metiamide and Asthma

Tracheal smooth muscle (TSM) from an ovalbumin sensitized canine model of allergic asthma showed hypersensitivity and hyper-reactivity to histamine (H) when compared to that from littermate controls in vitro. Mepyramine abolished H responses in TSM of both groups; it also abolished the allergic response to obalbumin of TSM from sensitized dogs. The H2 receptor agonist, 4-methyl histamine (4-MH) caused small dose-related decreases in H contractures but had no effect on carbachol- or K+-induced tension. Metiamide, an H2 antagonist, did not enhance the H contracture, suggesting the 4-MH may not be exerting a relaxant effect since H2 receptors were absent. The maximum H-induced isometric tension was potentiated when the sensitized and control muscle strips were pre-equilibrated with 4-MH. These observations are consistent with the presence in canine TSM of H1 but not relaxant H2 receptors, the release of endogenous H to the tissue during the antigen-antibody reaction, and the competition of H and 4-MH for the H1 receptors. Experiments with specific blockers also indicated that in this model the only transmitter found in the ovalbumin-induced allergic bronchospasm was histamine.

Topics: Airway Resistance; Anaphylaxis; Animals; Asthma; Dogs; Histamine; In Vitro Techniques; Methylhistamines; Metiamide; Muscle Contraction; Muscle, Smooth; Ovalbumin; Pyrilamine; Receptors, Histamine H2; Trachea

1 Isolated lung parenchymal strips of the dog contracted in response to histamine > carbachol > prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) > bradykinin (Bk) > 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). The order of the relative activity of these agents on the tracheobronchial smooth muscles (TBSM) was carbachol > 5-HT > histamine; PGF(2alpha) and Bk were inactive. Thus there are marked differences in the responsiveness of the smooth muscle of central (trachea and bronchus) and peripheral (lung strip) airways to autonomic and autacoid agents.2 Lung strips and TBSM partially contracted by carbachol, histamine or horse plasma, were relaxed by isoprenaline, PGE(1) and PGE(2).3 Lung strips from dogs sensitized to horse-plasma contracted in response to antigen (Schultz-Dale anaphylactic reaction). Tachyphylaxis or desensitization to subsequent antigen challenge was invariably observed; it was followed after 1 to 2 h of rest by partial recovery of the anaphylactic response.4 Mepyramine selectively antagonized responses to histamine without altering responses to carbachol and antigen.5 Metiamide, an H(2)-receptor antagonist, did not influence responses to histamine, carbachol or horse plasma.6 Indomethacin was found to be ineffective as an inhibitor of the Schultz-Dale anaphylactic reaction.7 The results showed the presence of H(1)-histamine receptors mediating constriction in the peripheral airways of the dog. Histamine and PGF(2alpha) appear to have no important role in the anaphylactic reaction in this tissue. The involvement of slow reacting substance of anaphylaxis (SRS-A) and endoperoxides (thromboxanes) in allergic reactions of canine lung is strongly suggested.

Topics: Anaphylaxis; Animals; Asthma; Autacoids; Disease Models, Animal; Dogs; Female; Histamine H1 Antagonists; In Vitro Techniques; Indomethacin; Lung; Male; Metiamide; Pyrilamine

The histamine H2-receptor antagonist metiamide was evaluated in in vitro and in vivo canine models of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions. At concentrations of 2 and 4 X 10(-4) M, the antagonist significantly increased the amount of histamine present in the medium surrounding passively sensitized canine lung fragments which had been challenged with ascaris antigen. In contrast, the compound was without effect on the release of a slow reacting substance of anaphylaxis. On the basis of these observations metiamide was investigated in an in vivo canine model of allergic asthma. At doses of 10, 30 and 50 mu moles/kg, the antagonist did not enhance the ascaris antigen-induced pulmonary pathophysiology. Similarly, at 10 and 50 mu moles/kg metiamide did not alter histamine-induced increases in pulmonary resistance or decreases in dynamic lung compliance. Insofar as the canine model of allergic asthma may be predictive of the human disease, it could be anticipated that the use of histamine H2-receptor antagonists may not be deleterious to allergic asthmatics.

Topics: Airway Resistance; Animals; Ascaris; Asthma; Dogs; Histamine; Hypersensitivity, Immediate; In Vitro Techniques; Lung; Male; Metiamide; Thiourea; Time Factors