meropenem and Diabetic-Foot

To investigate the distribution of microbes and drug susceptibility in patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI) and provide guidance for clinical empirical treatment and the rational selection of antibacterial drugs.. Retrospective analysis of the pathogenic bacterium distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility isolated from 581 DFI patients with different Wagner grades.. The 534 positive samples included 473 cases (88.58%)) of monomicrobial infections and 61 cases (11.42%) of polymicrobial infections before antibiotic therapy. A total of 656 strains were cultivated, including 387 (58.99%) strains of gram-positive organisms (GPOs), 235 (35.82%) gram-negative bacilli (GNB), and 21 (3.20%) fungal strains. Polymicrobial infections mainly occurred in patients with Wagner grade 3-4 ulcers. GPOs were predominant in Wagner grades 1-3 (grade 1: 96.67%, grade 2: 76.52%, grade 3 62.81%), and the most common was Staphylococcus aureus (grade 1: 31.66%, grade 2: 33.04%, grade 3 35.53%). GNB were predominant in grades 4-5 (grade 4: 51.46%, grade 5:60%), and the most common GNB in Wagner grades 4-5 was. The distribution of microbes and antimicrobial susceptibility in DFI patients varied with different Wagner grades. The most appropriate antimicrobial therapy should be selected based on the pathogen culture and antimicrobial susceptibility.

Topics: Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Coinfection; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Foot; Ertapenem; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Humans; Meropenem; Retrospective Studies; Tigecycline

The increasing emergence of extensive drug-resistant bacteria (XDR) among chronic diabetic foot ulcer patients (DFU) possess serious threat which leads to foot amputation. The ideal measurement estimations of the presently accessible medications are getting insufficient against extensive drug-resistant strains. For quite a long-time piperacillin monotherapy, Piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, Carbapenem class of anti-toxin, ceftalozane-Tazobactam, and so on, has been the suggested therapy towards persistent instances of diabetic foot ulcer but because of the resistance mechanism of the potent pathogens the potency and usage of the antibiotic concentration regime is under the radar. Based on this hypothesis two isolates namely VIT PC 7 &VIT PC 9 were found to be resistant to all five classes of antibiotics exhibiting extensive drug resistance (XDR). The whole-genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa VIT PC 7 and VIT PC 9 data showed the presence of various RND efflux related genes and antibiotic resistance genes. The broth microdilution assay showed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for ciprofloxacin and meropenem, Synergistic test was performed through checkerboard analysis and sub-MIC concentration of ciprofloxacin/meropenem was deduced using ∑ FICI, Time kills analysis was done for varying time interval to check the maximum reduction in CFU/ml of the bacterial cells, sub-MIC level of meropenem and ciprofloxacin showed inhibitory activity at lower concentration respectively. In vitro time-kill analysis showed the decrease in the number of cells, suggesting that the synergistic antimicrobial combinations are effective in decreasing the MIC level, and combinational test involving sub-MIC level of antibiotics also showed maximum reduction in biofilm forming cells, portraying the effectiveness of both the drugs. Accordingly, an expansion in the antimicrobial spectrum can be accomplished by utilizing the ideal measurements of ciprofloxacin/meropenem in persistent condition like diabetic foot ulcer, sub-MIC level of ciprofloxacin/meropenem could be a promising choice for anticipation against the ongoing drug-resistant crisis.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Ciprofloxacin; Diabetic Foot; Drug Resistance; Humans; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Piperacillin; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Tazobactam

To find the most prevalent organism in diabetic foot ulcers and its drug sensitivity and resistance to different standard antibiotics.. Adescriptive and cross-sectional study.. Ward 7, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Karachi, from December 2010 to December 2012.. Ninety-five diabetic patients with infected foot wounds of Wegener grade 2 - 5 who had not received any previous antibiotics were included in the study by consecutive sampling. Pus culture specimen from wounds was taken and the organism isolated was identified. Also the most sensitive group of antibiotics and the most resistant one to that organism was noted.. Staphylococcus aureuswas the most prevalent organism constituting 23.16% (n=22) of the organisms isolated; Escherichia coli with 17.89% (n=17) and Klebsiella with 12.63% (n=12) followed. Males presented more with diabetic foot (n=52) out of 95 patients. The most common age group affected was 41 - 60 years (73 patients). The organisms were most sensitive to Meropenem, effective in 90 (95%) patients and most resistant to Cotrimoxazole (80, 84% patients). Out of the 95 patients, 39 (41%) patients were hypertensive, 30 (31.5%) were obese and 14 (15%) were smokers. Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent organism overall irrespective to gender, age groups and co-morbidity of the patients.. Staphylococcus aureuswas the most frequent organism in diabetic foot ulcers; the most effective antibiotic is Meropenem and least effective is Cotrimoxazole.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetic Foot; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Humans; Klebsiella; Klebsiella Infections; Meropenem; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Pakistan; Prevalence; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Thienamycins; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Wound Infection

Against 182 anaerobe and 241 aerobe strains obtained from diabetic foot infections, doripenem was the most active carbapenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC(90), 2 microg/ml), more active than imipenem against Proteus mirabilis, and ertapenem was more active against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. The MIC(50) and MIC(90) values were < or =0.125 microg/ml for methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and all streptococci and 0.25/1 for Bacteroides fragilis.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteria, Aerobic; Bacteria, Anaerobic; Bacterial Infections; Carbapenems; Diabetic Foot; Doripenem; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests