Page last updated: 2024-10-30

memantine and Brain Neoplasms

memantine has been researched along with Brain Neoplasms in 32 studies

Brain Neoplasms: Neoplasms of the intracranial components of the central nervous system, including the cerebral hemispheres, basal ganglia, hypothalamus, thalamus, brain stem, and cerebellum. Brain neoplasms are subdivided into primary (originating from brain tissue) and secondary (i.e., metastatic) forms. Primary neoplasms are subdivided into benign and malignant forms. In general, brain tumors may also be classified by age of onset, histologic type, or presenting location in the brain.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Memantine, mefloquine, and metformin can be combined safely with TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma."9.30Phase 1 lead-in to a phase 2 factorial study of temozolomide plus memantine, mefloquine, and metformin as postradiation adjuvant therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. ( Aldape, KD; Alfred Yung, WK; Conrad, CA; de Groot, JF; Gilbert, MR; Groves, MD; Hess, KR; Loghin, ME; Mammoser, AG; Maraka, S; Melguizo-Gavilanes, I; O'Brien, BJ; Penas-Prado, M; Puduvalli, VK; Sulman, EP; Tremont-Lukats, IW, 2019)
"To investigate the effects of metformin, dichloroacetate (DCA), and memantine on T98G and U87-MG human glioblastoma (GBM) cells to target tumor cell metabolism in a multi-directional manner."8.02Targeting Cancer Cell Metabolism with Metformin, Dichloroacetate and Memantine in Glioblastoma (GBM). ( Albayrak, G; Dere, UA; Emmez, H; Konac, E, 2021)
"Riluzole and memantine can be safely and effectively delivered intracranially via polymer in rat glioma models."7.80Efficacy of local polymer-based and systemic delivery of the anti-glutamatergic agents riluzole and memantine in rat glioma models. ( Blakeley, J; Brem, H; Gincel, D; Pardo, AC; Rothstein, JD; Tyler, B; Weaver, KD; Yohay, K, 2014)
" For this purpose, we measured the modulation of GDNF release in C6 glioma cell cultures treated for 24 h with amantadine and memantine."7.73Amantadine and memantine induce the expression of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in C6 glioma cells. ( Caumont, AS; Hermans, E; Octave, JN, 2006)
"Memantine was withheld while dexamethasone, valproate, and morphine were continued for headache."5.91Life-threatening altered mental status secondary to memantine in an adolescent undergoing cranial radiotherapy for medulloblastoma. ( Croy, C; Kim, KN; Kotch, C; LaRiviere, M; Lustig, RA; Shah, YB, 2023)
"Glioblastoma is one of the most aggressive malignant primary brain cancer in adults."5.46Memantine-derived drugs as potential antitumor agents for the treatment of glioblastoma. ( Cacciatore, I; Ciulla, M; Di Stefano, A; Eusepi, P; Fornasari, E; Marinelli, L; Ozdemir, O; Tatar, A; Turkez, H, 2017)
"Memantine, mefloquine, and metformin can be combined safely with TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma."5.30Phase 1 lead-in to a phase 2 factorial study of temozolomide plus memantine, mefloquine, and metformin as postradiation adjuvant therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. ( Aldape, KD; Alfred Yung, WK; Conrad, CA; de Groot, JF; Gilbert, MR; Groves, MD; Hess, KR; Loghin, ME; Mammoser, AG; Maraka, S; Melguizo-Gavilanes, I; O'Brien, BJ; Penas-Prado, M; Puduvalli, VK; Sulman, EP; Tremont-Lukats, IW, 2019)
"  Studies in early radiotherapy treatment phase (five studies) Pharmacological studies in the "early radiotherapy treatment phase" were designed to prevent or ameliorate cognitive deficits and included drugs used in dementia (memantine) and fatigue (d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride)."5.22Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation. ( Brown, PD; Day, J; Gehring, K; Grosshans, D; Kirkman, MA; Li, J; Taphoorn, M; Zienius, K, 2022)
"To investigate the effects of metformin, dichloroacetate (DCA), and memantine on T98G and U87-MG human glioblastoma (GBM) cells to target tumor cell metabolism in a multi-directional manner."4.02Targeting Cancer Cell Metabolism with Metformin, Dichloroacetate and Memantine in Glioblastoma (GBM). ( Albayrak, G; Dere, UA; Emmez, H; Konac, E, 2021)
"Riluzole and memantine can be safely and effectively delivered intracranially via polymer in rat glioma models."3.80Efficacy of local polymer-based and systemic delivery of the anti-glutamatergic agents riluzole and memantine in rat glioma models. ( Blakeley, J; Brem, H; Gincel, D; Pardo, AC; Rothstein, JD; Tyler, B; Weaver, KD; Yohay, K, 2014)
" For this purpose, we measured the modulation of GDNF release in C6 glioma cell cultures treated for 24 h with amantadine and memantine."3.73Amantadine and memantine induce the expression of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in C6 glioma cells. ( Caumont, AS; Hermans, E; Octave, JN, 2006)
"Adult patients with brain metastases were randomized to HA-WBRT + memantine or WBRT + memantine."3.30Sustained Preservation of Cognition and Prevention of Patient-Reported Symptoms With Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: Final Results of NRG Oncology CC001. ( Armstrong, TS; Baschnagel, AM; Benzinger, TLS; Bovi, JA; Brown, PD; Deshmukh, S; Gilbert, MR; Gondi, V; Kachnic, LA; Kaufman, I; Konski, A; Kundapur, V; Mehta, MP; Roberge, D; Robinson, CG; Shah, S; Tome, WA; Usuki, KY; Wefel, JS, 2023)
"The management of patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BMs) is exquisitely multidisciplinary."3.01Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer. ( Aizer, AA; Lin, NU; Trapani, D, 2023)
"Memantine was well tolerated and had a toxicity profile very similar to placebo."2.78Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ( Bentzen, SM; Brown, PD; Choucair, A; Fox, S; Kavadi, V; Khuntia, D; Laack, NN; Mehta, MP; Meyers, C; Pugh, S; Roberge, D; Suh, JH; Watkins-Bruner, D; Wefel, JS, 2013)
"Memantine has consistently shown promise in both in-vitro and in-vivo studies as a neuroprotective agent that may improve cognitive outcomes in patients undergoing whole brain radiotherapy."2.61Preservation of cognitive function following whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases: Complications, treatments, and the emerging role of memantine. ( Lynch, M, 2019)
"Many patients with brain cancer experience cognitive problems."2.61Interventions for cognitive problems in adults with brain cancer: A narrative review. ( Gehring, K; Klaver, KM; Schagen, SB; Sitskoorn, MM; van Lonkhuizen, PJC; Wefel, JS, 2019)
"Patients with brain tumors remain at risk for infections from the perioperative period through many months after treatment, and steroids may mask signs of infection."2.52Medical management of patients with brain tumors. ( Pruitt, AA, 2015)
"Memantine was withheld while dexamethasone, valproate, and morphine were continued for headache."1.91Life-threatening altered mental status secondary to memantine in an adolescent undergoing cranial radiotherapy for medulloblastoma. ( Croy, C; Kim, KN; Kotch, C; LaRiviere, M; Lustig, RA; Shah, YB, 2023)
"Atrial myxomas are generally considered benign neoplasms."1.51Somatic PRKAR1A mutation in sporadic atrial myxoma with cerebral parenchymal metastases: a case report. ( Adams, J; Baehring, JM; Canosa, S; Huttner, A; Kimbrough, T; Madri, JA; Roque, A; Sklar, J; Traner, C, 2019)
"Glioblastoma is one of the most aggressive malignant primary brain cancer in adults."1.46Memantine-derived drugs as potential antitumor agents for the treatment of glioblastoma. ( Cacciatore, I; Ciulla, M; Di Stefano, A; Eusepi, P; Fornasari, E; Marinelli, L; Ozdemir, O; Tatar, A; Turkez, H, 2017)

Research

Studies (32)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's2 (6.25)29.6817
2010's14 (43.75)24.3611
2020's16 (50.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Park, JS1
Kim, T1
Kim, D1
Jeong, YI1
Surendran, HP1
Narmadha, MP1
Kalavagunta, S1
Sasidharan, A1
Dutta, D1
Kim, KN1
Shah, YB1
Croy, C1
Lustig, RA1
LaRiviere, M1
Kotch, C1
Kirkman, MA3
Day, J3
Gehring, K4
Zienius, K3
Grosshans, D4
Taphoorn, M3
Li, J11
Brown, PD9
Trapani, D3
Aizer, AA4
Lin, NU3
Gondi, V3
Deshmukh, S2
Wefel, JS4
Armstrong, TS2
Tome, WA2
Gilbert, MR3
Konski, A2
Robinson, CG1
Bovi, JA2
Benzinger, TLS2
Roberge, D4
Kundapur, V2
Kaufman, I1
Shah, S2
Usuki, KY1
Baschnagel, AM1
Mehta, MP3
Kachnic, LA2
Roque, A1
Kimbrough, T1
Traner, C1
Baehring, JM1
Huttner, A1
Adams, J1
Canosa, S1
Sklar, J1
Madri, JA1
Pugh, S2
Robinson, C1
Khuntia, D2
Bruner, D1
Devisetty, K1
Usuki, K1
Anderson, BM1
Stea, B1
Yoon, H1
Laack, NN2
Kruser, TJ1
Chmura, SJ1
Shi, W1
Weiner, JP1
Halim, AA1
Alsayed, B1
Embarak, S1
Yaseen, T1
Dabbous, S1
Fontaine, O1
Dueluzeau, R1
Raibaud, P1
Chabanet, C1
Popoff, MR1
Badoual, J1
Gabilan, JC1
Andremont, A1
Gómez, L1
Andrés, S1
Sánchez, J1
Alonso, JM1
Rey, J1
López, F1
Jiménez, A1
Yan, Z1
Zhou, L1
Zhao, Y3
Wang, J6
Huang, L2
Hu, K1
Liu, H4
Wang, H3
Guo, Z1
Song, Y1
Huang, H4
Yang, R1
Owen, TW1
Al-Kaysi, RO1
Bardeen, CJ1
Cheng, Q1
Wu, S1
Cheng, T1
Zhou, X1
Wang, B4
Zhang, Q4
Wu, X2
Yao, Y3
Ochiai, T1
Ishiguro, H2
Nakano, R2
Kubota, Y2
Hara, M1
Sunada, K1
Hashimoto, K1
Kajioka, J1
Fujishima, A1
Jiao, J3
Gai, QY3
Wang, W2
Zang, YP2
Niu, LL2
Fu, YJ3
Wang, X4
Yao, LP1
Qin, QP1
Wang, ZY1
Liu, J4
Aleksic Sabo, V1
Knezevic, P1
Borges-Argáez, R1
Chan-Balan, R1
Cetina-Montejo, L1
Ayora-Talavera, G1
Sansores-Peraza, P1
Gómez-Carballo, J1
Cáceres-Farfán, M1
Jang, J1
Akin, D1
Bashir, R1
Yu, Z1
Zhu, J2
Jiang, H1
He, C2
Xiao, Z1
Xu, J2
Sun, Q1
Han, D1
Lei, H1
Zhao, K2
Zhu, L1
Li, X4
Fu, H2
Wilson, BK1
Step, DL1
Maxwell, CL1
Gifford, CA1
Richards, CJ1
Krehbiel, CR1
Warner, JM1
Doerr, AJ1
Erickson, GE1
Guretzky, JA1
Rasby, RJ1
Watson, AK1
Klopfenstein, TJ1
Sun, Y4
Liu, Z3
Pham, TD1
Lee, BK1
Yang, FC1
Wu, KH1
Lin, WP1
Hu, MK1
Lin, L3
Shao, J1
Sun, M1
Xu, G1
Zhang, X6
Xu, N1
Wang, R1
Liu, S1
He, H1
Dong, X2
Yang, M2
Yang, Q1
Duan, S1
Yu, Y2
Han, J2
Zhang, C3
Chen, L2
Yang, X1
Li, W3
Wang, T2
Campbell, DA1
Gao, K1
Zager, RA1
Johnson, ACM1
Guillem, A1
Keyser, J1
Singh, B1
Steubl, D1
Schneider, MP1
Meiselbach, H1
Nadal, J1
Schmid, MC1
Saritas, T1
Krane, V1
Sommerer, C1
Baid-Agrawal, S1
Voelkl, J1
Kotsis, F1
Köttgen, A1
Eckardt, KU1
Scherberich, JE1
Li, H4
Yao, L2
Sun, L3
Zhu, Z1
Naren, N1
Zhang, XX2
Gentile, GL1
Rupert, AS1
Carrasco, LI1
Garcia, EM1
Kumar, NG1
Walsh, SW1
Jefferson, KK1
Guest, RL1
Samé Guerra, D1
Wissler, M1
Grimm, J1
Silhavy, TJ1
Lee, JH2
Yoo, JS1
Kim, Y1
Kim, JS2
Lee, EJ1
Roe, JH1
Delorme, M1
Bouchard, PA1
Simon, M1
Simard, S1
Lellouche, F1
D'Urzo, KA1
Mok, F1
D'Urzo, AD1
Koneru, B1
Lopez, G1
Farooqi, A1
Conkrite, KL1
Nguyen, TH1
Macha, SJ1
Modi, A1
Rokita, JL1
Urias, E1
Hindle, A1
Davidson, H1
Mccoy, K1
Nance, J1
Yazdani, V1
Irwin, MS1
Yang, S1
Wheeler, DA1
Maris, JM1
Diskin, SJ1
Reynolds, CP1
Abhilash, L1
Kalliyil, A1
Sheeba, V1
Hartley, AM2
Meunier, B2
Pinotsis, N1
Maréchal, A2
Xu, JY1
Genko, N1
Haraux, F1
Rich, PR1
Kamalanathan, M1
Doyle, SM1
Xu, C1
Achberger, AM1
Wade, TL1
Schwehr, K1
Santschi, PH1
Sylvan, JB1
Quigg, A1
Leong, W1
Xu, W2
Gao, S1
Zhai, X1
Wang, C2
Gilson, E1
Ye, J1
Lu, Y1
Yan, R1
Zhang, Y6
Hu, Z1
You, Q1
Cai, Q1
Yang, D1
Gu, S1
Dai, H1
Zhao, X1
Gui, C1
Gui, J1
Wu, PK1
Hong, SK1
Starenki, D1
Oshima, K1
Shao, H1
Gestwicki, JE1
Tsai, S1
Park, JI1
Wang, Y7
Zhao, R1
Gu, Z1
Dong, C2
Guo, G1
Li, L4
Barrett, HE1
Meester, EJ1
van Gaalen, K1
van der Heiden, K1
Krenning, BJ1
Beekman, FJ1
de Blois, E1
de Swart, J1
Verhagen, HJ1
Maina, T1
Nock, BA1
Norenberg, JP1
de Jong, M1
Gijsen, FJH1
Bernsen, MR1
Martínez-Milla, J1
Galán-Arriola, C1
Carnero, M1
Cobiella, J1
Pérez-Camargo, D1
Bautista-Hernández, V1
Rigol, M1
Solanes, N1
Villena-Gutierrez, R1
Lobo, M1
Mateo, J1
Vilchez-Tschischke, JP1
Salinas, B1
Cussó, L1
López, GJ1
Fuster, V1
Desco, M1
Sanchez-González, J1
Ibanez, B1
van den Berg, P1
Schweitzer, DH1
van Haard, PMM1
Geusens, PP1
van den Bergh, JP1
Zhu, X1
Huang, X2
Xu, H2
Yang, G2
Lin, Z1
Salem, HF1
Nafady, MM1
Kharshoum, RM1
Abd El-Ghafar, OA1
Farouk, HO1
Domiciano, D1
Nery, FC1
de Carvalho, PA1
Prudente, DO1
de Souza, LB1
Chalfun-Júnior, A1
Paiva, R1
Marchiori, PER1
Lu, M2
An, Z1
Jiang, J2
Du, S1
Zhou, H1
Cui, J1
Wu, W1
Liu, Y7
Song, J1
Lian, Q1
Uddin Ahmad, Z1
Gang, DD1
Konggidinata, MI1
Gallo, AA1
Zappi, ME1
Yang, TWW1
Johari, Y1
Burton, PR1
Earnest, A1
Shaw, K1
Hare, JL1
Brown, WA1
Kim, GA1
Han, S1
Choi, GH1
Choi, J1
Lim, YS1
Gallo, A1
Cancelli, C1
Ceron, E1
Covino, M1
Capoluongo, E1
Pocino, K1
Ianiro, G1
Cammarota, G1
Gasbarrini, A1
Montalto, M1
Somasundar, Y1
Lu, IC1
Mills, MR1
Qian, LY1
Olivares, X1
Ryabov, AD1
Collins, TJ1
Zhao, L1
Doddipatla, S1
Thomas, AM1
Nikolayev, AA1
Galimova, GR1
Azyazov, VN1
Mebel, AM1
Kaiser, RI1
Guo, S1
Yang, P1
Yu, X2
Wu, Y2
Zhang, H1
Yu, B2
Han, B1
George, MW1
Moor, MB1
Bonny, O1
Langenberg, E1
Paik, H1
Smith, EH1
Nair, HP1
Hanke, I1
Ganschow, S1
Catalan, G1
Domingo, N1
Schlom, DG1
Assefa, MK1
Wu, G2
Hayton, TW1
Becker, B1
Enikeev, D1
Netsch, C1
Gross, AJ1
Laukhtina, E1
Glybochko, P1
Rapoport, L1
Herrmann, TRW1
Taratkin, M1
Dai, W1
Shi, J2
Carreno, J1
Kloner, RA1
Pickersgill, NA1
Vetter, JM1
Kim, EH1
Cope, SJ1
Du, K1
Venkatesh, R1
Giardina, JD1
Saad, NES1
Bhayani, SB1
Figenshau, RS1
Eriksson, J1
Landfeldt, E1
Ireland, S1
Jackson, C1
Wyatt, E1
Gaudig, M1
Stancill, JS1
Happ, JT1
Broniowska, KA1
Hogg, N1
Corbett, JA1
Tang, LF1
Bi, YL1
Fan, Y2
Sun, YB1
Wang, AL1
Xiao, BH1
Wang, LF1
Qiu, SW1
Guo, SW1
Wáng, YXJ1
Sun, J2
Chu, S1
Pan, Q1
Li, D2
Zheng, S2
Ma, L1
Wang, L3
Hu, T1
Wang, F1
Han, Z1
Yin, Z1
Ge, X1
Xie, K1
Lei, P1
Dias-Santagata, D1
Lennerz, JK1
Sadow, PM1
Frazier, RP1
Govinda Raju, S1
Henry, D1
Chung, T1
Kherani, J1
Rothenberg, SM1
Wirth, LJ1
Marti, CN1
Choi, NG1
Bae, SJ1
Ni, L1
Luo, X1
Dai, T1
Yang, Y3
Lee, R1
Fleischer, AS1
Wemhoff, AP1
Ford, CR1
Kleppinger, EL1
Helms, K1
Bush, AA1
Luna-Abanto, J1
García Ruiz, L1
Laura Martinez, J1
Álvarez Larraondo, M1
Villoslada Terrones, V1
Dukic, L1
Maric, N1
Simundic, AM1
Chogtu, B1
Ommurugan, B1
Thomson, SR1
Kalthur, SG1
Benidir, M1
El Massoudi, S1
El Ghadraoui, L1
Lazraq, A1
Benjelloun, M1
Errachidi, F1
Cassar, M1
Law, AD1
Chow, ES1
Giebultowicz, JM1
Kretzschmar, D1
Salonurmi, T1
Nabil, H1
Ronkainen, J1
Hyötyläinen, T1
Hautajärvi, H1
Savolainen, MJ1
Tolonen, A1
Orešič, M1
Känsäkoski, P1
Rysä, J1
Hakkola, J1
Hukkanen, J1
Zhu, N1
Li, Y4
Du, Q1
Hao, P1
Cao, X1
Li, CX1
Zhao, S1
Luo, XM1
Feng, JX1
Gonzalez-Cotto, M1
Guo, L1
Karwan, M1
Sen, SK1
Barb, J1
Collado, CJ1
Elloumi, F1
Palmieri, EM1
Boelte, K1
Kolodgie, FD1
Finn, AV1
Biesecker, LG1
McVicar, DW1
Qu, F1
Deng, Z1
Xie, Y2
Tang, J3
Chen, Z2
Luo, W1
Xiong, D1
Zhao, D1
Fang, J1
Zhou, Z1
Niu, PP1
Song, B1
Xu, YM1
Zhang, Z2
Qiu, N1
Yin, J1
Zhang, J3
Guo, W1
Liu, M2
Liu, T2
Chen, D5
Luo, K1
He, Z2
Zheng, G1
Xu, F1
Sun, W1
Yin, F1
van Hest, JCM1
Du, L2
Shi, X1
Kang, S1
Duan, W1
Zhang, S2
Feng, J2
Qi, N1
Shen, G1
Ren, H1
Shang, Q1
Zhao, W2
Yang, Z2
Jiang, X2
Alame, M1
Cornillot, E1
Cacheux, V1
Tosato, G1
Four, M1
De Oliveira, L1
Gofflot, S1
Delvenne, P1
Turtoi, E1
Cabello-Aguilar, S1
Nishiyama, M1
Turtoi, A1
Costes-Martineau, V1
Colinge, J1
Guo, Q1
Quan, M1
Dong, J1
Bai, J1
Han, R1
Cai, Y1
Lv, YQ1
Chen, Q1
Lyu, HD1
Deng, L1
Zhou, D1
Xiao, X1
De Langhe, S1
Billadeau, DD1
Lou, Z1
Zhang, JS1
Xue, Z1
Shen, XD1
Gao, F1
Busuttil, RW1
Kupiec-Weglinski, JW1
Ji, H1
Otano, I1
Alvarez, M1
Minute, L1
Ochoa, MC1
Migueliz, I1
Molina, C1
Azpilikueta, A1
de Andrea, CE1
Etxeberria, I1
Sanmamed, MF1
Teijeira, Á1
Berraondo, P1
Melero, I1
Zhong, Z1
Xie, X1
Yu, Q1
Zhou, C1
Liu, C2
Liu, W1
Chen, W1
Yin, Y1
Li, CW1
Hsu, JL1
Zhou, Q1
Hu, B1
Fu, P1
Atyah, M1
Ma, Q2
Xu, Y1
Dong, Q1
Hung, MC1
Ren, N1
Huang, P1
Liao, R1
Chen, X3
Cao, Q1
Yuan, X1
Nie, W1
Yang, J3
Shao, B1
Ma, X1
Bi, Z1
Liang, X1
Tie, Y1
Mo, F1
Xie, D1
Wei, Y1
Wei, X2
Dokla, EME1
Fang, CS1
Chu, PC1
Chang, CS1
Abouzid, KAM1
Chen, CS1
Blaszczyk, R1
Brzezinska, J1
Dymek, B1
Stanczak, PS1
Mazurkiewicz, M1
Olczak, J1
Nowicka, J1
Dzwonek, K1
Zagozdzon, A1
Golab, J1
Golebiowski, A1
Xin, Z1
Himmelbauer, MK1
Jones, JH1
Enyedy, I1
Gilfillan, R1
Hesson, T1
King, K1
Marcotte, DJ1
Murugan, P1
Santoro, JC1
Gonzalez-Lopez de Turiso, F1
Pedron, J1
Boudot, C1
Brossas, JY1
Pinault, E1
Bourgeade-Delmas, S1
Sournia-Saquet, A1
Boutet-Robinet, E1
Destere, A1
Tronnet, A1
Bergé, J1
Bonduelle, C1
Deraeve, C1
Pratviel, G1
Stigliani, JL1
Paris, L1
Mazier, D1
Corvaisier, S1
Since, M1
Malzert-Fréon, A1
Wyllie, S1
Milne, R1
Fairlamb, AH1
Valentin, A1
Courtioux, B1
Verhaeghe, P1
Fang, X1
Gao, M1
Gao, H1
Bi, W1
Tang, H1
Cui, Y1
Zhang, L3
Fan, H1
Yu, H1
Mathison, CJN1
Chianelli, D1
Rucker, PV1
Nelson, J1
Roland, J1
Huang, Z2
Xie, YF1
Epple, R1
Bursulaya, B1
Lee, C1
Gao, MY1
Shaffer, J1
Briones, S1
Sarkisova, Y1
Galkin, A1
Li, N1
Li, C2
Hua, S1
Kasibhatla, S1
Kinyamu-Akunda, J1
Kikkawa, R1
Molteni, V1
Tellew, JE1
Jin, X1
Pang, B1
Liu, Q2
Liu, X3
Huang, Y2
Josephine Fauci, A1
Ma, Y1
Soo Lee, M1
Yuan, W1
Gao, R1
Qi, H1
Zheng, W1
Yang, F2
Chua, H1
Wang, K1
Ou, Y1
Huang, M1
Zhu, Y1
Yu, J1
Tian, J1
Zhao, M1
Hu, J1
Yao, C1
Zhang, B1
Usawachintachit, M1
Tzou, DT1
Washington, SL1
Hu, W1
Chi, T1
Sorensen, MD1
Bailey, MR1
Hsi, RS1
Cunitz, BW1
Simon, J1
Wang, YN1
Dunmire, BL1
Paun, M1
Starr, F1
Lu, W1
Evan, AP1
Harper, JD1
Han, G1
Rodrigues, AE1
Fouladvand, F1
Falahi, E1
Asbaghi, O1
Abbasnezhad, A1
Anigboro, AA1
Avwioroko, OJ1
Cholu, CO1
Sonei, A1
Fazelipour, S1
Kanaani, L1
Jahromy, MH1
Jo, K1
Hong, KB1
Suh, HJ1
Park, JH1
Shin, E1
Park, E1
Kouakou-Kouamé, CA1
N'guessan, FK1
Montet, D1
Djè, MK1
Kim, GD1
González-Fernández, D1
Pons, EDC1
Rueda, D1
Sinisterra, OT1
Murillo, E1
Scott, ME1
Koski, KG1
Shete, PB1
Gonzales, R1
Ackerman, S1
Cattamanchi, A1
Handley, MA1
Li, XX1
Xiao, SZ1
Gu, FF1
He, WP1
Ni, YX1
Han, LZ1
Heffernan, JK1
Valgepea, K1
de Souza Pinto Lemgruber, R1
Casini, I1
Plan, M1
Tappel, R1
Simpson, SD1
Köpke, M1
Nielsen, LK1
Marcellin, E1
Cen, YK1
Lin, JG1
Wang, YL1
Wang, JY1
Liu, ZQ1
Zheng, YG1
Spirk, D1
Noll, S1
Burnier, M1
Rimoldi, S1
Noll, G1
Sudano, I1
Penzhorn, BL1
Oosthuizen, MC1
Kobos, LM1
Alqatani, S1
Ferreira, CR1
Aryal, UK1
Hedrick, V1
Sobreira, TJP1
Shannahan, JH1
Gale, P1
Singhroy, DN1
MacLean, E1
Kohli, M1
Lessem, E1
Branigan, D1
England, K1
Suleiman, K1
Drain, PK1
Ruhwald, M1
Schumacher, S1
Denkinger, CM1
Waning, B1
Van Gemert, W1
Pai, M1
Myers, RK1
Bonsu, JM1
Carey, ME1
Yerys, BE1
Mollen, CJ1
Curry, AE1
Douglas, TA1
Alinezhadbalalami, N1
Balani, N1
Schmelz, EM1
Davalos, RV1
Kamaldinov, T1
Erndt-Marino, J1
Levin, M1
Kaplan, DL1
Hahn, MS1
Heidarimoghadam, R1
Farmany, A1
Lee, JJ1
Kang, J1
Park, S1
Cho, JH1
Oh, S1
Park, DJ1
Perez-Maldonado, R1
Cho, JY1
Park, IH1
Kim, HB1
Song, M1
Mfarrej, B1
Jofra, T1
Morsiani, C1
Gagliani, N1
Fousteri, G1
Battaglia, M1
Giuliano, C1
Levinger, I1
Vogrin, S1
Neil, CJ1
Allen, JD1
Lv, Y1
Yuan, R1
Cai, B1
Bahrami, B1
Chowdhury, AH1
Yang, C2
Qiao, Q1
Liu, SF1
Zhang, WH1
Kolano, L1
Knappe, D1
Volke, D1
Sträter, N1
Hoffmann, R1
Coussens, M1
Calders, P1
Lapauw, B1
Celie, B1
Banica, T1
De Wandele, I1
Pacey, V1
Malfait, F1
Rombaut, L1
Vieira, D1
Angel, S1
Honjol, Y1
Gruenheid, S1
Gbureck, U1
Harvey, E1
Merle, G1
Seo, G1
Lee, G1
Kim, MJ1
Baek, SH1
Choi, M1
Ku, KB1
Lee, CS1
Jun, S1
Park, D1
Kim, HG1
Kim, SJ1
Lee, JO1
Kim, BT1
Park, EC1
Kim, SI1
Ende, M1
Kirkkala, T1
Loitzenbauer, M1
Talla, D1
Wildner, M1
Miletich, R1
Criado, A1
Lavela, P1
Tirado, JL1
Pérez-Vicente, C1
Kang, D1
Feng, D2
Fang, Z1
Wei, F1
De Clercq, E1
Pannecouque, C1
Zhan, P1
Guo, Y1
Shen, Y1
Wang, Q2
Kawazoe, Y1
Jena, P1
Sun, Z1
Li, Z2
Liang, H1
Xu, X1
Ma, G1
Huo, X1
Church, JS1
Chace-Donahue, F1
Blum, JL1
Ratner, JR1
Zelikoff, JT1
Schwartzer, JJ1
Fiseha, T1
Tamir, Z1
Yao, W1
Wang, P1
Mi, K1
Cheng, J1
Gu, C1
Huang, J2
Sun, HB1
Xing, WQ1
Liu, XB1
Zheng, Y1
Yang, SJ1
Wang, ZF1
Liu, SL1
Ba, YF1
Zhang, RX1
Liu, BX1
Fan, CC1
Chen, PN1
Liang, GH1
Yu, YK1
Wang, HR1
Li, HM1
Li, ZX1
Lalani, SS1
Anasir, MI1
Poh, CL1
Khan, IT1
Nadeem, M1
Imran, M1
Khalique, A1
Raspini, B1
Porri, D1
De Giuseppe, R1
Chieppa, M1
Liso, M1
Cerbo, RM1
Civardi, E1
Garofoli, F1
Monti, MC1
Vacca, M1
De Angelis, M1
Cena, H1
Kong, D1
Han, X1
Zhou, Y3
Xue, H1
Zhang, W1
Ruan, Z1
Li, S2
Noer, PR1
Kjaer-Sorensen, K1
Juhl, AK1
Goldstein, A1
Ke, C1
Oxvig, C1
Duan, C1
Kong, F1
Lin, S1
Wang, Z2
Bhattacharya, R1
Mazumder, D1
Yan, X1
Ma, C1
Tang, Y1
Kong, X1
Lu, J1
Zhang, M1
Vital-Jacome, M1
Cazares-Granillo, M1
Carrillo-Reyes, J1
Buitron, G1
Jacob, SI1
Douair, I1
Maron, L1
Ménard, G1
Rusjan, P1
Sabioni, P1
Di Ciano, P1
Mansouri, E1
Boileau, I1
Laveillé, A1
Capet, M1
Duvauchelle, T1
Schwartz, JC1
Robert, P1
Le Foll, B1
Xia, Y1
Chen, S1
Luo, M1
Wu, J1
Cai, S1
He, Y2
Garbacz, P1
Misiak, M1
Jackowski, K1
Yuan, Q1
Sherrell, PC1
Chen, J2
Bi, X1
Nutho, B1
Mahalapbutr, P1
Hengphasatporn, K1
Pattaranggoon, NC1
Simanon, N1
Shigeta, Y1
Hannongbua, S1
Rungrotmongkol, T1
Caffrey, PJ1
Kher, R1
Bian, K1
Delaney, S1
Xue, J1
Wu, P1
Xu, L1
Yuan, Y1
Luo, J1
Ye, S1
Ustriyana, P1
Wei, B1
Raee, E1
Hu, Y1
Wesdemiotis, C1
Sahai, N1
Kaur, A1
Nigam, K1
Srivastava, S1
Tyagi, A1
Dang, S1
Millar, JE1
Bartnikowski, N1
Passmore, MR1
Obonyo, NG1
Malfertheiner, MV1
von Bahr, V1
Redd, MA1
See Hoe, L1
Ki, KK1
Pedersen, S1
Boyle, AJ1
Baillie, JK1
Shekar, K1
Palpant, N1
Suen, JY1
Matthay, MA1
McAuley, DF1
Fraser, JF1
Settles, JA1
Gerety, GF1
Spaepen, E1
Suico, JG1
Child, CJ1
Oh, BL1
Lee, JS1
Lee, EY1
Lee, HY1
Yu, HG1
Leslie, I1
Boos, LA1
Larkin, J1
Pickering, L1
Lima, HK1
Vogel, K1
Hampel, D1
Wagner-Gillespie, M1
Fogleman, AD1
Ferraz, SL1
O'Connor, M1
Mazzucchelli, TG1
Kajiyama, H1
Suzuki, S1
Shimbo, A1
Utsumi, F1
Yoshikawa, N1
Kikkawa, F1
Javvaji, PK1
Dhali, A1
Francis, JR1
Kolte, AP1
Roy, SC1
Selvaraju, S1
Mech, A1
Sejian, V1
DeSilva, S1
Vaidya, SS1
Mao, C1
Akhatayeva, Z1
Cheng, H1
Zhang, G1
Jiang, F1
Meng, X1
Elnour, IE1
Lan, X1
Song, E1
Rohde, S1
Antonides, CFJ1
Muslem, R1
de Woestijne, PCV1
der Meulen, MHV1
Kraemer, US1
Dalinghaus, M1
Bogers, AJJC1
Pourmand, A1
Ghassemi, M1
Sumon, K1
Amini, SB1
Hood, C1
Sikka, N1
Duan, H1
Chen, WP1
Fan, M1
Wang, WP1
Yu, L1
Tan, SJ1
Xin, S1
Wan, LJ1
Guo, YG1
Tanda, S1
Gingl, K1
Ličbinský, R1
Hegrová, J1
Goessler, W1
Li, ZL1
Zhou, YL1
Yan, W1
Luo, L1
Su, ZZ1
Fan, MZ1
Wang, SR1
Zhao, WG1
Xu, D1
Hassan, HM1
Jiang, Z1
Bachmann, KF1
Haenggi, M1
Jakob, SM1
Takala, J1
Gattinoni, L1
Berger, D1
Bentley, RF1
Vecchiarelli, E1
Banks, L1
Gonçalves, PEO1
Thomas, SG1
Goodman, JM1
Mather, K1
Boachie, R1
Anini, Y1
Panahi, S1
Anderson, GH1
Luhovyy, BL1
Nafie, MS1
Arafa, K1
Sedky, NK1
Alakhdar, AA1
Arafa, RK1
Fan, S1
Hu, H1
Liang, J1
Hu, BC1
Wen, Z1
Hu, D1
Liu, YY1
Chu, Q1
Wu, MC1
Lu, X1
Wang, D1
Hu, M1
Shen, H1
Yao, M1
Dahlgren, RA1
Vysloužil, J1
Kulich, P1
Zeman, T1
Vaculovič, T1
Tvrdoňová, M1
Mikuška, P1
Večeřa, Z1
Stráská, J1
Moravec, P1
Balcar, VJ1
Šerý, O1
Qiao, L1
Xiong, X1
Peng, X1
Zheng, J1
Duan, J1
Xiao, W1
Zhou, HY1
Sui, ZY1
Zhao, FL1
Sun, YN1
Wang, HY1
Han, BH1
Jintao, X1
Shasha, Y1
Jincai, W1
Chunyan, L1
Mengya, Y1
Yongli, S1
Rasoanirina, BNV1
Lassoued, MA1
Miladi, K1
Razafindrakoto, Z1
Chaâbane-Banaoues, R1
Ramanitrahasimbola, D1
Cornet, M1
Sfar, S1
Liang, C1
Xing, Q1
Yi, JL1
Zhang, YQ1
Li, CY1
Tang, SJ1
Gao, C1
Sun, X1
Peng, M1
Sun, XF1
Zhang, T1
Shi, JH1
Liao, CX1
Gao, WJ1
Sun, LL1
Gao, Y1
Cao, WH1
Lyu, J1
Yu, CQ1
Wang, SF1
Pang, ZC1
Cong, LM1
Dong, Z1
Wu, F1
Wu, XP1
Jiang, GH1
Wang, XJ1
Wang, BY1
Li, LM1
Pan, L1
Wan, SP1
Yi, HWL1
He, HJ1
Yong, ZP1
Shan, GL1
Weng, TT1
Yan, SQ1
Gao, GP1
Wei, C1
Tao, FB1
Shao, ZH1
Yao, T1
Dong, S1
Shi, S1
Feng, YL1
Zhang, YW1
Wang, SP1
Shi, AX1
Operario, D1
Zhang, ZH1
Zhu, XF1
Zaller, N1
Gao, P1
Sun, YH1
Zhang, HB1
Lamba, N1
Mehanna, E1
Kearney, RB1
Catalano, PJ1
Haas-Kogan, DA1
Levy, A1
Dhermain, F1
Botticella, A1
Rivera, S1
Le Péchoux, C1
Andratschke, N1
Belderbos, J1
Mayinger, M1
Schagen, SB2
De Ruysscher, D1
Chun, SG1
Klopp, AH1
Yang, WC1
Chen, YF1
Yang, CC1
Wu, PF1
Chan, HM1
Chen, JL1
Chen, GY1
Cheng, JC1
Kuo, SH1
Hsu, FM1
Albayrak, G1
Konac, E1
Dere, UA1
Emmez, H1
Nepali, K1
Hsu, TI1
Hsieh, CM1
Lo, WL1
Lai, MJ1
Hsu, KC1
Lin, TE1
Chuang, JY1
Liou, JP1
Cacciatore, I1
Fornasari, E1
Marinelli, L1
Eusepi, P1
Ciulla, M1
Ozdemir, O1
Tatar, A1
Turkez, H1
Di Stefano, A1
Altinoz, MA1
Elmaci, İ1
Farrell, MJ1
Yahya, JB1
Degnin, C1
Chen, Y1
Holland, JM1
Henderson, MA1
Jaboin, JJ1
Harkenrider, MM1
Thomas, CR1
Mitin, T1
Lynch, M1
Maraka, S1
Groves, MD1
Mammoser, AG1
Melguizo-Gavilanes, I1
Conrad, CA1
Tremont-Lukats, IW1
Loghin, ME1
O'Brien, BJ1
Puduvalli, VK1
Sulman, EP1
Hess, KR1
Aldape, KD1
de Groot, JF1
Alfred Yung, WK1
Penas-Prado, M1
van Lonkhuizen, PJC1
Klaver, KM1
Sitskoorn, MM1
Blecic, S1
Rynkowski, M1
De Witte, O1
Lefranc, F1
Meyers, C1
Choucair, A1
Fox, S1
Suh, JH1
Kavadi, V1
Bentzen, SM1
Watkins-Bruner, D1
Yohay, K1
Tyler, B1
Weaver, KD1
Pardo, AC1
Gincel, D1
Blakeley, J1
Brem, H1
Rothstein, JD1
Pruitt, AA1
Slade, AN1
Stanic, S1
Wong, P1
Leppert, IR1
Boudam, K1
Muanza, T1
Pike, GB1
Chankowsky, J1
Mihalcioiu, C1
Caumont, AS1
Octave, JN1
Hermans, E1
Takano, T1
Lin, JH1
Arcuino, G1
Gao, Q1
Nedergaard, M1

Clinical Trials (7)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Memantine and Whole-Brain Radiotherapy With or Without Hippocampal Avoidance in Patients With Brain Metastases[NCT02360215]Phase 3518 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
A Phase 2 Prospective Trial of Hippocampal-Sparing Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatment of Brain Metastases Using CyberKnife[NCT05177185]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-01Not yet recruiting
Neurocognitive Outcome of Conformal Whole Brain Radiotherapy With or Without Hippocampal Avoidance for Brain Metastases: A Phase II Single Blind Randomized Trial[NCT02393131]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-03Active, not recruiting
Integration of Neurocognitive Biomarkers Into a Neuro-Oncology Clinic[NCT05504681]200 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-11-03Recruiting
A Randomized, Phase III, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Memantine for Prevention of Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients Receiving Whole-Brain Radiotherapy[NCT00566852]Phase 3554 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
UCSD Image-Guided Cognitive-Sparing Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: Avoidance of Eloquent White Matter and Hippocampal Regions[NCT04343157]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-01Recruiting
Role of Glutamate-mediate Excitotoxicity in Invasion and Progression Processes of Glioblastoma Multiforme[NCT05775458]50 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-06-01Recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change in EQ-5D-5L Index Score at 12 Months

The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 5 problem levels (1-none to 5-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The index score is reported here. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
HA-WBRT + Memantine-0.03
WBRT + Memantine-0.01

Change in EQ-5D-5L Index Score at 2 Months

The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 5 problem levels (1-none to 5-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The index score is reported here. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
HA-WBRT + Memantine-0.04
WBRT + Memantine-0.05

Change in EQ-5D-5L Index Score at 4 Months

The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 5 problem levels (1-none to 5-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The index score is reported here. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
HA-WBRT + Memantine-0.03
WBRT + Memantine-0.03

Change in EQ-5D-5L Index Score at 6 Months

The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 5 problem levels (1-none to 5-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The index score is reported here. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
HA-WBRT + Memantine-0.03
WBRT + Memantin-0.03

Change in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at 12 Months

The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 5 problem levels (1-none to 5-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The VAS score is reported here. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
HA-WBRT + Memantine2.86
WBRT + Memantine2.42

Change in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at 2 Months

The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 5 problem levels (1-none to 5-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The VAS score is reported here. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
HA-WBRT + Memantine-5.64
WBRT + Memantine-1.41

Change in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at 4 Months

The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 5 problem levels (1-none to 5-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The VAS score is reported here. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
HA-WBRT + Memantine-1.35
WBRT + Memantine-2.98

Change in EQ-5D-5L VAS Score at 6 Months

The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part self-assessment questionnaire. First part is 5 items (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each with 5 problem levels (1-none to 5-extreme). The 5-item index score is transformed into a utility score between 0 (worst health state) and 1 (best health state). The 2nd part is a visual analogue scale (VAS) valuing current health state, measured on a 20-cm scale ranging from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for best imaginable health state, marked at 10-point intervals. The VAS score is reported here. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
HA-WBRT + Memantine3.97
WBRT + Memantine3.49

Intracranial Progression-Free Survival

Intracranial progression-free survival time is defined as time from registration/randomization to the date of progression in the brain or death from any cause. Intracranial progression-free survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact. Analysis was planned to occur after 233 primary endpoint events (neurocognitive failure) were reported. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Six-month rates are provided. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis was planned to occur after 233 events were reported. Maximum follow-up was 15.6 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HA-WBRT + Memantine43.9
WBRT + Memantine44.8

Number of Patients With a Grade 3+ Adverse Event (AE) Regardless of Relationship to Treatment

. Adverse events were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v3.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to AE. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis was planned to occur after 233 events were reported. Maximum follow-up was 15.6 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HA-WBRT + Memantine144
WBRT + Memantine131

Overall Survival

Overall survival time is defined as time from registration/randomization to the date of death from any cause. Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive are censored at the date of last contact. Analysis was planned to occur after 233 primary endpoint events (neurocognitive failure) were reported. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Six-month rates are provided. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up was 15.6 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HA-WBRT + Memantine54.9
WBRT + Memantine50.6

Time to Neurocognitive Failure

Neurocognitive failure is defined as the first failure, defined as a neurocognitive decline using the reliable change index (RCI) on at least one of the following assessments or parts of : Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R), Trail Making Test (TMT), or Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA). The HVLT-R has 3 parts that were analyzed separately for decline: Total Recall, Delayed Recall, and Delayed Recognition. The TMT has 2 parts that were analyzed separately: Part A and Part B. Neurocognitive failure rate is estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Analysis was planned to occur after 233 events were reported. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Six-month rates are provided.Analysis was planned to occur after 233 events were reported. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up was 15.6 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
HA-WBRT + Memantine68.2
WBRT + Memantine59.3

Change From Baseline in the Clinical Trial Battery Composite (CTB COMP) Score [Neurocognitive Decline]

Clinical Trial Battery Composite score is the arithmetic mean of the HVLT-R (Free Recall, Delayed Recall, Delayed Recognition), TMTA, TMTB, and COWA scores, all of which are standardized, adjusting for age, education, and gender as necessary, such that mean is 0 and standard deviation is 1. A participant must have at least 5 of the 6 scores. A higher composite score indicates better neurocognitive function.Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
2 months4 months6 months12 months
HA-WBRT + Memantine-1.09-0.81-0.44-0.98
WBRT + Memantine-0.87-0.27-0.21-0.61

Change From Baseline in the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) Test (Neurocognitive Decline)

The COWA is a verbal fluency test that measures spontaneous production of words belonging to the same category or beginning with some designated letter. Patients are given 1 minute to name as many words as possible beginning with the designated letter. The procedure is then repeated for the remaining two letters. Two alternate forms of the COWA are employed to minimize practice effects. The score is the sum of the correct responses with a range of 0 to infinity. A higher score indicates better functioning. Scores are standardized, adjusting for age, education, and gender as necessary, such that mean is 0 and standard deviation is 1. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
2 months4 months6 months12 months
HA-WBRT + Memantine-0.28-0.06-0.15-0.44
WBRT + Memantine-0.29-0.08-0.11-0.21

Change From Baseline in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test -Revised (HVLT-R) Delayed Recall Score (Neurocognitive Decline)

The HVLT-R assesses verbal learning and memory. The test involves memorizing a list of 12 nouns for 3 consecutive trials (Total Recall), recalling the 12 targets after a 20-minute delay (Delayed Recall), and then identifying the 12 targets from a list of semantically related or unrelated items (delayed recognition). Raw scores are derived for total recall (sum of the number of targets correctly recalled), delayed recall (sum of the number of targets correctly recalled), and a delayed recognition discrimination index (sum of targets incorrectly identified subtracted from the sum of the number of targets correctly identified). The range of scores for total recall is 0 to 36, for delayed recall is 0 to 12, and -12 to 12 for recognition. A higher score indicates better functioning. Scores are standardized, adjusting for age, education, and gender as necessary, such that mean 0 and standard deviation is 1. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
2 months4 months6 months12 months
HA-WBRT + Memantine-0.75-0.88-0.54-0.89
WBRT + Memantine-0.73-0.68-0.30-0.87

Change From Baseline in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test -Revised (HVLT-R) Delayed Recognition (Neurocognitive Decline)

The HVLT-R assesses verbal learning and memory. The test involves memorizing a list of 12 nouns for 3 consecutive trials (Total Recall), recalling the 12 targets after a 20-minute delay (Delayed Recall), and then identifying the 12 targets from a list of semantically related or unrelated items (delayed recognition). Raw scores are derived for total recall (sum of the number of targets correctly recalled), delayed recall (sum of the number of targets correctly recalled), and a delayed recognition discrimination index (sum of targets incorrectly identified subtracted from the sum of the number of targets correctly identified). The range of scores for total recall is 0 to 36, for delayed recall is 0 to 12, and -12 to 12 for recognition. A higher score indicates better functioning. Scores are standardized by expressing the deviation from the mean score of the group in units of standard deviation. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
2 months4 months6 months12 months
HA-WBRT + Memantine-0.69-0.11-0.55-0.48
WBRT + Memantine-0.70-0.12-0.06-0.30

Change From Baseline in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test -Revised (HVLT-R) Total Recall Score (Neurocognitive Decline)

The HVLT-R assesses verbal learning and memory. The test involves memorizing a list of 12 nouns for 3 consecutive trials (Total Recall), recalling the 12 targets after a 20-minute delay (Delayed Recall), and then identifying the 12 targets from a list of semantically related or unrelated items (delayed recognition). Raw scores are derived for total recall (sum of the number of targets correctly recalled), delayed recall (sum of the number of targets correctly recalled), and a delayed recognition discrimination index (sum of targets incorrectly identified subtracted from the sum of the number of targets correctly identified). The range of scores for total recall is 0 to 36, for delayed recall is 0 to 12, and -12 to 12 for recognition. A higher score indicates better functioning. Scores are standardized, adjusting for age, education, and gender as necessary, such that mean 0 and standard deviation is 1. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
2 months4 months6 months12 months
HA-WBRT + Memantine-0.63-0.68-0.34-0.55
WBRT + Memantine-0.47-0.36-0.06-0.34

Change From Baseline in the Trail Making Test (TMT) Part A (Neurocognitive Decline)

The TMT is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching that can provide information about visual search speed, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functioning. Subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible while still maintaining accuracy. There are two parts to the test: in the first (Part A), the targets are all numbers (1, 2, 3, etc.) and the test taker needs to connect them in sequential order; in the second part (Part B), the subject alternates between numbers and letters (1, A, 2, B, etc.). The score is the amount of time, in seconds, that it takes the patient to complete each maze. The range for Part A is 0 to 180 (3 minutes) and for Part B is 0 to 300 (5 minutes). Lower scores indicate better functioning. Scores are standardized, adjusting for age, education, gender as needed, so that mean is 0 and standard deviation is 1. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
2 months4 months6 months12 months
HA-WBRT + Memantine-1.42-0.28-2.09-1.28
WBRT + Memantine-1.310.030.17-0.70

Change From Baseline in the Trail Making Test (TMT) Part B (Neurocognitive Decline)

The TMT is a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task switching that can provide information about visual search speed, scanning, speed of processing, mental flexibility, and executive functioning. Subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible while still maintaining accuracy. There are two parts to the test: in the first (Part A), the targets are all numbers (1, 2, 3, etc.) and the test taker needs to connect them in sequential order; in the second part (Part B), the subject alternates between numbers and letters (1, A, 2, B, etc.). The score is the amount of time, in seconds, that it takes the patient to complete each maze. The range for Part A is 0 to 180 (3 minutes) and for Part B is 0 to 300 (5 minutes). A lower score indicates better functioning. Scores are standardized by expressing the deviation from the mean score of the group in units of standard deviation. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
2 months4 months6 months12 months
HA-WBRT + Memantine-2.86-3.38-0.47-2.49
WBRT + Memantine-2.27-0.89-1.06-1.44

Change in M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Cognitive Factor Score

The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor (MDASI-BT) is a 28-item multi-symptom patient-reported outcome measure assessing the severity of symptoms experienced by cancer patients and the interference with daily living caused by these symptoms, with 9 items specific to brain tumors. Each item ranges from 0 (best condition) to 10 (worst condition). A subscale score (Cognitive Factor) is the average of the subscale items, given that a specified minimum numbers of items were completed. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
2 months4 months6 months12 months
HA-WBRT + Memantine0.450.520.571.04
WBRT + Memantine0.500.320.010.50

Change in M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Interference Score

The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor (MDASI-BT) is a 28-item multi-symptom patient-reported outcome measure assessing the severity of symptoms experienced by cancer patients and the interference with daily living caused by these symptoms, with 9 items specific to brain tumors. Each item ranges from 0 (best condition) to 10 (worst condition). A subscale score (Interference) is the average of the subscale items, given that a specified minimum numbers of items were completed. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
2 months4 months6 months12 months
HA-WBRT + Memantine0.840.350.570.64
WBRT + Memantine1.090.510.010.14

Change in M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Neurologic Factor Score

The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor (MDASI-BT) is a 28-item multi-symptom patient-reported outcome measure assessing the severity of symptoms experienced by cancer patients and the interference with daily living caused by these symptoms, with 9 items specific to brain tumors. Each item ranges from 0 (best condition) to 10 (worst condition). A subscale score (Neurologic Factor) is the average of the subscale items, given that a specified minimum numbers of items were completed. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
2 months4 months6 months12 months
HA-WBRT + Memantine0.170.130.230.60
WBRT + Memantine0.280.240.150.40

Change in M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT) Symptom Severity Score

The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for brain tumor (MDASI-BT) is a 28-item multi-symptom patient-reported outcome measure assessing the severity of symptoms experienced by cancer patients and the interference with daily living caused by these symptoms, with 9 items specific to brain tumors. Each item ranges from 0 (best condition) to 10 (worst condition). A subscale score (Symptom Severity) is the average of the subscale items, given that a specified minimum numbers of items were completed. (NCT02360215)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
2 months4 months6 months12 months
HA-WBRT + Memantine0.480.290.240.53
WBRT + Memantine0.610.36-0.090.09

Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy With Brain Subscale (FACT-Br) at 24 Weeks

The FACT-Br is a 50-question self-report questionnaire contains the following domains (scales): Physical well-being (7 questions), social/family well-being (7 questions), emotional well-being (6 questions), functional well-being (7 questions) and brain cancer subscale which contains concerns relevant to patients with brain tumors (23 questions). Each question has a value 0-4. For some questions a higher indicates better outcome and others are the opposite. The former are summed as is, the latter are reversed in value before adding, such that each domain ranges from 0 to 4 times the number of questions in the domain, with 0 indicating worst and the highest possible value indicating best outcome. The FACT-Br total is obtained by adding all domains together if the overall question response rate is greater than 80%. Total scores on the FACT-Br range from 0 to 184 with lower scores indicating declining quality of life. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from 24-week score. (NCT00566852)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks from start of treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
WBRT+Memantine0
WBRT+Placebo1

Change in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised for Delayed Recall (HVLT-R-delayed Recall) at 24 Weeks

The HVLT-R consists of 3 parts. Free call has a range of 0 to 36, delayed recall has a range from 0 to 12, and delayed recognition has a range of -12 to 12. Higher scores indicating better function in all 3 parts. Standardized scores are used by calculating an average standardized z score for each part of the HVLT-R. Change is calculated by subtracting baseline value from 24-week value. Imputation methods were used to determine values for all alive patients missing the 24 week assessment. This tool is being used to measure cognitive function, specifically memory. (NCT00566852)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks from the start of drug treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
WBRT+Memantine0
WBRT+Placebo-0.9

Median Progression-free Survival Time

Disease progression is defined as the first of the following events: an increase of at least 50% for lesions less than or equal to 1cm, an increase of least 25% for lesions greater than 1cm, appearance of any new brain metastases. Failure for progression-free survival is disease progression or death. Median progression-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00566852)
Timeframe: From randomization to date of progression, death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs at the same time as the primary outcome. Patients are followed until death and all follow-up collected at time of analysis is used.

Interventionmonths (Mean)
WBRT+Memantine4.7
WBRT+Placebo5.5

Median Time to Neurocognitive Failure

Neurocognitive failure is defined as the first cognitive failure on any of the neurocognitive tests: the HVLT-R for immediate recall, delayed recognition, and delayed recall; the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT); the Trail-Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B. Cognitive failure for each test is defined as a post-treatment score that meets one of the following criteria: follow-up score is at least 2 standard deviations worse than the patient's personal baseline score or the patient's raw score change is greater than the reliable change index. The cumulative incidence approach was used to estimate the median time to neurocognitive failure to account for the competing risks of disease progression and death. (NCT00566852)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months from the start of drug treatment

Interventionyears (Median)
WBRT+Memantine2.6
WBRT+Placebo2.3

Overall Survival

Failure for overall survival is death from any cause. Median survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00566852)
Timeframe: From randomization to date of death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs at the same time as the primary outcome. Patients are followed until death and all follow-up collected at time of analysis is used.

Interventionmonths (Median)
WBRT+Memantine6.7
WBRT+Placebo7.8

Change in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised for Delayed Recall (HVLT-R-delayed Recall) at 8, 16, and 52 Weeks

The HVLT-R consists of 3 parts. Free call has a range of 0 to 36, delayed recall has a range from 0 to 12, and delayed recognition has a range of -12 to 12. Higher scores indicating better function in all 3 parts. Standardized scores are used by calculating an average standardized z score for each part of the HVLT-R. Change is calculated by subtracting baseline value from the respective later time point value. Imputation methods were used to determine values for all alive patients missing the post-baseline assessments. This tool is being used to measure cognitive function, specifically memory. (NCT00566852)
Timeframe: Baseline, 8, 16, and 52 weeks from the start of drug treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
8-weeks16-weeks52-weeks
WBRT+Memantine-0.3600
WBRT+Placebo-0.7200

Reviews

9 reviews available for memantine and Brain Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Preservation of cognitive function after brain irradiation.
    Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2022, Volume: 28, Issue:5

    Topics: Brain; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Humans; Memantine; Quality of Life

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022, 11-25, Volume: 11

    Topics: Adult; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Cranial Irradiation; Dementia; Donepezil;

2022
Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer.
    Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2023, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Memantine; Radiosurgery

2023
Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer.
    Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2023, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Memantine; Radiosurgery

2023
Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer.
    Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2023, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Memantine; Radiosurgery

2023
Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer.
    Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2023, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Memantine; Radiosurgery

2023
Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer.
    Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2023, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Memantine; Radiosurgery

2023
Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer.
    Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2023, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Memantine; Radiosurgery

2023
Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer.
    Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2023, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Memantine; Radiosurgery

2023
Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer.
    Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2023, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Memantine; Radiosurgery

2023
Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer.
    Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2023, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Memantine; Radiosurgery

2023
    The Egyptian journal of chest diseases and tuberculosis, 2016, Volume: 65, Issue:1

    Topics: A549 Cells; Acetylmuramyl-Alanyl-Isoglutamine; Acinetobacter baumannii; Acute Lung Injury; Adaptor P

2016
Targeting nitric oxide and NMDA receptor-associated pathways in treatment of high grade glial tumors. Hypotheses for nitro-memantine and nitrones.
    Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry, 2018, 09-01, Volume: 79

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Benzenesulfonates; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Proliferation; Cyclic N-Oxi

2018
Preservation of cognitive function following whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases: Complications, treatments, and the emerging role of memantine.
    Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2019, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cranial Irradiation; Humans; Memantine; Memory; Neoplasm Staging

2019
Interventions for cognitive problems in adults with brain cancer: A narrative review.
    European journal of cancer care, 2019, Volume: 28, Issue:3

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Cognition; Cognitive

2019
[Glutamate and malignant gliomas, from epilepsia to biological aggressiveness: therapeutic implications].
    Bulletin du cancer, 2013, Volume: 100, Issue:9

    Topics: Benzodiazepines; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Death; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Dizocilpine Maleate

2013
Medical management of patients with brain tumors.
    Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2015, Volume: 21, Issue:2 Neuro-on

    Topics: Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Anticonvulsants; Brain Edema; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Dopamin

2015

Trials

7 trials available for memantine and Brain Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Sustained Preservation of Cognition and Prevention of Patient-Reported Symptoms With Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: Final Results of NRG Oncology CC001.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023, 11-01, Volume: 117, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Brain; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition; Cranial Irradiation; Hippocampus; Humans; Memantine

2023
Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Plus Memantine for Patients With Brain Metastases: Phase III Trial NRG Oncology CC001.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 04-01, Volume: 38, Issue:10

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Female; Hi

2020
Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Plus Memantine for Patients With Brain Metastases: Phase III Trial NRG Oncology CC001.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 04-01, Volume: 38, Issue:10

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Female; Hi

2020
Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Plus Memantine for Patients With Brain Metastases: Phase III Trial NRG Oncology CC001.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 04-01, Volume: 38, Issue:10

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Female; Hi

2020
Hippocampal Avoidance During Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Plus Memantine for Patients With Brain Metastases: Phase III Trial NRG Oncology CC001.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 04-01, Volume: 38, Issue:10

    Topics: Antiparkinson Agents; Brain Neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Female; Hi

2020
    The Egyptian journal of chest diseases and tuberculosis, 2016, Volume: 65, Issue:1

    Topics: A549 Cells; Acetylmuramyl-Alanyl-Isoglutamine; Acinetobacter baumannii; Acute Lung Injury; Adaptor P

2016
Hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy without memantine in preserving neurocognitive function for brain metastases: a phase II blinded randomized trial.
    Neuro-oncology, 2021, 03-25, Volume: 23, Issue:3

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Cranial Irradiation; Hippocampus; Humans; Memantine; Radiation Injuries

2021
Phase 1 lead-in to a phase 2 factorial study of temozolomide plus memantine, mefloquine, and metformin as postradiation adjuvant therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
    Cancer, 2019, 02-01, Volume: 125, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brain Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant

2019
Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Neuro-oncology, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Double-Bl

2013
Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Neuro-oncology, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Double-Bl

2013
Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Neuro-oncology, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Double-Bl

2013
Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Neuro-oncology, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Double-Bl

2013
Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Neuro-oncology, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Double-Bl

2013
Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Neuro-oncology, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Double-Bl

2013
Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Neuro-oncology, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Double-Bl

2013
Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Neuro-oncology, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Double-Bl

2013
Memantine for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Neuro-oncology, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Double-Bl

2013
A pilot study using dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI as a response biomarker of the radioprotective effect of memantine in patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy.
    Oncotarget, 2016, 08-09, Volume: 7, Issue:32

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood-Brain Barrier; Brain Neoplasms; Capillary Permeability; Contrast Media; Cranial I

2016

Other Studies

17 other studies available for memantine and Brain Neoplasms

ArticleYear
The Effect of Oxidative Stress and Memantine-Incorporated Reactive Oxygen Species-Sensitive Nanoparticles on the Expression of
    International journal of molecular sciences, 2021, Nov-15, Volume: 22, Issue:22

    Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Animals; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Drug Delivery Systems;

2021
Life-threatening altered mental status secondary to memantine in an adolescent undergoing cranial radiotherapy for medulloblastoma.
    Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2023, Volume: 29, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Brain Neoplasms; Cerebellar Neoplasms; Child; Cranial Irradiation; Humans; Male; Medullo

2023
Somatic PRKAR1A mutation in sporadic atrial myxoma with cerebral parenchymal metastases: a case report.
    Journal of medical case reports, 2019, Dec-25, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Carney Complex; Chemoradiotherapy; Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinase RIalpha Subu

2019
Neurocognitive Outcomes for Patients With Brain Metastasis in the Modern Era: Benefit of Treatment With Hippocampal Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Plus Memantine.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 04-01, Volume: 38, Issue:10

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Cranial Irradiation; Hippocampus; Humans; Memantine

2020
Prescription of memantine during non-stereotactic, brain-directed radiation among patients with brain metastases: a population-based study.
    Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020, Volume: 148, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists;

2020
Hippocampal Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) Versus WBRT in Patients With Brain Metastases: Were Hippocampi the Only Difference?
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 10-10, Volume: 38, Issue:29

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Cranial Irradiation; Hippocampus; Humans; Memantine

2020
Hippocampal Avoidance and Memantine for Whole-Brain Radiotherapy: Long-Term Follow-Up Warranted.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 10-10, Volume: 38, Issue:29

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Cranial Irradiation; Follow-Up Studies; Hippocampus; Humans; Memantine

2020
Meeting the Burden of Proof to Justify Intensity-Modulated Radiation for Brain Metastases.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 10-10, Volume: 38, Issue:29

    Topics: Brain; Brain Neoplasms; Hippocampus; Humans; Memantine; Radiation; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated

2020
Reply to S.G. Chun et al, A. Levy et al, and N. Andratschke et al.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 10-10, Volume: 38, Issue:29

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Hippocampus; Humans; Medical Oncology; Memantine

2020
Targeting Cancer Cell Metabolism with Metformin, Dichloroacetate and Memantine in Glioblastoma (GBM).
    Turkish neurosurgery, 2021, Volume: 31, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Dichloroacetic A

2021
Pragmatic recruitment of memantine as the capping group for the design of HDAC inhibitors: A preliminary attempt to unravel the enigma of glioblastoma.
    European journal of medicinal chemistry, 2021, May-05, Volume: 217

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood-Brain Barrier; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Proliferation; Dose-Respo

2021
Memantine-derived drugs as potential antitumor agents for the treatment of glioblastoma.
    European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2017, Nov-15, Volume: 109

    Topics: 8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine; Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Cells; Blood-Brain Barrier; Brain N

2017
Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Survey of US Radiation Oncologists on Current Practice Patterns.
    Clinical lung cancer, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Brain; Brain Neoplasms; Cognition Disorders; Cranial Irradiation; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Memantine;

2018
Efficacy of local polymer-based and systemic delivery of the anti-glutamatergic agents riluzole and memantine in rat glioma models.
    Journal of neurosurgery, 2014, Volume: 120, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Delivery Systems; Excitator

2014
The impact of RTOG 0614 and RTOG 0933 trials in routine clinical practice: The US Survey of Utilization of Memantine and IMRT planning for hippocampus sparing in patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases.
    Contemporary clinical trials, 2016, Volume: 47

    Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cranial Ir

2016
Amantadine and memantine induce the expression of the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in C6 glioma cells.
    Neuroscience letters, 2006, Feb-20, Volume: 394, Issue:3

    Topics: 5' Untranslated Regions; Amantadine; Animals; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Dopa

2006
Glutamate release promotes growth of malignant gliomas.
    Nature medicine, 2001, Volume: 7, Issue:9

    Topics: Amino Acid Transport System X-AG; Animals; Brain Neoplasms; Carrier Proteins; Cell Division; Dizocil

2001