maltodextrin and Gastroenteritis

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of an oral rehydration solution containing glycyl-glycine, glycine, and maltodextrin (GGG-ORS), in comparison to the glucose based ORS (standard ORS). The osmolality of the GGG-ORS (305 mOsm/l) and standard ORS (311 mOsm/l) was similar. Ninety-two children presenting with acute gastroenteritis and moderate dehydration, aged 3 months to 3 years, were randomly assigned to receive standard ORS or GGG-ORS. All the patients were successfully rehydrated orally. The two groups were comparable for baseline characteristics including the microbial etiology. Rotavirus (49%, 36%), ETEC (11%, 18%) or a combination of rotavirus and ETEC (15%, 9%) were the main stool pathogens isolated. There was no significant difference in the mean stool output or duration of diarrhoea between the two groups. Patients in the GGG-ORS group had higher urine output (p less than 0.01) and weight gain (p less than 0.05) in the initial 6 hours when feeding was withheld, but no such differences were observed beyond this period. Hypernatremia did not develop in any patient during the study. We conclude that glycine and glycyl-glycine supplemented oral rehydration solution does not have any therapeutic advantage in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis with moderate dehydration caused predominantly by rotavirus.

Topics: Acute Disease; Child, Preschool; Dehydration; Double-Blind Method; Fluid Therapy; Gastroenteritis; Glycine; Humans; Infant; Male; Polysaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rehydration Solutions