memantine has been researched along with Lassitude in 5 studies
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"In this study, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of memantine for improving fatigue in patients with MS." | 9.34 | Safety and efficacy of memantine for multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: A pilot randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. ( Agah, E; Aghamollaii, V; Balali, P; Dehghani, R; Falsafi, Z; Fouladi, Z; Ghaffarpour, M; Harirchian, MH; Mojarrad, M; Mousavi, SV; Pourghaz, B; Tafakhori, A, 2020) |
"Memantine 10 mg twice a day does not improve CP in subjects with MS, ages 18-65, without major depression, who have subjective cognitive complaints and perform worse than one SD below the mean on the PASAT or on the California Verbal Learning Test-II (total recall or delayed free recall)." | 9.14 | Memantine for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. ( Bandari, D; Bogardus, K; Bourdette, D; Brown, TR; Butler, K; Courtney, Y; Cua, L; Fowler, J; Frohman, E; Heimburger, G; Karman, J; Kilcup, S; Lovera, JF; McAleenan, J; Monahan, T; Nguyen, L; Remingon, G; Stuve, O; Whitham, R; Wild, K; Yadav, V, 2010) |
"In this study, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of memantine for improving fatigue in patients with MS." | 5.34 | Safety and efficacy of memantine for multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: A pilot randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. ( Agah, E; Aghamollaii, V; Balali, P; Dehghani, R; Falsafi, Z; Fouladi, Z; Ghaffarpour, M; Harirchian, MH; Mojarrad, M; Mousavi, SV; Pourghaz, B; Tafakhori, A, 2020) |
" Studies in early radiotherapy treatment phase (five studies) Pharmacological studies in the "early radiotherapy treatment phase" were designed to prevent or ameliorate cognitive deficits and included drugs used in dementia (memantine) and fatigue (d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride)." | 5.22 | Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation. ( Brown, PD; Day, J; Gehring, K; Grosshans, D; Kirkman, MA; Li, J; Taphoorn, M; Zienius, K, 2022) |
"Memantine was well tolerated in PD; however, specific measures of sleepiness, fatigue, depression, and attention did not significantly improve." | 5.15 | Memantine for non-motor features of Parkinson's disease: a double-blind placebo controlled exploratory pilot trial. ( Davidson, A; Lai, D; Ondo, WG; Shinawi, L, 2011) |
"Memantine 10 mg twice a day does not improve CP in subjects with MS, ages 18-65, without major depression, who have subjective cognitive complaints and perform worse than one SD below the mean on the PASAT or on the California Verbal Learning Test-II (total recall or delayed free recall)." | 5.14 | Memantine for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. ( Bandari, D; Bogardus, K; Bourdette, D; Brown, TR; Butler, K; Courtney, Y; Cua, L; Fowler, J; Frohman, E; Heimburger, G; Karman, J; Kilcup, S; Lovera, JF; McAleenan, J; Monahan, T; Nguyen, L; Remingon, G; Stuve, O; Whitham, R; Wild, K; Yadav, V, 2010) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 3 (60.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 2 (40.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Kirkman, MA | 3 |
Day, J | 3 |
Gehring, K | 3 |
Zienius, K | 3 |
Grosshans, D | 3 |
Taphoorn, M | 3 |
Li, J | 3 |
Brown, PD | 3 |
Falsafi, Z | 1 |
Tafakhori, A | 1 |
Agah, E | 1 |
Mojarrad, M | 1 |
Dehghani, R | 1 |
Ghaffarpour, M | 1 |
Aghamollaii, V | 1 |
Mousavi, SV | 1 |
Fouladi, Z | 1 |
Pourghaz, B | 1 |
Balali, P | 1 |
Harirchian, MH | 1 |
Lovera, JF | 1 |
Frohman, E | 1 |
Brown, TR | 1 |
Bandari, D | 1 |
Nguyen, L | 1 |
Yadav, V | 1 |
Stuve, O | 1 |
Karman, J | 1 |
Bogardus, K | 1 |
Heimburger, G | 1 |
Cua, L | 1 |
Remingon, G | 1 |
Fowler, J | 1 |
Monahan, T | 1 |
Kilcup, S | 1 |
Courtney, Y | 1 |
McAleenan, J | 1 |
Butler, K | 1 |
Wild, K | 1 |
Whitham, R | 1 |
Bourdette, D | 1 |
Ondo, WG | 1 |
Shinawi, L | 1 |
Davidson, A | 1 |
Lai, D | 1 |
Morimoto, Y | 1 |
Zhang, Q | 1 |
Adachi, K | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Double Blind Placebo Controlled Pilot Trial of Memantine for Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis[NCT00300716] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 82 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-04-30 | Completed | ||
Intranasal Insulin for Improving Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis[NCT02988401] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 105 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-12-01 | Completed | ||
A 16 Week, Investigator-initiated, Single-center, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Namenda® (Memantine Hcl) for Non-motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease[NCT00646204] | Phase 4 | 40 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-04-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
The BDI-II is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory test for measuring the severity of depression. Scores range from zero to 63; higher scores indicate greater depression. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include the BDI-II scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the scores. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | -0.022 |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | -0.019 |
Placebo | -0.045 |
This is a visual, nonverbal test of learning and memory. Scores range from zero to 12; higher is better. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include the BVMT-R delayed recall scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | 0.027 |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | 0.059 |
Placebo | 0.030 |
This is a verbal learning and memory test. Scores range from zero to 16; a higher number is better. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the primary analyses include the CVLT-II scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | 0.082 |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | 0.021 |
Placebo | 0.020 |
This test measures phonemic fluency. The test scores the number of words a participant can provide that begin with a specified letter within one minute, such that scores range from zero (worst) to an infinite number (better). Total score is sum of three 60-second trials. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the primary analyses include the COWAT scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | 0.090 |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | 0.070 |
Placebo | 0.021 |
This test measures executive functioning, concept formation, and cognitive flexibility. Scores range from zero to 16; higher is better. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include DKEFS correct sort scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | -0.001 |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | 0.027 |
Placebo | 0.002 |
Judgment of Line Orientation Test measures a person's ability to match the angle and orientation of lines in space. Scores range from zero to 30; higher is better. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include JLO data acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | -0.031 |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | 0.047 |
Placebo | -0.005 |
"The Rao-version of the PASAT evaluates processing speed, working memory, and basic addition skills. Scores range from zero to 60; higher is better. Herein we present 3-second PASAT results (PASAT-3). In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include PASAT-3 scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the SDMT." (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | 0.372 |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | 0.363 |
Placebo | 0.212 |
This task will be performed at five study visits. The SDMT is one of the most commonly used tests to assess processing speed in the MS population and is included in the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS (MACFIMS). Higher scores reflect a better outcome (range 0 to 110). In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the primary analyses include the SDMTs acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the SDMT. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | 0.145 |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | 0.207 |
Placebo | 0.163 |
The sleep questionnaire asks subjects to report various aspects related to their sleep routine. Scores range from zero to 21; higher score indicates worse sleep quality. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include the PSQIs acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | -0.026 |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | 0.035 |
Placebo | -0.045 |
FAMS is a self-reported health-related quality-of-life instrument for people with multiple sclerosis. Subjects rate six quality-of-life domains: Mobility, Symptoms, Emotional well-being, General contentment, Thinking/fatigue, and Family/social well-being. Scores range from zero to 176; higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. In order to account for all contributed data (even for those who did not complete the study but contributed some post-randomization data in the active study phase), the analyses include the FAMS scores acquired within the active treatment phase (from baseline to week 24 visit). We then calculated and report the average change per week in the score. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | 0.056 |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | 0.051 |
Placebo | 0.240 |
An adverse event will be defined as any occurrence or worsening of an undesirable or unintended sign, symptom (or abnormal laboratory test), or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or intervention, whether or not it is considered related to the product/intervention. We report overall adverse events in the relevant section. Here, we report adverse events that led to study discontinuation. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: Up to week 24 visit
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | 3 |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | 2 |
Placebo | 1 |
Fingerstick blood glucose levels were monitored twice within the 90 minutes following the first dose administration of study drug for the first 15 participants. (NCT02988401)
Timeframe: At the baseline visit, monitored twice within the 90 minutes following the first dose administration of study drug
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
First timepoint | Second timepoint | |
Intranasal Insulin 10 International Units | 95.8 | 92.2 |
Intranasal Insulin 20 International Units | 97.8 | 88.4 |
Placebo | 90.0 | 87.8 |
Change from baseline to end of study in the following assessment: global tremor assessment by examiner. The maximum total score is 48 and would indicate a high prevalence of tremor. The minimum total score is 0 and would indicate no tremor. (NCT00646204)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline | 16 Weeks | |
Memantine-1 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
Placebo-2 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
Assess the overall change from baseline in ON state motor United Parkinson Disease Rating scale (UPDRS) scores as assessed in the scale. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score 199. The maximum score of 199 means the worst possible disability from Parkinson's Disease. (NCT00646204)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Before treatment | After treatment | |
Memantine-1 | 12 | 10 |
Placebo-2 | 12 | 10 |
1 review available for memantine and Lassitude
Article | Year |
---|---|
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil; | 2022 |
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil; | 2022 |
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil; | 2022 |
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil; | 2022 |
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil; | 2022 |
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil; | 2022 |
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil; | 2022 |
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil; | 2022 |
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil; | 2022 |
3 trials available for memantine and Lassitude
Article | Year |
---|---|
Safety and efficacy of memantine for multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: A pilot randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Humans; Memantine; Multiple Sclerosis; Pilot Projects; Treatment Outco | 2020 |
Memantine for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Huma | 2010 |
Memantine for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Huma | 2010 |
Memantine for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Huma | 2010 |
Memantine for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Huma | 2010 |
Memantine for non-motor features of Parkinson's disease: a double-blind placebo controlled exploratory pilot trial.
Topics: Aged; Antiparkinson Agents; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Male; Memantin | 2011 |
1 other study available for memantine and Lassitude
Article | Year |
---|---|
Effects of memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, on fatigue and neuronal brain damage in a rat model of combined (physical and mental) fatigue.
Topics: Animals; Brain Injuries; Fatigue; Male; Memantine; Models, Animal; Neuroprotective Agents; Pyramidal | 2012 |