meropenem and Enterocolitis--Pseudomembranous

To estimate the acceptance of the pharmaceutical intervention in controlling duration of antimicrobial therapy and to evaluate their impact on optimizing the treatment.. Prospective observational study for two years in a General University Hospital. For the patients record, we followed non critical adult patients with antibiotic treatment. When the duration of antimicrobial treatment not complied with established criteria for each antibiotic and pathology, there was a communication with the physician, at which is recommended to assess the need for continue treatment. The acceptance of pharmaceutical intervention was collected and afterwards we analyzed the impact of this work by antimicrobial consumption and incidence of Clostridium difficile.. . In 122 patients the pharmacist made a pharmaceutical intervention due to prolonged antibiotic treatment. The most prevalent antibiotics were β-lactams, specifically meropenem. The intravenous administration was more frequent. In 77 cases it was decided to recommend the suspension of treatment, we conducted an orally prospective intervention at 70.15 % and the rest of interventions were written. Acceptance was 65.95 % and 65.00%, respectively. During the study period, the DDD of the antimicrobials decreased by 8.89% and expenditure on antimicrobials one 40.12%. The incidence of C. difficile was stable.. . In a hospital, a pharmaceutical counselling program on the duration of antimicrobial therapy is well accepted by the prescriber physician, but it must be improved. The route of information does not affect the degree of acceptance. These actions could involve a reduction of antimicrobial consumption.

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Clostridioides difficile; Drug Utilization; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous; Hospitals, General; Humans; Meropenem; Pharmacy Service, Hospital; Prospective Studies; Spain; Thienamycins

Clostridium difficile (CD) infection is almost always confined to the colon causing a spectrum of illness ranging from diarrhoea to fulminant colitis. CD infection of the small intestine has been described but the identification of CD toxin in the stoma effluent of a patient with an end ileostomy is rare. We describe a 91-year-old woman, with a history of proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, presenting with profuse ileostomy diarrhoea after a course of antibiotics. Ileostomy effluent was positive for CD toxin but the patient died despite appropriate treatment. This suggests that the small intestine is susceptible to CD infection in antibiotic-treated patients many years after a colectomy. CD enteritis should be considered in all patients with increased ileostomy diarrhoea despite the absence of a colon.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Colectomy; Colitis, Ulcerative; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous; Fatal Outcome; Female; Humans; Ileostomy; Infusions, Intravenous; Intestine, Small; Meropenem; Postoperative Complications; Staphylococcal Infections; Thienamycins

Agar dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing (CLSI, M11-A7, 2007) performed for 208 toxin-producing clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile resulted in OPT-80 MICs ranging from 0.06 to 1 microg/ml, with 90% of the isolates inhibited by a concentration of 0.5 microg/ml. The in vitro activity of OPT-80 was independent of the susceptibilities of isolates to nine other antimicrobial agents.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Toxins; Clostridioides difficile; Cross Infection; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous; Glycosides; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Microbial Sensitivity Tests

The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is increasing, and standard treatment is not always effective. Therefore, more-effective antimicrobial agents and treatment strategies are needed. We used the agar dilution method to determine the in vitro susceptibility of the following antimicrobials against 110 toxigenic clinical isolates of C. difficile from 1983 to 2004, primarily from the United States: doripenem, meropenem, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, OPT-80, ramoplanin, rifalazil, rifaximin, nitazoxanide, tizoxanide, tigecycline, vancomycin, tinidazole, and metronidazole. Included among the isolates tested were six strains of the toxinotype III, NAP1/BI/027 group implicated in recent U.S., Canadian, and European outbreaks. The most active agents in vitro were rifaximin, rifalazil, tizoxanide, nitazoxanide, and OPT-80 with MICs at which 50% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC(50)) and MIC(90) values of 0.0075 and 0.015 microg/ml, 0.0075 and 0.03 microg/ml, 0.06 and 0.125 microg/ml, 0.06 and 0.125 microg/ml, 0.125 and 0.125 microg/ml, respectively. However, for three isolates the rifalazil and rifaximin MICs were very high (MIC of >256 microg/ml). Ramoplanin, vancomycin, doripenem, and meropenem were also very active in vitro with narrow MIC(50) and MIC(90) ranges. None of the isolates were resistant to metronidazole, the only agent for which there are breakpoints, with tinidazole showing nearly identical results. These in vitro susceptibility results are encouraging and support continued evaluation of selected antimicrobials in clinical trials of treatment for CDAD.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Toxins; Clostridioides difficile; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; United States