mesna has been researched along with Adenoma* in 3 studies
1 trial(s) available for mesna and Adenoma
Article | Year |
---|---|
Chemically assisted submucosal injection facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms.
A randomized in vivo animal study previously demonstrated that topical injection of mesna solution (sodium-2-mercaptoethanesulfonate) chemically softened submucosal connective tissues and facilitated mechanical dissection of the submucosal tissue plane. The present study evaluated the technical feasibility and safety of chemically assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection (CA-ESD) using mesna in 20 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic excision of gastric neoplasm.. Following the margination of the lesion with a mucosal circumcision, 4 - 12 mL of 10 % mesna solution was injected into the submucosal layer. Mechanical submucosal dissection was then performed by bluntly cleaving the chemically treated submucosal layer with the tip of a cap-fitted gastroscope. The use of cautery was restricted to prophylactic hemostasis, dissection of the coagulated vessels and persistent submucosal tissues, and the final snare resection. Post-therapeutic ulceration repair and adverse events were followed up during a 1-week hospitalization and by repeat endoscopies at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month after the procedure.. Sixteen gastric cancers and four adenomas were treated in this study. The sampled tissue measured 38.25 +/- 14.53 mm, with an en bloc resection rate of 100 %. Mean operation time was 21.17 +/- 11.6 minutes. The time spent using cautery was limited to 26.1 % of the total submucosal dissection time. Ulcerations healed normally without complications.. This preliminary study demonstrates that submucosal injection of mesna facilitates and expedites mechanical submucosal dissection. The major limitations in this study include the single-arm study design and a small patient population. Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenoma; Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell; Dissection; Expectorants; Gastric Mucosa; Gastroscopy; Humans; Mesna; Protective Agents; Stomach Neoplasms | 2010 |
2 other study(ies) available for mesna and Adenoma
Article | Year |
---|---|
Prevention of colon tumors following urinary diversion by antagonizing of nitrosamines or separation of feces and urine?
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenoma; Animals; Bacteria; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Cocarcinogenesis; Colon, Sigmoid; Colostomy; Feces; Female; Humans; Mesna; Nitrates; Nitrosamines; Oxidation-Reduction; Pentosan Sulfuric Polyester; Random Allocation; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Sigmoid Neoplasms; Ureter; Ureteral Neoplasms; Urinary Bladder; Urinary Diversion | 1994 |
Tumor induction in a rat model for ureterosigmoidostomy without evidence of nitrosamine formation.
Twenty rats were randomized into a vesicosigmoidostomy and an unoperated control group. In both groups the 24 hour excretion of secondary amines, nitrate, nitrite and nitrosamines was measured before and after gavage of proline and nitrate, piperazine and nitrate, N-nitrosoproline, mono-N-nitrosopiperazine. The urinary nitrosamine concentrations were not significantly different between both groups neither before nor after application of the several substances. Thirty rats were randomized into two vesicosigmoidostomy groups with and without antibiotic coverage and an unoperated control group. After ligation of distal rectum and mesosigmoid the rectosigmoids were removed. No significant concentrations of volatile nitrosamines could be measured in the rectosigmoid contents of the three groups. One hundred and twenty rats randomized into three groups following vesicosigmoidostomy received the potential nitrosamine antidotes sodium-2-mercaptoethane sulfonate or sodiumpentosan-polysulfate or acted as controls. 12/118 (10.2%) developed adenomas and 25/118 (21.2%) adenocarcinomas at the vesico-colonic anastomosis with no significant differences between the three groups concerning tumor incidence or mortality. The results show that colon carcinomas occur in a rat model for ureterosigmoidostomy without evidence for thus induced nitrosamine formation. This and the missing effect of nitrosamine antidotes suggest that other factors than nitrosation must be responsible for colon carcinogenesis following urinary diversion via intestine. Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenoma; Amines; Anastomosis, Surgical; Animals; Colon, Sigmoid; Colonic Neoplasms; Feces; Female; Mesna; Nitrates; Nitrites; Nitrosamines; Pentosan Sulfuric Polyester; Rats; Rats, Inbred Strains; Rectum; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Urinary Diversion | 1991 |