methylphenidate has been researched along with Cognition Disorders in 125 studies
Methylphenidate: A central nervous system stimulant used most commonly in the treatment of ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER in children and for NARCOLEPSY. Its mechanisms appear to be similar to those of DEXTROAMPHETAMINE. The d-isomer of this drug is referred to as DEXMETHYLPHENIDATE HYDROCHLORIDE.
methylphenidate : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of the two threo isomers of methyl phenyl(piperidin-2-yl)acetate. A central stimulant and indirect-acting sympathomimetic, is used (generally as the hydrochloride salt) in the treatment of hyperactivity disorders in children and for the treatment of narcolepsy.
methyl phenyl(piperidin-2-yl)acetate : A amino acid ester that is methyl phenylacetate in which one of the hydrogens alpha to the carbonyl group is replaced by a piperidin-2-yl group.
Cognition Disorders: Disorders characterized by disturbances in mental processes related to learning, thinking, reasoning, and judgment.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Thirty epilepsy patients entered a 1-month open-label methylphenidate trial after a double-blind phase." | 9.24 | Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A 1-month open-label trial. ( Adams, J; Alipio-Jocson, V; Barry, JJ; Bartlett, V; Inoyama, K; Loring, DW; Meador, KJ; Oso, J; Sandhu, S, 2017) |
"To evaluate the potential efficacy of immediate-release methylphenidate (MPH) for treating cognitive deficits in epilepsy." | 9.24 | Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study. ( Adams, J; Alipio-Jocson, V; Barry, JJ; Bartlett, V; Inoyama, K; Loring, DW; Meador, K; Oso, J; Sandhu, S, 2017) |
"High and low-aggressive boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were compared and the effects of methylphenidate were examined on measures from three domains of aggression: (1) directly observed verbal and nonverbal aggressive behaviors exhibited in the context of a day treatment program, (2) aggressive responding when provoked during a laboratory task, and (3) social information processing patterns exhibited on tasks designed to tap the putative cognitive components of aggression." | 7.68 | Aggression in boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: methylphenidate effects on naturalistically observed aggression, response to provocation, and social information processing. ( Lang, AR; Murphy, DA; Pelham, WE, 1992) |
" We sought to prospectively study the effects of levodopa (LD) and/or methylphenidate (MPH) in combination with physiotherapy on mood and cognition following stroke in human subjects." | 6.76 | Effect of methylphenidate and/or levodopa combined with physiotherapy on mood and cognition after stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Delbari, A; Lokk, J; Salman-Roghani, R, 2011) |
"Thirty epilepsy patients entered a 1-month open-label methylphenidate trial after a double-blind phase." | 5.24 | Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A 1-month open-label trial. ( Adams, J; Alipio-Jocson, V; Barry, JJ; Bartlett, V; Inoyama, K; Loring, DW; Meador, KJ; Oso, J; Sandhu, S, 2017) |
"To evaluate the potential efficacy of immediate-release methylphenidate (MPH) for treating cognitive deficits in epilepsy." | 5.24 | Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study. ( Adams, J; Alipio-Jocson, V; Barry, JJ; Bartlett, V; Inoyama, K; Loring, DW; Meador, K; Oso, J; Sandhu, S, 2017) |
"We combined neural measures from three separate procedures (two inhibitory control tasks differing in their degree of emotional salience and resting-state functional connectivity) during methylphenidate (20 mg oral, versus randomized and counterbalanced placebo) and correlated these aggregated responses with cocaine use disorder diagnosis (22 cocaine abusers, 21 controls), symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and working memory capacity." | 5.22 | Abnormal response to methylphenidate across multiple fMRI procedures in cocaine use disorder: feasibility study. ( Goldstein, RZ; Konova, AB; Moeller, SJ; Parvaz, MA; Tomasi, D, 2016) |
"The reviewed studies support the use of methylphenidate to improve end-of-life patient cognitive functions, particularly in the case of hypoactive delirium." | 4.86 | [Using psychostimulants in end-of-life patients with hypoactive delirium and cognitive disorders: A literature review]. ( Elie, D; Gagnon, B; Gagnon, P; Giguère, A, 2010) |
"On the basis of this review, we came to the conclusion that methylphenidate is used to ameliorate opioid-induced somnolence, to augment the analgesic effects of opioids, to treat depression, and to improve cognitive function in patients with cancer." | 4.81 | Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review. ( Dreisbach, A; Kahn, MJ; Lertora, JJ; Rozans, M, 2002) |
"Many of the neurochemical changes associated with aging brain, particularly lower choline acetyltransferase and higher monoamine oxidase, occur with greater severity in senile dementia, Alzheimer's type (SDAT)." | 4.76 | Chemotherapy of cognitive disorders in geriatric subjects. ( Gershon, S; Goodnick, P, 1984) |
"High and low-aggressive boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were compared and the effects of methylphenidate were examined on measures from three domains of aggression: (1) directly observed verbal and nonverbal aggressive behaviors exhibited in the context of a day treatment program, (2) aggressive responding when provoked during a laboratory task, and (3) social information processing patterns exhibited on tasks designed to tap the putative cognitive components of aggression." | 3.68 | Aggression in boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: methylphenidate effects on naturalistically observed aggression, response to provocation, and social information processing. ( Lang, AR; Murphy, DA; Pelham, WE, 1992) |
"The outcome measurements included Mental Fatigue Scale, Choice Reaction Time, Compensatory Tracking Task, Mental Arithmetic Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression." | 2.84 | Efficacy of methylphenidate for the treatment of mental sequelae after traumatic brain injury. ( Wang, YF; Zhang, WT, 2017) |
" We sought to prospectively study the effects of levodopa (LD) and/or methylphenidate (MPH) in combination with physiotherapy on mood and cognition following stroke in human subjects." | 2.76 | Effect of methylphenidate and/or levodopa combined with physiotherapy on mood and cognition after stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Delbari, A; Lokk, J; Salman-Roghani, R, 2011) |
"To investigate the frequency and severity of side effects of methylphenidate among childhood survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and brain tumors and identify predictors of higher adverse effect levels." | 2.74 | Side effects of methylphenidate in childhood cancer survivors: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. ( Conklin, HM; Howard, SC; Jasper, BW; Khan, RB; Lawford, J; Morris, EB; Ogg, SW; Wu, S; Xiong, X, 2009) |
"Children surviving acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and malignant brain tumors (BTs) have a higher incidence of attention and learning problems in school than do their healthy peers." | 2.71 | Short-term efficacy of methylphenidate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among survivors of childhood cancer. ( Bonner, M; Brown, R; Christensen, R; Gururangan, S; Helton, S; Kaplan, S; Khan, RB; Mulhern, RK; Reddick, WE; Wu, S; Xiong, X, 2004) |
"Fenfluramine dosage was gradually increased to a standardized dose of 1." | 2.67 | Fenfluramine and methylphenidate in children with mental retardation and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: laboratory effects. ( Aman, MG; Arnold, LE; Kern, RA; McGhee, DE, 1993) |
"Methylphenidate appears to produce dose-dependent benefits to individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, but the evidence for benefit in Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia is inconclusive." | 2.66 | Is Methylphenidate Beneficial and Safe in Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement? ( Kapur, A, 2020) |
" The medication trials were double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response studies." | 2.66 | Treatment of chronic closed head injury with psychostimulant drugs: a controlled case study and an appropriate evaluation procedure. ( Evans, RW; Gualtieri, CT; Patterson, D, 1987) |
"Four groups of children referred for attention disorders, learning disorders, or both were blindly titrated at statistically equivalent dosage levels of methylphenidate and improved more or less equivalently on several measures of attentiveness (cognitive style tests and reaction time)." | 2.65 | Methylphenidate effects on cognitive style and reaction time in four groups of children. ( Ackerman, PT; Dykman, RA; Holcomb, PJ; McCray, DS, 1982) |
" Neither dosage of active medication was found to effect psychomotor or psychological test performance, subjective report, heart rate or blood pressure." | 2.64 | The effect of methylphenidate on test performance in the cognitively impaired aged. ( Crook, T; Ferris, S; Gershon, S; Raskin, A; Sathananthan, G, 1977) |
"Methylphenidate (MPH) is an effective treatment for ADHD symptoms, but its impact on cognition is less clearly understood." | 2.50 | Effects of methylphenidate on cognitive functions in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from a systematic review and a meta-analysis. ( Coghill, DR; Currie, J; Gagliano, A; Pedroso, S; Seth, S; Usala, T, 2014) |
"Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant originally used for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder." | 2.48 | Methylphenidate: established and expanding roles in symptom management. ( Prommer, E, 2012) |
"In patients with attention deficit disorder complicated by epilepsy, stimulant therapy is generally safe, provided seizures are controlled by antiepileptic medication." | 2.47 | Utility of the electroencephalogram in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. ( Millichap, JG; Millichap, JJ; Stack, CV, 2011) |
"Methylphenidate (MPH) was given to mice while they were also kept under an enrichment condition." | 1.38 | Methylphenidate improves the behavioral and cognitive deficits of neurogranin knockout mice. ( Huang, FL; Huang, KP, 2012) |
"At 14 years after smoke inhalation injury, he had persistent cognitive impairment." | 1.38 | Progressive neuropsychiatric and brain abnormalities after smoke inhalation. ( Tobe, E, 2012) |
"In a second sample of 14 cocaine abusers and 15 controls, administration of an indirect dopamine agonist, methylphenidate, reversed these midbrain responses in both groups, possibly indicating normalization of response in cocaine abusers because of restoration of dopamine signaling but degradation of response in healthy controls owing to excessive dopamine signaling." | 1.38 | Dopaminergic involvement during mental fatigue in health and cocaine addiction. ( Goldstein, RZ; Honorio, J; Moeller, SJ; Tomasi, D; Volkow, ND, 2012) |
" Physicians were presented with a hypothetical pharmaceutical cognitive enhancer that had been approved by the regulatory authorities for use in healthy adults, and was characterized as being safe, effective, and without significant adverse side effects." | 1.36 | Physician attitudes towards pharmacological cognitive enhancement: safety concerns are paramount. ( Banjo, OC; Nadler, R; Reiner, PB, 2010) |
" This study compared the cognitive consequences following chronic treatment with two doses (5 and 10 mg/kg) of methylphenidate on recognition and spatial memory in adult male Long-Evans rats using an established oral dosing procedure." | 1.35 | Chronic oral methylphenidate induces post-treatment impairment in recognition and spatial memory in adult rats. ( LeBlanc-Duchin, D; Taukulis, HK, 2009) |
"Neurobehavioural sequelae of traumatic brain injuries require an appropriate/effective pharmacological response in that they represent an important cause of disability." | 1.35 | Pharmacological treatment of neurobehavioural sequelae of traumatic brain injury. ( Lombardi, F, 2008) |
"In this study we approach problems related to the dosage and specific action of methylphenidate, its effects at cognitive and social levels, possible side-effects and limitations to its usage, and methods for evaluation of the response to treatment in the school environment." | 1.30 | [The evaluation of the effects of pharmacological treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder]. ( Amado, L; Presentación, MJ; Roselló, B, 1999) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 13 (10.40) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 12 (9.60) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 48 (38.40) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 50 (40.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 2 (1.60) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Rozenek, EB | 1 |
Górska, M | 1 |
Wilczyńska, K | 1 |
Waszkiewicz, N | 1 |
Kapur, A | 1 |
Osuagwu, FC | 1 |
Osuagwu, VC | 1 |
Machoka, AM | 1 |
Zhang, WT | 1 |
Wang, YF | 1 |
Adams, J | 2 |
Alipio-Jocson, V | 2 |
Inoyama, K | 2 |
Bartlett, V | 2 |
Sandhu, S | 2 |
Oso, J | 2 |
Barry, JJ | 2 |
Loring, DW | 2 |
Meador, KJ | 1 |
Dorer, CL | 1 |
Manktelow, AE | 1 |
Allanson, J | 1 |
Sahakian, BJ | 5 |
Pickard, JD | 2 |
Bateman, A | 1 |
Menon, DK | 1 |
Stamatakis, EA | 1 |
Korn, L | 1 |
Hassan, K | 1 |
Fainshtein, N | 1 |
Yusov, N | 1 |
Davidovitch, N | 1 |
Pasini, A | 1 |
Sinibaldi, L | 1 |
Paloscia, C | 1 |
Douzgou, S | 1 |
Pitzianti, MB | 1 |
Romeo, E | 1 |
Curatolo, P | 1 |
Pizzuti, A | 1 |
Matuskey, D | 1 |
Luo, X | 1 |
Zhang, S | 1 |
Morgan, PT | 1 |
Abdelghany, O | 1 |
Malison, RT | 1 |
Li, CS | 1 |
Del'Guidice, T | 1 |
Lemay, F | 1 |
Lemasson, M | 1 |
Levasseur-Moreau, J | 1 |
Manta, S | 1 |
Etievant, A | 1 |
Escoffier, G | 1 |
Doré, FY | 1 |
Roman, FS | 1 |
Beaulieu, JM | 1 |
Coghill, DR | 1 |
Seth, S | 1 |
Pedroso, S | 1 |
Usala, T | 1 |
Currie, J | 1 |
Gagliano, A | 1 |
Agay, N | 1 |
Yechiam, E | 1 |
Carmel, Z | 1 |
Levkovitz, Y | 1 |
Yabuki, Y | 1 |
Shioda, N | 1 |
Maeda, T | 1 |
Hiraide, S | 1 |
Togashi, H | 1 |
Fukunaga, K | 1 |
Denlinger, CS | 1 |
Ligibel, JA | 1 |
Are, M | 1 |
Baker, KS | 1 |
Demark-Wahnefried, W | 1 |
Friedman, DL | 1 |
Goldman, M | 1 |
Jones, L | 1 |
King, A | 1 |
Ku, GH | 1 |
Kvale, E | 1 |
Langbaum, TS | 1 |
Leonardi-Warren, K | 1 |
McCabe, MS | 1 |
Melisko, M | 1 |
Montoya, JG | 1 |
Mooney, K | 1 |
Morgan, MA | 1 |
Moslehi, JJ | 1 |
O'Connor, T | 1 |
Overholser, L | 1 |
Paskett, ED | 1 |
Raza, M | 1 |
Syrjala, KL | 1 |
Urba, SG | 1 |
Wakabayashi, MT | 1 |
Zee, P | 1 |
McMillian, NR | 1 |
Freedman-Cass, DA | 1 |
Mouri, A | 1 |
Hoshino, Y | 1 |
Narusawa, S | 1 |
Ikegami, K | 1 |
Mizoguchi, H | 1 |
Murata, Y | 1 |
Yoshimura, T | 1 |
Nabeshima, T | 1 |
Borghgraef, C | 1 |
Libert, Y | 1 |
Etienne, AM | 1 |
Delvaux, N | 1 |
Reynaert, C | 1 |
Razavi, D | 1 |
Casey, BJ | 1 |
Durston, S | 2 |
Slama, H | 1 |
Fery, P | 1 |
Verheulpen, D | 1 |
Vanzeveren, N | 1 |
Van Bogaert, P | 1 |
Day, J | 1 |
Zienius, K | 1 |
Gehring, K | 2 |
Grosshans, D | 1 |
Taphoorn, M | 1 |
Grant, R | 1 |
Li, J | 1 |
Brown, PD | 1 |
Peles, E | 1 |
Schreiber, S | 1 |
Linzy, S | 1 |
Domani, Y | 1 |
Adelson, M | 1 |
Lavretsky, H | 2 |
Reinlieb, M | 1 |
St Cyr, N | 1 |
Siddarth, P | 2 |
Ercoli, LM | 1 |
Senturk, D | 1 |
Maier, LJ | 1 |
Wunderli, MD | 1 |
Vonmoos, M | 1 |
Römmelt, AT | 1 |
Baumgartner, MR | 1 |
Seifritz, E | 1 |
Schaub, MP | 1 |
Quednow, BB | 1 |
Morein-Zamir, S | 1 |
McAllister, TW | 3 |
Zafonte, R | 1 |
Jain, S | 1 |
Flashman, LA | 2 |
George, MS | 1 |
Grant, GA | 1 |
He, F | 1 |
Lohr, JB | 1 |
Andaluz, N | 1 |
Summerall, L | 1 |
Paulus, MP | 1 |
Raman, R | 1 |
Stein, MB | 1 |
Huang, CH | 1 |
Huang, CC | 1 |
Sun, CK | 1 |
Lin, GH | 1 |
Hou, WH | 1 |
Yarmolovsky, J | 1 |
Szwarc, T | 1 |
Schwartz, M | 1 |
Tirosh, E | 1 |
Geva, R | 1 |
Moeller, SJ | 3 |
Konova, AB | 1 |
Tomasi, D | 3 |
Parvaz, MA | 2 |
Goldstein, RZ | 3 |
Savulich, G | 1 |
Piercy, T | 1 |
Brühl, AB | 1 |
Fox, C | 1 |
Suckling, J | 1 |
Rowe, JB | 1 |
O'Brien, JT | 1 |
McDonald, BC | 1 |
Arciniegas, DB | 2 |
Ferguson, RJ | 1 |
Xing, L | 1 |
Harezlak, J | 1 |
Sprehn, GC | 1 |
Hammond, FM | 1 |
Maerlender, AC | 1 |
Kruck, CL | 1 |
Gillock, KL | 1 |
Frey, K | 1 |
Wall, RN | 1 |
Saykin, AJ | 1 |
Meador, K | 1 |
Zhu, J | 1 |
Fan, F | 1 |
McCarthy, DM | 1 |
Zhang, L | 1 |
Cannon, EN | 1 |
Spencer, TJ | 2 |
Biederman, J | 2 |
Bhide, PG | 1 |
Sengupta, S | 1 |
Grizenko, N | 1 |
Schmitz, N | 1 |
Schwartz, G | 1 |
Bellingham, J | 1 |
Polotskaia, A | 1 |
Stepanian, MT | 1 |
Goto, Y | 1 |
Grace, AA | 1 |
Joober, R | 1 |
Harel, Y | 1 |
Appleboim, N | 1 |
Lavie, M | 1 |
Achiron, A | 1 |
LeBlanc-Duchin, D | 2 |
Taukulis, HK | 2 |
Kim, Y | 1 |
Shin, MS | 1 |
Kim, JW | 1 |
Yoo, HJ | 1 |
Cho, SC | 1 |
Kim, BN | 1 |
Silver, JM | 1 |
Conklin, HM | 1 |
Lawford, J | 1 |
Jasper, BW | 1 |
Morris, EB | 1 |
Howard, SC | 1 |
Ogg, SW | 1 |
Wu, S | 2 |
Xiong, X | 3 |
Khan, RB | 2 |
Ludwig, HT | 1 |
Matte, B | 1 |
Katz, B | 1 |
Rohde, LA | 1 |
Advokat, C | 1 |
Elie, D | 1 |
Gagnon, P | 1 |
Gagnon, B | 1 |
Giguère, A | 1 |
Mohamed, WM | 1 |
Unger, EL | 1 |
Kambhampati, SK | 1 |
Jones, BC | 1 |
Costa, J | 1 |
Stone, P | 1 |
Minton, O | 1 |
Meehan, WP | 1 |
Banjo, OC | 1 |
Nadler, R | 1 |
Reiner, PB | 1 |
Martín Fernández-Mayoralas, D | 2 |
Fernández-Jaén, A | 2 |
Blum, NJ | 1 |
Jawad, AF | 1 |
Clarke, AT | 1 |
Power, TJ | 1 |
Delbari, A | 1 |
Salman-Roghani, R | 1 |
Lokk, J | 1 |
Millichap, JG | 1 |
Millichap, JJ | 1 |
Stack, CV | 1 |
Patwardhan, SY | 1 |
Collins, R | 1 |
Groves, MD | 1 |
Etzel, CJ | 1 |
Meyers, CA | 2 |
Wefel, JS | 1 |
Kang, KD | 1 |
Choi, JW | 1 |
Kang, SG | 1 |
Han, DH | 1 |
Prommer, E | 1 |
Al Owesie, RM | 1 |
Morton, CS | 1 |
Huang, FL | 1 |
Huang, KP | 1 |
Tobe, E | 1 |
Wergin, R | 1 |
Modrykamien, A | 1 |
Honorio, J | 2 |
Volkow, ND | 3 |
Walker, WC | 1 |
Bell, KR | 1 |
Watanabe, TK | 1 |
Woicik, PA | 1 |
Bain, JN | 1 |
Prendergast, MA | 1 |
Terry, AV | 1 |
Arneric, SP | 1 |
Smith, MA | 1 |
Buccafusco, JJ | 1 |
Loo, SK | 1 |
Specter, E | 1 |
Smolen, A | 1 |
Hopfer, C | 1 |
Teale, PD | 1 |
Reite, ML | 1 |
Hall, SS | 1 |
Brown, LN | 1 |
Vickers, JN | 1 |
Vance, AL | 1 |
Maruff, P | 2 |
Barnett, R | 1 |
Insel, TR | 1 |
Mehta, MA | 1 |
Goodyer, IM | 1 |
Hanisch, C | 1 |
Konrad, K | 1 |
Günther, T | 1 |
Herpertz-Dahlmann, B | 1 |
Mulhern, RK | 3 |
Merchant, TE | 1 |
Gajjar, A | 2 |
Reddick, WE | 3 |
Kun, LE | 2 |
Kaplan, S | 1 |
Helton, S | 1 |
Christensen, R | 2 |
Bonner, M | 1 |
Brown, R | 1 |
Gururangan, S | 1 |
Lee, H | 1 |
Kim, SW | 1 |
Kim, JM | 1 |
Shin, IS | 1 |
Yang, SJ | 1 |
Yoon, JS | 1 |
Napolitano, E | 1 |
Elovic, EP | 1 |
Qureshi, AI | 1 |
Gimpel, GA | 1 |
Collett, BR | 1 |
Veeder, MA | 1 |
Gifford, JA | 1 |
Sneddon, P | 1 |
Bushman, B | 1 |
Hughes, K | 1 |
Odell, JD | 1 |
Ruud, A | 1 |
Arnesen, P | 1 |
Stray, LL | 1 |
Vildalen, S | 1 |
Vesterhus, P | 1 |
Vaidya, CJ | 1 |
Bunge, SA | 1 |
Dudukovic, NM | 1 |
Zalecki, CA | 1 |
Elliott, GR | 1 |
Gabrieli, JD | 1 |
Keenan, S | 1 |
Mavaddat, N | 1 |
Iddon, J | 1 |
Wilens, TE | 1 |
Waxmonsky, J | 1 |
Scott, M | 1 |
Swezey, A | 1 |
Kwon, A | 1 |
Llorente, AM | 1 |
Voigt, RG | 1 |
Jensen, CL | 1 |
Berretta, MC | 1 |
Kennard Fraley, J | 1 |
Heird, WC | 1 |
Park, S | 1 |
Kumar, A | 1 |
Reynolds, CF | 1 |
Katz, J | 1 |
Tillery, KL | 1 |
Langleben, DD | 1 |
Monterosso, J | 1 |
Elman, I | 1 |
Ash, B | 1 |
Krikorian, G | 1 |
Austin, G | 1 |
Fallu, A | 1 |
Richard, C | 1 |
Prinzo, R | 1 |
Binder, C | 1 |
Salgado, JV | 1 |
Costa-Silva, M | 1 |
Malloy-Diniz, LF | 2 |
Siqueira, JM | 1 |
Teixeira, AL | 1 |
Morice, E | 1 |
Billard, JM | 1 |
Denis, C | 1 |
Mathieu, F | 1 |
Betancur, C | 1 |
Epelbaum, J | 1 |
Giros, B | 1 |
Nosten-Bertrand, M | 1 |
Leite, WB | 1 |
Corrêa, H | 1 |
Leitner, Y | 1 |
Doniger, GM | 1 |
Barak, R | 1 |
Simon, ES | 1 |
Hausdorff, JM | 1 |
Sukhodolsky, DG | 1 |
Scahill, L | 1 |
Gadow, KD | 1 |
Arnold, LE | 2 |
Aman, MG | 2 |
McDougle, CJ | 1 |
McCracken, JT | 1 |
Tierney, E | 1 |
Williams White, S | 1 |
Lecavalier, L | 1 |
Vitiello, B | 1 |
Gontkovsky, ST | 1 |
Nevels, R | 1 |
McDonald, NB | 1 |
Winkelmann, MH | 1 |
Mar Fan, HG | 1 |
Clemons, M | 1 |
Xu, W | 1 |
Chemerynsky, I | 1 |
Breunis, H | 1 |
Braganza, S | 1 |
Tannock, IF | 1 |
Lombardi, F | 1 |
Calleja-Pérez, B | 1 |
Moreno-Acero, N | 1 |
Muñoz-Jareño, N | 1 |
Semrud-Clikeman, M | 1 |
Pliszka, S | 1 |
Liotti, M | 1 |
Goodnick, P | 1 |
Gershon, S | 3 |
Somerville, ER | 1 |
Bruni, J | 1 |
Whalen, CK | 1 |
Henker, B | 1 |
Ackerman, PT | 1 |
Dykman, RA | 1 |
Holcomb, PJ | 1 |
McCray, DS | 1 |
Reisberg, B | 1 |
Ferris, SH | 1 |
Kern, RA | 1 |
McGhee, DE | 1 |
Risser, MG | 1 |
Bowers, TG | 1 |
van Dyck, CH | 1 |
McMahon, TJ | 1 |
Rosen, MI | 1 |
O'Malley, SS | 1 |
O'Connor, PG | 1 |
Lin, CH | 1 |
Pearsall, HR | 1 |
Woods, SW | 1 |
Kosten, TR | 1 |
Galynker, I | 1 |
Ieronimo, C | 1 |
Miner, C | 1 |
Rosenblum, J | 1 |
Vilkas, N | 1 |
Rosenthal, R | 1 |
Weitzner, MA | 1 |
Glenn, MB | 1 |
Kempton, S | 1 |
Vance, A | 1 |
Luk, E | 1 |
Costin, J | 1 |
Pantelis, C | 1 |
Lindsay, RL | 1 |
Tomazic, T | 1 |
Levine, MD | 1 |
Accardo, PJ | 1 |
Piguet, O | 1 |
King, AC | 1 |
Harrison, DP | 1 |
Roselló, B | 1 |
Amado, L | 1 |
Presentación, MJ | 1 |
Thompson, SJ | 1 |
Leigh, L | 1 |
Heideman, RL | 1 |
Merchant, T | 1 |
Pui, CH | 1 |
Hudson, MM | 1 |
Scherder, EJ | 1 |
Van Deursen, S | 1 |
Van Manen, SR | 1 |
Ferenschild, K | 1 |
Simis, R | 1 |
Vuyk, PJ | 1 |
Hinkin, CH | 1 |
Castellon, SA | 1 |
Hardy, DJ | 1 |
Farinpour, R | 1 |
Newton, T | 1 |
Singer, E | 1 |
Lena, SM | 1 |
Chidambaram, U | 1 |
Panarella, C | 1 |
Sambasivan, K | 1 |
Rozans, M | 1 |
Dreisbach, A | 1 |
Lertora, JJ | 1 |
Kahn, MJ | 1 |
Fox, GB | 1 |
Pan, JB | 1 |
Esbenshade, TA | 1 |
Bennani, YL | 1 |
Black, LA | 1 |
Faghih, R | 1 |
Hancock, AA | 1 |
Decker, MW | 1 |
Fernandez, F | 2 |
Davis, JM | 1 |
Crook, T | 2 |
Ferris, S | 2 |
Sathananthan, G | 2 |
Raskin, A | 1 |
DeLong, R | 1 |
Friedman, H | 1 |
Friedman, N | 1 |
Gustafson, K | 1 |
Oakes, J | 1 |
Murphy, DA | 1 |
Pelham, WE | 1 |
Lang, AR | 1 |
Adams, F | 1 |
Levy, JK | 1 |
Holmes, VF | 1 |
Neidhart, M | 1 |
Mansell, PW | 1 |
Evans, RW | 1 |
Gualtieri, CT | 1 |
Patterson, D | 1 |
Kinsbourne, M | 1 |
Wender, PH | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assessing Cognitive Performance Among Adults With Attention Disorders Working on Treadmill[NCT05243186] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 30 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-10-01 | Recruiting | ||
The Effects of Methylphenidate (MPH) and Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (tDCS) on Inhibitory Control Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[NCT04964427] | 26 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2021-02-08 | Completed | |||
The Relation Between Attentional, Sensory and Emotional Dysregulation in Adults With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Randomized Controlled Trial of the Combined Treatment With Reboxetine and Methylphenidate[NCT05133804] | Phase 2 | 53 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-06-01 | Recruiting | ||
A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Methylphenidate in Veterans With a Diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Recent Cerebral Stroke.[NCT04885257] | Phase 2 | 60 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-01-14 | Recruiting | ||
Methylphenidate Treatment of Attentional and Cognitive Deficits in Epilepsy[NCT02178995] | Phase 4 | 55 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-08-31 | Completed | ||
Learning Impairments Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer[NCT00576472] | Phase 4 | 469 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2000-01-31 | Completed | ||
Transcranial LED Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury[NCT02383472] | 53 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-09-30 | Completed | |||
The Relative Efficacy of Aerobic Exercise in the Treatment of Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Versus Medication Only and the Combination of the Two: A Pilot Study[NCT02788851] | 70 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2016-04-30 | Active, not recruiting | |||
Exercise Training in Depressed Traumatic Brain Injury Survivors[NCT01805479] | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-02-28 | Withdrawn (stopped due to Unable to enroll participants. Sponsor requested study closure.) | |||
Conscious Dying/Conscious Living: Ketamine-Assisted Psychotherapy (KAP) for Patients at End of Life-A Pilot Study for Palliative and Hospice Care[NCT05214417] | Phase 2 | 120 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-05-01 | Not yet recruiting | ||
Neuroplasticity Technology for Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[NCT03363568] | 41 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-07-18 | Completed | |||
An Open-label Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of OROS Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (CONCERTA) in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder[NCT00246207] | Phase 3 | 32 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-03-31 | Completed | ||
Methylphenidate for Hyperactivity and Impulsiveness in Children and Adolescents With Pervasive Developmental Disorders[NCT00025779] | 60 participants | Interventional | 2001-10-31 | Completed | |||
Neural Mechanisms of CBT for Anxiety in Children With Autism: Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT02725619] | 70 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-04-30 | Completed | |||
Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Study[NCT02225808] | 10 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-08-31 | Completed | |||
Treatment Study for Frontotemporal Dementia[NCT00088751] | 20 participants | Observational | 2004-07-23 | Completed | |||
Randomized Study Evaluating the Antiasthenic Effect of Methylphenidate (Ritalin) in Palliative Care in Cancer Patients[NCT00273741] | Phase 3 | 39 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-01-31 | Terminated (stopped due to difficulty of recrutement) | ||
A Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Methylphenidate as an Add on Therapy for Mirtazapine in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Cancer Patients Under Palliative Care[NCT01497548] | Phase 3 | 120 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2011-03-31 | Recruiting | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
"This is a side-effects reporting scale for anti-epileptic medications. Because it encompasses cognitive and non-cognitive side effects, it was not considered one of our main cognitive/quality of life outcomes of interest. It is used in other studies of AED side effects, however, so was included.~The scale consists of 19 symptoms rated 1 (Never a problem) to 4 (Always or often a problem). Minimum score is 19, maximum score is 76. A higher score is WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1) vs end of Open-label (week 8)
Intervention | Points (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline) | 41.9 |
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion) | 34.4 |
"Hit reaction time represents the average number of milliseconds required for a participant to respond to target stimuli. There are no meaningful absolute minimum or maximum scores, though 101ms is the current fastest verified response time per our review. A higher score is WORSE.~This was not a pre-specified variable or an intentional post-hoc analysis, but it is calculated automatically and included here only for completeness of data submission." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Visits 2 vs 3 vs 4 on randomized medication doses.
Intervention | ms (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo | 437.4 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose | 433.9 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg | 435.6 |
"Hit reaction time represents the average number of milliseconds required for a participant to respond to target stimuli. There are no meaningful absolute minimum or maximum scores, though 101ms is the current fastest verified response time per our review. A higher score is WORSE.~This was not a pre-specified variable or an intentional post-hoc analysis, but it is calculated automatically and included here only for completeness of data submission." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Visits 2 vs 3 vs 4 on randomized medication doses.
Intervention | Milliseconds (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 431.2 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label) | 425.7 |
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 447.7 |
Healthy Controls: Visit 5 | 423.4 |
MCG paragraph memory test is a measure verbal memory. Participants are read aloud a long, detailed story, and are then asked to immediately repeat all information they can remember from the story. Each pertinent story element (as pre-defined on a key) is considered 1 correct response. Minimum score is 0, maximum is 100. A higher score is better. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: The single-dose double blind phase was followed by an open-label 4-week treatment phase.
Intervention | Points (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 18.6 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label) | 30.5 |
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 32.7 |
Healthy Controls: Visit 5 | 44.9 |
MCG paragraph memory test is a measure of verbal memory. Participants are read aloud a long, detailed story, and are then asked to immediately repeat all information they can remember from the story. Each pertinent story element (as pre-defined on a key) is considered 1 correct response. Minimum score is 0, maximum is 100. A higher score is better. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Difference in scores between MPH 20mg, 10mg, or placebo, randomized to be given at weeks 2, 3, or 4
Intervention | Points (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo | 25.2 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose | 27.4 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg | 28 |
"QOLIE-89 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life and subjective cognitive effects. The aggregate score is the overall calculated score. Note: most of its questions are specific to patients with epilepsy, and therefore the questionnaire cannot be validly completed by healthy controls. Therefore, only participants with epilepsy completed the questionnaire.~QOLIE aggregate scores and subscale scores are calculated based on individual patient responses throughout the survey, and according to scoring rules as determined by the creator of the questionnaire. Scores are rated 0 (worst) to 100 (best)." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to end of methylphenidate open label treatment (end month 2)
Intervention | Points (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline) | 60.2 |
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion) | 72.0 |
Seizures per 28 'at-risk' days. This is a comparison of 28 days prior to baseline visit as compared to seizure rate while taking methylphenidate, adjusted to provide a 'number of seizures per 28 days' measurement. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Randomized portion is followed by 1-month open-label portion.
Intervention | Seizures per 28 at-risk days (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline) | 2.8 |
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion) | 2.4 |
Seizures per 28 'at-risk' days. This is a comparison of 28 days prior to baseline visit as compared to seizure rate while taking methylphenidate, adjusted to provide a 'number of seizures per 28 days' measurement. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Seizure rate during 28 days prior to study compared to during randomized, single-dose portion, rate adjusted to seizures per 28 patient days.
Intervention | Seizures per 28 at-risk days (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline) | 2.5 |
Participants With Epilepsy (Double-blind Portion) | 2.0 |
"This is a questionnaire covering common stimulant side-effects, intended to help monitor for any significant or common adverse effects.~The scale lists 16 common stimulant side effects rated 0 (absent) to 9 (serious). Minimum score is 0, maximum is 144. A higher score is WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1) vs end of Open-label (week 8)
Intervention | Points (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline) | 37.2 |
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion) | 27.3 |
Symbol-digit matching test is a measure processing speed and working memory. The task involves matching nonsense symbols with numbers based on a key as quickly as possible within 90s. Score represents the number of correct responses within the time frame. Minimum score is 0. There is not a meaningful 'maximum' score, as there are too many symbols for a participant to successfully complete within the allotted time. A higher score is better. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Difference in scores between MPH 20mg, 10mg, or placebo during double-blind portion during which medication was randomized to weeks 2, 3, or 4.
Intervention | points (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo | 49.8 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose | 52.2 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg | 50.6 |
Symbol-digit matching test is a measure processing speed and working memory. The task involves matching nonsense symbols with numbers based on a key as quickly as possible within 90s. Score represents the number of correct responses within the time frame. Minimum score is 0. There is not a meaningful 'maximum' score, as there are too many symbols for a participant to successfully complete within the allotted time. A higher score is better. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: The single-dose double blind phase was followed by an open-label 4-week treatment phase.
Intervention | points (Mean) |
---|---|
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 48.1 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label) | 53.8 |
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 55.9 |
Healthy Controls: Visit 5 | 60.1 |
"Within-groups comparison (between visit 1 and visit 5 within patients with epilepsy, comparing scores at baseline to scores on methylphenidate) as well as a comparison against healthy controls who repeated the cognitive measures an equal number of times (to assess and control for test/retest and placebo improvements).~D' represents 'detectability,' and is a derived statistic which measures a participant's ability to distinguish target stimuli from non-target stimuli, and incorporates response time and accuracy factors. The equation for deriving it is proprietary to the test which markets the CPT. A higher, or less negative, score is considered WORSE.~HRTSD represents the standard deviation of participant hit reaction time data, as measured for a variety of different stimuli types across the trial. It is a measure of the participant's ability to maintain attention across the trial. A higher score represents more variability and is considered WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Difference between scores at baseline (visit 1) and on methylphenidate open-label (visit 5), compared to untreated healthy controls
Intervention | Units (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
HRTSD | D' | |
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 0.20 | -3.7 |
Healthy Controls: Visit 5 | 0.15 | -4.2 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 0.22 | -2.9 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label) | 0.16 | -3.8 |
"Scores on this test measure attentiveness/vigilance and response time. Primary measures are: D', HRTSD D' represents 'detectability,' and is a derived statistic which measures a participant's ability to distinguish target stimuli from non-target stimuli, and incorporates response time and accuracy factors. The equation for deriving it is proprietary to the test which markets the CPT. A higher, or less negative, score is considered WORSE.~HRTSD represents the standard deviation of participant hit reaction time data, as measured for a variety of different stimuli types across the trial. It is a measure of the participant's ability to maintain attention across the trial. A higher score represents more variability and is considered WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: difference in scores on specific variables between MPH 20mg, 10mg, and placebo (randomized to administration at weeks 2, 3, or 4)
Intervention | Units (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
D' | HRTSD | |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose | -3.58 | 0.17 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg | -3.66 | 0.17 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo | -3.3 | 0.19 |
"Omissions, commissions, and hits~Hits represents the raw number of accurate responses to target stimuli, out of a maximum of 288. A higher number is better.~Omissions are errors committed when a target stimuli is not appropriately responded to. A higher number is worse. Theoretically, the maximum number of omissions would be 288. A lower number is BETTER.~Commissions are errors committed when a participant responds to a non-target stimuli. Because a participant may make multiple such errors for a given stimuli, there is no raw maximum. A lower number is BETTER." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1) vs end of Open-label (week 8)
Intervention | Points (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hits | Omissions | Commissions | |
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 287 | 0.3 | 16.7 |
Healthy Controls: Visit 5 | 287.6 | 0.1 | 13.2 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 284.6 | 1.0 | 34.8 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label) | 287.6 | 0.1 | 18.5 |
"Secondary variables in CPT: hits, omissions, commissions~Hits represents the raw number of accurate responses to target stimuli, out of a maximum of 288. A higher number is better.~Omissions are errors committed when a target stimuli is not appropriately responded to. A higher number is worse. Theoretically, the maximum number of omissions would be 288. A lower number is BETTER.~Commissions are errors committed when a participant responds to a non-target stimuli. Because a participant may make multiple such errors for a given stimuli, there is no raw maximum. A lower number is BETTER." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Difference between scores on MPH 20mg, 10mg, or placebo during randomized visits weeks 2, 3, or 4
Intervention | Units (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hits | Omissions | Commissions | |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose | 286.9 | 0.3 | 21.5 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg | 287 | 0.3 | 21.2 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo | 285.3 | 0.9 | 24 |
"Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Apathy Evaluation Scale. These were not primary or secondary variables of interest given methylphenidate's primary expected action being on cognition. Included given one author's interest, as other studies suggesting psychiatric improvements (particularly apathy and depression) with methylphenidate.~BDI is a common clinical and research measure of depression. It has 21 questions and is scored 0 (no depression) to 63 (most severe depression). A higher score is worse.~BAI is a measure of anxiety, which also has 21 questions and is scored 0 (no anxiety) to 63 (most severe anxiety). A higher score is worse.~AES is a measure of clinical apathy, and is an 18-item scale. It rates symptoms as not at all, slightly, somewhat, or a lot, which are then converted to numerical values 1 (least apathy) to 4 (most apathy). Scores range from 18 (no apathy) to 72 (most apathy)." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1) vs end of Open-label (week 8)
Intervention | Points (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
BDI | BAI | AES | |
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 2.0 | 2.4 | 23.3 |
Healthy Controls: Visit 5 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 22.9 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 9.6 | 10.9 | 31.2 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label) | 6.4 | 9.6 | 28.7 |
"These are the remaining subscales of the QOLIE-89. These were not pre-specified variables of interest or intentional post-hoc analyses, but are automatically calculated in scoring the QOLIE-89 and are included ONLY for completeness of data submission.~QOLIE aggregate scores and subscale scores are calculated based on individual patient responses throughout the survey, and according to scoring rules as determined by the creator of the questionnaire. Scores are rated 0 (worst) to 100 (best)." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (baseline) vs end of open-label (week 8)
Intervention | Points (Mean) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health Perceptions | Overall QOL (pt rating) | Physical Function | Role Limitations (Emotional) | Role Limitations (Physical) | Pain | Work/Driving/Social | Emotional Wellbeing | Health Discouragement | Seizure Worry | Medication Effects | Social Support | Social Isolation | |
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline) | 55.2 | 65.5 | 78.0 | 67.8 | 62.8 | 70.4 | 61.1 | 70.3 | 66.4 | 55.5 | 48.1 | 71.2 | 74.6 |
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion) | 63.4 | 73.0 | 83.2 | 79.3 | 82.8 | 78.1 | 69.5 | 75.1 | 81.8 | 61.9 | 50.9 | 73.0 | 81.4 |
"Pre-selected secondary variables were cognitive subscales on the QOLIE-89 felt likely to be affected by MPH: attention/concentration; memory; language; energy/fatigue.~QOLIE aggregate scores and subscale scores are calculated based on individual patient responses throughout the survey, and according to scoring rules as determined by the creator of the questionnaire. Scores are rated 0 (worst) to 100 (best)." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Comparing baseline (visit 1) to end of open-label (end of week 8)
Intervention | Points (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Attention/Concentration | Memory | Language | Energy/Fatigue | |
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline) | 50.4 | 36.8 | 58.1 | 45.9 |
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion) | 74.8 | 59.7 | 72.3 | 61.6 |
"Remaining CPT variables are automatically calculated by the program. They were not pre-specified variables of interest nor intentional post-hoc analyses. They are included ONLY for completeness of data submission.~Hit reaction time represents to the average number of milliseconds required for a participant to respond to target stimuli. There are no meaningful absolute minimum or maximum scores, though 101ms is the current fastest verified response time per our review. A higher score is WORSE.~Variability refers to variations in response time across individual blocks of time within the trial. It differs from HRTSD in that HRTSD measures variability across the entire trial. Minimum is 0. There are no absolute maximums. A higher score is WORSE.~Perseverations are errors made either faster than physiologically possible (<100ms). Minimum is 0, there is no maximum. Higher scores are WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Placebo vs 10mg vs 20mg (visits 2, 3, 4)
Intervention | Units (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Variability (units) | Perseverations (units) | |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose | 0.04 | 0.05 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg | 0.04 | 0.04 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo | 0.04 | 0.06 |
"These are automatically-calculated CPT variables which were not pre-specified variables of interest or intentional post-hoc analyses. They are included ONLY for completeness of data. They include hit reaction time (HRT), variability (VAR), and perseverations (PRS).~Hit reaction time represents to the average number of milliseconds required for a participant to respond to target stimuli. There are no meaningful absolute minimum or maximum scores, though 101ms is the current fastest verified response time per our review. A higher score is WORSE.~Variability refers to variations in response time across individual blocks of time within the trial. It differs from HRTSD in that HRTSD measures variability across the entire trial. Minimum is 0. There are no absolute maximums. A higher score is WORSE.~Perseverations are errors made either faster than physiologically possible (<100ms). Minimum is 0, there is no maximum. Higher scores are WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Baseline vs end of open-label (week 8)
Intervention | Units (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Variability (units) | Perseverations (units) | |
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 0.042 | 0.08 |
Healthy Controls: Visit 5 | 0.035 | 0.0 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline) | 0.05 | 0.2 |
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label) | 0.04 | 0.01 |
To compare the white matter volume of patients with those of sibling controls using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.
Intervention | percentage (Mean) |
---|---|
Patients | 27 |
Siblings | 30.3 |
To compare the white matter volume of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) patients with those of patients with malignant brain tumors using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.
Intervention | percentage (Mean) |
---|---|
Patients With ALL | 28.4 |
Patients With Brain Tumors | 25.5 |
To compare the white matter volume of patients by treatment intensity groups (mild, moderate, and high) and sibling controls using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.
Intervention | percentage (Mean) |
---|---|
Siblings | 30.3 |
Mild Treatment Intensity | 28.8 |
Moderate Treatment Intensity | 25.9 |
High Treatment Intensity | 25.4 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -9.56 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 and 24.36 months. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -8.74 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-eight questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -3.34 |
The Social Skills Rating System- Parent Version (SSRS-P) is a parent rating scale of social behaviors in reference to typically developing children. Thirty eight questions are rated 0 (Never) to 3 (very often). The social skills score is norm-referenced with a mean of 100±15 where a higher score is indicative of better skills. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | 7.99 |
The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Math Composite score assesses the child's ability to solve calculation problems (Numerical Operations) and solve applied, word problems (Math Reasoning). Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and after completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | 0.22 |
The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Reading Composite consists of Basic Reading (single word reading) and Reading Comprehension. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -0.21 |
The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Spelling score assesses the child's ability to spell words to dictation. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and after completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -2.41 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-eight questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Methylphenidate (MPH) Home Maintenance Phase(baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 and 24.36 months. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of Methylphenidate (MPH) Home Maintenance Phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -7.17 |
The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated Standard Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 97.4890 |
Low Dose | 97.0891 |
Moderate Dose | 97.5709 |
The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated Standard Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 99.4412 |
Low Dose | 101.5457 |
Moderate Dose | 101.8999 |
The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated Standard Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 100.6084 |
Low Dose | 98.6610 |
Moderate Dose | 97.3103 |
The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated Standard Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 97.6171 |
Low Dose | 100.6957 |
Moderate Dose | 102.5281 |
The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 57.5805 |
Low Dose | 54.4226 |
Moderate Dose | 53.5317 |
The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 57.6595 |
Low Dose | 54.6491 |
Moderate Dose | 52.9854 |
The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 54.2138 |
Low Dose | 52.2771 |
Moderate Dose | 51.5143 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 58.7691 |
Low Dose | 54.7438 |
Moderate Dose | 54.1974 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 62.7053 |
Low Dose | 59.3272 |
Moderate Dose | 59.6638 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 55.7638 |
Low Dose | 52.1765 |
Moderate Dose | 52.6495 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Color Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 40.7031 |
Placebo | 39.8889 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 0.8142 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Ink Color Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 45.1094 |
Placebo | 41.7937 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 3.3157 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Interference Score have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 52.6875 |
Placebo | 50.6349 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 2.0526 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Word Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 39.0156 |
Placebo | 37.8571 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 1.1585 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Z Score for Long Delay Free Recall has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated Z Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | -0.3692 |
Placebo | -0.2090 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -0.1603 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Z Score for Short Delay Free Recall has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated Z Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | -0.3636 |
Placebo | -0.3358 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -0.0278 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Trials 1-5 have a mean T Score of 50 and Standard Deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 44.6970 |
Placebo | 45.9403 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -1.2433 |
Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. D' and β are derived variables from signal detection theory. β is a measure of response tendency; higher scores indicate a more conservative response pattern. β was calculated using the formula = -d'*.5*(NORMSINV(hits)-NORMSINV(false alarms)). In the case where the false alarm rate = 0 or the hit rate = 1.0, we used the standard correction of 1/2N and 1- 1/2N, respectively. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated raw score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 0.2300 |
Placebo | 0.2647 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -0.0346 |
Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Commission errors are the raw score for the numbers of nontargets presented where the subject incorrectly responded. Accordingly, the range for this variable is 0-6 with a higher score indicative of worse performance or impulsivity. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated raw score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 3.6984 |
Placebo | 3.5970 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 0.1014 |
Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. D' and β are derived variables from signal detection theory. D' is a measure of sensitivity of a person to the signal or target; a higher score is indicative of better performance or better sustained attention. D' was calculated as z(hit) - z(commission). Z-scores were calculated using the NORMSINV function in Microsoft Excel. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated raw score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 1.6809 |
Placebo | 1.7972 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -0.1163 |
Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Hit reaction time is average reaction time in milliseconds for all correct responses when targets were presented. There is no pre-defined range for reaction time; higher score is indicative of slower processing speed. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated raw score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 350.0590 |
Placebo | 354.8515 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -4.7925 |
Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Omission errors are the raw score for the number of targets presented where the subject did not respond. Accordingly, the range for this variable is 0-54 with a higher score indicative of worse performance or problems with sustained attention. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated raw score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 1.8889 |
Placebo | 1.6269 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 0.2620 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were done weekly during the 3-week Home Crossover Period with the best response being used as the measurement for the test. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: weekly during 3-week home crossover phase
Intervention | T score (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Oppositional T Score | Cognitive Problems/Inattention T Score | Hyperactivity T Score | Adhd T Score | |
Low Dose | 50.87 | 53.14 | 51.14 | 53.08 |
Moderate Dose | 50.44 | 51.72 | 50.63 | 52.23 |
Placebo | 49.49 | 55.64 | 51.96 | 55.45 |
This measure indicates the mean differences in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) tests between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. D-KEFs color-word interferences, made up of color naming, word reading, and inhibition, is measured in seconds, a smaller number represents a better outcome. Participants were given 90 seconds to complete color naming and word reading and 180 seconds to complete inhibition. D-KEFs trail making test, made up of number sequencing, letter sequencing, and number-letter sequencing, is measured in seconds, a faster speed (lower number) represents a better outcome. Participants were given 150 seconds to complete number and letter sequencing and 240 seconds to complete number-letter sequencing. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks
Intervention | Seconds (Mean) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D-KEFs Color Naming - 3 Weeks | D-KEFs Color Naming - 6 Weeks | D-KEFs Word Reading - 3 Weeks | D-KEFs Word Reading - 6 Weeks | D-KEFs Inhibition - 3 Weeks | D-KEFs Inhibition - 6 Weeks | D-KEFs Number Sequencing - 3 weeks | D-KEFs Letter Sequencing- 3 weeks | D-KEFs Number-Letter Sequencing- 3 weeks | D-KEFs Number Sequencing - 6 weeks | D-KEFs Letter Sequencing- 6 weeks | D-KEFs Number-Letter Sequencing- 6 weeks | |
MedX Health Console Model 1100 | 3.27 | 3.76 | 0.95 | 1.71 | 7.64 | 32.62 | -24.45 | -28.41 | 8.00 | 11.33 | 6.86 | 12.95 |
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo | 4.76 | 4.07 | 4.07 | 3.44 | 4.48 | 31.59 | -21.17 | -19.51 | 21.93 | 6.89 | 10.59 | 19.81 |
This measure indicates the mean differences in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) tests between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. D-KEFs Verbal Fluency Test, made up of letter fluency and category fluency, is measured by number of responses, a larger number represents a better outcome. Participants were given 60 seconds to complete each fluency test. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks
Intervention | Correct responses (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
D-KEFs Verbal Fluency- letters 3 weeks | D-KEFs Verbal Fluency- letters 6 weeks | D-KEFs Verbal Fluency- category 3 weeks | D-KEFs Verbal Fluency- category 6 weeks | |
MedX Health Console Model 1100 | -3.45 | -6.71 | -1.14 | -1.62 |
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo | -6.10 | -9.89 | -0.03 | -2.00 |
The primary outcome is mean difference on composite scores of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) between entry into the study and completion of treatment (visit 18, week 6) for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. There are 5 composite scores on the ImPACT test; verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor speed, reaction time, and symptom score. The ranges for these subscales are as follows: verbal memory and visual memory: 0-100, visual motor speed: 0-60, reaction time: 0-1.0, and symptom score: 0-132. A higher verbal memory, visual memory, and visual motor speed represent a better outcome, while a lower reaction time and lower symptom score represent a better outcome. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 6 weeks
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Verbal Memory | Visual Memory | Visual Motor Speed | Reaction Time | Symptom Score | |
MedX Health Console Model 1100 | -0.9 | 3.52 | -2.04 | -0.001 | 10.14 |
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo | -5.78 | -7.26 | -5.15 | 0.030 | 11.44 |
"This measure indicates the mean difference in total cognitive symptom scores between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 weeks scores. The total cognitive symptom scored is a sum of 7 symptom scores from the PCSS; feeling slowed down, feeling like in a fog, don't feel right, difficulty concentrating, difficulty remembering, fatigue or low energy, and confusion. The severity of these symptoms are scored 0-6, 0=none, 6=severe. The range for the total cognitive symptom score is 0-42, a lower score represents a better outcome." (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cognitive Sx Score - 3 Weeks | Cognitive Sx Score - 6 Weeks | |
MedX Health Console Model 1100 | 3.95 | 4.00 |
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo | 1.31 | 5.00 |
This measure indicates the mean differences in total post concussion symptom score (PCSS) between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. The PCSS is a sum of severity scores from 0-6 (0=none, 6=severe) for 22 individual symptoms, like headache, neck pain, or drowsiness. The range for the PCSS is 0-132, a lower score represents a better outcome. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
PCSS Total Score - 3 Weeks | PCSS Total score - 6 Weeks | |
MedX Health Console Model 1100 | 9.41 | 7.86 |
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo | 7.03 | 14.63 |
28 reviews available for methylphenidate and Cognition Disorders
Article | Year |
---|---|
In search of optimal psychoactivation: stimulants as cognitive performance enhancers.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; F | 2019 |
Is Methylphenidate Beneficial and Safe in Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement?
Topics: Aged; Animals; Attention; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Re | 2020 |
Effects of methylphenidate on cognitive functions in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Topics: Age Factors; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cogni | 2014 |
[Treatment of cognitive impairments in oncology: a review of longitudinal controlled studies].
Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Case-Control Studies; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cog | 2014 |
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Donepezil; Humans; Indans; Me | 2014 |
Methylphenidate on Cognitive Improvement in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis.
Topics: Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Databases, Factua | 2016 |
Depression and cognitive complaints following mild traumatic brain injury.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Brain; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Choline; | 2009 |
What are the cognitive effects of stimulant medications? Emphasis on adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Topics: Achievement; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syst | 2010 |
[Using psychostimulants in end-of-life patients with hypoactive delirium and cognitive disorders: A literature review].
Topics: Aged; Caffeine; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Confusion; Delirium; Depress | 2010 |
European Palliative Care Research collaborative pain guidelines. Central side-effects management: what is the evidence to support best practice in the management of sedation, cognitive impairment and myoclonus?
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Conscious Sedation; Drug | 2011 |
Medical therapies for concussion.
Topics: Amantadine; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Antiparkinson Agents; Athletic Injuries; Brain Concussion; Bra | 2011 |
[Alcoholic foetopathy: an update].
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Alcoholism; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Central Nervous System Stimulan | 2011 |
Utility of the electroencephalogram in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Waves; Central Nervous System | 2011 |
Methylphenidate: established and expanding roles in symptom management.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorde | 2012 |
Cognitive impairment in ICU survivors: assessment and therapy.
Topics: Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Critical Il | 2012 |
A review of the biological bases of ADHD: what have we learned from imaging studies?
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition D | 2003 |
Late neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of brain tumours in childhood.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Brain; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Child, Pres | 2004 |
Pharmacological stimulant treatment of neurocognitive and functional deficits after traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury.
Topics: Amantadine; Animals; Brain Injuries; Bromocriptine; Cognition Disorders; Dextroamphetamine; Humans; | 2005 |
[The effects of methylphenidate on cognitive-attentional processes. The use of continuous performance tests].
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neuropsychol | 2008 |
Chemotherapy of cognitive disorders in geriatric subjects.
Topics: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Aged; Aging; Alzheimer Disease; Arecoline; Brain Chemistry; Choline; Co | 1984 |
An overview of pharmacologic treatment of cognitive decline in the aged.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition Disorders; Dihydroergotoxine; Humans; Hyperbaric | 1981 |
Methylphenidate treatment of negative symptoms in patients with dementia.
Topics: Aged; Alzheimer Disease; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depressive Disorder | 1997 |
Cognitive functioning and quality of life in malignant glioma patients: a review of the literature.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Clinical Trials a | 1997 |
Methylphenidate for cognitive and behavioral dysfunction after traumatic brain injury.
Topics: Behavioral Symptoms; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Control | 1998 |
Impact of attentional dysfunction in dyscalculia.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; | 1999 |
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of | 2002 |
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of | 2002 |
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of | 2002 |
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of | 2002 |
Neuropsychiatric aspects of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
Topics: AIDS Dementia Complex; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; HIV Seropositivity; H | 2002 |
Minimal brain dysfunction in children. Diagnosis and management.
Topics: Abnormalities, Multiple; Affective Symptoms; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit | 1973 |
39 trials available for methylphenidate and Cognition Disorders
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy of methylphenidate for the treatment of mental sequelae after traumatic brain injury.
Topics: Adult; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Huma | 2017 |
Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A 1-month open-label trial.
Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition D | 2017 |
Methylphenidate-mediated motor control network enhancement in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Topics: Adult; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Brain Mapping; Case-Control Studies; Central Nervous System Stimul | 2018 |
Methylphenidate enhances cognitive performance in adults with poor baseline capacities regardless of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis.
Topics: Adult; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; | 2014 |
Cognitive Improvement of Attention and Inhibition in the Late Afternoon in Children With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Treated With Osmotic-Release Oral System Methylphenidate.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syst | 2015 |
Citalopram, methylphenidate, or their combination in geriatric depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Aged; Anxiety Disorders; Apathy; Citalopram; Cognition Disorders; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double | 2015 |
Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate or Galantamine for Persistent Emotional and Cognitive Symptoms Associated with PTSD and/or Traumatic Brain Injury.
Topics: Adult; Affective Symptoms; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Fema | 2016 |
Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate or Galantamine for Persistent Emotional and Cognitive Symptoms Associated with PTSD and/or Traumatic Brain Injury.
Topics: Adult; Affective Symptoms; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Fema | 2016 |
Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate or Galantamine for Persistent Emotional and Cognitive Symptoms Associated with PTSD and/or Traumatic Brain Injury.
Topics: Adult; Affective Symptoms; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Fema | 2016 |
Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate or Galantamine for Persistent Emotional and Cognitive Symptoms Associated with PTSD and/or Traumatic Brain Injury.
Topics: Adult; Affective Symptoms; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Fema | 2016 |
Hot executive control and response to a stimulant in a double-blind randomized trial in children with ADHD.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; | 2017 |
Abnormal response to methylphenidate across multiple fMRI procedures in cocaine use disorder: feasibility study.
Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Cognition; C | 2016 |
Methylphenidate and Memory and Attention Adaptation Training for Persistent Cognitive Symptoms after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Topics: Adult; Attention; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; | 2017 |
Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study.
Topics: Adult; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Cross-Over Studies; Double | 2017 |
COMT Val108/158Met polymorphism and the modulation of task-oriented behavior in children with ADHD.
Topics: Amino Acid Substitution; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catechol O-Methyltransferase | 2008 |
Single dose of methylphenidate improves cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis patients with impaired attention process.
Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Case-Control Studies; Central Nervous System S | 2009 |
Neurocognitive effects of switching from methylphenidate-IR to OROS-methylphenidate in children with ADHD.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan | 2009 |
Side effects of methylphenidate in childhood cancer survivors: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Cognition Disorders; Comorbid | 2009 |
Effect of osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate on different domains of attention and executive functioning in children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervo | 2011 |
Effect of methylphenidate and/or levodopa combined with physiotherapy on mood and cognition after stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antiparkinson Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disor | 2011 |
A randomized trial on the efficacy of methylphenidate and modafinil for improving cognitive functioning and symptoms in patients with a primary brain tumor.
Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders | 2012 |
Sports therapy for attention, cognitions and sociality.
Topics: Age Factors; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catecholamines; Central Nervo | 2011 |
Functional effects of the DAT1 polymorphism on EEG measures in ADHD.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; | 2003 |
Methylphenidate improves working memory and set-shifting in AD/HD: relationships to baseline memory capacity.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimula | 2004 |
Age-dependent neuropsychological deficits and effects of methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a comparison of pre- and grade-school children.
Topics: Age Factors; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Pres | 2004 |
Short-term efficacy of methylphenidate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among survivors of childhood cancer.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System S | 2004 |
Comparing effects of methylphenidate, sertraline and placebo on neuropsychiatric sequelae in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Do | 2005 |
Comparing effects of methylphenidate, sertraline and placebo on neuropsychiatric sequelae in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Do | 2005 |
Comparing effects of methylphenidate, sertraline and placebo on neuropsychiatric sequelae in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Do | 2005 |
Comparing effects of methylphenidate, sertraline and placebo on neuropsychiatric sequelae in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Do | 2005 |
Methylphenidate-enhanced antidepressant response to citalopram in the elderly: a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial.
Topics: Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Citalopram; Cognition Disorders; Depressive Disorder, Major | 2006 |
Does OROS-methylphenidate improve core symptoms and deficits in executive function? Results of an open-label trial in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cardiovascular System; C | 2006 |
A novel multidomain computerized cognitive assessment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: evidence for widespread and circumscribed cognitive deficits.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; | 2007 |
A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of the effects of d-methylphenidate on fatigue and cognitive dysfunction in women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cognition | 2008 |
Executive functioning in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: combined type with and without a stimulant medication history.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; | 2008 |
Methylphenidate effects on cognitive style and reaction time in four groups of children.
Topics: Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Response | 1982 |
An overview of pharmacologic treatment of cognitive decline in the aged.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition Disorders; Dihydroergotoxine; Humans; Hyperbaric | 1981 |
Fenfluramine and methylphenidate in children with mental retardation and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: laboratory effects.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; Cogni | 1993 |
Sustained-release methylphenidate for cognitive impairment in HIV-1-infected drug abusers: a pilot study.
Topics: Adult; Attention; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Delayed-Action Preparation | 1997 |
Assessment of minimally responsive patients: clinical difficulties of single-case design.
Topics: Adult; Arousal; Attention; Brain Injury, Chronic; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disor | 1999 |
Immediate neurocognitive effects of methylphenidate on learning-impaired survivors of childhood cancer.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Attention; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Cognition Disorders; Double-Bli | 2001 |
Methylphenidate improves HIV-1-associated cognitive slowing.
Topics: Adult; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Cross-Over Studies; Female; HIV Serop | 2001 |
The effect of methylphenidate on test performance in the cognitively impaired aged.
Topics: Aged; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Drug Evaluation; Female; H | 1977 |
The effect of methylphenidate on test performance in the cognitively impaired aged.
Topics: Aged; Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; | 1977 |
Treatment of chronic closed head injury with psychostimulant drugs: a controlled case study and an appropriate evaluation procedure.
Topics: Adult; Attention; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition Disorders; Craniocerebral Tra | 1987 |
59 other studies available for methylphenidate and Cognition Disorders
Article | Year |
---|---|
Methylphenidate Ameliorates Worsening Distractibility Symptoms of Misophonia in an Adolescent Male.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognit | 2020 |
Non-Medical Use of Prescription Stimulants for Treatment of Attention Disorders by University Students: Characteristics and Associations.
Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition D | 2019 |
Neurocognitive effects of methylphenidate on ADHD children with different DAT genotypes: a longitudinal open label trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; | 2013 |
Methylphenidate remediates error-preceding activation of the default mode brain regions in cocaine-addicted individuals.
Topics: Adult; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cerebral Cortex; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Cognition Diso | 2013 |
Stimulation of 5-HT2C receptors improves cognitive deficits induced by human tryptophan hydroxylase 2 loss of function mutation.
Topics: 5-Hydroxytryptophan; Animals; Avoidance Learning; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Dopamine Uptake In | 2014 |
Aberrant CaMKII activity in the medial prefrontal cortex is associated with cognitive dysfunction in ADHD model rats.
Topics: Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; CA1 Region, Hippocampal; Calcium- | 2014 |
Survivorship: cognitive function, version 1.2014.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; | 2014 |
Thyrotoropin receptor knockout changes monoaminergic neuronal system and produces methylphenidate-sensitive emotional and cognitive dysfunction.
Topics: Affective Symptoms; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Biogenic Monoamines; Cog | 2014 |
The impact of stimulants on cognition and the brain in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: what does age have to do with it?
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition D | 2014 |
Differences in methylphenidate abuse rates among methadone maintenance treatment patients in two clinics.
Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzodiazepines; Central Nervous System Stimul | 2015 |
Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement in Healthy Individuals: A Compensation for Cognitive Deficits or a Question of Personality?
Topics: Adult; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Decision Making; Empathy; | 2015 |
Pharmacological cognitive enhancement: treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders and lifestyle use by healthy people.
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cholinestera | 2015 |
Focusing the Neuroscience and Societal Implications of Cognitive Enhancers.
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; | 2017 |
A prenatal nicotine exposure mouse model of methylphenidate responsive ADHD-associated cognitive phenotypes.
Topics: Age Factors; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hypera | 2017 |
Chronic oral methylphenidate induces post-treatment impairment in recognition and spatial memory in adult rats.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Cognition Disorders; Exploratory Behavior; Male | 2009 |
Do sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms predict response to methylphenidate in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-inattentive type?
Topics: Adolescent; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; Cogni | 2009 |
Methylphenidate improves cognitive deficits produced by infantile iron deficiency in rats.
Topics: Analysis of Variance; Anemia, Iron-Deficiency; Animals; Attention; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2011 |
Neurocognitive effects of childhood cancer treatment.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Child; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; Risk Factors | 2010 |
Physician attitudes towards pharmacological cognitive enhancement: safety concerns are paramount.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders | 2010 |
Psychopharmacologic intervention after hemorrhagic basal ganglia damage.
Topics: Adult; Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage; Cognition Disorders; Galantamine; Glasgow Coma Scale; Humans; Male; | 2012 |
Methylphenidate improves the behavioral and cognitive deficits of neurogranin knockout mice.
Topics: Animals; Cognition Disorders; Female; Gene Expression; Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein; Hippocampus; | 2012 |
Progressive neuropsychiatric and brain abnormalities after smoke inhalation.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Brain; Cognition Disorders; Depressive Disorder, Major; DNA Damage; Fluo | 2012 |
Dopaminergic involvement during mental fatigue in health and cocaine addiction.
Topics: Adult; Brain; Case-Control Studies; Caudate Nucleus; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Cognition Disorders; | 2012 |
Use of methylphenidate during inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Appetite; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorde | 2012 |
Methylphenidate enhances executive function and optimizes prefrontal function in both health and cocaine addiction.
Topics: Adult; Association Learning; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Cognition | 2014 |
Enhanced attention in rhesus monkeys as a common factor for the cognitive effects of drugs with abuse potential.
Topics: Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention; Caffeine; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Color Perce | 2003 |
The quest for a smart pill.
Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Benzhydryl Compounds; Caffeine; Central Nervous System | 2003 |
Temporal judgments, hemispheric equivalence, and interhemispheric transfer in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cerebr | 2004 |
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, combined type: better executive function performance with longer-term psychostimulant medication.
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Cognition D | 2003 |
What are the long-term effects of methylphenidate treatment?
Topics: Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Cognition Disorders; Disease Models, | 2003 |
Effects of stimulant medication on cognitive performance of children with ADHD.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Amphetamines; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Case-Control Stud | 2005 |
Stimulant medication in 47,XYY syndrome: a report of two cases.
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Cognition D | 2005 |
Altered neural substrates of cognitive control in childhood ADHD: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Topics: Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders; Brain Mapping; Central Nervous System Stimulant | 2005 |
Effects of methylphenidate on cognition and apathy in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a case study and review.
Topics: Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; H | 2005 |
An open trial of adjunctive donepezil in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamines; Antimanic Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Ch | 2005 |
Performance on a visual sustained attention and discrimination task is associated with urinary excretion of norepineprhine metabolite in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD).
Topics: Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; | 2006 |
Can central auditory processing tests resist supramodal influences?
Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Cogn | 2005 |
Effect of methylphenidate on Stroop Color-Word task performance in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; | 2006 |
Prefrontal cognitive dysfunction following brainstem lesion.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Astrocytoma; Attention; Brain Stem Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; | 2007 |
Parallel loss of hippocampal LTD and cognitive flexibility in a genetic model of hyperdopaminergia.
Topics: Animals; Brain Diseases, Metabolic; Cognition Disorders; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamine; Dopamine | 2007 |
Effects of methylphenidate on cognition and behaviour: ruptured communicant aneurysm of the anterior artery.
Topics: Aneurysm, Ruptured; Attention; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Decision Maki | 2007 |
Chronic oral methylphenidate administration to periadolescent rats yields prolonged impairment of memory for objects.
Topics: Age Factors; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; | 2007 |
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder | 2008 |
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder | 2008 |
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder | 2008 |
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder | 2008 |
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder | 2008 |
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder | 2008 |
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder | 2008 |
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder | 2008 |
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder | 2008 |
Decreased serum glucose levels after initiation of methylphenidate in a patient status post-cerebellar tumour resection: a potential interaction with glipizide.
Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cerebellar Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; | 2007 |
Pharmacological treatment of neurobehavioural sequelae of traumatic brain injury.
Topics: Amantadine; Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Brain Injuries; Cognition; Cogniti | 2008 |
Tonic status epilepticus presenting as confusional state.
Topics: Adolescent; Cognition Disorders; Confusion; Diazepam; Electroencephalography; Humans; Male; Methylph | 1983 |
Hyperactivity and the attention deficit disorders: expanding frontiers.
Topics: Aggression; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior Therapy; Child; Cognition; Cogni | 1984 |
Cognitive and neuropsychological characteristics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder children receiving stimulant medications.
Topics: Adolescent; Arousal; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Cognition Diso | 1993 |
Executive function and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: stimulant medication and better executive function performance in children.
Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; | 1999 |
[The evaluation of the effects of pharmacological treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder].
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Child, Pres | 1999 |
Effects of TENS and methylphenidate in tuberculous meningo-encephalitis.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Child Behavior Disorders; Cognition Disorders; Combined Mo | 2001 |
Cognitive factors in anorexia nervosa: a case history.
Topics: Adolescent; Anorexia Nervosa; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System | 2001 |
Effects of histamine H(3) receptor ligands GT-2331 and ciproxifan in a repeated acquisition avoidance response in the spontaneously hypertensive rat pup.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Arousal; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Avoidance Lear | 2002 |
Critique of single amine theories: evidence of a cholinergic influence in the major mental illnesses.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Diso | 1975 |
Stimulants and other drugs for treatment of mental symptoms in the elderly.
Topics: Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Mental Disorders; Methylphenid | 1978 |
Methylphenidate in neuropsychological sequelae of radiotherapy and chemotherapy of childhood brain tumors and leukemia.
Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Child, Preschool; Cognition Disorders; Demyelinatin | 1992 |
Aggression in boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: methylphenidate effects on naturalistically observed aggression, response to provocation, and social information processing.
Topics: Aggression; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child Behavior Disorders; Cognitio | 1992 |
Cognitive impairment due to AIDS-related complex and its response to psychostimulants.
Topics: Adult; AIDS-Related Complex; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Dextroamphetami | 1988 |
School problems: diagnosis and treatment.
Topics: Agnosia; Amphetamine; Anxiety; Child; Child, Preschool; Cognition Disorders; Developmental Disabilit | 1973 |