Page last updated: 2024-10-30

metformin and Hypoglycemia

metformin has been researched along with Hypoglycemia in 488 studies

Metformin: A biguanide hypoglycemic agent used in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus not responding to dietary modification. Metformin improves glycemic control by improving insulin sensitivity and decreasing intestinal absorption of glucose. (From Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 30th ed, p289)
metformin : A member of the class of guanidines that is biguanide the carrying two methyl substituents at position 1.

Hypoglycemia: A syndrome of abnormally low BLOOD GLUCOSE level. Clinical hypoglycemia has diverse etiologies. Severe hypoglycemia eventually lead to glucose deprivation of the CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM resulting in HUNGER; SWEATING; PARESTHESIA; impaired mental function; SEIZURES; COMA; and even DEATH.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"This study provides evidence that, compared to glimepiride, saxagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in T2D patients who are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy, especially in overweight patients with moderate hyperglycaemia and a relatively short duration of diabetes."9.30Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr ( Bi, Y; Cheng, J; Gu, T; Li, D; Ma, J; Shao, J; Shi, B; Sun, Z; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q; Zhong, S; Zhu, D; Zhu, L, 2019)
"Metformin prevents weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D)."9.27Metformin-associated prevention of weight gain in insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients cannot be explained by decreased energy intake: A post hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled 4.3-year trial. ( Jager-Wittenaar, H; Kooy, A; Krijnen, W; Lehert, P; Miedema, I; Out, M; Stehouwer, C; van der Schans, C, 2018)
"Metformin inhibits cyclic AMP generation and activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which inhibits the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin pathways."9.27A Randomized Clinical Trial of Metformin to Treat Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. ( Abebe, KZ; Bae, KT; Hallows, KR; Miskulin, DC; Perrone, RD; Seliger, SL; Watnick, T, 2018)
"Metformin has been used in pregnancy since the 1970s."9.22Metformin for pregnancy and beyond: the pros and cons. ( Dunne, FP; Newman, C, 2022)
"The percentage of patients experiencing any hypoglycemia event (ie, symptomatic event or event of plasma glucose concentration <54 mg/dL regardless of symptoms) was lower with saxagliptin compared with glimepiride (5."9.22Effects of Glimepiride versus Saxagliptin on β-Cell Function and Hypoglycemia: A Post Hoc Analysis in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin. ( Cook, W; Hirshberg, B; Ohman, P; Perl, S; Wei, C, 2016)
" This study examined the efficacy and safety of liraglutide monotherapy compared with metformin monotherapy in overweight/obese Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM)."9.20Efficacy and safety of liraglutide monotherapy compared with metformin in Japanese overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Atsumi, Y; Imai, T; Irie, J; Itoh, H; Kawai, T; Meguro, S; Morimoto, J; Saisho, Y; Shigihara, T; Takei, I; Tanaka, K; Tanaka, M; Yajima, K, 2015)
"Saxagliptin + metformin was associated with fewer patients reporting hypoglycemia and fewer and less severe hypoglycemic events in those experiencing hypoglycemia compared with glipizide + metformin."9.19Saxagliptin versus glipizide as add-on therapy to metformin: assessment of hypoglycemia. ( Minervini, G; Mintz, ML, 2014)
"Linagliptin as add-on therapy to metformin and pioglitazone produced significant and clinically meaningful improvements in glycaemic control, without an additional risk of hypoglycaemia or weight gain (Clinical Trials Registry No: NCT 00996658)."9.19Linagliptin improved glycaemic control without weight gain or hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by a combination of metformin and pioglitazone: a 24-week randomized, double-blind study. ( Bajaj, M; Gilman, R; Kempthorne-Rawson, J; Lewis-D'Agostino, D; Patel, S; Woerle, HJ, 2014)
"To evaluate the effects of vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on glycemic control, insulin resistance and post-prandial lipemia."9.19Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bianchi, L; Bonaventura, A; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Maffioli, P; Romano, D, 2014)
"In obese, difficult-to-treat patients with T2DM inadequately controlled on high MDI insulin doses, empagliflozin improved glycemic control and reduced weight without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia and with lower insulin requirements."9.19Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. ( Broedl, UC; Frappin, G; Jelaska, A; Kim, G; Rosenstock, J; Salsali, A; Woerle, HJ, 2014)
"0 mmol/mol) without hypoglycaemia and weight gain was higher with vildagliptin than glimepiride after 2 years in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy, regardless of age and duration of diabetes."9.17Vildagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of HbA₁c < 7.0% without hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared with glimepiride after 2 years of treatment. ( Bader, G; Geransar, P; Schweizer, A, 2013)
"In metformin-treated patients, exenatide BID was noninferior to PIA for glycemic control but superior for hypoglycemia and weight control."9.15Exenatide twice daily versus premixed insulin aspart 70/30 in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia. ( Bachmann, O; Becker, B; Böhmer, M; Gallwitz, B; Helsberg, K; Milek, K; Mölle, A; Peters, N; Petto, H; Segiet, T, 2011)
"Vildagliptin add-on has similar efficacy to glimepiride after 2 years' treatment, with markedly reduced hypoglycaemia risk and no weight gain."9.14Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study. ( Ahren, B; Couturier, A; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Foley, JE; Fonseca, V; Matthews, DR; Zinman, B, 2010)
"To explore the non-severe hypoglycemia risk difference (RD) for SU use compared with SGLT2-I in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as an add on to metformin."8.95Non-severe Hypoglycemia Risk Difference between Sulfonylurea and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT2-I) as an Add-On to Metformin in Randomized Controlled Trials. ( Farahani, P, 2017)
"To synthesize data addressing outcomes of metformin use in populations with type 2 diabetes and moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (CKD), congestive heart failure (CHF), or chronic liver disease (CLD) with hepatic impairment."8.95Clinical Outcomes of Metformin Use in Populations With Chronic Kidney Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, or Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review. ( Cameron, CB; Crowley, MJ; Diamantidis, CJ; Kosinski, AS; McDuffie, JR; Mock, CK; Nagi, A; Stanifer, JW; Tang, S; Wang, X; Williams, JW, 2017)
"To determine the comparative efficacy, risk of weight gain, and hypoglycemia associated with noninsulin antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 DM not controlled by metformin alone."8.86Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. ( Coleman, CI; Phung, OJ; Scholle, JM; Talwar, M, 2010)
"Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is an extremely rare but life-threatening adverse effect of metformin treatment."8.12Metformin-associated Lactic Acidosis with Hypoglycemia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. ( Hazama, Y; Irie, Y; Kosugi, M; Maruo, Y; Obata, Y; Takayama, K; Yamaguchi, H; Yasuda, T, 2022)
" This study will provide robust evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of metformin use in pregnancy, and may identify subgroups of patients who may benefit most from this treatment modality."7.96Metformin in Pregnancy Study (MiPS): protocol for a systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis. ( Burden, C; Carlsen, SM; Dodd, JM; Hague, W; Hilkka, I; Løvvik, T; Morin-Papunen, L; Mousa, A; Nicolaides, K; Norman, JE; Rönnemaa, T; Rowan, J; Shehata, H; Syngelaki, A; Teede, HJ; Tertti, K; Vanky, E, 2020)
"Liraglutide seems to reduce GV in the acute phase of acute coronary syndrome, and patients achieved optimal control with a low incidence of hypoglycemia."7.96Glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome: liraglutide compared with insulin glargine: a pilot study. ( Arnau Vives, MA; Ballesteros Martin-Portugués, A; Catalá Gregori, A; Caudet Esteban, J; Cerveró Rubio, A; Del Olmo-García, MI; Hervás Marín, D; Merino-Torres, JF; Penalba Martínez, M, 2020)
"Prior research suggests that warfarin, when given concomitantly with some sulfonylureas, may increase the risk of serious hypoglycemia."7.91Serious Hypoglycemia and Use of Warfarin in Combination With Sulfonylureas or Metformin. ( Bilker, WB; Brensinger, CM; Han, X; Hennessy, S; Leonard, CE; Nam, YH, 2019)
"To report a case of severe lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia due to acute metformin intoxication in a dog."7.88Severe lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia due to acute metformin intoxication in a dog. ( Borchers, A; Ueda, Y; Wong, C, 2018)
"Metformin toxicity is well known to cause lactic acidosis."7.88Recurrent hypoglycemia secondary to metformin toxicity in the absence of co-ingestions: a case report. ( Aldobeaban, S; Alshehri, AA; Mzahim, B, 2018)
"The objective of this nationwide study was to compare the risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease (CVD), and severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin monotherapy treatment starting second-line treatment with either insulin or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i)."7.85Second line initiation of insulin compared with DPP-4 inhibitors after metformin monotherapy is associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and severe hypoglycemia. ( Bodegard, J; Eriksson, JW; Nathanson, D; Norhammar, A; Nyström, T; Thuresson, M, 2017)
" significantly improved glycemic control without an increased risk of hypoglycemia in Asian, predominantly Chinese, patients with T2DM inadequately controlled on insulin, with or without metformin."7.83Vildagliptin as add-on therapy to insulin improves glycemic control without increasing risk of hypoglycemia in Asian, predominantly Chinese, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Kothny, W; Li, L; Lukashevich, V; Lv, X; Ma, J; Ning, G; Wang, W; Woloschak, M; Yang, M, 2016)
" Metformin initiators who intensified treatment with insulin or sulfonylurea were followed to either their first or recurrent hypoglycemia event using Cox proportional hazard models."7.83Risk of hypoglycemia following intensification of metformin treatment with insulin versus sulfonylurea. ( Elasy, T; Greevy, RA; Griffin, MR; Grijalva, CG; Hung, AM; Liu, X; Min, JY; Roumie, CL, 2016)
"To assess hypoglycemia incidence rates and associated costs in patients who initiated second-line treatment with the antidiabetic agents linagliptin or a sulfonylurea (SU) after metformin."7.83Hypoglycemia Incidence Rates and Associated Health Care Costs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Second-Line Linagliptin or Sulfonylurea After Metformin Monotherapy. ( Cai, B; D'Souza, AO; Raju, A; Shetty, S, 2016)
" The objective of this nationwide study was to compare the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), all-cause mortality and severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) starting second-line treatment with either metformin+sulphonylurea or metformin+dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i)."7.83Sulphonylurea compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in combination with metformin carries increased risk of severe hypoglycemia, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. ( Bodegard, J; Eriksson, JW; Nathanson, D; Norhammar, A; Nyström, T; Thuresson, M, 2016)
"Despite the limitations of this observational study, diabetes patients with MS who were treated with metformin plus DPP-4 inhibitors had better compliance, greater metabolic control, and lower rates of hypoglycemia, causing lower costs for the Spanish national health system than patients receiving metformin plus other antidiabetes drugs."7.80Healthcare costs of the combination of metformin/dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors compared with metformin/other oral antidiabetes agents in patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. ( Navarro-Artieda, R; Sicras-Mainar, A, 2014)
"Lactic acidosis is a well-recognized consequence of metformin."7.79Metformin overdose-induced hypoglycemia in the absence of other antidiabetic drugs. ( Al-Abri, SA; Hayashi, S; Olson, KR; Thoren, KL, 2013)
"In pre-specified analyses adjusting for the most recently measured HbA(1c) value, there was a substantial reduction in risk for confirmed hypoglycemia with sitagliptin compared to glipizide when added to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with T2DM."7.78Lower risk of hypoglycemia with sitagliptin compared to glipizide when either is added to metformin therapy: a pre-specified analysis adjusting for the most recently measured HbA(1c) value. ( Davies, MJ; Ferrante, SA; Goldstein, BJ; Kaufman, KD; Krobot, KJ; Meininger, GE; Seck, T; Williams-Herman, D, 2012)
"Lactic acidosis has been associated with use of metformin."7.74Metformin, sulfonylureas, or other antidiabetes drugs and the risk of lactic acidosis or hypoglycemia: a nested case-control analysis. ( Bodmer, M; Jick, SS; Krähenbühl, S; Meier, C; Meier, CR, 2008)
"Bicyclol is a synthetic compound known to protect the liver against oxidation and lipid injuries."6.79Randomized, vitamin E-controlled trial of bicyclol plus metformin in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with impaired fasting glucose. ( Ding, XD; Fan, JG; Han, Y; Ma, AL; Shi, JP; Xu, Y, 2014)
"Metformin has been shown to prevent insulin therapy-induced body weight gain when used in combination with insulin."6.70Metformin does not adversely affect hormonal and symptomatic responses to recurrent hypoglycemia. ( Born, J; Fehm, HL; Fruehwald-Schultes, B; Kern, W; Oltmanns, KM; Peters, A; Sopke, S; Toschek, B, 2001)
"Repaglinide is an insulin secretion enhancer with a different mechanism of action to the sulphonylureas, which means it does not continuously stimulate insulin secretion."6.41[Repaglinide, potentially a therapeutic improvement for diabetes mellitus type 2]. ( Rutten, GE, 2001)
"Although patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may fail to achieve adequate hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) control despite metformin-sulfonylurea (Met-SU) dual therapy, a third-line glucose-lowering medication-including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i), insulin, or thiazolidinedione (TZD)-can be added to achieve this."5.51Intensification with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, insulin, or thiazolidinediones and risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases, and severe hypoglycemia in patients on metformin-sulfonylurea dual therapy: A retrospective cohort study. ( Chan, EW; Ho, CW; Lam, CLK; Man, KKC; Shi, M; Tse, ETY; Wong, CKH; Wong, ICK, 2019)
"Metformin is a first-line oral antidiabetic therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus."5.46Hemodialysis-refractory metformin-associated lactate acidosis with hypoglycemia, hypothermia, and bradycardia in a diabetic patient with belated diagnosis and chronic kidney disease
. ( Zibar, K; Zibar, L, 2017)
"Metformin (Met), which is an insulin-sensitizer, decreases insulin resistance and fasting insulin levels."5.42Intracerebroventricular metformin decreases body weight but has pro-oxidant effects and decreases survival. ( Brochier, AW; de Assis, AM; de Carvalho, AK; Gnoatto, J; Haas, CB; Hansel, G; Muller, AP; Oses, JP; Portela, LV; Zimmer, ER, 2015)
"Unlike insulin, metformin lowered neonatal birth weights (mean difference - 122."5.41Short-term neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes treated using metformin versus insulin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ( Jiang, G; Li, H; Lin, X; Lv, B; Ni, J; Sheng, B, 2023)
"sulphonylurea (SU) compounds."5.38Worry vs. knowledge about treatment-associated hypoglycaemia and weight gain in type 2 diabetic patients on metformin and/or sulphonylurea. ( Knop, FK; Lund, A, 2012)
"Drug-induced hypoglycemia is possible even in diabetics not receiving insulin or oral antidiabetic agents increasing insulin secretion."5.31Severe hypoglycemia in an elderly patient treated with metformin. ( Reimann, IR; Schmechel, H; Zitzmann, S, 2002)
"This study provides evidence that, compared to glimepiride, saxagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in T2D patients who are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy, especially in overweight patients with moderate hyperglycaemia and a relatively short duration of diabetes."5.30Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr ( Bi, Y; Cheng, J; Gu, T; Li, D; Ma, J; Shao, J; Shi, B; Sun, Z; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q; Zhong, S; Zhu, D; Zhu, L, 2019)
"Metformin prevents weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D)."5.27Metformin-associated prevention of weight gain in insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients cannot be explained by decreased energy intake: A post hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled 4.3-year trial. ( Jager-Wittenaar, H; Kooy, A; Krijnen, W; Lehert, P; Miedema, I; Out, M; Stehouwer, C; van der Schans, C, 2018)
"Metformin inhibits cyclic AMP generation and activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which inhibits the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin pathways."5.27A Randomized Clinical Trial of Metformin to Treat Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. ( Abebe, KZ; Bae, KT; Hallows, KR; Miskulin, DC; Perrone, RD; Seliger, SL; Watnick, T, 2018)
"Empagliflozin/linagliptin as monotherapy or add-on to metformin for 52 weeks was well tolerated in patients with T2DM, with safety profiles similar to individual components, including a low risk of hypoglycemia."5.27Safety and Tolerability of Combinations of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Pooled Data from Two Randomized Controlled Trials. ( DeFronzo, RA; Kohler, S; Lee, C, 2018)
"This is a randomized double-blind multi-center clinical trial of insulin plus metformin versus insulin plus placebo for the treatment of type 2 diabetes complicating pregnancy."5.27Rationale, design, and methods for the Medical Optimization and Management of Pregnancies with Overt Type 2 Diabetes (MOMPOD) study. ( Berry, DC; Boggess, K; de Los Angeles Abreu, M; Dorman, KF; Ivins, AR; Thomas, SD; Young, L, 2018)
" to metformin monotherapy improved glycemic control over 104 weeks and was generally welltolerated with a low risk of hypoglycemia."5.24A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor omarigliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. ( Ceesay, P; Engel, SS; Gantz, I; Inzucchi, SE; Kaufman, KD; Lai, E; Scarabello, V; Shankar, RR; Suryawanshi, S, 2017)
"Vildagliptin effectively improved glucose level with a significantly greater reduction in glycemic variability and hypoglycemia than glimepiride in patients with T2DM ongoing metformin therapy."5.24The efficacy and safety of adding either vildagliptin or glimepiride to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Hur, KY; Jin, SM; Kim, G; Kim, JH; Lee, MK; Oh, S, 2017)
"In Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with vildagliptin and low-dose metformin, metformin up-titration significantly but modestly improved glycemic control without hypoglycemia and weight gain."5.24Safety and efficacy of metformin up-titration in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with vildagliptin and low-dose metformin. ( Azuma, K; Goto, H; Ikeda, F; Kanazawa, A; Komiya, K; Masuyama, A; Mita, T; Ogihara, T; Ohmura, C; Osonoi, T; Osonoi, Y; Saito, M; Sato, J; Shimizu, T; Someya, Y; Suzuki, L; Takayanagi, N; Takeno, K; Uzawa, H; Watada, H, 2017)
"Metformin has been used in pregnancy since the 1970s."5.22Metformin for pregnancy and beyond: the pros and cons. ( Dunne, FP; Newman, C, 2022)
"The aim of the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to compare the effectiveness of glycemic control and hypoglycemia risk of combination therapy (metformin plus a low hypoglycemic risk antidiabetic drug) vs."5.22Metformin plus a low hypoglycemic risk antidiabetic drug vs. metformin monotherapy for untreated type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. ( Chen, YJ; Cheng, CY; Hsu, CY; Hung, WT; Lee, M; Ovbiagele, B, 2022)
"Liraglutide provided better glycaemic control and greater body weight reduction than sitagliptin when administered as add-on to metformin."5.22Efficacy and safety of liraglutide versus sitagliptin, both in combination with metformin, in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26-week, open-label, randomized, active comparator clinical trial. ( Bian, F; Bosch-Traberg, H; Geng, J; Li, Y; Liu, J; Liu, Y; Luo, Y; Lv, X; Mu, Y; Peng, Y; Sun, Y; Yang, J; Zang, L, 2016)
"Titrated canagliflozin significantly improved HbA1c, FPG, body weight and SBP, and was generally well tolerated over 26 weeks in patients with T2DM as add-on to metformin and sitagliptin."5.22Efficacy and safety of titrated canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin and sitagliptin. ( Aggarwal, N; Alba, M; Cao, A; Fung, A; Pfeifer, M; Rodbard, HW; Seufert, J, 2016)
"Teneligliptin co-administered with metformin produced significant reductions in HbA1c in patients with T2DM without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia."5.22The efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to ongoing metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized study with open label extension. ( Bryson, A; Deak, L; Jennings, PE; Lawson, M; Paveliu, FS, 2016)
"To provide evidence-based options on how to intensify basal insulin, we explored head-to-head prandial interventions in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin glargine with or without 1-3 oral antidiabetic agents (OADs)."5.22Prandial Options to Advance Basal Insulin Glargine Therapy: Testing Lixisenatide Plus Basal Insulin Versus Insulin Glulisine Either as Basal-Plus or Basal-Bolus in Type 2 Diabetes: The GetGoal Duo-2 Trial. ( Aronson, R; Gentile, S; Guerci, B; Hanefeld, M; Heller, S; Perfetti, R; Rosenstock, J; Roy-Duval, C; Souhami, E; Tinahones, FJ; Wardecki, M; Ye, J, 2016)
"Severely burned adult patients with burns over 20% total body surface area (TBSA) burn were prospectively randomized in this Phase II clinical trial to either metformin or insulin (standard of care) treatment."5.22Glucose Control in Severely Burned Patients Using Metformin: An Interim Safety and Efficacy Analysis of a Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial. ( Abdullahi, A; Burnett, M; Jeschke, MG; Rehou, S; Stanojcic, M, 2016)
"Subjects insufficiently controlled with sitagliptin who switch to liraglutide can obtain clinically relevant reductions in glycaemia and body weight, without compromising safety."5.22Efficacy and safety of switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes (LIRA-SWITCH): a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled 26-week trial. ( Bailey, TS; Kaltoft, MS; Maislos, M; Rao, PV; Takács, R; Thomsen, AB; Tinahones, FJ; Tsoukas, GM, 2016)
"Triple therapy with saxagliptin add-on to dapagliflozin plus metformin for 52 weeks resulted in sustained improvements in glycaemic control without an increase in body weight or increased risk of hypoglycaemia."5.22One-year efficacy and safety of saxagliptin add-on in patients receiving dapagliflozin and metformin. ( Aggarwal, N; Chen, H; Chin, A; Garcia-Hernandez, P; Hansen, L; Iqbal, N; Johnsson, E; Matthaei, S, 2016)
"The percentage of patients experiencing any hypoglycemia event (ie, symptomatic event or event of plasma glucose concentration <54 mg/dL regardless of symptoms) was lower with saxagliptin compared with glimepiride (5."5.22Effects of Glimepiride versus Saxagliptin on β-Cell Function and Hypoglycemia: A Post Hoc Analysis in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin. ( Cook, W; Hirshberg, B; Ohman, P; Perl, S; Wei, C, 2016)
"Development of aleglitazar was halted because of a lack of cardiovascular efficacy and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-related side effects in patients with type 2 diabetes post-acute coronary syndrome; however, in the present studies, aleglitazar was well tolerated and effective in improving HbA1c, insulin resistance and lipid variables."5.20Efficacy, safety and tolerability of aleglitazar in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled findings from three randomized phase III trials. ( Andjelkovic, M; Buse, JB; Durrwell, L; El Azzouzi, B; Henry, RR; Herz, M; Jaekel, K; Mingrino, R; Wu, H, 2015)
"In patients completing 4 years of treatment, dapagliflozin was well tolerated and associated with sustained glycaemic efficacy and greater reductions in body weight and SBP versus glipizide."5.20Long-term glycaemic response and tolerability of dapagliflozin versus a sulphonylurea as add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: 4-year data. ( Del Prato, S; Durán-Garcia, S; Maffei, L; Nauck, M; Parikh, S; Rohwedder, K; Theuerkauf, A, 2015)
" This study examined the efficacy and safety of liraglutide monotherapy compared with metformin monotherapy in overweight/obese Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM)."5.20Efficacy and safety of liraglutide monotherapy compared with metformin in Japanese overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Atsumi, Y; Imai, T; Irie, J; Itoh, H; Kawai, T; Meguro, S; Morimoto, J; Saisho, Y; Shigihara, T; Takei, I; Tanaka, K; Tanaka, M; Yajima, K, 2015)
"Ertugliflozin (1-25 mg/day) improved glycaemic control, body weight and blood pressure in patients with T2DM suboptimally controlled on metformin, and was well tolerated."5.20Dose-ranging efficacy and safety study of ertugliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes on a background of metformin. ( Amin, NB; Jain, SM; Lee, DS; Nucci, G; Rusnak, JM; Wang, X, 2015)
"5 mg, compared with daily insulin glargine without forced titration, demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction and weight loss, with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events and a lower risk of hypoglycemia."5.20Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2). ( Benroubi, M; Giorgino, F; Pechtner, V; Sun, JH; Zimmermann, AG, 2015)
"Adding liraglutide to a basal insulin analogue ± metformin significantly improved glycaemic control, body weight and systolic blood pressure compared with placebo."5.20Efficacy and safety of liraglutide versus placebo added to basal insulin analogues (with or without metformin) in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. ( Ahmann, A; Boopalan, A; de Loredo, L; Lahtela, JT; Nauck, MA; Rodbard, HW; Rosenstock, J; Tornøe, K, 2015)
"Saxagliptin + metformin was associated with fewer patients reporting hypoglycemia and fewer and less severe hypoglycemic events in those experiencing hypoglycemia compared with glipizide + metformin."5.19Saxagliptin versus glipizide as add-on therapy to metformin: assessment of hypoglycemia. ( Minervini, G; Mintz, ML, 2014)
"Linagliptin as add-on therapy to metformin and pioglitazone produced significant and clinically meaningful improvements in glycaemic control, without an additional risk of hypoglycaemia or weight gain (Clinical Trials Registry No: NCT 00996658)."5.19Linagliptin improved glycaemic control without weight gain or hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by a combination of metformin and pioglitazone: a 24-week randomized, double-blind study. ( Bajaj, M; Gilman, R; Kempthorne-Rawson, J; Lewis-D'Agostino, D; Patel, S; Woerle, HJ, 2014)
"To evaluate the effects of vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on glycemic control, insulin resistance and post-prandial lipemia."5.19Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bianchi, L; Bonaventura, A; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Maffioli, P; Romano, D, 2014)
"In obese, difficult-to-treat patients with T2DM inadequately controlled on high MDI insulin doses, empagliflozin improved glycemic control and reduced weight without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia and with lower insulin requirements."5.19Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. ( Broedl, UC; Frappin, G; Jelaska, A; Kim, G; Rosenstock, J; Salsali, A; Woerle, HJ, 2014)
"Alogliptin monotherapy maintained glycaemic control comparable to that of glipizide in elderly patients with T2DM over 1 year of treatment, with substantially lower risk of hypoglycaemia and without weight gain."5.17Alogliptin versus glipizide monotherapy in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with mild hyperglycaemia: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, 1-year study. ( Fleck, P; Rosenstock, J; Wilson, C, 2013)
"0 mmol/mol) without hypoglycaemia and weight gain was higher with vildagliptin than glimepiride after 2 years in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy, regardless of age and duration of diabetes."5.17Vildagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of HbA₁c < 7.0% without hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared with glimepiride after 2 years of treatment. ( Bader, G; Geransar, P; Schweizer, A, 2013)
"The glucose-lowering efficiency of combination therapy with metformin + vildagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, was comparable with that of a metformin + SU combination, but safer with respect to the risk of developing hypoglycemia."5.17[A combination of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and metformin in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: effective control of glycemia, weight, and quantitative body composition]. ( Aleksandrov, AA; Chernova, TO; Dedov, II; Il'in, AV; Shestakova, MV; Shmushkovich, IA; Suhareva, OIu, 2013)
"Canagliflozin added onto metformin significantly improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes and was associated with low incidence of hypoglycemia and significant weight loss."5.16Dose-ranging effects of canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, as add-on to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes. ( Aggarwal, N; Arbit, D; Canovatchel, W; Capuano, G; Polidori, D; Rosenstock, J; Usiskin, K; Zhao, Y, 2012)
"Exenatide demonstrated more beneficial effects on HbA(1C), weight reduction and insulin resistance during 26 weeks of treatment, but there were more hypoglycemic events and mild-to-moderate nausea compared with metformin."5.16Efficacy and tolerability of exenatide monotherapy in obese patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a randomized, 26 weeks metformin-controlled, parallel-group study. ( Gao, Y; Guo, XH; Huang, YY; Song, WL; Yuan, GH, 2012)
" The neonates of metformin group had less rate of birth weight centile >90 than insulin group (RR: 0."5.16Metformin compared with insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial. ( Akbari, S; Alavi, A; Amjadi, N; Moosavi, S; Niromanesh, S; Sharbaf, FR, 2012)
"In metformin-treated patients, exenatide BID was noninferior to PIA for glycemic control but superior for hypoglycemia and weight control."5.15Exenatide twice daily versus premixed insulin aspart 70/30 in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia. ( Bachmann, O; Becker, B; Böhmer, M; Gallwitz, B; Helsberg, K; Milek, K; Mölle, A; Peters, N; Petto, H; Segiet, T, 2011)
"Metformin treatment prevented weight gain (mean weight gain, -3."5.14Long-term effects of metformin on metabolism and microvascular and macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Bets, D; de Jager, J; Donker, AJ; Kooy, A; Lehert, P; Stehouwer, CD; Wulffelé, MG, 2009)
" Vildagliptin provided additional HbA(1c) lowering to that achieved with metformin alone and comparable to that achieved with pioglitazone, with only pioglitazone causing weight gain."5.14Comparison of vildagliptin and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. ( Bolli, G; Colin, L; Dotta, F; Goodman, M; Minic, B, 2009)
"The only significant difference in outcome between the 2 treatment drugs was that maternal weight gain during pregnancy was less in the metformin (n=40) than in the glyburide group (n=32) (10."5.14Metformin compared with glyburide for the management of gestational diabetes. ( Bertini, AM; Bizato, J; de Souza, BV; Pacheco, C; Ribeiro, TE; Silva, JC, 2010)
"Vildagliptin add-on has similar efficacy to glimepiride after 2 years' treatment, with markedly reduced hypoglycaemia risk and no weight gain."5.14Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study. ( Ahren, B; Couturier, A; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Foley, JE; Fonseca, V; Matthews, DR; Zinman, B, 2010)
" If insufficient in monotherapy, it can preferably be used in combination with metformin, which targets insulin resistance, and also in combination with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition, thiazolidinediones and insulin, which target other mechanisms."5.12Glucose-lowering action through targeting islet dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: Focus on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition. ( Ahrén, B, 2021)
"in patients with type 2 diabetes failing on metformin or a sulfonylurea, Mix25+M provided similar overall glycemic control, lower ppPG, reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia, and fewer hyperglycemic symptoms compared to G+M."5.10Therapy after single oral agent failure: adding a second oral agent or an insulin mixture? ( Beattie, SD; Campaigne, BN; Howard, AS; Johnson, PA; Malone, JK; Milicevic, Z, 2003)
"08]), but less hypoglycemia as add-on to metformin (odds ratio [OR] 0."5.01Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors Compared with Sulfonylureas in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Metformin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. ( Chen, Z; Li, G, 2019)
"To explore the non-severe hypoglycemia risk difference (RD) for SU use compared with SGLT2-I in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as an add on to metformin."4.95Non-severe Hypoglycemia Risk Difference between Sulfonylurea and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT2-I) as an Add-On to Metformin in Randomized Controlled Trials. ( Farahani, P, 2017)
"To synthesize data addressing outcomes of metformin use in populations with type 2 diabetes and moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (CKD), congestive heart failure (CHF), or chronic liver disease (CLD) with hepatic impairment."4.95Clinical Outcomes of Metformin Use in Populations With Chronic Kidney Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, or Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review. ( Cameron, CB; Crowley, MJ; Diamantidis, CJ; Kosinski, AS; McDuffie, JR; Mock, CK; Nagi, A; Stanifer, JW; Tang, S; Wang, X; Williams, JW, 2017)
"Adding different AHAs to metformin was associated with varying effects on HbA1c, BW, SBP, hypoglycemia, UTI and GTI which should impact clinician choice when selecting adjunctive therapy."4.91Comparative efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drug regimens added to metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis. ( Coleman, CI; Doleh, Y; Kohn, CG; Mearns, ES; Saulsberry, WJ; Sobieraj, DM; White, CM; Zaccaro, E, 2015)
"In women with gestational diabetes, metformin use and insulin therapy have comparable glycemic control profile, but metformin use was associated with lower risk of neonatal hypoglycemia."4.91Metformin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: An updated meta-analysis. ( Kitwitee, P; Limwattananon, C; Limwattananon, S; Nguyen, TV; Phimphilai, M; Pongchaiyakul, C; Ratanachotpanich, T; Waleekachonlert, O, 2015)
"Compared with other oral insulinotropic agents, gliclazide significantly reduced HbA1c with no difference regarding hypoglycemia risk."4.91Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and hypoglycemic safety of gliclazide versus other insulinotropic agents. ( Chan, SP; Colagiuri, S, 2015)
" This is the case for metformin (risk of lactic acidosis) and for many sulfonylureas (risk of hypoglycemia)."4.89Pharmacokinetic considerations for the treatment of diabetes in patients with chronic kidney disease. ( Scheen, AJ, 2013)
" These options are mostly new and have the advantage a neutral or favourable (for GLP-1) effect on body weight in obese type 2 DM patient and the absence of any hypoglycaemic risk in both classes of incretins."4.89[Management of type 2 diabetes: new or previous agents, how to choose?]. ( Halimi, S, 2013)
" The traditional approach involves: i) metformin, acting mainly on fasting blood glucose; ii) sulphonylureas, that have shown a number of drawbacks, including the high risk of hypoglycemia; iii) pioglitazone, with a substantial effect on fasting and postprandial glucose and a low risk of hypoglycaemia; iv) insulin, that can be utilized with the basal or prandial approach."4.89What are the preferred strategies for control of glycaemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus? ( Marangoni, A; Zenari, L, 2013)
" The use of pioglitazone has been associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer, edema, heart failure, weight gain, and distal bone fractures in postmenopausal women."4.89[Limitations of insulin-dependent drugs in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus]. ( de Pablos-Velasco, PL; Valerón, PF, 2013)
"In patients with type 2 diabetes who do not achieve the glycaemic targets with metformin alone, DPP-4 inhibitors can lower HbA(1c), in a similar way to sulfonylureas or pioglitazone, with neutral effects on body weight."4.88Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Karagiannis, T; Matthews, DR; Paletas, K; Paschos, P; Tsapas, A, 2012)
"To determine the comparative efficacy, risk of weight gain, and hypoglycemia associated with noninsulin antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 DM not controlled by metformin alone."4.86Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. ( Coleman, CI; Phung, OJ; Scholle, JM; Talwar, M, 2010)
" The only drug that proved to be effective in reducing cardiovascular events is metformin, which increases AMP-activated protein kinase activity and has a potent cardioprotective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury."4.86[Hypoglycemic therapy in heart disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus]. ( Cosmi, D; Cosmi, F, 2010)
" The sulfonyluereas, repaglinide, metformin, acarbose and the thiazolidinediones are effective in decreasing fasting plasma glucose levels, but their limitations may include adverse effects, such as weight gain and hypoglycemia, and an inability to modify some of the important comorbidities of diabetes."4.80Advances in oral therapy for type 2 diabetes. ( Davis, SN, 2000)
"To assess if switching to or adding sulfonylureas increases major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or severe hypoglycemia versus remaining on metformin alone."4.31Sulfonylureas as second line therapy for type 2 diabetes among veterans: Results from a National Longitudinal Cohort Study. ( Axon, RN; Chandler, O; Gebregziabher, M; Strychalski, ML; Taber, DJ; Ward, R; Weeda, ER, 2023)
" This study aimed to compare glycemic control and the incidence of hypoglycemia and chronic complications among adult patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4I), and sulfonylurea (SU) as monotherapy or dual combination therapy."4.12Real-world comparison of mono and dual combination therapies of metformin, sulfonylurea, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors using a common data model: A retrospective observational study. ( Cho, EH; Jin, HY; Kim, SS; Kim, YJ; Lee, KA; Park, TS, 2022)
" We used blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and self-report to compare hypoglycemia rates and duration in 179 type 2 diabetes patients treated with sulphonylureas (n=100) and insulin (n=51) in comparison with those treated with metformin only (n=28)."4.12Continuous glucose monitoring demonstrates low risk of clinically significant hypoglycemia associated with sulphonylurea treatment in an African type 2 diabetes population: results from the OPTIMAL observational multicenter study. ( Balungi, PA; Carr, ALJ; Hattersley, AT; Jones, AG; Mwebaze, R; Niwaha, AJ; Nyirenda, MJ; Rodgers, LR; Shields, BM, 2022)
"Metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) is an extremely rare but life-threatening adverse effect of metformin treatment."4.12Metformin-associated Lactic Acidosis with Hypoglycemia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. ( Hazama, Y; Irie, Y; Kosugi, M; Maruo, Y; Obata, Y; Takayama, K; Yamaguchi, H; Yasuda, T, 2022)
"To compare the risk of myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death in patients with T2D treated with mitoKATP channel high-affinity sulfonylureas and low-affinity sulfonylureas as add-on to metformin."4.12Comparison of Mitochondrial Adenosine Triphosphate-Sensitive Potassium Channel High- vs Low-Affinity Sulfonylureas and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin. ( Hsu, YJ; Huang, YL; Lai, JH; Lee, CH; Lin, C; Lin, TC; Pan, HY; Wang, MT; Wang, PC; Wu, LW, 2022)
"Metformin is beneficial for GDM women to control total GWG compared with insulin, regulate fetal birth weight more than insulin and glyburide, and increase the risk of unmet treatment targets compared with insulin."4.12Efficacy and safety of hypoglycemic agents on gestational diabetes mellitus in women: A Bayesian network analysis of randomized controlled trials. ( Chen, H; Cui, W; Guo, H; Huang, L; Jing, Y; Liu, X; Song, L; Sun, B; Wang, M; Wang, N; Wang, T; Xu, J, 2022)
"Initial triple combination therapy with the DPP4 inhibitor, metformin, and thiazolidinedione showed a higher achievement of the target HbA1c goal with a lower risk of hypoglycemia, better restoration of β-cell function, and multiple metabolic benefits, implying durable glycemic control."3.96Therapeutic efficacy and safety of initial triple combination of metformin, sitagliptin, and lobeglitazone in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: initial triple study. ( Davies, MJ; Kim, KM; Ku, EJ; Lee, JE; Lee, JH; Lee, SY; Lim, S, 2020)
" This study will provide robust evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of metformin use in pregnancy, and may identify subgroups of patients who may benefit most from this treatment modality."3.96Metformin in Pregnancy Study (MiPS): protocol for a systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis. ( Burden, C; Carlsen, SM; Dodd, JM; Hague, W; Hilkka, I; Løvvik, T; Morin-Papunen, L; Mousa, A; Nicolaides, K; Norman, JE; Rönnemaa, T; Rowan, J; Shehata, H; Syngelaki, A; Teede, HJ; Tertti, K; Vanky, E, 2020)
"Liraglutide seems to reduce GV in the acute phase of acute coronary syndrome, and patients achieved optimal control with a low incidence of hypoglycemia."3.96Glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome: liraglutide compared with insulin glargine: a pilot study. ( Arnau Vives, MA; Ballesteros Martin-Portugués, A; Catalá Gregori, A; Caudet Esteban, J; Cerveró Rubio, A; Del Olmo-García, MI; Hervás Marín, D; Merino-Torres, JF; Penalba Martínez, M, 2020)
"Prior research suggests that warfarin, when given concomitantly with some sulfonylureas, may increase the risk of serious hypoglycemia."3.91Serious Hypoglycemia and Use of Warfarin in Combination With Sulfonylureas or Metformin. ( Bilker, WB; Brensinger, CM; Han, X; Hennessy, S; Leonard, CE; Nam, YH, 2019)
"To report a case of severe lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia due to acute metformin intoxication in a dog."3.88Severe lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia due to acute metformin intoxication in a dog. ( Borchers, A; Ueda, Y; Wong, C, 2018)
"Metformin toxicity is well known to cause lactic acidosis."3.88Recurrent hypoglycemia secondary to metformin toxicity in the absence of co-ingestions: a case report. ( Aldobeaban, S; Alshehri, AA; Mzahim, B, 2018)
"Sitagliptin can reduce BMI and the occurrence of hypoglycemia in obese patients with insulin treatment-induced diabetes mellitus, and the effect may be related to decreased HOMA-IR, decreased leptin and visfatin levels, and increased adiponectin levels."3.85The effect of sitagliptin on obese patients with insulin treatment-induced diabetes mellitus. ( Li, H; Li, S; Wang, R; Zhang, JP, 2017)
"The objective of this nationwide study was to compare the risk of all-cause mortality, fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease (CVD), and severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin monotherapy treatment starting second-line treatment with either insulin or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i)."3.85Second line initiation of insulin compared with DPP-4 inhibitors after metformin monotherapy is associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and severe hypoglycemia. ( Bodegard, J; Eriksson, JW; Nathanson, D; Norhammar, A; Nyström, T; Thuresson, M, 2017)
"DPP4is as a second-line add-on to metformin had a significantly lower stroke risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0."3.85Comparative cardiovascular risks of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors with other second- and third-line antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Chang, KC; Li, CY; Ou, HT; Wu, JS, 2017)
" significantly improved glycemic control without an increased risk of hypoglycemia in Asian, predominantly Chinese, patients with T2DM inadequately controlled on insulin, with or without metformin."3.83Vildagliptin as add-on therapy to insulin improves glycemic control without increasing risk of hypoglycemia in Asian, predominantly Chinese, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Kothny, W; Li, L; Lukashevich, V; Lv, X; Ma, J; Ning, G; Wang, W; Woloschak, M; Yang, M, 2016)
"Linagliptin added to basal insulin and metformin improved glycaemic control, without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia or body weight gain."3.83Efficacy and safety of linagliptin as add-on therapy to basal insulin and metformin in people with Type 2 diabetes. ( Durán-Garcia, S; Hehnke, U; Lee, J; Patel, S; Rosenstock, J; Thiemann, S; Woerle, HJ; Yki-Järvinen, H, 2016)
" Metformin initiators who intensified treatment with insulin or sulfonylurea were followed to either their first or recurrent hypoglycemia event using Cox proportional hazard models."3.83Risk of hypoglycemia following intensification of metformin treatment with insulin versus sulfonylurea. ( Elasy, T; Greevy, RA; Griffin, MR; Grijalva, CG; Hung, AM; Liu, X; Min, JY; Roumie, CL, 2016)
"To assess hypoglycemia incidence rates and associated costs in patients who initiated second-line treatment with the antidiabetic agents linagliptin or a sulfonylurea (SU) after metformin."3.83Hypoglycemia Incidence Rates and Associated Health Care Costs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Second-Line Linagliptin or Sulfonylurea After Metformin Monotherapy. ( Cai, B; D'Souza, AO; Raju, A; Shetty, S, 2016)
" The objective of this nationwide study was to compare the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), all-cause mortality and severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) starting second-line treatment with either metformin+sulphonylurea or metformin+dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i)."3.83Sulphonylurea compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in combination with metformin carries increased risk of severe hypoglycemia, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. ( Bodegard, J; Eriksson, JW; Nathanson, D; Norhammar, A; Nyström, T; Thuresson, M, 2016)
"56]) compared with sulfonylureas as add-on therapy to metformin but had no effect on risks for myocardial infarction and hospitalization for heart failure."3.81Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Adding Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Versus Sulfonylureas to Metformin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. ( Chao, PW; Chen, TJ; Chen, YT; Chu, H; Kuo, SC; Lee, YJ; Li, SY; Lin, CC; Ou, SM; Shih, CJ; Tarng, DC; Wang, SJ; Yang, CY, 2015)
"Despite the limitations of this observational study, diabetes patients with MS who were treated with metformin plus DPP-4 inhibitors had better compliance, greater metabolic control, and lower rates of hypoglycemia, causing lower costs for the Spanish national health system than patients receiving metformin plus other antidiabetes drugs."3.80Healthcare costs of the combination of metformin/dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors compared with metformin/other oral antidiabetes agents in patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. ( Navarro-Artieda, R; Sicras-Mainar, A, 2014)
"Lactic acidosis is a well-recognized consequence of metformin."3.79Metformin overdose-induced hypoglycemia in the absence of other antidiabetic drugs. ( Al-Abri, SA; Hayashi, S; Olson, KR; Thoren, KL, 2013)
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of metformin-associated lactic acidosis in our metformin-intoxicated patients, the general approach for their management, and determine the frequency of hypoglycemia and outcome in these patients."3.79Metformin toxicity: a report of 204 cases from Iran. ( Askari, A; Barzi, F; Ebrahimian, K; Hassanian-Moghaddam, H; Shadnia, S; Zamani, N, 2013)
"In pre-specified analyses adjusting for the most recently measured HbA(1c) value, there was a substantial reduction in risk for confirmed hypoglycemia with sitagliptin compared to glipizide when added to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with T2DM."3.78Lower risk of hypoglycemia with sitagliptin compared to glipizide when either is added to metformin therapy: a pre-specified analysis adjusting for the most recently measured HbA(1c) value. ( Davies, MJ; Ferrante, SA; Goldstein, BJ; Kaufman, KD; Krobot, KJ; Meininger, GE; Seck, T; Williams-Herman, D, 2012)
"To evaluate the experience of hypoglycemia in patients treated with metformin in combination with sulphonylureas (SUs) and the impact on patients' quality of life (QoL) and worry about hypoglycemia."3.77Self-reported experience of hypoglycemia among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (Exhype). ( Deleskog, A; Journath, G; Pettersson, B; Rosenqvist, U; Wändell, P, 2011)
" Because patient compliance may be affected when media sensationalism about controversial findings is misunderstood, we sought to clarify the recent controversy surrounding the cardiovascular and bone-health risks of thiazolidinediones, the risk of lactic acidosis with metformin, and the risk of hypoglycemia with oral therapies."3.75Balancing risk and benefit with oral hypoglycemic drugs. ( Hamnvik, OP; McMahon, GT, 2009)
"Lactic acidosis has been associated with use of metformin."3.74Metformin, sulfonylureas, or other antidiabetes drugs and the risk of lactic acidosis or hypoglycemia: a nested case-control analysis. ( Bodmer, M; Jick, SS; Krähenbühl, S; Meier, C; Meier, CR, 2008)
" There were 42 cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) with 18 deaths (43%); 40 of the MALA cases had documented contra-indications, especially renal impairment, and the remaining two cases were due to drug overdosage, one being a suicide."3.67Metformin and the sulphonylureas: the comparative risk. ( Campbell, IW, 1985)
"Seventy drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age, 52."3.30Effects of Initial Combinations of Gemigliptin Plus Metformin Compared with Glimepiride Plus Metformin on Gut Microbiota and Glucose Regulation in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The INTESTINE Study. ( Ahn, J; Florez, JC; Lim, S; Nauck, MA; Sohn, M, 2023)
"In VERTIS CV, mean duration of type 2 diabetes was 13."3.30Ertugliflozin Delays Insulin Initiation and Reduces Insulin Dose Requirements in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Analyses From VERTIS CV. ( Cannon, CP; Cherney, DZI; Cosentino, F; Dagogo-Jack, S; Frederich, R; Gantz, I; Liu, J; Masiukiewicz, U; Pratley, RE; Shi, H, 2023)
"iGlarLixi achieved significant HbA1c reductions, to near-normoglycaemic levels, compared with iGlar or Lixi, with no meaningful additional risk of hypoglycaemia and mitigated body weight gain versus iGlar, with fewer gastrointestinal adverse events versus Lixi."3.11Efficacy and safety benefits of iGlarLixi versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL or lixisenatide in Asian Pacific people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes on oral agents: The LixiLan-O-AP randomized controlled trial. ( Chen, L; Cheng, Z; Dong, X; Gu, S; Li, Q; Liu, M; Niemoeller, E; Ping, L; Souhami, E; Xiao, J; Yang, W; Yuan, G, 2022)
"This phase 3 confirmatory diabetes mellitus treatment study compared the safety and efficacy of Rapilin and NovoRapid insulin asparts in combination with metformin."3.11Comparative efficacy and safety of two insulin aspart formulations (Rapilin and NovoRapid) when combined with metformin, for patients with diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial. ( Guo, X; Han, P; Li, Q; Lu, J; Lv, X; Mo, Z; Peng, Y; Shi, Y; Sun, L; Wang, D; Wang, W; Wang, Z; Xue, Y; Yan, D; Yang, T; Yang, W; Yao, J; Yu, X; Zhang, F; Zhang, L; Zhang, X; Zhu, L, 2022)
"Pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and foetal outcomes."3.11A randomised placebo-controlled trial of the effectiveness of early metformin in addition to usual care in the reduction of gestational diabetes mellitus effects (EMERGE): study protocol. ( Alvarez-Iglesias, A; Browne, M; Devane, D; Dunne, F; Gillespie, P; Newman, C; O'Donnell, M; Smyth, A, 2022)
"Metformin treatment was associated with a better postprandial glycemic control than insulin for some meals, a lower risk of hypoglycemic episodes, less maternal weight gain, and a low rate of failure as an isolated treatment."3.01Metformin for gestational diabetes study: metformin vs insulin in gestational diabetes: glycemic control and obstetrical and perinatal outcomes: randomized prospective trial. ( González-Mesa, E; González-Romero, S; Molina-Vega, M; Olveira, G; Picón-César, MJ; Roldan-López, R; Romero-Narbona, F; Sola-Moyano, AP; Suárez-Arana, M; Tinahones, FJ, 2021)
" The incidence of overall adverse events and the number of hypoglycaemic adverse events were similar between the study groups."2.94Efficacy and safety of gemigliptin as add-on therapy to insulin, with or without metformin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (ZEUS II study). ( Benjachareonwong, S; Chamnan, P; Cho, YM; Choi, S; Deerochanawong, C; Kang, ES; Kim, S; Kosachunhanun, N; Kwon, S; Lee, MK; Lee, WJ; Oh, T; Pratipanawatr, T; Sattanon, S; Seekaew, S; Sirirak, T; Suraamornkul, S; Suwanwalaikorn, S, 2020)
"Given the current lack of clinical data, this study will provide evidence supporting safe and effective glycemic control using basal insulin glargine-based therapy plus OADs compared with twice-daily premixed insulin in Chinese patients with T2DM after short-term IIT."2.94Efficacy and Safety of Basal Insulin-Based Treatment Versus Twice-Daily Premixed Insulin After Short-Term Intensive Insulin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (BEYOND V). ( Cui, N; Guo, L; Jiang, X; Liu, J; Mu, Y; Wang, G; Xu, B; Zhang, X, 2020)
" The incidence of adverse events, including the incidence of hypoglycemia (18."2.94Efficacy and safety of generic exenatide injection in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. ( Gao, Y; Guo, L; Hong, T; Li, Q; Tian, Q; Xiao, W; Yang, J; Zhong, L, 2020)
" Adverse events overall and changes from baseline in body weight were similar between the two treatment groups."2.90Double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of continuing or discontinuing the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin when initiating insulin glargine therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: The CompoSIT-I Study. ( Darmiento, C; Duran-García, S; Engel, SS; Gantz, I; Golm, GT; Kaufman, KD; Lam, RLH; O'Neill, EA; Roussel, R; Shah, S; Shankar, RR; Zhang, Y, 2019)
" DAPA plus SAXA was generally well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment arms."2.90Sustained 52-week efficacy and safety of triple therapy with dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin versus dual therapy with sitagliptin added to metformin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. ( Del Prato, S; Garcia-Sanchez, R; Handelsman, Y; Iqbal, N; Johnsson, E; Kurlyandskaya, R; Mathieu, C; Rosenstock, J, 2019)
"Metformin use was associated with decreased fracture risk (HR = 0."2.90Glycemic Control and Insulin Treatment Alter Fracture Risk in Older Men With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. ( Adler, RA; Colón-Emeric, C; LaFleur, J; Lee, RH; Lyles, KW; Pieper, C; Sloane, R; Van Houtven, C, 2019)
"In patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes while using metformin, co-administration of ertugliflozin and sitagliptin provided more effective glycaemic control through 52 weeks compared with the individual agents."2.87Ertugliflozin plus sitagliptin versus either individual agent over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin: The VERTIS FACTORIAL randomized trial. ( Eldor, R; Engel, SS; Golm, G; Huyck, SB; Johnson, J; Lauring, B; Mancuso, JP; Pratley, RE; Qiu, Y; Raji, A; Sunga, S; Terra, SG, 2018)
" After 24 weeks, incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between triple and dual therapy and between concomitant and sequential add-on regimens."2.87Safety and tolerability of dapagliflozin, saxagliptin and metformin in combination: Post-hoc analysis of concomitant add-on versus sequential add-on to metformin and of triple versus dual therapy with metformin. ( Chen, H; Del Prato, S; Garcia-Sanchez, R; Hansen, L; Iqbal, N; Johnsson, E; Mathieu, C; Rosenstock, J, 2018)
"Elderly subjects with metformin-treated type 2 diabetes have lower glucagon levels at 3."2.87Effects on the glucagon response to hypoglycaemia during DPP-4 inhibition in elderly subjects with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. ( Ahrén, B; Farngren, J; Persson, M, 2018)
"Patients with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c 53-86 mmol/mol (7% to 10%) were randomized to empagliflozin 25 mg or glimepiride 1 to 4 mg for 104 weeks as add-on to metformin."2.87Empagliflozin compared with glimepiride in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: 208-week data from a masked randomized controlled trial. ( Andersen, KR; Ridderstråle, M; Rosenstock, J; Salsali, A; Woerle, HJ, 2018)
"More dapagliflozintreated than saxagliptin-treated patients achieved the composite endpoint of HbA1c reduction ≥ 0."2.87Dapagliflozin versus saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. ( Chen, H; Garcia-Sanchez, R; Mathieu, C; Rosenstock, J; Saraiva, GL, 2018)
" The overall frequency of adverse events was similar among the groups."2.84Randomized, double-blind, phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily treatment with alogliptin and metformin hydrochloride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Kaku, K; Katou, M; Kinugawa, Y; Nishiyama, Y; Sumino, S, 2017)
" A higher incidence of serious adverse events was observed in the sitagliptin group (5."2.84A randomized clinical trial of the safety and efficacy of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled by acarbose alone. ( Engel, SS; Fujita, KP; Kaufman, KD; Liu, X; Ma, J; Ning, G; O'Neill, EA; Shankar, RR; Wang, W; Wu, F; Xu, L; Zheng, S, 2017)
" In general, both treatments were well tolerated, with incidences and types of adverse events comparable between the two groups."2.84Efficacy and safety of adding evogliptin versus sitagliptin for metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week randomized, controlled trial with open label extension. ( Chung, CH; Han, KA; Hong, SM; Hwang, DM; Lee, CB; Mok, JO; Park, CY; Park, KS; Park, SW; Yoon, KH, 2017)
"Glyburide was started in 53 patients and metformin in 51."2.84Glyburide Versus Metformin and Their Combination for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Study. ( Gam Ze Letova, Y; Hasanein, J; Hissin, N; Nachum, Z; Salim, R; Suleiman, A; Yefet, E; Zafran, N, 2017)
"0%, the proportion of patients with gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs), and the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 7."2.84Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin compared with acarbose in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus uncontrolled on metformin monotherapy: Results of a Phase IV open-label randomized controlled study (the SMART study). ( Bian, F; Du, J; Fang, H; Li, W; Liang, L; Mu, Y; Shen, L; Wang, X; Xu, C; Xu, F, 2017)
" The primary outcome was the HbA1c level, and secondary outcomes included the body mass index (BMI), total insulin daily dose (TIDD) (unit/kg/d), hypoglycemia events, diabetes ketoacidosis (DKA) events, and gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs)."2.82Effect and Safety of Adding Metformin to Insulin Therapy in Treating Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials. ( Chen, H; Li, H; Li, L; Liu, Y; Wu, J, 2022)
"Hypoglycemia was defined as sensor glucose level of less than 60 mg/dl in two or more consecutive readings from CGM."2.82Glycemic excursions are positively associated with changes in duration of asymptomatic hypoglycemia after treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Lee, IT; Lee, WJ; Lin, SD; Lin, SY; Sheu, WH; Su, SL; Tseng, YH; Tu, ST; Wang, JS, 2016)
"To assess the effect of metformin versus placebo both in combination with insulin analogue treatment on changes in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with type 2 diabetes."2.82Metformin versus placebo in combination with insulin analogues in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus-the randomised, blinded Copenhagen Insulin and Metformin Therapy (CIMT) trial. ( Almdal, TP; Boesgaard, TW; Breum, L; Carstensen, B; Duun, E; Gade-Rasmussen, B; Gluud, C; Hedetoft, C; Hemmingsen, B; Jensen, T; Krarup, T; Lund, SS; Lundby-Christensen, L; Madsbad, S; Mathiesen, ER; Pedersen, O; Perrild, H; Røder, M; Sneppen, SB; Snorgaard, O; Tarnow, L; Thorsteinsson, B; Vaag, A; Vestergaard, H; Wetterslev, J; Wiinberg, N, 2016)
"Participants with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7."2.82Effects of biphasic, basal-bolus or basal insulin analogue treatments on carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the randomised Copenhagen Insulin and Metformin Therapy (CIMT) trial. ( Almdal, TP; Boesgaard, TW; Breum, L; Carstensen, B; Duun, E; Gade-Rasmussen, B; Gluud, C; Hedetoft, C; Hemmingsen, B; Jensen, T; Krarup, T; Lund, SS; Lundby-Christensen, L; Madsbad, S; Mathiesen, ER; Pedersen, O; Perrild, H; Røder, M; Sneppen, SB; Snorgaard, O; Tarnow, L; Thorsteinsson, B; Vaag, A; Vestergaard, H; Wetterslev, J; Wiinberg, N, 2016)
"Among patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes taking glargine and metformin, treatment with degludec/liraglutide compared with up-titration of glargine resulted in noninferior HbA1c levels, with secondary analyses indicating greater HbA1c level reduction after 26 weeks of treatment."2.82Effect of Insulin Glargine Up-titration vs Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide on Glycated Hemoglobin Levels in Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: The DUAL V Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Buse, JB; García-Hernández, P; Lehmann, L; Lingvay, I; Norwood, P; Pérez Manghi, F; Tarp-Johansen, MJ, 2016)
"8 mg in combination with metformin (≥1500 mg) were randomized to addition of once-daily IDeg ('IDeg add-on to liraglutide' arm; n = 174) or placebo ('placebo add-on to liraglutide' arm; n = 172), with dosing of both IDeg and placebo based on titration guidelines."2.82Effect of adding insulin degludec to treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and liraglutide: a double-blind randomized controlled trial (BEGIN: ADD TO GLP-1 Study). ( Andersen, TH; Aroda, VR; Bailey, TS; Cariou, B; Kumar, S; Leiter, LA; Philis-Tsimikas, A; Raskin, P; Zacho, J, 2016)
" The mean terminal half-life (t1/2 ) was 2-3 h."2.82Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AZP-531, a first-in-class analogue of unacylated ghrelin, in healthy and overweight/obese subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes. ( Abribat, T; Allas, S; Delale, T; Julien, M; Ngo, N; Ritter, J; Sahakian, P; van der Lely, AJ, 2016)
"After run-in on metformin and basal-bolus insulin (BBI), 102 participants continued metformin and basal insulin and were randomized to exenatide dosing before the two largest meals (glucacon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and insulin [GLIPULIN group]) or continuation of rapid-acting insulin analogs (BBI group)."2.82Glucose Variability in a 26-Week Randomized Comparison of Mealtime Treatment With Rapid-Acting Insulin Versus GLP-1 Agonist in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk. ( , 2016)
"LixiLan achieved statistically significant reductions to near-normal HbA1c levels with weight loss and no increased hypoglycemic risk, compared with insulin glargine alone, and a low incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin."2.82Efficacy and Safety of LixiLan, a Titratable Fixed-Ratio Combination of Lixisenatide and Insulin Glargine, Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Metformin Monotherapy: The LixiLan Proof-of-Concept Randomized Trial. ( Aroda, VR; Diamant, M; Fonseca, V; Perfetti, R; Rosenstock, J; Silvestre, L; Souhami, E; Zhou, T, 2016)
" The key secondary endpoints included percentage of patients achieving target HbA1c without adverse gastrointestinal (GI) events and mean change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline to week 24."2.82Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin versus metformin uptitration in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: a randomized, open-label, prospective study (VISION). ( Ji, LN; Li, H; Li, Q; Li, QF; Lu, JM; Pan, CY; Peng, YD; Tian, HM; Wang, BH; Wang, L; Yao, C; Zhao, ZG; Zhu, DL, 2016)
" The insulin dosing algorithm was not sufficient to equalize nocturnal hypoglycaemia between the two insulins."2.80Modulation of insulin dose titration using a hypoglycaemia-sensitive algorithm: insulin glargine versus neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes. ( Bolli, GB; Candelas, C; Dain, MP; Deerochanawong, C; Home, PD; Landgraf, W; Mathieu, C; Pilorget, V; Riddle, MC, 2015)
"Hypoglycemia was infrequent, with no episodes of major hypoglycemia."2.80Dual add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with metformin monotherapy: a randomized double-blind trial of saxagliptin plus dapagliflozin addition versus single addition of saxagliptin or dapagliflozin to metformin. ( Cook, W; Hansen, L; Hirshberg, B; Iqbal, N; Li, Y; Rosenstock, J; Zee, P, 2015)
"In a south Indian population with gestational diabetes, metformin was associated with better neonatal outcomes than glibenclamide."2.80Comparison of neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes with moderate hyperglycaemia on metformin or glibenclamide--a randomised controlled trial. ( Abraham, A; Antonisamy, B; Beck, M; Benjamin, SJ; George, A; Jana, AK; Mathews, JE; Sam, D; Thomas, N, 2015)
"Patients with type 2 diabetes who were inadequately controlled on twice-daily premixed insulin were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either insulin lispro mix (mix 50 before breakfast and lunch plus mix 25 before dinner) or basal-bolus therapy (insulin glargine at bedtime plus prandial insulin lispro thrice-daily) for 24 weeks."2.80Comparison of thrice-daily premixed insulin (insulin lispro premix) with basal-bolus (insulin glargine once-daily plus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro) therapy in east Asian patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled with twice-daily pre ( Ahn, KJ; Bao, Y; Chen, L; Chuang, LM; Gao, F; Ji, Q; Jia, W; Li, P; Pang, C; Tu, Y; Xiao, X; Yang, J, 2015)
"The dapagliflozin treatment arm was associated with a mean incremental benefit of 0."2.80The cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus sulfonylurea as an add-on to metformin in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Bergenheim, K; Callan, L; Charokopou, M; Lister, S; McEwan, P; Postema, R; Roudaut, M; Tolley, K; Townsend, R, 2015)
" Changes from baseline in gastric emptying, 24-h plasma glucose profile, HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 24-h ambulatory heart rate and blood pressure, amylase and lipase levels, and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed."2.80Contrasting Effects of Lixisenatide and Liraglutide on Postprandial Glycemic Control, Gastric Emptying, and Safety Parameters in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Optimized Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin: A Randomized, Open-Label Trial. ( Coester, HV; Delfolie, A; Forst, T; Hincelin-Méry, A; Kapitza, C; Meier, JJ; Menge, BA; Rosenstock, J; Roy-Duval, C, 2015)
"Glucose-lowering treatment options for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with chronic kidney disease are limited."2.80Combination of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin with insulin-based regimens in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. ( Crowe, S; McGill, JB; von Eynatten, M; Woerle, HJ; Yki-Järvinen, H, 2015)
" Overall, all treatments were well tolerated and no new adverse events or tolerability issues were observed for IDegLira."2.80One-year efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a 26-week extension to a 26-week main trial. ( Bode, BW; Buse, JB; Gough, SC; Linjawi, S; Reiter, PD; Rodbard, HW; Woo, VC; Zacho, M, 2015)
"In people with Type 2 diabetes, empagliflozin 10 mg and 25 mg given as add-on to metformin for 76 weeks were well tolerated and led to sustained reductions in HbA1c , weight and systolic blood pressure."2.80Empagliflozin as add-on to metformin in people with Type 2 diabetes. ( Broedl, UC; Christiansen, AV; Häring, HU; Kim, G; Meinicke, T; Merker, L; Roux, F; Salsali, A; Woerle, HJ, 2015)
" No acute adverse events (AEs) were associated with infusion."2.80Allogeneic Mesenchymal Precursor Cells in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Safety and Tolerability Pilot Study. ( Fonseca, VA; Rosenstock, J; Segal, KR; Skyler, JS, 2015)
"Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using sulphonylurea and metformin received dapagliflozin 10 mg/day or placebo added to therapy for 52 weeks (24-week randomized, double-blind period plus 28-week double-blind extension)."2.80Durability and tolerability of dapagliflozin over 52 weeks as add-on to metformin and sulphonylurea in type 2 diabetes. ( Bowering, K; Johnsson, E; Matthaei, S; Parikh, S; Rohwedder, K; Sugg, J, 2015)
"Treatment with dapagliflozin add-on to saxagliptin plus metformin resulted in a greater mean HbA1c reduction than placebo (-0."2.80Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial of Triple Therapy With Dapagliflozin Add-on to Saxagliptin Plus Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes. ( Chen, H; Cook, W; Ekholm, E; Hansen, L; Hirshberg, B; Iqbal, N; Li, D; Mathieu, C; Ranetti, AE, 2015)
" The percentage of subjects who experienced all adverse events including hypoglycemia with alogliptin were comparable to those with placebo."2.80[Efficacy and safety of alogliptin in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial in mainland China]. ( Bu, R; Gu, W; Han, P; Ji, Q; Jiang, Z; Lei, M; Li, C; Li, L; Li, W; Li, X; Li, Z; Liu, J; Liu, X; Liu, Y; Liu, Z; Lu, J; Lyu, X; Pan, C; Peng, Y; Qu, S; Shi, B; Song, Q; Xu, X; Xue, Y; Yan, L; Yang, J; Zeng, J; Zheng, B, 2015)
" Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout 104 weeks."2.79Dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving high doses of insulin: efficacy and safety over 2 years. ( Parikh, S; Rohwedder, K; Sugg, J; Wilding, JP; Woo, V, 2014)
"Bicyclol is a synthetic compound known to protect the liver against oxidation and lipid injuries."2.79Randomized, vitamin E-controlled trial of bicyclol plus metformin in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with impaired fasting glucose. ( Ding, XD; Fan, JG; Han, Y; Ma, AL; Shi, JP; Xu, Y, 2014)
" Safety and tolerability assessments included adverse events (AEs), hypoglycaemia and body weight."2.79A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin plus a sulphonylurea. ( Brook, D; Fisher, SA; Kalra, S; Montanaro, M; Monyak, J; Moses, RG; Sockler, J; Visvanathan, J, 2014)
"Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a new basal insulin with an ultra-long and stable glucose-lowering effect."2.79Health status and hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec versus insulin glargine: a 2-year trial in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Cariou, B; Handelsman, Y; Mathieu, C; Rana, A; Rodbard, HW; Wolden, ML; Zinman, B, 2014)
"People with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (n = 99) were randomly assigned on a 1∶1∶1 basis to receive insulin glargin, with fixed doses of glimepiride, metformin, and glimepiride plus metformin."2.79Comparison between the therapeutic effect of metformin, glimepiride and their combination as an add-on treatment to insulin glargine in uncontrolled patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Chon, S; Kang, JG; Lee, CB; Noh, J; Oh, SJ; Park, CY; Park, SW, 2014)
"In Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus insufficiently controlled on metformin ± sulfonylurea, lixisenatide significantly improved glycaemic control and was well tolerated during the 24-week study."2.79Lixisenatide treatment improves glycaemic control in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin with or without sulfonylurea: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week trial (GetGoal-M-Asia). ( Feng, P; Han, P; Jin Kui, Y; Liu, X; Lv, X; Niemoeller, E; Shang, S; Su, B; Tian, H; Yan, S; Yu Pan, C; Zhou, Z, 2014)
"In patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on once-daily basal insulin glargine and metformin and/or pioglitazone, intensification with LM25 was superior to a basal-prandial approach in terms of reduction in HbA1c after 24 weeks and did not increase hypoglycaemia episodes."2.79Insulin lispro low mixture twice daily versus basal insulin glargine once daily and prandial insulin lispro once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin intensification: a randomized phase IV trial. ( Cleall, S; Gross, JL; Onaca, A; Rodríguez, A; Tinahones, FJ, 2014)
" The most common gastrointestinal adverse events for dulaglutide were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea."2.79Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-1). ( Arakaki, R; Atisso, C; Blevins, T; Colon, G; Garcia, P; Kuhstoss, D; Lakshmanan, M; Wysham, C, 2014)
"To show that albiglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is an effective and generally safe treatment to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose hyperglycaemia is inadequately controlled with pioglitazone (with or without metformin)."2.79Efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist albiglutide (HARMONY 1 trial): 52-week primary endpoint results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus not controlled ( Bode, BW; Cirkel, DT; Perkins, CM; Perry, CR; Reinhardt, RR; Reusch, J; Stewart, MW; Ye, J, 2014)
" Adverse events (AE) and hypoglycemia were monitored."2.79Saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by cardiovascular disease history and cardiovascular risk factors: analysis of 3 clinical trials. ( Bryzinski, B; Cook, W; Hirshberg, B; Minervini, G, 2014)
" Overall, lixisenatide once daily was well tolerated, with a similar proportion of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs between groups (lixisenatide: 72."2.78Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide once daily versus placebo in type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on pioglitazone (GetGoal-P). ( Aronson, R; Goldenberg, R; Guo, H; Muehlen-Bartmer, I; Niemoeller, E; Pinget, M, 2013)
"Vildagliptin treatment was associated with less fluctuation of glucose levels than glimepiride treatment as assessed by 24-h CGM device, suggesting vildagliptin may have the potential to offer long-term beneficial effects for patients with T2DM in preventing the development of complications of diabetes."2.78Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring. ( Forst, T; Foteinos, G; He, YL; Kulmatycki, K; Mattapalli, D; Neelakantham, S; Taylor, A, 2013)
" Most adverse events were mild or moderate, with slightly greater frequency of upper respiratory infections with saxagliptin."2.78Long-term 4-year safety of saxagliptin in drug-naive and metformin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes. ( Aguilar-Salinas, C; Berglind, N; Fleming, D; Gross, JL; Hissa, M; Ravichandran, S; Rosenstock, J, 2013)
" The rate of adverse events was comparable in both groups."2.78[Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin as a second-line therapy vs other oral antidiabetic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes: Czech results within the worldwide prospective cohort EDGE study]. ( Brada, M; Dohnalová, L; Edelsberger, T; Gerle, J; Haluzík, M; Houdová, J; Veselá, V, 2013)
"Optimal dosing of basal insulin is needed to achieve target fasting blood glucose and to avoid hypoglycaemia on the other hand in patients of type 2 diabetes on bedtime basal insulin and daytime sulfonylureas."2.78Study of optimal basal insulin glargine dose requirement in Indian population as an add on therapy to oral hypoglycaemic agents to achieve target fasting blood glucose levels. ( Agarwal, SK; Singh, BK; Wadhwa, R, 2013)
"Patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with sitagliptin plus metformin were randomly assigned to 20 weeks of treatment with twice-daily exenatide plus placebo and metformin (SWITCH, n = 127) or twice-daily exenatide plus sitagliptin and metformin (ADD, n = 128)."2.77A randomized non-inferiority study comparing the addition of exenatide twice daily to sitagliptin or switching from sitagliptin to exenatide twice daily in patients with type 2 diabetes experiencing inadequate glycaemic control on metformin and sitaglipti ( Bachmann, OP; Chan, JY; Lüdemann, J; Oliveira, JH; Reed, VA; Violante, R; Yoon, KH; Yu, MB, 2012)
"Despite half of all type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients being over 65 and treatment being complicated by an elevated risk of iatrogenic hypoglycaemia, information about antidiabetic treatment is scarce in this age group."2.77Real-life comparison of DPP4-inhibitors with conventional oral antidiabetics as add-on therapy to metformin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: the HYPOCRAS study. ( Bourdel-Marchasson, I; Dejager, S; Penfornis, A; Quere, S, 2012)
"patients with type 2 diabetes and an HbA(1c) of 6."2.76Efficacy and safety of treatment with sitagliptin or glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. ( Arechavaleta, R; Chen, Y; Duran, L; Goldstein, BJ; Kaufman, KD; Krobot, KJ; O'Neill, EA; Seck, T; Williams-Herman, D, 2011)
" Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and hypoglycaemia."2.76Efficacy and safety of insulin detemir once daily in combination with sitagliptin and metformin: the TRANSITION randomized controlled trial. ( Hollander, P; Liutkus, JF; Raslova, K; Råstam, J; Skjøth, TV, 2011)
"glipizide was associated with a significantly smaller proportion of patients with hypoglycaemic events (3."2.75Saxagliptin is non-inferior to glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin alone: a 52-week randomised controlled trial. ( Eriksson, J; Gallwitz, B; Gause-Nilsson, I; Göke, B; Hellqvist, A, 2010)
"Patients with Type 2 diabetes (n = 88, age 56."2.74Nateglinide combination therapy with basal insulin and metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes. ( Juurinen, L; Kauppinen-Mäkelin, R; Kock, T; Kotronen, A; Lanki, H; Leppävuori, E; Nikkilä, K; Saltevo, J; Teikari-Myyrä, T; Tiikkainen, M; Yki-Järvinen, H, 2009)
"Vildagliptin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, demonstrating similar improvement in glycaemic control as metformin, with superior GI tolerability."2.74Comparison of vildagliptin and metformin monotherapy in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, double-blind, randomized trial. ( Bosi, E; Dejager, S; Schweizer, A, 2009)
"Efficacy measurements included haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) and eight-point plasma glucose (PG); safety included adverse events (AEs) and hypoglycaemic episodes."2.74Three different premixed combinations of biphasic insulin aspart - comparison of the efficacy and safety in a randomized controlled clinical trial in subjects with type 2 diabetes. ( Christiansen, JS; Cucinotta, D; Kanc, K; le Devehat, C; Liebl, A; López de la Torre, M; Smirnova, O; Wojciechowska, M, 2009)
"The efficacy of twice-daily dosing of a repaglinide/metformin FDC tablet was non-inferior to that of three-times-daily dosing."2.74Twice-daily and three-times-daily dosing of a repaglinide/metformin fixed-dose combination tablet provide similar glycaemic control. ( Lewin, A; Lyness, W; Raskin, P; Reinhardt, R, 2009)
"The mean weight gain was higher in the prandial group than in either the biphasic group or the basal group."2.74Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes. ( Darbyshire, JL; Davies, MJ; Farmer, AJ; Holman, RR; Keenan, JF; Levy, JC; Paul, SK, 2009)
"Weight gain was less with metformin plus biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 than with repaglinide plus biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (difference in mean body weight between treatments -2."2.74Combining insulin with metformin or an insulin secretagogue in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 12 month, randomised, double blind trial. ( Frandsen, M; Hansen, BV; Lund, SS; Nielsen, BB; Parving, HH; Pedersen, O; Tarnow, L; Vaag, AA, 2009)
"Hypoglycemia was similar in the 2 groups, but sample size limited the ability to make a definite safety assessment."2.73Addition of neutral protamine lispro insulin or insulin glargine to oral type 2 diabetes regimens for patients with suboptimal glycemic control: a randomized trial. ( Beneduce, F; Ceriello, A; Ciotola, M; Esposito, K; Feola, G; Giugliano, D; Gualdiero, R; Maiorino, MI; Schisano, B, 2008)
" Insulin dosage in each group was titrated to target fasting blood glucose (FBG) of 100 mg/dL or less (2.73Combination of oral antidiabetic agents with basal insulin versus premixed insulin alone in randomized elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Busch, K; Janka, HU; Plewe, G, 2007)
"Treatment with nateglinide plus metformin for up to 12 months was not associated with weight gain."2.73Nateglinide or gliclazide in combination with metformin for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on maximum doses of metformin alone: 1-year trial results. ( Collober-Maugeais, C; Cressier, F; Pecher, E; Ristic, S; Tang, P, 2007)
" 47%) and drug-related adverse experiences (AEs) (15 vs."2.73Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin. ( Fanurik, D; Hermansen, K; Khatami, H; Kipnes, M; Luo, E; Stein, P, 2007)
"One nateglinide/metformin-treated patient experienced a mild hypoglycaemic episode compared with eight episodes in eight patients on glyburide/metformin; one severe episode led to discontinuation."2.73Nateglinide, alone or in combination with metformin, is effective and well tolerated in treatment-naïve elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Baron, MA; Gerich, JE; Jean-Louis, L; Marcellari, A; Purkayastha, D; Schwarz, SL, 2008)
"In these patients with type 2 diabetes that was poorly controlled by OADs, BIAsp 30 TID and BIAsp 30 BID plus MET were associated with significantly greater reductions in HbA(1c) and postprandial BG compared with OADs alone."2.73Comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 given three times daily or twice daily in combination with metformin versus oral antidiabetic drugs alone in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a 16-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial ( Al-Tayar, B; Kazakova, E; Morozova, A; Saifullina, M; Sazonova, O; Shapiro, I; Sokolovskaya, V; Starceva, M; Starkova, N; Tarasov, A; Ushakova, O; Valeeva, F; Zanozina, O; Zhadanova, E, 2007)
"Metformin is a logical treatment for women with gestational diabetes mellitus, but randomized trials to assess the efficacy and safety of its use for this condition are lacking."2.73Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. ( Battin, MR; Gao, W; Hague, WM; Moore, MP; Rowan, JA, 2008)
"Semaglutide is an advantageous choice for the treatment of T2D since it has greater efficacy in reducing glycated hemoglobin and body weight compared with other GLP-1RAs, has demonstrated benefits in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events, and has a favorable profile in special populations (e."2.72Clinical Perspectives on the Use of Subcutaneous and Oral Formulations of Semaglutide. ( Gallwitz, B; Giorgino, F, 2021)
"In type 2 diabetic patients we compared 9 months of combination therapy with insulin glargine and metformin with 9 months of NPH insulin combined with metformin."2.72Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study. ( Hänninen, J; Hardy, K; Hulme, S; Kauppinen-Mäkelin, R; Lahdenperä, S; Lehtonen, R; Levänen, H; McNulty, S; Nikkilä, K; Ryysy, L; Tiikkainen, M; Tulokas, T; Vähätalo, M; Virtamo, H; Yki-Järvinen, H, 2006)
" Other adverse events, except increased cough in the INH group, were similar."2.72An open, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety profile of inhaled human insulin (Exubera) with metformin as adjunctive therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on a sulfonylurea. ( Barnett, AH; Dreyer, M; Lange, P; Serdarevic-Pehar, M, 2006)
"Consenting adults aged 18-80 years with Type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months, HbA1c of 7."2.72A randomized trial of adding insulin glargine vs. avoidance of insulin in people with Type 2 diabetes on either no oral glucose-lowering agents or submaximal doses of metformin and/or sulphonylureas. The Canadian INSIGHT (Implementing New Strategies with ( Dempsey, E; Gerstein, HC; Harris, SB; Issa, M; Stewart, JA; Yale, JF, 2006)
"Starting insulin in Type 2 diabetes patients with twice-daily BIAsp 30 plus met can reduce HbA (1c) and mean prandial plasma glucose increment to a greater extent than once-daily glarg plus glim."2.72Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin Aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride. ( Kann, PH; Medding, J; Moeller, J; Mokan, M; Mrevlje, F; Regulski, M; Szocs, A; Wascher, T; Zackova, V, 2006)
" Insulin dosage was titrated to target FBG 2.71Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. ( Janka, HU; Kliebe-Frisch, C; Plewe, G; Riddle, MC; Schweitzer, MA; Yki-Järvinen, H, 2005)
"In patients with Type 2 diabetes and inadequate glucose control while on insulin or insulin and oral agent(s) combination therapy, treatment with a twice-daily insulin lispro mixture plus metformin, which targets both post-prandial and pre-meal BG, provided clinically significant improvements in A1c, significantly reduced post-prandial BG after each meal, and reduced nocturnal hypoglycaemia as compared with once-daily glargine plus metformin, a treatment that targets fasting BG."2.71Twice-daily pre-mixed insulin rather than basal insulin therapy alone results in better overall glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. ( Augendre-Ferrante, B; Bai, S; Campaigne, BN; Malone, JK; Reviriego, J, 2005)
"0 mg/metformin (M) 400 mg combination with a G 2."2.71Effects of two different glibenclamide dose-strengths in the fixed combination with metformin in patients with poorly controlled T2DM: a double blind, prospective, randomised, cross-over clinical trial. ( Brunetti, P; Gori, M; Pagano, G; Perriello, G; Turco, C, 2004)
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dosage strengths of a single-tablet metformin-glibenclamide (glyburide) combination, compared with the respective monotherapies, in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy."2.70Improved glycaemic control with metformin-glibenclamide combined tablet therapy (Glucovance) in Type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled on metformin. ( Allavoine, T; Howlett, H; Lehert, P; Marre, M, 2002)
"Metformin has been shown to prevent insulin therapy-induced body weight gain when used in combination with insulin."2.70Metformin does not adversely affect hormonal and symptomatic responses to recurrent hypoglycemia. ( Born, J; Fehm, HL; Fruehwald-Schultes, B; Kern, W; Oltmanns, KM; Peters, A; Sopke, S; Toschek, B, 2001)
"458 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes that could not be controlled with diet and had hyperglycemic symptoms or fasting plasma glucose levels greater than 15 mmol/L during the initial 3 months of diet therapy (primary diet failure group) and 1620 patients in whom disease was controlled by diet therapy and who had fasting plasma glucose levels of 6 to 15 mmol/L and no hyperglycemic symptoms while receiving diet therapy alone."2.69United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study 24: a 6-year, randomized, controlled trial comparing sulfonylurea, insulin, and metformin therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes that could not be controlled with diet therapy. United Kingdom Pro ( , 1998)
" Adverse events were generally similar between the treatment groups."2.61Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with premixed insulin. ( Chen, G; Engel, SS; Lin, J; Liu, S; O'Neill, EA; Shankar, RR; Tu, Y; Yu, M; Zhang, R; Zhang, Y, 2019)
"The number of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing worldwide."2.61Metformin and second- or third-generation sulphonylurea combination therapy for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Gnesin, F; Hemmingsen, B; Kähler, LKA; Kähler, P; Madsbad, S; Madsen, KS; Metzendorf, MI; Richter, B, 2019)
"The choice of therapy for type 2 diabetes after metformin is guided by overall estimates of glycemic response and side effects seen in large cohorts."2.58Sex and BMI Alter the Benefits and Risks of Sulfonylureas and Thiazolidinediones in Type 2 Diabetes: A Framework for Evaluating Stratification Using Routine Clinical and Individual Trial Data. ( Dennis, JM; Hamilton, WT; Hattersley, AT; Henley, WE; Holman, RR; Janmohamed, S; Jones, AG; Lonergan, M; Pearson, ER; Rodgers, LR; Sattar, N; Shields, BM; Weedon, MN, 2018)
"Metformin has also proven to be safe and may be considered as an initial single agent for milder gestational diabetes."2.55The care of pregestational and gestational diabetes and drug metabolism considerations. ( Davis, SN; Hedrington, MS, 2017)
"Glyburide has good efficacy and short-term data but it also crosses the placenta and may be associated with increased rates of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants and neonatal hypoglycaemia when compared with insulin."2.55Pharmacological Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. ( Feig, DS; Mukerji, G, 2017)
"Vildagliptin is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with T2DM, both as monotherapy and as add-on treatment."2.53Systematic review and meta-analysis of vildagliptin for treatment of type 2 diabetes. ( Athanasiadou, E; Bekiari, E; Boura, P; Karagiannis, T; Liakos, A; Mainou, M; Papatheodorou, K; Rika, M; Rizava, C; Tsapas, A, 2016)
" This meta-analysis revealed the use of dulaglutide as a monotherapy or an add-on to OAM and lispro appeared to be effective and safe for adults with T2DM."2.53Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and systematic review. ( Tong, N; Zhang, L; Zhang, M; Zhang, Y, 2016)
"Iatrogenic and compensatory hyperinsulinemia are metabolic disruptors of β-cells, liver, muscle, kidney, brain, heart and vasculature, inflammation, and lipid homeostasis, among other systems."2.53Obviating much of the need for insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A re-assessment of insulin therapy's safety profile. ( Herman, ME; Jellinger, PS; Schwartz, SS, 2016)
" Other oral medications have not been shown to be safe in pregnancy."2.52Safety considerations with pharmacological treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus. ( Simmons, D, 2015)
"At short term, in women with gestational diabetes requiring drug treatment, glibenclamide is clearly inferior to both insulin and metformin, while metformin (plus insulin when required) performs slightly better than insulin."2.52Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Balsells, M; Corcoy, R; García-Patterson, A; Gich, I; Roqué, M; Solà, I, 2015)
" Incretins are associated with a low risk of hypoglycemia when used as monotherapy; the dosage of sulfonylurea or insulin should be reduced when used in combination."2.52Combination therapy when metformin is not an option for type 2 diabetes. ( Goldman-Levine, JD, 2015)
" RCTs were selected for meta-analysis if (1) they were RCTs comparing DPP-4 inhibitors plus metformin as initial combination therapy or DPP-4 inhibitor monotherapy to metformin monotherapy, (2) duration of treatment was ≥12 weeks and (3) reported data on haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) change, weight change, adverse cardiovascular (CV) events, hypoglycaemia or gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs)."2.50Efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and metformin as initial combination therapy and as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. ( Li, L; Liu, C; Wu, D, 2014)
"RCTs enrolling subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy were included."2.50Dapagliflozin compared with other oral anti-diabetes treatments when added to metformin monotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. ( Barnett, AH; Goring, S; Hawkins, N; Roudaut, M; Townsend, R; Wood, I; Wygant, G, 2014)
"Hypoglycemia is a frequent adverse effect of treatment with sulfonylurea, glinides, or insulin in older adults with diabetes."2.49[Attention to the use of oral anti-diabetic medication in older adults with type 2 diabetes]. ( Aso, Y; Jojima, T, 2013)
" Of the recently introduced oral hypoglycemic/antihyperglycemic agents, the DPP-4 inhibitors are moderately efficacious compared with mainstay treatment with metformin with a low side-effect profile and have good efficacy in combination with other oral agents and insulin."2.49A review of the efficacy and safety of oral antidiabetic drugs. ( Davis, SN; Lamos, EM; Stein, SA, 2013)
"The average glucose level at which hemiparesis developed was 1."2.48A case of hypoglycemic hemiparesis and literature review. ( Itoh, A; Itoh, H; Kawai, T; Meguro, S; Soeda, Y; Yoshino, T, 2012)
" In this article, we review the pharmacokinetic DDIs concerning oral antidiabetics, including metformin, sulfonylureas, meglitinide analogs, thiazolidinediones and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and the underlying mechanistic basis that can help to predict and prevent DDIs."2.48Drug interactions with oral antidiabetic agents: pharmacokinetic mechanisms and clinical implications. ( Backman, JT; Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M; Tornio, A, 2012)
"Although drugs for type 2 diabetes are studied in heterogeneous samples of patients, their efficacy can be predicted by some clinical parameters."2.47Predictors of response to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: evidence from randomized clinical trials. ( Cremasco, F; Lamanna, C; Mannucci, E; Marchionni, N; Monami, M, 2011)
"Adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) often have problems in achieving optimal glycaemic control."2.47[Metformin in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: not evidence-based]. ( Aanstoot, HJ; Bilo, HJ; Brand, PL; Kleefstra, N; Spaans, EA; van Hateren, KJ, 2011)
" DPP-4 inhibitors are safe and tolerable with no increased risk of adverse events compared to placebo and have a low risk of hypoglycaemia."2.45Clinical results of treating type 2 diabetic patients with sitagliptin, vildagliptin or saxagliptin--diabetes control and potential adverse events. ( Ahrén, B, 2009)
"The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of a sulphonylurea on glycaemic control and the risk adverse events when incorporated into the treatment regimen of patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin."2.44Glycaemic control and adverse events in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin + sulphonylurea: a meta-analysis. ( Belsey, J; Krishnarajah, G, 2008)
"However, hyperglycemia (especially postprandial hyperglycemia) and hypoglicemia continue to be problematic in the management of type 1 diabetes."2.44[Adjunctive therapies to glycaemic control of type 1 diabetes mellitus]. ( Gabbay, Mde A, 2008)
"Repaglinide is an insulin secretion enhancer with a different mechanism of action to the sulphonylureas, which means it does not continuously stimulate insulin secretion."2.41[Repaglinide, potentially a therapeutic improvement for diabetes mellitus type 2]. ( Rutten, GE, 2001)
"MetforminHydrochloride is an antidiabetic used for many years, currently; it considered the first choice in treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D)."1.91[Cross-Sectional Study on Adverse Effects of Metformin Hydrochloride on 130 Patients Type 2 Diabetic Admitted to Medical Center and Diabetes Home of Sidi Bel-Abbès]. ( Belakhdar, K; Kraroubi, A; Matmour, D; Sakouhi, M, 2023)
"Amongst the OAD's used in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in this study, total number of hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic episodes were found to be more in patients taking sulfonylurea as compared with DPP4 inhibitors when used in combination with metformin with or without insulin."1.72Role of Ambulatory Glucose Profile in Precision Medicine in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. ( Aggarwal, R; Prakash, A; Sidharth, S, 2022)
"could be used as a new strategy to treat cancer under hypoglycemia through glucose metabolism reprogramming."1.72Arene-Ruthenium(II)/Osmium(II) Complexes Potentiate the Anticancer Efficacy of Metformin via Glucose Metabolism Reprogramming. ( Chen, ZF; Gu, YQ; Liang, H; Ma, R; Xu, XF; Yang, QY, 2022)
" Sodium glucose co-transporter -2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are considered safe with a low risk of hypoglycemia."1.72Efficacy and safety of combination of empagliflozin and metformin with combination of sitagliptin and metformin during Ramadan: an observational study. ( Aamir, AH; Ahmed, I; Asghar, A; Ghaffar, T; Ishtiaq, O; Khan, S; Kumar, S; Masood, F; Raja, UY; Randhawa, FA; Raza, A; Rehman, T; Sherin, A; Wahab, MU, 2022)
" The proportion of the people who had hypoglycaemia, or any adverse event related to the study drug was assessed after-Ramadan."1.72Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in people with type 2 diabetes during Ramadan fasting. ( Ahmedani, MY; Yousuf, S, 2022)
"Serious hypoglycemia is a major adverse event associated with insulin secretagogues."1.72Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Used Concomitantly with Insulin Secretagogues and the Risk of Serious Hypoglycemia. ( Bilker, WB; Brensinger, CM; Flory, JH; Hee Nam, Y; Hennessy, S; Leonard, CE, 2022)
"Metformin use was associated with lower risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0."1.56A Safety Comparison of Metformin vs Sulfonylurea Initiation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study. ( Clemens, KK; Hougen, I; Komenda, P; Rigatto, C; Tangri, N; Whitlock, RH, 2020)
"Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often experience hypoglycaemia and weight gain due to treatment side effects."1.56Real-world Evaluation of glycemic control and hypoglycemic Events among type 2 Diabetes mellitus study (REEDS): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in Thailand. ( Benjasuratwong, Y; Nitiyanant, W; Ongphiphadhanakul, B; Pratipanawatr, T; Satirapoj, B; Suwanwalaikorn, S, 2020)
"All adults diagnosed with documented type 2 diabetes (extrapolated to the German population: 6."1.56Changes in incidence of severe hypoglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes from 2006 to 2016: analysis based on health insurance data in Germany considering the anti-hyperglycaemic medication. ( Günster, C; Kloos, C; Klöss, A; Lehmann, T; Müller, N; Müller, UA, 2020)
"A total of 66,807 people with type 2 diabetes were treated with metformin (MET) plus a combination of second- and third-line therapies."1.56Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, Severe Hypoglycemia, and All-Cause Mortality for Widely Used Antihyperglycemic Dual and Triple Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes Management: A Cohort Study of All Danish Users. ( Hejlesen, O; Jakobsen, PE; Jensen, MH; Kjolby, M; Vestergaard, P, 2020)
"Metformin appears to be an effective treatment for women with GDM and may reduce risk of some adverse neonatal outcomes when compared with insulin."1.51Comparative effectiveness of metformin versus insulin for gestational diabetes in New Zealand. ( Boggess, K; Engel, SM; Howe, AS; Jonsson Funk, M; Landi, SN; Radke, S; Stürmer, T, 2019)
"The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is expected to rise in the frail elderly population, which will have significant consequences for the health economy."1.51Pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus in frail elderly patients. ( Muraleedharan, V; Rabindranathnambi, A; Sathyanarayanan, A, 2019)
"Although patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may fail to achieve adequate hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) control despite metformin-sulfonylurea (Met-SU) dual therapy, a third-line glucose-lowering medication-including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i), insulin, or thiazolidinedione (TZD)-can be added to achieve this."1.51Intensification with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, insulin, or thiazolidinediones and risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases, and severe hypoglycemia in patients on metformin-sulfonylurea dual therapy: A retrospective cohort study. ( Chan, EW; Ho, CW; Lam, CLK; Man, KKC; Shi, M; Tse, ETY; Wong, CKH; Wong, ICK, 2019)
"No significant difference in the other treatment groups."1.48Are we missing hypoglycaemia? Elderly patients with insulin-treated diabetes present to primary care frequently with non-specific symptoms associated with hypoglycaemia. ( Hamilton, W; Hattersley, AT; Hope, SV; Shields, BM; Taylor, PJ, 2018)
"0%, change in body weight at 12 and 24 weeks, change in HbA1c by sub-groups (baseline HbA1c, age, body mass index [BMI], dosage strength, co-morbidities) from baseline to week 24, and safety."1.48Initial combination therapy with vildagliptin plus metformin in drug-naïve patients with T2DM: a 24-week real-life study from Asia. ( Chawla, M; Cooke, K; Faruque, P; Hours-Zesiger, P; Kim, TH; Mirasol, RC; Shete, A, 2018)
"Metformin is a first-line drug for the treatment of individuals with type 2 diabetes, yet its precise mechanism of action remains unclear."1.48Metformin reduces liver glucose production by inhibition of fructose-1-6-bisphosphatase. ( Hughey, CC; Hunter, RW; Jessen, N; Lantier, L; Peggie, M; Sakamoto, K; Sicheri, F; Sundelin, EI; Wasserman, DH; Zeqiraj, E, 2018)
"Hypoglycemia is associated with local invasion and angiogenesis, whereas hyperglycemia promotes metastatic colonization."1.48Glycemic Variability Promotes Both Local Invasion and Metastatic Colonization by Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. ( Akkan, J; Benitz, S; Bruns, P; Ceyhan, GO; Cheng, T; Friess, H; Hofmann, T; Huang, P; Jäger, C; Jastroch, M; Jian, Z; Kleeff, J; Kleigrewe, K; Kong, B; Lamp, D; Maeritz, N; Michalski, CW; Nie, S; Raulefs, S; Shen, S; Shi, K; Steiger, K; Zhang, Z; Zou, X, 2018)
"We compared, in 733 women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated with metformin and/or insulin, rates of neonatal hypoglycaemia in those who had received a dextrose/insulin infusion during labour and prior to delivery (n = 132) with those who did not (n = 601)."1.46The use of dextrose/insulin infusions during labour and delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: Is there any point? ( Battin, M; Farrant, MT; Hague, WM; Rowan, JA; Williamson, K, 2017)
"Metformin is a first-line oral antidiabetic therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus."1.46Hemodialysis-refractory metformin-associated lactate acidosis with hypoglycemia, hypothermia, and bradycardia in a diabetic patient with belated diagnosis and chronic kidney disease
. ( Zibar, K; Zibar, L, 2017)
" Safety was assessed by reporting of adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs)."1.46Effectiveness and safety of vildagliptin and vildagliptin add-on to metformin in real-world settings in Egypt - results from the GUARD study. ( Rakha, S; Shelbaya, S, 2017)
"Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) do not achieve glycaemic control targets on basal insulin regimens."1.43How much is too much? Outcomes in patients using high-dose insulin glargine. ( Gao, L; Gill, J; Reid, T; Rhinehart, A; Stuhr, A; Traylor, L; Vlajnic, A, 2016)
"The included 3810 patients with type 2 diabetes had their treatment intensified at baseline."1.43Incidence, characteristics and impact of hypoglycaemia in patients receiving intensified treatment for inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Bramlage, P; Gitt, AK; Schneider, S; Tschöpe, D, 2016)
" Adverse effect rates were 64% with placebo, 63."1.43Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with other oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Ampudia-Blasco, FJ; Ariño, B; Giljanovic Kis, S; Naderali, E; Pérez, A; Pfarr, E; Romera, I, 2016)
"Optimal glucose-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus requires a patient-specific approach."1.42A decision support tool for appropriate glucose-lowering therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Ampudia-Blasco, FJ; Benhamou, PY; Charpentier, G; Consoli, A; Diamant, M; Gallwitz, B; Khunti, K; Mathieu, C; Phan, TM; Ridderstråle, M; Seufert, J; Stoevelaar, H; Tack, C; Vilsbøll, T, 2015)
"Metformin (Met), which is an insulin-sensitizer, decreases insulin resistance and fasting insulin levels."1.42Intracerebroventricular metformin decreases body weight but has pro-oxidant effects and decreases survival. ( Brochier, AW; de Assis, AM; de Carvalho, AK; Gnoatto, J; Haas, CB; Hansel, G; Muller, AP; Oses, JP; Portela, LV; Zimmer, ER, 2015)
"Bariatric surgery rapidly improves Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)."1.42Effect of bariatric surgery combined with medical therapy versus intensive medical therapy or calorie restriction and weight loss on glycemic control in Zucker diabetic fatty rats. ( Abegg, K; Boza, C; Corteville, C; Docherty, NG; le Roux, CW; Lutz, TA; Muñoz, R, 2015)
"Vildagliptin treatment with or without metformin was generally well tolerated."1.42Clinical effectiveness and safety of vildagliptin in >19 000 patients with type 2 diabetes: the GUARD study. ( Abou Jaoude, E; Al-Arouj, M; DiTommaso, S; Fawwad, A; Latif, ZA; Orabi, A; Rosales, R; Shah, P; Vaz, J, 2015)
" In total, 136 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 71 (10."1.42Real-life safety and efficacy of vildagliptin as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes in Turkey--GALATA study. ( Akin, F; Ar, IB; Ayvaz, G; Dokmetas, HS; Keskin, L; Tasan, E; Uren, E, 2015)
"Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease that cannot be treated adequately using the known monotherapies, especially when the disease progresses to an advanced stage."1.42Combination therapy with oleanolic acid and metformin as a synergistic treatment for diabetes. ( Abdelkader, D; Chen, Y; Hassan, W; Liu, J; Sun, H; Wang, X, 2015)
"The Cardiff Model was used to simulate disease progression and estimate the long-term effect of treatments on patients."1.42Cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin vs glimepiride as a second-line therapy added to metformin in Type 2 diabetes in China. ( Deng, J; Dong, H; Gu, S; Mu, Y; Shi, L, 2015)
"The treatment of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus is diverse, with no clear consensus regarding the initial drug regimen or dosing to achieve optimal glycemic control."1.42Getting to goal in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes using combination drug "subtraction therapy". ( George, TM; Jennings, AS; Jennings, JS; Lovett, AJ, 2015)
"In elderly Americans with type 2 diabetes, use of insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) accounts for almost one-fourth of drug adverse event-related hospitalizations."1.42Sulfonylurea monotherapy and emergency room utilization among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Brodovicz, K; Engel, SS; Fu, C; Heaton, PC; Rajpathak, SN, 2015)
"Her treatment was metformin 850 mg every 12 hours and glimepiride 4 mg every 24 hours."1.40How to prevent and treat pharmacological hypoglycemias. ( Mezquita Raya, P; Reyes García, R, 2014)
"The treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) follows a stepwise progression."1.40The evaluation of clinical and cost outcomes associated with earlier initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Curtis, BH; Gahn, JC; Murphy, DR; Smolen, HJ; Yu, X, 2014)
"Gliclazide or metformin-treated patients demonstrated lesser mortality risk than glibenclamide-treated ones in all four evaluation models, but age and duration stratification can influence this phenomenon in case of "first prescription model"."1.40Evaluation approach can significantly influence oral glucose-lowering drugs total mortality risks in retrospective cohorts of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. ( Khalangot, M; Kovtun, V, 2014)
"DiaRegis included 3810 patients with type 2 diabetes in which antidiabetic therapy was intensified."1.39Prognostic implications of DPP-4 inhibitor vs. sulfonylurea use on top of metformin in a real world setting - results of the 1 year follow-up of the prospective DiaRegis registry. ( Binz, C; Bramlage, P; Deeg, E; Gitt, AK; Krekler, M; Tschöpe, D, 2013)
" We conclude that this treatment intensification approach may be useful, efficient, and safe in daily clinical practice for patients with type 2 diabetes."1.39Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine added to a fixed-dose combination of metformin and a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor: results of the GOLD observational study. ( Bramlage, P; Pegelow, K; Seufert, J, 2013)
"A total of 660 insulin-naive type 2 diabetes patients with poor glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] ≥7."1.38The impact of initiating biphasic human insulin 30 therapy in type 2 diabetes patients after failure of oral antidiabetes drugs. ( Bao, Y; Cai, Q; Gu, Y; Hou, X; Jia, W; Pan, J; Zhang, L, 2012)
"sulphonylurea (SU) compounds."1.38Worry vs. knowledge about treatment-associated hypoglycaemia and weight gain in type 2 diabetic patients on metformin and/or sulphonylurea. ( Knop, FK; Lund, A, 2012)
"Metformin was combined with MPI in 81 patients."1.37Improved glycaemic control with reduced hypoglycaemic episodes and without weight gain using long-term modern premixed insulins in type 2 diabetes. ( Levit, S; Toledano, Y; Wainstein, J, 2011)
"The study cohort consisted of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (n = 80) on regular therapy with glibenclamide either alone or with concomitant metformin."1.37Influence of CYP2C9 gene polymorphisms on response to glibenclamide in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. ( Adithan, C; Agrawal, A; Anichavezhi, D; Pradhan, SC; Rajan, S; Subrahmanyam, DK; Surendiran, A, 2011)
"This article describes a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus achieving glycemic control after transitioning from premixed to basal-prandial insulin."1.36Effective switch from premixed to basal-prandial insulin to achieve glycemic goals in type 2 diabetes. ( Lavernia, F, 2010)
"Patients with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk for disease and treatment related complications after the initial approach of oral mono/dual antidiabetic therapy has failed."1.36Diabetes treatment patterns and goal achievement in primary diabetes care (DiaRegis) - study protocol and patient characteristics at baseline. ( Binz, C; Bramlage, P; Deeg, E; Gitt, AK; Krekler, M; Plate, T; Tschöpe, D, 2010)
"A total of 400 patients with type 2 diabetes, who were > or = 35 years old and who had been treated with metformin and a sulphonylurea for at least 6 months, completed questionnaires during their usual primary care office visit."1.35Hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a combination of metformin and sulphonylurea therapy in France. ( Krishnarajah, G; Lyu, R; Mavros, P; Vexiau, P; Yin, D, 2008)
"Patients with type 2 diabetes who added a sulphonylurea or a thiazolidinedione to ongoing metformin therapy on a date (index date) from January 2001 through January 2006 and who had at least one haemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) measurement in the 12-month period before the visit date were eligible."1.35Hypoglycaemic symptoms, treatment satisfaction, adherence and their associations with glycaemic goal in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from the Real-Life Effectiveness and Care Patterns of Diabetes Management (RECAP-DM) Study. ( Alvarez Guisasola, F; Krishnarajah, G; Lyu, R; Mavros, P; Tofé Povedano, S; Yin, D, 2008)
"(1) When type 2 diabetes is inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic therapy, one option is to add subcutaneous insulin injections (or to accept less stringent glycaemic control)."1.34Exenatide: new drug. Type 2 diabetes for some overweight patients. ( , 2007)
" Adverse reactions attributed to drugs included hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal distress."1.33Efficacy and safety of hypoglycemic drugs in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Benavides, S; Germak, J; Nahata, MC; Striet, J, 2005)
"Drug-induced hypoglycemia is possible even in diabetics not receiving insulin or oral antidiabetic agents increasing insulin secretion."1.31Severe hypoglycemia in an elderly patient treated with metformin. ( Reimann, IR; Schmechel, H; Zitzmann, S, 2002)

Research

Studies (488)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-199013 (2.66)18.7374
1990's6 (1.23)18.2507
2000's71 (14.55)29.6817
2010's335 (68.65)24.3611
2020's63 (12.91)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Newman, C2
Dunne, FP1
Tomlinson, B1
Patil, NG1
Fok, M1
Chan, P1
Lam, CWK1
Molina-Vega, M3
Picón-César, MJ3
Gutiérrez-Repiso, C1
Fernández-Valero, A1
Lima-Rubio, F1
González-Romero, S3
Moreno-Indias, I1
Tinahones, FJ6
Lee, KA1
Jin, HY1
Kim, YJ1
Kim, SS1
Cho, EH1
Park, TS2
Reiff, S1
Fava, S1
Mehrpour, O1
Saeedi, F1
Hoyte, C1
Hadianfar, A1
Nakhaee, S1
Brent, J1
Yang, W4
Dong, X2
Li, Q5
Cheng, Z1
Yuan, G1
Liu, M1
Xiao, J1
Gu, S3
Niemoeller, E4
Chen, L4
Ping, L1
Souhami, E3
Sidharth, S1
Aggarwal, R1
Prakash, A1
Niwaha, AJ1
Rodgers, LR2
Carr, ALJ1
Balungi, PA1
Mwebaze, R1
Hattersley, AT3
Shields, BM3
Nyirenda, MJ1
Jones, AG2
Kellerer, M2
Kaltoft, MS2
Lawson, J1
Nielsen, LL1
Strojek, K1
Tabak, Ö1
Jacob, S2
Takayama, K1
Obata, Y1
Maruo, Y1
Yamaguchi, H1
Kosugi, M1
Irie, Y1
Hazama, Y1
Yasuda, T1
Pan, Q1
Li, Y4
Wan, H1
Wang, J1
Xu, B2
Wang, G2
Jiang, C1
Liang, L2
Feng, W1
Liu, J9
Wang, T2
Zhang, X4
Cui, N2
Mu, Y5
Guo, L4
Hung, WT1
Chen, YJ1
Cheng, CY1
Ovbiagele, B1
Lee, M1
Hsu, CY1
Liu, Y6
Chen, H7
Li, H5
Li, L5
Wu, J1
Yao, J1
Guo, X1
Sun, L2
Han, P3
Lv, X5
Mo, Z1
Zhang, L3
Wang, Z4
Zhu, L2
Yang, T2
Wang, W5
Xue, Y2
Shi, Y1
Lu, J2
Peng, Y3
Zhang, F1
Yan, D1
Wang, D1
Yu, X2
Yang, QY1
Ma, R1
Gu, YQ1
Xu, XF1
Chen, ZF1
Liang, H2
Wang, CY1
Huang, KC1
Lu, CW1
Chu, CH1
Huang, CN2
Chen, HS1
Lee, IT2
Chen, JF1
Chen, CC1
Chen, CS1
Hsieh, CH1
Tien, KJ1
Chien, HY1
Huang, YY2
Hsu, JP1
Shane, GT1
Chang, AC1
Wu, YC1
Sheu, WH3
Dunne, F1
Devane, D1
Smyth, A1
Alvarez-Iglesias, A1
Gillespie, P1
Browne, M1
O'Donnell, M1
Ahmed, I1
Raja, UY1
Wahab, MU1
Rehman, T1
Ishtiaq, O1
Aamir, AH1
Ghaffar, T1
Raza, A1
Kumar, S2
Sherin, A1
Masood, F1
Randhawa, FA1
Asghar, A1
Khan, S1
Volke, V1
Katus, U1
Johannson, A1
Toompere, K1
Heinla, K1
Rünkorg, K1
Uusküla, A1
Yousuf, S1
Ahmedani, MY1
Sakouhi, M3
Matmour, D3
Belakhdar, K3
Kraroubi, A3
Wang, MT2
Pan, HY2
Huang, YL2
Wu, LW2
Wang, PC2
Hsu, YJ2
Lin, TC2
Lin, C2
Lai, JH2
Lee, CH2
Jing, Y1
Guo, H2
Xu, J1
Wang, M1
Huang, L1
Cui, W1
Song, L1
Liu, X5
Sun, B1
Wang, N1
Sheng, B1
Ni, J1
Lv, B1
Jiang, G1
Lin, X1
Lim, S4
Sohn, M1
Florez, JC1
Nauck, MA4
Ahn, J1
Shrivastava, A1
Kesavadev, J2
Mohan, V1
Saboo, B1
Shrestha, D1
Maheshwari, A1
Makkar, BM1
Modi, KD1
Kumar Das, A1
Dagogo-Jack, S1
Frederich, R2
Cannon, CP1
Shi, H2
Cherney, DZI1
Cosentino, F1
Masiukiewicz, U1
Gantz, I3
Pratley, RE3
Weeda, ER1
Ward, R1
Gebregziabher, M1
Chandler, O1
Strychalski, ML1
Axon, RN1
Taber, DJ1
Hamano, K1
Akita, K1
Takeuchi, Y1
Suwa, T1
Takeda, J1
Dodo, S1
Wojszel, ZB1
Kasiukiewicz, A1
Cho, YM1
Deerochanawong, C2
Seekaew, S1
Suraamornkul, S1
Benjachareonwong, S1
Sattanon, S1
Chamnan, P2
Sirirak, T1
Kosachunhanun, N1
Pratipanawatr, T3
Suwanwalaikorn, S3
Lee, WJ2
Kim, S1
Choi, S1
Kang, ES1
Oh, T1
Kwon, S2
Lee, MK3
Araki, E2
Unno, Y1
Tanaka, Y3
Sakamoto, W1
Miyamoto, Y1
Bao, LX1
Shi, WT1
Han, YX1
Aberer, F1
Pferschy, PN1
Tripolt, NJ1
Sourij, C1
Obermayer, AM1
Prüller, F1
Novak, E1
Reitbauer, P1
Kojzar, H1
Prietl, B1
Kofler, S1
Brunner, M1
Svehlikova, E1
Stojakovic, T1
Scharnagl, H1
Oulhaj, A1
Aziz, F1
Riedl, R1
Sourij, H1
Kelty, E1
Tran, DD1
Atkinson, A1
Preen, DB1
Havard, A1
Landi, SN1
Radke, S1
Boggess, K2
Engel, SM1
Stürmer, T1
Howe, AS1
Jonsson Funk, M1
Sathyanarayanan, A1
Rabindranathnambi, A1
Muraleedharan, V1
Satirapoj, B2
Ongphiphadhanakul, B2
Nitiyanant, W3
Cannon, AJ1
Bargiota, A1
Billings, L1
Hunt, B2
Leiter, LA3
Malkin, S1
Mocarski, M1
Ranthe, MF2
Schiffman, A1
Doshi, A1
Wong, CKH1
Man, KKC1
Shi, M1
Chan, EW1
Ho, CW1
Tse, ETY1
Wong, ICK1
Lam, CLK1
Whitlock, RH1
Hougen, I1
Komenda, P1
Rigatto, C1
Clemens, KK1
Tangri, N1
Li, JX1
Li, Z2
Jin, W1
Wang, TJ1
Guo, QZ1
Fan, MY1
Ku, EJ2
Lee, SY1
Lee, JH1
Lee, JE1
Kim, KM2
Davies, MJ6
Benjasuratwong, Y1
Frias, JP2
Gonzalez-Galvez, G1
Johnsson, E7
Maaske, J1
Testa, MA1
Simonson, DC1
Dronamraju, N1
Garcia-Sanchez, R5
Peters, AL1
Lawal, SK1
Adeniji, AA1
Sulaiman, SO1
Akajewole, MM1
Buhari, MO1
Osinubi, AA1
Jiang, X1
Müller, N1
Lehmann, T1
Klöss, A1
Günster, C1
Kloos, C1
Müller, UA2
Yang, J8
Xiao, W1
Zhong, L1
Gao, Y2
Tian, Q1
Hong, T1
Jindal, S1
Kalra, S2
Le, P1
Chaitoff, A1
Misra-Hebert, AD1
Ye, W1
Herman, WH2
Rothberg, MB1
Jensen, MH1
Kjolby, M1
Hejlesen, O1
Jakobsen, PE1
Vestergaard, P1
Patoulias, D1
Katsimardou, A1
Kalogirou, MS1
Zografou, I1
Toumpourleka, M1
Imprialos, K1
Stavropoulos, K1
Stergiou, I1
Papadopoulos, C1
Doumas, M1
Mousa, A1
Løvvik, T1
Hilkka, I1
Carlsen, SM1
Morin-Papunen, L1
Tertti, K1
Rönnemaa, T1
Syngelaki, A1
Nicolaides, K1
Shehata, H1
Burden, C1
Norman, JE1
Rowan, J2
Dodd, JM1
Hague, W2
Vanky, E1
Teede, HJ1
Koufakis, T1
Mustafa, OG1
Zebekakis, P1
Kotsa, K1
Jia, S1
Han, R2
Zhang, Z2
Qin, X1
Zhao, M2
Xiang, R2
Del Olmo-García, MI1
Hervás Marín, D1
Caudet Esteban, J1
Ballesteros Martin-Portugués, A1
Cerveró Rubio, A1
Arnau Vives, MA1
Catalá Gregori, A1
Penalba Martínez, M1
Merino-Torres, JF1
Wallis, KA1
Wells, S1
Selak, V1
Poppe, K1
Jabbour, SA1
Ahmed, A1
Hardy, E3
Choi, J1
Sjöström, CD1
Guja, C1
Rosenstock, J19
Bajaj, HS2
Janež, A1
Silver, R1
Begtrup, K1
Hansen, MV1
Jia, T1
Goldenberg, R2
De Buitléir, C1
O' Connor, E1
Satti, MM1
Shaw, J1
Liew, A1
Kurozumi, A1
Okada, Y1
Suárez-Arana, M1
González-Mesa, E1
Sola-Moyano, AP1
Roldan-López, R1
Romero-Narbona, F1
Olveira, G1
Ahrén, B6
Brož, J1
Brožová, K1
Joseph, CMC1
Gallwitz, B7
Giorgino, F2
Yu, Y1
Chen, J1
Liu, S2
Cheng, D1
Hee Nam, Y1
Brensinger, CM2
Bilker, WB2
Flory, JH1
Leonard, CE2
Hennessy, S2
Cigrovski Berković, M1
Herman Mahečić, D1
Gradišer, M1
Bilić-Ćurčić, I1
Xu, W1
Zhou, L1
Weng, J1
Lingvay, I3
Raslan, IA1
McDonald, EG1
Lee, TC1
Shankar, RR5
Inzucchi, SE3
Scarabello, V1
Kaufman, KD6
Lai, E1
Ceesay, P1
Suryawanshi, S1
Engel, SS8
Farahani, P1
Zhang, Y4
Zhao, Z1
Wang, S1
Zhu, W1
Jiang, Y1
Sun, S1
Chen, C1
Wang, K1
Mu, L1
Cao, J1
Zhou, Y1
Gu, W2
Hong, J1
Ning, G3
Kragh, N1
McConnachie, CC1
Valentine, WJ1
Rossi, MC1
Montagnoli, R1
Ye, C1
Jain, E1
Venn, K1
Stein, E1
Aronson, R3
Harris, S1
Jaeckel, E1
Chandarana, K1
Jódar, E1
Sun, J1
Fan, D1
Luan, Z1
Scott, LJ1
Scheen, AJ4
Paquot, N1
Out, M1
Miedema, I1
Jager-Wittenaar, H1
van der Schans, C1
Krijnen, W1
Lehert, P4
Stehouwer, C1
Kooy, A2
Kim, G4
Oh, S1
Jin, SM1
Hur, KY1
Kim, JH1
Khunti, K5
Godec, TR1
Medina, J1
Garcia-Alvarez, L1
Hiller, J1
Gomes, MB1
Cid-Ruzafa, J1
Charbonnel, B3
Fenici, P1
Hammar, N1
Hashigami, K1
Kosiborod, M1
Nicolucci, A3
Shestakova, MV2
Ji, L2
Pocock, S1
Li, S1
Wang, R2
Zhang, JP1
Alemayehu, B1
Rajpathak, S2
Hedrington, MS1
Davis, SN3
Aggarwal, N5
Singla, A1
Mathieu, C9
Montanya, E1
Pfeiffer, AFH1
Zhao, J1
Iqbal, N7
Bailey, C1
Mukerji, G1
Feig, DS1
Chamberlain, JJ1
Kalyani, RR1
Leal, S1
Rhinehart, AS1
Shubrook, JH1
Skolnik, N1
Hope, SV1
Taylor, PJ1
Hamilton, W1
Yu, O1
Azoulay, L1
Yin, H1
Filion, KB1
Suissa, S1
Tieu, J1
Coat, S1
Middleton, P1
Shepherd, E1
Vos, RC1
Rutten, GEHM1
Pace, E1
Tingen, J1
Suzuki, L1
Kanazawa, A1
Uzawa, H1
Osonoi, Y1
Masuyama, A1
Azuma, K1
Takeno, K1
Takayanagi, N1
Sato, J1
Someya, Y1
Komiya, K1
Goto, H1
Mita, T1
Ikeda, F1
Ogihara, T1
Shimizu, T1
Ohmura, C1
Saito, M1
Osonoi, T1
Watada, H1
Beachler, DC1
Fernandes, G1
Deshpande, G1
Jemison, J1
Lyons, JG1
Lanes, S1
McNeill, A1
Eldor, R1
Raji, A1
Golm, G1
Huyck, SB1
Qiu, Y1
Sunga, S1
Johnson, J1
Terra, SG2
Mancuso, JP1
Lauring, B2
Chon, S2
Rhee, SY1
Ahn, KJ3
Baik, SH2
Park, Y2
Nam, MS1
Lee, KW2
Yoo, SJ1
Koh, G1
Lee, DH2
Kim, YS1
Woo, JT1
Chakravarty, A1
Rastogi, M1
Dhankhar, P1
Bell, KF1
Del Prato, S6
Hansen, L5
Fisher, SJ1
Huang, X1
Pawaskar, M1
Witt, EA1
Farngren, J2
Persson, M2
Ueda, Y1
Wong, C1
Borchers, A1
Moura, CS1
Rosenberg, ZB1
Abrahamowicz, M1
Bernatsky, S1
Behlouli, H1
Pilote, L1
Chawla, M1
Kim, TH1
Mirasol, RC1
Faruque, P1
Cooke, K1
Hours-Zesiger, P1
Shete, A1
Seliger, SL1
Abebe, KZ1
Hallows, KR1
Miskulin, DC1
Perrone, RD1
Watnick, T1
Bae, KT1
Nam, YH1
Han, X1
Steyn, M1
Couchman, L1
Coombes, G1
Earle, KA1
Johnston, A1
Holt, DW1
DeFronzo, RA3
Lee, C1
Kohler, S1
Chang, B1
Yang, L1
Feng, B1
Ridderstråle, M2
Andersen, KR1
Woerle, HJ10
Salsali, A4
Dennis, JM1
Henley, WE1
Weedon, MN1
Lonergan, M1
Hamilton, WT1
Sattar, N2
Janmohamed, S1
Holman, RR3
Pearson, ER2
Aldobeaban, S1
Mzahim, B1
Alshehri, AA1
Qian, D1
Zhang, T2
Tan, X1
Zheng, P1
Liang, Z1
Xie, J2
Jiang, J1
Situ, B1
Hunter, RW1
Hughey, CC1
Lantier, L1
Sundelin, EI1
Peggie, M1
Zeqiraj, E1
Sicheri, F1
Jessen, N1
Wasserman, DH1
Sakamoto, K1
Yu, M2
Zhang, R1
Lin, J1
O'Neill, EA4
Chen, G1
Tu, Y2
Jian, Z1
Cheng, T1
Raulefs, S1
Shi, K1
Steiger, K1
Maeritz, N1
Kleigrewe, K1
Hofmann, T1
Benitz, S1
Bruns, P1
Lamp, D1
Jastroch, M1
Akkan, J1
Jäger, C1
Huang, P1
Nie, S1
Shen, S1
Zou, X1
Ceyhan, GO1
Michalski, CW1
Friess, H1
Kleeff, J1
Kong, B1
Saraiva, GL1
Takahara, M1
Shiraiwa, T1
Katakami, N1
Maeno, Y1
Yamamoto, K1
Shiraiwa, Y1
Yoshida, Y1
Matsuoka, TA1
Shimomura, I1
Min, JY2
Griffin, MR2
Chipman, J1
Hackstadt, AJ1
Greevy, RA2
Grijalva, CG2
Hung, AM2
Roumie, CL2
Roussel, R1
Duran-García, S5
Shah, S1
Darmiento, C1
Golm, GT2
Lam, RLH1
Bonadonna, RC1
Yale, JF2
Brulle-Wohlhueter, C1
Boëlle-Le Corfec, E1
Choudhary, P1
Bailey, TS3
Cukierman-Yaffe, T1
Bosch, J1
Jung, H1
Punthakee, Z1
Gerstein, HC2
Handelsman, Y2
Kurlyandskaya, R1
Gu, T1
Ma, J3
Zhang, Q1
Zhang, H1
Xu, L2
Cheng, J1
Shi, B2
Li, D2
Shao, J1
Sun, Z1
Zhong, S1
Bi, Y1
Zhu, D1
Khaloo, P1
Asadi Komeleh, S1
Alemi, H1
Mansournia, MA1
Mohammadi, A1
Yadegar, A1
Afarideh, M1
Esteghamati, S1
Nakhjavani, M1
Esteghamati, A1
Berry, DC1
Thomas, SD1
Dorman, KF1
Ivins, AR1
de Los Angeles Abreu, M1
Young, L1
Bashir, M1
Dabbous, Z1
Baagar, K1
Elkhatib, F1
Ibrahim, A1
Brich, SA1
Abdel-Rahman, ME1
Konje, JC1
Abou-Samra, AB1
Khedkar, A1
Lebovitz, H1
Fleming, A1
Cherrington, A1
Jose, V1
Athalye, SN1
Vishweswaramurthy, A1
Gallo, S1
Goldman, A1
Huyck, S1
Darekar, A1
Madsen, KS1
Kähler, P1
Kähler, LKA1
Madsbad, S3
Gnesin, F1
Metzendorf, MI1
Richter, B1
Hemmingsen, B3
Elgendy, M1
Cirò, M1
Hosseini, A1
Weiszmann, J1
Mazzarella, L1
Ferrari, E1
Cazzoli, R1
Curigliano, G1
DeCensi, A1
Bonanni, B1
Budillon, A1
Pelicci, PG1
Janssens, V1
Ogris, M1
Baccarini, M1
Lanfrancone, L1
Weckwerth, W1
Foiani, M1
Minucci, S1
Chen, Z1
Li, G1
Momcilovic, M1
Shackelford, DB1
Perl, S2
Lee, RH1
Sloane, R1
Pieper, C1
Lyles, KW1
Adler, RA1
Van Houtven, C1
LaFleur, J1
Colón-Emeric, C1
Kopecky, C1
Meneghini, L1
Demissie, M1
Nazeri, A1
Hollander, P2
Wilson, C3
Fleck, P3
Bader, G1
Geransar, P2
Schweizer, A2
Al-Abri, SA1
Hayashi, S1
Thoren, KL1
Olson, KR1
Quilliam, BJ1
Ozbay, AB1
Sill, BE1
Kogut, SJ1
Barkin, JA1
Block, HM1
Mendez, PE1
Pinget, M1
Muehlen-Bartmer, I1
Lapuerta, P2
Zambrowicz, B2
Powell, DR1
Ogbaa, I2
Freiman, J1
Cefalu, WT2
Banks, P2
Frazier, K1
Kelly, M1
Sands, A2
Göke, B2
Eriksson, JG1
Hellqvist, Å2
Gause-Nilsson, I2
Halimi, S1
Hanif, W2
Malik, W1
Hassanein, M2
Kamal, A1
Andrews, C1
Azam, M1
Barnett, AH5
Süfke, S1
Steinhoff, J1
Schütt, M1
Strain, WD1
Lukashevich, V3
Kothny, W3
Hoellinger, MJ1
Paldánius, PM1
Protti, A1
He, YL1
Foteinos, G1
Neelakantham, S1
Mattapalli, D1
Kulmatycki, K1
Forst, T2
Taylor, A1
Karyekar, CS1
Ravichandran, S2
Gross, JL4
Aguilar-Salinas, C1
Hissa, M1
Berglind, N1
Fleming, D1
Wu, D1
Liu, C1
Wilding, JP1
Woo, V2
Rohwedder, K5
Sugg, J3
Parikh, S4
Gitt, AK3
Bramlage, P4
Binz, C2
Krekler, M2
Deeg, E2
Tschöpe, D3
Zenari, L1
Marangoni, A1
Kim, HS1
Shin, JA1
Lee, SH1
Kim, ES2
Cho, JH1
Son, HY1
Yoon, KH5
Shadnia, S1
Barzi, F1
Askari, A1
Hassanian-Moghaddam, H1
Zamani, N1
Ebrahimian, K1
Han, Y1
Shi, JP1
Ma, AL1
Xu, Y1
Ding, XD1
Fan, JG1
Garg, SK1
Michels, AW1
Shah, VN1
Suhareva, OIu1
Chernova, TO1
Shmushkovich, IA1
Aleksandrov, AA1
Il'in, AV1
Dedov, II1
Matyjaszek-Matuszek, B1
Lenart-Lipińska, M1
Rogalska, D1
Nowakowski, A1
Araga, M1
Moses, RG1
Brook, D1
Sockler, J1
Monyak, J1
Visvanathan, J1
Montanaro, M1
Fisher, SA1
Goring, S2
Hawkins, N2
Wygant, G1
Roudaut, M2
Townsend, R2
Wood, I1
Seufert, J3
Pegelow, K1
Vora, J1
Caputo, S2
Damci, T1
Orozco-Beltran, D1
Pan, C3
Svendsen, AL1
Sølje, KS1
Svačina, S1
Veselá, V2
Haluzík, M1
Gerle, J1
Brada, M1
Dohnalová, L1
Edelsberger, T1
Houdová, J1
Consoli, A2
Di Fulvio, P1
Brady, EM1
Gray, LJ2
Saeed, MA1
Smith, D1
Jojima, T1
Aso, Y1
Mintz, ML1
Minervini, G2
Valerón, PF1
de Pablos-Velasco, PL1
Reyes García, R1
Mezquita Raya, P1
Maffioli, P3
Derosa, G4
Rodbard, HW6
Cariou, B3
Zinman, B3
Wolden, ML1
Rana, A1
Seino, Y1
Takami, A1
Boka, G1
Raccah, D2
Park, CY2
Kang, JG1
Noh, J1
Oh, SJ1
Lee, CB2
Park, SW3
Yu Pan, C1
Yan, S1
Feng, P1
Zhou, Z1
Tian, H1
Jin Kui, Y1
Su, B1
Shang, S1
Gourdy, P1
Sagnard, L1
Ceriello, A2
Onaca, A1
Cleall, S2
Rodríguez, A1
Cheng, Q1
Yang, S1
Zhao, C1
Feng, Z1
Li, R1
Ye, P1
Zhang, S2
Deng, H1
Zhou, B1
Long, J1
Gong, L1
Qing, H1
Luo, C1
Bajaj, M1
Gilman, R1
Patel, S4
Kempthorne-Rawson, J1
Lewis-D'Agostino, D1
Bonaventura, A1
Bianchi, L1
Romano, D1
Fogari, E2
D'Angelo, A2
Wysham, C2
Blevins, T1
Arakaki, R1
Colon, G1
Garcia, P1
Atisso, C1
Kuhstoss, D1
Lakshmanan, M2
Krentz, AJ1
Morrow, L1
Petersson, M1
Norjavaara, E1
Hompesch, M1
Langkilde, AM1
Parikh, SJ1
Jelaska, A1
Frappin, G1
Broedl, UC5
Tahrani, AA1
Home, PD1
Bolli, GB1
Landgraf, W2
Candelas, C1
Pilorget, V1
Dain, MP2
Riddle, MC3
Agarwal, SK1
Singh, BK1
Wadhwa, R1
Diamant, M3
Shaginian, R1
Malone, JK3
Reaney, M2
de Vries, D1
Hoogwerf, BJ3
MacConell, L1
Wolffenbuttel, BH1
Sicras-Mainar, A1
Navarro-Artieda, R1
Zintzaras, E1
Miligkos, M1
Ziakas, P1
Balk, EM1
Mademtzoglou, D1
Doxani, C1
Mprotsis, T1
Gowri, R1
Xanthopoulou, P1
Mpoulimari, I1
Kokkali, C1
Dimoulou, G1
Rodopolou, P1
Stefanidis, I1
Kent, DM1
Hadjigeorgiou, GM1
Buse, JB5
Vilsbøll, T3
Thurman, J1
Blevins, TC1
Langbakke, IH2
Bøttcher, SG1
Camisasca, R1
Reusch, J1
Stewart, MW1
Perkins, CM1
Cirkel, DT1
Ye, J2
Perry, CR1
Reinhardt, RR1
Bode, BW2
Smolen, HJ1
Murphy, DR1
Gahn, JC1
Curtis, BH1
Owens, DR1
Traylor, L2
Arias, P1
Langslet, G2
Balis, DA1
Millington, D1
Vercruysse, F1
Canovatchel, W3
Meininger, G2
Fournier, M1
Germe, M1
Theobald, K1
Scholz, GH1
Lehmacher, W1
Khalangot, M1
Kovtun, V1
Ampudia-Blasco, FJ2
Benhamou, PY1
Charpentier, G1
Tack, C1
Phan, TM1
Stoevelaar, H1
Zee, P1
Cook, W5
Hirshberg, B5
Bryzinski, B1
Abdul-Ghani, MA1
Puckett, C1
Triplitt, C1
Maggs, D1
Adams, J1
Cersosimo, E1
Lecube, A1
Bueno, M1
Suárez, X1
Brietzke, SA1
Portela, LV1
Gnoatto, J1
Brochier, AW1
Haas, CB1
de Assis, AM1
de Carvalho, AK1
Hansel, G1
Zimmer, ER1
Oses, JP1
Muller, AP1
Kaneko, S1
Chow, F1
Choi, DS1
Taneda, S1
Hirao, K1
Andersen, TH2
Gall, MA1
Christiansen, JS2
Abegg, K1
Corteville, C1
Docherty, NG1
Boza, C1
Lutz, TA1
Muñoz, R1
le Roux, CW2
Simmons, D1
Lewin, A2
Liu, D1
Kaste, R1
Rosales, R1
Abou Jaoude, E1
Al-Arouj, M1
Fawwad, A1
Orabi, A1
Shah, P1
DiTommaso, S1
Vaz, J1
Latif, ZA1
Matthaei, S5
Bowering, K2
Grohl, A1
Balsells, M1
García-Patterson, A1
Solà, I1
Roqué, M1
Gich, I1
Corcoy, R1
George, A1
Mathews, JE1
Sam, D1
Beck, M1
Benjamin, SJ1
Abraham, A1
Antonisamy, B1
Jana, AK1
Thomas, N1
Ayvaz, G1
Keskin, L1
Akin, F1
Dokmetas, HS1
Tasan, E1
Ar, IB1
Uren, E1
Henry, RR1
Wu, H1
Durrwell, L1
Mingrino, R1
Jaekel, K1
El Azzouzi, B1
Andjelkovic, M1
Herz, M1
Nauck, M2
Maffei, L1
Theuerkauf, A1
Tanaka, K1
Saisho, Y1
Kawai, T2
Tanaka, M1
Meguro, S2
Irie, J1
Imai, T1
Shigihara, T1
Morimoto, J1
Yajima, K1
Atsumi, Y1
Takei, I1
Itoh, H2
Amin, NB2
Wang, X4
Jain, SM1
Lee, DS1
Nucci, G1
Rusnak, JM1
Jia, W2
Xiao, X1
Ji, Q2
Chuang, LM1
Bao, Y2
Pang, C1
Gao, F1
Li, P1
Schernthaner, G2
Hanefeld, M2
Niskanen, L1
Östgren, CJ1
Malvolti, E1
Goldman-Levine, JD1
Tanizawa, Y1
Taniguchi, A1
Koiwai, K1
Chen, Y2
Abdelkader, D1
Hassan, W1
Sun, H1
Charokopou, M1
McEwan, P3
Lister, S1
Callan, L1
Bergenheim, K3
Tolley, K1
Postema, R1
Rosas-Guzmán, J1
Dotta, F2
Guerci, B3
Simó, R1
Festa, A1
Kiljański, J1
Zhou, M1
Pall, D1
Paragh, G1
Denney, WS1
Le, V1
Riggs, M1
Calle, RA1
Meier, JJ1
Hincelin-Méry, A1
Roy-Duval, C2
Delfolie, A1
Coester, HV1
Menge, BA1
Kapitza, C1
Sharma, MP1
Kar, SK1
Mearns, ES1
Sobieraj, DM1
White, CM1
Saulsberry, WJ1
Kohn, CG1
Doleh, Y1
Zaccaro, E1
Coleman, CI2
Yang, M1
Woloschak, M1
McGill, JB3
Yki-Järvinen, H5
Crowe, S1
von Eynatten, M2
Deng, J1
Shi, L1
Dong, H2
Gough, SC3
Woo, VC1
Linjawi, S1
Zacho, M1
Reiter, PD1
Jennings, AS1
Lovett, AJ1
George, TM1
Jennings, JS1
Hong, AR1
Lee, J2
Hwangbo, Y1
Moon, JH1
Choi, SH1
Jang, HC2
Papazafiropoulou, A1
Papanas, N1
Pappas, S1
Maltezos, E1
Mikhailidis, DP1
Merker, L1
Häring, HU1
Christiansen, AV1
Roux, F1
Meinicke, T1
Benroubi, M1
Sun, JH1
Zimmermann, AG1
Pechtner, V2
van Brunt, K1
Kitwitee, P1
Limwattananon, S1
Limwattananon, C1
Waleekachonlert, O1
Ratanachotpanich, T1
Phimphilai, M1
Nguyen, TV1
Pongchaiyakul, C1
Rajpathak, SN1
Fu, C1
Brodovicz, K1
Heaton, PC1
Skyler, JS2
Fonseca, VA1
Segal, KR1
Ahmann, A1
Lahtela, JT1
de Loredo, L1
Tornøe, K1
Boopalan, A1
Zhong, X1
Wei, X1
Qin, Y1
Jin, Z1
Chen, Q1
Ma, X1
He, J1
Ranetti, AE1
Ekholm, E2
Catrinoiu, D1
Celiński, A1
Kvist, K1
Chan, SP2
Colagiuri, S1
Dungan, KM1
Raz, I1
Skrivanek, Z1
Sealls, W1
Fahrbach, JL1
Ma, Z1
Chen, R1
Yu, P1
Chirila, C1
Zheng, Q1
Davenport, E1
Kaschinski, D1
Pfarr, E2
Hach, T1
Palencia, R1
Hinnen, D1
Ou, SM1
Shih, CJ1
Chao, PW1
Chu, H1
Kuo, SC1
Lee, YJ1
Wang, SJ1
Yang, CY1
Lin, CC1
Chen, TJ1
Tarng, DC1
Li, SY1
Chen, YT1
Reid, T1
Gao, L1
Gill, J2
Stuhr, A1
Vlajnic, A1
Rhinehart, A1
Schneider, S1
Hehnke, U1
Thiemann, S2
Lozano-Ortega, G1
Bennett, HA1
Sternhufvud, C1
Mukherjee, J1
Bekiari, E1
Rizava, C1
Athanasiadou, E1
Papatheodorou, K1
Liakos, A1
Karagiannis, T2
Mainou, M1
Rika, M1
Boura, P1
Tsapas, A2
Zhang, M1
Tong, N1
Pettus, J1
McNabb, B1
Eckel, RH1
Dhalla, A1
Guan, S1
Jochelson, P1
Belardinelli, L1
Henry, RH1
Li, W2
Zeng, J1
Li, C1
Lyu, X1
Li, X2
Qu, S1
Xu, X1
Jiang, Z1
Zheng, B1
Bu, R1
Liu, Z1
Yan, L1
Lei, M1
Song, Q1
Wang, JS1
Lin, SD1
Su, SL1
Tu, ST1
Tseng, YH1
Lin, SY1
Elasy, T1
Weinrauch, LA1
D'Elia, JA1
Finn, P1
Lewis, EF1
Desai, AS1
Claggett, BL1
Cooper, ME1
Wan Seman, WJ1
Kori, N1
Rajoo, S1
Othman, H1
Mohd Noor, N1
Wahab, NA1
Sukor, N1
Mustafa, N1
Kamaruddin, NA1
Lundby-Christensen, L2
Tarnow, L3
Boesgaard, TW2
Lund, SS3
Wiinberg, N2
Perrild, H2
Krarup, T2
Snorgaard, O2
Gade-Rasmussen, B2
Thorsteinsson, B2
Røder, M2
Mathiesen, ER3
Jensen, T2
Vestergaard, H2
Hedetoft, C2
Breum, L2
Duun, E2
Sneppen, SB2
Pedersen, O3
Carstensen, B2
Gluud, C2
Wetterslev, J2
Vaag, A2
Almdal, TP2
Pérez Manghi, F1
García-Hernández, P2
Norwood, P1
Lehmann, L1
Tarp-Johansen, MJ1
Aroda, VR2
Raskin, P2
Zacho, J1
Philis-Tsimikas, A1
Zang, L1
Geng, J1
Luo, Y1
Bian, F2
Sun, Y1
Bosch-Traberg, H2
Zhou, K1
Pedersen, HK1
Dawed, AY1
Allas, S1
Delale, T1
Ngo, N1
Julien, M1
Sahakian, P1
Ritter, J1
Abribat, T1
van der Lely, AJ1
Hansen, CT1
Xu, H1
Wagner, R1
Raju, A1
Shetty, S1
Cai, B1
D'Souza, AO1
Cao, A1
Fung, A1
Pfeifer, M1
Alba, M1
Bryson, A1
Jennings, PE1
Deak, L1
Paveliu, FS1
Lawson, M1
Schwartz, SS1
Jellinger, PS1
Herman, ME1
Gentile, S1
Wardecki, M1
Perfetti, R2
Heller, S1
D'Alessio, D1
Jia, N1
Botros, FT1
Silvestre, L1
Zhou, T1
Fonseca, V3
Rizzo, M1
Johnson, A1
Madsen, J1
Gautier, JF1
Monguillon, P1
Verier-Mine, O1
Valensi, P1
Fiquet, B1
Dejager, S4
Eriksson, JW2
Bodegard, J2
Nathanson, D2
Thuresson, M2
Nyström, T2
Norhammar, A2
Jeschke, MG1
Abdullahi, A1
Burnett, M1
Rehou, S1
Stanojcic, M1
Takács, R1
Rao, PV1
Tsoukas, GM1
Thomsen, AB1
Maislos, M1
Chin, A1
Ji, LN2
Pan, CY1
Lu, JM1
Zhu, DL1
Li, QF1
Peng, YD1
Tian, HM1
Yao, C1
Zhao, ZG1
Wang, L1
Wang, BH1
van Dalem, J1
Brouwers, MC1
Stehouwer, CD3
Krings, A1
Leufkens, HG1
Driessen, JH1
de Vries, F1
Burden, AM1
Andersen, SE1
Christensen, M1
Sabapathy, S1
Neslusan, C1
Yoong, K1
Teschemaker, A1
Johansen, P1
Willis, M1
Patel, CA1
Bailey, RA1
Vijapurkar, U1
Blonde, L2
Farrant, MT1
Williamson, K1
Battin, M1
Hague, WM2
Rowan, JA2
Romera, I1
Pérez, A1
Ariño, B1
Giljanovic Kis, S1
Naderali, E1
Han, KA3
Yu, J1
Moon, MK1
Kim, DJ2
Kim, M1
Wongtanate, M1
Kim, EY1
Kim, SH1
van Dijk, P1
Bouma, A1
Landman, GW1
Groenier, KH1
Bilo, H1
Kleefstra, N2
van Hateren, KJ2
Boulin, M1
Diaby, V1
Tannenbaum, C1
Lipska, KJ1
Yao, X1
Herrin, J1
McCoy, RG1
Ross, JS1
Steinman, MA1
Gill, TM1
Krumholz, HM1
Shah, ND1
Pecoits-Filho, R1
Fortes, J1
Volaco, A1
Vencio, S1
Sposito, AC1
Cusi, K1
Sanyal, AJ1
Chang, AM1
Jacober, SJ1
Bue-Valleskey, JM1
Higdon, AN1
Bastyr, EJ1
Haupt, A1
Hartman, ML1
Nordaby, M1
Götz, S1
Maldonado-Lutomirsky, M1
Broglio, F1
Mannucci, E3
Napoli, R1
Purrello, F1
Nikonova, E1
Stager, W1
Trevisan, R1
de Lapertosa, SB1
Frechtel, G1
Sauque-Reyna, L1
Wei, C1
Ohman, P1
Davidson, JA1
Sloan, L1
Zeng, Y1
Yu, D1
Hu, X1
Kaku, K1
Sumino, S1
Katou, M1
Nishiyama, Y1
Kinugawa, Y1
Petrie, JR1
Chaturvedi, N1
Ford, I1
Hramiak, I1
Hughes, AD1
Jenkins, AJ1
E Klein, B1
Klein, R1
Ooi, TC1
Rossing, P1
Colhoun, HM1
Gordon, J1
Evans, M2
Puelles, J1
Sinclair, A1
Ahn, CH1
Yu, JM1
Nam, JY1
Oh, TK1
Lee, HW1
Kim, J1
Chung, CH2
Kim, BJ1
Park, HK1
Lee, KJ1
Kim, SW1
Park, JH1
Ko, KP1
Kim, CH1
Lee, H1
Park, KS2
Zheng, S1
Wu, F1
Fujita, KP1
Crowley, MJ1
Diamantidis, CJ1
McDuffie, JR1
Cameron, CB1
Stanifer, JW1
Mock, CK1
Tang, S1
Nagi, A1
Kosinski, AS1
Williams, JW1
Hong, SM1
Hwang, DM1
Mok, JO1
Kuang, J1
Kadir, AA1
Lee, D1
Nachum, Z1
Zafran, N1
Salim, R1
Hissin, N1
Hasanein, J1
Gam Ze Letova, Y1
Suleiman, A1
Yefet, E1
Ou, HT1
Chang, KC1
Li, CY1
Wu, JS1
Brown, J1
Martis, R1
Hughes, B1
Crowther, CA1
Zibar, L1
Zibar, K1
Al Khalifah, RA1
Alnhdi, A1
Alghar, H1
Alanazi, M1
Florez, ID1
Ebrahim, I1
Blockman, M1
Peng, XV1
Marcinak, JF1
Raanan, MG1
Cao, C1
Du, J1
Fang, H1
Xu, F1
Shen, L1
Xu, C1
Shelbaya, S1
Rakha, S1
Lundberg, GD1
Bodmer, M1
Meier, C1
Krähenbühl, S1
Jick, SS1
Meier, CR1
Esposito, K1
Ciotola, M1
Maiorino, MI1
Gualdiero, R1
Schisano, B1
Beneduce, F1
Feola, G1
Giugliano, D3
Jermendy, G2
Erdesz, D1
Nagy, L1
Yin, D3
Phatak, H1
Karve, S1
Engel, S1
Balkrishnan, R1
De Mattia, G1
Laurenti, O1
Moretti, A1
Chan, JY2
Leyk, M1
Frier, BM2
Tan, MH1
Milicevic, Z2
Hancu, N1
Car, N1
Ivanyi, T1
Schwarzenhofer, M1
de Jager, J1
Bets, D1
Wulffelé, MG1
Donker, AJ1
Juurinen, L1
Tiikkainen, M2
Saltevo, J1
Nikkilä, K2
Lanki, H1
Leppävuori, E1
Kock, T1
Teikari-Myyrä, T1
Kauppinen-Mäkelin, R2
Kotronen, A1
Hamnvik, OP1
McMahon, GT1
Bosi, E1
Cucinotta, D2
Smirnova, O1
Kanc, K1
le Devehat, C1
Wojciechowska, M1
López de la Torre, M1
Liebl, A1
Bolli, G1
Colin, L1
Minic, B1
Goodman, M1
Reinhardt, R1
Lyness, W1
Devendra, D1
Gohel, B1
Bravis, V1
Hui, E1
Salih, S1
Mehar, S1
Cuddihy, R1
Arakaki, RF1
Belin, RM1
Planquois, JM1
Lyons, JN1
Heilmann, CR1
Farmer, AJ1
Levy, JC1
Darbyshire, JL1
Keenan, JF1
Paul, SK1
Frandsen, M1
Nielsen, BB1
Hansen, BV1
Parving, HH1
Vaag, AA1
Ng, JM1
Mellor, DD1
Masson, EA1
Allan, BJ1
Da Silva, D1
Zancan, P1
Coelho, WS1
Gomez, LS1
Sola-Penna, M1
Margolis, KL1
O'Connor, PJ1
Sperl-Hillen, JM1
Phung, OJ1
Scholle, JM1
Talwar, M1
Kan, H1
Hermansen, K2
Kolotkin, RL1
Hammer, M1
Zdravkovic, M1
Matthews, D1
Lavernia, F1
Marsh, KA1
Steinbeck, KS1
Atkinson, FS1
Petocz, P1
Brand-Miller, JC1
Silva, JC1
Pacheco, C1
Bizato, J1
de Souza, BV1
Ribeiro, TE1
Bertini, AM1
Matthews, DR2
Ferrannini, E1
Couturier, A1
Foley, JE1
Zhao, TY1
Li, F1
Xiong, ZY1
Macisaac, RJ1
Jerums, G1
Campbell, RK1
Cobble, ME1
Reid, TS1
Shomali, ME1
Plate, T1
Eriksson, J1
Ntaios, G1
Savopoulos, C1
Chatzopoulos, S1
Mikhailidis, D1
Hatzitolios, A1
Cosmi, F1
Cosmi, D1
Weir, MA1
Gomes, T1
Mamdani, M1
Juurlink, DN1
Hackam, DG1
Mahon, JL1
Jain, AK1
Garg, AX1
Levit, S1
Toledano, Y1
Wainstein, J1
Pettersson, B1
Rosenqvist, U1
Deleskog, A1
Journath, G1
Wändell, P1
Arechavaleta, R1
Seck, T2
Krobot, KJ2
Duran, L1
Williams-Herman, D2
Goldstein, BJ3
Raslova, K1
Skjøth, TV1
Råstam, J1
Liutkus, JF1
Böhmer, M1
Segiet, T1
Mölle, A1
Milek, K1
Becker, B1
Helsberg, K1
Petto, H1
Peters, N1
Bachmann, O1
Monami, M1
Cremasco, F1
Lamanna, C1
Marchionni, N1
Surendiran, A1
Pradhan, SC1
Agrawal, A1
Subrahmanyam, DK1
Rajan, S1
Anichavezhi, D1
Adithan, C1
Seck, TL1
Williams-Herman, DE1
Sisk, CM1
Wang, H1
Zhou, R1
Leahy, J1
Kramer, CK1
Leitão, CB1
Viana, LV1
Schaan, BD1
Pinto, LC1
Rodrigues, TC1
Azevedo, MJ1
Crasto, W1
Jarvis, J2
Skinner, TC2
Brela, J1
Troughton, J1
Daly, H1
Lawrence, IG2
McNally, PG2
Carey, ME1
Petznick, A1
Spaans, EA1
Aanstoot, HJ1
Bilo, HJ1
Brand, PL1
Gupta, PS1
Green, AN1
Chowdhury, TA1
McIntosh, B1
Cameron, C1
Singh, SR1
Yu, C1
Ahuja, T1
Welton, NJ1
Dahl, M1
Gu, Y1
Hou, X1
Pan, J1
Cai, Q1
Fenske, WK1
Pournaras, DJ1
Aasheim, ET1
Miras, AD1
Scopinaro, N1
Scholtz, S1
Ringholm, L1
Damm, P1
Yoshino, T1
Soeda, Y1
Itoh, A1
Violante, R1
Oliveira, JH1
Reed, VA1
Yu, MB1
Bachmann, OP1
Lüdemann, J1
Paschos, P1
Paletas, K1
Miller, DK1
Brinson, AJ1
Catalano, G1
Catalano, MC1
Lund, A1
Knop, FK1
Tornio, A1
Niemi, M1
Neuvonen, PJ1
Backman, JT1
Liu, SC1
Tu, YK1
Chien, MN1
Chien, KL1
Polidori, D1
Zhao, Y1
Arbit, D1
Usiskin, K1
Capuano, G1
Naha, K1
Vivek, G1
Dasari, S1
Prabhu, M1
Inkster, B1
Zammitt, NN1
Ferrante, SA1
Meininger, GE1
Nigam, S1
Virdi, NS1
Daskiran, M1
Kozma, CM1
Paris, A1
Dickson, WM1
Yuan, GH1
Song, WL1
Guo, XH1
Harper, R1
Toorawa, R1
Penfornis, A1
Bourdel-Marchasson, I1
Quere, S1
Niromanesh, S1
Alavi, A1
Sharbaf, FR1
Amjadi, N1
Moosavi, S1
Akbari, S1
Pellegrini, F1
Perriello, G2
Sbraccia, P1
Stein, SA1
Lamos, EM1
Marre, M2
Howlett, H2
Allavoine, T2
Scannapieco, G1
Franzoso, F1
Grasso, M1
Garber, A2
Cornes, M1
Lepore, C1
Iacobellis, G1
Merante, D1
Antonucci, G1
Beattie, SD1
Campaigne, BN2
Johnson, PA1
Howard, AS1
Jakob, S1
Linn, T1
Haslbeck, M1
Tan, HH1
McMurdo, ME1
Morris, AD1
Janka, HU2
Plewe, G2
Kliebe-Frisch, C1
Schweitzer, MA1
Bai, S1
Reviriego, J1
Augendre-Ferrante, B1
Feinglos, M1
Dailey, G1
Cefalu, W1
Osei, K1
Tayek, J1
Chaiken, R1
Kourides, I1
Brunetti, P1
Pagano, G1
Turco, C1
Gori, M1
Benavides, S1
Striet, J1
Germak, J1
Nahata, MC1
Kvapil, M1
Swatko, A1
Hilberg, C1
Shestakova, M1
Klein, E1
Bruce, S1
Sankoh, S1
Mohideen, P1
Gaddi, AV1
Piccinni, MN1
Salvadeo, S1
Ciccarelli, L1
Ghelfi, M1
Ferrari, I1
Cicero, AF1
Vähätalo, M1
Virtamo, H1
Tulokas, T1
Hulme, S1
Hardy, K1
McNulty, S1
Hänninen, J1
Levänen, H1
Lahdenperä, S1
Lehtonen, R1
Ryysy, L1
Dreyer, M1
Lange, P1
Serdarevic-Pehar, M1
Soderstrom, J1
Murray, L1
Daly, FF1
Little, M1
Harris, SB1
Issa, M1
Stewart, JA1
Dempsey, E1
Kann, PH1
Wascher, T1
Zackova, V1
Moeller, J1
Medding, J1
Szocs, A1
Mokan, M1
Mrevlje, F1
Regulski, M1
Busch, K1
Thaware, PK1
Tringham, JR1
Howe, J1
Johnston, V1
Kitchener, DL1
Durán García, S1
Milton, DR1
Giaconia, JM1
Kim, DD1
Trautmann, ME2
Brodows, RG1
Ristic, S1
Collober-Maugeais, C1
Cressier, F1
Tang, P1
Pecher, E1
Kipnes, M1
Luo, E1
Fanurik, D1
Khatami, H1
Stein, P1
Talwalkar, PG1
Deotale, P1
Schwarz, SL1
Gerich, JE1
Marcellari, A1
Jean-Louis, L1
Purkayastha, D1
Baron, MA1
Schiel, R1
Hamann, A1
Garcia-Puig, J1
Paul, G1
Donaldson, J1
Stewart, M1
Burger, J1
Johns, D1
Brodows, R1
Kendall, DM1
Roberts, A1
Ushakova, O1
Sokolovskaya, V1
Morozova, A1
Valeeva, F1
Zanozina, O1
Sazonova, O1
Zhadanova, E1
Starceva, M1
Kazakova, E1
Saifullina, M1
Shapiro, I1
Tarasov, A1
Al-Tayar, B1
Starkova, N1
Wolpert, HA1
Belsey, J1
Krishnarajah, G3
Vexiau, P1
Mavros, P2
Lyu, R2
Alvarez Guisasola, F1
Tofé Povedano, S1
Gabbay, Mde A1
Gao, W1
Battin, MR1
Moore, MP1
Ecker, JL1
Greene, MF1
Campbell, IW2
Furst, P1
Turner, RC1
Moses, R1
Rutten, GE1
Fruehwald-Schultes, B1
Kern, W1
Oltmanns, KM1
Sopke, S1
Toschek, B1
Born, J1
Fehm, HL1
Peters, A1
Reynolds, RM1
Walker, JD1
Zitzmann, S1
Reimann, IR1
Schmechel, H1
Torella, R1
Improta, L1
Scognamiglio, G1
Luyckx, A1
Binder, D1
Lefebvre, P1
Gill, G1
Levy, JM1
Stoll, C1
Amar, U1
Thierry, R1
Segura, N1
Bouaziz, M1
Hadden, DR1
Bhatia, SK1
Montgomery, DA1
Losert, W1
Schillinger, E1
Kraaz, W1
Loge, O1
Jahn, P1
Mirouze, J1
Jaffiol, C1
Mary, P1
Chhetri, MK1
Loubatières, A1
Mariani, MM1
Jallet, F1
Clarke, BF1
Duncan, LJ1
Sigstad, H1
Harris, EL1

Clinical Trials (146)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Randomized, 24 Week, Active-controlled, Open-label, 3-arm, Parallel-group Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of iGlarLixi to Insulin Glargine and Lixisenatide in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Insufficiently Controlled With Oral Anti[NCT03798054]Phase 3878 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-15Completed
Effect of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Insulin Aspart Three Times Daily, Both as Add on to Metformin and Optimised Insulin Glargine (U100) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes A 52-week, Multi-centre, Multinational, Open-label, Active-controlled, Two Armed,[NCT03689374]Phase 32,274 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-01Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CS02 Tablet in Combination With Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Alone[NCT03317028]Phase 2201 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-10Completed
A Randomised Placebo Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Early MEtformin in Addition to Usual Care in the Reduction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Effects (EMERGE)[NCT02980276]Phase 3535 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-06Completed
A 24 Week Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Efficacy and Safety Trial of Once Daily Linagliptin, 5 Milligrams Orally, as Add on to Basal Insulin in Elderly Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Insufficient Glycaemic Control[NCT02240680]Phase 4302 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-23Completed
A 52-week International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3bTrial With a Blinded 104-week Long -Term Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin Co-administered With Dapagliflozin in C[NCT02419612]Phase 3444 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-14Completed
A 26-Week, Multi-Center, Open-label, Randomized, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Treatment Regimens in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes After Short-Term Intensive Insulin Therapy: Basal Insulin Based Treatment (With Prandial O[NCT03359837]Phase 4384 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-20Completed
A 28-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Study With a 24-week Extension Phase Followed by a 52-week Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Simultaneous Administration of Exenatide Once Weekly 2 mg and Da[NCT02229396]Phase 3695 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-04Completed
An Investigational Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Once Weekly NNC0148-0287 C (Insulin 287) Versus Once Daily Insulin Glargine, Both in Combination With Metformin, With or Without DPP-4 Inhibitors, in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT03751657]Phase 2247 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-29Completed
Effect of Metformin on Healthy Live Birth After In-vitro Fertilization in Women With Prediabetes Mellitus: a Multicenter Double-blind Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial[NCT06064669]988 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-01Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Quadruple Therapy on Pancreatic Islet Function, Insulin Resistance and Cardiovascular Function in Patients With Mixed Prediabetes and Obesity: Randomized Clinical Trial[NCT04131582]Phase 334 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-01Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of the Addition of MK-3102 to Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Therapy[NCT01755156]Phase 3402 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-11Completed
A Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DUAL™ V - Basal Insulin Switch)[NCT01952145]Phase 3557 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-20Completed
Study of Metformin HCL in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Intensively Treated With Insulin: a Treatment Strategy for Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT00375388]Phase 3400 participants Interventional1998-01-31Completed
The Effect of Vildagliptin Based Treatment Versus Sulfonylurea on Glycemic Variability, Oxidative Stress, GLP-1, and Endothelial Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01404676]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Efficacy, Safety & Tolerability of Combination of Ertugliflozin and Sitagliptin in Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus[NCT05556291]190 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-12-01Recruiting
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Ertugliflozin (MK-8835/PF-04971729) With Sitagliptin Compared With Ertugliflozin Alone and Sitagliptin Alone, in the Treatment of Subjects W[NCT02099110]Phase 31,233 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-22Completed
Use of Combination Empagliflozin/Linagliptin or Dapagliflozin/Saxagliptin vs Empagliflozin or Dapagliflozin Alone, Subclinical Inflammation of the Genito-urinary Tract and Risk of Infections.[NCT04735042]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-10-07Recruiting
A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Oral Administration of BI 10773 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg and BI 10773 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg Fixed Dose Combination Tablets Compared With the Indivi[NCT01422876]Phase 31,405 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Combined Therapy Glimepiride / Vildagliptin / Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With Dual Treatment Failure[NCT04841096]Phase 3172 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-21Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Add-On Therapy With Saxagliptin and Dapagliflozin Added to Metformin Compared to Add-On Therapy With Saxagliptin in Combinatio[NCT01606007]Phase 31,282 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of the Continuation of Sitagliptin Compared With the Withdrawal of Sitagliptin During Initiation and Titration of Insulin Glargine (LANT[NCT02738879]Phase 3746 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-09Completed
A Multicenter, International Randomized, 2x2 Factorial Design Study to Evaluate the Effects of Lantus (Insulin Glargine) Versus Standard Care, and of Omega-3 Fatty Acids Versus Placebo, in Reducing Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in High Risk Peopl[NCT00069784]Phase 312,537 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin and Glimepiride in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Controlled Inadequately With Metformin Monotherapy (SPECIFY Study) : a 48-week, Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label Trial[NCT02280486]Phase 4388 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Medical Optimization of Management of Type 2 Diabetes Complicating Pregnancy[NCT02932475]Phase 3831 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-25Terminated (stopped due to Recommendation by the DSMB that the study be stopped for futility)
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 26-Week Multicenter Study With a 78-Week Extension To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Ertugliflozin In Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus And Inadequate Glycemic Control On Metformin Monothe[NCT02033889]Phase 3621 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-13Completed
A 26 Week Randomised, Multinational, Open Labelled, 2 Armed, Parallel Group, Treat-to-target Once Daily Treatment Trial With Insulin Detemir Versus Insulin Glargine, Both in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00909480]Phase 4457 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 2-arm Parallel-group, Multicenter Study With a 24-week Main Treatment Period and an Extension Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of AVE0010 on Top of Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not Adequate[NCT00763815]Phase 3484 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Effects of Lixisenatide on Gastric Emptying, Glycaemia and 'Postprandial' Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes and Healthy Subjects.[NCT02308254]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-11-30Recruiting
A 52-Week International, Multi-centre, Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Phase III Study With a 52-Week Extension Period to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saxagliptin in Combination With Metformin Compared With Sulphonylure[NCT00575588]Phase 3891 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 24 Weeks Treatment With Vildagliptin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients ≥ 70 Years (Drug-naive or Inadequately Controlled on Oral Agents)[NCT01257451]Phase 3431 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Pilot Study to Assess the Difference in Glycemic Profiles Between Vildagliptin and Glimepiride Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device[NCT01262586]Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
A Randomised Controlled Trial for People With Established Type 2 Diabetes During Ramadan: Canagliflozin (Invokana™) vs. Standard Dual Therapy Regimen: The 'Can Do Ramadan' Study[NCT02694263]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
"A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BMS-477118 in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Alone"[NCT00121667]Phase 31,462 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin (BMS477118) in Combination With Thiazolidinedione Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control[NCT00295633]Phase 3565 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin in Combination With Metformin IR as Initial Therapy Compared to Saxagliptin Monotherapy and to Metformin IR Monotherapy in Subjects[NCT00327015]Phase 31,306 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin in Combination With Glyburide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control With Glyburide Alone[NCT00313313]Phase 3768 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin (BMS-477118) as Monotherapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control With Diet and Exercise[NCT00121641]Phase 31,035 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A 24-week International, Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study With a 80-week Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin Therapy When Added to the Therapy of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes W[NCT00673231]Phase 31,240 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Effect of Anti-diabetic Drugs on Glycemic Variability. A Comparison Between Gliclazide MR (Modified Release) and Dapagliflozin on Glycemic Variability Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes[NCT02925559]Phase 4135 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 24 Weeks Treatment With Vildagliptin 50 mg Bid as add-on Therapy to Metformin Plus Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01233622]Phase 3317 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
A Multicentre, Open Label, Observational 24-week Study to Evaluate Safety of Initiating Insulin Therapy With Levemir® (Insulin Detemir) Once-daily in Oral Antidiabetic Drug-treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00825643]18,481 participants (Actual)Observational2008-04-30Completed
Evaluation on Safety of Self-titration in Insulin naïve People With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Levemir® (Insulin Detemir) and Oral Antidiabetic Agents[NCT00740519]882 participants (Actual)Observational2008-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin Plus Metformin, Alogliptin Alone, or Metformin Alone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01023581]Phase 3784 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Insulin Glargine Combined With Sulfonylurea Versus Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.[NCT00708578]Phase 499 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Insufficiently Controlled by Metformin (With or Without Sulfonylurea): a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study With 24-week Treatment P[NCT01169779]Phase 3391 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Comparison of Twice-Daily Insulin Lispro Low Mixture Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin Glargine and Once-Daily Prandial Insulin Lispro as Insulin Intensification Strategies in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Basal Insul[NCT01175824]Phase 4478 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
A Phase III, Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study of Linagliptin 5 mg Administered Orally Once Daily Over 24 Weeks in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Insufficient Glycaemic Control Despite a Therapy of Metfor[NCT00996658]Phase 3278 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
A Study of the Effects of Dapagliflozin on Ambulatory Aortic Pressure, Arterial Stiffness and Urine Albumin Excretion in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT02887677]Phase 485 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Terminated (stopped due to On February 2019 Astra-Zeneca Greece decided to stop the financial support of the study.)
Effectiveness of the Treatment With Dapagliflozin and Metformin Compared to Metformin Monotherapy for Weight Loss on Diabetic and Prediabetic Patients With Obesity Class III[NCT03968224]Phase 2/Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-07Recruiting
SGLT-2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Effects on Appetite and Weight Regulation: A Randomised Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial (The SEESAW Study)[NCT02798744]Phase 468 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Completed
Comparative Effects of Empagliflozin Versus Glimepiride After 26-weeks of Treatment Add on Metformin on Myocardial Metabolic Rate of Glucose Estimated Through 18FDG-PET in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT04183868]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Safety and Efficacy Study of BI 10773 (10 mg and 25 mg Administered Orally Once Daily) During 52 Weeks in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Insufficient Glycemic Control on[NCT01306214]Phase 3566 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Use of Dapagliflozin to Reduce Burden of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation (DAPA-AF) Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial[NCT04792190]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-27Completed
Superiority of Insulin Glargine Lantus vs. NPH: Treat to Normoglycemia Concept.Effect of Insulin Glargine in Comparison to Insulin NPH in Insulin-nave People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With at Least One OAD and Not Adequately Controlled[NCT00949442]Phase 4708 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Therapies: Basal Insulin/Glargine, Exenatide and Metformin Therapy (BET) or Basal Insulin/Glargine, Bolus Insulin Lispro and Metformin Therapy (BBT) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Were Previously Treated by Basal Ins[NCT00960661]Phase 31,036 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Is the Stepping-down Approach a Better Option Than Multiple Daily Injections in Patients With Chronic Poorly-controlled Diabetes on Advanced Insulin Therapy?[NCT02846233]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
Variability of Glucose Assessed in a Randomized Trial Comparing the Initiation of A Treatment Approach With Biosimilar Basal Insulin Analog Or a Titratable iGlarLixi combinatioN in Type 2 Diabetes Among South Asian Subjects (VARIATION 2 SA Trial)[NCT03819790]Phase 4119 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-02Completed
A 26-week Randomised, Parallel Two-arm, Double-blind, Multi-centre, Multinational, Treat-to-target Trial Comparing Fixed Ratio Combination of Insulin Degludec and Liraglutide With Insulin Degludec in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01392573]Phase 3413 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-28Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, 3-Arm Parallel-Group, 2-Year (104-Week), Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-28431754 Compared With Glimepiride in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Optimally Co[NCT00968812]Phase 31,452 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of LX4211 in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metfor[NCT01376557]Phase 2299 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Evaluation of the Benefit at 6 Months of a 3 Weeks Spa Treatment in the Type 2 Diabetic Patient. Multicenter Randomized Therapeutic Trial[NCT03912623]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-13Recruiting
Effectiveness and Tolerability of Novel, Initial Triple Combination Therapy With Xigduo (Dapagliflozin Plus Metformin) and Saxagliptin vs. Conventional Stepwise add-on Therapy in Drug-naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT02946632]Phase 3104 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin Added to Insulin Monotherapy or to Insulin in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Ins[NCT00757588]Phase 3455 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
A 16-wk, Uni-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Phase 3b Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of Saxagliptin + Dapagliflozin vs.Dapagliflozin With Regard to EGP in T2DM With Insufficient Glycemic Control on Metformin+/-Sulfonylurea Therapy[NCT02613897]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Effect of Dapagliflozin on the Progression From Prediabetes to T2DM in Subjects With Myocardial Infarction[NCT03658031]Phase 3576 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-01Not yet recruiting
A Pan Asian Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of NN5401 and Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Type 2 Diabetes (BOOST™: INTENSIFY ALL)[NCT01059812]Phase 3424 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-01Completed
A 24-week, Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, International Phase III Study With a 28-week Extension Period to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Dapagliflozin 10mg Once Daily in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate G[NCT01392677]Phase 3311 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Efficacy of Ipragliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes With Sulfonylurea and Metformin[NCT03076112]Phase 3170 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-25Completed
Glyburide and Metformin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing These Drugs Either vs Insulin or vs Each Other.[NCT01998113]2,509 participants (Actual)Observational2013-03-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Aleglitazar Monotherapy Compared With Placebo in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) Who Are Drug-Naïve to Anti-Hyperg[NCT01691755]Phase 3196 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED,PHASE III STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY,SAFETY AND TOLERABILITY OF ALEGLITAZAR ADDED TO A SU OR ADDED TO A SU IN COMBINATION WITH MET IN PATIENTS WITH T2D INADEQUATELY CONTROLLED WITH SU MONOTHERA[NCT01691989]Phase 3197 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
Prospective, Parallel Goups Study, Aimed to Evaluating Possible Benefits of the Treatment of New Generation Hypoglycaemic Drugs Compared to Sulphonylureas for the Tratment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT04272359]138 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2019-05-06Recruiting
A 12-Week, Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy Of Once Daily PF-04971729 And Sitagliptin On Glycemic Control And Body Weight In Adult Patients With T[NCT01059825]Phase 2375 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-24Completed
A Comparison of Premixed and Basal-Bolus Insulin Intensification Therapies in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycaemic Control on Twice-daily Premixed Insulin[NCT01175811]Phase 4402 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A 52-Week, Randomised, Double Blind, Active-Controlled, Multi-Centre Phase IIIb/IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared to Glimepiride in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycaemic Contr[NCT01006603]Phase 4957 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
A 52-week, Randomised, Multi-centre, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of BI 10773 (10 mg or 25 mg Administered Orally Once Daily) as add-on Therapy to an Oral Antidiabetic Drug (Sulfonylurea, Biguanide, Thiazolidinedione, Alpha [NCT01368081]Phase 31,162 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Long Term Treatment With Exenatide Versus Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Pretreated With Metformin (EUREXA: European Exenatide Study)[NCT00359762]Phase 31,029 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Parallel Group Study To Evaluate Safety And Efficacy Of Pf-04937319 And Glimepiride In Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled On Metformin[NCT01517373]Phase 2304 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Parallel Group Study To Evaluate Safety And Efficacy Of Pf-04937319 And Sitagliptin On Glycemic Control In Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled On Met[NCT01475461]Phase 2345 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Three-parallel-group Study on Pharmacodynamic Effects of 8-week QD Treatment With Lixisenatide Compared to Liraglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not Adequately Controlled With Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin[NCT01596504]Phase 2142 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A 24-week, Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin 50mg Bid as an add-on Therapy to Insulin, With or Without Metformin, in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT01582230]Phase 3293 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
A 26 Week Randomised, Parallel Three-arm, Open-label, Multi-centre, Multinational Treat-to-target Trial Comparing Fixed Ratio Combination of Insulin Degludec and Liraglutide Versus Insulin Degludec or Liraglutide Alone, in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Tr[NCT01336023]Phase 31,663 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-23Completed
The Study About Glucose Lowering Effect of Vildagliptin in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Who Are Uncontrolled With Metformin and a Sulphonylurea[NCT01099137]Phase 4344 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Effect of Dulaglutide on Liver Fat in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT03590626]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Arm, Noninferiority Comparison of the Effects of Two Doses of LY2189265 and Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Stable Doses of Metformin and Glimepiride[NCT01075282]Phase 3810 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Escalation Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of a Single Intravenous Infusion of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Precursor Cells (MPCs) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Sub-optimally Controlled on Metformin[NCT01576328]Phase 1/Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
The Effect of Liraglutide Versus Placebo When Added to Basal Insulin Analogues With or Without Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01617434]Phase 3451 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Therapy With Dapagliflozin Added to Saxagliptin in Combination With Metformin Compared to Therapy With Placebo Added to Saxag[NCT01646320]Phase 3320 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Triple Therapy With Saxagliptin Added to Dapagliflozin in Combination With Metformin Compared to Therapy With Placebo Added t[NCT01619059]Phase 3315 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Effect of Lixisenatide on Glucagon Secretion During Hypoglycemia in Patients With Insulin-treated Type 2 Diabetes[NCT02020629]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
The Effect of Metformin Versus Placebo, Including Three Insulin-Analogue Regimens With Variating Postprandial Glucose Regulation, on CIMT in T2DM Patients - A Randomized, Multicenter Trial[NCT00657943]Phase 4415 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
The Effect of Insulin Degludec in Combination With Liraglutide and Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Qualifying for Treatment Intensification[NCT01664247]Phase 3346 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-01Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide Compared to Sitagliptin, Both in Combination With Metformin in Chinese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes.(LIRA-DPP-4 CHINA™)[NCT02008682]Phase 4368 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (BEGIN™: ONCE)[NCT01849289]Phase 3833 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-02Completed
FLAT-SUGAR: FLuctuATion Reduction With inSULin and Glp-1 Added togetheR[NCT01524705]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Using Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas Technology to Reduce Glycemic Variability and Subsequently Improve Cardiovascular Health in Type 1 Diabetes[NCT05653518]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-09Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled, 3-arm Parallel-group, 26-week Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide to That of Insulin Glulisine Once Daily and Insulin Glulisine Three Times Daily in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Insufficien[NCT01768559]Phase 3894 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Randomized, 24-week, Open-label, 2-arm Parallel-group, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination Versus Insulin Glargine on Top of Metformin in Type 2 Diabetic Patients[NCT01476475]Phase 2323 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide as add-on to Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01973231]Phase 4404 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Sitagliptin to Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving Adequate Glycaemic Control on Sitagliptin and Metformin[NCT01907854]Phase 4407 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-02Completed
An Open-labeled, Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective, Parallel Group, Interventional Study to Demonstrate the Effectiveness of 24 Weeks Treatment With Vildagliptin 50mg Bid as Add on to Metformin 500 mg Bid Compared to Metformin up to 1000 mg Bid in Chin[NCT01541956]Phase 43,091 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
SPIDER: A Structured Process Informed by Data, Evidence and Research - A Research and Quality Improvement Collaboration Supporting Practices in Improving Care for Complex Elderly Patients[NCT03689049]104 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-26Enrolling by invitation
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Linagliptin 5 mg Compared to Placebo, Administered as Oral Fixed Dose Combination With Empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg for 24 Weeks, in Patients With Type 2 Di[NCT01778049]Phase 3708 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Sitagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Diet/Exercise Therap[NCT01177384]Phase 3380 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-25Completed
[NCT01563120]Phase 4108 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
SMART Study - A 24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared With Acarbose When in Combination With Metformin in Patients With Type 2[NCT02243176]Phase 4689 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Modulating Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress as a Prophylactic Approach Against Symptomatic Viral Infection[NCT04267809]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-22Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Twice-Daily Insulin Lispro Low Mixture Compared to a Once-Daily Long Acting Insulin Comparator in Patients New to Insulin Therapy Who Were Inadequately Controlled on Oral Agents[NCT00036504]Phase 4100 participants Interventional2001-08-31Completed
Long-Term Effects of Insulin Plus Metformin Regimens on the Overall and Postprandial Glycemic Control of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparison of Premeal Insulin Lispro Mixtures to Once-Daily Insulin Glargine[NCT00191464]Phase 4320 participants Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Metformin Glycinate Compared to Metformin Hydrochloride on the Progression of Type 2 Diabetes[NCT04943692]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-31Suspended (stopped due to Administrative decision of the investigation direction)
Comparison of the Effect on Glycemic Control of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 70/30, Biphasic Insulin Aspart 50/50, and Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30/70 All in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (the INTENSIMIX Trial).[NCT00184574]Phase 3603 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Repaglinide and Metformin Combination Tablet (NN4440) in a TID Regimen Compared to a BID Regimen and BID Avandamet in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes: A Twenty-Six Week, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Group Trial to Investigate Efficacy and S[NCT00399711]Phase 3560 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A 36-month, Multi-centre, Open-label, Randomised, Parallel-group Trial Comparing the Safety, Efficacy and Durability of Adding a Basal Insulin Versus a Twice Daily Insulin Mixture Versus a Meal-time Rapid-Acting Insulin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes In[NCT00184600]Phase 3708 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Effect of Repaglinide Versus Metformin Treatment in Combination With Insulin Biasp30 (Novologmix 70/30) Predinner on Glycemic and Non-Glycemic Cardiovascular Risk-Factors in Non-Obese Patients With Type-2-Diabetes With Unsatisfactory Glycaemic Control Wit[NCT00118963]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
The Effects of Saxagliptin 5mg, Once Daily for 52 Weeks on 24 Hour Urine Albumin Creatinine Rate(ACR) , in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycaemic Control on Metformin or/and Acarbose[NCT02462369]Phase 488 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-30Enrolling by invitation
Safety and Efficacy of Metformin Glycinate vs Metformin Hydrochloride on Metabolic Control and Inflammatory Mediators in Type 2 Diabetes Patients[NCT01386671]Phase 3203 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
DPP-4 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Myocardial Infarction:Effects on Platelet Function[NCT02377388]Phase 374 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-07Completed
A Comparison of a Pulse-Based Diet and the Therapeutic Lifestyle Changes Diet on Reproductive and Metabolic Parameters in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome[NCT05428566]110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Recruiting
A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Sitagliptin Compared With the Addition of Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin[NCT00701090]Phase 31,035 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Effect of Detemir and Sitagliptin on Blood Glucose Control in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00789191]Phase 3222 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
A Multi-centre, Open-labeled, Randomized, Parallel Study on Liver Fat Content and Visceral Fat Mass in Overweight and Obese Type 2 Diabetes Patients After 26 Weeks Treatment With Insulin Detemir Once Daily Versus Insulin NPH Once Daily[NCT01310452]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-01-31Active, not recruiting
Effect of Exenatide Plus Metformin vs. Premixed Human Insulin Aspart Plus Metformin on Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemia in Patients With Inadequate Control of Type 2 Diabetes on Oral Antidiabetic Treatment[NCT00434954]Phase 3494 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of MK0431 Compared With Sulfonylurea Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Monotherapy[NCT00094770]Phase 31,172 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A 12 Week, Parallel, Open-label, Randomized, Multi-center Study Evaluating Use, Safety and Effectiveness of a Web Based Tool vs. Enhanced Usual Therapy of Glargine Titration in T2DM Patients With a 4 Week Safety Extension[NCT02540486]139 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Protocol Driven Management of Type 2 Diabetes After Gastric Bypass Surgery[NCT01213563]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Terminated (stopped due to Data were published that superseded this study.)
A Comparison of Adding Exenatide With Switching to Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Experiencing Inadequate Glycemic Control With Sitagliptin Plus Metformin[NCT00870194]Phase 4255 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Effect of the Combination of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor (DPP4i) and Insulin in Comparison to Insulin on Metabolic Control and Prognosis in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19[NCT04542213]Phase 370 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-01Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Dummy, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Dose-Ranging Study in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Orally Administered SGLT2 Inhibitor JNJ-28431754 [NCT00642278]Phase 2451 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Randomised, db, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study of BI 1356 (5mg), Administered Orally Once Daily for 18 Weeks Followed by a 34 Week Double-blind Extension Period (Placebo Patients Switched to Glimepiride) in Type 2 Diabetic [NCT00740051]Phase 3227 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Clinical Benefit on Hypoglycemia Frequency of 24 Weeks Treatment With Galvus Versus Usual Care (Any OAD of Another Class Added to Metformin Within SmPc) in Older P[NCT01238978]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of Comparison of Combination Therapy of Gliclazide MR and Basal Insulin With Pre-mix Insulin Monotherapy for the Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00736515]Phase 4160 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Basal Insulin Therapy in Patients With Insulin Resistance: A 6 Month Comparison of Insulin Glargine and NPH Insulin[NCT01854723]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Withdrawn
Comparison of Carbohydrate Metabolism During the Night and at Hypoglycemia in Type-2 Diabetic Patients Either on Glargine or NPH Insulin[NCT00468364]12 participants (Actual)Observational2003-07-31Completed
Bedtime Insulin Glargine or Bedtime Neutral Protamine Lispro Combined With Sulfonylurea and Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes. A Randomized, Controlled Trial[NCT00641407]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Difference of Basal Insulin Titration Method in Reducing HbA1c Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Patients.[NCT05331469]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-19Recruiting
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Plus Metformin With Insulin Glargine Plus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00619697]Phase 4260 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Thiazolidinediones or Thiazolidinediones and Metformin[NCT00099320]Phase 3182 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of MK0431 to Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Glimepiride Alone or in Combination With Metf[NCT00106704]Phase 3441 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Effects of Sitagliptin on Postprandial Glycaemia, Incretin Hormones and Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes - Relationship to Gastric Emptying[NCT02324010]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Effect of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 on Glycaemic Control in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00280046]Phase 3307 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
Does Metformin Improve Pregnancy Outcomes (Incidence of LGA (≥90% Birth Weight Centile) Babies, Onset of Maternal GDM, Hypertension, PET, Macrosomia, Shoulder Dystocia, Admission to SCBU) in Obese Non-diabetic Women?[NCT01273584]Phase 2/Phase 3450 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Prevention of Pre-eclampsia Using Metformin: a Randomized Control Trial[NCT04855513]414 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-24Not yet recruiting
Preventing Recurrent Gestational Diabetes Mellitus With Early Metformin Intervention[NCT02394158]Phase 4112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-27Recruiting
Non-inferiority Between Acarbose and Prandial Insulin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Randomized Multicenter and Prospective Trial. ACARB-GDM Study.[NCT03380546]Phase 3341 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-04Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Metformin in Patients Initiating Androgen Deprivation Therapy as Prevention and Intervention of Metabolic Syndrome: The Prime Study[NCT03031821]Phase 3168 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-12Terminated (stopped due to Manufacturer discontinued the production of study drugs.)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)

Change from baseline in HbA1c at week 52 is presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c (Mean)
Semaglutide-1.5
Insulin Aspart-1.2

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose Profile (SMPG ): Mean 7-point Profile (7-PP)

Change from baseline in 7-point self-measured plasma glucose profile: mean 7-PP at week 52 is presented. All participants were instructed to perform 7-point SMPG profiles before breakfast, 90 minutes after the start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after the start of lunch, before main evening meal (dinner), 90 minutes after the start of main evening meal (dinner) and at bedtime. The measurements were to be performed before any injection of bolus insulin and just before the start of the meal (breakfast, lunch or main evening meal), and values measured before breakfast were performed in a fasting condition. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Semaglutide-2.1
Insulin Aspart-2.1

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose Profile: Mean Post-prandial Increment (Over All Meals)

Change from baseline in 7-point SMPG profile: mean post-prandial increment (over all meals) at week 52 is presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Semaglutide-0.7
Insulin Aspart-0.9

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Change from baseline in BMI at week 52 is presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

Interventionkilograms per meter square (kg/m^2) (Mean)
Semaglutide-1.5
Insulin Aspart1.0

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Body Weight (Kilogram (kg))

Change from baseline in body weight at week 52 is presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Semaglutide-4.2
Insulin Aspart2.9

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Body Weight (Percentage): Ratio to Baseline

Change from baseline in body weight (measured in percentage) at week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

InterventionRatio of body weight (Mean)
Semaglutide1.0
Insulin Aspart1.0

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting Blood Lipids: High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline in HDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) at week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

InterventionRatio of HDL cholesterol (Geometric Mean)
Semaglutide1.0
Insulin Aspart1.0

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting Blood Lipids: Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline in LDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) at week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

InterventionRatio of LDL cholesterol (Geometric Mean)
Semaglutide1.0
Insulin Aspart1.0

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting Blood Lipids: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline in total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) at week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

InterventionRatio of total cholesterol (Geometric Mean)
Semaglutide1.0
Insulin Aspart1.0

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting Blood Lipids: Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)

Change from baseline in triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) at week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

InterventionRatio of triglycerides (Geometric Mean)
Semaglutide0.9
Insulin Aspart1.0

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Change from baseline in FPG at week 52 is presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

Interventionmillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Semaglutide-1.3
Insulin Aspart-0.8

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Pulse Rate

Change from baseline in pulse rate at week 52 is presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

InterventionBeats per minute (beats/min) (Mean)
Semaglutide2.2
Insulin Aspart1.1

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Waist Circumference

Change from baseline in waist circumference at week 52 is presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

Interventioncentimeters (cm) (Mean)
Semaglutide-3.3
Insulin Aspart2.1

Daily Basal Insulin Dose at Week 52

Daily basal insulin dose at week 52 is presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: At week 52

InterventionUnits of insulin (Mean)
Semaglutide35.8
Insulin Aspart40.7

Number of Event Adjudication Committee-confirmed Severe (ADA) or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed, Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Plasma Glucose Less Than (<) 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL)) From Randomization to Week 52

Number of EAC-confirmed severe or BG confirmed, symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes (PG <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL)) from randomization (week 0) to week 52 are presented. As per 2013 ADA criteria severe hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes with PG <=3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was an episode, that was BG confirmed by PG value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: From randomization (week 0) to week 52

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Semaglutide254
Insulin Aspart1744

Number of Event Adjudication Committee-confirmed Severe (ADA) or Blood Glucose Confirmed, Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Plasma Glucose <= 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)) From Randomization to Week 52

Number of EAC-confirmed severe or BG confirmed, symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes (PG <=3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)) from randomization (week 0) to week 52 are presented. As per 2013 ADA criteria severe hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes with PG <=3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was an episode during which symptoms of hypoglycaemia were not accompanied by a PG determination but that was presumably caused by a PG concentration <= 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: From randomization (week 0) to week 52

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Semaglutide1420
Insulin Aspart5616

Number of Event Adjudication Committee-confirmed Severe (ADA) or Clinically Significant Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Plasma Glucose < 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL)) From Randomization to Week 52

Number of EAC-confirmed severe or clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes (plasma glucose < 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL)) from randomization (week 0) to week 52 are presented. As per 2013 ADA criteria severe hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes with PG <=3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). Severe hypoglycaemia was an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon or take other corrective actions. Hypoglycaemic episode with plasma glucose < 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL)) was considered as clinically significant. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: From randomization (week 0) to week 52

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Semaglutide339
Insulin Aspart2270

Number of Event Adjudication Committee-confirmed Severe Hypoglycaemic Episodes (ADA) From Randomization to Week 52

Number of EAC-confirmed severe hypoglycaemic episodes from randomization (week 0) up to week 52 are presented. As per 2013 ADA criteria severe hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes with PG <=3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). EAC confirmed-severe hypoglycaemia was an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon or take other corrective actions. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: From randomization (week 0) to week 52

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Semaglutide4
Insulin Aspart7

Number of Event Adjudication Committee-confirmed Severe Hypoglycaemic Episodes (ADA) Requiring Hospitalization, Documented Medical Help, or is Life-threatening From Randomization to Week 52

Number of EAC-confirmed severe hypoglycaemic episodes requiring hospitalization, documented medical help, or is life-threatening from randomization (week 0) to week 52 are presented. As per 2013 ADA criteria severe hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes with PG <=3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). Severe hypoglycaemia was an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon or take other corrective actions. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: From randomization (week 0) to week 52

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Semaglutide2
Insulin Aspart4

Time to First Event Adjudication Committee (EAC)-Confirmed Severe Hypoglycaemic Episode American Diabetes Association (ADA) From Randomization up to Week 52

First event per 100 years of exposure time for first EAC confirmed severe hypoglycaemic episodes from randomization (week 0) to week 52 are presented. As per 2013 ADA criteria severe hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes with plasma glucose (PG) less than or equal to (<=) 3.9 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (70 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)). EAC confirmed-severe hypoglycaemia was an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon or take other corrective actions. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: From randomization (week 0) up to week 52

InterventionFirst event per 100 years of exposure (Number)
Semaglutide0.4
Insulin Aspart0.7

Time to First Event Adjudication Committee-confirmed Severe Hypoglycaemic Episode (ADA) Requiring Hospitalization, Documented Medical Help, or is Life-threatening Randomization up to Week 52

First event per 100 years of exposure time for first EAC confirmed severe hypoglycaemic episodes requiring hospitalization, documented medical help, or is life threatening from randomization (week 0) to week 52 are presented. As per 2013 ADA criteria severe hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes with PG <=3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). EAC confirmed-severe hypoglycaemia was an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon or take other corrective actions. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: From randomization (week 0) up to week 52

InterventionFirst event per 100 years of exposure (Number)
Semaglutide0.2
Insulin Aspart0.4

Total Daily Insulin Dose at Week 52

Total daily insulin dose at week 52 is presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: At week 52

InterventionUnits of insulin (Mean)
Semaglutide35.8
Insulin Aspart77.7

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2): Total Summary Scores (Physical Component and Mental Component) and Scores From the 8 Domains

SF-36v2 is 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health to measure participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It has 36 items: 8 domains of physical, mental health status (physical functioning, role physical health (range:21.23-57.16), bodily pain (range: 21.68-62.00), general health (range: 18.95-66.50), vitality (range: 22.89-70.42), social functioning (range: 17.23-57.34), role emotional problem (range: 14.39-56.17) and mental health (range: 11.63-63.95)) and 2 total summary scores: physical components summary (range: 7.32-70.14) and mental components summary (range: 5.79-69.91) calculated from domain scores. All 10 scores range from 5.79-70.42 . Higher scores indicated a better health state. Change from baseline in SF-36v2, 2 summary and 8 domains scores at week 52 is presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Physical Component SummaryMental Component SummaryPhysical FunctioningRole Physical HealthBodily PainGeneral HealthVitalitySocial FunctioningRole Emotional ProblemMental Health
Insulin Aspart0.4-0.30.2-0.20.80.30.1-0.6-0.20.1
Semaglutide1.40.11.40.11.51.61.10.20.00.6

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Diabetes Quality of Life Clinical Trial Questionnaire (DQLCTQ-R): Scores From the 8 Domains

The DQLCTQ-R questionnaire was used to assess participants' HRQoL. The DQLCTQ-R questionnaire contains 57 items and measures and provide scores for the 8 domains (physical function, energy or fatigue, health distress, mental health, satisfaction, treatment satisfaction, treatment flexibility and frequency of symptoms). The 8 domain scores related to DQLCTQ-R are measured on a scale from 0-100. For all scores, higher values indicated better health status. Change from baseline in DQLCTQ-R 8 domain scores at week 52 is presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Physical functionEnergy or fatigueHealth distressMental healthSatisfactionTreatment satisfactionTreatment flexibilityFrequency of symptoms
Insulin Aspart-0.40.40.30.5-0.20.8-1.21.8
Semaglutide2.42.3-0.27.24.19.94.24.1

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at week 52 are presented. Data is reported for 'on-treatment' observation period: from the date of first dose of trial product (week 0) to the last date on trial product with a visit window of +7 days (week 52). (NCT03689374)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), week 52

,
Interventionmillimeter of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Diastolic Blood PressureSystolic Blood Pressure
Insulin Aspart-0.41.0
Semaglutide-1.4-2.8

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

This outcome has measured difference between FPG values from baseline to 24 weeks post treatment. The term 'baseline' refers to the last observation prior to the administration of any randomised study medication (NCT02240680)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmilligram/decilitre (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo (Up to 24 Weeks)0.2
Linagliptin 5 Milligram (Up to 24 Weeks)-11.3

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) After 24 Weeks of Treatment.

This outcome has measured difference between HbA1c values from baseline to 24 weeks post treatment. The term 'baseline' refers to the last observation prior to the administration of any randomised study medication. HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin, a blood pigment that carries oxygen, which is bound to glucose. The term HbA1c also refers to glycated hemoglobin. High levels of HbA1c (Normal range is less than 6%) indicate poorer control of diabetes than level in normal range. (NCT02240680)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionPercentage (%) of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo (Up to 24 Weeks)-0.38
Linagliptin 5 Milligram (Up to 24 Weeks)-1.01

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c Lowering by at Least 0.5%.

The percentage of patients who attained lowering of HbA1c by ≥0.5% from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment were analysed. The confidence intervals mentioned in measure of dispersion are exact 95% CI by Clopper and Pearson. (NCT02240680)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of patients (%) (Number)
Placebo (Up to 24 Weeks)37.4
Linagliptin 5 Milligram (Up to 24 Weeks)69.1

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c on Treatment <7.0%

This is the percentage of patients with HbA1c on treatment <7.0% after 24 weeks of treatment. The confidence intervals mentioned in measure of dispersion are exact 95% CI by Clopper and Pearson. (NCT02240680)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Patients (%) (Number)
Placebo (Up to 24 Weeks)14.6
Linagliptin 5 Milligram (Up to 24 Weeks)37.8

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c<8.0%

This is the percentage of patients with HbA1c on treatment <8.0% after 24 weeks of treatment. The confidence intervals mentioned in measure of dispersion are exact 95% CI by Clopper and Pearson. (NCT02240680)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of patients (%) (Number)
Placebo (Up to 24 Weeks)40.2
Linagliptin 5 Milligram (Up to 24 Weeks)70.1

Percentage of Patients Experiencing at Least One Hypoglycaemia Accompanied by a Prespecified Glucose Value.

Hypoglycaemia accompanied by a prespecified glucose value is defined as any investigator reported hypoglycaemia (event or AE) with a reported blood glucose level of less than 54 milligram/deciLitre (3.0 millimole/Litre) or any investigator reported symptomatic hypoglycaemic AE with a reported blood glucose level of less or equal 70 milligram/deciLitre (3.9millimole/Litre) or any severe hypoglycaemic AE. Severe hypoglycaemia is an event that requires the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrates or glucagon because the patient is unable to take the substance on his or her own. The confidence intervals mentioned in measure of dispersion are exact 95% confidence interval by Clopper and Pearson. The percentage of patients with at least one hypoglycaemia accompanied by a glucose value less than 54mg/dL alone has also represented separately according American Diabetes Association definition of clinically significant hypoglycaemia. (NCT02240680)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionPercentage of patients (%) (Number)
Prespecified glucose valueGlucose value <54 mg/dL
Linagliptin 5 Milligram (Up to 24 Weeks)30.916.8
Placebo (Up to 24 Weeks)23.815.0

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 52

To examine whether the mean change from baseline in HbA1c with co-administered saxagliptin 5 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin is superior to titrated glimepiride plus metformin after 52 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Intervention% HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg-1.35
Titrated Glimepiride-0.98

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 52

To examine whether the change from baseline in SBP with co-administered saxagliptin 5 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin is superior to titrated glimepiride plus metformin after 52 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg-2.6
Titrated Glimepiride1.0

Change From Baseline in Total Body Weight at Week 52

To examine whether the mean change from baseline in total body weight with co-administered saxagliptin 5 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin is superior to titrated glimepiride plus metformin after 52 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionkilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg-3.11
Titrated Glimepiride0.95

Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response, Defined as HbA1c < 7.0%, at Week 156

Therapeutic glycemic response was defined as HbA1c <7.0%. Subjects rescued or discontinued prior to, and subjects with missing measurements at Week 156 were treated as non-responders. The percentage of subjects with a therapeutic glycemic response is based on the logistic regression method with adjustment for baseline HbA1c. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: At Week 156

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg21.4
Titrated Glimepiride11.7

Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response, Defined as HbA1c < 7.0%, at Week 52

Therapeutic glycemic response was defined as HbA1c <7.0%. Subjects rescued or discontinued prior to, and subjects with missing measurements at Week 52 were treated as non-responders. The percentage of subjects with a therapeutic glycemic response is based on the logistic regression method with adjustment for baseline HbA1c. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: At Week 52

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg44.3
Titrated Glimepiride34.3

Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Intensification During the 156-Week Short-term Plus Long-Term Treatment Period.

Treatment intensification was defined as the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control. Time to treatment intensification was censored after 156-week treatment period if treatment intensification had not occurred by then. Subjects rescued at Week 156 were counted as having an event for the analysis. The values presented are the percentage of subjects requiring the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control during the 156-week treatment period. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Up to Week 156

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg37.0
Titrated Glimepiride55.6

Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Intensification During the 52-week Short-term Treatment Period

Treatment intensification was defined as the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control. Time to treatment intensification was censored after the 52-week treatment period if treatment intensification had not occurred by then. Subjects rescued at Week 52 were counted as having an event for the analysis. The values presented are the percentage of subjects requiring the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control during the 52-week short -term treatment period. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg1.3
Titrated Glimepiride8.8

Time to Treatment Intensification During the 156-Week Short-term Plus Long-Term Treatment Period.

Treatment intensification was defined as the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control. Time to treatment intensification was censored after 156-week treatment period if treatment intensification had not occurred by then. Subjects rescued at Week 156 were counted as having an event for the analysis. Time to treatment intensification curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Up to Week 156

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mgNA
Titrated Glimepiride92.3

Change From Baseline to Week 28 in 2-hour Postprandial Glucose After a Standard Meal Tolerance Test

To compare the change from baseline to Week 28 in 2-hour postprandial glucose after a standard Meal Tolerance Test between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone. (NCT02229396)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin + Placebo-61.05
Exenatide + Dapagliflozin-87.83
Exenatide + Placebo-60.09

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 28

To compare the change from baseline to Week 28 in body weight between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone. (NCT02229396)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionkilogram (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin + Placebo-2.22
Exenatide + Dapagliflozin-3.55
Exenatide + Placebo-1.56

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 2

To compare the change from baseline to Week 2 in fasting plasma glucose between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone. (NCT02229396)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 2

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin + Placebo-26.31
Exenatide + Dapagliflozin-41.34
Exenatide + Placebo-21.08

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Week 28

To compare the change from baseline to Week 28 in fasting plasma glucose between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone. (NCT02229396)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionmilligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin + Placebo-49.19
Exenatide + Dapagliflozin-65.83
Exenatide + Placebo-45.75

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 28

To compare the change from baseline to Week 28 in HbA1c between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone. (NCT02229396)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Intervention% HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin + Placebo-1.39
Exenatide + Dapagliflozin-1.98
Exenatide + Placebo-1.60

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 28

To compare the change from baseline to Week 28 in systolic blood pressure between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone. (NCT02229396)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin + Placebo-1.8
Exenatide + Dapagliflozin-4.3
Exenatide + Placebo-1.2

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <7% at Week 28

To compare the percentage of patients achieving HbA1c <7% at 28 weeks between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone. (NCT02229396)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Intervention% of patients (Number)
Dapagliflozin + Placebo19.1
Exenatide + Dapagliflozin44.7
Exenatide + Placebo26.9

Percentage of Patients Achieving Weight Loss ≥5.0% at Week 28

To compare the percentage of patients achieving weight loss ≥5.0% at 28 weeks between exenatide once weekly (EQW) 2 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg administered simultaneously compared to EQW 2 mg alone and dapagliflozin 10 mg alone. (NCT02229396)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 28

Intervention% of patients (Number)
Dapagliflozin + Placebo20.0
Exenatide + Dapagliflozin33.3
Exenatide + Placebo13.7

Change in Anti-insulin 287 Antibody Titres

Samples from the insulin 287 arm of the study were analysed for anti-insulin 287 antibodies. Confirmed anti-insulin 287 antibody positive samples had an antibody titre value determined. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period, starting at randomisation, and ending at the last direct participant-site contact, or when participant withdrew their informed consent, or the last participant-investigator contact for participants lost to follow-up, or death. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: From baseline (Visit 2) to week 31 (Visit 30)

InterventionAntibody titers (Mean)
Insulin 287979.9

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from on-treatment without ancillary treatment period, starting at the date of first dose of trial product until the follow-up visit, or the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin, or initiation of any diabetes treatment other than trial products and metformin +/- DPP4i, or increase of the dose of metformin or DPP4i. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: From baseline (Visit 2) to week 26 (Visit 28)

InterventionKilogram (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin 2871.49
Insulin Glargine1.56

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from on-treatment without ancillary treatment period, starting at the date of first dose of trial product until the follow-up visit, or the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin, or initiation of any diabetes treatment other than trial products and metformin +/- DPP4i, or increase of the dose of metformin or DPP4i. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: From baseline (Visit 2) to week 26 (Visit 28)

Interventionmmol/l (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin 287-3.20
Insulin Glargine-2.99

Change in Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) [Percentage Point (%-Point)]

Change in HbA1c from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from on-treatment without ancillary treatment period, starting at the date of first dose of trial product until the follow-up visit, or the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin, or initiation of any diabetes treatment other than trial products and metformin +/- DPP4i, or increase of the dose of metformin or DPP4i. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: From baseline (Visit 2) to week 26 (Visit 28)

InterventionPercentage point of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin 287-1.33
Insulin Glargine-1.15

Change in HbA1c [Millimoles/Mole (mmol/Mol)]

Change in HbA1c from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from on-treatment without ancillary treatment period, starting at the date of first dose of trial product until the follow-up visit, or the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin, or initiation of any diabetes treatment other than trial products and metformin +/- DPP4i, or increase of the dose of metformin or DPP4i. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: From baseline (Visit 2) to week 26 (Visit 28)

Interventionmmol/mol (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin 287-14.51
Insulin Glargine-12.54

Change in Mean of the 9-point Profile, Defined as the Area Under the Profile Divided by Measurement Time

Participants measured their PG levels using blood glucose meters at 9 time points (before breakfast, 90 minutes after the start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after the start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after the start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4 am, before breakfast the following day). The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from on-treatment without ancillary treatment period, starting at the date of first dose of trial product until the follow-up visit, or the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin, or initiation of any diabetes treatment other than trial products and metformin +/- DPP4i, or increase of the dose of metformin or DPP4i. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: From baseline (Visit 2) to week 26 (Visit 28)

Interventionmmol/l (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin 287-2.70
Insulin Glargine-2.26

Fasting C-peptide

Fasting C-peptide at week 26 is presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from on-treatment without ancillary treatment period, starting at the date of first dose of trial product until the follow-up visit, or the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin, or initiation of any diabetes treatment other than trial products and metformin +/- DPP4i, or increase of the dose of metformin or DPP4i. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: At week 26 (Visit 28)

InterventionNanomoles per liter (nmol/l) (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin 2870.44
Insulin Glargine0.47

Fluctuations of the 9-point Profile (Defined as the Integrated Absolute Distance From the Mean Profile Value Divided by Measurement Time).

Participants measured their plasma glucose (PG) levels using blood glucose meters at 9 time points (before breakfast, 90 minutes after the start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after the start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after the start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4 am, before breakfast the following day). Presented fluctuation in 9-point SMPG profile is the integrated absolute distance from the mean profile value divided by measurement time and is calculated using the trapezoidal method. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from on-treatment without ancillary treatment period, starting at the date of first dose of trial product until the follow-up visit, or the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin, or initiation of any diabetes treatment other than trial products and metformin +/- DPP4i, or increase of the dose of metformin or DPP4i. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: Week 26 (Visit 28)

Interventionmmol/l (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin 2870.92
Insulin Glargine0.94

Number of Clinically Significant Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Level 2) (<3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL), Confirmed by BG Meter) or Severe Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Level 3)

Clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes (level 2) were defined as episodes that were sufficiently low to indicate serious, clinically important hypoglycaemia with plasma glucose value of less than (<) 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL). Severe hypoglycaemic episodes (level 3) were defined as episodes that were associated with severe cognitive impairment requiring external assistance for recovery. Number of clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes (level 2), confirmed by blood glucose (BG) meter or severe hypoglycaemic episodes (level 3) that occurred from week 0 to week 26 are presented. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: From baseline (Visit 2) to week 26 (Visit 28)

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Insulin 28738
Insulin Glargine31

Number of Hypoglycaemic Alert Episodes (Level 1) (≥3.0 and <3.9 mmol/L (≥54 and <70 mg/dL), Confirmed by BG Meter)

Hypoglycaemia alert value (level 1) was defined as episodes that were sufficiently low for treatment with fast-acting carbohydrate and dose adjustment of glucose-lowering therapy with plasma glucose value of equal to or above (>=) 3.0 and less than (<) 3.9 mmol/L (>= 54 and < 70 mg/dL) confirmed by BG meter. Number of hypoglycaemic alert episodes (level 1) that occurred from week 0 to week 26 are presented. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: From baseline (Visit 2) to week 26 (Visit 28)

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Insulin 287358
Insulin Glargine145

Number of Severe Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Level 3)

Severe hypoglycaemic episodes (level 3) were defined as episodes that were associated with severe cognitive impairment requiring external assistance for recovery. Number of severe hypoglycaemic episodes that occurred from week 0 to week 26 are presented. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: From baseline (Visit 2) to week 26 (Visit 28)

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Insulin 2871
Insulin Glargine0

Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject administered or using a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or usage. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date (or increase in severity) during the on-treatment observation period. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from on-treatment period, starting at the date of first dose of trial product, and ending at follow-up visit, or the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: From baseline (Visit 2) to week 31 (Visit 30)

InterventionEvents (Number)
Insulin 287229
Insulin Glargine158

Weekly Dose of Insulin 287 and Weekly Dose of Insulin Glargine

Weekly dose of insulin 287 and weekly dose of glargine at week 25 and week 26 are presented.The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from on-treatment without ancillary treatment period, starting at the date of first dose of trial product until the follow-up visit, or the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin, or initiation of any diabetes treatment other than trial products and metformin +/- DPP4i, or increase of the dose of metformin or DPP4i. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: week 25 (Visit 27) and 26 (Visit 28)

InterventionUnits of Insulin (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin 287229.06
Insulin Glargine284.05

9-point Profile (Individual SMPG Values)

Participants measured their plasma glucose (PG) levels using blood glucose meters (as plasma equivalent values of capillary whole blood glucose) at 9 time points (before breakfast, 90 minutes after the start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after the start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after the start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4 am, before breakfast the following day). 9-point SMPG values after 26 weeks are presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from on-treatment without ancillary treatment period, starting at the date of first dose of trial product until the follow-up visit, or the last date on trial product + 5 weeks for once daily insulin and + 6 weeks for once weekly insulin, or initiation of any diabetes treatment other than trial products and metformin +/- DPP4i, or increase of the dose of metformin or DPP4i. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: Week 26 (Visit 28)

,
Interventionmmol/l (Least Squares Mean)
Before breakfast90 minutes after start of breakfastBefore lunch90 minutes after start of lunchBefore main evening meal90 minutes after the start of main evening mealBefore bedtimeAt 4:00 a.m.Before breakfast the following day
Insulin 2875.707.906.097.836.558.017.355.725.74
Insulin Glargine6.198.516.198.506.968.477.875.986.05

Change in Cross-reactive Anti-human Insulin Antibody Status (Positive/Negative)

Anti-insulin 287 or glargine antibodies were classified as negative if % B/T was below a certain cut point. Samples positive for anti-insulin 287 or glargine antibodies were further tested for cross-reactivity to endogenous insulin. Samples not further tested are categorised as not applicable (NA). Unknown refers to samples with insufficient volume to perform analysis. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period, starting at randomisation, and ending at the last direct participant-site contact, or when participant withdrew their informed consent, or the last participant-investigator contact for participants lost to follow-up, or death. (NCT03751657)
Timeframe: From baseline (Visit 2) to week 31 (Visit 30)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Week 072515459Week 072515460Week 3172515460Week 3172515459
PositiveUnknownNot ApplicableNegative
Insulin Glargine1
Insulin 2871
Insulin Glargine9
Insulin 287124
Insulin Glargine112
Insulin 2879
Insulin Glargine0
Insulin 28786
Insulin Glargine26
Insulin 2870
Insulin 28725
Insulin Glargine89

Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post-meal Glucose (PMG) at Week 24 (Phase A)

Change from baseline in 2-hour PMG at Week 24 was analyzed using cLDA method with a restriction of the same baseline mean across treatment groups. The cLDA model included terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin (Phase A)-26.8
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A)-12.2

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 104 (Phase A+B)

A1C is measured as a percent. Change from baseline in A1C at Week 104 was analyzed using cLDA method with a restriction of the same baseline mean across treatment groups. The cLDA model included terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Omarigliptin (Phase B)-0.42
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Glimepiride (Phase B)-0.51

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin at Week 104 (Phase A+B)

Change from baseline in fasting insulin at Week 104 based on a cLDA model including terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionμIU/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Omarigliptin (Phase B)1.2
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Glimepiride (Phase B)1.8

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin at Week 24 (Phase A)

Change from baseline in fasting insulin at Week 24 based on a cLDA model including terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmicro International Unit (μIU)/mL (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin (Phase A)1.8
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A)-1.9

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24 (Phase A)

Change from baseline in FPG at Week 24 was analyzed using cLDA method with a restriction of the same baseline mean across treatment groups. The cLDA model included terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin (Phase A)-10.7
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A)-1.2

Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 104 (Phase A+B)

Change from baseline in FPG at Week 104 was analyzed using cLDA method with a restriction of the same baseline mean across treatment groups. The cLDA model included terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Omarigliptin (Phase B)-7.8
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Glimepiride (Phase B)-18.2

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (A1C) at Week 24 (Phase A)

A1C is measured as a percent. Change from baseline in A1C at Week 24 was analyzed using a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) method with a restriction of the same baseline mean across treatment groups. The cLDA model included terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin (Phase A)-0.54
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A)0.00

Change From Baseline in PMG Total Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve (AUC) at Week 24 (Phase A)

Change from baseline in PMG total AUC at Week 24 based on a cLDA model including terms for treatment, time, and the interaction of time by treatment. Plasma glucose levels were measured before the meal (0 minutes), and at 60 and 120 minutes after the meal. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg*h/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin (Phase A)-46.4
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A)-18.6

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Cumulative Incidence of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy by 104 Weeks (Phase A+B)

Participants who did not meet progressively stricter glycemic criteria in Phase A had rescue initiated with open-label glimepiride. If during Phase B participants on open-label glimepiride or blinded glimepiride/glimepiride matching placebo needed rescue after maximum up-titration, then insulin glargine was initiated and the dose of open-label glimepiride or blinded glimepiride/glimepiride-matching placebo was discontinued. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Up to 104 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Omarigliptin (Phase B)20.2
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Glimepiride (Phase B)16.2

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Cumulative Incidence of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy by 24 Weeks (Phase A)

Participants who did not meet progressively stricter glycemic criteria in Phase A had rescue initiated with open-label glimepiride. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Omarigliptin (Phase A)8.5
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A)9.7

Percentage of Participants Attaining A1C Glycemic Goals of <6.5% After 104 Weeks of Treatment (Phase A+B)

Percentage of participants attaining A1C glycemic goals of <6.5% (48 mmol/mol) after 104 weeks of treatment estimated using standard multiple imputation techniques. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: 104 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Omarigliptin (Phase B)13.7
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Glimepiride (Phase B)17.9

Percentage of Participants Attaining A1C Glycemic Goals of <6.5% After 24 Weeks of Treatment (Phase A)

Percentage of participants attaining A1C glycemic goals of <6.5% (48 mmol/mol) after 24 weeks of treatment estimated using standard multiple imputation techniques. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Omarigliptin (Phase A)10.6
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A)6.4

Percentage of Participants Attaining A1C Glycemic Goals of <7.0% After 24 Weeks of Treatment (Phase A)

Percentage of participants attaining A1C glycemic goals of <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) after 24 weeks of treatment estimated using standard multiple imputation techniques. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Omarigliptin (Phase A)38.0
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A)18.8

Percentage of Participants Attaining A1C Glycemic Goals of <7% After 104 Weeks of Treatment (Phase A+B)

Percentage of participants attaining A1C glycemic goals of <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) after 104 weeks of treatment estimated using standard multiple imputation techniques. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: 104 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Least Squares Mean)
Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Omarigliptin (Phase B)32.2
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Glimepiride (Phase B)39.0

Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy at or Before Week 104 (Phase A+B)

Data presented are a cumulative incidence of participants with glycemic rescue by Week 104. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Up to 104 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Omarigliptin (Phase B)17.4
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Glimepiride (Phase B)13.9

Percentage of Participants Requiring Glycemic Rescue Therapy at or Before Week 24 (Phase A)

Data presented are a cumulative incidence of participants with glycemic rescue by Week 24. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Omarigliptin (Phase A)8.0
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A)9.0

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (Phase A+B)

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Presented data exclude data after glycemic rescue. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Up to 104 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Omarigliptin (Phase B)2.0
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Glimepiride (Phase B)4.5

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event Which Were Included Under the System Order Class of Investigations (Phase A+B)

The following laboratory parameters were included: blood chemistry, hematology, electrocardiograms, lipids, body weight, and vital signs. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Up to 104 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Omarigliptin (Phase B)21.9
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Glimepiride (Phase B)17.4

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (Phase A+B)

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Presented data exclude data after glycemic rescue. (NCT01755156)
Timeframe: Up to 107 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Omarigliptin (Phase B)65.7
Placebo to Omarigliptin (Phase A) → Glimepiride (Phase B)65.2

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks of treatment (NCT01952145)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

InterventionKg (Mean)
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira)-1.4
Insulin Glargine (IGlar)1.8

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)

Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment (NCT01952145)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

InterventionPercentage (%) (Mean)
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira)-1.81
Insulin Glargine (IGlar)-1.13

Number of Treatment Emergent Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as either: Severe (i.e., an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions) or an episode biochemically confirmed by a plasma glucose value of <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL), with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. (NCT01952145)
Timeframe: During 26 weeks of treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes (Number)
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira)289
Insulin Glargine (IGlar)683

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 26: Excluding Rescue Approach

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C. Excluding recue approach data analysis excluded all data following the initiation of rescue therapy at any time point, in order to avoid the confounding influence of the rescue therapy. (NCT02099110)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercentage (Least Squares Mean)
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.02
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-1.08
Sitagliptin 100 mg-1.05
Ertugliflozin 5 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg-1.49
Ertugliflozin 15 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg-1.52

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: Excluding Rescue Approach

This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight. Excluding recue approach data analysis excluded all data following the initiation of rescue therapy at any time point, in order to avoid the confounding influence of the rescue therapy. (NCT02099110)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-2.69
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-3.74
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.67
Ertugliflozin 5 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg-2.52
Ertugliflozin 15 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg-2.94

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26 - Excluding Rescue Approach

Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis after at least a 10-hour fast. This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 FPG minus the Week 0 FPG. Excluding recue approach data analysis excluded all data following the initiation of rescue therapy at any time point, in order to avoid the confounding influence of the rescue therapy. (NCT02099110)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-35.73
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-36.91
Sitagliptin 100 mg-25.56
Ertugliflozin 5 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg-43.96
Ertugliflozin 15 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg-48.70

Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26: Excluding Rescue Approach

This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 systolic blood pressure minus the Week 0 systolic blood pressure. Excluding recue approach data analysis excluded all data following the initiation of rescue therapy at any time point, in order to avoid the confounding influence of the rescue therapy. (NCT02099110)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-3.89
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-3.69
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.66
Ertugliflozin 5 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg-3.42
Ertugliflozin 15 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg-3.67

Change From Baseline in Static Beta-Cell Sensitivity to Glucose Index at Week 26; Excluding Rescue Approach

Static beta-cell sensitivity to glucose index (SBCSGI) estimates the ratio of insulin secretion (expressed in pmol/min) related to above-basal glucose concentration (expressed in mmol/L * L) following a meal. Blood samples were collected before and after a standard meal and glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels were analyzed. The C-peptides minimal model was used to estimate the insulin secretion rate (ISR). Analysis included both non-model-based [including insulinogenic index with C-peptide, glucose area under the curve (AUC)/insulin AUC] and model-based [beta cell function and insulin secretion rate at 9 mM glucose] testing. Analysis was performed with non-linear least squares using the Software Architecture Analysis Method (SAAM) II software. SBCSGI was expressed in units of 10^-9 min^-1. Excluding rescue approach data analysis excluded all data following the initiation of rescue therapy at any time point, in order to avoid the confounding influence of the rescue therapy. (NCT02099110)
Timeframe: 30 min. before and 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes following the start of the standard meal at Baseline and Week 26

InterventionSBCSGI (10^-9min^-1) (Least Squares Mean)
Ertugliflozin 5 mg8.62
Ertugliflozin 15 mg9.71
Sitagliptin 100 mg21.11
Ertugliflozin 5 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg16.24
Ertugliflozin 15 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg11.51

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Hemoglobin A1C of <7% (<53 mmol/Mol) (Raw Proportions): Excluding Rescue Approach

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over a prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Excluding recue approach data analysis excluded all data following the initiation of rescue therapy at any time point, in order to avoid the confounding influence of the rescue therapy. (NCT02099110)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ertugliflozin 5 mg26.4
Ertugliflozin 15 mg31.9
Sitagliptin 100 mg32.8
Ertugliflozin 5 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg52.3
Ertugliflozin 15 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg49.2

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE: Including Rescue Approach

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Including rescue approach data analysis included data following the initiation of rescue therapy. (NCT02099110)
Timeframe: Up to 52 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ertugliflozin 5 mg3.2
Ertugliflozin 15 mg3.2
Sitagliptin 100 mg2.8
Ertugliflozin 5 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg3.3
Ertugliflozin 15 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg3.7

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE): Including Rescue Approach

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Including rescue approach data analysis included data following the initiation of rescue therapy. (NCT02099110)
Timeframe: Up to 54 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Ertugliflozin 5 mg62.0
Ertugliflozin 15 mg57.7
Sitagliptin 100 mg57.5
Ertugliflozin 5 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg58.8
Ertugliflozin 15 mg + Sitagliptin 100 mg55.7

Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Metformin Background Patients

Change from baseline in body weight for Metformin Background patients. (NCT01422876)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks

Interventionkg change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-2.99
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-2.60
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 25 mg-3.18
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 10 mg-2.53
Metformin Background: Linagliptin 5 mg-0.69

Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Treatment Naive Patients

Change from baseline in body weight for Treatment Naive patients. (NCT01422876)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks

Interventionkg change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-2.00
Treament Naive: Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-2.74
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 25 mg-2.13
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 10 mg-2.27
Treatment Naive: Linagliptin 5 mg-0.78

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 24 for Metformin Background Patients

Change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose at week 24 for Metformin Background patients. (NCT01422876)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks

Interventionmg/dL change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-35.25
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-32.18
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 25 mg-18.83
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 10 mg-20.84
Metformin Background: Linagliptin 5 mg-13.05

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 24 for Treatment Naive Patients

Change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose at week 24 for Treatment Naive patients. (NCT01422876)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks

Interventionmg/dL change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-29.55
Treament Naive: Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-28.21
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 25 mg-24.24
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 10 mg-22.39
Treatment Naive: Linagliptin 5 mg-5.92

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) for Metformin Background Patients

Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a measurement of the percentage of hemoglobin that is glycated. The change from baseline in HbA1c is calculated as the week 24 HbA1c minus the baseline HbA1c. Since HbA1c is measured as a percentage the change from baseline is also a percentage. (NCT01422876)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Intervention% change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-1.19
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-1.08
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 25 mg-0.62
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 10 mg-0.66
Metformin Background: Linagliptin 5 mg-0.70

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) for Treatment Naive Patients

Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a measurement of the percentage of hemoglobin that is glycated. The change from baseline in HbA1c is calculated as the week 24 HbA1c minus the baseline HbA1c. Since HbA1c is measured as a percentage the change from baseline is also a percentage. (NCT01422876)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Intervention% change from baseline (Least Squares Mean)
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-1.08
Treament Naive: Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg-1.24
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 25 mg-0.95
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 10 mg-0.83
Treatment Naive: Linagliptin 5 mg-0.67

Occurrence of Treat to Target Efficacy Response for Metformin Background Patients

Occurrence of the treat-to-target efficacy response for Metformin Background patients measured as HbA1c < 7.0% after 24 weeks of treatment for patients with HbA1c >=7.0% at baseline. (NCT01422876)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Intervention% of patients satisfying HbA1c <7.0% (Number)
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg61.8
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg57.8
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 25 mg32.6
Metformin Background: Empagliflozin 10 mg28.0
Metformin Background: Linagliptin 5 mg36.1

Occurrence of Treat to Target Efficacy Response for Treatment Naive Patients

Occurrence of the treat-to-target efficacy response for Treatment Naive patients measured as HbA1c < 7.0% after 24 weeks of treatment for patients with HbA1c >=7.0% at baseline. (NCT01422876)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks

Intervention% of patients satisfying HbA1c <7.0% (Number)
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg55.4
Treament Naive: Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg62.3
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 25 mg41.5
Treatment Naive: Empagliflozin 10 mg38.8
Treatment Naive: Linagliptin 5 mg32.3

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post Prandial Glucose (PPG) From a Liquid Meal Tolerance Test (MTT) at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. PPG measurements were obtained at week 24 in the doubleblind period, including observations prior to rescue. (NCT01606007)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 24

InterventionMG/DL PPG (Mean)
Arm 1: Saxagliptin+Metformin XR+Placebo-35.6
Arm 2: Dapagliflozin+Metformin XR+Placebo-70.4
Arm 3: Saxagliptin+Dapagliflozin+Metformin XR-79.6

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

Baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. Body weight measurements were obtained at Week 24 in the doubleblind period, including observations prior to rescue. (NCT01606007)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 24

InterventionBody weight Kg (Mean)
Arm 1: Saxagliptin+Metformin XR+Placebo0.00
Arm 2: Dapagliflozin+Metformin XR+Placebo-2.39
Arm 3: Saxagliptin+Dapagliflozin+Metformin XR-2.05

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. FPG measurements were obtained at Week 24 in the doubleblind period, including observations prior to rescue. (NCT01606007)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Arm 1: Saxagliptin+Metformin XR+Placebo-14.0
Arm 2: Dapagliflozin+Metformin XR+Placebo-31.7
Arm 3: Saxagliptin+Dapagliflozin+Metformin XR-37.8

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) at Week 24

HbA1c was measured as percent of hemoglobin by a central laboratory. Baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. HbA1c measurements were obtained at Week 24 in the double-blind period, including observations prior to rescue. (NCT01606007)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0) and at Week 24

Intervention% HbA1c (Mean)
Arm 1: Saxagliptin+Metformin XR+Placebo-0.88
Arm 2: Dapagliflozin+Metformin XR+Placebo-1.20
Arm 3: Saxagliptin+Dapagliflozin+Metformin XR-1.47

Adjusted Percentage of Participants Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response (Hemoglobin A1c [HbA1C]) <7.0% at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Therapeutic glycemic response is defined as HbA1c <7.0%. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. HbA1c was measured as a percent of hemoglobin. (NCT01606007)
Timeframe: At Week 24

Intervention% of Participants (Number)
Arm 1: Saxagliptin+Metformin XR+Placebo18.3
Arm 2: Dapagliflozin+Metformin XR+Placebo22.2
Arm 3: Saxagliptin+Dapagliflozin+Metformin XR41.4

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 30

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 30 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C. (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

InterventionPercent A1C (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-1.88
Placebo-1.42

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 30

Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 30 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 30 minus FPG at Week 0). (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-84.8
Placebo-78.3

Change From Baseline in Total Daily Insulin Dose (Units) at Week 30

Change from baseline reflects the Week 30 total daily insulin dose minus the Week 0 total daily insulin dose. The Week 0 total daily insulin dose was 0, by definition, because insulin was not administered at baseline. (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

InterventionInsulin Units (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin53.2
Placebo61.3

Event Rate of Documented Hypoglycemia With Blood Glucose <56 mg/dL (≤3.1 mmol/L)

Documented hypoglycemia is defined by a measured (e.g., by fingerstick) plasma glucose concentration <56 mg/dL (≤3.1 mmol/L). The event rate was the total number of events divided by follow-up time (participant-years), including multiple events from the same participant. (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Up to 30 weeks

InterventionEvents/Participant-Years (Number)
Sitagliptin0.30
Placebo0.36

Event Rate of Documented Hypoglycemia With Blood Glucose ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L)

Documented hypoglycemia is defined by a measured (e.g., by fingerstick) plasma glucose concentration ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L). The event rate was the total number of events divided by follow-up time (participant-years), including multiple events from the same participant. (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Up to 30 weeks

InterventionEvents/Participant-Years (Number)
Sitagliptin5.05
Placebo6.21

Event Rate of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia With Blood Glucose <56 mg/dL (≤3.1 mmol/L)

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia is defined as an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured (e.g., by fingerstick) plasma glucose concentration <56 mg/dL (≤3.1 mmol/L). The event rate was the total number of events divided by follow-up time (participant-years), including multiple events from the same participant. (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Up to 30 weeks

InterventionEvents/Participant-Years (Number)
Sitagliptin0.17
Placebo0.22

Event Rate of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia With Blood Glucose ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L)

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia is defined as an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured (e.g., by fingerstick) plasma glucose concentration ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L). The event rate was the total number of events divided by follow-up time (participant-years), including multiple events from the same participant. (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Up to 30 weeks

InterventionEvents/Participant-Years (Number)
Sitagliptin1.55
Placebo2.12

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Up to 30 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sitagliptin1.3
Placebo1.6

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced One or More Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Up to 32 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sitagliptin57.9
Placebo60.0

Percentage of Participants With A1C Goal <7.0% (<53 mmol/Mol at Week 30 and No Documented Hypoglycemia With Blood Glucose ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L) up to Week 30

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sitagliptin15.3
Placebo10.0

Percentage of Participants With A1C Goal <7.0% (<53 mmol/Mol) at Week 30

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sitagliptin54.2
Placebo35.4

Percentage of Participants With Documented Hypoglycemia With Blood Glucose <56 mg/dL (≤3.1 mmol/L)

Documented hypoglycemia is defined by a measured (e.g., by fingerstick) plasma glucose concentration <56 mg/dL (≤3.1 mmol/L). (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Up to 30 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sitagliptin12.4
Placebo13.6

Percentage of Participants With Documented Hypoglycemia With Blood Glucose ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L)

Documented hypoglycemia is defined by a measured (e.g., by fingerstick) plasma glucose concentration ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L). (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Up to 30 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sitagliptin66.8
Placebo68.0

Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia With Blood Glucose <56 mg/dL (≤3.1 mmol/L)

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia is defined as an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured (e.g., by fingerstick) plasma glucose concentration <56 mg/dL (≤3.1 mmol/L). (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Up to 30 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sitagliptin7.6
Placebo8.3

Percentage of Participants With Events of Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia With Blood Glucose ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L)

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia is defined as an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured (e.g., by fingerstick) plasma glucose concentration ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L). The incidence (number of participants with ≥1 event divided by number of participants) of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was determined. (NCT02738879)
Timeframe: Up to 30 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sitagliptin33.5
Placebo37.7

Incidence of Development of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Participants With IGT and/or IFG

The incidence was determined by calculating the proportion of randomized participants without diabetes at randomization who either developed diabetes during the study or who were classified as having possible diabetes based on results of two oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) performed after the last follow-up visit (within 21-28 days for OGTT#1 and within 10-14 weeks for OGTT#2). (NCT00069784)
Timeframe: from randomization until the last follow-up visit or last OGTT (median duration of follow-up: 6.2 years)

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Insulin Glargine24.7
Standard Care31.2

Number of Patients With First Occurrence of Any Type of Cancer

Data on cancers that occurred in association with hospitalizations were collected systematically in both groups from the start of the study. All reported cancers occurring during the trial (new or recurrent) were adjudicated by the Event Adjudication Committee. (NCT00069784)
Timeframe: from randomization until study cut-off date (median duration of follow-up: 6.2 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Insulin Glargine559
Standard Care561

Total Mortality (All Causes)

Number of deaths due to any cause (NCT00069784)
Timeframe: from randomization until study cut-off date (median duration of follow-up: 6.2 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Insulin Glargine951
Standard Care965

Composite Diabetic Microvascular Outcome (Kidney or Eye Disease)

"The composite outcome used to analyze microvascular disease progression contained components of clinical events:~the occurrence of laser surgery or vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy (DR);~the development of blindness due to DR;~the occurrence of renal death or renal replacement therapy; as well as the following laboratory-based events:~doubling of serum creatinine; or~progression of albuminuria (from none to microalbuminuria [at least 30 mg/g creatinine], to macroalbuminuria [at least 300 mg/g creatinine])." (NCT00069784)
Timeframe: from randomization until study cut-off date (median duration of follow-up: 6.2 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with a composite endpointEndpoint's composition: vitrectomyEndpoint's composition: laser therapy for DREndpoint's composition: dialysisEndpoint's composition: renal transplantEndpoint's composition: serum creatinine doubledEndpoint's composition: death due to renal failureEndpoint's composition: albuminuria progression
Insulin Glargine132324571808241153
Standard Care136325672808831171

Composite of the First Occurrence of Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI) or Nonfatal Stroke

"Number of participants with a first occurrence of one of the above events.~The outcome's evaluation is based on the number of such positively-adjudicated first events occurring for patients assigned to the study groups. Assessments of the above events were reviewed by the Event Adjudication Committee who was kept blinded to the group assignment of participants.~Statistical analysis is performed on the time from randomization to the first occurrence of the events. Number of participants with a composite endpoint (i.e. with first occurrence of CV death, nonfatal MI or nonfatal stroke) is provided in the first row of the statistical table." (NCT00069784)
Timeframe: from randomization until study cut-off date (median duration of follow-up: 6.2 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with a composite endpointEndpoint's composition: CV deathEndpoint's composition: nonfatal MIEndpoint's composition: nonfatal stroke
Insulin Glargine1041484297261
Standard Care1013476282256

Composite of the First Occurrence of Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (MI), Nonfatal Stroke, Revascularization Procedure or Hospitalization for Heart Failure (HF)

"Number of participants with a first occurrence of one of the above events (revascularization procedures included coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) i.e. balloon, PTCA with stent, other percutaneous intervention, carotid angioplasty with/without stent, carotid endarterectomy, peripheral angioplasty with or without stent, peripheral vascular surgery, and limb amputation due to vascular disease).~The outcome's evaluation is based on the number of such positively-adjudicated first events occurring for patients assigned to the study groups. Assessments of the above events were reviewed by the Event Adjudication Committee who was kept blinded to the group assignment of participants.~Statistical analysis is performed on the time from randomization to the first occurrence of the events. Number of participants with a composite endpoint (i.e. with first occurrence of the events) is provided in the first row of the statistical table." (NCT00069784)
Timeframe: from randomization until study cut-off date (median duration of follow-up: 6.2 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with a composite endpointEndpoint's composition: CV deathEndpoint's composition: nonfatal MIEndpoint's composition: nonfatal strokeEndpoint's composition: revascularizationEndpoint's composition: hospitalization for HF
Insulin Glargine1792350257231763249
Standard Care1727339238227717259

Number of Patients With Various Types of Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Events

"Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia, based on data recorded in the participant's diary. These were further categorized as confirmed (ie, with a concomitant home glucose reading ≤54 mg/dL [≤3.0 mmol/L]) or unconfirmed.~Severe hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia in which the participant required the assistance of another person, and one of the following:~the event was associated with a documented self-measured or laboratory plasma glucose level ≤36 mg/dL (≤2.0 mmol/L), or~the event was associated with prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration." (NCT00069784)
Timeframe: on-treatment period (median duration of follow-up: 6.2 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with hypoglycemia eventsPatients with non-severe hypoglycemiaPatients with confirmed non-severe hypoglycemiaPatients with severe hypoglycemia
Insulin Glargine359735332581352
Standard Care16241582904113

Mean Infant Fat Mass

Neonatal fat mass measured by skin-fold thickness (anthropometrics).The circumference of the upper limb is the circumference of the upper arm, and the circumference of the lower limb equals the mean of the circumferences measured at the midthigh and calf. The volume of the subcutaneous layer of fat covering each cylinder is estimated by multiplying the length times the circumference times the layer of fat estimated by the skinfold measures. The triceps skinfold measure is used as an estimate of the fat thickness of the limbs, and the subscapular skinfold measure approximates the fat thickness of the trunk. Total body fat is estimated by summing the volumes of fat covering each of the cylinders and multiplying by 0.9 (the density of fat). (NCT02932475)
Timeframe: Within 72 hrs of birth

Interventionkg (Mean)
Maternal Metformin0.46
Maternal Placebo0.5

Number of Participants With Composite Adverse Neonatal Outcome

"Participants with one or more of the following:~capillary blood glucose level of < 30 mg/dL or capillary blood glucose requiring medical treatment, or~Birth trauma (umbilical cord artery pH < 7.0 or shoulder dystocia with brachial plexus injury), or~Hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy, or~Deliver < 37 weeks' gestation, or~Miscarry, are stillborn, experience a neonatal demise, or~Large for gestational age infant (birth weight > 90th percentile for gestational age), or~Small for gestational age infant (birth weight < 10th percentile for gestational age) or low birth weight (< 2500 gm)" (NCT02932475)
Timeframe: An average of 48 hours for term infants and 30 days for preterm infants

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Metformin269
Placebo277

Maternal Safety Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Adverse maternal outcomes. (NCT02932475)
Timeframe: An average of 48 hours following delivery

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any adverse event leading to early study agent discontinuationAny adverse event associated with maternal deathAny adverse event associated with fetal deathAny maternal serious adverse eventAny maternal non-serious adverse event
Metformin13210113149
Placebo20110111157

Neonatal Safety Based on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Adverse neonatal outcomes (NCT02932475)
Timeframe: up to 28 days of life

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any neonatal serious adverse eventAny neonatal non-serious adverse event
Maternal Metformin81157
Maternal Placebo105162

Number of Participants With Maternal Side Effects

"Secondary outcome of maternal side effects were defined as:~clinically relevant hypoglycemia defined as capillary blood glucose < 60 or < 80 with symptoms~GI side effects defined as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea" (NCT02932475)
Timeframe: Throughout study until delivery at 40 weeks gestation

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Clinically relevant hypoglycemiaGastrointestinal side effects
Metformin87182
Placebo85171

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 104 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent A1C (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.58
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.60
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.89

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent A1C (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.03
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.73
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.91

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 52 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent A1C (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.68
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.72
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.96

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 104 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.18
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-3.77
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-3.63

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-1.33
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-3.01
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-2.93

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 52 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.07
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-3.23
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-3.35

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 104 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 104 minus FPG at Week 0). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-10.9
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-18.2
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-28.2

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.85
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-27.54
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-39.10

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Therapy)

Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 52 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 52 minus FPG at Week 0). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-12.0
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-22.4
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-35.2

Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 104 sitting DBP minus the Week 0 sitting DBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.46
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-2.36
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-1.52

Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.23
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.59
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-2.19

Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 52 sitting DBP minus the Week 0 sitting DBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.38
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.40
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-1.19

Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 104 sitting SBP minus the Week 0 sitting SBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.05
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-3.61
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-3.13

Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.70
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-4.38
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-5.20

Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 52 sitting SBP minus the Week 0 sitting SBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.65
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-2.63
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-4.28

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 104 as Measured by DXA at the Femoral Neck Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-1.23
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.11
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.96

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 104 as Measured by DXA at the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4) Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.09
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.19
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.13

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 104 as Measured by DXA at the Total Hip Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-1.18
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.72
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-2.02

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 26 as Measured by DXA at the Distal Forearm Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the distal forearm was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.06
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.15
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.13

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 26 as Measured by DXA at the Femoral Neck Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.40
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.10
Ertugliflozin 15 mg0.30

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 26 as Measured by DXA at the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4) Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.22
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.01
Ertugliflozin 15 mg0.12

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 26 as Measured by DXA at the Total Hip Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.63
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.55
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.36

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 52 as Measured by DXA at the Distal Forearm Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the distal forearm was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.44
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.59
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.39

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 52 as Measured by DXA at the Femoral Neck Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.69
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.49
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.44

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 52 as Measured by DXA at the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4) Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.10
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.28
Ertugliflozin 15 mg0.07

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 52 as Measured by DXA at the Total Hip Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.82
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.04
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-1.32

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linking Telopeptides of Type I Collagen (CTX) at Week 26 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

CTX is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride10.8
Ertugliflozin 5 mg51.9
Ertugliflozin 15 mg80.2

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker CTX at Week 104 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

CTX is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride19.29
Ertugliflozin 5 mg26.94
Ertugliflozin 15 mg32.53

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker CTX at Week 52 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

CTX is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride15.54
Ertugliflozin 5 mg34.36
Ertugliflozin 15 mg41.57

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker P1NP at Week 104 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

P1NP is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride19.38
Ertugliflozin 5 mg10.11
Ertugliflozin 15 mg24.21

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker P1NP at Week 52 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

P1NP is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride24.50
Ertugliflozin 5 mg8.41
Ertugliflozin 15 mg19.79

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) at Week 26 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

PTH is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.98
Ertugliflozin 5 mg0.28
Ertugliflozin 15 mg0.14

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker Procollagen Type I N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 26 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

P1NP is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.5
Ertugliflozin 5 mg0.8
Ertugliflozin 15 mg0.5

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker PTH at Week 104 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

PTH is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride10.12
Ertugliflozin 5 mg8.16
Ertugliflozin 15 mg5.46

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker PTH at Week 52 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

PTH is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride8.11
Ertugliflozin 5 mg11.09
Ertugliflozin 15 mg2.48

Percent Change From BMD at Week 104 as Measured by DXA at the Distal Forearm Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the distal forearm was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.58
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.40
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.64

Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with open-label glimepiride or basal insulin according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride2.4
Ertugliflozin 5 mg3.4
Ertugliflozin 15 mg3.9

Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with open-label glimepiride or basal insulin according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 106

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride77.5
Ertugliflozin 5 mg70.5
Ertugliflozin 15 mg75.6

Percentage of Participants Receiving Glycemic Rescue Therapy up to Week 104

Per protocol participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride24.4
Ertugliflozin 5 mg11.1
Ertugliflozin 15 mg10.7

Percentage of Participants Receiving Glycemic Rescue Therapy up to Week 26

Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 26

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride17.7
Ertugliflozin 5 mg2.9
Ertugliflozin 15 mg1.5

Percentage of Participants Receiving Glycemic Rescue Therapy up to Week 52

Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride17.2
Ertugliflozin 5 mg4.3
Ertugliflozin 15 mg1.5

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 104

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride7.2
Ertugliflozin 5 mg10.6
Ertugliflozin 15 mg12.2

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride2.9
Ertugliflozin 5 mg8.7
Ertugliflozin 15 mg12.2

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride11.0
Ertugliflozin 5 mg10.6
Ertugliflozin 15 mg14.6

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <7% (53 mmol/Mol) at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 104

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride19.1
Ertugliflozin 5 mg24.6
Ertugliflozin 15 mg33.7

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <7% (53 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride15.8
Ertugliflozin 5 mg35.3
Ertugliflozin 15 mg40.0

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <7% (53 mmol/Mol) at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride30.6
Ertugliflozin 5 mg34.8
Ertugliflozin 15 mg36.6

Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy at Week 26

Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionDays (Median)
Placebo/Glimepiride105
Ertugliflozin 5 mg112
Ertugliflozin 15 mg139

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations (ng/mL): Summary Statistics Over Time (Excluding Rescue Approach)

Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at approximately 24 hours following the prior day's dose and before administration of the current day's dose. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 0.500 mg/mL. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and/or 60 minutes post-dose on Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 30

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Week 6:Pre-doseWeek 12:Pre-doseWeek 12:60 mins post-doseWeek 18:Pre-doseWeek 18:60 mins post-doseWeek 30:Pre-dose
Ertugliflozin 15 mg38.3829.23228.1324.46214.9630.55
Ertugliflozin 5 mg14.8912.3474.849.9174.3912.66
Placebo/GlimepirideNANANA0.010.010.15

"Number of Subjects Having the Adverse Event Incorrect Dose Administered"

"Number of subjects having the adverse event incorrect dose administered within the system organ class Injury, poisoning and procedural complications" (NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-26

InterventionSubjects (Number)
IDet12
IGlar24

Change in Body Weight From Baseline

(NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 26

Interventionkg (Mean)
IDet-0.49
IGlar1

Change in HbA1c From Baseline

(NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 26

Interventionpercentage point change (Mean)
IDet-0.48
IGlar-0.74

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

(NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
IDet6.22
IGlar6.09

Glycaemic Control as Measured by Plasma Glucose (9-point Self-measured Profiles)

Plasma glucose measured: before breakfast, 2 hours after breakfast, before lunch, 2 hours after lunch, before dinner, 2 hours after dinner, bedtime and at 3 am. (NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Before breakfast (N=200, N=197)2 hours after breakfast (N=192, N=188)Before Lunch (N=193, N=189)2 hours After Lunch (N=194, N=186)Before Dinner (N=194, N=186)2 hours after dinner (N=192, N=190)Bedtime (N=190, N=183)At 3AM (N=193, N=186)Before Breakfast Next Day (N=197, N=195)
IDet5.89.17.29.78.210.39.56.65.7
IGlar5.98.76.68.87.59.896.35.6

Hypoglycaemic Episodes, Diurnal

Number of hypoglycaemic episodes from Week 0 to Week 26, defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if unable to treat her/himself. Minor if able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if able to treat her/himself and no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-26

,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
IDet075128
IGlar2118222

Hypoglycaemic Episodes, Nocturnal

Number of hypoglycaemic episodes from Week 0 to Week 26, defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if unable to treat her/himself. Minor if able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if able to treat her/himself and no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-26

,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
IDet03976
IGlar03061

Hypoglycemic Episodes, Unclassifiable

Number of hypoglycaemic episodes from Week 0 to Week 26, defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if unable to treat her/himself. Minor if able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if able to treat her/himself and no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-26

,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
IDet056
IGlar0816

Incidence of Hypoglycaemic Episodes During the Trial

Number of hypoglycaemic episodes from Week 0 to Week 26, defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if unable to treat her/himself. Minor if able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if able to treat her/himself and no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-26

,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
All EventsMajorMinorSymptoms only
IDet3290119210
IGlar4572156299

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 6.5%

The percentage of subjects - overall and by previous OAD treatment - meeting the HbA1c of 6.5% or less (NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
Interventionpercentage (%) of subjects (Number)
Metformin monotherapyMetformin+TZDMetformin+2nd OAD other than TZDAll
IDet2213511
IGlar30131721

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 7.0%

The percentage of subjects - overall and by previous OAD treatment - meeting the HbA1c less than or equal to 7% (NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Metformin monotherapyMetformin+TZDMetformin+2nd OAD other than TZDAll
IDet55403138
IGlar70404753

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c of 6.5% or Less With no Hypoglycaemia

The subjects must have reached target and not have experienced any confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia or any confirmed major hypoglycaemia within the last 30 days of treatment. (NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
Interventionpercentage (%) of subjects (Number)
Metformin monotherapyMetformin+TZDMetformin+2nd OAD other than TZDAll
IDet22739
IGlar21131315

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c of 7% or Less With no Hypoglycaemia

The subjects must have reached target and not have experienced any confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia or any confirmed major hypoglycaemia within the last 30 days of treatment. (NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
Interventionpercentage (%) of subjects (Number)
Metformin monotherapyMetformin+TZDMetformin+2nd OAD other than TZDAll
IDet48332532
IGlar52333338

Within-subject Variation of Self Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Before Breakfast

The median values of the sample standard variation (the within subject variation) within the IDet and IGlar arms were plotted against time. (NCT00909480)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
Interventionmmol/L (Median)
Metformin MonotherapyMetformin+TZDMetformin+2nd OAD other than TZDOverall
IDet0.480.720.60.57
IGlar0.670.840.710.71

Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

Absolute change = HbA1c value at Week 24 minus HbA1c value at baseline. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.34
Lixisenatide-0.90

Change From Baseline in Beta-cell Function Assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment for Beta-cell Function (HOMA-beta) at Week 24

Beta cell function was assessed by HOMA-beta. HOMA-beta (% of normal beta cells function) = (20 multiplied by fasting plasma insulin [micro unit per milliliter]) divided by (fasting plasma glucose [mmol/L] minus 3.5). Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Intervention% of normal beta cells function (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo6.98
Lixisenatide6.72

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionkilogram (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.21
Lixisenatide-0.21

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.32
Lixisenatide-1.16

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Insulin (FPI) at Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.01
Lixisenatide-10.36

Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During Main 24-Week Period

Routine fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG >270 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (15.0 mmol/L), from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG >240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c >8.5%. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo11.3
Lixisenatide3.8

Percentage of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is time from the first dose of study drug and up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug, on or before Visit 12 (Week 24) or Day 169 if Visit 12 is not available, and before the introduction of rescue therapy. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo5.1
Lixisenatide9.2

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo26.4
Lixisenatide52.3

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo10.1
Lixisenatide28.9

Number of Patients With Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

Symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from a hypoglycemic episode with an accompanying plasma glucose less than 60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) or associated with prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration if no plasma glucose measurement was available. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was symptomatic hypoglycemia event in which the patient required the assistance of another person and was associated with either a plasma glucose level below 36 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration, if no plasma glucose measurement was available. (NCT00763815)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration, for up to 132 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Symptomatic HypoglycemiaSevere Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
Lixisenatide230
Placebo70

Mean Slope of the Regressions of Change From Week 24 to Week 104 in HbA1c

Mean slopes of regression of change from Week 24 to Week 104 in HbA1c for saxagliptin added on to metformin versus glipizide added on to metformin (Full Analysis Set) achieved by fitting a mixed model with subject specific slopes for the time effect (weeks on randomized treatment was utilized). This analysis gives an assessment of the durability of the HbA1c effect. (NCT00575588)
Timeframe: Week 24 to Week 104

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Saxagliptin + Metformin0.0041
Glipizide + Metformin0.0076

Mean Slope of the Regressions of Change From Week 24 to Week 52 in HbA1c

Mean slopes of regression of change from Week 24 to Week 52 in HbA1c for saxagliptin added on to metformin versus glipizide added on to metformin (Per Protocol Analysis Set) achieved by fitting a mixed model with subject specific slopes for the time effect (weeks on randomized treatment was utilized). This analysis gives an assessment of the durability of the HbA1c effect. (NCT00575588)
Timeframe: Week 24 to Week 52

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Saxagliptin + Metformin0.001
Glipizide + Metformin0.004

Proportion of Participants Reporting at Least One Episode of Any Hypoglycaemic Event Over 104 Weeks

Proportion of participants reporting at least one episode of any hypoglycaemic event for saxagliptin added on to metformin versus glipizide added on to metformin over 104 weeks (Safety Analysis Set) (NCT00575588)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Saxagliptin + Metformin3.5
Glipizide + Metformin38.4

Proportion of Participants Reporting at Least One Episode of Any Hypoglycaemic Event Over 52 Weeks

Proportion of participants reporting at least one episode of any hypoglycaemic event for saxagliptin added on to metformin versus glipizide added on to metformin over 52 weeks (Safety Analysis Set) (NCT00575588)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Saxagliptin + Metformin3
Glipizide + Metformin36.3

Body Weight Change From Baseline to Week 104

Adjusted mean change from baseline in Body Weight achieved with saxagliptin added on to metformin versus glipizide added on to metformin at Week 104. Body Weight is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated as the Week 104 value minus the baseline value. (NCT00575588)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

,
Interventionkilograms (Mean)
BaselineWeek 104Adjusted Change from Baseline to Week 104
Glipizide + Metformin88.5789.801.29
Saxagliptin + Metformin88.6987.47-1.47

Body Weight Change From Baseline to Week 52

Adjusted mean change from baseline in Body Weight achieved with saxagliptin added on to metformin versus glipizide added on to metformin at Week 52 (Safety Analysis Set). Body Weight is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated as the Week 52 (LOCF) value minus the baseline value. (NCT00575588)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52 (Last Observation Carried Forward)

,
Interventionkilogram (Mean)
BaselineWeek 52Adjusted Change from Baseline to Week 52
Glipizide + Metformin88.689.71.1
Saxagliptin + Metformin88.787.6-1.1

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Change From Baseline to Week 104

Adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c achieved with saxagliptin added on to metformin versus glipizide added on to metformin at Week 104 (Full Analysis Set). HbA1c is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated as the Week 104 value minus the baseline value. (NCT00575588)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

,
InterventionPercent (Mean)
BaselineWeek 104Adjusted Change from Baseline to Week 104
Glipizide + Metformin7.657.27-0.35
Saxagliptin + Metformin7.657.27-0.41

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Change From Baseline to Week 52

Adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c achieved with saxagliptin added on to metformin versus glipizide added on to metformin at Week 52 (Per Protocol Analysis Set). HbA1c is a continuous measure, the change from baseline for each participant is calculated as the Week 52 value minus the baseline value. (NCT00575588)
Timeframe: Baseline to 52 Weeks

,
InterventionPercent (Mean)
BaselineWeek 52Adjusted Change from Baseline to Week 52
Glipizide + Metformin7.536.71-0.80
Saxagliptin + Metformin7.466.74-0.74

All Reported Hypoglycemic Adverse Events During the ST + LT Treatment Period

Hypoglycemic Events are based upon the Saxagliptin Predefined List of Events, which are hypoglycemia, blood glucose decreased, and hypoglycemic unconsciousness. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit day in the ST+LT period; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit day + 30 days in the LT+ST period. Mean duration of exposure: 124, 118, 130, 95 wks respectively for 2.5mg, 5mg, 10 mg, pla

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin23
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin20
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin21
Placebo+ Metformin20

Confirmed Hypoglycemia During the ST + LT Treatment Period

'Confirmed' = recorded on the hypoglycemia AE case report form with a fingerstick glucose <= 50 mg/dL and associated symptoms. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit day in the ST+LT period; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit day + 30 days in the LT+ST period. Mean duration of exposure: 124, 118, 130, 95 wks respectively for 2.5mg, 5mg, 10 mg, pla

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin3
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin2
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin3
Placebo+ Metformin1

Percentage of Participants Achieving Therapeutic Glycemic Response (A1C < 7.0%) at Week 24

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin37.1
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin43.5
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin44.4
Placebo+ Metformin16.6

Baseline and Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC)

Mean change from baseline is adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo+ Metformin47407-3291
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin44931-8137
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin48224-8891
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin49021-9586

Baseline and Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline is adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo+ Metformin174.941.24
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin175.86-20.50
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin173.57-14.31
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin179.03-22.03

Baseline and Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline is adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobins (Mean)
Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo+ Metformin8.060.13
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin7.98-0.58
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin8.08-0.59
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin8.07-0.69

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Basophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 170, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 175, 170, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 172, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=168, 166, 159, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 157, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 157, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 151, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=159, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 124)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 113, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=104, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=90, 87, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 84, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=77, 71, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=76, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=69, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 71, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 48, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin0.02-0.00-0.000.00-0.00-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.000.00-0.000.000.000.000.00-0.000.00-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.01
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin0.020.000.00-0.000.00-0.00-0.00-0.000.000.000.00-0.000.000.000.010.010.010.020.010.020.010.020.010.000.010.010.000.01
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin0.02-0.000.00-0.00-0.00-0.000.00-0.00-0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.010.010.020.010.010.010.010.010.000.01-0.000.010.01
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin0.02-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.000.000.000.000.00-0.010.000.000.000.000.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.01-0.000.000.01

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Eosinophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 170, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 175, 170, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 172, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=168, 166, 159, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 157, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 157, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 151, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=159, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 124)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 113, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=104, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=90, 87, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 84, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=77, 71, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=76, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=69, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 71, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 48, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin0.210.000.000.010.000.010.000.020.040.040.020.030.010.00-0.01-0.02-0.01-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.01-0.03-0.05-0.04-0.04-0.09
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin0.24-0.00-0.02-0.03-0.02-0.02-0.03-0.02-0.02-0.00-0.020.00-0.010.00-0.030.02-0.01-0.01-0.010.010.000.01-0.01-0.000.00-0.01-0.000.03
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin0.24-0.02-0.01-0.02-0.00-0.02-0.020.01-0.02-0.01-0.04-0.01-0.03-0.02-0.00-0.03-0.00-0.01-0.02-0.010.00-0.01-0.01-0.010.010.03-0.02-0.03
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin0.230.01-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.010.00-0.00-0.01-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.02-0.02-0.02-0.01-0.050.00-0.02-0.02-0.03-0.02-0.01-0.03-0.00-0.03

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Lymphocyte Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 170, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 175, 170, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 172, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=168, 166, 159, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 157, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 157, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 151, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=159, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 124)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 114, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=104, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=91, 88, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 84, 48)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=78, 71, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=77, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=69, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 71, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 48, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin2.31-0.020.00-0.030.000.150.070.110.040.140.100.180.020.040.00-0.10-0.16-0.17-0.21-0.20-0.12-0.21-0.17-0.19-0.13-0.14-0.14-0.32
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin2.23-0.03-0.13-0.12-0.13-0.03-0.11-0.08-0.12-0.06-0.12-0.09-0.09-0.07-0.17-0.25-0.30-0.30-0.33-0.30-0.23-0.28-0.22-0.35-0.24-0.26-0.30-0.36
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin2.29-0.02-0.02-0.03-0.010.12-0.020.130.040.220.080.160.070.060.04-0.12-0.12-0.11-0.14-0.20-0.13-0.15-0.04-0.23-0.11-0.21-0.18-0.40
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin2.29-0.07-0.04-0.06-0.040.07-0.020.04-0.080.04-0.070.05-0.020.030.00-0.17-0.17-0.23-0.23-0.14-0.15-0.24-0.20-0.28-0.25-0.35-0.31-0.39

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Monocyte Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 170, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 175, 170, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 172, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=168, 166, 159, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 157, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 157, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 151, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=159, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 124)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 113, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=104, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=90, 87, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 84, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=77, 71, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=76, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=69, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 71, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 48, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin0.400.010.030.020.010.050.030.050.030.060.040.070.040.050.030.030.040.050.060.060.040.040.070.050.050.040.040.01
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin0.42-0.00-0.010.01-0.020.030.010.030.020.050.020.030.020.020.020.040.060.040.060.030.080.040.070.030.030.060.060.02
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin0.40-0.010.010.010.000.050.020.040.020.060.020.060.030.020.030.040.060.030.040.020.040.040.050.010.010.020.010.00
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin0.41-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.000.020.010.030.020.040.020.040.020.020.030.040.060.050.040.070.050.050.060.070.070.040.080.04

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 170, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 175, 170, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 172, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=168, 166, 159, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 157, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 157, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 151, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=159, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 124)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 113, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=104, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=90, 87, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 84, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=77, 71, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=76, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=69, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 71, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 48, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin4.230.120.190.070.020.190.270.170.330.340.240.240.030.040.08-0.25-0.25-0.13-0.18-0.35-0.01-0.110.07-0.34-0.22-0.20-0.19-0.29
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin4.190.210.150.220.350.260.400.320.300.410.320.300.200.260.20-0.010.230.030.08-0.050.110.110.32-0.230.06-0.170.11-0.03
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin4.270.150.210.150.160.270.220.380.240.410.170.240.060.210.27-0.03-0.05-0.11-0.17-0.160.00-0.040.000.06-0.04-0.23-0.25-0.14
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin4.270.050.110.100.030.280.110.240.140.160.060.240.150.030.110.020.030.02-0.08-0.04-0.13-0.04-0.23-0.100.02-0.35-0.11-0.40

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Hematocrit During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionpercentage red blood cells (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=181, 177, 172, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 178, 174, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=176, 174, 166, 160)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=173, 176, 165, 157)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=149, 134, 137, 131)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 167, 160, 144)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 154, 146, 139)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=167, 166, 159, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 158, 149, 141)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 152, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=164, 160, 159, 137)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=161, 155, 154, 137)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=152, 149, 146, 122)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=151, 142, 146, 127)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=148, 137, 142, 116)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=123, 114, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=108, 104, 112, 70)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=99, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=92, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 79, 85, 48)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=81, 74, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=77, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=70, 61, 73, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 50, 64, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin41.8-0.4-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.10.00.00.2-0.1-0.3-0.5-0.4-0.2-0.1-0.0-0.0-0.4-0.3-0.7-0.2-0.5-0.9-1.6-1.1-1.2-0.7-1.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin42.2-0.5-0.2-0.1-0.0-0.20.4-0.1-0.1-0.3-0.2-0.5-0.3-0.00.0-0.1-0.10.1-0.3-0.2-0.4-0.5-0.3-1.2-1.2-0.7-0.5-0.7
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin41.9-0.3-0.3-0.2-0.4-0.4-0.1-0.2-0.1-0.3-0.1-0.2-0.3-0.2-0.1-0.40.1-0.2-0.2-0.7-0.1-0.6-0.6-1.5-1.0-1.1-0.7-1.5
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin42.3-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.1-0.4-0.1-0.20.0-0.5-0.3-0.5-0.4-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.5-0.4-0.5-0.90.0-0.5-0.6-1.7-1.6-1.8-1.7-2.3

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Hemoglobin During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=181, 177, 172, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 178, 174, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=176, 174, 166, 160)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=173, 176, 165, 157)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=149, 134, 137, 131)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 167, 160, 144)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 154, 146, 139)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=167, 166, 159, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 158, 149, 141)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 152, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=164, 160, 159, 137)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=161, 155, 154, 137)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=152, 149, 146, 122)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=151, 142, 146, 127)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=148, 137, 142, 116)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=123, 114, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=108, 104, 112, 70)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=99, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=92, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 79, 85, 48)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=81, 74, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=77, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=70, 61, 73, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 50, 64, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin13.99-0.090.030.000.01-0.16-0.05-0.02-0.01-0.09-0.12-0.23-0.24-0.18-0.17-0.12-0.07-0.26-0.25-0.34-0.26-0.28-0.45-0.57-0.51-0.53-0.53-0.75
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin14.18-0.18-0.09-0.07-0.02-0.160.03-0.10-0.10-0.19-0.10-0.25-0.25-0.22-0.19-0.13-0.17-0.26-0.32-0.27-0.36-0.39-0.42-0.47-0.53-0.46-0.47-0.49
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin14.06-0.08-0.07-0.06-0.07-0.16-0.05-0.15-0.12-0.24-0.16-0.21-0.23-0.19-0.17-0.22-0.10-0.27-0.22-0.36-0.26-0.40-0.49-0.59-0.49-0.62-0.60-0.62
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin14.18-0.18-0.15-0.15-0.07-0.17-0.11-0.20-0.13-0.28-0.23-0.33-0.30-0.29-0.29-0.22-0.28-0.31-0.38-0.40-0.26-0.41-0.45-0.56-0.58-0.81-0.82-0.87

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Platelet Counts (x 10^9 c/L) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^9 c/L (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 189, 181, 178)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=179, 168, 167, 166)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 172, 168, 164)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=171, 171, 164, 157)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 170, 162, 151)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=147, 132, 137, 129)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 165, 157, 141)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=153, 149, 145, 133)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 161, 156, 133)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=152, 155, 147, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=160, 151, 153, 144)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=151, 148, 142, 134)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=158, 153, 156, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=157, 153, 148, 130)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=149, 142, 139, 120)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=151, 141, 143, 120)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 132, 137, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=132, 124, 130, 92)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 111, 122, 84)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=107, 103, 110, 69)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=99, 93, 98, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=91, 84, 88, 51)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=83, 77, 84, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=79, 70, 77, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=75, 64, 74, 41)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=68, 60, 71, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=67, 57, 68, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 49, 64, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin261.013.711.112.08.511.58.27.57.48.56.84.1-2.32.0-2.3-6.4-4.74.713.66.17.04.512.012.513.88.912.29.8
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin258.76.55.15.14.90.54.82.5-0.05.2-1.7-1.7-2.0-0.8-11.9-9.00.1-2.61.43.31.22.21.1-1.8-1.9-8.3-8.5-4.7
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin265.58.411.38.76.74.76.86.15.35.64.93.50.6-0.1-2.6-3.22.60.19.10.31.15.79.28.010.1-2.71.3-0.7
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin256.29.811.88.57.58.59.37.47.13.07.09.73.53.6-4.1-2.43.54.08.66.14.23.26.59.43.2-1.2-2.91.5

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Counts (x 10^6 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^6 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=181, 177, 172, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 178, 174, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=176, 174, 166, 160)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=173, 176, 165, 157)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=149, 134, 137, 131)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 167, 160, 144)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 154, 146, 139)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=167, 166, 159, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 158, 149, 141)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 152, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=164, 160, 159, 137)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=161, 155, 154, 137)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=152, 149, 146, 122)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=151, 142, 146, 127)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=148, 137, 142, 116)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=123, 114, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=108, 104, 112, 70)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=99, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=92, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 79, 85, 48)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=81, 74, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=77, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=70, 61, 73, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 50, 64, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin4.66-0.030.010.030.030.000.040.040.080.030.03-0.02-0.03-0.010.00-0.03-0.02-0.09-0.07-0.14-0.11-0.08-0.13-0.20-0.16-0.16-0.13-0.15
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin4.70-0.05-0.010.000.030.000.090.040.070.040.060.010.010.020.020.00-0.01-0.02-0.07-0.07-0.06-0.06-0.06-0.11-0.12-0.09-0.12-0.09
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin4.68-0.04-0.02-0.010.00-0.030.030.010.040.000.020.00-0.02-0.01-0.00-0.06-0.01-0.08-0.09-0.13-0.08-0.10-0.13-0.19-0.14-0.16-0.14-0.16
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin4.73-0.05-0.04-0.020.02-0.020.030.010.05-0.010.02-0.03-0.02-0.02-0.01-0.04-0.04-0.06-0.09-0.12-0.04-0.07-0.10-0.17-0.15-0.21-0.22-0.25

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in White Blood Cell Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Intervention10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (Week 0) (n=192, 191, 181, 179)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=178, 175, 171, 169)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=176, 176, 171, 166)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=175, 172, 165, 158)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=172, 174, 163, 153)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=148, 130, 137, 128)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=169, 166, 159, 142)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=156, 152, 145, 136)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 166, 159, 137)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=155, 158, 149, 139)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=162, 153, 154, 146)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=157, 152, 143, 138)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=162, 160, 157, 135)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=160, 155, 154, 136)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=150, 149, 146, 121)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=150, 142, 145, 125)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=147, 136, 140, 115)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 130, 94)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=122, 114, 123, 85)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=105, 104, 111, 68)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=98, 92, 95, 57)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=90, 87, 88, 50)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=85, 78, 85, 47)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=77, 72, 78, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=76, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=70, 60, 72, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=69, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 49, 63, 31)
Placebo+ Metformin7.190.110.220.070.030.390.370.330.420.580.390.500.100.140.10-0.36-0.39-0.30-0.38-0.54-0.15-0.32-0.07-0.54-0.38-0.37-0.35-0.71
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin7.120.17-0.020.070.190.230.260.240.160.390.190.240.110.210.02-0.20-0.02-0.25-0.21-0.31-0.05-0.120.13-0.55-0.18-0.38-0.13-0.36
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin7.230.100.190.110.150.420.180.570.280.670.230.450.130.270.34-0.14-0.10-0.19-0.29-0.36-0.10-0.16-0.01-0.19-0.15-0.40-0.45-0.58
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin7.25-0.030.040.02-0.030.370.080.300.070.23-0.020.360.120.050.10-0.14-0.10-0.18-0.34-0.11-0.26-0.27-0.42-0.38-0.18-0.72-0.34-0.80

Changes From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=182, 181, 176, 170)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 179, 175, 164)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=178, 176, 171, 162)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=175, 176, 170, 152)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=116, 108, 101, 101)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 166, 161, 138)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=132, 129, 124, 116)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 164, 156, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=144, 141, 132, 123)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=163, 155, 153, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=146, 140, 136, 126)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=165, 160, 161, 140)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=162, 156, 155, 138)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=154, 151, 149, 123)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=155, 147, 151, 130)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=151, 138, 145, 117)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 133, 98)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=124, 117, 125, 86)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=111, 107, 113, 73)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=100, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=94, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=87, 82, 85, 49)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=84, 75, 79, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=78, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=71, 63, 74, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 53, 64, 33)
Placebo+ Metformin-1.5-1.4-1.4-2.2-3.4-1.7-2.1-1.0-1.8-1.9-1.6-2.4-1.6-1.6-1.4-0.7-1.8-2.1-3.6-3.6-3.1-2.7-4.6-2.0-1.6-2.6-2.8
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin-0.9-1.3-0.5-1.5-1.6-2.1-2.2-1.7-2.3-2.1-1.6-2.5-1.6-1.9-1.5-0.9-1.6-1.9-2.3-1.1-1.2-3.0-2.7-1.6-0.9-1.7-2.3
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin-1.0-0.3-0.1-1.10.3-0.6-0.2-0.7-1.4-1.2-0.7-1.3-0.9-0.9-1.1-0.8-0.2-1.2-2.2-0.1-0.60.7-0.72.1-0.30.4-2.8
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin-1.1-0.9-1.6-1.9-0.5-1.0-0.4-1.0-0.7-1.0-1.2-1.3-0.5-1.1-1.7-0.3-1.2-0.8-0.40.70.00.3-1.8-1.4-1.4-2.6-0.6

Changes From Baseline in Heart Rate During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionbeats/min (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=182, 181, 176, 170)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 179, 175, 164)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=178, 176, 171, 162)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=175, 176, 170, 152)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=116, 106, 100, 101)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 166, 161, 138)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=132, 129, 124, 116)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 164, 156, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=144, 141, 132, 123)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=163, 155, 153, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=146, 140, 136, 126)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=165, 160, 161, 140)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=162, 156, 154, 138)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=154, 151, 149, 123)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=154, 147, 151, 130)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=151, 138, 145, 117)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 133, 98)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=124, 116, 125, 86)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=111, 107, 113, 73)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=100, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=94, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=87, 82, 85, 49)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=84, 75, 79, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=78, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=71, 63, 74, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 53, 64, 33)
Placebo+ Metformin0.70.1-0.5-0.6-1.5-1.5-1.5-0.5-0.5-0.8-1.6-0.7-0.1-0.6-1.0-0.5-1.4-1.6-1.8-2.4-0.9-1.2-2.8-0.9-2.7-1.8-1.1
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin-0.4-0.0-0.20.60.20.11.0-0.50.3-0.30.30.4-0.3-0.30.1-0.8-0.5-0.20.6-0.8-0.9-0.6-0.0-1.20.2-1.1-1.2
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin-0.3-0.1-0.20.5-0.5-0.2-0.1-0.6-0.0-0.00.4-0.6-0.7-1.2-1.0-0.8-1.3-1.5-0.6-0.5-0.2-1.7-0.60.3-0.8-0.30.1
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin1.01.31.00.80.90.71.40.41.60.92.40.20.50.60.80.4-0.0-0.30.5-0.3-0.7-1.7-0.9-0.0-2.8-2.2-0.9

Changes From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=182, 181, 176, 170)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=178, 179, 175, 164)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=178, 176, 171, 162)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=175, 176, 170, 152)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=116, 108, 101, 101)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=170, 166, 161, 138)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=132, 129, 124, 116)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=166, 164, 156, 140)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=144, 141, 132, 123)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=163, 155, 153, 147)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=146, 140, 136, 126)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=165, 160, 161, 140)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=162, 156, 155, 138)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=154, 151, 149, 123)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=155, 147, 151, 130)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=151, 138, 145, 117)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=134, 126, 133, 98)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=124, 117, 125, 86)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=111, 107, 113, 73)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=100, 94, 98, 58)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=94, 88, 90, 52)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=87, 82, 85, 49)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=84, 75, 79, 45)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=78, 67, 75, 42)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=71, 63, 74, 41)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=70, 60, 72, 40)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=61, 53, 64, 33)
Placebo+ Metformin-3.3-2.9-2.8-3.7-6.8-4.3-2.6-2.6-4.1-4.3-4.7-4.5-3.4-2.3-2.9-0.0-1.70.3-2.0-2.8-2.50.3-2.8-1.82.7-1.4-0.4
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin-1.6-3.3-2.8-4.2-2.8-4.3-3.4-4.4-4.2-4.9-3.1-3.8-2.5-3.3-1.9-0.6-0.7-1.7-2.8-1.31.5-1.51.50.73.50.21.7
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin-1.6-2.0-2.8-2.9-2.1-2.2-0.7-2.7-1.9-2.9-2.0-4.3-3.6-2.6-2.6-0.6-0.1-3.7-3.2-0.4-0.4-0.70.30.8-0.0-0.1-2.6
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin-2.5-2.3-4.1-4.2-3.3-2.8-2.3-3.5-2.2-2.2-3.1-3.6-1.1-1.8-1.70.9-0.60.30.62.02.92.0-0.0-0.43.10.92.2

Electrocardiogram (ECG) Tracings - Shift Table From Baseline (BL) to Selected Visits During ST + LT Treatment Period

The normality/abnormality of the ECG tracing was determined by the investigator. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 76, 102, 154, 206,

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Normal BL, Normal Week 12(BL n=108, 109, 104, 104)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 12 (BL n=108,109,104,104)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 12 (BL n=69, 66, 70, 58)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 12(BL n=69, 66, 70, 58)Normal BL, Normal Week 24 (BL n=96, 87, 83, 77)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 24 (BL n=96, 87, 83, 77)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 24 (BL n=58, 58, 56, 41)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 24(BL n=58, 58, 56, 41)Normal BL, Normal Week 76 (BL n=94, 89, 92, 81)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 76 (BL n=94, 89, 92, 81)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 76 (BL n=51, 52, 59, 44)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 76 (BL n=51,52,59,44)Normal BL, Normal Week 102 (BL n=80, 66, 65, 50)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 102 (BL n=80, 66, 65, 50)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 102 (BL n=43,45,49, 21)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 102 (BL n=43,45,49, 21)Normal BL, Normal Week 154 (BL n=60, 46, 53, 34)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 154 (BL n=60, 46, 53, 34)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 154 (BL n=26, 34, 34, 16)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 154 (BL n=26,34,34,16)Normal BL, Normal Week 206 (BL n=48, 31, 42, 24)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 206 (BL n=48, 31, 42, 24)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 206 (BL n=20, 25, 28, 13)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 206 (BL n=20,25,28,13)
Placebo+ Metformin8222124661161427602113314196152687916876
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin941022487013154173191841481714353716122232101117
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin9711145582141642751913386317113248121016399911
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin981122447982236741518345511143136101321274916

Marked Laboratory Abnormalities - During ST + LT Treatment Period

A laboratory value was considered a marked abnormality if it is outside the pre-defined criteria for marked abnormality and the on-treatment value was more extreme (farther from the limit) than the baseline value. Pre-Rx=pretreatment; ULN=upper limit of normal; ALP=alkaline phosphatase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase; ALT=alanine aminotransferase; unspec=unspecified; sodium serum low: <0.9 x Pre-Rx & <=130mEq/L / high: >1.1 x Pre-Rx & >=150mEq/L; potassium, serum low: <=0.8 x Pre-Rx & >=6.0mEq/L / high: 1.2 x Pre-Rx & >=6.0mEq/L; LLN=lower limit of normal. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: Lab assessments taken during and up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug during the ST + LT Treatment Period. Mean duration of exposure: 124, 118, 130, 95 weeks, respectively, for 2.5mg, 5mg, 10 mg, placebo.

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin < 8 g/dL (n=189, 190, 181, 179)Hematocrit < 0.75 x pre-Rx (n=189, 190, 181, 179)Platelets < 50 x 10^9 c/L (n=189, 188, 181, 178)Platelets > 1.5 x ULN (n=189, 188, 181, 178)Leukocytes < 2 x 1000 c/µL (n=189, 190, 181, 179)Neutrophils+Bands <1x1000 c/µL (n=189,190,181,179)Eosinophils >0.9x1000 c/µL (n=189, 190, 181, 179)Lymphocytes <=0.75x1000 c/µL (n=189,190,181,179)ALP >3 x pre-Rx and >ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)ALP >1.5 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)AST >3 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)AST >5 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)AST >10 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)AST >20 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)ALT >3 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)ALT >5 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)ALT >10 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)ALT >20 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)Bilirubin Total >2mg/dL (n=190,190,181,179)Bilirubin Total >1.5xULN (n=190,190,181,179)Bilirubin Total >2xULN (n=190,190,181,179)BUN >2 x pre-Rx and >ULN (n=190,190,181,179)Creatinine >2.5 mg/dL (n=190,190,181,179)Glucose, Serum Fasting < 50 mg/dL (n=0, 0, 0, 0)Glucose, Serum Fasting > 500 mg/dL (n=0, 0, 0, 0)Glucose, Serum Unspec. < 50 mg/dL (n=0,0,0,0)Glucose, Serum Unspec. > 500 mg/dL (n=0,0,0,0)Glucose, Plasma Fasting<50mg/dL(n=189,189,181,179)Glucose,Plasma Fasting>500mg/dL(n=189,189,181,179)Glucose, Plasma Unspec.<50mg/dL(n=192,191,181,179)Glucose,Plasma Unspec.>500mg/dL(n=192,191,181,179)Sodium,Serum Low (*) (n=190,190,181,179)Sodium,Serum High (*) (n=190,190,181,179)Potassium, Serum Low (*) (n=190,190,181,179)Potassium, Serum High (n=190,190,181,179)Chloride < 90 mEq/L (n=190, 190, 181, 179)Chloride > 120 mEq/L (n=190, 190, 181, 179)Albumin < 0.9 LLN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)Creatine Kinase > 5 x ULN (n=190, 190, 181, 179)Uric Acid > 1.5 x ULN (n=0, 0, 0, 0)Protein Urine, >=2-4 (n=187, 189, 180, 178)Blood Urine, >=2-4 (n=187, 189, 180, 178)Red Blood Cells Urine >=2-4 (n=175,176,162,166)White Blood Cells Urine >=2-4 (n=175,176,162,166)
Placebo+ Metformin020101920300000000110910000309110170001012132028
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin1504001840131004100000610000109141153003013182226
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin12000112303610041102201210000201911004211107172843
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin150001124011000400011191000030712015300209212738

Overall Summary of Adverse Events During ST+LT Treatment Period

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event. Related events=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. (NCT00121667)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit day in the ST+LT period; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit day + 30 days in the LT+ST period. Mean duration of exposure: 124, 118, 130, 95 wks respectively for 2.5mg, 5mg, 10 mg, pla

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
At Least 1 AEAt Least 1 Related AEDeathsAt Least 1 SAEAt Least 1 Related SAEDiscontinuations Due to SAEsDiscontinuations Due to AEs
Placebo+ Metformin14256215109
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin161651221613
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Metformin177531230411
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin155570273618

Percentage of Participants Achieving A1c <7% at Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving A1C < 7%, the American Diabetic Association's defined goal for glycemia, at each dose of saxagliptin plus TZD versus placebo plus TZD at Week 24. (NCT00295633)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg Plus Open-label TZD42.2
Saxagliptin 5 mg Plus Open-label TZD41.8
Placebo Plus Open-label TZD25.6

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline in FPG at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00295633)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo Plus Open-label TZD162.4159.3-2.8
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg Plus Open-label TZD163.0148.2-14.3
Saxagliptin 5 mg Plus Open-label TZD159.5143.0-17.3

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline in A1C at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00295633)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo Plus Open-label TZD8.197.91-0.30
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg Plus Open-label TZD8.257.59-0.66
Saxagliptin 5 mg Plus Open-label TZD8.357.39-0.94

Changes From Baseline in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Response to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline for 0 to 180 minutes PPG AUC achieved at each dose of saxagliptin plus TZD versus placebo plus TZD at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00295633)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo Plus Open-label TZD4725644819-2690
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg Plus Open-label TZD4830140255-7849
Saxagliptin 5 mg Plus Open-label TZD4786638587-9269

Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C < 7% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants achieving A1C < 7%, the American Diabetes Association's defined goal for glycemia, at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus metformin alone at Week 24. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin60.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin59.7
Metformin41.1

Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C < 7% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants achieving A1C < 7%, the American Diabetes Association's defined goal for glycemia, at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus saxagliptin alone at Week 24. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin60.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin59.7
Saxagliptin 10 mg32.2

Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C ≤6.5% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants achieving A1C ≤6.5%, at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus metformin alone at Week 24. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin45.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin40.6
Metformin29.0

Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C ≤6.5% at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants achieving A1C ≤6.5%, at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus saxagliptin alone at Week 24. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin45.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin40.6
Saxagliptin 10 mg20.3

Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue or Discontinuation at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants requiring rescue for failing to achieve pre-specified glycemic targets or discontinuing for lack of efficacy within the 24-week treatment period at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus metformin alone. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin7.5
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin5.9
Metformin10.1

Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue or Discontinuation at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Percentage of participants requiring rescue for failing to achieve pre-specified glycemic targets or discontinuing for lack of efficacy within the 24-week treatment period at each dose of saxagliptin plus metformin versus saxagliptin alone. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin7.5
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin5.9
Saxagliptin 10 mg21.2

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline in A1C at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Metformin9.437.48-1.99
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin9.537.02-2.49
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin9.416.93-2.53

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline in FPG at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Metformin199.1152.7-47.3
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin204.3140.1-62.2
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin198.9140.2-59.8

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline in FPG at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Saxagliptin 10 mg200.9169.9-30.9
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin204.3140.1-62.2
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin198.9140.2-59.8

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline in A1C at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Saxagliptin 10 mg9.617.86-1.69
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin9.537.02-2.49
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin9.416.93-2.53

Changes From Baseline in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Response to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline for 0 to 180 minutes PPG AUC at Week 24, adjsuted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Metformin5793742428-15005
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin5721935790-21336
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin5553135324-21080

Changes From Baseline in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Response to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 24, Saxagliptin Plus Metformin Versus Saxagliptin Monotherapy

Mean change from baseline for 0 to 180 minutes PPG AUC at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00327015)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Saxagliptin 10 mg5758441229-16054
Saxagliptin 10 mg + Metformin5721935790-21336
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Metformin5553135324-21080

Percentage of Participants Achieving A1C < 7% at Week 24

Percentage of participants achieving A1C < 7%, the American Diabetes Association's defined goal for glycemia, at each dose of saxagliptin plus glyburide versus placebo plus upward titrated glyburide at Week 24. (NCT00313313)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Glyburide 7.5 mg22.4
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Glyburide 7.5 mg22.8
Placebo + Glyburide 7.5 mg9.1

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline in FPG at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00313313)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo + Glyburide 7.5 mg174.4174.60.7
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Glyburide 7.5 mg170.1164.4-7.1
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Glyburide 7.5 mg175.0164.6-9.7

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline in A1C at Week 24, adjusted for baseline value. (NCT00313313)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo + Glyburide 7.5 mg8.448.520.08
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Glyburide 7.5 mg8.367.83-0.54
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Glyburide 7.5 mg8.487.83-0.64

Changes From Baseline in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Response to an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) at Week 24

Mean change from baseline for 0 to 180 minutes PPG AUC at Week 24, adjusted for baseline values. (NCT00313313)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,
Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
Baseline MeanWeek 24 MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo + Glyburide 7.5 mg51801524161196
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg + Glyburide 7.5 mg4912445402-4296
Saxagliptin 5 mg + Glyburide 7.5 mg5034245391-5000

All Reported Hypoglycemic Adverse Events During ST + LT Treatment Period

Hypoglycemic Events are based upon the Saxagliptin Predefined List of Events, which included hypoglycemia, blood glucose decreased, and hypoglycemic unconsciousness. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit + 30 days. Mean duration of exposure was 109 weeks in 10 mg arm, 94.7 weeks in 2.5 mg arm, 103 weeks in 5 mg arm, and 98.4 weeks in placebo arm.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg9
Saxagliptin 5 mg11
Saxagliptin 10 mg10
Placebo9

All Reported Hypoglycemic Adverse Events During ST + LT Treatment Period - Open-Label Cohort

Hypoglycemic Events are based upon the Saxagliptin Predefined List of Events, which included hypoglycemia, blood glucose decreased, and hypoglycemic unconsciousness. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit + 30 days. Mean duration of exposure was 34 weeks.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)2

Baseline Demographic Characteristic (Age, Continuous) - Summary for ST + LT Treatment Period - Open-Label Cohort

This cohort represents a different population (screening A1C > 10.0% and ≤ 12.0%) than the double-blind cohort, and was presented separately in the study report. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionyears (Mean)
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)49.09

Baseline Demographic Characteristic (Body Mass Index) - Summary for ST + LT Treatment Period - Open-Label Cohort

This cohort represents a different population (screening A1C > 10.0% and ≤ 12.0%) than the double-blind cohort, and was presented separately in the study report. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)31.73

Baseline Demographic Characteristic (Weight) - Summary for ST + LT Treatment Period - Open-Label Cohort

This cohort represents a different population (screening A1C > 10.0% and ≤ 12.0%) than the double-blind cohort, and was presented separately in the study report. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionkg (Mean)
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)91.41

Confirmed Hypoglycemia During ST + LT Treatment Period

'Confirmed' = recorded on the hypoglycemia AE case report form page with a fingerstick glucose <= 50 mg/dL and associated symptoms (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit + 30 days. Mean duration of exposure was 109 weeks in 10 mg arm, 94.7 weeks in 2.5 mg arm, 103 weeks in 5 mg arm, and 98.4 weeks in placebo arm.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg1
Saxagliptin 5 mg1
Saxagliptin 10 mg0
Placebo0

Confirmed Hypoglycemia During ST + LT Treatment Period - Open-Label Cohort

'Confirmed' = recorded on the hypoglycemia AE case report form page with a fingerstick glucose <= 50 mg/dL and associated symptoms (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit + 30 days. Mean duration of exposure was 34 weeks.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)0

Percentage of Participants Achieving Therapeutic Glycemic Response (A1C < 7.0%) at Week 24

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg35.0
Saxagliptin 5 mg37.9
Saxagliptin 10 mg41.1
Placebo23.9

Percentage of Participants Achieving Therapeutic Glycemic Response (A1C < 7.0%) at Week 24 - Open Label Cohort

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Open Label Cohort (Direct Enrollees)14.1

A1C Changes From Baseline at Week 24 - Open Label Cohort

To compare the change from baseline in HbA1c achieved with each dose of saxagliptin versus placebo in treatment naive subjects with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control defined as A1C ≥7.0% and ≤10.0%. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

InterventionPercentage of glycosylated hemoglobins (Mean)
Baseline MeanMean Change from Baseline
Open Label Cohort (Direct Enrollees)10.70-1.87

Baseline and Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineAdjusted Change from Baseline
Placebo171.856.06
Saxagliptin 10 mg176.51-16.75
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg177.72-14.53
Saxagliptin 5 mg171.31-8.67

Baseline and Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) - Open Label Cohort

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Open-Label Cohort (Direct Enrollees)241.08-33.42

Baseline and Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC)

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
BaselineAdjusted Change from Baseline
Placebo46030-646.6
Saxagliptin 10 mg44614-8084
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg45030-6868
Saxagliptin 5 mg45691-6896

Baseline and Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) - Open Label Cohort

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline
Open Label Cohort (Direct Enrollees)60687-11078

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Basophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionx 10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=102, 106, 98, 94)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=95, 99, 92, 86)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=91, 99, 90, 90)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=89, 95, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=91, 88, 90, 79)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=68, 76, 69, 63)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=83, 88, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=76, 77, 80, 75)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=90, 91, 83, 71)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=78, 75, 82, 71)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=83, 79, 78, 72)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=77, 74, 75, 65)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=83, 81, 78, 74)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=76, 78, 79, 67)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=74, 72, 70, 60)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=67, 69, 71, 61)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=60, 66, 67, 55)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=51, 58, 63, 49)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=48, 58, 56, 42)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=39, 47, 50, 40)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 42, 34)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=30, 40, 40, 29)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=28, 38, 34, 28)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=26, 33, 31, 24)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 25)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 26)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 25, 26, 23)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 22, 23, 21)
Placebo0.020.00-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.00-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.00-0.00-0.010.010.000.020.020.010.020.020.030.030.020.010.020.020.020.01
Saxagliptin 10 mg0.02-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.00-0.01-0.01-0.00-0.010.00-0.01-0.010.000.010.020.020.020.020.010.010.010.020.010.000.010.01
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg0.010.000.000.010.000.00-0.000.000.000.000.010.010.000.000.000.020.020.020.020.020.020.030.020.030.020.010.010.00
Saxagliptin 5 mg0.02-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.00-0.01-0.010.00-0.000.00-0.01-0.00-0.010.010.010.010.010.010.020.020.030.030.020.020.010.020.010.02

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Eosinophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionx 10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=102, 106, 98, 94)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=95, 99, 92, 86)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=91, 99, 90, 90)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=89, 95, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=91, 88, 90, 79)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=68, 76, 69, 63)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=83, 88, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=76, 77, 80, 75)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=90, 91, 83, 71)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=78, 75, 82, 71)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=83, 79, 78, 72)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=77, 74, 75, 65)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=83, 81, 78, 74)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=76, 78, 79, 67)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=74, 72, 70, 60)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=67, 69, 71, 61)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=60, 66, 67, 55)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=51, 58, 63, 49)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=48, 58, 56, 42)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=39, 47, 50, 40)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 42, 34)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=30, 40, 40, 29)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=28, 38, 34, 28)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=26, 33, 31, 24)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 25)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 26)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 25, 26, 23)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 22, 23, 21)
Placebo0.20-0.02-0.02-0.02-0.010.01-0.02-0.01-0.000.00-0.03-0.02-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.01-0.02-0.03-0.02-0.01-0.00-0.010.010.030.060.070.050.06
Saxagliptin 10 mg0.20-0.02-0.01-0.02-0.02-0.02-0.01-0.01-0.03-0.03-0.04-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.04-0.02-0.00-0.02-0.020.02-0.01-0.03-0.00-0.010.01-0.000.000.03
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg0.18-0.01-0.020.010.00-0.010.00-0.01-0.02-0.02-0.02-0.00-0.02-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.00-0.03-0.030.02-0.00-0.02-0.010.00-0.02-0.02-0.010.00
Saxagliptin 5 mg0.200.01-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.02-0.02-0.01-0.02-0.02-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.03-0.01-0.010.00-0.04-0.020.010.070.02-0.00-0.00-0.02-0.01-0.01-0.00

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Lymphocyte Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionx 10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=102, 106, 98, 94)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=95, 99, 92, 86)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=91, 99, 90, 90)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=89, 95, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=91, 88, 90, 79)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=68, 76, 69, 63)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=83, 88, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=76, 77, 80, 75)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=90, 91, 83, 71)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=78, 75, 82, 71)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=83, 79, 78, 72)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=77, 74, 75, 65)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=83, 81, 78, 74)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=76, 78, 79, 67)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=74, 72, 70, 60)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=67, 69, 71, 61)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=60, 66, 67, 55)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=51, 58, 63, 49)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=49, 58, 56, 42)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=39, 48, 51, 40)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 43, 35)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=30, 40, 40, 30)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=28, 38, 34, 28)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=26, 33, 31, 24)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 25)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 26)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 25, 26, 23)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 22, 23, 21)
Placebo2.22-0.13-0.04-0.09-0.000.05-0.020.060.010.08-0.110.09-0.01-0.03-0.08-0.03-0.16-0.20-0.23-0.16-0.10-0.060.00-0.14-0.16-0.050.01-0.08
Saxagliptin 10 mg2.14-0.11-0.18-0.23-0.20-0.10-0.16-0.01-0.110.01-0.10-0.07-0.13-0.09-0.17-0.25-0.19-0.18-0.19-0.23-0.21-0.16-0.10-0.23-0.11-0.06-0.04-0.05
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg2.16-0.04-0.03-0.04-0.070.07-0.060.200.030.110.080.16-0.000.080.05-0.06-0.06-0.10-0.12-0.17-0.15-0.12-0.13-0.23-0.23-0.15-0.06-0.17
Saxagliptin 5 mg2.21-0.10-0.12-0.09-0.110.02-0.120.080.010.13-0.020.13-0.07-0.000.02-0.09-0.10-0.09-0.02-0.07-0.00-0.00-0.030.04-0.13-0.22-0.09-0.14

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Monocyte Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionx 10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=102, 106, 98, 94)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=95, 99, 92, 86)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=91, 99, 90, 90)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=89, 95, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=91, 88, 90, 79)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=68, 76, 69, 63)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=83, 88, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=76, 77, 80, 75)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=90, 91, 83, 71)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=78, 75, 82, 71)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=83, 79, 78, 72)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=77, 74, 75, 65)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=83, 81, 78, 74)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=76, 78, 79, 67)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=74, 72, 70, 60)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=67, 69, 71, 61)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=60, 66, 67, 55)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=51, 58, 63, 49)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=48, 58, 56, 42)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=39, 47, 50, 40)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 42, 34)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=30, 40, 40, 29)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=28, 38, 34, 28)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=26, 33, 31, 24)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 25)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 26)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 25, 26, 23)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 22, 23, 21)
Placebo0.32-0.010.010.02-0.020.030.010.040.010.040.010.050.030.030.000.060.070.050.050.070.130.070.100.080.110.110.130.09
Saxagliptin 10 mg0.32-0.05-0.01-0.01-0.010.040.000.030.040.060.040.060.030.040.040.050.070.060.080.090.060.070.100.060.100.110.110.13
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg0.310.010.050.050.030.080.050.090.060.060.040.080.040.050.060.070.080.120.110.140.120.120.080.100.070.080.090.05
Saxagliptin 5 mg0.340.010.00-0.010.030.040.000.060.040.050.020.050.010.030.020.030.050.040.030.040.050.040.020.050.040.040.040.05

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionx 10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=102, 106, 98, 94)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=95, 99, 92, 86)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=91, 99, 90, 90)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=89, 95, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=91, 88, 90, 79)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=68, 76, 69, 63)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=83, 88, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=76, 77, 80, 75)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=90, 91, 83, 71)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=78, 75, 82, 71)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=83, 79, 78, 72)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=77, 74, 75, 65)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=83, 81, 78, 74)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=76, 78, 79, 67)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=74, 72, 70, 60)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=67, 69, 71, 61)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=60, 66, 67, 55)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=51, 58, 63, 49)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=48, 58, 56, 42)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=39, 47, 50, 40)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 42, 34)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=30, 40, 40, 29)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=28, 38, 34, 28)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=26, 33, 31, 24)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 25)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 26)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 25, 26, 23)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 22, 23, 21)
Placebo4.01-0.070.230.170.190.450.300.460.180.210.150.32-0.030.000.200.270.16-0.010.010.010.420.220.400.410.330.51-0.010.31
Saxagliptin 10 mg4.160.000.050.040.030.170.180.170.160.320.070.440.160.320.240.190.080.080.050.240.290.560.450.470.270.550.510.90
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg4.00-0.060.090.010.020.180.010.070.170.230.190.440.090.040.130.030.110.050.580.190.280.610.410.25-0.040.230.340.15
Saxagliptin 5 mg3.980.110.160.190.270.480.210.640.490.670.320.580.570.290.420.400.250.330.180.430.810.590.800.390.560.500.080.63

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Hematocrit During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionpercentage red blood cells (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=102, 106, 98, 94)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=95,100, 93, 87)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=92, 99, 91, 91)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=91, 96, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=92, 90, 91, 79)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=70, 76, 69, 63)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=85, 88, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=76, 80, 81, 75)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=90. 91, 83, 71)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=78, 75, 82, 71)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=83, 80, 78, 72)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=78, 74, 76, 65)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=83, 82, 78, 74)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=77, 78, 79, 67)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=75, 73, 70, 62)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=67, 71, 71, 61)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=61, 66, 67, 55)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=51, 59, 63, 49)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=49, 58, 56, 42)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=40, 49, 51, 40)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 43, 35)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=30, 40, 40, 30)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=28, 39, 34, 28)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=26, 34, 31, 24)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 26)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 26)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 26, 26, 23)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 22, 24, 21)
Placebo42.8-0.40.30.30.50.50.70.20.30.40.20.50.50.4-0.40.20.70.80.4-0.70.2-0.1-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.0-0.5
Saxagliptin 10 mg42.7-0.7-0.10.00.2-0.20.60.20.60.30.1-0.3-0.10.20.40.10.60.71.2-0.00.20.00.2-1.00.21.00.50.2
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg42.5-0.4-0.20.10.50.60.60.60.50.20.70.30.00.50.00.10.30.70.9-0.2-0.00.2-0.1-0.8-0.11.10.6-0.4
Saxagliptin 5 mg42.8-0.2-0.20.30.4-0.00.40.60.70.40.40.20.2-0.1-0.10.30.10.50.90.50.60.3-0.1-0.80.20.61.10.2

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Hemoglobin During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=102, 106, 98, 94)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=95,100, 93, 87)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=92, 99, 91, 91)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=91, 96, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=92, 90, 91, 79)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=70, 76, 69, 63)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=85, 88, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=76, 80, 81, 75)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=90, 91, 83, 71)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=78, 75, 82, 71)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=83, 80, 78, 72)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=78, 74, 76, 65)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=83, 82, 78, 74)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=77, 78, 79, 67)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=75, 73, 70, 62)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=67, 71, 71, 61)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=61, 66, 67, 55)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=51, 59, 63, 49)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=49, 58, 56, 42)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=40, 49, 51, 40)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 43, 35)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=30, 40, 40, 30)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=28, 39, 34, 28)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=26, 34, 31, 24)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 26)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 26)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 26, 26, 23)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 22, 24, 21)
Placebo14.50-0.090.100.040.090.040.16-0.030.04-0.03-0.19-0.18-0.14-0.18-0.33-0.010.08-0.10-0.10-0.29-0.19-0.33-0.36-0.25-0.24-0.61-0.39-0.32
Saxagliptin 10 mg14.47-0.22-0.09-0.07-0.02-0.13-0.07-0.120.00-0.07-0.25-0.36-0.32-0.19-0.06-0.020.07-0.07-0.04-0.07-0.18-0.25-0.15-0.24-0.03-0.08-0.160.10
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg14.49-0.21-0.16-0.12-0.000.01-0.04-0.09-0.10-0.26-0.16-0.35-0.37-0.25-0.31-0.17-0.18-0.27-0.18-0.32-0.41-0.38-0.40-0.45-0.51-0.38-0.45-0.51
Saxagliptin 5 mg14.45-0.13-0.15-0.000.04-0.20-0.07-0.050.01-0.10-0.14-0.23-0.25-0.29-0.220.06-0.11-0.19-0.09-0.00-0.07-0.17-0.35-0.37-0.05-0.08-0.03-0.07

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Platelet Counts (x 10^9 c/L) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionx 10^9 c/L (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=101, 106, 96, 94)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=92, 96, 85, 82)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=88, 97, 90, 90)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=88, 93, 84, 81)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=86, 85, 86, 77)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=68, 75, 67, 62)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=83, 84, 85, 82)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=72, 79, 77, 74)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=86, 88, 81, 69)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=77, 71, 79, 70)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=78, 78, 72, 70)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=74, 72, 73, 62)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=80, 76, 73, 72)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=73, 74, 74, 67)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=70, 68, 66, 59)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=66, 67, 66, 59)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=59, 64, 65, 54)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=50, 58, 61, 49)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=47, 56, 54, 42)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=39, 47, 49, 39)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=33, 41, 41, 34)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=30, 38, 39, 30)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=27, 39, 33, 27)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=25, 35, 31, 23)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=22, 32, 28, 26)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=20, 27, 27, 25)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=17, 25, 25, 22)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=15, 21, 23, 21)
Placebo259.89.511.39.54.07.14.05.23.25.8-1.35.0-3.04.50.16.610.21.22.79.79.22.6-1.38.84.34.0-12.0-6.1
Saxagliptin 10 mg261.62.25.6-0.2-4.3-4.4-4.8-3.7-6.0-2.7-8.3-5.4-15.5-9.9-15.6-11.5-6.3-6.0-6.7-4.8-12.0-2.6-0.3-2.9-14.6-17.3-13.46.2
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg251.11.811.24.30.4-0.8-6.31.2-2.3-1.1-1.90.3-7.1-2.0-14.3-2.5-3.1-2.03.53.25.03.8-1.15.0-18.0-11.1-13.6-2.6
Saxagliptin 5 mg253.14.48.64.31.03.0-1.33.21.12.0-4.8-2.5-6.0-3.3-8.1-5.6-3.4-1.51.9-2.3-8.8-2.1-4.65.8-0.1-24.0-13.4-18.7

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Counts (x 10^6 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionx 10^6 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=102, 106, 98, 94)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=95,100, 93, 87Change from BL at Week 4 (n=92, 99, 91, 91)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=91, 96, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=92, 90, 91, 79)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=70, 76, 69, 63)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=85, 88, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=76, 80, 81, 75)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=90, 91, 83, 71)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=78, 75, 82, 71)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=83, 80, 78, 72)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=78, 74, 76, 65)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=83, 82, 78, 74)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=77, 78, 79, 67)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=75, 73, 70, 62)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=67, 71, 71, 61)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=61, 66, 67, 55)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=51, 59, 63, 49)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=49, 58, 56, 42)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=40, 49, 51, 40)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 43, 35)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=30, 40, 40, 30)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=28, 39, 34, 28)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=26, 35, 31, 24)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 26)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 26)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 26, 26, 23)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 22, 24, 21)
Placebo4.82-0.050.040.020.050.070.080.040.060.04-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.03-0.090.010.05-0.03-0.07-0.13-0.06-0.10-0.11-0.09-0.10-0.17-0.10-0.08
Saxagliptin 10 mg4.82-0.08-0.020.000.03-0.020.070.040.080.050.01-0.05-0.03-0.010.040.020.080.00-0.01-0.03-0.02-0.04-0.02-0.08-0.01-0.01-0.020.06
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg4.80-0.06-0.010.000.050.050.050.050.060.010.03-0.01-0.040.00-0.04-0.020.00-0.07-0.04-0.10-0.04-0.05-0.10-0.13-0.11-0.05-0.05-0.03
Saxagliptin 5 mg4.80-0.04-0.040.020.03-0.030.030.030.080.040.02-0.01-0.04-0.07-0.040.04-0.01-0.07-0.06-0.03-0.01-0.07-0.13-0.13-0.04-0.08-0.06-0.06

Baseline and Changes From Baseline in White Blood Cell Counts (x 10^3 c/µL) During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionx 10^3 c/µL (Mean)
Baseline (BL) (Week 0) (n=102, 106, 98, 94)Change from BL at Week 2 (n=95, 99, 92, 86)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=92, 99, 90, 90)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=89, 95, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=91, 89, 90, 79)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=68, 76, 69, 63)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=83, 88, 87, 82)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=76, 78, 80, 75)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=90, 91, 83, 71)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=78, 75, 82, 71)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=83, 79, 78, 72)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=77, 74, 76, 65)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=83, 82, 78, 74)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=77, 78, 79, 67)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=74, 73, 70, 62)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=67, 69, 71, 61)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=60, 66, 67, 55)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=51, 58, 63, 49)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=48, 58, 56, 42)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=39, 47, 51, 40)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 42, 34)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=30, 40, 40, 29)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=28, 39, 34, 28)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=26, 34, 31, 24)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 25)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 26)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 26, 26, 23)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 22, 23, 21)
Placebo6.79-0.230.170.090.160.530.260.560.190.320.020.45-0.06-0.030.140.290.06-0.20-0.18-0.090.440.220.510.380.350.650.190.38
Saxagliptin 10 mg6.82-0.14-0.16-0.18-0.170.120.050.220.040.420.010.440.080.280.12-0.03-0.04-0.07-0.100.100.110.440.440.300.270.590.601.01
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg6.71-0.110.060.01-0.020.32-0.000.330.240.370.290.660.100.150.210.010.120.030.510.160.240.580.350.12-0.220.130.340.01
Saxagliptin 5 mg6.750.050.050.100.180.550.090.710.540.820.290.720.470.330.420.330.200.230.170.440.930.660.780.440.440.300.020.55

Baseline Demographic Characteristics - Summary for ST + LT Treatment Period - Open-Label Cohort

This cohort represents a different population (screening A1C > 10.0% and ≤ 12.0%) than the double-blind cohort, and was presented separately in the study report. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Age <65 yearsAge >=65 yearsAge >=75 yearsGender, MaleGender, FemaleAge =<50 years, females onlyAge >50 years, females onlyRace, WhiteRace, Black/African AmericanRace, AsianRace, OtherEthnicity, Hispanic/LatinoEthnicity, Not Hispanic/LatinoEthnicity, Not ReportedBody Mass Index <30%Body Mass Index >=30%
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)642032341915613111337162244

Changes From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=96, 100, 94, 89)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=96, 100, 92, 91)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=91, 98, 88, 84)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=94, 91, 91, 80)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=51, 66, 51, 50)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=82, 83, 87, 79)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=65, 72, 66, 62)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=87, 87, 81, 72)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=73, 69, 76, 66)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=84, 80, 76, 73)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=78, 73, 76, 64)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=84, 83, 77, 75)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=79, 78, 79, 66)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=77, 74, 71, 66)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=70, 73, 73, 62)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=61, 66, 69, 56)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=53, 59, 64, 50)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=49, 58, 56, 44)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=42, 51, 51, 42)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 43, 37)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=31, 40, 41, 31)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=29, 40, 35, 29)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=27, 36, 33, 27)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 27)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 27)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 26, 27, 24)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 24, 24, 23)
Placebo-1.5-1.8-1.9-2.4-3.4-1.8-2.7-2.1-2.1-2.2-1.7-3.4-2.8-2.0-0.6-0.5-0.3-0.1-1.2-1.01.01.31.3-1.1-0.8-0.2-0.2
Saxagliptin 10 mg-0.50.3-0.8-0.7-1.3-0.7-2.4-0.1-1.9-1.9-2.5-2.3-0.3-0.6-0.3-0.00.1-1.6-0.4-1.11.11.12.52.40.50.51.9
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg-0.0-1.4-1.5-1.4-0.8-1.3-2.5-1.5-2.3-2.2-3.0-1.5-1.4-0.4-1.7-0.1-1.60.4-1.1-0.9-1.80.91.20.81.40.80.3
Saxagliptin 5 mg-1.2-1.1-0.9-0.9-1.1-2.0-2.4-0.5-1.6-1.8-2.0-1.7-2.2-1.70.3-0.4-2.0-2.1-2.0-2.7-3.7-2.0-0.80.3-2.0-1.6-0.6

Changes From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure During the ST + LT Period - Open Label Cohort

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=62)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=59)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=60)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=49)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=24)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=47)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=35)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=46)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=42)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=45)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=44)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=44)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=40)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=35)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=36)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=26)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=24)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=23)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=15)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=13)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=11)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=10)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=10)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=10)
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)-3.7-1.7-2.8-2.0-1.0-3.7-4.5-2.8-3.3-2.1-2.8-3.4-3.8-2.0-1.3-0.9-1.0-2.61.0-4.1-3.7-6.0-0.5-2.5

Changes From Baseline in Heart Rate During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=96, 100, 94, 89)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=96, 100, 92, 91)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=91, 98, 88, 84)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=94, 91, 91, 80)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=51, 66, 51, 49)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=82, 83, 87, 79)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=65, 72, 65, 62)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=87, 87, 81, 72)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=73, 69, 76, 66)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=84, 80, 76, 73)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=78, 73, 76, 64)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=84, 83, 77, 75)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=79, 78, 79, 66)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=77, 74, 71, 66)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=70, 73, 73, 62)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=62, 66, 69, 56)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=53, 59, 64, 50)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=49, 58, 56, 44)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=42, 51, 51, 42)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 43, 37)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=31, 40, 41, 31)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=29, 40, 35, 29)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=27, 36, 33, 27)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 27)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 27)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 26, 27, 24)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 24, 24, 23)
Placebo0.3-0.11.4-0.20.10.81.9-0.12.60.81.5-0.4-1.2-0.9-0.20.60.2-0.3-0.00.81.70.9-0.60.5-1.21.1-0.8
Saxagliptin 10 mg0.20.7-0.60.2-1.00.50.6-0.11.51.30.9-0.7-0.70.5-0.20.90.4-0.9-0.11.0-0.7-0.6-1.3-2.1-2.0-2.40.0
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg-0.10.2-1.5-0.5-0.20.30.1-0.8-0.01.30.1-0.3-0.1-0.4-0.1-0.4-0.3-0.5-2.8-3.2-2.1-2.8-2.0-5.1-3.1-4.6-5.3
Saxagliptin 5 mg-0.5-1.1-0.6-0.9-1.5-1.2-0.5-1.5-0.8-1.5-0.30.1-1.2-1.4-0.7-2.5-3.3-1.5-1.5-2.3-4.5-3.5-2.6-0.8-5.3-4.2-2.6

Changes From Baseline in Heart Rate During the ST + LT Period - Open Label Cohort

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=62)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=59)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=60)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=49)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=23)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=47)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=34)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=46)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=42)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=45)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=43)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=44)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=40)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=35)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=36)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=26)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=24)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=23)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=15)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=13)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=11)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=10)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=10)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=10)
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)-0.8-0.4-0.3-0.7-1.8-3.0-2.0-0.7-2.01.6-0.4-0.40.6-1.6-2.9-3.0-0.4-1.3-0.31.7-1.6-3.4-1.5-1.9

Changes From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure During the ST + LT Period

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167, 180, 193, 206

,,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=96, 100, 94, 89)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=96, 100, 92, 91)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=91, 98, 88, 84)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=94, 91, 91, 80)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=51, 66, 51, 50)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=82, 83, 87, 79)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=65, 72, 66, 62)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=87, 87, 81, 72)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=73, 69, 76, 66)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=84, 80, 76, 73)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=78, 73, 76, 64)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=84, 83, 77, 75)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=79, 78, 79, 66)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=77, 74, 71, 66)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=70, 73, 73, 62)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=62, 66, 69, 56)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=53, 59, 64, 50)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=49, 58, 56, 44)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=42, 47, 50, 40)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=34, 43, 43, 37)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=31, 40, 41, 31)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=29, 40, 35, 29)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=27, 36, 33, 27)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=24, 33, 30, 27)Change from BL at Week 180 (n=21, 28, 28, 27)Change from BL at Week 193 (n=19, 26, 27, 24)Change from BL at Week 206 (n=17, 24, 24, 23)
Placebo-3.1-4.3-4.5-5.5-6.1-3.2-1.9-2.1-4.7-4.9-3.9-6.3-5.4-3.6-0.4-2.4-0.9-2.2-1.00.91.1-1.42.3-0.6-0.8-2.60.7
Saxagliptin 10 mg-2.3-2.3-3.5-4.0-5.0-2.8-6.0-3.8-4.3-3.3-5.9-6.2-3.9-5.2-3.3-1.1-3.1-5.4-2.9-1.60.00.33.54.00.90.02.3
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg-1.0-1.9-1.5-3.0-3.6-3.3-4.9-3.2-5.1-5.0-6.1-2.8-3.6-3.0-2.5-1.2-2.9-2.8-0.6-2.6-5.1-1.8-0.80.70.93.44.8
Saxagliptin 5 mg-2.0-1.2-2.1-1.8-2.9-2.9-2.0-2.1-0.9-3.2-4.5-4.1-3.8-3.50.1-0.3-2.6-3.4-1.1-2.6-5.5-5.2-0.5-1.8-5.4-7.5-2.8

Changes From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure During the ST + LT Period - Open Label Cohort

(NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 30, 37, 50, 63, 76, 89, 102, 115, 128, 141, 154, 167

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change from BL at Week 2 (n=62)Change from BL at Week 4 (n=59)Change from BL at Week 6 (n=60)Change from BL at Week 8 (n=49)Change from BL at Week 10 (n=24)Change from BL at Week 12 (n=47)Change from BL at Week 14 (n=35)Change from BL at Week 16 (n=46)Change from BL at Week 18 (n=42)Change from BL at Week 20 (n=45)Change from BL at Week 22 (n=44)Change from BL at Week 24 (n=44)Change from BL at Week 30 (n=40)Change from BL at Week 37 (n=35)Change from BL at Week 50 (n=36)Change from BL at Week 63 (n=26)Change from BL at Week 76 (n=24)Change from BL at Week 89 (n=23)Change from BL at Week 102 (n=15)Change from BL at Week 115 (n=13)Change from BL at Week 128 (n=11)Change from BL at Week 141 (n=10)Change from BL at Week 154 (n=10)Change from BL at Week 167 (n=10)
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)-4.4-3.8-2.7-5.1-4.2-4.9-5.1-1.9-5.8-3.6-4.0-4.3-4.8-4.7-1.6-0.7-1.9-4.00.9-6.6-5.6-7.25.7-2.2

Electrocardiogram (ECG) Tracings - Shift Table From Baseline (BL) to Selected Visits During ST + LT Treatment Period

The normality/abnormality of the ECG tracing was determined by the investigator. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 76, 102, 154, 206

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Normal BL, Normal Week 12 (BL n=65, 66, 67, 47)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 12 (BL n=65, 66, 67, 47)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 12 (BL n=27, 32, 26, 43)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 12(BL n=27, 32, 26, 43)Normal BL, Normal Week 24 (BL n=53, 52, 47, 33)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 24 (BL n=53, 52, 47, 33)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 24 (BL n=19, 24, 21, 25)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 24(BL n=19, 24, 21, 25)Normal BL, Normal Week 76 (BL n=48, 49, 48, 36)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 76 (BL n=48, 49, 48, 36)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 76 (BL n=19, 23, 21, 27)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 76(BL n=19, 23, 21, 27)Normal BL, Normal Week 102 (BL n=32, 32, 36, 22)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 102 (BL n=32, 32, 36, 22)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 102 (BL n=12, 18, 17, 20)Abnormal BL,Abnormal Week 102(BL n=12, 18, 17, 20)Normal BL, Normal Week 154 (BL n=20, 21, 26, 15)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 154 (BL n=20, 21, 26, 15)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 154 (BL n=7, 16, 11, 13)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 154(BL n=7, 16, 11, 13)Normal BL, Normal Week 206 (BL n=15, 13, 20, 14)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 206 (BL n=15, 13, 20, 14)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 206 (BL n=4, 13, 8, 11)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 206 (BL n=4, 13, 8, 11)
Placebo434152831281730613141841191417611347
Saxagliptin 10 mg5989174349124086153151252335618244
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg57862143105143711811257481644315022
Saxagliptin 5 mg5610626448816445815266513174412121310

Electrocardiogram (ECG) Tracings - Shift Table From Baseline (BL) to Selected Visits During ST + LT Treatment Period - Open Label Cohort

The normality/abnormality of the ECG tracing was determined by the investigator. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 76, 102, 154, 206

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Normal BL, Normal Week 12 (BL n=23)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 12 (BL n=23)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 12 (BL n=18)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 12 (BL n=18)Normal BL, Normal Week 24 (BL n=10)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 24 (BL n=10)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 24 (BL n=6)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 24(BL n=6)Normal BL, Normal Week 76 (BL n=17)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 76 (BL n=17)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 76 (BL n=13)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 76 (BL n=13)Normal BL, Normal Week 102 (BL n=8)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 102 (BL n=8)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 102 (BL n=4)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 102 (BL n=4)Normal BL, Normal Week 154 (BL n=4)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 154 (BL n=4)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 154 (BL n=2)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 154 (BL n=2)Normal BL, Normal Week 206 (BL n=3)Normal BL, Abnormal Week 206 (BL n=3)Abnormal BL, Normal Week 206 (BL n=1)Abnormal BL, Abnormal Week 206 (BL n=1)
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)194513822413449621331022101

Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) Changes From Baseline at Week 24

To compare the change from baseline in HbA1c achieved with each dose of saxagliptin versus placebo in treatment naive subjects with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control defined as A1C ≥7.0% and ≤10.0%. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,,,
InterventionPercentage of glycosylated hemoglobins (Mean)
Baseline MeanAdjusted Mean Change from Baseline
Placebo7.880.19
Saxagliptin 10 mg7.85-0.54
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg7.91-0.43
Saxagliptin 5 mg7.98-0.46

Marked Laboratory Abnormalities - During ST + LT Treatment Period

A laboratory value was considered a marked abnormality if it is outside the pre-defined criteria for marked abnormality and the on-treatment value was more extreme (farther from the limit) than the baseline value. Pre-Rx=pretreatment; ULN=upper limit of normal; ALP=alkaline phosphatase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase; ALT=alanine aminotransferase; unspec=unspecified; sodium serum low: <0.9 x Pre-Rx & <=130mEq/L / high: >1.1 x Pre-Rx & >=150mEq/L; potassium, serum low: <=0.8 x Pre-Rx & >=6.0mEq/L / high: 1.2 x Pre-Rx & >=6.0mEq/L; LLN=lower limit of normal. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Lab assessments taken during and up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug during the ST + LT Treatment Period. Mean duration of exposure was 109 weeks in 10 mg arm, 94.7 weeks in 2.5 mg arm, 103 weeks in 5 mg arm, and 98.4 weeks in placebo arm.

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin < 8 g/dL (n=101, 105, 97, 93)Hematocrit < 0.75 x pre-Rx (n=101, 105, 97, 93)Platelets < 50 x 10^9 c/L (n=100, 104, 94, 93)Platelets > 1.5 x ULN (n=100,104, 94, 93)Leukocytes < 2 x 1000 c/µL (n=101, 105, 97, 93)Neutrophils+Bands <1x1000 c/µL(n=101, 105, 97, 93)Eosinophils >0.9x1000 c/µL (n=101, 105, 97, 93)Lymphocytes <=0.75x1000 c/µL (n=101, 105, 97, 93)ALP >3 x pre-Rx and >ULN (n=101,105, 97, 94)ALP >1.5 x ULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)AST >3 x ULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)AST >5 x ULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)AST >10 x ULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)AST >20 x ULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)ALT >3 x ULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)ALT >5 x ULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)ALT >10 x ULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)ALT >20 x ULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)Bilirubin Total >2mg/dL (n=101, 105, 97, 94)Bilirubin Total >1.5xULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)Bilirubin Total >2xULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)BUN >2 x pre-Rx and >ULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)Creatinine >2.5 mg/dL (n=101, 105, 97, 94)Glucose, Serum Fasting < 50 mg/dL (n=0, 0, 0, 0)Glucose, Serum Fasting > 500 mg/dL (n=0, 0, 0, 0)Glucose, Serum Unspec. < 50 mg/dL (n=0,0,0,0)Glucose, Serum Unspec. > 500 mg/dL (n=0,0,0,0)Glucose, Plasma Fasting<50mg/dL(n=101, 104, 96,94)Glucose,Plasma Fasting>500mg/dL(n=101, 104, 96,94)Glucose, Plasma Unspec.<50mg/dL(n=102, 105, 98,95)Glucose,Plasma Unspec.>500mg/dL(n=102, 105, 98,95)Sodium,Serum Low (see above) (n=101, 105, 97, 94)Sodium,Serum High(see above) (n=101, 105, 97, 94)Potassium,Serum Low(see above)(n=101, 105, 97, 94)Potassium, Serum High(see above)(n=101,105,97,94)Chloride < 90 mEq/L (n=101, 105, 97, 94)Chloride > 120 mEq/L (n=101, 105, 97, 94)Albumin < 0.9 LLN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)Creatine Kinase > 5 x ULN (n=101, 105, 97, 94)Uric Acid > 1.5 x ULN (n=0, 0, 0, 0)Protein Urine, >=2-4 (n=99, 103, 94, 92)Blood Urine, >=2-4 (n=99, 103, 94, 92)Red Blood Cells Urine >=2-4 (n=95, 97, 89, 88)White Blood Cells Urine >=2-4 (n=95, 97, 89, 88)
Placebo00010041010000100000000000020321003100403161412
Saxagliptin 10 mg010001320110000000331100000104001010001048815
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg000100140232103110111110000107001030002085613
Saxagliptin 5 mg0000005201210021000003000000041000300040911819

Marked Laboratory Abnormalities During ST + LT Treatment Period - Open-Label Cohort

A laboratory value was considered a marked abnormality if it is outside the pre-defined criteria for marked abnormality and the on-treatment value was more extreme (farther from the limit) than the baseline value. Pre-Rx=pretreatment; ULN=upper limit of normal; ALP=alkaline phosphatase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase; ALT=alanine aminotransferase; unspec=unspecified; sodium serum low: <0.9 x Pre-Rx & <=130mEq/L / high: >1.1 x Pre-Rx & >=150mEq/L; potassium, serum low: <=0.8 x Pre-Rx & >=6.0mEq/L / high: 1.2 x Pre-Rx & >=6.0mEq/L; LLN=lower limit of normal. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: Lab assessments taken during and up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug during the ST + LT Treatment Period. Mean duration of exposure was 34 weeks.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin < 8 g/dL (n=64)Hematocrit < 0.75 x pre-Rx (n=64)Platelets < 50 x 10^9 c/L (n=64)Platelets > 1.5 x ULN (n=64)Leukocytes < 2 x 1000 c/µL (n=64)Neutrophils+Bands <1x1000 c/uL (n=64)Eosinophils >0.9x1000 c/µL (n=64)Lymphocytes <=0.75x1000 c/uL (n=64)ALP >3 x pre-Rx and >ULN (n=64)ALP >1.5 x ULN (n=64)AST >3 x ULN (n=64)AST >5 x ULN (n=64)AST >10 x ULN (n=64)AST >20 x ULN (n=64)ALT >3 x ULN (n=64)ALT >5 x ULN (n=64)ALT >10 x ULN (n=64)ALT >20 x ULN (n=64)Bilirubin Total >2mg/dL (n=64)Bilirubin Total >1.5xULN (n=64)Bilirubin Total >2xULN (n=64)BUN >2 x pre-Rx and >ULN (n=64)Creatinine >2.5 mg/dL (n=64)Glucose, Serum Fasting < 50 mg/dL (n=1)Glucose, Serum Fasting > 500 mg/dL (n=1)Glucose, Serum Unspec. < 50 mg/dL (n=1)Glucose, Serum Unspec. > 500 mg/dL (n=1)Glucose, Plasma Fasting <50 mg/dL (n=64)Glucose,Plasma Fasting >500 mg/dL (n=64)Glucose, Plasma Unspec. <50 mg/dL (n=65)Glucose,Plasma Unspec. >500 mg/dL (n=65)Sodium,Serum Low (see above) (n=65)Sodium,Serum High (see above) (n=65)Potassium,Serum Low (see above) (n=65)Potassium, Serum High (see above) (n=65)Chloride < 90 mEq/L (n=65)Chloride > 120 mEq/L (n=65)Albumin < 0.9 LLN (n=64)Creatine Kinase > 5 x ULN (n=64)Uric Acid > 1.5 x ULN (n=0)Protein Urine, >=2-4 (n=64)Blood Urine, >=2-4 (n=64)Red Blood Cells Urine >=2-4 (n=58)White Blood Cells Urine >=2-4 (n=58)
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)00000120001000100011020000000210202100002476

Overall Summary of Adverse Events During ST+LT Treatment Period

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event. Related events=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit + 30 days. Mean duration of exposure was 109 weeks in 10 mg arm, 94.7 weeks in 2.5 mg arm, 103 weeks in 5 mg arm, and 98.4 weeks in placebo arm.

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
At Least 1 AEAt Least 1 Related AEDeathsAt Least 1 SAEAt Least 1 Related SAEDiscontinuations Due to SAEsDiscontinuations Due to AEs
Placebo7725111015
Saxagliptin 10 mg8725090310
Saxagliptin 2.5 mg8925011069
Saxagliptin 5 mg94230181210

Overall Summary of Adverse Events During ST+LT Treatment Period - Open-Label Cohort

AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event. Related events=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. (NCT00121641)
Timeframe: AEs: up to last treatment day + 1 day or last visit; SAEs: up to last treatment day + 30 days or last visit + 30 days. Mean duration of exposure was 34 weeks.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
At Least 1 AEAt Least 1 Related AEDeathsAt Least 1 SAEAt Least 1 Related SAEDiscontinuations Due to SAEsDiscontinuations Due to AEs
Open-Label Treatment Cohort (Direct Enrollees)49906025

Adjusted Mean Change in Body Weight

To examine whether treatment with dapagliflozin in combination with insulin is superior in reducing body weight or causing less weight gain as compared to placebo added to insulin treatment after 24 weeks of treatment (LOCF), excluding data after insulin up-titration. (NCT00673231)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.02
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg-0.98
Dapagliflozin 5mg-0.98
Dapagliflozin 10mg-1.67

Adjusted Mean Change in Calculated Mean Daily Insulin Dose

To examine whether treatment with dapagliflozin in combination with insulin leads to a lower absolute calculated mean daily insulin dose as compared to placebo added to insulin treatment alone, from baseline to week 24, including data after insulin up-titration. (NCT00673231)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionIU/day (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.08
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg-1.80
Dapagliflozin 5mg-0.61
Dapagliflozin 10mg-1.16

Adjusted Mean Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

To examine whether treatment with dapagliflozin in combination with insulin is superior in reducing Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) as compared to placebo added to insulin treatment after 24 weeks of treatment, excluding data after insulin up-titration. (NCT00673231)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.3
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg-12.5
Dapagliflozin 5mg-18.8
Dapagliflozin 10mg-21.7

Adjusted Mean Change in HbA1c Levels

To assess the efficacy of 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg dapagliflozin compared to placebo as add-on therapy to insulin in improving glycaemic control in participants with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control on ≥ 30 IU injectable insulin daily for at least 8 weeks prior to enrolment, as determined by the change in HbA1c levels from baseline to Week 24, excluding data after insulin up-titration. (NCT00673231)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.30
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg-0.75
Dapagliflozin 5mg-0.82
Dapagliflozin 10mg-0.90

Proportion of Participants With Calculated Mean Daily Insulin Dose Reduction

To examine whether treatment with dapagliflozin in combination with insulin leads to higher percentage of participants with calculated mean daily insulin dose reduction from baseline to week 24 (i.e. reduction >= 10%) as compared to placebo added to insulin treatment. (NCT00673231)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo11.0
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg18.1
Dapagliflozin 5mg16.8
Dapagliflozin 10mg19.7

Proportion of Participants With Lack of Glycemic Control

Participants with lack of glycemic control or insulin up-titration for failing to achieve pre-specified glycemic targets (NCT00673231)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo54
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg22
Dapagliflozin 5mg24
Dapagliflozin 10mg19

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26

The change from Baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound). (NCT01023581)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26.

Interventionpercentage glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.15
Alogliptin 25 QD-0.52
Alogliptin 12.5 BID-0.56
Metformin 500 BID-0.65
Metformin 1000 BID-1.11
Alogliptin 12.5 BID + Metformin 500 BID-1.22
Alogliptin 12.5 BID + Metformin 1000 BID-1.55

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Over Time

The change from Baseline in fasting plasma glucose was assessed at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26. Least Squares Means were from an ANCOVA model with treatment and geographic region as fixed effects, and baseline fasting plasma glucose as a covariate. (NCT01023581)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 26.

,,,,,,
Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Week 1 (n=102, 103, 94, 95, 104, 101, 109)Week 2 (n=105, 112, 105, 102, 108, 106, 111)Week 4 (n=105, 112, 106, 106, 110, 106, 111)Week 8 (n=105, 112, 106, 106, 110, 106, 112)Week 12 (n=105, 112, 106, 106, 110, 106, 112)Week 16 (n=105, 112, 106, 106, 110, 106, 112)Week 20 (n=105, 112, 106, 106, 110, 106, 112)Week 26 (n=105, 112, 106, 106, 110, 106, 112)
Alogliptin 12.5 BID-11.9-11.6-16.6-12.1-14.7-14.7-12.3-9.7
Alogliptin 12.5 BID + Metformin 1000 BID-36.3-43.6-44.1-43.8-44.7-47.7-44.6-45.9
Alogliptin 12.5 BID + Metformin 500 BID-32.7-34.5-37.6-32.9-31.6-35.9-33.8-31.7
Alogliptin 25 QD-3.9-7.4-11.5-10.9-9.7-7.1-9.2-6.1
Metformin 1000 BID-23.1-22.2-29.0-30.7-30.7-33.5-35.1-31.9
Metformin 500 BID-12.6-14.5-16.9-11.8-14.0-13.3-10.9-11.5
Placebo5.74.67.27.111.610.18.712.4

Change From Baseline in HbA1c Over Time

"The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20.~Least squares means are from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment and geographic region as fixed effects, and baseline HbA1c as a covariate." (NCT01023581)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20.

,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=95, 97, 89, 94, 102, 94, 101)Week 8 (n=102, 104, 104, 103, 108, 102, 111)Week 12 (n=102, 104, 104, 103, 108, 102, 111)Week 16 (n=102, 104, 104, 103, 108, 102, 111)Week 20 (n=102, 104, 104, 103, 108, 102, 111)
Alogliptin 12.5 BID-0.42-0.58-0.62-0.63-0.59
Alogliptin 12.5 BID + Metformin 1000 BID-0.75-1.17-1.40-1.50-1.54
Alogliptin 12.5 BID + Metformin 500 BID-0.70-1.08-1.22-1.26-1.25
Alogliptin 25 QD-0.34-0.51-0.53-0.58-0.57
Metformin 1000 BID-0.58-0.86-1.02-1.09-1.14
Metformin 500 BID-0.37-0.59-0.68-0.72-0.68
Placebo0.090.080.120.130.12

Absolute Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

Absolute change = HbA1c value at Week 24 minus HbA1c value at baseline. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT01169779)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.47
Lixisenatide-0.83

Change From Baseline in 2-Hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) at Week 24

The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. (NCT01169779)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.33
Lixisenatide-5.61

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT01169779)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionkilogram (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.24
Lixisenatide-1.50

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Change was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT01169779)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.21
Lixisenatide-0.69

Change From Baseline in Glucose Excursion at Week 24

Glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose 30 minutes prior to the standardized meal test, before study drug administration. Change was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. (NCT01169779)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.79
Lixisenatide-4.78

Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During Main 24-Week Period

Routine fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG >250 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (13.9 mmol/L), from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG >220 mg/dL (12.2 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c >8.5%. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT01169779)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo6.7
Lixisenatide3.6

Percentage of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT01169779)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo14.7
Lixisenatide19.7

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT01169779)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo38.8
Lixisenatide53.0

Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. For a patient to be included in mITT population, both baseline and at least 1 post baseline on-treatment assessment for at least 1 efficacy variable, were required. (NCT01169779)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo18.1
Lixisenatide32.4

Number of Patients With Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

Symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from a hypoglycemic episode with an accompanying plasma glucose less than 60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) or associated with prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration, if no plasma glucose measurement was available. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was symptomatic hypoglycemia event in which the patient required the assistance of another person and was associated with either a plasma glucose level below 36 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration, if no plasma glucose measurement was available. (NCT01169779)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Symptomatic hypoglycemiaSevere symptomatic hypoglycemia
Lixisenatide110
Placebo50

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to 24 Weeks Endpoint (Intention-to-Treat Population)

The change from baseline to 24 weeks in the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in plasma. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) that included baseline HbA1c concentration as a covariate, treatment, country, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects, and participant and error as random effects. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture-1.30
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro-1.08

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to 24 Weeks Endpoint (Per Protocol Population)

The change from baseline to 24 weeks in the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in plasma. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) that included baseline HbA1c concentration as a covariate, treatment, country, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects, and participant and error as random effects. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture-1.30
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro-1.09

Change in the HbA1c Concentration From Baseline to 12 Weeks Endpoint

The change from baseline to 12 weeks in the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in plasma. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) that included baseline HbA1c concentration as a covariate, treatment, country, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects, and participant and error as random effects. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture-1.12
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro-1.01

Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) Score at 24 Weeks

ITSQ: validated instrument containing 22 items which are measured on a 7-point scale: 1 (no bother at all) to 7 (a tremendous bother) used to assess insulin treatment satisfaction. Items are divided into 5 domains: Inconvenience of Regimen (5 items: domain score range 5 to 35), Lifestyle Flexibility (3 items: domain score range 3 to 21), Glycemic Control (3 items: domain score range 3 to 21), Hypoglycemic Control (5 items: domain score range 5 to 35), Insulin Delivery Device (6 items: domain score range 6 to 42) lower scores reflect better outcome. ITSQ Total Overall Score ranged from 22 to 154. Raw domain scores transformed on 0-100 scale, where transformed domain score = 100×[(7-raw domain score)/6]. Higher scores indicate better treatment satisfaction. Least squares (LS) mean estimated from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model that included baseline score as covariate and treatment, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) stratum, and country as fixed effects. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture80.91
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro81.84

The Number of Participants With a Hypoglycemic Episodes (Incidence)

A hypoglycemic episode was defined as an event associated with 1) reported signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia, and/or 2) a documented blood glucose (BG) concentration of <= 70 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL, 3.9 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)]. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture144
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro150

The Number of Participants With Severe Hypoglycemic Episodes

The number of participants who had a severe hypoglycemic episode anytime during the study. Severe hypoglycemia was defined as any event in which the participant required the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture2
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro0

The Rate of Hypoglycemic Episodes

The hypoglycemia rate per 30 days was calculated as the number of episodes reported for the interval between visits and during the study divided by the number of days in the given interval and multiplied by 30. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: Baseline through 24 weeks

Interventionhypoglycemic episodes per 30 day period (Mean)
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture1.07
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro1.36

7-point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles at 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks

7-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles are measures of blood glucose taken 7 times a day at the morning pre-meal, morning 2-hours post-meal, midday pre-meal, midday 2-hours post-meal, evening pre-meal, evening 2-hours post-meal, and 0300 hour [3 am]. Each participant took measures on 3 non-consecutive days and the average was calculated for each of the 7 time points. The mean of the 7-point averages was calculated for all the participants at baseline, Weeks 12 and 24. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from mixed-effects model with repeated measures that included the baseline value of the variable as a covariate, treatment, country, baseline glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)stratification level, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects, and participant and error as random effects. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: 12 weeks, 24 weeks

,
Interventionmillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
pre-morning meal (Week 12) (n=223, 222)2 hour post-morning meal (Week 12) (n=220, 221)pre-midday meal (Week 12) (n=220, 221)2 hours post-midday meal (Week 12) (n=220, 221)pre-evening meal (Week 12) (n=221, 221)2 hours post-evening meal (Week 12) (n=217, 220)3 am - during the night (Week 12)(n=197, 201)pre-morning meal (Week 24) (n=217, 216)2 hours post-morning meal (Week 24) (n=216, 215)pre-midday meal (Week 24) (n=215, 216)2 hours post-midday meal (Week 24) (n=216, 216)pre-evening meal (Week 24) (n=216, 216)2 hours post-evening meal (Week 24) (n=212, 216)3 am - during the night (Week 24)(n=198, 195)
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro6.209.017.449.148.259.108.526.268.867.448.997.958.958.26
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture6.878.826.969.467.989.158.216.608.526.829.087.709.118.05

Change in the Fasting Plasma Glucose Concentration From Baseline to 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks

The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) that included baseline fasting plasma glucose value as a covariate, treatment, country, baseline HbA1c stratification level, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects, and participant and error as random effects. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks

,
Interventionmillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Change at 12 Weeks (n= 222, 222)Change at 24 Weeks (n=219, 217)
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro0.640.75
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture1.040.89

Change in Weight From Baseline to 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks

The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from a mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) that included baseline weight as a covariate, treatment, country, baseline glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) stratification level, week of visit, and the treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects, and participant and error as random effects. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks

,
Interventionkilograms (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
Change at 12 weeks (n=224, 225)Change at 24 weeks (n=219, 217)
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro0.340.50
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture0.541.13

Daily Insulin Dose: Total, Basal, and Prandial at 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks

(NCT01175824)
Timeframe: 12 weeks, 24 weeks

,
Interventioninternational units (IU) (Mean)
Total Insulin Dose at 12 Weeks (n=224, 224)Total Insulin Dose at 24 Weeks LOCF (n=236, 240)Basal Insulin Dose at 12 Weeks (n=224, 224)Basal Insulin Dose at 24 Weeks LOCF (n=236, 240)Prandial Insulin Dose at 12 Weeks (n=224, 224)Prandial Insulin Dose at 24 Weeks LOCF(n=236, 240)
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro49.250.837.137.412.113.5
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture51.253.138.439.812.813.3

Glycemic Variability From the 7-point Self-Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles at 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks

The 7-point SMBG profile was calculated as the average blood glucose concentration across the 7 pre-specified time points in a day that was then averaged over 3 non-consecutive days in the 2 weeks prior to the 12 week visit and 24 week visit. Glycemic variability was calculated as the standard deviation of the 7-point SMBG profiles. Standard deviation was first calculated for each day and then averaged over 3 non-consecutive days for each visit. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from mixed-effects model with repeated measures that included the baseline value of the variable as a covariate, treatment, country, baseline glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)stratification level, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects, and participant and error as random effects. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: 12 weeks, 24 weeks

,
Interventionmillimoles/liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
SMBG glycemic variability, 12 weeks (n=220, 221)SMBG glycemic variability, 24 weeks (n=216, 216)
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro2.131.99
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture2.122.03

Number of Participants Who Achieve a Target HbA1c Concentration of Less Than 7% or Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 24 Weeks

(NCT01175824)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
HbA1c <7%HbA1c <=6.5%
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro6631
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture7636

Perceptions About Medications-Diabetes 21 (PAM-D21) Questionnaire Score at 24 Weeks

PAM-D21 is a validated questionnaire consisting of 21 items to assess a participant's perceptions about their diabetes treatment regimens and perceived emotional and physical side-effects. The PAM-D21 consists of 4 subscales: Convenience/Flexibility (items 1 to 3); Perceived Effectiveness (items 4 to 6); Emotional Effects (items 7 to 11); and Physical Effects (items 12 to 21). Item scores range from 1 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time). Subscale scores were linearly transformed to a 0-100, with higher score corresponds to better perceptions about diabetes medications. The least squares (LS) mean was estimated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model that included baseline score as a covariate and treatment, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) stratum, and country as fixed effects. (NCT01175824)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Convenience/Flexibility (n= 231, 230)Perceived Effectiveness (n=231, 230)Emotional Effects (n=231, 230)Physical Effects (n=231, 228)
Insulin Glargine+Insulin Lispro84.1378.7681.8689.04
Insulin Lispro Low Mixture83.9076.7881.8487.89

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) After 12 Weeks

Adjusted mean change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline at week 12 (NCT00996658)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (milligrams per deciliter) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Tablet3.8
Linagliptin 5 mg Tablet-7.1

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) After 18 Weeks

Adjusted mean change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline at week 18 (NCT00996658)
Timeframe: baseline, 18 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (milligrams per deciliter) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Tablet-2.4
Linagliptin 5 mg Tablet-8.6

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) After 24 Weeks

Adjusted mean change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline at week 24 (NCT00996658)
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (milligrams per deciliter) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Tablet0.1
Linagliptin 5 mg Tablet-10.3

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) After 6 Weeks

Adjusted mean change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline at week 6 (NCT00996658)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (milligrams per deciliter) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Tablet12.4
Linagliptin 5 mg Tablet-3.3

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) After 12 Weeks

Glycosylated hemoglobin is reported as a percentage of the total hemoglobin (NCT00996658)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Tablet-0.28
Linagliptin 5 mg Tablet-0.82

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) After 18 Weeks

Glycosylated hemoglobin is reported as a percentage of the total hemoglobin (NCT00996658)
Timeframe: baseline, 18 weeks

InterventionPercentage (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Tablet-0.37
Linagliptin 5 mg Tablet-0.91

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) After 24 Weeks

Glycosylated hemoglobin is reported as a percentage of the total hemoglobin (NCT00996658)
Timeframe: baseline, 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Tablet-0.27
Linagliptin 5 mg Tablet-0.84

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Hemoglobin) After 6 Weeks

Glycosylated hemoglobin is reported as a percentage of the total hemoglobin (NCT00996658)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 weeks

InterventionPercentage (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Tablet-0.19
Linagliptin 5 mg Tablet-0.60

Occurrence of Absolute Efficacy Response (HbA1c < 6.5%) After 24 Weeks

Glycosylated hemoglobin is reported as a percentage of the total hemoglobin (NCT00996658)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Responder (HbA1c < 6.5%)Non-responder (HbA1c >= 6.5%)Missing
Linagliptin 5 mg Tablet341431
Placebo Tablet5840

Occurrence of Absolute Efficacy Response (HbA1c < 7%) After 24 Weeks

Glycosylated hemoglobin is reported as a percentage of the total hemoglobin (NCT00996658)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Responder (HbA1c < 7.0%)Non-responder (HbA1c >= 7.0%)Missing
Linagliptin 5 mg Tablet571181
Placebo Tablet12750

Occurrence of Relative Efficacy Response (Reduction in HbA1c >= 0.5%) After 24 Weeks

Glycosylated hemoglobin is reported as a percentage of the total hemoglobin (NCT00996658)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Responder (reduction in HbA1c >= 0.5%)Non-responder (reduction in HbA1c < 0.5%)Missing
Linagliptin 5 mg Tablet117611
Placebo Tablet44450

Change From Baseline in Body Weight After 52 Weeks of Treatment

The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in body weight after 52 weeks of treatment (NCT01306214)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 weeks

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.44
Empagliflozin 10 mg-1.95
Empagliflozin 25 mg-2.04

Change From Baseline in HbA1c After 18 Weeks of Treatment

The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in HbA1c after 18 weeks of treatment. (NCT01306214)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 weeks

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.50
Empagliflozin 10 mg-0.94
Empagliflozin 25 mg-1.02

Change From Baseline in HbA1c After 52 Weeks of Treatment

The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in HbA1c after 52 weeks of treatment (NCT01306214)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.81
Empagliflozin 10 mg-1.18
Empagliflozin 25 mg-1.27

Change From Baseline in Insulin Dose After 52 Weeks of Treatment

The secondary endpoint is change from baseline in insulin dose after 52 weeks of treatment (NCT01306214)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 weeks

InterventionIU/day (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo10.16
Empagliflozin 10 mg1.33
Empagliflozin 25 mg-1.06

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30.

Change in body weight from baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model.The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: baseline, week 30

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-2.45
Insulin Lispro (BBT)2.11

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) from baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model.The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: baseline, Week 30

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-0.64
Insulin Lispro (BBT)-0.14

Change in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) From Baseline to Week 30.

Change in fasting blood glucose (FBG) from Baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model. The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 30

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-0.46
Insulin Lispro (BBT)0.18

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in HbA1c from baseline following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e. HbA1c at week 30 minus HbA1c at baseline). (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, 30 weeks

Interventionpercent of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-1.13
Insulin Lispro (BBT)-1.10

Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) from baseline to Week 30 using ANCOVA model.The model included the respective secondary outcome as dependent variable, country, prior use of SU's and treatment groups as factors, and the respective outcomes baseline value as a covariate. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 30

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-0.04
Insulin Lispro (BBT)0.03

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) from baseline to week 30 using ANCOVA model.The model included the respective secondary outcome as dependent variable, country, prior use of SU's and treatment groups as factors, and the respective outcomes baseline value as a covariate. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 30

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-0.12
Insulin Lispro (BBT)-0.03

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 30

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) from baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model.The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 30

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-4.13
Insulin Lispro (BBT)0.37

Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 30

Change in total cholesterol from baseline to Week 30 using ANCOVA model. The model included the respective secondary outcome as dependent variable, country, prior use of SU's and treatment groups as factors, and the respective outcomes baseline value as a covariate. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 30

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide (BET)-0.14
Insulin Lispro (BBT)-0.03

Major Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year

Mean (standard deviation) of major hyperglycemia episodes experienced per year. Rates per year were calculated for each individual as the number of episodes divided by the total number of days in the study (from randomization to last visit date), then multiplied by 365.25. Major hypoglycemia was defined as any symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure that shows prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose OR documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) and requiring the assistance of another person because of severe impairment in consciousness or behavior. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: 30 weeks

Interventionrate per year (Mean)
Exenatide (BET)0.0
Insulin Lispro (BBT)0.1

Minor Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year

Mean (standard deviation) of minor hyperglycemia episodes experienced per year. Rates per year were calculated for each individual as the number of episodes divided by the total number of days in the study (from randomization to last visit date), then multiplied by 365.25. Minor hypoglycemia was defined as any time a participant feels that he or she is experiencing a sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that is either self-treated by the participant or resolves on its own AND has a concurrent finger stick blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: 30 weeks

Interventionrate per year (Mean)
Exenatide (BET)2.1
Insulin Lispro (BBT)5.0

Percent of Participants Achieving HbA1c ≤ 6.5%.

Percent of participants achieving HbA1c ≤ 6.5%. (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Week 30

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide (BET)26.2
Insulin Lispro (BBT)25.5

Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1C < 7.0%

Percentage of participants achieving HbA1C < 7.0% (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide (BET)46.7
Insulin Lispro (BBT)42.6

Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Baseline and at Week 30

Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at baseline and at Week 30 (NCT00960661)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 30

,
InterventionIU/day (Mean)
BaselineWeek 30
Exenatide (BET)61.556.9
Insulin Lispro (BBT)61.151.5

Change in A1c at the End of Study Period

change in A1c (%) from baseline to end of study at 16 weeks (NCT02846233)
Timeframe: 16 weeks (from baseline to end of study at 16 weeks)

Intervention% change of A1c (Mean)
Treatment Group-2.38
Control Group-0.83

Changes in Blood Pressure

change (mmHg) of systolic BP from baseline to the end of study at 16 weeks (NCT02846233)
Timeframe: 16 weeks (from baseline to end of study at 16 weeks)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Treatment Group-16
Control Group15

Changes in Heart Rate

change (beats/min) from baseline to the end of study at 16 weeks (NCT02846233)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionbeats per min (Mean)
Treatment Group4.3
Control Group5.13

Changes in LDL

change (mg/dL) from baseline to the end of study at 16 weeks (NCT02846233)
Timeframe: 16 weeks (from baseline to end of study at 16 weeks)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Treatment Group-15.7
Control Group21

Changes in Serum Creatinine

change (mg/dL) from baseline to the end of study at 16 weeks (NCT02846233)
Timeframe: 16 weeks (from baseline to end of study at 16 weeks)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Treatment Group0.04
Control Group0.04

Changes in Total Cholesterol

change (mg/dL) from baseline to the end of study at 16 weeks (NCT02846233)
Timeframe: 16 weeks (from baseline to end of study at 16 weeks)

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Treatment Group-18.5
Control Group18.38

Changes in Treatment Satisfaction Scores (DM-SAT Total Score)

"Patient satisfaction with treatment in both groups will be measured by the validated the Diabetes Medications Satisfaction Tool (DM-SAT). Response options range from 0=not at all satisfied to 10=extremely satisfied and a total score is calculated ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more diabetes medication satisfaction." (NCT02846233)
Timeframe: 16 weeks (from baseline to end of study at 16 weeks)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment Group45.3
Control Group4.63

Changes in Weight

change (in pounds) from baseline to the end of study at 16 weeks (NCT02846233)
Timeframe: 16 weeks (from baseline to end of study at 16 weeks)

Interventionpounds (Mean)
Treatment Group-16.38
Control Group-0.1

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)

Observed mean change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 Weeks of treatment. (NCT01392573)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
IDegLira-1.90
IDeg-0.89

Change in Body Weight

Observed mean change from baseline in body weight after 26 Weeks of treatment. (NCT01392573)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionkg (Mean)
IDegLira-2.7
IDeg0.0

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 104

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 104 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.65
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.74
Glimepiride-0.55

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.82
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.93
Glimepiride-0.81

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-4.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg-4.7
Glimepiride1.0

Percentage of Patients Experiencing at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Event From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the percentage of patients who experienced at least 1 documented hypoglycemic event from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in percentages. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Canagliflozin 100 mg5.6
Canagliflozin 300 mg4.9
Glimepiride34.2

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 12

(NCT01376557)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionkg (Mean)
75 mg LX4211 qd-0.995
200 mg LX4211 qd-1.956
400 mg LX4211 qd-1.848
200 mg LX4211 Bid-2.477
Placebo qd-0.395

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) to Week 12

(NCT01376557)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
75 mg LX4211 qd-9.5
200 mg LX4211 qd-17.4
400 mg LX4211 qd-27.1
200 mg LX4211 Bid-26.9
Placebo qd2.2

Change From Baseline in HbA1c to Week 12

(NCT01376557)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Intervention% change (Mean)
75 mg LX4211 qd-0.42
200 mg LX4211 qd-0.52
400 mg LX4211 qd-0.92
200 mg LX4211 Bid-0.80
Placebo qd-0.09

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SPB) at Week 12

(NCT01376557)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
75 mg LX4211 qd-0.123
200 mg LX4211 qd-3.878
400 mg LX4211 qd-5.746
200 mg LX4211 Bid-4.452
Placebo qd-0.283

Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12

(NCT01376557)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
75 mg LX4211 qd-16.2
200 mg LX4211 qd6.6
400 mg LX4211 qd-16.8
200 mg LX4211 Bid-16.9
Placebo qd-30.5

Number of Participants Achieving a HbA1c Value of <7% at Week 12

(NCT01376557)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
75 mg LX4211 qd16
200 mg LX4211 qd15
400 mg LX4211 qd22
200 mg LX4211 Bid17
Placebo qd14

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in A1C Levels (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Change from baseline: post-pre. Adjusted for baseline (value and metformin use). ANCOVA model: difference between week t and baseline values=baseline values + treatment + metformin use (NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of change (Mean)
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin-0.73
Placebo + Insulin-0.32

Change From Baseline in 120-minute PPG Values During an MTT

An MTT is a 2-part test that measures glucose and insulin levels after an overnight fast and before ingesting a meal consisting of a nutritional drink and power bar and again at prespecified times (30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes) after the start of ingestion of the meal. (NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin-27.2
Placebo + Insulin-4.2

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose Values

(NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin-10.1
Placebo + Insulin-6.1

Change From Baseline in Mean Total Daily Dose of Insulin (MTDDI) (LOCF)

Based on information recorded in the participant's daily diary. The MTDDI was calculated at every visit using the values patients recorded since the last regularly scheduled visit (minimum of 80% of days with a value). At every visit, the MTDDI was compared with the participant's baseline MTDDI (measured during a 4-week lead-in period) to identify any changes in insulin use at that visit compared with insulin use at baseline. (NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionUnits (Mean)
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin1.71
Placebo + Insulin5.01

Change From Baseline in Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Area Under the Curve (AUC) Response to an Meal Tolerance Test (MTT)

An MTT is a 2-part test that measures glucose and insulin levels after an overnight fast and before ingesting a meal consisting of a nutritional drink and power bar and again at prespecified times (30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes) after the start of ingestion of the meal (NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg*min/dL (Mean)
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin-4548.5
Placebo + Insulin-718.8

Number of Participants With Abnormal Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Results

"ECG abnormalities included those in nonspecific other categories (Other nonspecific ST/T, Other intraventricular conduction defect, Other, and Other rhythm abnormalities)and nonspecific findings, such as sinus bradycardia, sinus arrythmia, sinus tachycardia, poor R-wave progression, and ventricular premature contractions." (NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin15
Placebo + Insulin11

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response

Therapeutic glycemic response is defined as an A1C<7%. Significance was not interpreted with a p value. (NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin17.3
Placebo + Insulin6.7

Mean Changes From Baseline in Heart Rate

(NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, 44, and 52

,
InterventionBeats per minute (Number)
Week 2 (n=294, 147)Week 4 (n=293, 144)Week 6 (n=280, 141)Week 8 (n=290, 142)Week 12 (n=286, 144)Week 16 (n=278, 139)Week 20 (n=276, 137)Week 24 (n=273, 134)Week 28 (n=264, 132)Week 36 (n=261, 129)Week 44 (n=250, 125)Week 52 (n=246, 125)
Placebo + Insulin-0.7-1.0-0.9-0.70.2-0.60.4-1.0-0.6-0.0-0.70.2
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin-0.5-0.5-0.5-0.00.3-1.0-0.50.0-1.00.00.2-0.3

Mean Changes From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Readings

(NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, 44, and 52

,
Interventionmm Hg (Number)
Systolic blood pressure (Week 2) (n=294, 147)Systolic blood pressure (Week 4) (n=293, 144)Systolic blood pressure (Week 6) (n=280, 141)Systolic blood pressure (Week 8) (n=290, 142)Systolic blood pressure (Week 12) (n=286, 144)Systolic blood pressure (Week 16) (n=278, 139)Systolic blood pressure (Week 20) (n=276, 137)Systolic blood pressure (Week 24) (n=273, 134)Systolic blood pressure (Week 28) (n=264, 132)Systolic blood pressure (Week 36) (n=261, 129)Systolic blood pressure (Week 44) (n=250, 125)Systolic blood pressure (Week 52) (n=246, 125)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 2) (n=294, 147)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 4) (n=293, 144)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 6) (n=280, 141)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 8) (n=290, 142)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 12) (n=286, 144)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 16) (n=278, 139)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 20) (n=276, 137)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 24) (n=273, 134)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 28) (n=264, 132)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 36) (n=261, 129)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 44) (n=250, 125)Diastolic blood pressure (Week 52) (n=246, 125)
Placebo + Insulin2.30.01.02.42.21.11.3-0.11.83.62.61.01.41.80.32.11.01.31.10.50.20.20.40.1
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin-1.0-1.2-0.8-0.8-1.7-1.2-0.6-1.5-1.4-0.7-0.60.00.10.00.0-0.5-0.8-1.1-0.7-1.7-1.6-1.2-0.3-0.5

Number of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE), at Least 1 Treatment-related AE, Death as Outcome, at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE), at Least 1 Treatment-related SAE, Discontinuations Due to SAEs, and Discontinuations Due to AEs

An AE is any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical event that at any dose: results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency or abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; requires inpatient hospitalization; or prolongs existing hospitalization. Treatment-related=possibly, probably, or certainly related to and of unknown relationship to study treatment. (NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52, continuously

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
At least 1 AEAt least 1 treatment-related AEDeathsAt least 1 SAEAt least 1 treatment-related SAEDiscontinuations due to SAEsDiscontinuations due to AEs
Placebo + Insulin10834013003
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin20256225349

Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities During the 24-Week ST + 52-Week LT Treatment Period

"Marked abnormality=a laboratory value lying outside the predefined criteria and more extreme (farther from the limit)on-treatment than at baseline. ULN=upper limit of normal; LLN=lower limit of normal; prx=pre-RX=pretreatment.~Criteria 1: if prx=0 use >=2, if prx=0.5 or 1 use >=3, if prx=2 use 4." (NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline and during and up to 14 days after last dose of study drug (in Week 52)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin <8 g/dL (n=300; 150)Hematocrit <0.75*prx (n=300; 150)Platelets <50*10^9 c/L (n=297; 145)Platelets >1.5*ULN (n=297; 145)Leukocytes <2*1000 c/uL (n=300; 150)Neutrophils <1*1000 c/uL (n=296; 150)Eosinophils >0.9*1000 c/uL (n=296; 150)Lymphocytes <=0.75*1000 c/uL (n=296; 150)Alkaline phosphatase >3*prx & >ULN (n=302; 150)Alkaline phosphatase >1.5 ULN (n=302; 150)Aspartate aminotransferase >3* ULN (n=298; 148)Aspartate aminotransferase>5* ULN (n=298; 148)Aspartate aminotransferase >10*ULN (n=298; 148)Aspartate aminotransferase >20*ULN (n=298; 148)Alanine transaminase >3*ULN (n=300; 148)Alanine transaminase >5*ULN (n=300; 148)Alanine transaminase >10*ULN (n=300; 148)Alanine transaminase >20*ULN (n=300; 148)Bilirubin, total >2 mg/dL (n=301; 150)Bilirubin, total >1.5*ULN (n=301; 150)Bilirubin, total >2*ULN (n=301; 150)Blood urea nitrogen >2*prx & >ULN (n=302; 150)Creatinine >2.5 mg/dL (n=303; 150)Glucose, serum fasting <50 mg/dL (n=0; 0)Glucose, serum fasting >500 mg/dL (n=0; 0)Glucose, serum unspecified <50 mg/dL (n=0; 0)Glucose, serum unspecified >500 mg/dL (n=0; 0)Glucose, plasma fasting <50 mg/dL (n=301;150)Glucose, plasma fasting >500 mg/dL (n=301;150)Glucose, plasma unspecified <50 mg/dL (n=272; 133)Glucose, plasma unspecified >500 mg/d (n=272; 133)Sodium, serum <0.9*prx & <=130 mEq/L (n=302; 150)Sodium, serum >1.1*prx & >=150 mEq/L (n=302; 150)Potassium, serum <0.8 prx &<=3.2 mEq/L(n=300; 148)Potassium, serum >1.2*prx&>= 6.0 mEq/L(n=300; 148)Chloride, serum <90 mEq/L (n=302; 150)Chloride, serum >120 mEq/L (n=302; 150)Albumin <0.9*LLN; if prxCreatine kinase >5*ULN (n=301, 148)Uric acid >1.5*ULN; if prx >ULN, >2 (n=0,0)Protein urine (see criteria 1) (n=297,146)Blood urine (see criteria 1) (n=297; 146)Red blood cells urine (see criteria 1) (n=53; 31)White blood cells urine (see criteria 1)(n=115;53)
Placebo + Insulin020010721500003000010700000011100180002032310
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin22000193210210051000005000005051103810160814835

Percentage of Participants With Reported and Confirmed Hypoglycemia

Confirmed hypoglycemia=fingerstick glucose measurement of ≤50 mg/dL with associated symptoms/ (NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
ReportedConfirmed
Placebo + Insulin24.56.6
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin19.47.6

Shift in Absolute Lymphocyte Counts From Baseline to Selected Visits (LOCF)

Absolute lymphocyte count=value*10^3 c/uL (NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24 and 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline <= 0.75; Week 24 <= 0.75Baseline <= 0.75; Week 24 >0.75- <= 5.00Baseline <= 0.75; Week 24 >5.00Baseline >0.75- <= 5.00; Week 24 <= 0.75Baseline >0.75- <= 5.00; Week 24 >0.75- <= 5.00Baseline >0.75- <= 5.00; Week 24 >5.00Baseline >5.00; Week 24 <= 0.75Baseline >5.00; Week 24 >0.75- <= 5.00Baseline >5.00; Week 24 >5.00Baseline <= 0.75; Week 52 <= 0.75Baseline <= 0.75; Week 52 >0.75- <= 5.00Baseline <= 0.75; Week 52 >5.00Baseline >0.75- <= 5.00; Week 52 <= 0.75Baseline >0.75- <= 5.00; Week 52 >0.75- <= 5.00Baseline >0.75- <= 5.00; Week 52 >5.00Baseline >5.00; Week 52 <= 0.75Baseline >5.00; Week 52 >0.75- <= 5.00Baseline >5.00; Week 52 >5.00
Placebo + Insulin0200148000002001471000
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin0001293100100002950001

Shift in Platelet Counts From Baseline to Selected Visits (LOCF)

Platelet count=value*10^9 c/L (NCT00757588)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24 and 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline <= 100; Week 24 <= 100Baseline <= 100; Week 24 >100 - <= 600Baseline <= 100; Week 24 >600Baseline >100 - <= 600; Week 24 <= 100Baseline >100 - <= 600; Week 24 >100 - <= 600Baseline >100 - <= 600; Week 24 >600Baseline >600; Week 24 <= 100Baseline >600; Week 24 >100 - <= 600Baseline >600; Week 24 >600Baseline <= 100; Week 52 <= 100Baseline <= 100; Week 52 >100 - <= 600Baseline <= 100; Week 52 >600Baseline >100 - <= 600; Week 52 <= 100Baseline >100 - <= 600; Week 52 >100 - <= 600Baseline >100 - <= 600; Week 52 >600Baseline >600; Week 52 <= 100Baseline >600; Week 52 >100 - <= 600Baseline >600; Week 52 >600
Placebo + Insulin0001143000001001440000
Saxagliptin, 5 mg + Insulin0001296000000022950000

Change in BMI

Change in BMI (body mass index) from study start to 16 weeks (NCT02613897)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 16 weeks

InterventionKg/m^2 (Mean)
DAPA/SAXA (Dapagliflozin Plus Saxagliptin)-0.8
DAPA (Dapagliflozin Plus Placebo)-0.66
PCB (Placebo Plus Placebo)0.16

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline to 16 weeks (NCT02613897)
Timeframe: Baseline to 16 weeks

InterventionKg (Mean)
DAPA/SAXA (Dapagliflozin Plus Saxagliptin)-2.28
DAPA (Dapagliflozin Plus Placebo)-1.76
PCB (Placebo Plus Placebo)0.26

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucagon (FPG)

A measure of the change in fasting plasma glucagon from study start to 16 weeks (NCT02613897)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 16 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
DAPA/SAXA (Dapagliflozin Plus Saxagliptin)-28.52
DAPA (Dapagliflozin Plus Placebo)26.89
PCB (Placebo Plus Placebo)6.88

Change in Free Fatty Acids (FFA)

Measure of change in Free Fatty Acids from study start to 16 weeks (NCT02613897)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 16 weeks

InterventionmEq/L (Mean)
DAPA/SAXA (Dapagliflozin Plus Saxagliptin)-0.06
DAPA (Dapagliflozin Plus Placebo)-0.01
PCB (Placebo Plus Placebo)0.00

Change in Glucose Oxidation

Change in percentage of glucose oxidation from study start to 16 weeks (NCT02613897)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage of oxidation (Mean)
DAPA/SAXA (Dapagliflozin Plus Saxagliptin)-22.07
DAPA (Dapagliflozin Plus Placebo)-46.54
PCB (Placebo Plus Placebo)4.65

Change in Lipid Oxidation

Change in lipid oxidation percentage from baseline to 16 weeks (NCT02613897)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage of oxidation (Mean)
DAPA/SAXA (Dapagliflozin Plus Saxagliptin)-11.87
DAPA (Dapagliflozin Plus Placebo)22.02
PCB (Placebo Plus Placebo)-6.69

HBA1c

Change in blood glucose level measured over a 3 month period from study start to 16 weeks (NCT02613897)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage change in blood glucose level (Mean)
DAPA/SAXA (Dapagliflozin Plus Saxagliptin)-1.67
DAPA (Dapagliflozin Plus Placebo)-1.46
PCB (Placebo Plus Placebo)0.44

Mean Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT)

Measure of change in OGTT from study start to 16 weeks (NCT02613897)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 16 weeks

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
DAPA/SAXA (Dapagliflozin Plus Saxagliptin)-49.62
DAPA (Dapagliflozin Plus Placebo)-44.24
PCB (Placebo Plus Placebo)20.26

Change in Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP)

All subjects received a Double-Tracer Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) with 75g of glucose containing 14C-glucose together with intravenous primed-continuous infusion of 3(3H)-glucose for 240 minutes, at baseline (prior to) and after 16 weeks of therapy. Blood and urine samples were obtained during the OGTT to determine EGP. (NCT02613897)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks

,,
Interventionmg/kg*min (Mean)
Baseline Measurement16 weeks
DAPA (Dapagliflozin Plus Placebo)2.562.8
DAPA/SAXA (Dapagliflozin Plus Saxagliptin)2.452.4
PCB (Placebo Plus Placebo)1.952.15

Change in Body Weight

Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01059812)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 26

Interventionkg (Mean)
IDegAsp BID1.1
BIAsp 30 BID1.4

Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) After 26 Weeks of Treatment

Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01059812)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
IDegAsp BID-1.38
BIAsp 30 BID-1.42

Mean of 9-point Self Measured Plasma Glucose Profile (SMPG) at Week 26

Mean of SMPG at 26 weeks of treatment. Plasma glucose measured: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4 am and before breakfast. (NCT01059812)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
IDegAsp BID7.6
BIAsp 30 BID7.9

Rate of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Rate of confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes per 100 patient years of exposure (PYE). Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes consisted of severe hypoglycaemia as well as minor hypoglycaemic episodes. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes are defined as requiring assistance to administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemic episodes are defined as able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol. (NCT01059812)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 26 + 7 days follow up

InterventionEpisodes/100 years of patient exposure (Number)
IDegAsp BID956
BIAsp 30 BID952

Rate of Nocturnal Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Rate of confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes per 100 patient years of exposure (PYE). Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes consisted of severe hypoglycaemia as well as minor hypoglycaemic episodes. Severe hypoglycaemic episodes are defined as requiring assistance to administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemic episodes are defined as able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose below 3.1 mmol/L. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes are defined as occuring between 00:01 and 05:59 a.m. (NCT01059812)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 26 + 7 days follow up

InterventionEpisodes/100 years of patient exposure (Number)
IDegAsp BID111
BIAsp 30 BID155

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in FPG

To compare the change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) to week 24 (LOCF) between dapagliflozin and placebo (NCT01392677)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Plus Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea-0.78
Dapagliflozin 10mg Plus Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea-34.23

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c Levels

To compare the change from baseline in HbA1c to week 24 between dapagliflozin 10 mg in combination with metformin and sulfonylurea and placebo in combination with metformin and sulfonylurea. (NCT01392677)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 24

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Plus Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea-0.17
Dapagliflozin 10mg Plus Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea-0.86

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure

To compare the change from baseline in seated systolic blood pressure (SBP) to week 8 (LOCF) between dapagliflozin and placebo (NCT01392677)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Plus Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea-0.27
Dapagliflozin 10mg Plus Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea-4.04

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Total Body Weight

To compare the change from baseline in total body weight to week 24 (LOCF) between dapagliflozin and placebo (NCT01392677)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 24

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Plus Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea-0.58
Dapagliflozin 10mg Plus Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea-2.65

Proportion of Participants With HbA1c Value < 7.0% at Week 24 (LOCF)

To compare the proportion of subjects achieving a therapeutic glycemic response, defined as HbA1c <7.0%, at week 24 (LOCF) between dapagliflozin and placebo (NCT01392677)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Plus Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea11.1
Dapagliflozin 10mg Plus Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea31.8

Baseline Body Weight

(NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionkg (Mean)
Placebo83.78
Ertugliflozin 1 mg83.44
Ertugliflozin 5 mg85.74
Ertugliflozin 10 mg82.28
Ertugliflozin 25 mg81.81
Sitagliptin 100 mg85.52

Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure

Sitting blood pressure was measured in triplicate and the average of the measurements taken at a single assessment time was analyzed. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo79.14
Ertugliflozin 1 mg78.95
Ertugliflozin 5 mg78.19
Ertugliflozin 10 mg78.45
Ertugliflozin 25 mg78.61
Sitagliptin 100 mg79.15

Baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose

Laboratory measurements were performed after an overnight fast ≥8 hours in duration. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo165.3
Ertugliflozin 1 mg162.5
Ertugliflozin 5 mg156.5
Ertugliflozin 10 mg163.3
Ertugliflozin 25 mg171.3
Sitagliptin 100 mg166.2

Baseline Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

HbA1c is measured as percent. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Placebo8.08
Ertugliflozin 1 mg8.01
Ertugliflozin 5 mg7.88
Ertugliflozin 10 mg8.13
Ertugliflozin 25 mg8.30
Sitagliptin 100 mg8.24

Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure

Sitting blood pressure was measured in triplicate and the average of the measurements taken at a single assessment time was analyzed. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo126.7
Ertugliflozin 1 mg126.5
Ertugliflozin 5 mg127.9
Ertugliflozin 10 mg125.8
Ertugliflozin 25 mg124.9
Sitagliptin 100 mg126.6

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 12

Sitting blood pressure was measured in triplicate and the average of the measurements taken at a single assessment time was analyzed. The change from baseline is the Week 12 diastolic blood pressure minus the Week 0 diastolic blood pressure (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.81
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-1.12
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.01
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-3.18
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-1.83
Sitagliptin 100 mg1.68

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 2

Sitting blood pressure was measured in triplicate and the average of the measurements taken at a single assessment time was analyzed. The change from baseline is the Week 2 diastolic blood pressure minus the Week 0 diastolic blood pressure (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.57
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-1.25
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.26
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-1.97
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-3.01
Sitagliptin 100 mg0.92

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 4

Sitting blood pressure was measured in triplicate and the average of the measurements taken at a single assessment time was analyzed. The change from baseline is the Week 4 diastolic blood pressure minus the Week 0 diastolic blood pressure (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.80
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-2.47
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-3.08
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-2.81
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-2.10
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.51

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 8

Sitting blood pressure was measured in triplicate and the average of the measurements taken at a single assessment time was analyzed. The change from baseline is the Week 8 diastolic blood pressure minus the Week 0 diastolic blood pressure (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.80
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-1.40
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.69
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-2.23
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-1.20
Sitagliptin 100 mg0.32

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 12

The change from baseline is the Week 12 FPG minus the Week 0 fasting plasma glucose (LOCF). Laboratory measurements were performed after an overnight fast ≥8 hours in duration. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo2.76
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-18.23
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-23.06
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-31.47
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-29.26
Sitagliptin 100 mg-17.29

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2

The change from baseline is the Week 2 FPG minus the Week 0 FPG (LOCF). Laboratory measurements were performed after an overnight fast ≥8 hours in duration. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.89
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-15.07
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-15.68
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-26.65
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-16.44
Sitagliptin 100 mg-14.69

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 4

The change from baseline is the Week 4 FPG minus the Week 0 FPG (LOCF). Laboratory measurements were performed after an overnight fast ≥8 hours in duration. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.17
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-16.91
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-22.77
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-27.95
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-26.62
Sitagliptin 100 mg-18.00

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 8

The change from baseline is the Week 8 FPG minus the Week 0 FPG (LOCF). Laboratory measurements were performed after an overnight fast ≥8 hours in duration. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.82
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-18.25
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-24.69
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-31.59
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-30.99
Sitagliptin 100 mg-18.93

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 12

HbA1c is measured as percent. The change from baseline is the Week 12 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent (last observation carried forward [LOCF]). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.11
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-0.56
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.80
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-0.73
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-0.83
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.87

Change From Baseline in HbA1C at Week 2

HbA1c is measured as percent. The change from baseline is the Week 2 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.00
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-0.14
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.29
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-0.22
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-0.17
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.26

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 4

HbA1c is measured as percent. The change from baseline is the Week 4 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.04
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-0.40
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.49
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-0.48
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-0.40
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.48

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 8

HbA1c is measured as percent. The change from baseline is the Week 8 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.10
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-0.57
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.76
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-0.73
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-0.75
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.77

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 12

Sitting blood pressure was measured in triplicate and the average of the measurements taken at a single assessment time was analyzed. The change from baseline is the Week 12 systolic blood pressure minus the Week 0 systolic blood pressure (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.55
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-2.69
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-4.03
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-3.43
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-3.93
Sitagliptin 100 mg-1.09

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 2

Sitting blood pressure was measured in triplicate and the average of the measurements taken at a single assessment time was analyzed. The change from baseline is the Week 2 systolic blood pressure minus the Week 0 systolic blood pressure (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.93
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-2.30
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-4.73
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-2.28
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-5.39
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.91

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 4

Sitting blood pressure was measured in triplicate and the average of the measurements taken at a single assessment time was analyzed. The change from baseline is the Week 4 systolic blood pressure minus the Week 0 systolic blood pressure (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.57
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-3.94
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-5.15
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-5.43
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-3.33
Sitagliptin 100 mg-3.32

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 8

Sitting blood pressure was measured in triplicate and the average of the measurements taken at a single assessment time was analyzed. The change from baseline is the Week 8 systolic blood pressure minus the Week 0 systolic blood pressure (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.44
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-1.53
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-2.85
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-3.04
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-3.30
Sitagliptin 100 mg-2.43

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Medication Due to an AE

An adverse event is defines as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Below table includes all data collected since the first dose of sponsor-provided metformin and excludes a temporary discontinuation of study medication. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Up to 84 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo1
Ertugliflozin 1 mg1
Ertugliflozin 5 mg3
Ertugliflozin 10 mg2
Ertugliflozin 25 mg1
Sitagliptin 100 mg1
Metformin Run-in3

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Advere Event (AE)

An adverse event is defines as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Below table includes all data collected since the first dose of sponsor-provided metformin. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Up to 98 days

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Placebo29
Ertugliflozin 1 mg31
Ertugliflozin 5 mg30
Ertugliflozin 10 mg29
Ertugliflozin 25 mg28
Sitagliptin 100 mg30
Metformin Run-in82

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 12

The percent change from baseline is the ([Week 12 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight] divided by the Week 0 body weight) X 100 (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.75
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-1.90
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-2.50
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-2.90
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-2.66
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.30

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2

The percent change from baseline is the ([Week 2 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight] divided by the Week 0 body weight) X 100 (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 2

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.24
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-0.65
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.36
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-1.14
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-1.11
Sitagliptin 100 mg0.21

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 4

The percent change from baseline is the ([Week 4 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight] divided by the Week 0 body weight) X 100 (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.44
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-1.20
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.76
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-1.68
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-1.52
Sitagliptin 100 mg0.01

Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 8

The percent change from baseline is the ([Week 8 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight] divided by the Week 0 body weight) X 100 (LOCF). (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.62
Ertugliflozin 1 mg-1.65
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-2.18
Ertugliflozin 10 mg-2.30
Ertugliflozin 25 mg-2.40
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.38

Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1C <6.5% at Week 12

Laboratory measurements were performed after an overnight fast ≥8 hours in duration. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo6.7
Ertugliflozin 1 mg12.0
Ertugliflozin 5 mg20.4
Ertugliflozin 10 mg13.6
Ertugliflozin 25 mg14.9
Sitagliptin 100 mg25.5

Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7% at Week 12

Laboratory measurements were performed after an overnight fast ≥8 hours in duration. (NCT01059825)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo15.6
Ertugliflozin 1 mg44.0
Ertugliflozin 5 mg42.9
Ertugliflozin 10 mg38.6
Ertugliflozin 25 mg36.2
Sitagliptin 100 mg43.1

Change in Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to 24 Week Endpoint

Least Squares (LS) means are calculated using mixed model repeating measures (MMRM) with the change from baseline in HbA1c at all post baseline measurement as dependent variables, treatment, country, visit and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline HbA1c value as a covariate and participant as a random effect. (NCT01175811)
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 weeks

Interventionpercent HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Premixed Insulin-1.05
Basal-Bolus-1.06

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to 12 Week Endpoint

Least Squares (LS) means are calculated using mixed model repeating measures (MMRM) with the change from baseline in HbA1c at all post baseline measurement as dependent variables, treatment, country, visit and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline HbA1c value as a covariate and participant as a random effect. (NCT01175811)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks

Interventionpercent HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Premixed Insulin-0.96
Basal-Bolus-0.96

Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Severe Hypoglycemic Episode

Severe hypoglycemic episode is defined as any event requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. The percentage of participants experiencing a severe hypoglycemic episode is defined as the 100 multiplied by the number of participants experiencing a severe hypoglycemic episode divided by the number of participants exposed to study drug. (NCT01175811)
Timeframe: baseline through 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Premixed Insulin0.0
Basal-Bolus0.0

Percentage of Participants With Hypoglycemic Episodes (Incidence)

Incidence of hypoglycemic episodes is defined as 100 multiplied by the number of participants experiencing a hypoglycemic episode divided by the number of participants exposed to study drug. Hypoglycemic episodes are defined as an event which is associated with reported signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia, and/or a documented blood glucose (BG) concentration of <= 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). (NCT01175811)
Timeframe: baseline through 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Premixed Insulin54.8
Basal-Bolus55.0

The Rate of Hypoglycemic Episodes

The rate of hypoglycemic episodes is defined as the mean number of hypoglycemic episodes per 30 days per participant. Hypoglycemic episodes are defined as an event which is associated with reported signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia, and/or a documented blood glucose (BG) concentration of <= 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). (NCT01175811)
Timeframe: baseline through 24 weeks

Interventionhypoglycemic episode/30 days/participant (Mean)
Premixed Insulin0.468
Basal-Bolus0.409

Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) From Baseline to 12 and 24 Weeks

Body mass index is an estimate of body fat based on body weight divided by height squared. Least Squares (LS) means are calculated using mixed model repeating measures (MMRM) using change from baseline in BMI at all post baseline measurement as dependent variables, treatment, country, visit and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects, baseline BMI value as a covariate and participants as a random effect. (NCT01175811)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks

,
Interventionkilogram per square meter (kg/m^2) (Least Squares Mean)
Change at 12 weeksChange at 24 weeks
Basal-Bolus0.200.29
Premixed Insulin0.260.31

Daily Dose of Insulin Per Kilogram of Body Weight: Total, Basal and Prandial

(NCT01175811)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionInternational Units per kilogram (IU/kg) (Mean)
Total Daily DoseDaily Insulin Dose BasalDaily Insulin Dose Bolus (prandial)
Basal-Bolus0.7600.3480.412
Premixed Insulin0.7380.4400.298

Daily Dose of Insulin: Total, Basal, and Prandial

(NCT01175811)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
InterventionInternational Units (IU) (Mean)
Total Daily DoseDaily Insulin Dose BasalDaily Insulin Dose Bolus (prandial)
Basal-Bolus54.024.71729.269
Premixed Insulin52.931.53921.385

The 7-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles at Baseline, 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks.

7-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles are measures of blood glucose taken 7 times a day at the morning pre-meal, morning 2-hours post-meal, midday pre-meal, midday 2-hours post-meal, evening pre-meal, evening 2-hours post-meal, and 0300 hour [3 am]. Each participant took measures on 3 non-consecutive days and the average was calculated for each of the 7 time points. The mean of the 7-point averages was calculated for all the participants at baseline, Weeks 12 and 24. (NCT01175811)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks

,
Interventionmilligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (Mean)
Morning Pre-meal (Week 0) (n=195, 201)Morning Pre-meal (Week 12) (n=187, 191)Morning Pre-meal (Week 24) (n=177, 186)Morning 2 hours Post-meal (Week 0) (n=194, 201)Morning 2 hours Post-meal (Week 12) (n=187, 190)Morning 2 hours Post-meal (Week 24) (n=176, 184)Midday Pre-meal (Week 0) (n=195, 200)Midday Pre-meal (Week 12) (n=187, 190)Midday Pre-meal (Week 24) (n=177, 186)Midday 2 hours Post-meal (Week 0) (n=194, 201)Midday 2 hours Post-meal (Week 12) (n=186, 189)Midday 2 hours Post-meal (Week 24) (n=175, 184)Evening Pre-meal (Week 0) (n=195, 200)Evening Pre-meal (Week 12) (n=187, 190)Evening Pre-meal (Week 24) (n=177, 186)Evening 2 hours Post-meal (Week 0) (n=194, 201)Evening 2 hours Post-meal (Week 12) (n=186, 190)Evening 2 hours Post-meal (Week 24)(n=176, 185)0300 Hours (3 am) (Week 0) (n=185, 193)0300 Hours (3 am) (Week 12) (n=177, 185)0300 Hours (3 am) (Week 24) (n=171, 179)
Basal-Bolus157.7136.5132.4213.6176.5165.8164.9149.4142.1227.5177.2171.1190.0157.6151.1209.9176.2165.6180.0163.6155.8
Premixed Insulin155.0141.8137.4207.1179.6169.7160.7142.5139.5219.7162.5161.9186.6148.1145.0204.8177.1172.0175.9150.3145.1

The Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) Less Than or Equal to 6.5% and Less Than or Equal to 7% at 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks

The Percentage of participants achieving a haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) less than or equal (<=) to 6.5% or 7% is defined as 100 multiplied by the number of participants with a HbA1c of the cut-off value (6% or 7%) divided by the number of participants exposed to study drug. Participants with missing HbA1c values at endpoint were treated as not achieving the HbA1c goal. (NCT01175811)
Timeframe: 12 weeks, 24 weeks

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
<=6.5 Percent HbA1c at 12 weeks<=7.0 Percent HbA1c at 12 weeks<=6.5 Percent HbA1c at 24 weeks<=7.0 Percent HbA1c at 24 weeks
Basal-Bolus8.927.711.934.2
Premixed Insulin6.126.49.129.9

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the first day after the last dosing date)and the last pre-randomisation fasting plasma glucose value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Saxagliptin 5 mg-0.73
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg-1.29

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in HbA1c.

Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the 8th day after the last dosing date), and the last pre-randomisation HbA1c value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52.

Intervention% of glycosylated hemoglobin (Mean)
Saxagliptin 5 mg-0.44
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg-0.64

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin

Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the first day after the last dosing date) and the last pre-randomisation fasting plasma insulin value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52

InterventionµU/mL (Mean)
Saxagliptin 5 mg-2.0
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg-0.6

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in β-cell Function (as Measured by Homeostasis Model Assessment-β [HOMA-β]

β-cell function as estimated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) model. Value is derived from FPG and fasting insulin; fasting insulin values below 2.074 μU/mL or above 57.595 μU/mL and FPG values below 3 mmol/L or above 25 mmol/L are excluded (as restricted by the calculation method used). Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52

Interventionpercentage of change from baseline (Mean)
Saxagliptin 5 mg3.83
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg16.22

Proportion of Patients Achieving a Therapeutic Glycaemic Response at Week 52 Defined as HbA1c <7.0%

Proportion of patients with their last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the 8th day after the last dosing date), as determined by central laboratory, below the specified limits. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52

Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg44.7
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg54.7

Proportion of Patients Having Experienced at Least One Hypoglycaemic Event (Confirmed or Severe) Over the 52-week Double-blind Treatment Period.

"Hypoglyceamic event defined as, Confirmed hypoglycaemia: any event defined as either a symptomatic event with blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) and no need for external assistance, or an asymptomatic blood glucose measurement <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL).~Major (or severe) hypoglycaemia: symptomatic events requiring external assistance due to severe impairment in consciousness or behaviour, with or without blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL), but with prompt recovery after glucose or glucagon administration. These events may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery, attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal, was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Safety analysis set." (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg1.1
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg15.3

Proportion of Patients Reaching HbA1c <7% After 52 Weeks of Treatment Without Confirmed or Severe Hypoglycaemia.

"Defined as obtained on or before the 8th day after the last dosing day, as determined by central laboratory. Safety analysis set.~Confirmed hypoglycaemia defined as: any event defined as either a symptomatic event with blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) and no need for external assistance, or an asymptomatic blood glucose measurement <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL).~Major (or severe) hypoglycaemia defined as: symptomatic events requiring external assistance due to severe impairment in consciousness or behaviour, with or without blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL), but with prompt recovery after glucose or glucagon administration. These events may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery, attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal, was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration." (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All patientspatients aged <75 years (n=217, n=216)patients aged ≥75 years (n=142, n=143)
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg38.233.345.5
Saxagliptin 5 mg37.939.235.9

Change From Baseline in HbA1c

Change from baseline in HbA1c after 52 weeks of treatment (NCT01368081)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Sulfonylurea: Empa 10mg-0.93
Sulfonylurea: Empa 25mg-0.96
Sulfonylurea: Metformin-0.97
Biguanide: Empa 10mg-0.81
Biguanide: Empa 25mg-0.98
Thiazolidinedione: Empa 10mg-0.90
Thiazolidinedione: Empa 25mg-0.96
Alpha Glucosidase Inhibitor: Empa 10mg-0.87
Alpha Glucosidase Inhibitor: Empa 25mg-0.77
DPP-IV Inhibitor: Empa 10mg-1.00
DPP-IV Inhibitor: Empa 25mg-0.83
Glinide: Empa 10mg-0.98
Glinide: Empa 25mg-0.98

Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Adverse Events

Number of patients with confirmed hypoglycaemic adverse events (NCT01368081)
Timeframe: After the first drug intake until 7 days after the last treatment administration, up to 383 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sulfonylurea: Empa 10mg6
Sulfonylurea: Empa 25mg9
Sulfonylurea: Metformin5
Biguanide: Empa 10mg0
Biguanide: Empa 25mg1
Thiazolidinedione: Empa 10mg2
Thiazolidinedione: Empa 25mg1
Alpha Glucosidase Inhibitor: Empa 10mg0
Alpha Glucosidase Inhibitor: Empa 25mg0
DPP-IV Inhibitor: Empa 10mg0
DPP-IV Inhibitor: Empa 25mg1
Glinide: Empa 10mg0
Glinide: Empa 25mg2

Number of Patients With Drug Related Adverse Events

Number of Patients With Drug Related Adverse Events after the first drug intake until 7 days after the last treatment administration, up to 383 days (NCT01368081)
Timeframe: After the first drug intake until 7 days after the last treatment administration, up to 383 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Sulfonylurea: Empa 10mg19
Sulfonylurea: Empa 25mg25
Sulfonylurea: Metformin13
Biguanide: Empa 10mg13
Biguanide: Empa 25mg9
Thiazolidinedione: Empa 10mg20
Thiazolidinedione: Empa 25mg19
Alpha Glucosidase Inhibitor: Empa 10mg7
Alpha Glucosidase Inhibitor: Empa 25mg5
DPP-IV Inhibitor: Empa 10mg9
DPP-IV Inhibitor: Empa 25mg18
Glinide: Empa 10mg9
Glinide: Empa 25mg9

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Year 3

Change in Body weight from baseline to Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 3 in Period II

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-3.92
Glim + Met1.47

Change in DI30/DG30 Ratio From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in DI30/DG30 ratio from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met12.10
Glim + Met0.91

Change in Disposition Index From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in disposition index from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met9.15
Glim + Met1.82

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-0.87
Glim + Met-0.41

Change in Fasting Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio From Baseline to Endpoint.

Change in fasting proinsulin (measured in pmol/L)/insulin (measured in pmol/L) ratio from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met0.03
Glim + Met0.05

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint. Endpoint for HbA1c was defined as the HbA1c measured at the treatment failure for patients reaching primary endpoint and was the last observation in study period II for other patients (either followed until the end of the study period II or discontinuing the study). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-0.36
Glim + Met-0.21

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 2 for Patients Not Randomized at Entry in Period III

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 2. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline in Period III, Year 2 in Period III

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Mean)
Glim + Met + Exen - Not Randomized-0.47

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 2 for Patients Randomized at Entry in Period III

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 2. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline in Period III, Year 2 in Period III

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met + Glim - Randomized-0.19
Exen + Met + Pio or Rosi - Randomized-0.47

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 3

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 3 in Period II

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-0.30
Glim + Met-0.12

Change in HOMA-B From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in HOMA-B from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met5.56
Glim + Met19.92

Change in Postprandial (2 Hours) Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Endpoint

Change from baseline in postprandial (2 hours) plasma glucose to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-2.72
Glim + Met-0.53

Diastolic Blood Pressure at Year 3

Diastolic Blood pressure at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met77.45
Glim + Met79.16

Disposition Index at Year 3

Disposition Index at Year 3. Disposition index was calculated as (DI30/DG30 ratio)/(HOMA index for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)); where HOMA-IR=(fasting insulin (measured in pmol/L) x fasting glucose (measured in mmol/L))/(22.5 x 7.175). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met12.56
Glim + Met7.89

Fasting Plasma Glucose at Year 3

Fasting plasma glucose at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met7.27
Glim + Met7.96

Fasting Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio at Year 3

Fasting proinsulin (measured in pmol/L)/insulin (measured in pmol/L) ratio at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met0.22
Glim + Met0.23

Heart Rate at Year 3

Heart rate at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionbeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met73.51
Glim + Met74.23

High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Year 3

HDL Cholesterol at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met1.31
Glim + Met1.25

Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) at Year 3

HOMA-B at Year 3. HOMA-B is an index of beta-cell function and was calculated as: HOMA-B = (20 x fasting insulin (measured in pmol/L))/((fasting glucose (measured in mmol/L) - 3.5) x 7.175). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met66.86
Glim + Met68.52

Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year

All hypoglycemia episodes were taken into account. Severe hypoglycemia: event requiring assistance of another person to administer carbohydrate, glucagons, or other resuscitative actions; Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with typical symptoms accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Asymptomatic hypoglycemia: event not accompanied by typical symptoms but with a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with symptoms not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionevents per subject-year (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met1.52
Glim + Met5.32

Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year in Period III

All hypoglycemia episodes were taken into account. Severe hypoglycemia: event requiring assistance of another person to administer carbohydrate, glucagons, or other resuscitative actions; Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with typical symptoms accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Asymptomatic hypoglycemia: event not accompanied by typical symptoms but with a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with symptoms not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Start of Period III to end of study

Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Exen + Metformin + Glim - Randomized2.78
Exen + Met + Pio or Rosi - Randomized0.60
Glim + Met + Exen - Not Randomized4.62

Postprandial (2 Hours) Plasma Glucose at Year 3

Postprandial (2 hours) plasma glucose at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met12.65
Glim + Met15.45

Ratio of the 30 Minute Increment in Plasma Insulin Concentration and the 30 Minute Increment in Plasma Glucose During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (DI30/DG30 Ratio) at Year 3

DI30/DG30 at Year 3. DI30/DG30 ratio was calculated as (30 minute post prandial insulin - fasting insulin) (measured in pmol/L)/(30 minute post prandial glucose - fasting glucose) (measured in mmol/L). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met25.81
Glim + Met26.38

Systolic Blood Pressure at Year 3

Systolic Blood pressure at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met130.58
Glim + Met135.78

Time to Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as one of the following:1. HbA1c exceeding 9% at any visit after the initial 3 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 6), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. 2. HbA1c exceeding 7% at 2 consecutive visits 3 months apart, after the initial 6 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 9), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionweek (Median)
Exen + Met180.0
Glim + Met142.1

Total Cholesterol at Year 3

Total Cholesterol at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met4.77
Glim + Met4.75

Triglycerides at Year 3

Triglycerides at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met1.69
Glim + Met1.95

Number of Patients With Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as one of the following:1. HbA1c exceeding 9% at any visit after the initial 3 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 6), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. 2. HbA1c exceeding 7% at 2 consecutive visits 3 months apart, after the initial 6 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 9), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

,
Interventionnumber of patients (Number)
Number of patients with treatment failureNumber of patients censored
Exen + Met203287
Glim + Met262225

Number of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant

A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Median of 1 and 2 events per participant was reported. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionevents per participant (Median)
Placebo0
PF-04937319 10 mg0
PF-04937319 50 mg0
PF-04937319 100 mg0
Glimepiride0

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values

Hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cells(RBC) count:less than [<]0.8*lower limit of normal [LLN],platelets:<0.5*LLN/greater than [>]1.75*upper limit of normal [ULN],white blood cells(WBC):<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,lymphocytes,total neutrophils:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN, basophils,eosinophil,monocytes:>1.2*ULN;aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:>0.3*ULN,total protein,albumin:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN;total bilirubin,direct bilirubin,indirect bilirubin:>1.5*ULN;triglycerides,cholesterol:>1.3*ULN, HDL:<0.8*LLN, LDL:>1.2*ULN,blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:>1.3*ULN,uric acid:>1.2*ULN;sodium: <0.95*LLN or >1.05*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:<0.9*LLN or >1.1*ULN;creatine kinase:>2.0*ULN;glucose:<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,urine WBC and RBC:>= 20/High Power Field [HPF]),urine epithelial cells (>=1 HPF),urine bacteria >20 high-powered field;qualitative urine glucose,urine blood to Hgb ratio (>=1);urine(protein,nitrite,mucus,leukocyte >=1 in urine dipstick test). (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo56
PF-04937319 10 mg52
PF-04937319 50 mg56
PF-04937319 100 mg54
Glimepiride51

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode

A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. HAE was defined as 1 of the given definitions: Characteristic symptoms of HAE with no home glucose monitoring performed where clinical picture included prompt resolution with food intake, subcutaneous glucagon, or intravenous glucose; or characteristic symptoms of HAE with home glucose monitoring measurement =< 70 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<74 mg/dL using International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers; or any laboratory glucose value, meeting the following criterion with or without accompanying symptoms: =<49 mg/dL using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<53 mg/dL using IFCC referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo4.9
PF-04937319 10 mg3.3
PF-04937319 50 mg4.9
PF-04937319 100 mg6.6
Glimepiride34.4

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14

(NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14 (follow-up)

,,,,
Interventionkilogram (kg) (Mean)
Baseline (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 60)Change at Week 2 (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 58)Change at Week 4 (n=58, 56, 55, 59, 60)Change at Week 6 (n=57, 54, 55, 59, 56)Change at Week 8 (n=58, 54, 53, 58, 56)Change at Week 12 (n=56, 52, 53, 55, 54)Change at Week 14 (n=55, 51, 53, 55, 53)
Glimepiride90.388-0.0240.3100.4730.4931.2111.234
PF-04937319 10 mg89.518-0.069-0.378-0.604-0.522-0.685-0.472
PF-04937319 100 mg87.530-0.021-0.284-0.290-0.397-0.545-0.573
PF-04937319 50 mg89.860-0.028-0.074-0.228-0.311-0.961-0.978
Placebo89.859-0.402-0.620-0.564-1.082-1.529-1.478

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

(NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12

,,,,
Interventionmilligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (Mean)
Baseline (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 61)Change at Week 2 (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 59)Change at Week 4 (n=59, 58, 56, 59, 60)Change at Week 6 (n=58, 56, 56, 59, 57)Change at Week 8 (n=59, 56, 54, 58, 57)Change at Week 12 (n=57, 54, 54, 55, 55)
Glimepiride163.7-19.9-26.2-23.4-26.9-22.5
PF-04937319 10 mg168.7-2.0-8.4-6.9-7.0-6.2
PF-04937319 100 mg160.4-10.5-11.4-10.4-13.0-10.3
PF-04937319 50 mg174.7-7.9-7.7-7.2-13.0-9.9
Placebo161.33.1-0.5-2.60.93.4

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1C was reported. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Mean)
Baseline (n=59, 57, 55, 60, 60)Change at Week 12 (n=56, 53, 53, 54, 54)
Glimepiride8.12-1.01
PF-04937319 10 mg7.97-0.18
PF-04937319 100 mg7.88-0.64
PF-04937319 50 mg7.91-0.45
Placebo7.90-0.13

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1C was reported. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Mean)
Week 4 (n=58, 57, 55, 58, 60)Week 6 (n=57, 55, 55, 58, 55)Week 8 (n=58, 55, 53, 57, 55)
Glimepiride-0.54-0.78-0.89
PF-04937319 10 mg-0.07-0.14-0.17
PF-04937319 100 mg-0.32-0.51-0.59
PF-04937319 50 mg-0.22-0.22-0.38
Placebo-0.08-0.14-0.19

Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data

Participants who met the criteria for increase from baseline in ECG data were reported. Criteria for increase from baseline data: PR interval (percent change of greater than or equal to [>=] 25/50% [if baseline value was >200 then percent change of >25% counts; if baseline value was <=200 then percent change of >50% counts]); QRS complex (percent change of >=50%); QT Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval (change of >= 30 to <60 millisecond [msec], and change of >=60 msec). (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%QRS interval: Percent change of >=50%QTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msecQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec
Glimepiride0141
PF-04937319 10 mg0152
PF-04937319 100 mg0262
PF-04937319 50 mg1182
Placebo0062

Number of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs Data

Participants who met the criteria for increase or decrease in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for increase or decrease from baseline vital signs data: sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) of >=30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); sitting diastolic BP of >=20 mmHg and pulse rate was based on investigator's discretion. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Increase in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)Increase in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)Decrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)Decrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)
Glimepiride5215
PF-04937319 10 mg1333
PF-04937319 100 mg3456
PF-04937319 50 mg3032
Placebo2154

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 14 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to 14 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 101 days)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Glimepiride361
PF-04937319 10 mg281
PF-04937319 100 mg291
PF-04937319 50 mg312
Placebo260

Percentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used and data are presented in categories of less than 6.5 percent and less than 7 percent. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Less Than 6.5 PercentLess Than 7 Percent
Glimepiride18.245.5
PF-04937319 10 mg1331.5
PF-04937319 100 mg27.352.7
PF-04937319 50 mg18.527.8
Placebo7.026.3

Number of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant

A hypoglycemic event (HAE) was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Median number of events per participant was reported (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionevents per participant (Median)
Metformin 500 mg0
Placebo0
PF-04937319 3 mg0
PF-04937319 20 mg0
PF-04937319 50 mg0
PF-04937319 100 mg0
Sitagliptin 100 mg0

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values

Hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cells(RBC) count:less than [<]0.8*lower limit of normal[LLN],platelets:<0.5*LLN/greater than [>]1.75*upper limit of normal [ULN],white blood cells(WBC):<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,lymphocytes,total neutrophils:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN, basophils,eosinophil,monocytes:>1.2*ULN;aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:>0.3*ULN,total protein,albumin:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN;total bilirubin,direct bilirubin,indirect bilirubin:>1.5*ULN;triglycerides,cholesterol:>1.3*ULN, HDL:<0.8*LLN, LDL:>1.2*ULN,blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:>1.3*ULN,uric acid:>1.2*ULN;sodium: <0.95*LLN or >1.05*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:<0.9*LLN or >1.1*ULN;creatine kinase:>2.0*ULN;glucose:<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,urine WBC and RBC:>= 20/High Power Field [HPF]),urine epithelial cells (>=1 HPF),urine bacteria >20 high-powered field;qualitative urine glucose,urine blood to Hgb ratio (>=1);urine(protein,nitrite,mucus,leukocyte >=1 in urine dipstick test). (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo46
PF-04937319 3 mg49
PF-04937319 20 mg45
PF-04937319 50 mg46
PF-04937319 100 mg53
Sitagliptin 100 mg43

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode

A hypoglycemic event (HAE) was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. HAE is defined as 1 of the given definitions: Characteristic symptoms of HAE with no home glucose monitoring performed where clinical picture included prompt resolution with food intake, subcutaneous glucagon, or intravenous glucose; or characteristic symptoms of HAE with home glucose monitoring measurement =< 70 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<74 mg/dL using International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers; or any laboratory glucose value, meeting the following criterion with or without accompanying symptoms: =<49 mg/dL using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<53 mg/dL using IFCC referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Metformin 500 mg0
Placebo0
PF-04937319 3 mg0
PF-04937319 20 mg1
PF-04937319 50 mg0
PF-04937319 100 mg2
Sitagliptin 100 mg1

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14

(NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8 , 12 , 14

,,,,,
Interventionkilogram (kg) (Mean)
Baseline (n=55, 55, 50, 56, 54, 55)Change at Week 2 (n=54, 55, 49, 56, 53, 55)Change at Week 4 (n=51, 55, 49, 55, 53, 53)Change at Week 8 (n=49, 53, 45, 52, 50, 52)Change at Week 12 (n=47, 52, 45, 52, 50, 53)Change at Week 14 (n=44, 52, 44, 52, 50, 53)
PF-04937319 100 mg91.239-0.053-0.374-0.475-0.623-0.916
PF-04937319 20 mg88.371-0.052-0.192-0.510-0.455-0.613
PF-04937319 3 mg87.8650.4350.214-0.003-0.1420.011
PF-04937319 50 mg88.066-0.283-0.203-0.270-0.352-0.492
Placebo86.446-0.239-0.704-0.823-0.804-0.588
Sitagliptin 100 mg87.025-0.384-0.353-0.702-0.917-1.172

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14

(NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14

,,,,,
Interventionmilligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (Mean)
Baseline (n=56, 56, 52, 56, 55, 55)Change at Week 2 (n=54, 56, 50, 56, 54, 55)Change at Week 4 (n=52, 56, 51, 55, 54, 53)Change at Week 8 (n=50, 54, 47, 52, 51, 52)Change at Week 12 (n=48, 53, 47, 52, 51, 53)Change at Week 14 (n=45, 53, 46, 52, 51, 53)
PF-04937319 100 mg164.8-10.8-9.6-6.53.510.2
PF-04937319 20 mg155.1-3.2-0.2-2.5-3.8-3.1
PF-04937319 3 mg159.80.7-0.30.7-2.5-3.5
PF-04937319 50 mg166.1-6.8-8.3-15.2-10.8-1.0
Placebo168.3-5.2-1.8-3.1-7.5-5.9
Sitagliptin160.7-13.6-19.3-15.4-12.9-2.6

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than (<) 6.5 percent (%) by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1c in participants were reported. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Mean)
Baseline (n=50,55,48,55,53,53)Change at Week 12 (n=46,52,45,52,50,53)
PF-04937319 100 mg8.31-0.80
PF-04937319 20 mg7.80-0.53
PF-04937319 3 mg8.00-0.33
PF-04937319 50 mg8.15-0.59
Placebo8.01-0.42
Sitagliptin7.89-0.79

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as <6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1c in participants were reported. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline(Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Mean)
Change at Week 4 (n= 50, 55, 48, 55, 53, 53)Change at Week 8 (n=48, 53, 45, 52, 50, 51)
PF-04937319 100 mg-0.50-0.86
PF-04937319 20 mg-0.32-0.46
PF-04937319 3 mg-0.24-0.32
PF-04937319 50 mg-0.35-0.50
Placebo-0.20-0.36
Sitagliptin-0.52-0.77

Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)Data

Criteria for increase from baseline data: PR interval (percent change of greater than or equal to [>=] 25/50% [if baseline>200 then percent change of >25% counts; if baseline <=200 then percent change of >50% counts]; QRS complex (percent change of >=50%); QT Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval (change of >=30 to <60 millisecond [msec], and change of >=60 msec). (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%QRS interval: Percent change of >=50%QTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msecQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec
PF-04937319 100 mg1132
PF-04937319 20 mg0130
PF-04937319 3 mg1150
PF-04937319 50 mg0131
Placebo0071
Sitagliptin2170

Number of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs Data

Participants who met the criteria for increase or decrease in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for increase or decrease from baseline vital signs data: sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) of >=30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); sitting diastolic BP of >=20 mmHg and pulse rate was based on investigator's discretion. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Increase in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)Increase in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)Decrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)Decrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)
PF-04937319 100 mg3423
PF-04937319 20 mg2016
PF-04937319 3 mg2421
PF-04937319 50 mg1111
Placebo1112
Sitagliptin2211

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 14 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to 14 days after last dose (up to 101 days)

,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Metformin 500 mg370
PF-04937319 100 mg241
PF-04937319 20 mg191
PF-04937319 3 mg190
PF-04937319 50 mg160
Placebo191
Sitagliptin 100 mg180

Percentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as <6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used and data are presented in categories of <6.5 percent and <7 percent. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
<6.5 percent<7 percent
PF-04937319 100 mg17.639.2
PF-04937319 20 mg19.142.6
PF-04937319 3 mg9.426.4
PF-04937319 50 mg15.430.8
Placebo12.522.9
Sitagliptin32.156.6

Change From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Coefficient

Gastric emptying was measured using 13C-octanoic acid breath test by isotope-selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry. Gastric emptying coefficient was derived from a mathematical formula that describes the gastric emptying rate and gives an overall index of gastric emptying. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: 0 (7:30 clock time, prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 hours on Day -4 (baseline) and on Day 55

Interventioncoefficient (unit-less) (Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg-0.33
Liraglutide 1.2 mg-0.34
Liraglutide 1.8 mg-0.28

Change From Baseline to Day 55 in Gastric Emptying Half Life (t1/2)

Gastric emptying was measured using 13C-octanoic acid breath test by isotope-selective non-dispersive infrared spectrometry. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: 0 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 hours on Day -4 (baseline) and on Day 55

Interventionminutes (min) (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg453.56
Liraglutide 1.2 mg175.31
Liraglutide 1.8 mg130.49

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Average 7-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG)

Seven-point SMPG (before breakfast, 2 hours post breakfast, before lunch, 2 hours post lunch, before dinner, 2 hours post dinner, and at bedtime) was measured using Freestyle Precision glucometer and average of the 7 measurements was calculated. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: Before breakfast, 2 hours post breakfast, before lunch, 2 hours post lunch, before dinner, 2 hours post dinner, and at bedtime on Day -3 (Baseline) and on Day 56

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg-0.69
Liraglutide 1.2 mg-0.76
Liraglutide 1.8 mg-1.2

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose

(NCT01596504)
Timeframe: Day -7 (Baseline), Day 56

Interventionunits (Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg-4.7
Liraglutide 1.2 mg-4.6
Liraglutide 1.8 mg-4.0

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected C-Peptide AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours

C-peptide was assessed using the Electro Chemiluminescence Immuno Assay.The range of the method was 0.2 to 25 nanogram per millilitre (ng/mL) and the LOD was 0.07 ng/mL. Measurement was done on Day -3 (Baseline) and Day 56 as the maximum change in C-peptide from time of breakfast start (time: 0.5 hours) until 5 hours later (time: 5.5 hours) subtracted from pre-meal plasma concentration. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day-3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

Interventionh*nmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg-1.16
Liraglutide 1.2 mg1.23
Liraglutide 1.8 mg0.88

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Corrected Glucagon AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours

Glucagon was assessed using the radioimmunoassay. The range of the method was 4.7 to 150 picomole per litre (pmol/L). Measurement was done on Day -3 (Baseline) and Day 56 as the maximum change in glucagon from time of breakfast start (time: 0.5 hours) until 5 hours later (time: 5.5 hours) subtracted from pre-meal plasma concentration. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

Interventionh*ng/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg-16.56
Liraglutide 1.2 mg11.58
Liraglutide 1.8 mg5.6

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as LOD. The value of FPG on Day -3 was the baseline. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: 0.5 hour (prior to standardized breakfast) on Day -3; 0.5 hour (prior to standardized breakfast) on Day 56

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg0.1
Liraglutide 1.2 mg0.12
Liraglutide 1.8 mg0.13

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in HbA1c

HbA1C was assessed using the high performance liquid chromatography method. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (Hour 0) on Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 56

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg-0.58
Liraglutide 1.2 mg-0.66
Liraglutide 1.8 mg-0.74

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected Area Under The Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time 0.5 Hours to 4.5 Hours

Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 milligram per decilitre (mg/dL) with 1 mg/dL as limit of detection (LOD). Calculation of the AUC was made on Day -3 (baseline) and on Day 56 using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration [time: 0.5 hours]) to 4 hours after breakfast start (time: 4.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast plasma glucose concentration (time: 0.5 hours). (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

Interventionh*mmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 μg-13.33
Liraglutide 1.2 mg-7.32
Liraglutide 1.8 mg-8.72

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in Plasma Glucose Corrected AUC From Time 0.5 Hours to 5.5 Hours

Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as limit of detection (LOD). Calculation of the AUC was made on Day -3 (baseline) and on Day 56 using the linear trapezoidal rule from time of breakfast start (30 minutes after study drug administration [time: 0.5 hours]) to 5 hours after breakfast start (time: 5.5 hours) and corrected by subtracting pre-breakfast plasma glucose concentration (time: 0.5 hours). (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.5 (prior to standardized breakfast), 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

Interventionh*mmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg-13.82
Liraglutide 1.2 mg-9.09
Liraglutide 1.8 mg-10.33

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in PPG Excursion

Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as LOD. PPG excursion was determined on Day -3 (Baseline) and Day 56 as the maximum change in PPG from time of breakfast start (time: 0.5 hours) until 5 hours later (time: 5.5 hours) subtracted from pre-meal plasma concentration. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3 (baseline); 0.67, 0.84, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg-3.26
Liraglutide 1.2 mg-1.79
Liraglutide 1.8 mg-2.5

Change From Baseline to Day 57 in Body Weight

(NCT01596504)
Timeframe: 0.5 hours prior to standardized breakfast on Day -1 (Baseline); 0.5 hours prior to study drug administration on Day 57

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg-1.61
Liraglutide 1.2 mg-1.78
Liraglutide 1.8 mg-2.42

Change From Baseline to Day 57 in Waist Circumference

(NCT01596504)
Timeframe: 0.5 hours prior to standardized breakfast on Day -1 (Baseline); 0.5 hours prior to IMP administration on Day 57

Interventioncm (Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg-1.40
Liraglutide 1.2 mg-1.93
Liraglutide 1.8 mg-2.12

Change From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Heart Rate

The baseline value was the 24-hour mean on Day -2/-1 determined as overall, night and daytime mean. Measurements were made every 15 minutes from 07:00 to 23:00 (daytime) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 to 07:00 (night-time) at baseline and Day 57/58. Measurements were obtained after 10 minutes in the supine resting position. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: Every 15 minutes from 07:00 clock time to 23:00 clock time (day-time) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 clock time to 07:00 clock time (night-time) on Day -2/-1 (Baseline) and Day 57/58

Interventionbeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide 20 µg3.34
Liraglutide 1.2 mg9.33
Liraglutide 1.8 mg9.17

Number of Participants With 2-Hour Post-prandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) <7.77 (mmol/L) at Day 56

Plasma glucose was assessed using the Gluco-quant Glucose/hexokinase assay. The range of the method was 3 to 1000 mg/dL with 1 mg/dL as LOD. The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after start of a standardised breakfast. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: Day 56

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Lixisenatide 20 µg35
Liraglutide 1.2 mg13
Liraglutide 1.8 mg11

Change From Baseline to Day 56 in the Cumulative Score Mean on the Appetite Perception Using a Visual Analogue Scale After Standardized Solid Breakfast

Visual Analogue Scale, 100 mm in length with words anchored at each end, expressing the most positive (100 mm) and the most negative rating (0 mm), was used to assess hunger, satiety, fullness and prospective food consumption. Responses were measured as distance from the left end of the line to the mark. Mean change from baseline was calculated for each parameter separately. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: 0.5 (8:00 clock time, prior to standardized breakfast), 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours on Day -3; 0 (prior to standardized breakfast), 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 hours post study drug administration on Day 56

,,
Interventionmm (Mean)
How hungry do you feel?How satisfied do you feel?How full do you feel?How much do you think you can eat?
Liraglutide 1.2 mg-3.18.99.3-4.5
Liraglutide 1.8 mg-1.03.66.4-7.2
Lixisenatide 20 µg-3.74.54.9-6.4

Change From Baseline to Day 57/58 in 24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure

The baseline value was the 24-hour means on Day -2/-1 determined as overall, night and day-time mean. Measurements were made every 15 minutes from 07:00 to 23:00 (day-time) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 to 07:00 (night-time) at baseline and at Day 57/58. Measurements were obtained after 10 minutes in the supine resting position. (NCT01596504)
Timeframe: Every 15 minutes from 07:00 clock time to 23:00 clock time (day-time) and every 30 minutes from 23:00 clock time to 07:00 clock time (night-time) on Day -2/ -1 (Baseline) and Day 57/58

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
24-Hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure24-Hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure
Liraglutide 1.2 mg-0.52.4
Liraglutide 1.8 mg-2.51.6
Lixisenatide 20 µg0.40.8

Change From Baseline in Incremental Area Under the Curve 0-4h (iAUC0-4h) Derived From the Glucose Concentration Profile During Meal Test

Values of mean change in normalised iAUC0-4h values based on LOCF data derived from the glucose concentration profiles during a meal test. The meal test was performed at selected sites at baseline and after 26 weeks of treatment in the main trial period. The incremental AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method and the resulting area was divided length of the observation period to yield the (normalised) prandial increment in mmol/L using the available valid glucose observations and the associated actual elapsed time point. (NCT01336023)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
IDeg-0.17
IDegLira-0.87
Liraglutide-0.78

Mean Actual Daily Insulin Dose

Mean of the actual doses recorded at visit 28 (Week 26). (NCT01336023)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionunits (Mean)
IDeg53
IDegLira38

Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26

Values of mean change in body weight. (NCT01336023)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 26

Interventionkg (Mean)
IDeg1.6
IDegLira-0.5
Liraglutide-3.0

Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) at Week 26.

Values of mean change in HbA1c. (NCT01336023)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

InterventionPercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
IDeg-1.44
IDegLira-1.91
Liraglutide-1.28

Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Reported hypoglycemaic episodes are number of hypoglycemic events per 100 patient years of exposure. (NCT01336023)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-26

InterventionEvents per 100 patient years of exposure (Number)
IDeg256.7
IDegLira180.2
Liraglutide22.0

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.08
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.76
Insulin Glargine-0.63

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks and 78 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258)78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)
Insulin Glargine-0.65-0.59
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.89-0.62
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.16-0.90

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks for Body Mass Index

Body mass index (BMI) is an estimate of body fat based on body weight divided by height squared. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionkilograms per square meter (kg/m^2) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245)52 weeks (n=250, 252, 238)78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)
Insulin Glargine0.440.620.59
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.50-0.39-0.39
LY2189265 1.5 mg-0.64-0.64-0.64

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks for Body Weight

Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionkilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine1.011.441.28
LY2189265 0.75 mg-1.47-1.33-1.54
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.82-1.87-1.96

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks for Daily Mean Blood Glucose Values From the 8-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles

The self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) data were collected at the following 8 time points: pre-morning meal; 2 hours post-morning meal; pre-midday meal; 2 hours post-midday meal; pre-evening meal; 2 hours post-evening meal; bedtime; and 3 AM or 5 hours after bedtime. Least Squares (LS) means of the mean of the 8 time points (Daily Mean) were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionmillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=199, 204, 190)52 weeks (n=180, 185, 176)78 weeks (n=172, 164, 168)
Insulin Glargine-1.58-1.44-1.47
LY2189265 0.75 mg-1.46-1.32-1.15
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.79-1.69-1.55

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the EuroQol 5 Dimension

The European Quality of Life - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. It consists of 2 parts: the first part assesses 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that have 3 possible levels of response (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem). These dimensions are converted into a weighted health-state Index Score. The EQ-5D United Kingdom (UK) score ranges from -0.59 to 1.0, where a score of 1.0 indicates perfect health and negative values are valued as worse than dead. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) on which the participants rated their perceived health state on that day from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health). Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted by treatment, country, and baseline. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
EQ-5D UK, 26 weeks (n=257, 254, 249)EQ-5D UK, 52 weeks (n=259, 260, 253)EQ-5D UK, 78 weeks (n=259, 260, 253)VAS, 26 weeks (n=253, 252, 243)VAS, 52 weeks (n=260, 258, 252)VAS, 78 weeks (n=260, 258, 252)
Insulin Glargine-0.01-0.040.000.81.12.2
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.000.000.003.42.33.2
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.010.010.013.33.23.8

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living

"The Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living questionnaire (renamed the Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire [APPADL]) contains 7 items that assess how difficult it is for participants to engage in certain activities considered to be integral to normal daily life, such as walking, standing and climbing stairs. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = not at all difficult and 1 = unable to do. The individual scores from all 7 items are summed and a single total score is calculated and may range between 7 and 35. A higher score indicates better ability to perform activities of daily living. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate." (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=256, 256, 248)52 weeks (n=260, 261, 249)78 weeks (n=260, 261, 249)
Insulin Glargine-0.3-0.6-0.3
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.10.40.3
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.70.91.0

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Self-Perception

The Impact of Weight on Self-Perception (IW-SP) questionnaire contains 3 items that assess how often the participants' body weight affects how happy they are with their appearance and how often they feel self-conscious when out in public. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = never and 1 = always. A single total score is calculated by summing the scores for all 3 items. Total score ranges between 3 and 15, where a higher score is indicative of better self-perception. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=258, 258, 251)52 weeks (n=260, 261, 252)78 weeks (n=260, 261, 252)
Insulin Glargine-0.10.10.1
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.20.20.3
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.10.50.5

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the Low Blood Sugar Survey

The Low Blood Sugar Survey (LBSS) contains 33 items comprised of 2 subscales (behavior and worry), each of which is rated on a 5-point numeric rating scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). It captures behavioral changes associated with the concerns and experiences of hypoglycemia and the degree to which participants are worried about certain aspects associated with hypoglycemia during the previous 4 weeks. The behavior (or avoidance) subscale has 15 items, and the worry (or affect) subscale has 18 items. Subscale scores are calculated by summing participant responses to items (behavior range 0-60; worry range 0-72). A total score is calculated as the sum of both subscales (range 0-132). Higher scores indicate greater negative impact on subscales and total score. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=255, 255, 244)52 weeks (n=258, 259, 245)78 weeks (n=258, 259, 245)
Insulin Glargine0.3-1.0-2.0
LY2189265 0.75 mg-2.4-4.1-4.7
LY2189265 1.5 mg-2.8-4.2-4.6

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval

The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using Fridericia's formula: QTc = QT/RR^0.33. Corrected QT (QTc) is the QT interval corrected for heart rate and RR, which is the interval between two R waves. PR is the interval between the P wave and the QRS complex. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionmilliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean)
QTcF interval, 26 weeks (n=240, 245, 229)QTcF interval, 52 weeks (n=231, 240, 228)QTcF interval, 78 weeks (n=221, 220, 222)PR interval, 26 weeks (n=240, 245, 229)PR interval, 52 weeks (n=230, 240, 227)PR interval, 78 weeks (n=221, 220, 222)
Insulin Glargine1.243.704.441.241.501.21
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.101.343.442.331.883.27
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.711.551.662.782.612.62

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Heart Rate

Electrocardiogram (ECG) heart rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=241, 247, 231)52 weeks (n=232, 242, 231)78 weeks (n=223, 222, 225)
Insulin Glargine-1.24-1.01-0.26
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.900.380.47
LY2189265 1.5 mg2.642.412.49

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Pancreatic Enzymes

Amylase (total and pancreas-derived) and lipase concentrations were measured. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits/liter (Median)
Amylase (total), 26 weeksAmylase (total), 52 weeksAmylase (total), 78 weeksAmylase (pancreas-derived), 26 weeksAmylase (pancreas-derived), 52 weeksAmylase (pancreas-derived), 78 weeksLipase, 26 weeksLipase, 52 weeksLipase, 78 weeks
Insulin Glargine2.0003.0001.0001.0001.0000.000-1.000-1.000-2.000
LY2189265 0.75 mg4.0005.0004.0003.0003.0002.0005.0004.0004.000
LY2189265 1.5 mg4.0004.0004.0003.0003.0002.0005.0004.0004.000

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Serum Calcitonin

(NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionpicogram/milliliter (Mean)
26 weeks (n=266, 267, 258)52 weeks (n=266, 269, 259)78 weeks (n=267, 269, 259)
Insulin Glargine0.1490.1760.151
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.0970.1320.035
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.1630.1280.086

Change From Baseline to 26, 52, and 78 Weeks on Blood Pressure

Sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionmilliliter of mercury (mmHG) (Least Squares Mean)
SBP, 26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245)SBP, 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240)SBP, 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)DBP, 26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245)DBP, 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240)DBP, 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)
Insulin Glargine-0.030.510.51-0.29-0.93-1.04
LY2189265 0.75 mg-1.600.09-0.59-0.17-0.19-0.36
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.280.17-0.70-0.16-0.26-0.44

Change From Baseline to 52 and 78 Weeks in Glucagon Concentration

Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionpicomoles per liter (pmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
52 weeks (n=232, 231, 228)78 weeks (n=235, 235, 232)
Insulin Glargine-3.85-3.65
LY2189265 0.75 mg-3.31-3.37
LY2189265 1.5 mg-3.91-3.57

Change From Baseline to 52 and 78 Weeks in Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA2-%B) and Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA2-%S)

The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) is a method used to quantify insulin resistance and beta (β)-cell function. HOMA2-B is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). HOMA2-S is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate insulin sensitivity (%S), as percentages of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference population for both HOMA2-B and HOMA-2S were set at 100%. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline of C-peptide based HOMA2-%B and HOMA2-%S were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52, and 78 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of HOMA2 (Least Squares Mean)
HOMA2-%B, 52 weeks (n=175, 181)HOMA2-%B, 78 weeks (n=167, 165)HOMA2-%S, 52 weeks (n=175,181)HOMA2-%S, 78 weeks (n=167, 165)
LY2189265 0.75 mg24.6015.66-2.66-3.62
LY2189265 1.5 mg29.9528.54-2.89-2.64

Change in Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Pulse Rate

Sitting pulse rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=257, 260, 245)52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240)78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)
Insulin Glargine-1.21-0.52-0.91
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.740.510.61
LY2189265 1.5 mg1.561.291.31

Number of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7% at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Number of participants achieving HbA1c levels less than 7.0% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258)52 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)
Insulin Glargine848079
LY2189265 0.75 mg1229991
LY2189265 1.5 mg153140129

Number of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Number of participants achieving HbA1c levels less than or equal to 6.5% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258)52 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)
Insulin Glargine403543
LY2189265 0.75 mg746059
LY2189265 1.5 mg977174

Number of Participants Requiring Additional Intervention Due to Hyperglycemia at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Additional intervention was defined as any additional therapeutic intervention in participants who developed persistent, severe hyperglycemia despite full compliance with the assigned therapeutic regimen, or initiation of an alternative antihyperglycemic medication following study drug discontinuation. The number of participants requiring additional intervention due to hyperglycemia is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine0816
LY2189265 0.75 mg42034
LY2189265 1.5 mg21124

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Information on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors was collected at baseline. Data on any new CV event was prospectively collected using a CV event electronic case report form. At prespecified visits, participants were asked about any new CV event. Deaths and nonfatal cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) were adjudicated by a committee of physicians with cardiology expertise external to the Sponsor. The nonfatal cardiovascular AEs to be adjudicated include myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary interventions (such as coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention), and cerebrovascular events including cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and transient ischemic attack. The number of participants with adjudicated CV events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any CV event, 26 weeksAny fatal CV event, 26 weeksAny non-fatal CV event, 26 weeksAny CV event, 52 weeksAny fatal CV event, 52 weeksAny non-fatal CV event, 52 weeksAny CV event, 78 weekAny fatal CV event, 78 weekAny non-fatal CV event, 78 week
Insulin Glargine303615918
LY2189265 0.75 mg101404616
LY2189265 1.5 mg202303303

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

The number of participants with pancreatitis confirmed by adjudication is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine000
LY2189265 0.75 mg111
LY2189265 1.5 mg122

Number of Participants With LY2189265 Antibodies at 26, 52, 78 Weeks and 4 Weeks After Last Dose of Study Drug (83 Weeks Maximum)

LY2189265 (Dulaglutide) anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed at baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks, and at the safety follow-up visit 30 days after study drug discontinuation (83 weeks). The number of participants with initial postbaseline detection of treatment emergent (defined as a 4-fold increase in the ADA titer from baseline) LY2189265 ADA at each time point were summarized. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, 78, and 83 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks83 weeks
LY2189265 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg11310

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that first occurs or worsens (increases in severity) after baseline regardless of causality or severity. The number of participants with one or more TEAE is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine137175192
LY2189265 0.75 mg146175188
LY2189265 1.5 mg160189201

Number of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of =<3.9 mmol/L), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of =<3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The number of self-reported hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionevents (Number)
Severe HE, 26 weeksSevere HE, 52 weeksSevere HE, 78 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 26 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 52 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 78 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 26 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 52 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 78 weeksNocturnal HE, 26 weeksNocturnal HE, 52 weeksNocturnal HE, 78 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 26 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 52 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 78 weeks
Insulin Glargine122447789103360910931358240519635202226
LY2189265 0.75 mg000315444515484709911117147184192428
LY2189265 1.5 mg112311515607500757884145185215111720

Rate of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of =<3.9 mmol/L), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of =<3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The 1-year adjusted rate of hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionevents per participant per year (Mean)
Severe HE, 26 weeksSevere HE, 52 weeksSevere HE, 78 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 26 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 52 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 78 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 26 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 52 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 78 weeksNocturnal HE, 26 weeksNocturnal HE, 52 weeksNocturnal HE, 78 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 26 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 52 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 78 weeks
Insulin Glargine0.010.010.013.643.343.034.824.413.801.862.071.810.150.080.07
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.000.000.002.521.971.663.582.682.380.960.650.590.140.090.07
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.010.000.012.352.031.673.793.082.561.230.900.770.080.070.05

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

The estimated mean change in body weight after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01617434)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 26

Interventionkg (Mean)
Liraglutide-3.54
Placebo-0.42

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26

The estimated mean change from baseline in FPG after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01617434)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide-1.44
Placebo-0.16

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 26

The estimated mean change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01617434)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 26

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
Liraglutide-1.30
Placebo-0.11

Change in Mean Self-Measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) of 7-Point Profile From Baseline to Week 26

The estimated mean change from baseline in mean SMPG of 7-point profile (7-points were before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime) after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01617434)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide-2.61
Placebo-1.02

Number of Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes During The Randomised Treatment Period

A minor hypoglycaemic episode was defined as either, (a) an episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by blood glucose <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) that was handled by the subject him/herself or (b) any asymptomatic blood glucose value <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL). (NCT01617434)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 26 + 7 days follow up

InterventionEvents/100 years of patient exposure (Number)
Liraglutide126
Placebo83

Number of Severe Hypoglycaemic Episodes During The Randomised Treatment Period

Severe hypoglycaemia episode was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon or other resuscitative actions. (NCT01617434)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 26 + 7 days follow up

InterventionEvents/100 years of patient exposure (Number)
Liraglutide0
Placebo0

Number of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Below 7.0% (American Diabetes Association [ADA] Target)

Number of subjects achieving HbA1c below 7.0% (American Diabetes Association [ADA] target) after 26 weeks of treatment (NCT01617434)
Timeframe: At Week 26

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Liraglutide59.24
Placebo14.02

Number of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists [AACE] Target)

Number of subjects achieving HbA1c below or equal to 6.5% (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists [AACE] target) after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01617434)
Timeframe: At Week 26

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Liraglutide42.91
Placebo3.60

Number of Adverse Events (AEs) During The Randomised Treatment Period

An AE was defined as treatment emergent if the onset date (or increase in severity) was on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than 7 days after the last day of randomised treatment. The adverse events were categorised as 'serious' and 'non-serious' adverse events. Adverse events were also categorised according to the severity as 'mild', 'moderate' and 'severe' adverse events. (NCT01617434)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 26 + 7 days follow up

,
InterventionEvents/1000 years of patient exposure (Number)
Adverse EventsSerious Adverse EventsSevere Adverse EventsModerate Adverse EventsMild Adverse Events
Liraglutide491814916912743474
Placebo373710110110602575

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in 120-minute Postprandial Glucose (PPG) at Week 24

2-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) from a liquid meal tolerance test (2-h MTT) Subject must be fasted for at least 8 hrs prior to the MTT. (NCT01646320)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Dapa+Saxa+Met-73.5
Pla+Saxa+Met-38.0

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. Body weights were measured during the qualification and lead-in periods and on Day 1 and Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24 in the double-blind period. (NCT01646320)
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 24

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Dapa+Saxa+Met-1.91
Pla+Saxa+Met-0.41

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 24

Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. FPG measurements were obtained during the qualification and lead-in periods and on Day 1 and Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24 in the double-blind period (NCT01646320)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Dapa+Saxa+Met-32.7
Pla+Saxa+Met-5.3

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) at Week 24

HbA1c was measured as percent of hemoglobin by a central laboratory. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. Baseline was defined as the last assessment prior to the start date and time of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. In cases where time of the first dose or time of the assessment was not available, baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. HbA1c measurements were obtained during the qualification and lead-in periods and on Day 1 and Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24 in the double-blind period. (NCT01646320)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

InterventionPercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Dapa+Saxa+Met-0.82
Pla+Saxa+Met-0.1

Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response (Hemoglobin A1c [HbA1C]) <7.0% at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Percent adjusted for baseline HbA1c. Therapeutic glycemic response is defined as HbA1c <7.0%. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. (NCT01646320)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 24

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Dapa+Saxa+Met36.7
Pla+Saxa+Met13.3

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in 2-hour Post Prandial Glucose (PPG) From a Liquid Meal Tolerance Test (MTT) at Week 24

Baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. PPG measurements were obtained at Week 24 in the double-blind period, including observations prior to rescue. (NCT01619059)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Saxagliptin 5mg + Dapagliflozin 10mg + Metformin-37.1
Placebo + Dapagliflozin 10mg + Metformin-31.3

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 24

Baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. FPG measurements were obtained at Week 24 in the double-blind period, including observations prior to rescue. (NCT01619059)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Saxagliptin 5mg + Dapagliflozin 10mg + Metformin-9.1
Placebo + Dapagliflozin 10mg + Metformin-5.3

Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) at Week 24

HbA1c was measured as percent of hemoglobin by a central laboratory. Baseline was defined as the last assessment on or prior to the date of the first dose of the double-blind study medication. HbA1c measurements were obtained at Week 24 in the double-blind period, including observations prior to rescue. (NCT01619059)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

InterventionPercent of glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
Saxagliptin 5mg + Dapagliflozin 10mg + Metformin-0.51
Placebo + Dapagliflozin 10mg + Metformin-0.16

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response (Hemoglobin A1c [HbA1C]) <7.0% at Week 24 (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

Therapeutic glycemic response is defined as HbA1c <7.0%. Data after rescue medication was excluded from this analysis. HbA1c was measured as a percent of hemoglobin. (NCT01619059)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin 5mg + Dapagliflozin 10mg + Metformin35.3
Placebo + Dapagliflozin 10mg + Metformin23.1

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Change from baseline in FPG after 26 weeks of treatment (NCT01664247)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
IDeg-2.60
Placebo-0.28

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)

Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment (NCT01664247)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
IDeg-0.99
Placebo-0.07

Change From Baseline in Mean of the 8-point Profile

Change from baseline in mean of the 8-point profile after 26 weeks of randomised treatment. (NCT01664247)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
IDeg-2.3
Placebo-0.5

Change From Baseline in Mean Pre-breakfast Measurements Used for Titration

Change from baseline after 26 weeks of treatment in the average of the pre-breakfast self measured plasma glucose (SMPG) measured on the day of the contact and the two days immediately prior to the contact. The least squares means presented are the estimated values after 26 weeks of treatment and the statistical analysis presents the treatment difference of the change from baseline values as the model is adjusted for baseline. (NCT01664247)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
IDeg5.88
Placebo8.23

Number of Adverse Events

Number of treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs) from week 0 to week 26 of the randomised treatment. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than 7 days after the last day of randomised treatment. (NCT01664247)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 - 26

Interventionevents (Number)
IDeg285
Placebo252

Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Number of confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes from week 0 to 26 weeks of randomised treatment. A hypoglycaemic episode was defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the episode occurred after the first administration of investigational medicinal product and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product. Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes consisted of severe hypoglycaemia or minor hypoglycaemic episodes. (NCT01664247)
Timeframe: Weeks 0 - 26

Interventionevents (Number)
IDeg47
Placebo9

Number of Responders for HbA1c (Below 7.0 %)

Number of responders for HbA1c below 7.0%, after 26 weeks of randomised treatment. (NCT01664247)
Timeframe: After 26 weeks of randomised treatment.

Interventionpercentage (%) of subjects (Number)
IDeg77.6
Placebo35.5

Change From Baseline in 8-point Profile

The change from baseline in the 8-point SMPG profile after 26 weeks of randomised treatment. The least squares means presented are the estimated values after 26 weeks of treatment and the statistical analysis presents the treatment difference of the change from baseline values as the model is adjusted for baseline. (NCT01664247)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Before breakfast, N=170, 16490 min after breakfast, N=153, 148Before lunch, N=151,14990 min after lunch, N=152,150Before evening meal, N=154,14890 mins after evening meal, N=147,145Before bedtime, N=148, 142Before breakfast the next day, N=164,161
IDeg5.857.656.337.736.777.937.216.05
Placebo8.549.758.349.679.519.658.958.55

Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Health-related Quality of Life Using the Short-Form 36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36®v2)

Change in subject's quality of life was evaluated using the Short-Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36®v2). Evaluations were performed at baseline and at the last treatment visit (week 26). SF-36 was assessed on a scale range of 0.65 to 80.73 for physical health and -8.81 to 81.65 for mental health respectively, where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. 0-100 scores from the SF-36 were converted to a norm-based score using a T-score transformation in order to obtain a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 1998 U.S. general population. (NCT01664247)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

,
InterventionT-scores (Mean)
Physical healthMental health
IDeg0.50.6
Placebo0.0-0.7

Change From Baseline in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose Profile

Mean change from baseline in mean of 7-point self-measured plasma glucose at week 26. The 7-point self-measured plasma glucose levels were measured before and after (120 minutes after the start of the meal) the three main meals (breakfast, lunch and dinner), and at bed time. (NCT02008682)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide-2.25
Sitagliptin-1.36

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Mean change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at Week 26. (NCT02008682)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide-2.347
Sitagliptin-1.205

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)

Mean change from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26. (NCT02008682)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

InterventionPercent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
Liraglutide-1.666
Sitagliptin-0.969

Number of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

confirmed hypoglycaemic episode defined as severe (unable to treat her/himself) or biochemically confirmed by a plasma glucose < 3.1 mmol/L (NCT02008682)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-26

Interventionepisodes (Number)
Liraglutide2
Sitagliptin1

Subjects Who Achieve (Yes/no) HbA1c Below 7.0 % (American Diabetes Association Target)

Calculated as the percentage of subjects achieving treatment target of HbA1c < 7.0% at Week 26 (NCT02008682)
Timeframe: After 26 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Liraglutide76.5
Sitagliptin52.6

Subjects Who Achieve (Yes/no) HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5 % (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Target)

Calculated as the percentage of subjects achieving treatment target of HbA1c <= 6.5% at Week 26 (NCT02008682)
Timeframe: After 26 weeks of treatment

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Liraglutide61.7
Sitagliptin26.3

Change From Baseline in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) (Analysed by Central Laboratory)

Change from baseline in FPG after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01849289)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
IDeg OD-3.35
IGlar OD-3.14

Change From Baseline in HbA1c (%) (Analysed by Central Laboratory)

Change from baseline in HbA1c (%) after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01849289)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
IDeg OD-1.3
IGlar OD-1.2

Number of Severe and Minor Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes consisted of episodes of severe hypoglycaemia as well as minor hypoglycaemic episodes with a confirmed PG value of less than 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL).Minor hypoglycaemic episode is defined as an episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by full blood glucose < 2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL), or PG < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) and which is handled by the subject himself/herself or any asymptomatic full blood glucose value < 2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or PG value < 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL). (NCT01849289)
Timeframe: On or after the first day of exposure to randomised trial drug (week 0) and no later than 7 days after last exposure to randomised trial drug (week 27)

InterventionEpisodes/100 years of patient exposure (Number)
IDeg OD85
IGlar OD97

Number of Treatment Emergent AEs (Adverse Events)

Treatment emergent events (after first trial product administration and no later than 7 days after last trial product administration) (NCT01849289)
Timeframe: On or after the first day of exposure to randomised trial drug (week 0) and no later than seven days after last exposure to randomised trial drug (week 27)

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
IDeg OD612
IGlar OD387

Responder for HbA1c (Below 7.0%) at End of Trial Without Severe and Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes

A responder for HbA1c without severe or confirmed hypoglycaemia is defined as a subject, who meets the HbA1c target at end of trial without treatment emergent severe or confirmed hypoglycaemia during the last 12 weeks of treatment or within 7 days from last treatment. (NCT01849289)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionparticipants (Number)
IDeg OD252
IGlar OD114

Within-subject Variability as Measured by Coefficient of Variation (CV%) in Pre-breakfast SMPG (Self-measured Plasma Glucose)

Within subject Coefficient of variation(CV[%]) in pre-breakfast self measured plasma glucose for dose adjustment after 26 treatment weeks are displayed below. (NCT01849289)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
IDeg OD10.65
IGlar OD10.01

Coefficient of Variation at 26 Weeks Minus Coefficient of Variation at Baseline

The change in the coefficient of variation (CV) of continuous glucose readings, as assessed by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) (NCT01524705)
Timeframe: At baseline, 6 months of intervention

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Exenatide-2.43
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Prandial Insulin0.44

HbA1C Levels

% of glycosylated hemoglobin in whole blood at 26 weeks (NCT01524705)
Timeframe: Baseline vs 26 weeks

Intervention% of HbA1C (Mean)
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Exenatide7.1
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Prandial Insulin7.2

Number of Participants With Hypoglycemia

Severe hypoglycemia-documented glucose <50mg/dl (participant journal), and hypoglycemic attacks requiring hospitalization, or treatment by emergency personnel. (NCT01524705)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Exenatide0
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Prandial Insulin0

Weight Change During Trial

Weight in kg at 26 weeks minus weight at baseline. (NCT01524705)
Timeframe: Baseline vs 26 weeks

Interventionkg (Mean)
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Exenatide-4.8
Insulin Glargine, Metformin, Prandial Insulin0.7

Change in Average 7-point SMPG Profiles From Baseline to Week 26

Participants recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2 hours after each meal and at bedtime three times in a week before baseline, before visit Week 12 and before visit week 26 and the average value across the profiles performed in the week a visit for the 7-time points was calculated. Change in average 7-point SMPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide-0.784
Insulin Glulisine QD-0.782
Insulin Glulisine TID-1.053

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

"Primary outcome was the comparison between Lixisenatide versus Insulin Glulisine TID.~Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug." (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide-0.63
Insulin Glulisine QD1.03
Insulin Glulisine TID1.37

Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 26

Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide-0.23
Insulin Glulisine QD-0.21
Insulin Glulisine TID-0.06

Change in Glucose Excursions From Baseline to Week 26 (in Participants Who Had an Injection of IMP Before Breakfast)

Glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose 30 minutes prior to the standardized meal test, before study drug administration. Change in glucose excursions was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Lixisenatide-3.42
Insulin Glulisine QD-1.59
Insulin Glulisine TID-1.56

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

Change in HbA1C was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using last on-treatment observation carried forward (LOCF). On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide-0.63
Insulin Glulisine QD-0.58
Insulin Glulisine TID-0.84

Change in Insulin Glargine Dose From Baseline to Week 26

Change in Insulin glargine dose was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

InterventionU (Least Squares Mean)
Lixisenatide0.7
Insulin Glulisine QD-0.06
Insulin Glulisine TID-3.13

Change in PPG From Baseline to Week 26 (in Participants Who Had an Injection of Investigational Medicinal Product [IMP] Before Breakfast)

The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 26 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Lixisenatide-3.93
Insulin Glulisine QD-1.62
Insulin Glulisine TID-1.87

Insulin Glulisine Dose at Week 26

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionU (Mean)
Insulin Glulisine QD9.97
Insulin Glulisine TID20.24

Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% and Had no Weight Gain at Week 26

The on-treatment period for HbA1c assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. The on-treatment period for body weight assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lixisenatide31.2
Insulin Glulisine QD16.7
Insulin Glulisine TID17.6

Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% at Week 26 and Did Not Experienced Documented (Plasma Glucose <60 mg/dL) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During 26 Week Treatment Period

The on-treatment period for HbA1c assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. The on-treatment period for symptomatic hypoglycemia assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lixisenatide29.4
Insulin Glulisine QD24.2
Insulin Glulisine TID26.1

Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7%, Had no Weight Gain at Week 26, and Did Not Experience Documented (Plasma Glucose <60 mg/dL) Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During 26-Week Treatment Period

The on-treatment period for HbA1c assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. The on-treatment period for body weight assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug. The on-treatment period for symptomatic hypoglycemia assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug. Participants without post-baseline on-treatment values (HbA1c and body weight) that were no more than 30 days apart were counted as non-responders if at least one of the components (HbA1c and/or body weight) was available and showed non-response, or if they experienced at least one documented symptomatic hypoglycemia during the on-treatment period. Otherwise, they were counted as missing data. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lixisenatide22.2
Insulin Glulisine QD9.2
Insulin Glulisine TID10.8

Percentage of Participants With no Weight Gain at Week 26

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lixisenatide64.7
Insulin Glulisine QD36.6
Insulin Glulisine TID30.5

Total Insulin Dose at Week 26

"The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.~The outcome is reporting results of total insulin (amounts of Insulin Glargine plus Insulin Glulisine ) only for the arms in which Insulin Glulisine was administered and is not applicable for the lixisenatide arm in which only Insulin Glargine is administered. Change in dose of the insulin used by patients in the Lixisenatide arm (i.e. Insulin Glargine) is reported in the secondary Outcome Measure 9." (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionU (Mean)
Insulin Glulisine QD73.61
Insulin Glulisine TID81.05

Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of <60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L). Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was symptomatic hypoglycemia event in which the participant required the assistance of another person and was associated with either a plasma glucose level below 36 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration, if no plasma glucose measurement was available. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration (maximum of 185 days)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemiaSevere symptomatic hypoglycemia
Insulin Glulisine QD37.50.7
Insulin Glulisine TID44.60
Lixisenatide31.50

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Level <7% and ≤6.5% at Week 26

The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. (NCT01768559)
Timeframe: Week 26

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c ≤6.5%HbA1c <7.0%
Insulin Glulisine QD17.838.4
Insulin Glulisine TID30.849.2
Lixisenatide20.542.1

Average Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Week 24

Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Week 24

InterventionUnits (U) (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination36.08
Insulin Glargine39.32

Change in 2-hour Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 24

2-hour plasma glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of the meal and before IMP administration. Change in plasma glucose excursion was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination-3.91
Insulin Glargine-0.67

Change in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) From Baseline to Week 24

The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination-7.49
Insulin Glargine-4.33

Change in Average 7-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profiles From Baseline to Week 24

Participants recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2-hours after each meal and at bedtime, over a single day, once in a week before baseline, before visit Week 12 and before visit Week 24 and the average value across the profiles performed in the week before a visit for the 7-time points was calculated. Change in average 7-point SMPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination-3.23
Insulin Glargine-2.93

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24

Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 3 days after the last injection of IMP. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination-0.97
Insulin Glargine0.48

Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 24

Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 1 day after the last injection of IMP. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination-3.35
Insulin Glargine-3.51

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24

Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 14 days after the last injection of investigational medicinal product (IMP). (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination-1.82
Insulin Glargine-1.64

Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% at Week 24 With no Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During 24-week Treatment Period

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). Participants without any post-baseline on-treatment value for HbA1c were counted as non-responders if they experienced at least one documented symptomatic hypoglycemia before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 1 day after the last injection of IMP. Otherwise, they were counted as missing data. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 14 days after the last injection of IMP. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination67.5
Insulin Glargine59.0

Percentage of Participants Reaching HbA1c <7% With no Body Weight Gain at Week 24

Participants without any post-baseline on-treatment values (for HbA1c and body weight) that were no more than 30 days apart were counted as non-responders if at least one of the components (for HbA1c and body weight) was available and showed non-response. Otherwise, they were counted as missing data. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination56.3
Insulin Glargine37.3

Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy During 24-week Treatment Period

Routine fasting SMPG and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceed the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after Week 12) were performed. Threshold values from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG >240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 30: fasting SMPG/FPG >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c >8%. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination0
Insulin Glargine0.6

Change in 30 Minute and 1-hour Plasma Glucose Excursion From Baseline to Week 24

30-minute and 1-hour plasma glucose excursion = 30-minute and 1-hour PPG minus plasma glucose value obtained 30 minutes prior to the start of the meal and before IMP administration. Change in plasma glucose excursion was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
30-minute plasma glucose excursion (n=151, 152)1-hour plasma glucose excursion (n=150, 152)
Insulin Glargine-0.05-0.44
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination-1.47-2.34

Change in 30-minute and 1-hour PPG From Baseline to Week 24

The 30 minute and 1-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 30 minutes and 1-hour after eating a standardized meal. Change in PPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to the date of last injection of IMP. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24

,
Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
30-minute PPG (n=151, 153)1-hour PPG (n=150, 153)
Insulin Glargine-3.76-4.10
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination-5.01-5.94

Percentage of Participants With Documented Symptomatic and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of ≤70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L).Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. These episodes were associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure, unconsciousness or coma. All episodes in which neurological impairment was severe enough to prevent self-treatment and which were thought to place participants at risk for injury to themselves or others. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration (maximum of 219 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemiaSevere Symptomatic Hypoglycemia
Insulin Glargine (Lantus® SoloSTAR®)22.80.0
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination21.70.0

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c ≤6.5 % or <7.0 % at Week 24

On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug till before the introduction of rescue medication and up to 14 days after the last injection of IMP. (NCT01476475)
Timeframe: Week 24

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HbA1c ≤6.5%HbA1c <7.0%
Insulin Glargine64.678.3
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Fixed Ratio Combination71.984.4

Change in Body Weight From Baseline

Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01973231)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionkg (Mean)
Liraglutide-4.24
Lixisenatide-3.69

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline

Change from baseline in FPG after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01973231)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide-2.904
Lixisenatide-1.644

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline

Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment. (NCT01973231)
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

InterventionPercent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
Liraglutide-1.809
Lixisenatide-1.238

Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than 7 days after the last day of randomised treatment. Severity was assessed by investigator. (NCT01973231)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-26

,
Interventionevents (Number)
EventsSeriousSevereModerateMild
Liraglutide5401310109421
Lixisenatide4357384348

Subjects Who Achieve HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target) (Yes/no)

Subjects who achieved HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) after 26 weeks of treatment (yes/no). (NCT01973231)
Timeframe: After 26 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionpercentage (%) of subjects (Number)
YesNo
Liraglutide74.225.8
Lixisenatide45.554.5

Subjects Who Achieve HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)

Subjects who achieved HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and no weight gain after 26 weeks of treatment (yes/no). (NCT01973231)
Timeframe: After 26 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionpercentage (%) of subjects (Number)
YesNo
Liraglutide66.533.5
Lixisenatide41.958.1

Subjects Who Achieve HbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists [AACE] Target) (Yes/no)

Subjects who achieved HbA1c below equal to or below 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) after 26 weeks of treatment (yes/no). (NCT01973231)
Timeframe: After 26 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionpercentage (%) of subjects (Number)
YesNo
Liraglutide54.645.4
Lixisenatide26.273.8

Change in Body Weight

Change from baseline in body weight was analysed after 26 weeks of treatment. Analysis population set: FAS: all randomised subjects receiving at least one dose of any of the trial products. Missing values were imputed using MMRM. (NCT01907854)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26

Interventionkg (Mean)
Liraglutide-3.32
Sitagliptin-1.80

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose

Change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose was analysed after 26 weeks of treatment. Missing values were imputed using MMRM. (NCT01907854)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26

Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Liraglutide-1.967
Sitagliptin-0.588

Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)

Change from baseline in HbA1c was analysed after 26 weeks of treatment. Analysis population set: full analysis set (FAS); all randomised subjects receiving at least one dose of any of the trial products. Missing values were imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM). (NCT01907854)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
Liraglutide-1.146
Sitagliptin-0.529

Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date (or increase in severity) on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment. The number of TEAEs was recorded during 26 weeks of treatment plus one week follow-up period. (NCT01907854)
Timeframe: During 26 weeks of treatment plus one week follow-up period.

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
Liraglutide455
Sitagliptin318

Change in Fasting Blood Lipids

Ratio to baseline in fasting blood lipids (total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein [LDL], very low density lipoprotein [VLDL], high density lipoprotein [HDL], triglycerides, and free fatty acids) were analysed after 26 weeks treatment. Missing values were imputed using MMRM. Here we are presenting ratio to baseline data. (NCT01907854)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Total cholesterolLDL cholesterolVLDL cholesterolHDL cholesterolTriglyceridesFree Fatty acids
Liraglutide1.0111.0491.0621.0041.0891.086
Sitagliptin1.0451.1211.0750.9971.0991.104

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were analysed after 26 weeks of treatment. Missing values were imputed using MMRM. (NCT01907854)
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
Liraglutide-3.6-0.23
Sitagliptin-2.57-0.81

Subjects Who Achieve HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association Target) (y/n)

Number of subjects who achieve HbA1c <7.0% were analysed after 26 weeks of treatment. Missing values were imputed using MMRM. (NCT01907854)
Timeframe: After 26 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionpercentage (%) (Number)
YesNo
Liraglutide50.649.4
Sitagliptin26.973.1

Change From Baseline of HbA1c After 24 Weeks of Treatment.

"Change from baseline in Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) [%] after 24 weeks of treatment with double-blind trial medication, i.e. HbA1c change from baseline at Week 24. The term baseline was not used to refer to measurements prior to the administration of open-label medication. Such measurements were referred to as pre-treatment. Analyses of change from pre-treatment used the last value before first administration of open-label medication as point of reference.~Observed Case (OC): This method analyse only available data that were observed while patients were on treatment, i.e., excluding the missing data. All values measured after rescue medication taken were set to missing. Full Analysis Set (FAS): Includes all patients in the Treated set who had a baseline HbA1c assessment and at least 1 on-treatment HbA1c assessment during the double-blind part of the trial." (NCT01778049)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lina5 (E10)-0.53
Plc (E10)-0.21
Lina5 (E25)-0.58
Plc (E25)-0.10

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at 24 Weeks.

Change from baseline FPG (mmol/L) after 24 weeks of treatment with double-blind trial medication, i.e. FPG change from baseline at Week 24. (NCT01778049)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lina5 (E10)-0.44
Plc (E10)0.21
Lina5 (E25)-0.68
Plc (E25)-0.24

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

Change from baseline at Week 24 is defined as Week 24 FPG minus Week 0 FPG. Efficacy analyses treated data as missing after the initiation of rescue therapy. (NCT01177384)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-17.9
Placebo-3.5

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (A1C) at Week 24

A1C is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent. Efficacy analyses treated data as missing after the initiation of rescue therapy. (NCT01177384)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.76
Placebo-0.14

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

(NCT01177384)
Timeframe: Up to 24 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin5
Placebo2

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event

(NCT01177384)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24 + 14 Day Post-Study Follow-up

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin62
Placebo58

Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (DAO)

Primary Objective: Efficacy of saxagliptin plus metformin on glycemic control compared with acarbose plus metformin in patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin. By Measure absolute change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (NCT02243176)
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

Intervention% (HbA1c) (Least Squares Mean)
Saxagliptin-0.82
Acarbose-0.78

Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (DAO)

The primary endpoint was analyzed based on Per protocol analysis set as the supportive analysis. (NCT02243176)
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

Intervention% (HbA1c) (Least Squares Mean)
Saxagliptin-0.83
Acarbose-0.80

Change From Baseline in 2H Postprandial Glucose (2HPPG)

Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24 (NCT02243176)
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

Interventionmmol/l (Least Squares Mean)
Saxagliptin-0.77
Acarbose-1.07

Change From Baseline in Body Weight

Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24 (NCT02243176)
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Saxagliptin-1.36
Acarbose-2.05

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24 (NCT02243176)
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

Interventionmmol/l (Least Squares Mean)
Saxagliptin-0.99
Acarbose-1.01

Change From Baseline in HOMA-β

Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function was estimated by the Homeostasis model assessment-β (HOMA-β), which was defined as fasting insulin (mU/mL) x 20 / (fasting glucose (mmol/mL) - 3.5, body weight at week 24 (NCT02243176)
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

InterventionmU/mmol (Least Squares Mean)
Saxagliptin20.56
Acarbose13.08

Proportion (%) of Patients Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response Defined as HbA1c<7.0%

Secondary Objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure proportion (%) of patients achieving a therapeutic glycemic response defined as HbA1c<7.0% (NCT02243176)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin38.3
Acarbose41.5

Proportion (%) of Patients Achieving HbA1c<7.0% Without GI Adverse Events

Secondary Objective: Assessment of any gastrointestinal adverse events of saxagliptin versus acarbose. by measure proportion (%) of patients achieving HbA1c<7.0% without GI adverse events. (NCT02243176)
Timeframe: Whole study duration

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Saxagliptin37.0
Acarbose28.8

Proportion (%) of Patients With Any GI Adverse Events

Secondary Objective: Assessment of any gastrointestinal adverse events of saxagliptin versus acarbose. by measure proportion (%) of patients with any gastrointestinal adverse events. (NCT02243176)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
NOYES
Acarbose75.324.7
Saxagliptin94.55.5

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Month 12

(NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Week 0 (baseline), month 12

Interventionkilogram (Mean)
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)1.9
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)5.7
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)4.7

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Month 36

(NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Week 0 (baseline), month 36

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)3.6
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)6.4
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)5.7

Number of Participants Having an 'Other' Adverse Event

(NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Up to month 37 (36 months of treatment plus 1 month follow-up)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)227
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)235
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)228

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Month 36 Value in HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5%

Percentage of participants who achieved the target (HbA1c below or equal to 6.5%) at Month 36 (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Month 36

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)43.2
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)44.8
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)31.9

Percentage of Participants Who Required A Second Insulin Therapy by Month 12

Percentage of participants who required a second insulin formulation to be added to their treatment. This outcome offers evidence to the efficacy and durability of the insulin regimens. (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)17.9
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)4.2
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)8.9

Percentage of Participants Who Required A Second Insulin Therapy by Month 36

Percentage of participants who required a second insulin formulation to be added to their treatment. This outcome offers evidence to the efficacy and durability of the insulin regimens. (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Month 36

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)89
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)82
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)88

Quality of Life as Measured by the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire Score (EQ5D) at 12 Months

The EuroQol Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire score (EQ5D) is a standardised instrument for use as a measure of health outcome in medical research. Responses can be used to generate a single numerical value associated with a given health state. The scale of values is graded from -0.59 to 1.00, with lower scores indicating a poorer health status. A score of 0 represents no quality of life and scores less than 0 represent states perceived by the respondent to be worse than death. (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)0.78
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)0.76
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)0.76

Quality of Life as Measured by the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire Score (EQ5D) at 36 Months

The EuroQol Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire score (EQ5D) is a standardised instrument for use as a measure of health outcome in medical research. Responses can be used to generate a single numerical value associated with a given health state. The scale of values is graded from -0.59 to 1.00, with lower scores indicating a poorer health status. A score of 0 represents no quality of life and scores less than 0 represent states perceived by the respondent to be worse than death. (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Month 36

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)0.80
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)0.77
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)0.76

Change in Eight-point Capillary Plasma Glucose Profiles (Self-measured) at 12 Months

For each visit and telephone contact, participants were asked to perform in advance three capillary glucose profiles (using blood glucose metre provided for the trial) obtained before breakfast and before the evening meal for participants in the biphasic and basal groups and before meals and two hours after meals and at bedtime in the prandial group. (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Baseline, month 12

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
All timepoints excluding 3amFastingPostprandial3am
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)-59-45-68-52
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)-65-23-83-34
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)-43-59-47-40

Change in Eight-point Capillary Plasma Glucose Profiles (Self-measured) at 36 Months

For each visit and telephone contact, participants were asked to perform in advance three capillary glucose profiles (using blood glucose metre provided for the trial) obtained before breakfast and before the evening meal for participants in the biphasic and basal groups and before meals and two hours after meals and at bedtime in the prandial group. (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Baseline, month 36

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
All timepoints excluding 3amFastingPostprandial3am
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)-56-50-61-38
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)-67-49-85-27
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)-58-47-67-45

HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) at Month 12

HbA1c values offer evidence of the efficacy and durability of the insulin regimens. (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

,,
Interventionpercentage (%) of total haemoglobin (Mean)
BaselineMonth 12
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)8.637.33
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)8.557.20
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)8.457.64

HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) at Month 36

HbA1c values offer evidence of the efficacy and durability of the insulin regimens. (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 36

,,
Interventionpercentage (%) of total haemoglobin (Mean)
BaselineMonth 36
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)8.637.22
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)8.557.04
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)8.457.11

Number of Hypoglycaemic Events Per Participant Per Year at Month 12 for All Participants and the Subset Who Achieved Target HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5%

Rate of hypoglycaemic events was calculated as the median number of events per participant per year, defined as grade 1 (symptoms only), 2 (minor) and 3 (major). Symptoms only if self-measured plasma glucose level of 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) or more. Minor (grade 2) if able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL). Major (grade 3) if unable to treat her/himself. Rates are reported for all participants and for the subset of participants who achieved target HbA1c below or equal to 6.5%. (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Month 12

,,
Interventionhypoglycaemic events/participant/year (Median)
All participants, Grade 1All participants, Grade 2All participants, Grade 3All participants, Grade 2 or 3Achieved HbA1c target, Grade 1, n=18, 50, 39Achieved HbA1c target, Grade 2, n=18, 50, 39Achieved HbA1c target, Grade 3, n=18, 50, 39Achieved HbA1c target, Grade 2 or 3, n=18, 50, 39
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)5.03.903.95.44.004.0
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)8.08.008.07.88.008.7
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)2.00003.93.003.0

Number of Hypoglycaemic Events Per Participant Per Year at Month 36 for All Participants and the Subset Who Achieved Target HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5%

Rate of hypoglycaemic events was calculated as the median number of events per participant per year, defined as grade 1 (symptoms only), 2 (minor) and 3 (major). Symptoms only if self-measured plasma glucose level of 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) or more. Minor (grade 2) if able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL). Major (grade 3) if unable to treat her/himself. Rates are reported for all participants and for the subset of participants who achieved target HbA1c below or equal to 6.5%. (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Month 36

,,
Interventionhypoglycaemic events/participant/year (Median)
All participants, Grade 1All participants, Grade 2All participants, Grade 3All participants, Grade 2 or 3Achieved HbA1c target, Grade 1, n=73, 70, 55Achieved HbA1c target, Grade 2, n=73, 70, 55Achieved HbA1c target, Grade 3, n=73, 70, 55Achieved HbA1c target, Grade 2 or 3, n=73, 70, 55
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)3.83.003.03.02.703.0
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)5.75.505.75.75.305.5
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)2.71.701.73.02.002.0

Percentage of Participants (Total Participants and the Subset of Participants Who Did Not Have an Hypoglycaemic Episode) Achieving a Month 12 Value in HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5%

Two participant counts are listed. The first is the percentage of total participants who achieved the target (HbA1c below or equal to 6.5%) at Month 12. The second is the percentage of subset of participants who achieved the target and did not have either minor or major hypoglycaemic episode within the four weeks prior to the month 12 exam. Minor hypoglycaemic episode is an episode in which the participant was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL). Major hypoglycaemic episode is an episode in which the participant was unable to treat her/himself. (NCT00184600)
Timeframe: Month 12

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Total participants who achieved targetSubset who achieved target, n=18, 50, 39
Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 (Biphasic Insulin)17.052.5
Insulin Aspart (Prandial Insulin)23.943.9
Insulin Detemir (Basal Insulin)8.178.9

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 30

Change from baseline at Week 30 was defined as Week 30 minus Week 0. (NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.8
Glimepiride1.2

Change From Baseline in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) at Week 30

Change from baseline at Week 30 was defined as Week 30 minus Week 0. (NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-14.6
Glimepiride-17.5

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 30

Patient-level HbA1c is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 30 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. (NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.47
Glimepiride-0.54

Percent of Patients With A1C <6.5% at Week 30

(NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin21.2
Glimepiride27.5

Percent of Patients With A1C <7.0% at Week 30

(NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin52.4
Glimepiride59.6

Percent of Patients With at Least One Hypoglycemia Episode of Any Type at Week 30

(NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin7.0
Glimepiride22.0

Change in BMI (Body Mass Index)

(NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 26

Interventionkg/m^2 (Mean)
Comb-0.30
Sita-0.58

Change in Body Weight

(NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 26

Interventionkg (Mean)
Comb-0.81
Sita-1.66

FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose)

(NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Comb6.08
Sita8.52

HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c)

(NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin (Mean)
Comb7.08
Sita7.64

Hypoglycemic Episodes

Overall: All episodes. Minor: Symptomatic, with PG < 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only: Symptomatic with PG ≥ 3.1 mmol/L (NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-26

,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
OverallMinorSymptoms OnlyUnclassified
Comb1000
Sita1000

Hypoglycemic Episodes: Day Time

Day time: Episodes between 6 pm and 11 am. Overall: All episodes. Minor: Symptomatic, with PG < 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only: Symptomatic with PG ≥ 3.1 mmol/L (NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-26

,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
OverallMinorSymptoms OnlyUnclassified
Comb1000
Sita1000

Hypoglycemic Episodes: Night Time

Night time: Episodes between 11 am and 6 pm. Overall: All episodes. Minor: Symptomatic, with PG < 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only: Symptomatic with PG ≥ 3.1 mmol/L (NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Weeks 0-26

,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
OverallMinorSymptoms OnlyUnclassified
Comb0000
Sita0000

Number of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 6.5%

(NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
InterventionSubjects (Number)
Target achievedTarget not achieved
Comb2083
Sita1195

Number of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 6.5% Without Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia

Symptomatic hypoglycaemia is biochemically confirmed hypoglycaemia or major hypoglycaemia (NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
InterventionSubjects (Number)
Target achievedTarget not achieved
Comb1588
Sita898

Number of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 7.0%

(NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
InterventionSubjects (Number)
Target achievedTarget not achieved
Comb4657
Sita2581

Number of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Less Than or Equal to 7.0% Without Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia

Symptomatic hypoglycaemia is biochemically confirmed hypoglycaemia or major hypoglycaemia (NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
InterventionSubjects (Number)
Target achievedTarget not achieved
Comb3766
Sita2185

Self-measured 9-point Plasma Glucose Profile

(NCT00789191)
Timeframe: Week 26

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Before breakfast120 minutes after start of breakfastBefore Lunch120 minutes after start of lunchBefore dinner120 minutes after start of dinnerBedtimeAt 03:00 A.M.Before breakfast the following day
Comb6.168.826.998.697.859.308.386.856.07
Sita8.1710.508.019.998.6110.209.428.027.87

Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Change in BMI from baseline after 26 weeks of treatment (i.e., BMI at week 26 minus BMI at week 0) (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

Interventionkg/m^2 (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily-1.39
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily0.32

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline after 26 weeks of treatment (i.e., body weight at week 26 minus body weight at week 0) (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily-4.10
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily1.02

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Change in HbA1c from baseline after 26 weeks of treatment (i.e., HbA1c at week 26 minus HbA1c at week 0) (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide Twice Daily-1.00
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily-1.14

Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Percentage of Participants With at Least One Hypoglycemic Episode)

Risk for first hypoglycemic episode (blood glucose <=3.9 mmol/L or severe episode) to occur up to week 26 (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily8.0
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily20.5

Incidence of Hypoglycemic Episodes [Blood Glucose <= 3.0 mmol/L or Severe] (Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced at Least One Treatment-emergent Hypoglycemic Episode During the 26-week Treatment Period)

Risk for the first hypoglycemic episode to occur up to Week 26 (percentage of subjects who experienced at least one treatment-emergent hypoglycemic episode during the 26-week treatment period)[ i.e., number of subjects experiencing at least one hypoglycemic episode divided by total number of subjects times 100%] (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily1.8
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily6.3

Incidence of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia (Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced at Least One Episode of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia During the 26 Week Treatment Period)

Risk for first nocturnal (night-time) hypoglycemic episode to occur up to week 26 (percentage of subjects who experienced at least one episode of nocturnal hypoglycemia during the 26 week treatment period) [i.e., number of subjects who experienced nocturnal hypoglycemia divided by total number of subjects times 100%]. (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily3.9
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily7.0

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of < 6.5%

Percentage of subjects achieving HbA1c target of < 6.5% at the end of study (week 26) [i.e., number of subjects who achieved HbA1c < 6.5% divided by total number of subjects times 100%]. (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily27.6
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily24.9

Percentage of Subjects Achieving HbA1c Target of < 7.0%

Percentage of subjects achieving HbA1c target of < 7.0% at the end of study (week 26) [i.e., number of subjects who achieved HbA1c < 7.0% divided by total number of subjects times 100%]. (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Exenatide Twice Daily49.2
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily56.6

7 Point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles

7-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles at baseline and the end of the study, measured at 7 times during the day (pre-breakfast, 2 hours post-breakfast, pre-lunch, 2 hours post-lunch, pre-dinner, 2 hours post-dinner, and 3:00am). (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Pre-breakfast at baseline (week 0)Pre-breakfast at endpoint (week 26)2 hrs post-breakfast at baseline (week 0)2 hrs post-breakfast at endpoint (week 26)Pre-lunch at baseline (week 0)Pre-lunch at endpoint (week 26)2 hrs post-lunch at baseline (week 0)2 hrs post-lunch at endpoint (week 26)Pre-dinner at baseline (week 0)Pre-dinner at endpoint (week 26)2 hrs post-dinner at baseline (week 0)2 hrs post-dinner at endpoint (week 26)3:00 am at baseline (week 0)3:00 am at endpoint (week 26)
Exenatide Twice Daily8.9337.77410.8218.0148.4437.5069.6988.5138.6847.61610.2417.7278.3237.518
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily9.0057.29310.9028.3048.3576.6569.8998.2168.7597.19410.2598.1438.4756.999

Blood Lipid Levels

Total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (calculated), and triglyceride levels at baseline (week 0) and the end of the study (week 26) (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Total cholesterol at baseline (week 0)Total cholesterol at endpoint (week 26)HDL cholesterol at baseline (week 0)HDL cholesterol at endpoint (week 26)LDL cholesterol (calculated) at baseline (week 0)LDL cholesterol (calculated) at endpoint (week 26)Triglycerides at baseline (week 0)Triglycerides at endpoint (week 26)
Exenatide Twice Daily5.1474.9711.2341.2442.8452.7382.3912.234
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily5.0845.0501.2551.3192.7682.8522.4102.006

Patient Reported Outcomes: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)

Total DTSQ treatment satisfaction score at baseline (week 0) and after 26 weeks of treatment (LOCF). Total DTSQ treatment satisfaction score is derived as sum score of the individual components 1 and 4-8 of the DTSQ questionnaire. Each component is scored on a scale of 0 (worst case) to 6 (best case). Higher values represent higher treatment satisfaction. (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

,
Interventionscores on DTSQ scale (Mean)
DTSQ score at baseline (week 0)DTSQ score at endpoint (week 26)
Exenatide Twice Daily29.530.6
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily29.729.3

Patient Reported Outcomes: Quality of Life (SF-12)

SF-12 Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores at baseline (week 0) and after 26 weeks of treatment (LOCF). SF-12 Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores are normalized scores ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case), and are derived from responses to 12 questions. Scores > 50 indicate an above-average health status. (NCT00434954)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 weeks

,
Interventionscores on SF-12 scale (Mean)
Physical Component at baseline (week 0)Physical Component at endpoint (week 26)Mental Component at baseline (week 0)Mental Component at endpoint (week 26)
Exenatide Twice Daily35.539.131.331.1
Premixed Insulin Aspart Twice Daily36.337.728.329.6

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 104

Change from baseline at Week 104 is defined as Week 104 minus Week 0. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-1.6
Glipizide0.7

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52

Change from baseline at Week 52 is defined as Week 52 minus Week 0. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-1.5
Glipizide1.1

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 104

HbA1c is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 104 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.54
Glipizide-0.51

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 52

HbA1c is measured as percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 52 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.67
Glipizide-0.67

Number of Participants With Drug-related LAEs at Week 104

Participants with drug-related (as assessed by an investigator who is a qualified physician according to his/her best clinical judgment) LAEs. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin 100 mg18
Glipizide21

Hypoglycemic Events at Week 104

Number of participants who reported 1 or more episodes of the adverse experience of hypoglycemia. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Participants with one or more Hypoglycemic AEsTotal number of Hypoglycemic episodesParticipants with no Hypoglycemic AEs
Glipizide199805385
Sitagliptin 100 mg3157557

Hypoglycemic Events at Week 52

Number of participants who reported 1 or more episodes of the adverse experience (AEs) of hypoglycemia. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Participants with one or more Hypoglycemic AEsTotal number of Hypoglycemic episodesParticipants with no Hypoglycemic AEs
Glipizide187657397
Sitagliptin 100 mg2950559

Number of Participants With Clinical Adverse Experiences (CAEs) at Week 104

An adverse experience (AE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR'S product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
With CAESWithout CAES
Glipizide480104
Sitagliptin 100 mg452136

Number of Participants With Drug-related CAEs at Week 104

Participants with drug-related (as assessed by an investigator who is a qualified physician according to his/her best clinical judgment) CAEs. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
With drug related CAEsWithout drug related CAEs
Glipizide193391
Sitagliptin 100 mg97491

Number of Participants With Laboratory Adverse Experiences (LAEs) at Week 104

A laboratory adverse experience (LAE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR'S product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
With LAEsWithout LAEs
Glipizide74510
Sitagliptin 100 mg85503

Number of Participants With Serious CAEs at Week 104

Serious CAEs are any AEs occurring at any dose that; Results in death; or Is life threatening; or Results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or Results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; or Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or Is a cancer; or Is an overdose. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
With serious CAEsWithout serious CAEs
Glipizide73511
Sitagliptin 100 mg64524

Number of Participants With Serious LAEs at Week 104

Serious LAEs are any LAEs occurring at any dose that: results in death; or is life threatening; or results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or results in or prolongs an existing inpatient hospitalization; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or is a cancer; or is an overdose. (NCT00094770)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 104

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
With serious LAEsWithout serious LAEs
Glipizide0584
Sitagliptin 100 mg0588

Change in Body Weight (kg)

Change in body weight from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo-2.58
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-2.20

Change in FSG (mmol/L)

Change in fasting serum glucose (FSG) from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo0.06
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-0.55

Change in HbA1c (Percent)

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint (Week 20); difference of base percent values [X% - Y%] (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionPercent HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo-0.38
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-0.68

Change in HDL (mmol/L)

Change in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo-0.03
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-0.01

Change in LDL (mmol/L)

Change in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo0.06
Exenatide + Sitagliptin0.10

Change in Total Cholesterol (mmol/L)

Change in total cholesterol from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo0.09
Exenatide + Sitagliptin0.08

Change in Triglycerides (mmol/L)

Change in triglycerides from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo0.17
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-0.07

Change in Waist Circumference (cm)

Change in waist circumference from baseline to endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventioncm (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo-3.25
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-2.36

Incidence of Confirmed Hypoglycemia(Overall)

Incidence of confirmed hypoglycemia experienced overall during the study (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo1
Exenatide + Sitagliptin2

Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Overall)

Incidence of hypoglycemic episodes experienced overall during the study (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo5
Exenatide + Sitagliptin10

Incidence of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia (Overall)

Incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia experienced overall during the study (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo0
Exenatide + Sitagliptin3

Incidence of Severe Hypoglycemia(Overall)

Incidence of severe hypoglycemia experienced overall during the study (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo1
Exenatide + Sitagliptin0

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=6.5%

Percentage of patients whose baseline HbA1c was > 6.5% achieving HbA1c <=6.5% at endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo16.5
Exenatide + Sitagliptin20.7

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <=7.0%

Percentage of patients whose baseline HbA1c was > 7.0% achieving HbA1c <=7.0% at endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo29.5
Exenatide + Sitagliptin44.3

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c <7.0%

Percentage of patients whose baseline HbA1c was >=7.0% achieving HbA1c <7.0% at endpoint (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionPercentage (Number)
Exenatide + Placebo26.6
Exenatide + Sitagliptin41.7

SMBG (mmol/L)

7 point Self Monitored Blood Glucose Profiles - daily mean value (Week 20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo8.57
Exenatide + Sitagliptin8.16

Waist-to-Hip Ratio

Change in waist-to-hip ratio from baseline to endpoint (Week20) (NCT00870194)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 Weeks

InterventionRatio (Least Squares Mean)
Exenatide + Placebo-0.01
Exenatide + Sitagliptin-0.00

Absolute Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 12

The table below shows the mean absolute change in body weight from Baseline to Week 12 for each treatment group. (NCT00642278)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 12

Interventionkg (Mean)
Placebo-0.78
Canagliflozin 50 mg Daily-1.96
Canagliflozin 100 mg Daily-2.25
Canagliflozin 200 mg Daily-2.32
Canagliflozin 300 mg Daily-2.88
Canagliflozin 300 mg Twice Daily-2.87
Sitagliptin 100 mg Daily-0.43

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 12

The table below shows the mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 12 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the least-squares mean change. (NCT00642278)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 12

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Placebo0.2
Canagliflozin 50 mg Daily-0.9
Canagliflozin 100 mg Daily-1.4
Canagliflozin 200 mg Daily-1.5
Canagliflozin 300 mg Daily-1.4
Canagliflozin 300 mg Twice Daily-1.3
Sitagliptin 100 mg Daily-0.7

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 12

The table below shows the mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 12 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the least-squares mean change. (NCT00642278)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 12

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Placebo-0.22
Canagliflozin 50 mg Daily-0.79
Canagliflozin 100 mg Daily-0.76
Canagliflozin 200 mg Daily-0.70
Canagliflozin 300 mg Daily-0.92
Canagliflozin 300 mg Twice Daily-0.95
Sitagliptin 100 mg Daily-0.74

Change in Overnight Urine Glucose/Creatinine Ratio From Baseline to Week 12

The table below shows the mean change in overnight urine glucose/creatinine ratio from Baseline to Week 12 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the least-squares mean change. (NCT00642278)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 12

Interventionmg/mg (Mean)
Placebo1.9
Canagliflozin 50 mg Daily35.4
Canagliflozin 100 mg Daily51.5
Canagliflozin 200 mg Daily50.5
Canagliflozin 300 mg Daily49.4
Canagliflozin 300 mg Twice Daily61.6
Sitagliptin 100 mg Daily-1.9

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 12

The table below shows the mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 12 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the least-squares mean change. (NCT00642278)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 12

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo-1.1
Canagliflozin 50 mg Daily-2.3
Canagliflozin 100 mg Daily-2.6
Canagliflozin 200 mg Daily-2.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg Daily-3.4
Canagliflozin 300 mg Twice Daily-3.4
Sitagliptin 100 mg Daily-0.6

Percentage of Patients With Symptoms of Hypoglycemia

The table below shows the percentage of patients who experienced symptomatic hypoglycemic events between Baseline and Week 12. (NCT00642278)
Timeframe: Up to Week 12

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo2
Canagliflozin 50 mg Daily0
Canagliflozin 100 mg Daily2
Canagliflozin 200 mg Daily6
Canagliflozin 300 mg Daily0
Canagliflozin 300 mg Twice Daily3
Sitagliptin 100 mg Daily5

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at Week 18 (Interim Analysis)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 18 FPG minus the Week 0 FPG. Means are adjusted for baseline FPG, baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance (Interim Analysis). (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo7.2
Linagliptin-13.3

HbA1c Change From Baseline at Week 18 (Final Analysis)

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Means are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Means are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. The primary analysis was re-run at the completion of the study in the final study report. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Placebo0.21
Linagliptin-0.39

HbA1c Change From Baseline at Week 18 (Interim Analysis)

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Means are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Placebo0.14
Linagliptin-0.44

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c Lowering by 0.5% at Week 18 (Interim Analysis)

Odds ratios are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Week 18

Interventionpercent of patients (Number)
Placebo17.8
Linagliptin36.1

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c<6.5 at Week 18 (Interim Analysis)

Odds ratios are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Week 18

Interventionpercent of patients (Number)
Placebo2.9
Linagliptin8.9

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c<7.0 at Week 18 (Interim Analysis)

Odds ratios are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Week 18

Interventionpercent of patients (Number)
Placebo11.8
Linagliptin23.5

The Change in FPG From Baseline by Visit Over Time

This change from baseline reflects the FPG (at weeks 6, 12, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52) minus the Week 0 FPG. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 6,12,18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Change from baseline at week 6 (N=63, 134)Change from baseline at week 12 (N=55,92)Change from baseline at week 18 (N=47, 115)Change from baseline at week 22 (N=46, 110)Change from baseline at week 26 (N=50, 108)Change from baseline at week 30 (N=48, 95)Change from baseline at week 34 (N=48, 95)Change from baseline at week 40 (N=47, 92)Change from baseline at week 46 (N=47, 92)Change from baseline at week 52 (N=43, 86)
Linagliptin-8.4-14.3-12.9-14.0-17.0-19.1-15.8-19.0-18.1-14.0
Placebo/Glimepiride9.75.45.0-19.3-22.6-31.4-25.6-19.5-22.8-19.1

The Change in HbA1c From Baseline by Visit Over Time

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the HbA1c percent (at weeks 6, 12, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52) minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 6,12, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Change from baseline at week 6 (N=64, 136)Change from baseline at week 12 (N=57, 129)Change from baseline at week 18 (N=47, 118)Change from baseline at week 22 (N=46, 113)Change from baseline at week 26 (N=50, 110)Change from baseline at week 30 (N=49, 98)Change from baseline at week 34 (N=50, 96)Change from baseline at week 40 (N=49, 94)Change from baseline at week 46 (N=45, 92)Change from baseline at week 52 (N=45, 92)
Linagliptin-0.21-0.43-0.38-0.40-0.48-0.49-0.49-0.45-0.42-0.44
Placebo/Glimepiride0.260.260.10-0.32-0.53-0.79-0.75-0.73-0.78-0.72

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 24

Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) is measured as percent. Thus this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent. (NCT00106704)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.45
Placebo/ Pioglitazone0.28

Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 24

The change from baseline is the Week 24 Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) minus the Week 0 FPG. (NCT00106704)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-4.4
Placebo/ Pioglitazone15.7

Reviews

94 reviews available for metformin and Hypoglycemia

ArticleYear
Metformin for pregnancy and beyond: the pros and cons.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2022, Volume: 39, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Gestational W

2022
Metformin plus a low hypoglycemic risk antidiabetic drug vs. metformin monotherapy for untreated type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2022, Volume: 189

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combinat

2022
Effect and Safety of Adding Metformin to Insulin Therapy in Treating Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022, Volume: 13

    Topics: Adolescent; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agent

2022
Systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials comparing sulfonylureas and low hypoglycaemic risk antidiabetic drugs.
    BMC endocrine disorders, 2022, Oct-19, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dipeptidyl-Peptida

2022
Short-term neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes treated using metformin versus insulin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Acta diabetologica, 2023, Volume: 60, Issue:5

    Topics: Birth Weight; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infant, Newb

2023
Clinical Evidence and Practice-Based Guidelines on the Utility of Basal Insulin Combined Oral Therapy (Metformin and Glimepiride) in the Current Era.
    Current diabetes reviews, 2023, Volume: 19, Issue:8

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglyce

2023
Metformin versus insulin for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 2021, Volume: 34, Issue:16

    Topics: Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infant, Newborn; Insulin;

2021
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors as add-on therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of surrogate metabolic endpoints.
    Diabetes & metabolism, 2020, Volume: 46, Issue:4

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide

2020
Oral antidiabetes agents for the management of inpatient hyperglycaemia: so far, yet so close.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2020, Volume: 37, Issue:9

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hy

2020
Incretin mimetics and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors as monotherapy or add-on to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Acta diabetologica, 2021, Volume: 58, Issue:1

    Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therap

2021
Efficacy and safety of a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor versus placebo as an add-on therapy for people with type 2 diabetes inadequately treated with metformin and a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ran
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2021, Volume: 38, Issue:2

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hy

2021
Glucose-lowering action through targeting islet dysfunction in type 2 diabetes: Focus on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition.
    Journal of diabetes investigation, 2021, Volume: 12, Issue:7

    Topics: Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipep

2021
Clinical Perspectives on the Use of Subcutaneous and Oral Formulations of Semaglutide.
    Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021, Volume: 12

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comorbidity; Decision Making; Diabetes M

2021
SODIUM GLUCOSE COTRANSPORTER 2 AND DIPEPTIDYL PEPTIDASE-4 INHIBITION: PROMISE OF A DYNAMIC DUO.
    Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, 2017, Volume: 23, Issue:7

    Topics: Adamantane; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptide

2017
Non-severe Hypoglycemia Risk Difference between Sulfonylurea and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT2-I) as an Add-On to Metformin in Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique, 2017, 05-23, Volume: 24, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; M

2017
Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as monotherapy or add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Resistance;

2018
The care of pregestational and gestational diabetes and drug metabolism considerations.
    Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2017, Volume: 13, Issue:10

    Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic

2017
Pharmacological Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.
    Drugs, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:16

    Topics: Acarbose; Blood Glucose; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemi

2017
Oral anti-diabetic agents for women with established diabetes/impaired glucose tolerance or previous gestational diabetes planning pregnancy, or pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017, 10-18, Volume: 10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Glucose Intolerance; Humans;

2017
The safety of empagliflozin plus metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2018, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2018
Sex and BMI Alter the Benefits and Risks of Sulfonylureas and Thiazolidinediones in Type 2 Diabetes: A Framework for Evaluating Stratification Using Routine Clinical and Individual Trial Data.
    Diabetes care, 2018, Volume: 41, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Datasets as T

2018
Comparison of antidiabetic drugs added to sulfonylurea monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta-analysis.
    PloS one, 2018, Volume: 13, Issue:8

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Comb

2018
Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with premixed insulin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug

2019
Metformin and second- or third-generation sulphonylurea combination therapy for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019, 04-18, Volume: 4

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Met

2019
Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors Compared with Sulfonylureas in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Metformin: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2019, Volume: 39, Issue:6

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypogly

2019
Use of noninsulin antidiabetic medications in hospitalized patients.
    Critical care nursing clinics of North America, 2013, Volume: 25, Issue:1

    Topics: Benzamides; Biguanides; Bromocriptine; Diabetes Mellitus; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glycos

2013
Pharmacokinetic considerations for the treatment of diabetes in patients with chronic kidney disease.
    Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2013, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glomerular Filtration Rat

2013
[Management of type 2 diabetes: new or previous agents, how to choose?].
    Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983), 2013, Volume: 42, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Body Weight; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Pep

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Area Under Curve; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2013
Efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and metformin as initial combination therapy and as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Ther

2014
What are the preferred strategies for control of glycaemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15 Suppl 2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Reducing; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhib

2013
Use of non-insulin therapies for type 1 diabetes.
    Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Allylamine; Animals; Blood Glucose; Bromocriptine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Colesevelam Hydrochlorid

2013
Dapagliflozin compared with other oral anti-diabetes treatments when added to metformin monotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2014
[Attention to the use of oral anti-diabetic medication in older adults with type 2 diabetes].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2013, Volume: 71, Issue:11

    Topics: Cognition Disorders; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglyc

2013
[Limitations of insulin-dependent drugs in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus].
    Medicina clinica, 2013, Volume: 141 Suppl 2

    Topics: Contraindications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Comb

2013
Lixisenatide as add-on to oral anti-diabetic therapy: an effective treatment for glycaemic control with body weight benefits in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2014, Volume: 30, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Melli

2014
Assessment of the relative effectiveness and tolerability of treatments of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2014, Oct-01, Volume: 36, Issue:10

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycat

2014
Efficacy and safety of basal insulin glargine 12 and 24 weeks after initiation in persons with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis of data from treatment arms of 15 treat-to-target randomised controlled trials.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2014, Volume: 106, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobi

2014
Indirect comparison of lixisenatide versus neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin as add-on to metformin and sulphonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2014, Volume: 12

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agen

2014
[Twice-daily and weekly exenatide: clinical profile of two pioneer formulations in incretin therapy].
    Medicina clinica, 2014, Volume: 143 Suppl 2

    Topics: Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Adm

2014
Oral antihyperglycemic treatment options for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    The Medical clinics of North America, 2015, Volume: 99, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Drug Monitorin

2015
Safety considerations with pharmacological treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus.
    Drug safety, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic

2015
Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015, Jan-21, Volume: 350

    Topics: Adult; Birth Weight; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Fetal Macrosomia; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemi

2015
Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015, Jan-21, Volume: 350

    Topics: Adult; Birth Weight; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Fetal Macrosomia; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemi

2015
Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015, Jan-21, Volume: 350

    Topics: Adult; Birth Weight; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Fetal Macrosomia; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemi

2015
Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015, Jan-21, Volume: 350

    Topics: Adult; Birth Weight; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Fetal Macrosomia; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemi

2015
Combination therapy when metformin is not an option for type 2 diabetes.
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2015, Volume: 49, Issue:6

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hy

2015
Comparative efficacy and safety of antidiabetic drug regimens added to metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis.
    PloS one, 2015, Volume: 10, Issue:4

    Topics: Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglob

2015
Effects of oral hypoglycemic agents on platelet function.
    Journal of diabetes and its complications, 2015, Volume: 29, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Blood Platelets; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; H

2015
Metformin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: An updated meta-analysis.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2015, Volume: 109, Issue:3

    Topics: Birth Weight; Blood Glucose; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agent

2015
Effects of three injectable antidiabetic agents on glycaemic control, weight change and drop-out in type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled with metformin and/or a sulfonylurea: A network meta-analysis.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2015, Volume: 109, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Community Networks; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycat

2015
Benefits of combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide are independent of baseline glycated haemoglobin level and duration of type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyp

2016
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and hypoglycemic safety of gliclazide versus other insulinotropic agents.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2015, Volume: 110, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glicl

2015
Achieving the composite endpoint of glycated haemoglobin <7.0%, no weight gain and no hypoglycaemia in the once-weekly dulaglutide AWARD programme.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides;

2016
Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Diverse Patient Populations With Type 2 Diabetes.
    The Diabetes educator, 2015, Volume: 41, Issue:1 Suppl

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipepti

2015
Network meta-analysis of treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus following failure with metformin plus sulfonylurea.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:5

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combinat

2016
Systematic review and meta-analysis of vildagliptin for treatment of type 2 diabetes.
    Endocrine, 2016, Volume: 52, Issue:3

    Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Met

2016
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Scientific reports, 2016, Jan-08, Volume: 6

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated H

2016
Pharmacogenomics in diabetes mellitus: insights into drug action and drug discovery.
    Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2016, Volume: 12, Issue:6

    Topics: Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Discovery; Drug-Related Side

2016
Obviating much of the need for insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A re-assessment of insulin therapy's safety profile.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2016, Volume: 128, Issue:6

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes

2016
Hypoglycaemia when adding sulphonylurea to metformin: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016, Volume: 82, Issue:5

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Met

2016
Current management of diabetic patients with kidney disease: a renal‑cardio‑endocrine perspective.
    Panminerva medica, 2017, Volume: 59, Issue:1

    Topics: alpha-Glucosidases; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabet

2017
Beneficial effect of lixisenatide after 76 weeks of treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis from the GetGoal programme.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Femal

2017
Fixed-Dose Combination of Canagliflozin and Metformin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: An Overview.
    Advances in therapy, 2017, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diab

2017
Cost-Effectiveness of Saxagliptin versus Acarbose as Second-Line Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes in China.
    PloS one, 2016, Volume: 11, Issue:11

    Topics: Adamantane; Asian People; Cardiovascular Diseases; China; Costs and Cost Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus

2016
Clinical Outcomes of Metformin Use in Populations With Chronic Kidney Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, or Chronic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review.
    Annals of internal medicine, 2017, Feb-07, Volume: 166, Issue:3

    Topics: Cause of Death; Chronic Disease; Contraindications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Heart Failure; Humans

2017
Oral anti-diabetic pharmacological therapies for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017, 01-25, Volume: 1

    Topics: Acarbose; Administration, Oral; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypo

2017
The effect of adding metformin to insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Pediatric diabetes, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:7

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evi

2017
Advances in oral therapy for type 2 diabetes.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2000, May-15, Volume: 107, Issue:6 Suppl Ke

    Topics: Acarbose; Administration, Oral; Blood Glucose; Carbamates; Cyclohexanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

2000
Selecting among ADA/EASD tier 1 and tier 2 treatment options.
    The Journal of family practice, 2009, Volume: 58, Issue:9 Suppl Tr

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Dr

2009
Clinical results of treating type 2 diabetic patients with sitagliptin, vildagliptin or saxagliptin--diabetes control and potential adverse events.
    Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 23, Issue:4

    Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptid

2009
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Effect of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs added to metformin therapy on glycemic control, weight gain, and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.
    JAMA, 2010, Apr-14, Volume: 303, Issue:14

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2010
Intensive glucose control and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes.
    Heart, lung & circulation, 2011, Volume: 20, Issue:10

    Topics: Age Factors; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Typ

2011
Iatrogenic hyperhomocysteinemia in patients with metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
    Atherosclerosis, 2011, Volume: 214, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antihypertensive Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Fibric Acids; Homocys

2011
[Hypoglycemic therapy in heart disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus].
    Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006), 2010, Volume: 11, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Human

2010
Predictors of response to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: evidence from randomized clinical trials.
    Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2011, Volume: 27, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Enzyme Inhibitors; Glycated He

2011
An analysis of early insulin glargine added to metformin with or without sulfonylurea: impact on glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2011, Volume: 13, Issue:9

    Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Co

2011
Effect of antihyperglycemic agents added to metformin and a sulfonylurea on glycemic control and weight gain in type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis.
    Annals of internal medicine, 2011, May-17, Volume: 154, Issue:10

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Ag

2011
[Metformin in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: not evidence-based].
    Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2011, Volume: 155, Issue:39

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Fe

2011
[Hypoglycemia].
    Praxis, 2011, Oct-19, Volume: 100, Issue:21

    Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gliclazide; Humans;

2011
Second-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: a systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis.
    Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal, 2011, Volume: 5, Issue:1

    Topics: Bayes Theorem; Body Weight; Confidence Intervals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV

2011
A case of hypoglycemic hemiparesis and literature review.
    Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2012, Volume: 117, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Metformin; Pa

2012
Liraglutide: from clinical trials to clinical practice.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2012, Volume: 14 Suppl 2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Respo

2012
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012, Mar-12, Volume: 344

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Di

2012
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012, Mar-12, Volume: 344

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Di

2012
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012, Mar-12, Volume: 344

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Di

2012
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012, Mar-12, Volume: 344

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Di

2012
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012, Mar-12, Volume: 344

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Di

2012
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012, Mar-12, Volume: 344

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Di

2012
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012, Mar-12, Volume: 344

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Di

2012
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012, Mar-12, Volume: 344

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Di

2012
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2012, Mar-12, Volume: 344

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Di

2012
Drug interactions with oral antidiabetic agents: pharmacokinetic mechanisms and clinical implications.
    Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2012, Volume: 33, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Benzamides; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C8; Cytochrome

2012
Effect of antidiabetic agents added to metformin on glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia and weight change in patients with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2012, Volume: 14, Issue:9

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobi

2012
Drug-induced hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2012, Volume: 11, Issue:4

    Topics: Adamantane; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Exenati

2012
A review of the efficacy and safety of oral antidiabetic drugs.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2013, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents;

2013
Influence of initial hyperglycaemia, weight and age on the blood glucose lowering efficacy and incidence of hypoglycaemic symptoms with a single-tablet metformin-glibenclamide therapy (Glucovance) in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2003, Volume: 5, Issue:3

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relation

2003
[Continuation 50. Type 2 diabetes: possibilities and limitations of pharmacological therapy].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2003, Dec-18, Volume: 145, Issue:51-52

    Topics: 1-Deoxynojirimycin; Acarbose; Aged; Blood Glucose; Carbamates; Contraindications; Cyclohexanes; Diab

2003
DPP-4 inhibitors.
    Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism, 2007, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Adamantane; Animals; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dru

2007
Glycaemic control and adverse events in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin + sulphonylurea: a meta-analysis.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2008, Volume: 10 Suppl 1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobi

2008
[Adjunctive therapies to glycaemic control of type 1 diabetes mellitus].
    Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia, 2008, Volume: 52, Issue:2

    Topics: Acarbose; Amyloid; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastrointest

2008
[Repaglinide, potentially a therapeutic improvement for diabetes mellitus type 2].
    Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2001, Aug-11, Volume: 145, Issue:32

    Topics: Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; H

2001
Practical management of diabetes in the tropics.
    Tropical doctor, 1990, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Chlorpropamide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucose

1990
Oral treatment of diabetes mellitus.
    Journal of the Indian Medical Association, 1968, May-16, Volume: 50, Issue:10

    Topics: Chlorpropamide; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Phenformin;

1968
Advances in the treatment of diabetes mellitus.
    The Practitioner, 1971, Volume: 207, Issue:240

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Chlorpropamide; Clofibrate; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Coma; Diabetic Ketoacidosis;

1971

Trials

217 trials available for metformin and Hypoglycemia

ArticleYear
Metformin action over gut microbiota is related to weight and glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized trial.
    Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, 2022, Volume: 145

    Topics: Adult; Body Mass Index; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Glycemic Control

2022
Efficacy and safety benefits of iGlarLixi versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL or lixisenatide in Asian Pacific people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes on oral agents: The LixiLan-O-AP randomized controlled trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2022, Volume: 24, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated H

2022
Effect of once-weekly semaglutide versus thrice-daily insulin aspart, both as add-on to metformin and optimized insulin glargine treatment in participants with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 11): A randomized, open-label, multinational, phase 3b trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2022, Volume: 24, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Li

2022
Efficacy and safety of a basal insulin + 2-3 oral antihyperglycaemic drugs regimen versus a twice-daily premixed insulin + metformin regimen after short-term intensive insulin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes: The multicentre, open-label, rando
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2022, Volume: 24, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglyc

2022
Comparative efficacy and safety of two insulin aspart formulations (Rapilin and NovoRapid) when combined with metformin, for patients with diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2022, Volume: 38, Issue:11

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hy

2022
A Randomized Controlled Trial of R-Form Verapamil Added to Ongoing Metformin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2022, 09-28, Volume: 107, Issue:10

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated H

2022
A randomised placebo-controlled trial of the effectiveness of early metformin in addition to usual care in the reduction of gestational diabetes mellitus effects (EMERGE): study protocol.
    Trials, 2022, Sep-21, Volume: 23, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Galactose; Gestat

2022
Effects of Initial Combinations of Gemigliptin Plus Metformin Compared with Glimepiride Plus Metformin on Gut Microbiota and Glucose Regulation in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The INTESTINE Study.
    Nutrients, 2023, Jan-03, Volume: 15, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Gl

2023
Ertugliflozin Delays Insulin Initiation and Reduces Insulin Dose Requirements in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Analyses From VERTIS CV.
    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2023, Jul-14, Volume: 108, Issue:8

    Topics: Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Hyp

2023
Efficacy and safety of gemigliptin as add-on therapy to insulin, with or without metformin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (ZEUS II study).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; D

2020
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Linagliptin in a Japanese Population with Type 2 Diabetes Aged ≥ 60 Years Treated with Basal Insulin: A Randomised Trial.
    Advances in therapy, 2019, Volume: 36, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glycated H

2019
Hypoglycaemia leads to a delayed increase in platelet and coagulation activation markers in people with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin only: Results from a stepwise hypoglycaemic clamp study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020, Volume: 22, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Biomarkers; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Tests; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Gl

2020
Evaluation of the Short-Term Cost-Effectiveness of IDegLira Versus Basal Insulin and Basal-Bolus Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Based on Attainment of Clinically Relevant Treatment Targets.
    Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2020, Volume: 26, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated

2020
Efficacy and safety of dual add-on therapy with dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin versus glimepiride in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes on a stable dose of metformin: Results from a 52-week, randomized, active-controlled trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020, Volume: 22, Issue:7

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Double

2020
Efficacy and Safety of Basal Insulin-Based Treatment Versus Twice-Daily Premixed Insulin After Short-Term Intensive Insulin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (BEYOND V).
    Advances in therapy, 2020, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination;

2020
Efficacy and safety of generic exenatide injection in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
    Acta diabetologica, 2020, Volume: 57, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Generic; E

2020
Efficacy and Safety Over 2 Years of Exenatide Plus Dapagliflozin in the DURATION-8 Study: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Phase 3, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Diabetes care, 2020, Volume: 43, Issue:10

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blin

2020
Once-Weekly Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes without Previous Insulin Treatment.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2020, 11-26, Volume: 383, Issue:22

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; D

2020
Metformin for gestational diabetes study: metformin vs insulin in gestational diabetes: glycemic control and obstetrical and perinatal outcomes: randomized prospective trial.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2021, Volume: 225, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Cesarean Section; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Gestational Weight Gain; Humans; Hypoglycemi

2021
A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor omarigliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2017, Volume: 33, Issue:10

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Heterocyclic Compounds

2017
Long-term Cost-effectiveness of Two GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Italian Setting: Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2017, Volume: 39, Issue:7

    Topics: Body Mass Index; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; G

2017
Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was effective across a range of dysglycaemia and body mass index categories in the DUAL V randomized trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; D

2018
Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide: A Review in Type 2 Diabetes.
    Drugs, 2017, Volume: 77, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gluca

2017
Metformin-associated prevention of weight gain in insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients cannot be explained by decreased energy intake: A post hoc analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled 4.3-year trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Obesity Agents; Appetite Depressants; Body Mass Index; Diabetes

2018
The efficacy and safety of adding either vildagliptin or glimepiride to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dinoprost; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female;

2017
Metformin extended-release versus immediate-release: An international, randomized, double-blind, head-to-head trial in pharmacotherapy-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Combined Modality Therapy; Delayed-Action Preparations

2018
Safety and efficacy of metformin up-titration in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with vildagliptin and low-dose metformin.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:18

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination;

2017
Ertugliflozin plus sitagliptin versus either individual agent over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin: The VERTIS FACTORIAL randomized trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Body Mass Index; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidy

2018
Ertugliflozin plus sitagliptin versus either individual agent over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin: The VERTIS FACTORIAL randomized trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Body Mass Index; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidy

2018
Ertugliflozin plus sitagliptin versus either individual agent over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin: The VERTIS FACTORIAL randomized trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Body Mass Index; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidy

2018
Ertugliflozin plus sitagliptin versus either individual agent over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin: The VERTIS FACTORIAL randomized trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Body Mass Index; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidy

2018
Long-term effects on glycaemic control and β-cell preservation of early intensive treatment in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: A multicentre randomized trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Foll

2018
Safety and tolerability of dapagliflozin, saxagliptin and metformin in combination: Post-hoc analysis of concomitant add-on versus sequential add-on to metformin and of triple versus dual therapy with metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Benzhydryl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inh

2018
Effects on the glucagon response to hypoglycaemia during DPP-4 inhibition in elderly subjects with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, placebo-controlled study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase

2018
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Metformin to Treat Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.
    American journal of nephrology, 2018, Volume: 47, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Cysts; Disease Progression; Dose-Response Rel

2018
Safety and Tolerability of Combinations of Empagliflozin and Linagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Pooled Data from Two Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Advances in therapy, 2018, Volume: 35, Issue:7

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring;

2018
A randomized, open-label, multicentre, parallel-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 30 plus metformin with biphasic insulin aspart 30 monotherapy for type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled with oral anti
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemo

2018
Empagliflozin compared with glimepiride in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: 208-week data from a masked randomized controlled trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug The

2018
Dapagliflozin versus saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin.
    Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2018, Volume: 62, Issue:4

    Topics: Adamantane; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Typ

2018
Double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of continuing or discontinuing the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin when initiating insulin glargine therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: The CompoSIT-I Study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Deprescriptions; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind M

2019
Hypoglycaemia as a function of HbA1c in type 2 diabetes: Insulin glargine 300 U/mL in a patient-level pooled analysis of EDITION 1, 2 and 3.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019, Volume: 21, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, D

2019
Hypoglycemia and Incident Cognitive Dysfunction: A Post Hoc Analysis From the ORIGIN Trial.
    Diabetes care, 2019, Volume: 42, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cognitive Dysfunction; Educational Status; Female; Humans; Hypoglycem

2019
Sustained 52-week efficacy and safety of triple therapy with dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin versus dual therapy with sitagliptin added to metformin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Double

2019
Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Female;

2019
Sitagliptin vs. pioglitazone as add-on treatments in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes on the maximal dose of metformin plus sulfonylurea.
    Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2019, Volume: 42, Issue:7

    Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up S

2019
Rationale, design, and methods for the Medical Optimization and Management of Pregnancies with Overt Type 2 Diabetes (MOMPOD) study.
    BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018, Dec-12, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Birth Injuries; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Management; Double-Blind Metho

2018
Impact of Insulin Tregopil and Its Permeation Enhancer on Pharmacokinetics of Metformin in Healthy Volunteers: Randomized, Open-Label, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study.
    Clinical and translational science, 2019, Volume: 12, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Confidence Intervals; Cross-Over Studies; Female; Healthy V

2019
Long-term efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: 104-week VERTIS MET trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Bone Density; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type

2019
Triple therapy with low-dose dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin versus dual therapy with each monocomponent, all added to metformin, in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019, Volume: 21, Issue:9

    Topics: Adamantane; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides;

2019
Glycemic Control and Insulin Treatment Alter Fracture Risk in Older Men With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2019, Volume: 34, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Density; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fractures,

2019
Once-daily initiation of basal insulin as add-on to metformin: a 26-week, randomized, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:8

    Topics: Argentina; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administrati

2013
Alogliptin versus glipizide monotherapy in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with mild hyperglycaemia: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, 1-year study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitor

2013
Vildagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of HbA₁c < 7.0% without hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared with glimepiride after 2 years of treatment.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 100, Issue:3

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metf

2013
Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide once daily versus placebo in type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on pioglitazone (GetGoal-P).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring;

2013
Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide once daily versus placebo in type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on pioglitazone (GetGoal-P).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring;

2013
Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide once daily versus placebo in type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on pioglitazone (GetGoal-P).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring;

2013
Efficacy and safety of lixisenatide once daily versus placebo in type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled on pioglitazone (GetGoal-P).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring;

2013
Study design and rationale of a dose-ranging trial of LX4211, a dual inhibitor of SGLT1 and SGLT2, in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.
    Clinical cardiology, 2013, Volume: 36, Issue:7

    Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Clinical Protocols; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Femal

2013
Saxagliptin vs. glipizide as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin alone: long-term (52-week) extension of a 52-week randomised controlled trial.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:4

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Di

2013
Individualised treatment targets for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes using vildagliptin add-on or lone therapy (INTERVAL): a 24 week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    Lancet (London, England), 2013, Aug-03, Volume: 382, Issue:9890

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, C

2013
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu

2013
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu

2013
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu

2013
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu

2013
Long-term 4-year safety of saxagliptin in drug-naive and metformin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2013, Volume: 30, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors

2013
Long-term 4-year safety of saxagliptin in drug-naive and metformin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2013, Volume: 30, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors

2013
Long-term 4-year safety of saxagliptin in drug-naive and metformin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2013, Volume: 30, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors

2013
Long-term 4-year safety of saxagliptin in drug-naive and metformin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2013, Volume: 30, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors

2013
Dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving high doses of insulin: efficacy and safety over 2 years.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus,

2014
Dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving high doses of insulin: efficacy and safety over 2 years.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus,

2014
Dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving high doses of insulin: efficacy and safety over 2 years.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus,

2014
Dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving high doses of insulin: efficacy and safety over 2 years.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus,

2014
A comparative study of the effects of a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor and sulfonylurea on glucose variability in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control on metformin.
    Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; D

2013
Randomized, vitamin E-controlled trial of bicyclol plus metformin in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with impaired fasting glucose.
    Clinical drug investigation, 2014, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Biphenyl Compounds; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; L

2014
[A combination of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and metformin in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: effective control of glycemia, weight, and quantitative body composition].
    Terapevticheskii arkhiv, 2013, Volume: 85, Issue:8

    Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; D

2013
Exenatide twice daily versus insulin glargine for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Poland - subgroup data from a randomised multinational trial GWAA.
    Endokrynologia Polska, 2013, Volume: 64, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Sch

2013
Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with dual combination of metformin and sulphonylurea.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitu

2014
Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with dual combination of metformin and sulphonylurea.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitu

2014
Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with dual combination of metformin and sulphonylurea.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitu

2014
Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with dual combination of metformin and sulphonylurea.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitu

2014
A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin plus a sulphonylurea.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Australia; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canada; Diabetes Mellitus

2014
Effect of once-daily insulin detemir on oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) use in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2014, Volume: 39, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans;

2014
Effect of once-daily insulin detemir on oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) use in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2014, Volume: 39, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans;

2014
Effect of once-daily insulin detemir on oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) use in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2014, Volume: 39, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans;

2014
Effect of once-daily insulin detemir on oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) use in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2014, Volume: 39, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans;

2014
[Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin as a second-line therapy vs other oral antidiabetic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes: Czech results within the worldwide prospective cohort EDGE study].
    Vnitrni lekarstvi, 2013, Volume: 59, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Cohort Studies; Czech Republic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Co

2013
A randomized controlled trial comparing the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide to a sulphonylurea as add on to metformin in patients with established type 2 diabetes during Ramadan: the Treat 4 Ramadan Trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide

2014
Saxagliptin versus glipizide as add-on therapy to metformin: assessment of hypoglycemia.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2014, Volume: 30, Issue:5

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptid

2014
Efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with alogliptin plus metformin versus either as monotherapy in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, 6-month study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:7

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combinatio

2014
Health status and hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec versus insulin glargine: a 2-year trial in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:9

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Administration Sc

2014
Pharmacodynamics of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide in Japanese and Caucasian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus poorly controlled on sulphonylureas with/without metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Comparison between the therapeutic effect of metformin, glimepiride and their combination as an add-on treatment to insulin glargine in uncontrolled patients with type 2 diabetes.
    PloS one, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response

2014
Lixisenatide treatment improves glycaemic control in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin with or without sulfonylurea: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week trial (GetGoal-M-Asia).
    Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2014, Volume: 30, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Drug Resistance, Mult

2014
Insulin lispro low mixture twice daily versus basal insulin glargine once daily and prandial insulin lispro once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin intensification: a randomized phase IV trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:10

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin;

2014
Efficacy of metformin-based oral antidiabetic drugs is not inferior to insulin glargine in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients with severe hyperglycemia after short-term intensive insulin therapy.
    Journal of diabetes, 2015, Volume: 7, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-U

2015
Linagliptin improved glycaemic control without weight gain or hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by a combination of metformin and pioglitazone: a 24-week randomized, double-blind study.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2014, Volume: 31, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combinatio

2014
Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients.
    Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2014, Volume: 63, Issue:7

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method

2014
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide added onto pioglitazone and metformin versus exenatide in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-1).
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combinat

2014
Effect of exogenously administered glucagon versus spontaneous endogenous counter-regulation on glycaemic recovery from insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a novel glucokinase activator, AZD1656, and metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:11

    Topics: Azetidines; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Catecholamines; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, T

2014
Durability of glycaemic efficacy over 2 years with dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapies in patients whose type 2 diabetes mellitus is inadequately controlled with metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:11

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Re

2014
Durability of glycaemic efficacy over 2 years with dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapies in patients whose type 2 diabetes mellitus is inadequately controlled with metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:11

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Re

2014
Durability of glycaemic efficacy over 2 years with dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapies in patients whose type 2 diabetes mellitus is inadequately controlled with metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:11

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Re

2014
Durability of glycaemic efficacy over 2 years with dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapies in patients whose type 2 diabetes mellitus is inadequately controlled with metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:11

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Re

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Improved glucose control with weight loss, lower insulin doses, and no increased hypoglycemia with empagliflozin added to titrated multiple daily injections of insulin in obese inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Dr

2014
Modulation of insulin dose titration using a hypoglycaemia-sensitive algorithm: insulin glargine versus neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Asia; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Dosage

2015
Study of optimal basal insulin glargine dose requirement in Indian population as an add on therapy to oral hypoglycaemic agents to achieve target fasting blood glucose levels.
    Journal of the Indian Medical Association, 2013, Volume: 111, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; H

2013
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist or bolus insulin with optimized basal insulin in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide

2014
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist or bolus insulin with optimized basal insulin in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide

2014
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist or bolus insulin with optimized basal insulin in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide

2014
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist or bolus insulin with optimized basal insulin in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide

2014
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist or bolus insulin with optimized basal insulin in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide

2014
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist or bolus insulin with optimized basal insulin in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide

2014
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist or bolus insulin with optimized basal insulin in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide

2014
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist or bolus insulin with optimized basal insulin in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide

2014
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist or bolus insulin with optimized basal insulin in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide

2014
Contribution of liraglutide in the fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira).
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy

2014
Durability of the efficacy and safety of alogliptin compared with glipizide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 2-year study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase

2014
Efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist albiglutide (HARMONY 1 trial): 52-week primary endpoint results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus not controlled
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:12

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Th

2014
Canagliflozin provides durable glycemic improvements and body weight reduction over 104 weeks versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Ther

2015
Greater dose-ranging effects on A1C levels than on glucosuria with LX4211, a dual inhibitor of SGLT1 and SGLT2, in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin monotherapy.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Adm

2015
Dual add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with metformin monotherapy: a randomized double-blind trial of saxagliptin plus dapagliflozin addition versus single addition of saxagliptin or dapagliflozin to metformin.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides;

2015
Dual add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with metformin monotherapy: a randomized double-blind trial of saxagliptin plus dapagliflozin addition versus single addition of saxagliptin or dapagliflozin to metformin.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides;

2015
Dual add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with metformin monotherapy: a randomized double-blind trial of saxagliptin plus dapagliflozin addition versus single addition of saxagliptin or dapagliflozin to metformin.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides;

2015
Dual add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with metformin monotherapy: a randomized double-blind trial of saxagliptin plus dapagliflozin addition versus single addition of saxagliptin or dapagliflozin to metformin.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides;

2015
Saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by cardiovascular disease history and cardiovascular risk factors: analysis of 3 clinical trials.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2014, Volume: 126, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2014
Saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by cardiovascular disease history and cardiovascular risk factors: analysis of 3 clinical trials.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2014, Volume: 126, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2014
Saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by cardiovascular disease history and cardiovascular risk factors: analysis of 3 clinical trials.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2014, Volume: 126, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2014
Saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by cardiovascular disease history and cardiovascular risk factors: analysis of 3 clinical trials.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2014, Volume: 126, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2014
Saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by cardiovascular disease history and cardiovascular risk factors: analysis of 3 clinical trials.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2014, Volume: 126, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2014
Saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by cardiovascular disease history and cardiovascular risk factors: analysis of 3 clinical trials.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2014, Volume: 126, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2014
Saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by cardiovascular disease history and cardiovascular risk factors: analysis of 3 clinical trials.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2014, Volume: 126, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2014
Saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by cardiovascular disease history and cardiovascular risk factors: analysis of 3 clinical trials.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2014, Volume: 126, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2014
Saxagliptin efficacy and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by cardiovascular disease history and cardiovascular risk factors: analysis of 3 clinical trials.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2014, Volume: 126, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2014
Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans

2015
Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans

2015
Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans

2015
Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans

2015
Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans

2015
Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans

2015
Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans

2015
Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans

2015
Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans

2015
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal or pre-/self-mixed insulin: a 26-week, randomised, treat-to-target trial.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2015, Volume: 107, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combina

2015
Combination of empagliflozin and linagliptin as second-line therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors;

2015
Dapagliflozin improves glycemic control and reduces body weight as add-on therapy to metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 24-week randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2015
Dapagliflozin improves glycemic control and reduces body weight as add-on therapy to metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 24-week randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2015
Dapagliflozin improves glycemic control and reduces body weight as add-on therapy to metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 24-week randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2015
Dapagliflozin improves glycemic control and reduces body weight as add-on therapy to metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 24-week randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2015
Comparison of neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes with moderate hyperglycaemia on metformin or glibenclamide--a randomised controlled trial.
    The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2015, Volume: 55, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Birth Injuries; Birth Weight; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Fetal Macrosomia; Glyburide; Hum

2015
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of aleglitazar in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled findings from three randomized phase III trials.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemog

2015
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of aleglitazar in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled findings from three randomized phase III trials.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemog

2015
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of aleglitazar in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled findings from three randomized phase III trials.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemog

2015
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of aleglitazar in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled findings from three randomized phase III trials.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemog

2015
Long-term glycaemic response and tolerability of dapagliflozin versus a sulphonylurea as add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: 4-year data.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2015
Efficacy and safety of liraglutide monotherapy compared with metformin in Japanese overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Endocrine journal, 2015, Volume: 62, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglyc

2015
Dose-ranging efficacy and safety study of ertugliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes on a background of metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Di

2015
Comparison of thrice-daily premixed insulin (insulin lispro premix) with basal-bolus (insulin glargine once-daily plus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro) therapy in east Asian patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled with twice-daily pre
    The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2015, Volume: 3, Issue:4

    Topics: Acarbose; Aged; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemogl

2015
Efficacy and tolerability of saxagliptin compared with glimepiride in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled study (GENERATION).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:7

    Topics: Adamantane; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptid

2015
Long-term treatment with empagliflozin as add-on to oral antidiabetes therapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Biguanides; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-

2015
The cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus sulfonylurea as an add-on to metformin in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2015, Volume: 32, Issue:7

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Cohort Studies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellit

2015
Treatment escalation options for patients with type 2 diabetes after failure of exenatide twice daily or glimepiride added to metformin: results from the prospective European Exenatide (EUREXA) study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule

2015
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl

2015
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl

2015
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl

2015
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl

2015
Contrasting Effects of Lixisenatide and Liraglutide on Postprandial Glycemic Control, Gastric Emptying, and Safety Parameters in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Optimized Insulin Glargine With or Without Metformin: A Randomized, Open-Label Trial.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fem

2015
Combination of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin with insulin-based regimens in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
    Diabetes & vascular disease research, 2015, Volume: 12, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptidyl-P

2015
One-year efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a 26-week extension to a 26-week main trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Comb

2015
Comparison of vildagliptin as an add-on therapy and sulfonylurea dose-increasing therapy in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes using metformin and sulfonylurea (VISUAL study): A randomized trial.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2015, Volume: 109, Issue:1

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug T

2015
Empagliflozin as add-on to metformin in people with Type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2015, Volume: 32, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Body Mass Index; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Treatment satisfaction in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with once-weekly dulaglutide: data from the AWARD-1 and AWARD-3 clinical trials.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Gluc

2015
Allogeneic Mesenchymal Precursor Cells in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Safety and Tolerability Pilot Study.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Meth

2015
Efficacy and safety of liraglutide versus placebo added to basal insulin analogues (with or without metformin) in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Dr

2015
Durability and tolerability of dapagliflozin over 52 weeks as add-on to metformin and sulphonylurea in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Diabetes Mellit

2015
Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial of Triple Therapy With Dapagliflozin Add-on to Saxagliptin Plus Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:11

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides;

2015
Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Triple Therapy With Saxagliptin Add-on to Dapagliflozin Plus Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:11

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides;

2015
Effect of liraglutide vs. NPH in combination with metformin on blood glucose fluctuations assessed using continuous glucose monitoring in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.
    International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2015, Volume: 53, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Ther

2015
Effect of the GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Lixisenatide on Counterregulatory Responses to Hypoglycemia in Subjects With Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucagon;

2016
Effect of ranolazine on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with either glimepiride or metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Dr

2016
[Efficacy and safety of alogliptin in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial in mainland China].
    Zhonghua nei ke za zhi, 2015, Volume: 54, Issue:11

    Topics: Asian People; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Co

2015
Glycemic excursions are positively associated with changes in duration of asymptomatic hypoglycemia after treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2016, Volume: 113

    Topics: Acarbose; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female;

2016
Strategies for glucose control in a study population with diabetes, renal disease and anemia (Treat study).
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2016, Volume: 113

    Topics: Aged; Anemia; Australia; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Europe; Female; Humans; Hypoglyce

2016
Switching from sulphonylurea to a sodium-glucose cotransporter2 inhibitor in the fasting month of Ramadan is associated with a reduction in hypoglycaemia.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combi

2016
Metformin versus placebo in combination with insulin analogues in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus-the randomised, blinded Copenhagen Insulin and Metformin Therapy (CIMT) trial.
    BMJ open, 2016, Feb-25, Volume: 6, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Denmark; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glyc

2016
Effects of biphasic, basal-bolus or basal insulin analogue treatments on carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the randomised Copenhagen Insulin and Metformin Therapy (CIMT) trial.
    BMJ open, 2016, Feb-25, Volume: 6, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Denmark; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug

2016
Effect of Insulin Glargine Up-titration vs Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide on Glycated Hemoglobin Levels in Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: The DUAL V Randomized Clinical Trial.
    JAMA, 2016, Mar-01, Volume: 315, Issue:9

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; I

2016
Effect of adding insulin degludec to treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and liraglutide: a double-blind randomized controlled trial (BEGIN: ADD TO GLP-1 Study).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:7

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; F

2016
Efficacy and safety of liraglutide versus sitagliptin, both in combination with metformin, in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a 26-week, open-label, randomized, active comparator clinical trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anorexia; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Chin

2016
Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of AZP-531, a first-in-class analogue of unacylated ghrelin, in healthy and overweight/obese subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:9

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Double-Bli

2016
A Multinational, Randomized, Open-label, Treat-to-Target Trial Comparing Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    Drugs in R&D, 2016, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia;

2016
Efficacy and safety of titrated canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin and sitagliptin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-B

2016
The efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to ongoing metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized study with open label extension.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2016, Volume: 17, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combinatio

2016
Glucose Variability in a 26-Week Randomized Comparison of Mealtime Treatment With Rapid-Acting Insulin Versus GLP-1 Agonist in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk.
    Diabetes care, 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular

2016
Glucose Variability in a 26-Week Randomized Comparison of Mealtime Treatment With Rapid-Acting Insulin Versus GLP-1 Agonist in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk.
    Diabetes care, 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular

2016
Glucose Variability in a 26-Week Randomized Comparison of Mealtime Treatment With Rapid-Acting Insulin Versus GLP-1 Agonist in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk.
    Diabetes care, 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular

2016
Glucose Variability in a 26-Week Randomized Comparison of Mealtime Treatment With Rapid-Acting Insulin Versus GLP-1 Agonist in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk.
    Diabetes care, 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cardiovascular

2016
Prandial Options to Advance Basal Insulin Glargine Therapy: Testing Lixisenatide Plus Basal Insulin Versus Insulin Glulisine Either as Basal-Plus or Basal-Bolus in Type 2 Diabetes: The GetGoal Duo-2 Trial.
    Diabetes care, 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combinat

2016
Baseline factors associated with glycaemic response to treatment with once-weekly dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Fas

2016
Efficacy and Safety of LixiLan, a Titratable Fixed-Ratio Combination of Lixisenatide and Insulin Glargine, Versus Insulin Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Metformin Monotherapy: The LixiLan Proof-of-Concept Randomized Trial.
    Diabetes care, 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combin

2016
Once-Daily Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide as Add-on to Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes: A 26-Week Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Diabetes care, 2016, Volume: 39, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administ

2016
Which oral antidiabetic drug to combine with metformin to minimize the risk of hypoglycemia when initiating basal insulin?: A randomized controlled trial of a DPP4 inhibitor versus insulin secretagogues.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2016, Volume: 116

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug

2016
Glucose Control in Severely Burned Patients Using Metformin: An Interim Safety and Efficacy Analysis of a Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Annals of surgery, 2016, Volume: 264, Issue:3

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Burns; Fats; Female; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin R

2016
Efficacy and safety of switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes (LIRA-SWITCH): a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled 26-week trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asia; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-

2016
One-year efficacy and safety of saxagliptin add-on in patients receiving dapagliflozin and metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:11

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

2016
Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin versus metformin uptitration in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: a randomized, open-label, prospective study (VISION).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Di

2016
Efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with gemigliptin and metformin compared with monotherapy with either drug in patients with type 2 diabetes: A double-blind randomized controlled trial (INICOM study).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors

2017
Hypoglycemia in Frail Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Sulfonylurea.
    Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2017, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Frail Eld

2017
Linagliptin as add-on to empagliflozin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: Two 24-week randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trials.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Ther

2017
The effects of exenatide twice daily compared to insulin lispro added to basal insulin in Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective analysis of the 4B trial.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2016, Volume: 122

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Argentina; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration S

2016
Effects of Glimepiride versus Saxagliptin on β-Cell Function and Hypoglycemia: A Post Hoc Analysis in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2016, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-

2016
Randomized, double-blind, phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily treatment with alogliptin and metformin hydrochloride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:3

    Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administrat

2017
Metformin in adults with type 1 diabetes: Design and methods of REducing with MetfOrmin Vascular Adverse Lesions (REMOVAL): An international multicentre trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Atherosclerosis; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Cholesterol, LDL

2017
Efficacy and safety of gemigliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with combination treatment of metformin and sulphonylurea: a 24-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monit

2017
A randomized clinical trial of the safety and efficacy of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled by acarbose alone.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2017, Volume: 33, Issue:4

    Topics: Acarbose; Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Monitoring; Dru

2017
Efficacy and safety of adding evogliptin versus sitagliptin for metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week randomized, controlled trial with open label extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistanc

2017
Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination therapy, alogliptin plus metformin, in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: A phase 3 trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:5

    Topics: China; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Diabetic; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV

2017
Glyburide Versus Metformin and Their Combination for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Study.
    Diabetes care, 2017, Volume: 40, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combina

2017
Combining the G-protein-coupled receptor 40 agonist fasiglifam with sitagliptin improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without metformin: A randomized, 12-week trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:8

    Topics: Benzofurans; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitor

2017
Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin compared with acarbose in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus uncontrolled on metformin monotherapy: Results of a Phase IV open-label randomized controlled study (the SMART study).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:11

    Topics: Acarbose; Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Di

2017
Addition of neutral protamine lispro insulin or insulin glargine to oral type 2 diabetes regimens for patients with suboptimal glycemic control: a randomized trial.
    Annals of internal medicine, 2008, Oct-21, Volume: 149, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combinati

2008
Comparison of glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes on basal insulin and fixed combination oral antidiabetic treatment: results of a pilot study.
    Acta diabetologica, 2009, Volume: 46, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Gl

2009
Relationship between HbA1c and hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with different insulin regimens in combination with metformin.
    Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2009, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hum

2009
Relationship between HbA1c and hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with different insulin regimens in combination with metformin.
    Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2009, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hum

2009
Relationship between HbA1c and hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with different insulin regimens in combination with metformin.
    Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2009, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hum

2009
Relationship between HbA1c and hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with different insulin regimens in combination with metformin.
    Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2009, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hum

2009
Effect of two starting insulin regimens in patients with type II diabetes not controlled on a combination of oral antihyperglycemic medications.
    Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2009, Volume: 117, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administrat

2009
Long-term effects of metformin on metabolism and microvascular and macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Archives of internal medicine, 2009, Mar-23, Volume: 169, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dr

2009
Long-term effects of metformin on metabolism and microvascular and macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Archives of internal medicine, 2009, Mar-23, Volume: 169, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dr

2009
Long-term effects of metformin on metabolism and microvascular and macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Archives of internal medicine, 2009, Mar-23, Volume: 169, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dr

2009
Long-term effects of metformin on metabolism and microvascular and macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Archives of internal medicine, 2009, Mar-23, Volume: 169, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dr

2009
Nateglinide combination therapy with basal insulin and metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2009, Volume: 26, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Cyclohexanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Co

2009
Comparison of vildagliptin and metformin monotherapy in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, double-blind, randomized trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:8

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptid

2009
Three different premixed combinations of biphasic insulin aspart - comparison of the efficacy and safety in a randomized controlled clinical trial in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:7

    Topics: Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Ther

2009
Comparison of vildagliptin and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptid

2009
Twice-daily and three-times-daily dosing of a repaglinide/metformin fixed-dose combination tablet provide similar glycaemic control.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Ther

2009
A comparison between simplified and intensive dose-titration algorithms using AIR inhaled insulin for insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes in a randomized noninferiority trial.
    Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2009, Volume: 11 Suppl 2

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, C

2009
Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2009, Oct-29, Volume: 361, Issue:18

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combina

2009
Combining insulin with metformin or an insulin secretagogue in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 12 month, randomised, double blind trial.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009, Nov-09, Volume: 339

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination

2009
Patient-reported outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide or glimepiride, both as add-on to metformin.
    Primary care diabetes, 2010, Volume: 4, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans;

2010
Hypoglycemic symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes in Asia-Pacific-Real-life effectiveness and care patterns of diabetes management: the RECAP-DM study.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2010, Volume: 89, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic

2010
Metformin compared with glyburide for the management of gestational diabetes.
    International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2010, Volume: 111, Issue:1

    Topics: Birth Weight; Blood Glucose; Diabetes, Gestational; Fasting; Female; Glyburide; Glycated Hemoglobin;

2010
Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:9

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Dr

2010
Saxagliptin is non-inferior to glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin alone: a 52-week randomised controlled trial.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2010, Volume: 64, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhi

2010
Efficacy and safety of treatment with sitagliptin or glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2011, Volume: 13, Issue:2

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Co

2011
Efficacy and safety of insulin detemir once daily in combination with sitagliptin and metformin: the TRANSITION randomized controlled trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2011, Volume: 13, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated

2011
Efficacy and safety of insulin detemir once daily in combination with sitagliptin and metformin: the TRANSITION randomized controlled trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2011, Volume: 13, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated

2011
Efficacy and safety of insulin detemir once daily in combination with sitagliptin and metformin: the TRANSITION randomized controlled trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2011, Volume: 13, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated

2011
Efficacy and safety of insulin detemir once daily in combination with sitagliptin and metformin: the TRANSITION randomized controlled trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2011, Volume: 13, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated

2011
Exenatide twice daily versus premixed insulin aspart 70/30 in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized 26-week study on glycemic control and hypoglycemia.
    Diabetes care, 2011, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Humans; Hyp

2011
Sitagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint for A1C reduction, lack of hypoglycemia and no body weight gain compared with glipizide.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2011, Volume: 93, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gl

2011
Multifactorial intervention in individuals with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria: the Microalbuminuria Education and Medication Optimisation (MEMO) study.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2011, Volume: 93, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuminuria; Antihypertensive Agents; Aspirin; Blood Pressure; Chole

2011
A randomized non-inferiority study comparing the addition of exenatide twice daily to sitagliptin or switching from sitagliptin to exenatide twice daily in patients with type 2 diabetes experiencing inadequate glycaemic control on metformin and sitaglipti
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2012, Volume: 29, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Argentina; Australia; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-

2012
Dose-ranging effects of canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, as add-on to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2012, Volume: 35, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Rela

2012
Dose-ranging effects of canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, as add-on to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2012, Volume: 35, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Rela

2012
Dose-ranging effects of canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, as add-on to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2012, Volume: 35, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Rela

2012
Dose-ranging effects of canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, as add-on to metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2012, Volume: 35, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Rela

2012
Efficacy and tolerability of exenatide monotherapy in obese patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a randomized, 26 weeks metformin-controlled, parallel-group study.
    Chinese medical journal, 2012, Volume: 125, Issue:15

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypo

2012
Linagliptin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes patients for whom metformin is inappropriate: an 18-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial with a 34-week active-controlled extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2012, Volume: 14, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Pep

2012
Real-life comparison of DPP4-inhibitors with conventional oral antidiabetics as add-on therapy to metformin in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: the HYPOCRAS study.
    Diabetes & metabolism, 2012, Volume: 38, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Drug Therapy, Combination;

2012
Metformin compared with insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2012, Volume: 98, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Birth Weight; Blood Glucose; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fetal

2012
Safety and efficacy of insulin aspart and soluble human insulin in Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Minerva endocrinologica, 2012, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyp

2012
Improved glycaemic control with metformin-glibenclamide combined tablet therapy (Glucovance) in Type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled on metformin.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2002, Volume: 19, Issue:8

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blin

2002
Therapy after single oral agent failure: adding a second oral agent or an insulin mixture?
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2003, Volume: 62, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Huma

2003
Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2005, Volume: 28, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hy

2005
Twice-daily pre-mixed insulin rather than basal insulin therapy alone results in better overall glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2005, Volume: 22, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Ad

2005
Effect on glycemic control of the addition of 2.5 mg glipizide GITS to metformin in patients with T2DM.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2005, Volume: 68, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Do

2005
Effects of two different glibenclamide dose-strengths in the fixed combination with metformin in patients with poorly controlled T2DM: a double blind, prospective, randomised, cross-over clinical trial.
    Diabetes, nutrition & metabolism, 2004, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; C-Peptide; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dou

2004
Biphasic insulin aspart 30 plus metformin: an effective combination in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2006, Volume: 8, Issue:1

    Topics: Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedu

2006
Metformin-glibenclamide versus metformin plus rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2006, Volume: 8, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combin

2006
Differential effect of glimepiride and rosiglitazone on metabolic control of type 2 diabetic patients treated with metformin: a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2006, Volume: 8, Issue:2

    Topics: Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated

2006
Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study.
    Diabetologia, 2006, Volume: 49, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasti

2006
Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study.
    Diabetologia, 2006, Volume: 49, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasti

2006
Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study.
    Diabetologia, 2006, Volume: 49, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasti

2006
Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study.
    Diabetologia, 2006, Volume: 49, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasti

2006
Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study.
    Diabetologia, 2006, Volume: 49, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasti

2006
Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study.
    Diabetologia, 2006, Volume: 49, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasti

2006
Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study.
    Diabetologia, 2006, Volume: 49, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasti

2006
Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study.
    Diabetologia, 2006, Volume: 49, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasti

2006
Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study.
    Diabetologia, 2006, Volume: 49, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasti

2006
An open, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety profile of inhaled human insulin (Exubera) with metformin as adjunctive therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on a sulfonylurea.
    Diabetes care, 2006, Volume: 29, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

2006
A randomized trial of adding insulin glargine vs. avoidance of insulin in people with Type 2 diabetes on either no oral glucose-lowering agents or submaximal doses of metformin and/or sulphonylureas. The Canadian INSIGHT (Implementing New Strategies with
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2006, Volume: 23, Issue:7

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Canada; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug T

2006
Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin Aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride.
    Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2006, Volume: 114, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relati

2006
Combination of oral antidiabetic agents with basal insulin versus premixed insulin alone in randomized elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2007, Volume: 55, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fem

2007
A randomized controlled trial examining combinations of repaglinide, metformin and NPH insulin.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2007, Volume: 24, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule;

2007
The effect of adding exenatide to a thiazolidinedione in suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial.
    Annals of internal medicine, 2007, Apr-03, Volume: 146, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind M

2007
Nateglinide or gliclazide in combination with metformin for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on maximum doses of metformin alone: 1-year trial results.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Cyclohexanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Femal

2007
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy

2007
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy

2007
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy

2007
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy

2007
Nateglinide, alone or in combination with metformin, is effective and well tolerated in treatment-naïve elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2008, Volume: 10, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Cyclohexanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Do

2008
Efficacy and treatment satisfaction of once-daily insulin glargine plus one or two oral antidiabetic agents versus continuing premixed human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes previously on long-term conventional insulin therapy: the Switch pilot st
    Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2007, Volume: 115, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus,

2007
Comparison of fixed-dose rosiglitazone/metformin combination therapy with sulphonylurea plus metformin in overweight individuals with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin alone.
    Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2008, Volume: 116, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; G

2008
Tolerability and efficacy of exenatide and titrated insulin glargine in adult patients with type 2 diabetes previously uncontrolled with metformin or a sulfonylurea: a multinational, randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover noninferiority trial.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Metho

2007
Comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 given three times daily or twice daily in combination with metformin versus oral antidiabetic drugs alone in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a 16-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial
    Clinical therapeutics, 2007, Volume: 29, Issue:11

    Topics: Biomarkers; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination;

2007
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
The UK Prospective Diabetes Study. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.
    Annals of medicine, 1996, Volume: 28, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Humans; Hype

1996
United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study 24: a 6-year, randomized, controlled trial comparing sulfonylurea, insulin, and metformin therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes that could not be controlled with diet therapy. United Kingdom Pro
    Annals of internal medicine, 1998, Feb-01, Volume: 128, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up

1998
Repaglinide in combination therapy with metformin in Type 2 diabetes.
    Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 1999, Volume: 107 Suppl 4

    Topics: Australia; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemogl

1999
Metformin does not adversely affect hormonal and symptomatic responses to recurrent hypoglycemia.
    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2001, Volume: 86, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Autonomic Nervous System; Blood Glucose; Double-Blind Method; Glucose Clamp

2001
Effects of metformin on plasma glucose, insulin, FFA, glucagon, growth hormone and cortisol responses to oral glucose in subjects with chemical diabetes.
    Il Farmaco; edizione pratica, 1979, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified; Femal

1979
[Early and late dumping treated with metformin (Glucofag)].
    Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke, 1972, Jul-10, Volume: 92, Issue:19

    Topics: Dumping Syndrome; Female; Gastrectomy; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insuli

1972

Other Studies

177 other studies available for metformin and Hypoglycemia

ArticleYear
The role of sulfonylureas in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2022, Volume: 23, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Sulfonylurea Compou

2022
Real-world comparison of mono and dual combination therapies of metformin, sulfonylurea, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors using a common data model: A retrospective observational study.
    Medicine, 2022, Feb-25, Volume: 101, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fem

2022
Does optimal HbA1c in diabetes differ according to drug treatment? An evaluation of national electronic database in Malta.
    Diabetes & metabolic syndrome, 2022, Volume: 16, Issue:4

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electronics; Glycated Hemoglobi

2022
Distinguishing characteristics of exposure to biguanide and sulfonylurea anti-diabetic medications in the United States.
    The American journal of emergency medicine, 2022, Volume: 56

    Topics: Abdominal Pain; Acidosis; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus; Diarrhea; D

2022
Role of Ambulatory Glucose Profile in Precision Medicine in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 2022, Volume: 70, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase

2022
Continuous glucose monitoring demonstrates low risk of clinically significant hypoglycemia associated with sulphonylurea treatment in an African type 2 diabetes population: results from the OPTIMAL observational multicenter study.
    BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2022, Volume: 10, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans

2022
Metformin-associated Lactic Acidosis with Hypoglycemia during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2022, Aug-01, Volume: 61, Issue:15

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; COVID-19; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Ma

2022
Arene-Ruthenium(II)/Osmium(II) Complexes Potentiate the Anticancer Efficacy of Metformin via Glucose Metabolism Reprogramming.
    Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2022, 09-19, Volume: 61, Issue:38

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Coordination Complexes; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Metf

2022
Efficacy and safety of combination of empagliflozin and metformin with combination of sitagliptin and metformin during Ramadan: an observational study.
    BMC endocrine disorders, 2022, Oct-13, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Drug Therapy

2022
Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in people with type 2 diabetes during Ramadan fasting.
    Diabetes & metabolic syndrome, 2022, Volume: 16, Issue:11

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypogl

2022
[Cross-Sectional Study on Adverse Effects of Metformin Hydrochloride on 130 Patients Type 2 Diabetic Admitted to Medical Center and Diabetes Home of Sidi Bel-Abbès].
    Annales pharmaceutiques francaises, 2023, Volume: 81, Issue:4

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug-Related Side Effec

2023
[Cross-Sectional Study on Adverse Effects of Metformin Hydrochloride on 130 Patients Type 2 Diabetic Admitted to Medical Center and Diabetes Home of Sidi Bel-Abbès].
    Annales pharmaceutiques francaises, 2023, Volume: 81, Issue:4

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug-Related Side Effec

2023
[Cross-Sectional Study on Adverse Effects of Metformin Hydrochloride on 130 Patients Type 2 Diabetic Admitted to Medical Center and Diabetes Home of Sidi Bel-Abbès].
    Annales pharmaceutiques francaises, 2023, Volume: 81, Issue:4

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug-Related Side Effec

2023
[Cross-Sectional Study on Adverse Effects of Metformin Hydrochloride on 130 Patients Type 2 Diabetic Admitted to Medical Center and Diabetes Home of Sidi Bel-Abbès].
    Annales pharmaceutiques francaises, 2023, Volume: 81, Issue:4

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug-Related Side Effec

2023
Comparison of Mitochondrial Adenosine Triphosphate-Sensitive Potassium Channel High- vs Low-Affinity Sulfonylureas and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin.
    JAMA network open, 2022, 12-01, Volume: 5, Issue:12

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycem

2022
Comparison of Mitochondrial Adenosine Triphosphate-Sensitive Potassium Channel High- vs Low-Affinity Sulfonylureas and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin.
    JAMA network open, 2022, 12-01, Volume: 5, Issue:12

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycem

2022
Comparison of Mitochondrial Adenosine Triphosphate-Sensitive Potassium Channel High- vs Low-Affinity Sulfonylureas and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin.
    JAMA network open, 2022, 12-01, Volume: 5, Issue:12

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycem

2022
Comparison of Mitochondrial Adenosine Triphosphate-Sensitive Potassium Channel High- vs Low-Affinity Sulfonylureas and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Metformin.
    JAMA network open, 2022, 12-01, Volume: 5, Issue:12

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycem

2022
Efficacy and safety of hypoglycemic agents on gestational diabetes mellitus in women: A Bayesian network analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Frontiers in public health, 2022, Volume: 10

    Topics: Birth Weight; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; I

2022
Sulfonylureas as second line therapy for type 2 diabetes among veterans: Results from a National Longitudinal Cohort Study.
    Primary care diabetes, 2023, Volume: 17, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Longitud

2023
Glucose-responsive Insulinoma with Insulin Hypersecretion Suppressed by Metformin.
    Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2019, Dec-15, Volume: 58, Issue:24

    Topics: Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulinoma; Male; Metfor

2019
A retrospective cross-sectional study of type 2 diabetes overtreatment in patients admitted to the geriatric ward.
    BMC geriatrics, 2019, 09-02, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug The

2019
Maternal and Neonatal Health Outcomes Associated with the Use of Gliclazide and Metformin for the Treatment of Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Record Linkage Study.
    Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2020, Volume: 22, Issue:2

    Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Gliclazide; Hospitalization; Huma

2020
Comparative effectiveness of metformin versus insulin for gestational diabetes in New Zealand.
    Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2019, Volume: 28, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Birth Weight; Cesarean Section; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Humans; Hypoglycem

2019
Pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus in frail elderly patients.
    British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005), 2019, Nov-02, Volume: 80, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Frail Elderly; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglyc

2019
Impact of Hypoglycemia on Health-Related Quality of Life among Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Thailand.
    Journal of diabetes research, 2019, Volume: 2019

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination;

2019
Intensification with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, insulin, or thiazolidinediones and risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases, and severe hypoglycemia in patients on metformin-sulfonylurea dual therapy: A retrospective cohort study.
    PLoS medicine, 2019, Volume: 16, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidas

2019
A Safety Comparison of Metformin vs Sulfonylurea Initiation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2020, Volume: 95, Issue:1

    Topics: Canada; Cardiovascular Diseases; Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Monitoring; Effect Modi

2020
Hypoglycemic encephalopathy caused by overdose of metformin in an adolescent.
    Chinese medical journal, 2020, Jan-05, Volume: 133, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Brain Diseases; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Metformin

2020
Therapeutic efficacy and safety of initial triple combination of metformin, sitagliptin, and lobeglitazone in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: initial triple study.
    BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2020, Volume: 8, Issue:1

    Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combinatio

2020
Real-world Evaluation of glycemic control and hypoglycemic Events among type 2 Diabetes mellitus study (REEDS): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in Thailand.
    BMJ open, 2020, 02-12, Volume: 10, Issue:2

    Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycemic Control; Hum

2020
Comparative effects of glibenclamide, metformin and insulin on fetal pancreatic histology and maternal blood glucose in pregnant streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.
    African health sciences, 2019, Volume: 19, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes, Gestational; Female;

2019
Changes in incidence of severe hypoglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes from 2006 to 2016: analysis based on health insurance data in Germany considering the anti-hyperglycaemic medication.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2020, Volume: 37, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhi

2020
Developing a definition for Oral Antidiabetic Drug (OAD) Failure.
    JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 2020, Volume: 70, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Clinical Decision-Making; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination

2020
Use of Antihyperglycemic Medications in U.S. Adults: An Analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
    Diabetes care, 2020, Volume: 43, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabet

2020
Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, Severe Hypoglycemia, and All-Cause Mortality for Widely Used Antihyperglycemic Dual and Triple Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes Management: A Cohort Study of All Danish Users.
    Diabetes care, 2020, Volume: 43, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Cohort Studies; Denmark; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2020
Metformin in Pregnancy Study (MiPS): protocol for a systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis.
    BMJ open, 2020, 05-21, Volume: 10, Issue:5

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Infant, Newborn; Meta-Analysis a

2020
Glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome: liraglutide compared with insulin glargine: a pilot study.
    The Journal of international medical research, 2020, Volume: 48, Issue:6

    Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobi

2020
Long-term follow up of older people on diabetes medications: observational study using linked health databases.
    Australian journal of primary health, 2020, Volume: 26, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Diseases; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Fol

2020
Glucose-lowering effects of 7-day treatment with SGLT2 inhibitor confirmed by intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in outpatients with type 1 diabetes. A pilot study.
    Endocrine journal, 2021, Mar-28, Volume: 68, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes

2021
Gestational diabetes, metformin, and the risk of hypoglycemia.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2021, Volume: 225, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Pregnancy

2021
Gestational diabetes, metformin, and risk of hypoglycemia.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2021, Volume: 225, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Pregnancy

2021
Symptomatic Hypoglycemia During Treatment with a Therapeutic Dose of Metformin.
    The American journal of case reports, 2021, Jun-02, Volume: 22

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination;

2021
ROS-responsive organosilica nanocarrier for the targeted delivery of metformin against cancer with the synergistic effect of hypoglycemia.
    Journal of materials chemistry. B, 2021, 08-04, Volume: 9, Issue:30

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Survival; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Screening

2021
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Used Concomitantly with Insulin Secretagogues and the Risk of Serious Hypoglycemia.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2022, Volume: 111, Issue:1

    Topics: Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

2022
Impact of health policy and practice on finding the best fit for patients with type 2 diabetes after metformin failure: Croatian pilot study.
    Primary care diabetes, 2017, Volume: 11, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Clinical Decisi

2017
Differential increments of basal glucagon-like-1 peptide concentration among SLC47A1 rs2289669 genotypes were associated with inter-individual variability in glycaemic response to metformin in Chinese people with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2017, Volume: 34, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; China; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Resistance; Female; Follow-Up Studies;

2017
Missed Opportunities for Deprescription: A Teachable Moment.
    JAMA internal medicine, 2017, 07-01, Volume: 177, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Deprescriptions; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Therapy, Combina

2017
Intensive insulin therapy combined with metformin is associated with reduction in both glucose variability and nocturnal hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2017, Volume: 33, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglob

2017
Glycemic Improvement with a Fixed-dose combination of DPP-4 inhibitor + metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes (GIFT study).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Combinatio

2018
[Gliptin-gliflozin combination for treating type 2 diabetes].
    Revue medicale suisse, 2016, Aug-24, Volume: 12, Issue:527

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Dru

2016
Patterns of glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating second-line therapy after metformin monotherapy: Retrospective data for 10 256 individuals from the United Kingdom and Germany.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Mon

2018
The effect of sitagliptin on obese patients with insulin treatment-induced diabetes mellitus.
    European review for medical and pharmacological sciences, 2017, Volume: 21, Issue:15

    Topics: Adiponectin; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female

2017
Healthcare resource use and associated costs of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed sulfonylureas.
    Journal of diabetes and its complications, 2017, Volume: 31, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Combined Modality Therapy; Costs and Cost Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

2017
Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes: Synopsis of the 2017 American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes.
    Annals of internal medicine, 2017, Oct-03, Volume: 167, Issue:7

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans

2017
Are we missing hypoglycaemia? Elderly patients with insulin-treated diabetes present to primary care frequently with non-specific symptoms associated with hypoglycaemia.
    Primary care diabetes, 2018, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Accidental Falls; Age Factors; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Me

2018
Sulfonylureas as Initial Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes and the Risk of Severe Hypoglycemia.
    The American journal of medicine, 2018, Volume: 131, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents;

2018
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents Added to Insulin Monotherapy for Type 2 Diabetes.
    JAMA, 2017, Oct-17, Volume: 318, Issue:15

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hum

2017
Dulaglutide (Trulicity) for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    American family physician, 2017, Oct-15, Volume: 96, Issue:8

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; H

2017
Patient and prescriber characteristics among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus continuing or discontinuing sulfonylureas following insulin initiation: data from a large commercial database.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2018, Volume: 34, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Monitoring; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia;

2018
Comparison of costs and outcomes of dapagliflozin with other glucose-lowering therapy classes added to metformin using a short-term cost-effectiveness model in the US setting.
    Journal of medical economics, 2018, Volume: 21, Issue:5

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

2018
Hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes: understanding patients' and physicians' knowledge and experience.
    Endocrine, 2018, Volume: 60, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Clinical Decision-Making; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Health

2018
Severe lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia due to acute metformin intoxication in a dog.
    Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001), 2018, Volume: 28, Issue:3

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Animals; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Female; Glucose; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; I

2018
Treatment Discontinuation and Clinical Events in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated with Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors or NPH Insulin as Third-Line Therapy.
    Journal of diabetes research, 2018, Volume: 2018

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Humans;

2018
Initial combination therapy with vildagliptin plus metformin in drug-naïve patients with T2DM: a 24-week real-life study from Asia.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2018, Volume: 34, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Asia; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglo

2018
Serious Hypoglycemia and Use of Warfarin in Combination With Sulfonylureas or Metformin.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2019, Volume: 105, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hy

2019
A herbal treatment for type 2 diabetes adulterated with undisclosed drugs.
    Lancet (London, England), 2018, 06-16, Volume: 391, Issue:10138

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Contamination; Female; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoalbuminemia; Hypoglyce

2018
Recurrent hypoglycemia secondary to metformin toxicity in the absence of co-ingestions: a case report.
    Journal of medical case reports, 2018, Aug-18, Volume: 12, Issue:1

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Anti-Obesity Agents; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Metformin; Polycystic Ovary Syn

2018
Metformin reduces liver glucose production by inhibition of fructose-1-6-bisphosphatase.
    Nature medicine, 2018, Volume: 24, Issue:9

    Topics: Adenosine Monophosphate; Aminoimidazole Carboxamide; Animals; Base Sequence; Chickens; Disease Model

2018
Glycemic Variability Promotes Both Local Invasion and Metastatic Colonization by Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
    Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology, 2018, Volume: 6, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Collagen Type VI; Core

2018
Different daily glycemic profiles after switching from once-daily alogliptin plus twice-daily metformin to their once-daily fixed-dose combination in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients.
    Endocrine journal, 2019, Jan-28, Volume: 66, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Drug Substitution;

2019
Recent metformin adherence and the risk of hypoglycaemia in the year following intensification with a sulfonylurea.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2019, Volume: 36, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Com

2019
Type 2 diabetes mellitus in pregnancy: The impact of maternal weight and early glycaemic control on outcomes.
    European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2019, Volume: 233

    Topics: Adult; Case-Control Studies; Cesarean Section; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fetal Macrosomia;

2019
Combination of Hypoglycemia and Metformin Impairs Tumor Metabolic Plasticity and Growth by Modulating the PP2A-GSK3β-MCL-1 Axis.
    Cancer cell, 2019, 05-13, Volume: 35, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Fasting; Gene Expression Regulation, N

2019
Teaching an Old Drug New Tricks.
    Cancer cell, 2019, 05-13, Volume: 35, Issue:5

    Topics: Fasting; Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Metformin; Myeloid Cell Leukemia Seq

2019
Metformin overdose-induced hypoglycemia in the absence of other antidiabetic drugs.
    Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2013, Volume: 51, Issue:5

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Adolescent; Drug Overdose; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Hypo

2013
The association between adherence to oral anti-diabetic drugs and hypoglycaemia in persons with Type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2013, Volume: 30, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Com

2013
Octreotide: a novel therapy for refractory sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia.
    Pancreas, 2013, Volume: 42, Issue:4

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agen

2013
Treatment adherence with vildagliptin compared to sulphonylurea as add-on to metformin in Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus fasting during Ramadan.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2013, Volume: 29, Issue:7

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combi

2013
[Diabetes treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease].
    Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2013, Volume: 138, Issue:21

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combinatio

2013
One other explanation for hypoglycemia during metformin overdose.
    Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2013, Volume: 51, Issue:6

    Topics: Drug Overdose; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin

2013
Prognostic implications of DPP-4 inhibitor vs. sulfonylurea use on top of metformin in a real world setting - results of the 1 year follow-up of the prospective DiaRegis registry.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Comb

2013
Metformin toxicity: a report of 204 cases from Iran.
    Current drug safety, 2013, Volume: 8, Issue:4

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Child; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; H

2013
Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine added to a fixed-dose combination of metformin and a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor: results of the GOLD observational study.
    Vascular health and risk management, 2013, Volume: 9

    Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inh

2013
[Prospective, multicentric, non-interventional study to assess the existing treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy - KOMETA CZ].
    Vnitrni lekarstvi, 2013, Volume: 59, Issue:12

    Topics: Czech Republic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gly

2013
[Anti-diabetes agents and hypoglycemia].
    Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006), 2013, Volume: 14, Issue:12 Suppl

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Metformin; Sulfonylur

2013
How to prevent and treat pharmacological hypoglycemias.
    Revista clinica espanola, 2014, Volume: 214, Issue:4

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Antihypertensive Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperc

2014
Hypoglycemia, its implications in clinical practice, and possible ways to prevent it.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2014, Volume: 30, Issue:5

    Topics: Adamantane; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Female; Glipizide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Me

2014
SGLT-2 inhibitors as second-line therapy in type 2 diabetes.
    The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2014, Volume: 2, Issue:9

    Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Th

2014
Healthcare costs of the combination of metformin/dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors compared with metformin/other oral antidiabetes agents in patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome.
    Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diab

2014
The evaluation of clinical and cost outcomes associated with earlier initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2014, Volume: 20, Issue:9

    Topics: Cohort Studies; Cost Savings; Costs and Cost Analysis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Ty

2014
Evaluation approach can significantly influence oral glucose-lowering drugs total mortality risks in retrospective cohorts of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.
    Current diabetes reviews, 2014, Volume: 10, Issue:5

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gliclazide; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metform

2014
A decision support tool for appropriate glucose-lowering therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Body Mass Index; Clinical Protocols; Comorbidity; Decision Support Systems, Clinical; Diabetes Melli

2015
Intracerebroventricular metformin decreases body weight but has pro-oxidant effects and decreases survival.
    Neurochemical research, 2015, Volume: 40, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Body Weight; Cells, Cultured; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusions, Intraventricula

2015
Effect of bariatric surgery combined with medical therapy versus intensive medical therapy or calorie restriction and weight loss on glycemic control in Zucker diabetic fatty rats.
    American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2015, Feb-15, Volume: 308, Issue:4

    Topics: Age Factors; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Caloric Restriction; Combined Mod

2015
Clinical effectiveness and safety of vildagliptin in >19 000 patients with type 2 diabetes: the GUARD study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dru

2015
Real-life safety and efficacy of vildagliptin as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes in Turkey--GALATA study.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2015, Volume: 31, Issue:4

    Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhi

2015
Combination therapy with oleanolic acid and metformin as a synergistic treatment for diabetes.
    Journal of diabetes research, 2015, Volume: 2015

    Topics: Animals; Biomarkers; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diseas

2015
Surreptitious metformin abuse in anorexia nervosa presenting as periodic hypoglycaemia.
    The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2015, Volume: 49, Issue:9

    Topics: Anorexia Nervosa; Coma; Drug Overdose; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin;

2015
Vildagliptin as add-on therapy to insulin improves glycemic control without increasing risk of hypoglycemia in Asian, predominantly Chinese, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Journal of diabetes, 2016, Volume: 8, Issue:3

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asia; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type

2016
Cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin vs glimepiride as a second-line therapy added to metformin in Type 2 diabetes in China.
    Journal of medical economics, 2015, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular Diseases; China; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analy

2015
Getting to goal in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes using combination drug "subtraction therapy".
    Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2015, Volume: 64, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fe

2015
Sulfonylurea monotherapy and emergency room utilization among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2015, Volume: 109, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Emergency Medical Services;

2015
Sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Efficacy after five years of therapy.
    Pharmacological research, 2015, Volume: 100

    Topics: Adolescent; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hyp

2015
Treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes patients taking empagliflozin compared with patients taking glimepiride.
    Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016, Volume: 25, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Clinical Protocols; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Dru

2016
Effects on Clinical Outcomes of Adding Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Versus Sulfonylureas to Metformin Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    Annals of internal medicine, 2015, Nov-03, Volume: 163, Issue:9

    Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibito

2015
How much is too much? Outcomes in patients using high-dose insulin glargine.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2016, Volume: 70, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Huma

2016
Incidence, characteristics and impact of hypoglycaemia in patients receiving intensified treatment for inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Diabetes & vascular disease research, 2016, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Amputation, Surgical; Angina, Stable; Asymptomatic Diseases; Blood Glucose; Depressive Disorde

2016
Efficacy and safety of linagliptin as add-on therapy to basal insulin and metformin in people with Type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2016, Volume: 33, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fem

2016
Risk of hypoglycemia following intensification of metformin treatment with insulin versus sulfonylurea.
    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2016, Apr-05, Volume: 188, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Comb

2016
Hypoglycemia Incidence Rates and Associated Health Care Costs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Second-Line Linagliptin or Sulfonylurea After Metformin Monotherapy.
    Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2016, Volume: 22, Issue:5

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Health Care Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2016
Sulphonylurea compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in combination with metformin carries increased risk of severe hypoglycemia, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2016, Volume: 117

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Co

2016
Risk of hypoglycaemia in users of sulphonylureas compared with metformin in relation to renal function and sulphonylurea metabolite group: population based cohort study.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016, Jul-13, Volume: 354

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neph

2016
Cost-effectiveness of Canagliflozin versus Sitagliptin When Added to Metformin and Sulfonylurea in Type 2 Diabetes in Canada.
    Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique, 2016, Volume: 23, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Canada; Canagliflozin; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipept

2016
A post-hoc analysis of the comparative efficacy of canagliflozin and glimepiride in the attainment of type 2 diabetes-related quality measures.
    BMC health services research, 2016, 08-05, Volume: 16, Issue:a

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure Determination; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-

2016
The use of dextrose/insulin infusions during labour and delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: Is there any point?
    The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2017, Volume: 57, Issue:3

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; In

2017
Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in combination with other oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Endocrinologia y nutricion : organo de la Sociedad Espanola de Endocrinologia y Nutricion, 2016, Volume: 63, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease

2016
Preventing Unnecessary Costs of Drug-Induced Hypoglycemia in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States and Canada.
    PloS one, 2016, Volume: 11, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Canada; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Trees; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; H

2016
Trends in Drug Utilization, Glycemic Control, and Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia, 2006-2013.
    Diabetes care, 2017, Volume: 40, Issue:4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase

2017
Different effects of basal insulin peglispro and insulin glargine on liver enzymes and liver fat content in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18 Suppl 2

    Topics: Adipose Tissue; Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Bilirubin; Blood Glu

2016
Managing glycaemia in older people with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective, primary care-based cohort study, with economic assessment of patient outcomes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aging; Cohort Studies; Cost of Illness; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipe

2017
Second line initiation of insulin compared with DPP-4 inhibitors after metformin monotherapy is associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and severe hypoglycemia.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 123

    Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Huma

2017
Comparative cardiovascular risks of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors with other second- and third-line antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017, Volume: 83, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Cardiovascular System; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase

2017
Hemodialysis-refractory metformin-associated lactate acidosis with hypoglycemia, hypothermia, and bradycardia in a diabetic patient with belated diagnosis and chronic kidney disease
.
    International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2017, Volume: 55, Issue:4

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Aged; Biomarkers; Bradycardia; Delayed Diagnosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug

2017
Metabolic acidosis in a patient with metformin overdose.
    South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde, 2017, Jan-30, Volume: 107, Issue:2

    Topics: Acidosis; Blood Gas Analysis; Cardiotonic Agents; Drug Overdose; Fatal Outcome; Female; Heart Arrest

2017
Effectiveness and safety of vildagliptin and vildagliptin add-on to metformin in real-world settings in Egypt - results from the GUARD study.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2017, Volume: 33, Issue:5

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Monitoring; D

2017
Metformin Trumps insulin in the treatment of gestational diabetes.
    Medscape journal of medicine, 2008, Jul-31, Volume: 10, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycem

2008
Metformin, sulfonylureas, or other antidiabetes drugs and the risk of lactic acidosis or hypoglycemia: a nested case-control analysis.
    Diabetes care, 2008, Volume: 31, Issue:11

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female;

2008
Outcomes of adding second hypoglycemic drug after metformin monotherapy failure among type 2 diabetes in Hungary.
    Health and quality of life outcomes, 2008, Oct-31, Volume: 6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Huma

2008
Balancing risk and benefit with oral hypoglycemic drugs.
    The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York, 2009, Volume: 76, Issue:3

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans

2009
Vildagliptin therapy and hypoglycaemia in Muslim type 2 diabetes patients during Ramadan.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2009, Volume: 63, Issue:10

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fastin

2009
[Insulin secretion is increased depending on glucose.. Metabolism regulation in type 2 diabetes mellitus over five paths].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2009, May-07, Volume: 151, Issue:19

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exena

2009
[Type 2 diabetes: interview with Prof. Stephan Matthaei. Reaching HbA1c target value while preventing hypoglycemia].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2009, Oct-15, Volume: 151, Issue:42

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated H

2009
Sulphonyurea as a cause of severe hypoglycaemia in the community.
    Primary care diabetes, 2010, Volume: 4, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Huma

2010
Metformin reverses hexokinase and 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase inhibition in skeletal muscle, liver and adipose tissues from streptozotocin-induced diabetic mouse.
    Archives of biochemistry and biophysics, 2010, Apr-01, Volume: 496, Issue:1

    Topics: Adipose Tissue; Animals; Biocatalysis; Cell Line; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Drug Design; Glyc

2010
Insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2010, Mar-11, Volume: 362, Issue:10

    Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia;

2010
Understanding the inter-relationship between improved glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia and weight change within a long-term economic model.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia;

2010
Effective switch from premixed to basal-prandial insulin to achieve glycemic goals in type 2 diabetes.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2010, Volume: 122, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combina

2010
Effect of a low glycemic index compared with a conventional healthy diet on polycystic ovary syndrome.
    The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2010, Volume: 92, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diet;

2010
Frequent reoccurrence of hypoglycemia in a type 2 diabetic patient with insulin antibodies.
    Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2010, Aug-01, Volume: 14, Issue:4

    Topics: Acarbose; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemia

2010
Distinguishing among incretin-based therapies. Safety, tolerability, and nonglycemic effects of incretin-based therapies.
    The Journal of family practice, 2010, Volume: 59, Issue:9 Suppl 1

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhi

2010
Diabetes treatment patterns and goal achievement in primary diabetes care (DiaRegis) - study protocol and patient characteristics at baseline.
    Cardiovascular diabetology, 2010, Sep-16, Volume: 9

    Topics: Adult; Comorbidity; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Ge

2010
Impaired renal function modifies the risk of severe hypoglycaemia among users of insulin but not glyburide: a population-based nested case-control study.
    Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2011, Volume: 26, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Canada; Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up

2011
Improved glycaemic control with reduced hypoglycaemic episodes and without weight gain using long-term modern premixed insulins in type 2 diabetes.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2011, Volume: 65, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Fasting; Femal

2011
Self-reported experience of hypoglycemia among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (Exhype).
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2011, Volume: 92, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin;

2011
Influence of CYP2C9 gene polymorphisms on response to glibenclamide in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.
    European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011, Volume: 67, Issue:8

    Topics: Alleles; Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Cohort Stud

2011
Insulin management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    American family physician, 2011, Jul-15, Volume: 84, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug

2011
The impact of initiating biphasic human insulin 30 therapy in type 2 diabetes patients after failure of oral antidiabetes drugs.
    Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2012, Volume: 14, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fem

2012
Can a protocol for glycaemic control improve type 2 diabetes outcomes after gastric bypass?
    Obesity surgery, 2012, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Clinical Protocols; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mel

2012
Pregnancy management of women with pregestational diabetes.
    Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America, 2011, Volume: 40, Issue:4

    Topics: Congenital Abnormalities; Counseling; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Me

2011
Lactic acidosis, hypotension, and sensorineural hearing loss following intentional metformin overdose.
    Current drug safety, 2011, Nov-01, Volume: 6, Issue:5

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Drug Overdose; Glyburide; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypog

2011
Worry vs. knowledge about treatment-associated hypoglycaemia and weight gain in type 2 diabetic patients on metformin and/or sulphonylurea.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2012, Volume: 28, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; Denmark; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Health Knowledge,

2012
Ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes mellitus in a patient with Sheehan's syndrome: a rare convergence of two distinct endocrine entities.
    BMJ case reports, 2012, Jan-18, Volume: 2012

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hypogl

2012
Lower risk of hypoglycemia with sitagliptin compared to glipizide when either is added to metformin therapy: a pre-specified analysis adjusting for the most recently measured HbA(1c) value.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2012, Volume: 28, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Calibration; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Th

2012
Association between sitagliptin adherence and self-monitoring of blood glucose.
    Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2012, May-01, Volume: 6, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

2012
[Pitfalls and precautions concerning the use of conventional oral antidiabetic drugs].
    Revue medicale de Liege, 2002, Volume: 57, Issue:5

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Administration, Oral; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypog

2002
[Severe hypoglycemia caused by sulfonylureas and biguanides in a patient with obstructive anuria: resolution with ureteral stent].
    Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica, 2002, Volume: 74, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Anuria; Female; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Remission Ind

2002
Inadequacy of therapeutic education: a risk factor of hypoglycaemia.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2003, Volume: 62, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agent

2003
Evidence based medicine, guidelines and common sense.
    Age and ageing, 2004, Volume: 33, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Evidence-Based Medicine; H

2004
Efficacy and safety of hypoglycemic drugs in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Pharmacotherapy, 2005, Volume: 25, Issue:6

    Topics: Adolescent; Body Mass Index; Child; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Gastrointestinal

2005
Metformin and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2006, Volume: 52

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin

2006
Toxicology case of the month: oral hypoglycaemic overdose.
    Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2006, Volume: 23, Issue:7

    Topics: Adolescent; Drug Overdose; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Glipizide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hyp

2006
Severe hypoglycemia in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin monotherapy.
    The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 2007, Volume: 55

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged

2007
[New data on hypoglycemia risk and beta cell function].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2007, Nov-01, Volume: 149, Issue:44

    Topics: C-Peptide; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Gluc

2007
Exenatide: new drug. Type 2 diabetes for some overweight patients.
    Prescrire international, 2007, Volume: 16, Issue:92

    Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptid

2007
Combined therapy with insulin plus oral agents: is there any advantage? An argument in favor.
    Diabetes care, 2008, Volume: 31 Suppl 2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hy

2008
The nuts and bolts of achieving end points with real-time continuous glucose monitoring.
    Diabetes care, 2008, Volume: 31 Suppl 2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Capillaries; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Eating; Glycemic Index; Humans; Hypoglycemia;

2008
Hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a combination of metformin and sulphonylurea therapy in France.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2008, Volume: 10 Suppl 1

    Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; Glipi

2008
Hypoglycaemic symptoms, treatment satisfaction, adherence and their associations with glycaemic goal in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from the Real-Life Effectiveness and Care Patterns of Diabetes Management (RECAP-DM) Study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2008, Volume: 10 Suppl 1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe

2008
Gestational diabetes--setting limits, exploring treatments.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2008, May-08, Volume: 358, Issue:19

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Me

2008
Metformin and glibenclamide: comparative risks.
    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.), 1984, Aug-04, Volume: 289, Issue:6440

    Topics: Acidosis; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Lactates; Metformin; Ris

1984
More on metformin.
    The American journal of nursing, 1996, Volume: 96, Issue:6

    Topics: Drug Interactions; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Sulfonylurea Compounds

1996
Management of type 2 diabetes: long-awaited evidence of benefits after blood sugar control.
    Prescrire international, 1999, Volume: 8, Issue:43

    Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Ag

1999
Hypoglycaemia induced by disopyramide in a patient with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2001, Volume: 18, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disopyramide; Drug The

2001
Severe hypoglycemia in an elderly patient treated with metformin.
    International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2002, Volume: 40, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin

2002
Comparative effects of metformin and indanorex in the treatment of reactive hypoglycemia.
    International journal of clinical pharmacology and biopharmacy, 1979, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified; Female; Glucagon; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Hydroco

1979
Metformin and the sulphonylureas: the comparative risk.
    Hormone and metabolic research. Supplement series, 1985, Volume: 15

    Topics: Acidosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Interactions; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Metformin;

1985
[Exogenous steroid diabetes in a leukemic boy. Study of insulin and GH blood levels].
    Archives francaises de pediatrie, 1973, Volume: 30, Issue:10

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified; Glucose Tolerance Test;

1973
Clinical observations on the mechanism of the antidiuretic action of chlorpropamide in vasopressin-sensitive diabetes insipidus and in normal subjects.
    Hormones, 1972, Volume: 3, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Blood Glucose; Child; Child, Preschool; Chlorpropamide; Diabetes Insipidus; Drug

1972
[Animal experimental studies on the mode of action of biguanides. 1. Studies with hypoglycemia-inducing doses of biguanide].
    Arzneimittel-Forschung, 1972, Volume: 22, Issue:7

    Topics: Animals; Biguanides; Blood Glucose; Carbon Isotopes; Diaphragm; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fa

1972
[Extragonadal endocrine manifestations of Klinefelter's disease].
    Actualites endocrinologiques, 1973, Volume: 13, Issue:0

    Topics: Adrenal Gland Diseases; Adult; Antibodies; Autoantibodies; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Diazoxi

1973
[Experimental demonstration of the simulating action of biguanides (phenformin, metformin) on insulin secretion].
    Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des seances de l'Academie des sciences. Serie D: Sciences naturelles, 1971, Jan-11, Volume: 272, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Autoanalysis; Blood Glucose; Dogs; Hypoglycemia; In Vitro Techniques; Insulin; Insulin Secr

1971
Adverse reactions to oral antidiabetic agents.
    British medical journal, 1971, Jul-03, Volume: 3, Issue:5765

    Topics: Acetohexamide; Acidosis; Administration, Oral; Anemia; Chlorpropamide; Drug Antagonism; Drug Synergi

1971