meropenem and Leukemia

Febrile neutropenia is often observed in patients with hematologic malignancies, especially in those with acute leukemia. Meropenem has potent and broad antibacterial activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, and is recommended as first-line empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia. In contrast, the safety and efficacy of doripenem in patients with febrile neutropenia and hematologic malignancies is limited. In this randomized, prospective, cooperative, open-label trial, we compared doripenem (1.0 g every 8 h) to meropenem (1.0 g every 8 h) as first-line empiric antibacterial treatment of febrile neutropenia. To evaluate efficacy and safety, 133 hospitalized patients with acute leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, who developed febrile neutropenia during or after chemotherapy, were randomized to each drug. Resolution of fever within 3 to 5 days without treatment modification (i.e., the primary endpoint) did not significantly differ between the doripenem and meropenem groups (60.0% vs. 45.6%, respectively; P = 0.136). However, resolution of fever within 7 days of treatment was significantly higher in the doripenem group than in the meropenem group (78.4% vs. 60.2%, respectively; P = 0.037). Similar rates of adverse events (grades 1-2) were observed in both groups. Thus, we conclude that both drugs are safe and well-tolerated for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with acute leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, and that the clinical efficacy of doripenem is noninferior to that of meropenem. UMIN Clinical Trial Registry number: 000006124.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia; Doripenem; Female; Fever; Humans; Leukemia; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Prospective Studies

In Norway, initial treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN) has traditionally been benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside. Internationally, FN is often treated with a broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic. We aimed to compare these two regimens in a prospective, randomized, trial in patients with lymphoma or leukaemia with an expected period of neutropenia ≥7 days, and a suspected bacterial infection.. Adult neutropenic patients with lymphoma or leukaemia, and a suspected bacterial infection, were randomized for treatment with benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside or meropenem. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined as no modification of antibiotics and clinical stability 72 h after randomization.. Among 322 randomized patients, 297 proved evaluable for analyses. Fifty-nine per cent (95% CI 51%-66%), (87/148) of the patients given benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside were clinically stable, and had no antibiotic modifications 72 h after randomization, compared with 82% (95% CI 75%-87%), (122/149) of the patients given meropenem (p <0.001). When the antibiotic therapy was stopped, 24% (95% CI 18%-32%), (36/148) of the patients given benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside, compared with 52% (95% CI 44%-60%), (78/149) of the patients given meropenem, had no modifications of their regimens (p <0.001). In the benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside arm, the all-cause fatality within 30 days of randomization was 3.4% (95% CI 1.2%-7.9%), (5/148) of the patients, compared with 0% (95% CI 0.0%-3.0%), (0/149) of the patients in the meropenem arm (p 0.03).. Clinical success was more common in FN patients randomized to meropenem compared with the patients randomized to benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside. The all-cause fatality was higher among the patients given benzylpenicillin plus an aminoglycoside.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Female; Humans; Leukemia; Lymphoma; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Mortality; Neutropenia; Norway; Penicillin G; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The efficacies of meropenem, a novel carbapenem, and ceftazidime, as empirical therapy of febrile neutropenic patients, were compared in a prospective, randomized clinical trial. One hundred and twelve adult patients were given meropenem 1 g tds iv for 153 episodes of fever, while 109 patients received ceftazidime 2 g tds iv for 151 episodes. All patients survived the first 3 days of therapy and, by the end of the treatment courses, 67 (44%) episodes had responded to meropenem, compared with 62 (41%) to ceftazidime. Eighty (53%) episodes initially treated with ceftazidime and 63 (41%) episodes treated with meropenem were considered to have failed treatment because it was thought necessary to administer additional antibacterial agents; however, modifications were made twice as often because of fever that persisted beyond 2-3 days than because of obvious causes of failure such as persistent infection. Three patients in the ceftazidime group and five in the meropenem group died. Meropenem was well tolerated, with no reports of nausea or toxicity to the central nervous system. Although ceftazidime was shown in the present study to be as effective as meropenem, the broader spectrum of activity of meropenem against Gram-positive cocci suggests that it might be more appropriate as empirical therapy of febrile neutropenic patients who are at high risk of acquiring infections caused by these bacteria.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Bacterial Infections; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Female; Fever; Humans; Leukemia; Leukocyte Count; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Failure

New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) is a serious challenge to the treatment of infections and public health. Serbia has been designated as an endemic region for isolates carrying the bla

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Typing Techniques; beta-Lactam Resistance; beta-Lactamases; Cloning, Molecular; Conjugation, Genetic; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Gene Expression; Humans; Leukemia; Male; Meropenem; Plasmids; Thienamycins