Page last updated: 2024-10-30

metformin and Fractures, Bone

metformin has been researched along with Fractures, Bone in 27 studies

Metformin: A biguanide hypoglycemic agent used in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus not responding to dietary modification. Metformin improves glycemic control by improving insulin sensitivity and decreasing intestinal absorption of glucose. (From Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 30th ed, p289)
metformin : A member of the class of guanidines that is biguanide the carrying two methyl substituents at position 1.

Fractures, Bone: Breaks in bones.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Addition of rosiglitazone to glucose-lowering therapy in people with type 2 diabetes is confirmed to increase the risk of heart failure and of some fractures, mainly in women."5.14Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. ( Beck-Nielsen, H; Curtis, PS; Gomis, R; Hanefeld, M; Home, PD; Jones, NP; Komajda, M; McMurray, JJ; Pocock, SJ, 2009)
"To assess the effect of empagliflozin on bone fractures and bone mineral density in patients with type 2 diabetes in pooled placebo-controlled trial data and a head-to-head study versus glimepiride."4.98Analysis of Fractures in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Empagliflozin in Pooled Data From Placebo-Controlled Trials and a Head-to-Head Study Versus Glimepiride. ( Kaspers, S; Kohler, S; Salsali, A; Woerle, HJ; Zeller, C, 2018)
" Recent epidemiologic studies have shown that the fracture rate was decreased in patients treated with metformin, one of the anti-hyperglycemic agents by improving insulin resistance."4.85[Usefulness of metformin in diabetes-related bone disease]. ( Kanazawa, I, 2009)
"Older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of bone fracture independent of their bone mineral density (BMD), which is explained mainly by the deteriorated bone quality in T2DM compared to that in non-diabetic adults."2.94The effect of luseogliflozin on bone microarchitecture in older patients with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial using second-generation, high-resolution, peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). ( Abiru, N; Chiba, K; Haraguchi, A; Horie, I; Ito, A; Kawakami, A; Kawazoe, Y; Miyamoto, J; Morimoto, S; Osaki, M; Sato, S; Shigeno, R; Tashiro, S; Yamamoto, H, 2020)
"Metformin use was associated with decreased fracture risk (HR = 0."2.90Glycemic Control and Insulin Treatment Alter Fracture Risk in Older Men With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. ( Adler, RA; Colón-Emeric, C; LaFleur, J; Lee, RH; Lyles, KW; Pieper, C; Sloane, R; Van Houtven, C, 2019)
"More patients reported bone fractures in the rosiglitazone group (238, 10."2.80Cancer and bone fractures in observational follow-up of the RECORD study. ( Curtis, PS; Home, PD; Jones, NP, 2015)
"Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of fragility fractures despite increased body weight and normal or higher bone mineral density."2.52The impact of diabetes and diabetes medications on bone health. ( Gilbert, MP; Pratley, RE, 2015)
"Clinicians and patients with type 2 diabetes enjoy an expanding list of medications to improve glycemic control."2.50Systematic reviews to ascertain the safety of diabetes medications. ( Brito, JP; Gionfriddo, MR; Leppin, AL; Montori, VM; Morey-Vargas, OL; Murad, MH, 2014)
"Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a greater risk of bone fracture compared with those with normal glucose tolerance (NGT)."1.91Increased Advanced Glycation Endproducts, Stiffness, and Hardness in Iliac Crest Bone From Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Insulin. ( Donnelly, E; Lekkala, S; Moseley, KF; Sacher, SE; Taylor, EA; Williams, RM, 2023)
"Treatment with metformin (HR: 0."1.72Unmasking Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: The Association of Longitudinal Glycemic Hemoglobin Level and Medications. ( Bockman, RS; Glicksberg, BS; Nadkarni, GN; Poundarik, AA; Vashishth, D; Wang, B; Wang, Z; Zaki, MJ, 2022)
"Pioglitazone was associated with reduced all cause mortality compared with metformin."1.35Risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed oral antidiabetes drugs: retrospective cohort study using UK general practice research database. ( Curcin, V; Elliott, P; Hughes, RI; Khunti, K; Little, MP; Majeed, A; Millett, CJ; Molokhia, M; Ng, A; Tzoulaki, I; Wilkins, MR, 2009)

Research

Studies (27)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's6 (22.22)29.6817
2010's14 (51.85)24.3611
2020's7 (25.93)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Wang, B1
Wang, Z1
Poundarik, AA1
Zaki, MJ1
Bockman, RS1
Glicksberg, BS1
Nadkarni, GN1
Vashishth, D1
Lekkala, S2
Sacher, SE2
Taylor, EA2
Williams, RM2
Moseley, KF2
Donnelly, E2
Wang, Y1
Yu, L1
Ye, Z1
Lin, R1
Sun, AR1
Liu, L1
Wei, J2
Deng, F1
Zhong, X1
Cui, L1
Li, L1
Liu, Y2
Guo, Y1
Liu, C1
Li, X1
Yan, W1
van Hulten, V1
Driessen, JHM1
Starup-Linde, JK1
Al-Mashhadi, ZK1
Viggers, R1
Klungel, OH1
Souverein, PC1
Vestergaard, P1
Stehouwer, CDA1
van den Bergh, JP1
Zhang, Z1
Cao, Y1
Tao, Y1
E, M1
Tang, J1
Li, F1
Haraguchi, A1
Shigeno, R1
Horie, I1
Morimoto, S1
Ito, A1
Chiba, K1
Kawazoe, Y1
Tashiro, S1
Miyamoto, J1
Sato, S1
Yamamoto, H1
Osaki, M1
Kawakami, A1
Abiru, N1
Lecka-Czernik, B2
Fixen, CW1
Fixen, DR1
Kohler, S1
Kaspers, S1
Salsali, A1
Zeller, C1
Woerle, HJ1
Bahrambeigi, S1
Yousefi, B1
Rahimi, M1
Shafiei-Irannejad, V1
Lee, RH1
Sloane, R1
Pieper, C1
Lyles, KW1
Adler, RA1
Van Houtven, C1
LaFleur, J1
Colón-Emeric, C1
Schlechte, JA1
Lapane, KL1
Yang, S1
Brown, MJ1
Jawahar, R1
Pagliasotti, C1
Rajpathak, S1
Gionfriddo, MR1
Morey-Vargas, OL1
Brito, JP1
Leppin, AL1
Murad, MH1
Montori, VM1
Jones, NP2
Curtis, PS2
Home, PD2
Gilbert, MP1
Pratley, RE1
Meier, C1
Schwartz, AV1
Egger, A1
Josse, RG1
Majumdar, SR1
Zheng, Y1
Adler, A2
Bethel, MA1
Buse, JB1
Green, JB1
Kaufman, KD1
Rodbard, HW1
Tankova, T1
Westerhout, CM1
Peterson, ED1
Holman, RR2
Armstrong, PW1
Solomon, DH1
Cadarette, SM1
Choudhry, NK1
Canning, C1
Levin, R1
Stürmer, T1
Pocock, SJ1
Beck-Nielsen, H1
Gomis, R1
Hanefeld, M1
Komajda, M1
McMurray, JJ1
Bloomgarden, ZT1
Kanazawa, I1
Tzoulaki, I1
Molokhia, M1
Curcin, V1
Little, MP1
Millett, CJ1
Ng, A1
Hughes, RI1
Khunti, K1
Wilkins, MR1
Majeed, A1
Elliott, P1
Petrie, JR1
Vella, S1
Montagnani, A1
Gonnelli, S1
Kahn, SE1
Zinman, B1
Lachin, JM1
Haffner, SM1
Herman, WH1
Kravitz, BG1
Yu, D1
Heise, MA1
Aftring, RP1
Viberti, G1

Clinical Trials (6)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
The Effect of Simvastatin on Bone Density in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes: a Double-blind, Randomized Active-comparator (Ezetimibe) Controlled Clinical Trial[NCT05613400]Phase 4240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-13Enrolling by invitation
A Long Term, Open Label, Randomised Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, Comparing the Combination of Rosiglitazone and Either Metformin or Sulfonylurea With Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea on Cardiovascular Endpoints and Glycaemia[NCT00379769]Phase 34,447 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Metformin Glycinate Compared to Metformin Hydrochloride on the Progression of Type 2 Diabetes[NCT04943692]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-31Suspended (stopped due to Administrative decision of the investigation direction)
Safety and Efficacy of Metformin Glycinate vs Metformin Hydrochloride on Metabolic Control and Inflammatory Mediators in Type 2 Diabetes Patients[NCT01386671]Phase 3203 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Durability of Glucose Lowering and Preservation of Pancreatic Beta-Cell Function of Rosiglitazone Monotherapy Compared to Metformin or Glyburide/Glibenclamide in Patients With Drug-Naive, Recently Diagnosed [NCT00279045]Phase 34,426 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-03Completed
The Comparison of Effect Between Salsalate and Placebo in Osteoarthritis With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Investigator Initiated Randomized Placebo-controlled Double-blind, Pilot Study[NCT03222206]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-08Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Independent Re-adjudication (IR) Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions

IR was based on original RECORD endpoint definitions. CV death= no unequivocal non-CV cause (sudden death, death from acute vascular events, heart failure, acute MI, other CV causes, and deaths adjudicated as unknown cause). MI event=hospitalization + elevation of specific cardiac biomarkers above the upper limit of normal + cardiac ischemia symptoms/new pathological electrocardiogram findings. Stroke event=hospitalization + rapidly developed clinical signs of focal/global disturbance of cerebral function for more than 24 hours, with no apparent cause other than a vascular origin. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined RSG181
Combined MET/SU188

Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants (Par.) With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions

Par. with a stroke (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the original RECORD endpoint definitions was recorded. A stroke event=hospitalization plus rapidly developed clinical signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function lasting more than 24 hours (unless interrupted by thrombolysis, surgery, or death), with no apparent cause other than a vascular origin, including par. presenting clinical signs/symptoms suggestive of subarachnoid haemorrhage/intracerebral haemorrhage/cerebral ischemic necrosis or cause of death adjudicated as stroke. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined RSG50
Combined MET/SU63

Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause

All deaths identified during the original record study and discovered after the re-adjudication efforts began were included. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined RSG139
Combined MET/SU160

Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions

The number of participants with a CV (or unknown) death as determined by independent re-adjudication using the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions was recorded. CV death included death resulting from an acute myocardial infarction (MI), sudden cardiac death, death due to heart failure, death due to stroke, and death due to other CV causes. Deaths of unknown cause were counted as CV deaths. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined RSG88
Combined MET/SU96

Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a CV (or Unknown) Death, Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions

"The number of participants with a CV death (or unknown) as determined by independent re-adjudication using the original RECORD endpoint definitions was recorded. CV death was defined as any death for which an unequivocal non-CV cause could not be established. CV death included death following heart failure, death following acute myocardial infarction (MI), sudden death, death due to acute vascular events, and other CV causes. Deaths due to unknown causes were classified as unknown deaths, but were counted as CV deaths for the analysis of this endpoint." (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined RSG88
Combined MET/SU96

Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With a First Occurrence of a Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) Defined as CV (or Unknown) Death, Non-fatal MI, and Non-fatal Stroke Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions

Independent re-adjudication was based on the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions. CV death included death resulting from an acute MI; sudden cardiac death and death due to heart failure, stroke, and to other CV causes. Deaths of unknown cause were counted as CV deaths. MI was defined as evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia. Stroke was defined as an acute episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal or global brain, spinal cord, or retinal vascular injury. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined RSG186
Combined MET/SU191

Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions

The number of participants with an MI (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions was recorded. An event of MI was defined as evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined RSG72
Combined MET/SU62

Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Original RECORD Endpoint Definitions

The number of participants with an MI (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the original RECORD endpoint definitions was recorded. An event of MI was defined as hospitalization plus elevation of cardiac biomarkers troponin (TN) I and/or TNT above the upper limit of normal (ULN) or creatinine kinase (CK) MB (M=muscle type; B=brain type) isoenzyme >= 2x the ULN or CK > 2x the ULN plus typical symptoms of cardiac ischemia or new pathological electrocardiogram findings, or cause of death adjudicated as MI. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined RSG68
Combined MET/SU60

Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Stroke (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions

The number of participants with a stroke (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions was recorded. An event of stroke was defined as an acute episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal or global brain, spinal cord, or retinal vascular injury. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined RSG53
Combined MET/SU64

Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase at Month 60

Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in alanine aminotransferase was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase

InterventionU/L (Units/Liter) (Mean)
RSG in Addition to Background MET-37.43
SU in Addition to Background MET-21.73
RSG in Addition to Background SU-30.17
MET in Addition to Background SU-24.00

Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Month 60

Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in body weight was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase

Interventionkilograms (Mean)
RSG in Addition to Background MET3.93
SU in Addition to Background MET-0.54
RSG in Addition to Background SU4.72
MET in Addition to Background SU-2.16

Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Month 60

Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period

Interventionmmol/L (millimoles/Liter) (Mean)
RSG in Addition to Background MET-1.38
SU in Addition to Background MET-0.29
RSG in Addition to Background SU-2.00
MET in Addition to Background SU-0.94

Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Month 60

Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 60 of randomised dual therapy treatment period

InterventionPercent (Mean)
RSG in Addition to Background MET-0.14
SU in Addition to Background MET0.17
RSG in Addition to Background SU-0.24
MET in Addition to Background SU-0.10

Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Month 60

Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in waist circumference was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase

Interventioncm (centimeters) (Mean)
RSG in Addition to Background MET2.70
SU in Addition to Background MET0.65
RSG in Addition to Background SU3.00
MET in Addition to Background SU-0.60

Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Month 60

The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in Apo-B was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]). (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period

Interventionpercent change (Geometric Mean)
RSG in Addition to Background MET-13.77
SU in Addition to Background MET-11.63
RSG in Addition to Background SU-9.68
MET in Addition to Background SU-12.09

Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for C-Reactive Protein at Month 60

The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in C-Reactive Protein was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]). (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase

Interventionpercent change (Geometric Mean)
RSG in Addition to Background MET-57.40
SU in Addition to Background MET-28.92
RSG in Addition to Background SU-56.50
MET in Addition to Background SU-36.29

Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Fibrinogen at Month 60

The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in fibrinogen was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]). (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase

Interventionpercent change (Geometric Mean)
RSG in Addition to Background MET2.12
SU in Addition to Background MET5.74
RSG in Addition to Background SU-0.23
MET in Addition to Background SU3.14

Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) Antigen at Month 60

The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) antigen was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]). (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase

Interventionpercent change (Geometric Mean)
RSG in Addition to Background MET-9.85
SU in Addition to Background MET15.01
RSG in Addition to Background SU-7.79
MET in Addition to Background SU-0.64

Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Urinary Albumin Creatinine Ratio at Month 60

The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in urinary albumin creatinine ratio was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]). (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase

Interventionpercent change (Geometric Mean)
RSG in Addition to Background MET8.31
SU in Addition to Background MET15.17
RSG in Addition to Background SU-3.43
MET in Addition to Background SU11.91

Number of Participants With an Event of Death Due to a Bone Fracture-related Event: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up0
Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up0

Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Death/Cardiovascular Hospitalisation Events

The number of participants with cardiovascular death events (death due to cardiovascular causes or deaths with insufficient information to rule out a cardiovascular cause) and cardiovascular hospitalisation events (hospitalisation for a cardiovascular event, excluding planned admissions not associated with a worsening of the disease/condition of the participant) was recorded. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined RSG321
Combined MET/SU323

Number of Participants With First Cardiovascular Hospitalisations/Cardiovascular Deaths by Stratum

Participants with first cardiovascular death (death due to cardiovascular causes or deaths with insufficient information to rule out a cardiovascular cause) and cardiovascular hospitalisation (hospitalisation for a cardiovascular event, excluding planned admissions not associated with a worsening of the disease/condition of the participant) were recorded by study stratum. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionpartcipants (Number)
RSG in Addition to Background MET158
SU in Addition to Background MET154
RSG in Addition to Background SU163
MET in Addition to Background SU169

Number of Participants With Glycaemic Failure Events

Failure of glycaemic control was defined as two consecutive HbA1c values of ≥8.5 percent, or HbA1c ≥8.5percent at a single visit, after which the subject was either moved to the post-randomised treatment phase or triple therapy was started. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through to end of randomised dual therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RSG in Addition to Background MET281
SU in Addition to Background MET451
RSG in Addition to Background SU365
MET in Addition to Background SU424

The Number of Participants Starting Insulin at Any Time During the Study

The number of participants starting insulin at any time during the study was recorded. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RSG in Addition to Background MET126
SU in Addition to Background MET276
RSG in Addition to Background SU168
MET in Addition to Background SU259

Model Adjusted Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Month 60

Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within treatment groups) change from baseline in SBP and DBP was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase

,,,
InterventionmmHg (millimeters of mercury) (Mean)
SBPDBP
MET in Addition to Background SU-0.6-2.3
RSG in Addition to Background MET-1.9-3.6
RSG in Addition to Background SU-2.3-3.6
SU in Addition to Background MET-2.2-3.4

Model Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Insulin and Pro-insulin at Month 60

Model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline values between within stratum treatment groups) change from baseline in insulin and pro-insulin was calculated as the value at Month 60 minus the Baseline value. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period

,,,
Interventionpicamoles/liter (pmol/L) (Mean)
Insulin, Adjusted Change from BaselinePro-insulin, Adjusted Change from Baseline
MET in Addition to Background SU-12.1-3.0
RSG in Addition to Background MET-18.6-2.4
RSG in Addition to Background SU-16.9-3.2
SU in Addition to Background MET3.74.2

Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Total Cholesterol (TC), Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, Triglycerides, and Free Fatty Acids (FFAs) at Month 60

The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in TC, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and FFAs was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]). (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Geometric Mean)
Total cholesterolHDL-cholesterolLDL-cholesterolTriglyceridesFree fatty acids
MET in Addition to Background SU-9.686.14-17.80-2.504.47
RSG in Addition to Background MET-5.499.95-12.70-7.97-16.46
RSG in Addition to Background SU-2.917.73-8.99-2.68-11.58
SU in Addition to Background MET-9.092.57-17.68-1.952.79

Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) for Total Cholesterol (TC):High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol and Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol:HDL Cholesterol Ratios at Month 60

The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in TC:HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol:HDL cholesterol was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]). (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Geometric Mean)
Total Cholesterol: HDL Cholesterol RatioLDL Cholesterol: HDL-Cholesterol Ratio
MET in Addition to Background SU-15.01-22.53
RSG in Addition to Background MET-14.20-20.89
RSG in Addition to Background SU-9.93-15.85
SU in Addition to Background MET-11.33-20.04

Model Adjusted Ratio to Baseline (Expressed as a Percentage) Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) Beta Cell Function and Insulin Sensitivity at Month 60

The model adjusted (adjusted for any imbalances in the baseline [BL] values between within stratum treatment groups) ratio to BL in HOMA beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity was calculated as the ratio of the Month 60 value to the BL value and was expressed as percent change from BL. For each treatment group, the model-adjusted mean change from BL at Month 60 was determined on the log scale. This mean was then back transformed to give a geometric mean (GM) of the ratio of the Month 60 value to BL on the original scale. The GM was expressed as a percentage (100*[GM^-1]). (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment phase

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Geometric Mean)
Beta cell functionInsulin sensitivity
MET in Addition to Background SU12.4323.90
RSG in Addition to Background MET20.5442.57
RSG in Addition to Background SU32.3542.07
SU in Addition to Background MET19.28-3.45

Number of Bone Fracture Events With the Indicated Outcome: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined

"The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. The indicated fracture outcome was pre-specified in the CRF and included Unknown as a category. Fracture events with missing outcome data were reported as Data unavailable." (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)

,
Interventionbone fracture events (Number)
Number of bone fracture eventsUnknownNormal healing with standard managementComplicationAdditional therapeutic measures requiredData unavailable
Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up17451421395
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up2997250141612

Number of Bone Fracture Events With the Indicated Outcome: Observational Follow-up

"The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. The indicated fracture outcome was pre-specified in the CRF and included Unknown as a category. Fracture events with missing outcome data were reported as Data unavailable." (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)

,
Interventionbone fracture events (Number)
Number of bone fracture eventsUnknownNormal healing with standard managementComplicationAdditional therapeutic measures requiredData unavailable
Combined MET/SU: Observational Follow-up41133421
Combined RSG: Observational Follow-up70151738

Number of HbA1c and Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Responders at Month 60

Number of responders, i.e., participants meeting glycaemic targets (HbA1c less than or equal to 7 percent, FPG less than or equal to 7 mmol/L) (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline to Month 60 of the randomised dual therapy treatment period

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
HbA1c RespondersFPG Responders
MET in Addition to Background SU180154
RSG in Addition to Background MET265300
RSG in Addition to Background SU235257
SU in Addition to Background MET208180

Number of Participants Who Died Due to the Indicated Cancer-related Event: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any cancer-related deathAny gastrointestinal eventPancreaticColon/rectalGastricLiverGall bladder/biliaryGastrointestinal event; not specifiedAny genitourinary eventRenalUterineProstateBladderOvarianLungAny hematologic eventSkin (melanoma)Skin (non-melanomatous)MetastasesBreastHead and neckAny neurologic eventEndocrineNot specified
Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up723412113431153523211000432201
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up592546744062111113431221210

Number of Participants Who Died Due to the Indicated Cancer-related Event: Observational Follow-up

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any cancer-related deathAny gastrointestinal eventPancreaticColon/rectalGastricLiverGall bladder/biliaryGastrointestinal event; not specifiedAny genitourinary eventRenalUterineProstateBladderOvarianLungAny hematologic eventSkin (melanoma)Skin (non-melanomatous)MetastasesBreastHead and neckAny neurologic eventEndocrineNot specified
Combined MET/SU: Observational Follow-up24143612110000005000130100
Combined RSG: Observational Follow-up25103222102110004411111100

Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event - Overall and by Gender: Main Study and Observational Follow-up Combined

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Overall, n=2220, 2227Male, n=1142, 1152Female, n=1078, 1075
Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up1516091
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up23882156

Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event - Overall and by Gender: Observational Follow-up

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Overall, n=1280, 1250Male, n=665, 635Female, n=615, 615
Combined MET/SU: Observational Follow-up371126
Combined RSG: Observational Follow-up642539

Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event Reported as the Indicated Serious Adverse Event (by Higher Level Group Term) or Death: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined

The OFU was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the OFU. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any eventUpper limbDistal lower limbFemur/hipSpinalPelvicOther
Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up57171611934
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up81412415707

Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture Event Reported as the Indicated Serious Adverse Event (by Higher Level Group Term) or Death: Observational Follow-up

The OFU was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the OFU. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any eventUpper limbDistal lower limbFemur/hipSpinalPelvicOther
Combined MET/SU: Observational Follow-up21584311
Combined RSG: Observational Follow-up351796202

Number of Participants With Addition of Third Oral Agent/Switch to Insulin

The number of participants with addition of a third oral agent or switch to insulin from randomised dual combination treatment were recorded. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with an eventFirst Event - Triple TherapyFirst Event - Insulin
MET in Addition to Background SU1716165
RSG in Addition to Background MET29525738
RSG in Addition to Background SU34429649
SU in Addition to Background MET1837176

Number of Participants With Bone Fracture Events of the Indicated Cause: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any eventNon-traumatic eventTraumatic eventPathologicUnknownData unavailable
Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up15155774193
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up2381131101209

Number of Participants With Bone Fracture Events of the Indicated Cause: Observational Follow-up

"The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. The indicated fracture outcome was pre-specified in the CRF and included Unknown as a category. Fracture events with missing outcome data were reported as Data unavailable." (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any eventNon-traumatic event,Traumatic eventPathologicUnknownData unavailable
Combined MET/SU: Observational Follow-up371417241
Combined RSG: Observational Follow-up643624113

Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Events and All-cause Deaths

Composites of participants with first cardiovascular (CV) hospitalisations and CV death or all-cause death and individual first events of acute myocardial infarction (MI) , stroke, congestive heart failure (CHF), CV death, and all-cause death. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CV death, acute MI, strokeCV death, acute MI, stroke, unstable anginaCV death, acute MI, stroke, unstable angina, CHFAll-cause death,acuteMI,stroke,unstable angina,CHFAcute MI (fatal or non-fatal)Stroke (fatal or non-fatal)CHF (fatal or non-fatal)Death from CV causesDeath (all cause) during CV follow-upDeath (all-cause) including survival status
Combined MET/SU16518420626856632971139157
Combined RSG15417120425164466160111136

Number of Participants With CV/Microvascular Events

The number of participants with first cardiovascular or microvascular events (renal, foot, eye) were recorded. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with a CV/Microvascular eventParticipants with any microvascular eventParticipants with any eye eventParticipants with any foot eventParticipants with any renal event
Combined MET/SU3857852280
Combined RSG3635942190

Number of Participants With Potentially High Morbidity Fracture Events and Non-high Morbidity Fracture Events, in Participants With Prior Hand/Upper Arm/Foot Fractures (H/UA/FF): Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. The following bone fractures were grouped and were identified as potentially high morbidity bone fractures: hip, pelvis, upper leg, vertebral (lumbar spine, thoracic spine, cervical spine, spine - site unknown). (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any H/UA/FF event, overall, n=2220, 2227Any H/UA/FF event, male, n=1142, 1152Any H/UA/FF event, female, n=1078, 1075High morbidity fractures, overall, n=2220, 2227High morbidity fractures, male, n=1142, 1152High morbidity fractures, female, n=1078, 1075Non-high morbidity fractures, overall, n=2220, 222Non-high morbidity fractures, male, n=1142, 1152Non-high morbidity fractures, female, n=1078, 1075
Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up461531101431
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up86285850515213

Number of Participants With Potentially High Morbidity Fractures: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date and that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. The following bone fractures were grouped and were identified as potentially high morbidity bone fractures: hip, pelvis, upper leg, vertebral (lumbar spine, thoracic spine, cervical spine, spine - site unknown). (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any event, overall, n=2220, 2227Any event, male, n=1142, 1152Any event, female, n=1078, 1075Hip, overall, n=2220, 2227Hip, male, n=1142, 1152Hip, female, n=1078, 1075Pelvis, overall, n=2220, 2227Pelvis, male, n=1142, 1152Pelvis, female, n=1078, 1075Upper leg, overall, n=2220, 2227Upper leg, male, n=1142, 1152Upper leg, female, n=1078, 1075Any vertebral event, overall, n=2220, 2227Any vertebral event, male, n=1142, 1152Any vertebral event, female, n=1078, 1075Lumbar spine, overall, n=2220, 2227Lumbar spine, male, n=1142, 1152Lumbar spine, female, n=1078, 1075Thoracic spine, overall, n=2220, 2227Thoracic spine, male, n=1142, 1152Thoracic spine, female, n=1078, 1075Cervical spine, overall, n=2220, 2227Cervical spine, male, n=1142, 1152Cervical spine, female, n=1078, 1075
Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up3113187165416061385431844110
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up311021909000743166101055514101

Number of Participants With the Indicated Bone Fracture by Fracture Site: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any event, overall; n=2220, 2227Any event, male; n=1142, 1152Any event, female; n=1078, 1075Upper limb, any event, overall; n=2220, 2227Upper limb, any event, male; n=1142, 1152Upper limb, any event, female; n=1078, 1075Distal lower limb, any event, overall; n=2220, 222Distal lower limb, any event, male; n=1142, 1152Distal lower limb, any event, female; n=1078, 1075Femur/hip, any event, overall; n=2220, 2227Femur/hip, any event, male; n=1142, 1152Femur/hip, any event, female; n=1078, 1075Spinal, any event, overall; n=2220, 2227Spinal, any event, male; n=1142, 1152Spinal, any event, female; n=1078, 1075Pelvic, any event, overall; n=2220, 2227Pelvic, any event, male; n=1142, 1152Pelvic, any event, female; n=1078, 1075Unclassified, any event, overall; n=2220, 2227Unclassified, any event, male; n=1142, 1152Unclassified, any event, female; n=1078, 1075Other, any event, overall; n=2220, 2227Other, any event, male; n=1142, 1152Other, any event, female; n=1078, 1075
Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up1516091702248401426131121495541000261610
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up2388215611632848831571641218711000110311813

Number of Participants With the Indicated Bone Fracture by Fracture Site: Observational Follow-up

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. A bone fracture event is defined as one or more fractured bones occurring on the same date that had the same Higher Level Group Term (HLGT) for fracture location, per participant. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any event, overall; n=1280, 1250Any event, male; n=665, 635Any event, female; n=615, 615Upper limb, any event, overall; n=1280, 1250Upper limb, any event, male; n=665, 635Upper limb, any event, female; n=615, 615Distal lower limb, any event, overall; n=1280,1250Distal lower limb, any event, male; n=665, 635Distal lower limb, any event, female; n=615, 615Femur/hip, any event, overall; n=1280, 1250Femur/hip, any event, male; n=665, 635Femur/hip, any event, female; n=615, 615Spinal, any event, overall; n=1280, 1250Spinal, any event, male; n=665, 635Spinal, any event, female; n=615, 615Pelvic, any event, overall; n=1280, 1250Pelvic, any event, male; n=665, 635Pelvic, any event, female; n=615, 615Unclassified, any event, overall; n=1280, 1250Unclassified, any event, male; n=665, 635Unclassified, any event, female; n=615, 615Other, any event, overall; n=1280, 1250Other, any event, male; n=665, 635Other, any event, female; n=615, 615
Combined MET/SU: Observational Follow-up371126153121349505541110000110
Combined RSG: Observational Follow-up6425393310231899615413000110642

Number of Participants With the Indicated Serious Adverse Event: Observational Follow-up

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any eventAnkle fractureProstate cancerLung neoplasm malignantBreast cancerBasal cell carcinomaPancreatic carcinomaColon cancerHumerus fractureUpper limb fractureMalignant melanomaUterine cancerGastric cancerWrist fractureHip fractureRadius fractureForearm fractureHepatic neoplasm malignantRectal cancerRenal cancerFoot fractureRenal cell carcinomaFemur fractureFemoral neck fractureLumbar vertebral fractureMetastases to boneMetastases to liverBladder cancerFallMetastases to central nervous systemRib fractureSquamous cell carcinomaAcute myocardial infarctionBrain neoplasmGastric neoplasmMetastases to lungPatella fractureDeathAbdominal painAcute myeloid leukaemiaAcute respiratory failureAnaemiaBenign salivary gland neoplasmBiliary colicBiliary neoplasmBone neoplasm malignantBronchial carcinomaCardiac failure acuteChest painChronic lymphocytic leukaemiaColon neoplasmContusionDrowningDysplasiaEndometrial cancer stage ILeukaemiaLower limb fractureLung squamous cell carcinoma stage unspecifiedLymphomaMalignant neoplasm of pleuraMetastases to skinMetastases to testicleMetastatic renal cell carcinomaOesophageal carcinomaOsteoarthritisPancreatic necrosisRectal cancer stage IISpinal fractureT-cell lymphomaUrinary tract infectionUterine leiomyosarcomaBiliary cancer metastaticCervix carcinomaChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseComminuted fractureCraniocerebral injuryGastrointestinal neoplasmHepatic lesionJoint dislocationLaryngeal cancerLip neoplasm malignant stage unspecifiedLung neoplasmMetastases to lymph nodesMetastasisMusculoskeletal chest painMyocardial infarctionNon-Hodgkin's lymphomaPubis fracturePulmonary embolismRectal cancer recurrentRectal neoplasmSkin cancerSkin ulcerSmall cell lung cancer stage unspecifiedSternal fractureSubdural haemorrhageSudden deathThoracic vertebral fractureThyroid cancerVulval cancer
Combined MET/SU: Observational Follow-up76314633611230011222230122220000011111200000000000000000000000000000111011111111111111111111111111111
Combined RSG: Observational Follow-up99674244155324433222213211112222211111011111111111111111111111111111111100000000000000000000000000000

Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Malignant Neoplasms/Cancer Events Reported as an SAE or Death by Location (Including Location of Special Interest): Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined

The observational follow-up (OFU) was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the OFU. The neoplasms/cancer events of bladder, breast, colon, liver, pancreatic, prostate cancer, and melanoma were pre-specified as cancers of interest for the OFU. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any genitourinaryProstateRenalUterineBladderVaginal/vulvarOvarianAny gastrointestinalColon/rectal cancerColonGastricPancreaticLiverGall bladder/biliaryGastrointestinal; not specifiedAny hematologicLungSkin (non-melanomatous)Skin (melanomatous)MetastasesBreastHead and neckNeurologicEndocrineNot specifiedOther
Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up5722916514623021516551615134182373613
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up572212118154822141354401219196121243300

Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Malignant Neoplasms/Cancer Events Reported as an SAE or Death by Location (Including Location of Special Interest): Observational Follow-up

The observational follow-up (OFU) was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the OFU. The neoplasms/cancer events of bladder, breast, colon, liver, pancreatic, prostate cancer, and melanoma were pre-specified as cancers of interest for the OFU. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any genitourinaryProstateRenalUterineBladderVaginal/vulvarOvarianAny gastrointestinalColon/rectal cancerColonGastricPancreaticLiverGall bladder/biliaryGastrointestinal; not specifiedAny hematologicLungSkin (non-melanomatous)Skin (melanomatous)MetastasesBreastHead and neckNeurologicEndocrineNot specifiedOther
Combined MET/SU: Observational Follow-up8124010191171321116526711100
Combined RSG: Observational Follow-up1875420017525421066633221000

Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Neoplasm/Cancer Event Reported as a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or Death: Main Study + Observational Follow-up Combined

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the beginning of the main study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 11.4 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
All neoplasms/cancer (N/C) (benign/malignant)Malignant (Mal.) N/CMal. N/C; excluding non-melanomatous skin cancers
Combined MET/SU: Main Study and Observational Follow-up215195186
Combined RSG: Main Study and Observational Follow-up196179164

Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Neoplasm/Cancer Event Reported as a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) or Death: Observational Follow-up

The observational follow-up was designed to collect data concerning cancer and bone fractures in RECORD participants during a 4-year period after the end of the main RECORD study. At the end of the main study, all study medication was stopped. Participants were not provided with study medication in the observational follow-up; instead, anti-diabetic treatment was prescribed at the investigator's discretion. An SAE is defined as any event that is fatal; life threatening; disabling/incapacitating; results in hospitalization (excluding elective surgery or routine clinical procedures); prolongs a hospital stay; is associated with a congenital abnormality; cancer; is associated with an overdose. In addition, any event that the investigator regards as serious or that would suggest any significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution that may be associated with the study procedures should be reported as an SAE. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: From the end of the RECORD study through the end of the observational follow-up (up to 4.0 years)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
All neoplasms/cancer (N/C) (benign/malignant)Malignant (Mal.) N/CMal. N/C; excluding non-melanomatous skin cancers
Combined MET/SU: Observational Follow-up515146
Combined RSG: Observational Follow-up605955

Total Number of Cardiovascular Hospitalisations and Cardiovascular Deaths

The total number of events for individual components of cardiovascular (CV) hospitalisations and cardiovascular deaths were recorded. MI, myocardial infarction. (NCT00379769)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)

,
InterventionNumber of events (Number)
CV deathsDeath due to acute MIDeath due to heart failureSudden deathDeath due to acute vascular eventsOther CV mortalityDeath of presumed CV causeCardiovascular hospitalisationHospitalisation for acute MIHospitalisation for unstable anginaHospitalisation for congestive heart failureHospitalisation for strokeHospitalisation for transient ischaemic attackHospitalisation for invasive CV procedureHospitalisation for amputation of extremitiesOther CV hospitalisations
Combined MET/SU711021210433490572836671011623153
Combined RSG60710816284836628695110996154

Reviews

13 reviews available for metformin and Fractures, Bone

ArticleYear
Association of metformin use with fracture risk in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022, Volume: 13

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Metformin; Risk

2022
Sulfonylurea and fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2020, Volume: 159

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Metformin; Risk Fa

2020
Diabetes, bone and glucose-lowering agents: basic biology.
    Diabetologia, 2017, Volume: 60, Issue:7

    Topics: Animals; Biomarkers; Blood Flow Velocity; Blood Glucose; Bone and Bones; Bone Density; Diabetes Mell

2017
Managing and maintaining bone mineral density in diabetes patients with pharmacotherapy.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:18

    Topics: Bone Density; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Hyp

2017
Analysis of Fractures in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Empagliflozin in Pooled Data From Placebo-Controlled Trials and a Head-to-Head Study Versus Glimepiride.
    Diabetes care, 2018, Volume: 41, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Bone Density; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials,

2018
Metformin; an old antidiabetic drug with new potentials in bone disorders.
    Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie, 2019, Volume: 109

    Topics: AMP-Activated Protein Kinases; Animals; Bone Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fractures, Bone; H

2019
Sulfonylureas and risk of falls and fractures: a systematic review.
    Drugs & aging, 2013, Volume: 30, Issue:7

    Topics: Accidental Falls; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Fractures, Bone; Hu

2013
Systematic reviews to ascertain the safety of diabetes medications.
    Current diabetes reports, 2014, Volume: 14, Issue:4

    Topics: Acidosis, Lactic; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Fractur

2014
The impact of diabetes and diabetes medications on bone health.
    Endocrine reviews, 2015, Volume: 36, Issue:2

    Topics: Bone and Bones; Bone Density; Bone Remodeling; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV In

2015
Effects of diabetes drugs on the skeleton.
    Bone, 2016, Volume: 82

    Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Fractures, Bone; Gluc

2016
[Usefulness of metformin in diabetes-related bone disease].
    Clinical calcium, 2009, Volume: 19, Issue:9

    Topics: Bone Density; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Cell Differentiation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fractures,

2009
What to add in with metformin in type 2 diabetes?
    QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2011, Volume: 104, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Synergism; Fractures, Bone; Gluc

2011
Antidiabetic therapy effects on bone metabolism and fracture risk.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:9

    Topics: Aging; Animals; Bone Density; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Pepti

2013

Trials

6 trials available for metformin and Fractures, Bone

ArticleYear
The effect of luseogliflozin on bone microarchitecture in older patients with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial using second-generation, high-resolution, peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT).
    Trials, 2020, May-05, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Density; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Fractur

2020
Glycemic Control and Insulin Treatment Alter Fracture Risk in Older Men With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2019, Volume: 34, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Density; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fractures,

2019
Cancer and bone fractures in observational follow-up of the RECORD study.
    Acta diabetologica, 2015, Volume: 52, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Stu

2015
Sitagliptin and risk of fractures in type 2 diabetes: Results from the TECOS trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Blood Preservation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neuropathies; Double-Blin

2017
Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes in oral agent combination therapy for type 2 diabetes (RECORD): a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2009, Jun-20, Volume: 373, Issue:9681

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Angina, Unstable; Body Weight; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Diabetes Me

2009
Rosiglitazone-associated fractures in type 2 diabetes: an Analysis from A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial (ADOPT).
    Diabetes care, 2008, Volume: 31, Issue:5

    Topics: Age of Onset; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Female; Fractures, Bone; Glyburi

2008
Rosiglitazone-associated fractures in type 2 diabetes: an Analysis from A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial (ADOPT).
    Diabetes care, 2008, Volume: 31, Issue:5

    Topics: Age of Onset; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Female; Fractures, Bone; Glyburi

2008
Rosiglitazone-associated fractures in type 2 diabetes: an Analysis from A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial (ADOPT).
    Diabetes care, 2008, Volume: 31, Issue:5

    Topics: Age of Onset; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Female; Fractures, Bone; Glyburi

2008
Rosiglitazone-associated fractures in type 2 diabetes: an Analysis from A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial (ADOPT).
    Diabetes care, 2008, Volume: 31, Issue:5

    Topics: Age of Onset; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Female; Fractures, Bone; Glyburi

2008

Other Studies

8 other studies available for metformin and Fractures, Bone

ArticleYear
Unmasking Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: The Association of Longitudinal Glycemic Hemoglobin Level and Medications.
    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2022, 03-24, Volume: 107, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors;

2022
Increased Advanced Glycation Endproducts, Stiffness, and Hardness in Iliac Crest Bone From Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Insulin.
    Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2023, Volume: 38, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fractures, Bone; Glucose; Glucose Intoleranc

2023
Increased Advanced Glycation Endproducts, Stiffness, and Hardness in Iliac Crest Bone From Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Insulin.
    Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2023, Volume: 38, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fractures, Bone; Glucose; Glucose Intoleranc

2023
Increased Advanced Glycation Endproducts, Stiffness, and Hardness in Iliac Crest Bone From Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Insulin.
    Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2023, Volume: 38, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fractures, Bone; Glucose; Glucose Intoleranc

2023
Increased Advanced Glycation Endproducts, Stiffness, and Hardness in Iliac Crest Bone From Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Insulin.
    Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2023, Volume: 38, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fractures, Bone; Glucose; Glucose Intoleranc

2023
Metformin regulates bone marrow stromal cells to accelerate bone healing in diabetic mice.
    eLife, 2023, 07-07, Volume: 12

    Topics: Animals; Bony Callus; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fractures, Bone; M

2023
The associations of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as add-on to metformin with fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2023, Volume: 25, Issue:11

    Topics: Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dipeptidyl-Peptidases

2023
Update in endocrinology: evidence published in 2012.
    Annals of internal medicine, 2013, Jun-04, Volume: 158, Issue:11

    Topics: Biliopancreatic Diversion; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Diseases, Metabolic;

2013
A cohort study of thiazolidinediones and fractures in older adults with diabetes.
    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2009, Volume: 94, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Hypogly

2009
Bone disease, gestational diabetes mellitus, and health care.
    Diabetes care, 2009, Volume: 32, Issue:7

    Topics: Bone Density; Bone Diseases; Collagen; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Fra

2009
Risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed oral antidiabetes drugs: retrospective cohort study using UK general practice research database.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009, Dec-03, Volume: 339

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Fractures, Bon

2009
Risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed oral antidiabetes drugs: retrospective cohort study using UK general practice research database.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009, Dec-03, Volume: 339

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Fractures, Bon

2009
Risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed oral antidiabetes drugs: retrospective cohort study using UK general practice research database.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009, Dec-03, Volume: 339

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Fractures, Bon

2009
Risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed oral antidiabetes drugs: retrospective cohort study using UK general practice research database.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009, Dec-03, Volume: 339

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Fractures, Bon

2009