meropenem and Neutropenia

The intravenous form of fosfomycin, a bactericide antibiotic used to treat multiresistant bacterial infections is little prescribed. The most common reported adverse effects are hypokaliemia and hypernatremia. We describe a case of agranulocytosis, a rarely described side effect that may be fatal.. A 45 year-old woman was admitted to the intensive care unit for post-surgical meningitis following meningioma resection. Meropenem and vancomycin were first introduced. A DRESS-syndrom with meropenem was suspected. Neutropenia was diagnosed three days after the introduction of parenteral fosfomycin and agranulocytosis four days later. Eosinophilia was also observed. A bone marrow aspiration was performed showing a disappearance of the neutrophil granulocyte line and a significant eosinophilia. Meropenem was discontinued. Fosfomycin was maintained and filgrastim was added. As filgrastim had no effect, the relationship with fosfomycin was suspected, so it was then withheld. An increase of the neutrophil count was observed. Because of the complexity of the case, the unfavorable course of the illness and the urgent need for revision surgery, a rechallenge with fosfomycin was done followed by a decrease of the neutrophil count.. This is the third paper reporting agranulocytosis induced by fosfomycin, and the first detailed description of a case. Based on chronological and semiological criteria and bibliographic data, the event was qualified as probable with the Naranjo adverse drug probability scale. Literature data is scarce. The summary of product characteristics mentions that only a few cases of transient neutropenia and agranulocytosis have been reported. An analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database highlighted a higher than expected frequency of agranulocytosis in patients treated with fosfomycin. Parenteral fosfomycin is often used in patients receiving other medications, so that it is rarely the only suspect. In our case, the results of the bone marrow aspiration, the sudden drop of the neutrophil count with concomitant eosinophilia and the absence of improvement despite the dose decrease, point towards an immuno-allergic mechanism. However, the overlap between the suspected DRESS induced by meropenem and the agranulocytosis do not allow to conclude with certainty on the causality. Awareness should be raised about this side effect.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Eosinophilia; Female; Filgrastim; Fosfomycin; Humans; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia

Several beta-lactams are recommended as single agents for the treatment of febrile neutropenia.. To compare the effectiveness of different anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams as single agents in the treatment of febrile neutropenia. To compare the development of bacterial resistance, bacterial and fungal superinfections during or following treatment with the different beta-lactams.. We searched the Cochane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Issue 3, 2010. MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, FDA drug applications, conference proceedings and ongoing clinical trial databases up to August 2010. References of included studies were scanned.. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing an antipseudomonal beta-lactam to another antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotic, both given alone or with the addition of the same glycopeptide to both study arms, for the initial treatment of fever and neutropenia among cancer patients.. Two review authors applied inclusion criteria and extracted the data independently. Missing data were sought. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and pooled using the fixed effect model. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using a domain-based evaluation and its effect of results was assessed through sensitivity analyses.. Forty-four trials were included. The antibiotics assessed were cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem and meropenem. Adequate allocation concealment and generation were reported in about half of the trials and only two trials were double-blinded. The risk for all-cause mortality was significantly higher with cefepime compared to other beta-lactams (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.86, 21 trials, 3471 participants), without heterogeneity and with higher RRs in trials at low risk for bias. There were no differences in secondary outcomes but for a non-significantly higher rate of bacterial superinfections with cefepime. Mortality was significantly lower with piperacillin-tazobactam compared to other antibiotics (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.92, 8 trials, 1314 participants), without heterogeneity. Carbapenems resulted in similar all-cause mortality and a lower rate of clinical failure and antibiotic modifications as compared to other antibiotics, but a higher rate of diarrhea caused by Clostridium difficile.. Current evidence supports the use of piperacillin-tazobactam in locations where antibiotic resistance profiles do not mandate empirical use of carbapenems. Carbapenems result in a higher rate of antibiotic-associated and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. There is a high level of evidence that all-cause mortality is higher with cefepime compared to other beta-lactams and it should not be used as monotherapy for patients with febrile neutropenia.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactams; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Fever; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thienamycins

Meropenem is a new carbapenem antibacterial agent with wide spectrum of activity against gram-negative, gram-positive and anaerobic organisms. It is stable against most beta-lactamases produced by gram-negative bacteria and has greatest utility in treating severe infections in hospitalized children. It has good CSF penetrability and useful in treatment of childhood meningitis and infections in neutropenic children. Due to concern relating to emergence of resistance, it should be used as a reserve drug in difficult-to-treat infections caused by resistant organisms or when conventional treatment fails.

Topics: Bacterial Infections; Central Nervous System Bacterial Infections; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Intensive Care Units; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Thienamycins

Antimicrobial resistance is increasing among bacterial pathogens. In particular, organisms producing extended spectrum beta-lactamase enzymes (ESBLs) and AmpC chromosomal beta-lactamase enzymes are resistant to third generation cephalosporins and pose a formidable challenge in the management of seriously ill patients. Carbapenems are a class of broad-spectrum antibiotics with stability against ESBL and AmpC chromosomal beta-lactamases. They are well tolerated by patients. This review will examine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two carbapenems imipenem and meropenem and discuss their clinical use in children. References are limited to the English language and extend back to 1980. Sources include computerized databases such as MEDLINE searched using PubMed, and bibliographies of recent articles and books. Approximately 50% of the articles initially reviewed are included in the bibliography. Carbapenems are efficacious in the treatment of a variety of bacterial infections including meningitis, pneumonia, intraabdominal infections, bone, joint and urinary tract infections. The broad spectrum activity and comparatively low toxicity of carbapenems make them valuable therapeutic agents in the treatment of seriously ill patients with bacterial infections. These agents should be used judiciously in order to minimize the risk for development of carbapenem-resistant pathogens.

Topics: Child; Humans; Imipenem; Meningitis, Bacterial; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Thienamycins

Topics: Acute Disease; Amikacin; Anemia, Aplastic; Antilymphocyte Serum; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclosporine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Escherichia coli Infections; Gastric Mucosa; Gastritis; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Immunosuppressive Agents; Meropenem; Methylprednisolone; Necrosis; Neutropenia; Omeprazole; Parenteral Nutrition, Total; T-Lymphocytes; Thienamycins

Administration of empirical antibiotic therapy is now standard practice in the management of febrile neutropenia, but there has been considerable debate about the selection of an efficacious empirical antimicrobial regimen over the past 2 decades. A variety of approaches, including both monotherapeutic and multidrug regimens, have been demonstrated to be effective, although no one regimen has been proven to be superior to another. Changes in the epidemiology of infectious organisms and the growing emergence of highly drug-resistant strains make it necessary to continually reevaluate the therapeutic options. Fortunately, the number of therapeutic options has also been broadening as new antimicrobial agents, including third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenem antibiotics such as imipenem and meropenem, become available. Optimal management is directed by the findings of a clinical evaluation of the patient as well as an awareness of institutional patterns of infection and susceptibility of likely infecting organisms.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Cephalosporins; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fever; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Thienamycins

Monotherapy with ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem or meropenem for the empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia appears as effective as the combination therapy involving aminoglycosides. However, empiric therapy with a combination of a beta-lactam plus an aminoglycoside is a reasonable decision under circumstances where Gram negative sepsis is very likely. Monotherapy is usually associated with a modest rate of response in infections caused by Gram positive organisms. In about 30% of the patients, a glycopeptide will be added at some point, because the response to the initial therapy is not considered optimal.

Topics: Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fever; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Sepsis; Thienamycins

Early empiric antibiotic therapy can significantly decrease the risk of mortality and infectious morbidity in patients with hematologic malignancies. Broad-spectrum antibiotics, usually a combination regimen of a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside, have traditionally been employed against the wide variety of organisms that cause febrile episodes. However, since the 1970's, there has been a shift in epidemiology from Gram-negative to Gram-positive infections, against which traditional combination regimens have only limited efficacy. The carbapenems offer a suitable monotherapeutic alternative as they have a very broad spectrum of antibacterial activity, and equivalent efficacy and safety compared with combination regimes. Trials using imipenem/cilastatin have shown equal efficacy to ceftazidime but neurologic and gastrointestinal toxicity were observed at high doses (1 g 6-hourly). In the largest study to date, meropenem (1 g 8-hourly) provided effective, well tolerated monotherapy for patients with febrile neuropenia, equivalent to a regimen of ceftazidime plus amikacin. It is concluded that meropenem appears to be a realistic option for initial monotherapy in febrile neutropenic patients, providing therapy that is equivalent to a standard regimen of ceftazidime and amikacin.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fever; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thienamycins

Infection remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality for cancer patients who become granulocytopenic as a result of chemotherapy. Treatment is instituted at the first sign of infection and before the identification of the causative pathogen (empiric treatment). For many years, standard empiric treatment has been combination therapy with beta-lactams and aminoglycosides. The advent of new broad spectrum antibiotics, such as ceftazidime, has introduced the possibility of empiric monotherapy. However, ceftazidime has only modest activity against infections due to Gram-positive organisms, which presently account for at least 50% of infections in neutropenic patients, and resistance to ceftazidime in Gram-negative organisms has been documented. Meropenem is a new carbapenem with a broad antibacterial spectrum with greater in vitro activity than ceftazidime against staphylococci, streptococci and many Gram-negative bacteria. A comparative study of intravenous meropenem (1 g 8-hourly) and ceftazidime (2 g 8-hourly) in the empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies has been conducted. In an open, randomised trial of the treatment of 338 febrile episodes, all patients survived to 72 hours on both treatments, and meropenem was found to be at least as clinically effective as ceftazidime in eradicating both Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections. Early modification of treatment (48-72 hours) was required for approximately 40% of patients but occurred less frequently in patients treated with meropenem than with ceftazidime. Tolerability of both treatments was good. Meropenem should be compared with standard combination therapy in a large randomised trial before adopting it as empiric monotherapy for febrile neutropenic patients.

Topics: Bacterial Infections; Ceftazidime; Clinical Trials as Topic; Fever; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thienamycins

Neutropenic sepsis remains a common treatment complication for patients receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment. The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence have not recommended switching from empirical intravenous antibiotics to oral antibiotics within 48 h for patients assessed as low risk for septic complications because of uncertainty about whether this would achieve comparable outcomes to using intravenous antibiotics for longer. The UK National Institute for Health Research funded the EASI-SWITCH trial to tackle this uncertainty.. If the trial demonstrates non-inferiority of early switching to oral antibiotics, with potential benefits for patient quality of life and resource savings, this finding will have significant implications for the routine clinical management of those with low-risk neutropenic sepsis.. ISRCTN: 84288963. Registered on the 1 July 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN84288963. EudraCT: 2015-002830-35.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ciprofloxacin; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Administration Schedule; Equivalence Trials as Topic; Humans; Meropenem; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Piperacillin; Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic; Quality of Life; Sepsis; Tazobactam; Treatment Outcome

In Norway, initial treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN) has traditionally been benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside. Internationally, FN is often treated with a broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic. We aimed to compare these two regimens in a prospective, randomized, trial in patients with lymphoma or leukaemia with an expected period of neutropenia ≥7 days, and a suspected bacterial infection.. Adult neutropenic patients with lymphoma or leukaemia, and a suspected bacterial infection, were randomized for treatment with benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside or meropenem. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined as no modification of antibiotics and clinical stability 72 h after randomization.. Among 322 randomized patients, 297 proved evaluable for analyses. Fifty-nine per cent (95% CI 51%-66%), (87/148) of the patients given benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside were clinically stable, and had no antibiotic modifications 72 h after randomization, compared with 82% (95% CI 75%-87%), (122/149) of the patients given meropenem (p <0.001). When the antibiotic therapy was stopped, 24% (95% CI 18%-32%), (36/148) of the patients given benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside, compared with 52% (95% CI 44%-60%), (78/149) of the patients given meropenem, had no modifications of their regimens (p <0.001). In the benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside arm, the all-cause fatality within 30 days of randomization was 3.4% (95% CI 1.2%-7.9%), (5/148) of the patients, compared with 0% (95% CI 0.0%-3.0%), (0/149) of the patients in the meropenem arm (p 0.03).. Clinical success was more common in FN patients randomized to meropenem compared with the patients randomized to benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside. The all-cause fatality was higher among the patients given benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Female; Humans; Leukemia; Lymphoma; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Mortality; Neutropenia; Norway; Penicillin G; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of carbapenems as initial treatment for febrile neutropenia (FN), and in patients unresponsive to this initial therapy, to evaluate the efficacy of subsequent treatment with aminoglycosides (AGs) or ciprofloxacin (CPFX). FN patients were randomized to receive cefepime (CFPM, control), panipenem/betamiprom (PAPM/BP), or meropenem (MEPM). Defervescence, an outcome endpoint, was evaluated 3 days later. Patients with minimal response were given CPFX or AGs, and their responses were reevaluated on day 7. A total of 255 patients were included. The efficacies of CFPM, PAPM/BP, and MEPM were comparable. In patients unresponsive to this initial therapy, the efficacy of subsequent CPFX and AGs treatments was also similar. There was no significant between-arm difference in cumulative efficacy on days 14 and 30. Adverse reactions were infrequent and mild. In conclusion, PAPM/BP and MEPM are as useful as CFPM as initial therapy for FN, and AGs are as efficacious as CPFX in patients unresponsive to the initial therapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Female; Fever; Hematologic Diseases; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Our unit adopted the single administration of cefepime as the initial treatment for febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. However, recently, cefepime-resistant gram-negative bacteremia, including those with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producers, was frequently observed in these patients. Therefore, we instituted a rotation of primary antibiotics for febrile neutropenic patients in an attempt to control antibiotic resistance.. This prospective trial was performed from August 2008 through March 2011 at our unit. After a pre-intervention period, in which cefepime was used as the initial agent for febrile neutropenia, 4 primary antibiotics, namely, piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, and cefepime, were rotated at 1-month intervals over 20 months. Blood and surveillance cultures were conducted for febrile episodes, in order to assess the etiology, the resistance pattern (particularly to cefepime), and the prognosis.. In this trial, 219 patients were registered. A 65.9% reduction in the use of cefepime occurred after the antibiotic rotation. In the surveillance stool cultures, the detection rate of cefepime-resistant gram-negative isolates, of which ESBL-producers were predominant, declined significantly after the intervention (8.5 vs 0.9 episodes per 1000 patient days before and after intervention respectively, P<0.01). Interestingly, ESBL-related bacteremia was not detected after the initiation of the trial (1.7 vs 0.0 episodes per 1000 patient days before and after intervention respectively, P<0.01). Infection-related mortality was comparable between the 2 periods.. We implemented a monthly rotation of primary antibiotics for febrile neutropenic patients. An antibiotic heterogeneity strategy, mainly performed as a cycling regimen, would be useful for controlling antimicrobial resistance among patients treated for febrile neutropenia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; beta-Lactam Resistance; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fever; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of meropenem (MEPM) were assessed when 1 g (40 mg/kg for some of the pediatric patients) t.i.d. was administered every 8hours to 101 adult and 6 pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) as diagnosed based on the Japanese guideline for FN treatment. The efficacy rate evaluated as antifebrile effect up to Day 4 of treatment was 40.0% (40/100) in adult and 66.7% (4/6) in pediatric patients. The antifebrile effect in adult patients was analyzed after stratifying them according to their neutrophil counts up to Day 4. Treatment with MEPM produced an antifebrile effect not only in patients with higher neutrophil counts (> or = 500/mm3) but also in those with lower counts (< 100/mm3), and the efficacy rate was comparable between the two groups: 38.2% in the < 100/mm3 group and 29.4 to 55.6% in the > or = 500/mm3 group. The bacteriological efficacy of MEPM evaluated as disappearance rate on Days 3 to 5 and Day 7 was both 100% (8/8 and 4/4, respectively). The time above minimal inhibitory concentration (% T > MIC) in the treatment interval was greater than 90% in 9 out of 10 patients for whom likely causative organism was isolated and identified after MEPM treatment or for whom causative organism emerging after treatment was isolated and identified. The incidence of adverse events was 93.1% in adult and 83.3% in pediatric patients. There were three deaths and one serious adverse event reported among the adult patients; however, all these cases were assessed as not related to the study medication. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was 45.5% and 66.7%, respectively. All the observed adverse drug reactions were mild or moderate in severity and none of them was severe. Adverse drug reactions which were unknown from the previous MEPM clinical studies and investigation of the results of clinical experience include 'chest discomfort', 'blood uric acid decreased', 'lymphocyte deformation', 'blood uric acid increased', 'abnormal funduscopy', 'hypesthesia' and 'hemorrhagic cystitis'. All these events were mild or moderate in severity and resolved without requiring any action or after providing symptomatic treatment. There was no unknown adverse drug reaction that resulted in treatment discontinuation. No nervous system disorders such as convulsion and impaired consciousness were reported. The results show that monotherapy of MEPM 1 g (or 40 mg/kg for some of the pediatric patients) t.i.d. every 8 hours was effective, and wa

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Thienamycins

The bactericidal activity of β-lactams is determined by the time that concentrations in tissue and serum are above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T>MIC) for the pathogen. The aim of this study was to compare the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for meropenem between administration by bolus injection and a 3-h infusion. The study was a randomised, three-way, cross-over design in eight febrile neutropenic patients with bacteraemia. Each subject received meropenem in three regimens consecutively: (i) a bolus injection of 1g every 8 h (q8h) for 24 h; (ii) a 3-h infusion of 1 g q8h for 24 h; and (iii) a 3-h infusion of 2 g q8h for 24h. For pathogens with an MIC of 4 μg/mL, the PTA of achieving 40% T>MIC following administration of meropenem by a bolus injection of 1g q8h, a 3-h infusion of 1 g q8h and a 3-h infusion of 2g q8h was 75.7%, 99.24% and 99.96%, respectively. Only the 3-h infusion of 2 g q8h achieved a PTA >99% for 40% T>MIC for a MIC of 8μg/mL. By referral to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) MIC distributions, the three regimens of meropenem were predicted to achieve a CFR≥90% against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. In conclusion, a 3-h infusion of 2 g of meropenem q8h resulted in the highest PTA rates. The three regimens of meropenem had high probabilities of achieving optimal impact against E. coli and Klebsiella spp.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Critical Illness; Escherichia coli; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Injections, Intravenous; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The objectives of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of meropenem, to simulate the percent time above minimum inhibitory concentration (%T > MIC) at various MICs, and to estimate effective dosage regimens by calculating the target attainment rates against various strains of bacteria. A total of 209 plasma samples (1-3 concentrations per patient) were obtained from 98 adult Japanese patients with febrile neutropenia in an open-labeled Phase 3 study. The final population PK model was fit to a two-compartment model with zero-order input. Creatinine clearance had a positive significant correlation with CL. Gender had a significant effect on Vc; however, this effect was small, and the PK profile in male patients was similar to that in female patients. The population PK parameters developed in this study are useful in simulating PK profiles of meropenem at various dosage regimens precisely for calculation of %T > MIC. The PK-PD analysis indicated that 0.5 g every 6 h (q6h) was more effective than 1 g q12h, although provided 2 g per day in total. A meropenem dosage regimen of 1 g q8h and/or longer infusion duration was better against a pathogen of comparatively low sensitivity, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (for MIC ≥2 μg/ml). Although causative bacteria were identified in a small number of patients, the target attainment rates at 75%T > MIC (89%) were comparable to microbiological response (89%). The present PK-PD analyses under various conditions are useful in the treatment of febrile neutropenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteria; Computer Simulation; Female; Fever; Humans; Japan; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Monte Carlo Method; Neutropenia; Thienamycins

Invasive fungal infection (IFI) is a serious complication of chemotherapy for hematological malignancies and autologous/allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and shows a high mortality rate. We performed a randomized trial comparing micafungin (MCFG), a new anti-fungal agent, with fosfluconazole, a prodrug of fluconazole (FF) conventionally used as a prophylactic agent, for prophylaxis against IFI. Cefpirome was administered as prophylaxis against bacterial infection, and meropenem+minocycline as an empiric window therapy for febrile neutropenia. MCFG 2 mg/kg/day (max 100 mg/day) and FF 10 mg/kg/day (max 400 mg/day) were both safe and effective (event free ratio of IFI, MCFG 94.4% vs FF 94.3%) without significant difference. Thus, MCFG is safe and can be used for prophylaxis against IFI in children.

Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Echinocandins; Female; Fluconazole; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Infant; Lipopeptides; Male; Meropenem; Micafungin; Minocycline; Mycoses; Neutropenia; Opportunistic Infections; Organophosphates; Prodrugs; Thienamycins

The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h), piperacillin/tazobactam (4 g/500 mg every 6 h), and meropenem (1 g every 8 h), when combined with amikacin (15 mg/kg once daily), in the empirical treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with haematological malignancy.. A prospective, comparative study designed in the haematology unit of a university hospital in Turkey.. A total of 89 febrile episodes in 60 neutropenic patients were treated; 29 febrile episodes in 23 patients with ceftazidime plus amikacin (group 1), 30 episodes in 25 patients with piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin (group 2), and 30 episodes in 25 patients with meropenem plus amikacin (group 3). The 3 groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, underlying malignancy, pretherapy neutrophil counts, duration of neutropenia and types of infections. Neutropenia, since the start of fever, persisted for > or =10 days in all of the episodes in the 3 study groups. Nearly all of the episodes were seen in patients with acute leukaemia. In 25.8% (23/89) of the febrile neutropenia episodes, an aetiologic organism was isolated, with gram-negative bacteria being the most commonly isolated. The success without modification rates were 34.5%, 30% and 36.7% for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (P >0.05). After modification with a different class of antimicrobial therapy, the response rates increased to 65.5%, 63.3% and 70% for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (P >0.05). The mean duration of treatment and the time to defervescence were also comparable in all groups. In all arms, side effects were minimal.. It is concluded that the 3 regimens were equally effective and safe in the empirical treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenic episodes.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Tazobactam; Thienamycins

Optimal sampling design with nonparametric population modeling offers the opportunity to determine pharmacokinetic parameters for patients in whom blood sampling is restricted. This approach was compared to a standard individualized modeling method for meropenem pharmacokinetics in febrile neutropenic patients. The population modeling program, nonparametric approach of expectation maximization (NPEM), with a full data set was compared to a sparse data set selected by D-optimal sampling design. The authors demonstrated that the D-optimal sampling strategy, when applied to this clinical population, provided good pharmacokinetic parameter estimates along with their variability. Four individualized and optimally selected sampling time points provided the same parameter estimates as more intensive sampling regimens using traditional and population modeling techniques. The different modeling methods were considerably consistent, except for the estimation of CL(d) with sparse sampling. The findings suggest that D-optimal sparse sampling is a reasonable approach to population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies during drug development when limited sampling is necessary.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Creatinine; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Neutropenia; Research Design; Thienamycins

We report on 232 patients undergoing autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) entered into a multicentre, randomised trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of meropenem (MPM) with that of piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) as empirical antimicrobial first-line therapy for febrile neutropenia. In 27.6% of patients in the MPM group and 22.4% in the P/T group, therapy was initially supplemented with a glycopeptide for venous catheter infection or bacteraemia because of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Complete response rate after 72 h was 63.8% in the MPM group and 49.6% in the P/T group (P = 0.034). Overall complete response rate after treatment modification was 94.0% in the MPM group and 93.1% in the P/T group. Median time to defervescence was 2 d in the MPM group and 3 d in the P/T group. The most frequently isolated pathogens were Gram-positive cocci. Treatment was well tolerated in both groups. One patient (0.4%) died from infection. Empirical first-line therapy with MPM as well as with P/T is safe and effective in febrile episodes emerging after ASCT. Higher response rates to primary treatment can be achieved with MPM.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Opportunistic Infections; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Prospective Studies; Tazobactam; Thienamycins

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Empiricism; Female; Fever; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Infant; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Male; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Therapeutic Equivalency; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem plus amikacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam plus netilmicin for initial empirical antibiotic treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenia in children with cancer. Patients with hematologic malignancy (leukemia or stage III/IV non-Hodgkin lymphoma) who presented with fever and neutropenia (ANC < 500/mm3) and patients with solid tumors who presented with fever and severe neutropenia (ANC < 100/mm3) were considered to be at high risk and eligible for this study. In this prospective study, 33 patients with 50 febrile neutropenic episodes received i.v. neropenem (20 mg/kg every 8 h) plus amikacin (15 mg/kg/d in 2 divided doses) (in 31 episodes) or piperacillin/tazobactam (100 mg/4 mg/kg every 8 h) plus netilmicin (7 mg/kg every 24 h) (in 19 episodes). Clinical response was determined at 72 h and at completion of the therapy. The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, initial ANC, use of growth factors, and classification of the infections. An infection was documented microbiologically in 12 episodes (39%) in the meropenem plus amikacin group and in 8 episodes (42%) in the piperacillin/tazobactam plus netilmicin group. Of the 22 microbiological isolates, 37% were gram-positives, 45% were gram-negatives, and 18% were fungi. Most of the clinically documented infections were of lower respiratory tract, gastrointestinal mucosa, or urinary tract origin. The mean duration of neutropenia was 9 days in both groups. Fever persisted for 1-30 days (mean 3 vs. 5 days). The success rate with initial empiric therapy was 52% in the meropenem plus amikacin and 42% in the piperacillin/tazobactam plus netilmicin group, respectively (p = .5). Total success rate (with or without modification) was 97% vs. 90% in the episodes. Three patients died due to infection (1 vs. 2 patients). No major adverse effects were observed in each group. Empirical therapy with meropenem plus amikacin or piperacillin/tazobactam plus netilmicin for high-risk febrile neutropenia is equally effective and safe in pediatric cancer patients.

Topics: Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fever; Fungi; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Infections; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Netilmicin; Neutropenia; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Tazobactam; Thienamycins

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the therapy for febrile neutropenia (FN). Our patient population differed significantly from those of previous studies as no patients received antimicrobial or CSF prophylaxis before randomization and all were solid tumor patients. When the diagnosis of FN was established, patients were started on intravenous meropenem 1 g every 8 hours and randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (5 microg/kg body weight per day subcutaneously) or not. Twenty-eight patients with 30 FN episodes received G-CSF and 25 patients with 30 FN episodes did not receive G-CSF according to randomization. The time to resolution of fever, recovery of neutrophil count over 1000/mm3, duration of hospitalization, need for erythrocyte and platelet transfusion and mortality rate were similar in both study groups. Side effects of therapy were mild. These results provide preliminary evidence that G-CSF administration, in addition to effective antibiotic therapy as treatment of febrile neutropenic patients with solid tumor, does not help improve infection-related morbidity and mortality.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Comorbidity; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fever; Follow-Up Studies; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Probability; Prospective Studies; Reference Values; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Statistics, Nonparametric; Survival Rate; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

Meropenem is a promising carbapenem antibiotic as an empirical monotherapy in patients with febrile neutropenia (FN). With the limited data of the therapy in pediatric patients, the authors conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem as empirical antibiotic therapy in 30 pediatric cancer patients with FN (mean age = 7.5 years), who were admitted to King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from May 2000 to December 2001. Meropenem 60 mg/kg/day was given intravenously every 8 hours. The efficacy of meropenem was assessed as successful, inconclusive and failure on days 3 and 5 of the therapy and compared to that of other empirical antibiotics used from January 1997 to April 2000. The study showed that six blood culture specimens (20%) grew organisms, half of which were considered to be contaminants, and six urine culture specimens (20%) grew gram negative rod bacteria. On day 3 and 5 of the therapy, the success rate of meropenem was higher than that of comparatives (30.0% vs 17.6% on day 3, 50.0% vs 39.3% on day 5). The use of meropenem appeared safe, with minimal side effects. In conclusion, the present study showed that meropenem was safe and tolerable in children. The efficacy as an empirical monotherapy in pediatric cancer patients with FN was satisfactory, with a failure rate of 23.3 per cent on day 5 of treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Thienamycins

Fifty-four pediatric cancer patients with a total of 100 febrile neutropenic episodes treated at China Medical College Hospital were randomized to receive meropenem or ceftazidime plus amikacin from January 2001 to April 2002. The characteristics of 76 assessable febrile episodes (39 with meropenem and 37 with ceftazidime plus amikacin) were compared between the 2 groups. The success rate with unmodified therapy was not significantly different between the meropenem group (72%) and the ceftazidime-plus-amikacin group (57%). The incidence of side effects was similar between the 2 groups and these side effects were reversible. Microbiologically documented infection, clinically documented infection, and unexplained fever accounted for 35%, 37%, and 28% of episodes, respectively. The clinical response rates in subgroups of documented infection and unexplained fever did not significantly differ between the 2 treatment groups. Meropenem was significantly more effective than ceftazidime plus amikacin in children at high risks of developing severe infection who had profound neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 100/mm3), prolonged neutropenia (ANC < 500/mm3 lasting for > 10 days), or clinically deteriorating shock (p=0.045). As an empirical treatment, meropenem seems to be as effective and safe as ceftazidime plus amikacin for febrile episodes in children with cancer and neutropenia. Meropenem is more effective for pediatric cancer patients at the high risk of severe infection.

Topics: Adolescent; Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Child; Child, Preschool; Diarrhea; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Cocci; Hospitals, University; Humans; Infant; Male; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Taiwan; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of meropenem versus ceftazidime as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenia in paediatric cancer patients. In a prospective randomized study, 172 evaluable febrile episodes in the meropenem arm and 170 episodes in the ceftazidime arm were analysed for the clinical and microbiological response dependent on the kind of infection. About half the episodes were classified as fever of unknown origin (FUO) and the remainder as microbiologically or clinically documented infections. The most frequently documented infections in both arms were bacteraemias (22.1 versus 26.5%), predominantly caused by Gram-positive organisms (57.9 versus 71.1%). The success rate of the initial monotherapy differed significantly between the two arms and was 55.8% in the meropenem and 40.0% in the ceftazidime arm (P = 0.003). In addition, a significantly longer duration of fever and of antimicrobial therapy was observed in the ceftazidime arm than in the meropenem arm (median 5 versus 4 days, P = 0.022, and 7 versus 6 days, P = 0.009, respectively). With respect to the kind of infection, differences between the two arms were significant only in episodes classified as FUO but not in documented infections. In both arms, side effects were minimal. Despite the greater response rate for meropenem in FUO, the fact that ceftazidime has been proven to be as effective as meropenem in documented infections in the present study suggests that both drugs are useful as empirical monotherapy in febrile paediatric cancer patients.

Topics: Bacterial Infections; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Escherichia coli; Female; Fever; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Male; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Relapsing Fever; Thienamycins; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Infection remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised children with malignancy. In addition, the economic impact of antibiotic treatment should always be evaluated, especially in developing countries. In our center between January 1998 and January 1999, 73 children with hematological malignancies [acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML)]; 9 children with solid tumors (rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma) had 87 febrile neutropenic episodes (related to chemotherapy). These children were randomized prospectively into three treatment groups. The first group (n: 28) received cefepime plus netilmicin, while the second group (n: 29) was treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin and the third (n: 30) with meropenem as monotherapy. The aim of the study was to compare the success rates and cost of fourth generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycoside and monotherapy of meropenem with ceftazidime plus amikacin, which is the standard therapy for febrile neutropenia. Microbiologically documented infections were 29.9%, clinically documented infections were 9.2% and 60.9% of the febrile neutropenic episodes were considered to be FUO. Gram-positive microorganisms were the most commonly isolated agents from blood cultures [MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus) in 6 patients and MSSA (Methicillin Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) in 4 patients]. The success rates were 78.5%, 79.3% and 73.3 % for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd groups respectively. In 4 patients (4.5%) fever responded only to amphotericin-B therapy. There was no statistically significant difference between the three treatment regimens with respect to efficacy, safety and tolerance (chi2 test, p>0.05), but while the third and fourth generation cephalosporins + aminoglycosides were comparable for cost, the monotherapy regimen was the most expensive. The main determining factors for the choice of treatment of febrile neutropenic children, especially in a developing country, are cost, presence of indwelling catheter and the bacterial flora of the unit, as well as efficacy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amikacin; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Humans; Infant; Male; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Netilmicin; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins; Turkey

A total of 101 cancer patients with 121 febrile neutropenia episodes were randomised to receive empirical treatment with i.v. meropenem (1g/8 h) or ceftazidime (2 g/8 h). After 3 days, 89% of patients were on unmodified therapy in the meropenem group, compared with 83% in the ceftazidime group. Of the evaluable episodes (n = 106), the success rate with unmodified empirical therapy until the end of the treatment course was slightly higher with meropenem than with ceftazidime (48% vs 38%, P=0.39). Furthermore, initial success with further infections was observed in 22% of episodes treated with meropenem and in 13% of episodes treated with ceftazidime. Glycopeptides were used as first modification in 28% and 39% of meropenem and ceftazidime recipients, respectively. Both treatments were well tolerated and there were no reports of drug-related nausea/vomiting or seizures. No significant differences in response rate or in tolerability were observed when analysing only the first febrile episodes. In conclusion, meropenem seems to be as efficacious and well tolerated as ceftazidime and may be associated with a lesser requirement for the addition of glycopeptides.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Drug Tolerance; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Thienamycins

To compare meropenem, a carbapenem antibiotic, with ceftazidime for the empirical treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia.. A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at medical centers in North America and the Netherlands. A total of 411 cancer patients (196 treated with meropenem and 215 treated with ceftazidime), who had 471 episodes of fever, participated in the trial. For each neutropenic episode, patients were allocated at random to receive intravenous administration of meropenem (1 g every 8 hours) or ceftazidime (2 g every 8 hours). Treatment could be modified at any time. Key end points were clinical and bacteriologic outcomes, eradication of infecting organism, and adverse events.. The rate of successful clinical response at the end of therapy was significantly higher for patients treated with meropenem than for those on ceftazidime for all episodes (54% v 44%, respectively) and for episodes of fever of unknown origin (62% v 46%, respectively), but differences between groups were not statistically significant for clinically defined or microbiologically defined infections. Meropenem was significantly more effective than ceftazidime in severely neutropenic (

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fever; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins

Eighty three patients with neutropenia and cancer were randomised to receive either 1 g meropenem tds or amikacin 15 mg/kg single dose daily plus ceftazidime 2 g tds. No prophylactic antibiotics were allowed before entry to the trial. Seventy seven patients were available for analysis. Infection was microbiologically or clinically documented in 53 episodes (69%). The overall success rate without adjustment was 49% in monotherapy, 37.5% in the combination group. These rates were increased to 65% and 56%, respectively when secondary infection episodes requiring a different class of chemotherapy were taken into account. Median duration for defervescence was 3 days in successfully treated patients in both groups. Only minor reversible side effects were noted in both treatment arms. Meropenem monotherapy seemed as effective and safe as amikacin plus ceftazidime for the empirical treatment of neutropenic cancer patients with fever.

Topics: Adult; Amikacin; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Ceftazidime; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

Meropenem was used in the treatment of 14 infectious complications in 11 patients including 8 with acute myeloid leukemia due to the cytostatic therapy, 1 with chronic myeloid leukemia, 1 with aplastic anemia and 1 with acute intermittent porphyria. At the moment of the meropenem use critical neutropenia (less than 500 granulocytes per 1 ml) in 11 cases (79 per cent) was stated. The drug was administered as intravenous infusions in a dose of 1 g every 8 hours for 4 to 41 days (the median of 11 days). 9 out of the 14 infectious complications were cured (the body temperature normalized and all the inflammation foci were eliminated), among them 6 out of 8 pyocyanic sepsis. Eradication of gram-negative bacteria was observed in 8 out of 10 cultures of the biological materials. No toxic complications or electrolytic disorders due to the drug use were recorded. The drug tolerance was good.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Female; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

Infections remain the major cause of morbidity and mortality among neutropenic cancer patients. The current study addresses the question whether monotherapy with the new broad-spectrum carbapenem meropenem exhibits efficacy comparable to that of the standard combination therapy with ceftazidime and amikacin for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients. Seventy-one patients with hematological malignancies (55%) or solid tumors (45%), neutropenia < 500/microliter, and fever > 38.5 degrees C were randomly assigned to either meropenem (1 g every 8 h) or ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h) and amikacin (15 mg/kg/day) intravenously. Meropenem (n = 34) and ceftazidime/amikacin (n = 37) were equivalent with respect to the clinical response at 72 h (62% versus 68%) (p > 0.05) and at the end of unmodified therapy (59% versus 62%). Gram-positive bacteremia responded poorly in the meropenem and ceftazidime/amikacin group (29% versus 25%), whereas all gram-negative bacteremias responded except for one in the meropenem group caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All patients survived to 72 h. One patient in each group died of gram-positive sepsis resistant to study medication. No significant side effects occurred in any regimen. This study suggests that meropenem monotherapy might be as effective as combination therapy with ceftazidime and amikacin for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Bacterial Infections; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fever; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Thienamycins

In this Swedish multicentre study we compared the efficacy of meropenem with ceftazidime for treatment of febrile neutropenia. 192 patients were randomized and the number of evaluable patients was 92 in the meropenem group and 95 in the ceftazidime group. 40 (43%) patients in the meropenem arm and 49 (52%) in the ceftazidime arm had acute leukaemia. 56 (61%) and 52 (55%) patients respectively had a neutrophil count of < 0.1 x 10(9)/l at randomization and the median duration of neutropenia was 6.5 and 8 d, respectively. Thirty-one (34%) and 28 (29%) patients had a microbiologically defined infection, 14 (15%) and 17 (18%) a clinically defined infection and the remaining 47 (51%) and 50 (53%) had unexplained fever. After 72 h of treatment, 46 (50%) patients in the meropenem arm and 53 (56%) patients in the ceftazidime arm were alive on unmodified monotherapy. 42 (46%) and 47 (49%) of these completed the study on monotherapy alone. Only 2 patients (2%) in each arm had to stop treatment owing to allergic reactions. None of the observed differences were statistically significant and we therefore conclude that meropenem was an effective and safe alternative to ceftazidime for empiric treatment of fever during neutropenia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Opportunistic Infections; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

The efficacies of meropenem, a novel carbapenem, and ceftazidime, as empirical therapy of febrile neutropenic patients, were compared in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. One hundred and twelve adult patients were given meropenem 1 g tds iv for 153 episodes of fever, while 109 patients received ceftazidime 2 g tds iv for 151 episodes. All patients survived the first 3 days of therapy and, by the end of the treatment courses, 67 (44%) episodes had responded to meropenem, compared with 62 (41%) to ceftazidime. Eighty (53%) episodes initially treated with ceftazidime and 63 (41%) episodes treated with meropenem were considered to have failed treatment because it was thought necessary to administer additional antibacterial agents; however, modifications were made twice as often because of fever that persisted beyond 2-3 days than because of obvious causes of failure such as persistent infection. Three patients in the ceftazidime group and five in the meropenem group died. Meropenem was well tolerated, with no reports of nausea or toxicity to the central nervous system. Although ceftazidime was shown in the present study to be as effective as meropenem, the broader spectrum of activity of meropenem against Gram-positive cocci suggests that it might be more appropriate as empirical therapy of febrile neutropenic patients who are at high risk of acquiring infections caused by these bacteria.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bacterial Infections; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Female; Fever; Humans; Leukemia; Leukocyte Count; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Failure

We explored the adverse drug reaction signals of drug-induced neutropenia (DIN) and drug-induced agranulocytosis (DIA) in hospitalized patients and evaluated the novelty of these correlations.. A two-step method was established to identify the relationship between drugs and DIN or DIA using 5-year electronic medical records (EMRs) obtained from 242 000 patients at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. First, the drugs suspected to induce DIN or DIA were selected. The associations between suspected drugs and DIN or DIA were evaluated by a retrospective cohort study using unconditional logistic regression analysis and multiple linear regression model.. Twelve suspected drugs (vancomycin, meropenem, voriconazole, acyclovir, ganciclovir, fluconazole, oseltamivir, linezolid, compound borax solution, palonosetron, polyene phosphatidylcholine, and sulfamethoxazole) were associated with DIN, and six suspected drugs (vancomycin, voriconazole, acyclovir, ganciclovir, fluconazole, and oseltamivir) were associated with DIA. The multivariate linear regression model revealed that nine drugs (vancomycin, meropenem, voriconazole, ganciclovir, fluconazole, oseltamivir, compound borax solution, palonosetron, and polyene phosphatidylcholine) and four drugs (vancomycin, voriconazole, ganciclovir, and fluconazole) were found to be associated with DIN and DIA, respectively. While logistic regression analysis revealed that palonosetron and ganciclovir were associated with DIN and DIA, respectively.. Palonosetron and ganciclovir were found to be correlated with drug-induced granulocytopenia. The results of this study provide an early warning of drug safety signals for drug-induced granulocytopenia, facilitating a quick and appropriate response for clinicians.

Topics: Acyclovir; Aged; Agranulocytosis; Electronic Health Records; Ganciclovir; Humans; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Palonosetron; Thrombocytopenia; Vancomycin; Voriconazole

Febrile neutropenia has a significant clinical and economic impact on cancer patients. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of different current empiric antibiotic treatments.. A decision analytic model was constructed to compare the use of cefepime, meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin, and piperacillin/tazobactam for treatment of high-risk patients. The analysis was performed from the perspective of U.S.-based hospitals. The time horizon was defined to be a single febrile neutropenia episode. Cost-effectiveness was determined by calculating costs and deaths averted. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for various willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTP), were used to address the uncertainty in cost-effectiveness.. The base-case analysis results showed that treatments were equally effective but differed mainly in their cost. In increasing order: treatment with imipenem/cilastatin cost $52,647, cefepime $57,270, piperacillin/tazobactam $57,277, and meropenem $63,778. In the probabilistic analysis, mean costs were $52,554 (CI: $52,242-$52,866) for imipenem/cilastatin, $57,272 (CI: $56,951-$57,593) for cefepime, $57,294 (CI: $56,978-$57,611) for piperacillin/tazobactam, and $63,690 (CI: $63,370-$64,009) for meropenem. Furthermore, with a WTP set at $0 to $50,000, imipenem/cilastatin was cost-effective in 66.2% to 66.3% of simulations compared to all other high-risk options.. Imipenem/cilastatin is a cost-effective strategy and results in considerable health care cost-savings at various WTP thresholds. Cost-effectiveness analyses can be used to differentiate the treatments of febrile neutropenia in high-risk patients.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Fever; Health Care Costs; Humans; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Treatment Outcome

Although the proportion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections has reduced after the introduction of antibiotics with anti-pseudomonal effects, P. aeruginosa bacteremia still causes high mortality in immunocompromised patients. This study determined the clinical characteristics and outcomes of P. aeruginosa bacteremia and the antibiotic susceptibilities of strains isolated from febrile neutropenic patients.. Thirty-one febrile neutropenic children and adolescents with underlying hematologic/oncologic disorders diagnosed with P. aeruginosa bacteremia between 2011 and 2016 were enrolled in the study. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the demographic and clinical characteristics. Antibiotic susceptibility rates of the isolated P. aeruginosa to eight antibiotic categories (anti-pseudomonal penicillin, anti-pseudomonal penicillin and β-lactamase inhibitor combination, anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin, monobactam, carbapenem, aminoglycoside, fluoroquinolone, and colistin) were also determined. Among the investigated factors, risk factors for mortality and infections by a multidrug-resistance (MDR) strain were determined.. Thirty-six episodes of P. aeruginosa bacteremia were identified. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 9.5 ± 5.4 years, and 26 (72.2%) episodes occurred in boys. Acute myeloid leukemia (41.7%) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (33.3%) were the most common underlying disorders. The 30-day mortality was 38.9%, and 36.1% of the episodes were caused by MDR strains. The deceased patients were more likely to experience breakthrough infection (P = 0.036) and bacteremia (P = 0.005) due to MDR strains when compared with the patients who survived. The survived patients more likely received appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (P = 0.024) and anti-pseudomonal β-lactam and aminoglycoside combination therapy (P = 0.039) compared with the deceased patients. The antibiotic susceptibility rates of the isolated P. aeruginosa strains were as follows: piperacillin/tazobactam, 67.6%; meropenem, 72.2%; and amikacin, 100%.. Mortality due to P. aeruginosa bacteremia remained at 38.9% in this study, and more than one-third of the isolated strains were MDR. In this context, empirical antibiotic combination therapy to expand the antibiotic spectrum may be a strategy to reduce mortality due to P. aeruginosa bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Amikacin; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Carbapenems; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Female; Fever; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Retrospective Studies; Thienamycins

Novel drug discovery against non-tuberculous mycobacteria is beset with a large number of challenges including the existence of myriad innate drug resistance mechanisms as well as a lack of suitable animal models, which hinders effective translation. In order to identify molecules acting via novel mechanisms of action, we screened the Library of Pharmacologically Active Compounds against non-tuberculous mycobacteria to identify such compounds.. Whole-cell growth inhibition assays were used to screen and identify novel inhibitors. The hit compounds were tested for cytotoxicity against Vero cells to determine the selectivity index, and time-kill kinetics were determined against Mycobacterium fortuitum. The compound's ability to synergize with amikacin, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and meropenem was determined using fractional inhibitory concentration indexes followed by its ability to decimate mycobacterial infections ex vivo. Finally, the in vivo potential was determined in a neutropenic murine model mimicking mycobacterial infection.. We have identified diphenyleneiodonium chloride (DPIC), an NADPH/NADH oxidase inhibitor, as possessing potent antimicrobial activity against non-tuberculous mycobacteria. DPIC exhibited concentration-dependent bactericidal activity against M. fortuitum and synergized with amikacin, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime and meropenem. When tested in a murine neutropenic M. fortuitum infection model, DPIC caused a significant reduction in bacterial load in kidney and spleen. The reduction in bacterial count is comparable to amikacin at a 100-fold lower concentration.. DPIC exhibits all properties to be repositioned as a novel anti-mycobacterial therapy and possesses a potentially new mechanism of action. Thus, it can be projected as a potential new therapeutic against ever-increasing non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections.

Topics: Amikacin; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Load; Chlorocebus aethiops; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Discovery; Kinetics; Meropenem; Mice; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous; Neutropenia; Nontuberculous Mycobacteria; Onium Compounds; Small Molecule Libraries; Thienamycins; Vero Cells

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ciprofloxacin; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Infant; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Purpura; Shock, Septic; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Thienamycins

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) infections are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients due to antibiotic resistance. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of the anti-P. aeruginosa serotype O11 lipopolysaccharide monoclonal antibody Panobacumab in a clinically relevant murine model of neutropenia induced by cyclophosphamide and in combination with meropenem in susceptible and meropenem resistant P. aeruginosa induced pneumonia. We observed that P. aeruginosa induced pneumonia was dramatically increased in neutropenic mice compared to immunocompetent mice. First, Panobacumab significantly reduced lung inflammation and enhanced bacterial clearance from the lung of neutropenic host. Secondly, combination of Panobacumab and meropenem had an additive effect. Third, Panobacumab retained activity on a meropenem resistant P. aeruginosa strain. In conclusion, the present data established that Panobacumab contributes to the clearance of P. aeruginosa in neutropenic hosts as well as in combination with antibiotics in immunocompetent hosts. This suggests beneficial effects of co-treatment even in immunocompromised individuals, suffering most of the morbidity and mortality of P. aeruginosa infections.

Topics: Acute Disease; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibodies, Bacterial; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Synergism; Female; Lung; Meropenem; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Neutropenia; Pneumonia; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Thienamycins

Enterococcus is an important cause of bacteraemia. Previous epidemiological studies examining risk factors for enterococcal bacteraemia have used traditional case-control study designs, which can be potentially biased. This case-case-control study examining risk factors for enterococcal bacteraemia was conducted over 10 years (January 2000 to December 2009) in a tertiary, university-affiliated hospital. There were 440 episodes of enterococcal bacteraemia, 80 of which were caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Two multivariable models were generated, comparing VRE and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus (VSE) with the same control group. VRE bacteraemia was associated with central venous catheter use (OR 11.6, 95% CI 2.6-51.5), neutropenia (OR 16.9, 95% CI 2.4-120.2), and allogenic bone marrow transplantation (OR 18.0, 95% CI 2.4-133.4). In contrast, VSE bacteraemia risk factors included: age (OR 1.0, 95% CI 1.0-1.1), exposure to metronidazole (OR 8.7, 95% CI 1.7-43.5), and gastrointestinal disease (OR 6.4, 95% CI 1.2-34.5). Meropenem use decreased the risk of VSE bacteraemia (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9). Hypoalbuminaemia was the only factor identified in both models (VRE, OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.7-21.1; VSE, OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4-7.7). The absence of substantial overlap of risk factors for VRE and VSE argues in favour of differences in pathogenesis. These data suggest that environmental sources are more important in VRE bacteraemia. Endogenous sources, particularly the gastrointestinal tract, play a pivotal role in VSE bacteraemia. This study highlights the importance of infection control protocols to reduce the risk of VRE bacteraemia.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Bacteremia; Bone Marrow Transplantation; Case-Control Studies; Catheterization, Central Venous; Enterococcus; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Hospitals; Humans; Hypoalbuminemia; Male; Meropenem; Metronidazole; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Neutropenia; Odds Ratio; Phenotype; Risk Factors; Thienamycins; Transplantation, Homologous; Vancomycin; Vancomycin Resistance

Topics: Amikacin; Facial Dermatoses; Fatal Outcome; Female; Gangrene; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Infant, Premature, Diseases; Meropenem; Necrosis; Neutropenia; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Sepsis; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Skin Ulcer; Thienamycins

A 66-year-old male with acute type adult T-cell leukemia that was refractory to chemotherapy underwent unrelated allogeneic bone marrow transplantation after non-myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan and total body irradiation. During an episode of neutropenia on day 12 after transplantation, pneumonia and sepsis due to multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa developed. Drug susceptibility tests demonstrated resistance to all kinds of intravenous antibiotics available for P. aeruginosa in Japan. Multi-drug susceptibility tests by the breakpoint-checkerboard plate method were then performed and combination therapy with meropenem hydrate and colistin was started based on the test results. After starting treatment, clinical symptoms and laboratory data immediately improved and engraftment of neutrophils was achieved on day 18. Infections with multi-drug-resistant P. aeruginosa are often critical for patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and are difficult to control. In this paper, we report a case of severe multi-drug-resistant P. aeruginosa infection that was successfully treated by combination therapy selected using the breakpoint-checkerboard plate method.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bone Marrow Transplantation; Colistin; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Neutropenia; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Thienamycins; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a serious complication associated with morbidity and mortality. To manage infections in neutropenic patients, it is necessary to administer empirical antibiotic therapy in a timely and efficient manner. We developed an electronic critical pathway system for a computer-stored medical record system (EGMAIN-GX, Fujitsu), which matches FN patients to either: i) the first-line therapy with meropenem (3 g/day) alone, or ii) the second-line therapy with meropenem plus vancomycin (2 g/day). If patients do not respond to the first-line therapy within 72 hours, then they are provided with the second-line therapy. A total of 28 FN events were treated in 14 patients presenting with hematological malignancies. The mean and median neutrophil counts were 42 (0-300)/microl and 0/microl, respectively. The response rates with the first-line and second-line therapies were 57% and 93%, respectively. There were no serious adverse events. Meropenem is a highly effective treatment for FN. Use of an electronic critical pathway system could ensure that neutropenic patients receive this necessary empiric therapy in a timely manner so as to prevent the serious complications associated with FN.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amphotericin B; Critical Pathways; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electronic Health Records; Female; Fever; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Liposomes; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome; Vancomycin; Young Adult

Because of the refractory and recurrent nature of febrile neutropenia (FN), definite diagnosis and early empiric treatment with antibiotics are important for FN patients. With this background, guidelines for FN treatment have been published in Japan and overseas, although a treatment method appropriate for clinical practice in Japan has not yet been established. Therefore, we conducted a survey of actual practice, including trends in prescription of antibiotics for FN, in the hope that it would help establish a definitive treatment for FN in Japan. The survey results confirmed that FN patients under care of hematology departments accounted for the largest proportion, followed by pediatrics (hematology), pulmonary medicine, medical oncology, and respiratory surgery, and the proportions of patients diagnosed with FN and those receiving antibiotics in hematology departments are larger than in other departments. Across all departments, cefepime (CFPM) is most frequently used as the initial treatment of choice, accounting for 35.9% of prescriptions, followed by meropenem (MEPM) (24.3%). These drugs are selected because they exhibit high potency and wide coverage against organisms that are presumed to cause FN, and their costs are covered by insurance, while the existence of insurance coverage is the major determining factor for treatment in Japan. Among second-line drugs, MEPM is most frequently used, accounting for 46.3% of prescriptions. The guidelines are commonly used as the basis for treatment, accounting for 52.0% of all departments, especially the guidelines established by the Japan Febrile Neutropenia Study Group. On the other hand, the percentage of departments that have introduced a hospital protocol and clinical path is only 13.0% in total. To provide appropriate treatment for FN patients, insurance coverage and introduction of a hospital protocol and clinical path based on guidelines and evidence are essential. The current situation, in which these are not implemented, is not desirable. The survey results show that the guidelines need to be revised to more closely reflect the actual situation in Japan and hospital protocols and clinical paths need to be introduced.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Critical Pathways; Evidence-Based Medicine; Fever; Humans; Japan; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Physicians; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thienamycins

Chemotherapy related neutropenia developing in oncologic patients is a significant condition and major cause of morbidity and mortality. Febrile neutropenic attacks without complications can be successfully treated with wide-spectrum anti-pseudomonal cephalosporins or carbapenems.. We investigated the efficacy and safety of meropenem in the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer.. Twenty four patients who had a febrile neutropenic episodes followed by initiation of empirical meropenem therapy were included in the study.. Of all the patients, 13 (54.2%) had solid tumors, while 11 (45.8%) were diagnosed to have acute leukemia. Among all, 7 (29.2%) and 15 (62.5%) infections were identified microbiologically and clinically, respectively. Fever of unknown origin was observed in 2 (8.3%) patients. The mean duration of neutropenia was 7.2 +/- 3.1 (4-14) days in patients with solid tumors, and 9.3 +/- 4.7 (2-17) days in the group with leukemia. This difference was not statistically significant (log rank, p=0.063). Average time of stay in hospital was 10.1 +/- 6.4 (4-21) days for patients with solid tumors, and 15.9 +/- 11.7 (5-37) days for patients with leukemia (log rank, p=0.041). FN duration was observed to be significantly longer in patients with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than 100/mm3 and even those with an ANC of less than 200/mm3, and in children who were not in remission for the underlying malign disease (p<0.05). While 22 (91.7%) of the patients were discharged from the hospital, 2 (8.3%) died. The success rate of empirical therapy started with meropenem was 87.5%.. Meropenem is effective and safe for treatment of FN in pediatric cancer patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Retrospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

Infections caused by antibiotics-resistant Gram-positive bacteria have been reported from many pediatric hematology-oncology centers.. The susceptibility profiles to meropenem, piperacillin, and vancomycin among oral flora isolates of alpha-hemolytic streptococci (AHS) obtained from six children with cancer who received several empirical therapies (ET) against febrile neutropenia, were investigated.. Meropenem minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of AHS isolated from ET patients was 2.167 +/- 0.258 microg/mL (mean +/- SD), which was significantly higher than the MIC of AHS isolated from control groups. Intriguingly, AHS isolated approximately 6 months after hospital discharge indicated recovery of susceptibility to meropenem.. AHS isolates from neutropenic children with cancer should be checked for antibiotic susceptibility, even against carbapenems.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus; Thienamycins

To compare clinical outcomes of patients receiving an alternative dosage of meropenem with those of patients receiving imipenem-cilastatin or the traditional dosage of meropenem after failure of or intolerance to cefepime for treatment of febrile neutropenia.. Retrospective, single-center cohort study.. 1250-bed urban academic medical center.. One hundred twenty-seven adults with neutropenic fever who received either imipenem-cilastatin or meropenem; imipenem-cilastatin was the preferred carbapenem until September 1, 2006, after which meropenem became the formulary carbapenem.. Of the 127 patients, 40 received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg every 6 hours between September 1, 2005, and August 31, 2006; 87 patients received meropenem between September 1, 2006, and August 31, 2007: 29 received a traditional dosage of meropenem 1 g every 8 hours, and 58 received an alternative dosage of meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours. Primary outcomes of time to defervescence (median 3 vs 2 vs 3 days), need for additional antibiotics (20% vs 17% vs 14%), and time to receipt of additional antibiotics (median 5 vs 2 vs 1 days) were not significantly different among the imipenem-cilastatin, traditionally dosed meropenem, and alternatively dosed meropenem groups, respectively. In addition, significant differences in secondary outcomes, which were treatment duration (median 10 vs 8 vs 8 days), seizure rate (0% vs 0% vs 0%), in-hospital mortality (5% vs 7% vs 7%), and 30-day mortality (13% vs 7% vs 14%), were not identified among the three groups, respectively.. The alternative meropenem dosage of 500 mg every 6 hours yielded similar patient outcomes, including time to defervescence, need for additional antibiotics, duration of therapy, and mortality, when compared with the traditional meropenem dosage and imipenem-cilastatin in adults with febrile neutropenia. In addition, no adverse effects on clinical outcomes were observed with the alternative dosage of meropenem.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Cilastatin; Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Female; Fever; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Imipenem; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Retreatment; Seizures; Thienamycins; Time Factors

Ciprofloxacin is one of the most commonly used antibacterial agents with relatively few side effects. Serious adverse reactions reported with ciprofloxacin are rare with an incidence of 0.6%. Recently we came across two rare adverse effects of ciprofloxacin, viz. toxic epidermal necrolysis and agranulocytosis. To our knowledge, a total of seven cases have been reported in the literature documenting an association between oral ciprofloxacin administration and toxic epidermal necrolysis. One case of granulocytopenia, four of pancytopenia and fifteen of leucopenia worldwide have been reported. With the use of ciprofloxacin becoming more and more widespread, these two rare but fatal complications of ciprofloxacin should be borne in mind.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Agranulocytosis; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Ciprofloxacin; Female; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Leukopenia; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Risk Factors; Sepsis; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; Thienamycins

The management of acute appendicitis in the febrile neutropenic patient after intensive chemotherapy is controversial. We report our single-center-experience of 5 children diagnosed with appendicitis during febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy for acute leukemia or lymphoma. All patients presented with an isolated appendicitis without signs of overt mucositis or more diffuse enterocolitis. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed by ultrasonography. Perforation with retrocecal abscess was present in 1 patient. Administration of combination antimicrobial regimens including meropenem resulted in complete resolution in all patients. Our observations indicate that acute appendicitis in clinically stable neutropenic cancer patients can be managed conservatively without surgery.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Appendicitis; Child; Female; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Infant; Male; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Thienamycins

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is a combination chemotherapeutic agent, a commonly used antibiotic. Adverse drug reactions occur in 6-8% of patients. Although, the most common adverse reactions include mild gastrointestinal distress and cutaneous events, also a wide range of hematological abnormalities have been ascribed to TMP-SMX. We report a 40-year-old male patient who developed an early onset neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, generalised rash and oral candidiasis after 5 days long TMP-SMX therapy. Although generalised rash may seen more and improves with discontinuation of the therapy; severe neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and oral candidiasis are seen very rare and rarely leads to fatality as it was in our case. Despite thrombocyte transfusions, whole blood transfusions, red cell concentrates and filgrastim therapy we lost our patient. We want to underline that although the TMP-SMX combination is usually well tolerated it can also lead to fatal complications.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Candidiasis, Oral; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Chlorhexidine; Drug Eruptions; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Exanthema; Fatal Outcome; Filgrastim; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Nystatin; Platelet Transfusion; Prednisolone; Recombinant Proteins; Thienamycins; Thrombocytopenia; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

Population pharmacokinetic parameters of meropenem in 57 febrile neutropenic patients and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) data for clinically isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli were applied to estimate the time above the MIC (T>MIC) using the Monte Carlo simulation method. Mean population clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V(d)) of meropenem were proportional to creatinine clearance (CL(Cr)) and body weight, respectively: CL (L/h)=9.7 x (CL(Cr)(mL/min)/120); V(d) (L)=14.6 x (body weight (kg)/61). In 1000 simulated patients treated with meropenem 0.5g or 1g every 8h, the proportions of patients who had a T>MIC less than 40% of the dosing interval were 46.3% and 39.5% for P. aeruginosa and 5.8% and 5.6% for E. coli, respectively. The overwhelming resistance of the pathogenic microorganisms, especially P. aeruginosa, in our data compared with that reported in North America suggests the importance of regions or countries as a critical factor for determining the dosage regimen of meropenem in addition to patient characteristics and pharmacokinetics.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Creatinine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Escherichia coli; Fever; Humans; Korea; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Models, Biological; Neutropenia; Population; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Thienamycins

This study compared the in-vitro properties and in-vivo effects of Escherichia coli filaments, spheroplasts and normal cells in a murine thigh infection model. E. coli was exposed to ceftazidime, meropenem or saline to obtain filaments, spheroplasts or normal bacilli, which were then injected into neutropenic mice. After 24 h, morphology, CFUs, local and circulating endotoxin levels, cytokine levels and mortality were recorded, and correlations between bacterial and host parameters of infection were investigated. Filaments and spheroplasts contained more endotoxin/CFU than controls. Histological studies showed that morphologically altered bacteria changed into rod-shaped cells in the absence of antibiotics. Bacterial spread to the liver was significantly higher in mice challenged with rod-shaped cells, compared with antibiotic-exposed bacteria (p 0.007). Muscle endotoxin levels correlated significantly with circulating interleukin (IL)-6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and both pro-inflammatory cytokines were correlated significantly (p 0.011). Despite a tendency toward higher local and systemic concentrations of endotoxin in the filament group, inflammatory responses and survival did not differ between groups. It was concluded that morphologically altered bacteria contain more endotoxin and can regain a rod shape after withdrawal of antibiotics, while non-antibiotic-exposed bacteria show greater spread to the liver. There was a clear intra-individual relationship between local endotoxin, systemic endotoxin, TNF-alpha and IL-6 production, but these parameters did not differ among groups.

Topics: Animals; Animals, Outbred Strains; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; Cyclophosphamide; Cytoskeleton; Disease Models, Animal; Endotoxins; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; Interleukin-6; Liver; Meropenem; Mice; Muscles; Muscular Diseases; Neutropenia; Spheroplasts; Thienamycins; Thigh; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

The coagulase-negative bacterial species Staphylococcus sciuri is widely distributed in the natural environment. Although principally found in animals, S. sciuri is occasionally isolated from human samples. In this paper, S. sciuri bacteremia which was associated with an indwelling catheter of a patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and neutropenia was presented. An empirical intravenous antibiotic therapy (meropenem, vancomycin) was initiated with the preliminary diagnosis of febrile neutropenia and catheter infection. The catalase and oxidase positive, tube coagulase negative strain isolated from three of the concurrent blood cultures and intravenous catheter culture has been identified as S. sciuri. The isolate was found resistant to penicilin and oxacilline. This case has emphasized the importance of identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from the cultures of patients with haematological malignancy.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Catheters, Indwelling; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Female; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Oxacillin; Penicillin Resistance; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus; Thienamycins; Vancomycin

Pharmacodynamic investigations with antimicrobials define the relationship between the infecting organism and achievable drug concentrations with clinical outcome.. To examine this relationship for meropenem in a population of patients who are at high risk of infection-related morbidity and mortality.. The study was a retrospective analysis of a multicenter, randomized, blinded clinical trial. A population-based predictive model was created using data from adults with febrile neutropenia and the nonparametric modeling program, NPEM. Patient age, body weight, and serum creatinine level were covariates in the model used to predict unbound concentrations for each patient. Pathogen susceptibility was estimated using product literature minimum inhibitory concentrations for effectiveness against 50% of microorganisms (MIC50) for specific organisms. The pharmacodynamic index of percent time above MIC (% T>MIC) was analyzed for its association with clinical outcome.. A 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model using patient covariates of body weight and renal function best described the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in febrile neutropenic patients. Sixty patients with confirmed gram-positive or -negative bacteremia were studied. An average of 83% T>MIC was identified for the 42 clinical responders compared with 59% T>MIC for the 18 nonresponders (p = 0.04). An 80% clinical response rate was evident when the % T>MIC for meropenem exceeded 75% of the dosing interval (p = 0.01).. To our knowledge, this is the first published report of a relationship between a pharmacodynamic index and clinical outcome in a febrile neutropenic population. Based on this relationship, dosing with intravenous meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours is predicted to be comparable to the currently recommended 1 g every 8 hours for serious infections. Our model provides further justification for a prospective clinical trial to evaluate a pharmacodynamically targeted meropenem dosing schedule as to its ability to improve clinical outcome in these patients.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Neutropenia; Retrospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of meropenem in immunocompromised children. Between January 1998 and December 2002 in the hemato-oncological units of our hospital meropenem was used in 87 febrile events diagnosed in 55 patients, and 328 bacterial cultures were evaluated. Microorganisms were detected and identified in 64 of the 328 hemocultures; there was a predominance of gram-positive strains (67%). In 49.4% the infection was documented microbiologically. In 16 additional cases the infection was proven clinically and 32.2% of the episodes were considered to be fever of unknown origin. The success rate of the meropenem therapy-excluding the proven fungal or coagulase-negative Staphylococcus infections--was 72.9% and for the whole cohort 49.4%. The results demonstrate that meropenem is effective and well-tolerated when used for the treatment of neutropenic cancer children.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Bacteria; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Evaluation; Female; Fever; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Infant; Male; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Opportunistic Infections; Retrospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Bacterial Infections; Cohort Studies; Drug Resistance; Fever; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Meropenem; Multivariate Analysis; Neutropenia; Odds Ratio; Research Design; Risk Factors; Thienamycins; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Adolescent; Amphotericin B; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Catheterization, Central Venous; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Fever; Humans; Infant; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins; Vancomycin

Infectious complications are the major causes of morbidity and mortality in children receiving chemotherapy for malignant diseases. Granulocytopenia carries the risk of bacterial infection, and also, if prolonged, of fungal infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of meropenem in immunocompromised children in association with isolated bacteria from blood cultures and clinical background.. Retrospective study of all febrile episodes when meropenem was used in neutropenic children between January 1998 and December 2002 in the haemato-oncological units of the authors hospital. During the study period meropenem was used in 87 febrile events diagnosed in 55 patients (mean age 10 years 5 months), and 328 bacterial cultures were performed. Blood samples were taken from each patient with granulocytopenia (< 0.5 G/l) and fever (> or = 38 degrees C), prior to the start of any antibiotic therapy. For the microbiological process Bactec 9050 (Becton Dickinson) blood culture systems were used.. Microorganisms were detected and identified in 64 (19.5%) from the 328 hemocultures. There was a predominance of Gram-positive strains, 67% (43/64)--the most common bacteria being coagulase negative Staphylococcus (cnS). From the 87 periods in 43 cases (49.4%) the infection was documented microbiologically. In 16 additional cases the infection was proven clinically (based on the clinical course, laboratory and radiologic results) and 32.2% (28/87) of the febrile neutropenic episodes were considered to be fever of unknown origin. Meropenem was used in a mean dose of 60.8 (30-120) mg/kg/die, for 9.3 (2-24) days. The success rate of the meropenem therapy -excluding the proven fungal (n = 13) or cnS (n = 15) infections-was 72.9%. No severe side effects occurred in any regimens.. The results demonstrate that meropenem is effective and well-tolerated when used for the treatment of feverish neutropenic cancer children.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Infective Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Bacteremia; Bacterial Infections; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Fever; Humans; Infant; Male; Meropenem; Mycoses; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Retrospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

Resistance patterns that are currently problematic in Europe can vary greatly within the same species over time, among various patient populations and among geographic regions on the same continent. The results from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program, which monitors carbapenem resistance rates in institutions using meropenem, were used to determine resistance differences among Proteus mirabilis. MIC results from 688 P. mirabilis strains were classified into 4 patient care groups: ICU (n=426), neutropenia patients (NP; n=145), general wards (n=97) and cystic fibrosis patients (CF; n=20). A total of 40 centers from 12 European countries have participated since 1997, divided into 3 geographic regions (East, North, South). All testing was performed by NCCLS reference methods and interpretive criteria, including screening of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) phenotypes. Over the monitored interval the resistance rates varied for each agent without a clear trend toward a greater rate. Rank order of susceptibility was: meropenem (99%) > piperacillin/tazobactam (TAZ; 96%) > cefepime (95%) > ceftazidime (CAZ; 94%) > imipenem (IPM; 92%). Ciprofloxacin (CIP) was the least active agent tested (MIC90 4 microg/ml; 86% susceptible). Unexpectedly, 3.6% of P. mirabilis were imipenem-resistant (MIC, > or = 16 microg/ml). Greater rates of resistance were found for strains from NP and CF patients, and from eastern or southern European sites, usually associated with epidemic clusters. Generally susceptible species such as P. mirabilis have recently emerged as therapeutic problems in European medical centers following mutations that compromise CIP, CAZ and aminoglycoside use. Imipenem also showed decreased susceptibility of greater than 7% compared to less than 1% for meropenem. Continued surveillance by the MYSTIC Program appears to be a prudent practice to focus effective empiric treatment regimens.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Ciprofloxacin; Critical Care; Cystic Fibrosis; Data Collection; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Europe; Humans; Imipenem; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Neutropenia; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Population Surveillance; Proteus Infections; Proteus mirabilis; Tazobactam; Thienamycins

Topics: Amikacin; Anemia; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Female; Filgrastim; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Opportunistic Infections; Prednisone; Recombinant Proteins; Sjogren's Syndrome; Thienamycins; Thrombocytopenia; Treatment Failure

Ceftazidime is commonly used as monotherapy of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. Concern, however, has been raised regarding potential for drug resistance due to its widespread use. Meropenem is a new carbapenem with more extended antibacterial spectrum including anaerobes. It provides better coverage against gram positives. Hence, it may offer an advantage over ceftazidime.. We prospectively treated 49 patients hospitalized for fever (> 38 degrees C) and neutropenia (ANC < or = 500/cmm) with meropenem. We compared their outcome with 50 patients who consecutively received ceftazidime in the immediate past for the same indication.. Comparison of demographic features between the 2 groups revealed no differences in age, gender, type of neoplasm, number of patients with prior antibiotic use, number of days since chemotherapy, absolute neutrophil count and number of patients previously or already hospitalized. Duration of fever, duration of neutropenia and number of patients with pyrexia of undetermined origin were also similar. Therapeutic outcome was same between the two groups. Eighty four percent of patients receiving meropenem and 79% receiving ceftazidime required no modification of the initially assigned therapeutic regimen. Two patients receiving meropenem died. Toxicity was minimal.. We conclude that meropenem offers no significant advantage over ceftazidime in the management of neutropenic febrile patients.

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins

The Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program is a longitudinal global antimicrobial surveillance study that compares the activity of meropenem and comparator antimicrobial agents against pathogens isolated from intensive care, neutropenic or cystic fibrosis patients, and general wards. Data from the different European MYSTIC Program units (1997-2000) showed that the most prevalent isolates tested overall were methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA; in accordance with study design methicillin-resistant S. aureus was not tested), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. In all the unit types, E. coli (approximately 20% having an extended spectrum beta-lactamase phenotype) and MSSA were highly susceptible to meropenem (97-99% susceptibility). Isolates of MSSA showed lower levels of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (61-77% susceptibility) in both cystic fibrosis and neutropenia patients, and particularly high levels of resistance to ceftazidime (38% susceptibility) in cystic fibrosis units. Ciprofloxacin (54% susceptibility) and gentamicin (46% susceptibility) demonstrated low levels of activity against P. aeruginosa (frequently encountered in cystic fibrosis units). Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa in all the unit types. Carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam have sustained > 90% susceptibility rates overall against the most frequently isolated pathogens. The analysis of specific units that house patients with a high-risk of contracting antimicrobial-resistant pathogens remains very important for the optimal selection of empiric regimens.

Topics: Burkholderia cepacia; Cystic Fibrosis; Databases, Factual; Escherichia coli; Europe; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Patients' Rooms; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Thienamycins

The choice of an antibiotic for the treatment of a serious paediatric infection is generally a difficult problem. The arrival of Carbapenem resulted an important advance in the field of medicine due to its broad-spectrum, low incidence of resistances and good safety profile. Among Carbapenems, Meropenem introduction represents a progress because of its pharmacokinetics characteristics and blood-brain barrier penetration. Meropenem dosage depends on the patient weight, and the way of administration is potentially easier. Meropenem has been compared with the most used paediatric antimicrobial in controlled and randomised clinical trials, showing a high efficacy in the treatment of several infections (respiratory, urinary, intraabdominal, dermatological, septicemia) and in neutropenic and cystic fibrosis patients aged between one month and twelve years old. Meropenem is specially useful in the bacterial meningitis treatment because it penetrates into the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with inflamed meninges and reaches therapeutic concentrations, and because appearance of seizures is low. Adverse reactions produced by Meropenem show a poor incidence and its severity is usually mild. With regard to this characteristics, it can be concluded that Meropenem is an antimicrobial which efficacy and safety profiles guarantee its use in the treatment of severe paediatric infections.

Topics: Bacterial Infections; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Meningitis, Bacterial; Meropenem; Neutropenia; Respiratory Tract Infections; Thienamycins; Urinary Tract Infections

Infected, neutropenic animals are used as experimental models to evaluate the relative efficacies of antimicrobial agents and host-pathogen-antibiotic interactions. In the past, these models used death as the study end point. Because of the concern about use of death as an end point, we evaluated the accuracy with which various signs of infection predicted mortality in a neutropenic guinea pig model of treated and untreated Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. The potential surrogate markers studied included ruffled fur, respiratory distress, diarrhea, hunched posture, lethargy, abnormal neurologic movements (twitching, paralysis of a limb), inappetence for > 48 h, the inability to ambulate, and the inability of a supine animal to stand. In addition, we evaluated whether percentage of weight loss or change in daily food and water consumption were predictive of mortality. Animals were inspected for these signs at least every 4 h during the day and every 8 h in the evening. In treated and untreated animals, 100% of subjects that were unable to ambulate or to rise from the supine position died (positive predictive value for death was 100% for either sign). Guinea pigs that could not rise from a supine position expired between 1 and 8 h after this sign was observed. Those that could not ambulate died between 4 and 40 h after that sign was observed. In treated and untreated animals, none of the survivors manifested either sign of disease (100% specificity for each sign). However, 59% of untreated and 69% of treated animals that were ambulatory were found dead at the next observation period, underscoring the rapidity with which this infection progresses to death when it enters its final stage. No other signs of infection distinguished animals that survived or died. Thus, the inability of neutropenic, infected guinea pigs to rise from a supine position and the inability to ambulate were the only signs that accurately predicted death and, therefore, are the only signs that can be used as surrogates for death in this experimental model of P. aeruginosa sepsis.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Biomarkers; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Diarrhea; Disease Models, Animal; Female; Guinea Pigs; Imipenem; Meropenem; Movement Disorders; Neutropenia; Predictive Value of Tests; Pseudomonas Infections; Regression Analysis; Respiration; Thienamycins; Time Factors; Tobramycin; Weight Loss

To determine the impact of neutropenia on the pharmacokinetics of meropenem, 14 patients with fever and neutropenia were given 1 g of meropenem i.v. every 8 h as an infusion over 30 min. The volume of distribution (16.2 l/1.73 m2) and the nonrenal clearance [75 ml/(min x 1.73 m2)] in this group were significantly increased compared to healthy subjects studied previously with identical techniques. The kinetic study was repeated when the patients had a normal temperature and a raised neutrophil count; most kinetic variables did not differ from the findings on the first day of treatment. The pharmacokinetic profile of meropenem in febrile neutropenic patients differs from earlier findings in healthy subjects. Considering these data and known minimum inhibitory concentration values for common pathogens, meropenem administered every 6 to 8 h seems an appropriate regimen in patients with febrile neutropenia. The shorter time interval may be used for treatment of Pseudomonas infection.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carbapenems; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Thienamycins