mercuric-chloride--ammoniated and Dermatitis--Allergic-Contact

Contact allergy to cosmetic ingredients is common. However, there are no recent comprehensive studies on contact allergy to cosmetic ingredients in Asia.. To identify positive patch test reactions in patients tested at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand to allergens present in cosmetics.. A retrospective review of medical records from the outpatient contact dermatitis clinic was conducted from January 1999 to December 2008. Patients with at least one positive patch test reaction to allergens associated with cosmetic ingredients were studied. The results were evaluated using Pearson's χ(2) -test with Yates' continuity correction or Fisher's exact test where appropriate,and a p-value <0.002 was considered to be statistically significant by Bonferroni correction.. There were 1247 cases (239 males and 1008 females; mean age 38.5 years). Fragrance chemicals and preservatives were the most commonly recognized cosmetic allergens. Ammoniated mercury was the only allergen that showed a significantly increased frequency over the 10-year period (p = 0.0008).. Our study showed that ammoniated mercury is an emerging cosmetic allergen, showing an increased prevalence in recent years in Thailand. A focus is required on emerging cosmetic allergens and what may account for the upward trend of cosmetic contact dermatitis.

Topics: Adult; Allergens; Ammonia; Chi-Square Distribution; Cosmetics; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Female; Humans; Male; Mercuric Chloride; Middle Aged; Patch Tests; Perfume; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Thailand; Young Adult

The prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis is high. Patch testing is the standard procedure to detect contact sensitivity. More than 3000 allergens are known, today. On the basis of the data of this study the top allergens are presented.. The retrospective analysis is based on the patch test results collected by the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology in 2004. Data of 9948 patients (6175 female und 3773 male) referred for the evaluation of suspected contact allergy were analysed to determine the frequency of sensitization to the 10 most common contact allergens.. The top ten allergens were nickel sulphate (frequency of sensitization standardized for sex and age 17.2 %), fragrance mix (7.2 %), balsam of Peru (6.7 %), cobalt chloride (6.5 %), potassium dichromate (5.3 %), colophony (4.6 %), lanolin alcohol (4.3 %), p-phenylenediamine (4.2 %), ammoniated mercury (3.5 %) und methyldibromoglutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol (3.4 %) in 2004.. Even after healing of the skin lesions of allergic contact dermatitis, it must be considered that sensitization persists indefinitely. Therefore, patients have to be informed exactly about their relevant contact allergens to ensure complete avoidance. To do so, physicians need a detailed knowledge of the most common contact allergens which are discussed in this paper.

Topics: Adult; Allergens; Ammonia; Balsams; Chromium; Cobalt; Coloring Agents; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Ethylene Glycols; Female; Humans; Lanolin; Male; Mercuric Chloride; Nickel; Nitriles; Patch Tests; Perfume; Phenylenediamines; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; Resins, Plant; Retrospective Studies

There has been increasing interest in characterizing the sensitizing moiety of thimerosal [TIM], following the finding that patients with photosensitivity to piroxicam are allergic to the thiosalicylic acid [TIO] moiety of TIM. For this purpose, the authors have conducted 2 studies in TIM-sensitive patients. In the 1st, of 175 patients tested with TIO and ammoniated mercuric chloride [HGAM], 45.7% reacted only to TIM, whereas 45.7% reacted also to TIO and 17.7% also to HGAM; 9.1% reacted to both TIO and HGAM. In the 2nd, of 47 patients tested with TIO and ethylmercuric chloride [ETHG], 87.2% reacted to ETHG, 44.7% to TIO and 31.9% reacted to both. None of the patients reacted only to TIM. The authors conclude that thimerosal allergy is due either to the mercuric moiety or to thiosalicylic acid, with no cases of sensitivity only to the whole molecule of TIM. TIM-sensitive patients are mainly allergic to the mercuric moiety, but among them there are a large number of TIO-sensitive patients, and these should be advised to avoid piroxicam.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ammonia; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Benzoates; Child; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Ethylmercuric Chloride; Female; Humans; Male; Mercuric Chloride; Mercury; Middle Aged; Photosensitivity Disorders; Piroxicam; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; Sulfhydryl Compounds; Thimerosal

Putative allergens in, clinical manifestations of, and patch tests with traditional Chinese medicinal materials (CMM) causing contact dermatitis (CD) were studied. 14 patients with CMM CD and 351 controls were patch tested with the standard series of allergens of Beijing Medical University and the suspected drug, as is. It was found that most CMM CD was caused by the CMM frequently used topically for analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect. All patients patch tested with the suspected drug gave positive results. Some patients also reacted to fragrance mix, colophony, rubber mix and ammoniated mercury. The positivity rates of fragrance mix and colophony in CMM CD patients were significantly higher than in controls (55.6% versus 16.5% for fragrance mix, chi 2 = 11.86, p < 0.01; and 55.6% versus 5.1% for colophony, chi 2 = 29.35, p < 0.01), while not those of rubber mix and ammoniated mercury. Results indicated that the topical analgesic and anti-inflammatory CMM, especially those containing fragrance, may cause contact sensitization. Clinical findings in CMM CD included cutaneous irritation, allergic contact dermatitis, immediate contact reactions and systemic contact dermatitis. CMM CD can be diagnosed by patch testing the putative drug, as is.

Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adolescent; Adult; Ammonia; Analgesics; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Dermatitis, Contact; Dermatitis, Irritant; Drug Eruptions; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Humans; Hypersensitivity, Immediate; Male; Mercuric Chloride; Middle Aged; Patch Tests; Perfume; Resins, Plant; Rubber; Tars

Oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) or lichen-planus-like lesions are often idiopathic. Our aim was to determine whether OLL can be caused by allergy to mercury in amalgam fillings, and whether resolution of OLL occurs after replacement of amalgam with other dental fillings. Patients with only OLL (except for 1 case with cutaneous lichen planus) referred for patch testing during 1985-1994 to the Contact and Occupational Dermatitis Clinic of the Skin & Cancer Foundation, Darlinghurst, were reviewed. Patch tests were performed with 1% mercury, 1% ammoniated mercury, 0.1% thimerosal, 0.1% mercuric chloride, 0.05% phenylmercuric nitrate and an amalgam disc, using Finn Chambers occluded for 2 days, 19 patients (17 women and 2 men; age range: 28-72 years) had OLL in close contact with amalgam fillings and showed positive patch test reactions to mercury compounds, 16 out of 19 patients had their amalgam fillings replaced. In 13 patients, the OLL healed. 1 patient had marked improvement. 1 patient had no improvement and developed multiple oral squamous cell carcinoma. In conclusion, OLL can be caused by allergy to mercury in amalgam fillings. Replacement of amalgam with other dental fillings usually results in resolution of OLL and is recommended for cases with positive patch test reactions to mercury compounds.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Ammonia; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Dental Amalgam; Dental Materials; Dental Restoration, Permanent; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Disinfectants; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypersensitivity; Lichen Planus, Oral; Male; Mercuric Chloride; Mercury; Middle Aged; Mouth Neoplasms; Patch Tests; Phenylmercury Compounds; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; Thimerosal

Topics: Adult; Alloys; Ammonia; Cosmetics; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Dermatologic Agents; Female; Humans; Mercuric Chloride; Mercury

441 consecutive patients (294 female, 147 male) with suspected contact dermatitis were patch tested to the European standard series, mercury metal (1% pet), ammoniated mercury (1% pet.), and mercuric chloride (0.1% aq.). 14 patients (3.2%), 12 of whom were female, showed a positive response to 1 or more mercury compounds; none reacted to mercuric chloride alone. Primary sensitization was most likely due to either inoculation with vaccines containing merthiolate preservatives or amalgam dental restorations. Mercury allergy was of historical clinical relevance in only 2 patients, both women who developed gingivostomatitis following insertion of amalgam dental fillings. 1 of these women subsequently developed allergic contact dermatitis from contact lens solutions, shampoos and cosmetics which contained mercury preservatives. On the basis of these findings, we recommend patch testing with both metallic mercury and ammoniated mercury in patients with suspected mercury allergy.

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Care Facilities; Ammonia; Dental Amalgam; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Female; Humans; Male; Mercuric Chloride; Mercury; Middle Aged; Northern Ireland; Patch Tests; Vaccines