meglumine-ioxithalamate and Colorectal-Neoplasms

meglumine-ioxithalamate has been researched along with Colorectal-Neoplasms* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for meglumine-ioxithalamate and Colorectal-Neoplasms

ArticleYear
Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colonography: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance.
    Clinical radiology, 2011, Volume: 66, Issue:1

    To evaluate the minimal iodine contrast medium load necessary for an optimal computed tomography colonography tagging quality.. Faecal occult blood test positive patients were randomly selected for one of three iodine bowel preparations: (1) 3 × 50 ml meglumine ioxithalamate (45 g iodine), (2) 4 × 25 ml meglumine ioxithalamate (30 g iodine); or (3) 3 × 25 ml (22.5 g iodine) meglumine ioxithalamate. Two experienced readers assessed the tagging quality per colonic segment on a five-point scale and the presence of adherent stool. Also semi-automatic homogeneity measurements were performed. Patient acceptance was assessed with questionnaires.. Of 70 eligible patients, 45 patients participated (25 males, mean age 62 years). Each preparation group contained 15 patients. The quality of tagging was insufficient (score 1-2) in 0% of segments in group 1; 4% in group 2 (p<0.01 versus group 1); and 5% in group 3 (p=0.06 versus group 1). In group 1 in 11% of the segments adherent stool was present compared with 49% in group 2 and 41% in group 3 (p<0.01, group 2 and 3 versus group 1). Homogeneity was 85, 102 (p<0.01), and 91 SD HU (p=0.26) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In group 1 two patients experienced no burden after contrast agent ingestion compared to one patient in group 2 and nine patients in group 3 (p=0.017).. A dose of 3 × 50 ml meglumine ioxithalamate is advisable for an optimal tagging quality despite beneficial effects on the patient acceptance in patients receiving a lower dose.

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Cathartics; Colonography, Computed Tomographic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Contrast Media; Drug Administration Schedule; Feasibility Studies; Feces; Female; Humans; Iothalamate Meglumine; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Reproducibility of Results

2011
CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemes.
    European radiology, 2010, Volume: 20, Issue:2

    The aim of this study was to compare a 1-day with a 2-day iodine bowel preparation for CT colonography in a positive faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening population.. One hundred consecutive patients underwent CT colonography and colonoscopy with segmental unblinding. The first 50 patients (group 1) ingested 7 50 ml iodinated contrast starting 2 days before CT colonography. The latter 50 patients (group 2) ingested 4 50 ml iodinated contrast starting 1 day before CT colonography. Per colonic segment measurements of residual stool attenuation and homogeneity were performed, and a subjective evaluation of tagging quality (grade 1-5) was done. Independently, two reviewers performed polyp and carcinoma detection.. The tagging density was 638 and 618 HU (p = 0.458) and homogeneity 91 and 86 HU for groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.145). The tagging quality was graded 5 (excellent) in 90% of all segments in group 1 and 91% in group 2 (p = 0.749). Mean per-polyp sensitivity for lesions >or=10 mm was 86% in group 1 and 97% in group 2 (p = 0.355). Patient burden from diarrhoea significantly decreased for patients in group 2.. One-day preparation with meglumine ioxithalamate results in an improved patient acceptability compared with 2-day preparation and has a comparable, excellent image quality and good diagnostic performance.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Attitude to Health; Colonography, Computed Tomographic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Contrast Media; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Intestines; Iothalamate Meglumine; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity

2010