memantine has been researched along with Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration in 6 studies
Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: Heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by frontal and temporal lobe atrophy associated with neuronal loss, gliosis, and dementia. Patients exhibit progressive changes in social, behavioral, and/or language function. Multiple subtypes or forms are recognized based on presence or absence of TAU PROTEIN inclusions. FTLD includes three clinical syndromes: FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA, semantic dementia, and PRIMARY PROGRESSIVE NONFLUENT APHASIA.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Memantine has been used off-label to treat frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTD)." | 9.17 | Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Boxer, AL; Fields, S; Graf-Radford, N; Grossman, M; Kaufer, DI; Kerwin, D; Klepac, K; Knopman, DS; Koestler, M; Kramer, JH; Lerner, A; Lipowski, K; Mendez, M; Merrilees, J; Mesulam, MM; Miller, BL; Neuhaus, J; Onyike, C; Shapira, J; Sullivan, K; Ullah, J; Wu, CK, 2013) |
"The diagnostic criteria of catatonia and frontotemporal dementia partly overlap." | 1.39 | Three patients with mood disorders showing catatonia and frontotemporal lobes atrophy. ( Arai, H; Iseki, E; Utumi, Y, 2013) |
"Memantine was used by 17." | 1.38 | Use of antidementia drugs in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. ( Bisbe, J; Calvó-Perxas, L; Cullell, M; Garre-Olmo, J; Hernández, E; Lejarreta, S; López-Pousa, S; Manzano, A; Meléndez, R; Perkal, H; Roig, AM; Turró-Garriga, O; Vilalta-Franch, J, 2012) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 5 (83.33) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 1 (16.67) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Perry, A | 1 |
Hughes, LE | 1 |
Adams, N | 1 |
Naessens, M | 1 |
Murley, AG | 1 |
Rouse, MA | 1 |
Street, D | 1 |
Jones, PS | 1 |
Cope, TE | 1 |
Kocagoncu, E | 1 |
Rowe, JB | 1 |
Utumi, Y | 1 |
Iseki, E | 1 |
Arai, H | 1 |
López-Pousa, S | 1 |
Calvó-Perxas, L | 1 |
Lejarreta, S | 1 |
Cullell, M | 1 |
Meléndez, R | 1 |
Hernández, E | 1 |
Bisbe, J | 1 |
Perkal, H | 1 |
Manzano, A | 1 |
Roig, AM | 1 |
Turró-Garriga, O | 1 |
Vilalta-Franch, J | 1 |
Garre-Olmo, J | 1 |
Chow, TW | 1 |
Fam, D | 1 |
Graff-Guerrero, A | 1 |
Verhoeff, NP | 1 |
Tang-Wai, DF | 1 |
Masellis, M | 1 |
Black, SE | 1 |
Wilson, AA | 1 |
Houle, S | 1 |
Pollock, BG | 1 |
Boxer, AL | 1 |
Knopman, DS | 1 |
Kaufer, DI | 1 |
Grossman, M | 1 |
Onyike, C | 1 |
Graf-Radford, N | 1 |
Mendez, M | 1 |
Kerwin, D | 1 |
Lerner, A | 1 |
Wu, CK | 1 |
Koestler, M | 1 |
Shapira, J | 1 |
Sullivan, K | 1 |
Klepac, K | 1 |
Lipowski, K | 1 |
Ullah, J | 1 |
Fields, S | 1 |
Kramer, JH | 1 |
Merrilees, J | 1 |
Neuhaus, J | 1 |
Mesulam, MM | 1 |
Miller, BL | 1 |
Hodges, JR | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
An Open Label Pilot Study of the Effects of Memantine Administration on FDG-PET in Frontotemporal Dementia[NCT00594737] | Phase 3 | 17 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-10-31 | Completed | ||
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration [ARTFL]: Research Projects 1 & 2[NCT02365922] | 1,489 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2014-09-30 | Completed | |||
A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, 26 Week, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Memantine (10mg BID) for the Frontal and Temporal Subtypes of Frontotemporal Dementia[NCT00545974] | Phase 4 | 81 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-10-31 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
NPI:12-domain caregiver assessment of behavioral disturbances occurring in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, motor disturbance, appetite/eating, nighttime behavior. A screening question is asked about each sub-domain. If the responses to these questions indicate that the patient has problems with a particular sub-domain of behavior, the caregiver is only then asked all the questions about that domain, rating the frequency of the symptoms on a 4-point scale, their severity on a 3-point scale, and the distress the symptom causes them on a 5-point scale. Severity(1=Mild to 3=Severe),frequency(1=occasionally to 4=very frequently) scales recorded for each domain; frequency*severity=each domain score(range 0-12). Total score=sum of each domain score(range 0-144);higher score=greater behavioral disturbances;negative change score from baseline=improvement. (NCT00545974)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Memantine | -1.9 |
Placebo | 0.3 |
The scale is rated on a 7-point scale, using a range of responses from 1 (very much improved) through 7 (very much worse). The clinician compares the participant's current condition to the condition at admission to the project. (NCT00545974)
Timeframe: 26 Weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Memantine | 4.4 |
Placebo | 4.8 |
(NCT00545974)
Timeframe: 26 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Memantine | 1 |
Placebo | 2 |
"Clinical dementia rating sum of boxes CDR-SB (0-18) high scores indicate high impairment.~Functional activities questionnaire FAQ (0-30) high scores indicate high impairment.~Texas functional living scale TFLS (0 to 52) high scores suggest better instrumental activities of daily living functioning.~Mini-Mental State Examination MMSE (0-30) low scores indicate low cognition. The executive interview EXIT25 (0 to 50) high scores indicate more executive impairment.~A modified unified Parkinson's disease rating scale UPDRS (0-199) high scores indicate worse disability.~Boston naming test (0-15) low scores indicate more retrieval difficulties." (NCT00545974)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 Weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDR-SB | FAQ | TFLS | MMSE | EXIT25 | UPDRS | Boston naming test | |
Memantine | 1.5 | 4.3 | -3.7 | -1.2 | 1.9 | 1.7 | -1.4 |
Placebo | 1.5 | 2.9 | -2.8 | -0.9 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.7 |
"Letter fluency, score is number of words recalled starting with a specified letter for 60 seconds. There are 3 trials, with 3 different letters. The total number of correct responses is totaled for all 3 trials for the score. Low scores indicate high impairment~Category fluency, score is number of items generated belonging to a specific category (such as animals) in 60 seconds, low scores indicate high impairment.~Digit symbol, score is number of symbols that correctly corresponded to the random numerals entered in the form in 90 seconds. Participants are given a table of numerals with matching symbols, and a form with random numerals with open spaces. Low scores indicate high impairment.~Digits backwards, score is number of digits backwards recalled (range: 0-14), The participant hears a list of digits and is asked to repeat the digits backwards. Low scores indicate high impairment." (NCT00545974)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 Weeks
Intervention | number of items recalled (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Letter fluency | Category fluency | Digit symbol | Digits backwards | |
Memantine | -0.1 | -0.5 | -3.9 | 0.1 |
Placebo | -0.3 | -0.7 | 4.2 | -0.2 |
1 trial available for memantine and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
Article | Year |
---|---|
Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Double-Blind Method; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Follo | 2013 |
Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Double-Blind Method; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Follo | 2013 |
Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Double-Blind Method; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Follo | 2013 |
Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Topics: Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Double-Blind Method; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Follo | 2013 |
5 other studies available for memantine and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration
Article | Year |
---|---|
The neurophysiological effect of NMDA-R antagonism of frontotemporal lobar degeneration is conditional on individual GABA concentration.
Topics: Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Frontotemporal Dementia; Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration; | 2022 |
Three patients with mood disorders showing catatonia and frontotemporal lobes atrophy.
Topics: Aged; Atrophy; Catatonia; Combined Modality Therapy; Dopamine Agents; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Fem | 2013 |
Use of antidementia drugs in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alzheimer Disease; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cross-Sectional Studies; Fema | 2012 |
Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in semantic dementia after 6 months of memantine: an open-label pilot study.
Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration; Humans; Memantine; | 2013 |
Hope abandoned: memantine therapy in frontotemporal dementia.
Topics: Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration; Humans; Male; Memantin | 2013 |