losartan has been researched along with Mitral Incompetence in 5 studies
Losartan: An antagonist of ANGIOTENSIN TYPE 1 RECEPTOR with antihypertensive activity due to the reduced pressor effect of ANGIOTENSIN II.
losartan : A biphenylyltetrazole where a 1,1'-biphenyl group is attached at the 5-position and has an additional trisubstituted imidazol-1-ylmethyl group at the 4'-position
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 2 (40.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 3 (60.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Bartko, PE | 1 |
Dal-Bianco, JP | 1 |
Guerrero, JL | 1 |
Beaudoin, J | 1 |
Szymanski, C | 1 |
Kim, DH | 1 |
Seybolt, MM | 1 |
Handschumacher, MD | 1 |
Sullivan, S | 1 |
Garcia, ML | 1 |
Titus, JS | 1 |
Wylie-Sears, J | 1 |
Irvin, WS | 1 |
Messas, E | 1 |
Hagège, AA | 1 |
Carpentier, A | 1 |
Aikawa, E | 1 |
Bischoff, J | 1 |
Levine, RA | 1 |
Pierard, LA | 1 |
Magne, J | 1 |
Sekuri, C | 1 |
Utuk, O | 1 |
Bayturan, O | 1 |
Bilge, A | 1 |
Kurhan, Z | 1 |
Tavli, T | 1 |
Geirsson, A | 1 |
Singh, M | 1 |
Ali, R | 1 |
Abbas, H | 1 |
Li, W | 1 |
Sanchez, JA | 1 |
Hashim, S | 1 |
Tellides, G | 1 |
Dujardin, KS | 1 |
Enriquez-Sarano, M | 1 |
Bailey, KR | 1 |
Seward, JB | 1 |
Tajik, AJ | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Molecular Mechanisms of Volume Overload-Aim 1(SCCOR in Cardiac Dysfunction and Disease)[NCT01052428] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 38 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-08-31 | Completed | ||
The Study to Define the Unique Molecular Mechanisms of Mitral Regurgitation in Order to Find New Targeted Therapy to Attenuate the Remodeling and Delay the Need for Surgery and Improve Surgical Outcomes.[NCT01052532] | 65 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2005-06-30 | Completed | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Is a calculation of heart pump function determined from the volume after complete filling minus the volume after complete contraction divided by the volume after complete filling. A value of 55% or greater is normal. (NCT01052428)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | percent (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=19,19) | Month 3 (n=1,0) | Month 6 (n=17,19) | Month 9 (n=1,1) | Month 12 (n=14,15) | Month 15 (n=3,2) | Month 18 (n=14,18) | Month 21 (n=5,0) | Month 24 (n=16,18) | |
Placebo | 62.62 | 63.90 | 63.80 | 41.90 | 61.70 | 44.70 | 60.95 | 53.79 | 59.95 |
Toprol XL | 62.09 | NA | 61.29 | 54.81 | 62.77 | 68.47 | 62.05 | NA | 63.02 |
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Indexed to Body Surface Area: As an indicator of heart size, the blood volume of the heart is related to the body size. The end diastolic volume is the blood volume of the heart at the end of filling, just before contraction. The relation of heart blood volume to body size is more accurate in determining pathology because larger people require a larger heart blood volume. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. (NCT01052428)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | ml/m^2 (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=19,19) | Month 3 (n=1,0) | Month 6 (n=17,19) | Month 9 (n=1,0) | Month 12 (n=14,15) | Month 15 (n=3,2) | Month 18 (n=14,18) | Month 21 (n=5,0) | Month 24 (n=16,18) | |
Placebo | 91.66 | 90.93 | 90.84 | 70.56 | 88.99 | 82.73 | 90.16 | 85.75 | 87.31 |
Toprol XL | 95.74 | NA | 95.24 | NA | 95.71 | 98.16 | 97.6 | NA | 95.16 |
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Indexed to Body Surface Area As an indicator of heart size, the blood volume of the heart is related to the body size. The end systolic volume is the blood volume of the heart at the end of contraction and is an index of the pump function of the heart. This relation to body size is more accurate in determining pathology because larger people require a larger heart blood volume. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. (NCT01052428)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | ml/m^2 (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=19,19) | Month 3 (n=1,0) | Month 6 (n=17,19) | Month 9 (n=1,0) | Month 12 (n=14,15) | Month 15 (n=3,2) | Month 18 (n=14,18) | Month 21 (n=5,0) | Month 24 (n=16,18) | |
Placebo | 34.01 | 32.83 | 32.53 | 40.99 | 33.70 | 47.25 | 34.99 | 39.97 | 34.47 |
Toprol XL | 35.98 | NA | 36.53 | NA | 35.89 | 30.97 | 36.72 | NA | 35.13 |
Left Ventricular End-diastolic Mass Indexed to Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume As an indicator of heart muscle mass and heart blood volume, the mass indexed to end diastolic volume determines whether there is an adequate amount of heart muscle to pump the heart blood volume obtained from a three-dimensional analysis. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. (NCT01052428)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | g/ml (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=19,19) | Month 3 (n=1,0) | Month 6 (n=17,19) | Month 9 (n=1,1) | Month 12 (n=14,15) | Month 15 (n=3,2) | Month 18 (n=14,18) | Month 21 (n=5,0) | Month 24 (n=16,18) | |
Placebo | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.64 |
Toprol XL | 0.61 | NA | 0.6 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.59 | NA | 0.62 |
Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Radius to Wall Thickness As an indicator of heart muscle mass and heart volume chamber diameter, the end-diastolic radius indexed to end diastolic wall thickness determines whether there is an adequate amount of heart muscle to pump the heart blood volume obtained from a two-dimensional analysis. The values that are too high or too low indicate a diseased myocardium. (NCT01052428)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | unitless (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=19,19) | Month 3 (n=1,0) | Month 6 (n=17,19) | Month 9 (n=1,1) | Month 12 (n=14,15) | Month 15 (n=3,2) | Month 18 (n=14,18) | Month 21 (n=5,0) | Month 24 (n=16,18) | |
Placebo | 4.76 | 5.02 | 4.51 | 4.15 | 4.46 | 4.61 | 4.43 | 4.72 | 4.52 |
Toprol XL | 4.69 | NA | 4.85 | 5.74 | 4.79 | 5.02 | 4.77 | NA | 4.59 |
Peak Early Filling Rate The peak early filling rate of change is calculated from the slope of the volume during the early filling of the heart with respect to time. The higher values indicate a very healthy heart muscle and lower values are indicative of a very stiff muscle. (NCT01052428)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | EDV/sec (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=19,19) | Month 3 (n=1,0) | Month 6 (n=17,19) | Month 9 (n=1,0) | Month 12 (n=14,15) | Month 15 (n=3,2) | Month 18 (n=14,18) | Month 21 (n=5,0) | Month 24 (n=16,18) | |
Placebo | 2.27 | 2.58 | 2.38 | 1.56 | 2.26 | 1.83 | 1.95 | 1.73 | 2.17 |
Toprol XL | 2.12 | NA | 2.08 | NA | 2.24 | 2.28 | 2.26 | NA | 2.25 |
Systolic Longitudinal Strain. By identifying two points on the heart, the strain is the difference between the distance between these two points at the end of filling of the heart and the end of contraction divided by the length at the end of filling. Thus, the measure is like the ejection fraction, however the strain is more localized to a specified segment in the heart muscle. The higher values indicate a healthy heart. (NCT01052428)
Timeframe: 5 visits per Participant over 2 years (about every 6 months)
Intervention | percent/%Systolic interval (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month 0 (n=19,19) | Month 3 (n=1,0) | Month 6 (n=17,19) | Month 9 (n=1,0) | Month 12 (n=14,15) | Month 15 (n=3,2) | Month 18 (n=14,18) | Month 21 (n=5,0) | Month 24 (n=16,18) | |
Placebo | 87.94 | 115.07 | 45.90 | 37.2 | 87.85 | 52.95 | 88.11 | 67.53 | 79.94 |
Toprol XL | 82.55 | NA | 78.68 | NA | 80.04 | 88.34 | 79.29 | NA | 85.18 |
5 other studies available for losartan and Mitral Incompetence
Article | Year |
---|---|
Effect of Losartan on Mitral Valve Changes After Myocardial Infarction.
Topics: Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Echocardiography, Three-Di | 2017 |
New Pharmacological Target to Treat Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Thinking Outside the Box.
Topics: Humans; Losartan; Mitral Valve; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischem | 2017 |
Effect of losartan on exercise tolerance and echocardiographic parameters in patients with mitral regurgitation.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Chronic Disease; Electrocardiography; Exercise | 2008 |
Modulation of transforming growth factor-β signaling and extracellular matrix production in myxomatous mitral valves by angiotensin II receptor blockers.
Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; Biphenyl Compounds; Cells, Cultured; Co | 2012 |
Effect of losartan on degree of mitral regurgitation quantified by echocardiography.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Echocardiography, Doppler; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Long-Term Care; | 2001 |
Effect of losartan on degree of mitral regurgitation quantified by echocardiography.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Echocardiography, Doppler; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Long-Term Care; | 2001 |
Effect of losartan on degree of mitral regurgitation quantified by echocardiography.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Echocardiography, Doppler; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Long-Term Care; | 2001 |
Effect of losartan on degree of mitral regurgitation quantified by echocardiography.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Echocardiography, Doppler; Female; Hemodynamics; Humans; Long-Term Care; | 2001 |