 1 absolute neutrophil count value <0.5 × 10^9/L during the Treatment Period, the patient was assigned as Yes to the occurrence of SN; otherwise, it was No. (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 22 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 5 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 13 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 3 |
Median time (months) and 95% CI from date of first dose date of study drug/randomization until date of death. Patients who do not die during the study will be censored at the date last known to be alive. (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: From date of first dose of study drug (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2) until the date of death due to any cause (evaluated up to a maximum of 2220 days).
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 6.5 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 5.8 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 6.2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | NA |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 10.6 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 8.3 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 9.4 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 4.4 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 10.0 |
Maximum concentration (Cmax) of topotecan when administered with trilaciclib (G1T28) (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: Part 1 of the study during Cycle 1 Day 4 : predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5 (optional), and 24.5 hours post dose. Part 2 of the study during Cycle 1 Day 4 : predose, 0.5, 1, between 3 to 4 hours and between 5.5 to 6.5 hours post dose.
Intervention | ng/ml (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Trilaciclib (G1T28) + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m²- Part 1 | 21.1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) + Topotecan 1 mg/m²- Part 1 | 36.8 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m²- Part 1 | 52.4 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) + Topotecan 1.50 mg/m²- Part 1 | NA |
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 43.0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 17.5 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 41.4 |
Maximum concentration (Cmax) of trilaciclib (G1T28) when administered with topotecan (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: Part 1 of the study during Cycle 1 Day 4 : predose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5 (optional), and 24.5 hours post dose. Part 2 of the study during Cycle 1 Day 4 : predose, 0.5, 1, between 3 to 4 hours and between 5.5 to 6.5 hours post dose.
Intervention | ng/ml (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan - Part 1 | 1060 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan - Part 1 | 1220 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan - Part 1 | 2220 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 913 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 1100 |
"Median time (months) and 95% CI from date of first dose of study drug/randomization until date of documented disease progression or death due to any cause.~Investigators followed the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1.1 guidelines for tumor assessments to determine progression. Progressive Disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression)." (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: From date of first dose of study drug (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), until date of documented disease progression or death due to any cause (evaluated up to a maximum of 1335 days).
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 4.2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 3.0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 4.2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 5.5 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 4.3 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 3.6 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 4.5 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 1.8 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 2.1 |
Average exposure and cycle modifications in chemotherapy (topotecan) (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to a maximum of 1335 days).
Intervention | cycles (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Number of cycles completed | Number of cycles delayed | |
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 4 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 4 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 7 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 6 | 3 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 6 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 5 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 4 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 5 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 4 | 0 |
The count of patients with any platelet lab value that meets the CTCAE toxicity grade criteria for ≥ Grade 3 and the value is treatment emergent (occurs after first dose of study drug). (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2), 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator (assessed up to 1090 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Overall Grade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia | Overall Grade 4 Thrombocytopenia | |
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 19 | 11 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 3 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 2 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 2 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 2 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 15 | 9 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 4 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 21 | 13 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 4 | 2 |
"The percentage of patients who fall into each category of Best overall response (BOR) as defined by RECIST, Version 1.1.~Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions.~Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions.~Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.~When no imaging/measurement is done, the patient is not evaluable (NE); and if only a subset of lesion measurements are made, usually the case is also considered NE." (NCT02514447)
Timeframe: From date of first dose of study drug (Part 1)/randomization (Part 2) until the occurrence of progressive disease, withdrawal of consent, or initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, (assessed up to a maximum of 1335 days).
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Complete Response (CR) | Partial Response (PR) | Stable Disease (SD) | Progressive Disease (PD) | Not Evaluable (NE) | No post-baseline tumor assessment (Missing) | |
Placebo + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Parts 2a and 2b | 1 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 3- Part 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.25 mg/m² - Cohort 2- Part 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 200 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Cohort 1- Part 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohorts 4 and 6- Part 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Part 2a | 0 | 3 | 15 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.0 mg/m² - Cohort 7- Part 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 240 mg/m² + Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² - Part 2b | 0 | 5 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Trilaciclib (G1T28) 280 mg/m² + Topotecan 0.75 mg/m² - Cohort 5- Part 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
5 trials available for midazolam and Lung Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Studies Between Trilaciclib and Midazolam, Metformin, Rifampin, Itraconazole, and Topotecan in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Topics: Area Under Curve; Drug Interactions; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Itraconazole; Lung Neoplasms; Metfo | 2022 |
A Phase 1 Drug-Drug Interaction Study Between Brigatinib and the CYP3A Substrate Midazolam in Patients With ALK-Positive or ROS1-Positive Solid Tumors.
Topics: Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Drug Interaction | 2023 |
Effect of ceritinib on the pharmacokinetics of coadministered CYP3A and 2C9 substrates: a phase I, multicenter, drug-drug interaction study in patients with ALK + advanced tumors.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cross-Over Studies; Cytochr | 2021 |
Role of Cytochrome P450 3A4 and 1A2 Phenotyping in Patients with Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Erlotinib Treatment.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Caffeine; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Chromatography, Liquid; Cytoc | 2017 |
Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions Through Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) for the Selective ALK Inhibitor Alectinib.
Topics: Adult; Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase; Carbazoles; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3 | 2017 |
16 other studies available for midazolam and Lung Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy and safety of EBUS-TBNA under conscious sedation with meperidine and midazolam.
Topics: Aged; Bronchoscopy; Conscious Sedation; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration; Humans; | 2022 |
Combined procedure with radial probe and convex probe endobronchial ultrasound.
Topics: Bronchoscopy; Endosonography; Fentanyl; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Midazolam | 2022 |
Assessment of the potential of the MET inhibitor tepotinib to affect the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A4 and P-gp substrates.
Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member | 2023 |
Anti-metastatic effect of midazolam on melanoma B16F10 cells in the lungs of diabetic mice.
Topics: Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Animals; Cell Survival; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Dose-Response Relati | 2020 |
Sedation with fentanyl and midazolam without oropharyngeal anesthesia compared with sedation with pethidine and midazolam with oropharyngeal anesthesia in ultrathin bronchoscopy for peripheral lung lesions.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia; Biopsy; Bronchoscopy; Conscious Sedation; Female; Fentanyl; Hemodynamics; Humans; | 2021 |
Impact of interstitial pneumonia complications on palliative medication for terminal lung cancer: A single-center retrospective study.
Topics: Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Lung Neoplasms; Midazolam; Palliative | 2021 |
Bronchoscopic diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lung cancer employing sedation with fentanyl and midazolam.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biopsy; Bronchoscopy; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Conscious S | 2017 |
Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine Affect Neuroglioma and Lung Carcinoma Cell Biology In Vitro and In Vivo.
Topics: Animals; Apoptosis; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Dexmedetom | 2018 |
Deep sedation versus minimal sedation during endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Ant | 2018 |
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: patient satisfaction under light conscious sedation.
Topics: Anesthetics, Intravenous; Bronchoscopy; Carcinoma; Conscious Sedation; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided | 2014 |
A Distress Protocol for Respiratory Emergencies in Terminally Ill Patients With Lung Cancer or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analgesics, Opioid; Clinical Protocols; Dyspnea; Emergencies; Female; Human | 2016 |
The insertion of self expanding metal stents with flexible bronchoscopy under sedation for malignant tracheobronchial stenosis: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bronchial Diseases; Bronchoscopy; Carcinoma; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Ce | 2012 |
Hiccups induced by midazolam during sedation in flexible bronchoscopy.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Bronchoscopy; Conscious Sedation; Female; Flumazenil; GABA Modulators; Hiccup; Human | 2012 |
Practice of palliative sedation in children with brain tumors and sarcomas at the end of life.
Topics: Adolescent; Bone Neoplasms; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Combined Modality Therapy; Consciousness; Glioma | 2007 |
Midazolam for intractable hiccup.
Topics: Aged; Hiccup; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Kidney Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Midazolam; Mi | 1996 |
Operative lung continuous positive airway pressure to minimize FIO2 during one-lung ventilation.
Topics: Adult; Anesthesia, Inhalation; Fentanyl; Humans; Isoflurane; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Midazolam; | 1990 |