meropenem and Febrile-Neutropenia

Antipseudomonal β-lactams have been used for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN); however, the efficacy and safety of antipseudomonal β-lactams in pediatric patients remain unclear. The aim of this study was to comprehensively compare the efficacy and side effects of optional antipseudomonal β-lactams for pediatric FN.. PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from their inception to December 18, 2020. Eligible randomized controlled trials in which pediatric FN patients were treated with an empiric monotherapy of antipseudomonal β-lactams were selected. Data synthesis was performed using WinBUGS 14.0 software and meta packages implemented in R 3.6.2. Random-effects network meta-analysis was performed, and dichotomous data were pooled as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The primary outcome was treatment success without modification; the secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs), all-cause mortality, and new infections. The GRADE tool was used to assess the quality of the evidence. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO ID CRD42021226763.. Eighteen studies with 2517 patients were included. The results showed no statistically significant difference between the optional antipseudomonal β-lactams in the outcomes of treatment success without modification, all AEs, all-cause mortality, and new infections for pediatric FN. Based on the results of Bayesian rank probability, meropenem was ranked highest among all the treatment options with regard to treatment success without modification benefit; ceftazidime and meropenem were associated with a lower risk of AEs; cefoperazone/sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam were associated with a lower risk of mortality, and piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem were associated with a lower risk of new infections. The quality of evidence was moderate.. Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam were found to be better with regard to treatment success without modification, with a comparable safety profile. Therefore, our findings support the use of meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam as a treatment option for pediatric FN patients.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactams; Ceftazidime; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Imipenem; Male; Meropenem; Network Meta-Analysis; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Meropenem monotherapy vs ceftazidime plus amikacin have been approved for use against febrile neutropenia. To assess the effectiveness and safety of them for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.. Randomized controlled trials on ceftazidime plus amikacin, or/and monotherapy with meropenem for the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia were identified by searching Cochrane Library, PubMed, Science Direct, Wiley Online, Science Citation Index, Google (scholar), National Center for Biotechnology Information, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Data on interventions, participants' characteristics and the outcomes of therapy, were extracted for statistical analysis. Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria.. The treatment with ceftazidime plus amikacin was more effective than meropenem (OR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.93-1.46; 1270 participants). However, the treatment effects of the 2 therapy methods were almost parallel in adults (OR = 1.15; 95% CI 0.91-1.46; 1130 participants older than 16). Drug-related adverse effects afflicted more patients treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin (OR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.52-1.15; 1445 participants). The common responses were nausea, diarrhea, rash, and increased in serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase and bilirubin.. Ceftazidime plus amikacin should be the first choice for empirical treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia, and meropenem may be chosen as a last defense against pathogenic bacteria.

Topics: Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftazidime; Drug Therapy, Combination; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Meropenem; Neoplasms

Meropenem is a carbapenem antibiotic that exhibits time-dependent bactericidal activity, traditionally dosed intravenously at 1 g every 8 h. In order to maximize its pharmacodynamic activity and reduce costs, an alternative regimen employed by many institutions is 500 mg every 6 h. The objective of this review was to summarize and evaluate published literature comparing clinical outcomes associated with these two meropenem dosing regimens. The literature was searched up to October 2016 using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. Three retrospective cohort studies were identified that compared clinical outcomes in general infectious disease patients (two studies) and patients with febrile neutropenia (one study). All studies reported no difference in clinical outcomes (clinical success, time to defervescence, sign or symptom resolution, length of stay, mortality, need for other antibiotics, and seizure rates). One study reported reduced economic costs with the alternative dosing. Interpretation of findings was primarily limited by small sample sizes and generalizability. Based on the data reviewed, the alternative dosing regimen of meropenem 500 mg intravenously every 6 h could be considered a therapeutic option. Future studies are needed to confirm the findings of this review, especially in high-risk populations such as immunocompromised patients or those with severe infections.

Topics: Communicable Diseases; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Meropenem; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

Although survival of children with hematological diseases and cancer has increased dramatically, febrile neutropenia (FN) is a frequently observed complication and is sometimes life-threatening in pediatric cancer patients. A prospective, randomized study was performed to clarify the usefulness of meropenem (MEPM) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) for pediatric patients with FN. Ninety-nine patients with 394 episodes were randomly assigned to receive MEPM or PIPC/TAZ. MEPM was administered at 120 mg/kg/day as a 1-h drip infusion 3 times a day. On the other hand, PIPC/TAZ was administered at 360 mg/kg/day as a 1-h drip infusion 4 times a day. MEPM was effective in 69.5% of the 200 episodes, and PIPC/TAZ was effective in 77.2% of the 193 episodes. Compared with our previous study of MEPM 120 mg/kg/day as a 1-h drip infusion 3 times a day versus PIPC/TAZ 337.5 mg/kg/day as a 1-h drip infusion 3 times a day, the success rate of the MEPM group was not different. However, the success rate of the PIPC/TAZ group was higher than in the previous study (p = 0.001). In particular, the success rate in patients ≥ 15 years of age was improved in the PIPC/TAZ group of the present study compared with the previous study (p = 0.005).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Body Weight; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Febrile Neutropenia; Historically Controlled Study; Humans; Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infusions, Intravenous; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Stem Cell Transplantation; Young Adult

Although survival of children with hematological diseases and cancer has increased dramatically, life-threatening complications due to bacterial infections occur in 5-10% of febrile episodes in pediatric cancer patients. A prospective randomized study was performed to clarify the usefulness of meropenem (MEPM) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) with or without intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as second-line therapy for pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia (FN).. As first-line therapy for FN, 105 patients with 434 episodes were randomly assigned to receive MEPM or PIPC/TAZ. A total of 71 pediatric patients and 144 episodes were judged as failures and enrolled for second-line treatment. In second-line treatment, patients were randomized to a group of MEPM and PIPC/TAZ with or without IVIG. MEPM was given to patients who received PIPC/TAZ as first-line treatment, and PIPC/TAZ was given to patients who received MEPM as first-line treatment.. The total success rate of second-line therapy was 49.3%. MEPM with or without IVIG was effective in 44.3% of cases, and PIPC/TAZ with or without IVIG was effective in 55.3%; this difference was not significant. The success rate in patients with serum IgG under 1000 mg/dl was 41.3% in the MEPM or PIPC/TAZ group and 64.3% in the MEPM + IVIG or PIPC/TAZ + IVIG group (p = 0.028).. The present results suggest that PIPC/TAZ is as effective as MEPM and safe for second-line treatment of FN in pediatric patients. Furthermore, IVIG appears very effective for patients with low serum IgG levels.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; Child; Child, Preschool; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Meropenem; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Febrile neutropenia frequently develops after chemotherapy. There is little evidence to indicate the type of antimicrobial agents that should be used in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with solid tumors. The objective is to determine the efficacy and safety of cefepime (CFPM) and meropenem (MEPM) in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in lung cancer patients in a prospective randomized study. FN patients with lung cancer were randomly divided into CFPM or MEPM groups. The primary end-point was the response rate. The secondary end-points were the defervescence rates at 72 h, 7 days, 14 days and the incidence of adverse events. Twenty-one patients were treated with CFPM and 24 patients were treated with MEPM. One patient died of FN. The CFPM treatment completion rate was 17.65% (95% CI; 0.00-35.77%), while the MEPM treatment completion rate was 38.10% (95% CI; 17.33-58.87%). The defervescence rates at 72 h, 7 days, and 14 days were 70.59%, 86.67%, and 100.00%, respectively in the CFPM group; and 65.00%, 84.21%, and 92.31% in the MEPM group. Adverse events were observed in 33.33% of the CFPM group and 45.83% of the MEPM group. The response rate of the CFPM group was 94.12% (95% CI; 73.02-98.95%), while that of the MEPM group was 85.71% (95% CI; 65.36-95.02%). No differences were found in the efficacy or safety of CFPM and MEPM in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with lung cancer.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Cefepime; Cephalosporins; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins

Meropenem (MEPM) is widely used for treatment of febrile neutropenia. There have been many reports on MEPM for pediatric febrile neutropenia showing success rates of approximately 50-75%. Although i.v. immunoglobulin (IVIG) is widely used for treatment of infection with antibiotics, there has been no report on the efficacy of IVIG for pediatric febrile neutropenia. This prospective randomized study was therefore carried out to clarify the usefulness of MEPM with or without IVIG as second line-therapy for pediatric febrile neutropenia.. A total of 61 pediatric patients with 146 episodes were judged to have failure of first-line therapy (August 2008-April 2010: cefozopran vs cefepime; April 2010-April 2012: cefepime vs piperacillin/tazobactam) for febrile neutropenia, and were randomized to MEPM and MEPM + IVIG groups.. MEPM with or without IVIG as second-line therapy was effective in 68.1% of a total of 144 episodes. Success rates in the MEPM and MEPM + IVIG groups were 66.3% and 70.5%, respectively. Furthermore, success rates for patients with IgG <500 mg/dL were 62.5% in the MEPM group and 81.3% in the MEPM + IVIG group. This result, however, was not statistically significant, possibly because of the small sample size.. MEPM is effective and safe for second-line treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic pediatric patients. Moreover, IVIG is effective for patients with low serum IgG.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Meropenem; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins; Young Adult

We report a case of brucellosis-induced severe neutropenia in a 2-year-old girl who presented with a 2-week history of fever. On clinical examination, the patient was febrile with mild aphthous stomatitis. However, her general condition was stable, and systemic examination did not show involvement of any other organ. Laboratory test results revealed severe neutropenia, mild anemia, and an elevated serum C-reactive protein level. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood leukocytes revealed no malignancy, and blood film morphology was unremarkable except for mild microcytosis and hypochromia. Antineutrophil antibody and Coombs test results were negative. We administered intravenous cefuroxime; however, therapy was switched to meropenem plus clarithromycin because fever persisted for 5 days, despite treatment. On the 10th day after admission, Brucella serology tests showed positive results, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole plus rifampicin therapy was prescribed for 8 weeks. The fever defervesced, and the child was discharged in a good state of health. Neutropenia persisted for several months but gradually resolved. Neutropenia, defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1.5 cells × 10 9 /L beyond the first year of life, is a benign transient condition associated with an intercurrent infection (usually viral illnesses or infections) in immunocompetent children. However, severe neutropenia (ANC < 0.5 × 10 9 /L) associated with fever necessitates hospitalization and administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics to avoid the high risk of sepsis, particularly in children. Brucellosis is rarely associated with hematologic abnormalities such as neutropenia. Early diagnosis of hematologic complications of brucellosis is essential for prompt initiation of specific and aggressive treatment.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Brucellosis; C-Reactive Protein; Cefuroxime; Child; Child, Preschool; Clarithromycin; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Fever; Humans; Meropenem; Rifampin; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination

To evaluate broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic use before and after the implementation of a revised febrile neutropenia management algorithm in a population of adults with hematologic malignancies.. Quasi-experimental study.. Patients admitted between 2014 and 2018 to the Adult Malignant Hematology service of an acute-care hospital in the United States.. Aggregate data for adult malignant hematology service were obtained for population-level antibiotic use: days of therapy (DOT), C. difficile infections, bacterial bloodstream infections, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. All rates are reported per 1,000 patient days before the implementation of an febrile neutropenia management algorithm (July 2014-May 2016) and after the intervention (June 2016-December 2018). These data were compared using interrupted time series analysis.. In total, 2,014 patients comprised 6,788 encounters and 89,612 patient days during the study period. Broad-spectrum intravenous (IV) antibiotic use decreased by 5.7% with immediate reductions in meropenem and vancomycin use by 22 (P = .02) and 15 (P = .001) DOT per 1,000 patient days, respectively. Bacterial bloodstream infection rates significantly increased following algorithm implementation. No differences were observed in the use of other antibiotics or safety outcomes including C. difficile infection, ICU length of stay, and in-hospital mortality.. Reductions in vancomycin and meropenem were observed following the implementation of a more stringent febrile neutropenia management algorithm, without evidence of adverse outcomes. Successful implementation occurred through a collaborative effort and continues to be a core reinforcement strategy at our institution. Future studies evaluating patient-level data may identify further stewardship opportunities in this population.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Clostridioides difficile; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Interrupted Time Series Analysis; Meropenem; Vancomycin

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; beta-Lactams; Cephalosporins; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Hypersensitivity; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Meropenem; Penicillins

Antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a threat to children with cancer. We explored the association between P. aeruginosa resistance and previous antibiotic exposure. All children with cancer and P. aeruginosa bacteremia in 2007 to 2016 in Denmark, a country with an overall resistance rate of ∼3%, were included. Twenty percent (10/49) of isolates from children previously exposed to meropenem were meropenem nonsusceptible. The only significant risk factor of meropenem nonsusceptibility was previous meropenem therapy (P=0.03). On the basis of these results, we suggest that meropenem should be reserved as a last resort for children with febrile neutropenia in countries with low antimicrobial resistance.

Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Denmark; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Prognosis; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Retrospective Studies

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is a widely used and safe procedure to treat mostly hematologic diseases. These patients are at risk of infectious complications, which represents a major cause of morbidity and it is the second cause of mortality. This retrospective 12-year analysis of the incidence, type, and severity of infections in 266 consecutive unselected ASCT patients at our institution provides novel information addressing this issue. We included 266 ASCT procedures. Patients included in the 2006-2013 period are referred to as group 1 (ciprofloxacin prophylaxis and ceftazidime-amikacin as empirical antibiotics), and those in the 2013-2017 period are group 2 (levofloxacin prophylaxis and meropenem as empirical antibiotics). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 72% in group 1 and 86.2% in group 2 (p = 0.004). The majority of infectious episodes were associated with fever of unknown origin: 55% in group 1 and 59% in group 2. Febrile of unknown origin episodes were 82.6% in group 1 and 80% in group 2. Significant differences between both groups were found in age, hypogammaglobulinemia, and advanced disease at ASCT. No differences were found between groups regarding the most common agent documented in positive blood cultures (Gram+ were 66.6% in group 1 and 69% in group 2 (p = 0.68)). Mortality within 100 days of transplant was low, 1.87%. Regardless of the prophylactic regimen used, most patients experience febrile episodes in the ASCT setting, fever of unknown origin is the most common infection complication, and Gram+ agents are prevalent in both groups. Mortality rates were low. According to our results, ASCT is a safe procedure and there is no clear benefit in favor of levofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. Both anti-infectious approaches are acceptable, yielding similar outcomes.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Amikacin; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bacteremia; Ceftazidime; Ciprofloxacin; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Fever of Unknown Origin; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Incidence; Levofloxacin; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation; Retrospective Studies; Transplantation, Autologous; Uruguay; Young Adult

To assess the role that real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided optimization of continuous-infusion (CI) meropenem may have in maximizing empirical treatment and in preventing breakthrough infection and/or colonization with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) among oncohaematological patients with febrile neutropenia (FN).. A monocentric, interventional, prospective study was conducted. The pharmacodynamic (PD) target was a steady-state meropenem concentration-to-MIC ratio (Css/MIC) of 4-8. The primary endpoint was 14 day all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was the prevalence of CRE colonization in rectal swabs of patients rehospitalized within 3 months.. Among the 75 patients enrolled, most (56%) had AML, almost half (37/75, 49.3%) underwent HSCT and one-third (32%) received meropenem as monotherapy. Meropenem dosages were adjusted in 30.1% of TDM reassessments. Gram-negative infections were microbiologically documented in 20.0% of patients. All of the 12 patients having infections caused by in vitro meropenem-susceptible pathogens attained the desired PD target and were cured. Three patients had infections caused by in vitro meropenem-resistant pathogens. Two of these achieved a Css/MIC target of 1 and were cured; the other one achieved a suboptimal PD target (0.59) and died. The 14 day all-cause mortality (10.7%) was significantly associated, at multivariate regression, with HSCT (OR 0.086, 95% CI 0.008-0.936, P = 0.044) and with augmented renal clearance (OR 10.846, 95% CI 1.534-76.672, P = 0.017). None of the patients who had hospital readmissions in the 3 month follow-up (63/75) had CRE colonization in rectal swabs.. Real-time TDM-guided CI meropenem may be a useful approach for attaining adequate exposure and preventing CRE emergence in FN oncohaematological patients.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Monitoring; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azabicyclo Compounds; Ceftazidime; Coinfection; Colistin; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enterococcus faecalis; Enterococcus faecium; Eye Neoplasms; Febrile Neutropenia; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Klebsiella Infections; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Male; Melanoma; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Pseudomonas Infections; Tigecycline

Guidelines for the treatment of sepsis, febrile neutropenia, and hospital-acquired pneumonia caused by

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Iatrogenic Disease; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pneumonia; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Sepsis; Tazobactam; Thienamycins; Tobramycin

The post-marketing surveillance of meropenem (Meropen) for febrile neutropenia (FN) was conducted between July 2010 and June 2012 to evaluate safety and efficacy under actual clinical use. There were 1191 and 1124 evaluable cases for safety and efficacy respectively, of 1207 case cards collected from 180 institutions. In safety analysis, the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with use of meropenem (including abnormal laboratory findings) was 15.7% (187/1191 cases), and the main ADRs were alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood alkaline phosphatase increased, hepatic function abnormal, and liver disorder, which were similar to these observed in the clinical study for FN or post marketing surveillances of meropenem conducted before. In efficacy analysis, the overall efficacy was 81.8% (919/1124 cases). Also, it was 79.2% (708/894 cases) for hematological malignancy and 91.8% (213/232 cases) for solid cancer. These results confirmed meropenem (Meropen) is one of the well-tolerated and potent antimicrobial agents for febrile neutropenia.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Meropenem; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Thienamycins

Information on the efficacy of extended meropenem administration in neutropenic patients is scarce. Our objective was to determine whether the administration of meropenem in a 4 h extended infusion (EI) leads to a better clinical outcome in patients with febrile neutropenia than the conventional short infusion (SI).. This was a retrospective observational study. The subjects were neutropenic patients who presented with fever after receiving haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation or induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia. The primary endpoint was the success of treatment after 5 days of meropenem therapy, defined as follows: the disappearance of fever leading to a maintained (≥ 24 h) feverless state; the resolution or improvement of the clinical signs and symptoms of infection; the absence of persistent or breakthrough bacteraemia; and no additional antibiotics prescribed because of an unsatisfactory clinical evolution.. Eighty-eight patients received meropenem (1 g/8 h) in SI and 76 received the same dose in EI. Treatment success on day 5 was superior in the EI group [52/76 (68.4%) versus 36/88 (40.9%); P<0.001]. Meropenem administered in EI was independently associated with success (OR 3.13, 95% CI 1.61-6.10). Fewer additional antibiotics were prescribed in the EI group during the first 5 days of treatment [20/76 (26.3%) versus 44/88 (50.0%); P=0.002]. Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis a more prompt defervescence and a faster decrease in C-reactive protein concentration were observed in the EI group (P=0.021 and P=0.037, respectively). There were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay and in the mortality rate.. Meropenem administration in EI results in a better clinical outcome for febrile neutropenia episodes, with fewer additional antibiotics needed.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Thienamycins; Treatment Outcome

Infection is a serious cause of mortality in febrile neutropenia of pediatric cancer patients. Recently, monotherapy has replaced the combination therapy in empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. Since there has been no reported trial comparing the efficacy of meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP/ TAZ) monotherapies, the present retrospective study was conducted to compare safety and efficacy in febrile neutropenic children with cancer.. Charts of febrile, neutropenic children hospitalized at our center between March 2008 and April 2011 for hemato-oncological malignancies were reviewed. Patients received PIP/TAZ 360 mg/kg/day or meropenem 60 mg/kg/day intravenously in three divided doses. Duration of fever and neutropenia, absolute neutrophil count, modification, and success rate were compared between the two groups. Resolution of fever without antibiotic change was defined as success and resolution of fever with antibiotic change or death of a patient was defined as failure. Modification was defined as changing the empirical antimicrobial agent during a febrile episode.. Two hundred eighty four febrile neutropenic episodes were documented in 136 patients with a median age of 5 years. In 198 episodes meropenem and in 86 episodes PIP/ TAZ were used. Duration of fever and neutropenia, neutrophil count, sex, and primary disease were not different between two groups. Success rates and modification rate between two groups showed no significant differences (p>0.05). Overall success rate in the meropenem and PIP/TAZ groups were 92.4% and 91.9% respectively. No serious adverse effects occurred in either of the groups.. Meropenem and PIP/TAZ monotherapy are equally safe and effective in the initial treatment of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Febrile Neutropenia; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Meropenem; Neoplasms; Neutrophils; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Retrospective Studies; Thienamycins; Young Adult