Page last updated: 2024-10-31

methylphenidate and Cognition Disorders

methylphenidate has been researched along with Cognition Disorders in 125 studies

Methylphenidate: A central nervous system stimulant used most commonly in the treatment of ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER in children and for NARCOLEPSY. Its mechanisms appear to be similar to those of DEXTROAMPHETAMINE. The d-isomer of this drug is referred to as DEXMETHYLPHENIDATE HYDROCHLORIDE.
methylphenidate : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of the two threo isomers of methyl phenyl(piperidin-2-yl)acetate. A central stimulant and indirect-acting sympathomimetic, is used (generally as the hydrochloride salt) in the treatment of hyperactivity disorders in children and for the treatment of narcolepsy.
methyl phenyl(piperidin-2-yl)acetate : A amino acid ester that is methyl phenylacetate in which one of the hydrogens alpha to the carbonyl group is replaced by a piperidin-2-yl group.

Cognition Disorders: Disorders characterized by disturbances in mental processes related to learning, thinking, reasoning, and judgment.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Thirty epilepsy patients entered a 1-month open-label methylphenidate trial after a double-blind phase."9.24Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A 1-month open-label trial. ( Adams, J; Alipio-Jocson, V; Barry, JJ; Bartlett, V; Inoyama, K; Loring, DW; Meador, KJ; Oso, J; Sandhu, S, 2017)
"To evaluate the potential efficacy of immediate-release methylphenidate (MPH) for treating cognitive deficits in epilepsy."9.24Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study. ( Adams, J; Alipio-Jocson, V; Barry, JJ; Bartlett, V; Inoyama, K; Loring, DW; Meador, K; Oso, J; Sandhu, S, 2017)
"High and low-aggressive boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were compared and the effects of methylphenidate were examined on measures from three domains of aggression: (1) directly observed verbal and nonverbal aggressive behaviors exhibited in the context of a day treatment program, (2) aggressive responding when provoked during a laboratory task, and (3) social information processing patterns exhibited on tasks designed to tap the putative cognitive components of aggression."7.68Aggression in boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: methylphenidate effects on naturalistically observed aggression, response to provocation, and social information processing. ( Lang, AR; Murphy, DA; Pelham, WE, 1992)
" We sought to prospectively study the effects of levodopa (LD) and/or methylphenidate (MPH) in combination with physiotherapy on mood and cognition following stroke in human subjects."6.76Effect of methylphenidate and/or levodopa combined with physiotherapy on mood and cognition after stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Delbari, A; Lokk, J; Salman-Roghani, R, 2011)
"Thirty epilepsy patients entered a 1-month open-label methylphenidate trial after a double-blind phase."5.24Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A 1-month open-label trial. ( Adams, J; Alipio-Jocson, V; Barry, JJ; Bartlett, V; Inoyama, K; Loring, DW; Meador, KJ; Oso, J; Sandhu, S, 2017)
"To evaluate the potential efficacy of immediate-release methylphenidate (MPH) for treating cognitive deficits in epilepsy."5.24Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study. ( Adams, J; Alipio-Jocson, V; Barry, JJ; Bartlett, V; Inoyama, K; Loring, DW; Meador, K; Oso, J; Sandhu, S, 2017)
"We combined neural measures from three separate procedures (two inhibitory control tasks differing in their degree of emotional salience and resting-state functional connectivity) during methylphenidate (20 mg oral, versus randomized and counterbalanced placebo) and correlated these aggregated responses with cocaine use disorder diagnosis (22 cocaine abusers, 21 controls), symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and working memory capacity."5.22Abnormal response to methylphenidate across multiple fMRI procedures in cocaine use disorder: feasibility study. ( Goldstein, RZ; Konova, AB; Moeller, SJ; Parvaz, MA; Tomasi, D, 2016)
"The reviewed studies support the use of methylphenidate to improve end-of-life patient cognitive functions, particularly in the case of hypoactive delirium."4.86[Using psychostimulants in end-of-life patients with hypoactive delirium and cognitive disorders: A literature review]. ( Elie, D; Gagnon, B; Gagnon, P; Giguère, A, 2010)
"On the basis of this review, we came to the conclusion that methylphenidate is used to ameliorate opioid-induced somnolence, to augment the analgesic effects of opioids, to treat depression, and to improve cognitive function in patients with cancer."4.81Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review. ( Dreisbach, A; Kahn, MJ; Lertora, JJ; Rozans, M, 2002)
"Many of the neurochemical changes associated with aging brain, particularly lower choline acetyltransferase and higher monoamine oxidase, occur with greater severity in senile dementia, Alzheimer's type (SDAT)."4.76Chemotherapy of cognitive disorders in geriatric subjects. ( Gershon, S; Goodnick, P, 1984)
"High and low-aggressive boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were compared and the effects of methylphenidate were examined on measures from three domains of aggression: (1) directly observed verbal and nonverbal aggressive behaviors exhibited in the context of a day treatment program, (2) aggressive responding when provoked during a laboratory task, and (3) social information processing patterns exhibited on tasks designed to tap the putative cognitive components of aggression."3.68Aggression in boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: methylphenidate effects on naturalistically observed aggression, response to provocation, and social information processing. ( Lang, AR; Murphy, DA; Pelham, WE, 1992)
"The outcome measurements included Mental Fatigue Scale, Choice Reaction Time, Compensatory Tracking Task, Mental Arithmetic Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression."2.84Efficacy of methylphenidate for the treatment of mental sequelae after traumatic brain injury. ( Wang, YF; Zhang, WT, 2017)
" We sought to prospectively study the effects of levodopa (LD) and/or methylphenidate (MPH) in combination with physiotherapy on mood and cognition following stroke in human subjects."2.76Effect of methylphenidate and/or levodopa combined with physiotherapy on mood and cognition after stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Delbari, A; Lokk, J; Salman-Roghani, R, 2011)
"To investigate the frequency and severity of side effects of methylphenidate among childhood survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and brain tumors and identify predictors of higher adverse effect levels."2.74Side effects of methylphenidate in childhood cancer survivors: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. ( Conklin, HM; Howard, SC; Jasper, BW; Khan, RB; Lawford, J; Morris, EB; Ogg, SW; Wu, S; Xiong, X, 2009)
"Children surviving acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and malignant brain tumors (BTs) have a higher incidence of attention and learning problems in school than do their healthy peers."2.71Short-term efficacy of methylphenidate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among survivors of childhood cancer. ( Bonner, M; Brown, R; Christensen, R; Gururangan, S; Helton, S; Kaplan, S; Khan, RB; Mulhern, RK; Reddick, WE; Wu, S; Xiong, X, 2004)
"Fenfluramine dosage was gradually increased to a standardized dose of 1."2.67Fenfluramine and methylphenidate in children with mental retardation and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: laboratory effects. ( Aman, MG; Arnold, LE; Kern, RA; McGhee, DE, 1993)
"Methylphenidate appears to produce dose-dependent benefits to individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, but the evidence for benefit in Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia is inconclusive."2.66Is Methylphenidate Beneficial and Safe in Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement? ( Kapur, A, 2020)
" The medication trials were double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response studies."2.66Treatment of chronic closed head injury with psychostimulant drugs: a controlled case study and an appropriate evaluation procedure. ( Evans, RW; Gualtieri, CT; Patterson, D, 1987)
"Four groups of children referred for attention disorders, learning disorders, or both were blindly titrated at statistically equivalent dosage levels of methylphenidate and improved more or less equivalently on several measures of attentiveness (cognitive style tests and reaction time)."2.65Methylphenidate effects on cognitive style and reaction time in four groups of children. ( Ackerman, PT; Dykman, RA; Holcomb, PJ; McCray, DS, 1982)
" Neither dosage of active medication was found to effect psychomotor or psychological test performance, subjective report, heart rate or blood pressure."2.64The effect of methylphenidate on test performance in the cognitively impaired aged. ( Crook, T; Ferris, S; Gershon, S; Raskin, A; Sathananthan, G, 1977)
"Methylphenidate (MPH) is an effective treatment for ADHD symptoms, but its impact on cognition is less clearly understood."2.50Effects of methylphenidate on cognitive functions in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from a systematic review and a meta-analysis. ( Coghill, DR; Currie, J; Gagliano, A; Pedroso, S; Seth, S; Usala, T, 2014)
"Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant originally used for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder."2.48Methylphenidate: established and expanding roles in symptom management. ( Prommer, E, 2012)
"In patients with attention deficit disorder complicated by epilepsy, stimulant therapy is generally safe, provided seizures are controlled by antiepileptic medication."2.47Utility of the electroencephalogram in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. ( Millichap, JG; Millichap, JJ; Stack, CV, 2011)
"Methylphenidate (MPH) was given to mice while they were also kept under an enrichment condition."1.38Methylphenidate improves the behavioral and cognitive deficits of neurogranin knockout mice. ( Huang, FL; Huang, KP, 2012)
"At 14 years after smoke inhalation injury, he had persistent cognitive impairment."1.38Progressive neuropsychiatric and brain abnormalities after smoke inhalation. ( Tobe, E, 2012)
"In a second sample of 14 cocaine abusers and 15 controls, administration of an indirect dopamine agonist, methylphenidate, reversed these midbrain responses in both groups, possibly indicating normalization of response in cocaine abusers because of restoration of dopamine signaling but degradation of response in healthy controls owing to excessive dopamine signaling."1.38Dopaminergic involvement during mental fatigue in health and cocaine addiction. ( Goldstein, RZ; Honorio, J; Moeller, SJ; Tomasi, D; Volkow, ND, 2012)
" Physicians were presented with a hypothetical pharmaceutical cognitive enhancer that had been approved by the regulatory authorities for use in healthy adults, and was characterized as being safe, effective, and without significant adverse side effects."1.36Physician attitudes towards pharmacological cognitive enhancement: safety concerns are paramount. ( Banjo, OC; Nadler, R; Reiner, PB, 2010)
" This study compared the cognitive consequences following chronic treatment with two doses (5 and 10 mg/kg) of methylphenidate on recognition and spatial memory in adult male Long-Evans rats using an established oral dosing procedure."1.35Chronic oral methylphenidate induces post-treatment impairment in recognition and spatial memory in adult rats. ( LeBlanc-Duchin, D; Taukulis, HK, 2009)
"Neurobehavioural sequelae of traumatic brain injuries require an appropriate/effective pharmacological response in that they represent an important cause of disability."1.35Pharmacological treatment of neurobehavioural sequelae of traumatic brain injury. ( Lombardi, F, 2008)
"In this study we approach problems related to the dosage and specific action of methylphenidate, its effects at cognitive and social levels, possible side-effects and limitations to its usage, and methods for evaluation of the response to treatment in the school environment."1.30[The evaluation of the effects of pharmacological treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder]. ( Amado, L; Presentación, MJ; Roselló, B, 1999)

Research

Studies (125)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-199013 (10.40)18.7374
1990's12 (9.60)18.2507
2000's48 (38.40)29.6817
2010's50 (40.00)24.3611
2020's2 (1.60)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Rozenek, EB1
Górska, M1
Wilczyńska, K1
Waszkiewicz, N1
Kapur, A1
Osuagwu, FC1
Osuagwu, VC1
Machoka, AM1
Zhang, WT1
Wang, YF1
Adams, J2
Alipio-Jocson, V2
Inoyama, K2
Bartlett, V2
Sandhu, S2
Oso, J2
Barry, JJ2
Loring, DW2
Meador, KJ1
Dorer, CL1
Manktelow, AE1
Allanson, J1
Sahakian, BJ5
Pickard, JD2
Bateman, A1
Menon, DK1
Stamatakis, EA1
Korn, L1
Hassan, K1
Fainshtein, N1
Yusov, N1
Davidovitch, N1
Pasini, A1
Sinibaldi, L1
Paloscia, C1
Douzgou, S1
Pitzianti, MB1
Romeo, E1
Curatolo, P1
Pizzuti, A1
Matuskey, D1
Luo, X1
Zhang, S1
Morgan, PT1
Abdelghany, O1
Malison, RT1
Li, CS1
Del'Guidice, T1
Lemay, F1
Lemasson, M1
Levasseur-Moreau, J1
Manta, S1
Etievant, A1
Escoffier, G1
Doré, FY1
Roman, FS1
Beaulieu, JM1
Coghill, DR1
Seth, S1
Pedroso, S1
Usala, T1
Currie, J1
Gagliano, A1
Agay, N1
Yechiam, E1
Carmel, Z1
Levkovitz, Y1
Yabuki, Y1
Shioda, N1
Maeda, T1
Hiraide, S1
Togashi, H1
Fukunaga, K1
Denlinger, CS1
Ligibel, JA1
Are, M1
Baker, KS1
Demark-Wahnefried, W1
Friedman, DL1
Goldman, M1
Jones, L1
King, A1
Ku, GH1
Kvale, E1
Langbaum, TS1
Leonardi-Warren, K1
McCabe, MS1
Melisko, M1
Montoya, JG1
Mooney, K1
Morgan, MA1
Moslehi, JJ1
O'Connor, T1
Overholser, L1
Paskett, ED1
Raza, M1
Syrjala, KL1
Urba, SG1
Wakabayashi, MT1
Zee, P1
McMillian, NR1
Freedman-Cass, DA1
Mouri, A1
Hoshino, Y1
Narusawa, S1
Ikegami, K1
Mizoguchi, H1
Murata, Y1
Yoshimura, T1
Nabeshima, T1
Borghgraef, C1
Libert, Y1
Etienne, AM1
Delvaux, N1
Reynaert, C1
Razavi, D1
Casey, BJ1
Durston, S2
Slama, H1
Fery, P1
Verheulpen, D1
Vanzeveren, N1
Van Bogaert, P1
Day, J1
Zienius, K1
Gehring, K2
Grosshans, D1
Taphoorn, M1
Grant, R1
Li, J1
Brown, PD1
Peles, E1
Schreiber, S1
Linzy, S1
Domani, Y1
Adelson, M1
Lavretsky, H2
Reinlieb, M1
St Cyr, N1
Siddarth, P2
Ercoli, LM1
Senturk, D1
Maier, LJ1
Wunderli, MD1
Vonmoos, M1
Römmelt, AT1
Baumgartner, MR1
Seifritz, E1
Schaub, MP1
Quednow, BB1
Morein-Zamir, S1
McAllister, TW3
Zafonte, R1
Jain, S1
Flashman, LA2
George, MS1
Grant, GA1
He, F1
Lohr, JB1
Andaluz, N1
Summerall, L1
Paulus, MP1
Raman, R1
Stein, MB1
Huang, CH1
Huang, CC1
Sun, CK1
Lin, GH1
Hou, WH1
Yarmolovsky, J1
Szwarc, T1
Schwartz, M1
Tirosh, E1
Geva, R1
Moeller, SJ3
Konova, AB1
Tomasi, D3
Parvaz, MA2
Goldstein, RZ3
Savulich, G1
Piercy, T1
Brühl, AB1
Fox, C1
Suckling, J1
Rowe, JB1
O'Brien, JT1
McDonald, BC1
Arciniegas, DB2
Ferguson, RJ1
Xing, L1
Harezlak, J1
Sprehn, GC1
Hammond, FM1
Maerlender, AC1
Kruck, CL1
Gillock, KL1
Frey, K1
Wall, RN1
Saykin, AJ1
Meador, K1
Zhu, J1
Fan, F1
McCarthy, DM1
Zhang, L1
Cannon, EN1
Spencer, TJ2
Biederman, J2
Bhide, PG1
Sengupta, S1
Grizenko, N1
Schmitz, N1
Schwartz, G1
Bellingham, J1
Polotskaia, A1
Stepanian, MT1
Goto, Y1
Grace, AA1
Joober, R1
Harel, Y1
Appleboim, N1
Lavie, M1
Achiron, A1
LeBlanc-Duchin, D2
Taukulis, HK2
Kim, Y1
Shin, MS1
Kim, JW1
Yoo, HJ1
Cho, SC1
Kim, BN1
Silver, JM1
Conklin, HM1
Lawford, J1
Jasper, BW1
Morris, EB1
Howard, SC1
Ogg, SW1
Wu, S2
Xiong, X3
Khan, RB2
Ludwig, HT1
Matte, B1
Katz, B1
Rohde, LA1
Advokat, C1
Elie, D1
Gagnon, P1
Gagnon, B1
Giguère, A1
Mohamed, WM1
Unger, EL1
Kambhampati, SK1
Jones, BC1
Costa, J1
Stone, P1
Minton, O1
Meehan, WP1
Banjo, OC1
Nadler, R1
Reiner, PB1
Martín Fernández-Mayoralas, D2
Fernández-Jaén, A2
Blum, NJ1
Jawad, AF1
Clarke, AT1
Power, TJ1
Delbari, A1
Salman-Roghani, R1
Lokk, J1
Millichap, JG1
Millichap, JJ1
Stack, CV1
Patwardhan, SY1
Collins, R1
Groves, MD1
Etzel, CJ1
Meyers, CA2
Wefel, JS1
Kang, KD1
Choi, JW1
Kang, SG1
Han, DH1
Prommer, E1
Al Owesie, RM1
Morton, CS1
Huang, FL1
Huang, KP1
Tobe, E1
Wergin, R1
Modrykamien, A1
Honorio, J2
Volkow, ND3
Walker, WC1
Bell, KR1
Watanabe, TK1
Woicik, PA1
Bain, JN1
Prendergast, MA1
Terry, AV1
Arneric, SP1
Smith, MA1
Buccafusco, JJ1
Loo, SK1
Specter, E1
Smolen, A1
Hopfer, C1
Teale, PD1
Reite, ML1
Hall, SS1
Brown, LN1
Vickers, JN1
Vance, AL1
Maruff, P2
Barnett, R1
Insel, TR1
Mehta, MA1
Goodyer, IM1
Hanisch, C1
Konrad, K1
Günther, T1
Herpertz-Dahlmann, B1
Mulhern, RK3
Merchant, TE1
Gajjar, A2
Reddick, WE3
Kun, LE2
Kaplan, S1
Helton, S1
Christensen, R2
Bonner, M1
Brown, R1
Gururangan, S1
Lee, H1
Kim, SW1
Kim, JM1
Shin, IS1
Yang, SJ1
Yoon, JS1
Napolitano, E1
Elovic, EP1
Qureshi, AI1
Gimpel, GA1
Collett, BR1
Veeder, MA1
Gifford, JA1
Sneddon, P1
Bushman, B1
Hughes, K1
Odell, JD1
Ruud, A1
Arnesen, P1
Stray, LL1
Vildalen, S1
Vesterhus, P1
Vaidya, CJ1
Bunge, SA1
Dudukovic, NM1
Zalecki, CA1
Elliott, GR1
Gabrieli, JD1
Keenan, S1
Mavaddat, N1
Iddon, J1
Wilens, TE1
Waxmonsky, J1
Scott, M1
Swezey, A1
Kwon, A1
Llorente, AM1
Voigt, RG1
Jensen, CL1
Berretta, MC1
Kennard Fraley, J1
Heird, WC1
Park, S1
Kumar, A1
Reynolds, CF1
Katz, J1
Tillery, KL1
Langleben, DD1
Monterosso, J1
Elman, I1
Ash, B1
Krikorian, G1
Austin, G1
Fallu, A1
Richard, C1
Prinzo, R1
Binder, C1
Salgado, JV1
Costa-Silva, M1
Malloy-Diniz, LF2
Siqueira, JM1
Teixeira, AL1
Morice, E1
Billard, JM1
Denis, C1
Mathieu, F1
Betancur, C1
Epelbaum, J1
Giros, B1
Nosten-Bertrand, M1
Leite, WB1
Corrêa, H1
Leitner, Y1
Doniger, GM1
Barak, R1
Simon, ES1
Hausdorff, JM1
Sukhodolsky, DG1
Scahill, L1
Gadow, KD1
Arnold, LE2
Aman, MG2
McDougle, CJ1
McCracken, JT1
Tierney, E1
Williams White, S1
Lecavalier, L1
Vitiello, B1
Gontkovsky, ST1
Nevels, R1
McDonald, NB1
Winkelmann, MH1
Mar Fan, HG1
Clemons, M1
Xu, W1
Chemerynsky, I1
Breunis, H1
Braganza, S1
Tannock, IF1
Lombardi, F1
Calleja-Pérez, B1
Moreno-Acero, N1
Muñoz-Jareño, N1
Semrud-Clikeman, M1
Pliszka, S1
Liotti, M1
Goodnick, P1
Gershon, S3
Somerville, ER1
Bruni, J1
Whalen, CK1
Henker, B1
Ackerman, PT1
Dykman, RA1
Holcomb, PJ1
McCray, DS1
Reisberg, B1
Ferris, SH1
Kern, RA1
McGhee, DE1
Risser, MG1
Bowers, TG1
van Dyck, CH1
McMahon, TJ1
Rosen, MI1
O'Malley, SS1
O'Connor, PG1
Lin, CH1
Pearsall, HR1
Woods, SW1
Kosten, TR1
Galynker, I1
Ieronimo, C1
Miner, C1
Rosenblum, J1
Vilkas, N1
Rosenthal, R1
Weitzner, MA1
Glenn, MB1
Kempton, S1
Vance, A1
Luk, E1
Costin, J1
Pantelis, C1
Lindsay, RL1
Tomazic, T1
Levine, MD1
Accardo, PJ1
Piguet, O1
King, AC1
Harrison, DP1
Roselló, B1
Amado, L1
Presentación, MJ1
Thompson, SJ1
Leigh, L1
Heideman, RL1
Merchant, T1
Pui, CH1
Hudson, MM1
Scherder, EJ1
Van Deursen, S1
Van Manen, SR1
Ferenschild, K1
Simis, R1
Vuyk, PJ1
Hinkin, CH1
Castellon, SA1
Hardy, DJ1
Farinpour, R1
Newton, T1
Singer, E1
Lena, SM1
Chidambaram, U1
Panarella, C1
Sambasivan, K1
Rozans, M1
Dreisbach, A1
Lertora, JJ1
Kahn, MJ1
Fox, GB1
Pan, JB1
Esbenshade, TA1
Bennani, YL1
Black, LA1
Faghih, R1
Hancock, AA1
Decker, MW1
Fernandez, F2
Davis, JM1
Crook, T2
Ferris, S2
Sathananthan, G2
Raskin, A1
DeLong, R1
Friedman, H1
Friedman, N1
Gustafson, K1
Oakes, J1
Murphy, DA1
Pelham, WE1
Lang, AR1
Adams, F1
Levy, JK1
Holmes, VF1
Neidhart, M1
Mansell, PW1
Evans, RW1
Gualtieri, CT1
Patterson, D1
Kinsbourne, M1
Wender, PH1

Clinical Trials (18)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Assessing Cognitive Performance Among Adults With Attention Disorders Working on Treadmill[NCT05243186]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-01Recruiting
The Effects of Methylphenidate (MPH) and Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (tDCS) on Inhibitory Control Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[NCT04964427]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-08Completed
The Relation Between Attentional, Sensory and Emotional Dysregulation in Adults With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Randomized Controlled Trial of the Combined Treatment With Reboxetine and Methylphenidate[NCT05133804]Phase 253 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Recruiting
A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Methylphenidate in Veterans With a Diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Recent Cerebral Stroke.[NCT04885257]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-14Recruiting
Methylphenidate Treatment of Attentional and Cognitive Deficits in Epilepsy[NCT02178995]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Learning Impairments Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer[NCT00576472]Phase 4469 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Transcranial LED Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury[NCT02383472]53 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
The Relative Efficacy of Aerobic Exercise in the Treatment of Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Versus Medication Only and the Combination of the Two: A Pilot Study[NCT02788851]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-30Active, not recruiting
Exercise Training in Depressed Traumatic Brain Injury Survivors[NCT01805479]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Withdrawn (stopped due to Unable to enroll participants. Sponsor requested study closure.)
Conscious Dying/Conscious Living: Ketamine-Assisted Psychotherapy (KAP) for Patients at End of Life-A Pilot Study for Palliative and Hospice Care[NCT05214417]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Not yet recruiting
Neuroplasticity Technology for Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)[NCT03363568]41 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-18Completed
An Open-label Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of OROS Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (CONCERTA) in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder[NCT00246207]Phase 332 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Methylphenidate for Hyperactivity and Impulsiveness in Children and Adolescents With Pervasive Developmental Disorders[NCT00025779]60 participants Interventional2001-10-31Completed
Neural Mechanisms of CBT for Anxiety in Children With Autism: Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT02725619]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Study[NCT02225808]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Treatment Study for Frontotemporal Dementia[NCT00088751]20 participants Observational2004-07-23Completed
Randomized Study Evaluating the Antiasthenic Effect of Methylphenidate (Ritalin) in Palliative Care in Cancer Patients[NCT00273741]Phase 339 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Terminated (stopped due to difficulty of recrutement)
A Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Methylphenidate as an Add on Therapy for Mirtazapine in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Cancer Patients Under Palliative Care[NCT01497548]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-03-31Recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Adverse Events Profile (Open-Label)

"This is a side-effects reporting scale for anti-epileptic medications. Because it encompasses cognitive and non-cognitive side effects, it was not considered one of our main cognitive/quality of life outcomes of interest. It is used in other studies of AED side effects, however, so was included.~The scale consists of 19 symptoms rated 1 (Never a problem) to 4 (Always or often a problem). Minimum score is 19, maximum score is 76. A higher score is WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1) vs end of Open-label (week 8)

InterventionPoints (Mean)
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline)41.9
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion)34.4

Hit Reaction Time (Double Blind)

"Hit reaction time represents the average number of milliseconds required for a participant to respond to target stimuli. There are no meaningful absolute minimum or maximum scores, though 101ms is the current fastest verified response time per our review. A higher score is WORSE.~This was not a pre-specified variable or an intentional post-hoc analysis, but it is calculated automatically and included here only for completeness of data submission." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Visits 2 vs 3 vs 4 on randomized medication doses.

Interventionms (Mean)
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo437.4
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose433.9
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg435.6

Hit Reaction Time (Open-Label)

"Hit reaction time represents the average number of milliseconds required for a participant to respond to target stimuli. There are no meaningful absolute minimum or maximum scores, though 101ms is the current fastest verified response time per our review. A higher score is WORSE.~This was not a pre-specified variable or an intentional post-hoc analysis, but it is calculated automatically and included here only for completeness of data submission." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Visits 2 vs 3 vs 4 on randomized medication doses.

InterventionMilliseconds (Mean)
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline)431.2
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label)425.7
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline)447.7
Healthy Controls: Visit 5423.4

MCG (Open-label Portion)

MCG paragraph memory test is a measure verbal memory. Participants are read aloud a long, detailed story, and are then asked to immediately repeat all information they can remember from the story. Each pertinent story element (as pre-defined on a key) is considered 1 correct response. Minimum score is 0, maximum is 100. A higher score is better. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: The single-dose double blind phase was followed by an open-label 4-week treatment phase.

InterventionPoints (Mean)
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline)18.6
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label)30.5
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline)32.7
Healthy Controls: Visit 544.9

MCG Paragraph Memory Test (Double-blind Portion)

MCG paragraph memory test is a measure of verbal memory. Participants are read aloud a long, detailed story, and are then asked to immediately repeat all information they can remember from the story. Each pertinent story element (as pre-defined on a key) is considered 1 correct response. Minimum score is 0, maximum is 100. A higher score is better. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Difference in scores between MPH 20mg, 10mg, or placebo, randomized to be given at weeks 2, 3, or 4

InterventionPoints (Mean)
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo25.2
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose27.4
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg28

QOLIE-89 Aggregate Score

"QOLIE-89 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life and subjective cognitive effects. The aggregate score is the overall calculated score. Note: most of its questions are specific to patients with epilepsy, and therefore the questionnaire cannot be validly completed by healthy controls. Therefore, only participants with epilepsy completed the questionnaire.~QOLIE aggregate scores and subscale scores are calculated based on individual patient responses throughout the survey, and according to scoring rules as determined by the creator of the questionnaire. Scores are rated 0 (worst) to 100 (best)." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to end of methylphenidate open label treatment (end month 2)

InterventionPoints (Mean)
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline)60.2
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion)72.0

Seizure Frequency (Open-label Portion)

Seizures per 28 'at-risk' days. This is a comparison of 28 days prior to baseline visit as compared to seizure rate while taking methylphenidate, adjusted to provide a 'number of seizures per 28 days' measurement. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Randomized portion is followed by 1-month open-label portion.

InterventionSeizures per 28 at-risk days (Mean)
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline)2.8
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion)2.4

Seizure Frequency/Severity (Double-blind Portion)

Seizures per 28 'at-risk' days. This is a comparison of 28 days prior to baseline visit as compared to seizure rate while taking methylphenidate, adjusted to provide a 'number of seizures per 28 days' measurement. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Seizure rate during 28 days prior to study compared to during randomized, single-dose portion, rate adjusted to seizures per 28 patient days.

InterventionSeizures per 28 at-risk days (Mean)
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline)2.5
Participants With Epilepsy (Double-blind Portion)2.0

Stimulant Side-effects Checklist

"This is a questionnaire covering common stimulant side-effects, intended to help monitor for any significant or common adverse effects.~The scale lists 16 common stimulant side effects rated 0 (absent) to 9 (serious). Minimum score is 0, maximum is 144. A higher score is WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1) vs end of Open-label (week 8)

InterventionPoints (Mean)
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline)37.2
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion)27.3

Symbol-digit Matching Test (Double-blind Portion)

Symbol-digit matching test is a measure processing speed and working memory. The task involves matching nonsense symbols with numbers based on a key as quickly as possible within 90s. Score represents the number of correct responses within the time frame. Minimum score is 0. There is not a meaningful 'maximum' score, as there are too many symbols for a participant to successfully complete within the allotted time. A higher score is better. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Difference in scores between MPH 20mg, 10mg, or placebo during double-blind portion during which medication was randomized to weeks 2, 3, or 4.

Interventionpoints (Mean)
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo49.8
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose52.2
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg50.6

Symbol-digit Matching Test (Open Label Phase)

Symbol-digit matching test is a measure processing speed and working memory. The task involves matching nonsense symbols with numbers based on a key as quickly as possible within 90s. Score represents the number of correct responses within the time frame. Minimum score is 0. There is not a meaningful 'maximum' score, as there are too many symbols for a participant to successfully complete within the allotted time. A higher score is better. (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: The single-dose double blind phase was followed by an open-label 4-week treatment phase.

Interventionpoints (Mean)
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline)48.1
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label)53.8
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline)55.9
Healthy Controls: Visit 560.1

Conners CPT Outcomes (Primary Variables) (Open-Label Portion)

"Within-groups comparison (between visit 1 and visit 5 within patients with epilepsy, comparing scores at baseline to scores on methylphenidate) as well as a comparison against healthy controls who repeated the cognitive measures an equal number of times (to assess and control for test/retest and placebo improvements).~D' represents 'detectability,' and is a derived statistic which measures a participant's ability to distinguish target stimuli from non-target stimuli, and incorporates response time and accuracy factors. The equation for deriving it is proprietary to the test which markets the CPT. A higher, or less negative, score is considered WORSE.~HRTSD represents the standard deviation of participant hit reaction time data, as measured for a variety of different stimuli types across the trial. It is a measure of the participant's ability to maintain attention across the trial. A higher score represents more variability and is considered WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Difference between scores at baseline (visit 1) and on methylphenidate open-label (visit 5), compared to untreated healthy controls

,,,
InterventionUnits (Mean)
HRTSDD'
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline)0.20-3.7
Healthy Controls: Visit 50.15-4.2
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline)0.22-2.9
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label)0.16-3.8

Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Double-blind Portion, Primary Variables)

"Scores on this test measure attentiveness/vigilance and response time. Primary measures are: D', HRTSD D' represents 'detectability,' and is a derived statistic which measures a participant's ability to distinguish target stimuli from non-target stimuli, and incorporates response time and accuracy factors. The equation for deriving it is proprietary to the test which markets the CPT. A higher, or less negative, score is considered WORSE.~HRTSD represents the standard deviation of participant hit reaction time data, as measured for a variety of different stimuli types across the trial. It is a measure of the participant's ability to maintain attention across the trial. A higher score represents more variability and is considered WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: difference in scores on specific variables between MPH 20mg, 10mg, and placebo (randomized to administration at weeks 2, 3, or 4)

,,
InterventionUnits (Mean)
D'HRTSD
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose-3.580.17
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg-3.660.17
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo-3.30.19

CPT Outcomes (Secondary Variables) (Open-label Portion)

"Omissions, commissions, and hits~Hits represents the raw number of accurate responses to target stimuli, out of a maximum of 288. A higher number is better.~Omissions are errors committed when a target stimuli is not appropriately responded to. A higher number is worse. Theoretically, the maximum number of omissions would be 288. A lower number is BETTER.~Commissions are errors committed when a participant responds to a non-target stimuli. Because a participant may make multiple such errors for a given stimuli, there is no raw maximum. A lower number is BETTER." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1) vs end of Open-label (week 8)

,,,
InterventionPoints (Mean)
HitsOmissionsCommissions
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline)2870.316.7
Healthy Controls: Visit 5287.60.113.2
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline)284.61.034.8
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label)287.60.118.5

CPT Scores (Double-blind Portion) (Secondary Variables)

"Secondary variables in CPT: hits, omissions, commissions~Hits represents the raw number of accurate responses to target stimuli, out of a maximum of 288. A higher number is better.~Omissions are errors committed when a target stimuli is not appropriately responded to. A higher number is worse. Theoretically, the maximum number of omissions would be 288. A lower number is BETTER.~Commissions are errors committed when a participant responds to a non-target stimuli. Because a participant may make multiple such errors for a given stimuli, there is no raw maximum. A lower number is BETTER." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Difference between scores on MPH 20mg, 10mg, or placebo during randomized visits weeks 2, 3, or 4

,,
InterventionUnits (Mean)
HitsOmissionsCommissions
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose286.90.321.5
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg2870.321.2
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo285.30.924

Neuropsychiatric Questionnaires

"Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Apathy Evaluation Scale. These were not primary or secondary variables of interest given methylphenidate's primary expected action being on cognition. Included given one author's interest, as other studies suggesting psychiatric improvements (particularly apathy and depression) with methylphenidate.~BDI is a common clinical and research measure of depression. It has 21 questions and is scored 0 (no depression) to 63 (most severe depression). A higher score is worse.~BAI is a measure of anxiety, which also has 21 questions and is scored 0 (no anxiety) to 63 (most severe anxiety). A higher score is worse.~AES is a measure of clinical apathy, and is an 18-item scale. It rates symptoms as not at all, slightly, somewhat, or a lot, which are then converted to numerical values 1 (least apathy) to 4 (most apathy). Scores range from 18 (no apathy) to 72 (most apathy)." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1) vs end of Open-label (week 8)

,,,
InterventionPoints (Mean)
BDIBAIAES
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline)2.02.423.3
Healthy Controls: Visit 51.11.722.9
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline)9.610.931.2
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label)6.49.628.7

QOLIE-89 Additional Subscales (Open-label)

"These are the remaining subscales of the QOLIE-89. These were not pre-specified variables of interest or intentional post-hoc analyses, but are automatically calculated in scoring the QOLIE-89 and are included ONLY for completeness of data submission.~QOLIE aggregate scores and subscale scores are calculated based on individual patient responses throughout the survey, and according to scoring rules as determined by the creator of the questionnaire. Scores are rated 0 (worst) to 100 (best)." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Visit 1 (baseline) vs end of open-label (week 8)

,
InterventionPoints (Mean)
Health PerceptionsOverall QOL (pt rating)Physical FunctionRole Limitations (Emotional)Role Limitations (Physical)PainWork/Driving/SocialEmotional WellbeingHealth DiscouragementSeizure WorryMedication EffectsSocial SupportSocial Isolation
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline)55.265.578.067.862.870.461.170.366.455.548.171.274.6
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion)63.473.083.279.382.878.169.575.181.861.950.973.081.4

QOLIE-89 Selected Cognitive Subscales (Open-label)

"Pre-selected secondary variables were cognitive subscales on the QOLIE-89 felt likely to be affected by MPH: attention/concentration; memory; language; energy/fatigue.~QOLIE aggregate scores and subscale scores are calculated based on individual patient responses throughout the survey, and according to scoring rules as determined by the creator of the questionnaire. Scores are rated 0 (worst) to 100 (best)." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Comparing baseline (visit 1) to end of open-label (end of week 8)

,
InterventionPoints (Mean)
Attention/ConcentrationMemoryLanguageEnergy/Fatigue
Participants With Epilepsy (Baseline)50.436.858.145.9
Participants With Epilepsy (Open-label Portion)74.859.772.361.6

Remaining CPT Variables (Double-blind Portion)

"Remaining CPT variables are automatically calculated by the program. They were not pre-specified variables of interest nor intentional post-hoc analyses. They are included ONLY for completeness of data submission.~Hit reaction time represents to the average number of milliseconds required for a participant to respond to target stimuli. There are no meaningful absolute minimum or maximum scores, though 101ms is the current fastest verified response time per our review. A higher score is WORSE.~Variability refers to variations in response time across individual blocks of time within the trial. It differs from HRTSD in that HRTSD measures variability across the entire trial. Minimum is 0. There are no absolute maximums. A higher score is WORSE.~Perseverations are errors made either faster than physiologically possible (<100ms). Minimum is 0, there is no maximum. Higher scores are WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Placebo vs 10mg vs 20mg (visits 2, 3, 4)

,,
InterventionUnits (Mean)
Variability (units)Perseverations (units)
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 10 mg Dose0.040.05
Participants With Epilepsy: Methylphenidate 20 mg0.040.04
Participants With Epilepsy: Placebo0.040.06

Remaining CPT Variables (Open-label)

"These are automatically-calculated CPT variables which were not pre-specified variables of interest or intentional post-hoc analyses. They are included ONLY for completeness of data. They include hit reaction time (HRT), variability (VAR), and perseverations (PRS).~Hit reaction time represents to the average number of milliseconds required for a participant to respond to target stimuli. There are no meaningful absolute minimum or maximum scores, though 101ms is the current fastest verified response time per our review. A higher score is WORSE.~Variability refers to variations in response time across individual blocks of time within the trial. It differs from HRTSD in that HRTSD measures variability across the entire trial. Minimum is 0. There are no absolute maximums. A higher score is WORSE.~Perseverations are errors made either faster than physiologically possible (<100ms). Minimum is 0, there is no maximum. Higher scores are WORSE." (NCT02178995)
Timeframe: Baseline vs end of open-label (week 8)

,,,
InterventionUnits (Mean)
Variability (units)Perseverations (units)
Healthy Controls: Visit 1 (Baseline)0.0420.08
Healthy Controls: Visit 50.0350.0
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 1 (Baseline)0.050.2
Participants With Epilepsy: Visit 5 (Open Label)0.040.01

Brain White Matter Volume for Patients Versus Sibling Controls

To compare the white matter volume of patients with those of sibling controls using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Patients27
Siblings30.3

Brain White Matter Volume for Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Versus Brain Tumors

To compare the white matter volume of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) patients with those of patients with malignant brain tumors using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Patients With ALL28.4
Patients With Brain Tumors25.5

Brain White Matter Volume for Treatment Intensity Groups and Sibling Controls

To compare the white matter volume of patients by treatment intensity groups (mild, moderate, and high) and sibling controls using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Siblings30.3
Mild Treatment Intensity28.8
Moderate Treatment Intensity25.9
High Treatment Intensity25.4

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Conner's Parent Rating Scale (CPRS: Cognitive Problem T Score)

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-9.56

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS: ADHD T Score)

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 and 24.36 months. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-8.74

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS: Cognitive Problem T Score)

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-eight questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-3.34

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Social Skill Rating System (SSRS-P)

The Social Skills Rating System- Parent Version (SSRS-P) is a parent rating scale of social behaviors in reference to typically developing children. Thirty eight questions are rated 0 (Never) to 3 (very often). The social skills score is norm-referenced with a mean of 100±15 where a higher score is indicative of better skills. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall7.99

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) Math: Composite Standard Score

The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Math Composite score assesses the child's ability to solve calculation problems (Numerical Operations) and solve applied, word problems (Math Reasoning). Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and after completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall0.22

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) Reading: Composite Standard Score

The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Reading Composite consists of Basic Reading (single word reading) and Reading Comprehension. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-0.21

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) Spelling: Standard Score

The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Spelling score assesses the child's ability to spell words to dictation. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and after completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-2.41

Change From Methylphenidate (MPH) Home Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS: ADHD T Score)

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-eight questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Methylphenidate (MPH) Home Maintenance Phase(baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 and 24.36 months. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of Methylphenidate (MPH) Home Maintenance Phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-7.17

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by Social Skills Rating System - Parent (SSRS-P) - Problem Behavior.

The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated Standard Score (Mean)
Placebo97.4890
Low Dose97.0891
Moderate Dose97.5709

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by Social Skills Rating System - Parent (SSRS-P) - Social Skill.

The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated Standard Score (Mean)
Placebo99.4412
Low Dose101.5457
Moderate Dose101.8999

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by Social Skills Rating System - Teacher (SSRS-T) - Problem Behavior.

The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated Standard Score (Mean)
Placebo100.6084
Low Dose98.6610
Moderate Dose97.3103

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by Social Skills Rating System - Teacher (SSRS-T) - Social Skill.

The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated Standard Score (Mean)
Placebo97.6171
Low Dose100.6957
Moderate Dose102.5281

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ADHD Index.

The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo57.5805
Low Dose54.4226
Moderate Dose53.5317

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) Cognitive Problem/Inattention Scale.

The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo57.6595
Low Dose54.6491
Moderate Dose52.9854

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) Hyperactivity Scale.

The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo54.2138
Low Dose52.2771
Moderate Dose51.5143

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS) ADHD Index.

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo58.7691
Low Dose54.7438
Moderate Dose54.1974

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS) Cognitive Problem/Inattention Scale.

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo62.7053
Low Dose59.3272
Moderate Dose59.6638

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS) Hyperactivity Scale.

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo55.7638
Low Dose52.1765
Moderate Dose52.6495

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Interference, Impulsivity, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention Using the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) for Color Naming Time.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Color Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)40.7031
Placebo39.8889
MPH Versus Placebo0.8142

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Interference, Impulsivity, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention Using the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) for Ink Color Naming Time.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Ink Color Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)45.1094
Placebo41.7937
MPH Versus Placebo3.3157

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Interference, Impulsivity, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention Using the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) for Interference Score.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Interference Score have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)52.6875
Placebo50.6349
MPH Versus Placebo2.0526

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Interference, Impulsivity, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention Using the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) for Word Naming Time.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Word Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)39.0156
Placebo37.8571
MPH Versus Placebo1.1585

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Learning and Recall Using California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) for Long Delay Free Recall.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Z Score for Long Delay Free Recall has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated Z Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)-0.3692
Placebo-0.2090
MPH Versus Placebo-0.1603

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Learning and Recall Using California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) for Short Delay Free Recall.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Z Score for Short Delay Free Recall has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated Z Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)-0.3636
Placebo-0.3358
MPH Versus Placebo-0.0278

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Learning and Recall Using California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) Over Five Learning Trials.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Trials 1-5 have a mean T Score of 50 and Standard Deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)44.6970
Placebo45.9403
MPH Versus Placebo-1.2433

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Sustained Attention, Reaction Time, and, Impulsivity Using Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) for Beta (Risk Taking).

Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. D' and β are derived variables from signal detection theory. β is a measure of response tendency; higher scores indicate a more conservative response pattern. β was calculated using the formula = -d'*.5*(NORMSINV(hits)-NORMSINV(false alarms)). In the case where the false alarm rate = 0 or the hit rate = 1.0, we used the standard correction of 1/2N and 1- 1/2N, respectively. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated raw score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)0.2300
Placebo0.2647
MPH Versus Placebo-0.0346

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Sustained Attention, Reaction Time, and, Impulsivity Using Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) for Commission Errors.

Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Commission errors are the raw score for the numbers of nontargets presented where the subject incorrectly responded. Accordingly, the range for this variable is 0-6 with a higher score indicative of worse performance or impulsivity. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated raw score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)3.6984
Placebo3.5970
MPH Versus Placebo0.1014

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Sustained Attention, Reaction Time, and, Impulsivity Using Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) for d' (Sensitivity).

Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. D' and β are derived variables from signal detection theory. D' is a measure of sensitivity of a person to the signal or target; a higher score is indicative of better performance or better sustained attention. D' was calculated as z(hit) - z(commission). Z-scores were calculated using the NORMSINV function in Microsoft Excel. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated raw score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)1.6809
Placebo1.7972
MPH Versus Placebo-0.1163

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Sustained Attention, Reaction Time, and, Impulsivity Using Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) for Hit Reaction Time.

Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Hit reaction time is average reaction time in milliseconds for all correct responses when targets were presented. There is no pre-defined range for reaction time; higher score is indicative of slower processing speed. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated raw score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)350.0590
Placebo354.8515
MPH Versus Placebo-4.7925

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Sustained Attention, Reaction Time, and, Impulsivity Using Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) for Omission Errors.

Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Omission errors are the raw score for the number of targets presented where the subject did not respond. Accordingly, the range for this variable is 0-54 with a higher score indicative of worse performance or problems with sustained attention. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated raw score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)1.8889
Placebo1.6269
MPH Versus Placebo0.2620

Best Weekly Score Measured by Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS: ADHD T Score) During the 3-week Home Crossover Phase.

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were done weekly during the 3-week Home Crossover Period with the best response being used as the measurement for the test. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: weekly during 3-week home crossover phase

,,
InterventionT score (Mean)
Oppositional T ScoreCognitive Problems/Inattention T ScoreHyperactivity T ScoreAdhd T Score
Low Dose50.8753.1451.1453.08
Moderate Dose50.4451.7250.6352.23
Placebo49.4955.6451.9655.45

Mean Difference in Change in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) Color-Word Interference and Trail Making Test Performance at Weeks 3 and 6.

This measure indicates the mean differences in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) tests between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. D-KEFs color-word interferences, made up of color naming, word reading, and inhibition, is measured in seconds, a smaller number represents a better outcome. Participants were given 90 seconds to complete color naming and word reading and 180 seconds to complete inhibition. D-KEFs trail making test, made up of number sequencing, letter sequencing, and number-letter sequencing, is measured in seconds, a faster speed (lower number) represents a better outcome. Participants were given 150 seconds to complete number and letter sequencing and 240 seconds to complete number-letter sequencing. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks

,
InterventionSeconds (Mean)
D-KEFs Color Naming - 3 WeeksD-KEFs Color Naming - 6 WeeksD-KEFs Word Reading - 3 WeeksD-KEFs Word Reading - 6 WeeksD-KEFs Inhibition - 3 WeeksD-KEFs Inhibition - 6 WeeksD-KEFs Number Sequencing - 3 weeksD-KEFs Letter Sequencing- 3 weeksD-KEFs Number-Letter Sequencing- 3 weeksD-KEFs Number Sequencing - 6 weeksD-KEFs Letter Sequencing- 6 weeksD-KEFs Number-Letter Sequencing- 6 weeks
MedX Health Console Model 11003.273.760.951.717.6432.62-24.45-28.418.0011.336.8612.95
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo4.764.074.073.444.4831.59-21.17-19.5121.936.8910.5919.81

Mean Difference in Change in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) Verbal Fluency Performance at Weeks 3 and 6.

This measure indicates the mean differences in Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEF) tests between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. D-KEFs Verbal Fluency Test, made up of letter fluency and category fluency, is measured by number of responses, a larger number represents a better outcome. Participants were given 60 seconds to complete each fluency test. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks

,
InterventionCorrect responses (Mean)
D-KEFs Verbal Fluency- letters 3 weeksD-KEFs Verbal Fluency- letters 6 weeksD-KEFs Verbal Fluency- category 3 weeksD-KEFs Verbal Fluency- category 6 weeks
MedX Health Console Model 1100-3.45-6.71-1.14-1.62
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo-6.10-9.89-0.03-2.00

Mean Difference in Change in Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) Score at Baseline and 6 Weeks.

The primary outcome is mean difference on composite scores of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) between entry into the study and completion of treatment (visit 18, week 6) for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. There are 5 composite scores on the ImPACT test; verbal memory, visual memory, visual motor speed, reaction time, and symptom score. The ranges for these subscales are as follows: verbal memory and visual memory: 0-100, visual motor speed: 0-60, reaction time: 0-1.0, and symptom score: 0-132. A higher verbal memory, visual memory, and visual motor speed represent a better outcome, while a lower reaction time and lower symptom score represent a better outcome. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 6 weeks

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Verbal MemoryVisual MemoryVisual Motor SpeedReaction TimeSymptom Score
MedX Health Console Model 1100-0.93.52-2.04-0.00110.14
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo-5.78-7.26-5.150.03011.44

Mean Difference in Change in Total Cognitive Symptom Score at Weeks 3 and Weeks 6

"This measure indicates the mean difference in total cognitive symptom scores between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 weeks scores. The total cognitive symptom scored is a sum of 7 symptom scores from the PCSS; feeling slowed down, feeling like in a fog, don't feel right, difficulty concentrating, difficulty remembering, fatigue or low energy, and confusion. The severity of these symptoms are scored 0-6, 0=none, 6=severe. The range for the total cognitive symptom score is 0-42, a lower score represents a better outcome." (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cognitive Sx Score - 3 WeeksCognitive Sx Score - 6 Weeks
MedX Health Console Model 11003.954.00
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo1.315.00

Mean Difference in Change in Total Post Concussion Symptom Score (PCSS) at Weeks 3 and Weeks 6.

This measure indicates the mean differences in total post concussion symptom score (PCSS) between entry into the study and 3 weeks and entry into the study and 6 weeks for both the LED group and the placebo group. The mean difference is calculated by taking the mean of differences of the entry scores minus the 3 week scores and the entry scores minus the 6 week scores. The PCSS is a sum of severity scores from 0-6 (0=none, 6=severe) for 22 individual symptoms, like headache, neck pain, or drowsiness. The range for the PCSS is 0-132, a lower score represents a better outcome. (NCT02383472)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 weeks and from baseline to 6 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PCSS Total Score - 3 WeeksPCSS Total score - 6 Weeks
MedX Health Console Model 11009.417.86
MedX Health Console Model 1100-placebo7.0314.63

Reviews

28 reviews available for methylphenidate and Cognition Disorders

ArticleYear
In search of optimal psychoactivation: stimulants as cognitive performance enhancers.
    Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju, 2019, Sep-01, Volume: 70, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; F

2019
Is Methylphenidate Beneficial and Safe in Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement?
    CNS drugs, 2020, Volume: 34, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Animals; Attention; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Re

2020
Effects of methylphenidate on cognitive functions in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
    Biological psychiatry, 2014, Oct-15, Volume: 76, Issue:8

    Topics: Age Factors; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cogni

2014
[Treatment of cognitive impairments in oncology: a review of longitudinal controlled studies].
    Bulletin du cancer, 2014, Volume: 101, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Case-Control Studies; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cog

2014
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014, Dec-18, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Donepezil; Humans; Indans; Me

2014
Methylphenidate on Cognitive Improvement in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis.
    Current neuropharmacology, 2016, Volume: 14, Issue:3

    Topics: Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Databases, Factua

2016
Depression and cognitive complaints following mild traumatic brain injury.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 2009, Volume: 166, Issue:6

    Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Brain; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Choline;

2009
What are the cognitive effects of stimulant medications? Emphasis on adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2010, Volume: 34, Issue:8

    Topics: Achievement; Adult; Amphetamine; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syst

2010
[Using psychostimulants in end-of-life patients with hypoactive delirium and cognitive disorders: A literature review].
    Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2010, Volume: 55, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Caffeine; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Confusion; Delirium; Depress

2010
European Palliative Care Research collaborative pain guidelines. Central side-effects management: what is the evidence to support best practice in the management of sedation, cognitive impairment and myoclonus?
    Palliative medicine, 2011, Volume: 25, Issue:5

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Conscious Sedation; Drug

2011
Medical therapies for concussion.
    Clinics in sports medicine, 2011, Volume: 30, Issue:1

    Topics: Amantadine; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Antiparkinson Agents; Athletic Injuries; Brain Concussion; Bra

2011
[Alcoholic foetopathy: an update].
    Revista de neurologia, 2011, Mar-01, Volume: 52 Suppl 1

    Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Alcoholism; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Central Nervous System Stimulan

2011
Utility of the electroencephalogram in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2011, Volume: 42, Issue:3

    Topics: Anticonvulsants; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Waves; Central Nervous System

2011
Methylphenidate: established and expanding roles in symptom management.
    The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2012, Volume: 29, Issue:6

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorde

2012
Cognitive impairment in ICU survivors: assessment and therapy.
    Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine, 2012, Volume: 79, Issue:10

    Topics: Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Critical Il

2012
A review of the biological bases of ADHD: what have we learned from imaging studies?
    Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews, 2003, Volume: 9, Issue:3

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition D

2003
Late neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of brain tumours in childhood.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2004, Volume: 5, Issue:7

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Brain; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Child, Pres

2004
Pharmacological stimulant treatment of neurocognitive and functional deficits after traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury.
    Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2005, Volume: 11, Issue:6

    Topics: Amantadine; Animals; Brain Injuries; Bromocriptine; Cognition Disorders; Dextroamphetamine; Humans;

2005
[The effects of methylphenidate on cognitive-attentional processes. The use of continuous performance tests].
    Revista de neurologia, 2008, Volume: 46 Suppl 1

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neuropsychol

2008
Chemotherapy of cognitive disorders in geriatric subjects.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 1984, Volume: 45, Issue:5

    Topics: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Aged; Aging; Alzheimer Disease; Arecoline; Brain Chemistry; Choline; Co

1984
An overview of pharmacologic treatment of cognitive decline in the aged.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 1981, Volume: 138, Issue:5

    Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition Disorders; Dihydroergotoxine; Humans; Hyperbaric

1981
Methylphenidate treatment of negative symptoms in patients with dementia.
    The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 1997,Spring, Volume: 9, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Alzheimer Disease; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depressive Disorder

1997
Cognitive functioning and quality of life in malignant glioma patients: a review of the literature.
    Psycho-oncology, 1997, Volume: 6, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Clinical Trials a

1997
Methylphenidate for cognitive and behavioral dysfunction after traumatic brain injury.
    The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 1998, Volume: 13, Issue:5

    Topics: Behavioral Symptoms; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Control

1998
Impact of attentional dysfunction in dyscalculia.
    Developmental medicine and child neurology, 1999, Volume: 41, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

1999
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2002, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of

2002
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2002, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of

2002
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2002, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of

2002
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2002, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of

2002
Neuropsychiatric aspects of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
    Current psychiatry reports, 2002, Volume: 4, Issue:3

    Topics: AIDS Dementia Complex; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; HIV Seropositivity; H

2002
Minimal brain dysfunction in children. Diagnosis and management.
    Pediatric clinics of North America, 1973, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Abnormalities, Multiple; Affective Symptoms; Age Factors; Amphetamine; Attention; Attention Deficit

1973

Trials

39 trials available for methylphenidate and Cognition Disorders

ArticleYear
Efficacy of methylphenidate for the treatment of mental sequelae after traumatic brain injury.
    Medicine, 2017, Volume: 96, Issue:25

    Topics: Adult; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Huma

2017
Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A 1-month open-label trial.
    Epilepsia, 2017, Volume: 58, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition D

2017
Methylphenidate-mediated motor control network enhancement in patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Brain injury, 2018, Volume: 32, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Brain Mapping; Case-Control Studies; Central Nervous System Stimul

2018
Methylphenidate enhances cognitive performance in adults with poor baseline capacities regardless of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis.
    Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2014, Volume: 34, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants;

2014
Cognitive Improvement of Attention and Inhibition in the Late Afternoon in Children With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Treated With Osmotic-Release Oral System Methylphenidate.
    Journal of child neurology, 2015, Volume: 30, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous Syst

2015
Citalopram, methylphenidate, or their combination in geriatric depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 2015, Volume: 172, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Anxiety Disorders; Apathy; Citalopram; Cognition Disorders; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double

2015
Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate or Galantamine for Persistent Emotional and Cognitive Symptoms Associated with PTSD and/or Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2016, Volume: 41, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Affective Symptoms; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Fema

2016
Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate or Galantamine for Persistent Emotional and Cognitive Symptoms Associated with PTSD and/or Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2016, Volume: 41, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Affective Symptoms; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Fema

2016
Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate or Galantamine for Persistent Emotional and Cognitive Symptoms Associated with PTSD and/or Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2016, Volume: 41, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Affective Symptoms; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Fema

2016
Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate or Galantamine for Persistent Emotional and Cognitive Symptoms Associated with PTSD and/or Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2016, Volume: 41, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Affective Symptoms; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Fema

2016
Hot executive control and response to a stimulant in a double-blind randomized trial in children with ADHD.
    European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2017, Volume: 267, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2017
Abnormal response to methylphenidate across multiple fMRI procedures in cocaine use disorder: feasibility study.
    Psychopharmacology, 2016, Volume: 233, Issue:13

    Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Cognition; C

2016
Methylphenidate and Memory and Attention Adaptation Training for Persistent Cognitive Symptoms after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2017, Volume: 42, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Attention; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders;

2017
Methylphenidate, cognition, and epilepsy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose study.
    Neurology, 2017, Jan-31, Volume: 88, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Cross-Over Studies; Double

2017
COMT Val108/158Met polymorphism and the modulation of task-oriented behavior in children with ADHD.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2008, Volume: 33, Issue:13

    Topics: Amino Acid Substitution; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catechol O-Methyltransferase

2008
Single dose of methylphenidate improves cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis patients with impaired attention process.
    Journal of the neurological sciences, 2009, Jan-15, Volume: 276, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Case-Control Studies; Central Nervous System S

2009
Neurocognitive effects of switching from methylphenidate-IR to OROS-methylphenidate in children with ADHD.
    Human psychopharmacology, 2009, Volume: 24, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulan

2009
Side effects of methylphenidate in childhood cancer survivors: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
    Pediatrics, 2009, Volume: 124, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Cognition Disorders; Comorbid

2009
Effect of osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate on different domains of attention and executive functioning in children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder.
    Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2011, Volume: 53, Issue:9

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervo

2011
Effect of methylphenidate and/or levodopa combined with physiotherapy on mood and cognition after stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    European neurology, 2011, Volume: 66, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Antiparkinson Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disor

2011
A randomized trial on the efficacy of methylphenidate and modafinil for improving cognitive functioning and symptoms in patients with a primary brain tumor.
    Journal of neuro-oncology, 2012, Volume: 107, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders

2012
Sports therapy for attention, cognitions and sociality.
    International journal of sports medicine, 2011, Volume: 32, Issue:12

    Topics: Age Factors; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Catecholamines; Central Nervo

2011
Functional effects of the DAT1 polymorphism on EEG measures in ADHD.
    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2003, Volume: 42, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2003
Methylphenidate improves working memory and set-shifting in AD/HD: relationships to baseline memory capacity.
    Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2004, Volume: 45, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimula

2004
Age-dependent neuropsychological deficits and effects of methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a comparison of pre- and grade-school children.
    Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2004, Volume: 111, Issue:7

    Topics: Age Factors; Analysis of Variance; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Pres

2004
Short-term efficacy of methylphenidate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among survivors of childhood cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2004, Dec-01, Volume: 22, Issue:23

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System S

2004
Comparing effects of methylphenidate, sertraline and placebo on neuropsychiatric sequelae in patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Human psychopharmacology, 2005, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Do

2005
Comparing effects of methylphenidate, sertraline and placebo on neuropsychiatric sequelae in patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Human psychopharmacology, 2005, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Do

2005
Comparing effects of methylphenidate, sertraline and placebo on neuropsychiatric sequelae in patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Human psychopharmacology, 2005, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Do

2005
Comparing effects of methylphenidate, sertraline and placebo on neuropsychiatric sequelae in patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Human psychopharmacology, 2005, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Do

2005
Methylphenidate-enhanced antidepressant response to citalopram in the elderly: a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial.
    The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry, 2006, Volume: 14, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Citalopram; Cognition Disorders; Depressive Disorder, Major

2006
Does OROS-methylphenidate improve core symptoms and deficits in executive function? Results of an open-label trial in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2006, Volume: 22, Issue:12

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Cardiovascular System; C

2006
A novel multidomain computerized cognitive assessment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: evidence for widespread and circumscribed cognitive deficits.
    Journal of child neurology, 2007, Volume: 22, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2007
A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of the effects of d-methylphenidate on fatigue and cognitive dysfunction in women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
    Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2008, Volume: 16, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cognition

2008
Executive functioning in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: combined type with and without a stimulant medication history.
    Neuropsychology, 2008, Volume: 22, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2008
Methylphenidate effects on cognitive style and reaction time in four groups of children.
    Psychiatry research, 1982, Volume: 7, Issue:2

    Topics: Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Cognition Disorders; Dose-Response

1982
An overview of pharmacologic treatment of cognitive decline in the aged.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 1981, Volume: 138, Issue:5

    Topics: Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition Disorders; Dihydroergotoxine; Humans; Hyperbaric

1981
Fenfluramine and methylphenidate in children with mental retardation and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: laboratory effects.
    Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1993, Volume: 23, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; Cogni

1993
Sustained-release methylphenidate for cognitive impairment in HIV-1-infected drug abusers: a pilot study.
    The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 1997,Winter, Volume: 9, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Attention; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Delayed-Action Preparation

1997
Assessment of minimally responsive patients: clinical difficulties of single-case design.
    Brain injury, 1999, Volume: 13, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Arousal; Attention; Brain Injury, Chronic; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disor

1999
Immediate neurocognitive effects of methylphenidate on learning-impaired survivors of childhood cancer.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2001, Mar-15, Volume: 19, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Attention; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Cognition Disorders; Double-Bli

2001
Methylphenidate improves HIV-1-associated cognitive slowing.
    The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2001,Spring, Volume: 13, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Cross-Over Studies; Female; HIV Serop

2001
The effect of methylphenidate on test performance in the cognitively impaired aged.
    Psychopharmacology bulletin, 1977, Volume: 13, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Drug Evaluation; Female; H

1977
The effect of methylphenidate on test performance in the cognitively impaired aged.
    Psychopharmacology, 1977, May-09, Volume: 52, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Blood Pressure; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method;

1977
Treatment of chronic closed head injury with psychostimulant drugs: a controlled case study and an appropriate evaluation procedure.
    The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 1987, Volume: 175, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Attention; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognition Disorders; Craniocerebral Tra

1987

Other Studies

59 other studies available for methylphenidate and Cognition Disorders

ArticleYear
Methylphenidate Ameliorates Worsening Distractibility Symptoms of Misophonia in an Adolescent Male.
    The primary care companion for CNS disorders, 2020, Sep-24, Volume: 22, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognit

2020
Non-Medical Use of Prescription Stimulants for Treatment of Attention Disorders by University Students: Characteristics and Associations.
    Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019, May-21, Volume: 25

    Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition D

2019
Neurocognitive effects of methylphenidate on ADHD children with different DAT genotypes: a longitudinal open label trial.
    European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society, 2013, Volume: 17, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2013
Methylphenidate remediates error-preceding activation of the default mode brain regions in cocaine-addicted individuals.
    Psychiatry research, 2013, Nov-30, Volume: 214, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cerebral Cortex; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Cognition Diso

2013
Stimulation of 5-HT2C receptors improves cognitive deficits induced by human tryptophan hydroxylase 2 loss of function mutation.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2014, Volume: 39, Issue:5

    Topics: 5-Hydroxytryptophan; Animals; Avoidance Learning; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Dopamine Uptake In

2014
Aberrant CaMKII activity in the medial prefrontal cortex is associated with cognitive dysfunction in ADHD model rats.
    Brain research, 2014, Apr-04, Volume: 1557

    Topics: Animals; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; CA1 Region, Hippocampal; Calcium-

2014
Survivorship: cognitive function, version 1.2014.
    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2014, Volume: 12, Issue:7

    Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Benzhydryl Compounds; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants;

2014
Thyrotoropin receptor knockout changes monoaminergic neuronal system and produces methylphenidate-sensitive emotional and cognitive dysfunction.
    Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2014, Volume: 48

    Topics: Affective Symptoms; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Biogenic Monoamines; Cog

2014
The impact of stimulants on cognition and the brain in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: what does age have to do with it?
    Biological psychiatry, 2014, Oct-15, Volume: 76, Issue:8

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition D

2014
Differences in methylphenidate abuse rates among methadone maintenance treatment patients in two clinics.
    Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2015, Volume: 54

    Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzodiazepines; Central Nervous System Stimul

2015
Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement in Healthy Individuals: A Compensation for Cognitive Deficits or a Question of Personality?
    PloS one, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Decision Making; Empathy;

2015
Pharmacological cognitive enhancement: treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders and lifestyle use by healthy people.
    The lancet. Psychiatry, 2015, Volume: 2, Issue:4

    Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cholinestera

2015
Focusing the Neuroscience and Societal Implications of Cognitive Enhancers.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2017, Volume: 101, Issue:2

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Benzhydryl Compounds; Cognition; Cognition Disorders;

2017
A prenatal nicotine exposure mouse model of methylphenidate responsive ADHD-associated cognitive phenotypes.
    International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience, 2017, Volume: 58

    Topics: Age Factors; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hypera

2017
Chronic oral methylphenidate induces post-treatment impairment in recognition and spatial memory in adult rats.
    Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2009, Volume: 91, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Cognition Disorders; Exploratory Behavior; Male

2009
Do sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms predict response to methylphenidate in patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-inattentive type?
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2009, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child, Preschool; Cogni

2009
Methylphenidate improves cognitive deficits produced by infantile iron deficiency in rats.
    Behavioural brain research, 2011, Jan-01, Volume: 216, Issue:1

    Topics: Analysis of Variance; Anemia, Iron-Deficiency; Animals; Attention; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2011
Neurocognitive effects of childhood cancer treatment.
    Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2010, Volume: 678

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Child; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; Risk Factors

2010
Physician attitudes towards pharmacological cognitive enhancement: safety concerns are paramount.
    PloS one, 2010, Dec-14, Volume: 5, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorders

2010
Psychopharmacologic intervention after hemorrhagic basal ganglia damage.
    Journal of the neurological sciences, 2012, Nov-15, Volume: 322, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Adult; Basal Ganglia Hemorrhage; Cognition Disorders; Galantamine; Glasgow Coma Scale; Humans; Male;

2012
Methylphenidate improves the behavioral and cognitive deficits of neurogranin knockout mice.
    Genes, brain, and behavior, 2012, Volume: 11, Issue:7

    Topics: Animals; Cognition Disorders; Female; Gene Expression; Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein; Hippocampus;

2012
Progressive neuropsychiatric and brain abnormalities after smoke inhalation.
    BMJ case reports, 2012, Aug-08, Volume: 2012

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Brain; Cognition Disorders; Depressive Disorder, Major; DNA Damage; Fluo

2012
Dopaminergic involvement during mental fatigue in health and cocaine addiction.
    Translational psychiatry, 2012, Oct-23, Volume: 2

    Topics: Adult; Brain; Case-Control Studies; Caudate Nucleus; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Cognition Disorders;

2012
Use of methylphenidate during inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury.
    PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2012, Volume: 4, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Appetite; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorde

2012
Methylphenidate enhances executive function and optimizes prefrontal function in both health and cocaine addiction.
    Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2014, Volume: 24, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Association Learning; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cocaine-Related Disorders; Cognition

2014
Enhanced attention in rhesus monkeys as a common factor for the cognitive effects of drugs with abuse potential.
    Psychopharmacology, 2003, Volume: 169, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Attention; Caffeine; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Color Perce

2003
The quest for a smart pill.
    Scientific American, 2003, Volume: 289, Issue:3

    Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Benzhydryl Compounds; Caffeine; Central Nervous System

2003
Temporal judgments, hemispheric equivalence, and interhemispheric transfer in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Experimental brain research, 2004, Volume: 154, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cerebr

2004
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, combined type: better executive function performance with longer-term psychostimulant medication.
    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2003, Volume: 37, Issue:5

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Cognition D

2003
What are the long-term effects of methylphenidate treatment?
    Biological psychiatry, 2003, Dec-15, Volume: 54, Issue:12

    Topics: Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain; Cognition Disorders; Disease Models,

2003
Effects of stimulant medication on cognitive performance of children with ADHD.
    Clinical pediatrics, 2005, Volume: 44, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Amphetamines; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Case-Control Stud

2005
Stimulant medication in 47,XYY syndrome: a report of two cases.
    Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2005, Volume: 47, Issue:8

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Cognition D

2005
Altered neural substrates of cognitive control in childhood ADHD: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 2005, Volume: 162, Issue:9

    Topics: Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders; Brain Mapping; Central Nervous System Stimulant

2005
Effects of methylphenidate on cognition and apathy in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a case study and review.
    British journal of neurosurgery, 2005, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; H

2005
An open trial of adjunctive donepezil in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2005, Volume: 15, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amphetamines; Antimanic Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Ch

2005
Performance on a visual sustained attention and discrimination task is associated with urinary excretion of norepineprhine metabolite in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD).
    The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2006, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2006
Can central auditory processing tests resist supramodal influences?
    American journal of audiology, 2005, Volume: 14, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Cogn

2005
Effect of methylphenidate on Stroop Color-Word task performance in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Psychiatry research, 2006, Mar-30, Volume: 141, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2006
Prefrontal cognitive dysfunction following brainstem lesion.
    Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2007, Volume: 109, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Astrocytoma; Attention; Brain Stem Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants;

2007
Parallel loss of hippocampal LTD and cognitive flexibility in a genetic model of hyperdopaminergia.
    Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2007, Volume: 32, Issue:10

    Topics: Animals; Brain Diseases, Metabolic; Cognition Disorders; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamine; Dopamine

2007
Effects of methylphenidate on cognition and behaviour: ruptured communicant aneurysm of the anterior artery.
    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2007, Volume: 41, Issue:6

    Topics: Aneurysm, Ruptured; Attention; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Decision Maki

2007
Chronic oral methylphenidate administration to periadolescent rats yields prolonged impairment of memory for objects.
    Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2007, Volume: 88, Issue:3

    Topics: Age Factors; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders;

2007
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
    Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2008, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder

2008
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
    Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2008, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder

2008
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
    Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2008, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder

2008
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
    Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2008, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder

2008
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
    Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2008, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder

2008
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
    Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2008, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder

2008
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
    Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2008, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder

2008
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
    Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2008, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder

2008
Parent-rated anxiety symptoms in children with pervasive developmental disorders: frequency and association with core autism symptoms and cognitive functioning.
    Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2008, Volume: 36, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Aggression; Antipsychotic Agents; Anxiety; Asperger Syndrome; Attention Deficit Disorder

2008
Decreased serum glucose levels after initiation of methylphenidate in a patient status post-cerebellar tumour resection: a potential interaction with glipizide.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2007, Volume: 27, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cerebellar Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders;

2007
Pharmacological treatment of neurobehavioural sequelae of traumatic brain injury.
    European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement, 2008, Volume: 42

    Topics: Amantadine; Animals; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Brain Injuries; Cognition; Cogniti

2008
Tonic status epilepticus presenting as confusional state.
    Annals of neurology, 1983, Volume: 13, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Cognition Disorders; Confusion; Diazepam; Electroencephalography; Humans; Male; Methylph

1983
Hyperactivity and the attention deficit disorders: expanding frontiers.
    Pediatric clinics of North America, 1984, Volume: 31, Issue:2

    Topics: Aggression; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Behavior Therapy; Child; Cognition; Cogni

1984
Cognitive and neuropsychological characteristics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder children receiving stimulant medications.
    Perceptual and motor skills, 1993, Volume: 77, Issue:3 Pt 1

    Topics: Adolescent; Arousal; Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Cognition Diso

1993
Executive function and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: stimulant medication and better executive function performance in children.
    Psychological medicine, 1999, Volume: 29, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

1999
[The evaluation of the effects of pharmacological treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder].
    Revista de neurologia, 1999, Volume: 28 Suppl 2

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Child, Pres

1999
Effects of TENS and methylphenidate in tuberculous meningo-encephalitis.
    Brain injury, 2001, Volume: 15, Issue:6

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Child Behavior Disorders; Cognition Disorders; Combined Mo

2001
Cognitive factors in anorexia nervosa: a case history.
    The International journal of eating disorders, 2001, Volume: 30, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Anorexia Nervosa; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System

2001
Effects of histamine H(3) receptor ligands GT-2331 and ciproxifan in a repeated acquisition avoidance response in the spontaneously hypertensive rat pup.
    Behavioural brain research, 2002, Apr-01, Volume: 131, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Anxiety Agents; Arousal; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Avoidance Lear

2002
Critique of single amine theories: evidence of a cholinergic influence in the major mental illnesses.
    Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease, 1975, Volume: 54

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Antipsychotic Agents; Bipolar Diso

1975
Stimulants and other drugs for treatment of mental symptoms in the elderly.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 1978, Aug-25, Volume: 20, Issue:17

    Topics: Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Mental Disorders; Methylphenid

1978
Methylphenidate in neuropsychological sequelae of radiotherapy and chemotherapy of childhood brain tumors and leukemia.
    Journal of child neurology, 1992, Volume: 7, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Child, Preschool; Cognition Disorders; Demyelinatin

1992
Aggression in boys with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder: methylphenidate effects on naturalistically observed aggression, response to provocation, and social information processing.
    Journal of abnormal child psychology, 1992, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Aggression; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Child; Child Behavior Disorders; Cognitio

1992
Cognitive impairment due to AIDS-related complex and its response to psychostimulants.
    Psychosomatics, 1988,Winter, Volume: 29, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; AIDS-Related Complex; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Dextroamphetami

1988
School problems: diagnosis and treatment.
    Pediatrics, 1973, Volume: 52, Issue:5

    Topics: Agnosia; Amphetamine; Anxiety; Child; Child, Preschool; Cognition Disorders; Developmental Disabilit

1973