Page last updated: 2024-10-31

methylphenidate and Benign Neoplasms

methylphenidate has been researched along with Benign Neoplasms in 86 studies

Methylphenidate: A central nervous system stimulant used most commonly in the treatment of ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER in children and for NARCOLEPSY. Its mechanisms appear to be similar to those of DEXTROAMPHETAMINE. The d-isomer of this drug is referred to as DEXMETHYLPHENIDATE HYDROCHLORIDE.
methylphenidate : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of the two threo isomers of methyl phenyl(piperidin-2-yl)acetate. A central stimulant and indirect-acting sympathomimetic, is used (generally as the hydrochloride salt) in the treatment of hyperactivity disorders in children and for the treatment of narcolepsy.
methyl phenyl(piperidin-2-yl)acetate : A amino acid ester that is methyl phenylacetate in which one of the hydrogens alpha to the carbonyl group is replaced by a piperidin-2-yl group.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant drug used to treat fatigue in patients with advanced cancer, for which there is no gold standard of treatment."9.51Improved cancer-related fatigue in a randomised clinical trial: methylphenidate no better than placebo. ( Centeno, C; Cuervo, MA; De Santiago, A; Gagnon, B; Gandara, A; Portela, MA; Ramos, D; Rojí, R; Salgado, E; Sanz, A, 2022)
"To evaluate the efficacy of methylphenidate as needed for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer."9.34Methylphenidate as Needed for Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer. A Prospective, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Study. ( Groenvold, M; Lund, L; Pedersen, L; Petersen, MA; Sjogren, P, 2020)
"To determine the effectiveness of methylphenidate for depression treatment in patients with advanced cancer."9.24Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of methylphenidate for the treatment of depression in SSRI-treated cancer patients receiving palliative care. ( Ganzini, L; Goy, E; Mongoue-Tchokote, S; Mori, M; Sullivan, DR, 2017)
"REASON FOR THE STUDY: Studies on methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue showed conflicting results."9.19Use of methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in Chinese patients with cancer. ( Kwok, AO; Lam, PT; Law, M; Leung, TW; Liu, RK; Ng, KH; Siu, SW; Soong, IS; Wong, KH, 2014)
" Using an area under the serum concentration-time curve analysis, there was no evidence that methylphenidate, as compared with placebo, improved the primary end point of cancer-related fatigue in this patient population (P = ."9.14Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of long-acting methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue: North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG-N05C7 trial. ( Ali, A; Atherton, PJ; Barton, D; Dakhil, SR; Duane, SF; Griffin, PC; Johnson, DB; Loprinzi, CL; Moraska, AR; Silberstein, PT; Sloan, JA; Sood, A; Suh, JJ, 2010)
"To evaluate the effectiveness of patient-controlled methylphenidate as compared with placebo in cancer patients with fatigue, as measured by the Functional Assessment for Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F)."9.12Patient-controlled methylphenidate for cancer fatigue: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. ( Bruera, E; Driver, L; Palmer, JL; Shen, L; Valero, V; Willey, J; Zhang, T, 2006)
"To investigate the clinical improvement observed in patients with advanced cancer and hypoactive delirium after the administration of methylphenidate hydrochloride."9.11Methylphenidate hydrochloride improves cognitive function in patients with advanced cancer and hypoactive delirium: a prospective clinical study. ( Gagnon, B; Low, G; Schreier, G, 2005)
"To assess the effects of patient-controlled methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue."9.10Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report. ( Barnes, EA; Bruera, E; Driver, L; Escalante, C; Palmer, JL; Shen, L; Willey, J, 2003)
"Twenty consecutive patients with cancer pain receiving a continuous subcutaneous infusion of narcotics were admitted to a double-blind, crossover trial designed to assess the effects of methylphenidate on neuropsychological functions."9.07Neuropsychological effects of methylphenidate in patients receiving a continuous infusion of narcotics for cancer pain. ( Bruera, E; Kuehn, N; Macmillan, K; Miller, MJ, 1992)
"Thirty-two patients with chronic pain due to advanced cancer were treated with methylphenidate (10 mg with breakfast and 5 mg with lunch) for 3 days, versus placebo, in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study designed to evaluate the capacity of methylphenidate to potentiate the analgesic effect of narcotics and/or to decrease sedation induced by narcotics."9.06Methylphenidate associated with narcotics for the treatment of cancer pain. ( Brenneis, C; Bruera, E; Chadwick, S; Hanson, J; MacDonald, RN, 1987)
"Single therapy with methylphenidate or American ginseng contributes to the reduction in cancer-related fatigue (CRF) with different pharmacologic mechanisms and is relatively safe."7.88Single Institute Experience With Methylphenidate and American Ginseng in Cancer-Related Fatigue. ( Chang, YD; Davis, M; Kim, R; Oberoi-Jassal, R; Portman, D; Rajasekhara, S; Smith, J, 2018)
"To review recent evidence on the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate as a symptomatic treatment of patients with cancer-related fatigue (CRF)."7.85The use of methylphenidate to relieve fatigue. ( Centeno, C; Rojí, R, 2017)
"Fatigue is common in life-limiting cancer."6.80The Effect of Methylphenidate on Fatigue in Advanced Cancer: An Aggregated N-of-1 Trial. ( Carmont, SA; Currow, DC; Good, P; Hardy, JR; Mitchell, GK; Nikles, CJ; Schluter, PJ; Senior, HE, 2015)
"Methylphenidate dose was 5 mg every 2 hours as needed up to 20 mg per day."6.78Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial. ( Allo, JA; Bruera, E; Cohen, MZ; Frisbee-Hume, S; Palmer, JL; Perez-Cruz, PE; Williams, JL; Yennurajalingam, S, 2013)
"In advanced cancer, the prevalence of fatigue is high and can be related to treatment or disease."6.75Pilot study to determine the optimal dose of methylphenidate for an n-of-1 trial for fatigue in patients with cancer. ( Carmont, SA; Hardy, JR; Mitchell, GK; Nikles, CJ; O'Shea, A; Schluter, P; Vora, R, 2010)
"Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant drug used to treat fatigue in patients with advanced cancer, for which there is no gold standard of treatment."5.51Improved cancer-related fatigue in a randomised clinical trial: methylphenidate no better than placebo. ( Centeno, C; Cuervo, MA; De Santiago, A; Gagnon, B; Gandara, A; Portela, MA; Ramos, D; Rojí, R; Salgado, E; Sanz, A, 2022)
"To evaluate the efficacy of methylphenidate as needed for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer."5.34Methylphenidate as Needed for Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer. A Prospective, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Study. ( Groenvold, M; Lund, L; Pedersen, L; Petersen, MA; Sjogren, P, 2020)
"To determine the effectiveness of methylphenidate for depression treatment in patients with advanced cancer."5.24Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of methylphenidate for the treatment of depression in SSRI-treated cancer patients receiving palliative care. ( Ganzini, L; Goy, E; Mongoue-Tchokote, S; Mori, M; Sullivan, DR, 2017)
"REASON FOR THE STUDY: Studies on methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue showed conflicting results."5.19Use of methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in Chinese patients with cancer. ( Kwok, AO; Lam, PT; Law, M; Leung, TW; Liu, RK; Ng, KH; Siu, SW; Soong, IS; Wong, KH, 2014)
" Using an area under the serum concentration-time curve analysis, there was no evidence that methylphenidate, as compared with placebo, improved the primary end point of cancer-related fatigue in this patient population (P = ."5.14Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of long-acting methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue: North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG-N05C7 trial. ( Ali, A; Atherton, PJ; Barton, D; Dakhil, SR; Duane, SF; Griffin, PC; Johnson, DB; Loprinzi, CL; Moraska, AR; Silberstein, PT; Sloan, JA; Sood, A; Suh, JJ, 2010)
"The amphetamine, methylphenidate (Ritaline) has been proposed as being of interest in the treatment of asthenia in patients with advanced cancer."5.13[Methylphenidate in palliative care in cancer patient: a double-blind randomised trial versus placebo]. ( Laval, G; Paris, A, 2008)
"To evaluate the effectiveness of patient-controlled methylphenidate as compared with placebo in cancer patients with fatigue, as measured by the Functional Assessment for Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F)."5.12Patient-controlled methylphenidate for cancer fatigue: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. ( Bruera, E; Driver, L; Palmer, JL; Shen, L; Valero, V; Willey, J; Zhang, T, 2006)
"To investigate the clinical improvement observed in patients with advanced cancer and hypoactive delirium after the administration of methylphenidate hydrochloride."5.11Methylphenidate hydrochloride improves cognitive function in patients with advanced cancer and hypoactive delirium: a prospective clinical study. ( Gagnon, B; Low, G; Schreier, G, 2005)
"To assess the effects of patient-controlled methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue."5.10Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report. ( Barnes, EA; Bruera, E; Driver, L; Escalante, C; Palmer, JL; Shen, L; Willey, J, 2003)
"Major depressive disorder in 26 hospice inpatients was managed with a trial of methylphenidate (mean daily dosage, 17."5.08Methylphenidate in terminal depression. ( Macleod, AD, 1998)
"Twenty consecutive patients with cancer pain receiving a continuous subcutaneous infusion of narcotics were admitted to a double-blind, crossover trial designed to assess the effects of methylphenidate on neuropsychological functions."5.07Neuropsychological effects of methylphenidate in patients receiving a continuous infusion of narcotics for cancer pain. ( Bruera, E; Kuehn, N; Macmillan, K; Miller, MJ, 1992)
"Thirty-two patients with chronic pain due to advanced cancer were treated with methylphenidate (10 mg with breakfast and 5 mg with lunch) for 3 days, versus placebo, in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study designed to evaluate the capacity of methylphenidate to potentiate the analgesic effect of narcotics and/or to decrease sedation induced by narcotics."5.06Methylphenidate associated with narcotics for the treatment of cancer pain. ( Brenneis, C; Bruera, E; Chadwick, S; Hanson, J; MacDonald, RN, 1987)
"Erythropoietin and methylphenidate significantly reduced fatigue severity in patients with cancer and in recipients of hsct."4.98Pharmacologic interventions for fatigue in cancer and transplantation: a meta-analysis. ( Cabral, S; Cataudella, D; Culos-Reed, N; Davis, H; Duong, N; Dupuis, LL; Gibson, F; Götte, M; Hinds, P; Nijhof, SL; Oberoi, S; Robinson, PD; Sung, L; Tomlinson, D; van der Torre, P, 2018)
"This review potentially supports the use of methylphenidate for opioid-induced sedation, cognitive decline and fatigue in cancer patients."4.98The Use of Methylphenidate for Physical and Psychological Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Review. ( Andrew, BN; Guan, NC; Jaafar, NRN, 2018)
" We included studies investigating pemoline and modafinil in participants with multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated fatigue and methylphenidate in patients suffering from advanced cancer and fatigue in meta-analysis."4.91Pharmacological treatments for fatigue associated with palliative care. ( Cuhls, H; Minton, O; Mücke, M; Peuckmann-Post, V; Radbruch, L; Stone, P, 2015)
"Although most research to date has focused on the use of methylphenidate for the relief of symptoms such as asthenia and depression in cancer patients, there is growing interest in the use of modafinil, a psychostimulant with a structure and mechanism that differs from other drugs belonging to this group."4.87The use of psychostimulants in cancer patients. ( Centeno, C; Portela, MA; Rubiales, AS, 2011)
" Studies investigating amantadine, pemoline, and modafinil in participants with Multiple Sclerosis (MS)-associated fatigue and methylphenidate in patients suffering from advanced cancer and fatigue could be used for meta-analysis."4.86Pharmacological treatments for fatigue associated with palliative care. ( Elsner, F; Krumm, N; Peuckmann, V; Radbruch, L; Trottenberg, P, 2010)
"There is some evidence that treatment of cancer-related fatigue with methylphenidate appears to be effective."4.84A systematic review and meta-analysis of the pharmacological treatment of cancer-related fatigue. ( Hotopf, M; Minton, O; Richardson, A; Sharpe, M; Stone, P, 2008)
"On the basis of this review, we came to the conclusion that methylphenidate is used to ameliorate opioid-induced somnolence, to augment the analgesic effects of opioids, to treat depression, and to improve cognitive function in patients with cancer."4.81Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review. ( Dreisbach, A; Kahn, MJ; Lertora, JJ; Rozans, M, 2002)
"Single therapy with methylphenidate or American ginseng contributes to the reduction in cancer-related fatigue (CRF) with different pharmacologic mechanisms and is relatively safe."3.88Single Institute Experience With Methylphenidate and American Ginseng in Cancer-Related Fatigue. ( Chang, YD; Davis, M; Kim, R; Oberoi-Jassal, R; Portman, D; Rajasekhara, S; Smith, J, 2018)
"To review recent evidence on the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate as a symptomatic treatment of patients with cancer-related fatigue (CRF)."3.85The use of methylphenidate to relieve fatigue. ( Centeno, C; Rojí, R, 2017)
"Response to methylphenidate is associated with higher baseline fatigue but not with higher baseline depression or sedation."3.77Factors associated with response to methylphenidate in advanced cancer patients. ( Bruera, E; Chacko, R; Palmer, JL; Yennurajalingam, S, 2011)
"Methylphenidate and modafinil were equivalent to one another."3.01Cancer-related fatigue-pharmacological interventions: systematic review and network meta-analysis. ( Boldt, G; Bruera, E; Chiu, L; Chow, R; Lock, M; Prsic, E; Sanatani, M, 2023)
"Fatigue is common in life-limiting cancer."2.80The Effect of Methylphenidate on Fatigue in Advanced Cancer: An Aggregated N-of-1 Trial. ( Carmont, SA; Currow, DC; Good, P; Hardy, JR; Mitchell, GK; Nikles, CJ; Schluter, PJ; Senior, HE, 2015)
"It involved 88 terminally ill cancer patients from University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia."2.79Rapid response to methylphenidate as an add-on therapy to mirtazapine in the treatment of major depressive disorder in terminally ill cancer patients: a four-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. ( Boks, MP; de Wit, NJ; Ng, CG; Roes, KC; Sulaiman, AH; Tan, SB; Zainal, NZ, 2014)
"Methylphenidate dose was 5 mg every 2 hours as needed up to 20 mg per day."2.78Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial. ( Allo, JA; Bruera, E; Cohen, MZ; Frisbee-Hume, S; Palmer, JL; Perez-Cruz, PE; Williams, JL; Yennurajalingam, S, 2013)
"Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant that has been used to relieve depressive symptoms in advanced cancer patients."2.77Multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of methylphenidate on depressive symptoms in advanced cancer patients. ( Almaraz, MJ; Centeno, C; Cuervo, MA; Gonzalez, J; Hernansanz, S; Lama, M; Nabal, M; Pascual, A; Ramos, D; Sanz, A; Vara, F, 2012)
"MLN8054 dosing for up to 14 days of a 28-day cycle was feasible."2.76Phase 1 study of MLN8054, a selective inhibitor of Aurora A kinase in patients with advanced solid tumors. ( Burris, H; Cohen, RB; Danaee, H; Dees, EC; Ecsedy, J; Eton, O; Fingert, H; Galvin, K; Infante, JR; Jones, S; Lee, Y; Liu, H; Manfredi, M; O'Neil, BH; Stringer, B; von Mehren, M, 2011)
"In contrast, the cancer control group only showed improvement on parent ratings of attention (Conners' Parent Rating Scale indices; P < ."2.75Long-term efficacy of methylphenidate in enhancing attention regulation, social skills, and academic abilities of childhood cancer survivors. ( Ashford, J; Bonner, M; Brown, R; Christensen, R; Conklin, HM; Howard, SC; Khan, RB; Morris, EB; Ogg, S; Reddick, WE; Wu, S; Xiong, X, 2010)
"In advanced cancer, the prevalence of fatigue is high and can be related to treatment or disease."2.75Pilot study to determine the optimal dose of methylphenidate for an n-of-1 trial for fatigue in patients with cancer. ( Carmont, SA; Hardy, JR; Mitchell, GK; Nikles, CJ; O'Shea, A; Schluter, P; Vora, R, 2010)
"Depression is quite common among cancer patients."2.73An open-label long-term naturalistic study of mirtazapine treatment for depression in cancer patients. ( Elbi, H; Ersoy, MA; Noyan, AM, 2008)
"Cognitive dysfunction is a challenging adverse effect of chemotherapy and radiotherapy that has limited treatment options."2.61Pharmacologic management of cognitive impairment induced by cancer therapy. ( Dietrich, J; Karschnia, P; Parsons, MW, 2019)
"Fatigue is a common symptom experienced by people with cancer and other long-term, non-malignant conditions."2.61The holistic management of fatigue within palliative care. ( Dean, A, 2019)
"Survivors of childhood cancer frequently experience cancer-related cognitive dysfunction, commonly months to years after treatment for pediatric brain tumors, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or tumors involving the head and neck."2.50Developing interventions for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors. ( Castellino, SM; Lange, BJ; Ullrich, NJ; Whelen, MJ, 2014)
"Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant originally used for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder."2.48Methylphenidate: established and expanding roles in symptom management. ( Prommer, E, 2012)
"Fatigue is a highly prevalent and distressing symptom associated with significant psychological and functional morbidity and decreased quality of life among patients with cancer."2.46Psychostimulants for cancer-related fatigue. ( Alici, Y; Breitbart, W, 2010)
" To address the question of long-term use of MPH, we published the data of 30 chronically treated children and also saw no difference compared to untreated children."2.46Prospective follow-up studies found no chromosomal mutagenicity of methylphenidate therapy in ADHD affected children. ( Gerlach, M; Kämpf, K; Oli, RG; Stopper, H; Walitza, S; Warnke, A, 2010)
"Methylphenidate has been studied most and is effective and well tolerated despite common side effects."2.44Pharmacologic treatment options for cancer-related fatigue: current state of clinical research. ( Alici, Y; Breitbart, W, 2008)
"Methylphenidate has been studied most and seems to be effective and well tolerated despite common side effects."2.44Update on psychotropic medications for cancer-related fatigue. ( Alici-Evcimen, Y; Breitbart, W, 2007)
"Current treatments for fatigue include educating patients and caregivers about fatigue, applying etiology-specific treatments, utilizing nonpharmacologic interventions, and prescribing pharmacologic therapies."2.42Treatment of cancer-related fatigue: an update. ( Escalante, CP, 2003)
"Treatment with methylphenidate has been advocated in patients with traumatic brain injury and stroke, cancer patients, and those with human immunodeficiency virus infection."2.41Methylphenidate: its pharmacology and uses. ( Challman, TD; Lipsky, JJ, 2000)
"We also examined the effects of MMT on insomnia, fatigue, depression, quality of life and actigraphy."1.62Sleep disturbance in patients with cancer: a feasibility study of multimodal therapy. ( Balachandran, D; Bruera, E; Carmack, C; Delgado, M; Eng, C; Guzman Gutierrez, D; Hess, KR; Lim, B; Lu, Z; Ochoa, J; Park, M; Raznahan, M; Williams, JL; Yennurajalingam, S, 2021)
"Frequencies of cancer diagnoses in these groups were compared."1.39The association between medication for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and cancer. ( Helenius, D; Steinhausen, HC, 2013)
"Childhood cancer survivors' attention improved after 1 month on MPH."1.37Parent and teacher ratings of attention during a year-long methylphenidate trial in children treated for cancer. ( Ashford, JM; Conklin, HM; Kahalley, LS; Netson, KL; Wu, S; Xiong, X, 2011)
" Methylphenidate (MP) appears safe when used in the treatment of depression and fatigue in advanced cancer."1.36Methylphenidate side effects in advanced cancer: a retrospective analysis. ( Davis, MP; Khoshknabi, DS; Lasheen, W; Mahmoud, F; Rivera, N; Walsh, D, 2010)
"Childhood cancer survivors taking MPH experience significant, though modest, deceleration of BMI and weight across the first year of MPH intervention."1.35Growth effects of methylphenidate among childhood cancer survivors: a 12-month case-matched open-label study. ( Conklin, HM; Howard, SC; Jasper, BW; Khan, RB; Lawford, J; Morris, EB; Shelso, J; Wu, S; Xiong, X, 2009)
"Psychiatrists treated major depressive disorder in advanced cancer patients on the basis of the algorithm."1.35Clinical experience of the use of a pharmacological treatment algorithm for major depressive disorder in patients with advanced cancer. ( Akechi, T; Akizuki, N; Ito, T; Nakano, T; Okamura, M; Shimizu, K; Uchitomi, Y, 2008)
"Further study of MPH use and lymphocytic leukemia risk is needed to determine whether our results are due to chance alone."1.34Methylphenidate use in children and risk of cancer at 18 sites: results of surveillance analyses. ( Chan, J; Friedman, GD; Habel, LA; Jiang, SF; Oestreicher, N; Quesenberry, C, 2007)
"Methylphenidate is a central nervous system stimulant approved by the U."1.33NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of methylphenidate. ( , 2005)
"Depressive symptoms associated with cancer range from normal sadness through acute stress response to major depression."1.27Diagnosis and treatment of depression in the cancer patient. ( Holland, JC; Massie, MJ, 1984)

Research

Studies (86)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19907 (8.14)18.7374
1990's6 (6.98)18.2507
2000's28 (32.56)29.6817
2010's40 (46.51)24.3611
2020's5 (5.81)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Chow, R1
Bruera, E14
Sanatani, M1
Chiu, L1
Prsic, E1
Boldt, G1
Lock, M1
Dean, A1
Yennurajalingam, S4
Carmack, C1
Balachandran, D1
Eng, C1
Lim, B1
Delgado, M1
Guzman Gutierrez, D1
Raznahan, M1
Park, M1
Hess, KR1
Williams, JL2
Lu, Z1
Ochoa, J1
Pedersen, L2
Lund, L1
Petersen, MA1
Sjogren, P1
Groenvold, M1
Centeno, C4
Rojí, R2
Portela, MA2
De Santiago, A1
Cuervo, MA2
Ramos, D2
Gandara, A1
Salgado, E1
Gagnon, B3
Sanz, A2
Belloni, S1
Arrigoni, C1
de Sanctis, R1
Arcidiacono, MA1
Dellafiore, F1
Caruso, R1
Andrew, BN1
Guan, NC1
Jaafar, NRN1
Tomlinson, D1
Robinson, PD1
Oberoi, S1
Cataudella, D1
Culos-Reed, N1
Davis, H1
Duong, N1
Gibson, F1
Götte, M1
Hinds, P1
Nijhof, SL1
van der Torre, P1
Cabral, S1
Dupuis, LL1
Sung, L1
Karschnia, P1
Parsons, MW1
Dietrich, J1
Miladi, N1
Dossa, R1
Dogba, MJ1
Cléophat-Jolicoeur, MIF1
Steinhausen, HC1
Helenius, D1
Siu, SW1
Law, M1
Liu, RK1
Wong, KH1
Soong, IS1
Kwok, AO1
Ng, KH1
Lam, PT1
Leung, TW1
Palmer, JL4
Perez-Cruz, PE1
Frisbee-Hume, S1
Allo, JA1
Cohen, MZ1
Stone, PC2
Gong, S1
Sheng, P1
Jin, H1
He, H1
Qi, E1
Chen, W1
Dong, Y1
Hou, L1
Ng, CG1
Boks, MP1
Roes, KC1
Zainal, NZ1
Sulaiman, AH1
Tan, SB1
de Wit, NJ1
Rayner, L1
Hotopf, M4
Hernansanz, S1
Gonzalez, J1
Almaraz, MJ1
Lama, M1
Vara, F1
Nabal, M1
Pascual, A1
Borghgraef, C1
Libert, Y1
Etienne, AM1
Delvaux, N1
Reynaert, C1
Razavi, D1
Castellino, SM1
Ullrich, NJ1
Whelen, MJ1
Lange, BJ1
Mitchell, GK2
Hardy, JR2
Nikles, CJ2
Carmont, SA2
Senior, HE1
Schluter, PJ1
Good, P1
Currow, DC1
Mücke, M1
Cuhls, H1
Peuckmann-Post, V1
Minton, O5
Stone, P4
Radbruch, L2
Qu, D1
Zhang, Z1
Yu, X1
Zhao, J1
Qiu, F1
Huang, J1
Sullivan, DR1
Mongoue-Tchokote, S1
Mori, M1
Goy, E1
Ganzini, L1
Mustian, KM1
Alfano, CM1
Heckler, C1
Kleckner, AS1
Kleckner, IR1
Leach, CR1
Mohr, D1
Palesh, OG1
Peppone, LJ1
Piper, BF1
Scarpato, J1
Smith, T1
Sprod, LK1
Miller, SM1
Chang, YD1
Smith, J1
Portman, D1
Kim, R1
Oberoi-Jassal, R1
Rajasekhara, S1
Davis, M1
McNeil, C1
Richardson, A3
Sharpe, M3
Breitbart, W3
Alici, Y2
Jasper, BW1
Conklin, HM4
Lawford, J1
Morris, EB2
Howard, SC3
Wu, S4
Xiong, X4
Shelso, J1
Khan, RB3
Lasheen, W1
Walsh, D2
Mahmoud, F1
Davis, MP1
Rivera, N1
Khoshknabi, DS1
Palshof, T1
Schwartz, AL1
Lower, EE1
Fleishman, S1
Cooper, A1
Zeldis, J1
Faleck, H1
Yu, Z1
Manning, D1
Walitza, S1
Kämpf, K1
Oli, RG1
Warnke, A1
Gerlach, M1
Stopper, H1
Dees, EC1
Infante, JR1
Cohen, RB1
O'Neil, BH1
Jones, S1
von Mehren, M1
Danaee, H1
Lee, Y1
Ecsedy, J1
Manfredi, M1
Galvin, K1
Stringer, B1
Liu, H1
Eton, O1
Fingert, H1
Burris, H1
Moraska, AR1
Sood, A1
Dakhil, SR1
Sloan, JA1
Barton, D1
Atherton, PJ1
Suh, JJ1
Griffin, PC1
Johnson, DB1
Ali, A1
Silberstein, PT1
Duane, SF1
Loprinzi, CL2
Costa, J1
O'Shea, A1
Vora, R1
Schluter, P1
Reddick, WE2
Ashford, J1
Ogg, S1
Brown, R2
Bonner, M2
Christensen, R2
Peuckmann, V1
Elsner, F1
Krumm, N1
Trottenberg, P1
Netson, KL1
Ashford, JM1
Kahalley, LS1
Chacko, R1
Rubiales, AS1
Prommer, E1
Escalante, CP1
Driver, L2
Barnes, EA1
Willey, J2
Shen, L2
Escalante, C1
Westberg, J1
Gobel, BH1
Vale, S1
Low, G1
Schreier, G1
El-Zein, RA1
Hay, MJ1
Lopez, MS1
Bondy, ML1
Morris, DL1
Legator, MS1
Abdel-Rahman, SZ1
Valero, V1
Zhang, T1
Okamura, M1
Akizuki, N2
Nakano, T2
Shimizu, K1
Ito, T1
Akechi, T2
Uchitomi, Y2
Helton, S1
Mulhern, RK1
Zito, JM1
Safer, DJ1
Oestreicher, N1
Friedman, GD1
Jiang, SF1
Chan, J1
Quesenberry, C1
Habel, LA1
Alici-Evcimen, Y1
Jacobson-Kram, D1
Mattison, D1
Shelby, M1
Slikker, W1
Tice, R1
Witt, K1
Ersoy, MA1
Noyan, AM1
Elbi, H1
Laval, G1
Paris, A1
Massie, MJ1
Holland, JC1
Wilwerding, MB1
Mailliard, JA1
O'Fallon, JR1
Miser, AW1
van Haelst, C1
Barton, DL1
Foley, JF1
Athmann, LM1
Yee, JD1
Berde, CB1
O'Neill, WM1
Macleod, AD1
Challman, TD1
Lipsky, JJ1
Homsi, J1
Nelson, KA1
Rozans, M1
Dreisbach, A1
Lertora, JJ1
Kahn, MJ1
LeGrand, SB1
Sugawara, Y1
Shima, Y1
Okuyama, T1
Fainsinger, R1
MacEachern, T1
Hanson, J2
Miller, MJ1
Macmillan, K1
Kuehn, N1
Brenneis, C3
Paterson, AH2
MacDonald, RN4
Portenoy, RK1
Fernandez, F1
Adams, F1
Holmes, VF1
Levy, JK1
Neidhart, M1
Chadwick, S1

Clinical Trials (14)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Feasibility Study of Adjunctive Bright Light Therapy (BLT) for Amelioration of Fatigue in Chinese Cancer Patients Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit[NCT04525924]42 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-01Recruiting
Multimodal Therapy for the Treatment of Sleep Disturbance in Patients With Cancer[NCT01628029]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-15Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate and a Nursing Telephone Intervention (NTI) for Fatigue in Advanced Cancer Patients[NCT00424099]Phase 2/Phase 3197 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-09Completed
A Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Methylphenidate as an Add on Therapy for Mirtazapine in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Cancer Patients Under Palliative Care[NCT01497548]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-03-31Recruiting
MentalPlus® for Assessment and Rehabilitation of Cognitive Functions After Remission of Symptoms of COVID-19[NCT04632719]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-08Recruiting
Feasibility Study of a Hypnosis Intervention and a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention to Reduce Fatigue in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT04999306]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-17Recruiting
Clinical Study on Wide Spectrum Micronutrients Supplementation in Patients With Cancer Related Fatigue During Adjuvant Chemotherapy[NCT06137833]92 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-27Not yet recruiting
Fatigue in Sarcoidosis - A Feasibility Study Investigating the Treatment of Fatigue in Stable Sarcoidosis Patients Using Methylphenidate[NCT02643732]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Alisertib in Combination With Abiraterone and Prednisone for Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer After Progression on Abiraterone[NCT01848067]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-14Completed
Long Acting Methylphenidate (Concerta™) for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Study[NCT00376675]Phase 3148 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Randomized Study Evaluating the Antiasthenic Effect of Methylphenidate (Ritalin) in Palliative Care in Cancer Patients[NCT00273741]Phase 339 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Terminated (stopped due to difficulty of recrutement)
Conscious Dying/Conscious Living: Ketamine-Assisted Psychotherapy (KAP) for Patients at End of Life-A Pilot Study for Palliative and Hospice Care[NCT05214417]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Not yet recruiting
Learning Impairments Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer[NCT00576472]Phase 4469 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Methylphenidate Effect on Performing Humphrey Visual Fields[NCT02162381]32 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change in Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Fatigue Score

The ESAS was used to assess the following 9 symptoms commonly experienced symptoms by cancer patients: pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, dyspnea, anorexia, and well-being. Patients rate the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10 (0=not at all and 10=very much). Total ESAS fatigue score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicate higher fatigue. We measured the median change in ESAS fatigue score between Baseline and Day 15 using Kruskal-Wallis test. (NCT00424099)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Methylphenidate (MP) + Nursing Telephone Intervention (NTI)-3.00
Methylphenidate (MP) + Control Telephone Intervention (CTI)-1.00
Placebo (PL)+ Nursing Telephone Intervention (NTI)-2.00
Placebo (PL) + Control Telephone Intervention (CTI)-2.00

Change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Fatigue Subscale Score

FACIT-F fatigue subscale consists of 13 items. Patients rate the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=not at all and 4=very much). Total FACIT-F fatigue subscale score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher scores indicate higher fatigue. We measured the median change in FACIT-F fatigue sub scale score between Baseline and Day 15 using Kruskal-Wallis test. (NCT00424099)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Methylphenidate (MP) + Nursing Telephone Intervention (NTI)4.00
Methylphenidate (MP) + Control Telephone Intervention (CTI)7.00
Placebo (PL)+ Nursing Telephone Intervention (NTI)8.50
Placebo (PL) + Control Telephone Intervention (CTI)5.00

Number of Participants With a PSA Value Equal to or Greater Than 25%

Compared between the two patient subsets using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. A comparison of CTC counts between baseline and at progression for those who have progressed will be carried out using either a paired t test or the nonparameteric Wilcoxon matched pairs test. (NCT01848067)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Alisertib, Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone)3

Phase I: Frequency of Dose Limiting Toxicities of Alisertib, Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.1

Summarized with descriptive statistics. (NCT01848067)
Timeframe: Up to 21 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Alisertib, Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone)2

Anchor-based Minimally Important Difference in SGIC Emotional State Based on Mean Changes From Baseline to Week 4 on BFI Usual Fatigue

"Perceived treatment efficacy was measured by the Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC). The SGIC is a 3-point item in which the patient rates the change in the overall status since beginning the study drug (ranging from very much better, moderately better, a little better, about the same, a little worse, moderately worse, to very much worse). The average change in patient fatigue scores for those participants who express a perceived change of a little better via the SGIC scores were calculated. BFI usual fatigue item score was translated into 0 to 100 point scale for the analysis, with 0 (poor QOL or bad symptoms) and 100 (best QOL or no symptoms)." (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionUnits on scale (Mean)
Methylphenidate31.0
Placebo23.8

Anchor-based Minimally Important Difference in SGIC Overall Quality of Life Based on Mean Changes From Baseline to Week 4 on BFI Usual Fatigue

"Perceived treatment efficacy was measured by the Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC). The SGIC is a 3-point item in which the patient rates the change in the overall status since beginning the study drug (ranging from very much better, moderately better, a little better, about the same, a little worse, moderately worse, to very much worse). The average change in patient fatigue scores for those participants who express a perceived change of a little better via the SGIC scores were calculated. BFI usual fatigue item score was translated into 0 to 100 point scale for the analysis, with 0 (poor QOL or bad symptoms) and 100 (best QOL or no symptoms)." (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Methylphenidate20.9
Placebo15

Anchor-based Minimally Important Difference in SGIC Physical Condition Based on Mean Changes From Baseline to Week 4 on BFI Usual Fatigue

"Perceived treatment efficacy was measured by the Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC). The SGIC is a 3-point item in which the patient rates the change in the overall status since beginning the study drug (ranging from very much better, moderately better, a little better, about the same, a little worse, moderately worse, to very much worse). The average change in patient fatigue scores for those participants who express a perceived change of a little better via the SGIC scores were calculated. BFI usual fatigue item score was translated into 0 to 100 point scale for the analysis, with 0 (poor QOL or bad symptoms) and 100 (best QOL or no symptoms)." (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionUnits on scale (Mean)
Methylphenidate20.0
Placebo11.4

AUC of Sleep Quality as Measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index at Baseline and at Weeks 1-4

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) consists of 19 items and 7 scales. The AUC for the overall PSQI at baseline and at weeks 1-4 after being translated onto a 0 to 100 point scale was calculated. Higher scores are better. (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventionunits on a scale * weeks (Mean)
Methylphenidate144.37
Placebo145.93

AUC of Vitality as Measured by the Short Form-36 Vitality Subscale at Baseline and at Weeks 1-4

The SF-36 is a 36-item short form to measure health status in various populations. The vitality subscale is comprised of 4 items and is a measure of energy level as well as fatigue. The AUC for the vitality subscale at baseline and at weeks 1-4 after being translated onto a 0 to 100 point scale was calculated. Higher scores are better. (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Interventionunits on a scale * weeks (Mean)
Methylphenidate134.74
Placebo121.59

Prorated AUC of Total Fatigue as Measured by the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) at Baseline and at Weeks 1-4

"The prorated area under the curve (AUC) for the usual fatigue question of the BFI at baseline and at weeks 1-4 after being translated onto a 0 (poor quality of life (QOL) or bad symptoms) to 100 (best QOL or no symptoms) point scale was calculated as the following:~For those completed 4 weeks item: AUC/4;~For those completed up to week 3 item: (AUC * 4) / 3;~For those completed up to week 2 item: AUC * 2;~For those completed up to week 1 item: AUC * 4;~The prorated AUC scores were then transformed onto 0 to 100 point scale with 0 (poor QOL or bad symptoms) and 100 (best QOL or no symptoms) for analysis." (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 4

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Methylphenidate50.33
Placebo47.15

AUC of Other Fatigue Scores as Measured by Items of the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) at Baseline and at Weeks 1-4

Area under the curve (AUC) for the other fatigue items of the BFI at baseline and at weeks 1-4 after being translated onto a 0 to 100 point scale was calculated. Higher scores are better. (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale * weeks (Mean)
Fatigue right nowWorst fatigue last 24 hoursFatigue interference with general activityFatigue interference with moodFatigue interference with walking abilityFatigue interference with normal workFatigue interference with relations with othersFatigue interference with enjoyment of life
Methylphenidate179.96144.59187.60205.31210.09179.94224.72194.15
Placebo174.94126.36171.06220.29206.46168.84243.87184.12

AUC of Overall Quality of Life (QOL) and QOL Domains as Measured by the Linear Analogue Self Assessment at Baseline and at Weeks 1-4

Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA) consists of 6 single-item numeric analogue scales. The AUC for the six-items at baseline and at weeks 1-4 after being translated onto a 0 to 100 point scale was calculated. Higher scores are better. (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale * weeks (Mean)
Overall QOLMental well-beingPhysical well-beingEmotional well-beingSocial activitySpiritual well-being
Methylphenidate204.21227.04188.13203.65189.68231.24
Placebo201.34226.40191.07215.65177.34255.88

Severity of Adverse Events as Measured by the Symptom Experience Diary Based on Mean Changes From Baseline to Week 4

The Symptom Experience Diary (SED) consists of 12 items. All scores were translated onto a 0-100 point scale, with 0 represent poor quality of life (QOL) or bad symptom and 100 is best QOL or no symptoms.The change in severity of adverse events was calculated as subtracting the item scores at baseline from the scores at week 4. (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
NervousnessAppetite decreaseSex driveAbdominal painDizzinessShakinessHeartbeatVomitingHeadachesTrouble sleepingFatigue distressFatigue control satisfaction
Methylphenidate-2.7-5.2-0.9-3.5-2.2-0.6-2.0-0.8-0.810.622.928.0
Placebo9.56.69.83.62.11.4-1.60.43.911.115.823.2

Brain White Matter Volume for Patients Versus Sibling Controls

To compare the white matter volume of patients with those of sibling controls using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Patients27
Siblings30.3

Brain White Matter Volume for Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Versus Brain Tumors

To compare the white matter volume of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) patients with those of patients with malignant brain tumors using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Patients With ALL28.4
Patients With Brain Tumors25.5

Brain White Matter Volume for Treatment Intensity Groups and Sibling Controls

To compare the white matter volume of patients by treatment intensity groups (mild, moderate, and high) and sibling controls using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Siblings30.3
Mild Treatment Intensity28.8
Moderate Treatment Intensity25.9
High Treatment Intensity25.4

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Conner's Parent Rating Scale (CPRS: Cognitive Problem T Score)

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-9.56

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS: ADHD T Score)

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 and 24.36 months. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-8.74

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS: Cognitive Problem T Score)

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-eight questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-3.34

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Social Skill Rating System (SSRS-P)

The Social Skills Rating System- Parent Version (SSRS-P) is a parent rating scale of social behaviors in reference to typically developing children. Thirty eight questions are rated 0 (Never) to 3 (very often). The social skills score is norm-referenced with a mean of 100±15 where a higher score is indicative of better skills. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall7.99

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) Math: Composite Standard Score

The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Math Composite score assesses the child's ability to solve calculation problems (Numerical Operations) and solve applied, word problems (Math Reasoning). Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and after completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall0.22

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) Reading: Composite Standard Score

The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Reading Composite consists of Basic Reading (single word reading) and Reading Comprehension. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-0.21

Change From Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) Spelling: Standard Score

The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Spelling score assesses the child's ability to spell words to dictation. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and after completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-2.41

Change From Methylphenidate (MPH) Home Maintenance Phase Baseline to Completion of Phase as Measured by Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS: ADHD T Score)

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-eight questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Methylphenidate (MPH) Home Maintenance Phase(baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 and 24.36 months. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of Methylphenidate (MPH) Home Maintenance Phase, on average 16.3 months.

InterventionT-score (Mean)
Overall-7.17

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by Social Skills Rating System - Parent (SSRS-P) - Problem Behavior.

The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated Standard Score (Mean)
Placebo97.4890
Low Dose97.0891
Moderate Dose97.5709

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by Social Skills Rating System - Parent (SSRS-P) - Social Skill.

The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated Standard Score (Mean)
Placebo99.4412
Low Dose101.5457
Moderate Dose101.8999

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by Social Skills Rating System - Teacher (SSRS-T) - Problem Behavior.

The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated Standard Score (Mean)
Placebo100.6084
Low Dose98.6610
Moderate Dose97.3103

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by Social Skills Rating System - Teacher (SSRS-T) - Social Skill.

The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated Standard Score (Mean)
Placebo97.6171
Low Dose100.6957
Moderate Dose102.5281

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ADHD Index.

The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo57.5805
Low Dose54.4226
Moderate Dose53.5317

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) Cognitive Problem/Inattention Scale.

The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo57.6595
Low Dose54.6491
Moderate Dose52.9854

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) Hyperactivity Scale.

The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo54.2138
Low Dose52.2771
Moderate Dose51.5143

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS) ADHD Index.

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo58.7691
Low Dose54.7438
Moderate Dose54.1974

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS) Cognitive Problem/Inattention Scale.

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo62.7053
Low Dose59.3272
Moderate Dose59.6638

Effectiveness of MPH in Enhancing Classroom Attentiveness, Academic Productivity, and Social Behavior Measured by The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS) Hyperactivity Scale.

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
Placebo55.7638
Low Dose52.1765
Moderate Dose52.6495

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Interference, Impulsivity, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention Using the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) for Color Naming Time.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Color Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)40.7031
Placebo39.8889
MPH Versus Placebo0.8142

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Interference, Impulsivity, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention Using the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) for Ink Color Naming Time.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Ink Color Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)45.1094
Placebo41.7937
MPH Versus Placebo3.3157

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Interference, Impulsivity, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention Using the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) for Interference Score.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Interference Score have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)52.6875
Placebo50.6349
MPH Versus Placebo2.0526

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Interference, Impulsivity, Cognitive Flexibility, and Selective Attention Using the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) for Word Naming Time.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Word Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)39.0156
Placebo37.8571
MPH Versus Placebo1.1585

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Learning and Recall Using California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) for Long Delay Free Recall.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Z Score for Long Delay Free Recall has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated Z Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)-0.3692
Placebo-0.2090
MPH Versus Placebo-0.1603

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Learning and Recall Using California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) for Short Delay Free Recall.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Z Score for Short Delay Free Recall has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated Z Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)-0.3636
Placebo-0.3358
MPH Versus Placebo-0.0278

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Learning and Recall Using California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) Over Five Learning Trials.

Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Trials 1-5 have a mean T Score of 50 and Standard Deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated T Score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)44.6970
Placebo45.9403
MPH Versus Placebo-1.2433

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Sustained Attention, Reaction Time, and, Impulsivity Using Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) for Beta (Risk Taking).

Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. D' and β are derived variables from signal detection theory. β is a measure of response tendency; higher scores indicate a more conservative response pattern. β was calculated using the formula = -d'*.5*(NORMSINV(hits)-NORMSINV(false alarms)). In the case where the false alarm rate = 0 or the hit rate = 1.0, we used the standard correction of 1/2N and 1- 1/2N, respectively. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated raw score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)0.2300
Placebo0.2647
MPH Versus Placebo-0.0346

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Sustained Attention, Reaction Time, and, Impulsivity Using Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) for Commission Errors.

Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Commission errors are the raw score for the numbers of nontargets presented where the subject incorrectly responded. Accordingly, the range for this variable is 0-6 with a higher score indicative of worse performance or impulsivity. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated raw score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)3.6984
Placebo3.5970
MPH Versus Placebo0.1014

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Sustained Attention, Reaction Time, and, Impulsivity Using Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) for d' (Sensitivity).

Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. D' and β are derived variables from signal detection theory. D' is a measure of sensitivity of a person to the signal or target; a higher score is indicative of better performance or better sustained attention. D' was calculated as z(hit) - z(commission). Z-scores were calculated using the NORMSINV function in Microsoft Excel. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated raw score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)1.6809
Placebo1.7972
MPH Versus Placebo-0.1163

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Sustained Attention, Reaction Time, and, Impulsivity Using Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) for Hit Reaction Time.

Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Hit reaction time is average reaction time in milliseconds for all correct responses when targets were presented. There is no pre-defined range for reaction time; higher score is indicative of slower processing speed. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated raw score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)350.0590
Placebo354.8515
MPH Versus Placebo-4.7925

Establish the Effectiveness of MPH on Laboratory Measures of Sustained Attention, Reaction Time, and, Impulsivity Using Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) for Omission Errors.

Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Omission errors are the raw score for the number of targets presented where the subject did not respond. Accordingly, the range for this variable is 0-54 with a higher score indicative of worse performance or problems with sustained attention. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.

InterventionEstimated raw score (Mean)
MPH (Methylphenidate)1.8889
Placebo1.6269
MPH Versus Placebo0.2620

Best Weekly Score Measured by Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS: ADHD T Score) During the 3-week Home Crossover Phase.

The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were done weekly during the 3-week Home Crossover Period with the best response being used as the measurement for the test. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: weekly during 3-week home crossover phase

,,
InterventionT score (Mean)
Oppositional T ScoreCognitive Problems/Inattention T ScoreHyperactivity T ScoreAdhd T Score
Low Dose50.8753.1451.1453.08
Moderate Dose50.4451.7250.6352.23
Placebo49.4955.6451.9655.45

Reviews

30 reviews available for methylphenidate and Benign Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Cancer-related fatigue-pharmacological interventions: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2023, Volume: 13, Issue:3

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Modafinil; Neoplasms; Network M

2023
The holistic management of fatigue within palliative care.
    International journal of palliative nursing, 2019, Aug-02, Volume: 25, Issue:8

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chronic Disease; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Complementary Ther

2019
A systematic review of systematic reviews and pooled meta-analysis on pharmacological interventions to improve cancer-related fatigue.
    Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 2021, Volume: 166

    Topics: Adult; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; Systematic Reviews as Topic

2021
The Use of Methylphenidate for Physical and Psychological Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Review.
    Current drug targets, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:8

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Cancer Pain; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognitive Dysfunction;

2018
Pharmacologic interventions for fatigue in cancer and transplantation: a meta-analysis.
    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2018, Volume: 25, Issue:2

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Erythropoietin; Fatigue; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation;

2018
Pharmacologic management of cognitive impairment induced by cancer therapy.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2019, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognitive Dysfu

2019
Psychostimulants for cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, Volume: 27, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Cancer Survivors; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Humans

2019
Effect of methylphenidate in patients with cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    PloS one, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:1

    Topics: Cognition; Depression; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms

2014
[Treatment of cognitive impairments in oncology: a review of longitudinal controlled studies].
    Bulletin du cancer, 2014, Volume: 101, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Case-Control Studies; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cog

2014
Developing interventions for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2014, Volume: 106, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Br

2014
Pharmacological treatments for fatigue associated with palliative care.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015, May-30, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Amantadine; Benzhydryl Compounds; Carnitine; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chronic Disea

2015
Psychotropic drugs for the management of cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    European journal of cancer care, 2016, Volume: 25, Issue:6

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Modafinil; Neoplasms; Psychotropic Drugs

2016
Comparison of Pharmaceutical, Psychological, and Exercise Treatments for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis.
    JAMA oncology, 2017, Jul-01, Volume: 3, Issue:7

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Dexmethylphen

2017
Comparison of Pharmaceutical, Psychological, and Exercise Treatments for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis.
    JAMA oncology, 2017, Jul-01, Volume: 3, Issue:7

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Dexmethylphen

2017
Comparison of Pharmaceutical, Psychological, and Exercise Treatments for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis.
    JAMA oncology, 2017, Jul-01, Volume: 3, Issue:7

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Dexmethylphen

2017
Comparison of Pharmaceutical, Psychological, and Exercise Treatments for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis.
    JAMA oncology, 2017, Jul-01, Volume: 3, Issue:7

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Dexmethylphen

2017
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the pharmacological treatment of cancer-related fatigue.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008, Aug-20, Volume: 100, Issue:16

    Topics: Anemia; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stim

2008
Pharmacologic treatment options for cancer-related fatigue: current state of clinical research.
    Clinical journal of oncology nursing, 2008, Volume: 12, Issue:5 Suppl

    Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cholinesterase Inhib

2008
[Pharmaceutical treatment of cancer-associated fatigue--a survey of a Cochrane review].
    Ugeskrift for laeger, 2009, Sep-21, Volume: 171, Issue:39

    Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Erythropoietin; Evidenc

2009
Fatigue in long-term cancer survivors.
    Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.), 2009, Volume: 23, Issue:8 Suppl

    Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Algorithms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Exercise Therapy; Fatigue;

2009
Prospective follow-up studies found no chromosomal mutagenicity of methylphenidate therapy in ADHD affected children.
    Toxicology letters, 2010, Mar-01, Volume: 193, Issue:1

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Carcinogens; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2010
Drug therapy for the management of cancer-related fatigue.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010, Jul-07, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Darbepoetin alfa; Erythropoietin; F

2010
Psychostimulants for cancer-related fatigue.
    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2010, Volume: 8, Issue:8

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dextroamphetamine; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; W

2010
European Palliative Care Research collaborative pain guidelines. Central side-effects management: what is the evidence to support best practice in the management of sedation, cognitive impairment and myoclonus?
    Palliative medicine, 2011, Volume: 25, Issue:5

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Conscious Sedation; Drug

2011
Pharmacological treatments for fatigue associated with palliative care.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010, Nov-10, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Amantadine; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Kidney

2010
Psychostimulants for the management of cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 2011, Volume: 41, Issue:4

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neopl

2011
The use of psychostimulants in cancer patients.
    Current opinion in supportive and palliative care, 2011, Volume: 5, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Asthenia; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chi

2011
Methylphenidate: established and expanding roles in symptom management.
    The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2012, Volume: 29, Issue:6

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorde

2012
Treatment of cancer-related fatigue: an update.
    Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2003, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Exercise; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; Quality of

2003
Update on psychotropic medications for cancer-related fatigue.
    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2007, Volume: 5, Issue:10

    Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dextroamphetamine; Fatigue; Humans; Methyl

2007
Methylphenidate: its pharmacology and uses.
    Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2000, Volume: 75, Issue:7

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; De

2000
Methylphenidate: its pharmacology and uses.
    Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2000, Volume: 75, Issue:7

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; De

2000
Methylphenidate: its pharmacology and uses.
    Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2000, Volume: 75, Issue:7

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; De

2000
Methylphenidate: its pharmacology and uses.
    Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2000, Volume: 75, Issue:7

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; De

2000
Psychostimulants in supportive care.
    Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2000, Volume: 8, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Caffeine; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Dextroamphetamine; Ephedrine; Humans; Men

2000
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2002, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of

2002
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2002, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of

2002
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2002, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of

2002
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2002, Jan-01, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of

2002

Trials

24 trials available for methylphenidate and Benign Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Methylphenidate as Needed for Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer. A Prospective, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Study.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020, Volume: 60, Issue:5

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Methylphenidate; Ne

2020
Improved cancer-related fatigue in a randomised clinical trial: methylphenidate no better than placebo.
    BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2022, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms;

2022
Use of methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in Chinese patients with cancer.
    The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2014, Volume: 31, Issue:3

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Hong Kong;

2014
Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Jul-01, Volume: 31, Issue:19

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Counseling; Depression; Dopami

2013
Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Jul-01, Volume: 31, Issue:19

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Counseling; Depression; Dopami

2013
Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Jul-01, Volume: 31, Issue:19

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Counseling; Depression; Dopami

2013
Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Jul-01, Volume: 31, Issue:19

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Counseling; Depression; Dopami

2013
Rapid response to methylphenidate as an add-on therapy to mirtazapine in the treatment of major depressive disorder in terminally ill cancer patients: a four-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.
    European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2014, Volume: 24, Issue:4

    Topics: Academic Medical Centers; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Depressive Disorder, Major; Diagnostic and St

2014
Multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of methylphenidate on depressive symptoms in advanced cancer patients.
    BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2012, Volume: 2, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depression; Double-Blind Method;

2012
The Effect of Methylphenidate on Fatigue in Advanced Cancer: An Aggregated N-of-1 Trial.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 2015, Volume: 50, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Australia; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cross-Over Studies; Do

2015
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of methylphenidate for the treatment of depression in SSRI-treated cancer patients receiving palliative care.
    Psycho-oncology, 2017, Volume: 26, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hospice Car

2017
Efficacy of dexmethylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue after cancer chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 2009, Volume: 38, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dexmethylphenidat

2009
Efficacy of dexmethylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue after cancer chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 2009, Volume: 38, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dexmethylphenidat

2009
Efficacy of dexmethylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue after cancer chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 2009, Volume: 38, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dexmethylphenidat

2009
Efficacy of dexmethylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue after cancer chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 2009, Volume: 38, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dexmethylphenidat

2009
Phase 1 study of MLN8054, a selective inhibitor of Aurora A kinase in patients with advanced solid tumors.
    Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2011, Volume: 67, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Aurora Kinases; Benzaze

2011
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of long-acting methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue: North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG-N05C7 trial.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010, Aug-10, Volume: 28, Issue:23

    Topics: Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylp

2010
Pilot study to determine the optimal dose of methylphenidate for an n-of-1 trial for fatigue in patients with cancer.
    Journal of palliative medicine, 2010, Volume: 13, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphe

2010
Long-term efficacy of methylphenidate in enhancing attention regulation, social skills, and academic abilities of childhood cancer survivors.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010, Oct-10, Volume: 28, Issue:29

    Topics: Adolescent; Analysis of Variance; Attention; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chi

2010
Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2003, Dec-01, Volume: 21, Issue:23

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Midd

2003
Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2003, Dec-01, Volume: 21, Issue:23

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Midd

2003
Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2003, Dec-01, Volume: 21, Issue:23

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Midd

2003
Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2003, Dec-01, Volume: 21, Issue:23

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Midd

2003
Methylphenidate hydrochloride improves cognitive function in patients with advanced cancer and hypoactive delirium: a prospective clinical study.
    Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2005, Volume: 30, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Delirium; Female;

2005
Patient-controlled methylphenidate for cancer fatigue: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2006, May-01, Volume: 24, Issue:13

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Fem

2006
Acute neurocognitive response to methylphenidate among survivors of childhood cancer: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial.
    Journal of pediatric psychology, 2007, Volume: 32, Issue:9

    Topics: Brain; Child; Child, Preschool; Cognition; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans;

2007
An open-label long-term naturalistic study of mirtazapine treatment for depression in cancer patients.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2008, Volume: 28, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Depressive Disorder;

2008
[Methylphenidate in palliative care in cancer patient: a double-blind randomised trial versus placebo].
    Bulletin du cancer, 2008, Volume: 95, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asthenia; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Methylphenida

2008
A randomized, crossover evaluation of methylphenidate in cancer patients receiving strong narcotics.
    Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 1995, Volume: 3, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenid

1995
The cognitive and psychomotor effects of opioid drugs in cancer pain management.
    Cancer surveys, 1994, Volume: 21

    Topics: Adult; Amphetamines; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chronic D

1994
Methylphenidate in terminal depression.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 1998, Volume: 16, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depressive Disorder; Female; Hospice Care; Humans; M

1998
Neuropsychological effects of methylphenidate in patients receiving a continuous infusion of narcotics for cancer pain.
    Pain, 1992, Volume: 48, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Chi-Square Distribution; Cognition; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intraveno

1992
Methylphenidate associated with narcotics for the treatment of cancer pain.
    Cancer treatment reports, 1987, Volume: 71, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Drug Evaluation; D

1987

Other Studies

32 other studies available for methylphenidate and Benign Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Sleep disturbance in patients with cancer: a feasibility study of multimodal therapy.
    BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2021, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Combined Modality Therapy; Double

2021
The use of methylphenidate to relieve fatigue.
    Current opinion in supportive and palliative care, 2017, Volume: 11, Issue:4

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Methylphenidate; Neoplas

2017
The association between medication for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and cancer.
    Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2013, Volume: 23, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamines; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder wi

2013
Methylphenidate in the management of cancer-related fatigue.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013, Jul-01, Volume: 31, Issue:19

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Counseling; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Neopl

2013
Better--but good enough? The first randomised controlled trial of psychostimulants for depressive symptoms in advanced cancer.
    BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2012, Volume: 2, Issue:4

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depression; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms

2012
The Role of Methylphenidate in Cancer-Related Fatigue. Commentary on Mitchell et al.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 2015, Volume: 50, Issue:3

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms

2015
Single Institute Experience With Methylphenidate and American Ginseng in Cancer-Related Fatigue.
    The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2018, Volume: 35, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Complementary Therapies; Drug Therapy, Combination;

2018
No rest for fatigue researchers.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008, Aug-20, Volume: 100, Issue:16

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous Sys

2008
Growth effects of methylphenidate among childhood cancer survivors: a 12-month case-matched open-label study.
    Pediatric blood & cancer, 2009, Volume: 52, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Body Height; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Female; Growth; Human

2009
Methylphenidate side effects in advanced cancer: a retrospective analysis.
    The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2010, Volume: 27, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Anorexia; Central Nervous System Stimulants

2010
Challenge of managing cancer-related fatigue.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2010, Aug-10, Volume: 28, Issue:23

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms

2010
Neurocognitive effects of childhood cancer treatment.
    Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2010, Volume: 678

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Child; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; Risk Factors

2010
Parent and teacher ratings of attention during a year-long methylphenidate trial in children treated for cancer.
    Journal of pediatric psychology, 2011, Volume: 36, Issue:4

    Topics: Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child;

2011
Factors associated with response to methylphenidate in advanced cancer patients.
    The oncologist, 2011, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Anorexia; Anxiety; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depression; Drug Monitoring; Dyspnea; Fatigue;

2011
Methylphenidate use for the management of opioid-induced sedation.
    Clinical journal of oncology nursing, 2004, Volume: 8, Issue:2

    Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Drug Thera

2004
Is methylphenidate an irreplaceable therapy for the fatigued cancer patient?
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2004, Oct-01, Volume: 22, Issue:19

    Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms

2004
Response to comments on 'Cytogenetic effects in children treated with methylphenidate' by El-Zein et al.
    Cancer letters, 2006, Jan-08, Volume: 231, Issue:1

    Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Carcinogens; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child

2006
NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of methylphenidate.
    NTP CERHR MON, 2005, Issue:15

    Topics: Animals; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Female; Fetus; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms;

2005
Clinical experience of the use of a pharmacological treatment algorithm for major depressive disorder in patients with advanced cancer.
    Psycho-oncology, 2008, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Alprazolam; Amitriptyline; Antidepressive Agents; Anxiety Disorders; Benzod

2008
Is there a connection between methylphenidate and cancer in youth?
    Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2007, Volume: 16, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; California; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Databases, Factual; Drug Utilizati

2007
Methylphenidate use in children and risk of cancer at 18 sites: results of surveillance analyses.
    Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2007, Volume: 16, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Age of Onset; Amphetamines; California; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Clinic

2007
Methylphenidate and chromosome damage.
    Cancer letters, 2008, Feb-18, Volume: 260, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Adolescent; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulant

2008
Diagnosis and treatment of depression in the cancer patient.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 1984, Volume: 45, Issue:3 Pt 2

    Topics: Adjustment Disorders; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Asparaginase; Combined Modality Therapy; Dep

1984
Dextroamphetamine or methylphenidate as adjuvants to opioid analgesia for adolescents with cancer.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 1994, Volume: 9, Issue:2

    Topics: Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic; Adolescent; Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Dextroamphetamine; Female; Humans; M

1994
Cancer fatigue--more data, less information?
    Current oncology reports, 2002, Volume: 4, Issue:4

    Topics: Anemia; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chronic Disease; Cytokines; Depression; Exercise; Fatigue

2002
Efficacy of methylphenidate for fatigue in advanced cancer patients: a preliminary study.
    Palliative medicine, 2002, Volume: 16, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Middle Aged

2002
The use of methylphenidate in patients with incident cancer pain receiving regular opiates. A preliminary report.
    Pain, 1992, Volume: 50, Issue:1

    Topics: Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Methylphenidate; Narcotics; Neoplasms; Palliative Care; Time Factor

1992
Use of methylphenidate as an adjuvant to narcotic analgesics in patients with advanced cancer.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 1989, Volume: 4, Issue:1

    Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Middle Aged; Morphine; Neoplasms;

1989
Use of methylphenidate as an adjuvant to narcotic analgesics in patients with advanced cancer.
    Journal of pain and symptom management, 1989, Volume: 4, Issue:3

    Topics: Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; Pain

1989
Narcotics plus methylphenidate (Ritalin) for advanced cancer pain.
    The American journal of nursing, 1988, Volume: 88, Issue:11

    Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Mental Disorders; Methylphenidate; Narcotics; Neoplasms; Pain

1988
Overwhelming fatigue in advanced cancer.
    The American journal of nursing, 1988, Volume: 88, Issue:1

    Topics: Asthenia; Humans; Mazindol; Methylphenidate; Methylprednisolone; Neoplasms

1988
Methylphenidate for depressive disorders in cancer patients. An alternative to standard antidepressants.
    Psychosomatics, 1987, Volume: 28, Issue:9

    Topics: Depressive Disorder; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms

1987