melphalan has been researched along with Vitreous-Hemorrhage* in 4 studies
2 review(s) available for melphalan and Vitreous-Hemorrhage
Article | Year |
---|---|
The role for intra-arterial chemotherapy for refractory retinoblastoma: a systematic review.
Intra-arterial chemotherapy is a new retinoblastoma treatment associated with high rates of globe salvage that has been widely adopted for primary treatment of retinoblastoma but is less frequently used as secondary treatment for refractory retinoblastoma. This systematic review aims to summarize the reported outcomes of intra-arterial chemotherapy for refractory retinoblastoma.. We conducted a systematic review of studies published on PubMed, Medline, and Embase from 2011 to 2021 reporting globe salvage rates following intra-arterial chemotherapy for secondary treatment of refractory retinoblastoma.. Our search yielded 316 studies, and 24 met inclusion criteria. The 24 included studies were comprised of 1366 patients and 1757 eyes. Among these, 1184 (67%) eyes received secondary indication treatment, and globe salvage was achieved for 776 of these 1184 eyes (64%). Sixteen studies reported cannulation success rates from 71.8 to 100%. Pooled analysis of subjects revealed 21 patients (2.6%) with metastatic disease and 26 deaths (3%) during study follow-up periods (7-74 months). The most common ocular complications were vitreous hemorrhage (13.2%), loss of eyelashes (12.7%), and periocular edema (10.5%). The most common systemic complications were nausea/vomiting (20.5%), neutropenia (14.1%), fever (8.2%), and bronchospasm (6.2%).. Intra-arterial chemotherapy is associated with high rates of globe salvage and low rates of serious complications in patients with refractory retinoblastoma. Unfortunately, current literature is predominantly comprised of retrospective case studies, and further high-quality evidence is necessary to inform clinical practice. Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bronchial Spasm; Carboplatin; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Edema; Eyelashes; Febrile Neutropenia; Humans; Infusions, Intra-Arterial; Melphalan; Methotrexate; Nausea; Retinal Neoplasms; Retinoblastoma; Salvage Therapy; Topotecan; Vitreous Hemorrhage; Vomiting | 2021 |
Ocular side effects following intravitreal injection therapy for retinoblastoma: a systematic review.
To describe the ocular side effects in patients receiving intravitreal injection therapy (IViT) for retinoblastoma.. PubMed (1946-present), Scopus (all years), Science Citation Index (1900-present) and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (1990-present) electronic databases were searched to identify all published reports of therapeutic intravitreal injections for retinoblastoma in humans.. Ten studies with original IViT ocular side effect data were included in this systematic review. In these combined reports, a total of 1287 intravitreal injections were given to 306 eyes of 295 patients, with a mean follow-up of 74.1 months. Two hundred sixty-one (88.5%) patients received comparatively standard melphalan IViT doses (8-30 mcg). Ocular side effects occurred in 38 patients (17 significant, 21 minor). The proportion of patients experiencing potentially significant ocular side effects following standard melphalan IViT regimens was 0.031 (8/261; 95% CI 0.013 to 0.06). The side effects of these eight included iris atrophy in three, two each with chorioretinal atrophy and vitreous haemorrhage and one with retinal detachment. Of the other nine patients with significant complications, five experienced sight-threatening complications following dramatic dose escalations (four with melphalan, one with thiotepa), three experienced complications that are commonly associated with concurrent therapies given to these patients and one had a retinal detachment. Of the 61 patients receiving IViT via safety-enhancing injection techniques, all six significant side effects were either attributed to the therapeutic dose or confounded by concurrent treatments.. Significant ocular complications following IViT for retinoblastoma are uncommon, and this risk may be reduced further by the use of careful injection technique and standard dosing regimens. Care must be taken in the dosing of intravitreal treatments to avoid potentially irreversible vision loss. Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Atrophy; Corneal Dystrophies, Hereditary; Humans; Intravitreal Injections; Iris; Melphalan; Retinal Detachment; Retinal Neoplasms; Retinoblastoma; Vitreous Hemorrhage | 2014 |
2 other study(ies) available for melphalan and Vitreous-Hemorrhage
Article | Year |
---|---|
Intravitreal chemotherapy in the management of vitreous disease in retinoblastoma.
To evaluate the therapeutic outcome of intravitreal melphalan injection in the management of vitreous disease in patients with retinoblastoma. We particularly aimed to assess whether higher melphalan dose with lower number of injections was more effective and associated with fewer side effects.. This retrospective, interventional, noncomparative, and nonrandomized study included 39 eyes of 37 patients. Vitreous seeds were classified as dust, sphere, and cloud types. Intravitreal injections were performed through pars plana free of any visible tumor using 30-G needle. Response of the seeds (disappearance, conversion into inactive debris, or progression) and enucleation rate were determined as outcome measures.. All patients previously received systemic or intra-arterial chemotherapy. Vitreous seeding was primary in 54% of eyes and secondary in 46% of eyes. Vitreous seeds were classified as dust in 9 (23.1%) eyes, sphere in 24 (61.5%) eyes, and cloud in 6 (15.4%) eyes. Melphalan dose varied between 20 and 40 µg and 20 (51.3%) eyes received >30 µg. The total number of injections was 70 (range 1-5, mean 1.8 per eye). Various types of regression were obtained in 27 (69.2%) eyes. Sphere-type seeds were the most responsive to melphalan. Nonresponse and disease progression were noted in 12 (30.8%) eyes. After a mean follow-up of 11.8 months, 17 (44%) eyes were enucleated. Vitreous hemorrhage (18%) and retinal pigment epithelial alterations (8%) were the most common side effects.. Intravitreal melphalan at 30-40 µg in 1 or 2 injections proved effective in 69.2% of eyes with vitreous disease. Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Child; Child, Preschool; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Infant; Intravitreal Injections; Logistic Models; Male; Melphalan; Neoplasm Seeding; Retinal Neoplasms; Retinoblastoma; Retrospective Studies; Vitreous Body; Vitreous Hemorrhage | 2017 |
Intraocular surgery with melphalan irrigation for vitreous hemorrhage in an only eye with retinoblastoma.
To illustrate the successful outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with melphalan irrigation for vitreous hemorrhage (VH) with suspected viable retinoblastoma. Despite the high risk of intraocular surgery, it was performed to preserve the only potentially seeing eye with treated retinoblastoma.. Vitreous hemorrhage occurred in the only eye of a 4-year-old boy after treatment for recurrent multifocal group C retinoblastoma with systemic chemotherapy (carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide; and vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin), ruthenium brachytherapy with plaque repositioning, cryotherapy, and external radiotherapy. The VH developed 8 months after repeated brachytherapy with subsequent intravitreal melphalan chemotherapy. The patient's parents refused to remove the eye. The fellow eye was enucleated earlier because of VH and secondary glaucoma, without histologic signs of a viable tumor. Pars plana lensectomy, 25-G vitrectomy with melphalan irrigation (5 μg/mL), and silicone oil tamponade were performed.. No ophthalmoscopic or morphologic signs of a viable tumor were detected. Four months later, the silicone oil was removed. Visual acuity was 20/200 with aphakic correction. Follow-up for 34 months revealed no signs of tumor recurrence or dissemination.. Despite the high risk of intraocular surgery, the need to preserve the only potentially seeing eye with treated retinoblastoma may require PPV. Thus, in unclear cases of VH with suspected viable tumor, PPV with intraocular melphalan irrigation, with caution, may be a reasonable procedure. Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brachytherapy; Carboplatin; Combined Modality Therapy; Cryotherapy; Cyclophosphamide; Dacarbazine; Endotamponade; Etoposide; Humans; Infant; Male; Melphalan; Retinal Neoplasms; Retinoblastoma; Silicone Oils; Therapeutic Irrigation; Vincristine; Visual Acuity; Vitrectomy; Vitreous Hemorrhage | 2015 |