meropenem and Myelodysplastic-Syndromes

meropenem has been researched along with Myelodysplastic-Syndromes* in 3 studies

Reviews

1 review(s) available for meropenem and Myelodysplastic-Syndromes

ArticleYear
A case of cellulitis complicating Campylobacter jejuni subspecies jejuni bacteremia and review of the literature.
    European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2004, Volume: 23, Issue:9

    Infection with Campylobacter species is a predominant cause of food-borne gastroenteritis in the industrialized world. Bacteremia is detected in <1% of patients with diarrhea, mainly in immunocompromised hosts or those in the extremes of age. Reported here is the case of a 78-year-old, immunocompromised male patient with Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni bacteremia complicated by cellulitis. The infection was characterized by a protracted course with several recurrences and refractoriness to multiple antibiotic regimens, responding only to a prolonged course of meropenem treatment. The frequency of cellulitis as reflected in previously reported series of Campylobacter bacteremia and the clinical characteristics of this difficult-to-treat infection are reviewed.

    Topics: Aged; Bacteremia; Campylobacter Infections; Campylobacter jejuni; Cellulitis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Male; Meropenem; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Roxithromycin; Severity of Illness Index; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

2004

Trials

2 trial(s) available for meropenem and Myelodysplastic-Syndromes

ArticleYear
Doripenem versus meropenem as first-line empiric therapy of febrile neutropenia in patients with acute leukemia: a prospective, randomized study.
    Annals of hematology, 2019, Volume: 98, Issue:5

    Febrile neutropenia is often observed in patients with hematologic malignancies, especially in those with acute leukemia. Meropenem has potent and broad antibacterial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, and is recommended as first-line empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia. In contrast, the safety and efficacy of doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia and hematologic malignancies is limited. In this randomized, prospective, cooperative, open-label trial, we compared doripenem (1.0 g every 8 h) to meropenem (1.0 g every 8 h) as first-line empiric antibacterial treatment of febrile neutropenia. To evaluate efficacy and safety, 133 hospitalized patients with acute leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, who developed febrile neutropenia during or after chemotherapy, were randomized to each drug. Resolution of fever within 3 to 5 days without treatment modification (i.e., the primary endpoint) did not significantly differ between the doripenem and meropenem groups (60.0% vs. 45.6%, respectively; P = 0.136). However, resolution of fever within 7 days of treatment was significantly higher in the doripenem group than in the meropenem group (78.4% vs. 60.2%, respectively; P = 0.037). Similar rates of adverse events (grades 1-2) were observed in both groups. Thus, we conclude that both drugs are safe and well-tolerated for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with acute leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, and that the clinical efficacy of doripenem is noninferior to that of meropenem. UMIN Clinical Trial Registry number: 000006124.

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia; Doripenem; Female; Fever; Humans; Leukemia; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Prospective Studies

2019
[Therapeutic effects of meropenem against severe infections in patients with hematopoietic disorders. Hanshin Study Group of Hematopoietic Disorders and Infection].
    The Japanese journal of antibiotics, 1992, Volume: 45, Issue:6

    The efficacy and the safety of meropenem (MEPM), a newly developed carbapenem antibiotic, were investigated in 150 patients with severe infections complicated with hematopoietic disorders. 1. Clinical responses in 132 patients who were evaluable for effectiveness were excellent in 33 patients, good in 45, fair in 10 and poor in 44, with an efficacy rate of 59.1%. 2. The efficacy rate in patients who had previously been treated with the other antibiotics was 51.2%, while that in patients who had not been thus treated was 62.9%. 3. The efficacy rate in patients whose neutrophil counts increased during the therapy with MEPM was higher than that in patients whose neutrophil counts did not increase. The efficacy rate in patients whose neutrophil counts during the therapy were below 100/mm3 was 48.1%. 4. Out of 150 cases, side effects were observed in 4 patients, 3 with eruption and 1 with jaundice. Abnormalities in laboratory test results on liver functions were noted in 8 patients. These results indicate that MEPM is an effective and safe antibiotic for the treatment of severe infections in patients with hematopoietic disorders.

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bacterial Infections; Female; Hematologic Diseases; Humans; Leukemia, T-Cell; Lymphatic Diseases; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Thienamycins

1992