lutetium-orthosilicate and Body-Weight

lutetium-orthosilicate has been researched along with Body-Weight* in 3 studies

Other Studies

3 other study(ies) available for lutetium-orthosilicate and Body-Weight

ArticleYear
Patient weight-based acquisition protocols to optimize (18)F-FDG PET/CT image quality.
    Journal of nuclear medicine technology, 2011, Volume: 39, Issue:2

    The choice of injected dose of (18)F-FDG and acquisition time is important in obtaining consistently high-quality PET images. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal acquisition protocols based on patient weight for 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET/CT.. This study was a retrospective analysis of 76 patients ranging from 29 to 101 kg who were injected with 228-395.2 MBq of (18)F-FDG for PET imaging. The study population was divided into 4 weight-based groups: less than 45 kg (group 1), 45-59 kg (group 2), 60-74 kg (group 3), and 75 kg or more (group 4). We measured the true coincidence rate, random coincidence rate, noise-equivalent counting rate (NECR), and random fraction and evaluated image quality by the coefficient of variance (COV) in the largest liver slices.. The true coincidence rate, random coincidence rate, and NECR significantly increased with increasing injected dose per kilogram (r = 0.91, 0.83, and 0.90; all P < 0.01). NECR maximized at 10.11 MB/kg in underweight patients. The true coincidence rate differed significantly among the 4 groups, except for group 3 versus group 4 (P < 0.01). The ratio of the true coincidence rate for group 2 to groups 3 and 4 was 1.4 and 1.6, respectively. The average random fraction for all 4 groups was approximately 35%. The COV of the 4 groups differed for all pairs (P < 0.01). The COVs in overweight patients were larger than those in underweight patients, and image quality in overweight patients was poor.. We modified acquisition protocols for (18)F-FDG PET/CT according to the characteristics of a 3-dimensional lutetium orthosilicate PET scanner and PET image quality based on patient weight. The optimal acquisition time was approximately 1.4-1.6 times longer in overweight patients than in normal-weight patients. Estimation of optimal acquisition times using the true coincidence rate is more important than other variables in improving PET image quality.

    Topics: Body Weight; Female; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Lutetium; Male; Middle Aged; Positron-Emission Tomography; Quality Control; Retrospective Studies; Silicates; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

2011
Count-rate analysis from clinical scans in PET with LSO detectors.
    Radiation protection dosimetry, 2008, Volume: 129, Issue:1-3

    The purpose of optimising the acquisition parameters in positron emission tomography is to improve the quality of the diagnostic images. Optimisation can be done by maximising the noise equivalent count rate (NECR) that in turn depends on the coincidence rate. For each bed position the scanner records coincidences and singles rates. For each patient, the true, random and scattered coincidences as functions of the single count rate(s) are determined by fitting the NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) 70 cm phantom count rate curves to measured clinical points. This enables analytical calculation of the personalised PNECR [pseudo NECR(s)] curve, linked to the NECR curve. For central bed positions, missing activity of approximately 70% is estimated to get maximum PNECR (PNECR(max)), but the improvement in terms of signal-toz-noise ratio would be approximately 15%. The correlation between patient weight and PNECR(max) is also estimated to determine the optimal scan duration of a single bed position as a function of patient weight at the same PNEC. Normalising the counts at PNECR(max) for the 70 kg patient, the bed duration for a 90 kg patient should be 230 s, which is approximately 30% longer. Although the analysis indicates that the fast scanner electronics allow using higher administered activities, this would involve poor improvement in terms of NECR. Instead, attending to higher bed duration for heavier patients may be more useful.

    Topics: Body Weight; Humans; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Lutetium; Phantoms, Imaging; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals; Silicates; Whole-Body Counting

2008
Impact of patient weight and emission scan duration on PET/CT image quality and lesion detectability.
    Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2004, Volume: 45, Issue:5

    This study was performed to prospectively evaluate fast PET/CT imaging protocols using lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) detector technology and 3-dimensional (3D) image-acquisition protocols.. Fifty-seven consecutive patients (30 male, 27 female; mean age, 58.6 +/- 15.7 y) were enrolled in the study. After intravenous injection of 7.77 MBq (0.21 mCi) of (18)F-FDG per kilogram, a standard whole-body CT study (80-110 s) and PET emission scan were acquired for 4 min/bed position in 49 patients and 3 min/bed position in 8 patients. One-minute-per-bed-position data were then extracted from the 3- or 4-min/bed position scans to reconstruct single-minute/bed position scans for each patient. Patients were subgrouped according to weight as follows: <59 kg (<130 lb; n = 15), 59-81 kg (130-179 lb; n = 33), and >or=82 kg (>or=180 lb; n = 9). Three experienced observers recorded numbers and locations of lesion by consensus and independently rated image quality as good, moderate, poor, or nondiagnostic.. The observers analyzed 220 reconstructed whole-body PET images from 57 patients. They identified 114 lesions ranging in size from 0.7 to 7.0 cm on the 3- (n = 8) and 4-min/bed position images (n = 49). Of these, only 4 were missed on the 1-min/bed position scans, and all lesions were identified on the corresponding 2-min/bed position images. One- and 2-min/bed position image quality differed significantly from the 4-min/bed position image reference (P < 0.05).. LSO PET detector technology permits fast 3D imaging protocols whereby weight-based emission scan durations ranging from 1 to 3 min/bed position provide similar lesion detectability when compared with 4-min/bed position images.

    Topics: Body Weight; Female; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Lutetium; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Posture; Prospective Studies; Radiopharmaceuticals; Silicates; Time Factors; Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed; Tomography, Emission-Computed; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

2004