Page last updated: 2024-10-30

memantine and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

memantine has been researched along with Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration in 6 studies

Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: Heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by frontal and temporal lobe atrophy associated with neuronal loss, gliosis, and dementia. Patients exhibit progressive changes in social, behavioral, and/or language function. Multiple subtypes or forms are recognized based on presence or absence of TAU PROTEIN inclusions. FTLD includes three clinical syndromes: FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA, semantic dementia, and PRIMARY PROGRESSIVE NONFLUENT APHASIA.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Memantine has been used off-label to treat frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTD)."9.17Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Boxer, AL; Fields, S; Graf-Radford, N; Grossman, M; Kaufer, DI; Kerwin, D; Klepac, K; Knopman, DS; Koestler, M; Kramer, JH; Lerner, A; Lipowski, K; Mendez, M; Merrilees, J; Mesulam, MM; Miller, BL; Neuhaus, J; Onyike, C; Shapira, J; Sullivan, K; Ullah, J; Wu, CK, 2013)
"The diagnostic criteria of catatonia and frontotemporal dementia partly overlap."1.39Three patients with mood disorders showing catatonia and frontotemporal lobes atrophy. ( Arai, H; Iseki, E; Utumi, Y, 2013)
"Memantine was used by 17."1.38Use of antidementia drugs in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. ( Bisbe, J; Calvó-Perxas, L; Cullell, M; Garre-Olmo, J; Hernández, E; Lejarreta, S; López-Pousa, S; Manzano, A; Meléndez, R; Perkal, H; Roig, AM; Turró-Garriga, O; Vilalta-Franch, J, 2012)

Research

Studies (6)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's0 (0.00)29.6817
2010's5 (83.33)24.3611
2020's1 (16.67)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Perry, A1
Hughes, LE1
Adams, N1
Naessens, M1
Murley, AG1
Rouse, MA1
Street, D1
Jones, PS1
Cope, TE1
Kocagoncu, E1
Rowe, JB1
Utumi, Y1
Iseki, E1
Arai, H1
López-Pousa, S1
Calvó-Perxas, L1
Lejarreta, S1
Cullell, M1
Meléndez, R1
Hernández, E1
Bisbe, J1
Perkal, H1
Manzano, A1
Roig, AM1
Turró-Garriga, O1
Vilalta-Franch, J1
Garre-Olmo, J1
Chow, TW1
Fam, D1
Graff-Guerrero, A1
Verhoeff, NP1
Tang-Wai, DF1
Masellis, M1
Black, SE1
Wilson, AA1
Houle, S1
Pollock, BG1
Boxer, AL1
Knopman, DS1
Kaufer, DI1
Grossman, M1
Onyike, C1
Graf-Radford, N1
Mendez, M1
Kerwin, D1
Lerner, A1
Wu, CK1
Koestler, M1
Shapira, J1
Sullivan, K1
Klepac, K1
Lipowski, K1
Ullah, J1
Fields, S1
Kramer, JH1
Merrilees, J1
Neuhaus, J1
Mesulam, MM1
Miller, BL1
Hodges, JR1

Clinical Trials (3)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
An Open Label Pilot Study of the Effects of Memantine Administration on FDG-PET in Frontotemporal Dementia[NCT00594737]Phase 317 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Advancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration [ARTFL]: Research Projects 1 & 2[NCT02365922]1,489 participants (Actual)Observational2014-09-30Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, 26 Week, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Memantine (10mg BID) for the Frontal and Temporal Subtypes of Frontotemporal Dementia[NCT00545974]Phase 481 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)

NPI:12-domain caregiver assessment of behavioral disturbances occurring in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, motor disturbance, appetite/eating, nighttime behavior. A screening question is asked about each sub-domain. If the responses to these questions indicate that the patient has problems with a particular sub-domain of behavior, the caregiver is only then asked all the questions about that domain, rating the frequency of the symptoms on a 4-point scale, their severity on a 3-point scale, and the distress the symptom causes them on a 5-point scale. Severity(1=Mild to 3=Severe),frequency(1=occasionally to 4=very frequently) scales recorded for each domain; frequency*severity=each domain score(range 0-12). Total score=sum of each domain score(range 0-144);higher score=greater behavioral disturbances;negative change score from baseline=improvement. (NCT00545974)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Memantine-1.9
Placebo0.3

Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

The scale is rated on a 7-point scale, using a range of responses from 1 (very much improved) through 7 (very much worse). The clinician compares the participant's current condition to the condition at admission to the project. (NCT00545974)
Timeframe: 26 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Memantine4.4
Placebo4.8

Number of Participants Starting Antipsychotic Therapy

(NCT00545974)
Timeframe: 26 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Memantine1
Placebo2

Longitudinal Changes From Baseline to 26 Weeks for Test Battery: CDR-SB, FAQ, TFLS, MMSE, EXIT25, UPDRS, Boston Naming Test

"Clinical dementia rating sum of boxes CDR-SB (0-18) high scores indicate high impairment.~Functional activities questionnaire FAQ (0-30) high scores indicate high impairment.~Texas functional living scale TFLS (0 to 52) high scores suggest better instrumental activities of daily living functioning.~Mini-Mental State Examination MMSE (0-30) low scores indicate low cognition. The executive interview EXIT25 (0 to 50) high scores indicate more executive impairment.~A modified unified Parkinson's disease rating scale UPDRS (0-199) high scores indicate worse disability.~Boston naming test (0-15) low scores indicate more retrieval difficulties." (NCT00545974)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 Weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CDR-SBFAQTFLSMMSEEXIT25UPDRSBoston naming test
Memantine1.54.3-3.7-1.21.91.7-1.4
Placebo1.52.9-2.8-0.90.71.40.7

Longitudinal Changes From Baseline to 26 Weeks for Test Battery: Letter Fluency, Category Fluency, Digit Symbol, Digits Backwards

"Letter fluency, score is number of words recalled starting with a specified letter for 60 seconds. There are 3 trials, with 3 different letters. The total number of correct responses is totaled for all 3 trials for the score. Low scores indicate high impairment~Category fluency, score is number of items generated belonging to a specific category (such as animals) in 60 seconds, low scores indicate high impairment.~Digit symbol, score is number of symbols that correctly corresponded to the random numerals entered in the form in 90 seconds. Participants are given a table of numerals with matching symbols, and a form with random numerals with open spaces. Low scores indicate high impairment.~Digits backwards, score is number of digits backwards recalled (range: 0-14), The participant hears a list of digits and is asked to repeat the digits backwards. Low scores indicate high impairment." (NCT00545974)
Timeframe: Baseline and 26 Weeks

,
Interventionnumber of items recalled (Mean)
Letter fluencyCategory fluencyDigit symbolDigits backwards
Memantine-0.1-0.5-3.90.1
Placebo-0.3-0.74.2-0.2

Trials

1 trial available for memantine and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

ArticleYear
Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    The Lancet. Neurology, 2013, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Double-Blind Method; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Follo

2013
Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    The Lancet. Neurology, 2013, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Double-Blind Method; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Follo

2013
Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    The Lancet. Neurology, 2013, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Double-Blind Method; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Follo

2013
Memantine in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    The Lancet. Neurology, 2013, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Double-Blind Method; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Follo

2013

Other Studies

5 other studies available for memantine and Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

ArticleYear
The neurophysiological effect of NMDA-R antagonism of frontotemporal lobar degeneration is conditional on individual GABA concentration.
    Translational psychiatry, 2022, 08-27, Volume: 12, Issue:1

    Topics: Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Frontotemporal Dementia; Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration;

2022
Three patients with mood disorders showing catatonia and frontotemporal lobes atrophy.
    Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society, 2013, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Atrophy; Catatonia; Combined Modality Therapy; Dopamine Agents; Electroconvulsive Therapy; Fem

2013
Use of antidementia drugs in frontotemporal lobar degeneration.
    American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 2012, Volume: 27, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alzheimer Disease; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cross-Sectional Studies; Fema

2012
Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in semantic dementia after 6 months of memantine: an open-label pilot study.
    International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2013, Volume: 28, Issue:3

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration; Humans; Memantine;

2013
Hope abandoned: memantine therapy in frontotemporal dementia.
    The Lancet. Neurology, 2013, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration; Humans; Male; Memantin

2013