maltodextrin and Flatulence

Average dietary fiber intake in the United States is roughly half of the recommended amount. As new dietary fiber products are introduced to increase fiber intake, it is critical to evaluate the physiological effects of such fibers.. This study examined the effect of 4 fibers derived from maize or tapioca on fecal chemistry, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and serum markers of chronic disease.. Twenty healthy subjects completed the single-blind crossover study in which 12 g/day of fiber (pullulan, Promitor Resistant Starch, soluble fiber dextrin or Promitor Soluble Corn Fiber) or placebo (maltodextrin) were consumed for 14 days followed by a 21-day washout. GI symptom surveys were completed (days 3 and 14), stools were collected (days 11-14), diet was recorded (days 12-14) and fasting blood samples were obtained (day 15).. The 4 test fibers were well tolerated, with mild to moderate GI symptoms. Total short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations did not differ among the treatments. Fecal pH and individual SCFAs were affected by some treatments. Stool weight and serum markers of chronic disease did not change with these treatments.. Increasing fiber intake by 12 g/day was well tolerated and may have a positive impact on colon health due to fermentation.

Topics: Adult; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Colic; Cross-Over Studies; Defecation; Dextrins; Dietary Fiber; Fatty Acids, Volatile; Feces; Female; Flatulence; Gastrointestinal Tract; Ghrelin; Glucans; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Lipids; Male; Manihot; Polysaccharides; Reference Values; Single-Blind Method; Zea mays

Specific carbohydrates, i.e. prebiotics such as fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS), are not digested in the small intestine but fermented in the colon. Besides beneficial health effects of an enhanced bifidobacteria population, intestinal gas production resulting from fermentation can induce abdominal symptoms. Partial replacement with slowly fermented acacia gum may attenuate side effects. The aim was to compare the effects of FOS with those of a prebiotic mixture (50 % FOS and 50 % acacia gum; BLEND) and a rapidly absorbed carbohydrate (maltodextrin) on general intestinal wellbeing, abdominal comfort and anorectal sensory function. Twenty volunteers (eight male and twelve female; age 20-37 years) completed this double-blind, randomised study with two cycles of a 2-week run-in phase (10 g maltodextrin) followed by 5 weeks of 10 g FOS or BLEND once daily, separated by a 4-week wash-out interval. Abdominal symptoms and general wellbeing were documented by telephone interview or Internet twice weekly. Rectal sensations were assessed by a visual analogue scale during a rectal barostat test after FOS and BLEND treatment. Both FOS and BLEND induced more side effects than maltodextrin. Belching was more pronounced under FOS compared with BLEND (P = 0.09 for females; P = 0.01 for males), and for self-reported general wellbeing strong sex differences were reported (P = 0.002). Urgency scores during rectal barostat were higher with FOS than BLEND (P = 0.01). Faced with a growing range of supplemented food products, consumers may benefit from prebiotic mixtures which cause fewer abdominal side effects. Sex differences must be taken in consideration when food supplements are used.

Topics: Adult; Bifidobacterium; Colon; Cross-Over Studies; Dietary Carbohydrates; Dietary Supplements; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fermentation; Flatulence; Gum Arabic; Health; Humans; Intestines; Male; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides; Probiotics; Sex Factors; Surveys and Questionnaires; Telemedicine

Study part 1 was executed as a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study and study part 2 as a longitudinal study.. Forty-one healthy adult volunteers aged 18-24 years were recruited from the student population of the University of Salford. All subjects enrolled and completed study part 1 and 39 subjects enrolled and completed study part 2.. In study part 1, individuals consumed, in random order 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 or 120 g of a RRM containing starch product incorporated in pre-prepared foods on individual test days. Assuming a minimum content of 50% RRM in the starch product this delivered respectively 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 or 60 g of RRM. All foods were prepared and coded by personnel not involved in carrying out the tests. Test days were separated by 7 day washout periods. In study part 2, consumption of RRM was increased from 3.6 g at day 1 in incremental doses up to each subject's MNED as determined in study 1, to be achieved at day 14. Subsequently, RRM intake was from day 15-21 in a way that the final intake at day 21 was at least 10 g above the individual MNED. In both parts of the study, subjects reported the prevalence and magnitude of GI symptoms.. No significant change was observed in either defecation frequency and faecal consistency or the number of subjects experiencing any GI symptoms, following consumption of foods containing 0-60 g RRM. The individual MNED at which an increase in symptoms did not occur was determined as 60 g RRM for 71% of the subjects who participated in study part 1. Regression analysis showed that consumption of gradually increasing doses of RRM in food products over 21 days was associated with a significant increase in the mean symptom score for flatulence (P=1.5 x 10(-4)), total bowel movement frequency (P=0.023) and bowel movement frequency to pass watery faeces (P=0.0157). Increasing the ingested dose of RRM by 10 g above the predetermined MNED, however, did not provoke significant increases in GI symptoms. In both studies, the majority of symptom responses were classified by the subjects as 'little more than usual'.. Consumption of up to 60 g RRM is tolerated well by most individuals with no evidence of any significant dose-dependent increase in the magnitude of symptoms or the occurrence of multiple GI symptoms. However, a mild laxative effect when consuming >60 g RRM is suggested. Although there was no change in GI responses following consumption of increasing doses of RRM over 21 days, generally a dose of 10 g RRM above the MNED level was tolerated well during medium term intake.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Defecation; Digestion; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Feces; Female; Flatulence; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Molecular Weight; Polysaccharides

Fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) are widely used in commercial food products. Most studies on FOS concern the health benefits, but some negative effects were recently reported concerning the faecal cytotoxicity and excretion of mucin-type oligosaccharides in combination with a Ca-restricted diet. The present study was performed to investigate whether these effects of FOS are observed in adults consuming a regular diet unrestricted in Ca. The study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, involving eleven healthy adults, who consumed 25-30 g FOS or maltodextrin (control) in a random order for 2 weeks in addition to their regular diet. Stools were collected for analysis of pH and SCFA (as markers of fermentation), for the assessment of faecal water cytotoxicity, and for the analysis of alkaline phosphatase activity (as a marker of epithelial cell turnover) and O-linked oligosaccharides (to estimate the excretion of mucin-type oligosaccharides). FOS consumption significantly altered bacterial fermentation (increased percentage of acetate, decreased percentage of butyrate) and tended to decrease stool pH. Furthermore, FOS consumption resulted in a significantly higher stool frequency and in significantly more complaints of flatulence. No significant differences between the control and FOS period were observed in the mean cytotoxicity of faecal water (37.5 (SEM 6.9)% v. 18.5 (SEM 6.9)%; P=0.084), in mean alkaline phosphatase activity (27.7 (SEM 2.9) v. 24.6 (SEM 3.2) U/g dry faeces; P=0.496) or in the mean excretion of mucin-type oligosaccharides (49.9 (sem 4.0) v. 53.5 (SEM 4.3) mg/g dry faeces; P=0.553). We conclude that dietary FOS in a dose up to 25-30 g/d altered the bacterial fermentation pattern but did not affect faecal cytotoxicity or the faecal concentration of mucin-type oligosaccharides in human adults consuming a regular diet.

Topics: Acetates; Adolescent; Adult; Alkaline Phosphatase; Analysis of Variance; Bacteria; Biomarkers; Body Water; Butyrates; Cell Death; Cross-Over Studies; Diarrhea; Diet; Double-Blind Method; Epithelial Cells; Erythrocytes; Feces; Female; Fermentation; Flatulence; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Male; Mucins; Oligosaccharides; Polysaccharides