memantine has been researched along with Adverse Drug Event in 6 studies
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the moderate-affinity, uncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, memantine, versus placebo in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (AD)." | 9.12 | Memantine treatment in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: a 24-week randomized, controlled trial. ( Graham, SM; McDonald, S; Olin, JT; Ott, BR; Peskind, ER; Pomara, N; Potkin, SG, 2006) |
"We conducted a disproportionality analysis using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database reported between April 2004 and March 2019 for detecting the neuropsychiatric adverse event (AE) signals associated with memantine and other potentially interactive drugs including amantadine, dextromethorphan, cimetidine, ranitidine, procainamide, quinidine, acetazolamide, citrate, and bicarbonate." | 8.02 | Safety of Memantine in Combination with Potentially Interactive Drugs in the Real World: A Pharmacovigilance Study Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Database. ( Iwata, A; Mano, T; Sato, K; Toda, T, 2021) |
"The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the moderate-affinity, uncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, memantine, versus placebo in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (AD)." | 5.12 | Memantine treatment in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: a 24-week randomized, controlled trial. ( Graham, SM; McDonald, S; Olin, JT; Ott, BR; Peskind, ER; Pomara, N; Potkin, SG, 2006) |
"We conducted a disproportionality analysis using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database reported between April 2004 and March 2019 for detecting the neuropsychiatric adverse event (AE) signals associated with memantine and other potentially interactive drugs including amantadine, dextromethorphan, cimetidine, ranitidine, procainamide, quinidine, acetazolamide, citrate, and bicarbonate." | 4.02 | Safety of Memantine in Combination with Potentially Interactive Drugs in the Real World: A Pharmacovigilance Study Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Database. ( Iwata, A; Mano, T; Sato, K; Toda, T, 2021) |
"Data was based on the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database." | 1.91 | Adverse Drug Event Profile Associated with Anti-dementia Drugs: Analysis of a Spontaneous Reporting Database. ( Ando, A; Enomoto, H; Kose, E; Tate, N; Yamamoto, T; Yasuno, N, 2023) |
"Modafinil was associated with DAAD in the total dataset (ROR, 2." | 1.46 | Sensitivity of Quantitative Signal Detection in Regards to Pharmacological Neuroenhancement. ( Connemann, BJ; Gahr, M; Schönfeldt-Lecuona, C; Zeiss, R, 2017) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 1 (16.67) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 3 (50.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 2 (33.33) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Liu, Z | 1 |
Shi, Q | 1 |
Ding, D | 1 |
Kelly, R | 1 |
Fang, H | 1 |
Tong, W | 1 |
Kose, E | 1 |
Yamamoto, T | 1 |
Tate, N | 1 |
Ando, A | 1 |
Enomoto, H | 1 |
Yasuno, N | 1 |
Sato, K | 1 |
Mano, T | 1 |
Iwata, A | 1 |
Toda, T | 1 |
Nikvarz, N | 1 |
Alaghband-Rad, J | 1 |
Tehrani-Doost, M | 1 |
Alimadadi, A | 1 |
Ghaeli, P | 1 |
Gahr, M | 1 |
Connemann, BJ | 1 |
Schönfeldt-Lecuona, C | 1 |
Zeiss, R | 1 |
Peskind, ER | 1 |
Potkin, SG | 1 |
Pomara, N | 1 |
Ott, BR | 1 |
Graham, SM | 1 |
Olin, JT | 1 |
McDonald, S | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effects of Combined Memantine (Namenda) Plus Escitalopram (Lexapro) Treatment in Elderly Depressed Patients With Cognitive Impairment[NCT01876823] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-04-30 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Change in 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) scores from baseline to Week 48: HAMD measures depression severity based on a series of 24 items items. The range of HAMD total score is 0-74; 0 indicates no depressive symptoms and a maximum HAMD score is a 74, where the greater the score indicates more significant psychopathology. In this study, moderate to severe depression is considered a HAMD-24 greater than 14. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48
Intervention | scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment | -15.2 |
Change in Selective Reminding Test-Delayed Recall scores from baseline to Week 48: SRT Delay is administered 15 minutes after the immediate recall portion. Patients are asked to remember as many of the words as they can from the 6 trials. Maximum raw score is a 12 for free recall. If a patient is unable to recall a word, they are given a chance to recognize it among three incorrect word choices. Maximum raw score for recognition is 12. The greater the score on the delayed recall portion, the better the patient does on the assessment. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment | 1.2 |
Change in Selective Reminding Test-Total Immediate Recall (SRT-IR) scores from baseline to Week 48: Measures word recall (maximum 12 words per trial, across 6 trials). Maximum total recall score across 6 trials is 72; minimum recall is 0 across 6 trials. The higher the raw score, the better the patient did at recalling the target words. The unit of measure is the raw score, or the sum of the number of words recalled across all 6 trials. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: baseline, 48 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment | 7.5 |
Change in Trails A scores from baseline to Week 48: Measures attention and executive function. It asks patients to connect numbers from 1-25 in numerical order as fast as they can. Patients are timed; the longer it takes for the patient to connect the numbers, the worse their score. Unit of measure is in seconds. The amount of errors that the patient makes during trails is also recorded. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48
Intervention | seconds (Mean) |
---|---|
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment | 1.9 |
Change from baseline to Week 48 on Trails B: Measures attention and executive function. It asks patients to connect numbers and letters in numerical to alphabetical order from (1-13 and A-L) as fast as they can. Patients are timed; the longer it takes for the patient to connect the numbers and letters, the worse their score. Unit of measure is in seconds. The amount of errors that the patient makes during trails is also recorded. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48
Intervention | seconds (Mean) |
---|---|
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment | -36.3 |
Change in Wechsler Memory Scale-III scores from baseline to Week 48: The WMS-III Visual Reproduction sub-test was used to measure visual working memory and delayed memory. Patients were shown pictures of four drawings and were asked to reproduce them from memory immediately after seeing them, and 25 minutes after seeing them. The four scores are summed and the greater the total raw score, the better the patient did on the assessment. The maximum raw score for this test is a 41 on both the immediate and delayed portions (the overall range is 0-82 points). The change score is calculated using the total scores of both the immediate and delayed portions. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment | 9.9 |
The CDR is a numeric rating scale that is used to quantify the severity of one's cognitive function. The scale goes from 0=normal; 0.5=mild cognitive impairment; 1 to 3=mild to moderate/severe dementia. CDR was used a dichotomous outcome measure (no=0; yes=1). (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment | 1 |
The CGI Cognitive Change follows a seven-point likert scale. Compared to the patient's condition at baseline in the study [prior to medication initiation], the patient's condition is rated as: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment. Responses from the entire group were calculated. Mean at final visit and baseline is reported below. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
CGI-Cognitive Change (Baseline) | Clinical Global Impression-Cogntive Change (WK 48) | |
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment | 3.6 | 2.7 |
The CGI Depression Change follows a seven-point likert scale. Compared to the patient's condition at baseline in the study [prior to medication initiation], the patient's condition is rated as: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment. Responses were calculated for the entire group. Mean at final visit has been reported below. Higher mean at baseline indicates a decrease in depression scores. (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cognitive Global Impression at Baseline | Cognitive Global Impression at Final Visit (WK 48) | |
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment | 4.1 | 2.1 |
"Somatic side effect rating scale which includes 26 common somatic side effects associated with previous medication clinical trials; rated by the study physician. Factors were dichotomized to yes or no responses on this scale, which equated to the symptom being either present or not present. Yes and no responses were given a value of 0 (no) or 1 (yes). Responses from the entire group were calculated and the mean at baseline and the last visit is reported below." (NCT01876823)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 48
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Treatment Emergent Side Effects (Baseline) | Treatment Emergent Side Effects (WK 48) | |
Es-citalopram and Memantine Treatment | 6.6 | 3.2 |
1 trial available for memantine and Adverse Drug Event
Article | Year |
---|---|
Memantine treatment in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: a 24-week randomized, controlled trial.
Topics: Aged; Alzheimer Disease; Cognition; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse React | 2006 |
5 other studies available for memantine and Adverse Drug Event
Article | Year |
---|---|
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Da | 2011 |
Adverse Drug Event Profile Associated with Anti-dementia Drugs: Analysis of a Spontaneous Reporting Database.
Topics: Acetylcholinesterase; Cholinesterase Inhibitors; Donepezil; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Re | 2023 |
Safety of Memantine in Combination with Potentially Interactive Drugs in the Real World: A Pharmacovigilance Study Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Database.
Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alzheimer Disease; Databases, Fact | 2021 |
Comparing Efficacy and Side Effects of Memantine vs. Risperidone in the Treatment of Autistic Disorder.
Topics: Autistic Disorder; Child; Child, Preschool; Dopamine Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug- | 2017 |
Sensitivity of Quantitative Signal Detection in Regards to Pharmacological Neuroenhancement.
Topics: Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Au | 2017 |