methylphenidate has been researched along with Benign Neoplasms in 86 studies
Methylphenidate: A central nervous system stimulant used most commonly in the treatment of ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER in children and for NARCOLEPSY. Its mechanisms appear to be similar to those of DEXTROAMPHETAMINE. The d-isomer of this drug is referred to as DEXMETHYLPHENIDATE HYDROCHLORIDE.
methylphenidate : A racemate comprising equimolar amounts of the two threo isomers of methyl phenyl(piperidin-2-yl)acetate. A central stimulant and indirect-acting sympathomimetic, is used (generally as the hydrochloride salt) in the treatment of hyperactivity disorders in children and for the treatment of narcolepsy.
methyl phenyl(piperidin-2-yl)acetate : A amino acid ester that is methyl phenylacetate in which one of the hydrogens alpha to the carbonyl group is replaced by a piperidin-2-yl group.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant drug used to treat fatigue in patients with advanced cancer, for which there is no gold standard of treatment." | 9.51 | Improved cancer-related fatigue in a randomised clinical trial: methylphenidate no better than placebo. ( Centeno, C; Cuervo, MA; De Santiago, A; Gagnon, B; Gandara, A; Portela, MA; Ramos, D; Rojí, R; Salgado, E; Sanz, A, 2022) |
"To evaluate the efficacy of methylphenidate as needed for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer." | 9.34 | Methylphenidate as Needed for Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer. A Prospective, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Study. ( Groenvold, M; Lund, L; Pedersen, L; Petersen, MA; Sjogren, P, 2020) |
"To determine the effectiveness of methylphenidate for depression treatment in patients with advanced cancer." | 9.24 | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of methylphenidate for the treatment of depression in SSRI-treated cancer patients receiving palliative care. ( Ganzini, L; Goy, E; Mongoue-Tchokote, S; Mori, M; Sullivan, DR, 2017) |
"REASON FOR THE STUDY: Studies on methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue showed conflicting results." | 9.19 | Use of methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in Chinese patients with cancer. ( Kwok, AO; Lam, PT; Law, M; Leung, TW; Liu, RK; Ng, KH; Siu, SW; Soong, IS; Wong, KH, 2014) |
" Using an area under the serum concentration-time curve analysis, there was no evidence that methylphenidate, as compared with placebo, improved the primary end point of cancer-related fatigue in this patient population (P = ." | 9.14 | Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of long-acting methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue: North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG-N05C7 trial. ( Ali, A; Atherton, PJ; Barton, D; Dakhil, SR; Duane, SF; Griffin, PC; Johnson, DB; Loprinzi, CL; Moraska, AR; Silberstein, PT; Sloan, JA; Sood, A; Suh, JJ, 2010) |
"To evaluate the effectiveness of patient-controlled methylphenidate as compared with placebo in cancer patients with fatigue, as measured by the Functional Assessment for Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F)." | 9.12 | Patient-controlled methylphenidate for cancer fatigue: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. ( Bruera, E; Driver, L; Palmer, JL; Shen, L; Valero, V; Willey, J; Zhang, T, 2006) |
"To investigate the clinical improvement observed in patients with advanced cancer and hypoactive delirium after the administration of methylphenidate hydrochloride." | 9.11 | Methylphenidate hydrochloride improves cognitive function in patients with advanced cancer and hypoactive delirium: a prospective clinical study. ( Gagnon, B; Low, G; Schreier, G, 2005) |
"To assess the effects of patient-controlled methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue." | 9.10 | Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report. ( Barnes, EA; Bruera, E; Driver, L; Escalante, C; Palmer, JL; Shen, L; Willey, J, 2003) |
"Twenty consecutive patients with cancer pain receiving a continuous subcutaneous infusion of narcotics were admitted to a double-blind, crossover trial designed to assess the effects of methylphenidate on neuropsychological functions." | 9.07 | Neuropsychological effects of methylphenidate in patients receiving a continuous infusion of narcotics for cancer pain. ( Bruera, E; Kuehn, N; Macmillan, K; Miller, MJ, 1992) |
"Thirty-two patients with chronic pain due to advanced cancer were treated with methylphenidate (10 mg with breakfast and 5 mg with lunch) for 3 days, versus placebo, in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study designed to evaluate the capacity of methylphenidate to potentiate the analgesic effect of narcotics and/or to decrease sedation induced by narcotics." | 9.06 | Methylphenidate associated with narcotics for the treatment of cancer pain. ( Brenneis, C; Bruera, E; Chadwick, S; Hanson, J; MacDonald, RN, 1987) |
"Single therapy with methylphenidate or American ginseng contributes to the reduction in cancer-related fatigue (CRF) with different pharmacologic mechanisms and is relatively safe." | 7.88 | Single Institute Experience With Methylphenidate and American Ginseng in Cancer-Related Fatigue. ( Chang, YD; Davis, M; Kim, R; Oberoi-Jassal, R; Portman, D; Rajasekhara, S; Smith, J, 2018) |
"To review recent evidence on the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate as a symptomatic treatment of patients with cancer-related fatigue (CRF)." | 7.85 | The use of methylphenidate to relieve fatigue. ( Centeno, C; Rojí, R, 2017) |
"Fatigue is common in life-limiting cancer." | 6.80 | The Effect of Methylphenidate on Fatigue in Advanced Cancer: An Aggregated N-of-1 Trial. ( Carmont, SA; Currow, DC; Good, P; Hardy, JR; Mitchell, GK; Nikles, CJ; Schluter, PJ; Senior, HE, 2015) |
"Methylphenidate dose was 5 mg every 2 hours as needed up to 20 mg per day." | 6.78 | Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial. ( Allo, JA; Bruera, E; Cohen, MZ; Frisbee-Hume, S; Palmer, JL; Perez-Cruz, PE; Williams, JL; Yennurajalingam, S, 2013) |
"In advanced cancer, the prevalence of fatigue is high and can be related to treatment or disease." | 6.75 | Pilot study to determine the optimal dose of methylphenidate for an n-of-1 trial for fatigue in patients with cancer. ( Carmont, SA; Hardy, JR; Mitchell, GK; Nikles, CJ; O'Shea, A; Schluter, P; Vora, R, 2010) |
"Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant drug used to treat fatigue in patients with advanced cancer, for which there is no gold standard of treatment." | 5.51 | Improved cancer-related fatigue in a randomised clinical trial: methylphenidate no better than placebo. ( Centeno, C; Cuervo, MA; De Santiago, A; Gagnon, B; Gandara, A; Portela, MA; Ramos, D; Rojí, R; Salgado, E; Sanz, A, 2022) |
"To evaluate the efficacy of methylphenidate as needed for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer." | 5.34 | Methylphenidate as Needed for Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer. A Prospective, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Study. ( Groenvold, M; Lund, L; Pedersen, L; Petersen, MA; Sjogren, P, 2020) |
"To determine the effectiveness of methylphenidate for depression treatment in patients with advanced cancer." | 5.24 | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of methylphenidate for the treatment of depression in SSRI-treated cancer patients receiving palliative care. ( Ganzini, L; Goy, E; Mongoue-Tchokote, S; Mori, M; Sullivan, DR, 2017) |
"REASON FOR THE STUDY: Studies on methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue showed conflicting results." | 5.19 | Use of methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in Chinese patients with cancer. ( Kwok, AO; Lam, PT; Law, M; Leung, TW; Liu, RK; Ng, KH; Siu, SW; Soong, IS; Wong, KH, 2014) |
" Using an area under the serum concentration-time curve analysis, there was no evidence that methylphenidate, as compared with placebo, improved the primary end point of cancer-related fatigue in this patient population (P = ." | 5.14 | Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of long-acting methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue: North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG-N05C7 trial. ( Ali, A; Atherton, PJ; Barton, D; Dakhil, SR; Duane, SF; Griffin, PC; Johnson, DB; Loprinzi, CL; Moraska, AR; Silberstein, PT; Sloan, JA; Sood, A; Suh, JJ, 2010) |
"The amphetamine, methylphenidate (Ritaline) has been proposed as being of interest in the treatment of asthenia in patients with advanced cancer." | 5.13 | [Methylphenidate in palliative care in cancer patient: a double-blind randomised trial versus placebo]. ( Laval, G; Paris, A, 2008) |
"To evaluate the effectiveness of patient-controlled methylphenidate as compared with placebo in cancer patients with fatigue, as measured by the Functional Assessment for Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F)." | 5.12 | Patient-controlled methylphenidate for cancer fatigue: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. ( Bruera, E; Driver, L; Palmer, JL; Shen, L; Valero, V; Willey, J; Zhang, T, 2006) |
"To investigate the clinical improvement observed in patients with advanced cancer and hypoactive delirium after the administration of methylphenidate hydrochloride." | 5.11 | Methylphenidate hydrochloride improves cognitive function in patients with advanced cancer and hypoactive delirium: a prospective clinical study. ( Gagnon, B; Low, G; Schreier, G, 2005) |
"To assess the effects of patient-controlled methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue." | 5.10 | Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report. ( Barnes, EA; Bruera, E; Driver, L; Escalante, C; Palmer, JL; Shen, L; Willey, J, 2003) |
"Major depressive disorder in 26 hospice inpatients was managed with a trial of methylphenidate (mean daily dosage, 17." | 5.08 | Methylphenidate in terminal depression. ( Macleod, AD, 1998) |
"Twenty consecutive patients with cancer pain receiving a continuous subcutaneous infusion of narcotics were admitted to a double-blind, crossover trial designed to assess the effects of methylphenidate on neuropsychological functions." | 5.07 | Neuropsychological effects of methylphenidate in patients receiving a continuous infusion of narcotics for cancer pain. ( Bruera, E; Kuehn, N; Macmillan, K; Miller, MJ, 1992) |
"Thirty-two patients with chronic pain due to advanced cancer were treated with methylphenidate (10 mg with breakfast and 5 mg with lunch) for 3 days, versus placebo, in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study designed to evaluate the capacity of methylphenidate to potentiate the analgesic effect of narcotics and/or to decrease sedation induced by narcotics." | 5.06 | Methylphenidate associated with narcotics for the treatment of cancer pain. ( Brenneis, C; Bruera, E; Chadwick, S; Hanson, J; MacDonald, RN, 1987) |
"Erythropoietin and methylphenidate significantly reduced fatigue severity in patients with cancer and in recipients of hsct." | 4.98 | Pharmacologic interventions for fatigue in cancer and transplantation: a meta-analysis. ( Cabral, S; Cataudella, D; Culos-Reed, N; Davis, H; Duong, N; Dupuis, LL; Gibson, F; Götte, M; Hinds, P; Nijhof, SL; Oberoi, S; Robinson, PD; Sung, L; Tomlinson, D; van der Torre, P, 2018) |
"This review potentially supports the use of methylphenidate for opioid-induced sedation, cognitive decline and fatigue in cancer patients." | 4.98 | The Use of Methylphenidate for Physical and Psychological Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Review. ( Andrew, BN; Guan, NC; Jaafar, NRN, 2018) |
" We included studies investigating pemoline and modafinil in participants with multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated fatigue and methylphenidate in patients suffering from advanced cancer and fatigue in meta-analysis." | 4.91 | Pharmacological treatments for fatigue associated with palliative care. ( Cuhls, H; Minton, O; Mücke, M; Peuckmann-Post, V; Radbruch, L; Stone, P, 2015) |
"Although most research to date has focused on the use of methylphenidate for the relief of symptoms such as asthenia and depression in cancer patients, there is growing interest in the use of modafinil, a psychostimulant with a structure and mechanism that differs from other drugs belonging to this group." | 4.87 | The use of psychostimulants in cancer patients. ( Centeno, C; Portela, MA; Rubiales, AS, 2011) |
" Studies investigating amantadine, pemoline, and modafinil in participants with Multiple Sclerosis (MS)-associated fatigue and methylphenidate in patients suffering from advanced cancer and fatigue could be used for meta-analysis." | 4.86 | Pharmacological treatments for fatigue associated with palliative care. ( Elsner, F; Krumm, N; Peuckmann, V; Radbruch, L; Trottenberg, P, 2010) |
"There is some evidence that treatment of cancer-related fatigue with methylphenidate appears to be effective." | 4.84 | A systematic review and meta-analysis of the pharmacological treatment of cancer-related fatigue. ( Hotopf, M; Minton, O; Richardson, A; Sharpe, M; Stone, P, 2008) |
"On the basis of this review, we came to the conclusion that methylphenidate is used to ameliorate opioid-induced somnolence, to augment the analgesic effects of opioids, to treat depression, and to improve cognitive function in patients with cancer." | 4.81 | Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review. ( Dreisbach, A; Kahn, MJ; Lertora, JJ; Rozans, M, 2002) |
"Single therapy with methylphenidate or American ginseng contributes to the reduction in cancer-related fatigue (CRF) with different pharmacologic mechanisms and is relatively safe." | 3.88 | Single Institute Experience With Methylphenidate and American Ginseng in Cancer-Related Fatigue. ( Chang, YD; Davis, M; Kim, R; Oberoi-Jassal, R; Portman, D; Rajasekhara, S; Smith, J, 2018) |
"To review recent evidence on the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate as a symptomatic treatment of patients with cancer-related fatigue (CRF)." | 3.85 | The use of methylphenidate to relieve fatigue. ( Centeno, C; Rojí, R, 2017) |
"Response to methylphenidate is associated with higher baseline fatigue but not with higher baseline depression or sedation." | 3.77 | Factors associated with response to methylphenidate in advanced cancer patients. ( Bruera, E; Chacko, R; Palmer, JL; Yennurajalingam, S, 2011) |
"Methylphenidate and modafinil were equivalent to one another." | 3.01 | Cancer-related fatigue-pharmacological interventions: systematic review and network meta-analysis. ( Boldt, G; Bruera, E; Chiu, L; Chow, R; Lock, M; Prsic, E; Sanatani, M, 2023) |
"Fatigue is common in life-limiting cancer." | 2.80 | The Effect of Methylphenidate on Fatigue in Advanced Cancer: An Aggregated N-of-1 Trial. ( Carmont, SA; Currow, DC; Good, P; Hardy, JR; Mitchell, GK; Nikles, CJ; Schluter, PJ; Senior, HE, 2015) |
"It involved 88 terminally ill cancer patients from University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia." | 2.79 | Rapid response to methylphenidate as an add-on therapy to mirtazapine in the treatment of major depressive disorder in terminally ill cancer patients: a four-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. ( Boks, MP; de Wit, NJ; Ng, CG; Roes, KC; Sulaiman, AH; Tan, SB; Zainal, NZ, 2014) |
"Methylphenidate dose was 5 mg every 2 hours as needed up to 20 mg per day." | 2.78 | Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial. ( Allo, JA; Bruera, E; Cohen, MZ; Frisbee-Hume, S; Palmer, JL; Perez-Cruz, PE; Williams, JL; Yennurajalingam, S, 2013) |
"Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant that has been used to relieve depressive symptoms in advanced cancer patients." | 2.77 | Multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of methylphenidate on depressive symptoms in advanced cancer patients. ( Almaraz, MJ; Centeno, C; Cuervo, MA; Gonzalez, J; Hernansanz, S; Lama, M; Nabal, M; Pascual, A; Ramos, D; Sanz, A; Vara, F, 2012) |
"MLN8054 dosing for up to 14 days of a 28-day cycle was feasible." | 2.76 | Phase 1 study of MLN8054, a selective inhibitor of Aurora A kinase in patients with advanced solid tumors. ( Burris, H; Cohen, RB; Danaee, H; Dees, EC; Ecsedy, J; Eton, O; Fingert, H; Galvin, K; Infante, JR; Jones, S; Lee, Y; Liu, H; Manfredi, M; O'Neil, BH; Stringer, B; von Mehren, M, 2011) |
"In contrast, the cancer control group only showed improvement on parent ratings of attention (Conners' Parent Rating Scale indices; P < ." | 2.75 | Long-term efficacy of methylphenidate in enhancing attention regulation, social skills, and academic abilities of childhood cancer survivors. ( Ashford, J; Bonner, M; Brown, R; Christensen, R; Conklin, HM; Howard, SC; Khan, RB; Morris, EB; Ogg, S; Reddick, WE; Wu, S; Xiong, X, 2010) |
"In advanced cancer, the prevalence of fatigue is high and can be related to treatment or disease." | 2.75 | Pilot study to determine the optimal dose of methylphenidate for an n-of-1 trial for fatigue in patients with cancer. ( Carmont, SA; Hardy, JR; Mitchell, GK; Nikles, CJ; O'Shea, A; Schluter, P; Vora, R, 2010) |
"Depression is quite common among cancer patients." | 2.73 | An open-label long-term naturalistic study of mirtazapine treatment for depression in cancer patients. ( Elbi, H; Ersoy, MA; Noyan, AM, 2008) |
"Cognitive dysfunction is a challenging adverse effect of chemotherapy and radiotherapy that has limited treatment options." | 2.61 | Pharmacologic management of cognitive impairment induced by cancer therapy. ( Dietrich, J; Karschnia, P; Parsons, MW, 2019) |
"Fatigue is a common symptom experienced by people with cancer and other long-term, non-malignant conditions." | 2.61 | The holistic management of fatigue within palliative care. ( Dean, A, 2019) |
"Survivors of childhood cancer frequently experience cancer-related cognitive dysfunction, commonly months to years after treatment for pediatric brain tumors, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or tumors involving the head and neck." | 2.50 | Developing interventions for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors. ( Castellino, SM; Lange, BJ; Ullrich, NJ; Whelen, MJ, 2014) |
"Methylphenidate is a psychostimulant originally used for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder." | 2.48 | Methylphenidate: established and expanding roles in symptom management. ( Prommer, E, 2012) |
"Fatigue is a highly prevalent and distressing symptom associated with significant psychological and functional morbidity and decreased quality of life among patients with cancer." | 2.46 | Psychostimulants for cancer-related fatigue. ( Alici, Y; Breitbart, W, 2010) |
" To address the question of long-term use of MPH, we published the data of 30 chronically treated children and also saw no difference compared to untreated children." | 2.46 | Prospective follow-up studies found no chromosomal mutagenicity of methylphenidate therapy in ADHD affected children. ( Gerlach, M; Kämpf, K; Oli, RG; Stopper, H; Walitza, S; Warnke, A, 2010) |
"Methylphenidate has been studied most and is effective and well tolerated despite common side effects." | 2.44 | Pharmacologic treatment options for cancer-related fatigue: current state of clinical research. ( Alici, Y; Breitbart, W, 2008) |
"Methylphenidate has been studied most and seems to be effective and well tolerated despite common side effects." | 2.44 | Update on psychotropic medications for cancer-related fatigue. ( Alici-Evcimen, Y; Breitbart, W, 2007) |
"Current treatments for fatigue include educating patients and caregivers about fatigue, applying etiology-specific treatments, utilizing nonpharmacologic interventions, and prescribing pharmacologic therapies." | 2.42 | Treatment of cancer-related fatigue: an update. ( Escalante, CP, 2003) |
"Treatment with methylphenidate has been advocated in patients with traumatic brain injury and stroke, cancer patients, and those with human immunodeficiency virus infection." | 2.41 | Methylphenidate: its pharmacology and uses. ( Challman, TD; Lipsky, JJ, 2000) |
"We also examined the effects of MMT on insomnia, fatigue, depression, quality of life and actigraphy." | 1.62 | Sleep disturbance in patients with cancer: a feasibility study of multimodal therapy. ( Balachandran, D; Bruera, E; Carmack, C; Delgado, M; Eng, C; Guzman Gutierrez, D; Hess, KR; Lim, B; Lu, Z; Ochoa, J; Park, M; Raznahan, M; Williams, JL; Yennurajalingam, S, 2021) |
"Frequencies of cancer diagnoses in these groups were compared." | 1.39 | The association between medication for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and cancer. ( Helenius, D; Steinhausen, HC, 2013) |
"Childhood cancer survivors' attention improved after 1 month on MPH." | 1.37 | Parent and teacher ratings of attention during a year-long methylphenidate trial in children treated for cancer. ( Ashford, JM; Conklin, HM; Kahalley, LS; Netson, KL; Wu, S; Xiong, X, 2011) |
" Methylphenidate (MP) appears safe when used in the treatment of depression and fatigue in advanced cancer." | 1.36 | Methylphenidate side effects in advanced cancer: a retrospective analysis. ( Davis, MP; Khoshknabi, DS; Lasheen, W; Mahmoud, F; Rivera, N; Walsh, D, 2010) |
"Childhood cancer survivors taking MPH experience significant, though modest, deceleration of BMI and weight across the first year of MPH intervention." | 1.35 | Growth effects of methylphenidate among childhood cancer survivors: a 12-month case-matched open-label study. ( Conklin, HM; Howard, SC; Jasper, BW; Khan, RB; Lawford, J; Morris, EB; Shelso, J; Wu, S; Xiong, X, 2009) |
"Psychiatrists treated major depressive disorder in advanced cancer patients on the basis of the algorithm." | 1.35 | Clinical experience of the use of a pharmacological treatment algorithm for major depressive disorder in patients with advanced cancer. ( Akechi, T; Akizuki, N; Ito, T; Nakano, T; Okamura, M; Shimizu, K; Uchitomi, Y, 2008) |
"Further study of MPH use and lymphocytic leukemia risk is needed to determine whether our results are due to chance alone." | 1.34 | Methylphenidate use in children and risk of cancer at 18 sites: results of surveillance analyses. ( Chan, J; Friedman, GD; Habel, LA; Jiang, SF; Oestreicher, N; Quesenberry, C, 2007) |
"Methylphenidate is a central nervous system stimulant approved by the U." | 1.33 | NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of methylphenidate. ( , 2005) |
"Depressive symptoms associated with cancer range from normal sadness through acute stress response to major depression." | 1.27 | Diagnosis and treatment of depression in the cancer patient. ( Holland, JC; Massie, MJ, 1984) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 7 (8.14) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 6 (6.98) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 28 (32.56) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 40 (46.51) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 5 (5.81) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Chow, R | 1 |
Bruera, E | 14 |
Sanatani, M | 1 |
Chiu, L | 1 |
Prsic, E | 1 |
Boldt, G | 1 |
Lock, M | 1 |
Dean, A | 1 |
Yennurajalingam, S | 4 |
Carmack, C | 1 |
Balachandran, D | 1 |
Eng, C | 1 |
Lim, B | 1 |
Delgado, M | 1 |
Guzman Gutierrez, D | 1 |
Raznahan, M | 1 |
Park, M | 1 |
Hess, KR | 1 |
Williams, JL | 2 |
Lu, Z | 1 |
Ochoa, J | 1 |
Pedersen, L | 2 |
Lund, L | 1 |
Petersen, MA | 1 |
Sjogren, P | 1 |
Groenvold, M | 1 |
Centeno, C | 4 |
Rojí, R | 2 |
Portela, MA | 2 |
De Santiago, A | 1 |
Cuervo, MA | 2 |
Ramos, D | 2 |
Gandara, A | 1 |
Salgado, E | 1 |
Gagnon, B | 3 |
Sanz, A | 2 |
Belloni, S | 1 |
Arrigoni, C | 1 |
de Sanctis, R | 1 |
Arcidiacono, MA | 1 |
Dellafiore, F | 1 |
Caruso, R | 1 |
Andrew, BN | 1 |
Guan, NC | 1 |
Jaafar, NRN | 1 |
Tomlinson, D | 1 |
Robinson, PD | 1 |
Oberoi, S | 1 |
Cataudella, D | 1 |
Culos-Reed, N | 1 |
Davis, H | 1 |
Duong, N | 1 |
Gibson, F | 1 |
Götte, M | 1 |
Hinds, P | 1 |
Nijhof, SL | 1 |
van der Torre, P | 1 |
Cabral, S | 1 |
Dupuis, LL | 1 |
Sung, L | 1 |
Karschnia, P | 1 |
Parsons, MW | 1 |
Dietrich, J | 1 |
Miladi, N | 1 |
Dossa, R | 1 |
Dogba, MJ | 1 |
Cléophat-Jolicoeur, MIF | 1 |
Steinhausen, HC | 1 |
Helenius, D | 1 |
Siu, SW | 1 |
Law, M | 1 |
Liu, RK | 1 |
Wong, KH | 1 |
Soong, IS | 1 |
Kwok, AO | 1 |
Ng, KH | 1 |
Lam, PT | 1 |
Leung, TW | 1 |
Palmer, JL | 4 |
Perez-Cruz, PE | 1 |
Frisbee-Hume, S | 1 |
Allo, JA | 1 |
Cohen, MZ | 1 |
Stone, PC | 2 |
Gong, S | 1 |
Sheng, P | 1 |
Jin, H | 1 |
He, H | 1 |
Qi, E | 1 |
Chen, W | 1 |
Dong, Y | 1 |
Hou, L | 1 |
Ng, CG | 1 |
Boks, MP | 1 |
Roes, KC | 1 |
Zainal, NZ | 1 |
Sulaiman, AH | 1 |
Tan, SB | 1 |
de Wit, NJ | 1 |
Rayner, L | 1 |
Hotopf, M | 4 |
Hernansanz, S | 1 |
Gonzalez, J | 1 |
Almaraz, MJ | 1 |
Lama, M | 1 |
Vara, F | 1 |
Nabal, M | 1 |
Pascual, A | 1 |
Borghgraef, C | 1 |
Libert, Y | 1 |
Etienne, AM | 1 |
Delvaux, N | 1 |
Reynaert, C | 1 |
Razavi, D | 1 |
Castellino, SM | 1 |
Ullrich, NJ | 1 |
Whelen, MJ | 1 |
Lange, BJ | 1 |
Mitchell, GK | 2 |
Hardy, JR | 2 |
Nikles, CJ | 2 |
Carmont, SA | 2 |
Senior, HE | 1 |
Schluter, PJ | 1 |
Good, P | 1 |
Currow, DC | 1 |
Mücke, M | 1 |
Cuhls, H | 1 |
Peuckmann-Post, V | 1 |
Minton, O | 5 |
Stone, P | 4 |
Radbruch, L | 2 |
Qu, D | 1 |
Zhang, Z | 1 |
Yu, X | 1 |
Zhao, J | 1 |
Qiu, F | 1 |
Huang, J | 1 |
Sullivan, DR | 1 |
Mongoue-Tchokote, S | 1 |
Mori, M | 1 |
Goy, E | 1 |
Ganzini, L | 1 |
Mustian, KM | 1 |
Alfano, CM | 1 |
Heckler, C | 1 |
Kleckner, AS | 1 |
Kleckner, IR | 1 |
Leach, CR | 1 |
Mohr, D | 1 |
Palesh, OG | 1 |
Peppone, LJ | 1 |
Piper, BF | 1 |
Scarpato, J | 1 |
Smith, T | 1 |
Sprod, LK | 1 |
Miller, SM | 1 |
Chang, YD | 1 |
Smith, J | 1 |
Portman, D | 1 |
Kim, R | 1 |
Oberoi-Jassal, R | 1 |
Rajasekhara, S | 1 |
Davis, M | 1 |
McNeil, C | 1 |
Richardson, A | 3 |
Sharpe, M | 3 |
Breitbart, W | 3 |
Alici, Y | 2 |
Jasper, BW | 1 |
Conklin, HM | 4 |
Lawford, J | 1 |
Morris, EB | 2 |
Howard, SC | 3 |
Wu, S | 4 |
Xiong, X | 4 |
Shelso, J | 1 |
Khan, RB | 3 |
Lasheen, W | 1 |
Walsh, D | 2 |
Mahmoud, F | 1 |
Davis, MP | 1 |
Rivera, N | 1 |
Khoshknabi, DS | 1 |
Palshof, T | 1 |
Schwartz, AL | 1 |
Lower, EE | 1 |
Fleishman, S | 1 |
Cooper, A | 1 |
Zeldis, J | 1 |
Faleck, H | 1 |
Yu, Z | 1 |
Manning, D | 1 |
Walitza, S | 1 |
Kämpf, K | 1 |
Oli, RG | 1 |
Warnke, A | 1 |
Gerlach, M | 1 |
Stopper, H | 1 |
Dees, EC | 1 |
Infante, JR | 1 |
Cohen, RB | 1 |
O'Neil, BH | 1 |
Jones, S | 1 |
von Mehren, M | 1 |
Danaee, H | 1 |
Lee, Y | 1 |
Ecsedy, J | 1 |
Manfredi, M | 1 |
Galvin, K | 1 |
Stringer, B | 1 |
Liu, H | 1 |
Eton, O | 1 |
Fingert, H | 1 |
Burris, H | 1 |
Moraska, AR | 1 |
Sood, A | 1 |
Dakhil, SR | 1 |
Sloan, JA | 1 |
Barton, D | 1 |
Atherton, PJ | 1 |
Suh, JJ | 1 |
Griffin, PC | 1 |
Johnson, DB | 1 |
Ali, A | 1 |
Silberstein, PT | 1 |
Duane, SF | 1 |
Loprinzi, CL | 2 |
Costa, J | 1 |
O'Shea, A | 1 |
Vora, R | 1 |
Schluter, P | 1 |
Reddick, WE | 2 |
Ashford, J | 1 |
Ogg, S | 1 |
Brown, R | 2 |
Bonner, M | 2 |
Christensen, R | 2 |
Peuckmann, V | 1 |
Elsner, F | 1 |
Krumm, N | 1 |
Trottenberg, P | 1 |
Netson, KL | 1 |
Ashford, JM | 1 |
Kahalley, LS | 1 |
Chacko, R | 1 |
Rubiales, AS | 1 |
Prommer, E | 1 |
Escalante, CP | 1 |
Driver, L | 2 |
Barnes, EA | 1 |
Willey, J | 2 |
Shen, L | 2 |
Escalante, C | 1 |
Westberg, J | 1 |
Gobel, BH | 1 |
Vale, S | 1 |
Low, G | 1 |
Schreier, G | 1 |
El-Zein, RA | 1 |
Hay, MJ | 1 |
Lopez, MS | 1 |
Bondy, ML | 1 |
Morris, DL | 1 |
Legator, MS | 1 |
Abdel-Rahman, SZ | 1 |
Valero, V | 1 |
Zhang, T | 1 |
Okamura, M | 1 |
Akizuki, N | 2 |
Nakano, T | 2 |
Shimizu, K | 1 |
Ito, T | 1 |
Akechi, T | 2 |
Uchitomi, Y | 2 |
Helton, S | 1 |
Mulhern, RK | 1 |
Zito, JM | 1 |
Safer, DJ | 1 |
Oestreicher, N | 1 |
Friedman, GD | 1 |
Jiang, SF | 1 |
Chan, J | 1 |
Quesenberry, C | 1 |
Habel, LA | 1 |
Alici-Evcimen, Y | 1 |
Jacobson-Kram, D | 1 |
Mattison, D | 1 |
Shelby, M | 1 |
Slikker, W | 1 |
Tice, R | 1 |
Witt, K | 1 |
Ersoy, MA | 1 |
Noyan, AM | 1 |
Elbi, H | 1 |
Laval, G | 1 |
Paris, A | 1 |
Massie, MJ | 1 |
Holland, JC | 1 |
Wilwerding, MB | 1 |
Mailliard, JA | 1 |
O'Fallon, JR | 1 |
Miser, AW | 1 |
van Haelst, C | 1 |
Barton, DL | 1 |
Foley, JF | 1 |
Athmann, LM | 1 |
Yee, JD | 1 |
Berde, CB | 1 |
O'Neill, WM | 1 |
Macleod, AD | 1 |
Challman, TD | 1 |
Lipsky, JJ | 1 |
Homsi, J | 1 |
Nelson, KA | 1 |
Rozans, M | 1 |
Dreisbach, A | 1 |
Lertora, JJ | 1 |
Kahn, MJ | 1 |
LeGrand, SB | 1 |
Sugawara, Y | 1 |
Shima, Y | 1 |
Okuyama, T | 1 |
Fainsinger, R | 1 |
MacEachern, T | 1 |
Hanson, J | 2 |
Miller, MJ | 1 |
Macmillan, K | 1 |
Kuehn, N | 1 |
Brenneis, C | 3 |
Paterson, AH | 2 |
MacDonald, RN | 4 |
Portenoy, RK | 1 |
Fernandez, F | 1 |
Adams, F | 1 |
Holmes, VF | 1 |
Levy, JK | 1 |
Neidhart, M | 1 |
Chadwick, S | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feasibility Study of Adjunctive Bright Light Therapy (BLT) for Amelioration of Fatigue in Chinese Cancer Patients Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit[NCT04525924] | 42 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-08-01 | Recruiting | |||
Multimodal Therapy for the Treatment of Sleep Disturbance in Patients With Cancer[NCT01628029] | Phase 2 | 68 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-01-15 | Active, not recruiting | ||
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Methylphenidate and a Nursing Telephone Intervention (NTI) for Fatigue in Advanced Cancer Patients[NCT00424099] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 197 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-01-09 | Completed | ||
A Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Methylphenidate as an Add on Therapy for Mirtazapine in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Cancer Patients Under Palliative Care[NCT01497548] | Phase 3 | 120 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2011-03-31 | Recruiting | ||
MentalPlus® for Assessment and Rehabilitation of Cognitive Functions After Remission of Symptoms of COVID-19[NCT04632719] | 200 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-11-08 | Recruiting | |||
Feasibility Study of a Hypnosis Intervention and a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention to Reduce Fatigue in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[NCT04999306] | 60 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-05-17 | Recruiting | |||
Clinical Study on Wide Spectrum Micronutrients Supplementation in Patients With Cancer Related Fatigue During Adjuvant Chemotherapy[NCT06137833] | 92 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-11-27 | Not yet recruiting | |||
Fatigue in Sarcoidosis - A Feasibility Study Investigating the Treatment of Fatigue in Stable Sarcoidosis Patients Using Methylphenidate[NCT02643732] | 30 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2016-11-30 | Recruiting | |||
A Phase I/II Study of Alisertib in Combination With Abiraterone and Prednisone for Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer After Progression on Abiraterone[NCT01848067] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 9 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-08-14 | Completed | ||
Long Acting Methylphenidate (Concerta™) for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Study[NCT00376675] | Phase 3 | 148 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-02-29 | Completed | ||
Randomized Study Evaluating the Antiasthenic Effect of Methylphenidate (Ritalin) in Palliative Care in Cancer Patients[NCT00273741] | Phase 3 | 39 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-01-31 | Terminated (stopped due to difficulty of recrutement) | ||
Conscious Dying/Conscious Living: Ketamine-Assisted Psychotherapy (KAP) for Patients at End of Life-A Pilot Study for Palliative and Hospice Care[NCT05214417] | Phase 2 | 120 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-05-01 | Not yet recruiting | ||
Learning Impairments Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer[NCT00576472] | Phase 4 | 469 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2000-01-31 | Completed | ||
Methylphenidate Effect on Performing Humphrey Visual Fields[NCT02162381] | 32 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-06-30 | Completed | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
The ESAS was used to assess the following 9 symptoms commonly experienced symptoms by cancer patients: pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, dyspnea, anorexia, and well-being. Patients rate the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10 (0=not at all and 10=very much). Total ESAS fatigue score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicate higher fatigue. We measured the median change in ESAS fatigue score between Baseline and Day 15 using Kruskal-Wallis test. (NCT00424099)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate (MP) + Nursing Telephone Intervention (NTI) | -3.00 |
Methylphenidate (MP) + Control Telephone Intervention (CTI) | -1.00 |
Placebo (PL)+ Nursing Telephone Intervention (NTI) | -2.00 |
Placebo (PL) + Control Telephone Intervention (CTI) | -2.00 |
FACIT-F fatigue subscale consists of 13 items. Patients rate the intensity of their fatigue symptoms on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=not at all and 4=very much). Total FACIT-F fatigue subscale score ranges from 0 to 52 with higher scores indicate higher fatigue. We measured the median change in FACIT-F fatigue sub scale score between Baseline and Day 15 using Kruskal-Wallis test. (NCT00424099)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate (MP) + Nursing Telephone Intervention (NTI) | 4.00 |
Methylphenidate (MP) + Control Telephone Intervention (CTI) | 7.00 |
Placebo (PL)+ Nursing Telephone Intervention (NTI) | 8.50 |
Placebo (PL) + Control Telephone Intervention (CTI) | 5.00 |
Compared between the two patient subsets using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. A comparison of CTC counts between baseline and at progression for those who have progressed will be carried out using either a paired t test or the nonparameteric Wilcoxon matched pairs test. (NCT01848067)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 3 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Treatment (Alisertib, Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone) | 3 |
Summarized with descriptive statistics. (NCT01848067)
Timeframe: Up to 21 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Treatment (Alisertib, Abiraterone Acetate, Prednisone) | 2 |
"Perceived treatment efficacy was measured by the Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC). The SGIC is a 3-point item in which the patient rates the change in the overall status since beginning the study drug (ranging from very much better, moderately better, a little better, about the same, a little worse, moderately worse, to very much worse). The average change in patient fatigue scores for those participants who express a perceived change of a little better via the SGIC scores were calculated. BFI usual fatigue item score was translated into 0 to 100 point scale for the analysis, with 0 (poor QOL or bad symptoms) and 100 (best QOL or no symptoms)." (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4
Intervention | Units on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate | 31.0 |
Placebo | 23.8 |
"Perceived treatment efficacy was measured by the Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC). The SGIC is a 3-point item in which the patient rates the change in the overall status since beginning the study drug (ranging from very much better, moderately better, a little better, about the same, a little worse, moderately worse, to very much worse). The average change in patient fatigue scores for those participants who express a perceived change of a little better via the SGIC scores were calculated. BFI usual fatigue item score was translated into 0 to 100 point scale for the analysis, with 0 (poor QOL or bad symptoms) and 100 (best QOL or no symptoms)." (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate | 20.9 |
Placebo | 15 |
"Perceived treatment efficacy was measured by the Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC). The SGIC is a 3-point item in which the patient rates the change in the overall status since beginning the study drug (ranging from very much better, moderately better, a little better, about the same, a little worse, moderately worse, to very much worse). The average change in patient fatigue scores for those participants who express a perceived change of a little better via the SGIC scores were calculated. BFI usual fatigue item score was translated into 0 to 100 point scale for the analysis, with 0 (poor QOL or bad symptoms) and 100 (best QOL or no symptoms)." (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4
Intervention | Units on scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate | 20.0 |
Placebo | 11.4 |
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) consists of 19 items and 7 scales. The AUC for the overall PSQI at baseline and at weeks 1-4 after being translated onto a 0 to 100 point scale was calculated. Higher scores are better. (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4
Intervention | units on a scale * weeks (Mean) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate | 144.37 |
Placebo | 145.93 |
The SF-36 is a 36-item short form to measure health status in various populations. The vitality subscale is comprised of 4 items and is a measure of energy level as well as fatigue. The AUC for the vitality subscale at baseline and at weeks 1-4 after being translated onto a 0 to 100 point scale was calculated. Higher scores are better. (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4
Intervention | units on a scale * weeks (Mean) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate | 134.74 |
Placebo | 121.59 |
"The prorated area under the curve (AUC) for the usual fatigue question of the BFI at baseline and at weeks 1-4 after being translated onto a 0 (poor quality of life (QOL) or bad symptoms) to 100 (best QOL or no symptoms) point scale was calculated as the following:~For those completed 4 weeks item: AUC/4;~For those completed up to week 3 item: (AUC * 4) / 3;~For those completed up to week 2 item: AUC * 2;~For those completed up to week 1 item: AUC * 4;~The prorated AUC scores were then transformed onto 0 to 100 point scale with 0 (poor QOL or bad symptoms) and 100 (best QOL or no symptoms) for analysis." (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 4
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Methylphenidate | 50.33 |
Placebo | 47.15 |
Area under the curve (AUC) for the other fatigue items of the BFI at baseline and at weeks 1-4 after being translated onto a 0 to 100 point scale was calculated. Higher scores are better. (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4
Intervention | units on a scale * weeks (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fatigue right now | Worst fatigue last 24 hours | Fatigue interference with general activity | Fatigue interference with mood | Fatigue interference with walking ability | Fatigue interference with normal work | Fatigue interference with relations with others | Fatigue interference with enjoyment of life | |
Methylphenidate | 179.96 | 144.59 | 187.60 | 205.31 | 210.09 | 179.94 | 224.72 | 194.15 |
Placebo | 174.94 | 126.36 | 171.06 | 220.29 | 206.46 | 168.84 | 243.87 | 184.12 |
Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA) consists of 6 single-item numeric analogue scales. The AUC for the six-items at baseline and at weeks 1-4 after being translated onto a 0 to 100 point scale was calculated. Higher scores are better. (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4
Intervention | units on a scale * weeks (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall QOL | Mental well-being | Physical well-being | Emotional well-being | Social activity | Spiritual well-being | |
Methylphenidate | 204.21 | 227.04 | 188.13 | 203.65 | 189.68 | 231.24 |
Placebo | 201.34 | 226.40 | 191.07 | 215.65 | 177.34 | 255.88 |
The Symptom Experience Diary (SED) consists of 12 items. All scores were translated onto a 0-100 point scale, with 0 represent poor quality of life (QOL) or bad symptom and 100 is best QOL or no symptoms.The change in severity of adverse events was calculated as subtracting the item scores at baseline from the scores at week 4. (NCT00376675)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nervousness | Appetite decrease | Sex drive | Abdominal pain | Dizziness | Shakiness | Heartbeat | Vomiting | Headaches | Trouble sleeping | Fatigue distress | Fatigue control satisfaction | |
Methylphenidate | -2.7 | -5.2 | -0.9 | -3.5 | -2.2 | -0.6 | -2.0 | -0.8 | -0.8 | 10.6 | 22.9 | 28.0 |
Placebo | 9.5 | 6.6 | 9.8 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 1.4 | -1.6 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 11.1 | 15.8 | 23.2 |
To compare the white matter volume of patients with those of sibling controls using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.
Intervention | percentage (Mean) |
---|---|
Patients | 27 |
Siblings | 30.3 |
To compare the white matter volume of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) patients with those of patients with malignant brain tumors using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.
Intervention | percentage (Mean) |
---|---|
Patients With ALL | 28.4 |
Patients With Brain Tumors | 25.5 |
To compare the white matter volume of patients by treatment intensity groups (mild, moderate, and high) and sibling controls using MRI results captured between -1.8 and 42.36 months from study enrollment. Existing MRIs very close to enrollment were permissable for inclusion in this study. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Enrollment to evaluation of MRI, on average 12.8 months.
Intervention | percentage (Mean) |
---|---|
Siblings | 30.3 |
Mild Treatment Intensity | 28.8 |
Moderate Treatment Intensity | 25.9 |
High Treatment Intensity | 25.4 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -9.56 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 and 24.36 months. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -8.74 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-eight questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -3.34 |
The Social Skills Rating System- Parent Version (SSRS-P) is a parent rating scale of social behaviors in reference to typically developing children. Thirty eight questions are rated 0 (Never) to 3 (very often). The social skills score is norm-referenced with a mean of 100±15 where a higher score is indicative of better skills. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | 7.99 |
The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Math Composite score assesses the child's ability to solve calculation problems (Numerical Operations) and solve applied, word problems (Math Reasoning). Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and after completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | 0.22 |
The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Reading Composite consists of Basic Reading (single word reading) and Reading Comprehension. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -0.21 |
The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test is an examiner administered measure of academic skills. The Spelling score assesses the child's ability to spell words to dictation. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100±15 where higher scores indicate better performance. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Home Therapy Phase (baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 to 24.36 months (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and after completion of home maintenance phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -2.41 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-eight questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed prior to beginning the Methylphenidate (MPH) Home Maintenance Phase(baseline) and upon completion of the phase. Phase completion ranged between 11.44 and 24.36 months. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: From beginning and at completion of Methylphenidate (MPH) Home Maintenance Phase, on average 16.3 months.
Intervention | T-score (Mean) |
---|---|
Overall | -7.17 |
The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated Standard Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 97.4890 |
Low Dose | 97.0891 |
Moderate Dose | 97.5709 |
The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated Standard Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 99.4412 |
Low Dose | 101.5457 |
Moderate Dose | 101.8999 |
The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated Standard Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 100.6084 |
Low Dose | 98.6610 |
Moderate Dose | 97.3103 |
The SSRS assesses social skills for children and adolescents at preschool, elementary and secondary developmental levels. The SSRS is 40 to 57 items, depending on age, completed separately by parents (SSRS-P) and teachers (SSRS-T). Respondents rate the frequency of occurrence for each item ranging from 0 to 2 (0-never, 1-sometimes, 2-very often). The raw scores for the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Social Skills Scales and the SSRS-P and SSRS-T Problem Behaviors Scales have different ranges that are dependent upon age. Raw scores obtained from the SSRS Scales cannot be used to directly interpret social skills or problem behaviors as raw scores vary in meaning based on scale, informant form and developmental level. Raw scores are converted to standard scores with a mean of 100 ± 15. For the Social Skills Scale, a higher score is indicative of better social functioning, and for the Problem Behaviors Scale, a higher score is indicative of greater behavior problems. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated Standard Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 97.6171 |
Low Dose | 100.6957 |
Moderate Dose | 102.5281 |
The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 57.5805 |
Low Dose | 54.4226 |
Moderate Dose | 53.5317 |
The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 57.6595 |
Low Dose | 54.6491 |
Moderate Dose | 52.9854 |
The Conners' Parent Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 54.2138 |
Low Dose | 52.2771 |
Moderate Dose | 51.5143 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 58.7691 |
Low Dose | 54.7438 |
Moderate Dose | 54.1974 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 62.7053 |
Low Dose | 59.3272 |
Moderate Dose | 59.6638 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Three scales are reported: Cognitive Problems/Inattention (assesses the ability to learn at the same pace as peers, organize and complete work, and concentrate for sustained periods of time), Hyperactivity (assesses the ability to sit still to complete tasks, and impulsivity) and ADHD Index (assesses risk for ADHD disorder to be corroborated by other clinical information). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were performed at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Evaluated at the end of each medication week during the Home Therapy Phase- placebo, low dose and moderate dose weeks.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 55.7638 |
Low Dose | 52.1765 |
Moderate Dose | 52.6495 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Color Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 40.7031 |
Placebo | 39.8889 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 0.8142 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Ink Color Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 45.1094 |
Placebo | 41.7937 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 3.3157 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Interference Score have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 52.6875 |
Placebo | 50.6349 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 2.0526 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the Stroop Word-Color Association Test (Stroop) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of interference, impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, and selective attention. Stroop T scores for Word Naming Time have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 39.0156 |
Placebo | 37.8571 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 1.1585 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Z Score for Long Delay Free Recall has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated Z Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | -0.3692 |
Placebo | -0.2090 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -0.1603 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Z Score for Short Delay Free Recall has a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated Z Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | -0.3636 |
Placebo | -0.3358 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -0.0278 |
Patients were randomized into two sequence groups: 1) P/M: placebo followed by MPH; 2) M/P: MPH followed by placebo. We are interested in testing the difference of effects of MPH and placebo, not in testing the difference of two sequence groups. We will use the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) to estimate the effectiveness of MPH on laboratory measures of learning and recall. CVLT Trials 1-5 have a mean T Score of 50 and Standard Deviation of 10. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated T Score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 44.6970 |
Placebo | 45.9403 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -1.2433 |
Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. D' and β are derived variables from signal detection theory. β is a measure of response tendency; higher scores indicate a more conservative response pattern. β was calculated using the formula = -d'*.5*(NORMSINV(hits)-NORMSINV(false alarms)). In the case where the false alarm rate = 0 or the hit rate = 1.0, we used the standard correction of 1/2N and 1- 1/2N, respectively. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated raw score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 0.2300 |
Placebo | 0.2647 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -0.0346 |
Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Commission errors are the raw score for the numbers of nontargets presented where the subject incorrectly responded. Accordingly, the range for this variable is 0-6 with a higher score indicative of worse performance or impulsivity. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated raw score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 3.6984 |
Placebo | 3.5970 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 0.1014 |
Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. D' and β are derived variables from signal detection theory. D' is a measure of sensitivity of a person to the signal or target; a higher score is indicative of better performance or better sustained attention. D' was calculated as z(hit) - z(commission). Z-scores were calculated using the NORMSINV function in Microsoft Excel. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated raw score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 1.6809 |
Placebo | 1.7972 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -0.1163 |
Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Hit reaction time is average reaction time in milliseconds for all correct responses when targets were presented. There is no pre-defined range for reaction time; higher score is indicative of slower processing speed. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated raw score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 350.0590 |
Placebo | 354.8515 |
MPH Versus Placebo | -4.7925 |
Change in raw scores for the shortened version of the Conner's CPT from Baseline to Post-dose. The continuous performance test used during the in-lab trial was developed in house using SuperLab Pro v2.0 (Cedrus Corp., Phoenix, AZ). The test was modeled after Conners' CPT, but was shortened for ease of administration and evaluation of short-form sensitivity. The test is one-sixth the length of the Conners' CPT, lasting 2.33 min with 54 total targets and six nontargets (10% of trials). Similar to the Conners' CPT, the interstimulus intervals also varied by trial blocks with lengths of 1, 2, or 4 s. Omission errors are the raw score for the number of targets presented where the subject did not respond. Accordingly, the range for this variable is 0-54 with a higher score indicative of worse performance or problems with sustained attention. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: Subjects were tested in both the drug and placebo groups before and after taking either MPH or placebo.
Intervention | Estimated raw score (Mean) |
---|---|
MPH (Methylphenidate) | 1.8889 |
Placebo | 1.6269 |
MPH Versus Placebo | 0.2620 |
The Conners' Teacher Rating Scale- Revised (S) is a measure of the observed frequency of behaviors associated with ADHD. Twenty-seven questions are rated on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores are converted to T scores using age and gender normative data. T scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. Assessments were done weekly during the 3-week Home Crossover Period with the best response being used as the measurement for the test. (NCT00576472)
Timeframe: weekly during 3-week home crossover phase
Intervention | T score (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Oppositional T Score | Cognitive Problems/Inattention T Score | Hyperactivity T Score | Adhd T Score | |
Low Dose | 50.87 | 53.14 | 51.14 | 53.08 |
Moderate Dose | 50.44 | 51.72 | 50.63 | 52.23 |
Placebo | 49.49 | 55.64 | 51.96 | 55.45 |
30 reviews available for methylphenidate and Benign Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Cancer-related fatigue-pharmacological interventions: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Modafinil; Neoplasms; Network M | 2023 |
The holistic management of fatigue within palliative care.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chronic Disease; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Complementary Ther | 2019 |
A systematic review of systematic reviews and pooled meta-analysis on pharmacological interventions to improve cancer-related fatigue.
Topics: Adult; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; Systematic Reviews as Topic | 2021 |
The Use of Methylphenidate for Physical and Psychological Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Review.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Cancer Pain; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognitive Dysfunction; | 2018 |
Pharmacologic interventions for fatigue in cancer and transplantation: a meta-analysis.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Erythropoietin; Fatigue; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; | 2018 |
Pharmacologic management of cognitive impairment induced by cancer therapy.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognitive Dysfu | 2019 |
Psychostimulants for cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Adult; Cancer Survivors; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Humans | 2019 |
Effect of methylphenidate in patients with cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Cognition; Depression; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms | 2014 |
[Treatment of cognitive impairments in oncology: a review of longitudinal controlled studies].
Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Case-Control Studies; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cog | 2014 |
Developing interventions for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Attention; Benzhydryl Compounds; Br | 2014 |
Pharmacological treatments for fatigue associated with palliative care.
Topics: Adult; Amantadine; Benzhydryl Compounds; Carnitine; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chronic Disea | 2015 |
Psychotropic drugs for the management of cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Modafinil; Neoplasms; Psychotropic Drugs | 2016 |
Comparison of Pharmaceutical, Psychological, and Exercise Treatments for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis.
Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Dexmethylphen | 2017 |
Comparison of Pharmaceutical, Psychological, and Exercise Treatments for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis.
Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Dexmethylphen | 2017 |
Comparison of Pharmaceutical, Psychological, and Exercise Treatments for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis.
Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Dexmethylphen | 2017 |
Comparison of Pharmaceutical, Psychological, and Exercise Treatments for Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Meta-analysis.
Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Dexmethylphen | 2017 |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the pharmacological treatment of cancer-related fatigue.
Topics: Anemia; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stim | 2008 |
Pharmacologic treatment options for cancer-related fatigue: current state of clinical research.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cholinesterase Inhib | 2008 |
[Pharmaceutical treatment of cancer-associated fatigue--a survey of a Cochrane review].
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Erythropoietin; Evidenc | 2009 |
Fatigue in long-term cancer survivors.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Algorithms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Exercise Therapy; Fatigue; | 2009 |
Prospective follow-up studies found no chromosomal mutagenicity of methylphenidate therapy in ADHD affected children.
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Carcinogens; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2010 |
Drug therapy for the management of cancer-related fatigue.
Topics: Adult; Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Darbepoetin alfa; Erythropoietin; F | 2010 |
Psychostimulants for cancer-related fatigue.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dextroamphetamine; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; W | 2010 |
European Palliative Care Research collaborative pain guidelines. Central side-effects management: what is the evidence to support best practice in the management of sedation, cognitive impairment and myoclonus?
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Conscious Sedation; Drug | 2011 |
Pharmacological treatments for fatigue associated with palliative care.
Topics: Adult; Amantadine; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Kidney | 2010 |
Psychostimulants for the management of cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neopl | 2011 |
The use of psychostimulants in cancer patients.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Asthenia; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chi | 2011 |
Methylphenidate: established and expanding roles in symptom management.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Cognition Disorde | 2012 |
Treatment of cancer-related fatigue: an update.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Exercise; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; Quality of | 2003 |
Update on psychotropic medications for cancer-related fatigue.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dextroamphetamine; Fatigue; Humans; Methyl | 2007 |
Methylphenidate: its pharmacology and uses.
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; De | 2000 |
Methylphenidate: its pharmacology and uses.
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; De | 2000 |
Methylphenidate: its pharmacology and uses.
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; De | 2000 |
Methylphenidate: its pharmacology and uses.
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Brain Injuries; Central Nervous System Stimulants; De | 2000 |
Psychostimulants in supportive care.
Topics: Adult; Caffeine; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Dextroamphetamine; Ephedrine; Humans; Men | 2000 |
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of | 2002 |
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of | 2002 |
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of | 2002 |
Palliative uses of methylphenidate in patients with cancer: a review.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Disorders of | 2002 |
24 trials available for methylphenidate and Benign Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Methylphenidate as Needed for Fatigue in Patients With Advanced Cancer. A Prospective, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Study.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Methylphenidate; Ne | 2020 |
Improved cancer-related fatigue in a randomised clinical trial: methylphenidate no better than placebo.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; | 2022 |
Use of methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in Chinese patients with cancer.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Hong Kong; | 2014 |
Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Counseling; Depression; Dopami | 2013 |
Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Counseling; Depression; Dopami | 2013 |
Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Counseling; Depression; Dopami | 2013 |
Methylphenidate and/or a nursing telephone intervention for fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Counseling; Depression; Dopami | 2013 |
Rapid response to methylphenidate as an add-on therapy to mirtazapine in the treatment of major depressive disorder in terminally ill cancer patients: a four-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study.
Topics: Academic Medical Centers; Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Depressive Disorder, Major; Diagnostic and St | 2014 |
Multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of methylphenidate on depressive symptoms in advanced cancer patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depression; Double-Blind Method; | 2012 |
The Effect of Methylphenidate on Fatigue in Advanced Cancer: An Aggregated N-of-1 Trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Australia; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cross-Over Studies; Do | 2015 |
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of methylphenidate for the treatment of depression in SSRI-treated cancer patients receiving palliative care.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Hospice Car | 2017 |
Efficacy of dexmethylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue after cancer chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dexmethylphenidat | 2009 |
Efficacy of dexmethylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue after cancer chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dexmethylphenidat | 2009 |
Efficacy of dexmethylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue after cancer chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dexmethylphenidat | 2009 |
Efficacy of dexmethylphenidate for the treatment of fatigue after cancer chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Dexmethylphenidat | 2009 |
Phase 1 study of MLN8054, a selective inhibitor of Aurora A kinase in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Aurora Kinases; Benzaze | 2011 |
Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of long-acting methylphenidate for cancer-related fatigue: North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG-N05C7 trial.
Topics: Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylp | 2010 |
Pilot study to determine the optimal dose of methylphenidate for an n-of-1 trial for fatigue in patients with cancer.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphe | 2010 |
Long-term efficacy of methylphenidate in enhancing attention regulation, social skills, and academic abilities of childhood cancer survivors.
Topics: Adolescent; Analysis of Variance; Attention; Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chi | 2010 |
Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Midd | 2003 |
Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Midd | 2003 |
Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Midd | 2003 |
Patient-controlled methylphenidate for the management of fatigue in patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Midd | 2003 |
Methylphenidate hydrochloride improves cognitive function in patients with advanced cancer and hypoactive delirium: a prospective clinical study.
Topics: Adolescent; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cognition; Delirium; Female; | 2005 |
Patient-controlled methylphenidate for cancer fatigue: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Fem | 2006 |
Acute neurocognitive response to methylphenidate among survivors of childhood cancer: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial.
Topics: Brain; Child; Child, Preschool; Cognition; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; | 2007 |
An open-label long-term naturalistic study of mirtazapine treatment for depression in cancer patients.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anorexia; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Depressive Disorder; | 2008 |
[Methylphenidate in palliative care in cancer patient: a double-blind randomised trial versus placebo].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Asthenia; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Methylphenida | 2008 |
A randomized, crossover evaluation of methylphenidate in cancer patients receiving strong narcotics.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenid | 1995 |
The cognitive and psychomotor effects of opioid drugs in cancer pain management.
Topics: Adult; Amphetamines; Analgesics, Opioid; Buprenorphine; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chronic D | 1994 |
Methylphenidate in terminal depression.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depressive Disorder; Female; Hospice Care; Humans; M | 1998 |
Neuropsychological effects of methylphenidate in patients receiving a continuous infusion of narcotics for cancer pain.
Topics: Adult; Chi-Square Distribution; Cognition; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intraveno | 1992 |
Methylphenidate associated with narcotics for the treatment of cancer pain.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Double-Blind Method; Drug Evaluation; D | 1987 |
32 other studies available for methylphenidate and Benign Neoplasms
Article | Year |
---|---|
Sleep disturbance in patients with cancer: a feasibility study of multimodal therapy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Combined Modality Therapy; Double | 2021 |
The use of methylphenidate to relieve fatigue.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Methylphenidate; Neoplas | 2017 |
The association between medication for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and cancer.
Topics: Adolescent; Amphetamines; Antidepressive Agents; Antipsychotic Agents; Attention Deficit Disorder wi | 2013 |
Methylphenidate in the management of cancer-related fatigue.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Counseling; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Neopl | 2013 |
Better--but good enough? The first randomised controlled trial of psychostimulants for depressive symptoms in advanced cancer.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depression; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms | 2012 |
The Role of Methylphenidate in Cancer-Related Fatigue. Commentary on Mitchell et al.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms | 2015 |
Single Institute Experience With Methylphenidate and American Ginseng in Cancer-Related Fatigue.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Complementary Therapies; Drug Therapy, Combination; | 2018 |
No rest for fatigue researchers.
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous Sys | 2008 |
Growth effects of methylphenidate among childhood cancer survivors: a 12-month case-matched open-label study.
Topics: Adolescent; Body Height; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Brain Neoplasms; Child; Female; Growth; Human | 2009 |
Methylphenidate side effects in advanced cancer: a retrospective analysis.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Akathisia, Drug-Induced; Anorexia; Central Nervous System Stimulants | 2010 |
Challenge of managing cancer-related fatigue.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms | 2010 |
Neurocognitive effects of childhood cancer treatment.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Child; Cognition Disorders; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; Risk Factors | 2010 |
Parent and teacher ratings of attention during a year-long methylphenidate trial in children treated for cancer.
Topics: Attention; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; | 2011 |
Factors associated with response to methylphenidate in advanced cancer patients.
Topics: Anorexia; Anxiety; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Depression; Drug Monitoring; Dyspnea; Fatigue; | 2011 |
Methylphenidate use for the management of opioid-induced sedation.
Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Drug Thera | 2004 |
Is methylphenidate an irreplaceable therapy for the fatigued cancer patient?
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms | 2004 |
Response to comments on 'Cytogenetic effects in children treated with methylphenidate' by El-Zein et al.
Topics: Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Carcinogens; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child | 2006 |
NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of methylphenidate.
Topics: Animals; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Female; Fetus; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; | 2005 |
Clinical experience of the use of a pharmacological treatment algorithm for major depressive disorder in patients with advanced cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Alprazolam; Amitriptyline; Antidepressive Agents; Anxiety Disorders; Benzod | 2008 |
Is there a connection between methylphenidate and cancer in youth?
Topics: Adolescent; California; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Databases, Factual; Drug Utilizati | 2007 |
Methylphenidate use in children and risk of cancer at 18 sites: results of surveillance analyses.
Topics: Adolescent; Age of Onset; Amphetamines; California; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Child; Clinic | 2007 |
Methylphenidate and chromosome damage.
Topics: Adolescent; Animals; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulant | 2008 |
Diagnosis and treatment of depression in the cancer patient.
Topics: Adjustment Disorders; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Asparaginase; Combined Modality Therapy; Dep | 1984 |
Dextroamphetamine or methylphenidate as adjuvants to opioid analgesia for adolescents with cancer.
Topics: Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic; Adolescent; Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Dextroamphetamine; Female; Humans; M | 1994 |
Cancer fatigue--more data, less information?
Topics: Anemia; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Chronic Disease; Cytokines; Depression; Exercise; Fatigue | 2002 |
Efficacy of methylphenidate for fatigue in advanced cancer patients: a preliminary study.
Topics: Aged; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Middle Aged | 2002 |
The use of methylphenidate in patients with incident cancer pain receiving regular opiates. A preliminary report.
Topics: Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Methylphenidate; Narcotics; Neoplasms; Palliative Care; Time Factor | 1992 |
Use of methylphenidate as an adjuvant to narcotic analgesics in patients with advanced cancer.
Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Methylphenidate; Middle Aged; Morphine; Neoplasms; | 1989 |
Use of methylphenidate as an adjuvant to narcotic analgesics in patients with advanced cancer.
Topics: Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms; Pain | 1989 |
Narcotics plus methylphenidate (Ritalin) for advanced cancer pain.
Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Mental Disorders; Methylphenidate; Narcotics; Neoplasms; Pain | 1988 |
Overwhelming fatigue in advanced cancer.
Topics: Asthenia; Humans; Mazindol; Methylphenidate; Methylprednisolone; Neoplasms | 1988 |
Methylphenidate for depressive disorders in cancer patients. An alternative to standard antidepressants.
Topics: Depressive Disorder; Humans; Methylphenidate; Neoplasms | 1987 |