meropenem and Hypersensitivity

Meropenem is a widely prescribed beta-lactam for hospitalized patients. There are few data on meropenem allergy assessments in inpatients with a reported history of penicillin allergy who require a treatment with meropenem. This can lead to the use of less effective second-line antibiotics that may increase antibiotic resistances. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a meropenem allergy assessment in admitted patients with a reported history of penicillin allergy that required meropenem for the treatment of an acute infection.. A retrospective analysis was performed on 182 inpatients labelled with a penicillin-allergy who received meropenem after an allergy assessment. The allergy study was performed bedside if meropenem was required urgently. The study included skin prick tests (SPTs) followed by an intradermal skin test (IDT) to meropenem, and a meropenem drug challenge test (DCT). If a non-immediate reaction to a beta-lactam was suspected, it was initiated with patch tests.. The median age of the patients was 59.7 years (range 28-95) and 80 (44%) were women. A total of 196 sets of diagnostic workups were performed, with 189 (96.4%) of them being tolerated. Only two patients had a positive meropenem IV DCT, both presenting a non-severe cutaneous reaction that completely resolved after treatment.. This study evidenced that a bedside meropenem allergy assessment of hospitalized patients labelled with a 'penicillin allergy' who require a broad-spectrum antibiotic for empiric coverage is a safe and effective procedure, avoiding the use of second-line antimicrobial agents.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactams; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Penicillins; Retrospective Studies; Skin Tests

Meropenem is a widely prescribed β-lactam antibiotic. Meropenem exhibits maximum pharmacodynamic efficacy when given by continuous infusion to deliver constant drug levels above the minimal inhibitory concentration. Compared with intermittent administration, continuous administration of meropenem may improve clinical outcomes.. To determine whether continuous administration of meropenem reduces a composite of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria compared with intermittent administration in critically ill patients with sepsis.. A double-blind, randomized clinical trial enrolling critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock who had been prescribed meropenem by their treating clinicians at 31 intensive care units of 26 hospitals in 4 countries (Croatia, Italy, Kazakhstan, and Russia). Patients were enrolled between June 5, 2018, and August 9, 2022, and the final 90-day follow-up was completed in November 2022.. Patients were randomized to receive an equal dose of the antibiotic meropenem by either continuous administration (n = 303) or intermittent administration (n = 304).. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28. There were 4 secondary outcomes, including days alive and free from antibiotics at day 28, days alive and free from the intensive care unit at day 28, and all-cause mortality at day 90. Seizures, allergic reactions, and mortality were recorded as adverse events.. All 607 patients (mean age, 64 [SD, 15] years; 203 were women [33%]) were included in the measurement of the 28-day primary outcome and completed the 90-day mortality follow-up. The majority (369 patients, 61%) had septic shock. The median time from hospital admission to randomization was 9 days (IQR, 3-17 days) and the median duration of meropenem therapy was 11 days (IQR, 6-17 days). Only 1 crossover event was recorded. The primary outcome occurred in 142 patients (47%) in the continuous administration group and in 149 patients (49%) in the intermittent administration group (relative risk, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.81-1.13], P = .60). Of the 4 secondary outcomes, none was statistically significant. No adverse events of seizures or allergic reactions related to the study drug were reported. At 90 days, mortality was 42% both in the continuous administration group (127 of 303 patients) and in the intermittent administration group (127 of 304 patients).. In critically ill patients with sepsis, compared with intermittent administration, the continuous administration of meropenem did not improve the composite outcome of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03452839.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Critical Illness; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Monobactams; Sepsis; Shock, Septic

β-Lactam antibiotics provide the cornerstone of treatment for respiratory exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. Unfortunately, approximately 20% of patients develop multiple nonimmediate allergic reactions that restrict therapeutic options. The purpose of this study was to explore the chemical and immunological basis of multiple β-lactam allergy through the analysis of human serum albumin (HSA) covalent binding profiles and T-cell responses against 3 commonly prescribed drugs; piperacillin, meropenem, and aztreonam. The chemical structures of the drug haptens were defined by mass spectrometry. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from 4 patients with multiple allergic reactions and cultured with piperacillin, meropenem, and aztreonam. PBMC responses were characterized using the lymphocyte transformation test and IFN-γ /IL-13 ELIspot. T-cell clones were generated from drug-stimulated T-cell lines and characterized in terms of phenotype, function, and cross-reactivity. Piperacillin, meropenem, and aztreonam formed complex and structurally distinct haptenic structures with lysine residues on HSA. Each drug modified Lys190 and at least 6 additional lysine residues in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. PBMC proliferative responses and cytokine release were detected with cells from the allergic patients, but not tolerant controls, following exposure to the drugs. 122 CD4+, CD8+, or CD4+CD8+ T-cell clones isolated from the allergic patients were found to proliferate and release cytokines following stimulation with piperacillin, meropenem, or aztreonam. Cross-reactivity with the different drugs was not observed. In conclusion, our data show that piperacillin-, meropenem-, and aztreonam-specific T-cell responses are readily detectable in allergic patients with cystic fibrosis, which indicates that multiple β-lactam allergies are instigated through priming of naïve T-cells against the different drug antigens. Characterization of complex haptenic structures on distinct HSA lysine residues provides a chemical basis for the drug-specific T-cell response.

Topics: Aztreonam; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; beta-Lactams; Cystic Fibrosis; Drug Hypersensitivity; Haptens; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Meropenem; Molecular Structure; Piperacillin; Serum Albumin; T-Lymphocytes; Thienamycins